Review Article: Mitochondrial Dynamics: Functional Link With Apoptosis
Review Article: Mitochondrial Dynamics: Functional Link With Apoptosis
Review Article: Mitochondrial Dynamics: Functional Link With Apoptosis
Review Article
Mitochondrial Dynamics: Functional Link with Apoptosis
Copyright © 2012 H. Otera and K. Mihara. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
Mitochondria participate in a variety of physiologic processes, such as ATP production, lipid metabolism, iron-sulfur cluster
biogenesis, and calcium buffering. The morphology of mitochondria changes dynamically due to their frequent fusion and division
in response to cellular conditions, and these dynamics are an important constituent of apoptosis. The discovery of large GTPase
family proteins that regulate mitochondrial dynamics, together with novel insights into the role of mitochondrial fusion and fission
in apoptosis, has provided important clues to understanding the molecular mechanisms of cellular apoptosis. In this paper, we
briefly summarize current knowledge of the role of mitochondrial dynamics in apoptosis and cell pathophysiology in mammalian
cells.
neurons, and neuronal synaptic loss and cell death in neu- fission in mammals. It is composed of an N-terminal GTPase
rodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, Parkin- domain thought to provide mechanical force, a dynamin-
son’s disease, and Huntington’s disease), although the func- like middle domain, a connecting domain (“B” in Figure 1),
tional relation between the morphologic alterations and and a C-terminal GTPase effector domain (GED) (Figure 1).
apoptosis is still insufficiently understood [16]. Compared with mitochondrial fusion, however, the in vivo
function of Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission is poorly
2. Regulation and Physiologic Significance of understood. During mitochondrial fission, Drp1 existing as
small oligomers in the cytoplasm assembles into larger oligo-
Mitochondrial Fusion and Fission
meric structures at the mitochondrial fission sites depending
Three types of high-molecular-weight GTPase proteins reg- on GTP binding and then severs the mitochondrial mem-
ulate mitochondrial fusion and fission in mammals [10]. brane by GTP hydrolysis. A heterozygous, dominant-nega-
Outer membrane fusion involves two mitofusin proteins tive mutation of the Drp1 gene (A395D in the middle
(Mfn1 and Mfn2; Fzo1 in yeast) located on the mitochon- domain) was identified in a newborn girl with severe pleio-
drial outer membrane (MOM) [17, 18]. An IMS-localized trophic defects, including abnormal brain development and
GTPase, OPA1 (Mgm1 in yeast), functions as a hetero-oligo- optic atrophy, who died at 37 days of age (Figure 1) [31].
meric complex of the larger size Opa1 (L-Opa1) and the To elucidate the detailed physiologic roles of mitochondrial
smaller size Opa1 (S-Opa1) in fusion and cristae organiza- fission in vivo, we and another group generated tissue-
tion of the inner membrane (MIM) [19, 20]. The cytoplas- specific Drp1 KO mice [32, 33]. Drp1 KO mice die at around
mic dynamin-related GTPase protein Drp1 (Dnm1 in yeast) E12.5 with developmental abnormalities, particularly in the
translocates to the foci of future mitochondrial fission sites forebrain. Neuron-specific Drp1 KO mice are born, but die
and mediates mitochondrial fission [21–23]. Mitochondrial within a day of birth due to neurodegeneration, although
fission factor (Mff), and mitochondrial dynamics (Mid) 51/ Drp1 is dispensable for the viability of mouse embryonic
mitochondrial elongation factor 1 (MIEF1), and the variant fibroblast (MEF) cells. In primary cultured neural Drp1 KO
Mid49 were recently reported to function as Drp1 receptors cells, enlarged mitochondrial clumps are sparsely distributed
on the MOM [10, 24–27], although detailed mechanisms of in the neurites and the synaptic structures are lost. These
Mff and MiD/MIEF1 proteins and their relation in Drp1- findings suggest that the Drp1-deficiency causes the abnor-
dependent mitochondrial fission remain to be clarified. The mal distribution of fused and aggregated mitochondria in
function of the mammalian homolog of yeast Fis1, which is polarized cells and these spatiotemporal defects might inhibit
thought to regulate mitochondrial fission as in yeast remains the ATP supply and Ca2+ signaling, eventually preventing
controversial [10, 24, 25]. synapse formation. Similarly, Drp1-dependent mitochon-
Mutations in the mitochondrial fusion factors Mfn2 and drial fission is essential for immune synapse formation in T-
OPA1 result in neurodegenerative disorders, such as Char- cell receptor signaling [34]. A missense mutation in mouse
cot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy 2a and Dominant Optic Atro- Drp1 in the middle domain, which is essential for oligomer-
phy I, respectively [16, 19, 20]. Mitochondrial fusion factor ization (Python mice; C452F mutation), leads to cardiomy-
knockout (KO) mice are lethal before embryonic day 12.5 opathy [35]. The physiologic relevance of Drp1 in other
(E12.5 for Mfn1 KO) or embryonic day 11.5 (E11.5 for Mfn2 tissues that might underlie various human diseases remains
KO), suggesting that both Mfn isoforms are essential for to be elucidated.
