Guidelines On Ph.D. Research
Guidelines On Ph.D. Research
Guidelines On Ph.D. Research
1.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
In the Social Sciences research means to find the things which are available upon earth.
In the Natural Sciences research means to find or to prepare the things which are not
available upon earth.
DEFINITIONS OF RESEARCH:
1. Redman and Mory: “Systematic efforts to gain new knowledge”
2. Directory of English: “A careful investigation or inquiry especially through search for
new facts
3. Advanced Oxford Learner’s Dictionary: “A careful investigation or inquiry specially
through search for new facts in any branch of knowledge”
4. Clifford Woody: “A careful inquiry or examination in seeking facts or principles, a
diligent investigation to ascertain something.”
5. C.C. Crawford: “ A systematic and refined technique of thinking, employing
specialized tools, instruments and procedures in order to obtain a more adequate
solution of a problem than would be possible under ordinary means. It starts with a
problem, collects data or facts, analyses them critically and reaches decisions based
on the actual evidence”.
6. According to Black and Champion: “Scientific research consist of obtaining
information through empirical observation that can be used for systematic
development of logically related propositions attempting to establish casual relations
among variable”.
7. Emory defines research as “any organized inquiry designed and carried out to
provide information for solving a problem”.
8. Kerlinger defines research as a” systematic, controlled, empirical and critical
investigation of hypothetical relations among natural phenomena”.
9. L.V. Redman and A.V.H. Morry have defined “systematic effort to gain new
knowledge, we call it as research”.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH:
The above definitions reveal the following characteristics of research :
1. Research involves the quest for answer to unsolved problems.
2. Research is a systematic and critical investigation to a phenomenon.
3. It aims at interpreting and explaining a phenomenon.
4. It adopts scientific method.
5. It is based on empirical evidences and observable experience.
6. It develops generalizations, principles or theories.
7. It directed towards finding answer to the questions and solutions to the problems.
8. It has social relevance
1.2
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
PURPOSE OF RESEARCH:
1. Research extends knowledge of human beings social life and environment. Research
reveals the mysteries of nature. Research establishes generalizations and general laws
and contributes to theory building in various fields of knowledge.
2. Research verifies and tests existing facts and theory.
3. Research helps us to improve our knowledge and ability to handle situation.
4. General laws developed through research may enable us to make reliable predictions
of events.
5. Research aims to analyze inter-relationship between variables and to derive causal
explanations, which help us to better understanding of the world in which we live.
6. Research aims to finding solutions to the problem, e.g. socio-economic problems,
health problems, organizational and human relational problems and so on…
7. Research also aims at developing new tools, concepts and theories for better
understanding to unknown phenomena.
8. Research helps national planning board to focus our national development. It enables
the planners to evaluate alternative strategies and on-going programs.
9. Research provides functional data for rational decision making and formulation of
strategies and policies.
MEANING AND ESSENTIALS OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD:
Scientific method is a way in which one can test opinion, impressions or guess by
examining available evidences for and against them. So it is controlling lot of things and
establishing stable belief. Essentials of scientific method are,
• Scientific method aims at discovering facts.
• It is itself corrective in nature.
• It is itself based on systematic doubts.
• Scientific theories are abstract in nature.
DISCIPLINES OF THE RESEARCH:
1. Natural Sciences: Physics, Chemistry, Botany, Zoology, Mathematics, Statistics,
Pharmacy, Agriculture, Geography, Medical Sciences, Engineering and Technology,
etc.
2. Social Sciences: Management, Commerce, Economics, Behavioural Sciences,
Philosophy, Psychology, Sociology, Political Science. History etc.
3. Languages: English, Hindi, Marathi, Japanese, French, Urdu, etc.
NATURE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH:
Social science research aims at adding new knowledge of human being about the
problems which the society faces. Social research discovers facts about social relationships,
social behavior, social interactions for understanding social problems and finding solutions to
1.3
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
it. Research is an activity undertaken to establish the facts and principles in a scientific way
and to extend our horizon of knowledge.
OBJECTIVES OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH:
Social research has certain objectives, which are as under
1. Development of knowledge
2. Scientific study of social life
3. Welfare of humanity
4. Classification of facts
5. Social control and predictions
WHY WE HAVE TO DO RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES:
1. To find new things.
2. To study cause and effect of events.
3. To find impact of one aspect upon another aspect- e.g.
(i) Company Policy-Company Performance.
(ii) Natural and Artificial Environment-Profit of the business.
(iii) Government Policy-Development of particular Sector.
4. To do Case Study of any business unit.
5. To compare the performance of same organization of different years’ i.e. 2012-13,
2013-14, 2014-15 this is called as Intra-Firm Comparison.
6. To compare two organizations with each other this is called as Inter Firm Comparison.
7. To do Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threat (SWOT) analysis of any
organization.
8. To study the reasons of failure of any organization.
9. To study the reasons of success of any organization those can be applied to any
other organization.
10. Any aspect which improve the performance, profitability, and success of the
organization.
11. Any aspect which is helpful for wellbeing of the society.
FACTORS MOTIVATE TO DO THE RESEARCH:
1. Desire to get a research degree along with the consequential benefits.
2. Desire to get the challenges in solving the unsolved problems.
3. Desire to get intellectual joy of doing some creative work.
4. Desire to provide service to the society.
5. Desire to get respect or to get status.
6. Directives of Government: To fulfil eligibility conditions
7. Employment Conditions.
1.4
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
1.6
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
1. Curiosity.
2. Scientific Attitude
3. Imagination
4. Insight
5. Perseverance
6. Clarity of thinking
7. Resourcefulness
8. Self Control
9. Intellectual Honesty
10. Organization
2. Specific Qualities:
1. Knowledge of the Subject
2. Knowledge of Research Methodology
3. Personal interest in the Research
4. Unbiased or impartial
5. Logical Thinking and Out of box thinking
6. Problem Solving Attitude
SEVEN POINT FORMULA FOR DOING Ph.D. RESEARCH SUCCESSFULLY:
Formula is GVRLWSC
Introduction:
Actuality this formula was prepared for undergraduate and post graduate students, but it
is also applicable to Ph.D. Students. So, now a days, each person requires appropriate
command over English language, which is necessary for doing such type of research work.
1. G (Grammar): The student has to learn and understand English grammar up to 12th
standard.
2. V (Vocabulary): The student must increase his vocabulary, i.e., stock of words.
3. R (Reading): The student has to read at least one newspaper daily.
4. L (Listen):The student must listen to English News and programmes on TV and Radio
5. W (Writing): The student should be able write ten pages of text in English on his/her
own
6. S (Speaking):The student should complete any one English Speaking Course
7. C (Communicate): The student must communicate in English with his or her teachers,
friends, parents, relatives etc.
RESEARCH METHODS OR TYPES OF RESEACH:
(A) FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH:
1. Pure, Basic or Original Research.
2. Gathering knowledge for knowledge.
3. Making addition in the existing knowledge.
4. Mainly concern with generalization and with formulation of theory.
1.7
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
1.9
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
1. It is formulating research.
2. Preparing hypothesis is necessary.
3. Testing of hypothesis is necessary.
DISCIPLINEWISE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
(A) NATURAL SCIENCES:
1. Experiments in the laboratory.
2. Testing of the Product with equipment and electronic devices.
3. Conversion of product into patents.
4. Production at mass level.
5. Application of product for human being.
(B) LANGUAGES:
1. Theoretical background.
2. Collection of secondary data.
3. Desk or table research.
4. Development of new ideas or thoughts.
5. Use of new ideas or thoughts for wellbeing of the society.
(C) SOCIAL SCIENCES:
1. Theoretical background
2. Review of literature.
3. Collection of data.
4. Analysis of data.
5. Conclusions and suggestions.
6. Application of suggestions in Business or Government Decisions.
7. Formulation of policy.
8. Implementation of policy decisions for wellbeing of the society.
SOCIAL RELAVANCE OF THE RESEARCH:
1. Research inculcates scientific and inductive thinking and it promotes the
development of logical habits of thinking.
2. The role of research in several fields of applied economics, whether related to
business or to the economy as a whole, has greatly increased in modern times.
3. Research provides the basis for nearly all Government policies in our economic
system.
4. Research has its special significance in solving various operational and planning
problems of business and industry.
5. Research is equally important for social scientists in studying social relationships and
in seeking answers to various social problems.
1.10
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Introduction to Research Work
It is the responsibility of the researcher that to explain about his or her research that it is
helpful to the society, stakeholders, company, organization, department, etc. After the
completion of Ph.D. Research Work the researcher should do extension or counseling work
which is beneficial to the society in his or her areas of study.
