Expert DD MSK
Expert DD MSK
Expert DD MSK
o 0
KELETAL
Carollo Andrews, MO
Musculoskeletal Radiology
Mink Radiologic Imaging
Beverly Hills, California
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MD
Chair, Department of RadIOlogy
Vice Chair, Regional Radiology
Marymount Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Ilealth System
Cleveland, Ohio
Catherine C. Roberts, MD
Associate Dean, Mayo School of Health Sciences
Associate Professor of Radiology
Consultant Radiologist
Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Arizona
AMIRSYS8
Names you know. Content you trust.8
iii
AMIRSYS
Names you know. Content you trust.'"
First Edition
Copyright © 2009 Amirsys, Inc.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or media
or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from Amirsys, Inc.
ISBN: 978-1-9318-8403-7
III the <:aseswhere drugs or other chemh;als arc prescribed, readers arc advised to <:heck the Product information currently provided by the manufacturer of each drug to be
administered to verify the rewmll1ended dose, the method and duration of administration, and contraindicatioIlS. II is the rc,>ponsibility of the treating phrsi<:ian relying on
experit'IlCe and knowledge of the patient to determine dosages and the best tre,ltment for the patient.
10 the ma:\irnum extent permitted hy applicilhle law, Amirsys provides the Product AS IS Al'\D WITH ALL FAULTS, AND III-RLBY DJSCL\IMS ALL WARRAN'llI'S AND
CO:\D1 nOl'\S, WHETHER LXPRISS, I\lPIlU) OR STATUTORY, Il'\CLUDIl'\li BUT l'\OT IIMnrD TO, ANY (IF A"JY) l\iPUFD \\',\RRN\ 111:5OR CO:'\J[)[TIO:-\S 01
MI'RClI.\'L\BILlTY, OF F1T'\lFSSH,JR.\ P.\RIICUL.AR PURPOSE, OF LACK O~ VIRUSES, OR ACCURACY OR CO\1PIJ,T1·\:E.SS OF RLSP(Y\SLS, OR RE')UITS, ,\'1) 01
I\CK O~ \:1'(;] IGrl'\CF. OR L\CK 01 WORKMAl'\IIKF EFFORT. ALSO, THFRr IS "\0 w'·\RRAl\rrY OR CONDITIO!'\' orTITlL, Ql"IFT P,JOY\fFXT, QUilT POSSISl)]Ol\,
C()RRFSP()~f)F!\CF. TO DFSCRWTlO~ OR NO'·INFRINGHiEl\.rr, WITII REGARD TO THr PRODUCf. THE ENTIRE RISK :\5 TO TIIF QUALITY or OR·\RISI\:c; Ol'T or L'iF OR
PFRlOR\i.\l\CF OF THE PRODUCT RF\fAI~S WITH THE READER.
\mirs)"S disclaims al] warranties of .my kind if the Product was customized, repackaged or altered in any way by any third party.
Manaster, B. J.
Expertddx. Musculoskeletal / B.j. Manaster. n 1st ed.
p.; em.
title: Musculoskeletal
Includes index.
ISBN 978-1-931884-03-7
I. Musculoskeletal systemnDiseases--Diagnosis--Atlases. 2. Diagnosis, DifferentialnAtiases. I. Title. II. Title: Musculoskeletal.
IDNLM: I. Musculoskeletal Diseases--diagnosis--Atlases. 2. Musculoskeletal SystemnAtiases. 3. Diagnosis, Differential--i\tlases. WE
17 M267e 20081
RC925.7.M3482008
612.7022'2ndc22
2008039950
iv
The authors wish to dedicate this book to our fellow musculoskeletal radiologists, past and present.
ft was not so many decades ago that osseous neoplasms were not recognized as distinguishable entities,
and arthritides were treated radiographically as a sil/gle process, Dedicated l1IusCliloskeletalradiologists
were few and far betweel/; howeve/; these few individuals began to make important observations and
sllClrethem with one another, This sharing process grew into two major societies, the Society of Skeletal
Radiology al/d the International Skeletal Society, both of which continue to serve as excellent sounding
boards and learning opportunities for I/lusCliloskeletal radiologists. Many of these individuals se/ved
as our mentors. As we conducted research for this book, we came to realize how significant their
contributions were; we are tmly standing on the shoulders of giants. We authors have also reinforced our
affection for one aI/other; throughout the process of producing this book, we have continued to learn fi'O/lI
ol/e al/otlm; enjoy one another's support, and feel inspired toward continued growth.
v
Once the appropriate technical protocols have been delineated, the best quality images obtained,
and the cases queued up on PACS, the diagnostic responsibility reaches the radiology reading room. The
radiologist must do more than simply "lay words on" but reach a real conclusion. If we cannot reach a
definitive diagnosis, we must offer a reasonable differential diagnosis. A list that's too long is useless; a list
that's too short may be misleading. To be useful, a differential must be more than a rote recitation from
some dusty book or a mnemonic from a lecture way back when. Instead, we must take into account key
imaging findings and relevant clinical information.
With these considerations in mind, we at Amirsys designed our Expert Differential Diagnoses series-
EXPERTddx for short. Leading experts in every subspecialty of radiology identified the top differential
diagnoses in their respective fields, encompassing specific anatomic locations, generic imaging findings,
modality-specific findings, and clinically based indications. Our experts gathered multiple images, both
typical and variant, for each EXPERTddx. Each features at least eight beautiful images that iUustrate the
possible diagnoses, accompanied by captions that highlight the pertinent imaging findings. Hundreds
more are available in the eBook feature that accompanies every book. In classic Amirsys fashion, each
EXPERTddx includes bulleted text that distills the available information to the essentials. You'll find
helpful clues for diagnoses, ranked by prevalence as Common, Less Common, and Rare but Important.
Anne G. Osborn, MD
Executive Vice President and Editor-in-Chief, Amirsys lne.
Paula]. Woodward, MD
Executive Vice President and Medical Director, Amirsys Ine.
vii
PREFACE
The world of musculoskeletal radiology is becoming daunting, with a huge knowledge base required as
we confront an exponentially expanding number of diagnoses and their associated imaging characteristics.
We all continually attack the steep learning curve required to stay "on top" of the subspecialty, and we
welcome reference material that can quickly address specific questions regarding an imaging finding or
clinical presentation. Ex ert Differential Dia nosis: Musculoskeletal is a unique collection addressing
this need; it offers over 200 expert differential diagnoses that cover a broad spectrum of musculoskeletal
diseases, including trauma, arthritis, tumor, congenital, and metabolic disease. The lists are those our
authors feel are most useful in our daily work. They are organized according to likelihood of occurrence,
and there is both text and imaging provided to further differentiate among the differential possibilities.
The book has three major sections. The "Clinically Based" differentials will serve you best when you
are given a general directive to determine the source of pain (for example, "lateral hip pain", "nerve
entrapment of the lower extremity") or clinically observed abnormality (for example, "cavus foot
deformity", "arthritis in a teenager", "hemihypertrophy"). The "Image Based" differentials will serve you
best when you have a unique imaging appearance that has a relatively short differential (for example,
"target lesions of bone", "nodular calcification", "lesion with bright Tl signal", "enlarged peripheral
nerves"). The" Anatomy Based" differential list is necessarily long in this musculoskeletal text. Anatomic
location of abnormalities is crucially important in the musculoskeletal system. Thus, there are lists of
abnormalities involving some specific bone or joint locations (for example, "solitary rib lesion", "tibial
bowing", "fluid collections about the knee"). There are also anatomic differential lists with more generic
locations (for example, "flat bone, bubbly lesion", "long bone, undertubulation", "MCP-predominant
arthritis"). ote that, among the long bone differential lists, there is a differentiation according to
location along the length of the bone (epiphyseal/subchondral, metaphyseal, diaphyseal) as well as
transversely across the bone (central, eccentric, cortically based, surface location).
Take a few moments to look at the table of contents and familiarize yourself with the layout of the
book. You will then recognize that an abnormality you are seeking to define may be found in several lists.
For example, an abnormality consisting of multiple aggressive lesions in the pelvic girdle of a child would
be included in the "flat bones, permeative lesion" list in the anatomy based section, but also would be
discussed in the "polyostotic lesions, child" list in the image based section. Another example might be of
a hand radiograph showing acroosteolysis and DIP erosions. This would be included in the anatomically
based list "acroosteolysis" found listed under "fingers and toes" as well as in the anatomically based list
"IP-predominant arthritis" found under "joints". Perusal of the table of contents will be valuable in
making best use of this reference.
We hope that you find this book useful in your daily practice of radiology and as a study guide if you
are just entering our specialty. It should be useful to orthopedic surgeons, physiatrists, rheumatologists,
and other practitioners as well. It is, of course, inevitable that we have neglected to discuss some
differentials (remember, though, that most spine discussions are found in the Brain and Spine text). It is
just as inevitable that we have left out some entities that belong in some of the lists or that the order we
have chosen in a list is debatable. We would be happy to hear your comments and suggestions. The eBook
companion allows us to add, alter, and update our lists. Email me at bjmanaster@amirsys.com and we will
consider your suggestions.
ix
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Text Editing
Douglas Grant Jackson
Ashley R. Renlund, MA
KellieJ. Heap
Image Editing
Jeffrey J. Marmorstone
Mitch D. Curinga
Production Lead
Melissa A. Hoopes
50me images were previously published in Manaster BJ, May DA, Disler DG. Musculoskeletal Imaging: The Requisites. 2nd ed.
Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Elsevier; 2002. Each of these images is Identified by "M5K Req" in the caption.
These images appear as follows: part.page.image; 1.5.1; 1.10.1; 1.14.2; 1.25.1; 1.25.3; 1.36.5; 1.37.1; 1.37.5; 1.39.5; 1.39.6; 1.42.5; 1.46.1;
1.47.6; 1.49.2; 1.50.2; 1.53.2; 1.54.2; 1.55.2; 1.55.5; 1.55.6; 1.57.5; 1.61.1; 1.61.2; 1.62.6; 1.65.3; 1.65.4; 1.77.6; 1.82.5; 1.82.6; 1.86.5; 1.87.1;
1.87.5; 1.87.6; 1.94.1; 1.95.1; 1.95.3; 1.95.4; 1.104.3; 1.106.2; 1.118.5; 1.121.3; 1.123.1; 1.124.1; 1.127.2; 1.129.1; 1.150.4; 1.156.1; 1.156.3;
1.157.4; 1.163.6; 1.182.5; 1.184.1; 1.189.5; 1.191.3; 1.191.4; 1.239.6; 1.249.2; 1.253.1; 1.253.2; 1.254.6; 1.257.3; 1.266.1; 1.278.1; 1.333.5;
1.339.1; 1.355.3; 1.355.4; 1.371.2; 1.371.6; 11.7.6; 11.8.2; 11.13.2; 11.15.2; 11.16.3; 11.17.4; 11.18.1; 11.19.2; 11.22.6; 11.23.3; 11.27.1; 11.31.4;
11.31.6; 11.35.6; 11.41.1; 11.41.2; 11.42.2; 11.43.2; 11.46.4; 11.47.3; 11.48.2; 11.49.3; [1.51.1; 11.57.1; 11.58.1; 11.86.3; 11.87.4; 11.91.1; 11.102.1;
11.102.2; 11.114.3; 11.114.5; 11.115.2; 11.118.4; 11.119.3; 11.120.1; 11.120. 5; [1.121.5; 11.123.2; 11.129.6; 11.142.5; 11.144.1; 11.145.1; 11.145.4;
11.158.1; 11.188.6; 111.17.1; 111.75.1; 111.112.4; 111.137.6; 111.1 51.5; 111.159.6; 111.177.3; 111.181.2; and 111.183.3.
xi
SECTIONS
PART I
Anatomy Based
Flat Bones
Long Bone, Epiphyseal
Long Bone, Metaphyseal
Long Bone, Meta-Diaphyseal
Long Bone, Growth Plate
Periosteum
Joint Based
Shoulder Girdle and Upper Arm
Elbow and Forearm
Wrist and Hand
Fingers and Toes
Intervertebral Disc
Paraspinal Abnormalities
Vertebral Shape
Vertebral Lesions
Ribs
Pelvis
Hip and Thigh
Knee and Lower Leg
Foot and Ankle
PART II
Image Based
Radiograph/CT, Osseous
Radiograph/CT, Soft Tissue
MR, Osseous
MR, Soft Tissue
MR, Joint
Ultrasound
Nuclear Medicine
PART III
Clinically Based
Shoulder Girdle and Upper Arm
Elbow and Forearm
Wrist and Hand
Pelvis, Hip, and Thigh
Knee and Leg
Ankle and Foot
Spine
Systemic Disease
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Long Bone, Surface Ouxtacortical) Lesion 1-60
PART I BI Manaster, MD, 1'hD, FACR
Anatomy Based
Long Bone, Meta-Diaphyseal
Flat Bones Long Bone, Central Diaphyseal Lesion, 1-66
Flat Bones, Focally Expanded or Bubbly Lesion 1-2 Non-aggressive
B.f. Manaster, MD, PIID, FACR B.f. Manaster, MD, 1'IID, FACR
Flat Bones, Permeative Lesion 1-6 Long Bone, Diaphyseal Lesion, Aggressive: Adult 1-70
B./. Manaster, MD, PIID, FACR B.f. Manaster, MO, PhD, FACR
Long Bone, Diaphyseal Lesion, Aggressive: Child 1-74
B.f. Manaster, MO, I'hD, FACR
Long Bone, Epiphyseal
Long Bone, Aggressive Diaphyseal Lesion with 1-78
Long Bone, Epiphyseal: Irregular or Stippled 1-12 Endosteal Thickening
B.f. Manaster, MD, PIID, FACR B.f. Manaster, MD, PhD, FACR
Long Bone, Epiphyseal, Overgrowth/Ballooning 1-16 Long Bone, Cortically Based Diaphyseal Lesion, 1-80
BI Manaster, MD, PhD, FACR Sclerotic
Long Bone, Epiphysis, Sclerosis/Ivory 1-18 BI Manaster, MD, 1'hD, FA R
BI Manaster, MD, 1'110, FACR Long Bone, Cortically Based Diaphyseal Lesion, 1-84
Long Bone, Epiphyseal/Apophyseal/Subchondral 1-22 Lytic
Lytic Lesion BI Manaster, MD, PhD, FACII
BI Mallaster, MO, 1'110, FACR Long Bone, Diffuse Cortical/Endosteal 1-90
Thickening
Catherine C. Roberts, MD
Long Bone, Metaphyseal
Tibial Metadiaphyseal Cortically Based Lesion 1-94
Long Bone, Metaphyseal Bands & Lines 1-26 BI Mallaster, MD, PhO, FACR
Cheryt A. Petersilge, MD
Long Bone, Undertubulation 1-96
Long Bone, Metaphyseal Cupping 1-30 B./. Mal7I1ster, MD, I'hD, FACR
Cheryl A. l'etersilge, MO
Long Bone, Overtubulation 1-102
Long Bone, Metaphyseal Fraying 1-32 BI Manaster, MD, PhD, FACR
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MO
Long Bone, Central Metaphyseal Lesion, 1-34
Non-aggressive
Long Bone, Growth Plate
BI Manaster, MO, PhD, FACR Growth Plate, Premature Physeal Closure 1-106
Long Bone, Central Metaphyseal Lesion, 1-40 B.f. Manaster, MD, PhD, FACR
Aggressive Growth Plate, Widened Physis 1-108
BI Manaster, MD, PhD, FACR B.f. Manaster, MO, PhD, FACR
Long Bone, Metaphyseal Lesion, Bubbly 1-44
B.f. Manaster, MO, 1'IID, FACR
Periosteum
Long Bone, Eccentric Metaphyseal Lesion, 1-48
Periosteum: Aggressive Periostitis 1-1]2
Non-aggressive
Cat/JerilJe C. Roberts, MD
B.f. Manaster, MD, 1'hO, FACR
Long Bone, Eccentric Metaphyseal Lesion, I-S2 Periosteum: Solid Periostitis 1-116
Catherine C. Roberts, MD
Aggressive
B./. Manaster, MD, 1'hO, FACR Periosteum: Bizarre Horizontal Periosteal 1-]22
Long Bone, Cortically Based Metaphyseal Lesion I-56 Reaction
BI Manaster, MD, PI'D, FACR B.f. Manaster, MD, PhD, FACR
XIV
Periosteum: Periostitis Multiple 1-126 Anterosuperior Labral Variations/Pathology 1-218
Bones/Acropachy, Adult Catl1er;l1e C. Roberts, MO
E./. Mal/aster, MO, 1'110, FACR Fluid Collections about the Shoulder 1-222
Periosteum: Periostitis Multiple Bones, Child 1-130 Carol L. AI/drews, MO
EI Mal/asler, MO, 1'110, FACR
Shoulder Girdle and Upper Arm Paravertebral Ossification and Calcification 1-276
Cl1eryl A. Petersilge, MO
Clavicle Lesions, Nonarticular 1-208
Cl1eryl A. Pelersilge, MO Linear Ossification Along Anterior Spine 1-280
Cl7eryl A. Petersilge, MO
Distal Clavicular Resorption 1-212
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MO
xv
Congenital & Acquired Childhood 1-284 Fluid Collections about the Knee 1-356
Platyspondyly BI Monaster, MO, PhO, FACR
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MO
Popliteal Mass, Extraarticular 1-362
Fish (Biconcave) or H-Shaped Vertebra 1-288 BI MClllaster, MO, PhO, FACll
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MO Alterations in Meniscal Size 1-366
Squaring of One or More Vertebra 1-290 B./. Mal/aster, MO, PhO, FACR
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MO Genu Valgum (Knock Knees) 1-370
B./. Monaster, MO, PhO, FACR
Vertebral Lesions Genu Varum (Bow Leg Deformity) 1-372
B./. Mal/osler, MO, 1'110,FACR
Vertebral Body Sclerosis 1-292
Cheryl A. Petersilge, MO
PART II
Pelvis Image Based
Sacroiliitis, Bilateral Symmetric 1-3]6
BI Mal/aster, MO, PhO, FACR Radiograph/CT, Osseous
Sacroiliitis, Bilateral Asymmetric 1-320
11-2
Polyostotic Lesions, Adult
B./. MOIlOster, MO, PlIO, FACR
HI Manasler, MO, PhO, FACR
Sacroiliitis, Unilateral 1-322
Polyostotic Lesions, Child 11-8
BI Mal/aster, MO, PhO, FACR
B./. Mal/osler, MO, 1'110,FACR
Symphysis Pubis with Productive 1-324
11-14
Solitary Geographic Lytic Lesions
Changes/Fusion Catheril/e C. Roberts, MO
Catheril/e C. Roberts, MO
Sclerotic Bone Lesion, Solitary 11-20
Symphysis Pubis, Widening 1-326
B./. MOIlOslel~ MO, 1'110, FACR
Catherine C. Roberts, MO
Sclerotic Bone Lesions, Multiple 11-26
Supra-acetabular Jliac Destruction 1-330
B./. MOIlOster, MO, 1'110, FACR
Catherine C. Roberts, MO
Sclerotic Lesion with Central Lucency 11-32
Catheril/e C. Roberts, MO
Hip and Thigh Sequestration 11-36
Protrusio Acetabuli 1-334 Catherine . /lober/s, MO
Carol L. AI/drews, MO Target Lesions of Bone 11-40
Coxa Magna Deformity 1-338 Catllerine C. Roberts, MO
BI Monaster, MD, 1'110,FACR Matrix-Containing Bone Lesions 11-44
Hip Labral Tears, Etiology 1-340 B./. Monaster, MO, 1'110, FACR
B./. Monaster, MO, PhO, FACR Benign Osseous Lesions that Can Appear II-SO
Aggressive
Knee and Lower Leg HI Monaster, MO, PhO, FACR
XVI
Sclerosing Dysplasias 11-68 Target Lesion of Soft Tissues 11-158
BI Mallaster, MD, PIID, FACR Catller;lIe C. Roberts, MD
Enthesopathy 11-96
Clleryl A. Petersi/ge, M D MR, Joint
Tendon & Ligamentous Ossification 11-100
Intraarticular Low Signal Material, All Sequences 11-]90
Clleryl A. Pelersilge, MD
BI Mallaster, MD, PIID, FACR
Bone Age, Advanced 11-]02
Catllerille C. Roberts, MD
PART III
MR, Osseous Clinically Based
Bone Marrow Edema Syndromes (Proximal 11-126
Femur)
Carol L. Alldrews, MD
Shoulder Girdle and Upper Arm
Subchondral Edematous-like Signal 11-130 Painful or Enlarged Sternoclavicular Joint 11I-2
Carol L. Alldrews, MD Clleryl A. Petersilge, MD
Bone Lesions with Fluid/Fluid Levels 11-]44 Nerve Entrapment, Shoulder 11I-I 4
Call1er;lIe C. Roberts, MD Carol L. Alldrews, MD
Soft Tissue Lesions with Predominately Low Tl 11-150 Lateral Elbow Pain 11I-]8
& T2 Signal Catller;lIe C. Roberts, MD
Catller;lIe C. Roberts, MD Medial Elbow Pain 11I-22
Soft Tissue Lesions with Fluid/Fluid Levels 11-154 Clleryl A. Petersilge, MV
Catllerine C. Roberts, MD
XVll
Olecranon Bursi tis 11I-26 Diabetic Foot Complications 11I-142
Clleryl A. Petersilge, MD B.f. Monaster, MO, PlIO, FACR
Nerve Entrapment, Elbow & Wrist 11I-28
Carol L. Alldrews, MD
Spine
Painful Scoliosis 11I-144
Wrist and Hand Cheryl A. Petersilse, MD
Wrist Clicking/Clunking/Instability 11I-32
Carol L. Alldrews, MD
Systemic Disease
Ulnar Sided Wrist Pain 11I-36
Carol L. Andrews, MD
Arthritis in a Teenager 11I-148
B.f. Mal1Oster, MO, PhD, FACR
Radial Sided Wrist Pain 111-42
Carol L. Andrews, MO
Anemia with Musculoskeletal Manifestations 11I-152
Catherine C. Roberts, MO
XVlll
xxi
PART I
Anatomy Based
Flat Bones
long Bone, Epiphyseal
long Bone, Metaphyseal
long Bone, Meta-Diaphyseal
long Bone, Growth Plate
Periosteum
Joint Based
Shoulder Girdle and Upper Arm
Elbow and Forearm
Wrist and Hand
Fingers and Toes
Intervertebral Disc
Paraspinal Abnormalities
Vertebral Shape
Vertebral lesions
Ribs
Pelvis
Hip and Thigh
Knee and lower leg
Foot and Ankle
en
<ll FLATBONES, FOCAllY EXPANDED OR BUBBLYlESION
c
o
[])
>-
• Plasmacytoma relatively non-aggressive
-
E
o
III
c:
«
• Fibrous Dysplasia (FD), Pelvis
• Metastases: Thyroid, Kidney
less Common
o Lytic & bubbly in pelvis; occasionally more
aggressive with cortical breakthrough
o Requires MR survey to determine whether
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) it has advanced to more diffuse myeloma
• Chondrosarcoma, Conventional • Fibrous Dysplasia (FD), Pelvis
• Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) o FD has different manifestations in
• Hemophilia different types of bones
• Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor o Pelvic FD is usually lytic & bubbly
• Expanded lesion may be quite large
Rare but Important
• Occasionally, more mild expansion with
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma ground-glass matrix, similar to lesion in
• Chondroblastoma long bone
• Osteoblastoma o Nonaggressive appearance
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) o Often polyostotic, which suggests
• Cystic Angiomatosis diagnosis
• Metastases: Thyroid, Kidney
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Flat bones & axial skeleton most common
sites for metastatic osseous lesions
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Most metastases are focal or permeative,
• Bubbly lesion in pelvis is usually a benign and multiple
process o Solitary expanded metastases less common
o Exceptions: Metastatic, plasmacytoma,
• Tend to have either renal cell or thyroid
chondrosarcoma may appear relatively as primary lesion
nonaggressive & should be considered o Note: Renal cell metastases may be
• Hint: Patient age can be a helpful extremely vascular
differentia tor among these lesions, though • When renal cell metastasis is suspected &
not always reliable axial imaging is performed, include a
• Hint: Cartilage tumors are common in look at kidneys
pelvis & scapula; remember to consider both • If kidney shows suspicious lesion,
benign & malignant varieties consider embolization of metastatic
• Note that list order is not the likelihood of lesion prior to biopsy
the individual lesion occurring, but its • Bleeding from biopsy can be excessive &
occurring with this specific appearance even life-threatening if it is at a site
o For example, LCH is common in pelvis,
which cannot be compressed
but only rarely appears bubbly, so is listed
as "rare" Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC)
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o ABC is common lesion in patients < 30
• Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) years of age
o Lytic lesion which is usually only
o More common in long than flat bones
moderately expanded in long bones o When present in flat bones, has typical
o Often large, highly expanded & even lytic bubbly expanded appearance
bubbly in pelvis o MR shows fluid levels except in small
o Prime age range: 30-60 years minority which are solid
o MR usually contains some low signal
• Chondrosarcoma, Conventional
within predominant high signal on T2; o Common lesion in adults (30-60 years age
may have fluid levels range most frequent), rare in teenagers
I
2
FLAT BONES, FOCALLY EXPANDED OR BUBBLY LESION »
o Flat bones & metaphyses of long bones are o HPTH is common (along with Brown
-
~
Cll
o
3
'<
most frequent locations tumors) in pelvis OJ
Cll
o Generally low grade at presentation, so o Expanded bubbly appearance much less CIl
(1)
may be mildly expanded, without cortical common for Brown tumor than lytic, c.
breakthrough focal, well-marginated destruction ::!!
~
o Rarely will present as expanded or bubbly Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses OJ
o Chondroid matrix (but not invariably)
o
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma ~
CD
o Hint: Consider chondrosarcoma for any o Rare lesions, but when in pelvis or scapula
CIl
-
E
o
III
c:
<l:
wing" Despite its size, the
lesion is non·aggressive.
Fibrous dysplasia is bubbly
when it arises in the pelvis;
this is an exlreme case.
(Right) AP radiograph shows
a highly expanded lytic
lesion of the distal clavicle
•• with destruction of the
acromion by contiguous
extent Ell This was a solitary
expansile renal cell
metastasis; a thin layer of
bone actually encased the
lesion.
I
4
flAT BONES, FOCALLY EXPANDED OR BUBBLY LESION
Chondroblastoma
(Leh) AP radiograph shows a
lytic bubbly lesion in the iliac
wing in this child •. Axial
imaging proved mild
expansion. This is a rare
presentation of
chondroblastoma in the
pelvis; it ;s usually an
epiphyseal lesion. (RighI) AP
radiograph shows highly
expanded lytic lesions
involving both pubic rami ••
as well as the iliac wing _.
They are large but
non-aggressive; growth was
documented over at leas! 10
years. This is a vascular
tumor, cystic angiomatosis.
I
5
C/)
Q) FLAT BONES, PERMEATIVE LESION
c
o
[!J
ro
u:: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Radiograph often normal; MR diagnosis
• Ewing Sarcoma
"'C
ell
Common o Wider age range (5-30 years) than
C/)
<0 • Metastases, Bone Marrow osteosarcoma
III
;., • Osteomyelitis o Location tends to be different with age
E • Ewing Sarcoma
-
«
o
<0
c:
• Osteosarcoma, Conventional
• Chondrosarcoma
• Younger patients: Long bones
• Teenagers & young adults: Flat bones
o Highly aggressive permeative lesion
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone o Large soft tissue mass
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) • Osteosarcoma, Conventional
• Lymphoma o Common location: Long bones,
• Multiple Myeloma (MM) metaphyseal
• Leukemia o Flat bones, especially pelvis, are less
• Hyperparathyroidism/Renal Osteodystrophy, frequently involved
Brown Tumor • However, osteosarcoma is such a
• Fibrosarcoma common lesion that pelvic
• Plasmacytoma osteosarcomas are seen not infrequently
Less Common o Usually produce tumor osteoid:
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous Amorphous, osseous density
• Radiation Osteonecrosis o Highly aggressive, with soft tissue mass
• Chondrosarcoma
Rare but Important
o Pelvis is common location of
• Radiation-Induced Sarcoma chondrosarcoma; scapula less so
• Paget Sarcoma o May appear permeative & aggressive
• Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis • Often is lower in grade than the other
sarcomas listed above, which accounts
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION for its lower position on this list
o Chondroid matrix usually present
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Because lesion often undetected for long
• Wide range of aggressive lesions arise in flat period of time, may be large, with huge
bones soft tissue mass extending intrapelvically
• Hint: Watch for evidence of polyostotic o Watch for multiple hereditary exostosis,
lesions, which may narrow the differential which predisposes to degeneration
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Proximal sites in body are most likely to
• Metastases, Bone Marrow degenerate to chondrosarcoma
o Metastases most commonly involve axial • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone
skeleton & flat bones o Flat bones are less common site of
o Diagnosis may be difficult in pelvis & involvement than long bones
scapula o Nonspecific appearance: Lytic, permeative,
• Thin bones, often in osteoporotic cortical breakthrough with soft tissue mass
patients o Fibrosarcoma: Similar appearance
• Overlying soft tissues • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
• Osteomyelitis o Pelvis & scapula are common sites
o Either from hematogenous seeding or o Watch for polyostotic lesions in a child
direct trauma o Lesions are lytic; range of appearance from
o Watch for air in sinus tract non-aggressive to highly aggressive
o Watch for dense reactive bone formation o Aggressive lesions may show more rapid
o Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis destruction than sarcomas
• Occurs in children with several months o Aggressive lesions may have cortical
of vague pain breakthrough with soft tissue mass
• Often no systemic symptoms • Lymphoma
I
6
FLAT BONES, PERMEATIVE lESION »
:J
..•o
III
TI
• Soft tissue mass often enormous, o Often polyostotic; especially lower §I
showing a more infiltrative character extremities OJ
than sarcoma o
:J
• Radiation Osteonecrosis <t>
o Children: 50% present as polyostotic VI
o Common in sites frequently treated with
• Aggressive lesion with cortical radiation: Pelvis & scapula
breakthrough and soft tissue mass o May become less common with more
• Multiple Myeloma (MM) modern radiation treatment
o Both MM and plasmacytoma generally
• Old cases will persist for many years
have well-defined lytic lesions o Appearance: Mixed lytic & sclerotic; may
o Aggressive or permeative pattern is
be somewhat permeative; no mass
uncommon o Watch for distribution in a radiation port
o Exception for MM is a presentation
without focality but with diffuse Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
infiltration • Radiation-Induced Sarcoma
• Permeative pattern is so subtle that o Common locations same as those for
lesions not detected on radiograph; radiation osteonecrosis: Pelvic, scapula
presents with osteoporosis o Destructive change superimposed on
• Diagnosis made on MR survey radiation osteonecrosis; soft tissue mass
• Leukemia o Generally occurs 7-10 years following RT
o Often presents with such a subtle • Paget Sarcoma
infiltrative pattern that only osteoporosis o Rare degeneration of Paget bone lesion
is detected by radiograph o Only with extensive & long term disease
o MR shows extent of lesions, which often o Degeneration more frequently seen in
include flat bones axial & flat bones than long bones
• Hyperparathyroidism/Renal o Acquires appearance of lesion it
Osteodystrophy, Brown Tumor degenerates into
o Brown tumor is usually well-defined, but • Osteosarcoma: Amorphous osteoid
surrounding bone is so osteoporotic that • Chondrosarcoma: Chondroid matrix
overall appearance may be aggressive • May be mixed types of sarcomas
o Watch for other signs of bone resorption
-E
o
III
r::
<l:
has just arrived from
Ethiopia. With this history &
appearance, infection must
be considered. (Right) Axial
T1 C+ FS MR of the same
patient shows multiple
abscesses in the 50ft tissues
on either side of the scapula
Ell they communicated
through an osseous defect.
This was a Staphylococcus
osteomyelitis.
I
8
FLAT BONES, PERMEATIVE LESION »
..o
::::l
III
3
'<
OJ
III
Chondrosarcoma Chondrosarcoma
(Left) AP radiograph shows a
'"
lD
Co
lytic lesion in the iliac wing
:!!
• of a 35 year old. It ~
contains a dense chondroid OJ
matrix; the diagnosis must be o
::::l
chondrosarcoma. Note, (!)
I
9
en flAT BONES, PERMEATIVE lESION
Q)
c
o
CO
CO
u:::
"0
Ql
VI
lymphoma lymphoma
III (Left) Anteroposterior
CO radiograph shows a highly
>- permeative lesion in the
E pelvis of a young woman _.
•...oIII It could represent several
r::
« malignant processes; this is
lymphoma, with a large soft
tissue mass. (t MSK Req).
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
permeative lytic lesions
iliac wings =
involving both right & left
as well as a
femoral neck lesion E!IIII in an
African American child. 50%
of lymphomas present as a
polyostotic process in
children.
the pelvis =
throughout the majority of
confirming
infiltration. There is also a
focal femoral neck lesion 11III.
Biopsy showed multiple
myeloma.
Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
leukemia Osteodystrophy, Brown Tumor
(Left) Axial STIR MR shows a
diffuse infiltrative process
involving the entire pelvis as
well as sacrum. The]O year
old patient had diffuse bone
pain but no focal
abnormalities on radiograph
(not shown), typical of
leukemia. (Right) AP
radiograph shows a poorly
marginated, mildly
aggressive lesion within the
acetabulum III. There is also
a well-circumscribed lesion
in the femoral neck EiIl as
well as osteopenia. This
makes the diagnosis of
Brown tumor.
I
10
FLAT BONES, PERMEATIVE LESION
Fibrosarcoma Plasmacytoma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a lytic
permeative lesion in the
pubic bones" with cortical
breakthrough and a soft
tissue mass. This is a
nonspecific appearance;
biopsy showed
fibrosarcoma. (Right) AP
radiograph shows a highly
aggressive lytic lesion
destroying the left iliac wing
_ extending to the sacrum.
Though plasmacytoma most
frequently has a less
aggressive appearance; that
proved to be the diagnosis in
this case.
I
11
co
Q)
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSEAL: IRREGULAR OR STIPPLED
l/J
>-
.J::
Cl.
Cl. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Warfarin embryopathy
W • Chondrodysplasia punctata
Q)
c
Common
o Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
CO • Normal Variant in Child (Mimic)
• Normal Variant in Child (Mimic)
Ol • Osteonecrosis
C
o o Seen in adolescents
--' • Legg-Calve-Perthes (LCP)
o Located on posterior aspect of femoral
"'C • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
Ql
l/J
condyles
ltl Less Common • Seen best on AP notch view which
CO
>. • Rickets profiles posterior femoral condylar
E • Hypothyroidism surface
•...o
ltl
C
• Osteomyelitis • Generally not visible on regular AP view
<l: • Complications of Warfarin (Coumadin) • May be seen on lateral
• Chondrodysplasia Punctata o MR shows overlying cartilage to be normal
• Trevor Fairbank (Dysplasia Epiphysealis o Do not confuse with pathologic process
Hemimelica) such as osteochondral injury or JIA
• Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia • Osteonecrosis
• Nail Patella Disease (Fong) o Prior to significant flattening, may see
Rare but Important punctate fragments in bed of site of
• Thermal Injury, Frostbite necrosis
• Complications of Dilantin • Legg-Calve-Perthes (LCP)
o Femoral head osteonecrosis in child (usual
• Hypoparathyroidism
• Hyperparathyroidism age range 4-8 years)
• Hypopituitarism o Capital epiphyseal flattening, increased
• Acromegaly density, fragmentation
o Results in coxa magna deformity
• Trisomy 18
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
• Fetal Alcohol Syndrome o "Crenulated" irregularity of carpal bones
• Mucopolysaccharidoses o Irregularity on femoral condylar articular
• Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia surface
• Pseudoachondroplasia Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Homocystinuria • Rickets
• Oilier Disease/Maffucci (Mimic) o True abnormality is metaphyseal/physeal
widening & fraying
o With weakened physis, epiphysis may slip,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
resulting in irregularity & fragmentation
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Hypothyroidism
• May be able to separate into irregular versus o Infant: Stippled epiphyses
stippled epiphyses o Toddler: Severe delay in skeletal
o Common diagnoses for "irregular" maturation
epiphyses • Fragmentation of femoral capital
• Normal variant, knee epiphysis
• Osteonecrosis • Osteomyelitis
• Legg-Calve-Perthes o Prenatal or childhood infections may cross
• Juvenile idiopathic arthritis from metaphysis to involve epiphysis
• Rickets • Epiphysis may slip
• Osteomyelitis • Destructive change results in irregularity,
• Trevor Fairbank fragmentation
• Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia • Complications of Warfarin (Coumadin)
o Common diagnoses for "stippled" o Maternal ingestion during early pregnancy
epiphyses o Stippled epiphyses
• Hypothyroidism
I
12
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSEAL: IRREGULAR OR STIPPLED »
-
E Anteroposterior radiograph
o shows irregularity, flattening,
I'll and increased density in the
c:
<l: femoral capital epiphysis •.
This child has typical
Legg-Calve-Perthes. (t MSK
Req).
Hypothyroidism Hypothyroidism
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
fragmentation of the femoral
capital epiphysis •.. This
patient also had severely
delayed skeletal maturation.
This appearance suggests
LCp, but it is also seen in
hypothyroidism. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
in an infant shows stippled
epiphyses" at the femoral
head/greater trochanter.
Hypothyroidism is one of
several entities that may
present with stippled
epiphyses.
I
14
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSEAL: IRREGULAR OR STIPPLED »
:J
..•o
III
3
'<
[D
III
VI
Osteomyelitis Complications of Warfarin (Coumadin) <tl
(Left) Lateral radiograph a.
shows irregularity & r
fragmentation of the o
:J
calcaneal apophysis m This <0
patient has osteomyelitis, III
o
with the associated :J
<tl
destruction. (Right) AP
radiographs show stippling m
"2.
of the epiphyses and "0
apophyses" of the ::r
'<
VI
acetabulum and femoral
CD
head. This infant's mother OJ
had been given Warfarin
during pregnancy; stippled
epiphyses are one
manifestation of Warfarin
embryopathy.
I
15
ro
Q)
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSEAL,OVERGROWTH/BALLOONING
(/)
>-
.r:
a.
a.
W
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
Q)
Common • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA)
c
o o Hemophilia: Similar to JIA
en • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA)
o Chronic hyperemia from synovitis alA) or
OJ
c • Hemophilia: MSK Complications
o recurrent intraarticular bleed (hemophilia)
-l Less Common o Knee> elbow> ankle
"tl
Ql • Septic Joint o Erosion of intercondylar or trochlear notch
III
III
en • Epiphyseal Fracture, Pediatric o Erosions, cartilage loss in both
>. • Epiphyseal Dysplasia • JIA may be distinguished by carpal fusion
•..Eo
III
• Hyperemia, Other Causes
• Turner Syndrome (Mimic)
• Hemophilia may be distinguished by
dense effusion (hemosiderin deposition)
C
« • Blount Disease (Mimic)
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Rare but Important • Septic Joint
• Meningococcemia (Mimic) o Effusion, cartilage loss, erosions
o Tuberculosis or fungal etiologies more
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION likely to result in overgrowth than
bacterial
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Slower joint destruction, so occurs over a
• Hyperemia is the fundamental cause of longer period of time, allowing chronic
overgrowth in several cases hyperemia
o In skeletally immature patient • Less likely to have reactive osseous
• Prolonged hyperemia adjacent to joint ...• change than bacterial etiology
overgrowth (ballooning) of epiphysis • Epiphyseal Fracture, Pediatric
• In addition to enlarged epiphysis, o Hyperemia with fracture healing results in
hyperemia ...•early physeal fusion ...•short overgrowth
limb o Watch for malunion
o Etiologies of overgrowth secondary to • Epiphyseal Dysplasia
hyperemia include o May be fragmented in severe cases or
• Hemophilia overgrown if less severe
• Juvenile idiopathic arthritis • Turner & Blount Disease (Mimics)
• Septic joint, particularly tuberculosis or o Underdevelopment or collapse of medial
fungal etiology tibial condyle results in relative
• Epiphyseal or metaphyseal fracture overgrowth of medial femoral condyle
o
3
'<
01
Ql
VI
Septic Joint Epiphyseal Fracture, Pediatric (1)
(Left) AP ,adiograph shows C.
an enlarged left femoral head
& neck =.This /2 year old
had a septic joint treated 9
r
o
:::l
(Q
Meningococcemia (Mimic)
(Left) AP radiograph shows
collapse of the medial tibial
metaphysis .:I in Blount
disease. There may be
compensatory overgrowth of
the medial femoral condyle
Ell but rarely enough to
prevent a significant varus
deformity. (Right) AP
radiograph shows
fragmentation & dysmorphic
changes in the femoral
capital epiphysis EilI typical
of meningococcemia. This
mimics a ballooned
epiphysis, but is due to
ischemia from thrombotic
episodes.
I
17
C'O
Q)
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSIS, SCLEROSIS/IVORY
VI
>-
.s:::
C-
on. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
w
Q)
Common • Osteonecrosis (AVN)
c
o o Sclerosis is 1st radiographic sign of AVN,
al • Osteonecrosis (AVN)
OJ • Renal Osteodystrophy secondary to surrounding osteopenia
c
o (relative sclerosis)
.-J Less Common • Classic appearance is central sclerosis in
"'C
ell • Cement & Bone Fillers, Normal femoral head
VI
<ll
al
• Neoplasm o Later, sclerosis is secondary to osseous
>- o Chondroblastoma impaction from collapse
E
-
«
o
<ll
C
o Ewing Sarcoma
o Osteosarcoma, Conventional
• Legg-Calve-Perthes (LCP)
o Even later, sclerosis is from reparative bone
formation
• Renal Osteodystrophy
• Osteopoikilosis o Diffuse sclerosis, including epiphyses
• Osteopetrosis • May be part of primary disease, due to
• Pycnodysostosis activation of osteoblasts
Rare but Important • More prominent, as neostosis, when
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) undergoing effective treatment
• Hypopituitarism o Indistinct trabeculae
-o
ra
r::
<l:
shows sclerosis in the radial
epiphysis _ but there is
also generalized increased
density as well as
indistinctness of the
/fabeculae. Endosteal
resorptive pal/ern adds 10
the Findings of renal
osteodystfOphy.