embryonic development in mammals [17]. Cells lacking Drp1 activity is regulated by various posttranslational
both Mfn1 and Mfn2 exhibit severe cellular defects, includ- modifications and changes in these modifications are related
ing poor cell growth, heterogeneity of inner membrane po- to several disorders (Figure 1). In the early mitotic phase,
tential, and decreased respiration, indicating that mitochon- Ser616 in human Drp1 is specifically phosphorylated by the
drial fusion has an essential role in maintaining functional Cdk1/cyclinB complex, which promotes mitochondrial fis-
mitochondria. Depletion of Mfn2 in neurons in mice leads sion to facilitate stochastic distribution of the mitochondria
to highly specific degeneration of Purkinje neurons [17]. to daughter cells [36]. Under oxidative stress conditions, pro-
The mitochondria in these mutant cells are fragmented and tein kinase Cδ mediates phosphorylation of Ser579 in human
fail to distribute to the long and branched neurites, indi- Drp1 isoform 3 (Ser616 in the human Drp1 isoform 1),
cating that fusion also plays an important role in mito- leading to mitochondrial fission and impaired mitochondrial
chondrial distribution in polarized cells. Depletion of both function, which contributes to hypertension-induced brain
Mfn isoforms in skeletal muscle results in muscle atrophy injury [37]. Phosphorylation at Ser637 in the GED domain
[28]. Homozygous mutation of OPA1 in mice leads to of human Drp1 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)
embryonic lethality by E13.5 in mice, while heterozygous stimulates Drp1 GTPase activity and releases Drp1 from
mutation causes a slow onset of degeneration in the optic the mitochondria by inhibiting oligomeric assembly on the
nerves [29]. Pancreatic beta-cell-specific OPA1 KO mice have membrane to promote mitochondrial network extension and
compromised glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and ATP cell viability [38]. This reaction is reversed by calcineurin-
production due to a defect in respiratory complex IV, sug- mediated dephosphorylation [39, 40]. Polyglutamine expan-
gesting that the function of OPA1 in the maintenance of the sions in huntingtin protein, the cause of Huntington’s dis-
respiratory chain is physiologically relevant to beta cells [30]. ease, superactivate calcineurin through enhanced calcium
The dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 localizes mainly in levels, and increase mitochondrial recruitment of Drp1,
the cytoplasm and plays a central role in mitochondrial leading to apoptosis due to mitochondrial fission, cristae
International Journal of Cell Biology 3
Apoptosis
(hypertension-induced brain injury)
Oxidative stress
Fission
PKCδ β-amyloid protein
P NO
(Lethal disease) Synaptic loss
A395D S616 C644 Fission apoptosis
N GTPase Middle B GED C
S637
P Fission Cell survive
Calcineurin
Q Q Q -huntingtin
Q
Q
QQ
Figure 1: Domain structure of Drp1 and schematic view of the regulation of Drp1 by posttranslational modifications. Drp1 activity is
regulated by various posttranslational modifications and changes in these modifications are related to several disorders. Under oxidative
stress, protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) phosphorylates Drp1 at Ser616 in the GED domain. Drp1 is recruited to mitochondria and stimulates
mitochondrial fission, leading to apoptosis in hypertension-induced brain. Cyclic-AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) phosphorylates
Drp1 at Ser637 in the GED domain. This reaction releases Drp1 from mitochondria to the cytosol, leading to mitochondrial elongation and
suppression of apoptosis vulnerability of the cells. Calcineurin dephosphorylates Drp1 at Ser637 and promotes mitochondrial fragmentation
and cell vulnerability to apoptosis. Polyglutamine expansion in huntingtin protein activates calcineurin and increases mitochondrial frag-
mentation and cell vulnerability to apoptosis. β-Amyloid protein increases S-nitrosylation of Drp1 at Cys644 in the GED domain to trigger
mitochondrial fission by activating GTPase, thereby causing synaptic loss. All amino acid numbering is based on the human Drp1 splice
variant 1 sequence.
disintegration, and cytochrome c release (Figures 1 and 3) an intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathway where mitochondria
[41]. Further, mutant huntingtin protein directly binds Drp1 play a central role governed by pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2
and increases its GTPase activity, leading to mitochondrial family proteins. The extrinsic pathway does not directly
fragmentation and defects in anterograde and retrograde involve the mitochondria, and activation of the initiator
mitochondrial transport and neuronal cell death [42, 43]. β- caspase (caspase-8) is mediated by the death-inducing sig-
Amyloid protein, a key mediator of Alzheimer’s disease, is naling complex [47]. Conversely, the intrinsic pathway is
reported to induce S-nitrosylation of Drp1 at Cys644 in the initiated by the release of cytochrome c from the IMS accom-
GED domain to trigger mitochondrial fission by activating panied by MOMP and cristae disorganization, which acti-
GTPase and thereby causing synaptic loss (Figure 1) [44], vates procaspase-9 through Apaf-1 [3, 4, 15]. Although the
although this model has been challenged [45]. Thus, mito- extrinsic and intrinsic pathways have long been considered
chondrial morphologic balance shift toward fission makes independent from each other, evidence that caspase-8 also
cells susceptible to apoptosis and vice versa (Figure 1). activates the intrinsic pathway has led to a more complex
view of apoptosis in which crosstalk exists between the two
pathways [48, 49].
