Ship Squat
Ship Squat
Ship Squat
1
The overall decrease in under –keel clearence due
to sinkage and trim is the squat forward or aft.
where
‘b’ is the breadth of the ship and
‘B’ is the width of the canal.
Even in open waters, this factor is to be
considered using the width of influence ‘B’ in
place of the width of the canal B.
2
The width of influence ‘B’ in open waters is
obtained as
‘B’ = [ 7.7 + 20 (1-Cb)2] b
where ‘b’ is the breadth of the ship.
The ‘B’ value in open waters varies from
about 8 b for large tankers to about 9.5 b for
general cargo vessels to about 12 b for
container and passenger ships.
In open waters where the depth of water to
draft of ship ratio is about 1.2, the value of
the blockage factor S will be around 0.1.
4) The static under keel clearance
The lesser the under-keel clearance, the more
is the squat because the stream lines of
return flow aft of the water, past the vessel
increases due to the reduced clearance under
the vessel.
This increases the kinetic energy and
therefore further reduces the pressure energy
of the water.
Thus as the ratio of depth of water to draft to
ship reduces, the squat increases.
5) The at rest trim of the vessel
The squat at the bow increases to a greater
extant if her at rest trim was by the head.
The squat at the stern will increase to a
greater extent if her at rest trim was by the
stern. The calculated maximum squat should
therefore be applied to the greater of the two
end drafts to obtain the minimum under keel
clearance.
6) Passing another ship in a river or canal
When the ship is passing or overtaking
another vessel in a river or canal, the squat
can increase upto twice the normal value as
3
the combined blockage factor, S, becomes the
sum of the blockage factor of each ship.
7) The squat increases if the ship is close to the
bank of a river or canal.
Various empirical formulae have been
suggested for estimating the maximum squat.
As there are so many variables and so many
factors, the exact values of which may not be
readily available, none of the formulae are
likely to provide absolutely accurate squat
values.
However, from the analysis of many
measured squat values on ships and results
of ship model tests some empirical formulae
have been developed for satisfactorily
estimating the maximum squat is confined
and one waters.
Obviously the squat is greater in confined
waters and lesser in open waters.
For a vessel at an even keel static trim when
the ratio of the depth of water to the draft of
ship is in the range of 1.1 to 1.4, the
maximum squat in open or confined waters
may be predicted fairly accurately by either of
the expressions:-
20
or
(ii) Maximum squat = Cb x S2 2/3 x V2.08
30
S As
where ‘S’2 = 1 S
= Ac As
50
Both the above approximate formulae slightly over
estimates the maximum squat thereby erring on
the safer side.
Indication that the ship is in shallow waters
include
(i) Wave making by the ship, especially forward,
increases.
(ii) Manoeuvring becomes sluggish.
(iii) The propeller RPM reduces.
(iv) The ship’s speed over the water reduces.
(v) Stopping distances and time increases.
(vi) The diameter of the turning circle increases
to a great extent.
(vii) Rolling and pitching reduces.
(viii) The ship may start to vibrate.