Example of social sciences research:
1. Collection of milk, boiling it, getting cream from it. Put some curd in it and to keep it
for 2-3 days - Collection of Primary and Secondary Data
2. To rinse cream, curd, water and to get butter.- Analysis and Interpretation of Data
3. To boil the butter and get pure ghee and butter milk from it- Findings,
Conclusions, and Suggestions
4. To use pure ghee and butter in a meal- Use of research findings for wellbeing of
the society. Getting patents and use them into production.
RESEARCH PROCESS:
Research process is made of a series of actions or steps that are essential and are to be
performed in a specific order. A brief description of the steps is given as follows :
1. Define the research problem
2. Mention the objectives of the research
3. Review of existing literature
4. Research design
5. Data collection
6. Analysis of data
7. Hypothesis testing
8. Generalization and interpretations
9. Report writing
10. Utilization of research findings
✍ ✍ ✍
1.11
Chapter 2…
Formalities for doing Ph.D.
Research Work
RULES FOR DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.)
2.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
(e) The fellow members of the institute of Chartered Accountants and / or institute of
Cost and Works Accountants and / or having qualification of Company Secretary shall
be eligible for admission to the Ph.D. Programme in the subject allocated to the
Board of Studies concerned under the Faculty of Commerce. Provided that such
candidates possess a Bachelor's Degree of any recognized University and also have at
least 5 years' professional experience.
(f) A Graduate in any Faculty who has developed important new technology (new for the
country) or designed and fabricated special instruments or apparatus which are
deemed by a competent judge to be a valuable contribution in the field of
Engineering/Pharmacy, may be permitted by the Research and Recognition
Committee of the Faculty concerned, on the recommendation of appropriate Board
or Boards of Studies to submit his thesis for the Ph.D. Degree in that faculty. Such a
candidate must have at least 5 years' standing as a Bachelor of the faculty concerned.
(g) Application for research in inter-disciplinary areas and from applicants belonging to a
faculty or subjects other than the Faculty or subjects in which the research is
proposed to be done and from the international candidates (those who have not
obtained the Master's Degree from Indian Universities) shall be considered on the
basis of the proven ability and aptitude of the researcher for such kind of research.
Such proposal shall be examined by the Guide and the Head, Place of Research
before giving provisional admission. The admission will be confirmed after the
Research and Recognition Committee/s concerned, approves the topic. Detailed
procedure for admission should be evolved by the faculty concerned.
(h) Percentage of marks required for admission of foreign candidates (those who have
not obtained Master's degree from Indian Universities) will be 50%or equivalent GPA
at Master's Degree level.
The following candidates are exempted from Ph.D. Entrance Examination:
Faculty Qualification/Experience
Mental, Moral and Minimum 10 years' professional experience in the relevant
Social Sciences field after Post Graduate Degree (Master's Degree) in the
Faculty concerned.
Commerce 1. Professionals with minimum 10 years' work experience
in the field of Accountancy/Auditing/Secretary-ship/Cost
accounting after passing examination of CA/CS/ICWA
OR
2. Candidates with minimum 10 years' work experience
in the area of Administration / Management / Commerce/
Banking & Financial Services/ insurance / Financial
engagement, etc. in Companies listed on Stock Exchange/
organizations registered under Trust Act / Government
2.2
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
2.3
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
2.4
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
On the basis of the interview, allotment of Research Guides for selected candidates shall
be decided by the University Departments/Research Centres in a formal manner depending
on the number of candidates per teacher, the available specialization among the Research
Guides and the research interest as indicated during interview by the candidates. The
allotment/allocation of Research Guide shall not be left to the individual candidate or guide.
Guide-wise quota will be declared. Reservation policy will be observed at the time of
allotment. The reservation will be followed as per guide basis e.g. (out of eight vacancies,
four should be open and four should be reserved category)
While granting admission to candidates to Ph.D. Programmes, the University
Departments/Research Centres will follow the State Reservation Policy. Foreign candidates
will be treated at par with Open Category for admission.
Only one foreign student will be permitted per guide. Head of the University
Departments/Research Centres will ensure the allotment of guide(s) within 3 months from
the date of selection of the candidates.
5. APPLICATION:
Every person, if he/she is otherwise eligible and qualifies as per above conditions and
desirous of doing research work for the Ph.D. degree shall face the interview before the
Committee constituted for the purpose. All such candidates will apply to respective University
Departments/Research Centres for registration for the purpose of interview. Candidates
exempted from Entrance Examination as per Clause 2 (a) shall also have to register their
candidature with the respective University Departments/Research Centre. Candidates will be
interviewed by the Committee constituted for the purpose as per clause 6 below.
6. THE COMMITTEE SHALL CONSIST OF:
(a) Admission at University Departments:
(i) Head of the Department concerned (Chairman);
(ii) Chairman of Board of Studies concerned or his nominee;
(iii) Two subject Experts (One from the Department concerned and One from outside,
approved by the Vice-Chancellor);
(iv) Two nominees of the Vice-Chancellor - One General and One Reservation
(b) Admission at PG/Research Centres at Affiliated Colleges and Recognized
Institutions:
(i) Principal / Director of the Affiliated Colleges and Recognized institutions concerned
(Chairman):
(ii) Chairman of Board of Studies concerned or his nominee;
(iii) Two subject Experts (One Head of the Department concerned of the affiliated
college/recognized institution, and one from University Departments/affiliated
college/recognized institution concerned, approved by the Vice-Chancellor);
(iv) Two nominees of the Vice-Chancellor - One General and One Reservation
(c) Admission at Recognized Research Institution:
2.5
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
(v) The Research and Recognition Committee shall consider approval of the topic of
research and appoint, in case of inter-disciplinary subjects, co-guide/s recognized by
the University or, in special circumstances, by any other recognized University.
(vi) The date of registration shall be the date of provisional admission. The registration
shall be valid for five years. Extension up to a maximum period of two years shall be
given by the Research and Recognition Committee/s concerned only if considerable
work has been done by the candidate. The candidate concerned must submit the
application for extension through his guide and Head of the Place of Research, three
months before the expiry of the registration period. Further extension of one year will
be given by Vice-Chancellor on the recommendation of the Dean of the Faculty
concerned.
(vii) If the candidate desires, he/she can partially modify the title and the proposed plan
of the research and the Research and Recognition Committee concerned shall
approve such changes on the recommendation of the guide and the Head of the
Place of Research.
(viii) The registered candidates shall not be allowed to register simultaneously for any
other degree course.
(ix) The admission will be confirmed after the Research and Recognition Committee
approves the topic. The Head of Research Centre shall admit the candidates as per
the rules and regulations of the University.
8. Course Work:
The course work is compulsory and will carry 20 credits. The bifurcation of these credits is
as under:
(i) 5 credits for Research Methodology which includes research methodology,
quantitative methods, computer application, tools and techniques including
instrumentation, communication skills, seminar presentation and review of published
research.
(ii) 10 credits for subject specific (2 subjects) course work.
(iii) 5 credits for field work, seminar and other academic activities.
The evaluation will be done by the teachers of the University Department/Research
Centre concerned.
Admitted candidates shall be required to undertake course work organized by the
University Department/Research Centre, as the case may be. The course work will be for a
minimum period of one semester. The course work shall be treated as pre-Ph.D. preparation.
The University Department/Research Centre, as the case may be, shall decide the minimum
qualifying requirement for allowing a candidate to proceed further with the writing of the
Ph.D. thesis. lf found necessary, course work may be carried out by doctoral candidates in
related departments/institutes either within or outside the University, for which due credit
will be given to them.
2.7
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
Candidates who have done M.Phil. from any recognized University and who were
admitted to M.Phil. Through an entrance examination and had also undertaken course at
M.Phil. Level, will be exempted from the course work.
9. SUPERVISION:
(a) Guide:
1. Normally a candidate shall be required to complete his/her doctoral research under
the supervision of the guide allotted to him/her. However, the Research and Recognition
Committee concerned may allow change of guide on the production of a 'No Objection
Certificate' from the first guide and an acceptance letter from the new guide. In case of such
a change, the candidate shall work for a minimum period of one calendar year under the new
guide before he/she submits the thesis. A 'No Objection Certificate' will not be required if the
candidate justifies the non-availability of his guide. The justification will have to be endorsed
by the Head, Place of Research. In case of any dispute/problem, non-availability of the guide,
the Vice-Chancellor on recommendation of the Dean of the Faculty concerned, will take an
appropriate decision.
2. At any given time, a guide shall not have more than eight registered Ph.D. candidates
And/or more than five M.Phil. Candidates working under his/her supervision.
3. In case of a dispute between a candidate and his guide, the Committee consisting of
the following shall examine the matter and report to the Vice Chancellor, whose decision
shall be final.
(i) Dean of the Faculty concerned [Convener];
(ii) Nominee of the Vice Chancellor;
(iii) The Head, Place of Research.
lf the complaint is against Head/the Dean; he/she shall not participate in the proceedings
of the meeting. In that case, additional member/may be appointed by the Vice Chancellor to
replace them.