I
20
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSIS, SCLEROSIS/IVORY :r>
~
..•
~
o
3
'<
OJ
~
III
Chondroblastoma <Il
(Left) Late,al radiograph a.
shows a lytic lesion with r
surrounding dense sclerosis o
::J
Ell There is thick, dense <0
periosteal reaction" The OJ
o
lesion is typical of ::J
<ll
chondroblastoma. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows m
"0
uniform sclerosis of the "0
epiphysis _ without ::r
'<
III
destructive changes. This
<ll
patient had Ewing sarcoma OJ
that originated in the
metaphysis & extended to
involve the epiphysis; the
density is due to reactive
change.
Osteosarcoma, Conventional
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a densely
sclerotic metaphysis,
extending to the epiphysis,
with periosteal reaction and
soft tissue mass" all
typical of osteosarcoma.
There is an ossified lymph
node metastasis III (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows flattened and sclerotic
femoral capital epiphysis _.
This is typical of advanced
Legg-Calve-Perthes disease
and will develop into a coxa
magna deformity.
Osteopoikilosis Osteopetrosis
(Left) Axial NECT shows
multiple small round
sclerotic densities in both
femoral epiphyses and both
acetabulae. The appearance
is typical of osteopoikilosis, a
sclerosing dysplasia. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows uniform density of the
epiphyses _ as well as the
remainder of the bones in
this child. Note also the
undertubulation of the
femora Ell indicating poor
remodeling with growth. This
is typical osteopetrosis.
I
21
m
(I)
lONG BONE, EPIPHYSEALIAPOPHYSEALISUBCHONDRAllYTIC lESION
en
>-
.r:
Cl.
'0. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Lytic lesion arising eccentrically within the
w epiphysis
(I)
c:: Common • May extend into the metaphysis as the
o
CD • Giant Cell Tumor physis fuses, but origin is clearly
OJ
c:: • Chondroblastoma epiphysis
o • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
--l • Location of origin may be confusing at
"0 • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric irregular physis in proximal humerus
Cl>
en • Lymphoma o Narrow zone of transition, but margin
m
CD • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis usually sclerotic; this helps to distinguish
>.
E • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) from GCT
-
m
o
c::
<l:
• Metastases, Bone Marrow
• Osteoarthritis
o May contain subtle chondroid matrix, but
may be entirely lytic
less Common • Subchondral Cyst: May become large,
• Gout simulating a lytic subchondral lesion
• Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath o Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
• Osteomyelitis, Adult • May develop particularly large
subchondral cysts
Rare but Important • Hint: Watch for subtle chondrocalcinosis
• Amyloid Deposition to consider the diagnosis
• Soft Tissue Mass Erosion (Mimic) • Most frequent locations: Knee, wrist, hip
• Chondrosarcoma, Clear Cell o Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
(PVNS)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • May develop large subchondral
cysts/erosions
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Monoarticular
• Hint: Consider patient age; only a limited • Associated nodular or lining synovitis
number of lesions are epiphyseal/apophyseal which contains mixed low & high MR
in children signal on T2 and enhances
• Hint: In older adult, look for reasons to o Osteoarthritis
suspect an arthritic etiology, with • Associated subchondral cysts are
subchondral cyst creating the "lytic lesion" particularly large in acetabulum (termed
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses "Egger cysts"); this is the site most likely
• Giant Cell Tumor to be confused with lytic lesion
o GCT: Lytic lesion arising eccentrically in • In long bones, watch for associated
metaphysis; location is highly specific osteophytes & cartilage loss
• By time of discovery, has usually o Gout
extended to subchondral bone; this • Occasionally develops large subchondral
makes GCT fall into the subchondral cysts without other signs of arthritis,
bone lesion category which may be confusing
• Hint: Narrow zone of transition but • Watch for other sites of arthritis, may
margin generally not sclerotic; this have more typical appearance of gout
character is often a distinguishing feature o Amyloid Deposition
• Occasionally may appear & behave • Deposition in bone appears as
aggressi vely subchondral lesion containing low signal
• Most frequent age range: 30-60 material
o Rarely arises in skeletally immature patient • Usually associated prominent thickening
• Begins in metaphysis & crosses into of tendons &/or capsule which remains
epiphysis as physis fuses low signal intensity on MR
• Will not show the sclerotic margin of • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric
chondroblastoma
• Chondroblastoma
I
22
lONG BONE, EPIPHYSEAl/APOPHYSEAl/SUBCHONDRAllYTIC lESION »
..
:J
III
o
o Metaphyseal location is most common site 3
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses '<
of osteomyelitis in child, due to terminal • Soft Tissue Mass Erosion (Mimic) OJ
III
vascular configuration o Erosion from adjacent soft tissue mass
VI
C1>
o Young children have vessels crossing Co
usually is only focal scalloping r
physis; they may develop osteomyelitis in o Larger erosion may, if imaged en face, give o
:J
epiphysis or both locations the appearance of a lytic lesion
CO
CD
• Lymphoma • Chondrosarcoma, Clear Cell o
:J
o In children, 50% of cases present as CD
o Rare chondrosarcoma arising in the
multifocallesion m
epiphysis or subchondral region "2.
o Most lesions are metadiaphyseal & are o Generally does not appear aggressive
-0
::::r
highly aggressive '<
o Hint: Often misdiagnosed as VI
CD
o When in epiphysis, lesions are aggressive OJ
chondroblastoma; if pathology not in
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis agreement, consider this lesion
o Often polyostotic; most frequent location
is fiat bones and diaphyses Alternative Differential Approaches
o May also appear in epiphyses & apophyses • True epiphyseal lesions (prior to skeletal
o Range of appearance & behavior from maturation)
non-aggressive to highly aggressive o Chondroblastoma
AP radiograph shows
non-sclerotic margin •.
a lytic geographic lesion with
It arises in the metaphysis but
AP radiograph shows a lytic lesion arising in the
epiphysis of the humerus • in a teenager (note the
I
extends to the subchondral cortex. The constellation of nearly fused physis 1IlJ. The margin is more sclerouc
findings in this young adult is typical of GCT. than in most GCTs but typical of chondroblastoma.
23
C'O
Q)
LONG BONEr EPIPHYSEAL/APOPHYSEAL/SUBCHONDRAL LYTIC LESION
'"
>.
.r:
Q.
Q.
W
Q)
c Pyrophosphate Arthropathy Osteomyelitis, Pediatric
o
CO (Leh) Sagittal T2WI MR
OJ shows multiple subchondral
c
o cysts •• along with
--l osteophytes in an older
"C patient. The radiograph
Gl
IJ) showed chondrocalcinosis.
nl The diagnosis is
aJ
pyrophosphate arthropathy,
>-
E which may develop huge
•..
o
nl
subchondral cysts. (RighI)
Sagittal T1WI MR shows low
c:
« signal replacing Hoffa fat
pad, extending inlO the tibial
epiphysis EilI in a 4 year old.
This is typical of epiphyseal
osteomyelitis, which may be
seen in children. The
radiograph was normal.
I
24
LONG BONE, EPIPHYSEAL/APOPHYSEAL/SUBCHONDRAL LYTIC LESION :>
::l
..•.
III
o
3
'<
[l:J
III
III
Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath Cl>
(Left) AP ,adiograph shows a Co
Iylic well-circumscribed r
lesion" in a 45 year old o
:J
woman. There was no other <C
Osteomyelitis, Adult
(Left) Axial bone CT shows a
serpiginous lytic lesion •.
wilhin the femoral
subchondral region. There is
surrounding sclerotic osseous
reaction. The pattern is
typical of osteomyelitis.
Subchondral location is
unusual in absence of septic
joint (t MSK Req). (Right)
Sagittal T2WI MR shows a
subchondral erosion
containing low signal
malerial ElIl along with low
signal thickening of Ihe
rolator cuff tendons" BOlh
findings are Iypical of
amyloid deposilion.
Soft Tissue Mass Erosion (Mimic) Soft Tissue Mass Erosion (Mimic)
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a Iylic
lesion within the lateral
humeral condyle" The
lesion appears
well-marginated, though
there are regions that appear
slighlly more aggressive •.
(Right) Sagiltal STIR MR of
the same patient shows a
large softlissue lesion •.
which proved 10 be
schwannoma, with local
invasion into the distal
humerus" It is unusualto
have such extensive local
osseous invasion.
I
25
LONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL BANDS & LINES
• Scurvy • Hyperemia
• Congenital Infection o LB: Bone resorption leads to osteoporosis
• Aminopterin Fetopathy o Arthritis, infection
• Hypophosphatasia • Heavy Metal or Chemical Ingestion
• Erythroblastosis Fetalis o DB, AB: Lead most common; lines are late
• Osteopathia Striata manifestation
• Primary Oxalosis • Rickets
o LB, VB (healing): Manifestation of bone
resorption of hyperparathyroidism
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Radiation
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o VB, LB, DB; ± physeal widening, fraying
• Manifestations include: Dense horizontal o DB, AB during healing
bands (DB), lucent bands (LB), alternating Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
dense & lucent bands (AB), vertical dense • Leukemia
bands (VB) o LB: May also see osteolytic lesions,
o AB indicate multiple insults separated in periostitis
time o DB, during healing
• Most are systemic, involve multiple physes o 2-5 years old
o Especially at knee, wrist (sites of greatest • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
growth) o LB due to hyperemia & chronic illness
I
26
LONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL BANDS & LINES :l>
:J
...•
III
o
o Monoarticular to symmetric polyarticular o DB: Ligament & tendon ossification, axial 3
'<
o Uniform joint space narrowing, marginal & appendicular III
III
erosions, periostitis o Osteosclerosis, abnormal dentition, VI
CD
• Ankylosing Spondylitis subcutaneous calcification Q.
r
o LB due to osteoporosis, hyperemia • Pseudohypoparathyroidism o
:J
o Anterior & posterior spinal fusion o DB: Same as hypoparathyroidism CO
CO
o Symmetric sacroiliitis o Differentiating features o
:J
o Hip, shoulder arthritis; enthesopathy • Short stature, developmental delay <1>
-E
o
ltl
c:
<l:
slress fracture with ill-defined
sclerotic line E!II and
adjacent periosteal new
bone formation __
I
28
LONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL BANDS & LINES :I>
~
..•.
III
o
3
'<
tll
III
II>
leukemia leukemia (1)
(Leh) Anteroposterior 0-
radiograph shows diffuse r
osteopenia and subtle lucent o
::>
metaphyseal bands. in co
this patient with leukemia. IJJ
o
(Right) Oblique radiograph ::>
CD
shows lypical appearance of
leukemic metaphyseal lucent 5:
CD
lines. at the ankle. 1ii
-0
::r
'<
II>
CD
OJ
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows typical
appearance of syphilis on
radiographs. The tibias show
Wimberger signs Ell and
generalized metaphyseal
osteiti5~which appears as
lucent bands •. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a typical appearance
of congenital syphilis with
generalized metaphyseal
osteitis manifesting as
metaphyseal lucencies _
I
29
ro lONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL CUPPING
<ll
VI
>.
.r:
Q.
May be isolated or involve random sites
a;ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o
~ Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
Common
<ll
C
• Normal Variant • Child Abuse, Metaphyseal Fx (Mimic)
o
0)
• Child Abuse, Metaphyseal Fx (Mimic) o Horizontal shear through growth plate;
OJ
C periostitis during healing
o less Common
--' • Renal Osteodystrophy Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
"0
CIl
VI • Rickets • Renal Osteodystrophy
o Combination of rickets &
'"
III • Pediatric Fracture
>- • Prolonged Immobilization hyperparathyroidism (HPTH)
-E
o
«'"
c:
• Sickle Cell Anemia
Rare but Important
• Pediatric Fracture
o Delayed complication
• Prolonged Immobilization
• Post Infection o Associated disuse osteoporosis
• Radiation-Induced • Sickle Cell Anemia
• Scurvy o Metacarpals, metatarsals; AVN, infarcts,
• Hypophosphatasia coarse trabecula, dactylitis, osteomyelitis
• Achondroplasia
• Metaphyseal Dysplasias Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Polio (Prolonged Immobilization) • Radiation-Induced
o Regional mixed t & • bone density
• Hypervitaminosis A
• Scurvy
o Subperiosteal hemorrhage, osteopenia
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Hypophosphatasia
o Coarse trabecula, osteopenia
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Rickets, renal osteodystrophy & • Achondroplasia
o Short femora & humeri; spine & pelvic
hypophosphatasia: Overgrowth of
disorganized chondrocytes anomalies
o Hint: Involves sites of rapid growth: Distal
• Metaphyseal Dysplasias
o Short stature, bowing of long bones
radius/ulna, distal femur, proximal tibia,
costochondral articulations • Polio (Prolonged Immobilization)
o Especially knees, metatarsals; muscle
• Other entities: Oligemia, thrombosis create
central metaphyseal depression; causative wasting, thin gracile osteoporotic bones
insult need not be at growth plate • Hypervitaminosis A
o Hyperostosis, premature physeal fusion
I Anteroposterior radiograph shows 2 metaphyseal corner Posteroanterior radiograph shows a widened zone or
30
fractures E!II of the upper humerus in this vicUm of child
abuse. The fractures mimic the appearance of a
widened and cupped metaphysis.
metaphyses of the radius and ulna
chronic renal disease.
=
provisional calcification and cupping/fraying of the
in this child with
:t>
LONG BONEr METAPHYSEAL CUPPING :J
...•
Dl
o
3
'<
to
Dl
VI
(1)
(Left) AntelOposteriOl 0-
radiograph shows changes of r
nutritional deficiency rickets o
:J
including metaphyseal <0
cupping and fraying of the OJ
o
distal radius and ulna •• :J
(!)
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows changes of ;s::
(!)
rickets. The glOwth plate
OJ
-0
changes are due to an
::T
increase ;n the number of '<
chondlOcytes with 1055of the
en
(!)
Q)
normal columnar
organization, leading to
widening and cupping of the
glOwth plate.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows classic
signs of scurvy including
osteopenia and dense lines
at the metaphyses and
epiphyses. Mild cupping is
present at the proximal and
distal metaphyses of both
tibia and fibula ••. (Right)
AntelOposterior radiograph
of a patient with
hypophosphatasia shows
oSleopenia and a widened
zone of provisional
ossification of the growth
plates •• with mild cupping
of the distal femur EiII.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows flaring
(cupping) of the metaphyses
of the distal femora" in
this patient with
achondlOplasia. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
widening of the distal radial
metaphysis" with mild
irregularity of the growth
plate in this patient with
metaphyseal dysplasia.
I
31
lONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL FRAYING
3
'<
OJ
Cl
VI
(\)
(Left) Late,al ,adio8faph 0-
shows demineralization of r
the posterior calcaneus with o
::J
(Q
i"egula,ity of the central
portion of the metaphyseal OJ
o
side of the growth plate. ::J
co
in this patient with biopsy &
culture-proven osteomyelitis. ~
(Right) Anteroposterior
co
5i
radiograph shows changes of "0
::T
a healing ischial tuberosity '<
VI
avulsion. The growth plate is co
widened and i"egular. OJ
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a widened
zone of provisional
calcification at all the physes
of the knee. in this patient
with nutritional rickets. The
weakened physes have
allowed a valgus deformity
to develop. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a widened zone of
provisional ossification at the
physes • as well as diffuse
osteopenia. Serological
studies proved
hypophosphatasia.
I
33
ro
Q)
lONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL lESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE
l/J
>.
.c
0-
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o May have small focal regions of endosteal
Q)
~ scalloping; no periosteal reaction
Q)
Common • Enostosis (Bone Island)
c • Enchondroma
o o Dense, regular hamartomatous cortical
en • Enostosis (Bone Island) bone formation in marrow
Ol
c • Paget Disease
o o Fades into normal bone at edges
-.J
• Chronic Osteomyelitis o May be large and continue to enlarge
"0
CIl
l/J
• Bone Infarct o Elicits no reaction; low signal on all MR
en'" • Hyperparathyroidism sequences; does not enhance
>. • Chondrosarcoma, Conventional • Paget Disease
•..oE • Desmoplastic Fibroma
• Intraosseous Lipoma
o Usually originates at subchondral bone
and progresses through metaphysis
~
'c" • Plasmacytoma towards diaphysis
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o Variably lytic, mixed lytic and sclerotic,
• Fibrous Dysplasia depending on stage
• Unicameral Bone Cyst o Enlarges the involved bone
• Metastases, Bone Marrow o Sharp sclerotic margin ("blade of grass")
• Fibroxanthoma (NOF) (Thin Bone) • Chronic Osteomyelitis
• Giant Cell Tumor (Large) o Applies to any variety (e.g., bacterial,
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (Thin Bone) tuberculosis, fungal)
less Common o Lytic, oval, well-marginated, metaphyseal
• Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor (LSMFT) lesion; not as permeative as acute bacterial
• Tuberculosis osteomyelitis
• Fungal o Elicits surrounding reactive bone
• Osteoblastoma formation in marrow and thick
periosteal/endosteal reaction
Rare but Important • TB and fungal osteomyelitis generally
• Vascular Tumor elicit less prominent osseous reaction
• Chondrosarcoma, Clear Cell o MR may show chronic intraosseous abscess
• Sarcoidosis • Bone Infarct
• Ollier Disease o Central, metaphyseal, geographic, lytic
• Maffucci Syndrome lesion; often noted only after dystrophic
calcification forms
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Dystrophic calcification often
serpiginous in pattern
o When diffuse (as in sickle cell disease),
may appear as a generalized t density
• Hyperparathyroidism
o Brown tumor is lytic and geographic, with
subtle sclerotic margin
o Often central metaphyseal, but not
restricted to this location
o Should see other signs of osseous
resorption: Mixed increased & decreased
bone density & various resorption patterns
o Brown tumor often hyperossifies once
treated, mimicking a sclerotic lesion
• Chondrosarcoma, Conventional
o Location: Central metaphysis, particularly
for chondrosarcoma arising in
enchondroma
I
34
LONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL LESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE »
..
;:,
Ql
o
o Chondroid matrix usually present, though o Initial plasma cell lesion, prior to 3
'<
it may be sparse or even absent dissemination as multiple myeloma III
Ql
o Most metaphyseal chondrosarcomas are o Generally non-aggressive to minimally VI
(t)
I
36
lONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL lESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE >::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
Ul
Intraosseous lipoma Plasmacytoma (l)
(Leh) AP radiograph shows a a.
faint lytic lesion in the central r
metaphysis. which has no o
::l
other defining features on to
radiograph. It has elicited no aJ
o
host reaction. MR proved fat ::l
(1)
signal within the entire lesion
on all sequences. (t MSK
Req). (Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a large
central metaphyseal lytic
lesion. It appears geographic,
but with non·sc/erotic
margins •. This description
applies to giant cell tumor as
well as plasmacytoma; the
latter was proven at biopsy.
I
37
C1l
OJ
LONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL LESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE
II)
>-
.r:
Cl.
C1l
Q)
:2
OJ Fibroxanthoma (NOF) (Thin Bone) Fibroxanthoma (NOF) (Thin Bone)
C
o (Leh) AP radiograph in this
CO young child shows a large
Ol bubbly lesion occupying the
C
o central metadiaphysis. The
.....J
humerus is thin at this age,
"0
Q)
and fibroxanthoma may
I/) occupy the entire width of
01
CO the bone, rather than having
>- its usual cortically based
E appearance. (Right) AP
•...o
01
radiograph in a child shows
C a lytic lesion occupying the
<t: entire metaphysis of the
fibula .:II. Normally
eccentric lesions like NOF
may appear central in thin
bones. Note the more typical
lesion in the tibia BI.
I
38
~
lONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL lESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE
.•
::J
Ql
o
3
'<
III
Ql
III
Tuberculosis Osteoblastoma (1)
(Left) PA radiog,aph shows a a.
multiloculated central r
metaphyseal lytic lesion III. o
:::J
/I has elicited a small amount <C
Sarcoidosis
(Lefl) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
longstanding lytic lesion
within the central metaphysis
of the femur. It has elicited
very regular periosteal and
endosteal reaction. This was
a case of Iymphangiomalosis,
present {or> 10 years.
(RighI) Oblique radiograph
shows central metaphyseal
lytic lesions containing lacy
trabeculae _ typical of
phalangeal sarcoidosis.
I
39
LONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE
o May also arise in the central metaphysis o GCT generally is eccentric within the
s::
(t)
I
42
LONG BONE, CENTRAL METAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE »
::J
..•o
Ql
3
'<
OJ
Ql
Plasmacytoma Ewing Sarcoma t/I
=
(1)
(Left) AP radiograph shows a a.
lytic expanded lesion that r
has no sclerotic margin and o
::J
(Q
has cortical breakthrough,
located in a metaphyseal CD
o
equivalent. This moderately ::J
CD
aggressive appearance and
location is typical of
plasmacytoma. (Right) AP
radiograph in an 8 year old
shows a highly aggressive
lesion =.
central metadiaphyseal
Though Ewing
sarcoma ;s thought of as a
diaphyseal lesion, it is not
uncommon for it to arise in
the metadiaphysis.
leukemia
(Left) Coronal STIR MR
shows a prominent
meta diaphyseal lesion
this ]0 year old, which
in =
proved to be acute leukemia.
The radiograph was normal.
Thispermeative lesion was
not solitary; note lesions
throughout the pelvis and
left femur. (Right) AP
radiograph shows an
aggressive permeative lesion
in the femoral neck =This
is a nonspecific appearance,
but it should be remembered
that LCH may appear highly
aggressive, imitating Ewing
sarcoma and osteomyelitis.
I
43
lONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL LESION, BUBBLY
chondrosarcoma expansion
o Common lesion in metaphysis that usually • Exception: Thyroid & kidney metastases
appears relatively non-aggressive, though often are solitary & highly expanded
not often truly bubbly o If kidney metastasis is suspected, consider
• Generally low grade (though may be unusual appearance for the lesion OJ
o
::l
large) when first discovered o If adjacent to cortex, expansion may lead CO
• May cause mild expansion, with to a mild bubbly appearance s:
CO
pseudotrabeculation, appearing bubbly o Lytic or small amount of chondroid fii
-0
• Adjacent cortex generally thinned, but • Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) ::T
'<
may cause endosteal thickening, o Common lesion of childhood (j)
CO
Q)
especially immediately distal to lesion o Central metaphyseal (especially proximal
• Chondroid matrix, but may be lytic humerus) is most frequent location
o Danger lies in underdiagnosis, leading to o Most common appearance is of central
potentially catastrophic undertreatment lucency with mild expansion of bone &
• If treated as benign with curettage & thinning of endosteal cortex
bone grafting, lesion will recur, often • With time, may develop
with spread to local soft tissues pseudotrabeculations in wall, giving a
o Hint: Always consider chondrosarcoma in "bubbly" appearance
following circumstances • Generally not truly significantly
• Proximal femoral or humeral expanded or bubbly
metaphyseal, PLUS • Enchondroma, Phalanx
• "Non-aggressive bubbly" lesion, PLUS o Enchondroma in long bone is generally
• Patient falls in 30-60 year age range! not expansile, except for mild focal
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses scalloping of endosteal cortex
o Exception: Small bones of hands & feet
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma (CMF)
o Most frequent location is eccentric in
• Enchondroma may show significantly
proximal tibial metaphysis bubbly expansion
o Uncommon lesion seen mostly in children
• Appears more aggressive than it behaves
and young adults • Often has punctate chondroid matrix,
o Sclerotic margination & bubbly appearance
but may be entirely lytic
o allier disease & Maffucci syndrome have
o Usually lytic, though may have chondroid
similar bubbly appearance of phalangeals
-
E
o
III
C
«
give such an appearance.
!tMSK Req). (RighI) AP
radiograph shows a
longstanding GCT that has
expanded with a somewhat
bubbly appearance. There
are pseudotrabeculations;
the location & appearance is
typical of GO:
I
46
LONG BONE, METAPHYSEAL LESION, BUBBLY »
::l
...•
ell
o
3
'<
Dl
ell
Chondromyxoid Fibroma (CMF) Chondroblastoma (CB) III
ll>
(Left) Anteroposterior a.
radiograph shows a mildly r
expanded and bubbly lesion o
::l
located eccentrically in the to
tibial metaphysis Ia. The OJ
o
tibia is the most frequent :J
CD
location, and this is a typical
appearance of CMF. (Right) s:
CD
Axial bone CT shows a small
1ii
bubbly eccentric lesion. at TI
::r
the junction of epiphysis & '<
VI
metaphysis in a young adult. CD
There is a small focus of Ol
chondroid matrix IIID; this is
chondroblas/oma.
Enchondroma, Phalanx
(Left) AI' radiograph in a
child shows a mildly
expanded metaphyseal
lesion. Pseudotrabeculations
may occasionally be seen in
UBC" particularly in the
healing phase, making them
appear bubbly. UBC more
normally is more bland in
appearance. (Right) I'A
radiograph shows a bubbly,
highly expanded phalangeal
lesion. Enchondroma in
other locations does not
appear bubbly but often
does when located in the
phalanx. Note the subtle
chondroid matrix.
I
47
lONG BONE, ECCENTRIC METAPHYSEAL lESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE
I
50
lONG BONE, ECCENTRIC METAPHYSEAL LESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE :t>
::l
..•o
III
3
'<
III
III
VI
Chronic Osteomyelitis ltl
(Left) AP radiograph shows Q.
an eccentric, lytic, r
geographic lesion within the o
:J
metaphysis". There is a <C
Chondroblastoma (Mimic)
(Left) AP radiograph shows a
slightly bubbly lytic lesion
with a sclerotic border
located eccenlricalfy within
the tibial metaphysis. The
appearance & location are
typical for a CMF. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows an
eccentric lytic lesion in the
humerus arising in the
epiphysis of a teenager".
Though the majority of the
lesion is within the epiphysis,
it extends slightly into the
metaphysis III once the
physis fuses, possibly
misleading one as to its
origin.
I
51
LONG BONE, ECCENTRIC METAPHYSEALLESION, AGGRESSIVE
AP radiograph shows an aggressive permeative AP radiograph shows an eccentric lesion with a sclerotic I
metaphyseal lesion •• that has tumor osteoid formation
both within the bone and within the soft tissue mass Ell
This is a classic osteosarcoma.
=
margin. about much of the circumference. However,
there is subtle cortical breakthrough an indication of
aggressiveness in this osteosarcoma. (tMSK Req).
53
LONG BONE, ECCENTRIC METAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE
"III
III
III
osteoid matrix, osteosarcoma
is the most likely diagnosis
[IJ and was subsequently
>- proven. (Right)
E Anteroposterior radiograph
.•..o
III
shows an eccentric, rather
c: permeative lesion. within
< the metaphysis of a child.
Osteomyelitis most
frequently arises in the
metaphysis in this age group
due to hematogenous
spread. (t MSK Req).
I
54
LONG BONE, ECCENTRIC METAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE »
-
:>
Ql
o
3
'<
lD
Ql
II>
Aneurysmal Bone Cyst Aneurysmal Bone Cyst t1>
(Left) AP radiograph shows a a.
lytic eccentric lesion in the r
metaphysis" It is so o
:>
permeative that it almost to
cannot be seen, bUllhere is aJ
o
a subtle margin present. :>
Cll
Though osteosarcoma is the
most likely lesion to present
in this way, other lesions
might be considered. (Right)
Axial T2WI MR of the same
case shows fluid levels
throughout the lesion
ABC was proven after a
=-
careful pathologic search
proved no evidence or
telangiectatic osteosarcoma.
(tMsK Req).
I
\ 55
(ij LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED METAPHYSEAL LESION
Ql
III
>-
..c:
-
~
0-
ra
Ql
Common
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
o
• Edema may obscure fracture line
Have a high degree of suspicion for these
fractures in elderly or osteoporotic patients
ai
c: • Insufficiency Fractures, Appendicular
o • Stress Fracture, Adult
CO • Stress Fracture, Adult
01 o Stress fractures of long bones often occur
c: • Osteoid Osteoma
o
...J
in metaphyseal region
• Osteochondroma • Femoral neck {basicervical)
'0
QI • Fibrous Dysplasia • Medial proximal tibia
III
IV • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) o On radiograph, watch for subtle
al
>- • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst abnormalities
-E
o
IV
c:
«
Less Common
• Adamantinoma
• Soft Tissue Tumor Excavation (Mimic)
• Focal linear sclerosis
• Periosteal reaction
o If suspected, MR should be performed
• May show only stress reaction (high
Rare but Important
signal in cortex on fluid sequences, low
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis on Tl, with surrounding edema but no
• Osteofibrous Dysplasia fracture line)
• If fractured, linear low signal fracture line
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION with surrounding edema
• Edema rarely may obscure fracture line
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Osteoid Osteoma
• Cortically based metaphyseal lesions require o Most osteoid osteoma (00) are cortically
special attention based in the diaphysis
o May put patient at risk for fracture
o Next most frequent location is
o May actually be a fracture
intraarticular, particularly at femoral neck
o In either case, patient needs protection
o Femoral neck 00 generally are in the
against completion of fracture mid-cervical region
o Hint: Include insufficiency or stress
• 00 itself is cortically based; on axial
fractures of the metaphyses in your search imaging, either anterior, medial, or
pattern posterior cortex
• Hint: In child or teenager with hip pain, • Axial imaging used to localize lesion,
search femoral neck for osteoid osteoma generally for radiofrequency ablation
o Relatively common location
o Femoral neck 00 is within hip joint
o May result in morphologic changes which • Elicits long-term joint effusion
obscure the actual diagnosis • Large effusion may result in long-term
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses lateral subluxation of femoral head
• Insufficiency Fractures, Appendicular o Lateral subluxation of femoral head, over
o In ufficiency fractur of long bon often several months, results in morphologic
occur in metaphyseal region changes
• 'urgical neck humerus • Calcar bultre sing
• Femoral n ck ( ubcapital, • steophyte formation, femoral head
in tertrochanteric) • F moral n ck valgus
• Medial proximal tibia • idening of radiographic teardrop
o On radiograph, watch for subtl han res ( vergrowth of medial acetabular wall)
• ortical buckle o Morphologic hang s may div rt attention
• Focallin ar clerosis at expected site to ard a dyspla ia or arthritis
o If insuffici ncy fracture is u p ted o Intraarticular 0 elicits densely sclerotic
clinically or radiographically, MR should reactive osseous formation
be performed • Unlike diaphy eal 00, reactiv bon
• Linear low signal fracture line seen on may not surround 00; generally i distal
either Tl or fluid sensitive sequence tOO, in subtrochanteric region
I
LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED METAPHYSEAL LESION l>
:l
...•
III
o
o Reactive bone may divert attention away • Fibrous Dysplasia 3
'<
from the 00 nidus o Generally central, but may arise in cortex al
III
o Between the morphologic changes & o Common lesion, so a cortical location l/I
CD
reactive sclerosis, lesion itself may be should not be surprising Co
-«
o
.C"
basicervical site expected for
a stress fracture •. This
patient is a marathon runner
who ignored advice to rest
and "ran through the pain I'.
This led to complelion of the
fracture_
Osteochondroma Osteochondroma
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows normal bone
extending from the
metaphysis as a stalk III into
the exostosis. More
peripherally the bone is not
as organized into regular
trabeculae. This continuation
of marrow and cortex into
the mass is the hallmark of
osteochondroma. (tMSK
Req). (Right) AP radiograph
shows a palient with mulliple
hereditary exostoses, with
the typical exophytic type
• as well as the sessile
forms" broadly based at
the cortex.
I
58
LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED METAPHYSEAL LESION >
::l
..•o
III
3
'<
DJ
III
Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) f/l
(l)
(Left) Axial NECT shows a Co
cortically based metaphyseal r
lesion which has a o
:J
ground-glass matrix ElII. The <0
appearance of the matrix is DJ
o
typical of fibrous dysplasia. :J
Ctl
Although the lesion is usually
located centrally, it may arise ;;::
Ctl
eccentrically or cortically.
1ii
(Right) Lateralradiograph "0
shows a large lytic lesion
~
'<
f/l
with sclerotic margins, Ctl
located in the cortex of the OJ
meta diaphysis lEI. The lesion
is beginning to heal, with
peripheralscferosis. Despite
the size, the appearance &
location are typical of NOF.
I
59
roill LONG BONE, SURFACE (JUXTACORTICAL) LESION
en
>-
.r:
0-
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Hint: Most extend to intramedullary
1il space; must include this observation to
~
Common ensure adequate resection
ill
c • Osteosarcoma, Parosteal
o o Location: Distal femur> proximal tibia>
CO • Periosteal Chondroma
OJ proximal femur> proximal humerus
C
o • Myositis Ossificans (Mimic) • Periosteal Chondroma
--l
Less Common o a.k.a., juxtacortical chondroma
"tl
Q)
en • Osteochondroma (Mimic) o Matrix arising at surface of bone,
III
CO • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (Mimic) extending into soft tissues; often difficult
:>. • Osteosarcoma, Periosteal to differentiate between chondroid &
E
-«
o
III
C
• Tug Lesion (Mimic)
• Avulsion Fractures (Mimic)
osteoid
o Scallops underlying cortex but does not
• Florid Reactive Periostitis & Bizarre involve medullary space
Osteochondromatous Proliferation o May be impossible to differentiate from
• High Grade Surface Osteosarcoma periosteal osteosarcoma by imaging
• Subperiosteal Ganglion • Hint: Periosteal chondroma is much
• Subperiosteal Abscess more common than periosteal
osteosarcoma
Rare but Important
• Myositis Ossificans (Mimic)
• Parosteal Lipoma o Mature myositis ossificans (MO) not
• Osteoma difficult to diagnose
• Osteoid Osteoma, Periosteal o Immature myositis forms amorphous
• Parosteal Chondrosarcoma osteoid (6-8 weeks following trauma) .
• If it is adjacent to bone, may mimic
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION periosteal or surface osteosarcoma
• May elicit periosteal reaction & even
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
abnormal marrow signal on MR
• Hint: Limited number of true surface lesions
• Watch for zoning of more mature bone
o Mimics may be cortically based or highly
peripherally, which is the opposite of the
expanded eccentric lesions
growing pattern of osteosarcoma
o Mimics may relate to local trauma
• Hint: Be careful not to confuse early Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
myositis ossificans with periosteal • Osteochondroma (Mimic)
osteosarcoma o Usually not difficult to differentiate, but a
o Both radiograph and biopsy may be small exostosis may mimic parosteal
confusing, depending on stage of lesion osteosarcoma
o Axial imaging & attention to zoning of o Continuation of cortex and marrow into
ossification helps to differentiate stalk-like lesion makes the diagnosis
o Hint: Myositis is much more frequently • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (Mimic)
seen than periosteal osteosarcoma o Arises from cortex or highly eccentrically
in bone, so is not a true surface lesion
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o May balloon so extensively that it has an
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal appearance of arising from the surface
o Most common surface lesion of bone
o Watch for thin rim of cortex continuing
o Mature bone formation at surface
around lesion & fluid levels
• When it is large, appears to "wrap
• Osteosarcoma, Periosteal
around" the cortex, often with a cleft
o Rare form of surface osteosarcoma, with
between most of the mass & the low grade appearance & behavior
underlying bone
o Generally produces matrix (though may
• Zoning: More mature centrally than not) at surface of cortex, extending into
peripherally soft tissues
I
60
lONG BONE, SURFACE (JUXTACORTICAl) lESION »
::l
...•
III
o
o Often scallops underlying cortex, but o May scallop underlying cortex but is not 3
'<
generally does not invade marrow invasive III
III
• Tug Lesion (Mimic) o Mass follows fluid signal on all sequences VI
<ll
o Tendinous insertion may "tug" its • Subperiosteal Abscess Co
attachment, resulting in mimic of surface o Raises the periosteum, soft tissue abscess r
o
:J
mass o Obliterates soft tissue fat planes (Q
.-Eo
III
c:
peripherally. (Right) AP
radiograph shows the typical
appearance of periosteal
< chondroma, with matrix
arising from the osseous
surface III. There is mild
cortex -=
scalloping of the underlying
destruction.
but not overt
I
62
lONG BONE, SURFACE (JUXTACORTICAl) LESION l>
:l
...•
Ql
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
tJI
Osteochondroma (Mimic) Osteochondroma (Mimic) <1l
(Left) Lateral radiograph C.
shows an ossific mass. in r
a position suggestive of o
:l
paroslea/osteosarcoma. The <C
I
63
ro
Ql
LONG BONE, SURFACE (JUXTACORTICAL) LESION
l/)
>,
.c
a.
ro
Qi
~ Florid Reactive Periostitis & Bizarre
Ql Tug Lesion (Mimic) Osteochondromatous Proliferation
c (Left) Axillary lateral shows
o
OJ heterotopic bone formation
Cl • & cortical resorption at
C
o the site of the deltoid
-l
insertion _ This represents
1:l a "tug" lesion of the deltoid
Ql
l/) but could be mistaken for a
Ol
OJ surface lesion of bone.
>, (Right) Oblique radiograph
E shows bone formation
•..o
Ol
adjacent to & surrounding
C the third metatarsal •.
< Florid reactive periostitis or
bizarre osteochondromatous
proliferation likely arise
secondary to trauma and
result in surface bone
formation.
Subperiosteal Ganglion
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a surface
lesion that does not contain
matrix but has elicited
horizontal periosteal reaction
•. There is subtle and
non-aggressive scalloping of
the underlying cortex •.
(Right) Axial T2WI MR
confirms the surface origins
and shows the lesion to be
fluid signa/m It confirms
the surface origins and the
subtle cortical scalloping _.
This proved to be an unusual
surface lesion~ a
subperiosteal ganglion.
I
lONG BONE, SURFACE (JUXTACORTICAl) lESION
Subperiosteal Abscess
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows subtle loss of posterior
cortical bone integrity _.
There is no other overt
destruction. The 50ft tissues
show obliteration of the fat
planes EiIIthat would
normally be expected to be
present. (RighI) Sagittal T1
C+ MR in the same patient
confirms cortical loss _.
There is also a large abscess
arising from the subperiosteal
location Ell Yersinia pestis
was cultured; plague had
been reported in the region
where this teenager had
been camping.
Parosteallipoma
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows fluffy bone formation
arising from posterior cortex
_ that appears to be
reactive rather than tumor
bone. There is a faint
suggestion of fat density
surrounding it EiII. (tMSK
Req). (Right) Axial bone CT
in the same patient shows
the reactive bone {ormation
_ and the surrounding
lipoma Ell Occasionally
when a lipoma arises
adjacent to a long bone, it
elicits this type of reaction. It
is termed parosteallipoma.
(tMSK Req).
I
65
ro
Q)
LONG BONE, CENTRAL DIAPHYSEAL LESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE
Cf)
>-
.r:
a.
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Usually some chondroid matrix is present,
o, but may be lytic
ro Common
Q) o May scallop endosteum, but otherwise is
2 • Enchondroma or appears non-aggressive
Q)
c • Paget Disease o Often an incidental finding; usually
o • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
CO asymptomatic
Ol
C
• Fibrous Dysplasia • Paget Disease
o • Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC)
---' o Common in adults
"0 • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) o Lesion usually originates at subchondral
Ql
I/)
I1l
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst, Thin Bones bone and proceeds into diaphysis
CO • Chronic Osteomyelitis • May be extensive, involving the majority
>.
..
E
o
I1l
C
Less Common
• Sickle Cell Anemia
of diaphysis
o Lesion may originate at mid-diaphysis
<l: • Bone Infarct (usually tibia) and extend proximally or
• Radiation Osteonecrosis distally
• Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor • With diaphyseal origin, lesion usually
• Tuberculosis begins in anterior cortex
• Fungal Osteomyelitis o Lesion always results in bone enlargement
o Appearance ranges from lytic to mixed
Rare but Important
lytic/sclerotic
• Vascular Tumors • Trabeculae appear coarsened &
• Neurofibromatosis disordered, but usually overall
• Desmoplastic Fibroma appearance is not aggressive
• Tuberous Sclerosis • Leading edge of lesion has straight
• Mastocytosis sclerotic line
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Lesion of childhood
o Often polyostotic, with axial & flat bones
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues involved as well as long bones
• Non-aggressive central diaphyseal lesions are o Long bone lesions may be metaphyseal or
much more common in 1st three decades epiphyseal, but diaphyseal is common
• Hint: "Common" lesions are MUCH more o Appearance ranges from lytic geographic
common than others (non-aggressive) to extremely aggressive
o Very few choices of diagnoses in adults
• Fibrous Dysplasia
• Enchondroma, Paget disease, chronic o Lesion of childhood and young adults
osteomyelitis o Often polyostotic, with flat bones & skull
o Relatively few choices in children frequently involved
• LCH, Fibrous dysplasia, UBC, chronic o Long bone lesions usually central &
osteomyelitis diaphyseal
• Many of the other lesions in the differential • Metaphyseal & epiphyseal extension is
require special circumstances common
o Gigantic NOF
• Central location is most common, but
o Thin bone location of NOF or ABC
cortical lesions occur as well
o Underlying abnormality: Radiation, renal
o Mild expansion of bone with thinning of
osteodystrophy endosteal cortex
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Subtle "ground-glass" matrix is most
• Enchondroma common, though lesion may be lytic
o Adult lesion, generally in metaphysis o Bone is soft, resulting in bowing
o Common lesion, so diaphyseal location is deformities
also relatively common • Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC)
o Common; generally a lesion of childhood
I
66
LONG BONE, CENTRAL DIAPHYSEAL LESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE »
::l
Enchondroma
'"
>-
J:::
a.
.~
o,
ro
Q; Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) Fibrous Dysplasia
~ (Left) Anteroposte,ior
Ql radiograph shows a central
c
o lytic lesion with narrow zone
CO of transition" It is mildly
Ol
C expanded and has slight
o endosteal scalloping. LCH
-l
has a range of presentations
"0
Ql but often is less aggressive.
en''""
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a lyUc &
>- ground-glass density mildly
I
68
LONG BONE, CENTRAL DIAPHYSEAL LESION, NON-AGGRESSIVE }>
:;,
..•.
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
tII
Bone Infarct (1)
(Left) Lateralradiograph 0-
shows extensive chronic r
bone infarct involving the o
:::J
tibial diaphysis in a sickle cell to
patient There is mixed lytic (IJ
o
8, sclerotic bone which has a :::J
<ll
disordered appearance.
(Right! AP radiograph shows ;;::
<ll
a non-aggressive lytic lesion Qj
III containing ,
pseudotrabeculations IlIl
o
0;-
This is a nonspecific
appearance that proved to "::T
'<
en
be bone infarct. When <ll
Q)
dystrophic calcification is
present, the diagnosis of
infarct is more
straightforward.
