Accelerated Life Testing of Harmonic Driver in Space Lubrication
Accelerated Life Testing of Harmonic Driver in Space Lubrication
Accelerated Life Testing of Harmonic Driver in Space Lubrication
2015–10:31am] [1–12]
//blrnas3.glyph.com/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/PIJJ/Vol00000/150060/APPFile/SG-PIJJ150060.3d (PIJ) [PREPRINTER stage]
Original Article
Abstract
For mechanical moving components in space applications, the accelerated life test for the verification of reliability is very
important. Since traditional methods of the accelerated life test for liquid lubrication have some limitations, a new
method is proposed in this paper, in which the harmonic driver is used as the object of study. First, the life test of a
harmonic driver is performed in vacuum. The results show that the adhesive wear caused by asperity contact at the wave
generator–flexspline interfaces is the crucial factor governing the life of harmonic driver. To clarify the lubricant film
behavior at the wave generator–flexspline interface, a mixed lubrication analysis is conducted. Furthermore, the scheme
of the accelerated life test is discussed. The speed and load are selected as the acceleration stresses of the test, while the
load supported by asperity contact is defined as the characteristic quantity of the life and used to select acceleration
factors. Finally, accelerated life tests under different working conditions are conducted to validate the results of the
theoretical analysis.
Keywords
Harmonic driver, accelerated life test, mixed lubrication analysis, adhesive wear
Table 1. HD materials.
Part Material
Table 2. Lubrication.
Part Material
Figure 2. Lubrication of the harmonic driver.
CS/FS Diamond-like carbon films (WC-DLC:H)
and PFPE-based oil (Braycote815Z)
raise many times. In this case, the heat stress may FS/WG PFPE-based oil (Braycote815Z)
arouse new failure mode which is the consequence WG PFPE-based oil (Braycote815Z)
of temperature increase, and that may not be accep- on race and polytetrafluoroethylene
table in accelerated life test. retainer
In the present study, life test and mixed lubrication
analysis of HD with new lubricating materials for
space applications are conducted to simulate the Table 3. The performance parameters of WC-DLC:H.
degeneration of transmission performance and the
Thickness Hardness E-modulus Critical
failure mechanism. Based on the obtained results, a
(lm) (GPa) (GPa) load (mN)
new method of accelerated life test is proposed and
verified by experiments. 1.3 9.2 89.0 92
Li et al. 3
Figure 5. Conditions of rubbing surface after life test: (a) Circular spline teeth and (b) Flexspline teeth.
Figure 6. Wear condition and surface profile of the bearing outer ring after life test.
Figure 7. Wear condition and surface profile of the inner surface of the flexspline after life test.
Li et al. 5
a clearance fit: H7/h7). When the elliptical plug is The relationship between normal force at the inter-
assembled and becomes rotating, the inner surface face of FS/WG and output load torque expressed as
of FS and the bearing outer ring of WG always follow
contact at opposite ends of the major axis of the T
ellipse, which can be described by an equivalent roll- FT ¼ 0:378
d1 cos 1
ing contact between a cylinder and a plane (Figure 9).
The effective radius of curvature at the contact can be where T is output load torque, d1 pitch diameter of
expressed as circular spline, and 1 is the pressure angle of gear.
R ¼ R1 R2 =ðR1 R2 Þ
Model formulation
where R1 is the radius of curvature of flexspline at end In the solution domain of a mixed lubrication analy-
of the major axis, R2 is that of the outer ring of wave sis, the pressure is governed by the Reynolds equation
generator at end of the major axis. expressed as follow
The contact rough surfaces have a composite RMS
roughness, which can be expressed as @ 3 @p @ 3 @p @ ðhÞ @ ðhÞ
h þ
h ¼U þ
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi @x 12 @x @y 12 @y @x @t
¼ R2rms1 þ R2rms2 ð1Þ
x2
h ¼ h0 þ þ 1 ðx, y, tÞ þ 2 ðx, y, tÞ þ Vðx, y, tÞ:
2Rx
1.1 ð2Þ
1.0
0.9
2855
2924 2358
1689 Here, Rx is the local radius of curvature at the
contact (representing macro-contact geometry), 1
Transmittance (%)
0.8 817
Before testing
0.7 690 and 2 denote the micro-roughness amplitudes of
After testing 627
0.6 1094 two rough surfaces, respectively, and V is the surface
1153
0.5 1206 deformation, which is computed through the follow-
0.4 ing integral.