The report shall include, among other things, about the specific recommendations. The
report shall be submitted to the Vice Chancellor.
(b) Progress:
1. All the registered candidates shall be required to submit to the Head, Place of
Research, through their research guides elaborate progress report after completion every six
months. If a candidate fails to submit three reports consecutively, his/her registration may be
treated as cancelled on recommendation of Head and Dean of the Faculty concerned.
2. The Head, Place of Research, with fifteen days after the completion of the given
period [one and half years], shall send to the P.G. Admission Section of the University, a
report on the non-compliance of the condition. The Head, Place of Research, shall also send
a copy of the progress report submitted by the candidate to the P.G. Admission Section of
the University, with fifteen days after the completion of the given period [one and half years].
2.8
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
3. The progress reports submitted shall be placed by the Head, Place of Research before
the Progress Monitoring Committee consisting of [a] the Head, Place of Research, [b] the
Research Guide, and [c] a research guide recommended by the Head, Place of Research from
amongst the recognized research guides of the University. The Committee shall scrutinize the
progress reports and prepare a brief statement on the progress of the candidate. In case of
dispute, the Dean of the Faculty concerned shall take final decision. The Head, Place of
Research shall maintain the record of these reports and statements.
10. SUBMISSION AND EVATUATION OF THESIS
(a) Submission of Thesis:
1. The submission of synopsis may be permitted only after completion of twenty two
months from the date of registration and after successful completion of the Coursework. The
synopsis should contain introduction, chapter-wise brief account of the work done and
overall conclusions. Ph.D. candidates has to publish one research paper in a standard
refereed journal before the submission of the thesis/monograph for adjudication, and
produce evidence for the same in the form of acceptance letter or the reprint.
2. At least three months before the date of submission of the thesis, each candidate
shall give a pre-submission seminar to be arranged by the Head, Place of Research at the
University Department/Research Centre on the request of the candidate duly endorsed by
the guide. The final plan of the thesis will be discussed by the research scholars present,
among whom the presence of the research guides and the Head, Place of Research or his/her
nominee shall be necessary.
3. In the light of the discussion during the seminar mentioned above, the candidate
shall submit to the Registrar fifteen copies of the synopsis of his/her thesis through his/her
guide within one month from the date of presentation of seminar. The candidate shall be
allowed to submit his/her thesis after the completion of a period of two months and before
six months from the date of submission of the synopsis, failing which the candidate will have
a pay the prescribed fine for late submission. Late submission of thesis shall be allowed up to
the completion of one year from the date of submission of the synopsis or till the expiry of
the registration period, whichever is earlier. The candidate will have to submit synopsis again,
if given extension.
4. The thesis shall be submitted in compact bound form along with a soft coy (CD).
Along with the thesis, five copies of the abstract shall be submitted. The final thesis shall be
presented in accordance with the following specifications:
(a) The paper used for printing shall be of 44 size;
(b) Printing shall be in a standardized form on one side of the paper and in 1.5 line
spacing;
(c) A margin of 1.5 inches shall be on the left hand side;
(d) The card for cover shall not be more than 330 GSM;
2.9
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
(e) The title of the thesis, name of the candidate, degree, name of the guide, place of
research and the month and year of submission shall be printed on the title page and
the front cover;
(f) The hard-bound thesis cover shall be of black colour. Spine of the binding [side
cover] should mention 'Ph.D. thesis' on the top, name of the candidate and month
and year.
6. The candidate shall submit to the Registrar two copies of his/her thesis and produce
an acknowledgement of the receipt of thesis by the Research Guide and the Head, Place of
Research.
7. The thesis shall include a Certificate of the guide and a Declaration by the candidate
that the work reported in the thesis has been carried out by the candidate himself/herself
and that the material from other sources, if any, is duly acknowledged.
8. The thesis shall be written in English except when it is related to Modern European or
Indian languages. Exceptional cases may be considered by Research and Recognition
Committee for writing the thesis in Marathi language only.
(b) Appointment of Examiners:
1. The procedure for the appointment of examiners shall be undertaken soon after the
candidate submits his/her synopsis.
2. The thesis should be sent to three examiners and evaluated by any two external
examiners for the respective Faculty as mentioned below:
(i) For Faculty of Science/Pharmacy/Engineering - one examiner from India and one
should be from out of India;
(ii) For other faculties - one examiner from within the State and one should be out of the
State.
The guide of the candidate shall be an internal examiner.
3. The Chairman for the Viva-Voce and the Panel for defence of the thesis shall be
appointed by the Head of the Place of research or by the Dean of the Faculty concerned
when the Head is the guide, from a panel of three experts suggested by the guide.
4. If the approval of the examiners' panel is delayed beyond three months, the Ph.D.
candidate, through his guide may bring this to the attention of the Vice-Chancellor directly
and the Vice-Chancellor in such a case, may initiate an appropriate action in consultation
with the Dean of the Faculty concerned ensuring that the panel is approved within a month.
5. The Vice-Chancellor may indicate the order of priority of examiners from 1 to 3 as per
the classification for various Faculties given in clause (2) above.
(c) Evaluation:
1. After the approval of the panel of examiners by Board of Examinations. The
Controller of Examinations shall invite the first three examiners from the approved panel, to
examine the thesis. The Controller of Examinations shall forward the thesis to the examiners
within a week from the date of the receipt of the acceptance letter of the examiner or the
2.10
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
submission of thesis, and whichever is later. If an examiner does not accept the invitation
within thirty days from the date of dispatch of the invitation letter, the Controller of
Examination shall send an invitation letter, to the next examiner on the panel.
2. The external examiners shall independently send their reports to the Controller of
Examinations within sixty days from the date of receipt of the thesis [The reports sent by fax
or e-mail by using the 'postscript' package will be accepted. lf an examiner fails to-do so, the
Controller of Examinations shall send him/her a reminder immediately after the expiry of the
said period and request him/her to submit the report within thirty days. lf the examiner
concerned fails to comply even within the extended period, the COE shall cancel his
appointment forthwith and invite the next examiner from the approved panel to evaluate the
thesis. In the event of a request for the late submission of a report, receipt of the report after
the appointment has been cancelled or the loss of report, postal delay, etc., the Dean of the
Faculty concerned shall take an appropriate decision in the interest of the candidate
concerned.
3. The positive reports received from the external examiners and the Research
Guide(internal Examiner) shall be immediately forwarded to the Head, Place of Research who,
after ascertaining that the reports are favorable, shall arrange the viva and the defence of the
thesis at the earliest date suitable to the Internal Examiner, the nearest external examiner and
the Chairperson. The Head of the Department shall nominate the Chairperson for the
defence from a panel of three senior research guides to be suggested by the internal
Examiner. The Head shall make the reports available to the candidate, the Research Guide
and the Chairperson at least a day before the date of the viva. In case of any problem, the
Dean of the Faculty concerned will take an appropriate decision.
4. In case one out of two external examiners give unfavorable report, then the
Controller of Examinations shall get the thesis examined by an additional examiner from the
panel of examiners approved by the Board of Examinations. If the additional examiner also
gives an unfavorable report, the candidate will be declared to have failed.
11. Viva Voce and Defence of the Thesis:
1. The day, date, time and the place for the viva voce and the defence of thesis shall be
notified by the Head of the Place of Research at least eight days in advance. Normally, the
viva voce and the defence of the thesis shall be arranged in the University Department. In
exceptional cases, the Vice-Chancellor may allow the viva to be conducted at a Place of
Research outside the University campus. In such a case, the procedure and norms for the
conduct of viva, payments, etc. shall be as laid down by the University.
2. The defence of the thesis shall take place in the presence of the Guide (internal
Examiner), one External Examiner and the Chairperson, who shall jointly evaluate the
performance of the candidate. In case of dispute, the Dean of the Faculty concerned shall
take an appropriate decision.
3. lf neither of the external examiners is able to be present at the time of the defence,
the Vice-Chancellor, on the recommendation of the Guide and the Dean of the Faculty
2.11
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
concerned, shall appoint a senior research guide to act as an examiner for the defence of the
thesis. In case the internal Examiner is not available, the Vice-Chancellor shall appoint one of
the senior research guides on the recommendation of the Dean of the concerned Faculty and
Head of the Place of Research.
4. The examiners present for the viva-voce and the defence of the thesis shall submit to
the Controller of Examinations (CEO) their final consolidated report along with the reply
given to the queries raised by the external examiners in the written form, signed and
accepted by the members of the Viva-Voce Panel. and a list of the persons attending the
open defence , in respect of the award of the Ph.D. degree immediately after the defence is
over.
5. In case the defence is not satisfactory, the examiners may unanimously recommend
with reasons that a fresh viva-voce and defence of the thesis be organized within a period of
not less than one month. If the defence is still not satisfactory, the Committee would record
the reasons for the same. The Committee may recommend the resubmission of the thesis
with suggested changes or recommend the rejection of the thesis.