3. Regulation of Mitochondrial Apoptosis by The Bcl-2 family proteins regulate the MOM integrity
Bcl-2 Family Proteins and contribute to the release of proapoptotic factors from the
IMS to the cytoplasm by MOMP [50, 51]. Irrespective of the
Mitochondria play a central role in apoptotic initiation by precise mechanism, the antiapoptotic members of the Bcl-2
providing proapoptotic factors that are involved in caspase family tend to stabilize the barrier function of the MOM,
activation, and chromosome condensation and fragmenta- whereas proapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins such as Bax or
tion [15]. Multiple cellular pathways trigger apoptosis [46]: Bak tend to antagonize such function and permeabilize the
an extrinsic pathway that is initiated by the binding of a death MOM. Upon apoptotic stimuli, caspase-8 activated by the
ligands to the plasma-membrane-localized receptor, result- death-inducing signaling complex cleaves the proapoptotic
ing in the rapid activation of caspases in the cytoplasm and BH3-only protein Bid to the active truncated form (tBid).
4 International Journal of Cell Biology
to carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP), action of the cells that is necessary for survival by increased
uncoupling agents that disrupt the electrochemical potential mitochondrial ATP production. Under nutrient starvation,
of the MIM [70]. Thus, how Drp1 contributes to apoptosis is mitochondrial fission is repressed in response to PKA-
an important issue for future studies. dependent Drp1 phosphorylation of Drp1 Ser637 due to
increased cAMP levels (Figure 1), resulting in elongation of
the mitochondria with a higher density of cristae and a
5. Cristae Remodeling and Apoptosis capacity for efficient ATP production. This response protects
Opa1, localizing in the inner membrane as a hetero-oligo- mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation and sus-
meric complex of large and small size forms, regulates MIM tains cell viability [76, 77]. Taken together, enhanced fusion
fusion and is necessary for maintenance of the cristae junc- in the mitochondrial fusion/fission balance promotes cell
tions independently of mitochondrial fusion. The majority survival. Alternatively, dysfunctional or damaged mitochon-
of cytochrome c is confined within the cristae folds and the dria are selectively eliminated by autophagic degradation
complete release and mobilization of cytochrome c in the (termed mitophagy): the process essential for maintaining
IMS require cristae remodeling or cristae-junction opening mitochondrial quality and cell function. For example, accu-
[71]. Opa1 depletion by RNAi leads to fragmented mito- mulation of a causal gene product of Parkinson’s disease,
chondria with disrupted cristae structures and an increase PTEN-induced mitochondrial protein kinase 1 (PINK1) on
in the sensitivity to the apoptotic stimuli [65, 72, 73]. Fur- depolarized mitochondria facilitates recruitment of cyto-
ther, during early apoptosis, the Opa1 hetero-oligomer is dis- plasmic Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, to mitochondria to
rupted, the cristae widen, and cytochrome c is released into initiate mitophagy [78–80]. The Parkin-PINK1 system thus
the IMS. Of note, we demonstrated that Opa1 RNAi HeLa monitors damaged mitochondria, and dysfunction of this
cells have disrupted cristae and efficient sensitivity to apop- mechanism is a possible cause of inflammation or Parkin-
tosis, based on the cytochrome c release. In contrast, Opa1/ son’s disease [81–86]. As it is thought that mitochondrial
Drp1 or Opa1/Mff double-RNAi cells have elongated but fission is related to the progression of mitophagy, inhibition
cristae-disrupted mitochondria, and exhibit a significant of mitochondrial fission by the dominant negative mutant of
delay in the cytochrome c release in response to apoptotic Drp1 or specific inhibitor of Drp1-GTPase mdivi-1 compro-
stimuli (State II in Figure 2) [24]. Importantly, however, mises Parkin-PINK1-dependent mitophagy [83]. Together,
mitochondrial targeting of Bax and the release of the IMS- mitochondrial fusion and fission are more likely to be in-
soluble Smac/DIABLO proceeded with the same kinetics as volved in mitochondrial quality control in healthy cells. A
in the control cells. Similarly, in Drp1 KO MEFs or Drp1 recent report demonstrated that the A-kinase anchoring pro-
RNAi HeLa cells, Bax/Bak-mediated MOMP occurs inde- tein 1 (AKAP1) localized on the MOM is involved in this
pendently of Drp1 and is separable from cytochrome c re- reaction. Thus, the PKA/AKAP1 complex-calcineurin system
lease. These results suggest that cristae disorganization and regulates mitochondrial morphology and cell viability by
mitochondrial fission as well as MOMP (State I in Figure 2) controlling the translocation of Drp1 to the mitochondria
are essentially required for efficient cytochrome c release and (Figure 1) [87].