0.3
Z Z
0.2 2 pð, &Þ
0.1 Vðx, y, tÞ ¼ qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffidd&
E0
0.0
ðx Þ2 þ ð y &Þ2
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500
-1 ð3Þ
Wave number (cm )
An effective viscosity has been introduced in Table 4. The performance parameters of Braycote815Z oil.
equation (1) to take into account the non-
Parameter Value
Newtonian lubricant properties19
Viscosity index 350
1 1 0 1 Kinematic viscosity (20 C) 250 (cSt)
¼ sinh ð4Þ
1 0 Kinematic viscosity (100 C) 100 (cSt)
Pressure–viscosity coefficient 22 (m2/N)
where 0 is a reference shear stress, 1 denotes the Density 1.87 (g/cm3)
shear stress acting on the lower surface, and is the
Thermal conductivity 0.084 (J/m.s.k)
limiting viscosity at low shear rate, which is assumed
to be a function of pressure and temperature
1 1
¼ 0 EXP p þ ð
þ pÞð Þ : ð5Þ
T T0
FT ¼ FC þ FH ð7Þ
Figure 10. 3D surface profiles.
where FC is the load supported by the asperity contact
and FH is the one by the hydrodynamic lubricant film.
When the average elastohydrodynamic film thick-
ness (ha ) is not greater than the composite RMS of 257 257 nodes equally spaced. The corresponding
roughness (), surface asperity contacts would usually dimensionless mesh spacing is sufficiently small.
take place,20 and a certain portion of load is sup- Readers may refer to the following paper for detailed
ported by the asperity contacts. The contact load descriptions. The solution
convergence
criterion is set
ratio (Wc ) is the load supported by asperity contacts to be: "p ¼ Pi,j new Pi,j old Pi,j new 5 0:00001
divided by the total load. l (l ¼ ha =) is defined as 0:0001
for the
solution of pressure and
ratio of average film thickness to the composite RMS "w ¼ wnew wold wnew 5 0:00001 0:0001 for the
roughness, which can well describe the global lubrica- load.
tion effectiveness in rough surface contacts. The Figure 11 shows the results of mixed-lubrication
recently developed unified mixed EHL model and analysis, and the areas in light yellow in film thickness
numerical approach have been proven to be capable contours indicate the locations of asperity contact.
of simulating the entire transition from full-film and The contact load ratio Wc is 44.8%, which means
mixed lubrication all the way down to boundary the WG–FS interface is under the condition of
lubrication and dry contact with the contact load mixed lubrication, and further verifies the conclusion
ratio Wc varying from 0 continuously to 1.0.21,22 in Part 2 that the lubrication severity of WG–FS inter-
The detailed numerical procedure will not be repeated face leading to adhesive wear is the crucial factor
in this paper. governing the life of the HD.
In order to guide the selecting of accelerated stress,
mixed-lubrication analysis under different conditions
Results and discussions is conducted. Variation of asperity contact load ratio
The property parameters of the oil (Braycote815Z) due to different input speeds, temperatures and loads
are listed in Table 4. The effective radius of curvature are shown in Figures 12 and 13. As expected, asperity
at the contact is R ¼ 2105 mm. Two machined sur- contact load ratio increases when increasing the tem-
faces with 3D roughness topography are rubbing perature and output load and decreasing the input
against each other, and the Rrms value of each surface speed, as shown in Figure 12. The increased tempera-
is 0.35 lm, which results in a composite RMS rough- ture can cause the oil viscosity and film thickness to
ness of ¼ 0:5 m. One of the 3D surface profiles is reduce, which will increase the asperity contact area
shown in Figure 10. The solution domain in the pre- and load, and therefore increase the wear and realize
sent study is defined as 3 4 X 4 and 3 4 Y 43. the accelerated life effect. But the oil of Braycote 815Z
The computational grid covering the domain consists has a high viscosity index, and the temperature has a
Li et al. 7
55 o
face under the condition of mixed lubrication in
0C
50 o
the present work. The lubricating condition of
20 C
45 o
wave generator–flexspline interface cannot be
40 C
40 o
changed during the accelerated life test, because
60 C
35 the failure in elastohydrodynamic lubrication is
30 mainly due to fatigue wear instead of adhesive
25 wear.