12. DEPOSITORY WITH THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSTON:
Following the successful completion of the evaluation process and announcements of the
award of Ph.D., the University shall submit a soft copy of the Ph.D. thesis to the University
Grants Commission within a period of thirty days, for hosting the same in INFLIBNET
accessible to all Colleges/institutions/Universities. The University shall issue a provisional
certificate, certifying to the effect that the Degree has been awarded in accordance with the
Regulations issued by the University Grants Commission as per the Notification dated June
2009. The overall result shall be officially declared by the COE within eight days from the date
of the receipt of the favorable report on the defence of the thesis.
2.12
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
Course: - Ph.D.
Faculty: -
Specialization: -
2.13
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
2.14
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
2.15
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
SUBMISSION OF SYNOPSIS
After the pre-submission seminar, the researcher has to submit fifteen copies of the
Synopsis of his/her thesis through the guide .A synopsis is viewed as a mini version of the
thesis. It should provide a clear idea about what the thesis is. It should (a) state the
objectives, nature and scope of the work done, (b) state the principle conclusions, and
(c) state the contribution made to the body knowledge on the subject. The expected length
of the synopsis is ten double-spaced A-4 size pages. The synopsis will be put-on the
University website.
2.16
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
2.17
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Formalities for doing Ph.D. Research Work
✍ ✍ ✍
2.18
Chapter 3…
Layout of Ph.D. Thesis
Introduction:
As per the requirements of the study of Ph.D. Research Work the layout should be
prepared accordingly.
Title page, declaration by the candidate, certificate of the guide, acknowledgement, list of
tables, list of graphs, list of maps etc. are initial parts. Student should take standard formats
of all these documents.
Contents in Ph.D. Thesis are important. Here, we have given tentative list of contents.
Student can add more topics into the thesis or some chapters can be clubbed together with
each other.
After completion all the chapters Bibliography and Questionnaire should be taken as
annexure.
If the title is ready and if we prepare layout or skeleton, then the path of Ph.D. Research
Work will be clear. We can start our work with enthusiasm. Layout is the structure of Ph.D.
Thesis which is as follows:
Layout of Ph.D. Thesis
(i) Title Page
(ii) Declaration
(iii) Certificate of Guide
(iv) Acknowledgement
(v) List of Tables
(vi) List of Graphs
(vii) List of Maps
3.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Layout of Ph.D. Thesis
CONTENTS
Chapter-I : Research Design and Methodology
✍ ✍ ✍
3.2
Chapter 4…
Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
Introduction:
At the time of registration of Ph.D. degree students are always in confused state, they do
not know how to start the work as well as from which stage it should be started. They also do
not know how many years they will require to complete the research work. Ph. D. Degree is
not like other bachelor or master degrees. It requires different state of mind, willingness to
do hard work, to meet so many people and to develop relationship with them and to collect
the required information.
In this chapter clear stages of Ph.D. Research work are given , by which the student can
get appropriate idea about the path of Ph.D. research work.
STAGE 1: READING THE BOOKS ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
For doing Ph.D. the student should know the research methodology in detail for this
purpose. He or she should read at least five books on Research Methodology and should
prepare notes of all the concepts, terms and theoretical information.
Books on Research Methodology written by various authors
Dr. C.R. Kothari Dr. F.N. Kerlinger
Dr. C.V. Good Dr. P.V. Young
Dr. S.R. Vajpai Dr. B.C. Tandon
Dr. J.W. Best and J.V. Khan Dr. Ackoff Russell L.
Dr. V.P. Michael Dr. Wilkinson and Dr. Bhandarakar
Dr. S.P. Gupta Dr. Redman
Dr. S. Das Dr. G.C. Beri
Dr. H.D. Sharma & Dr. S.P. Mukherji Dr. Zikmund, Balin, Carr, Adhikar, Criffim
Dr. Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S.
STAGE 2: READING Ph.D. THESES, WORKING PAPERS AND OTHER RESEARCH PAPERS
Thorough reading in our own subject is necessary for preparing the basic foundation of
Ph.D. Research Work. So the student has to read at least 20 Ph.D. Thesis related to his/her
subject and should write down the following information.
• Title of Ph.D. Thesis
• Name of Research Student
• Name of Research Guide
4.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
• Chapter Scheme
• Hypothesis
• Objectives
• Collection of Primary Data
• Collection of Secondary data
• Sample Size
• Conclusions and Suggestions
• Questionnaire
• Bibliography
1. This stage is also helpful to write the topic: “Review of past literature”.
2. After this stage the student can prepare synopsis of the Ph.D. Research Work
(Outline of Research)
3. Proper references should be maintained.
4. Keep one box for preparing and maintaining the cards for reference.
5. Standard formats of the following documents are to be selected
• Declaration
• Certificate
• Acknowledgement
• Contents
• List of Tables
• List of Graphs
• List of Maps
6. Ph.D. student has to read at least 20 working papers and research papers at the initial
stage.
7. Prepare abstract of each paper which contains the objectives, findings and
conclusions and suggestions in these papers.
8. Find out and prepare the list of titles of various theses in your specialization.
9. At the time of reading Ph.D. Thesis.
STAGE 3: PREPARATION FOR PRE-REGISTRATION VIVA VOCE
1. Preparation of Synopsis or Outline of Ph.D. research work in consultation with the
respective guide (Refer chapter No.5)
2. Preparation of PPTs for presentation of synopsis or outline of Ph.D. Research Work.
3. Pre-registration viva-voce: The student has to give presentation of outline of Ph.D.
Research Work in front of the following committee or panel members.
• Research Guide
• Two Referees
• Head Research
• Director or Principal
4.2
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
4.3
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
10. Archives
You have to find out the gap in your subject. Mention clearly that with the help of your
Ph.D. Research Work, you are going to fulfill some of the gap in your study area.
(a) There are different ways of analysis for the same topic. It is necessary to bridge the
gap between the previous researches and future researches.
(b) The objectives of literature review is to identify the “gap” in the area.
(c) Documentation of Literature review:
• Based on time
• Based on the Evolution of theory
• On the basis of Design
Each review should contain name of author, title of the work, main objectives, main
conclusions and core or important suggestions
STAGE 6: REVIEW OF LEGISLATIONS
Doing Ph.D. Research Work in any subject is to study that particular subject in all the
angles. So if we take any subject for Ph.D. Research Work, it is definitely related to some of
the legislations/laws/acts etc. So the review of legislations in respect of the subject or
organization should be taken along with recent amendments. E.g. If your study is related to
Small and Medium Enterprises, then you have to take review of all legislations applicable to
Small and Medium Enterprises.
The following aspects are to be reviewed
• Background and Introduction
• Definitions
• Rules, Regulations
• Ordinances
• Circulars
• Forms etc.
The main purpose of taking review of legislation is to study the subject organization,
section, etc. by the legislative angle, right from its inception.
Review of legislation should be taken in the Indian context but if the subject is of
global importance, the contingence of various laws at international level should be
taken.
STAGE 7: PROFILE OF STUDY AREA:
For doing Ph.D. Research Work in management, commerce and economics the
geographical area is selected by the student. Profile of the study area shows socio-economic
situation and environment in and around the organization/department/people/subject etc.
selected for the research work. Profile must contain the following aspects:
1. Historical Perspective.
2. Geographical Setting
4.4
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
4.5
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
4.8
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
3. Coding
4. Analysis and Interpretation( Please refer the Chapter No-8)
5. Graphical Presentation
Statistical Analysis: (Please refer the Chapter No-8)
1. Probability
2. Mean, Mode, Median
3. Standard deviation, Standard Error
4. Chi-Square Test, F-Test.
Testing of Hypothesis:
Hypothesis is an intellectual statement prepared after the pilot study of any of the field which
should be tested with the help of statistical or mathematical tools.
• Some assumptions to be accepted or rejected
• Direction to the research work
• Frame the walls to the research
• With the help of statistical analysis the hypothesis can be verified.
• Statistical tools/analysis is necessary but don’t use more statistical tools. Other logical
methods should also be used.
Selection of Sample Size: (Please refer the Chapter No---)
• The sample must be representative
• 10% sample size is the standard size
• Sample size should not be below 0.5, If universe is very large, then use appropriate
formula.
• Select samples by using appropriate sampling technique not by mental concoction.
Analysis of the Table:
While analyzing the table, mention minimum percentage, maximum percentage and
increasing trend or decreasing trend. It is necessary to give importance of the question
asked or the title of the table. Conclusions must be derived from the analysis and
interpretation. Graphical presentation is also to be made i.e. simple graphs, pi-charts etc.
Logical accuracy is quite necessary.
