Phototropic TO Length: Sensitivity
Phototropic TO Length: Sensitivity
Phototropic TO Length: Sensitivity
BY
EARL S. JOHNSTON
Division of Radiation and Organisms, Smithsonian Institution
(Publication 3285)
CITY OF WASHINGTON
PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
DECEMBER 6, 1934
BALTIMORE, UD., V. S. A.
PHOTOTROPIC SENSITIVITY IN RELATION TO
WAVE LENGTH
By earl S. JOHNSTON
Dk'ision of Radiation and Or(/anisnis, Smithsonian Institution
INTRODUCTION
Asymmetric growth resulting from unilateral stimulus has heen des-
ignated tropism. Growth curvatures following unilateral illumination
are usually classified under the term phototropism. Different plants
respond in different degrees to light, but perhaps those most fre-
quently used in phototropic experiments are the sporangiophores of
Phycomyces and the coleoptiles of Az'ena. In such studies the in-
tensity, the wave length, and the duration of exposure to light each
acts as a contributing factor toward the final result. Just as there
appears to be a threshold of intensity for a given duration of light
exposure, so there are wave lengths which seem to exert no influence
on these growth responses, but with exposures wave lengths
to other
the plants show Not only do different
distinct degrees of sensitivity.
plants vary in their sensitivity, but separate portions of the same plant
respond differently. Recent work on growth substances indicates the
presence of factors other than light in this complex plant-response.
In the present paper the subject is limited, in the main, to the influ-
ence of radiation of different wave lengths on phototropism as shown
by the response of the coleoptiles of Avena sativa. The variety used
is Culberson, C.I. no. 272,, for which the author wishes to thank
HISTORICAL SURVEY
Many of the early experiments on phototropism have been reviewed
by Parr (1918) and the data classified under four general theories:
I. The " intensity " theory originating with
De CandoUe in 1832 and
adhered to in a more form by Wiesner, Darwin,
or less modified
Engleman, Oltmanns, Yerkes, Loeb, and Davenport. 2. The ray-
(2) The presentation time decreases gradually from red to violet. There is no
indication of intermediate maxima or minima. (3) The presentation time does
not vary in direct ratio vi^ith the measured value of the energy of the light in
the different regions of the spectrum. (4) The presentation time varies in
inverse ratio to the square roots of the wave frequency. (5) The product of the
square root of the frequency times the presentation time, decreases with the
decrease in the energy value of the spectral regions, and is an approximate con-
stant for a given light-source. (6) The spectral energy in its relation to the
presentation time may be expressed approximately in the Weber-Fechner formula,
if the wave-frequencies be made a function of the constant. (7) The relation
of the spectral energy to the presentation time may also be approximately
expressed in the Trondle formula, the wave-frequencies being made a function
of the constant.
NO. II PHOTOTROPIC SENSITIVITY JOHNSTON 3
Wave length
4 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 92
It will be seen from this table that the amount of energy which
barely causes phototropic curvature varies with the wave length. The
yellow (5700 A) is about 600 times as intense as is the white light
necessary to bring about the same response, while the green (5460 A)
is approximately 400 times as intense, and the blue (4360 A) only
.03 as strong as the energy of his standard white light. The blue is
thus approximately 10,000 times as efifective phototropically as the
green and 20,000 times that of the yellow. The violet (4050 A) is
also very efifective but only about half that of the blue.
350
Fig. I. —Graphs from Bachmann and Bergann showing the sensitivity of Avena
sativa to wave lengths of light (continuous line) compared with their cor-
rected values of Blaauw (crosses), of Sonne (circles), and of Koningsberger
(horizontal lines).