20 2. Selecting accelerated stress
Mixed EHL
15 In order to shorten testing time, a higher input
10 speed is required. At the same time, the output
5 load must be increased in order to keep the lubri-
0 cation condition unchanged and retain the same
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
level of asperity contact load ratio.
Input speed V (r/min)
3. Establishing accelerated model
The adhesive wear of wave generator–flexspline
Figure 12. Asperity contact load ratio at different input interface is a crucial factor governing the life of
speeds and temperatures for a load torque of 5 N.m. HD, and the degradation of transmission effi-
ciency is directly related to the wear volume. In
the present work, the wear rate model is selected
as the reference accelerated model.
Asperity contact load ratio Wc (%)
3rpm
70 10rpm To describe adhesive wear of lubricated contact,
60 15rpm
20rpm Rowe23 introduced the concept of the fractional film
50 25rpm defect into the Archard theory, which was originally
30rpm
40 50rpm for describing adhesive wear due to dry sliding con-
100rpm tact. The work of Rowe correlates wear with the effec-
30
tiveness of the lubricant as follow
20
10 dV FT
¼ km ð1 þ f2 Þ1=2
ð8Þ
0 dL s
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Load torque T (N.m) where FT is the total normal load, s is the flow pres-
sure under static load, and f is coefficient of friction.
Figure 13. Asperity contact load ratio at different input The parameter km is characteristic of the tendency of
speeds and loads for temperature of 20 C. the couple to wear by adhesion, the parameter
is
characteristic of the lubricant for its ability to reduce shear stress in the hydrodynamic film is much lower
the asperity contact area. than the shear stress at asperity contact, the friction
Unfortunately, Rowe’s model does not take into coefficient of asperity contact, fC , is almost equal to
account the fact that the total load is supported by the friction coefficient f. Based on this, equation (8)
the lubricating film and the contacting asperities. In can be modified as follow
mixed lubrication, actually, the total normal load FT
is shared by the hydrodynamic lifting force FH and the dV FC
¼ km ð1 þ f2C Þ1=2
: ð13Þ
asperity interacting force FC . Similarly, the total fric- dL s
tion force is the sum of two components.
According to the criterion of plastic flow for a two-
N Z Z
X dimensional body under combined normal and tan-
Ff ¼ fFT ¼ Ff,C þ Ff,H ¼ ci dAci gential stresses, yielding of the contact asperity will
i¼1
Aci
ð9Þ follow the expression24
Z Z
þ H dAH
m2 þ 2 ¼ s2 ð14Þ
AH
where m is the flow pressure under combined stresses
where Ff,C is the asperity interacting friction force, and is the shear strength.
Ff,H is the hydrodynamic friction force, ci is the From friction theory
shear stress at asperity contact, H is the shear stress
in the hydrodynamic film, and AH is the hydrodyna- Ff,C fC FC
¼ ¼ ¼ fC m ð15Þ
mically lubricated area. Ac Ac
The friction coefficient of a single asperity fci can be
written as where Ff,c is almost equal to the total friction force.
Thus
ci
fci ¼ : ð10Þ
pci s
m ¼ 1=2
: ð16Þ
ð1 þ f2C Þ
Since the coefficient of friction is approximately
constant for all asperity contacts, Ff,C can be Substituting equation (16) into equation (13), one
written as can have
N Z Z
X N Z Z
X dV FC F T Wc
Ff,C ¼ fci pcidAci ¼ fC pcidAci ¼ fC FC ¼ km
¼ km
: ð17Þ
dL m m
i¼1 i¼1
Aci Aci
Li et al. 9
Table 5. Environment and conditions of ALT. Table 6. Wear conditions of flexspline inner surface.