Radiation Osteonecrosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows mixed
lytic/sclerotic disordered
bone throughout the entire
humerus. in a patient who
received whole bone RT.
This is typical of radiation
osteonecrosis, along with the
radiation-induced
osteosarcoma E!II. (Right!
Lateralradiograph shows
diffusely abnormal bone
density, with coarsened
trabeculae (HPTH). There is
abnormal bowing, as well as
several hyperossified round
lesions. whichare Brown
tumors.
Tuberculosis
(Left) AP radiograph shows a
lytic diaphyseal lesion with a
narrow zone of transition
and regular periosteal
reaction •. There is no
other host reaction. This is
TB osteomyelitis in a patient
who also had pulmonary
disease. (Right! Lateral
radiograph shows a
non-aggressive lytic
expanded lesion in the
fibular diaphysis. There is
pseudotrabeculation • 8, a
pathologic fracture ••.
Lesion is predominantly low
signal on MR but enhances,
typical of desmoid.
I
69
ro lONG BONE, DIAPHYSEAL lESION, AGGRESSIVE: ADULT
OJ
en
>-
.<::
c.
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Permeative change may be highly
o, aggressive, with aggressive-appearing
ro Common
Q5 periosteal reaction
::2; • Osteomyelitis o May not be able to differentiate from
OJ
c: • Metastases, Bone Marrow aggressive tumor
o • Multiple Myeloma (MM)
CO o May elicit reactive bone formation,
en • Lymphoma
c: including endosteal thickening
o • Ewing Sarcoma
-l o MR demonstrates abscess & fascial fluid
"tl
Q)
• Plasmacytoma • Metastases, Bone Marrow
III • Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor o May be highly permeative & therefore
'"
10
less Common extremely subtle
>-
E • Chondrosarcoma, Conventional o Often more apparent with MR or PET/CT
o
.•...
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone • Multiple Myeloma (MM)
'"
c:
<I: • Fibrosarcoma o MM may be so highly infiltrative that it is
• Osteosarcoma, Conventional inapparent on radiograph
• Fibrous Dysplasia • May appear as osteoporosis
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous • Usually discovered on MR or PET/CT
• Eventually develops lytic lesion that
Rare but Important
appears more focal than permeative
• Adamantinoma o Plasmacytoma generally arises in pelvis,
• Hemophilia: MSK Complications spine, or metaphyses
• Radiation-Induced Sarcoma • Rarely may be diaphyseal, particularly if
• Tertiary Syphilis pubic ramus is considered a diaphyseal
equivalent
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Lymphoma
o Frequently found in long bone diaphyses
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Highly permeative; may have cortical
• Hint: Most common diagnoses in this breakthrough with large & infiltrative soft
differential have been called "small round tissue mass
blue cell" lesions o May elicit prominent bone reaction,
o All have similar appearance on radiograph:
including endosteal thickening
Permeative, lytic, with periosteal reaction, o May have a bony sequestrum
cortical breakthrough, & soft tissue mass
• Ewing Sarcoma
o These lesions include both benign &
o Age range is 5-30, so Ewing sarcoma may
malignant entities be seen in young adults as well as children
• Osteomyelitis o Involvement of long bones is generally in
• Metastases the younger portion of age range, but
• Myeloma lymphoma diaphyseal involvement may still be found
• Ewing sarcoma in adults
o MR may help differentiate by showing
o Generally arises in mid-diaphysis, with an
abscess, but tumor necrosis may appear aggressive permeative pattern
similar o Aggressive periosteal reaction, cortical
• Hint: Most infiltrative lesions may initially breakthrough, often large soft tissue mass
be so permeative that radiograph appears o May elicit prominent reactive bone
normal formation, located within osseous margins
o MR or PET/CT makes diagnosis
but not soft tissues
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • May elicit dense endosteal thickening
• Osteomyelitis • Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor
o Diaphyseal location seen more frequently o Brown tumor is generally geographic
in adults than children, particularly rather than permeative
following trauma
I
70
LONG BONE, DIAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE: ADULT :>
ground-glass matrix r
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses o
::l
o Expanded, thin cortex but no reaction CD
• Chondrosarcoma, Conventional OJ
o Rarely will degenerate to fibrosarcoma o
o Common lesion, but most frequently ::l
o Pathologic fracture may make the lesion C1l
metaphyseal or meta-diaphyseal
• Diaphyseal chondrosarcoma is unusual
appear more aggressive s:
C1l
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous 5i,
o If permeative or aggressive, likely higher
o Lytic permeative aggressive lesion o
grade lesion than is usually seen Q)
o Predilection for lower extremities '0
o Chondroid matrix suggests diagnosis, but :::T
o Often polyostotic '<
VI
lesion may be entirely lytic C1l
Q)
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Primary MFH metaphyseal/diaphyseal • Adamantinoma
• Secondary MFH usually metaphyseal, o Diaphyseal/meta-diaphyseal, tibia
associated with bone infarcts o Lesion originates in cortex, may be
o Lytic, permeative, periosteal reaction, aggressive but usually not permeative
cortical breakthrough o May become malignant with associated
• Fibrosarcoma increase in degree of aggressiveness
o Unusual lesion in diaphysis of long bone • Hemophilia: MSK Complications
o Rarely fibrous dysplasia may degenerate o Pseudotumor may appear highly
into fibrosarcoma aggressive, with periosteal reaction &
• Appearance is of fibrous dysplasia cortical scalloping
(ground-glass matrix, central diaphysis) • Subperiosteal or cortical bleeds
with superimposed destructive change • Femur frequently involved long bone
• Osteosarcoma, Conventional • Radiation-Induced Sarcoma
o Common lesion, but usually metaphyseal o Whole long bone radiation may result in
or meta-diaphyseal radiation osteonecrosis
• Diaphyseal osteosarcoma is unusual • Radiation-induced sarcoma may arise
o Permeative, aggressive, with cortical (average 10-14 years post treatment)
breakthrough & soft tissue mass
-
o
E
1Il
C
<
shows a large diaphyseal
permeative
reactive
lesion, eliciting
bone in the form of
endosteal thickening •
while thinning the
endosteum in another region
Ell. This lesion is lymphoma.
Plasmacytoma
(Left) AP radiograph shows a
lytic expanded moderately
aggressive lesion occupying
the entire superior pubic
ramus. a diaphyseal
equivalent. Appearance is
typical for plasmacytoma,
which frequently arises in the
pelvis. (Right) Oblique
radiograph shows a lytic,
expanded, diaphyseal lesion
that has thinned the
endosteum and appears
moderately aggressive _.
The bone density is
abnormal and patchy; the
findings are typical of a
brown tumor of HPTH.
I
72
lONG BONE, DIAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE: ADULT »
~
...•
III
o
3
'<
ell
III
tII
Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone (1)
(Leh) AP ,adiograph shows a 0-
large, lytic, expanded, r
permeative lesion occupying o
:J
the diaphysis. There is a <0
pathologic fracture, with CD
o
matrix extruded into the 50ft :J
CD
tissues. The matrix is
chondroid, typical of :s:
CD
chondrosarcoma. (Right) AP a;
radiograph shows a highly
,
aggressive mid-diaphyseal 9
OJ
lesion, with cortical
breakthrough, soft tissue "::T
'<
en
mass, and periosteal CD
OJ
reaction. The diagnosis is
MFH, surprising only
because it occurred in a
teenager.
Radiation-Induced Sarcoma
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
long-term fibrous dysplasia
with ground-glass matrix,
involving the entire humeral
diaphysis. There is focal
expansion that makes this
case of fibrous dysplasia
appear more aggressive ••.
This proved to be a healing
fx. (Right) AP radiograph
shows a shorr humerus with
abnormal marrow: Radiation
osteonecrosis. The
mid-diaphysis shows an
aggressive radiation-induced
osteosarcoma containing
tumor bone in the sofllissue
mass.
I
73
<1l
OJ
LONG BONE, DIAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE: CHILD
Cf)
>.
.<:
a.
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Osteomyelitis
o, o Ewing sarcoma
<1l
Q) Common o Lymphoma
::2' • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric o Chondrosarcoma
<ll
C • Ewing Sarcoma
o
[]) • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
CJ)
• Leukemia • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric
c
o o Usually metaphyseal in children, but
--1 • Osteosarcoma
'tl • Metastases, Bone Marrow diaphyseal with direct trauma
CIl
VI • Lymphoma o Highly aggressive & permeative, often with
III
[]) reactive sclerosis & periosteal reaction
>. Less Common • Ewing Sarcoma
•..Eo
III
• Sickle Cell Anemia
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone
o Common in long bones in children
C o Highly aggressive permeative lesion,
« • Chondrosarcoma, Conventional cortical breakthrough & soft tissue mass
• Adamantinoma o Elicits reactive bone formation
• Radiation-Induced Sarcoma • May have appearance of tumor osteoid &
Rare but Important mimic osteosarcoma
• Hemophilia • Reactive bone NOT in soft tissue mass in
• Congenital Syphilis Ewing, but present in osteosarcoma
o May appear polyostotic since it may
present with osseous metastases
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Ranges in appearance between geographic
• Hint: Most common of these lesions fall non-aggressive and highly aggressive
into the small, round, blue cell category • When aggressive, is permeative & may
o All have an appearance that may be have soft tissue mass
indistinguishable from one another • May be indistinguishable from the
o Must consider each of these diagnoses with malignant lesions in the differential
this aggressive appearance o Often polyostotic
• Osteomyelitis o Beveled edge of skull lesion may help
• Ewing sarcoma distinguish
• Langerhans cell histiocytosis • Leukemia
• Leukemia o Usually polyostotic
• Metastases o May be so highly infiltrative that it is not
• Lymphoma visible on radiograph; MR makes diagnosis
o Hint: Note that in each of these cases, • Osteosarcoma
lesion may be polyostotic o Common lesion, but usually is
• Hint: Ewing sarcoma & osteosarcoma metaphyseal
usually have a distinct appearance from one o Less frequently is diaphyseal; if it is lytic in
another this location, may not be distinguished
o Occasionally they can be from other lesions in the differential
indistinguishable, if o Usually some tumor osteoid is visible
• Osteosarcoma is diaphyseal & lytic • Metastases, Bone Marrow
• Ewing sarcoma is metadiaphyseal & has o Usually polyostotic in children
sclerotic reactive bone formation o Metaphyseal is more frequent, but may be
• Hint: In these cases, watch for tumor diaphyseal
osteoid formation in soft tissue mass; o Neuroblastoma is most frequent in
this can only occur in osteosarcoma children
• Hint: Rarely, four of these lesions may be • Lymphoma
aggressive, yet induce endosteal & cortical o 50% of childhood lymphomas are
thickening polyostotic at presentation
I
74
LONG BONE, DIAPHYSEAL LESION, AGGRESSIVE: CHILD l>
:J
...•.
III
o
o Highly aggressive; metaphyseal more o Generally at least 7 years post radiation 3
'<
frequent than diaphyseal (RT), so seen in teenagers t1J
III
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses o Highly aggressive region in bone that VI
Cll
shows underlying radiation-related Co
• Sickle Cell Anemia r
o Early bone infarcts (particularly dactylitis)
abnormality o
:J
• Usually osteosarcoma; tumor osteoid <0
present with periosteal reaction t1J
o Consider locations likely to be radiated in o
o With evolution of infarct, will see mixed :J
childhood CD
lytic & sclerotic pattern
• Often longitudinal, involving entire • Long bones (Ewing sarcoma, lymphoma) ~
CD
diaphysis • Spine (Wilms tumor, leukemia) Oi
• Remember that bone infarct need not be
o Watch for underlying signs of radiation 6
iii
serpiginous and subchondral, especially osteonecrosis -0
::T
• Mixed lytic & sclerotic, disordered bone '<
in sickle cell patients VI
CD
o Watch for growth deformities associated OJ
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone
o Unusual lesion in children, may be seen in
with radiation
teenager • Long bone may be short if subjected to
whole bone radiation (physes at risk for
o Aggressive, may be metaphyseal or
vascular injury in RT)
diaphyseal
o No other distinguishing characteristics • Spine may develop scoliosis if spine not
completely included in radiation field
• Chondrosarcoma, Conventional
o Watch for port-like distribution of osseous
o Uncommon in children
o Should be considered if subtle matrix is
abnormalities, indicating RT
seen in diaphyseal lesion of teenager Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o May induce endosteal thickening rather • Hemophilia
than showing cortical breakthrough o Pseudotumor appears aggressive: Soft
• Adamantinoma tissue, intraosseous, & subperiosteal bleeds
o Almost invariably tibial metadiaphysis; o Femur most commonly involved long
cortically based bone
o Generally only moderately aggressive • Congenital Syphilis
initially o Periosteal reaction, infiltrative appearance
• May become aggressive & malignant
• Radiation-Induced Sarcoma
leukemia Osteosarcoma
(Left) AP radiograph shows
diffuse osteopenia in both
femoral diaphyses Ell along
lucent metaphyseal lines •
in a 5 year old. Though no
periosteal reaction is seen,
this must be interpreted as
aggressive; leukemia was
proven. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows a highly
aggressive mid-diaphyseal
humeral lesion with Cadman
triangle" an aggressive
periosteal reaction. There is
tumor osteoid forming in the
soft tissue mass !Ill
diagnostic of osteosarcoma.
I
76
lONG BONE, DIAPHYSEAL lESION, AGGRESSIVE: CHILD »
..o
:l
III
3
'<
tll
III
VI
Sickle Cell Anemia Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone (1)
(Left) AP radiograph shows Co
periosteal reaction. and a r
permeative appearance in o
:l
most of the metacarpals and CO
phalanges in the hand of this CD
o
I year old African American' :l
CD
child. This is sickle cell
dactylitis. (Right) AP
radiograph shows a lytic
permeative lesion occupying
the mid-diaphysis in a 13
year old. The lesion is
aggressive, with cortical
breakthrough and soft tissue
mass and prominent
periosteal reaction. MFH is
rare in children but certainly
does occur.
Adamantinoma
(Left) AP radiograph shows a
lytic lesion in the diaphysis of
the tibia of a 17 year old.
The lesion proved to be
entirely restricted to the
cortex _ which is typical of
adamantinoma. Note the
pathologic fracture _
(RighI) Axial T1 WI M R of the
same patient shows that the
tibial lesion is indeed based
entirely in the cortex HIlI. The
marrow is not entirely
normal, suggesting
involvement, which
contributes to the aggressive
appearance and behavior of
this lesion. (t MSK Req).
I
77
ctl
Q)
LONG BONE, AGGRESSIVE DIAPHYSEAL LESION WITH ENDOSTEAL THICKENING
VJ
>-
.r:
c.
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o If not considered, endosteal thickening in
o, one of these lesions may lull the reader
ctl Common
Q) into thinking it is a benign process
~ • Osteomyelitis o MR should be performed to further define
Q)
c • Chondrosarcoma lesion
o
CIl Less Common Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
en
c • Lymphoma
o • Osteomyelitis
-l
• Ewing Sarcoma o Dense reactive bone formation, located
'1:l
Ql
VJ
both at the periosteum & endosteum
ctl
lD ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Underlying lytic lesion may show
>- serpiginous tracking, proving the diagnosis
-
«
E
o
ctl
c
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Note: This discussion of endosteal
thickening does not include non-aggressive
• Chondrosarcoma
o Most are low grade & metaphyseal at
presentation
lesions o Need not have radiographically evident
o Stress fracture, stress reaction, & osteoid chondroid matrix
osteoma will show focal diaphyseal o Underlying lesion may not appear
endosteal thickening alarming
• Thickening should not be • May appear rather geographic
circumferential, as it is listed in • May be so permeative as to not be visible
diagnoses of this differential radiographically
• Note: All lesions in this differential diagnosis o Endosteal thickening is common in these
may appear much more aggressive than metadiaphyseallesions
shown in this discussion • In correct age group (30-60 years), must
o All may show permeative osseous alert reader to possibility of
destruction, aggressive periosteal reaction, chondrosarcoma
cortical breakthrough, and soft tissue mass
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Purpose of the differential is to remind us
that each of these lesions in the differential • Lymphoma & Ewing Sarcoma
o Most frequently has aggressive appearance
may have a non-aggressive appearance as
o Permeative change may be extremely
one of their manifestations
• Hint: Dense endosteal thickening should subtle, with only diaphyseal endosteal
force at least a consideration of these thickening seen
o Sequestrum suggests lymphoma
diagnoses
Osteomyelitis Osteomyelitis
3
'<
lXJ
III
III
Chondrosarcoma Chondrosarcoma lD
(Left) AP radiograph shows C.
chondroid matrix =:I with a r
surrounding permeative lytic o
::J
lesion ER indicating <0
chondrosarcoma. Note the CD
o
associated dense endosteal & ::J
(t)
periosteal reaction •.
(Right) AP radiograph shows s:
(t)
dense, regular endosteal &
periosteal reaction =- There
1ii
,
o
is an extremely subtle iii'
permeative change in the -0
:::r
adjacent marrow. No matrix '<
III
is seen. The diagnosis of (t)
OJ
chondrosarcoma is difficult
to make here, but age,
location, & reaction should
be suggestive.
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
permeative lytic lesion
centrally within the marrow,
associated with dense thick
endosteal & periosteal
reaction III. (Right) Lateral
radiograph of the same
patient shows not only the
cortical reaction" but also
endosteal scalloping III. The
permeative central lesion is
obvious. There is also a small
sequestrum iii present; this
is a finding that has been
described in primary
lymphoma of bone, though it
is also seen in osteomyelitis.
I
79
LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED DIAPHYSEAL LESION, SCLEROTIC
'"
01
CD
same lime as the previous
image shows edema within
>- the marrow" and in the
E
-o
01
c:
surface =
soft tissues at the cortical
but no fracture
line; this confirms tibial stress
~ syndrome and the patient
would be well-advised to
protect the leg.
Osteoid Osteoma
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows prominent cortical
reaction III in a child, seen
over a more extensive length
of the diaphysis than is
usually present with stress fx.
One must suspect osteoid
osteoma, with the lytic nidus
being obscured by the
reactive bone formation.
It MSK Req). (Right) Axial
NECT (same patient) proves
osteoid osteoma, a small
lytic nidus ~ adjacent to a
nutrient vessel ~ located
deep beneath the dense
cortical reactive bone •.
(tMSK Req).
I
82
lONG BONE, CORTICAllY BASED DIAPHYSEAL lESION, SClEROTIC :l>
-
:l
III
o
3
'<
lXl
III
l/I
Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) Chronic Osteomyelitis (Brodie Abscess) ~
(Left) AP radiograph shows Co
metadiaphyseal. NOFs, r
most frequently multiple in o
:l
neurofibromatosis. With to
skeletal maturation, the lytic aJ
o
lesions heal, with sclerotic :l
(1)
ossification. (Right) Lateral
radiograph of the femur ~
(1)
shows an irregular lytic Qi,
lesion containing a sclerotic
cente," both located
o
Ol
within a cortex which is "0
-::r
thickened with reactive bone '<
l/I
formation. This is typical of (1)
Ol
osteomyelitis; the central
sclerotic body is a
sequestrum.
Osteoma
(Left) Sagittal PO FSEFS MR
shows a lobulated mass.
arising from the ulnar cortex
which was densely sclerotic.
At resection, it was
consistent with the dense
bone formation of
melorheosrosis. (Right) AP
radiograph shows multiple
osteomas" projecting from
the femoral cortex in this
patient with Gardner
syndrome. The contralateral
femur was involved as well.
In the absence of polyposis
syndromes it is distinctly
unusuallo find an osteoma
involving the long bones.
I
83
ell
(l)
LONG BONE, CORTICALLYBASED DIAPHYSEALLESION, LYTIC
rJl
>-
.r:
a.
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Generally ends up in metadiaphysis;
o, mid-diaphyseal location is rare
ell
Q) Common o Natural history is to fill in with normal
2 • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) bone (from periphery to center) and
(l)
c • Metastases, Bone Marrow disappear in adulthood
o
OJ • Paget Disease • Metastases, Bone Marrow
Cl
C • Osteomyelitis o Most frequently located in marrow of
o
....J • Osteoid Osteoma metaphysis
"C
CIl
• Fibrous Dysplasia o Diaphyseal & cortical location of
rJl
ell
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst metastases is most suggestive of either
al
>- Less Common breast or lung primary lesion
-
C
E
o
ell
<I:
• Adamantinoma
• Tendon Injury (Tug Lesion)
• Osteofibrous Dysplasia
• Paget Disease
o Lesion usually originates in subchondral
region of bone & advances through
• Soft Tissue Mass Invasion (Mimic) metadiaphysis to diaphysis
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o Occasionally long bone lesion will
• Hyperparathyroidism originate in diaphysis
• Most frequent bone for this occurrence:
Rare but Important
Tibia, anterior cortex
• Bacillary Angiomatosis
• Earliest lesion is lytic; has defined margin
• Hemophilia: MSK Complications as leading edge of lesion
• Hardware, Reactive Changes • Eventually extends to subchondral bone
• Osteomyelitis
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o May originate in cortex, especially if
related to direct inoculation
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
o Watch for serpiginous pattern
• Cortically based lesions within the tibia o Generally will also see periosteal reaction
present a special circumstance o MR likely to show associated soft tissue
o Three lesions have a remarkably similar
fluid & abscess
appearance & propensity to occupy the
• Osteoid Osteoma
anterior cortex of tibia o Mid-diaphyseal lesion located in cortex
• Cortically based fibrous dysplasia • Often deep within the cortex, at margin
• Osteofibrous dysplasia with marrow
• Adamantinoma • Often associated with nutrient vessel
o These lesions have subtle pathologic
o Lesion is lytic, oval with regular margins
differences
• Lesion may have central ossific density
• May be considered to be in a spectrum of o Elicits significant reactive bone formation
pathology surrounding it; reactive bone may obscure
• Behavior may differ, since the lytic nidus
adamantinoma may have malignant
• Fibrous Dysplasia
behavior o Most frequently, FD is central and
o Hint: Statistically, fibrous dysplasia is far
expansile within long bone
more frequent than the other two lesions o Occasionally, FD originates in cortex
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • FD is such a common lesion that this
• Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) presentation is not considered rare
o Extremely common lesion in children, • May expand and extend around the
especially about the knees cortex, surrounding normal marrow
o Cortically based, but generally originates • Cortical FD in the differential with
in metaphysis osteofibrous dysplasia & adamantinoma
• With skeletal growth, the metaphysis o Watch for additional lesions; FD is often
migrates away from lesion polyostotic, which may help distinguish it
I
84
LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED DIAPHYSEAL LESION, LYTIC »
-
E
o
<U
C
<l:
(Right) Lateral radiograph
obtained 2 years later on the
same patient shows classic
Paget disease, now with
mixed lytic & scferotic
lesions, extending to the
subchondral bone.
Osteomyelitis
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a mildly expanded
lytic cortically based
diaphyseal lesion Ill. This 20
year old had normal lab
values, but this proved to be
Staphylococcal
osteomyelitis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a cortically based lytic
lesion III in the diaphysis.
The appearance is typical of
an osteoid osteoma, with
dense surrounding sclerosis
=. This sclerosis
occasionally is so dense as to
obscure the lytic lesion.
I
86
LONG BONE, CORTICAllY BASED DIAPHYSEAL LESION, LYTIC »
-
~
Ql
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
~
(Left) Lateral radiograph 0-
shows a rather complex lytic r
lesion originating in the o
:J
anterior cortex of the tibia <Cl
•• There appear to be OJ
o
several "daughter" lesions. :J
CD
Though (ibrous dysplasia
most Frequently arises within ~
CD
the central portion o( a long fii
bone, it is not rare for it to
,
occupy the cortex. rt MSK
o
OJ
Req). (Right) Sagillal TI WI "0
::r
MR of the same lesion shows '<
en
the lesion to be based CD
OJ
entirely within the anterior
corlex of the tibia" FO
was proven at excisional
biopsy.
Adamantinoma Adamantinoma
(Left) Lateralradiograph
shows a lytic lesion arising
within the anterior cortex of
the tibia" This lesion is an
adamantinoma, though
statistically a cortically based
Fibrous dysplasia is more
likely. (t MSK Req). (Right)
Axial T2WI MR of the same
patient shows the lesion to
be based entirely within the
anteriorcortex" This
adamantinoma is not
distinguishable from
cortically based FO or
osteofibrous dysplasia by
imaging. (tMSK Req).
I
87
roCIl LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED DIAPHYSEAL LESION, LYTIC
en
>-
.c
a.
.~
o,
m
Q5 Tendon Injury (Tug Lesion) Tendon Injury (Tug Lesion)
~ (Leh) Axillary lateral
CIl radiograph shows
c
o ossification of one of the slips
!Xl of the deltoid tendon _
Ol
c along with apparent lytic
o lesion in the cortex _ This
-' cortical" lesion" ;5 resorption
"0
Q) due to the avulsive injury.
en (Right) Axial bone CT shows
CU
lO an apparent cortically based
>- lytic lesion in the distal
E femoral metadiaphysis III
.•..o
cu This medial "Iesion" has also
c been termed a cortical
4: desmoid and is secondary to
tug injury of the adductor
tendon.
Soft Tissue Mass Invasion (Mimic) Soft Tissue Mass Invasion (Mimic)
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows a lytic lesion that
appears to be cortically
based •. Location is not
proven in this image, which
is not in tangent to the
lesion. (Right) Axial TI C+
MR of the same lesion shows
a 50ft tissue lesion that is
focally invading and eroding
the cortical bone _ This
proved not to be actually
cortically based but rather a
mimic. The lesion has a
target sign of low central
signal ~ and proved to be a
schwannoma.
I
88
LONG BONE, CORTICALLY BASED DIAPHYSEAL LESION, LYTIC »
::J
.•.o
III
3
'<
OJ
III
t/I
Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (1)
Lateralradiograph
(Left) Q.
I
89
ro lONG BONE, DIFFUSE CORTICAL/ENDOSTEAL THICKENING
Q)
(/)
>,
-<:
0..
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Additional findings: Subcutaneous edema,
o, phleboliths, varicose veins
ro Common
Q5 • Chronic Recurrent Multifocal
::2 • Paget Disease Osteomyelitis (CRMO)
Q)
c • Venous Stasis o Location: Long bone metaphysis
o • Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis
CD o Findings range from radiographically
OJ
C
(CRMO) occult to exuberant new bone formation
o • Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy
-' causing dense sclerosis of the majority of
"0
QI less Common the involved bone
(/)
111 • Melorheostosis • Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy
CO
>. • Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications o Symmetric, solid periosteal reaction
E thickens cortex
-o
111
C
<l:
• Renal Osteodystrophy
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) o Evaluate for underlying malignancy or
chronic pulmonary, cardiac or
Rare but Important
gastrointestinal disease
• Complications of Prostaglandins
• Engelmann-Camurati Disease Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Ribbing Disease • Melorheostosis
• Acromegaly o Begins as linear hyperostosis in proximal
• Intramedullary Osteosclerosis end of tubular bone
• Complications of Fluoride o Distal progression with progressive cortical
• Caffey Disease (Infantile Cortical thickening
Hyperostosis) o Usually limited to single extremity
• Pachydermoperiostosis o Typically follows sclerotome distribution
• Thyroid Acropachy • Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications
• Ewing Sarcoma o Diffuse cortical infarction in the long
bones
o Diametaphysis may be widened by
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION infarction &/or chronic infection
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Endosteal splitting = linear increased
• Many of the differential diagnosis entities densities paralleling the cortices
have an overlapping appearance • May produce a bone-in-bone appearance
• Patient age, history & additional skeletal • Renal Osteodystrophy
findings can help differentiate o Location: Tubular bones most common,
pubic rami, spine
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Neostosis = rapid new bone formation in
• Paget Disease patients undergoing treatment
o Location: Long bones most common,
o Additional findings include generalized
pelvis, skull skeletal sclerosis, subperiosteal resorption,
o Early lytic lesions originate at the
joint erosions, vertebral endplate sclerosis
subchondral cortex of long bone o Rare in primary hyperparathyroidism
• Tibia is the exception, often originating • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
in diaphysis o Location: Periarticular
o Sclerotic phase is less common than mixed
o Distribution: Localized or generalized
lytic & sclerotic phase
o Cortical & trabecular thickening results in Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
overall enlargement of bone • Complications of Prostaglandins
o Bowing deformities, pathologic fractures o Location: Long bone diaphysis
• Venous Stasis o Distribution: Generalized
o Cortical thickening from solid periosteal o Correlate with drug therapy
reaction usually mild • Engelmann-Camurati Disease
o Location: Long bone diaphysis, skull
o Distribution: Bilateral, symmetric
I
90
lONG BONEr DIFFUSE CORTICAL/ENDOSTEAL THICKENING »
..
::J
III
o
o Exuberant endosteal new bone o Location: Tibia diaphysis; femur & tibial 3
'<
o Presents in childhood metaphysis less common O:J
III
o Autosomal dominant (differentiate from o Distribution: Unilateral or asymmetric
Ribbing disease) bilateral endosteal thickening
'c."
(1)
disease & intramedullary osteosclerosis o Additional findings of tendon & ligament s::
(1)
osteosclerosis) bone
o Can have similar appearance to stress o One or more long bones, mandible,
fracture, chronic osteomyelitis, metabolic scapula, ribs may be involved
disorder, endocrine disorder, bone-forming o Onset less than six months of age
malignancy o Spontaneous resolution; residual bowing
• Acromegaly uncommon
o Bone enlargement & flared long bone ends • Pachydermoperiostosis
o Clinically differentiated from other entities o Primary hypertrophic osteoarthropathy
by elevated growth hormone & IGF-l o Thick, shaggy periosteal reaction produces
o Additional findings: Thick skull, large cortical thickening
frontal sinuses, enlarged mandible, • Thyroid Acropachy
spade-like finger tufts, wide phalangeal o Location: Tubular bones of hands & feet;
bases, wide MCP joints, thick heel pad, long bones rare
posterior vertebral body scalloping o Correlate with hyperthyroidism treatment
• Intramedullary Osteosclerosis • Ewing Sarcoma
o Similar appearance to Engelmann & o Exceptionally rare to have dense, solid
Ribbing disease but is nonhereditary periosteal reaction obscure permeative
• Adult female is most commonly affected destruction of tumor
demographic o MR can evaluate for underlying
malignancy
Paget Disease
Complications of Prostaglandins
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a dense linear
periostealreaction. that
thickens the femoral cortex.
The underlying bone density
is abnormal for a young
adult, with mixed lucency
and sclerosis, typical of renal
osteodystrophy /neostosis.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows dense, thick, new
bone formation involving this
infant's humerus. and
forearm bones Ell One
should also consider diffuse
osteomyelitis or nutritional
deficiency in an infant with
long-term hospitalization.
I
92
lONG BONE, DIFFUSE CORTICAL/ENDOSTEAL THICKENING
Engelmann-Camurati Disease
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows disordered r
cortical and endosteal bone, o
::J
resulting in a cortical <C
I
93
<1l
<I) TIBIAL METADIAPHYSEAL CORTICALLY BASED LESION
VJ
>-
.r:
Cl.
.~
o,
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
<1l
Common • Fibrous Dysplasia (FD)
Qj
2 • Fibrous Dysplasia (FD) o May be either central or cortically based
<I)
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal (Mimic) when involving tibial metadiaphysis
c
o
[lJ
• Tibia is the exception; in other bones, FD
Less Common is only central in location
Cl
c • Osteofibrous Dysplasia
o o Cortically based lesions are lytic &
-l
• Adamantinoma expansile, appearing moderately aggressive
-c
ell
l/l Rare but Important o May "wrap around", involving cortex
III
[lJ • Osteosarcoma, Periosteal (Mimic) circumferentially
>. • Osteosarcoma, Parosteal (Mimic)
E
-«
o
III
r::
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
o Surface osteoid-producing
involve marrow
lesion; may
3
'<
OJ
III
t/I
Osteosarcoma, Parosteal (Mimic) Osteofibrous Dysplasia ~
(Left) Axial bone CT shows a a.
surface lesion consisting of r
mature bone _ wilh less o
:J
mature tumor bone formed <0
peripherally Ell. This is lhe OJ
o
lypical appearance of :J
parostealosteosarcoma. This
~
lesion may involve the cortex ~
and extend into the marrow,
ct>
iii
lhus mimicking a corlically
based lesion. (tMSK Req).
6
iij"
(Right) Axial bone CT shows "0
::r
a lytic lesion arising in the '<
(f)
anterior cortex of the tibia ct>
•• in a 23 year old. The ~
appearance is nonspecific
bul proved la be
osteofibrous dysplasia.
Adamantinoma Adamantinoma
(Left) Laleral radiograph
shows a lytic lesion arising
from lhe corlex of lhe libial
meladiaphysis" The lesion
does not appear la involve
the underlying marrow and
does not appear highly
aggressive. (t MSK Req).
(Right) Axial T2WI FS MR in
the same patient shows the
lesion la arise from the
corlex •• bulla exlend into
lhe adjacenl sofllissue Ell.
There is no marrow
involvement. Adamantinoma
can be locally aggressive and
even malignant. (t MSK
Req).
I
95
l1l
Q)
LONG BONE, UNDERTUBULATION
rJl
>.
J:::
0..
l1l
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Widens bone, while thinning endosteum
o, • May not have geographic border
Q)
l1l
Common o Polyostotic lesions could be misinterpreted
::2; • Multiple Hereditary Exostoses (MHE) as undertubulation; ground-glass density
Q)
c • Fibrous Dysplasia (FD) • Unicameral Bone Cyst (Mimic)
o • Unicameral Bone Cyst (Mimic)
CD o Metaphyseal or metadiaphyseal
OJ
c • Paget Disease (Mimic) o Central, with osseous expansion, thinning
o • Storage Diseases
....J the endosteal cortex
"0 o Gaucher Disease o Solitary lesion; watch for mildly sclerotic
CIl
rJl o Niemann Pick geographic margin; ± fallen fragment
III
aI o Mucopolysaccharidoses • Paget Disease (Mimic)
>.
E • Thalassemia o Expands the involved bone
-<
o
III
l::
• Sickle Cell Anemia
• Chronic Osteomyelitis
o Generally easily distinguished by means of
the distinct border between normal &
Less Common abnormal bone ("blade of grass")
• Achondroplasia • Involvement of entire bone may mimic
• Ollier Disease undertubulation; mixed lytic/sclerotic
• Rickets (Healing) • Gaucher Disease
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta (01) o Storage disease resulting in expansion of
.•
:J
III
o
o Chronic disease may show little • Osteopetrosis 3
'<
destructive change (permeative o Uniformly dense bones, axial, & lJl
III
destruction, periosteal reaction) appendicular skeleton VI
C1l
o Sclerosis & endosteal bone formation may o Abnormality is in osteoclastic activity; Co
o May not have associated soft tissue abscess • - Bone-in-bone appearance lJl
o
:J
Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses • Engelmann-Camurati Disease C1l
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows gradual
widening of the distal
meta diaphysis, without
thinning of cortex or osseous
destruction" This flaring
gives the appearance of an
"Erlenmeyer flask" and is
typical of Gaucher disease.
(Right) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows widening
of the metacarpals, with
proximal constriction giving
the fan appearance" that
is typical of the
mucopolysaccharidoses
storage diseases.
I
98
LONG BONE, UNDERTUBULATION
Thalassemia Thalassemia
(Left) PA radiograph shows
diffuse abnormal modeling of
the bones, with widening of
the diaphyses and loss of the
expected metaphyseal
morphology. Cortices are
thin, & trabeculae are
abnormal. This is typical
marrow hyperplasia in
thalassemia. (Right) AP
radiograph shows widening
of the metaphyses ••
extending to include"much of
the diaphysis. This widening
results from marrow
hyperplasia in a patient with
thalassemia.
Chronic Osteomyelitis
(Left) AP radiograph shows
widening of the diaphysis of
the fibula" (compare with
adjacent tibia), with
extensive sclerosis and
cortical thickening. This
teenager had leg pain for I
year; this proved to be
chronic staphylococcal
osteomyelitis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows short, broad bones in
this case of achondroplastic
dwarfism. Undertubulation is
a prominent Feature in this
process.
I
99
ro LONG BONE, UNDERTUBULATION
Q)
(/)
>-
.<:
0-
ro
(5
cO
Ql Oilier Disease Rickets (Healing)
~ (Left) AP radiograph shows
Q) broadening of the
c
o metaphysis, with vertical
CD striations within it" All the
Cl
C metaphyses of the right
o lower limb showed similar
-1
undertubulation and the limb
"0
Q) was short; findings are
(/)
III
typical of Oilier disease.
CD (Right) AP radiograph shows
>- bowing & undertubulation of
E the distal femoral
-
o
ro
c
ct
metaphp-ses III in a case of
healing rickets, where the
widened and frayed
metaphyses are becoming
ossified. Remodeling may
occur with further treatment.
I
100
lONG BONE, UNDERTUBUlATlON :l>
:l
..•o
III
3
'<
llJ
III
III
Engelmann-Camurati Disease Maffucci Syndrome CD
(Left) AP radiograph shows 0-
severe underwbulation of r
the diaphysis. along with o
:l
(Q
cortical and endosteal
thickening. The metaphysis is OJ
o
normal. and the findings :l
CD
were bilateral, all typical of
Engelmann-Camurati s:
co
disease. (Right) AP Qi,
radiograph shows
undertubulation of the
o
iii'
meta diaphysis, with '0
::T
chondroid matrix within the '<
en
lesion EH There were co
III
hemangiomas elsewhere in
this patienes 50ft tissues,
making the diagnosis of
Maffucci syndrome.
I
101
co LONG BONE, OVERTUBULATION
Q)
(J)
>-
.s:::
a.
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Muscular atrophy ...•insufficient muscle
o, pull to promote normal growth of bones
co Common
Qi o Usually unilateral; limb length discrepancy
2 • Paralysis/Disuse • Cerebral Palsy
Q)
o Polio
c::
o o Spasticity with disuse atrophy of muscles ...•
co o Cerebral Palsy
insufficient muscle pull to promote
Ol
c:: • Neurofibromatosis normal growth of long bones
o
-' • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) o Patella alta common, with C-shaped
"Ql
(J)
Less Common patella
• Neurofibromatosis
m
ltl • Hemophilia
>- • Marfan Syndrome (Phalanges) o Long bone abnormality generally restricted
-
E
o
ltl
c::
«
• Muscular Disorders
o Arthrogryposis
o Muscular Dystrophy
to tibia/fibula
o Dysplasia of tibia, rather than
neurofibromas causing the abnormality
• Osteogenesis lmperfecta (01) o Bone may be bowed in any direction
o Often thin diaphysis; dysplastic bone at
Rare but Important
risk for pathologic (transverse) fractures
• Homocystinuria (Phalanges)
o May result in pseudarthrosis of either tibia
• Achondroplasia (Mimic)
or fibula at mid-diaphysis
• Hypophosphatasia
o Multiple fibroxanthomas (non ossifying
• Radiation
fibromas) may be present, especially
• Caudal Regression Syndrome around knee
• Epidermolysis Bullosa
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
• Progeria o Systemic variety of JIA results in prolonged
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis chronic illness
• Restrictive Dermopathy
o Chronic illness & muscle atrophy slows
• Hypopituitarism
growth of long bones
• Stickler Syndrome o Ends of long bones (metaphyses &
epiphyses) show overgrowth (ballooning)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION due to chronic hyperemia at involved
joints
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Overgrowth of ends of bones emphasizes
• Abnormality in long bone modeling, gracile nature of diaphyses, giving overall
resulting in a relatively narrow diaphysis
impression of overtubulation
o Concentric narrowing of the shaft
o Typically related to chronic disease that Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
affects a growing skeleton • Hemophilia
• Most of listed processes involve all bones o Chronic illness delays growth, resulting in
• Those diseases that may have single or gracile (thin) long bones
non symmetric involvement (site may be o Ends of long bones (metaphyses &
predictable) epiphyses) show overgrowth (ballooning)
o Polio due to chronic hyperemia at involved
o Neurofibromatosis joints
o Hemophilia • Overgrowth of ends of bones emphasizes
o Arthrogryposis gracile nature of diaphyses, giving overall
o Muscular dystrophy impression of overtubulation
o Caudal regression syndrome o Knee, elbow, ankle most frequently
o Radiation involved with arthropathy
o Epidermolysis bullosa • Overtubulation therefore seen most
frequently in femur, tibia, & humerus
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Gender specific (male)
• Polio
I
102
LONG BONE, OVERTUBULATION »
::l
..•o
III
I
104
lONG BONE, OVERTUBUlATION
Hypophosphatasia
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows short
bones of the limbs. The
metaphyses are broad and
(fat, giving the impression of
overtubulation. However,
the diaphyses are not truly
thinned in this patient with
achondroplasia. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows thinning, bowing, and
deformity of the femora _
There is severe osteopenia,
which has worsened with
lime. Protrus;o and widened,
irregular phys€s contribute to
the diagnosis of
hypophosphatasia.
Radiation
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a short
humerus, with thinning of
the distal diaphysis.
(compare size with the
normal thorax). This patient
had whole bone radiation as
a child for Ewing sarcoma,
resulting in growth
abnormalities. Radiation
sarcoma is also seen ••.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows absence of
lumbar spine. and
hypoplastic iliac wings with
absent sacrum _ typical of
caudal regression. Note the
thin, ill-formed femora Ell.