each can limit the initial apoptosis progression. In contrast to
these observations, detailed analysis with transmission elec- 7. Communication between the Mitochondria
tron microscopy and three-dimensional electron microscope and ER in Apoptosis
tomography revealed that neither cristae reorganization nor
cristae-junction opening is required for the complete release In yeast, the ER mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES
of cytochrome c [74]. Thus, the requirement of Opa1- comprising cytosolic Mdm12, mitochondrial Mdm10,
dependent cristae remodeling for cytochrome c release re- Mdm34, and Gem1, and ER membrane protein Mmm1),
mains to be reconciled. identified by synthetic biology and biochemical approaches
[88–90], are involved in phospholipid transport. A similar
structure is expected to exist in mammalian cells; a mam-
6. Mitochondrial Morphologic Responses in malian homolog of yeast Gem1, MIRO, is detected in the
Cell Survival proximity of the ER-mitochondria [90]. Ca2+ is a key regu-
lator of not only cell survival but also cell death in response
Many lines of evidence indicate that the efficiency of oxi- to various apoptotic stimuli (Figure 3). The mitochondria
dative phosphorylation by the mitochondrial electron trans- and ER have close contacts that are physiologically important
port chain is affected by the degree of mitochondrial connec- for the transfer of Ca2+ , lipids, and metabolites, and there-
tivity; a highly connected mitochondrial network correlates fore, for the regulation of mitochondrial metabolism and
with increased ATP production efficiency. Mitochondria other complex cellular processes including apoptosis. Mfn2
hyperfuse and form a highly interconnected network when and its regulator Trichoplein/mitostatin localizing on the
cells are exposed to modest levels of stress (e.g., UV irra- mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAM) is in-
diation, actinomycin D treatment), named stress-induced volved in tethering mitochondria and ER through hetero-
mitochondrial hyperfusion (SIMH) [75]. SIMH depends on or homotypic interactions with mitochondrial Mfn1 and
Mfn1, Opa1, and the MIM protein SLP-2, and delays the Mfn2, thereby regulating Ca2+ transfer from the ER to the
activation of Bax and MOMP similar to the beneficial effect mitochondria [91, 92]. Interactions between the mitochon-
of mitofusin overexpression. This seems to be a counterstress dria and ER are also supported by the finding that the ER
6 International Journal of Cell Biology
Nucleus
Ca2+
from ER to mitochondria Cytochrome c
ER Virus infection
SERCA
Bap31 ROS
Stress signal, etc.
Ca2+ influx
Casp-8
IP3R hFis1 Mfn2
p20Bap31
BiK
Mfn2
MICU1 Mfn1
LETM1
MAM Mfn1
Drp1-S637
Cristae remodeling P
Cytochrome c release
Mitochondrial
fragmentation Calcineurin
Bax/Bak
Drp1
recruitment
Drp1/Mff
Mitochondrial fragmentation Drp1-S637
Apoptosis
Figure 3: Hypothetical models of the role of contacts between mitochondria and ER in apoptosis. The hFis1/Bap31 platform transmits the
mitochondrial stress signal to the ER via the activation of procaspase-8. The cytosolic region of the ER integral membrane protein Bap31
is cleaved by activated caspase-8 to generate proapoptotic p20Bap31, which causes rapid transmission of ER calcium signals to the mito-
chondria via the IP3 receptor. At close ER-mitochondria contact sites, mitochondria takes up calcium into the matrix via the mitochondrial
calcium channels MICU1 or LETM1. The massive influx of calcium leads to mitochondrial fission, cristae remodeling, and cytochrome c
release. Mfn2 is enriched in the mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM) of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it interacts with
Mfn1 and Mfn2 on the mitochondria to form interorganellar bridges. Upon apoptosis signal, a BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family,
Bik, induces Ca2+ release from the ER and, in turn, induces Drp1 recruitment to the mitochondria and their fragmentation and cristae
remodeling. SERCA, sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ -ATPase. MICU1, mitochondrial calcium uptake 1. LETM1, leucine zipper/EF hand-
containing transmembrane 1.
can elicit mitochondrial apoptosis. ER targeting of Bik, a onstrated that hFis1 localized to the MAM transmits an
BH3-only member of the Bcl-2 family, induces Ca2+ release apoptosis signal from the ER to mitochondria by interacting
from the ER and its concomitant uptake by the mitochon- with Bap31 at the ER to form a platform for the recruitment
dria, which in turn induces Drp1 recruitment to the mito- of the initiator procaspase-8. Apoptotic signals induce cleav-
chondria and their fragmentation and cristae remodeling age of Bap31 into p20Bap31, which causes the rapid trans-
(Figure 3) [93]. Mammalian mitochondrial Fis1 is an ortho- mission of ER calcium to the mitochondria through inositol
log of yeast Fis1 thought to be involved in recruitment of triphosphate receptors at the ER-mitochondria junction
Drp1 to the mitochondria as in yeast [94]. Although recent [97]. Ca2+ influx into the mitochondria stimulates Drp1-
experiments revealed that Fis1 is not necessary for Drp1- dependent mitochondrial fission and cytochrome c release.
dependent mitochondrial fission in mammals [10, 24, 25], Thus, the hFis1-Bap31 complex, bridging the mitochondria
it might have another important role. In this context, over- and ER, functions as a platform to activate the initiator pro-
expression of hFis1 (for human Fis1) induces mitochondrial caspase in apoptosis signaling (Figure 3). Recently Green
fragmentation concomitant with Bax/Bak-dependent release and collaborators provided evidence that contacts between
of cytochrome c into the cytosol [95]. Of note, hFis1 does not mitochondria and other organelles such as ER are involved in
directly activate Bax and Bak, but induces ER Ca2+ -depend- regulation of the levels of sphingolipid metabolites that are
ent mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to mitochondrial required for Bax/Bak activation [98]. Distinct from the
apoptosis [96]. Interestingly, Iwasawa et al. recently dem- substrate or ion transfer function of the ER-mitochondria
International Journal of Cell Biology 7
contact, Friedman et al. [99] recently demonstrated that [2] P. Saikumar, Z. Dong, V. Mikhailov, M. Denton, J. M.