15 r/min, 5 N.m
75 15 r/min, 10 N.m
15 r/min, 20 N.m
70 15 r/min, 30 N.m
100 r/min, 5 N.m
65 3 r/min, 5 N.m
100 r/min, 10 N.m
60
55
15 r/min, 10 N.m 62.6
50 The end of life
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
6
Total output revolution (10 r)
Conclusions
20 15 r/min, 30 N.m When the HD operates with a low speed in vacuum,
the lubricating conditions of all contacting surfaces
Wear rate (10 mm /r)
15 r/min, 10 N.m
10 wave generator–flexspline interface is a crucial factor
governing the life of the HD.
5
15 r/min, 5 N.m 1. The method of accelerated life test of the HD is to
raise both input speed and load without changing
0 the lubrication condition. According to the adhe-
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 sive wear model, the load taken by asperity con-
Load taken by asperity contact (N) tact (FT Wc ) is defined as the accelerated factor
and further used to select proper accelerated
Figure 17. Wear rate of flexspline inner surface V.S. the load stress.
taken by asperity contact. 2. Accelerated life tests under different working con-
ditions have been conducted, and the results agree
well with the theoretical mixed lubrication
analysis.
than that under the condition of x ¼ 3 r/min and 3. The scheme of accelerated life test proposed in the
T ¼ 5 N.m. The rate is increased significantly when present paper can be applied to liquid lubricating
the load torque increases from 5 N.m to 30 N.m. interface if adhesive wear is the basic failure mode.
The results are in good agreement with those obtained
from the numerical analysis, i.e. the adhesive wear
Funding
rate is proportional to the load taken by the asperities.
Increasing load torque would increase asperity This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation
of China (grant nos. 51435001 and 51375506), China
contact load ratio if the wave generator–flexspline
Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (grant
interface still operates in mixed lubrication at the
no. 2013M542258) and the Chongqing Postdoctoral
input speed of 15 r/min. Good accelerating effect, Science Foundation funded project (grant no. Xm2014082).
therefore, can be obtained by raising the input speed
and load without changing the lubrication condition. Conflict of interest
After dismantling, no remarkable wear is observed on
None declared.
either gear pairs or wave generator bearing of the HD
under different working conditions, but significant References
wear is found on the inner surface of each flexspline 1. Fusaro RL. Preventing spacecraft failures due to tribo-
(see Table 6), and it shows that the wear volume have logical problems. NASA/TM-2001-210806, 2001.
similar tendency with that of the variation of the effi- 2. Manfred S and Schmidt J. Life test of industrial standard
ciency, which means, to some extent, that the effi- and of a stainless steel harmonic drive. In: 14th European
ciency degradation is closely related to the wear space mechanisms and tribology symposium, Constance,
volume. Germany, 28–30 September 2011, SP-698.
Li et al. 11
3. Schafer I, Bourlier P, Hantschack F, et al. Space lubrica- 20. Zhu D and Wang Q. On the l ratio range of mixed
tion and performance of harmonic Drive gears. In: 11th lubrication. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering
European space mechanisms and tribology symposium, Tribology 2012; 226: 1010–1022.
Lucerne, Switzerland, 21–23 September 2005, SP-591. 21. Hu YZ and Zhu D. A full numerical solution to the
4. Li B and Li RX. Transmission behaviors and tribological mixed lubrication in point contacts. ASME J Tribol
properties of the solid and grease lubricated harmonic 2000; 122: 1–10.
drivers at overload condition. Tribology 2011; 31: 216–11. 22. Zhu D. On some aspects in numerical simulation of thin
5. Gill S, Forster DJ and Rowntree RA. Thermal vacuum film and mixed EHL. Proc IMechE, Part J:
performance of cycloid and harmonic gearboxes with J Engineering Tribology 2007; 221: 561–579.
solid (MoS2) and liquid (Braycote 601) lubrication. In: 23. Rowe CN. Some aspects of the heat of adsorption in the
5th European space mechanisms and tribology symposium, function of a boundary lubricant. ASLE Trans 1966; 9:
Noordwijk, Netherlands, 28–30 October 1992, SP-334. 100–111.