I
105
OJ
GROWTH PLATE,PREMATUREPHYSEAl ClOSURE
~
CL
£
Fracture Osteomyelitis
I
107
GROWTH PLATE, WIDENED PHYSIS
• Hypophosphatasia medial
a Results in appearance of widened physis &
Rare but Important
"short" capital epiphysis
• Hypothyroidism a Bilateral in 20-25%, but need not be
• Scurvy synchronous
• Copper Deficiency (Menkes Kinky-Hair a Optimal age range: 8-14
Syndrome) • Renal Osteodystrophy (Renal 00)
• Metaphyseal Dysplasias a Combined findings of rickets &
hyperparathyroidism (HPTH)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION a Rickets results in widening of physis
.a Watch for HPTH as well
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Subperiosteal resorption
• Involvement of all physes rather than a • Subchondral resorption with collapse
single or few sites seen in several processes (particularly sacroiliac joints)
a Rickets & renal 00
• Rickets
a Total parenteral nutrition
a Similar appearance, whether renal or
a Gigantism
nutritional etiology
a Mucopolysaccharidoses
a Results from lack of mineralization of
a Osteogenesis imperfecta osteoid laid down at metaphyseal zone of
a Hypophosphatasia
provisional calcification
a Hypothyroidism
a Widened physis, often with fraying of
a Copper deficiency
metaphyses
a Metaphyseal dysplasias a Decreased bone density, smudgy
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses trabeculae
• Physeal Fracture Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
a Salter I: Fracture through physis; difficult
• Osteomyelitis
to visualize unless displaced a If metaphyseal osteomyelitis crosses
a Salter II: Fracture through physis,
physis, may result in slip of physis &
extending through metaphysis appearance of widening
• Metaphyseal portion may be subtle; a Watch for osseous destruction, periosteal
easier to visualize if displaced reaction
a Salter Ill: Fracture through physis, • Legg-Calve-Perthes (LCP)
extending through epiphysis a Osteonecrosis of femoral capital epiphysis
a Increased density, flattening,
fragmentation of epiphysis
I
108
GROWTH PLATE, WIDENED PHYSIS :t>
:J
...•
III
o
o Associated appearance of widened physis o Diffuse widening of physes 3
'<
o Optimal age range: 4-8 o Osteopenia OJ
III
• Blount Disease o Ranges from mild tarda form to severe IJl
(1)
Rickets Osteomyelitis
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a widened
physis •• at both the tibia
and femur due to nutritional
rickets. The abnormality is
secondary to the formation
of osteoid which is not
mineralized,' the appearance
is identical in rickets due to
renal 00. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows metaphyseal
destruction EiII and
periosteal reaction secondary
to osteomyelitis. Infection
has crossed the physis,
resulting in widening III and
slip of the epiphysis Ia.
I
110
GROWTH PLATE, WIDENED PHYSIS >
-
:J
III
o
3
'<
III
III
Mucopolysaccharidoses III
(1)
(Left) Lateral radiograph C-
shows widening of the physis o
and fraying of the o
:J
metaphyses III in a case of <C
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows osteopenia
and multiple healed fractures
typical of 01 tarda. The
physes are mildly widened
and slipped m. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
widening of the physis =
that is reminiscent of rickets.
This is a mild case of
hypophosphatasia. In severe
cases, the bone density is
significantly reduced and the
phys€s show more significant
widening, with fraying of the
metaphyses.
Hypothyroidism Scurvy
(Left) AP radiograph shows
widening of the physes
severe growth retardation in
=&
I
111
E
:J
PERIOSTEUM: AGGRESSIVE PERIOSTITIS
Q)
~
en
o
·C
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o a.k.a., amorphous or complex
a.. o Irregular collection of reactive bone
'tl Common o Complex pattern can be due to rapid
<1l
en
III
• Osteosarcoma, Conventional tumor growth, infection, or fracture
!Xl • Ewing Sarcoma
>-
• Codman triangle
E • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma o Focal triangular elevation of calcified
•..o
III
• Metastasis periosteum at site of bone insertion
c: • Fracture Healing Process o Classically associated with malignancy, but
<
Less Common also seen with infection and trauma
• Osteomyelitis • Thin periosteal reaction, < 1 mm, is
• Leukemia equivocal for an aggressive process
• Osteosarcoma, Periosteal (Mimic) o May progress to either interrupted or solid
• Lymphoma periosteal reaction
Rare but Important Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Fibrosarcoma • Osteosarcoma, Conventional
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous o Location: Femur, tibia, humerus most
common
o Periosteal reactions: "Sunburst", "hair on
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION end", lamellated, solid thin, disorganized
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Codman triangle common
• Periosteal reaction or periostitis is the o Osteoid matrix visible in 80%
• Periosteal reaction is visible on radiographs 20 years old; flat bones if > 20 years old
10 days to 3 weeks post insult o Periosteal reactions: Lamellated, "hair on
• Aggressive periosteal reaction is also termed o Large soft tissue mass is common
"interrupted" o Lacks metaphyseal lucent lines
o Indicates a rapidly progressing process, • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma
benign or malignant o Location: Long bone metaphysis, pelvis
o Is in contrast to solid (more o Periosteal reactions: Thin or disorganized;
o Disorganized • Metastasis
o Location: Multifocal
• Lamellated
o a.k.a., "onion skin" o Periosteal reactions: Thin, disorganized
-E
o
III
c:
<l:
the proximal fibular
metaphysis that has
traversed the cortex. There is
a wide zone of transition, a
large 50ft tissue mass, and
aggressive appearing
periosteal reaction _.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows Codman triangle of
aggressive periosteal reaction
•• along the anterior cortex
of the mid-femoral diaphysis.
There is underlying
permeative medullary lesion
and a subtle soft tissue mass.
Osteomyelitis
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a transverse
supracondylar distal
humerus fracture •.
Extensive disorganized
periosteal new bone
surroundsthe fracture.
due to the lack of proper
fracture immobilization.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows a nightstick fraclure
site complicated by
osteomyelitis. There is
permeative bone destruction
E!il a dense central bone
sequestrum JIll and
disorganized surrounding
periosteal reaction •.
I
114
PERIOSTEUM: AGGRESSIVE PERIOSTITIS
Angiosarcoma, Osseous
(Left) Lateralradiograph
shows only a "smudginess"
of the bone trabeculae EiIl
as well as subtle interrupted
periosteal reaction _ These
findings represent an
extremely permeative and
aggressive underlying lesion.
(Right) Coronal NEeT shows
a destructive mass III in the
proximal tibia. There is
breech of the cortex. and
a small amount of
disorganized periosteal
reaction _ Both infection
and malignancy were initially
considered in the differential
diagnosis.
I
115
E PERIOSTEUM: SOLID PERIOSTITIS
:::J
Q)
Ul
o
"C
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Distribution: Localized or generalized
CL
o Associated findings: Phleboliths, cellulitis
"0 Common • Psoriatic Arthritis
Ql
III
ltl
• Fracture Healing Process o Location: Periarticular, peripheral
In • Venous Stasis
>- ligament, and tendon insertions
E • Psoriatic Arthritis o Distribution: Localized or generalized
-
o
ltl
c:
<t
• Chronic Osteomyelitis
• Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy
o Periosteal reaction: Solid, irregular
• Chronic Osteomyelitis
• Stress Fracture o Location: Any location is possible
• Chondroblastoma o Distribution: Localized
• Osteoid Osteoma o Periosteal reaction: Thick, dense
less Common o Underlying mixed sclerotic and lytic lesion
• Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis ± sequestrum
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA) • Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis o Location: Long bone diaphyses
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications o Distribution: Symmetric, generalized
• Metastases, Treated o Evaluate for underlying carcinoma or
• Melorheostosis (Mimic) chronic disease (thoracic or abdominal)
Rare but Important • Stress Fracture
o Location: Tibia, metatarsals, long bones,
• Complications of Vitamin A
pelvis, calcaneus
• Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle
o Distribution: Localized
• Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis
o Periosteal reaction: Linear, ovoid, or
• Complications of Vitamin D
concentric
• Complications of Fluoride
• Chondroblastoma
• Thyroid Acropachy
o Location: Along metadiaphysis adjacent to
• Pachydermoperiostosis
epiphyseal chondroblastoma
• Engelmann Disease (Engelmann-Camurati)
o Periosteal reaction: Thick, solid, or layered
• Physiologic Periostitis, Lower Extremity
o Lytic epiphyseal lesion with variable
• Caffey Disease (Infantile Cortical
chondroid matrix and variably sclerotic
Hyperostosis)
border
• Scurvy
• Osteoid Osteoma
• Secondary Syphilis
o Location: Femur, tibia, fibula, humerus
o Periosteal reaction: Thick & dense; blends
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION with thickened cortex
o Central lucent nidus
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
o Intraarticular location has paucity of
• Thick, solid periosteal reactions typically periosteal new bone
reflect a nonmalignant underlying process
o Exception: Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
o Very rarely seen in osteosarcoma, Ewing • Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis
sarcoma, and untreated metastases o Location: Phalanges, metatarsals,
metacarpals
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Seen in healing phase
• Fracture Healing Process
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
o Periosteal reaction: Wide range depending
o Location: Periarticular, ligament and
on motion at fracture site during healing tendon insertions
• Greater motion = greater disorganization
o Distribution: Localized or generalized
o Periosteal reaction from traumatic and
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis
pathologic fractures can be similar
o Location: Calcaneus, metatarsals, lower leg
• Venous Stasis o Distribution: Localized
o Location: Lower extremity
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications
I
116
:I>
PERIOSTEUM: SOLID PERIOSTITIS
..
~
III
o
o Location: Tubular bones of hands & feet o Calcified ligaments and tendons 3
'<
(dactylitis), long bones • Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament OJ
III
o Distribution: Generalized common
o Osteosclerosis
'"
~
Q.
• Metastases, Treated
-0
o Solid periosteal reaction most common in • Thyroid Acropachy C1l
~
treated metastases
• Melorheostosis (Mimic)
o Location: Metacarpals, metatarsals
o Periosteal reaction: Solid, "fluffy" border ..'"
o'
C1l
c
o Sclerosing bone dysplasia produces o History of treatment for hyperthyroidism 3
endosteal &/or cortical ossification, not • Pachydermoperiostosis
true periosteal reaction o Primary form of hypertrophic
o Sclerotomal distribution common osteoarthropathy
o Periosteal reaction: Thick, shaggy
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Male predominance with onset at puberty
• Complications of Vitamin A
• Engelmann Disease
o Location: Ulna, lower leg, metatarsals,
(Engelmann-Camurati)
clavicle o Diaphyseal broadening of long bones
o Retinoid drug administration in teens
• Physiologic Periostitis, Lower Extremity
• Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle
o Location: Long bones, symmetric
o Location: Medial end of clavicle
o Infants up to 6 months of age
o Sclerosis of normal-sized bone with solid
• More common in premature infants
periosteal reaction
• Caffey Disease (Infantile Cortical
• Chronic Recurrent Multifocal
Hyperostosis)
Osteomyelitis
o Location: Jaw, long bone diaphysis,
o Location: Long bone metaphysis, clavicle,
clavicle, scapula, ribs
spine
o 1st seen in infants < 6 months of age
o Radiographically ranges from occult to
mimicking osteosarcoma • Scurvy
o Location: Long bones
• Complications of Vitamin D o Follows location of subperiosteal bleed &
o Rickets = wide physes; cupped, frayed
subsequent calcification
epiphyses
• Secondary Syphilis
o Periosteal elevation from unmineralized
o Location: Long bones, skull
osteoid or occult fracture
o Periosteal reaction: Solid with short
• Complications of Fluoride
spicules
o Location: Tubular bones, symmetric
-"'
<
E
o
c:
cartilage narrowing at several
joints HI The presence of
periostitis makes rheumatoid
arthritis unlikely. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows solid to perpendicular
periostitis" along the
medial edge of the distal
phalanx of the great toe. The
productive changes seen
here are typical of both
psoriatic arthritis and chronic
reactive arthritis.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows exuberant
periosteal reaction at the
proximal tibia IIIand a less
prominent reaction involving
the distal femur" and
fibula HI These changes
were secondary to lung
cancer. rt MSK Req). (Right)
Oblique radiograph shows
symmetric, solid periosteal
reaction. along the radius
and ulna. Secondary causes
are far more common than
primary; thus occult
malignancy should be
excluded when these
findings are encountered.
I
118
PERIOSTEUM: SOLID PERIOSTITIS :>
-
::J
III
o
3
'<
III
III
VI
Stress Fracture Stress Fracture (l)
(Leh) Coronal TSE TRIM MR a.
shows bone marrow edema -U
III in the area of stress and (l)
~
increased signal in the o·
VI
muscles. and periosteum r0-
III Radiographs were c
normal at this time. (Right) 3
Anteroposterior radiograph
in the same patient ten
weeks later shows dense
circumferential periosteal
new bone formation. in
the area of the stress
fracture.
Chondroblastoma
fLeft) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a lytic
epiphyseal lesion of the
humerus Ell. The lesion
contains a faint calcific
matrix III and has a dense
periosteal reaction in the
metaphyseal region III
typical for this diagnosis.
fRight) Axial NEeT shows a
cortically based osteoid
osteoma with a typical
lucent nidus III. It is
surrounded by densely
sclerotic cortical thickening
and periosteal new bone III
I
119
E PERIOSTEUM: SOLID PERIOSTITIS
::l
Q)
U;
o
'C
Q)
ll.
"0
QI Chronic Reactive Arthritis Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications
'"'"
(Left) Posteroanterior
III radiograph shows soft tissue
>- swelling of the index finger,
-E
o
c'":
<l:
as well as cartilage
narrowing in the DIP_
Additionally, there is
prominent periostitis at the
middle phalanx •. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a typical instance of
sickle cell dactylitis in a
baby. Solid periosteal
reaction. surrounds
several metacarpals. These
findings were present
bilaterally.
I
120
PERIOSTEUM: SOLID PERIOSTITIS »
:J
..•o
III
3
'<
lJl
Chronic Recurrent Multifocal III
VI
Osteomyelitis (t)
Engelmann Disease
Pachydermoperiostosis (Engelmann-Camurati)
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows solid
periosteal reaction
the metacarpals and
=
along
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows subtle
diffuse increased density of
the lower extremity long
bones, resulting from subtle
solid periostitis _ Findings
are particularly prominent
along the diaphyses and
were bifaterally symmetric.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse
osteopenia with metaphyseal
corner fractures _ termed
Pelken fractures. With these
fractures, the patient may
develop an extensive
subperiosteal bleed,
elevating the periosteum _
I
121
E PERIOSTEUM: BIZARRE HORIZONTAL PERIOSTEAL REACTION
::J
OJ
(j)
o
-;::
OJ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Hint: In presence of a focus of odd,
Q.
horizontal periosteal reaction, look for
"C Common other bones showing more
Cll
III
l'O • Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy (HOA) normal-appearing periosteal reaction
CO • Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis
>- • Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis
E less Common o Renal osteodystrophy, when active, shows
•..
o
l'O • Parosteal Lipoma subperiosteal resorption along metaphyses
l::
« • Hemophilic Pseudotumor of long bones
• Fibromatosis o When in a healing phase, shows new bone
• Juvenile Aponeurotic Fibroma formation
• Osteosarcoma (Mimic) • Most prominent appearance when renal
• Skull Hemangioma (Mimic) osteodystrophy was severe and adequate
• Thalassemia (Mimic) treatment is first instituted
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (Mimic) • New bone formation along periosteum
gives an appearance of dense linear
Rare but Important
periosteal reaction, but is neostosis
• Soft Tissue Tumor Adjacent To Bone • Neostosis rarely has an exuberant
• Subperiosteal Ganglion horizontal extension
• New bone is also seen in a round pattern,
I ESSENTIAL INFORMATION filling in and healing brown tumors
• New bone is also seen as a diffuse density
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues within long bones
• True bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction is o Hint: When suspecting neostosis, watch
uncommon for coarsened trabeculae, brown tumors
o Most of the entities generally present with (perhaps hyperossified), & patterns of
linear, regular periosteal bone formation residual resorption
o Occasional bizarre appearance may be
confusing; this list addresses these Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
uncommon instances • Parosteal Lipoma
o Soft tissue lipoma, adjacent to long bone
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Most do not elicit a reaction
• Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy (HOA) • Occasionally, juxta-osseous lipoma elicits
o Periosteal reaction in the appendicular
extensive horizontal periosteal reaction
skeleton, with either 1 or 2 etiology
0 0
I
124
PERIOSTEUM: BIZARRE HORIZONTAL PERIOSTEAL REACTION »
-
:J
III
o
3
'<
lJl
III
<II
Thalassemia (Mimic) m
(Left) Lateral radiograph a.
shows a large hemangioma "U
ct>
of the skull, expanding the ~
outer table. with a o'
<II
honeycomb appearance of r0-
the trabeculations ffi This is c
not a true periosteal reaction. 3
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows the "hair on end"
appearance of the skull" in
a patient with thalassemia.
This in fact is not a periosteal
reactive process but
represents the widened
diploic space required for
the erythropoietic needs in
this severe anemia.
I
125
E
::J
PERIOSTEUM: PERIOSTITIS MULTIPLE BONES/ACROPACHY, ADULT
Q)
iil
o
°C
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Clubbing of fingers
a.. o Patients complain of joint pain
"0 Common • Because of site of pain, radiograph is
ell
IJl
C1l
• Hypertrophic Pulmonary Osteoarthropathy often of wrist/hand or ankle/foot
to (HPOA) • Periosteal reaction is often seen only on
>-
• Extrathoracic Hypertrophic
•..Eo
C1l
Osteoarthropathy
the corner of the radiograph, involving
the diaphysis of long bone
c: • Vascular Insufficiency
« • Small bones of hand or foot may be
Less Common involved, less frequently than long bones
• Subperiosteal Resorption (Mimic) • Extrathoracic Hypertrophic
• Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis Osteoarthropathy
• Psoriatic Arthritis o Less common etiology of hypertrophic
• Pachydermoperiostosis osteoarthropathy than HPOA
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis o May be associated with biliary disease,
• Thyroid Acropachy cirrhosis, inflammatory bowel disease
o Radiographically identical to HPOA
Rare but Important
• Vascular Insufficiency
• Tuberous Sclerosis o Periosteal reaction in lower extremity,
• Hypervitaminosis A particularly tibia & fibula
• Hypervitaminosis D o Varicosities, cellulitis, & phleboliths
• Complications of Retinoids
• Fluorosis Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta (01) Tarda • Subperiosteal Resorption (Mimic)
• Leukemia o Hyperparathyroidism or renal
osteodystrophy
o Subperiosteal resorption may be aggressive,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION mimicking fluffy periosteal reaction
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Most common locations
• Multiple sites of periosteal reaction: Much • Radial aspect of middle phalanges (with
more limited differential than solitary bone severe disease, involves all phalanges,
involvement both radial & ulnar sides)
• Hint: Most important diagnosis is HPOA • Proximal medial humerus, tibia, femur
o Radiologist must direct clinician to look o Watch for suggestion that it is resorption
for lung pathology rather than added bony reaction
o May allow early detection of lung cancer • No solid cortex will be seen underlying
in a situation where there is no clinical the abnormality
suspicion of the disease • Bone density is abnormal, with
smudginess of trabeculae
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• May have other sites of resorption
• Hypertrophic Pulmonary (subchondral, subligamentous)
Osteoarthropathy (HPOA) • May have brown tumors &/or soft tissue
o Multiple intrathoracic etiologies, including
calcification
infection, pleural disease, & congestive • Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis
heart failure, but most frequent is lung o When severe renal osteodystrophy is
cancer newly & adequately treated, it results in
o Elicits dense periosteal reaction in long
new bone formation
bones without underlying osseous • May take the form of periosteal new
abnormality bone, termed neostosis
• Periosteal reaction usually linear & o Watch for other new bone formation
regular • Hyperossification of brown tumors
• Occasionally it is exuberant, mimicking a • Increased bone formation on trabeculae
surface bone-forming tumor leads to overall increased density
I
126
PERIOSTEUM: PERIOSTITIS MULTIPLE BONES/ACROPACHY, ADULT »
..
:l
III
o
o Watch for underlying signs of renal o May have thyrotoxicosis 3
'<
osteodystrophy o May have clubbing of fingers tD
III
• Various patterns of resorption Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses III
<1l
• Bowing deformities • Tuberous Sclerosis
Co
-0
• Psoriatic Arthritis o Uncommon disease; periosteal reaction is C1l
::l.
o Early changes, even pre-erosive, include o
rare manifestation III
• Sausage digit: Swelling of entire digit 10
• Hypervitaminosis A c
• Periostitis: Fluffy bone formation along o May have undulating periosteal reaction 3
shaft and metaphyses o Soft tissue nodularity
o Later changes include aggressive erosive
o Intracranial hypertension
change; pencil-in-cup, arthritis mutilans
• Hypervitaminosis D
o Hand involvement with interphalangeal
o Enthesopathy, rare periostitis
joint predominance
• Complications of Retinoids
• Pachydermoperiostosis o Usually productive change is in the form
o a.k.a., 1 hypertrophic osteoarthropathy
0
•..Eo
C1l
involving all metacarpals •.
Although one should
c: primarily suspect lung cancer
< with HPOA, in this case the
hypertrophic
osteoarthropathy was related
to liver cirrhosis. (Right) AP
radiograph shows dense
periosteal reaction. along
the tibia. This was a bilateral
finding but only involved the
legs. This exclusive lower
extremity distribution favors
vascular insufficiency as the
etiology.
I
128
PERIOSTEUM: PERIOSTITIS MUlTIPLE BONES/ACROPACHY, ADULT »
::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
lJl
III
Pachydermoperiostosis Pachydermoperiostosis VI
to
(Left) Anteroposterior Q.
radiograph shows prominent -U
<1l
periosteal reaction involving ~
all metacarpals & phalanges o·
VI
_ All the long bones had a r0-
similar appearance, & the c
skin of the patient's forehead 3
& dorsal hand was
thickened. The combination
makes the diagnosis of
pachydermoperiostosis.
(tMSK Req). (Right) Frontal
Tc99m bone scan in the
same patient shows diffuse
periosteal uptake in all long
bones, indicating extent of
periosteal reaction in this
patient with 1° HOA.
I
129
E
::J
PERIOSTEUM: PERIOSTITIS MUlTIPLE BONES, CHILD
Q)
eno
·C
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Normal growth may be so rapid during
0.. first 6 months that new periosteal bone is
-c Common produced
Ql
VI
Cll
• Physiologic Periostitis • Symmetric, regular
III • Child Abuse • Resolves by 6 months of age
>-
E • Multifocal Osteomyelitis • Child Abuse
•...o
Cll
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) o Always consider this diagnosis when
c: • Hypervitaminosis A
« periosteal reaction is seen in a child!
• Polyostotic Aggressive Bone Tumor o Often not symmetric
less Common o Often 2° to metaphyseal corner fracture
• Prostaglandin Periostitis • Fracture causes subperiosteal bleeding &
• Sickle Cell Dactylitis lifting of periosteum
o May occur without fracture 2° to normally
Rare but Important loose periosteum and a twisting injury
• Caffey Disease • Multifocal Osteomyelitis
• Renal Osteodystrophy (Mimic) o Congenital infections
• Leukemia • TORCH infections
• Scurvy • Congenital syphilis (may have "celery
• Complications of Chemotherapeutic Drugs, stalking" at metaphyses as well)
Methotrexate o Infections from newborn ICU: Generally
• Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy, Cystic Streptococcus
Fibrosis o Multifocal osteomyelitis later in childhood
• Complications of Retinoids • Hematogenous spread (metaphyseal)
• Consider underlying disease: HIV/AlDS
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION or sickle cell anemia
o Tuberculosis (TB) involvement in hands:
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues Dactylitis is termed spina ventosa
• Periosteal reaction is common in a single • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
bone, with a multitude of etiologies o First osseous manifestation may be
• Polyostotic periostitis is much less common; periostitis of hand or foot phalanges
the polyostotic nature and patient age helps o Later, joints will be involved
to limit the diagnosis o Differential is sickle cell & TB dactylitis
• Hint: Some etiologies are limited by patient • Hypervitaminosis A
age o Excessive intake of vitamin A results
o First appearance BEFORE6 months of age
initially in periosteal reaction
• Physiologic (should disappear by age 6 • Subtle at first but may become quite
months) dense & thick
• Congenital osteomyelitis • Painful
• Caffey disease o Continued use of excessive vitamin A may
• Prostaglandin periostitis lead to coned epiphyses
o First appearance AFTER6 months of age
• Polyostotic Aggressive Bone Tumor
• Juvenile idiopathic arthritis o Bone metastases
• Hypervitaminosis A • Ewing sarcoma presents with osseous
• Sickle cell dactylitis metastases as frequently as lung mets
• Renal osteodystrophy • Others to consider: Medulloblastoma,
• Scurvy neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma
• Hint: ALWAYSconsider the possibility of o Leukemia: Common but usually presents
child abuse/nonaccidental trauma with lucent metaphyseal bands or diffuse
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses osteoporosis
• Physiologic Periostitis • Periostitis is a rare manifestation
I
130
PERIOSTEUM: PERIOSTITIS MUlTIPLE BONES, CHILD
Child Abuse
"en
41
(Left) Antemposterior
Child Abuse Multifocal Osteomyelitis
en'" radiograph shows periosteal
>- reaction. related to a
E metaphyseal corner fracture
.•..o seen only on the lateral
c'": view; fracture occurred 19
< days earlier. Periosteal
reaction should alert
radiologist to seek other signs
of nonaccidental trauma.
(Right) Antemposterior
radiograph shows periosteal
reaction along tibia. o( an
infant. Other bones were
similarly involved. Finding is
nonspecific but can be seen
with congenital infections
such as syphilis in this case.
(Left) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows dense
periosteal accretion along
the ulnar diaphysis _ This
was seen on other bonesl
including both legs. This 1
year old was being given
large doses of vitamin A.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows thick & prominent
periosteal reaction along the
ulna _ Other bones
showed lytic lesions and
others showed simply
periosteal reaction in this
child with metastatic
medulloblastoma.
I
132
PERIOSTEUM: PERIOSTITIS MUlTIPLE BONES, CHILD »
-
::l
III
o
3
'<
llJ
III
Ul
Prostaglandin Periostitis Sickle Cell Dactylitis (1)
(Left) Late,a/,adiograph C.
shows thick, dense periosteal -U
reactionin the humerus. CD
:J.
as well as the bones of the o
Ul
forearm _ This infant had CD
been treated with c
prostaglandins for a cardiac 3
defect. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows subtle periosteal
reaction. and underlying
bone abnormality in this
African-American child who
developed hand pain on the
first cold day of winter. This
represents a bone infarct in
sickle cell disease.
I
133
"0
Q)
(/l
ARTHRITIS WITH NORMAL BONE DENSITY
co
(])
"C
QI Gout Synovial Osteochondromatosis
VI (left) Oblique radiograph
I'<l
al shows a prominent dense
>. gouty tophus. along with
E an osseous erosion with
-o
I'<l
c:
overhanging edge _ The
bone density remains
< normal, as is typical of gout.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows several
round osseous bodies.
within the elbow joint. The
bone density is normal, as is
expected with synovial
osteochondromatosis.
I
136
ARTHRITIS WITH NORMAL BONE DENSITY »
::l
..•o
Ql
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Neuropathic Arthropathy (Not Diabetic) <1>
(Left) Anteroposterior Co
radiograph shows huge
'-
Q.
subchondral cysts on both
acetabular and femoral sides ..•
::l
I
137
"0
Q) ARTHRITIS WITH OSTEOPENIA
en
co
co
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Purely erosive process; erosions are not
--,o well-marginated
"'C Common o Symmetric, typical distribution
<Il
VI
C1l
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) • MCP, distal radioulnar, radiocarpal joint
to • Diabetic Charcot Joint • Uniform throughout knee
>- • Septic Joint
E • Uniform narrowing hip, with protrusio
-
«
o
C1l
c:
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Less Common
• Diabetic Charcot Joint
o Charcot joints retain whatever bone
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) density was present prior to joint
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) destruction
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis (PSS) o Diabetic hands & feet are osteoporotic;
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) neuropathic changes are atrophic
• Transient Osteoporosis (Mimic) • Septic Joint
• Hemophilia o Effusion & subchondral/cortical
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis osteopenia are earliest changes
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Rare but Important
o Osteopenia is hallmark of AS & occurs
• Amyloid Deposition diffusely and early in disease
• Adult Still Disease
• Other spondyloarthritides (psoriatic or
• Ochronosis CRA) do not have as early or widespread
• Wilson Disease osteopenia
• Mixed Connective Tissue Disease o Combination of osteopenia & spine fusion
• HIV-Associated Arthritis
puts spine at risk for fracture from minor
• Tuberculosis Septic Joint trauma
• Fungal Septic Joint
• Familial Mediterranean Fever Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
o Osteopenia typical & widespread in SLE
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Due both to disease process & common
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues use of steroids
• Any highly inflammatory process will o Non-erosive deformities of hands & feet
present with FOCAL osteopenia • Simulates RA, but would expect erosions
o This includes diagnoses that are typically with the degree of deformity seen
considered to retain normal bone density, • Late in disease, mechanical erosions
including gout & psoriatic arthritis • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
• Any end-stage arthritis that results in o Hyperemia from synovitis results in two
DISUSE will develop diffuse osteopenia typical features
• This list represents those arthritic diseases • Osteoporosis at involved joints
that most commonly PRESENT with • Overgrowth of epiphyses, but often early
osteopenia physeal closure - short limb
o The distinction in this list is not whether o Destructive arthritic process continues,
the processes present with osteopenia with erosions & cartilage loss
commonly or rarely, but the frequency o Systemic JIA may eventually show diffuse
with which the arthritis with osteopenia osteoporosis
occurs o Hemophilia has similar appearance to JIA
o Hemophilia may show "dense" effusions
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Hemosiderin deposition in synovium
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
• Low signal which "blooms" on MR
o Osteopenia is the hallmark of RA
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis (PSS)
• Initially, with early inflammatory o Diffuse osteoporosis
change, location is juxtaarticular o Acroosteolysis with soft tissue calcification
• Later, with disuse, osteopenia is diffuse o Eventual mixed erosive/productive disease
I
138
ARTHRITIS WITH OSTEOPENIA l>
..
:J
III
o
• 1st carpometacarpal joint most severely o As in RA and JIA, juxtaarticular & eventual 3
'<
affected, with subluxation diffuse osteopenia develops OJ
III
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) o Distribution of disease C/I
~
o During inflammatory phase of arthritis, • Identical to adult RA a.
develops juxtaarticular osteopenia • DIP and pericapitate predominance '-
Q
o Osteopenia is usually not widespread • Ochronosis ~
OJ
o CRA features o Osteoporosis is hallmark of disease III
C/I
• Bilateral asymmetric SI joint disease; o Usually extensive disk calcification CD
a.
bulky asymmetric syndesmophytes o Long-standing disease results in cartilage
• Peripheral disease favors lower extremity, breakdown and true arthritis
especially calcaneus • Wilson Disease
• Associated features: Urethritis (cervicitis) o Osteopenia in majority
& conjunctivitis o Excrescences, cortical irregularity, or small
• Transient Osteoporosis (Mimic) ossicles adjacent to bones
o Effusion & osteoporosis around a joint o Focal fragmentation - arthropathy
• Usually large joint (hip, knee) • Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
• MR shows effusion & marrow edema o Overlap (clinically & radiographically) of
o Differential is septic joint; must aspirate SLE, PSS, dermatomyositis, & RA
o Self-limited; does not affect cartilage o Osteopenia plus various manifestations of
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis the above diseases
o Osteopenia is diffuse, usually related to • HIV-Associated Arthritis
steroid treatment of bowel disease o Usually incomplete clinical features of
o Arthritis pattern identical to that of AS CRA, but osseous features are same
• Symmetric SI disease, thin vertical spine • Tuberculosis & Fungal Septic Joint
syndesmophytes o Osteopenia is a routine feature
• Large proximal joint involvement o Slow but progressive destruction
o Little host reactive change
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Familial Mediterranean Fever
• Amyloid Deposition
o May develop arthropathy (usually hip)
o Amyloid usually occurs in patients with
o Initial osteoporosis & cartilage damage;
primary diseases resulting in osteopenia
eventual degenerative change
• End-stage renal disease, myeloma, RA
o Pain & disuse - focal osteopenia
• Adult Still Disease
-
~
o
I'll
r::
show severe osteopenia, due
to hyperemia. This 25 year
old man punched an
opponent in the mouth &
lacerated his knuckle. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
syndesmophytes Ell.
ankylosis, & osteoporosis,
typical of A5. The
combination of limited
motion & osteoporosis
increases the risk of fracture
from minor injury, seen here
at the odontoid'"
I
140
ARTHRITIS WITH OSTEOPENIA :I>
:l
..•o
Ql
3
'<
tll
Ql
III
Transient Osteoporosis (Mimic) Hemophilia tD
(Leh) AP radiograph shows Co
diffuse osteopenia of the '--
femoral head and, to a lesser Q.
extent, the acetabulum in a ;:l.
25 year old male. Note that tll
OJ
the cartilage width is normal III
C1>
•• Septic hip was Co
disproved, leaving transient
osteoporosis as a diagnosis
of exclusion. (Right) AP
radiograph shows severe
osteoporosis, radial head
overgrowth" widening of
the intercondylar notch ••
and erosive articular disease.
This is all typical of
hemophilic arthropathy in
this 25 year old male.
I
141
"0
Q) ARTHRITIS WITH PRODUCTIVE CHANGES
C/)
Cll
co
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
--,o • Osteoarthritis (OA)
"t:l Common
Q) o OA is the classic purely productive
C/) • Osteoarthritis (OA)
Ol
aJ
arthropathy
• Gout
>- o Do not expect to see any erosions
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
-E
o
Ol
c:
<I:
• Abutment Processes
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA)
• Exception: Mechanical erosion if joint is
significantly malaligned
• Exception: Erosive (inflammatory) OA
o Location is useful adjunct in diagnosis
• DISH (Mimic)
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) • Hand: IP joints> > MCP; 1st
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis (IBD) carpometacarpal,
• Osteonecrosis (Mimic, with Secondary scapho- tra pezoid- tra pezi urn
Osteoarthritis) • Knee: Medial compartment often more
significantly involved, though may be
Less Common tri-compartmental
• SAPHO (Mimic) • Hip: Inferomedial osteophyte is most
• Retinoid Spondyloarthropathy (Mimic) prominent; usually superolateral
• Hemochromatosis subluxation femoral head
• OPLL (Mimic) • Gout
Rare but Important o Osteophyte formation is common, along
• Wilson Disease with normal bone density
o Focal erosions tend to be well-marginated,
often with productive change at edge
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION (overhanging edge)
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Location may be classic, but also may be
• Hint: Very few diseases are purely polyostotic with unusual locations
productive • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
o Osteoarthritis o Earliest disease is erosive, then mixed
o DISH, OPLL, retinoid o End stage may be purely productive, with
spondyloarthropathy, SAPHO, abutment large osteophytes
processes • Has been described as "OA in an unusual
• Hint: Many processes may show coexistent distribution"
erosive and productive changes o Location is particularly useful for diagnosis
o Spondyloarthropathies (AS, PSA, IBD, CRA) • Carpus: Radiocarpal, often with
o Deposition arthropathies (gout, excavation of radius by scaphoid; may
pyrophosphate, hemochromatosis, result in SLAC (scapholunate advanced
Wilson) collapse) deformity
o One site may be predominantly • Hand: 2nd & 3rd MCP most commonly
productive, another erosive involved; other MCPs with advanced
• Hint: Processes that result in abnormal disease
alignment may result in mechanical erosions • Knee: Patellofemoral joint most
& productive changes prominently involved
o "Burned out" or inactive rheumatoid o Large subchondral cysts; normal density
arthritis o Chondrocalcinosis often present
• May appear confusing, with distribution o Hemochromatosis
of RAbut productive changes • Same appearance as pyrophosphate
superimposed on inactive erosive disease arthropathy, but in younger male patient
• Usually these have a mixed pattern, with • Abutment Processes
erosions seen as well as osteophytes o Most frequent is ulnar impaction due to
o Systemic lupus erythematosus ulnar positive variance
o Progressive systemic sclerosis
I
142
ARTHRITIS WITH PRODUCTIVE CHANGES »
:J
..•o
Ql
o Hamate & lunate may develop productive o DISH: Thoracic> cervical spine 3
'<
changes with SLAC wrist deformity o OPLL: Cervical> thoracic spine tc
Ql
o Impacted structure develops sclerosis, • Osteonecrosis (Mimic, with Secondary VI
(I)
":a
Q)
I
144
»
ARTHRITIS WITH PRODUCTIVE CHANGES
..
~
01
o
3
'<
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis III
01
III
Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) (IBD) (l)
(Left) Lateral radiograph C.
shows fluffy osseous '-
Q.
productive change atlhe
poslerior tubercle of lhe ~
calcaneus .:I as well as the
OJ
Ql
plantar aponeurosis insertion en
site _ This dense bone
production is seen about the
'"
0.
Hemochromatosis
(Left) PA radiograph shows
carli/age loss particularfy
involving lhe 2nd & 3rd MCP
joints, with oSleophyle
formalion _ A large
hook-like osteophyte is seen
allhe 3rd MC head III.
Findings in lhis young male
are typical of
hemochromalosis. (Right)
PA radiograph shows bony
excrescences arising from the
lunate. and radius III in a
patienl showing diffuse
osteoporosis. This productive
change is one of lhe
manifestations of Wilson
disease.
I
145
EROSIVE ARTHRITIS
o
o Location-specific o Since at joint surface, collapse mimics an 3
'<
• Hands: Radiocarpal, 2nd & 3rd erosion tD
III
metacarpals (Me) o Locations are typical III
(I)
o Large subchondral cysts often present • Distal clavicle (mimics erosions of RA or '"
Ctl
Q.
I
148
EROSIVE ARTHRITIS
arthropathy. (RighI)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows severe thinning of the
femoral neck from erosive
disease" (remember the
neck is intracapsular) as well
as a direct subchondral
erosion of the femoral head
EiII in a patient with
advanced /lA. There is
cartilage destruction as well.
I
149
"0
OJ EROSIVE ARTHRITIS
III
ro
CD
C
'0
-,
"0
Gl Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) H IV-Related Arthritis
III (Left) Lateral radiograph
l'll
CD shows a large erosion of the
>.
E
•...IIIo
calcaneus =-
posterior tubercle of the
This location
is typical of involvement by
c: CRA, which may be erosive
< initially. Later productive
disease will yield fluffy
periostitis. (Right) PA
radiograph shows swelling of
the index finger Isausage
digit) with narrowing of the
DIP" and periostitis"
This patient has HIV-AfD5;
such patients may develop
an arthropathy similar to
chronic reactive arthritis.
I
150
EROSIVE ARTHRITIS »
::::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
Progressive Systemic Sclerosis, Late III
VI
(PSS) Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria) (1)
(Left) PA radiograph shows Co
the acroosteolysis • and
50ft tissue calcifications.
'-
o
typical of progressive ~
OJ
systemic sclerosis. This is late OJ
disease, and the patient has VI
<1l
developed erosions Ell. The Co
I
151
"0
(f)
Q) MIXED EROSIVE/PRODUCTIVE ARTHRITIS
ctl
en
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Appears identical to pyrophosphate
·0
-, arthropathy; occurs in younger males
"0 Common • Erosive Osteoarthritis (EOA)
Ql
III
III
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy o IP joints show early erosions, may be
en • Erosive Osteoarthritis (EOA) mixed with osteophytes later
>-
E • Gout o 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint &
-o
III
c:
<l:
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA)
scapho-trapezium-trapezoid (SIT)
involvement confirms EOA as diagnosis
less Common • May be erosive, but usually productive
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) • Gout
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis (lED) o Early erosions develop sclerotic margins
• Hemochromatosis later, associated osteophytes
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Rare but Important
o Early erosions SI joints, generally
• SAPHO bilaterally symmetric, followed by fusion
o Large proximal joints (hip, shoulder) may
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION show both erosions & osteophytes
o Smaller peripheral joints show mixed
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
disease, but involved only late in process
• Purely erosive arthritis (RA) drops off list o lED arthritis appears similar
• Purely productive arthritis (classic OA) and
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) & Chronic
mimics (DISH, OPLL) drop off this list Reactive Arthritis (CRA)
• Hint: Most of the diagnoses on this list o Peripheral joints (hands predominate in
show erosive disease early, then progress to
PSA, foot/ankle predominate in CRA)
mixed & may end as purely productive • May have early periostitis, sausage digit
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o SI joint disease bilateral but asymmetric
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy o SI & peripheral joint disease begin erosive
o Erosions early (particularly articular surface but progress to productive
patella, radiocarpal joint) Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Followed by osteophyte formation
• SAPHO
(particularly hook-like osteophytes at o Sclerosis (particularly anterior chest wall)
MCPs, patellofemoral joint) defines productive change
o ± Chondrocalcinosis
o Synovitis uncommon, actual erosions rare
o Hemachromatosis
Hemochromatosis
(Left) AP radiograph in a 2/
year old woman with Crohn
disease shows erosive
change at the 51joint __
indicating
spondyloarthropathy. The
hip shows cartilage loss and
osteophyte formation ••.
The patient has /80
spondyloarthropathy. (Right)
PA radiograph shows mixed
erosive" and productive
• disease in a man with
hemochromatosis. The same
location and appearance
may be seen with
pyrophosphate arthropathy.
I
153
ARTHRITIS WITH LARGE SUBCHONDRAL CYSTS
acetabular cup liner or tibial tray liner to o Females more frequent; usually teenager or Co
-
E
o
ns
c:
ct
scaphoid, capitate, &
hamate, typical of
pyrophosphate arthropathy.
There is chondrocalcinosis in
the hyaline cartilage" as
well as the TFCC•
confirming the diagnosis.
(tMSK Req). (Right) Sagiual
T2WI FS MR shows large
subchondral cys(S ••
extending down the humeral
shaft Rotator cuff tear is
seen, with fluid in the
subdeltoid bursa Ell
common in RA.
I
156
ARTHRITIS WITH LARGE SUBCHONDRAL CYSTS >
::J
..•o
III
3
'<
Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath CD
III
(Mimic) III
ltl
(Left) PA radiograph shows Q.