STAGE 11: CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
1. Logical Conclusions according to the tables in Primary Data must be derived.
2. Constructive and appropriate suggestions should be made.
• All the conclusions and suggestions must be strictly depend upon primary data
i.e. Analysis of questionnaires, observations made by researcher, points of
discussions with respective personalities etc.
• Percentage wise information is necessarily to be included in conclusion.
• At the end of this topic the researcher must clearly mention about the fulfillment
of all the objectives.
4.9
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
• Whether all the objectives of the study have been fulfilled or not?
• Information about testing of hypothesis should be included at the end.
• Whether all the hypotheses are verified or not.
At the end of this chapter the student must write areas for further research in the same
subject.
STAGE 12: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
While doing Ph.D. Research Work as per the experience of the student many times he has
to change the objectives of the study, sometimes he has to modify hypotheses. As per the
changes in the situation and development in all aspects, the pre-determined objectives,
hypotheses and chapter scheme can be changed time to time, so chapter entitled “Research
Design and Methodology” should be prepared at the end of the research work. This chapter
must contain the following sub topics.
1. Introduction :Subject, Organization / Unit
2. Hypothesis
3. Objectives
4. Collection of Secondary Data
5. Sample Size
6. Collection of Primary Data
7. Significance of the Study
8. Limitations of the Study
9. Chapter Scheme
By adding conclusions and suggestions into it, we have to prepare Abstract or Synopsis
of Ph.D. Research Work which is necessarily to be submitted to the University along with
Ph.D. Thesis.
STAGE 13: PRE SUBMISSION VIVA AND TYPING, BINDING AND SUBMISSION:
1. Typing : First, Final
2. Proof reading and corrections
3. Declaration, Certificate, Acknowledgement, List of Tables, List of Graphs,
Questionnaire, Title Page, Contents, References, Bibliography.
4. Golden Embossing(optional)
5. Preparation of Synopsis / Abstract
6. Submission – Payment of fees and Completion of formalities.
7. Preparation for Pre-submission Viva.
After completion of the Ph.D. Research Work the student has to prepare a initial draft
of Ph.D. Thesis and make a request to his guide to arrange pre-submission of Ph.D.
Thesis viva-voce. The student has to give presentation of his entire research work in
front of the committee. The committee has the following members
Research guide
Two referees
4.10
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
4.12
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Stages for doing Ph.D. Research Work
4.13
Chapter 5…
Preparation of Outline or Synopsis of
Ph.D. Research Work
Introduction:
A research proposal is an essential first step in the Ph.D. journey. A Ph.D. proposal is an
outline of your proposed research that is designed to:
1. Formulate and define a clear, interesting research question, this may take the form of
a hypothesis to be tested, or a open ended enquiry,
2. Establish the relevance and the value of the proposed research question in the
context of current academic thinking highlighting its originality and significance,
3. Outline a clear and practical methodology which enables you to answer the research
question and to describe and to evaluate any data or source material you will draw
upon,
4. Suggests what you hope to discover at the end of your research and what new areas
it might open up,
5. Provide a provisional timeline of your research.
6. Ph.D. research proposal should be between 3000 words to 5000 words in the length.
(without reference)
Preparation of title of Ph.D. Research Work:
For preparing title of Ph.D. Research Work the student has to decide following four
aspects:
1. Subject: Management, Commerce, Economics, Financial Management, Operations
Management, Banking, Entrepreneurship etc.
2. Organization or Industry or Bushiness or Department or People etc.
3. Geographical area: Village, Town, City, Teshil, District, State, Country
4. Period of study: Number of years taken for study. E.g. From 2010 to 2015.
With the help of above stated four aspects the title of Ph.D. Thesis should be fixed by
taking guidance of the guide.
5.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Preparation of Outline or Synopsis of ….
The title of Ph.D. Thesis once approved by the University cannot be changed. If a student
wants change the title then he has to submit a proposal to the University through the
research centre requesting to change the title to the Research and Reconnection Committee
of the respective University.
IMPORTANT ASPECTS:
You have to revise your proposal several times to make sure that it is,
1. Clearly written
2. Well Structured
3. Present a good review of existing literature
4. Outlines the methodology be used
5. Explains the significance of your proposed research
SOME THINGS TO BEAR IN MIND:
1. Do not choose something too broad
2. Don’t choose something vague
3. Is there enough University expertise?
4. Make sure that you find it interesting
ACCEPTANCE OF Ph.D. RESEARCH PROPOSAL BY EXPERT COMMITTEE /R.R.
COMMITTEE DEPENDS UPON THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
1. Nature of your proposed research
2. The quality of your ideas
3. Your ability to commit to an intensive period of research study
4. The effectiveness of your research proposal in communicating your ideas.
5. The matching between proposed research and potential of supervisor
6. Social relevance of the research work
7. Additions in the knowledge domain
“The better your proposal, the better your chances of being accepted”
SIX STEPS TO A SUCCESSFUL RESEARCH PROPOSAL:
1. A clear working title for your research project:
• Grammatical accuracy
• Clarity in the statement
• Key words
2. A clear statement about what you want to work on and why it is important,
interesting, relevant and realistic.
• What research gaps will you be filling?
• How might your research add value to the subject?
5.2
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Preparation of Outline or Synopsis of ….
5.4
Chapter 6…
Schedule for Ph.D. Research Work
Introduction:
Some of the Ph.D. students have done their Ph.D. Research Work within 24 months.
University Grants Commission allows the candidate to submit Ph.D. Thesis after completion
of 24 months from the date of registration. If the candidate has M.Phil. Degree he can submit
his Ph.D. Thesis after 12 months from the registration with the special permission of the
University.
Here, we have prepared a strict schedule for doing Ph.D. Research Work. It’s our
suggestion to each one registered for Ph.D. must follow the schedule and complete the work
within twenty four months with appropriate quality.
It is supposed here that the candidate has been selected in the months of June 2015 and
his provisional registration has been completed in the month of June 2015. So his period of
two months for completing Ph.D. Research Work is from July 2015 to June 2017.
July 2015
• Reading of Books on Research Methodology, Research Papers, Ph.D. Theses, etc.
• Preparation of Synopsis or outline of Ph.D.
• Completion of Ph.D. Registration Formalities.
August 2015
• Starting with Theoretical Background by referring all theory books on the subject,
specialization, area etc.
September and October 2015
• Finding of the key words and starting of compilation of theory material.
• Finalization of the chapter “Theoretical Background”
November 2015
• Review of Literature – Books, Ph.D. Theses, Working Papers, Research Papers,
Government Reports, Annual Reports, etc.
December 2015
• Review of Legislations applicable to the organization, subject, department, etc.
6.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Schedule for Ph.D. Research Work
May 2017
• Modification and Finalization of the Ph.D. Thesis as per the guidelines of the referees
and the guide.
• Preparation of Final Copy of Ph.D. Thesis.
June 2017
• Submission of Final Copy of Ph.D. Thesis
After the submission of final Ph.D. Thesis to the University the student should prepare
himself for open defence viva-voce.
✍ ✍ ✍
6.3
Chapter 7…
Preparation of Questionnaire for
Collecting Primary Data
INTRODUCTION
In Ph.D. Research Work primary data is most important. It can be collected by various
ways or sources like Questionnaire, Schedule, Observation, Meetings, Discussions, Office
records, Mail and e-mail, Telephone and telegraphs, Survey: Public and Private, Manuals etc.
Curiosity of researcher is important. With the help of this curiosity of researcher, he has
to ask questions as per his title, objectives, hypotheses and the requirements of the
researcher. The following types of questions can be asked:-
W, H Questions
What Why
When Where
Whom Which
Who Whose
How How much
How many
TYPES OF QUESTIONS
1. Open ended questions- They are difficult to analyze or we can’t make generalization
from these types of questions.
2. Close ended questions: Easy to analyze
(i) Yes / No Type Questions
(ii) Multiple Choice, Objective type Questions
(iii) Last option should be open as - Any other/Please specify.
TO PREPARE QUESTIONNAIRE
At the time of preparing of questionnaire following points should be kept in mind.
1. Title of Ph.D. Thesis
2. Hypothesis
3. Objectives
4. Theoretical background
7.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Preparation of Questionnaire for …..
RELIABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE
7.3
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Preparation of Questionnaire for …..
5. Levels of respondent.
6. Distribution.
7. Responses of informants.
8. Nature of question.
9. Explanation of questions.
10. Observation.
11. Information
12. Sampling
13. Nature of relation
14. Clarity
15. Money
✍ ✍ ✍
7.5
Chapter 8…
Use of Statistical Tools in Ph.D.
Research
INTRODUCTION
Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and making inference from data. Statistics
is a particularly useful branch of mathematics that is not only studied theoretically by the
advanced mathematicians but one that is used by researchers in many fields to organize,
analyze, and summarize data. Statistical methods and analyses are often used to
communicate research findings and to support hypotheses and give credibility to research
methodology and conclusions. It is important for researchers and also consumers of
research to understand statistics so that they can be informed, evaluate the credibility and
usefulness of information, and make appropriate decisions. So, here in this chapter the
attempt has been made to explain the statistical tools and techniques for testing of
hypothesis along with appropriate examples.
