1 PDF
1 PDF
1 PDF
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
for rectangular sections from the stress-strain relationship case, P=0. The moment M corresponding to the assumed
using equation no.(2) and equation no.(3) respectively. ᵋcm is then calculated. The corresponding curvature can
now be obtained. By carrying out the calculation for a
Area under stress-strain curve = range of ᵋcm values, the moment-curvature characteristics
can be plotted.
c d c= cm …………..(2)
Modified Kent and Park (KP) Model by Park et al.
(1982). Park et al. (1982) modified the original model by
making an allowance for the enhancement in the concrete
Therefore, ….………..(3)
strength and the peak strain due to confinement. The
increase in concrete strength was assumed to be equal to
The first moment of area about origin of area under pt fyh, where pt is the volumetric ratio of tie steel, and fyh
stress-strain curve . is the yield strength of tie steel.
Where,
.(12)
n = number of reinforcement bars
Region CD: cm 20,c
fsi = Stress in ith bar
14)
Asi = Area of ith bar
For Beam:
…………..(8)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN (Online): 2347 - 2812, Volume-5, Issue -2, 2017
3
International Journal of Recent Advances in Engineering & Technology (IJRAET)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
The simplified numerical analysis with the moment REHABILITATION OF BUILDINGS (FEMA
curvature relation still can be effectively used in the Publication 273). Washington, D. C., USA:
nonlinear analysis of RC beams and columns. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The co-ordinates of moment curvature plot of [10] FEMA 356. (2000, November). Prestandard and
(chandrasekaran, nunziante, serino,carannante) fig1.3 for commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of
beam and fig1.5 for column were plotted in MATLAB and buildings. Washington, D. C.: American Society of
compared with the calculated plot (which was obtained Civil Engineers.
from the MATLAB code) as shown in fig1.4 and fig 1.6
for beam and column respectively. [11] Inel, M., & Ozmen, H. B. (2006). Effects of plastic
hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced
REFERENCES concrete buildings. Engineering Structures,
1494-1502.
[1] Design Aids For Nonlinear Analysis Of
Reinforced Concrete Structure By [12] IS 456. (2000). Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
(Chandrasekaran, Nunziante, Serino, Carannante) New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
[2] Rudrapratap (1996) Getting started with [13] McGuire, W., Gallagher, R. H., & Ziemian, R. D.
MATLAB (2000). Matrix Structural Analysis. New Delhi:
Wiley India Pvt. Ltd.
[3] ASCE 7. (2002). Minimum design loads for
buildings and other structures. Reston, Virginia, [14] Park, R., Priestley, M., & Gill, W. (1982). Ductility
of square-confined concrete columns.
[4] USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
[15] Kent, D., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural Mechanics
[5] ATC 40. (1996, November). Seismic evaluation with Confined Concrete. Journal of the Structural
and retrofit of concrete buildings (Volume 1). Division, 1969-1990
Redwood City, California, USA.
[16] Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. (1992). Sismic Design
[6] Baker, A. L., & Amarakone, A. N. (1964). of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings.
Inelastic Hyperstatic Frames Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
International Symposium on the Flexural
Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete (pp. 85-142). [17] Powell, G. H. (2010). Modeling for Structural
Miami: ASCE-ACI. Analysis. Berkeley: Computers and
Structures,Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.
[7] Chan, W. L. (1955). The Ultimate Strength and
Deformation of Plastic Hinges in Reinforced [18] Sargin, M., Ghosh, S. K., & Handa, V. K. (1971).
Concrete Frame works. Magazine of Concrete Effects of Lateral Reinforcement upon the
Research, 121-132. Strength and Deformation Properties of Concrete.
Magazine of Concrete Research, 99-110.
[8] Deierlein, G. D., Reinhorn, A. M., & Willford, M.
R. (2010, October). Library: Design & [19] Sharma, A., Reddy, G. R., Vaze, K., Ghosh, A.,
Construction: Technical Briefs. Retrieved Kushwaha, H., & Eligehausen, R. (2008).
fromNational Earthquake Hazards Reduction Experimental and analytical investigation on
Program: http://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/ behavior of scaled down reinforced concrete
nistgcr10-917-5.pdf Eurocode 8. (2004, framed structure under monotonic pushover loads.
December). Design of structures for earthquake Mumbai: Associate Director, Knowledge
resistance-Part 1: General rules, seismic actions Management Group and Head, Scientific
and rules for buildings. Brussels, Europe: Information Resource Division, Bhabha Atomic
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR Research Centre.
STANDARDIZATION.
[20] Soliman, M. T., & Yu, C. W. (1967). The Flexural
[9] FEMA 273. (1997, October). NEHRP Stress-Strain Relationship of Concrete Confined
GUIDELINES FOR THE SEISMIC by Rectangular Transverse einforcement. Magzine
of Concrete Research, 99-110.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
ISSN (Online): 2347 - 2812, Volume-5, Issue -2, 2017
4