mitochondrial fission occurs at contact regions between Weinberg, and M. A. Venkatachalam, “Apoptosis: definition,
the mitochondria and the ER. At the contacts, the ER wraps mechanisms, and relevance to disease,” American Journal of
around the mitochondria to form constrictions, where Drp1 Medicine, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 489–506, 1999.
and Mff accumulate and facilitate mitochondrial fission. [3] J. C. Martinou and D. R. Green, “Breaking the mitochondrial
barrier,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 1,
Interestingly, ER-localized Mfn2 which was shown to be
pp. 63–67, 2001.
involved in tethering mitochondria and ER [91] is not in-
[4] N. Zamzami and G. Kroemer, “The mitochondrion in apopto-
volved in this reaction [99]. sis: how Pandora’s box opens,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell
Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2001.
[5] P. A. Parone, D. James, and J. C. Martinou, “Mitochondria:
8. Conclusions regulating the inevitable,” Biochimie, vol. 84, no. 2-3, pp. 105–
Although key proteins regulating mammalian mitochondrial 111, 2002.
[6] G. Twig, A. Elorza, A. J. A. Molina et al., “Fission and selective
dynamics have been identified during the past decade,
fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by
molecular mechanisms, their coordination, and physiologic autophagy,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 433–446,
functions in distinct tissues are poorly understood, especially 2008.
in fission reaction: the mechanism of recruitment of Drp1 to [7] G. Twig, B. Hyde, and O. S. Shirihai, “Mitochondrial fusion,
fission foci, functional relation between Mff and Mid pro- fission and autophagy as a quality control axis: the bioener-
teins in the Drp1 recruitment, and regulation of the foci getic view,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1777, no. 9, pp.
assembly and disassembly. Furthermore, involvement of Fis1 1092–1097, 2008.
in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and its phys- [8] R. J. Youle and D. P. Narendra, “Mechanisms of mitophagy,”
iologic function remain to be investigated. It is generally Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–14,
agreed, but not completely admitted, that mitochondrial 2011.
fission/fusion dynamics are related to apoptosis and a bal- [9] K. Okamoto and N. Kondo-Okamoto, “Mitochondria and
autophagy: crinical interplay between the two homeostats,”
ance sift toward fission enhances apoptotic susceptibility of
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. In press.
essentially all types of cells. Accumulating evidence, however, [10] H. Otera and K. Mihara, “Molecular mechanisms and phys-
suggest that Bax/Bak-dependent MOMP and cytochrome c iologic functions of mitochondrial dynamics,” Journal of
mobilization within IMS after cristae disintegration are es- Biochemistry, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 241–251, 2011.
sential for cytochrome c release and Drp1 facilitates these [11] R. J. Youle and M. Karbowski, “Mitochondrial fission in apop-
processes. The mechanisms coordinating these reactions and tosis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 8, pp.
the effect of Bcl-2 family proteins on mitochondrial fission 657–663, 2005.
and fusion machineries remain to be analyzed at the mol- [12] P. A. Parone and J. C. Martinou, “Mitochondrial fssion and
ecular level. Recent studies have revealed that the ER-mito- apoptosis: an ongoing trial,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol.
chondria contacts (MAM structures) are involved in the reg- 1763, no. 5-6, pp. 522–530, 2006.
ulation of mitochondrial energy, lipid metabolism, calcium [13] D. Arnoult, “Mitochondrial fragmentation in apoptosis,”
signaling, and even in mitochondrial fission. Identification Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 2007.
[14] D. F. Suen, K. L. Norris, and R. J. Youle, “Mitochondrial dy-
of additional structural components, regulation of assembly
namics and apoptosis,” Genes and Development, vol. 22, no.
of these structures, and relation between various complexes 12, pp. 1577–1590, 2008.
will reveal novel aspects of cell physiology regulation through [15] J. C. Martinou and R. Youle, “Mitochondria in apoptosis: bcl-2
communication between mitochondria and ER. family members and mitochondrial dynamics,” Developmental
In conclusion, mitochondrial fusion and fission mach- Cell, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 92–101, 2011.
ineries have crucial function in regulating cell physiology, [16] H. Chen and D. C. Chan, “Mitochondrial dynamics—fusion,
and investigation of the relation between mitochondrial fission, movement, and mitophagy—in neurodegenerative
dynamics and their physiologic function will provide exciting diseases,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. R169–
breakthrough in cell biology and various disorders. R176, 2009.
[17] H. Chen, S. A. Detmer, A. J. Ewald, E. E. Griffin, S. E. Fraser,
and D. C. Chan, “Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately reg-
Acknowledgment ulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic
development,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 189–
This work has been supported by and Culture of Japan to 200, 2003.
Katsuyoshi Mihara and grants from the Ministry of Edu- [18] A. Santel and M. T. Fuller, “Control of mitochondrial mor-
cation, Science, and Culture of Japan to Katsuyoshi Mihara phology by a human mitofusin,” Journal of Cell Science, vol.
and Hidenori Otera, and from Naito foundation and Sumit- 114, no. 5, pp. 867–874, 2001.
omo foundation to Hidenori Otera. [19] C. Alexander, M. Votruba, U. E. Pesch et al., “OPA1, encoding
a dynamin-related GTPase, is mutated in autosomal dominant
optic atrophy linked to chromosome 3q28,” Nature Genetics,
References vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 211–215, 2000.
