ASSESMENT IN TEACHING IN LEARNING PERFORMANCE

In teaching learning process, the teacher gives or impart knowledge, skills and
abilities given or imparted by the teacher. It is a give and take relationship that
is practice in teaching learning process.
It is necessary that teachers must be equipped with knowledge, skills and
abilities in order that they can educate learners effectively, efficiently and
excellently- a necessity for global competitiveness; rather than teaching the
learners what they don’t know due to lack of expertise.

RUBRIC ASSESMENT OF TEACHING PERFORMANCE

Assessment of teaching performance is usually done at the end of the
semester for instructors and professors and at the end of the academic year for
elementary and secondary school teachers.
The teacher’s performance is evaluated by self, peer, head teacher, and
principal for elementary and secondary school teachers

Table 1.1 Sample Rubric Assessment Checklist of Faculty Performance in

the Tertiary Level
Name of Instructor/Professor: ______________________ College: ________________
Subject: ___________________ Time: ____________ Date: _______________________

Scale: s
5- Outstanding 3-Satisfactory 1-Unsatisfactory
4- Very Satisfactory 2-Fairly Satisfactory

I. Personality Trait (20%) 5 4 3 2 1

1. Well- groomed
2. Punctual in reporting for duty
3. Honest and Industrious
4. Polite and respectful
5. Speaks in pleasant and well-
modulated voice
6. Embodies interest in the
delivery of lessons
7. Wears the prescribe uniform
regularly
8. Attends meetings and other
activities
9. Exhibits good manners and
right conduct
10. Punctual in submission
of reports and other
requirements
 Mean: ____________

II. Classroom Management and 5 4 3 2 1

Discipline (20%)
1. Starts the class on time
2. End the class on time
3. Maintains well-discipline
classroom environment
4. Starts the lesson in order
5. Active participation of the class
during recitation
6. Friendly but strict to the
students
7. Utilizes class hours
productively
8. Sustains enthusiasm to the
students
9. Approachable to students and
colleagues
10. Praises the students for
having correct answer

Mean: _____________

III. Teaching Style (30%) 5 4 3 2 1

1. Has mastered the subject
matter
2. Has good command of the
medium of instruction used
3. Presents lesson in an
interesting and
understandable manner
4. Delivers the lesson effectively
5. Explains the lesson and
concepts clearly and logically
6. Uses interactive teaching
strategies fitted to the lesson
7. Utilizes creative teaching
techniques suited to the
lessons
8. Employs innovative
 approaches in presenting the
lesson
9. Applies appropriate visual aids
and multimedia technology to
enhance instructional
technology
10. Has a good sense of
humor
11. Gives relevant examples
and activities to support the
lesson
12. Integrates values
relevant to the lesson
13. Relates lesson to other
fields and daily life situation
14. Is broad-minded in
explaining the lesson
15. Observes the art of
questioning by avoiding to
repeat questions and answers

Mean: ______________

IV. Research (15%) 5 4 3 2 1

1. Descriptive research is on
progress.
2. Experimental research is on
progress.
3. Conducts patentable research
on the process
4. Completes the descriptive
research
5. Completes the experimental
research
6. Publishes descriptive/
experimental research in
Institutional Research Journal
7. Publishes
descriptive/experimental
research Referred Provincial
Research Journal
8. Publishes
descriptive/experimental
research in Referred Regional
Research Journal
9. Publishes
 Descriptive/experimental
research in Referred National
Research Journal
10. Publishes descriptive
/experimental research in
Referred International
Research Journal

Mean: ______________

V. Extension (15%) 5 4 3 2 1
1. Holds extension class in one
barangay once a week
2. Holds extension class in two
barangays once a week
3. Demonstrate technology
transfer in two barangays once
a week
4. Demonstrate technology
transfer in three barangays
weekly
5. Monitors extension class to
different barangays weekly
6. Monitors technology transfer to
different barangays