I
157
"0
<l> ATROPHIC JOINT DESTRUCTION
<Il
ro
co
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Differentiate from rheumatoid arthritis by
"0
-, rapidity of destructive changes
1:1
Common • Diabetic Foot: Charcot
Gl
III
III
• Rheumatoid Arthritis o Location: Lisfranc, talonavicular,
ell • Septic joint intertarsal, hindfoot-midfoot (Chopart)
>. • Diabetic Foot: Charcot
E o Distribution: Unilateral, asymmetric
-
o
III
l::
«
• Syringomyelia: Charcot
Less Common
o Bone resorption & fragmentation
o Amount of debris varies; often resorbed,
• Hemophilia: MSK Complications resulting in atrophic destruction
• Tuberculosis Arthritis o Variable degree of reactive sclerosis
• Fungal Arthritis o Large joint effusion
o Joint subluxation or dislocation
Rare but Important o Can be difficult to distinguish neuropathic
• Rapidly Destructive Osteoarthritis of Hip joint from osteomyelitis
• Chondrolysis, Post-Traumatic • Sinus tract to bone favors osteomyelitis
• Confluent low signal on Tl WI favors
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION osteomyelitis
• Abscess next to bone favors osteomyelitis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Syringomyelia: Charcot
• "Atrophic": Joint destruction with resorption o Location: Shoulder, elbow, cervical spine
of most debris & a relative paucity of o Distribution: Unilateral
reactive sclerosis o Bone fragmentation that mimics erosions
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Mild intraarticular bone debris common
• Rheumatoid Arthritis • Debris should not be confused with
o Location: Metacarpophalangeal, proximal tumor matrix (chondrosarcoma mimic)
interphalangeal, carpal joints, & similar • Extensive resorption of bone mimics
locations in feet are most common surgical resection
o Distribution: Polyarticular, bilateral, o Large joint effusion
symmetric • Clinically often mistaken for soft tissue
o Periarticular erosions, progress centrally mass
o Destruction may result in arthritis • Fluid can dissect away from joint
mutilans o No reactive change in the bone
o Demineralization o joint often subluxed or dislocated
o Ligamentous laxity - subluxation, o Image cervical spinal cord for syrinx
dislocation o Rapid destruction mimics septic arthritis
o Edematous synovium with effusion Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
o Intraarticular rice bodies
• Hemophilia: MSK Complications
o Rheumatoid nodules along extensor
o Location: Knee, elbow, ankle
surfaces or bony prominences o Distribution: Polyarticular, asymmetric
o Shoulder involvement associated with o Dense effusion from hemorrhage
rotator cuff tear & erosion of acromion o Synovitis & periarticular erosions
and distal clavicle • Can mimic Hill-Sachs deformity
• Septic joint o Subchondral cysts
o Location: Knee, hip, shoulder, spine
o Growth deformities
o Distribution: Monoarticular; polyarticular
• Overgrown epiphyses & metaphyses
less common from hyperemia
o Rapid cartilage & bone destruction
• Wide intercondylar notch of knee
o Involves entire joint
• Premature growth plate closure
o Large effusion, displaced fat pads
o Blooming signal on gradient echo MR
o Demineralization on both sides of joint
sequences from hemosiderin in joint
o Secondary osteoarthritis late
I
158
ATROPHIC JOINT DESTRUCTION :I>
::l
...•.
III
o
• Tuberculosis Arthritis • Low signal intensity lines on MR parallel 3
'<
o Location: Spine, hip, knee the subchondral bone IJl
III
o Distribution: Monoarticular o Lacks demineralization VI
lTl
o Slow clinical course compared with o Normal acetabulum excludes C.
-
E
o
«'"
!:
fusion of some of the carpal
bones. Note the marked
narrowing of the intercarpal
spaces ~ and radiocarpal
joint ~ Degenerative
changes are minimal
compared to the degree of
joint space narrowing.
(Right) Oblique radiograph
shows severe narrowing of
the interphalangeal joint of
the great toe" Osseous
destruction of the articular
surfaces has occurred along
both sides of the joint Ell
Syringomyelia: Charcot
(Left; Anteroposterior
radiograph shows abrupt
cut-off of the humeral head
•. almost a surgical
appearance. Given the
extent of the osseous
destruction; the amount of
bony debris is small. This is
typical of Charcot shoulder
due to syringomyelia. (Right)
Coronal T1WI MR shows a
destroyed humeral head •.
surrounded by fluid in the
distended joint Ell The fluid
communicates between the
glenohumeral joint and
subdeltoid bursa through a
rotator cuff tear.
I
160
ATROPHIC JOINT DESTRUCTION :l>
:l
...•
III
o
3
'<
lJl
III
VI
Hemophilia: MSK Complications Hemophilia: MSK Complications nI
(Left) Anteroposterior a.
radiograph shows signilicant '-
erosive change _ as well as Q.
subchondral cyst lormation. ;?
Note the relative overgrowth CD
OJ
01 the distal lemur and VI
(l)
proximal tibia and the a.
widened intercondylar notch
~ (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows complete
loss 01 cartilage width _ an
ellusion and subchondral
cyst formation in the elbow.
The prominently overgrown
radial head Ell is due to the
hyperemia resulting Irom the
repetitive bleeding episodes.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows signilicant
destruction of the
glenohumeral joint ••.
While one might consider
neuropathic joint as a
diagnosis, it is important to
note the densely calcilied
mass in the right upper lobe
•• due to tuberculosis.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows erosion
and demineralization. of
the 2nd through 5th
tarsometatarsal joints. This
indolent fungal infection was
due to Coccidioides immitis.
I
161
U
<Il ARTHRITIS MUTllANS
<f1
ro
CD
Congenital Insensitivity/Indifference to
Pain
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows severe deformity of
the ankle and hindfoot, with
destruction of the tibiotalar,
subta/ar, talonavicular, and
calcaneocuboid joints •.
The remaining joints in this
limb were normal. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows marked destruction of
most of the phalanges.
Additionally, there is linear
calcification in the location
of a digital nerve" This
combination of Findings is
pathognomonic for leprosy.
(tMSK Req).
I
163
"0
Q) NEUROPATHIC OSTEOARTHROPATHY
en
ro
IJ)
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Syringomyelia: Shoulder> > elbow, hand
·0
--, o Paraplegia: Spine, below level of injury
"'C Common o Alcohol: Hip
C1l
III
CO
• Diabetes: MSK Complications o Syphilis: Knee> hip> spine
IJ) • Charcot, Syringomyelia o Congenital insensitivity or indifference to
>- • Charcot Spine, Paraplegia
E pain: Knee> ankle
•..o
CO less Common Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
c:
« • Charcot, Congenital Insensitivity to Pain • Diabetes: MSK Complications
• Charcot, Congenital Indifference to Pain o Generally atrophic & osteoporotic
• Charcot, Alcoholic o Lisfranc > Chopart > talonavicular
• Charcot, Syphilis o Early malalignment & fragmentation
• "Tall Man" Insensate Neuropathy o Later loss of integrity of arches &
Rare but Important associated ulceration/infection
• Charcot, lntraarticular Steroid Use • Charcot, Syringomyelia
• Charcot, Multiple Sclerosis o Clinical signs of "mass" (due to distended
• Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease joint) mislead to diagnosis of tumor
• Riley-Day Syndrome • Destruction & debris in joint may
• Spinal Cord Compression mislead to diagnosis of chondrosarcoma
• Peripheral Nerve Tumors • Charcot Spine, Paraplegia
• Meningomyelocele o Generally stabilized at level of injury
• Polio o Uncontrolled motion & insensate distal to
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
Charcot, Congenital Insensitivity to Pain l1)
(Leh) Lateral ,adiograph C.
shows disruption at several L
thoracic vertebral bodies, Q.
with osseous debris _ MR ~
confirmed absence of OJ
OJ
abscess. This paraplegic Ul
CD
patient has an unstable spine Cl.
Charcot, Syphilis
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows complete destruction
of the distal tibia, fibula,
talus, calcaneus, and
midfoot This teenager had a
similar appearing
contralateral knee. He has
congenital indifference to
pain. (Right) AP radiograph
shows fracture and
dislocation of the hip, along
with abundant debris within
a distended joint The
combination represents
Charcot joint; the patient
had tertiary syphilis. Typical
sites of syphilis Charcot joint
are hip, knee, & spine.
I
165
"0
<lJ ARTHRITIS WITH PRESERVED CARTILAGE SPACE
C/l
ro
co
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Disease progression results in relatively
-,o early marginal erosions & cartilage
"'C Common damage
<lJ
C/l
n:l
• Any Arthritis in Early Stages o Osteoarthritis (Early)
CO o Rheumatoid Arthritis (Early) • Early disease, especially in hip, may show
>. o Osteoarthritis (Early)
E subchondral cyst (Egger cyst) without
-o
n:l
c:
<l:
o Septic Joint (Early)
o Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) (Early)
other findings
• Other early features: Osteophytes,
o Pyrophosphate Arthropathy (Early) subchondral sclerosis
o Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) (Early) • Though radiographs show normal "joint
o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) (Early) space", may have cartilage damage
o Hemophilia (Early) o Septic Joint (Early)
o Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) (Early) • May see distension of joint (effusion)
• Gout prior to cartilage damage
• Femoral Acetabular Impingement (FAI) • May have early deossification of articular
• Osteonecrosis (Mimic) cortex secondary to hyperemia
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus o Spondyloarthropathies (PSA, AS, CRA)
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) • Early sacroiliac (SI) joint disease is
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis erosive, with apparent "joint widening"
Less Common • Even if joint space appears preserved,
• Infection with Low Virulence Organisms cartilage damage is present once erosive
o Tuberculosis disease is established
o Fungal • Peripheral joints may show early
• Silastic Arthropathy (Mimic) preservation of cartilage with
deossification secondary to hyperemia &
Rare but Important
synovitis
• Amyloid Deposition o Pyrophosphate Arthropathy (Early)
• Cartilage space retained in early disease,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION despite cartilage damage
• Disease begins with erosions, progresses
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues to mixed or productive
• Hint: Condition of cartilage is dependent on • Highly location-specific: Radiocarpal,
stage in which it is evaluated MCP joints, patellofemoral compartment
o Initial stages of inflammatory arthritides of knee
retain normal cartilage width o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA) (Early)
o All arthritides, even those classically stated
• Early stages of hyperemia show
to retain cartilage, eventually may result in epiphyseal overgrowth & osteoporosis
cartilage destruction • Cartilage damage occurs later
• Hint: Even if cartilage width appears normal o Hemophilia (Early)
on radiograph, MR with contrast may show • Early stages of hyperemia from recurrent
fraying, focal defects, or delamination joint bleeds show epiphyseal overgrowth
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses & osteoporosis
• Arthritides that normally involve cartilage, • Cartilage damage & erosions occur later
presenting at early stage • Watch for dense erosions (hemosiderin
o Rheumatoid Arthritis (Early) deposition in synovium)
• With very early disease, synovitis may • Gout
result in distension of joint & apparent o Classic arthropathy said to preserve the
increase in cartilage width on radiograph cartilage over a relatively long term
• Early MR shows bone edema, synovitis, o Even in presence of large tophi, erosions,
tenosynovitis overhanging edges, cartilage may remain
intact
I
166
ARTHRITIS WITH PRESERVED CARTILAGE SPACE >
I
168
ARTHRITIS WITH PRESERVED CARTILAGE SPACE »
:3
..•o
III
3
'<
OJ
III
VI
Gout ~
(Leh) Lateral radiograph Co
shows oSleopenia but no
cartilage narrowing in this
'-
Q.
patient with chronic reactive ~
arthritis. loints of the foot OJ
OJ
showed more advanced VI
<1l
disease, but this early disease 0.
of the knee shows no true
erosive or cartilage change.
(Right) PA radiograph shows
a large dense gouty tophus
• with prominent erosive
change and overhanging
edge. typical of fairly
advanced gout. Despite the
advanced disease, the
carli/age width" remains
normal.
Osteonecrosis (Mimic)
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
lateral femoral neck bump
• & retroversion of the
acetabulum. resulting in
FAIfrom the cam & pincer
mechanisms, respectively.
MR arthrogram showed a
large bucket-handle labral
tear, but cartilage was intact.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows end-stage
AVN of the femoral head
with collapse. Despite
the severity of collapse, the
cartilage width is intact _
AVN does not affect the
cartilage until secondary OA
develops.
I
169
WIDENED JOINT SPACE
• Joint Effusion, Unspecified o Wide joint space from effusion & bone
-
Ol
o
3
'<
o Infectious, inflammatory, neoplastic, & destruction OJ
Ol
metabolic entities may all cause effusion o Distribution: Monoarticular 1Il
CD
o Pediatric hip effusion differential diagnosis • Spine> hip> knee a.
• Hemarthrosis (trauma), septic hip, o Slower clinical course than septic joint C-
O
Muscle Atony
-<
o
CO
c:
fat-fluid level is present •.
A vertical lateral tibial
plateau fracture was visible
on additional views. (Right)
Sagittal T2WI FS MR shows
osteomyelitis of the distal
humerus secondary to septic
arthritis of the elbow. There
is a significant joint effusion
~ and diffuse soft tissue
edema Ell The effusion has
resulted in widening of the
radiocapite/lar joint space.
I
172
WIDENED JOINT SPACE »
-
~
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
Subluxation/Dislocation Subluxation/Dislocation
(Leh) Anteroposterior,
'"
CD
Co
internal rotation radiograph
'-
Q.
shows joint space widening
• suggesting a posterior 2-
shoulder dislocation. The OJ
Ql
fact that external rotation
& standard axillary views
AP
'"n.
CD
I
173
"0
CIl
WIDENED JOINT SPACE
en
ro
lD
C
'0
-,
"0 Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Ql
CIl (Left) Frogleg lateral
ltl
lD radiograph shows a shallow
» left acetabular roof. and
E subluxation of the left femur
•...o
ltl
laterally Ill. The right hip is
c: in normal position. (Right)
< Coronal T2WI MR shows a
destroyed humeral head.
surrounded by fluid in the
distended joint HI. The fluid
communicates between the
glenohumeral joint and
subdeltoid bursa through a
full thickness rotator cuff
tear. The findings are typical
of Charcot shoulder. As
expected, the etiology was
syringomyelia.
Tuberculosis
(Leh) Axial T2WI MR shows
a heterogeneous mass in the
distal radioulnar joint. It had
low signal intensity on both
TlWI and T2WI. This
mass had caused an erosion
in the ulna, typical of gout.
(Right) Coronal NECT shows
destruction of the
glenohumeral joint III with
prominent surrounding
osseous debris. The presence
of superior hilar retraction
III and a calcified lung mass
favored tuberculosis over
neuropathic change from
syringomyelia.
I
174
}>
WIDENED JOINT SPACE
..
:J
III
o
3
'<
1XI
III
VI
legg-Calve-Perthes (l)
I
175
"0
Q) ANKYlOSIS
en
ro
III
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Erosive disease affects hands more than
'0
.....,
other peripheral joints; feet also frequently
"0 Common affected
Cl>
II)
I'll
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) • DIP > PIP> > MCP or MTP joints
!Xl • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) • Any joint may be affected in carpus;
>- • Surgical Ankylosis
E peri capitate distribution slightly
o
.•... • DISH (Mimic)
I'll predominates
c: • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
« o Mixed erosive & productive disease
Less Common o Two possible end-stage appearances
• Tarsal Coalition • Fusion, especially at IP joints
• Carpal Coalition • Severe mutilating erosive disease;
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) pencil-in-cup or telescoping fingers
• Septic Joint o 30-50% patients with psoriatic arthritis
develop spondyloarthropathy
Rare but Important
• Bilateral but asymmetric Sl joint disease
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
• Mixed erosive/productive
• Adult Still Disease
• Bulky lateral spine syndesmophytes,
• OPLL (Mimic) noncontiguous
• Fluorosis • May fuse facet joints
• Ochronosis
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
o Multiple presentations, some with
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION systemic symptomatology
o Earliest signs not erosive
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Periostitis of digits
• Note: Interphalangeal joints may appear • Hyperemia results in asymmetric growth
fused on AP view if digits are flexed of ossification centers
o Be certain to evaluate on lateral view
o Knee, elbow, ankle findings feature erosive
before presuming IP joint fusion disease & overgrowth (balloon joints)
• Spondyloarthropathies generally ankylose o Carpus features irregularity of bones &
only in axial skeleton frequent fusion
o Sacroiliac joints (SI]) and spine facet joints
o Cervical spine
o Peripheral joint fusion is rare in these
• Frequent fusion of bodies & posterior
diseases elements
• Hint: RA,JIA, & adult Still disease have • Fused bodies limited in growth potential;
different propensities to ankylose small relative to adjacent nonfused
o Adult RA almost never fuses
bodies
o JIA shows spinal & carpal fusion frequently
• Surgical Ankylosis
o Adult Still disease shows carpal fusion
o Surgical fusion is an option to treat a
occasionally painful joint
• Hint: Psoriatic arthritis is so predominant o Surgical fusion considered under
relative to the other nonsurgical etiologies of circumstances of pain limiting function
fusion of IP joints that it must be considered • If fusion will allow function of limb
in every case • If arthroplasty is not a viable choice
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses (particularly carpal, tarsal IP joints)
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) o Most frequently fused joints
o Penetrance of psoriatic arthritis in patients • Carpal (especially 4-corner ulnar column
with skin psoriasis not clear fusion for radiocarpal OA)
• Reported 0.5-25% • MCP of thumb, IP of digits
o May present with sausage digit & • Tibiotalar, subtalar, hindfoot-midfoot
periostitis • DISH (Mimic)
I
176
»
ANKYLOSIS
..
~
III
o
o Bulky anterior bridging osteophytes may • Bulky asymmetric vertebral body 3
'<
mimic vertebral body fusion syndesmophytes to
III
• Body & facet joint fusion are not a part • May fuse facet joints VI
(1)
-
E
o
III
c:
<
well as ankylosis at the
trapezoid-capitate- 2nd
metacarpal ElII in a child
with irregularity of the carpal
bones. j/A frequently results
in carpal fusion. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
fusion of the facets of
cervical vertebrae 2-6 •.
There is also fusion of
vertebral bodies 2·6 ElII
which occurred at a young
age, evidenced by the small
size of lhese bodies
compared with C7111:1.
I
178
ANKYLOSIS »
..
~
Ql
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
Carpal Coalition tD
(Left) Lateral radiograph Co
shows tarsal coalition of the '-
subtalar. talonavicular
Ei!l and calcaneocuboid •
joints. The patient is
..
Q.
::J
OJ
OJ
otherwise normal; coalition VI
C1>
is most commonly due to Co
failure of segmentation at the
embryologic stage. (Right)
Oblique radiograph shows
this patient has a carpal
coalition, considered a
normal variant. This is a
failure of segmentation of the
lunate and triquetrum •.
the most frequent site of
carpal coalition.
I
179
"0
Q) CALCIFIED INTRAARTICULAR BODY/BODIES
en
C\l
(])
I
182
CALCIFIED INTRAARTICULAR BODY/BODIES l>
:J
..•o
III
3
'<
III
III
VI
Charcot, Neuropathic Intraarticular Chondroma C1l
(Left) Anteroposterior a.
radiograph shows a C-
O
neuropathic joint in a patient
with tabes. There is ~
=
intraarlicular fragmentation
as well as dissection of
several small fragments
CD
III
VI
ell
C.
down the leg Ell from
overdistension of the joint by
the large effusion. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
pad =
calcification within Hoffa fat
which has caused a
small erosion on the tibial
plateau III. This appearance
in this location is almost
invariably due to
intraarticu/ar chondroma.
Meniscal Ossicle
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a faint
triangular·shaped ossification
located posteriorly within the
joint 11III. Although the
finding is nonspecific, the
triangular shape mimics that
of the meniscus and should
make one consider the
diagnosis of meniscal ossicle.
(Right) Coronal TlWI MR of
the same case shows the
ossification to follow marrow
signal and to be located in
the posterior horn of the
medial meniscus~. This
proves the diagnosis of
meniscalossicle.
I
183
CHONDROCALCINOSIS
Osteoarthritis
3
'<
lD
Cll
VI
Chronic Repetitive Trauma C1l
(Leh) PA radiograph shows Q.
I
185
-0
<1l PERIARTICULARCALCIFICATION
CI)
CIl
co
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
--,o • Calcific Tendinitis vs. Calcific Bursitis
"tl Common
QI o Character of calcification: Dense, globular,
CI) • Calcific Tendinitis
co'" • Calcific Bursitis smooth "toothpaste" appearance
>- o Calcific tendinitis located within tendon
E • Gout
•..o • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy (Mimic) • Usually within 1-3 em of insertion
• Follows the tendinous insertion
c'":: • Myositis Ossificans
< • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis throughout range of motion of adjacent
• Hyperparathyroidism joint; rarely changes shape
o Calcific bursitis located in position of
• Renal Osteodystrophy
• Chronic Repetitive Trauma/Ligamentous bursa (often adjacent to tendon)
• Shape of calcific density often changes
Less Common from globular to more dispersed pattern
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis with range of motion of adjacent joint
• Thermal Injury, Burns • Gout
• Calcific Myonecrosis o Extraarticular calcification within soft
• Periosteal Chondroma tissue mass: Tophus
• Hemangioma, Soft Tissue o Character of calcification
• Synovial Sarcoma • Usually subtle amorphous increased
• Dystrophic Calcification, Soft Tissue Tumor density within mass
• Soft Tissue Chondroma • Rarely has focal, dense calcification
• Charcot, Neuropathic o ± Adjacent juxta/intraarticular erosions
• Paraneoplastic Syndrome • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy (Mimic)
Rare but Important o Calcification is intra articular & rarely
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus capsular
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis, o Linear calcification located in either
Extraarticular fibrocartilage or hyaline cartilage
• Maffucci Syndrome o Watch for typical associated arthropathy
• Leprosy • Myositis Ossificans
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism o Character changes over time
• Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis • Calcification first seen 4-6 weeks
• Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma following trauma
• Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma • Initial calcification is faint & amorphous
• Ochronosis immature osteoid
• Wilson Disease • With time, ossification matures, with
more mature bone formation seen
peripherally & circumferentially
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Calcification: Globular or sheet-like
• Radiograph is essential to differentiate types o Watch for attenuated soft tissues and
of calcification, which often have a distinct acroosteolysis
appearance (may limit the differential) • Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
o Mineralized osseous matrix: Ranges from Osteodystrophy
faint & amorphous to distinct trabeculae o Calcification: Focal, dense, or amorphous
surrounded by dense cortex o Character & location of calcification may
o Mineralized cartilaginous matrix: Punctate change with treatment
density, termed "popcorn" or "rings & arcs" • May completely resolve
o Dystrophic calcification: Ranges from • Renal osteodystrophy on dialysis: May
amorphous & cloudy, to linear or rounded, develop fluffy large soft tissue deposits
globular distinct calcification o Hint: Watch for the various resorption
patterns of osseous structures
I
186
PERIARTICULARCALCIFICATION »
..
::l
III
o
• Patients generally younger adults than 3
Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses '<
with other sarcomas OJ
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis III
• Lower extremity, particularly about the
o Calcification occurs after muscle
knee (but extraarticular), is most
'Co"
(1)
Calcific Tendinitis
Anteroposterior
calcification"
radiograph shows a globular
superimfXJsedover the glenohumeral
Sagillal PO FSE MR of the same patient as previous
image shows tendon sheath fluid • and the
I
joint in an internally rotated shoulder radiograph. This is calcification •• associated with biceps tendon III
nonspecific, bur location suggests calcific tendinitis. confirming calcjfic tendinitis.
187
PERIARTICULAR CALCIFICATION
'tl
Q) Calcific Bursitis Calcific Bursitis
III (Left) AP external rotation
Cll
In radiograph shows fairly
>- dense calcification. in a
-
E
o
Cll
c::
«
position that could either be
supraspinatus calcific
tendinitis or subdeltoid
bursitis. (Right) AP internal
rotation of the same shoulder
demonstrates the density to
spread out in a thinner line
• & to remain in the
location of subdeltoid bursa.
Since it does not follow the
supraspinatus, the diagnosis
of calcific bursitis is
confirmed. Location of
calcification confirms
specific diagnosis.
Myositis Ossificans
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows joint
capsule chondrocalcinosis
•. Although usually seen
within the hyaline or
fibrocartilage, it may mimic
periarticular calcification
when it is capsular. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows mature bone adjacent
to the 5th Mep after crush
injury without fracture 5
months prior. Mature
peripheral bone.
surrounding a less organized
center is typical of myositis
ossificans (fibroosseou5
pseudotumor of digits).
I
188
PERIARTICULAR CALCIFICATION
Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows abnormal
bone density, subchondral
resorption at the 51!•• and
cloudy amorphous
periarticular calcification •.
This type of calcification not
infrequently develops in
patients on dialysis. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
sheet-like calcification in the
subcutaneous and fascial
tissue planes •. This
appearance is classic for
dermatomyositis, though the
calcification may also be
globular in this disease.
I
189
"0
Q) PERIARTICU lAR CALC! FICA TlON
Vl
11l
co
C
·0
-, Dystrophic Calcification, Soft Tissue
"C
Gl Synovial Sarcoma Tumor
Vl (Left) Lateral radiograph
1O
CO shows a 50ft tissue mass.
>. containing dystrophic
-
E
o
1O
c:
«
calcification. Any soft tissue
tumor may calcify, but
synovial sarcoma is the most
frequent; consider especially
when seen in the lower
extremity of young adults.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows dense
dystrophic calcification
within a sort tissue mass •.
Although synovial sarcoma
should be considered, any
tumor (such as this
schwan noma) may calcify.
I
190
PERIARTICULAR CALCIFICATION ~
::::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
Synovial Osteochondromatosis, Synovial Osteochondromatosis, OJ
III
VI
Extraarticular Extraarticular <1l
(Left) Lateral radiograph a.
shows hundreds of tiny
ossified bodies, both
'-
Q.
intraarticular and ;:!.
periarticular. This is aJ
III
conglomerate synovial VI
<1l
osteochondromatosis, a.
extending into surrounding
soft tissues. (Right) Axial
bone CT shows typical
round bodies within the
suprapatellar bursa. but
there is extraarticular
extension of the
conglomerate mass
extending into biceps &
surrounding the
neurovascular bundle Ell
Maffucci Syndrome
(Left) fA radiograph shows
multiple enchondromas
within the phalanges,
metacarpals, and an
associated soft tissue mass
_ The mass contains
phleboliths; the constellation
of findings is Maffucci
syndrome. rt MSK Req).
(Right) fA radiograph shows
acroosteolysis, which has
destroyed most of the
phalanges. Additionally,
there is linear calcification in
the location of a digital nerve
••. This combination of
findings is pathognomonic
for leprosy. rtMsK Req).
I
191
"0
Q) MCP-PREDOMINANT ARTHRITIS
en
co
en
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Earliest: Radiocarpal, often with ulnar
-,o translocation of carpus
"C Common • Later: Midcarpal, intercarpal
CIl
en • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
co
en • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy o MCP involvement is hallmark
>-
E • 2nd and 3rd MCPs earliest & most
-
o
co
c:
<
Less Common
•
•
Hemochromatosis
Robust Rheumatoid Arthritis (Robust RA)
frequently involved
• IPs not involved
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA) o Hook-like osteophytes are classic
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Mimic) • May begin as erosive or mixed
o Normal bone density
Rare but Important
o Carpal involvement
• Jaccoud Arthritis (Mimic) • Radiocarpal, often with S-L dissociation
• May evolve to SLACdeformity
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Hemochromatosis
• Hint: Character of MCP involvement may o Same appearance & distribution as
help differentiate pyrophosphate arthropathy
o Erosive: RA, robust RA,JIA, SLE, & o Younger adult male population
occasionally pyrophosphate & • Robust Rheumatoid Arthritis (Robust RA)
hemochromatosis arthropathy o Same appearance & distribution as RAt
o Productive or mixed: Pyrophosphate & with large subchondral cysts
hemochromatosis arthropathy • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA)
• Hint: Location of carpal involvement may o MCP > IP involvement; may have fusion
help differentiate o Carpal involvement variable
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Mimic)
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Generally a nonerosive deformity
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) • Hand deformities much more prominent
o MCP > > IP involvement
than erosive change
• Both earlier and more severe • Late erosions seen, MCP > IP
o Purely erosive disease
o Osteopenia (juxtaarticular; diffuse later) Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Carpal involvement • Jaccoud Arthritis (Mimic)
o Same appearance as SLE
I
193
"0
Q) IP-PREDOMINANT ARTHRITIS
(/)
ro
co
C
·0 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Periostitis, especially along shaft
--, o Late stages: Arthritis mutilans
'0 Common • Severe erosions ...•pencil-in-cup
Ql
II)
ltl
• Osteoarthritis (OA) • Severe erosions ...•telescoping digits
CO • Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) o May have spondyloarthropathy
>.
E • Erosive Osteoarthritis (EOA) • Bilateral asymmetric sacroiliitis
-o
ltl
c:
<l:
Less Common
• Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) (Mimic)
• Bulky, non-contiguous syndesmophytes
o Psoriatic skin rash generally present, but
arthritis may predate skin findings in 20%
Rare but Important
• Erosive Osteoarthritis (EOA)
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) o Same distribution as OA
• HIV-AIDS Related Arthritis o Mixed erosive & productive disease, often
• Adult Still Disease resulting in "gull wing" deformity
• Amyloid Deposition • Deep central subchondral erosion of
• Multicentric Reticulohistiocytosis middle phalanx, with more marginal
erosions base of distal phalanx
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Marginal osteophytes
o DIP> PIP, but all may be involved
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o MCPs not involved in absence of trauma
• Hint: Character of involvement may help o Carpal location: 1st carpometacarpal,
differentiate among these processes scapho- trapezoid- tra pezi um
o Erosive: All but OA may be purely erosive
• Generally productive, but may be erosive
o Productive: OA is purely productive
• Hint: This location of carpal disease may
o Mixed erosive/productive: PSA, CRA, HIV, serve as a differentiating factor from
EOA psoriatic arthritis
• Hint: Site of carpal involvement may help
differentiate among these Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Hint: Skin changes rarely may help with • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) (Mimic)
diagnosis o Subchondral resorption at phalanges is not
o Psoriatic rash an uncommon form of resorption
o Nodules in multicentric • Analogous to subchondral resorption at
reticulohistiocytosis distal clavicle or iliac side of sacroiliac
joint
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• With use, subchondral bone may
• Osteoarthritis (OA) collapse; this may mimic an erosive
o Purely productive (osteophyte-forming)
pattern
o DIP > PIP joints, but all may be involved
• Critical evaluation shows the collapse is
o MCPs not involved unless prior trauma
not always as rounded as an erosion &
o Carpal location: 1st carpometacarpal
has a fairly distinct cortex
(CMC), scapho-trapezoid-trapezium (SIT) o Seen with either HPTH or renal
• These carpal locations are not involved osteodystrophy
in other arthridities & are a reliable o DIP is most frequent site, though seen in
differentiating feature PIP & even in carpals
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) o Hint: Watch for other suggestions of
o Erosive> productive changes, but may be
HPTH in the hand
mixed • Most common: Overtubulation of
o DIP > PIP, but all may be involved
middle phalanges from subperiosteal
o MCPs not involved until late in disease
resorption (may not be active)
o Carpal location variable in proximal &
• Brown tumors
distal carpal rows; may be peri-capitate • Tuft resorption
o May present with a "sausage digit"
• Swelling of entire digit Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA)
I
194
IP-PREDOMINANT ARTHRITIS l>
..•o
::::J
III
o Erosive> productive changes, but may be • Similar distribution to PSA (IP > MCP); 3
'<
mixed fusion OJ
III
o Feet> hands o Carpal involvement: Variable, but may be t/l
CD
o DIP > PIP, but all may be involved pericapitate C.
C-
o Tarsal involvement variable; may see • Amyloid Deposition O
::::J
enthesopathy o Deposition in soft tissues, synovium,
OJ
o Calcaneal involvement common (erosive cartilage, bone Ol
VI
change plus periostitis posterior tubercle) o Often have large soft tissue masses CD
C.
o May present with a "sausage digit" • Shoulders, wrists, ankles
• Swelling of entire digit • Masses described as "lumpy"
• Periostitis, especially along shaft o MR fairly distinctive, but not specific
o Late stages: Arthritis mutilans • Low signal (may be heterogeneous) on
o May have spondyloarthropathy T2
• Bilateral asymmetric sacroiliitis • Gout may have a similar MR appearance
• Bulky, non-contiguous syndesmophytes o Articular deposition results in erosive
o Other components of syndrome: Urethritis change; DIP is common site
(cervicitis), uveitis o Diagnosis proven by biopsy
• HIV-AIDS Related Arthritis o Most cases are secondary, with patients
o Similar manifestations to chronic reactive affected by
arthritis • Rheumatoid arthritis
o Hands = feet • Multiple myeloma
o IP > MCPjMTP • Renal osteodystrophy
o Erosive> productive changes, but may be • Multicentric ReticuIohistiocytosis
mixed o Rare disease with combination of
o May present with a "sausage digit" • IP erosions
• Swelling of entire digit • Acroosteolysis
• Periostitis, especially along shaft • Nodules on the digits
o May have incomplete syndrome of CRA
• Adult Still Disease
o Systemic symptoms similar to juvenile
idiopathic arthritis
o Rheumatoid factor negative
o Two arthritic manifestations
• Similar distribution to RA (MCP > IP)
"0
Ql ErosiveOsteoarthritis (EOA) ErosiveOsteoarthritis (EOA)
III (Left) PA radiograph shows
nl
In subchondral central erosion
>- on the middle phalanx _
-
E
o
nl
c:
<
with marginal erosions and
osteophytes on the distal
phalanx Elll which result in
the "gull wing" deformity.
The appearance is typical of
fOA, which preferentially
affects the IP joints. (Right)
PA radiograph shows mixed
erosive & productive change
at the PIP joints. some
showing a gull wing
deformity. DIPs show only
cartilage narrowing. Carpus
showed tst CMC disease,
diagnostic of fOA.
I
196
IP-PREDOMINANT ARTHRITIS >
::I
..•
III
o
3
'<
lJl
III
Adult Still Disease Adult Still Disease
(Left) Posteroanterior
'"
lD
Q.
Amyloid Deposition
(Left) PA radiograph shows
cartilage 1055 and erosive
change isolated to the DIPs
=. This patient had
prominent soft tissue
nodularity around the wrist.
Synovial biopsy of the DIP
proved amyloid deposition.
(Right) PA radiograph of the
same patient shows nodular
50ft tissue swelling about the
wrist and forearm •. The
carpus shows no arthritic
change. With underlying
renal osteodystrophy, it is
not surprising that this is
secondary amyloid
deposition.
I
197
-0
ClJ MONOARTHRITIS
en
C\l
CO
C DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Osteoarthritis (OA) is generally
o
-, polyarticular
-0 Common o Osteoarthritis generally is specific in
ClJ
II)
III
• Septic Joint location
CO • Osteoarthritis, Post-Traumatic o Trauma may result in abnormalities
>-
• Gout
-
E
o
III
c:
<
• Charcot, Neuropathic
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis
predisposing a joint to osteoarthritis
• Fracture malunion
• Osteochondral defect
• Ligament laxity
• Viral (Toxic) Synovitis o If osteoarthritis is seen in an unusual
Less Common location, consider trauma as the etiology
• Hemophilia • OA is usually monoarticular in this case
• Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath (Mimic) • Gout
• Chondrolysis, Post-Traumatic o Often is monoarticular initially
o Most common location: 1st metatarsal
Rare but Important
joint
• Tuberculosis o When monoarticular, appearance is
• Fungal generally classic
• Well-defined erosions, both intraarticular
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION & juxtaarticular
• Dense tophus
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• MR shows largely low signal mass which
• Some processes are virtually always enhances
monoarticular
o Once gout is long-standing & untreated, it
o Pigmented villonodular synovitis
may be more difficult to diagnose
o Synovial osteochondromatosis
• Polyarticular, often involving unusual
o Viral (toxic) synovitis
joints
o Giant cell tumor of tendon sheath (mimic)
• May appear severely erosive
o Chondrolysis, post-traumatic
• Absence of tophi may complicate
• Some processes may be monoarticular or diagnosis
polyarticular
• Charcot, Neuropathic
o Septic joint, whatever etiology
o Some etiologies tend to be monoarticular
o Gout
• Syringomyelia
o Charcot
• Diabetes (though occasionally
o Hemophilia
polyarticular)
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Some etiologies tend to be polyarticular
• Septic Joint • Tabes
o Effusion may be first clue • Congenital insensitivity or indifference
o Subchondral cortex may loose distinct to pain
"crispness" on radiograph o Classic locations of Charcot joint, related
o MR generally not necessary to etiology
• Confirms effusion • Diabetes: Ankle/foot, wrist
• May show cortical & marrow edema • Syringomyelia: Shoulder
• Nonspecific • Tabes: Knee, spine
o Blood studies may be normal (white cell • Congenital insensitivity/indifference to
count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) pain: Knee, ankle
o Must maintain high index of suspicion • Paraplegia: Spine, distal to stabilized site
• Diagnosis is confirmed by aspiration of injury
• Aspiration should be considered urgent, o Classic appearance
particularly in hip • Osseous debris (though may be resorbed
• Osteoarthritis, Post-Traumatic in atrophic variety)
I
198
MONOARTH RillS :t>
..•o:J
III
• Distension of joint (large effusion, often o Hyperemia from bleeds in child result in 3
'<
presents as "mass", especially shoulder) epiphyseal/metaphyseal overgrowth to
III
• Disruption of joint o Inflammatory change may cause erosion, CIl
(l)
'0
Ql Osteoarthritis, Post-Traumatic Gout
III (Leh) PA radiograph shows
CO
aI osteophytes at the junction
>. of the lunate & triquetrum
E Ell. This is associated with
•...COo ulnar positive variance _
c: Trauma from the overly-long
< ulna results in focal
osteoarthritis, termed ulnar
abutment syndrome. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a single juxtaarticular
erosion. at the 1st MTP
joint. There is associated soft
tissue swelling. This is an
early radiographic finding of
gout, diagnosed by type of
erosion & location.
Charcot, Neuropathic
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows cut-off
destruction of the humeral
head. and a large amount
of debris within a distended
axillary bursa. of the
glenohumeral joint. The
appearance is that of a
neuropathic joint. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows very large
subchondral cysts on both
sides of the hip joint. The
bone density is normal, and
this is a monostotic process.
PVNS should be considered
in such a case and was
proven.
I
200
MONOARTH RillS l>
::l
...•
Ql
o
3
'<
llJ
Ql
III
Viral (Toxic) Synovitis (!l
(Leh) Anteroposterior C.
radiograph shows a slightly t-
O
widened "teardrop distance'!
of right hip compared with ;a.
left (compare at IBJ. This llJ
OJ
indicates effusion; aspiration III
ctl
of the right hip showed clear C.
synovial fluid that proved to
be uninfected. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows huge knee
effusion lID. Though there is
no cartilage destruction or
erosive change at this point,
overgrown Femoral
epiphyses & patella in this
young male suggest
hemophilic arthrWs.
Tuberculosis
(Leh) fA radiograph shows
erosive change involving the
entire midcarpal joint,
extending between the
scaphoid & lunate as well as
the bases of the metacarpals,
but sparing the radiocarpal
joint. There is cartilage Joss
and osseous destruction,
without reactive change.
(Right) fA radiograph shows
cartilage loss in the
radiocarpal joint, with
erosions involving both the
radiocarpal and distal
radioulnar joints.
extending across a ruptured
TFCC due to Sporotrichosis.
I
201
INTRAARTICULAR MASS
=
Coronal oblique T2WI FS MR shows a large
osteochondral loose body arising from a
Coronal T2WI FS MR shows bodies, too numerous to
count, within the subdeltoid bursa, communicating with
I
delamination injury of the femoral trochlea. Loose the glenohumeral joint. The txxiies are similar in size,
Ixxlies are sometimes overlooked on MR examination. typical of primary synovial osteochondromatosis.
203
-0
Q) INTRAARTICUlAR MASS
III
CO
lD
C
'0
-,
"0
Gl
::l (Left) Sagittal T7 WI MR
m shows a conglomerate mass
>. within the suprapatellar
E bursa which follows bone
.B signal on MR •. This
~ proved to be synovial
< osteochondromacosis, which
occasionally presents as a
single mass rather than
multiple bodies. (Right)
Sagittal T2* GRE MR shows
large effusion and synovial
thickening with nodularity
lining the entire joint •.
Note that the nodules
"bloom" on this gradient
echo sequence due CO the
hemosiderin deposits.
(Left) Sagittal T7 WI MR
shows a low signal mass in
the medial gutter of the
tibiotalar joint" This mass
remains mostly low signal on
all sequences, & there are
small associated erosions.
Biopsy proved gout. (Right)
Sagittal PO FSE MR shows
low signal nodular density
within Hoffa fat pad •. T2
signal was moderately high,
& the lesion enhanced
intensely. Differential
diagnosis is PVNS vs.
nodular synovitis. Location in
Hoffa fat pad favors the
latter.
I
204
INTRAARTICULAR MASS :l>
-
:J
ll>
o
3
'<
1XI
ll>
Lipoma Arborescens, Knee VI
Lipoma Arborescens, Knee It>
(Left) Sagittal PO FSEMR Co
shows a large mass located <-
within the suprapatellar Q,
bursa and knee joint_ The ~
mass follows the signal of CD
OJ
subcutaneous fat on all VI
ct>
sequences. Lipoma Co
Intraarticular Chondroma
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows multiple calcific
densities within Hoffa fat pad
•. The location and
appearance are typical of
intraarticular chondroma.
(Right) Sagittal T2WI FSEMR
of the same patient as
previous image shows the
mass to have virtually
replaced Hoffa fat pad ••.
The low signal regions within
the mass stayed low on all
sequences and represent the
calcified portions of the
lesion.
I
205
ARTHROPLASTY WITH LYTIc/CYSTIC LESIONS
I
207
ClAViClE LESIONS, NONARTICULAR
Clavicle Fracture
.-E"'
o
c:
lesion of the distal 1/3 of the
clavicle" in this patient
with metastatic prostate
< carcinoma.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a defect
with well-defined sclerotic
margins along the inferior
medial clavicle III. This is
the typical appearance and
location of a rhomboid fossa
at the attachment of the
costoclavicular ligament.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows mixed lytic
and sclerotic lesions within
the scapula, clavicle,
humeral head, and adjacent
ribs.:ll. The regional
distribution is a clue to the
diagnosis of radiation
osteonecrosis.
I
210
CLAVICLE LESIONS, NONARTICULAR »
..•o
j
III
3
'<
tll
III
<II
Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle Ewing Sarcoma ct>
(Left) Axial NECT shows 0-
typical case of osteitis (fJ
condensans of the clavicle. ::r
o
There is dense sclerosis and c
mature periosteal new bone c.
involving the medial right
,
CD
Gl
clavicle •. The medial left ,
clavicle is normal. (Right) c.
Anteroposterior radiograph CD
Ol
shows permeative :J
C.
destruction with aggressive
periostitis involving the C
"0
midclavicle in this 11 year "0
old with a large palpable soft ,CD
I
211
DISTALCLAVICULARRESORPTION
-
«
E
o
<a
l:
Rare but Important
• Septic Joint
o MR: Marrow edema, fracture or cysts
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows significant
subchondral resorption of
the distal clavicle ••
simulating widening of the
AC joint in this patient with
hyperparathyroidism. (RighI)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows multiple sites of bone
resorption in this patient with
renal osteodystrophy.