[20] C. Delettre, G. Lenaers, J. M. Griffoin et al., “Nuclear gene
[1] E. H. Baehrecke, “How death shapes life during development,” OPA1, encoding a mitochondrial dynamin-related protein, is
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 779– mutated in dominant optic atrophy,” Nature Genetics, vol. 26,
787, 2002. no. 2, pp. 207–210, 2000.
8 International Journal of Cell Biology
[21] E. Smirnova, L. Griparic, D. L. Shurland, and A. M. Van der [38] C. R. Chang and C. Blackstone, “Cyclic AMP-dependent
Bliek, “Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mito- protein kinase phosphorylation of Drp1 regulates its GTPase
chondrial division in mammalian cells,” Molecular Biology of activity and mitochondrial morphology,” Journal of Biological
the Cell, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2245–2256, 2001. Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 30, pp. 21583–21587, 2007.
[22] Y. Yoon, K. R. Pitts, and M. A. McNiven, “Mammalian [39] J. T. Cribbs and S. Strack, “Reversible phosphorylation of
dynamin-like protein DLP1 tubulates membranes,” Molecular Drp1 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and calcineurin
Biology of the Cell, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2894–2905, 2001. regulates mitochondrial fission and cell death,” EMBO Reports,
[23] E. Ingerman, E. M. Perkins, M. Marino et al., “Dnm1 forms vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 939–944, 2007.
spirals that are structurally tailored to fit mitochondria,” [40] G. M. Cereghetti, A. Stangherlin, M. de Brito et al., “Dephos-
Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 170, no. 7, pp. 1021–1027, 2005. phorylation by calcineurin regulates translocation of Drp1 to
[24] H. Otera, C. Wang, M. M. Cleland et al., “Mff is an es- mitochondria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
sential factor for mitochondrial recruitment of Drp1 during of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 41, pp. 15803–
mitochondrial fission in mammalian cells,” Journal of Cell 15808, 2008.
Biology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 1141–1158, 2010. [41] V. Costa, M. Giacomello, R. Hudec et al., “Mitochondrial fis-
[25] H. Otera and K. Mihara, “Discovery of membrane receptor sion and cristae disruption increase the response of cell models
for mitochondrial fission GTPase Drp1,” Small GTPases, vol. of Huntington’s disease to apoptotic stimuli,” EMBO Mol-
3, pp. 167–172, 2011. ecular Medicine, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 490–503, 2010.
[26] C. S. Palmer, L. D. Osellame, D. Laine, O. S. Koutsopoulos, A. [42] W. Song, J. Chen, A. Petrilli et al., “Mutant huntingtin binds
E. Frazier, and M. T. Ryan, “MiD49 and MiD51, new com- the mitochondrial fission GTPase dynamin-related protein-1
ponents of the mitochondrial fission machinery,” EMBO and increases its enzymatic activity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17,
Reports, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 565–573, 2011. no. 3, pp. 377–383, 2011.
[27] J. Zhao, T. Liu, S. Jin et al., “Human MIEF1 recruits Drp1 to [43] U. Shirendeb, M. J. Calkins, M. Manczak et al., “Mutant
mitochondrial outer membranes and promotes mitochondrial Huntingtin’s interaction with mitochondrial protein Drp1
fusion rather than fission,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 14, impairs mitochondrial biogenesis and causes defective axonal
pp. 2762–2778, 2011. transport and synaptic degeneration in Huntington’s disease,”
[28] H. Chen, M. Vermulst, Y. E. Wang et al., “Mitochondrial fusion Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 406–420, 2012.
is required for mtdna stability in skeletal muscle and tolerance [44] D. H. Cho, T. Nakamura, J. Fang et al., “β-Amyloid-related
of mtDNA mutations,” Cell, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 280–289, 2010. mitochondrial fission and neuronal injury,” Science, vol. 324,
[29] V. J. Davies, A. J. Hollins, M. J. Piechota et al., “Opa1 deficiency no. 5923, pp. 102–105, 2009.
in a mouse model of autosomal dominant optic atrophy [45] B. Bossy, A. Petrilli, E. Klinglmayr et al., “S-nitrosylation of
impairs mitochondrial morphology, optic nerve structure and DRP1 does not affect enzymatic activity and is not specific to
visual function,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 16, no. 11, Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 20, no.
pp. 1307–1318, 2007. 2, pp. 513–526, 2010.
[46] Z. Jin and W. S. El-Deiry, “Overview of cell death signaling
[30] Z. Zhang, N. Wakabayashi, J. Wakabayashi et al., “The
pathways,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 139–
dynamin-related GTPase Opa1 is required for glucose-stim-
163, 2005.
ulated ATP production in pancreatic beta cells,” Molecular Bio-
[47] I. Lavrik, A. Golks, and P. H. Krammer, “Death receptor sig-
logy of the Cell, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 2235–2245, 2011.
naling,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 265–267,
[31] H. R. Waterham, J. Koster, C. W. Van Roermund, P. A.
2005.