Mean: ___________
Grand Mean: ____________

VI. Plus Factor (Maximum of 2 points)

1. Has published books with ISBN
2. Has registered patent by the Bureau of Patents
3. Has received Regional Award
4. Has received National Award
5. Has received International Award
6. Has Income Generating Project with net profit of at least 10,000.00
pesos per semester
7. Has presented drama during Foundation Day or Town Fiesta with net
profit of at least 10,000.00 pesos.
Plus Factor_________________
Overall Rating_____________________
Qualitative Interpretative__________________
Suppose the performance of Faculty A in a certain state university is evaluated
by self, peer, chairman, and the dean using Table 1.1 Rubric Assessment
Checklist of Faculty Performance in the Tertiary Level. Their results are shown
as follows:
I. Personality Traits (20%)
1. Well-groomed
∑X
Self -5 X1 = X 1 = 4.25
N
Peer -4
17
Chairman -4 =
4
Dean -4
Total 17 X 1 = 4.25

2. Punctual in reporting for duty

∑X
Self -4 X2 = X 2 = 3.25
N
Peer -3
13
Chairman -3 =
4
Dean -3
Total 13 X 2 = 3.25

3. Honest and industrious

∑X
Self -4 X3 = X 3 = 3.5
N
Peer -4
14
Chairman -3 =
4
Dean -3
Total 14 X 3 = 3.5

4. Polite and respectful

∑X
Self -5 X4 = X 4= 4.25
N
Peer -4
17
Chairman -4 =
4
Dean -4
Total 17 X 4 = 4.25

5. Speaks in pleasant and well-modulated voice

∑X
Self -4 X5 = X 5 = 3.5
N
Peer -4
14
Chairman -3 =
4
Dean -3
Total 14 X 5 = 3.5
6. Embodies interest in the delivery of lessons

∑X
Self -4 X6 = X 6 = 3.25
N
Peer -3
13
Chairman -3 =
4
Dean -3
Total 13 X 6 = 3.25

7. Wears the prescribed uniform regularly

∑X
Self -5 X7 = X 7 = 5.0
N
Peer -5
20
Chairman -5 =
4
Dean -5
Total 20 X 7 = 5.0

8. Attends meeting and other activities regularly

∑X
Self -5 X8 = X 8= 4.5
N
Peer -5
18
Chairman -4 =
4
Dean -4
Total 18 X 8 = 4.5

9. Exhibits good manners and right conduct

∑X
Self -5 X9 = X 9= 4.25
N
Peer -4
17
Chairman -4 =
4
Dean -4
Total 17 X 9 = 4.25

10. Punctual in submission of reports and other requirements

∑X
Self -4 X 10 = X 10 = 3.0
N
Peer -3
12
Chairman -3 =
4
Dean -2
Total 12 X 10 = 3.0

38.75
∑X =
10
Grand Mean = 3.875 (Very Satisfactory)
 Using the same Personality Traits mean computation per item of
classroom Management and Discipline, Teaching Style, Research, and
Extension, the assumed result of self, peer, chairman, and dean
evaluation of Faculty A are given as follows:

II. Classroom Management and Discipline

1. Starts the class on times X 1 = 4.25
2. Ends the class on time X 2 = 4.25

3. Maintains well-disciplined classroom environment X 3 = 4.0

4. Starts the lesson in order X 4 = 4.0
5. Active participation of the class during recitation X 5 = 4.0
6. Friendly but strict to the students X 6 = 4.25
7. Utilizes the class hours productively X 7 = 3.25
8. Sustains enthusiasm to the students X 8 = 3.25
9. Approachable to the students and colleagues X 9 = 4.0
10. Praises the students for having correct answer X 10 = 3.5

∑ X 38.75
=
N 10
Grand Mean = 3.875 (Very Satisfactory)

III. Teaching Style (30%)

1. Has mastered the subject matter X 1 = 5.0
2. Has good command of the medium
of instruction used X2 = 4.0

3. Presents lesson in an interesting

and understandable manner X 3 = 4.0
4. Delivers the lesson effectively X 4 = 4.25
5. Explains the lesson and concepts
clearly and logically X 5 = 4.25
6. Uses interactive teaching strategies
fitted to the lesson X 6 = 4.0
7. Utilizes creative teaching techniques
suited to the lesson X 7 = 3.25
8. Employs innovative approaches in
presenting the lesson X 8 = 3.25
9. Applies appropriate visual aids
and multimedia X 9 = 4.0
10. Has a good sense of humor X 10 = 3.25
11. Gives relevant examples and activities
to support the lesson X 11 = 4.0
12. Integrates values relevant to the lesson X 12 = 4.0
13. Relates lesson to other fields
and daily life activities X 13 = 4.0
14. Is broad-minded to explain the lesson X 14 = 4.25
15. Observes the art of questioning
by avoiding to repeat questions and answer X 15 = 4.25
 ∑ X 59.75
=
N 15
Grand Mean = 3.98 (Very Satisfactory)