Changes include
subchondral resorption of
the distal clavicle. as well
as subligamentou5 resorption
at the attachments of the
coracoclavicular ligaments
Ell.
I
21l
PROXIMAL HUMERUS, EROSION MEDIAL METAPHYSIS
-
<
E
o
nl
c:
• Leukemia
• Periosteal Chondroma
'Rare but Important
•
bone density with smudgy trabeculae
Renal Osteodystrophy
o Similar to hyperparathyroidism
• Shoulder Arthroplasty Impingement
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications o Mechanical impingement of the native
• Hurler Syndrome proximal humeral metaphysis with the
• Gaucher Disease prosthetic glenoid component
• Syphilis
• Niemann Pick Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Normal Variant ("Upper Humeral Notch")
o Exaggerated convexity at the medial
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION humeral head-neck junction without
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues underlying abnormality
• Generally due either to mechanical erosion, o Smooth, intact cortex
resorption, or neoplasm • Metastases, Bone Marrow
o Lytic metastases may erode the cortex
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Leukemia
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) o Subcortical demineralization of the medial
o Altered shoulder biomechanics places the
metaphyseal humeral cortex may be the
medial humeral metaphysis in direct initial radiographic finding of leukemia
contact with the inferior glenoid, resulting • Region is commonly visible on standard
in a mechanical erosion chest radiographs
Periosteal Chondroma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a lytic
meta diaphyseal lesion •
that does not have obvious
matrix or soft tissue mass.
Differential dx would include
periosteal chondroma,
periosteal osteosarcoma, and
a cortically based lesion with
a very thin rim, such as
fibrous dysplasia or
aneurysmal bone cyst.
(Right) AP radiograph shows
subtle medial metaphyseal
erosion. due to congenital
syphilis; there is also an
acromial fracture Ell from
non-accidental trauma.
I
215
GLENOHUMERAL MALALIGNMENT
Rotator Cuff Tear (RCT) or Atrophy Rotator Cuff Tear (RCT) or Atrophy
I Anteroposterior radiograph
abutting the acromion.
shows humeral head
due to tear and retraction of
Coronal oblique PO FSE M R shows extensive disruption
of the supraspinatus tendon, leading to loss of distance
the intervening rotator cuff tendons. The humeral head between the humeral head and acromion and supedor
is superiorly migrated relative to the glenoid. migration of the humeral head.
216
}>
GLENOHUMERAL MALALIGNMENT :J
,..,.
III
o
3
'<
tll
III
<Jl
Humeral Head Rotation (Mimic) Surgical Neck Fracture <l>
(Left) Axial T1WI FS MR Co
shows an anterior labraltear (f)
••. The humeral head is ::r
o
internally rotated, creating c
the appearance of posterior a:
ctl
subluxation. Note that the ~
center of the humeral head Gl
~
remains along the long axis 0..
Instability Instability
(Left) Axial T1 WI FS MR
shows posterior subluxation
of the humeral head,
creating narrowing of the
joint posteriorly relative to
anterior •. There is 1055 of
the discrete triangular
contour of the posterior
labrum El!l which is tom.
(Right) ABER T1WI FS MR
to good advantage
accompanied by significant
=
shows an anterior labral tear
I
217
ANTEROSUPERIOR LABRALVARIATIONS/PATHOLOGY
I
218
ANTEROSUPERIOR LABRAL VARIATIONS/PATHOLOGY l>
::::l
...•
III
o
• Bucket-handle tear + lateral extension • Biceps Labral Complex, Type 1 3
'<
into biceps tendon o No space between glenoid rim and biceps OJ
III
• Similar to a type III with involvement of tendon insertion & superior labrum III
(tl
biceps • Biceps Labral Complex, Type 2 0-
• May be seen along with type II tear o Small sulcus between glenoid rim and m
:::r
• Associated with fall on outstretched arm biceps tendon insertion & superior labrum o
c
• SLAP Lesions V-X • Biceps Labral Complex, Type 3 0:
ct>
~
o Type V o Large sulcus between glenoid rim and
• Anterior inferior glenoid/labral injury + biceps tendon insertion & superior labrum
superior extension to superior labrum & o Meniscoid projection into joint space
biceps o Can mimic a SLAP type II lesion
• Associated with fall on outstretched arm Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
& glenohumeral instability
• Sublabral Foramen with Superior
o Type VI
Sublabral Recess (Sulcus)
• Anterior or posterior flap tear of labrum o a.k.a., "double Oreo cookie" sign
with biceps tendon separation
o Mimics of this sign = superior labral tear in
o Type VII
place of the superior sublabral recess or
• Superior labrum & biceps tear extending
volume averaging with superior
into middle glenohumeral ligament
glenohumeral ligament
• Associated with acute injury &
• Buford Complex
glenohumeral instability
o Normal variant in 1.5% of population
o Type VIII
o Absent anterosuperior labrum
• Superior labrum tear with posterior o Thick, cord-like middle glenohumeral
extension
ligament
• More extensive than type lIB
• Ligament attaches directly on
• Associated with posterior dislocation
anterosuperior glenoid
o Type IX
• Can mimic a displaced labral tear or a
• Complete or near complete detachment sublabral foramen
of the labrum circumferentially
• Pseudo-SLAP Lesion
• Associated with traumatic injury o Sulcus between biceps tendon origin &
o Type X
superior labrum
• Superior labrum tear extending into
o Variable depth of sulcus: Deep sulcus can
rotator interval or structures that cross
mimic SLAP lesion
the interval
-
o
«'"
c:
extensive, but most
important for classification is
extension into the biceps
tendon.
I
220
ANTEROSUPERIOR lABRAl VARIATIONS/PATHOLOGY :l>
:l
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
VI
l1>
(Left) Coronal oblique TI C+ Q,
(Left) Axial TI C + M R
arthrogram image of the right
shoulder shows the anterior
superior glenoid labrum is
absent _ The middle
glenohumeral ligament is
thickened. The posterior
labrum Ell has abnormal size
and shape due to a tear. This
tear is unrelated to the
Buford complex. (Right)
Sagittal oblique TI C+ MR
arthrogram in the same
patient as prior image best
demonstrates the thickened
middle glenohumeral
ligament.
I
221
E FLUID COLLECTIONS ABOUT THE SHOULDER
~
~Q)
a. • Rheumatoid arthritis: Osteopenia,
a.
:J
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
"0
erosions, joint space loss, synovial
C Common hypertrophy, ± rice bodies
1'O
Q) • Effusion • Psoriatic: Bilateral involvement, normal
"0
~ o Osteoarthritis mineralization, bone proliferation
~ o Inflammatory Arthritis o Crystalline Arthropathy
Q)
"0 o Crystalline Arthropathy • Gout, pyrophosphate (CPPD),
:::l
o o Charcot, Neuropathic hydroxyapatite (HADD)
L
(fJ • Bursitis • Gout: Prefers acromioclavicular joint,
"0
ell
• Tendon Tear difficult to distinguish from
l/l
1'O • Labral Cyst osteoarthri tis
al
>- Less Common • Pyrophosphate: Normal mineralization,
E bilateral involvement, chondrocalcinosis
-«
o
l'O
C
• Bicipital Tenosynovitis
• Hemarthrosis • Milwaukee shoulder: Mixed crystals
(HADD, CPPD, etc.) with rapid
• Hematoma
• Muscle Injury glenohumeral & rotator cuff (RC)
• Ganglion Cyst destruction
o Charcot, Neuropathic
• Synovial Cyst
• Iatrogenic • Osteolysis, joint dissolution, subluxation,
• Infection ± debris; due to cervical syringomyelia,
o Septic Joint diabetes
o Soft Tissue Abscess • Bursitis
o Bursae: Subacromial/subdeltoid,
Rare but Important subcoracoid, coracoclavicular,
• Venous Distension (Mimic) supraacromial
• Neoplasm o Inflammation due to subacromial
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis impingement, RC tear, arthropathy
• Amyloid Deposition including HADD, etc.
o Calcific bursitis: Focal ~ SI nodules due to
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION HADD, particularly near RC
• Tendon Tear
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o t SI within tendon substance with
• Fluid may be blood, inflammatory complete or partial tendon fiber disruption
transudate, purulent exudate, iatrogenic o Look for tendon retraction
• Hint: Evaluate in ALL 3 planes to locate • Labral Cyst
• Hint: Consider surrounding tissues to o Thin-walled fluid collection, ±
further characterize multilobulated, ± direct connection to
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses labral tear; posterior location most
• Effusion common
o Synovial transudate due to arthropathy o Hint: Cyst location helps reader find the
o Intraarticular (glenohumeral, associated labral tear; posteroinferior &
acromioclavicular) posterosuperior are most common
o Osteoarthritis Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Osteophytes, joint space loss, normal • Bicipital Tenosynovitis
bone mineralization, subchondral o Tendon sheath inflammation
sclerosis & cysts; ± loose bodies of o Look for accompanying long head biceps
varying sizes tendinopathy, subluxation, dislocation
o Inflammatory Arthritis • Hemarthrosis
• Rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, psoriatic, o Typically related to acute trauma, look for
ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile surrounding osseous, soft tissue injury
idiopathic arthritis
I
222
FLUID COLLECTIONS ABOUT THE SHOULDER :l>
::l
...•
Ql
o
o In absence of injury, consider vascular o Septic Joint 3
'<
malformations, hemophilia • Effusion, synovial hypertrophy, avid OJ
Ql
o Look for fluid/fluid level (hematocrit enhancement; ± marrow edema; VI
(1)
• Muscle Injury C
spino glenoid notch "0
o Related to acute or subacute muscle fiber "0
• Neoplasm ...,
(1)
-'"
o
c:
~
the glenohumeral" &
acromioclavicular HI joints.
The chronic effusion
contains thin septations E£
I
224
FLUID COLLECTIONS ABOUT THE SHOULDER :>
::::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
en
III
t/I
(l)
(Leh) Axial PO FsE Fs MR Q.
I
225
E
~ RADIAL DYSPLASIAS/APLASIA
ro
OJ
~
o
LL
"0 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Diagnoses
C
ro Common • Fanconi Anemia
~ o Thumb aplasia or short metacarpal
o • Fanconi Anemia
.D
o Absent or malformed navicular
W • Holt-Dram Syndrome
o Brachydactyly, clinodactyly
"0
Q)
• Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius (TAR)
VI
Syndrome • Holt-Dram Syndrome
III
CO o Brachydactyly, camptodactyly, &
>- Less Common clinodactyly
-
E
o
III
C
<l:
• Klippel Feil
• VATERAssociation
• Trisomy 18
o Thumb aplasia or malformation ±
triphalangeal thumb
o Abnormal navicular ± fusion
• Trisomy 13-15 o Os centrale
• Radioulnar Synostosis • Trisomy 18
• Dyschondrosteosis o Thumb aplasia or short metacarpal
Rare but Important o Ulnar deviation of MCP joints
• Pseudothalidomide Syndrome o Clinodactyly, syndactyly
• Thalidomide Embryopathy • Trisomy 13-15
• Fetal Varicella Syndrome o Polydactyly, clinodactyly
• Fetal Valproic Acid Exposure o Triphalangeal thumb
• Cornelia de Lange Syndrome o Broad thumb distal phalanx
• Radial Clubhand • Dyschondrosteosis
• Ulnar Clubhand o Decreased carpal angle
• Mesomelic Dysplasias o Carpal fusion
• Oculo-Auriculo-Vertebral Spectrum o Cone-shaped epiphyses
• Nail Patella Disease (Fong) • Cornelia de Lange Syndrome
o Short, wide thumb metacarpal
o Clinodactyly, brachydactyly
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Volar-radial curvature of fifth digit distal
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues phalanx (Kirner deformity)
• Radial hypoplasia, dysplasia, & aplasia are • Ulnar Clubhand
associated with many congenital syndromes o Aplasia or hypoplasia of the ulna with
and skeletal dysplasias radius deformity
o Forearm radiographs are often nonspecific o Thumb present, absent 4th and 5th digits
I Anteroposterior
=:I that is fused =
radiograph shows a dysplastic radius
to the ulna. The thumb is absent as
are the trapezium and scaphoid bones. The distal carpal
Posteroanterior radiograph shows an absence of the
radius and thumb. There is clinodactyly 01 the filth digit
1llEl. Skeletal changes in this entity range lrom
row is dysplastic. nonexistent to major congenital malformations.
226
RADIAL DYSPLASIAS/ APLASIA »
..
:J
III
o
3
'<
llJ
III
VI
Holt-Oram Syndrome VATER Association It>
(Leh) AP radiograph shows Co
an absence of the radius, !J}
trapezium, and scaphoid. 0-
The thumb is severely o
:E
dysplastic •. A small III
triangular bone proximal and :J
Q.
radial to the capitate likely Tl
represents an as centrale. o
~
anatomic variant. fRight) PA CD
III
radiograph shows
phocomeUa with near
3
complete aplasia of the
radius, a short curved ulna
_ and absent scaphoid
and thumb. The findings
were bilateral, and the
patient also had renal
abnormalities.
Trisomy 18
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
aplasia of the radius and
hypoplastic thumb.
Overlapping fingers III and
ulnar deviation of ihe
metacarpophalangeal joints
are common findings. (Right)
Lateralradiograph shows
fusion of the proximal radius
to the ulna _ The degree
of fusion and location in the
forearm is variable. This
bony fusion can be
congenital, due to lack of
segmentation, or
post-traumatic, due to
fracture or hetero~opic
ossification most commonly.
I
227
E
~ FOREARM DEFORMITY
ro
~
Q)
o
LL
"0 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Bowing ± radial head dislocation
C
ro • Madelung Deformity
Common o Ulnar, volar distal radius angulation
3
o • Fracture, Malunion
.a o Decreased carpal angle
W • Post-Operative o Distal ulna dorsally subluxated
"0
Ql
• Osteomyelitis o Unilateral or bilateral
III
nl
CD Less Common • Ollier Disease
>. • Multiple Hereditary Exostosis o Multiple enchondromas preferentially
E
-
«
o
nl
C
• Madelung Deformity
• Ollier Disease
involving extremity long bones &
phalanges
• Cartilaginous dysplasia involving the
• Radioulnar Synostosis
• Osteogenesis lmperfecta metaphyses
• Maffucci Syndrome • Endosteal scalloping, chondroid matrix
o Skull involvement ± mild platyspondyly
Rare but Important
a Up to 30% will develop bone malignancy
• Fanconi Syndrome • Pelvis> shoulder> femur> proximal
• Holt-Oram Syndrome tibia
• Thrombocytopenia Absent Radius Syndrome • Radioulnar Synostosis
• VATERAssociation a Developmental or post-traumatic
• Paget Disease a Bones are small with developmental causes
• Trisomy 18 due to lack of muscular stress
• Trisomy 13-15 • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
• Dyschondrosteosis a Multiple healed fractures
• Thalidomide Embryopathy a Wide metaphyses with thin cortices
• Cornelia de Lange Syndrome a Bowing deformities
• Ulnar/Radial Clubhand • Maffucci Syndrome
• Mesomelic Dysplasia a Multiple enchondromas, as in Ollier
• Nail Patella Disease (Fong) o Soft tissue cavernous hemangiomas with
• Klinefelter Syndrome phleboliths
• Camptomelic Dysplasia a Be vigilant for malignant transformation
• Post-Operative clinodactyly
o Joint replacement after trauma, infection, a Thumb aplasia or malformation ±
inflammatory or degenerative disease triphalangeal thumb
o Amputation after neoplasm, trauma, or a Abnormal navicular ± fusion
o Clinodactyly, brachydactyly m
• Anal atresia IT
• Cardiac defect o Volar-radial curvature of fifth digit distal o
::E
• Tracheoesophageal fistula phalanx (Kirner deformity) OJ
:J
• Renal abnormalities • Ulnar/Radial Clubhand Cl.
-n
• Limb abnormalities o Absence of the ulna/ulnar ray or o
~
(1)
o Radial dysplasia or aplasia radius/radial ray is associated with OJ
(Left) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows a sessjle
exostosis EiII bridging
between the forearm bones,
resulting in synostosis and
growth deformities. There is
a Madelung deformity of the
wrist. Additional exostoses
involve the phalanges ••.
(Right) AP radiograph shows
deformities of both the
radius and ulna. Bony
excrescences III from
multiple hereditary exostoses
have caused the deformities,
including decreased carpal
angle and growth
disturbance.
I
230
FOREARM DEFORMITY »
-
:J
Dl
o
3
'<
llJ
Dl
VI
Oilier Disease ell
(Left) Lateral radiograph Q.
I
231
"0
C CARPALCYSTIc/LYTIC LESIONS
ro
I
"0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Normal joints or 2° osteoarthritis
Ul
.;::
• Gout
Common
s: • Osteoarthritis
o Bilateral asymmetric erosions, overhanging
"0 edges, soft tissue nodules, joint space
ell
l/)
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy narrowing occurs late
co • Chronic Repetitive Trauma
CD • Ganglion, Intraosseous
>. • Gout o Solitary, communicates with joint
-E
o
co
c
ct
• Ganglion, lntraosseous
• Ulnar Abutment Syndrome
Less Common
• Ulnar Abutment Syndrome
o Ulna positive deformity, ulna abuts lunate;
subchondral sclerosis, cysts
• Brown Tumor Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Rheumatoid Arthritis • Brown Tumor
• Hemochromatosis o Often single lesion, bone resorption of
Rare but Important HPTH, periarticular calcium deposits
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) • Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Amyloid Deposition o Bilateral symmetric, periarticular
• Sarcoidosis osteoporosis, uniform joint space
narrowing, erosions/cysts, soft tissue
• Hemochromatosis
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Osteoporosis, chondrocalcinosis, large
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses subchondral cysts, uniform joint space
• Osteoarthritis narrowing, subchondral sclerosis,
o 1st carpal-metacarpal & osteophytes; mimics pyrophosphate
scaphomultangular joints, normal bone Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
mineralization, joint space narrowing, • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)
subchondral sclerosis, osteophytes, o Single compartment distribution, multiple
subluxation, loose bodies cystic lesions, MR with low T1 & T2 signal
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy • Amyloid Deposition
o Chondrocalcinosis (TFCC, lunotriquetral & o Osteopenia, cysts & erosions, joint space
scapholunate ligaments, articular normal or widened, bulky soft tissue
cartilage), bilateral asymmetric radiocarpal masses, intermediate T2WI signal
involvement • Sarcoidosis
• Chronic Repetitive Trauma o Well-defined cystic lesions
Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
I Oblique radiograph
space narrowing with
shows scaphomultangular joint
associated sufxhondral CyslS _
PA radiograph shows sulxhondral cysts in the capitate
& hamate III scapholunate ligament tear Ellt TFee
Isolated involvement of this joint may be seen with chondroca/cinosis •• & radioscaphoid narrowing, all
osteoarthritis or epPD deposition disease. common findings in pyrophosphate arthropathy.
232
CARPAL CYSTIC/lYTIC LESIONS l>
:J
...•
Ql
o
3
'<
llJ
Ql
III
Chronic Repetitive Trauma Gout III
(Left) Sagittal T2WI FS MR a.
shows cystic lesions within
the volar and dorsal surfaces
of the lunate" attributable
to chronic repetitive trauma
in the dominant hand of this
carpenter. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows multiple cysts and
erosions involving the distal
ulna, triquetrum, lunate,
capitate" with
accompanying radiocarpal
and mid-carpal joint space
narrowing. A large soft tissue
tophus is characteristic of
gout •.
I
233
"0
C ABNORMAL RADIOCARPAL ANGLE
C1l
I
"0
C
C1l DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Carpal bone fusion
iil o Drumstick phalanges
Common o Delayed bone age
~
"0
• Fracture, Malunion • Multiple Hereditary Exostosis
Ql
tI)
• Madelung Deformity o Madelung deformity
III
en • Turner Syndrome o Short ulna & fibula
>- • Multiple Hereditary Exostosis o Metaphyseal exostoses with exostosis apex
E
-
o
III
C
<l:
Less Common
• allier Disease
"dripping" away from joint
o Cortex and marrow space of exostosis is
• Marfan Syndrome contiguous with underlying bone
• Maffucci Syndrome o Onset in infancy and early childhood
• Cleidocranial Dysplasia o Watch for malignant degeneration, usually
• Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia chondrosarcoma
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Rare but Important • Ollier Disease
• Arthrogryposis o Multiple enchondromas: Lytic lesions with
• Mucopolysaccharidoses cartilaginous matrix
• Hurler Syndrome o Longitudinal steaks of alternating lucency
• Morquio Syndrome & sclerosis in metaphyses
• Mesomelic Dysplasia o Resultant bone deformity
• Dyschondrosteosis (Leri-Weill) • Madelung deformity
• Otopalatodigital Syndrome • Long bones, tubular bones of hands/feet,
• Frontometaphyseal Dysplasia pelvis, ribs
• Arthroophthalmopathy Syndrome o Increased risk of malignant transformation
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van • Marfan Syndrome
Creveld) o Long fingers (arachnodactyly)
• Larsen Syndrome • Third finger> l.Sx metacarpal length
• LEOPARDSyndrome o Clinodactyly
o Vertical talus, flatfoot
o Protrusio deformity of hips
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Enlarged paranasal sinuses
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Maffucci Syndrome
• Fracture, Malunion o Madelung deformity
o Malunion may result in increased or o Same as allier Disease + cutaneous
decreased carpal angle hemangiomas (phleboliths)
o Post-traumatic decreased carpal angle may o Increased risk of malignant degeneration
be differentiated from Madelung deformity • Cleidocranial Dysplasia
by lack of volar radial tilt o Increased carpal angle
• Madelung Deformity o Long second & fifth metacarpals
o V-shaped, steep radLocarpal joint o Short middle phalanges
producing a decreased carpal angle o Cone-shaped epiphyses
• Short radius with volar bowing o Delayed bone age
• Triangular distal radial epiphysis • Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia
• Carpal bones wedged together with o Flat epiphyses cause increased carpal angle
lunate at apex o Small, irregular, fragmented epiphyses
• Dorsal subluxation or dislocation of ulna o Short tubular bones of hands & feet
o Numerous potential etiologies of this o Delayed bone age
deformity • Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)
• Turner Syndrome o Increased carpal angle
o Madelung deformity o Dislocated radial head
o Short fourth metacarpal/metatarsal o Dysplastic fifth digit middle phalanx
I
234
ABNORMAL RADIOCARPAL ANGLE >
.•o
::3
III
• Dyschondrosteosis (Leri-Weill)
o Oilier disease
o Madelung deformity
o Maffucci syndrome
o Mesomelic dwarfism
o Mucopolysaccharidoses
o Short, curved tibia
o Hurler syndrome
o Short metacarpals & metatarsals
o Morquio syndrome
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van
o Mesomelic dysplasia
Creveld) o Dyschondrosteosis (Leri-Weill)
o Enlarged distal radius causing increased
• Madelung deformity
carpal angle
o Trauma
o Bony spike at distal humeral metaphysis
o Turner syndrome
medially o Multiple hereditary exostosis
o Short, heavy tubular bones
o Ollier disease
o Ninth carpal bone
o Maffucci syndrome
o Delayed skeletal maturation
o Dyschondrosteosis (Leri-Weill)
• Larsen Syndrome o LEOPARD syndrome
o Increased carpal angle
• Increased carpal angle (> 135 degrees)
o Short metacarpals & distal phalanges
o Fracture, malunion
o Spatulate thumbs
o Marfan syndrome
o Multiple accessory ossicles
o Cleidocranial dysplasia
• LEOPARD Syndrome o Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia
o Lentigines, EKG conduction abnormalities
o Down syndrome (trisomy 21)
Ocular hypertelorism, Pulmonary stenosis:
o Arthrogryposis
Abnormal genitalia, Retardation of growth,
o Otopalatodigital syndrome
Deafness (LEOPARD)
o Frontometaphyseal dysplasia
o Madelung deformity
o Arthroophthalmopathy syndrome
o Decreased bone age
o Chondroectodermal dysplasia (Ellis-van
o Hypoplastic fifth digit
Creveld)
o Syndactyly or soft tissue webbing
o Larsen syndrome
Alternative Differential Approaches
• Decreased carpal angle « 125 degrees)
Posteroanterior
radiocarpal joint _
radiograph shows a V-shaped
decreasing the normal radiocarpal
Posteroanterior radiograph shows a developmentally
steep distaf radius arUcular surface • and a dorsally
I
angle. The patient had a remote distal radius fracture dIslocated ulna _ as confirmed on the lateral view.
and resultant malunion. 235
ABNORMAL RADIOCARPAL ANGLE
I
216
ABNORMAL RADIOCARPAL ANGLE »
::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
Ul
Mucopolysaccharidoses <1>
(Left) Posteroanterior Co
radiograph shows a
decreased radiocarpal angle
=. The metacarpals are
short, broad, and constricted
proximally. This
"fan-shaped" appearance EilI
is classic for
mucopolysaccharidoses.
(Right) PA radiograph shows
findings similar to the prior
image. There is a decreased
radiocarpal angle III and
the metacarpals are short &
constricted proximally EilI.
The middle and distal
phalanges. have pointed
ends.
I
237
(/)
Q) ARACHNODACTYl Y
o
I-
"t:J
C
<Il DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Dural ectasia with lumbar vertebral body
~ scalloping
Q)
OJ Common o Spondylolisthesis, ± spondylolysis
C
u:: • Marfan Syndrome o Aortic root dilatation; may dissect
"'C • Ehlers-Danlos ascending aorta
Ql
VI
III
• Localized Giantism (Mimic) o Lens dislocation, myopia
al o Pectus carinatum or excavatum
>- less Common
E • Homocystinuria o Hypermobility of joints
.•..o
III • Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly • Ehlers-Danlos
C
« o Dural ectasia with lumbar vertebral body
Rare but Important
scalloping
• Myotonic Dystrophy o Hypermobility of joints
• Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type llB o Skin hyperextensibility
• Frontometaphyseal Dysplasia o Multiple aneurysms (friable vessels)
• Stickler Disease • Localized Giantism (Mimic)
• Chromosome XYY(Klinefelter) Syndrome o Vascular malformations, macrodystrophia
• Ichthyosis Syndrome lipomatosa, Klippel Trenaunay Weber
• Cleidocranial Dysplasia
Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
• Homocystinuria
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Arachnodactyly plus osteopenia
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o May have joint laxity
• Arachnodactyly is a rare condition, so the • More frequently develop joint
list of "common" diagnoses is relative contractures
• Arachnodactyly itself is nonspecific; clinical o Pectus carinatum or excavatum
or rarely other radiographic features may o Lens subluxation, myopia
differentiate the diagnoses o Mental deficiency
• Metacarpal index> 8.8 (male) or 9.4 (female) o Thromboembolic episodes
o Obtained by dividing the sum of the • Congenital Contractural Arachnodactyly
lengths of 2nd through 5th metacarpals by o Long thin limbs, scoliosis, joint
the sum of their respective widths contractures
o No eye or cardiac abnormalities
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Marfan Syndrome
Homocystinuria Homocystinuria
(Left) PA radiograph shows
fairly uniform elongation of
the metacarpals and
especially proximal
phalanges, allowing the
nonspecific diagnosis of
arachnodactyly. The bones
are osteopenic. (Right)
Lateral radiograph in the
same patient as previous
image shows the bones are
diffusely osteoporotic. There
is mild platyspondyly from
multiple compression
fractures. The combination
of arachnodactyly and
osteopenia is seen with
homocystinuria.
I
239
Cf)
Q) SOFT TISSUE MASS IN A FINGER
o
f--
""0
C
III DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS a Enhances more intensely than fibroma of
Cf)
L tendon sheath
Q)
OJ Common a Lacks surrounding soft tissue edema
C
LL • Mucoid Cysts • Hematoma
"0 • Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath a Absence of central enhancement helps
CIl
VI
III
• Hematoma differentiate from hemorrhagic tumor
CO • Gout a Surrounding soft tissue edema
>.
E • Soft Tissue Abscess • Gout
.•..o
III
• Infectious Tenosynovitis a Multiple gouty tophi often present
C
<l:
• Foreign Body • Tophi may show mild, irregular
a Paint Gun Injury enhancement
• Granulation Tissue a Bone erosions with overhanging edges
• Fibroma of Tendon Sheath • Soft Tissue Abscess
• Glomus Tumor a Thick, irregularly enhancing border
• Epidermal Inclusion Cyst a Central nonenhancing necrosis or debris
• Rheumatoid Nodule • Infectious Tenosynovitis
less Common a Fluid & debris in tendon sheath
• Preferential location along volar aspect a More common around large joints
Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath
241
'"
Q)
o
SOFT TISSUE MASS IN A FINGER
t-
"0
C
ro
~
'"
Q)
Ol
C Gout Infectious Tenosynovitis
u:: (Left) Posteroanterior
"0 radiograph shows an
CIl impressive soft tissue tophus
'"
01
1IJ
Ell, with density typical of
sodium urate deposition.
>- There is a large erosion at the
E
.-
o
01
c:
PIP that has resulted in a
classic overhanging edge _
(Right) Axial T1 C+ FS MR of
< the second finger shows
abnormalenhancmgsoh
tissue ~ around and
particularly deep to the
superficialis • and
profunda Ei!I flexor tendons
of the digit. This was caused
by a puncture wound with
secondary infection.
I
242
SOFT TISSUE MASS IN A FINGER »
..o
:J
Cl
3
'<
lJl
Cl
III
Fibroma of Tendon Sheath Glomus Tumor Cll
(Left) Axial T7 C+ FS MR 0-
with subtraction shows an
inhomogeneously enhancing
mass III abutting the mildly
"
:J
(Q
C1l
enhancing flexor tendon
~
III
sheath III. The mass had OJ
OJ
intermediate to low signal on 0-
T7 WI and T2WI. A giant cell --1
tumor of tendon sheath
o
C1l
III
could have a similar
appearance. (Right) Axial
T2WI MR demonstrates a
well-defined, solid,
subungual tumor IllII that
extends radially and ulnarly
to almost surround the shaft
of the distal phalanx. The
lesion moderately enhanced.
I
243
Vl
OJ SOFT TISSUE MASS IN A FINGER
o
t-
"0
c::
III
~
Vl
OJ
Ol
c:: ProgressiveSystemic Sclerosis Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis
u::: (Left) Posteroanterior
"0 radiograph shows several
Gl (oci of soft tissue dystrophic
Vl
calcification" most
'"
lD notably seen around the
>- base o( the first metacarpal
-
E
o
'"
c::
~
ElilI. The terminal phalanges
show acroosteolysis
tapered soft tissues. (Right)
Oblique radiograph shows
• with
tumoral calcinosis II
involving the soft tissues of
the thumb. Soft tissue
calcification is particularly
prominent in patients with
renal osteodystrophy once
they are treated with dialysis.
I
244
SOFT TISSUE MASS IN A FINGER :>
::l
..•o
Ql
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
Soft Tissue Chondroma Hemangioma, Soft Tissue CD
(Leh) Posteroanterior Co
radiograph shows a ::!1
nonspecific mass IIlI in the :>
<0
soft tissues adjacent to the CD
distal interphalangeal joint.
~
VI
The mass contains faint OJ
:>
calcification. On excision, Co
this was identified as a -l
o
periosteal chondroma. CD
VI
(Right) Lareral radiograph
shows bulky soft tissues, with
fatty stroma of the forearm
and hand ••. Although no
phleboliths are present, this
proved ta be a hemangioma.
Tenosynovial Chondromatosis
(Leh) Lateral T2WI FS MR
shows a large soft tissue
mass" at the dorsal aspect
of the hand which extended
into the base of the third
digit. Numerous oval bodies
are highly suggestive of
chondromatasis. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows diffuse hypertrophy
III of rhe second and third
digits and metacarpals
involving both the bony
structures and subcutaneous
fat. which is markedly
thickened and can be
mass-like clinically.
I
245
If)
Q) ACROOSTEOLYSIS
o
I-
-0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Generally a clean transverse or oblique
....
If)
osseous edge
Q)
OJ Common o 2-3 adjacent: Snowblower or lawn mower
C
u: • Trauma: Amputation injury
'tl • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH)
Q)
Ul
1tI
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis (PSS) o Resorption of the tufts of distal phalanges
llJ • Thermal Injury is one of the resorptive processes in HPTH
>.
E o Thermal Injury, Frostbite
• May be subtle, or severe, with dissolution
.•..o
1tI
o Thermal Injury, Burns of entire tuft
c
<I: Less Common • Overlying soft tissues remain normal in
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) size (no tapering)
• Vasculitis o Hint: Watch for other signs of HPTH
o Raynaud Disease • Subperiosteal, subligamentous,
• Diabetes (Neuropathic) subchondral resorption
• Congenital Indifference/Insensitivity to Pain • Soft tissue or vascular calcification
• Meningococcemia • Brown tumors
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis (PSS)
Rare but Important
o Resorption of tufts is common
• Leprosy o Associated tapering of distal soft tissues,
• Lesch-Nyhan
matching that of osseous resorption
• Hajdu-Cheney Acroosteolysis Syndrome
o May have globular soft tissue calcification
• Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
o Systemic abnormality: Involvement of
• Occupational Acroosteolysis
lungs, GI system (particularly esophagus)
• Pycnodysostosis
• Thermal Injury, Frostbite
• Multicentric Reticulohistiocytosis
o Frostbite in adult may result in tuft
• Amniotic Band Syndrome resorption
• Progeria o Frostbite in child results in injury to
• Pachydermoperiostosis
epiphyses of distal phalanges
• Sarcoidosis
• Resorption of epiphyses & cessation of
• Epidermolysis Bullosa
growth -+ short distal phalanges
• Venom Induced Complications o Usually have normal thumb
• Complications of Dilantin
• When cold, thumb is usually curled into
palm and protected
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Thermal Injury, Burns
o Soft tissue contractu res
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
o Acroosteolysis, involves both bone and
• Hint: Presence & character of soft tissue soft tissues
calcification may help make diagnosis
o May have associated globular soft tissue
o HPTH: Globular soft tissue calcification &
calcification
small vessel calcification
o PSS (a.k.a., scleroderma): Globular Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
calcification very often present • Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA)
o Thermal injury (burns): Globular o Distal tuft resorption may be absent,
calcification, infrequently present subtle, or severe
o Leprosy: Linear calcification in digital o Distal tuft may be sclerotic ("ivory tuft")
nerve o Hint: Watch for other signs of PSA
• Hint: First 6 diagnoses on list are far, far • "Sausage digit" type of soft tissue swelling
more prevalent than others • Periostitis
• Erosive or mixed erosive/productive
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
articular disease, particular
• Trauma: Amputation interphalangeal joints
I
246
ACROOSTEOl YSIS »
::l
..•o
Ql
• End stage: Arthritis mutilans, with o Acroosteolysis may be severe, involving all 3
'<
telescoping digits and pencil-in-cup phalanges as well as metacarpals [ll
Ql
deformities o Linear calcification of digital nerve
• Lesch-Nyhan
'"
CD
Co
• Vasculitis
o Any type of vasculitis may affect small
terminal vessels in digits
o X-linked disorder of male children
o Compulsive self-mutilation by biting
"
::l
to
<1l
~
o Raynaud and systemic lupus fingers & lips Ul
OJ
erythematosus are typical o Both soft tissue & osseous destruction OJ
Co
o Results in acroosteolysis & loss of soft • Hajdu-Cheney Acroosteolysis Syndrome -l
o
tissues, often with ulceration o Osteolysis, particularly of distal phalanges <1l
Ul
In'""'
2-5. indicating injury.
This results in shortening of
>- the terminal digit, a form of
E
-"'
<
o
c
acroosteolysis. The epiphysis
is at greater risk than the tuft
for thermal injury. Note the
thumb is normal Elll typical
of frostbite. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows short
terminal phalanges of digits
2-5 III & normal length of
terminal phalanx of the
thumb Elll sequela of
frostbite during childhood.
I
248
ACROOSTEOl YSIS :to
-
::l
III
o
3
'<
D:l
III
III
Raynaud Disease leprosy Cl)
(Left) Posteroanterior Co
radiograph shows tapering of "T1
the soft tissues of the
terminal phalanges =
with
osteolysis involving the right
::l
<C
C1l
en
thumb and both index OJ
::l
fingers. The findings are a.
nonspecific, but this patient -1
had Raynaud disease. (Right)
o
C1l
III
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows severe acroosteolysis
involving all the fingers, most
significantly the 4th & 5th
digits m. Additionally, there
is linear calcification of a
digital nerve =: this is
pathognomonic for leprosy.
(tMSK Req).
metatarsal =
fracture through the 5th
& other bones
(not shown). This
combination is typical of
pycnodysostosis.
3rd fingers =
acroosteolysis of the 2nd and
along with a
pressure erosion on the
proximal phalanx of the
thumb. This was the only site
of abnormality in this patient
with amniotic bands.
I
249
'"
<I)
a
ACROOSTEOSClEROSIS
I-
"0
C
Ctl DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Very uncommon finding, even for
'"~ "common" diagnoses
<I)
Ol Common o Sclerosis is typically subtle
C
u:: • Normal Variant
• Psoriatic Arthritis Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
"<l)
III • Rheumatoid Arthritis • Normal Variant
Cll
ell • Enostosis (Bone Island) o Endosteal thickening
>. o Young adult female predominant
E • Osteopoikilosis
•...o • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis • Psoriatic Arthritis
Cll
c o Asymmetric polyarthritis, distal
• Sarcoidosis
« interphalangeal joint involvement
less Common • Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Fracture Healing Process o Bilateral, symmetric joint changes
• Chronic Osteomyelitis o Marginal erosions & MCP ulnar deviation
• Osteopetrosis • Osteopoikilosis
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus o Multiple bone islands
• Lymphoma, Hodgkin o Clustered around joints
• Hepatitis o Differentiate from sclerotic metastases
• Osteonecrosis • Sarcoidosis
Rare but Important o Lacy appearance of phalanges
• Paget Disease Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
• Hyperparathyroidism • Chronic Osteomyelitis
• Hyperparathyroidism, Healed Brown Tumors o Permeative destruction early with late
• Thermal Injury, Frostbite sclerotic changes ± sequestrum
• Melorheostosis • Osteopetrosis
• Metastasis, Osteoblastic o Diffuse bone sclerosis that lacks definition
• POEMS between medulla & cortex
• Foreign Body
• Tuberous Sclerosis Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Thermal Injury, Frostbite
o Focal or asymmetric distribution with
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION adjacent normal digits possible
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Tuberous Sclerosis
o Irregular sclerotic & lytic lesions
• Increased density of the terminal phalanges
throughout skeleton
-
;:,
III
o
3
'<
Hyperparathyroidism, Healed Brown III
III
t/l
Chronic Osteomyelitis Tumors (l)
(Left) PA radiograph shows Co
sclerosis of the index finger ,.,
distal phalanx in this diabetic :::>
<0
patient with treated C1l
osteomyelitis ••. Note the
~
t/l
prior amputation III of the III
:::>
third digit and severe c.
atherosclerotic disease ~ -l
o
(Right) Posteroanterior C1l
sclerotic focus =
radiograph shows a round
in the tuft
of the index finger. This
(f)
Tuberous Sclerosis
(Left) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows two dense
foci •• surrounded by a
lucent region in the distal tuft
of the index finger. The
patient had embedded
sewing needle fragments
with a surrounding
epidermoid inclusion cyst.
(Right) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows a sclerotic
appearance of the ring finger
distal tuft III. This may be
partially artifactual due to
multiple lytic lesions. A soft
tissue mass adjacent to the
sclerotic area was due to a
periungual fibroma.
I
251
'"o
Q) PHALANGEAL CYSTIc/LYTIC LESIONS
I-
"0
C
Cll DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Watch for loss of cartilage width & pattern
'"'-- of DIP joints predominating
Q)
0> Common • Gout
C
LL • Enchondroma o Inactive erosions are well-marginated &
"0 • Osteoarthritis (OA) may give appearance of lytic lesion
Ql
VI
III
• Gout o ]uxtacortical erosions may distract from
CO • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) the arthritic appearance
>- • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
E o Cartilage destruction is late in process;
-
o
III
C
«
• Osteomyelitis
• Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor (HPTH)
may not appear to be an arthritis
o Watch for dense soft tissue tophi
• Arthroplasty Component Wear/Particle • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC)
Disease o Lytic, expansile
• Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath (Mimic) o Generally < 30 years of age
Less Common o Usually have fluid-fluid levels
• Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
• Glomus Tumor o Lytic, expansile
• Epidermal Inclusion Cyst o Unlike GCT in other bones, may occur
• Sarcoidosis prior to skeletal maturation
• Robust Rheumatoid Arthritis o MR: Generally solid lesion with some focal
low signal regions on T2; occasional
Rare but Important fluid-fluid levels
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) • Osteomyelitis
• Ollier Disease o Digits at risk for direct inoculation via
• Maffucci Syndrome trauma
• Vascular Tumors, Osseous o Great toe distal phalanx particularly at risk
• Fibrous Dysplasia (FD) • Nail bed base is directly adjacent to
• Amyloid Deposition periosteum of distal phalanx
• Tuberous Sclerosis • "Stubbed toe" may result in nail bed
hematoma & subsequent infection
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Lytic destruction, periosteal reaction
• Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues (HPTH)
• Hint: Watch for associated arthritic process o Often multiple
• Hint: True non-aggressive lytic phalangeal o Lytic, generally geographic
lesions most commonly are one of the o Watch for other signs of bone resorption
following • Subperiosteal (generally radial side,
o Enchondroma> > ABC, GCT, UBC middle phalanx), endosteal
o If there is no matrix present in an
• Tuft acroosteolysis
enchondroma, may not be able to • Arthroplasty Component Wear/Particle
differentiate by radiog]japh; MR is useful Disease
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Silastic & similar arthroplasties used in
• Enchondroma hand & foot
o Most common true lesion of phalanges o Breakdown is common due to instability,
o Lytic ± chondroid matrix malalignment
o May be expansile/bubbly, appearing more o Particles elicit synovitis & particle disease,
aggressive than it acts resulting in massive osteolysis
• Osteoarthritis (OA) o Osteolysis can be so prominent that the
o Subchondral cyst formation occasionally prosthesis may be overlooked
predominates relative to osteophyte • Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath (Mimic)
formation, especially in erosive OA o Soft tissue mass arising in tendon sheath
I
252
PHALANGEAL CYSTIC/LYTIC LESIONS l>
o Focal extrinsic bone erosion may appear as Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
-
::l
Ql
o
3
'<
lytic lesion • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) III
Ql
o Watch for soft tissue mass adjacent to VI
o Rare lytic lesion, usually in young child ltl
lesion o May be geographic or more aggressive,
C.