Mooyer, R. J. Wanders, and J. V. Leonard, “A lethal defect [48] H. Li, H. Zhu, C. J. Xu, and J. Yuan, “Cleavage of BID by
of mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission,” The New England caspase 8 mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas path-
Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 17, pp. 1736–1741, 2007. way of apoptosis,” Cell, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 491–501, 1998.
[32] N. Ishihara, M. Nomura, A. Jofuku et al., “Mitochondrial [49] X. Luo, I. Budihardjo, H. Zou, C. Slaughter, and X. Wang,
fission factor Drp1 is essential for embryonic development and “Bid, a Bcl2 interacting protein, mediates cytochrome c release
synapse formation in mice,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 8, from mitochondria in response to activation of cell surface
pp. 958–966, 2009. death receptors,” Cell, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 481–490, 1998.
[33] J. Wakabayashi, Z. Zhang, N. Wakabayashi et al., “The [50] A. Schinzel, T. Kaufmann, and C. Borner, “Bcl-2 family mem-
dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 is required for embryonic and bers: integrators of survival and death signals in physiology
brain development in mice,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 186, and pathology,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1644, no.
no. 6, pp. 805–816, 2009. 2-3, pp. 95–105, 2004.
[34] F. Baixauli, N. B. Martı́n-Cófreces, G. Morlino et al., “The [51] B. Leber, J. Lin, and D. W. Andrews, “Embedded together: the
mitochondrial fission factor dynamin-related protein 1 mod- life and death consequences of interaction of the Bcl-2 family
ulates T-cell receptor signalling at the immune synapse,” The with membranes,” Apoptosis, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 897–911, 2007.
EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1238–1250, 2011. [52] Y. Zaltsman, L. Shachnai, N. Yivgi-Ohana et al., “MTCH2/
[35] H. Ashrafian, L. Docherty, V. Leo et al., “A mutation in the MIMP is a major facilitator of tBID recruitment to mitochon-
mitochondrial fission gene Dnm1l leads to cardiomyopathy,” dria,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 553–562, 2010.
Plos genetics, vol. 6, no. 6, p. e1001000, 2010. [53] T. Moldoveanu, Q. Liu, A. Tocilj, M. Watson, G. Shore, and K.
[36] N. Taguchi, N. Ishihara, A. Jofuku, T. Oka, and K. Mihara, Gehring, “The X-ray structure of a BAK homodimer reveals
“Mitotic phosphorylation of dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 an inhibitory zinc binding site,” Molecular Cell, vol. 24, no. 5,
participates in mitochondrial fission,” Journal of Biological pp. 677–688, 2006.
Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 15, pp. 11521–11529, 2007. [54] A. P. Gilmore, A. D. Metcalfe, L. H. Romer, and C. H. Streuli,
[37] X. Qi, M. H. Disatnik, N. Shen, R. A. Sobel, and D. Mochly- “Integrin-mediated survival signals regulate the apoptotic
Rosen, “Aberrant mitochondrial fission in neurons induced by function of Bax through its conformation and subcellular
protein kinase Cδ under oxidative stress conditions in vivo,” localization,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 431–
Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 256–265, 2011. 445, 2000.
International Journal of Cell Biology 9
[55] E. H. Cheng, T. V. Sheiko, J. K. Fisher, W. J. Craigen, and [70] O. Y. Pletjushkina, K. G. Lyamzaev, E. N. Popova et al., “Effect
S. J. Korsmeyer, “VDAC2 inhibits BAK activation and mito- of oxidative stress on dynamics of mitochondrial reticulum,”
chondrial apoptosis,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5632, pp. 513–517, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1757, no. 5-6, pp. 518–524,
2003. 2006.
[56] M. Lazarou, D. Stojanovski, A. E. Frazier et al., “Inhibition [71] L. Scorrano, M. Ashiya, K. Buttle et al., “A distinct pathway
of Bak activation by VDAC2 is dependent on the Bak trans- remodels mitochondrial cristae and mobilizes cytochrome c
membrane anchor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, during apoptosis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–67,
no. 47, pp. 36876–36883, 2010. 2002.
[57] S. S. Roy, A. M. Ehrlich, W. J. Craigen, and G. Hajnóczky, [72] A. Olichon, L. Baricault, N. Gas et al., “Loss of OPA1 per-
“VDAC2 is required for truncated BID-induced mitochon- turbates the mitochondrial inner membrane structure and
drial apoptosis by recruiting BAK to the mitochondria,” integrity, leading to cytochrome c release and apoptosis,” Jour-
EMBO Reports, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1341–1347, 2009. nal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 10, pp. 7743–7746,
[58] K. Setoguchi, H. Otera, and K. Mihara, “Cytosolic factor- and 2003.
TOM-independent import of C-tail-anchored mitochondrial [73] C. Frezza, S. Cipolat, O. Martins de Brito et al., “OPA1 con-
outer membrane proteins,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 24, trols apoptotic cristae remodeling independently from mito-
pp. 5635–5647, 2006. chondrial fusion,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 177–189, 2006.