and correct the energy values of his data for light absorbed by CUSO4
and water filter, surface reflections, and color filter in order to com-
pare his results with those obtained by Bergann. The results of Sonne
and Koningsberger are and compared. These data are
also corrected
represented gra])hically in figure i, which the continuous line is
in
the sensitivity curve. The data from Blaauw's work are indicated as
inn
6 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 92
PRELIMINARY EXPERIMENTS
The general method of studying the wave-length effects on photo-
tropism as described by Johnston (1926) was used by Johnston,
Brackett, and Hoover (1931) with an improved plant photometer for
evaluating four spectral regions in terms of plant response. The gen-
eral procedure was to place an oat seedling between two different and
oppositely placed lights, and after an interval observe the growth
curvature. If, for example, when the seedling was exposed to blue and
to green lights, a distinct bending was noted toward the blue side,
—
(Coming's heat-resisting yellow yellow shade), whose cut-off on
the short-wave-length side was 5200 A. The threshold for wave-
length influence was found to lie somewhere between 5200 and
6000 A. The effects of green and blue light (Wratten filters nos. 61
and 47 respectively) were progressively greater, being in round num-
bers 1,000 for the green and 30,000 for the blue times that of the
yellow.
These results justified a more elaborate and better controlled ex-
periment wherein narrower spectral regions could be investigated.
For this purpose Johnston (1931) used the specially constructed
monochromator illustrated in plate i. Care was taken to eliminate
scattered light and to keep the conditions surrounding the coleoptile
NO. II PHOTOTROPIC SENSITIVITY —JOHNSTON 7
(1926) has shown that light afifects normal and etiolated shoots very
diiferently. The amount of light required to induce phototropic curva-
ture in normal light-grown shoots is greater, and must be continued
longer, than that required to bring a similar curvature in etiolated
shoots.
After a balance point had been determined and tested by using
several seedlings, a specially constructed thermocouple was inserted
into the glass cylinder occupied by the seedlings and the light intensi-
number 'j'j Wratten filter in the region 5430 to 5670 A, bending oc-
NO. II PHOTOTROPIC SENSITIVITY JOHNSTON 9
L \. - U ^
4700
1 1
4900
1
5000
— ^1
SIOO 5200
I
5300
I <=>—
Fig. 3. — Phototropic
sensitivity curve of preliminary experiment (continuous
line). The
ordinates are relative sensitivity values, the abscissae, wave lengths
in angstroms, and the horizontal bars indicate the wave-length ranges of the
balance points. Circles indicate points obtained with filters combined with the
monochromator. Points more accurately determined are indicated by crosses
and connected by dash lines.
or the other from the center of the light beam, in this particular por-
tion of the spectrum was sufficient to account for the difficulty of
obtaining entirely satisfactory data. If this were true, then it would
Wave-length
range (A)
NO. 1 IMIOTOTROl'IC SENSITIVITY JOHNSTON 13
The efficiency value for line 4358 A falls below the curve. This is to
DISCUSSION
The use of the plant photometer in determining the sensitivity of
seedHngs to light has in its favor the elimination of the operator's
judgment at many points during the experiment. The plant itself is
used as a null point instrument. After a time interval the plant has
grown toward or away from the standard light. There is no need for
the operator to estimate the angle of curvature or the exact time at
which bending begins. Repeated experiments demonstrate that by
moving the standard lamp 0.5 cm toward or away from the plant
when located at a balance distance of approximately 25 cm, the curva-
ture of seedlings can be changed from one direction to the opposite.
It is interesting to note that repetition of balance points seldom
differed from each other by more than 5 percent. Very rarely was
an unorthodox seedling or an apparently nonsensitive seedling found.
One possible objection to this method might be raised. Each point
on the phototropic curve is not strictly comparable to the others. This
arises from the fact that the plant was at a fixed distance from the
monochromator. The intensity of the various wave lengths used was
different. The intensity of the standard light was changed to balance
that of the monochromator light. A better method perhaps would be
to maintain the standard light at a fixed intensity with respect to the
plant and change the monochromator light to balance the standard
light.
also the position of one of the maxima found by Hoover (1934, data
unpublished) for carbon dioxide absorption by young wheat plants.