-n
o MR: Mass mostly low signal on T2;
with rapid growth ::l
co
enhances o Often polyostotic CO
~
VI
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses • allier Disease Ql
::l
• Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBe) o Multiple enchondromas in phalanges, Cl.
-l
o Less common but radiographically usually with chondroid matrix o
CO
indistinguishable from lytic enchondroma, o Usually other long bones affected as well VI
Enchondroma
I
254
PHALANGEAL CYSTIC/lYTIC lESIONS :t>
:J
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) III
(1)
(Leh) PA radiograph shows Q.
I
255
Vl
Q) PHALANGEAL CYSTIc/LYTIC LESIONS
o
I-
"0
c:
III
~
Vl
Q)
Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath
Ol (Mimic) (Mimic)
c:
u: (Left) fA radiograph shows
soft tissue swelling that is
"t:l
Q) massive, surrounding much
Vl
III of the thumb III. There are
al a/50 lytic lesions involving
>- the metacarpal and phalanx
•..Eo
III
EllI. Note that there is no
cartilage loss; this is not an
c: articular process. (Right)
< Oblique T I WI MR on the
same patient shows a large
low signal 50ft tissue mass
• with extension into the
bone" It is this focal
invasion by GCT of the
tendon sheath which causes
osseous lesions.
I
256
PHALANGEAL CYSTIC/LYTIC LESIONS :>
:;,
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
Robust Rheumatoid Arthritis Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) VI
ell
(Left) PA radiograph shows Co
subchondral cysts so large as -n
to appear as lytic lesions ••. :;,
CO
The fact that they are C1l
multiple & all adjacent to a in
destroyed joint makes III
:;,
diagnosis of arthropathy; RA Co
in patients who continue ~
activity results in this
o
C1l
VI
appearance. (Right) PA
radiograph shows a
nonspecific lytic lesion in the
phalanx". History is of
extremely rapid growth of
the lesion in a very young
patient, which helps suggest
the unusual diagnosis of LCH
in a phalanx.
I
257
l/J
Q)
SESAMOIDITIS
o
I-
"0
C
OJ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS a Acute: Sharp irregular margins, intense
~ marrow edema; CT often useful to define
Q)
Ol Common osseous detail
C
LL • Osteoarthritis a Chronic: Fracture nonunion similar to
1J • Stress Reaction bipartite sesamoid with smooth, rounded,
ell
l/J
III
• Fracture well-corticated margins
III
>. Less Common Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
E • Osteonecrosis
-
o
III
C
~
• Arthritis
• Plantar Plate Tear
• Osteonecrosis
a Initially marrow edema; evolves to
sclerosis, ~ SI on Tl & T2; may fragment
• Tendon Injury • Arthritis
Rare but Important a Arthritides involving hallux may recruit
• Infection sesamoids
• Neoplasm • Gout: Erosions, overhanging edges
• Rheumatoid: Osteopenia, erosions
• Psoriatic: Mixed erosive-productive;
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION periostitis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Plantar Plate Tear
• Typically refers to 1st toe medial & lateral a Hyperextension injury; fibrocartilaginous
sesamoids, though any sesamoid can be disruption, partial or complete
involved • Tendon Injury
a Ranges from tendinosis (t SI & thickening)
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses to complete disruption
• Osteoarthritis
a Joint space narrowing, osteophytes, Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
subchondral edema/cysts, sclerosis • Infection
a Look for hallux valgus or rigidus a Soft tissue infection: Swelling; ± abscess
Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis
3
'<
llJ
Cll
Stress Reaction Fracture III
(l)
(Left) Coronal PO FSE FS MR C.
shows intense lateral 'Tl
sesamoid edema (t 51) Ell & ::l
<0
a small joint effusion" in (1)
Osteonecrosis Arthritis
(Leh) Axial T7 WI MR shows
lateral sesamoid sclerosis (.
51) •• due 10 chronic
osteonecrosis. The sesamoid
was! 51 on all sequences
including STIR imaging (not
shown). Note the normal
bipartite medial sesamoid
•• (Right) Sagittal T7WI MR
shows a • 51 intracapsular
process eroding the 1st
metatarsal neck ••
sesamoid" & proximal
phalangeal base Ell. This
also showed. 51 on T2 (not
shown). This is
aspiration-proven gout.
I
259
(/)
<1l SHORT METACARPAL/METATARSAL
o
f-
"0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Trauma
~ o Crush injury, bayonet apposition of
<1l
OJ Common fracture fragments may result in
c
LL • Idiopathic (Normal Variant) shortening
"'C • Trauma
Ql Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
VI
III less Common • Osteonecrosis
co
>- • Osteonecrosis o Freiberg necrosis: Fragmentation &
-
E
o
III
C
<
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA)
• Turner Syndrome
• Noonan Syndrome
collapse of MT heads
• Usually 2nd MT; collapse leads to
shortening
• Hypothyroidism o Sickle cell: Bone infarct rarely results in
• Hypoparathyroidism cessation of growth
Rare but Important • May see dactylitis (periosteal reaction)
• Fetal Alcohol Syndrome o Thalassemia
• Mucopolysaccharidoses • Short broad MCs and MTs generally due
• Multiple Hereditary Exostoses to marrow hyperplasia; osteonecrosis
• Oilier Disease rarely may contribute
• Maffucci Syndrome • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
• Achondroplasia o Involvement of joint in child causes
• Hypochondroplasia hyperemia
• Chondrodysplasia Punctata • Initially causes overgrowth of epiphyses
• Poland Syndrome & metaphyses
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism / • Chronic hyperemia may result in early
Pseudo- Pseudohypoparath yroidism fusion & resultant shortening of bone
• Fanconi Anemia o Generally not uniform or symmetric
• VATERAssociation involvement
• Basal-Cell Nevus Syndrome • Turner Syndrome
• Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia o 4th MC most common; may involve 3rd &
• Diastrophic Dysplasia 5th
o Often have Madelung deformity of carpus
o May have metaphyseal excrescences
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Noonan Syndrome
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Short stature, kyphoscoliosis
• Short metacarpal (Me) or metatarsal (MT) is o Short fingers, syndactyly
usually nonspecific o Klippel Feil
o Uncommonly, other features may be • Hypothyroidism
present which lead to a diagnosis o Severely delayed bone age
• Consider whether all digits are involved; if o Uniformly short MC, MT, phalanges
this is the case, differential is more limited o Fragmented ("cretinoid") femoral capital
o Hypothyroidism epiphysis
o Mucopolysaccharidoses • Hypoparathyroidism
o Achondroplasia o Osteoporosis, calvarial thickening
o Hypochondroplasia o Subcutaneous & basal ganglion
o Noonan syndrome calcification
o Hypoparathyroidism o Premature fusion of physes results in
o Chondrodysplasia punctata shortened bones, 4th & 5th MC & MT
most frequent; 1st may be involved
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Idiopathic (Normal Variant) Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Far and away the most common reason for • Fetal Alcohol Syndrome
a solitary short MC or MT o Growth retardation, scoliosis
o Renal hypoplasia & anomalies
I
260
SHORT METACARPAL/METATARSAL l>
:J
...•
Dl
o
o Microcephaly & malformations of brain o Lumbar spine similar to achondroplasia, 3
'<
• Mucopolysaccharidoses with short pedicles & narrowing OJ
Dl
o Short MC with proximal constriction, interpediculate distance t/I
<Il
results in "fan-shaped" carpus • Chondrodysplasia Punctata a.
"Tl
o Oar-shaped ribs, ]-shaped sella o Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia; epiphyses
:J
• Multiple Hereditary Exostoses become calcified in first year of life <0
CD
~
o Osseous exostoses arising from o Short-limbed dwarfism
metaphyseal portions of bones • Poland Syndrome
'":J
OJ
n.
o May result in shortening & distortion of o Unilateral aplasia of chest wall -I
o
involved bone; mechanical distortion of musculature CD
Trauma Osteonecrosis
Hypothyroidism Mucopolysaccharidoses
(Left)Posteroanterior
radiograph shows short
metacarpals and phalanges.
None of the epiphyses are
ossified, yet the patient is 4
years of age. Severely
delayed bone age resulting in
short metacarpals and digits
is typical of hypothyroidism.
(Right) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows short
metacarpals with constricted
proximal ends 11II. This
results in a "fan-shaped"
wrist that is typical of the
mucopolysaccharidoses.
I
262
SHORT METACARPAl/METATARSAL >
:J
-
III
o
3
'<
[D
III
Maffucci Syndrome Achondroplasia III
<D
(Left) Posteroanterior a.
radiograph shows short TI
metacarpals, along with :J
<C
severe distortion of all the C1)
bones. Each bone shows an en
expanded lesion resulting in OJ
:J
shortening. Note also the a.
phleboliths in the soft tissues; -l
o
the complex is Maffucci C1)
III
syndrome. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows short. broad
metacarpals and phalanges.
This is typical in this infant
with achondroplasia, who
will continue to have short
bones through skeletal
maturity.
Pseudohypoparathyroidism / Pseudohypoparathyroidism /
Pseudo-Pseudohypoparathyroidism Pseudo-Pseudohypoparathyroidism
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows subtle soft
tissuecalcification. as
well as a short first metatarsal
Ell. These illustrate the
combination of Findings
which make the diagnosis of
pseudohypoparathyroidism
or pseudo-
pseudohypoparathyroidism.
(Right) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows all the
metacarpals to be short
(most significantly, the first.
fourth, and fifth); there is
evidence of previous coning
of the epiphyses, now fused
and resulting in short digits.
I
263
(/)
Q) ULNAR DEVIATION (MCP JOINTS)
o
f-
"0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Erosions & soft tissue calcification are
~
(/)
uncommon; deformities are reducible
Q)
OJ Common • Psoriatic Arthritis
c
LL • Rheumatoid Arthritis o Interphalangeal joints severely affected
"0 • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) o Erosions & periostitis
CIl
(/)
ltl
• Psoriatic Arthritis o Normal bone mineralization
en • juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
>. • Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
E o Juvenile onset of oligoarthritis or
•...o
ltl Less Common polyarthritis
C
<l: • Septic joint o Marginal erosions with joint space
• Charcot, Neuropathic narrowing
• jaccoud Arthropathy o ± Ankylosis
• Ehlers-Danlos • Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
o Globular or sheet-like periarticular
Rare but Important calcification
• Multicentric Reticulohistiocytosis
• Mass, Unspecified Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) • Septic Joint
• Trisomy 18 o Bone & joint destruction
-
::::I
01
o
3
'<
Dl
01
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) II>
<ll
(Leh) "Open book" C.
radiograph shows severe :!1
subluxation at the MCP joints ::::I
•. The reducible to
(1)
I
265
(/)
Q) SWELLING & PERIOSTITIS OF DIGIT (DACTYLITIS)
o
f-
"D
C o ± Erosions and cartilage narrowing
ell DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
~
(/) • Osteomyelitis
Q)
en Common o SweIling, periosteal reaction
c
l.L • Psoriatic Arthritis, "Sausage Digit" o Osseous destruction, ± sequestrum
"0 • Osteomyelitis • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
Q)
(/) • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) o Swelling and periostitis of multiple digits
nl
CO
Less Common may be initial sign of JIA
>-
E • Chronic Reactive Arthritis, "Sausage Digit" o Seen in younger children; may not have
-
o
nl
C
«
• HIV-AIDSRelated Arthritis
• Sickle Cell Disease, "Hand-Foot"
developed joint or overgrowth symptoms
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Rare but Important • Chronic Reactive Arthritis, "Sausage Digit"
• Fibroosseous Pseudotumor of Digits o SweIling along ray, not at single joint
• Tuberculosis, "Spina Ventosa" o Periostitis, especially along shafts of digits
o
3
'<
al
Ql
Osteomyelitis Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) tI>
(D
(Left) PA radiograph shows 0.
sort tissue swelling and
periosteal reaction •. "
::::l
<0
Additionally, there is an oval CD
density with surrounding
~
(f)
I
267
u lESIONS CROSSING A DISC SPACE
.!!1
o
ctl
~
.n DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Granulomatous: Tuberculosis; disc
Q)
t::
Q)
destruction late; may track along anterior
~ Common longitudinal ligament creating multiple
Q)
vertebral dimension, narrow disc space, o Osteosarcoma: Teens & young adults, 2nd
normal end plates; cervical spine peak older adults; ranges lytic to sclerotic ±
• Fusion (surgical): Marrow & trabecular soft tissue ossification
continuity; end plates not seen o Chondrosarcoma: Mesenchymal type;
• Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis: Debilitated women 3rd & 4th decades; ±
& immunocompromised patients mineralization
o Pyogenic: Typically single level • Chordoma: Any age, adults most common
o Fungal: Candida, immunocompromised o Sacrum> clivus> remainder of spinal axis
Sarcoma Chordoma
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR
shows an aggressive mass
arising from the L5 vertebral
body and extending into the
posterior elements, spinal
canal, paraspinous 50ft
tissues and into the sacrum
HI in this patient with
telangiectatic osteosarcoma.
(Right) Sagittal STIR MR
shows a large destructive
mass involving L4 and L5
bodies and intervening disc
space. with posterior
epidural extension and
extension into neural
foramen HI. This patient has
a chordoma.
I
269
()
.!a
DISCAL MINERALIZATION
o
~
Cll
• Early graft is visible; late - solid fusion
.0
a> DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
t with bridging bone end plate to endplate
a> Common
~ or pseudoarthrosis with collapsed graft
a> • Degenerative Spondylosis
C • Cages: Help retain graft within disc
• Surgical Spinal Fusion space, carbon fiber cages identified by
'0
Ql
II)
• Discography (Mimic) tantalum markers
III
r:rJ • DISH • Bone filler/graft substitute: Morselized
>- • Vertebroplasty Cement (Mimic) fragments or plug of material with
E • Congenital Fusion
•...oIII geometric shape (due to preparation for
c: • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy insertion)
oCt
Less Common • Discography (MimiC)
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) o Contrast material within disc space
• Hemochromatosis • Disc normal (especially if control) or
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) degenerative
• Hyperparathyroidism o Patterns of contrast distribution
~
Q)
C (Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows interbody fusion with
"Q)
III
cages. The cages are
identified by the tantalum
'"
1XI markers _ The graft
>- material appears as irregular
E density within the cages Ell
•..
o (Right) Sagittal CT
'"
l: myelogram shows interbody
« cages at L2-3 and L4-S Ell
The graft material within the
cages is difficult to
appreciate. At LJ-4 interbody
fusion has been performed
with a plug of calcium
hydroxyapatite graft 1IlI.
I
272
DISCAL MINERALIZATION
I
273
OSSIFICATION/CALCIFICATION ANTERIOR TO Cl
OJ
E
~ o a.k.a., longus colli calcific tendinitis
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
C
..0
o Hint: Symptomatic with pain, fever,
« Common elevated WBC
OJ
c • Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease o Amorphous density inferior to Cl arch
.6-
C/l
Less Common o Soft tissue swelling may be extensive
OJ
~ • Hyperextension (Teardrop) Fracture
OJ
a.. • Hydroxyapatite Deposition Disease (HADD)
• Hyperextension (Teardrop) Fracture o Older, osteopenic patient
-c
C1l
• Accessory Ossicle o Pain, history of trauma
C/l
III
• Avulsion Fracture Anterior Arch Cl o Soft tissue swelling
III
>- • Stylohyoid Ligament Ossification (Mimic) o Fragment from inferior C2 body
E
•..o
III
Rare but Important •
• Vertical dimension> horizontal
Accessory Ossicle
c:
« • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis o Asymptomatic, incidental finding
o Smooth margins, cortical-medullary
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION architecture
• Avulsion Fracture Anterior Arch Cl
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Hyperextension injury
• Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition o Horizontally oriented fx anterior arch Cl
Disease o Avulsion longus colli muscles &
o Rarely symptomatic atlantoaxial ligament
o Flocculent mineralization within midline
o Soft tissue swelling
Cl-2 articulation • Stylohyoid Ligament Ossification (Mimic)
• Calcification speckled or linear, o On lateral view ligament may project
irregularly distributed anterior to arch Cl
o Associated soft tissue mass may be large & o Eagle-Barrett syndrome: Sore throat, pain
may compress spinal canal during swallowing
o Varying size cysts in odontoid process &
anterior arch Cl Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o May see chondrocalcinosis elsewhere • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis
including symphysis, knee o Cloud-like soft tissue calcification
• Not necessary to make diagnosis o Pain, stiffness, dysphagia, spine or nerve
root compression
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses o Paraspinallocation: Any site cervical,
• Hydroxyapatite Deposition Disease thoracic, lumbar spine
(HADD)
3
'<
llJ
Hydroxyapatite Deposition Disease III
III
(HADD) Hyperextension (Teardrop) Fracture <D
(Left) Lateral radiograph Co
shows focal soft tissue -U
spine =
swelling in the upper cervical
and small
calcifications inferior to C 1
Cl
~
Cl
00
~.
:::J
and anterior to C2 EiIII Cl
indicative of longus colli
calcification. (Right) Sagittal
»
rr
:::J
NECT shows hyperextension o
teardrop (racture at the
anterior inferior margin of
3
Cl
I
275
en
Q) PARAVERTEBRALOSSIFICATION AND CALCIFICATION
:e
ro
E
'-
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis, Pyogenic
C
.0 o Disc space destruction
« Common o Endplate sclerosis & fragmentation
ro • Post-Operative Fusion
c • Fragmentation may give appearance of
0-
en • Extruded Cement (Mimic) soft tissue mineralization/ossification
[ll
ro • Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis, Pyogenic o Irregular periosteal new bone formation
ll.
"'C
Less Common o Paravertebral ossification may be
C1l
VI • Psoriatic Arthritis component of healing process
III
lXl • Chronic Reactive Arthritis • Located at disc space
>- • Paraplegia • Progresses to mature bone
E
.•.
o
III
• Charcot, Neuropathic • May lead to disc ankylosis
C
« Rare but Important Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Tumoral Calcinosis • Psoriatic Arthritis
• Osteochondroma o Spondyloarthropathy may involve any
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis segment of spine
• Osteoblastoma o Ranges from immature mineralization to
• Chondrosarcoma bulky mature bone
• Chordoma • May fuse with vertebral body & disc
• Vertebral Osteomyelitis, Granulomatous o More pronounced on the right; formation
• Osteosarcoma on the left possibly limited by aortic
• Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva pulsation
o Associated appendicular findings
• Enthesopathy, periosteal new bone
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Bilateral asymmetric erosive arthritis in
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues hands & feet
• Differential excludes syndesmophytes, • Sausage digits, phalangeal tuft resorption
anterior longitudinal ligament ossification, • Chronic Reactive Arthritis
& associated forms of ossification that are o Mimics psoriasis
more commonly seen anteriorly & closely • Cervical spine less common
adherent to spine • Foot involvement more common than
• Hint: Determine if associated findings upper extremity involvement
include abnormal disc space or abnormal • Paraplegia
vertebra or otherwise normal spine o Bulky paravertebral ossification mimics
psoriasis
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Other spinal changes
• Post-Operative Fusion
• Syndesmophyte-like ossification
o Posterior fusion
mimicking ankylosing spondylitis
• Initially just small osseous fragments
• Anterior longitudinal ligament
• Develops mature ossification with time;
ossification mimicking DISH
mayor may not -+ solid osseous union
• Neuropathic changes
• May extend from transverse process to
• Charcot, Neuropathic
transverse process or across facet joints
o Mimics vertebral osteomyelitis
o Anterior (interbody) fusion
• Destruction, osseous debris,
• Usually confined to disc space malalignment more extensive with
• Graft material may extrude; initially neuropathic disease
small mineralized fragments, may
progress to mature bone Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Extruded Cement (Mimic) • Tumoral Calcinosis
o Intravascular or within paraspinal muscles o Amorphous, cloud-like deposits of calcium
o Adjacent intravertebral cement, collapsed o Associated with hyperparathyroidism
vertebra
I
276
PARAVERTEBRALOSSIFICATION AND CALCIFICATION
I
278
PARAVERTEBRAL OSSIFICATION AND CALCIFICATION >
:J
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
VI
Osteoblastoma Chondrosarcoma (1)
(Left) Anteroposterior Q.
osteoblastoma might be
strongly considered, this
proved to be
chondrosarcoma, arising in
an exostosis.
Osteosarcoma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows multiple
sites of sclerotic dense bone
formation" in this patient
with osseous metastases
from a primary
osteosarcoma. A large
paravertebral ossified mass
ElII accompanies the largest
vertebral lesion. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows mature ossification
within the soft tissues of the
back •. A similar
ossification was present in
the anterior thigh of this
patient with fibrodysplasia
ossificans progressiva.
I
279
E
'"
Q) LINEAR OSSIFICATION ALONG ANTERIOR SPINE
Cii
E
•...
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Spinal fusion & thin syndesmophytes
c
.n • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis
« Common o Spine findings identical to AS
ro
c • DISH
0..
• Aortic Calcification Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
'"ro.... • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) • Psoriatic Arthritis
ro
0..
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis o Bulky paravertebral ossification
"t:l • Chronic Reactive Arthritis
Q)
VI Less Common o Spine findings identical to psoriasis
III
CO • Psoriatic Arthritis • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
>- • Chronic Reactive Arthritis
E o Mineralization anterior annular fibers
-
o
III
C
«
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
• Renal Osteodystrophy
(MAAF); disc normal or narrowed, favors
lumbar spine
• Hemochromatosis • Renal Osteodystrophy
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (Mimic) o 2° HPTH; Rugger Jersey spine
• Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) • Hemochromatosis
• Complications of Retinoids o MAAF; arthritis with subchondral cysts
• Paraplegia • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (Mimic)
Rare but Important o Hypoplastic discs mimic syndesmophytes;
• Sternoclavicular Hyperostosis (SAPHO) facet joint fusion
• Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria) • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH)
• Osteomalacia, Hypophosphatemic o MAAF, bone resorption, calcific deposits
• Complications of Retinoids
o ALL ossification, spinal osteophytes
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Paraplegia
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o MAAF, ALL/paravertebral ossification
• DISH Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Flowing anterior longitudinal ligament • Sternoclavicular Hyperostosis (SAPHO)
(ALL) ossification o Ossification ALL, cervical spine
o Closely adherent midvertebra, lucency at • Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria)
vertebra corner where loosely adherent o Syndesmophytes, spinal osteoporosis,
• Aortic Calcification discallinear mineralization
o Separate from disc • Osteomalacia, Hypophosphatemic
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) o MAAF; t bone density, enthesopathy
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis III
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) It)
(Left) Lateral radiograph Co
shows syndesmophyte -U
formation" throughout the ,
Q)
Q)
lumbar spine in this patient (f)
with ankylosing spondylitis. "2.
::l
The syndesmophytes are Q)
syndesmophytes at multiple a:
CD
levels" in this patient with (f)
spondyloarthropathy of
inflammatory bowel disease.
Posterior fusion is related to
prior injury.
I
281
Q)
a. BULLETSHAPED VERTEBRA/ANTERIORVERTEBRALBODY BEAKING
ro
.s:::
(f)
ro
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Brachycephaly, abnormal facies
..Cl
Q) o Short stature, atlanto-axial instability,
t
Q)
Common developmental hip dysplasia
> • Achondroplasia
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
"Ql
III
III
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)
• Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities
aJ Less Common o Regional osteoporosis ± scoliosis
>- • Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities
E • Hypothyroidism (Congenital)
o
.•... • Hypothyroidism (Congenital) o Mental retardation, delayed growth, short
• Pseudoachondroplasia
«'"
r:: stature, stippled epiphyses
Rare but Important o Abnormal skull & face with thick
• Morquio Syndrome protruding tongue, delayed dentition
• Hurler Syndrome • Pseudoachondroplasia
o Rhizomelic dwarf
o CI-2 subluxation, accentuated lumbar
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION lordosis, early osteoarthritis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Short thick tubular bones especially hands
• Bullet shape: Down, achondroplasia, & feet, metaphyseal excrescences
pseudoachondroplasia, hypothyroidism, Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
Hurler, Morquio • Morquio Syndrome
• Anterior beaking: Achondroplasia, o Short stature, macrocephaly, coarse facial
radiation-induced, Hurler, Morquio features, widely spaced teeth
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Odontoid hypoplasia, increased lumbar
• Achondroplasia lordosis, bell chest, & paddle-shaped ribs
o Rhizomelic dwarf o Flared iliac wings, inferior tapering iliac
o Exaggerated lumbar lordosis, posterior bones, steep acetabuli, coxa valga
vertebral scalloping, narrow foramen • Hurler Syndrome
magnum, congenital spinal stenosis, o Mental retardation, short stature
decreased interpediculate distance o Coarse facial features, macrocephaly, &
o Squared iliac wings, narrow sciatic notch, other craniovertebral anomalies including
horizontal acetabular roof ]-shaped sella
o Trident hand, flared anterior ribs o Small iliac bones with inferior tapering,
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) steep acetabuli, abnormal femoral heads
o Congenital heart disease, GI abnormalities o Thickened tubular bones, contractures
Achondroplasia
3
'<
lJl
III
IJJ
Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities Pseudoachondroplasia tD
(Left) Lateral radiograph a.
shows a hypoplaslic almost
bullet-shaped L1 • in a
<
tD
;:l.
child who was radiated 1 <ll
CT
year earlier for Wilms tumor. ~
Ql
Radialion of growing bone
(f)
slows or stops growth due to ::r
vascular damage. (Right) Cll
"0
Lateral radiograph shows <ll
very mild platyspondyly,
with mild anterior beaking
• in a patient with
pseudoachondroplasia.
Morquio Syndrome
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a thoracolumbar
kyphosis, with a hypoplaslic
oval L 1 and central anterior
beaking • in this paliem
with Morquio syndrome.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows classic example of
Morquio syndrome,
including dorsolumbar
gibbus with vertebral
beaking •.
Hurler Syndrome
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows inferior beaking ~ of
] vertebral bodies in this
patient with many classic
findings of Hurler syndrome.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows typical skeletal
findings of dysostosis
multiplex, including vertebral
body beaking • in this
patient with Hurler
syndrome.
I
283
Q)
a. CONGENITAL & ACQUIRED CHILDHOOD PLATYSPONDYLY
ro
.<::
(f)
ro
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Metaphyseal bands (lucent, dense, or
.0
Q) alternating), may involve vertebra
t
Q)
Common • Metastatic Disease
> • Trauma o Neuroblastoma, retinoblastoma, Wilms
"tl
OJ • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o ± Soft tissue mass, skeletal imaging
I/)
ltl • Leukemia nonspecific
co
>. • Metastatic Disease • Ewing Sarcoma
E • Ewing Sarcoma
-
o
ltl
C
<t:
Less Common
o Teens, young adults
o Solitary lesion
• Achondroplasia (Homozygous) o Permeative destruction, soft tissue mass
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Pseudoachondroplasia • Achondroplasia (Homozygous)
• Mucopolysaccharidoses o Radiographically & clinically mimics
• Radiation-Induced thanatophoric dwarf
• Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia o Both parents have achondroplasia
Rare but Important o Diffuse collapse
• Complications of Bisphosphonates o Congenital presentation
• Homocystinuria • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
• Idiopathic Juvenile Osteoporosis o Generalized osteoporosis
• Cushing Disease o Solitary, multiple, or diffuse vertebra
• Thanatophoric Dwarf involved
• Metatropic Dwarf • Depends on severity of disease
• Kniest Dysplasia • Younger patients at presentation have
• Short Rib Polydactyly more extensive disease
• Hypophosphatasia • May be congenital
o Multiple fractures axial & appendicular
skeleton
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Congenital platyspondyly type IIA
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Micromelia, short ribs
• Platyspondyly: Generalized vertebral • Pseudo achondroplasia
collapse maintaining relatively parallel o Rhizomelic dwarf
endplates o Normal infancy, manifests age 2-3 years
• Differentiating features: Congenital o As child develops, mimics
presentation vs. childhood onset; diffuse spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia
collapse vs. solitary or multifocal collapse o Diffuse collapse develops during childhood
• Mucopolysaccharidoses
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Short stature, diffuse skeletal dysplasia
• Trauma o Coarse facial features
o Solitary or multifocal, history diagnostic o Diffuse collapse
o Any age o Congenital presentation
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o Morquio, Hunter best known
o Childhood, thoracic spine mainly
• Mental retardation with Hunter
o Solitary or few vertebra involved
• Radiation-Induced
o May reconstitute during healing o Regional osteoporosis
• Leukemia o May affect only one side of vertebra
o Age 2-5 years
• ± Scoliosis
o Variable presentations
o May induce osteochondroma formation
• Generalized osteoporosis, diffuse collapse • Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
• Focallesion(s) with permeative o Truncal dwarfism
destruction, periostitis, soft tissue mass; o Diffuse spine deformities
collapse solitary or multifocal o Delayed ossification long bone epiphyses
I
284
CONGENITAL & ACQUIRED CHILDHOOD PlATYSPONDYlY :I>
::::l
..•o
III
~
.0
Q)
t
Q)
leukemia Ewing Sarcoma
> Sagiual T1 C+ MR
(Left)
"0 shows the typical
CIl
Vl appearance of leukemic
III
al marrow infiltration with
>. height loss of varying degrees
•..Eo
III
r::
=
involving all vertebral bodies
Note the
contra5l~enhancement of all
ct the vertebral bodies in this
child. (Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
=
asymmetric platyspondyly
with destruction of the
left pedicle in a 12 year old.
This proved to be early
destruction in Ewing
sarcoma.
Pseudoachondroplasia
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows multiple
rib, vertebral, and long bone
fractures in this fetus with
osteogenesis imperfecta,
type If. The arms and legs
are short due to angulation
and deformity resulting from
the fractures. (Right) Lateral
platyspondyly =
radiograph shows very mild
with mild
anterior beaking in this
patient with
pseudoachondrop~s~.
Mucopolysaccharidoses Radiation-Induced
(Left) Lateralradiograph
shows classic example of
Morquaio syndrome, with
diffuse vertebral body
collapse, dorsolumbar
gibbus, and vertebral
beaking. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows relative hypoplasia of
the left side of the T12, L1,
L2, and L3 vertebral bodies
_ creating an asymmetric
platyspondyly due to
radiation of a left Wilms
tumor. Note the clips from
the left nephrectomy.
I
286
CONGENITAL & ACQUIRED CHILDHOOD PLATYSPONDYLY :t>
.•o
:J
III
3
'<
III
III
Ul
<D
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR Co
shows endplate irregularity
and diffuse platyspondyly
<
<D
;:l-
with rectangular-shaped <D
CT
vertebral bodies. There is a ~
OJ
generous bony spinal canal
(j)
dimension. This is the adult ::T
appearance of OJ
"D
spondyloepiphyseal (1)
dysplasia. (RighI) AP
radiograph shows severe
osteopenia, gracile ribs, and
diffuse vertebral
compressions. Metaphyseal
dense bands are present.
This patient has osteogenesis
imperfecta and was treated
with bisphosphonates.
Thanatophoric Dwarf
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows short ribs _ and
classic platyspondyly ElII.
with the widened
intervertebral disc spaces
associated with many
dwarfisms, including
thanatophoric dwarfism.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows a severe deficit in
bone formation. Diffuse
platyspondyly is present. The
cranium is particularly
notable for having no
ossification, except at the
base of skull, a clue to the
diagnosis of
hypophosphatasia.
I
287
Q)
0-
FISH (BICONCAVE) OR H-SHAPED VERTEBRA
ro
.r:
(f)
ro
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Chronic medical diseases (exogenous) &
.D
Q) Cushing disease (endogenous)
t
Q)
Common • Paget Disease
> • Senile Osteoporosis (SOP) o Increased vertebral size, coarse trabecula,
"'0
Cll • Complications of Steroids increased density at vertebral margins
II)
• Paget Disease • Multiple Myeloma
'"
lXl
• Multiple Myeloma
>- o Generalized osteoporosis mimics SOP
..'"
E
o
c:
• Neoplasm
• Renal Osteodystrophy
• Neoplasm
o Metastatic: Multilevel disease, variable
<t • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH) destruction
• Osteomalacia o Primary: Ewing, lymphoma; collapse is
• Sickle Cell Anemia more common with other neoplasms
less Common • Renal Osteodystrophy
• Gaucher Disease o HPTH, osteomalacia, osteoporosis
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH)
• Thalassemia Major o Bone resorption weakens vertebra
• Osteomalacia
Rare but Important o Coarse, ill-defined trabecula
• Homocystinuria • Sickle Cell Anemia
o Osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, coarse
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION trabecula
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
• H-shape: Osteonecrosis producing central • Gaucher Disease
end plate collapse with sharp margins o Erlenmeyer flask deformity distal femur
o Sickle cell, Gaucher, thalassemia • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
• Biconcave: Structural weakening, disc o Bones thin & gracile or short & tubular
impresses upon & remodels vertebra o Osteoporosis, bowing, & deformities
o Any entity on list may be biconcave • Thalassemia Major
o Osteoporosis, Erlenmeyer flask deformities,
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses "hair on end" skull, rodent facies
• Senile Osteoporosis (SOP)
o Elderly individuals: Women> men Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Complications of Steroids • Homocystinuria
o Nonspecific osteoporosis, scoliosis
Neoplasm
(Left) Lateralradiograph
shows diffuse osteoporosis
and compression fractures of
all the lumbar vertebrae _
No focal lesions are seen.
Biopsy was required to
establish a diagnosis of
multiple myeloma. (Right)
Sagillal STIR MR shows
multiple vertebral lesions.
with severe compression of
LJ ElIIl Diagnosis of
metastatic disease is
facilitated by the multiplicity
of lesions.
I
289
Ql
0.
SQUARING OF ONE OR MORE VERTEBRA
co
L
(fJ
co
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Vertebra narrowed anterior to posterior
..c o Hypoplastic or fused disc
Ql
t
Ql
Common o ± Unilateral or bilateral posterior fusion
> • Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
"0
Cll • Long-Standing Posterior Fusion o Most common at thoracolumbar junction
III
ro • Paget Disease o Romanus lesion (early): Corner erosion
al
>. • Block Vertebra (Congenital Fusion) o Shiny corner: 2° new bone at corner
E • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) o Normal size vertebral bodies
o
+-
ro Less Common o Associated findings: Anterior & posterior
c:
« • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis fusion, symmetric sacroiliac (SI) disease,
• Normal Variant enthesopathy, large joint arthritis
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Psoriatic Arthritis • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis o Radiographically identical to ankylosing
spondylitis, differentiate clinically
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Normal Variant: Absence of other features
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Cervical fusion common (anterior &
• Finding is only evident on lateral view posterior); generalized osteoporosis
• Hint: Vertebral size is a distinguishing o Other: Erosive arthritis, periostitis,
feature ballooned epiphyses; esp. knee & elbow
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Psoriatic Arthritis
• Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion o Vertebral squaring uncommon, mimics AS
o Osseous-fusion across disc space o No spinal fusion, asymmetric SI arthritis
o Normal-sized vertebra o Associated findings
290
SQUARING OF ONE OR MORE VERTEBRA »
.•o
:J
III
3
'<
OJ
III
VI
Paget Disease l1>
(Left) Lateral radiograph C.
shows the classic 'lpicture <
C1>
frame" appearance of ;:l.
vertebral body Paget disease. C1>
CJ
With enlargement of the ~
Q)
body, the anterior concavity
is lost •. Note normal U>
::r
concavity in the adjacent Q)
-0
body for comparison HI. C1>
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows congenital fusion of
C3 and C4. Note the
relatively flat anterior
vertebra contours, especially
atO.
I
291
en
c VERTEBRALBODY SCLEROSIS
o
"iii
Q)
--l
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Reactive sclerosis to degenerative disc
~ disease
.n
t
Q)
Common o Endplate distribution, or triangular
Q)
> • Fracture Healing distribution in anterior vertebral body
"C • Schmorl Node • Intraosseous Hemangioma
C1l
en
ro
• Discogenic Sclerosis o Corduroy appearance: Thickened vertically
al • Intraosseous Hemangioma oriented struts
>- • Compression Fracture, Acute
E o Seen more often on MR than radiography
•...roo • Metastases, Blastic • Compression Fracture, Acute
c • Enostosis (Bone Island)
<I: o Superimposed trabecula creates sclerotic
• Vertebral Augmentation (Mimic) appearance
• Paget Disease o Height loss evident, may be along
• Osteomyelitis, Chronic end plate, diffuse or asymmetric
• Renal Osteodystrophy o Traumatic or insufficiency fracture
Less Common • Metastasis, Blastic
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o Breast, prostate, lung, colon, stomach,
• Lymphoma bladder, uterus, rectum, thyroid, kidney,
• Fibrous Dysplasia carcinoid
• Enostosis (Bone Island)
Rare but Important
o Round or oblong (long axis vertical),
• Chordoma
brush-like margins, solitary or multiple
• Myelofibrosis
• Vertebral Augmentation (Mimic)
• Plasma Cell Myeloma
o Homogeneously dense cement within
• Osteopetrosis
collapsed or destroyed vertebra
• Osteosarcoma
• Paget Disease
• Ewing Sarcoma
o Picture frame
• Chondrosarcoma
o Increased vertebra size, thickened cortices
• Helmut Sclerosis
& trabecula
• Mastocytosis
• Osteomyelitis, Chronic
• Fluorosis
o Disc space destruction ± fragmentation
• Axial Osteomalacia
o Osteolytic foci may be evident
• Melorheostosis
o Periosteal new bone formation
• Tuberous Sclerosis
o Paras pinal abscess
• Renal Osteodystrophy
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Rugger jersey spine: Thick sclerosis along
end plates
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
o Associated changes of
• Excludes conditions with diffuse polyostotic
hyperparathyroidism & osteomalacia
osteosclerosis unless limited to spine or
unusual appearance in spine Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Ivory vertebra (diffusely dense): Lymphoma, • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
Paget, blastic metastases, low grade o Increased density within vertebra plana
osteomyelitis o Protean manifestations: Varying types of
osteolytic lesions throughout skeleton
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Button sequestrum skull
• Fracture Healing
• Lymphoma
o Callus formation, may be seen with any
o Splenomegaly
fracture pattern
o Hodgkin> non-Hodgkin
• Schmorl Node
• Fibrous Dysplasia
o Nucleus pulposus herniates through
o Spine involvement unusual, more
endplate, sclerotic margin; abuts endplate
common with polyostotic disease
• Discogenic Sclerosis
o Expansile lesion, ground-glass matrix
I
292
VERTEBRALBODY SCLEROSIS l>
..
~
~
o
o Teens & young adults, 2nd peak older 3
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses '<
adults III
• Chordoma ~
o Spectrum
o Any age, adults most common
• Primary lytic lesion ± soft tissue mass,
'"a.
<ll
=-
I
294
VERTEBRAL BODY SCLEROSIS
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows unusually
severe sclerosis and
thickening of the vertebral
endplates •• Severe
nephrocalcinosis. and
small left kidney are a clue to
the underlying renal disease
that produced this rugger
jersey spine. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows unusually
severe sclerosis and
thickening of the vertebral
endplates" in this dramatic
case of rugger jersey spine in
a patient with renal
osteodystrophy.
(Leh) Lateralradiograph
shows vertebra plana with
diffuse sclerosis" in this
patient with Langerhans cell
histiocytosis. (Right) Axial
NECT in this patient with
lymphoma shows a single
sclerotic vertebral body and
paraspinal mass •.
Lymphoma is one of the
recognized causes of ivory
vertebra.
I
295
III
C VERTEBRAL BODY SCLEROSIS
o
';;;
Q)
..J
~
III
.0
Q)
t: Chordoma
Q)
Osteopetrosis Osteopetrosis
(Left) Axial bone CT shows a
typical example of dense
vertebral body in a patient
with osteopetrosis,
demonstrating diffuse bony
sclerosis. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows
bone-in-bone appearance
that can be seen in
osteopetrosis •. The bones
are mildly diffusely sclerotic.
The bone-in-bone
appearance results from
failure of osteoclasts to
remodel vertebral bodies
during growth.
I
296
VERTEBRAL BODY SCLEROSIS
Chondrosarcoma
(Left) Sagittal NECT shows a
large expanded mass with
flocculent chondroid ("arcs
and whorfs") matrix
involving posterior elements
and right posterior vertebral
body" in this patient with
chondrosarcoma. (Right)
Lateral radiograph of the
thoracic spine shows a
classicivory vertebra.
with dense bone replacing
the entire body but no
change in size. Focal
sclerosis such as this is one
appearance round in
mastocytosis.
Fluorosis Melorheostosis
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows diffuse sclerosis. There
is thickening and
indistinctness of the
trabeculae. The findings
resulted from two years or
fluoride treatment (Right)
Coronal NECT shows dense
sclerosis that involves the
right side of the C2 and C3
vertebral bodies. The
dermatomal distribution is
characteristic of
melorheostosis.
I
297
(/)
c SPINAL OSTEOPHYTES
o
·w
Q)
...J
cu DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Solitary/multifocal: Trauma, infection,
~ neuropathic
..c
t
Q)
Common
Q)
• Spondylosis Deformans Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
> • Seronegative SpondyIoarthropathy
"C • DISH (Mimic)
ell
(/) • Disc Disease (Mimic)
(Il
CO o Syndesmophytes in all forms
>. less Common o Psoriasis, chronic reactive arthritis
E • Seronegative Spondyloarthropathy (Mimic)
~
-
o
(Il
c
• Paralysis
• Complications of Retinoids
• Spectrum: Syndesmophytes to bulky
paravertebral ossification
• Enthesopathy, periostitis, bilateral
• Sternoclavicular Hyperostosis/SAPHO asymmetric erosive arthritis hands &
Rare but Important feet, sausage digits, tuft resorption
• Hypoparathyroidism • Paralysis
• Acromegaly o Spectrum: Osteophytes, syndesmophytes,
• Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria) bulky paravertebral ossification
• Fluorosis • Complications of Retinoids
o Ligament ossification, especially spinal;
enthesopathy
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Sternoclavicular Hyperostosis/SAPHO
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Spectrum: Osteophytes, syndesmophytes,
• Osteophytes demonstrate cortical & bulky paravertebral ossification
medullary continuity with vertebral body Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Hypoparathyroidism
• Spondylosis Deformans o Normal disc space, enthesopathy
o Independent of disc disease & facet • Acromegaly
arthritis o Posterior vertebral scalloping, t disc space
• DISH (Mimic) height, ossification mimics DISH
o Ossification anterior longitudinal ligament • Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria)
o Peripheral enthesopathy ± ossification o Linear disc mineralization & osteoporosis;
posterior longitudinal ligament osteophytes minimal
• Disc Disease • Fluorosis
o Disc space narrowing, endplate changes o Osteosclerosis, enthesopathy, tendon
o Multilevel or diffuse: Degenerative ossification
298
SPINAL OSTEOPHYTES »
::::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
Ol
III
Disc Disease VI
Disc Disease (I)
(Left) Sagittal T2Wf MR Co
shows severe disc
degeneration with loss of
<
CD
;:l-
disc height at every cervical CD
0-
level. Large anterior. and ~
smaller posterior osteophytes
are present. (Right) Axial
'"r-
CD
NEeT shows severe en
multilevel disc degeneration
o'
::::l
with loss of disc height, bony
en
eburnation, and vacuum
phenomenon at Ls-s1, LJ-4,
and L2-3, accompanied by
osteophytes •.