IV. Research
1. Descriptive research is on progress. X 1 = 3.0
2. Experimental research is on progress. X 2 = 3.0

3. Conducts patentable research on the process X 3 = 1.0

4. Completes the descriptive research X 4 = 3.0
5. Completes the experimental research X 5 = 2.5
6. Publishes Descriptive/ Experimental research
in Institutional Research Journal X 6 = 3.5
7. Publishes Descriptive/ Experimental research
In Referred Provincial Research Journal X 7 = 3.0
8. Publishes Descriptive/ Experimental research
In Referred Regional Research Journal X 8 = 3.0
9. Publishes Descriptive/ Experimental research
In Referred Nation Research Journal X 9 = 2.0
10. Publishes Descriptive/ Experimental research
In Referred International Research Journal X 10 = 1.0

∑ X 25
=
N 10
Grand Mean = 2.5 (Satisfactory)

V. Extension (15%)
1. Holds extension class in one
barangay once a week X 1 = 4.0
2. Holds extension class in two
barangays once a week X 2 = 3.5
3. Demonstrates technology transfer
in two barangays once a week X 3 = 3.0
4. Demonstrates technology transfer
in three barangays weekly X 4 = 3.0
5. Monitors extension class to
different barangays weekly X 5 = 3.0
6. Monitors technology transfer
to different barangays X 6 = 3.0
∑ X 19.5
=
N 6
Grand Mean = 3.5 (Satisfactory)

VI. Plus Factor (Maximum of 2 points)

Direction: Check the blanks at the right if the following have been
performed.
 1. Has published books with ISBN 1. √____
2. Has registered patent by the Bureau of patents 2. _____

3. Has received Regional Award 3. √____

4. Has received National Award 4. _____
5. Has received International Award 5. _____
6. Has Income Generating Project with net profit of
at least 10,000.00 per semester 6. √____
7. Has presented drama during Foundation Day or Town
Fiesta with net profit of at least 10,000.00 7. _____
Plus Factor ___2_______

Mean and Qualitative Interpretation of the Teaching Performance

Table 1.2 shows the summary of mean and qualitative interpretation of
the teaching performance of faculty A in a certain state university.
Table 1.2 Summary of Mean and Qualitative Interpretation of the
Teaching Performance of Faculty A in a Certain State University
Categories Mean Qualitative Percent Equivalent
X Interpretation %
I. Personality Traits 3.875 Very 20 0.775
Satisfactory
II. Classroom 3.875 Very 0.775
Management and Satisfactory 20
Discipline
III. Teaching Style 3.98 Very 30 1.194
satisfactory
IV. Research 2.5 Satisfactory 15 0.375
V. Extension 3.25 Satisfactory 15 0.4875
Grand Mean 3.61
VI. Plus Factor 2.0
Grand Mean Total Rating
5.61
Qualitative Rating
Outstanding

INTERPRETATION
The actual faculty rating at SUCs is enumerated as follows:
10- Outstanding 6- Satisfactory 2- Unsatisfactory
8- Very Satisfactory 4- Fairly Satisfactory
The scale is divisible by 2. In Rubric Assessment, it is divisible by 1. To convert
the Rubric assessment scale of teaching performance, just multiply it by 2s.
For instance, grand mean total rating is 5.61 x 2 = 11.22, Outstanding.
4 x 2 = 8, Very Satisfactory
3 x 2 = 6, Satisfactory
2 x 2 = 4, Fairly Satisfactory
1 x 2 = 2, Poor or Unsatisfactory
 ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING PERFORMANCE WITH THE USE OF NORM-
REFERENCED MEASURE

The learning performance of students is assessed as a group with the use of

norm-referenced measure. Mean and standard deviation are the statistical
techniques to determine the performance of students whether it is within the
norm, above the norm or below the norm. The learning performance of
students is compared with the norm. Standard deviation is a quantity
calculated to indicate the extent of deviation for a group a whole.

ILLUSTRATION
Suppose the teacher wishes to determine the learning performance of the
National Aptitude Test (NAT) of fifty (50) senior secondary students at the Holy
Rosary Academy in Iloilo City.