STATISTICS:
Statistics is the study of how to collect, organize, analyze and interpret numerical
information from data.
In statistics, a variable has two defining characteristics:
• A variable is an attribute that describes a person, place, thing, or idea.
• The value of the variable can "vary" from one entity to another.
For example, a person's hair color is a potential variable, which could have the value of
"blond" for one person and "brunette" for another.
QUALITATIVE Vs. QUANTITATIVE VARIABLES:
Variables can be classified as qualitative (categorical) or quantitative (numeric).
Qualitative: Qualitative variables take on values that are names or labels. The color
of a ball (e.g., red, green, blue) would be examples of qualitative or categorical
variables.
Quantitative: Quantitative variables are numeric. They represent a measurable
quantity. For example, when we speak of the population of a city, we are talking
about the number of people in the city - a measurable attribute of the city. Therefore,
population would be a quantitative variable.
8.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
Example: Students of different ages were given the same jigsaw puzzle to put together.
They were timed to see how long it took to finish the puzzle.
• Independent variable: Ages of the students
Different ages were tested by the scientist
• Dependent variable: The time it to put the puzzle together
The time was observed and measured by the scientist
• Controlled variable: Same puzzle
All of the participants were tested with the same puzzle. It would not have been a fair
test if some had an easy 30 piece puzzle and some had a harder 500 piece puzzle.
LEVELS OF MEASUREMENT:
We have categorized data as either qualitative or quantitative. Another way to classify
data is according to one of the 4 levels of measurement:
1. Nominal Level: It applies to data that consist of names, labels or categories. There
are no implied criteria by which the data can be ordered from smallest to largest.
Ex: The senator’s name is James.
The senator’s marital status is “Married”
2. Ordinal Level: It applies to data that can be arranged in order. However, differences
between data values either cannot be determined or are meaningless.
Ex: Course evaluation Scale: Poor, Acceptable, Good
3. Interval Level: It applies to data that can be arranged in order. In addition,
differences between data values are meaningful.
Ex: The years in which senator was elected to the senate are 2002, 2008, 2014
4. Ratio Level: It applies to data that can be arranged in order. In addition, both
differences between data values and ratios of data values are meaningful. Data at the
ratio level have a true zero.
Ex: The Senator’s total taxable income last year was ` 3,00,000.
STATISTICAL METHODS:
Details regarding statistical methods are presented below Fig. 8.1.
8.3
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
8.4
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
There are many statistical techniques for conducting multivariate analysis, and the most
appropriate technique for a given study varies with the type of study and the key research
questions. Four of the most common multivariate techniques are multiple regression analysis,
factor analysis, path analysis and multiple analysis of variance, or MANOVA.
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS:
This is the process of presenting and interpreting numerical data. All quantitative studies
will have some descriptive statistics, as well as frequency tables.
Quantitative data analysis often contains descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.
• Descriptive Statistics include measures of central tendency (averages - mean, median
and mode) and measures of variability about the average (range and standard
deviation).
• Inferential Statistics are the outcomes of statistical tests, helping deductions to be
made from the data collected, to test hypotheses set and relating findings to the
sample or population.
DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS:
1. Frequency: The number of times a certain value or class of values occurs.
(a) Frequency Distribution: The organization of raw data in table form with classes and
frequencies.
The following table shows the heights of 50 students, we can present the data as follows:
Heights(in cm) Absolute Frequency Relative Frequency (%)
Less than 150 5 10
151-160 10 20
161-170 20 40
171-180 10 20
181-190 3 6
More than 190 2 4
Total 50 100
The above frequency distribution we can present in bar diagram.
8.5
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
Fig. 8.2
(b) Pie-diagram: The pie chart is a commonly used graphical device for presenting
relative frequency distributions for qualitative data. First draw a circle; then use the relative
frequencies to subdivide the circle into sectors that correspond to the relative frequency for
each class. The pie chart is given below
Rating Percentage (%)
Poor 10
Below Average 15
Average 25
Above Average 45
Excellent 5
8.6
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
Fig. 8.3
(c) Histogram: Histogram is a common graphical presentation of quantitative data. A
rectangle is drawn above each class interval with its height corresponding to the interval’s
frequency unlike a bar graph; a histogram has no natural separation between rectangles of
adjacent classes. Draw the histogram from the following data
Item Frequency
0-10 20
10-20 30
20-30 25
30-40 40
40-50 10
(d) Ogive: Ogive is a graph of a cumulative distribution. The data values are shown on
the horizontal axis. Cumulative frequencies are shown on the vertical axis, the frequency
(one of the above) of each class is plotted as a point. The plotted points are connected by
straight lines.
Item Frequency Cumulative Frequency
1 20 20
2 30 50
3 25 75
4 40 115
5 10 125
Fig. 8.4
8.7
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
2. Mean: It is also referred as average. The sum of all scores and divided by number of
scores.
Find the mean from the monthly income of 10 employees is given below.
Employees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wages 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 3000 3000 2000 1000 3000
∑x 32000
Mean (x bar) wage = = = 3200
n 10
3. Median: It is the central value of an ordered distribution.
Find the median wage from the data given below:
Employees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wages 6000 2000 2000 3000 3000 3000 3000 4000 5000 1000
Procedure of calculating median
Step-1: Arrange the data either ascending or descending order of magnitude.
Wages 1000 2000 2000 3000 3000 3000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Step-2: Calculate by using the formula (n/2)th item
10th (5th item + 6th item) 6000
Median (M) = item = 5.5th item = = 3000 + 3000 = = 3000
2 2 2
4. Mode: Most frequently occurring item of the series.
Find the modal wage from the distribution:
Employees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wages 3000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 4000 3000 1000 3000
Mode = Most frequently used item of the series = 3000
5. Variance: The variance is a numerical value used to indicate how widely individuals in a
group vary. It is important to distinguish between the variance of a population and the
variance of a sample. They have different notation, and they are computed differently. The
variance of a population is denoted by σ2; and the variance of a sample, by s2.
The variance of a population is defined by the following formula:
∑ (Xi − X)2
σ=
N
where σ2 is the population variance, X is the population mean, Xi is the ith element from the
population, and N is the number of elements in the population.
The variance of a sample is defined by slightly different formula:
∑ (xi − x)2
s2 =
(n − 1)
8.8
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
where s2 is the sample variance, x is the sample mean, xi is the ith element from the sample,
and n is the number of elements in the sample. Using this formula, the variance of the
sample is an unbiased estimate of the variance of the population.
Standard Deviation: The standard deviation of a population is defined by the following
formula:
2
∑ (Xi − X)
σ = sqrt
N
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS:
Inferential statistics are used to draw inferences about a population from a sample.
Inferential statistics generally require that data come from a random sample. In a random
sample each person/object/item of the population has an equal chance of being chosen.
Population: A population is the total of all the individuals who have certain
characteristics and are of interest to a researcher.
Sample: A sample is a finite part of a statistical population whose properties are studied
to gain information about the population.
Census: Gathering data from all units of a population, no sampling.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING:
Hypothesis: An intellectual statement or assumption regarding population that should
be tested. It is of two types;
(a) Null Hypothesis: This is the statement that is under investigation or being tested. It
represents a statement of ‘no difference” or ‘no effect”. It is denoted by H0
Example: There is no significant different between the average height of Indians and
Americans.
(b) Alternate Hypothesis: A statistical test is designed to assess the strength of the
evidence against the null hypothesis. It is denoted by H1.
Example: There is a significant different between the average height of Indians and
Americans.
Procedure of Hypothesis Testing:
1. Test Statistic: The decision, whether to accept and reject the null hypothesis is made
based on this value. The test statistic is a defined formula based on the distribution t, z, F etc.
If the calculated test statistic value is less than the critical value, we accept the hypothesis;
otherwise, we reject the hypothesis.
Hypothesis Testing Formula: z test statistic is used for testing the mean of the large
sample. The test statistic is given by
−
x−µ
z= σ
8.9
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
where, −x is the sample mean, µ is the population mean, σ is the population standard
deviation and n is the sample size.
2. Level of Significance: The confidence at which a null hypothesis is accepted or
rejected is called level of significance. The level of significance is denoted by α.
3. Critical Value: Critical value is the value that divides the regions into two-Acceptance
region and rejection region. If the computed test statistic falls in the rejection region, we
reject the hypothesis. Otherwise, we accept the hypothesis. The critical value depends upon
the level of significance and alternative hypothesis.
4. One Sided or Two Sided Hypothesis: The alternative hypothesis is one sided if the
parameter is larger or smaller than the null hypothesis value. It is two sided when the
parameter is different from the null hypothesis value. The null hypothesis is usually tested
against an alternative hypothesis (H1).
