Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames: (Received 25 April 1980)
Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames: (Received 25 April 1980)
Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frames: (Received 25 April 1980)
00/0
Printed in Great Britain All rights KCSW& Copyri@t @ 1981 Pcquncm PIES Ltd
CHENGTZU THOMASHsti
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Jnstitute of Technology, Newark,
NJ 07102, U.S.A.
Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, h4cGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canads
Canada H3A 2K6
and
C.S.SuNNySEA§
Carolina Dewatering Corporation, Irvington, New York, U.S.A.
(Received25 April 1980)
Abstrwt- A computer analysis is described for the elastic-perfectly plastic analysis of reinforced concrete
planar frames. This computer program rquires less computer time and memory space and is intended as
practical analysis and design uses. The computer program is capable of complete analysis of reinforced
concrete frames from zero load until failure under any system of static gravity and lateral loads. The
program can cater for any given geometry and end conditions. The analysis of reinforced concrete frames
uses a computer program as a subroutine to calculate the moment-curvature characteristics under a
constant load applied at the section ccntroid. A reinforced concrete frame tested by Cranston and Cracknell
[l] are analyzed using the computer program developed and the results are compared with the experimental
results. It is noted that the txoposed nonlinear analysis satisfactorily reproduced the behavior of reinforced
concrete plane frames from Zero loads until failure.
223
224 CHENGTZIJTHOMASHsu et al.
perfectly plastic relationship without any serious error. and end conditions (fixed and/or pmned end con-
The plastic rotation capacity is then given by ditions).
The details of computer program can be found in the
Ref. [lo]. The flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1. The
program is coded in FORTRAN IV and can be run
either on the RAX or O/S systems of IBM 370/t% or
The following points must be considered in develop- IBM 360/75.
mg a computer program for an elasti*perfectly plastic
analysis of reinforced concrete frames :
(a) The inelastic rotation capacity of the hinging Example and dismssmn oj’ remits
region in a reinforced concrete section is dependent The specimen analysed using the present computer
on the section geometry, material properties and program is Frame FP4 tested by Cranston and Crack-
applied axial load and can be limited in some cases. nell [l] (Figs. 2 and 3). It must be noted-that the value
The axial loads applied at the members are based on of flexurai rigidity (En used in the main computer
the values obtained from the linear structural analysis program is the slope of the moment-c~ature curve
for plane frames. (under a constant axial force at the section centroid).
(b) The appearance of cracks in a structural concrete Moment-curvature curves for typical sections are
member gives rise to a varying flexural rigidity (EI) shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The location of formation of
along its length. Flexural rigidity (EI) used in the hinges and the final collapse mechanism are shown in
present method is on the basis of the &xural rigidity Fig. 6; these have been obtained from the computer
after concrete cracking. The zero flexural rigidity is analysis results. The. failure mechanism obtained
assumed after yielding of the tension steels. experimentally shows excellent agreement with the
(c) The descending branch of the moment-curvature present analysis results (Fig. 7).
curve at a section (or the moment-rotation curve at a The experimental and the computed loaddeforma-
hinge) provides the section with added ductility tion curves are shown in Fia. 8. The commuted ultimate
although its bending strength decreases. strengths of the frame is l;wer than thi experimental
(d) The strength of a reinforced concrete section in
positive and negative bending is dependent on the
quantity and the arrangement of tension and com-
pression steels. The bending strength of a reinforced
concrete section can therefore, be ~~~n~y differ-
ent under reversal of applied foads. Similarly, the
ductility of a reinforeed concrete section is dependent
r
on the reinforcement details.
(e) The provision of stirrups in a reinforced concrete
beam does not only prevent shear failures, but also
increases the ductility of the concrete. This increased
compressive strain capacity significantIy improves the
rotation capacity of the hinging region although it does
not add to the strength of the section
200.
,-P*SSOO Ibs
Fig. 8. Load-deflection curves for Frame FP4. Formulations for elastic-perfectly plastic analysis of plane
frames
The program can be used to examine the strength and The stiffness matnx of a member S relates the joint
ductility of reinforced concrete plane frames and the moments F and the corresponding rotations e as follows :
resulting factor of safety against failure.
F&e.
Acknowledgements-The writers are grateful to the Canada Equation (2a) can be written explicitly for a member 0 as
Emergency Measures Organization for the financial assist-
ance to the continuing program of study of the strength and F, =S,,e, +S,,e, 12b)
behavior of three-dimensional reinforced and prestressed
concrete structures. The financial assistance of the National F, =Slie, +Sj,e,. 12:)
Research Council of Canada and New Jersey Institute of It must be noted that eqns (2) account only for flexural
Technology towards the computer costs of this program is deformations in the member 0 while the axial and sheer
gratefully acknowledged. deformations are neglected. This follows an earlier formula-
tion by Wang [13, 141.A more complete formulation for an
REFERENCES elasticplastic material has been developed by Livesley [ 15]
and Jennings and Majid [16].
1. W. B. Cranston and J. A. Cracknell, Tests on reinforced Using the results from basic slope deflection equation,
concrete frames 2: Portal frames with fixed feet. the member stiffness matrix is given by.
Cement and Concrete Association TRA/420, London,
England (1969).
2. J. Ferry-Borges and E. R. Olivetra, Non-linear analysis
of reinforced concrete structures. Pub. LABS,!? 23, 51- where E=the modulus of elastictty: I=the moment of
69 (1963). inertia and L-the length of the member 0.
3. W. B. Cranston, A computer method for inelastic If a simple or a plastic hinge is introduced at the /th end
analysis of plane frames. Cement and Concrete Associa- of the member ii, the stiffness matrix S gets modified as
tion, TRA/386, London, England (1965).
4. J. M. Becker, Inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete (4)
frames. M.Sc. Diss., Cornell University, Ithaca. New
York (1967). Similarly if a simple or plastic hinge IS mtroduced at the
5. R. G. Drysdale, Prediction of the behavior of concrete ith end of the member ij, then S gets modified as
frames. IABSE Symp.. Design of Concrete Structures
for Creep, Shrinkage and Temperature Changes. (5)
Madrid (1970)
6. H. A. Franklin, Non-linear analysts of reinforced For a typtcal member g in bendmg
concrete frames and panels. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of
California, Berkeley, Calif. (1970). F=Se
7 C. T. Hsu, Behavior of structural concrete subjected to or
biaxial Bexure and axial compression. Ph.D. DIS-
sertation. McGill Univ.. Montreal. Quebec (1974). e=S -I F =DF (61
Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete frames 227
where D is the flexibility matrix for the member @and is where A’ =B and r denotes transport of a matrix and A is
given by the statics matrix relates the externally applied forces P to
internal end moments f: as follows :
P=AF. (11)
The external rotations X,, X,, and the deflection X, of If there are no hinges either at i or at j, then continuity
end j relative to end i are related to the internal rotations requires that the internal end rotations c 8s caused by the
ei and e, by the equation end moments F, be equal to those caused by the external
joint rotations or ~spI8~ments. Therefore it follows from
e=BX (8) eqns (6) and (lo), that
I0 1
where B=the deformation matrix DF=A’X (12)
-l/L Pa) whence
= 0 1 -l/L
[
F=D -‘A’X=SA’X (13)
W
and
which is familiar equation from the displacement method of
rigid fr8me at&y&.
If there is a hinge at any member end, then the hinge
rotation H is given by the angle from the direction of the
member as required by the external joint rotations or dis-
placements to that caused by the end moments. Therefore
Equation (8) can be rewritten as
H=DF-A’X. (14)
c=A’X (10)