6. Zhou H, Zheng J, Sang RP, et al. Tungsten containing
24. Tabor D. Junction growth in metallic friction: The role
hydrogenated DLC coatings on grease lubricated har-
of combined stresses and surface contamination. Proc
monic drive gear for space application. In: 14th
Roy Soc Math Physical Sci 1959; 251: 378–393.
European space mechanisms and tribology symposium,
Constance, Germany, 28–30 September 2011, SP-698.
7. Ueura K, Kiyosawa Y, Kurogi J, et al.
Tribological aspects of a strain wave gearing system Appendix 1
with specific reference to its space application. Proc
IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2008; 222: Notation
1051–1061.
8. Maniwa K and Obara S. Mixed lubrication analysis a half-width of Hertzian contact zone
between wave generator and flexspline in strain wave (mm)
gearing (numerical analysis under load-torque applying Aci area of contact of a single asperity
operation). Soc Tribol 2007; 52: 51–61. (mm2)
9. Michael RJ, Russ G and Ray H. Life test failure of AH contact area of hydrodynamic compo-
harmonic gears in a two-axis gimbal for the mars recon- nent (mm2)
naissance orbiter spacecraft. In: Proceedings of the 38th d1 pitch diameter of circular spline (mm)
aerospace mechanisms symposium, Langley Research f coefficient of friction
Center, 2006.
fci friction coefficient of a single asperity
10. Li JY, Wang JX, Zhou GW, et al. Study on failure
fC friction coefficient of asperity contact
mechanism of harmonic drivers with space lubrication.
Tribology 2013; 33: 44–48. FC load taken by the asperity contact (N)
11. Meeks CR. Accelerated testing of ball bearings. Ff total friction force (N)
Lubricat Eng 1972; 28: 372–378. Ff,C asperity interacting friction force (N)
12. Maniwa K and Obara S. Study on lubrication mechan- Ff,H hydrodynamic friction force (N)
isms of strain wave gearing. JAXA-RR-06-017, 2007. FH load taken by the hydrodynamic com-
13. Phinney DD and Pollard CL. Experience with duplex ponent (N)
bearing in narrow angle oscillating applications. In: FT normal force (N)
Proceedings of the 22nd aerospace mechanisms sympo- h lubricant film thickness (lm)
sium, Colorado, America, 1 May 1988, pp.211–216. ha average elastohydrodynamic film
14. Steven GV, Brian JD, Kenneth WS, et al. The role of
thickness (lm)
bearing and scan mechanism life testing in flight quali-
fication of the MODIS instrument. In: Proceedings of the km parameter of the tendency of the couple
35th aerospace mechanisms symposium, California, to wear by adhesion
America, 9–11 May 2001, pp.1–14. N number of asperities in contact
15. Simon DL. Accelerated testing of liquid lubricated pci normal pressure of a single asperity
spacecraft mechanisms. In: 7th European space mechan- (MPa)
isms and tribology symposium, Toulouse, The R relative contact curvature radius (mm)
Netherlands, 1–3 October 1997, SP-410. Rx local radius of curvature across the
16. Murray SF, Heshmat H and Robert F. Accelerated contact width
testing of space mechanisms. NASA CR-198437, Rrms RMS roughness of surface (lm)
Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, April 1995.
R1 curvature radius of flexspline at end of
17. Schafer I, Bourlier P, Hantschack F, et al. Space lubri-
cation and performance of harmonic Drive gears.
the major axis (mm)
European Space Mechanisms and Tribology R2 curvature radius of flexspline at end of
Symposium, 11th, Lucerne, Switzerland, 2005, SP-591. the major axis (mm)
18. Ren N, Zhu D and Chen WW. A three-dimensional t temperature ( C)
deterministic model for rough surface line-contact T output load torque (N.m)
EHL problems. ASME J Tribol 2009; 131: 0115011–9. V surface deformation (lm)
19. Yang PR and Wen SZ. A generalized Reynolds equa- Wc asperity contact load ratio
tion for non-newtonian thermal elastohydrodynamio x, X coordinate in the rolling direction,
lubrication. ASME J Tribol 1990; 112: 631–636. X ¼ x=a (mm)