Since phototropic response is an index of growth retardation it would
at first appear that photosynthesis progresses best at a point in the spec-
trum where growth is least. Such is not the case, however, when the
other and somewhat greater maximum of carbon dioxide absorption
is considered. This occurs in the region of 6400 A. Here there is
no phototropic response and no retardation in growth.
The absence of any phototropic effect in the red and infrared, as
shown in these experiments as well as by those of other investigators,
and the sharp rise in the curve from about 5000 A into the blue, is
Went and his school have shown- that small pieces of agar and gela-
tine impregnated with thisgrowth-promoting substance when placed
asymmetrically on decapitated coleoptiles bring about a growth
curvature with the small agar or gelatine block above the convex por-
tion of the coleoptile. The amount of bending can be influenced by
exposing the tips to light before impregnating the agar or gelatine
blocks. It would appear that light either prevents the formation of
the auxins or destroys their activity.
Furthermore, Kogl (1933) and
Kogl, Haagen-Smit. and b:rxleben (1933) show this growth-
promoting substance to be an unsaturated acid of the formula
C18H32O5, which loses its growth-promoting activity on oxidation.
Recently Flint (1934) has called attention to a very interesting
relationship between light
and the germination of lettuce seed. Cer-
tain varieties fail to germinate unless exposed while in a moist condi-
tion to a small amount of light. In his preliminary work it is shown
that light of wave lengths shorter than about 5200 A inhibits germina-
tion, while that longer than about 5200 A brings about changes result-
ing in germination. Furthermore, he has shown that normal or non-
light-sensitive seeds could be made by subjecting them
light-sensitive
in a moist condition to strong blue light. These seeds would not
germinate until exposed to light of wave lengths longer than 5200 A.
All of this work is common photochemically
very suggestive of a
responsive growth-promoting substance in these lettuce seeds and in
the coleoptiles of oats. Light in the visible spectrum of wave length
shorter than 5200 A exerts an inhibiting influence on the oat seedling.
Likewise this same wave-length region exerts a decided inhibiting
action on the germination of these lettuce seeds. However, an expo-
sure to light of longer wave length is necessary for the germination
of the light-sensitive seeds, even though the exposure is of as short a
duration as one minute. This stimulating effect of the red was not
noted in the phototropic experiments. All that can be said is that red
light did not exert an inhibiting action. The seedlings were
handled in
red light, so that a stimulating action were present,
if it could not be
detected, since no corresponding experiments were tried in total
darkness.
SUMMARY
The influence of radiation of dififerent wave lengths on photo-
tropism is briefly reviewed and discussed.
Experiments are described in which the plant photometer was
used to determine the sensitivity of the coleoptile of Avena saliva
to the dififerent wave-length regions of the visible spectrum.
l6 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 92
LITERATURE CITED
Bachmann, Fr., and Bergann, Fr.
1930. t)ber die Werkigkeit von Strahlen verschiedener Wellenlange fiir die
phototropische Reizung von Avena safiva. Planta, Arch. wiss. Bot.,
vol. 10, pp. 744-755-
Bergann, Friedrich.
1930. Untersuchungen iiber Lichtwachstuni, Lichtkriimmug und Lichtabfall
bei Avena sativa mit Hilfe monochroniatischen Lichtes. Planta,
Arch. wiss. Bot., vol. 10, pp. 666-743.
Blaauw, a. H.
1909. Die Perzeption des Lichtes. Rec. Trav. bot. neerl., vol. 5, pp. 209-372.
1914. Licht und Wachstum. I. Zeitschr. Bot., vol. 6, pp. 641-703.
1915. Licht und Wachstum. II. Zeitschr. Bot., vol. 7, pp. 465-532.
1919. Licht und Wachstum. III. Die Erklarung des Phototropismus. Med.
Landbouwhoogeschool, Wageningen, vol. 15, pp. 89-204.
Castle, E. S.
KoGL, Fritz.
1933. On plant growth hormones {auxin A and auxin B). Rep. British
Assoc. Adv. Sci., vol. 1933, pp. 600-609.
NO. II PHOTOTROPIC SENSITIVITY JOHNSTON jy