Table 1.3 NAT scores of 50 Senior Secondary Students at the Holy Rosary
Academy in Iloilo City (Artificial Data)
98 140 135 99 97
100 125 122 138 135
120 105 103 110 115
95 120 121 100 120
112 120 124 123 118
95 145 143 144 141
99 120 98 142 137
125 136 120 133 121
115 122 123 124 120
130 123 101 120 111

Mean and Standard Deviation Computation with the Use of Computer

The steps to compute mean and standard deviation with the use
computer are as follows:
Step 1. Switch on the computer.
Steps 2. Wait until the start menu appear
Step 3. Hold the mouse. Click Start menu, click Programs. Click Microsoft
Excel 2003.
Step 4. Wait until the computer displays Microsoft Excel Program.
Step 5. Type the data as follows:

1 98 26 143
 2 100 27 98
3 120 28 120
4 95 29 123
5 112 30 101
6 95 31 99
7 99 32 138
8 125 33 110
9 115 34 100
10 130 35 123
11 140 36 144
12 125 37 142
13 105 38 133
14 120 39 124
15 120 40 120
16 145 41 97
17 120 42 135
18 136 43 115
19 122 44 120
20 123 45 118
21 135 46 141
22 122 47 137
23 103 48 121
24 121 49 120
25 124 50 111

Step 6. Highlight the data. Click Tools menu. Click Data Analysis. The
computer displays Analysis Tools.
Step 7. Click Descriptive Statistics. Click OK.
Step 8. The computer displays Descriptive Statistics. In Input Range: Type
$A1: $A50.
Step 9. Click Summary Statistics. Click OK.
Step 10. The computer displays as follows:
Column 1
Mean 119.66
Median 120
Mode 120
Standard deviation 14.54004
Sample Variance 211.4127
Kurtosis -0.87602
Skewness -0.07969
Range 50
Minimum 95
Maximum 145
Sum 5983
Count 50
 In the above result, minimums the lowest score which is 95; maximum,
highest score, 145; sum, total, 5983; and count, number of cases, 50.
The mean is 119.66 and the standard deviation is 14.54 of the NAT
scores of senior secondary students of the Holy Rosary Academy. The value of
one standard deviation above the mean (X + 1SD) is 119.66 + 14.54 equals
134.2 and one standard Deviation below the mean (X – 1SD) is 119 – 14.54
equals 105.12. Figure 1.1 shows the NAT scores fall on one standard deviation
above the mean (X + 1SD), within the mean, and one standard deviation below
the mean (X – 1SD) of senior secondary students of the holy Rosary Academy.

-1SD X 1SD
105.1 119.66 134.2
2
Figure 1.1
NAT scores fall on ones Standard Deviation above the mean (X + 1SD),
within the Mean, and one Standard Deviation below the Mean (X – 1SD) of the
Holy Rosary Academy Senior Secondary Students
Suppose NAT National mean is 100 and standard deviation is 12.3. one
standard deviation above the mean (X + 1SD) or 100 + 12.3 equals 112. 3 and
standard deviation below the mean (X – 1SD) or 100 – 12.3 equals 87.7. Figure
1.2 presents national NAT scores one standard deviation above the mean (X +
1SD) within the mean, and one standards deviation below the mean (X – 1SD).

-1SD X 1SD
87.7 100 112.3
The National Achievement Test (NAT) of secondary students of the Holy Rosary
Academy ranged from “Satisfactory” to “Very Satisfactory” because the lowest
score is 95 and the highest score is 145.
The students who got score of the one standard deviation above the
mean (X + 1SD) obtained “Ver Satisfactory” within the mean, “Satisfactory,”
and one standard deviation below the mean (X – 1SD), “Unsatisfactory”.
Review of Rubric Assessment of Student Learning Performance
As mentioned earlier, Rubric assessment of student learning
performance has been discussed in Chapter 9 of Assessment in Student
Learning 1. However, it is necessary to review it to refresh the concepts. In
Rubric assessment, the student is rated individually by self, subject teacher,
and teacher-adviser.
Suppose the teacher wishes to evaluate the learning performance of
student C in mathematics asses by self, peer, subject teacher, and teacher-
adviser using the Rubric Assessment. Table 1.4 presents the checklist of rubric
assessment of student C’s learning performance in mathematics.
Table 1.4. Checklist of Rubric Assessment of Student C’s Learning
Performance in Mathematics (Artificial Data)