PARAMETRIC AND NON-PARAMETRIC STATISTICS: Fig. 8.2, exhibits the inferential
statistics
8.10
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
How to know that the data is normally distributed or not? Answer, is one supposed to
run histogram in SPSS to determine if the data meet the normality assumption required for
parametric test.
Parametric Tests: Below are explained some of important parametric tests.
T-Test: The t-distribution is used when ample size is 30 or less and population standard
deviation is unknown.
Application of the t-distribution
1. To test the significance of the means of a random sample: To test in determining
whether the mean of a sample drawn from a normal population deviates significantly from a
stated value.
−x − µ
Formula, t =
s/ n
where, −x = Mean of the sample
µ = The actual or hypothetical mean of the population
n = The sample size
S = The standard deviation of the sample
Example: The mobile manufacturer claims that his mobiles have a mean life of 25 years
with standard deviation of 5 years. A random sample of 6 such mobiles gave the following
values life in years: 24, 26, 30, 20, 20, and 18.
Can you regard that the producers claim to be valid at 1% level of significance
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the mean life of mobiles in the
sample and that of the population.
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): There is significant difference in the mean life of mobiles in
the sample and that of the population.
Note: If the calculated value (CV) of t is less than the table value, then the hypothesis is
accepted. If the calculated value (CV) of t is more than the table value, then the hypothesis is
rejected.
2. To test the difference between means of two independent samples: Given two
independent random samples of size n and n with means −
1 2 x and −
x and standard deviation
1 2
s1 and s2. Test the hypothesis that the samples come from the same normal population.
−x 1 − −x 2 n1 n2
Formula, t =
S n1 + n2
where; −x = Mean of the first sample
1
−x 2 = Mean of the second sample
n1 = Number of observations in the first sample
n2 = Number of observations in the second sample
8.11
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
8.12
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
8.13
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
− −
∑ (X − X) (Y − Y)
Formula : r =
− −
∑ (X − X)2 ∑ (Y − Y)2
8.14
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
60 3.1
61 3.6
62 3.8
63 4
65 4.1
By using the above formula we will find b = 0.19 and a = −8.098. Substitute the values of
‘a’ and ‘b’ in the regression equation.
Regression Equation (Y) = a + bX = − 8.098 + 0.19X.
Suppose if we want to know the approximate Y value for the variable X = 64. Then we
can substitute the value in the above equation.
Regression Equation (Y) = a + bX = − 8.098 + 0.19(64) = − 8.098 + 12.16 = 4.06
NON-PARAMETRIC TEST:
A nonparametric test is a hypothesis test that does not require the population's
distribution to be characterized by certain parameters. For example, many hypothesis tests
rely on the assumption that the population follows a normal distribution. Nonparametric
tests do not have this assumption, so they are useful when your data are strongly non-
normal and resistant to transformation. However, nonparametric tests are not completely
free of assumptions about your data. For instance, nonparametric tests require the data to be
an independent random sample.
For example, salary data are heavily skewed to the right, with many people earning
modest salaries and fewer people earning larger salaries. You can use nonparametric tests on
this data to answer questions such as the following:
• Is the median salary at your company equal to a certain value? Use the 1-Sample
Sign Test.
• Is the median salary at a bank's urban branch greater than the median salary of the
bank's rural branch? Use the Mann-Whitney test or the Kruskal-Wallis Test.
• Are median salaries different in rural, urban, and suburban bank branches? Use
Mood's median test.
• How does education level affect salaries at the rural and urban branch? Use Friedman
Test.
ALTERNATIVE PARAMETRIC TEST:
When a choice exists between using a parametric or a nonparametric procedure, and you
are relatively certain that the assumptions for the parametric procedure are satisfied, then
use the parametric procedure.
The following is a list of the nonparametric tests, and their parametric alternatives.
Non-parametric test Alternative parametric test
8.15
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
8.16
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
8.17
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
4 120 124
5 125 105
6 127 130
7 136 130
8 139 132
9 131 123
10 132 128
11 135 126
12 136 140
13 128 135
14 127 126
15 130 132
Null Hypothesis: The median difference is zero systolic blood pressure before exercise
and after exercise.
Alternative Hypothesis: The median difference is not zero systolic blood pressure
before exercise and after exercise.
In this example, W+ = 89 and W − = 31. Recall that the sum of the ranks (ignoring the
signs) will always equal n (n+1)/2. As a check on our assignment of ranks, we have n (n+1)/2
= 15(16)/2 = 120 which is equal to 89 + 31. The test statistic is W = 31.
We do not reject H0 because 31 > 25. Therefore, we do not have statistically significant
evidence at α = 0.05, to show that the median difference in systolic blood pressures is not
zero (i.e., that there is a significant difference in systolic blood pressures after the exercise
program as compared to before).
FRIEDMAN’S TEST:
An equivalent to the two-way analysis of variance with one observation for every cell.
Thus tests the hypothesis that k related variables come from the same population
The Friedman test is a test for comparing three or more related samples and which
makes no assumptions about the underlying distribution of the data. The data is set out in a
table comprising n rows by k columns. The data is then ranked across the rows and the mean
rank for each column is compared.
Example: A water company sought evidence the measures taken to clean up a river were
effective. Biological oxygen demand (BOD) at 12 sites on the river was compared before
cleanup and 1 month and 1 year after cleanup. The results are given below. Find whether the
cleanup procedure is effective or not.
8.18
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Use of Statistical Tools for Testing of Hypothesis
BOD
Site Before After one month After one year
1 3 2 1
2 3 2 1
3 3 1.5 1.5
4 3 2 1
5 3 2 1
6 1 3 2
7 3 2 1
8 1 2 3
9 3 1 2
10 3 1 2
11 3 2 1
12 3 2 1
Null Hypothesis: The cleanup procedure has had no effect on the Biological Oxygen
Demand.
Alternative Hypothesis: The cleanup procedure has effected on the Biological Oxygen
Demand.
Here the table value of at 5% level of significance is 7.5, which is less than the calculated
value (9.042), we can reject hull hypothesis. And conclude that cleanup procedure has
effected on the Biological Oxygen Demand.
✍ ✍ ✍
8.19
Chapter 9…
References and Bibliography
According to APA Style
INTRODUCTION
There are various styles of giving references and bibliography. The following two
methods are preferred by various researchers.
1. American Psychological Association(APA)
2. Harvard Referencing Style(HRS)
The American Psychological Association (APA) style is widely accepted in the social
sciences and other fields, such as education, business, and nursing. The APA citation format
requires parenthetical citations within the text rather than endnotes or footnotes. Citations in
the text provide brief information, usually the name of the author and the date of
publication, to lead the reader to the source of information in the reference list at the end of
the paper.
General Form
Author, A. A., Author, B. B., and Author, C. C. (Year).Title of article. Title of Journal, xx, xxx-
xxx.
One Author
Williams, J. H. (2008). Employee engagement: Improving participation in safety.
Professional Safety, 53(12), 40-45.
Two to Seven Authors [List all authors]
Keller, T. E., Cusick, G. R., & Courtney, M. E. (2007).Approaching the transition to
adulthood: Distinctive profiles of adolescents aging out of the child welfare system. Social
Services Review, 81, 453- 484.
Eight or More Authors [List the first six authors and the last author]
Wolchik, S. A., West, S. G., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.-Y., Coatsworth, D., Lengua, L.,...Griffin,
W. A. (2000). An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs
for children of divorce.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 843- 856.
Magazine Article
Mathews, J., Berrett, D., & Brillman, D. (2005, May 16). Other winning equations.
Newsweek, 145(20), 58-59.
Newspaper Article with No Author and Discontinuous Pages
9.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research References & Bibliography According …..
Generic Prozac debuts. (2001, August 3). The Washington Post, pp. E1, E4.
BOOKS, CHAPTERS IN BOOKS, REPORTS, ETC.
General Form
Author, A. A. (Year).Title of work. Location: Publisher.
One Author
Alexie, S. (1992). The business of fancy dancing: Stories and poems. Brooklyn, NY: Hang
Chapter in a Book
Booth-LaForce, C., & Kerns, K. A. (2009). Child-parent attachment relationships, peer
relationships, and peer-group functioning. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.),
Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 490-507). New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
ONLINE JOURNALS, MAGAZINES, NEWSPAPERS
General Format
Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (Year).Title of article.Name of Journal, xx, xxx-
xxx.doi:xxxxxxxxxx.