[59] F. Edlich, S. Banerjee, M. Suzuki et al., “Bcl-x(L) retrotranslo- [74] M. G. Sun, J. Williams, C. Munoz-Pinedo et al., “Correlated
cates Bax from the mitochondria into the cytosol,” Cell, vol. three-dimensional light and electron microscopy reveals
145, pp. 104–116, 2011. transformation of mitochondria during apoptosis,” Nature
[60] M. Karbowski, Y. J. Lee, B. Gaume et al., “Spatial and temporal Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1057–1065, 2007.
association of Bax with mitochondrial fission sites, Drp1, and [75] D. Tondera, S. Grandemange, A. Jourdain et al., “SlP-2 is
Mfn2 during apoptosis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 159, no. 6, required for stress-induced mitochondrial hyperfusion,” The
pp. 931–938, 2002. EMBO Journal, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1589–1600, 2009.
[61] M. Karbowski, D. Arnoult, H. Chen, D. C. Chan, C. L. Smith, [76] A. S. Ramold, B. Kostelecky, N. Elia, and J. Lippincott-
and R. J. Youle, “Quantitation of mitochondrial dynamics by Schwartz, “Tubular network formation protects mitochondria
photolabeling of individual organelles shows that mitochon- from autophagosomal deradation during nutrient starvation,”
drial fusion is blocked during the Bax activation phase of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
apoptosis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 493–499, States of America, vol. 25, pp. 10190–10195, 2011.
2004. [77] L. C. Gomes, G. D. Benedetto, and L. Scorrano, “During auto-
[62] C. Brooks, Q. Wei, L. Feng et al., “Bak regulates mitochondrial phagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation
morphology and pathology during apoptosis by interacting and sustain cell viability,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 5,
with mitofusins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- pp. 589–598, 2011.
ences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 28, pp. [78] D. Narendra, A. Tanaka, D. F. Suen, and R. J. Youle, “Parkin is
11649–11654, 2007. recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes
[63] S. Wasiak, R. Zunino, and H. M. McBride, “Bax/Bak promote their autophagy,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 183, no. 5, pp.
sumoylation of DRP1 and its stable association with mito- 795–803, 2008.
chondria during apoptotic cell death,” Journal of Cell Biology, [79] D. P. Narendra, S. M. Jin, A. Tanaka et al., “PINK1 is selectively
vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 439–450, 2007. stabilized on impaired mitochondria to activate Parkin,” Plos
[64] S. Frank, B. Gaume, E. S. Bergmann-Leitner et al., “The role Biology, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e1000298, 2010.
of dynamin-related protein 1, a mediator of mitochondrial [80] N. Matsuda, S. Sato, K. Shiba et al., “PINK1 stabilized
fission, in apoptosis,” Developmental Cell, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged
515–525, 2001. mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy,”
[65] Y. J. Lee, S. Y. Jeong, M. Karbowski, C. L. Smith, and R. J. Youle, Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 211–221, 2010.
“Roles of the mammalian mitochondrial fission and fusion [81] E. Deas, H. Plun-Faureau, and N. W. Wood, “PINK1 function
mediators Fis1, Drp1, Opa1 in apoptosis,” Molecular Biology in health and disease,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no.
of the Cell, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 5001–5011, 2004. 3, pp. 152–165, 2009.
[66] S. Gandre-Babbe and A. M. van der Bliek, “The novel tail- [82] J. C. Fitzgerald and H. Plun-Favreau, “Emerging pathways
anchored membrane protein Mff controls mitochondrial and in genetic Parkinson’s disease: autosomal-recessive genes in
peroxisomal fission in mammalian cells,” Molecular Biology of Parkinson’s disease—a common pathway?” The FEBS Journal,
the Cell, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2402–2412, 2008. vol. 275, no. 23, pp. 5758–5766, 2008.
[67] T. Rival, M. MacChi, L. Arnauné-Pelloquin et al., “Inner- [83] R. J. Youle and D. P. Narendra, “Mechanisms of mitophagy,”
membrane proteins PMI/TMEM11 regulate mitochondrial Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–14,
morphogenesis independently of the DRP1/MFN fission/ 2011.
fusion pathways,” EMBO Reports, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 223–230, [84] D. C. Rubinsztein, G. Mariño, and G. Kroemer, “Autophagy
2011. and aging,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 5, pp. 682–695, 2011.
[68] A. Cassidy-Stone, J. E. Chipuk, E. Ingerman et al., “Chemical [85] D. R. Green, L. Galluzzi, and G. Kroemer, “Mitochonria and
inhibition of the mitochondrial division dynamin reveals its the autophagy-inflammation-cell death axis in organismal
role in Bax/Bak-dependent mitochondrial outer membrane aging,” Science, vol. 333, no. 6046, pp. 1109–1112, 2011.
permeabilization,” Developmental Cell, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 193– [86] J. Tschopp, “Mitochondria: sovereign of inflammation?” Euro-
204, 2008. pean Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1196–1202,
[69] S. Montessuit, S. P. Somasekharan, O. Terrones et al., “Mem- 2011.
brane remodeling induced by the dynamin-related protein [87] R. A. Merrill, R. K. Dagda, A. S. Dickey et al., “Mechanism
Drp1 stimulates bax oligomerization,” Cell, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. of neuroprotective mitochondrial remodeling by pka/akap1,”
889–901, 2010. Plos Biology, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e1000612, 2011.
10 International Journal of Cell Biology
Peptides
Advances in
BioMed
Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Stem Cells
International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Virolog y
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
Genomics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Nucleic Acids
Zoology
International Journal of