Article Retrieved from an Online Database
Senior, B., & Swailes, S. (2007). Inside management teams: Developing a teamwork survey
instrument. British Journal of Management, 18, 138 - 153. doi:10.1111/j.1467-
8551.2006.00507.x
ARTICLE FROM AN ONLINE MAGAZINE
Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2001, May 23). Individual-group continuity in cooperation and
competition under varying communication conditions. Current Issues in Social Psychology,
6(12), 166-182. Retrieved from http://www.uiowa.edu/~grpproc/crisp/crisp.6.12.htm
PH.D. THESIS
Rajesh Kumar Agarwal., (2012), A study of hidden talent management in same status
employees with special reference to Industries in Pimpri Chinchwad, Tilak Maharashtra
Vidyapeeth, Pune.
✍ ✍ ✍
9.2
Chapter 10…
Preparation of Final Synopsis at the
Time of Submission of Ph.D. Thesis
INTRODUCTION
After completion of Ph.D. research work, at the time of submission of Ph.D. Thesis, the
candidate has to submit final synopsis of the research work done. This synopsis initially to be
prepared at the time of pre submission of Ph.D. Thesis Viva. As per the guidelines and the
suggestions given by the referees along with the guide the synopsis should be modified and
reframed.
The points to be covered in the synopsis of Ph.D. Thesis are as follows:
1. Title page
2. Introduction
3. Conceptual background(Key concepts)
4. Need and importance of the study
5. Statement of the problem
6. Objectives of the study
7. Hypothesis of the study
8. Scope of the study
9. Limitations of the study
10. Research Methodology
(a) Collection of secondary data
(b) Collection primary data
(i) Selection of sample size
(ii) Framing of questionnaire
(iii) Analysis and Interpretation of Data (in brief)
11. Testing of hypothesis
12. Fulfillment of objectives
13. Social relevance of the study
14. Chapter scheme of the study
15. Conclusions and suggestions
16. Areas for further research.
10.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Preparation of Final Synopsis …..
10.2
Chapter 11…
Writing of Research Paper or
Working Paper
1. INTRODUCTION
In the tenure of Ph.D. Research Work the student has to publish two research papers or
working papers in the reputed, refereed, research journals which has ISSN at national and
international level.
The papers are known as working papers must be strictly in the subject of Ph.D. Research
Work. The working papers must be published along with the guide. After compilation of
work up to pilot study the first paper should be published. At the time of analysis, a paper
depend upon some portion of Ph.D. Research Work can be published.
In this chapter the structure of working research paper has been given at first then the
points are given in each part to be covered in the paper systematically.
2. DIFFERENT RESEARCH COMPILATIONS
Research Project Report-U.G and P.G level
Dissertation- P.G., M. Phil., and Minor Research Project.
Thesis- Ph.D. and Major Research Project.
Research Articles or Research Papers or Working Papers.
3. STRUCTURE OF THE RESEARCH PAPER
1. Title
2. An abstract
3. Introduction
4. Objectives
5. Hypothesis
6. Collection of secondary data
7. Collection of primary data
8. Analysis and Interpretation
9. Findings, Conclusions and Suggestions
10. References
1. Title
• The title should be appropriate to the problem
• It should be self-explanatory
• No complications in the title
• Titles should not be so long or so short
11.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Writing of Research Paper of Working Paper
2. An Abstract:
• Purpose or objective of the research paper
• Conclusion in brief
• Fulfillment of objectives
3. Introduction
• Introduction of area or subject
• Conceptual background
• Introduction about organization, department or field
• Correlation between subject and organizations
• Definitions of key concepts
4. Objectives:
• 2 or 3 objectives are sufficient
• They should be related to title and hypothesis
• Clarity about objectives is necessary
• Purpose of doing research or writing research paper
5. Hypothesis
• Hypothesis is an intellectual statement prepared after the pilot study of any of the
field which should be tested with the help of statistical or mathematical tools.
• There is no limitation regarding number of hypotheses to be framed.
6. Collection of Secondary data (Sources):
• Books, Research Journals, e-Journals, M. Phil. Dissertation, Ph. D. Theses, Government
Reports, Annual Reports of various organizations etc.
7. Collection of Primary Data
• Sources: Questionnaire, Schedule, Meetings and Discussions, Observations and Office
Records.
8. Analysis and Interpretation of Data:
• Tabulation
• Interpretation
• Graphs(Bar charts, Pie charts etc)
• Testing of Hypothesis
9. Findings, Conclusions and Suggestions
• Findings with percentages
• Logical conclusions
• Constructive suggestions
• Solution to the problem
• Suggesting new or improved model
10. References
✍ ✍ ✍
11.2
Chapter 12…
Suggested Areas for Research in
Management, Commerce and
Economics
1. AREAS OF SPECIALIZATIONS IN MANAGEMENT:
General Management , Marketing Management, Financial Management, Human
Resource Management, Production / Operations / Materials Management, Information
Technology Management, International Business Management, Rural and Agri-business
Management, Technology Management, Supply Chain Management, Retail Management,
Knowledge Management etc.
(A) MARKETING MANAGEMENT
1. Market Survey for a particular product.
2. Brand image of a particular brand for a particular company.
3. Customer satisfaction for a particular product.
4. Advertising effectiveness.
5. Consumer behaviours.
6. Customer satisfaction.
7. Brand loyalty.
8. Celebrity endorsements on brands.
9. Competitor analysis.
10. Consumer perception survey.
11. Consumer psychology.
12. Customer loyalty study.
13. Developing a dealer network.
14. Effectiveness of channels in service delivery.
15. Effectiveness of channels (on-line/ Internet) in service delivery.
16. Effectiveness of promotion schemes.
17. Export potential studies.
18. Feasibility study of launching a new product.
12.1
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Suggested Areas for Research in …..
12.6
Guidelines on Ph.D. Research Suggested Areas for Research in …..
12.8
References
1. Ackoff, Russell L. (1961). The Design of Social Research, Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
2. Allen, T. Harrell. (1978). New Methods in Social Science Research, New York: Praeger
Publishers.
3. Bailey, Kenneth D. (1978). Methods of Social Research, New York.
4. Bajpai, N. (2011). Business Research Methods, Pearson Publishing, New Delhi.
5. Best, John W., and Kahn, James V. (1986). Research in Education, 5th Ed., New Delhi:
Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.
6. Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New
Delhi.
7. Burghate, M., Samundra, A. (2011). A complete text book on Ph.D. The Management
Consortium. Nagpur, India
8. Chawla, D., Sondhi, N. (2011). Research Methodology, Concepts and Cases, Vikash
Publishing, New Delhi.
9. Cochran, W.G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
10. Cooper, D.R., Schindler, P.S. (2009). Business Research Methods, Mc Graw Hill, New
Delhi.
11. Deming, W. Edwards. (1960). Sample Design in Business Research, New York: John
Wiley & Sons. Inc.
12. Ghosh, B.N. (1982). Scientific Methods and Social Research, New Delhi: Sterling
Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
13. Goode, William J., and Hatt, Paul K. (1952). Methods in Social Research, New York:
McGraw-Hill.
14. Gupta, S.C. (2006). Fundamentals of Statistics, Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai.
15. Kerlinger, Fred N. (1973). Foundations of Behavioral Research, 2nd ed., New York:
Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
16. Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology, Methods & Techniques, New Age Intern
17. Krishnaswami, O.R. & Ranganatham, M., (2005). Methodology of Research in Social
Sciences, Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai.
18. Michale, V.P. (2004). Research Methodology in Management. Himalaya Publishing
House, Mumbai, India
19. Panneerselvam, R., (2011). Research Methodology, PHI Learning, New Delhi.
R.1
Monograph on Ph.D. Research Work References
20. Sadhu, A.N., and Singh, A. (1980). Research Methodology in Social Sciences,
Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.
21. Sarwate Dilip, “A Practical Guidebook to Market Research-Text & Cases” Fourth
Edition, Everest Publishing.
22. Sharma, B.A.V., et al. (1976). Research Methods in Social Sciences, New Delhi:
Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 1983. 108. Sharma, H.D., and Mukherji, S.P., Research in
Economics and Commerce, Methodology and Surveys, Varanasi: Indian Biographic
Centre.
23. Sharma, H.D., and Mukherji, S.P. (1976). Research in Economics and Commerce,
Methodology and Surveys, Varanasi: Indian Biographic Centre.
24. T.S. and Bhandarkar, P.L. (1979). Methodology and Techniques of Social Research,
Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.
25. Uma, Sekaran, (2003), Research Methods for a Skill Building Approach, John Wiley &
Sons, ASIA, Pvt. Ltd., Singapore
26. University Grant Commission, (2005). Research Handbook-Towards Nurturing
Culture in Higher Education Institutes in India, UGC, New Delhi
27. Whitney, F.L. (1950). The Elements of Research, 3rd ed., New York: Prentice-Hall,
Wilkinson,
28. Young, Pauline V. (1960). Scientific Social Surveys and Research, 3rd ed., New York:
Prentice-Hall.
29. Zikmund, Balin, Carr, Adhikar, Criffim (2013). Business Research Methods, 8e, A
South Asian Prospective, Delhi.
✍ ✍ ✍
R.2