-
with disc space narrowing &
disc mineralization. Note the
small anterior osteophyles
I
299
VI
c LESIONS ORIGINATING IN VERTEBRALBODY
.Q
VI
Q)
--'CIl DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Schmorl Node (Mimic)
~ o Often multiple, no posterior element
..0
t
Q)
Common involvement
Q)
> • Intraosseous Hemangioma o Cup-like lesion adjacent to end plate
"tl • Metastases defect, disc continuity into lesion, sclerotic
Q)
VI
III
• Schmorl Node (Mimic) rim; if acute has edema on MR
CO • Paget Disease • Paget Disease
>- • Multiple Myeloma (MM)
E o Typically solitary, may be multiple
•..
o
III
• Limbus Vertebra (Mimic) o Hint: Enlarged vertebra
s:: • Osteonecrosis • Thick cortices, coarsened irregular
« • Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis trabecula (picture frame vertebra)
• Lymphoma • May produce ivory vertebra
• Plasmacytoma • Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Less Common o Patients typically 40 years or older
• Giant Cell Tumor o Multiple vertebra, variable appearance
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis • Multiple lytic foci, variable size,
• Fibrous Dysplasia non-sclerotic margins
• Ewing Sarcoma • Innumerable tiny lesions
• Osteochondroma • Solitary lesion: Plasmacytoma
• Renal Osteodystrophy, Brown Tumor • Sclerotic lesions: POEMS syndrome
o Bone scan: Cold lesions or false negative
Rare but Important
• Limbus Vertebra (Mimic)
• Chondrosarcoma o Well-corticated bone fragment at vertebral
• Chordoma corner; anterosuperior most common
• Osteosarcoma o Matching defect in adjacent vertebra,
• Echinococcal Disease variable size with sclerotic margin
o If acute has bright marrow signal on MR,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION increased uptake on bone scan
o No posterior element involvement
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Osteonecrosis
• List specifically excludes disc-centered o Difficult to see on radiographs
processes such as degenerative disease o MR: Serpiginous low signal rim & internal
• Unless stated, any lesion may extend into fat; posterior elements lesions rare, no soft
posterior elements tissue mass
• Most lesions have nonspecific appearance: o May have vertebral collapse
Lytic lesion that may be expansile, • H-shaped vertebra
geographic non-sclerotic margins ± soft • Ktimmel disease: Gas within cleft
tissue mass o Underlying medical condition such as
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses sickle cell, chronic steroid use
• Intraosseous Hemangioma • Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis
o Solitary or multiple o Typically destroyed intervertebral disc
o Rarely extends to posterior elements o Coccidiomycosis: Non-contiguous,
o Common on MR with characteristic intraosseous osteolytic foci, disc spared,
rounded hyperintense Tl lesion paraspinal abscesses, rib involvement
o Immature lesions have nonspecific, often o Tuberculosis: Non-contiguous vertebral
aggressive appearance lesions with anterior cortical destruction
o Corduroy vertebra: Coarse, vertically • Disc destruction late
oriented trabecula seen on CT & X-ray • Paraspinal masses may be extensive
• Metastases o No posterior element involvement, lesions
o Breast, lung, prostate, thyroid, kidney notexpansile
o Multiple lytic, blastic, or mixed lesions • Lymphoma
I
300
LESIONS ORIGINATING IN VERTEBRAL BODY ~
::l
••...•o
o Any age, frequently young adult o Hint: Corticomedullary continuity 3
'<
o Permeative destruction, soft tissue mass diagnostic CD
even without cortical destruction o Usually part of multiple hereditary ••
VI
C1l
o Variant: Ivory vertebra osteochondromas; evaluate knees to help Co
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses • Coarse ill-defined trabecula, bone r
(1)
resorption, soft tissue calcium deposits VI
• Giant Cell Tumor 0"
::l
o Adults: 25-40 years old Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses VI
Intraosseous Hemangioma
301
II)
c LESIONS ORIGINATING IN VERTEBRAL BODY
o
'(i'j
Ql
--l
~
<Il
.0
Ql
1::
Ql
Metastases Metastases
> (Left) Sagittal NECT shows
"l:l
multiple blastic metastatic
Ql foci involving the thoracic
II)
CO and lumbar vertebral bodies
CD III. (Right) Sagiltal T1 WI MR
>- shows multiple focal areas of
-
<
E
o
CO
C
abnormal low signal due CO
diffuse metastases. There is
confluent involvement
upper thoracic bodies with
of
I
302
lESIONS ORIGINATING IN VERTEBRALBODY »
::l
..•
III
o
3
'<
III
III
Multiple Myeloma (MM) limbus Vertebra (Mimic) <II
lD
(Left) Sagittal T1 WI MR a.
shows typical MR
appearance of multiple
<
<1l
;:l.
myeloma, with innumerable <1l
ill-defined marrow nodules,
r::T
~
III
subcentimeter in size.
Schmorl nodes are also
r
<1l
present •. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows limbus
'"::l
0'
fragments at both L4 and L5
•. At both levels, the
'"
f1divot" in the anterosuperior
vertebral body is larger than
the limbus fragment because
of concurrent Schmorl nodes
ElIlI.
Osteonecrosis
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows typical H-shaped
vertebra of sickle cell disease
•. The H-shape results from
collapse of the central
endplate due to
osteonecrosis. (Right)
Sagittal NECT shows multiple
focal areas of bone
destruction. with
preservation of the disc
spaces and minimal
prevertebraf soft tissue
involvement in this patient
with indolent infection
(coccidiomycosis).
I
303
III
C lESIONS ORIGINATING IN VERTEBRAL BODY
o
.iij
Q)
-'
~
Cll
.0
Q)
t
Q)
Plasmacytoma Giant Cell Tumor
> (Left) Axial bone CT shows
't:l
typical appearance of
Ql plasmacytoma, with a lytic
III
<1l lesion arising in the vertebral
!Xl body and mild expansion of
>- the lateral cortical margin 11III
E of the vertebra. (Right)
.•..o
<1l Lateral radiograph shows
C lesion with geographic
« non-sclerotic margins arising
in the. L 7 vertebral body 11III.
The lesion was subsequently
proven to be a giant cell
tumor.
I J
lO-l
lESIONS ORIGINATING IN VERTEBRAL BODY »
..
:J
Cl
o
3
'<
OJ
Cl
VI
Ewing Sarcoma Osteochondroma l1>
(Leh) Sagittal STIR MR C.
shows a lesion arising in the
L 1 vertebral body III in a
<
l1>
;:+
teenager. Posterior soft tissue <l>
rr
mass is present. The ~
OJ
appearance is consistent
r
with an aggressive process. <l>
VI
The patient's age indicates
that Ewing sarcoma must be
o'
:J
VI
considered. (RighI) Axial
bone CT shows a mature
osteochondroma arising from
the anterior cortex of the C2
vertebral body =.
Mineralization is present in
the cartilage cap EEl in this
skeletally mature individual.
Chondrosarcoma Chordoma
(Left) Axial bone CT shows a
destructive vertebral body
lesion that leatures stippled
chondroid matrix III
extending into the
prevertebral tissues. The
features are characteristic of
chondrosarcoma. (RighI)
Axial T1 C+ FS MR shows a
large, diffusely enhancing
soft tissue mass. arisingin
the L4 vertebral body. The
lesion also crossed the disc
space to extend into the LS
vertebra. Such behavior is
typical, but not specific, for
chordoma.
Osteosarcoma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows multiple
sites of sclerotic dense bone
formation, extending from
the bones into the adjacent
soft tissue, involving two
lumbarspine vertebra.
and the left pubic ramus 61
This patient has developed
osseous metastases from
osteosarcoma. (RighI)
Coronal T2WI MR shows a
complex, predominately
left-sided, multicystic mass
III involving bone and
adjacent soft tissue in this
patient with echinococcus
infection.
I
305
(/)
c lESIONS ORIGINATING IN POSTERIOR ElEMENTS
.Q
(/)
Q)
306
LESIONS ORIGINATING IN POSTERIOR ELEMENTS »
-
::I
Ql
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
Acute Trauma Pedicle Reactive Sclerosis CIl
(Left) Lateralradiograph a.
shows typical case of <
hangman fracture co
::l-
demonstrating fracture co
between the vertebral body rr
~
III
and neural arch ••. (Right)
Axial NECT shows left r
CO
posterior element hypoplasia ~.
o
EiII and left pedicle aplasia :J
1lII. There is sclerosis of the en
compensatory enlarged right
pedicfe, which contains a
central horizontal lucency
from an insufficiency fracture
=.
I
307
RIB NOTCHING, INFERIOR
"0
ell
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Normal Variant
'"
ltl
al o Inferior rib often undulating/indistinct
:>. Common • Post-Operative
E
-o
ltl
t:
<l:
• Coarctation Aorta, Thoracic
• Normal Variant
• Post-Operative
o Thoracotomy rib resection/deformity
• Hyperparathyroidism (Mimic)
o Subperiosteal & endosteal bone resorption
• Hyperparathyroidism (Mimic) o Bone destruction by Brown tumors
• Neurofibromatosis • Neurofibromatosis
less Common o Pressure from intercostal neurofibromas
• Decreased Pulmonary Blood Flow o Dysplastic "twis·ted ribbon" ribs
• Congenital Heart Disease, Repaired Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
• Subclavian Artery Obstruction • Decreased Pulmonary Blood Flow
• Low Aortic Obstruction o Notching from enlarged transpleural
• Thalassemia collateral vessels
• Arteriovenous Malformation o Congenital absence of pulmonary artery,
Rare but Important pulmonary stenosis, tetralogy of Fallot,
• Superior Vena Cava Obstruction Ebstein anomaly, emphysema
• Giant Cell Tumor (Mimic) • Congenital Heart Disease, Repaired
• Tuberous Sclerosis (Mimic) o Findings of Blalock-Taussig shunt or
cava-pulmonary anastomosis
o Often unilateral right-sided
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Subclavian Artery Obstruction
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Takayasu arteritis, arteriosclerosis
• Rib notching = localized erosion or thinning obliterans, Blalock-Taussig procedure,
thrombosis
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Low Aortic Obstruction
• Coarctation Aorta, Thoracic o Low thoracic or abdominal aorta
o Commonly involves 4th to 8th ribs
o Notching of lower ribs
• Tortuous, dilated intercostal arteries
• Thalassemia
o "Figure 3" sign = undulation in distal aortic
o Cortical erosion in posteromedial rib
arch at coarctation site o Unusual in widened rib
o Right unilateral notching if coarctation
• Arteriovenous Malformation
proximal to left subclavian artery origin o Involves intercostal or pulmonary vessels
o Bicuspid aortic valve in 25-50%
308
RIB NOTCHING, INFERIOR >
::::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
[Jl
III
Coarctation Aorta, Thoracic Coarctation Aorta, Thoracic III
l1>
(Left) Posteroante,iOf Co
I
309
C/l
.0 RIB NOTCHING, SUPERIOR
i:r:
't:J
Cl>
l/l DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
ns
Cll
Common • Hyperparathyroidism (Mimic)
>- o Subperiosteal & endosteal bone resorption
E • Normal Variant
•..ns
o
• Hyperparathyroidism (Mimic) • Unilateral predominance
c: o Bone destruction by Brown tumors
< • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
• Rheumatoid Arthritis, Wheelchair • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis o Third to fifth rib superior border
• Rheumatoid Arthritis, Wheelchair
Less Common o Osteoporosis + scapular erosion into ribs
• Coarctation Aorta, Thoracic
• Neurofibromatosis Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Multiple Hereditary Exostosis (Mimic) • Coarctation Aorta, Thoracic
o Usually causes inferior rib notching
• Post-Operative
o Superior rib notching seen when
• Pressure Effect, Thoracic Drainage Tube
• Pressure Effect, Rib Retractor intercostal arteries markedly enlarge &
• Radiation Osteonecrosis erode the superior surface of adjacent rib
• Neurofibromatosis
Rare but Important o Pressure erosions from neurofibromas are
• Intercostal Muscle Atrophy usually inferior
• Paraplegia, Complications o Dysplastic "twisted ribbon" ribs
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta o Vertebral abnormalities
• Marfan Syndrome • Radiation Osteonecrosis
• Polio o Delayed alteration in bone remodeling
• Restrictive Lung Disease
• Thalassemia Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Progeria • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
o Dysplastic rib rotation & curvature
• Marfan Syndrome
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Thin ribs with thin cortices
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Polio
o Thin ribs & atrophic intercostal muscles
• Rib notching = localized erosion or thinning
o Superior> inferior scalloping - "hourglass"
• Superior notching is less common than
inferior notching and is more likely to be shape
non-neurovascular in origin • Progeria
o Thin clavicles & ribs
310
RIB NOTCHING, SUPERIOR »
::::l
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
III
Cl)
(Left) Posteroanterior C.
radiograph shows an
i/l-defined superior cortex of
the posterior mid-thoracic
ribs" The combination of
osteoporosis & constant
rubbing of the scapula
againsllhe rib cage results in
this pattern of resorption in
this rheumatoid arthritis
patient who uses a
wheelchair. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a ribbon rib on the
/I I,
I
311
(/)
.D SOLITARY RIB LESION
a:
"0
Q)
(/) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Lytic to ground-glass density on
ra radiograph
al
>- Common o Commonly polyostotic (but < 50%)
E • Fracture Healing Process
-o
ra
c:
<l:
• Fibrous Dysplasia (FD)
• Enchondroma
• Enchondroma
o Quoted as being most common benign rib
lesion in autopsy series
• Multiple Myeloma (MM) o Not frequently noted on chest radiograph:
• Metastatic Small lesion, chest rather than osseous
• Pancoast Tumor X-ray technique makes it difficult to see
• Osteomyelitis o Watch for chondroid matrix (punctate)
• Osteochondroma o Generally no geographic margin
Less Common • Multiple Myeloma (MM)
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) o Usually multiple lytic lesions or diffuse
• Ewing Sarcoma infiltration seen only as osteopenia
o Rarely will find a single rib lesion, with
Rare but Important
other lesions elsewhere in skeleton
• Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
• If expanded or bubbly, lesion is likely the
• Chondrosarcoma original plasmacytoma
• Askin Tumor • Metastatic
• Osteosarcoma o Generally polyostotic
• Cystic Angiomatosis o Occasional solitary metastasis is found in
rib
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Thyroid or renal cell most common
• Pancoast Tumor
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
o Tumor in lung apex, may have rib
• Many entities in the differential may be destruction
polyostotic lesions, even if only a single rib o Proximity to nerves & vessels leads to
lesion is seen in any specific case typical clinical symptoms
o FD, MM, metastases, LCH,
• Shoulder & arm pain
osteochondroma, cystic angiomatosis
• Horner syndrome
o Hint: Look for other skeletal lesions
• Osteomyelitis
• Age may be a differentiating factor o Lytic destructive rib lesion
o FD, LCH, Ewing sarcoma, Askin tumor,
• Usually wide zone of transition, not
GCT tend to be seen in younger patients geographic
than metastases or MM o Soft tissue mass is most frequently present
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Elicits pleural effusion
• Fracture Healing Process o Radiographic appearance may be
o During callus-producing phase, fracture indistinguishable from Ewing sarcoma or
may appear as a sclerotic metastasis Askin tumor
o Slightly mal aligned healed fracture may o MR with contrast usually will differentiate
appear as a slightly expanded lytic lesion, • Osteochondroma
but without geographic borders o Rib osteochondromas less frequent than
o Generally will see other fractures in on long bones
adjacent ribs, making the diagnosis o Rib osteochondromas often seen as part of
obvious multiple hereditary exostosis (MHE)
• Fibrous Dysplasia (FD) o Osteochondroma of rib arises as on long
o Most common solitary rib lesion in bone
teenager & young adult • Stalk in continuity with rib cortex
o Slightly expanded to bubbly; not • Marrow extending from rib into
aggressive osteochondroma
• Overlying cartilage cap
I
312
SOLITARY RIB LESION >
..
::l
III
o
a Because rib osteochondromas often project 3
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses '<
intrathoracically, they may have the • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
CJ
III
appearance of lung nodules a Rare rib lesion
II>
Cl>
Co
• Hint: Watch for attaching stalk & a Lytic lesion, generally geographic but
osseous character of "nodule" ::u
rarely may be aggressive 0-
Il>
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses a Young to middle-aged adults
aggressive appearance
• Aggressive lesions may have cortical • Askin Tumor
breakthrough and soft tissue mass a Although rare, most common pleural
a May advance rapidly & be tumor in teenagers & young adults
indistinguishable by imaging from Ewing (especially females)
sarcoma a Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)
• Ewing Sarcoma arises in pleura or chest wall
a Aggressive lytic lesion a Involves rib 23-60% of time
• Cortical breakthrough, large soft tissue • Osteosarcoma
mass a Very rare lesion in rib
• Rib lesions often elicit a large pleural a Osteoid matrix, varying aggressiveness
effusion • Cystic Angiomatosis
a Proximal & flat bones such as ribs, pelvis, a One of the vascular tumors that may be
scapula generally involved in older age polyostotic
group; tubular bones in younger children a All may involve a rib; preference is lower
• Late teenage and young adults are the extremities
prime age group for Ewing of rib a Range of aggressiveness; cystic
a May appear polyostotic since osseous angiomatosis & hemangioma are generally
metastases are common the least aggressive
Osteomyelitis Osteochondroma
(Left) AP radiograph shows
destruction of a solitary rib
•• with associated large soft
tissue mass Ell. While this
certainly could represent an
aggressive tumor such as
Ewing sarcoma, osteomyelitis
can have just as aggressive
an appearance. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows a
"Iung nodule" which in fact
arises from the rib" The
lesion contains mature bone
and represents an
osteochondroma. The chest
X-ray technique is
suboptimal for evaluating the
matrix.
I
J1.j
SOLITARY RIB LESION :P
:l
...•
III
o
3
'<
III
III
III
langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (lCH) Ewing Sarcoma (1)
(Left) Axial CECT shows a Q.
Askin Tumor
(Left) Axial CECTshows a
large pleural-based tumor
extending around the
hemithorax III in a young
adult with associated
destruction and reactive
change of the adjacent rib
Ill. The distribution and age
of the patient are typical of
Askin tumor; rib involvement
is variable. (Right) Axial
bone CT shows a rare low
grade intraosseous
osteosarcoma of the rib •.
Statistically, most rib lesions
containing matrix are
chondroid in nature, most
frequently enchondroma.
I
315
~
II)
SACROILIITIS, BILATERAL SYMMETRIC
Q)
0...
"0
CIl DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Eventual profound osteoporosis
II)
III
o Spine involvement: Tends to be
III Common continuous
>- • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
E • Thin vertical syndesmophytes lead to
-«
o
III
c:
• Osteoarthritis (Mimic) (OA)
• DISH (Mimic)
body fusion
• Facets fuse as well, leads to bamboo spine
• Osteitis Condensans Ilii (Mimic) o Peripheral involvement: Large proximal
Less Common joints (hip, shoulder)
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis (lED) o Male> > female; onset 2nd or 3rd decade
• Psoriatic Arthritis, Late (PSA) • Osteoarthritis (Mimic) (OA)
• Renal Osteodystrophy (Mimic) (Renal OD) o Purely productive; osteophytes tend to
bridge anteriorly at superior & inferior
Rare but Important
ends of synovial portion of SI joint
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis, Late (CRA) o May mimic sclerosis of sacroiliitis, but
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) usually is easily differentiated
o May appear as a rounded region of
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION sclerosis overlying mid SI joint; may mimic
a sclerotic metastatic site
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• DISH (Mimic)
• Sacroiliac (SI) joint inflammatory disease is o Purely productive, not an articular process
most frequently seen in • Iliolumbar ligaments located superior to
spondyloarthropathies SI joints may ossify & bridge
• Two spondyloarthropathies are particularly • Nonarticular superior portion of SI joint
noted for bilateral and symmetric may ossify & appear fused
involvement • Synovial (inferior) portion of SI joint not
o Hint: Bilateral symmetric sacroiliitis most
affected by DISH
frequently is due to ankylosing spondylitis, o Ossified superior portions of SI joints
inflammatory bowel disease spondylitis appear symmetric & may mimic end-stage
o Hint: Remember that
sacroiliitis
spondyloarthropathies that are usually • Should be easily differentiated since the
bilaterally asymmetric (PSA, CRA) may true SI joint is not involved
develop bilaterally symmetric disease at o Other axial features
some point • Ossification sacrotuberous or sacrospinal
• Purely productive diseases of the SI joints ligaments
may mimic the sclerosis of sacroiliitis • Bridging anterior osteophytes along
o OA, DISH, osteitis condensans ilii
spine, particularly thoracic
o Sclerosis is predominantly on iliac side • Osteitis Condensans Ilii (Mimic)
o No associated erosive change
o Sclerotic reactive osseous change on iliac
o Hint: Watch for location of sclerosis of SI
side of joint
joints to differentiate these mimics from • Usually, but not invariably, symmetric
true spondyloarthropathies & from one • Sclerosis may mimic the sclerosis seen in
another sacroiliitis
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Sclerosis is generally specific in appearance
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) • Involves iliac side of joint, inferiorly
o Sacroiliitis begins with erosive change • Often triangular in shape
• Loss of distinctness of SI joint cortices o Not an articular process; joint is normal
• Erosions lead to widening of joints Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Usually bilaterally symmetric, but • Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis
occasionally one side lags behind the (IBD)
other & they appear asymmetric o Similar in appearance but much less
o Eventual sclerosis and bilateral fusion
frequent than AS
I
316
SACROILIITIS, BILATERAL SYMMETRIC l>
..•o
j
III
o Sacroiliitis begins with erosive change o Sacroiliac joints may appear widened & 3
'<
• Loss of distinctness of SI joint cortices irregular OJ
III
• Erosions lead to widening of joints o Most frequently bilateral & symmetric 1/1
(t)
other & they appear asymmetric • Subchondral resorption on the iliac side ~
1/1
o Eventual sclerosis and bilateral fusion • With weight-bearing, resorbed bone
o Spine involvement: Tends to be collapses, resulting in apparent widening
continuous & erosive change
• Thin vertical syndesmophytes lead to o Differentiating features: Look for other
body fusion signs of renal 00 or hyperparathyroidism
• Facets fuse as well, leads to bamboo spine • Abnormal bone density
o Peripheral involvement: Large proximal • Other resorptive patterns: Subperiosteal,
joints (hip, shoulder) subligamentous, Brown tumors
o Watch for signs of IBD
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Staple lines from ileoanal pull-through • Chronic Reactive Arthritis, Late (CRA)
• Colostomy o Spondyloarthropathy in CRA generally
• Signs of steroid use bilateral but asymmetric
• Tubular, featureless bowel pattern of • May appear symmetric, especially in
colitis early or end-stage (bilateral fusion)
• Psoriatic Arthritis, Late (PSA) o Differentiating features of end-stage fused
o Spondyloarthropathy in PSA generally sacroiliitis of CRA from AS
bilateral but asymmetric • Normal bone density
• May appear symmetric, especially in • Character of spine involvement (bulky
early or end-stage (bilateral fusion) paravertebral osteophytes, skip regions)
o Differentiating features of end-stage fused
• Peripheral joint disease favors ankles &
sacroiliitis of PSA from AS feet, rather than large proximal joints
• Normal bone density • Clinical symptoms of urethritis & uveitis
• Character of spine involvement (bulky • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
paravertebral osteophytes, skip regions) o RA relatively frequently affects SI joints
• Peripheral joint disease favors hands, • Erosions, generally bilaterally symmetric
feet, rather than large proximal joints o Though present, erosions generally not
• Skin disease large enough to be observed on imaging
• Renal Osteodystrophy (Mimic) (Renal 00)
"'>.
al
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Osteoarthritis (Mimic) (OA)
-"'
E (Left) AP radiograph shows
o bilaterally symmetric
sacroi!iitis which is
c: predominantlyerosive.
< with little productive change
at this point. The hips
bilaterally show minimal
productive change EllI in this
/8 year old male. (Right) AP
radiograph shows sclerosis
involving both sides of the 51
joints, bilaterally symmetric
_ The iliac side is more
prominently involved than
the sacral side. There is no
erosive change; this is
osteoarthritis.
I
318
SACROILIITIS, BILATERAL SYMMETRIC :l>
-
::::l
III
o
3
'<
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis lJl
III
(IBD) Psoriatic Arthritis, Late (PSA) III
(l)
(Left) AP radiograph shows Co
I
319
'"
s SACROILIITIS, BILATERALASYMMETRIC
Q)
0..
"'C
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Consider sites & appearance of peripheral
II)
1tI
arthropathy in making diagnosis
al Common • Hand> foot; acral> proximal
>- • Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) • Mixed erosive/productive
•..Eo
1tI
• Osteoarthritis (OA) (Mimic) • Sausage digit & periostitis
c: • Osteoarthritis (OA) (Mimic)
<l: Less Common
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) o Not sacroiliitis, but bridging osteophyte is
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) seen
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease (lBD) • Seen as sclerosis, often rounded, more
• Renal Osteodystrophy (Renal OD) (Mimic) often iliac than sacral side of joint
• Most prominent at margins of joint
Rare but Important
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Gout • Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA)
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) o Identical SI joint & spine findings to PSA
o MUCH less frequent than PSA sacroiliitis
o Peripheral involvement: Foot/ankle> hand
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Generally bilateral symmetric sacroiliitis,
• Bilateral asymmetric sacroiliac (SI) disease but early in disease may be asymmetric
most frequently is seen in PSA & CRA o Osteoporotic; peripheral disease usually
• Other spondyloarthropathies that are has large proximal joints
generally bilaterally asymmetric may be • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
asymmetric at some point in the process o Generally bilateral symmetric sacroiliitis,
o Hint: AS is much more prevalent than but early in disease may be asymmetric
either psoriatic or chronic reactive • Renal Osteodystrophy (Renal OD) (Mimic)
spondyloarthritis, so should be strongly o Subchondral resorption & collapse on iliac
considered with this appearance side may be asymmetric
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA), Gout,
o Spondyloarthritis is most frequently Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
bilateral & asymmetric o Involvement of SI joint may not be rare,
o Spine involvement: Bulky asymmetric but is rarely seen with imaging
paravertebral osteophytes, skip areas
I
321
.!!l SACROILIITIS, UNILATERAL
2:
OJ
Cl..
"tl
Ql DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • If chronic, sclerotic reactive changes
VI
ttl
• Abscess in iliopsoas or gluteal muscles
m Common
>. Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
E • Septic Joint
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA), Early
•...ottl Less Common o PSA sacroiliitis is a bilateral & generally
r::
« • Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA), Early asymmetric process
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Early o Early in process, changes may be so subtle
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA), Early on one side that the more advanced side
• Osteoarthritis (OA) (Mimic) appears to mimic unilateral disease
Rare but Important o Other findings to help differentiate PSA
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) • Peripheral mixed erosive/productive
• Gout disease in hands & feet; skin changes
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Early
o AS sacroiliitis is a bilateral & generally
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION symmetric process
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Early in process, changes may be so subtle
• Hint: True unilateral sacroiliitis must be on one side that the more advanced side
considered septic joint until proven appears to mimic unilateral disease
otherwise o Other findings to help differentiate AS
o Radiographic signs may be subtle • Large proximal joint arthritis
o Clinical signs may be misleading (buttock, • Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA), Early
groin, hip pain) o Like PSA, sacroiliitis is bilateral &
Septic joint
(Leh) Oblique axial T I WI
MR shows low signal
abnormality involving both
sides of the left 51joint •.
Note that the abnormal
signal is centered on the
synovial portion of the joint.
It should not be mistaken for
stress fracture. (Right)
Oblique axial TI C+ F5 MR
in the same patient shows
high signal, again involving
both sides of the left 51joint
•. There is a small fluid
collection adjacent to the
joint" there is no
diagnosis to consider other
than septic joint.
I
323
en
1: SYMPHYSIS PUBIS WITH PRODUCTIVE CHANGES/FUSION
Q)
0..
"'C
Ql DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • DISH
VI
III o Bone proliferation at ligamentous
lD Common insertions
>- • Chronic Repetitive Trauma
E o Flowing ossification of 4 contiguous
-
o
III
c:
<l:
• Post-Traumatic Instability
• Fracture, Malunion (Mimic)
vertebral bodies
o Disc spaces preserved
• Septic Joint
• Osteoarthritis Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• DISH • Ankylosing Spondylitis
o Symphysis pubis & sacroiliac joint erosion
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
• Stress Fracture, Adult (Mimic) leading to fusion
o Proliferative changes predominantly along
• Postpartum
• Post-Operative inferior pubic rami
• Hyperparathyroidism
Less Common o Erosion & sclerosis of symphysis pubis in
• Ankylosing Spondylitis primary hyperparathyroidism; rarely fuses
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA) • Psoriatic Arthritis
• Rheumatoid Arthritis o Erosion & sclerosis with asymmetric
• Hyperparathyroidism sacroiliac joint involvement
• Psoriatic Arthritis • Osteitis Pubis, Late
• Osteitis Pubis, Late o End stage - spontaneous arthrodesis
Rare but Important Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• SAPHO • Complications of Fluoride
• Complications of Fluoride o Diffuse increased bone density
• Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria) o Ligamentous ossification: Paraspinal,
sacrotuberous, & iliolumbar in pelvis
o Bulky spinal osteophytes
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
• Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria)
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Symphysis pubis fusion
• Septic Joint o Disc spaces narrowed + marginal vertebral
o Irregular bone destruction body sclerosis
o Sclerosis is sign of healing o Disc calcification progresses to ossification
• Osteoarthritis • Intervertebral bridging can mimic
o Osteophytes & joint space narrowing ankylosing spondylitis
3
'<
1Il
Dl
tII
Stress Fracture, Adult (Mimic) Ankylosing Spondylitis (1)
(Left) Axial T7 WI MR shows a.
changes typical of -U
nondisplaced insufficiency CO
(ractures in the pelvis. Edema <"
(ji.
and fracture lines are seen
not only in the left pubic
ramus EiII but also in the
right pubic ramus lID. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows solid bony fusion of
the symphysis pubis lIlI and
symmetric fusion of the
sacroiliac joints •.
Characteristic enthesopathic
changes are present along
the ischial tuberosities EiII.
Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria)
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows irregular
sclerosis and fusion of the
symphysis pubis lIlI. This
reflecls chronic changes
from osteitis pubis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows fusion of the
symphysis pubis lIlI.
Changes in the spine
including disc calcification
and marked disc space
narrowing" along with
large marginal osteophytes,
are typical for ochronosis.
I
325
en SYMPHYSIS PUBIS, WIDENING
~
Q)
0..
"tl
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Pregnancy
en o Symphysis pubis mobility increases to 8-12
nl
al Common mm during last trimester of pregnancy
>- • Osteitis Pubis
E o Air in symphysis pubis is normal < 24
-
o
nl
c:
«
• Pregnancy
• Trauma, Pelvic Injury
hours postpartum
• Trauma, Pelvic Injury
• Stress Fracture, Malunion o Injury patterns include diastasis, straddle
• Chronic Repetitive Trauma fracture, intraarticular fracture,
• Septic Joint overlapping dislocation, and
less Common fracture-dislocations
• Metastasis, Osteolytic o Diastasis is most common injury
• Radiation Osteonecrosis o Widening> 10 mm in adult males or > 15
• Hyperparathyroidism (Mimic) mm in females, suggests instability
• Ankylosing Spondylitis, Early o Widening> 25 mm suggests associated
• Rheumatoid Arthritis, Early sacroiliac joint injury
• Achondroplasia • Stress Fracture, Malunion
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis o Insufficiency fractures of pubic bone are
more common than overuse stress
Rare but Important
fractures
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o Typically these fractures are not
• Pycnodysostosis immobilized & thus prone to malunion
• Marfan Syndrome • Chronic Repetitive Trauma
• Ehlers-Danlos o Repetitive microtrauma leads to fatigue
• Chondrodysplasia Punctata fracture or ligamentous injury
• Hypophosphatasia o Widening, erosions, & sclerosis
• Prune Belly Syndrome (Eagle-Barrett)
• Septic Joint
• Cleidocranial Dysplasia o Moth-eaten destruction of bone
• Imperforate Anus o Pyogenic infection has rapid destruction
• Bladder Extrophy o Tuberculosis has more indolent course
• Urethral Duplication o Intravenous drug abuse increases risk of
• Hypospadias infection with unusual organisms
• Epispadius
• Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
• Dyggve-Melchior-Clausen Syndrome • Metastasis, Osteolytic
o Metastases are the most likely of any
tumor to involve both pubic bones
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Radiation Osteonecrosis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Located in distribution of radiation port
• Normal symphysis pubis width varies with o Damage is related to radiation dose
age & gender • Hyperparathyroidism (Mimic)
o 10 mm wide in early childhood o Subchondral bone resorption causing
o 6 mm wide in early adulthood symmetric symphyseal widening
o 3 mm wide in middle to late adulthood o Osteopenia
o Females have greater symphysis mobility o Focal bone lesions in pelvis
than males • Ankylosing Spondylitis, Early
o Symphysis pubis less commonly involved
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses than sacroiliac joints
• Osteitis Pubis o Erosive changes early, fusion late
o Mild widening - osteolysis & erosions -
o Proliferative new bone at muscle
sclerosis attachments
o ± Periosteal reaction
• Rheumatoid Arthritis, Early
o Symphysis may fuse late in course
o Marginal erosions & osteopenia
I
326
SYMPHYSIS PUBIS, WIDENING >
.•o
:]
III
Osteitis Pubis
-o
to
c:
<l:
shows anterior to posterior
displacement through the
pelvic ring. The right
hemipelvis ;s minimally
displaced anteriorly HI and
the pubic symphysis is
widened ffi The outlet view
nicely demonstrates the
anterior sacroiliac joint
widening 11II and the normal
posterior aspect of the joint
11II. (Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows widening
of the symphysis pubis 11II
due to malunion of a left
pubic bone stress
finsufficiency) fracture 11II.
symphysis =-
both sides of the pubic
representing
osteomyelitis. There is also a
collection of fluid within the
widened symphysis HI
representing a septic joint.
(RighI) Axial NECT shows
gross destruction of the
symphysis pubis 11II giving it
a widened appearance, with
osseous destruction of both
the superior and inferior
pubic rami. CT was used for
needle aspiration guidance.
I
328
SYMPHYSIS PUBIS, WIDENING »
-
:l
III
o
3
'<
lJl
III
III
langerhans Cell Histiocytosis C1l
(Left) Anteroposterior c..
radiograph shows irregular -U
destruction of the leFtpubic (\)
I
329
.!!?
.2:
SUPRA-ACETABULARILIAC DESTRUCTION
Q)
a..
"0
ell DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Arthroplasty Loosening & Dislocation
III
<ll
o Lucency greater than 2 mm at the
aJ Common cement-bone or prosthesis-bone interface
>. • Subchondral Cyst
E of acetabular component of total hip
•..
o
<ll
• Metastases, Bone Marrow replacement
C • Arthroplasty Loosening & Dislocation o Evaluate multiple projections to assess for
<t
• Arthroplasty Component Wear/Particle component malposition or dislocation
Disease • Arthroplasty Component Wear/Particle
• Multiple Myeloma Disease
• Plasmacytoma o Polyethylene wear evident by progressive
• Osteomyelitis, Adult eccentric location of femoral component
• Radiation Osteonecrosis within the acetabular component
• Paget Disease o Periprosthetic lucency, as described above
• Ewing Sarcoma • Multiple Myeloma
Less Common o Multiple sharply demarcated lytic lesions
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst o Intramedullary with endosteal scalloping
• Osteosarcoma o Lacks periosteal new bone formation
• Chondroblastoma o ± Soft tissue mass
• Hyperparathyroidism o Spine> ribs> femur> pelvis
• Fibrous Dysplasia • Plasmacytoma
• Fibrosarcoma o Solitary focus of myeloma
• Lymphoma o Larger & more expansile lesion than
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous multiple myeloma
• Hemophilia, Pseudotumor • Osteomyelitis, Adult
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma o Permeative bone destruction
• Giant Cell Tumor o Periosteal new bone
o Soft tissue abscess
Rare but Important
o Late surrounding sclerosis + sequestrum
• Syphilis, Secondary or Tertiary o More rapid bone destruction than tumor,
• Hemangiopericytoma, Osseous except for Langerhans cell histiocytosis
• Gaucher Disease • Radiation Osteonecrosis
o Ill-defined bone destruction ± fracture
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Lacks a soft tissue mass
o Latent period of at least one year before
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses bone changes are seen in pelvis
• Subchondral Cyst • Paget Disease
o Well-defined lytic lesion, often with
o Well-defined lytic lesions in active stage
sclerotic border o Enlarged bone with coarse trabeculae
o Most common cause is osteoarthritis
o Thickened iliopectineal line
• Associated findings of joint space o Acetabular protrusio
narrowing & osteophytes o Polyostotic in 70%
o Numerous less common causes include
o Pelvis> spine> skull
gout, PVNS, synovial • Ewing Sarcoma
osteochondromatosis, inflammatory o Osteolysis, cortical destruction, periosteal
arthropathy, & seronegative reaction, & soft tissue mass
spondyloarthropathy • Can mimic osteomyelitis
• Metastases, Bone Marrow o Aggressive periosteal new bone
o Well-defined lytic to ill-defined,
• Laminated, onion skin, sunburst, or "hair
permeative lesions on end"
o Breast, lung, & renal carcinoma metastases
o Lower skeletal involvement in 2/3 of cases
common • Femur> ilium> tibia
o Multiple lesions are usually evident
I
330
SUPRA-ACETABULARILIAC DESTRUCTION ~
::l
• Hemophilia, Pseudotumor
-
III
o
3
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses '<
o lntraosseous and subperiosteal bleeds lJl
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst III
produce pressure erosion of bone (fl
nl
o Well-defined osteolysis with bone
o Soft tissue mass may extend into the Q.
expansion -u
iliopsoas and gluteal muscles
o Internal fluid-fluid levels <1l
:;:-
o ± Surrounding bone sclerosis
• Giant Cell Tumor (ii'
o Lytic metaphyseal lesion without sclerotic
• Osteosarcoma
border
o Mixed osteolytic & osteosclerotic lesion
• Bones around the acetabulum are
depending on subtype
metaphyseal and epiphyseal equivalents
o Aggressive periosteal reaction
o Cortical violation with soft tissue mass Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Osteoid matrix present • Syphilis, Secondary or Tertiary
• Chondroblastoma o Secondary syphilis - irregular bone lysis
o Located around acetabulum in pelvis • Skull involvement is characteristic
• Epiphyseal equivalent o Tertiary syphilis - neuropathic changes
o Well-defined round to oval lytic lesion o Periostitis is common
with thin sclerotic rim • Hemangiopericytoma, Osseous
o Periosteal reaction in adjacent metaphysis o Lobulated lytic foci with honeycomb
or diaphysis appearance
• Hyperparathyroidism o Mild bone expansion
o Brown tumors in primary or secondary o Aggressive features include soft tissue
hyperparathyroidism mass, cortical destruction, ill-defined
o Well-defined lytic lesion ± bone expansion borders
o May undergo necrosis, producing a cyst o 10% of cases in innominate bone
• Fibrous Dysplasia • Gaucher Disease
o Hazy radiolucent, or ground-glass, lesions o Younger patients with generalized
± mild bone expansion osteopenia
o Usually polyostotic when pelvis is o Marrow infiltration causing cortical
involved scalloping can mimic metastasis, myeloma,
o Protrusio acetabula present or pseudotumor of hemophilia
• Lymphoma o Additional findings of abdominal
o Cancellous bone erosion early organomegaly, "H-shaped" vertebral
o Cortex destroyed late bodies, & femoral head avascular necrosis
-'"
o
c
<l:
shows acetabular lysis •.
Note that the distance
between the femoral head
and acetabular rim is less on
the superolateral side III
than the inferomedial side
Ell indicating wear of the
polyethylene liner. (Right)
Coronal TI WI MR shows the
multifocal presentation of
myeloma as hypoinlense
deposits" adjacent to the
normal bone marrow. This
has the appearance of
multiple "punched out" lytic
lesions on radiographs,
typical of myeloma.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
well-defined, lytic bubbly
lesion III that occupies the
superior pubic ramus and
extends well into the
acetabulum. The lesion is
mildly expansile. This is a
typical appearance of
plasmacytoma. (Right)
Coronal T1WI MR
demonstrates the extent of
the right hip infection •.
which destroys both
acetabular and femoral
bone. Antibiotic beads III
and surrounding 50ft tissue
edema EEl are also evident.
Paget Disease
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows bone
overgrowth and trabecular
thickening of the pelvis and
femurs. The bones have a
mixed sclerotic and lytic III
appearance. Protrusio at the
hips III and femoral
deformity reflect bone
softening. (Right) Coronal
T2WI MR shows an
expansile lesion" involving
the superomedial
acetabulum. Multiple
loeulations contain fluid
intensity materiat and
fluid-fluid levels were seen
on axial images.
I
332
SUPRA-ACETABULAR ILIAC DESTRUCTION l>
-
~
'o"
3
'<
III
Osteosarcoma Hyperparathyroidism '"
III
(I)
(Left) Anteroposterior Co
radiograph shows a mixed -U
osteosclerotic and osteolytic CO
lesion" in the S.
(f)
supra-acetabular region.
There is an associated large
soft tissue mass lID that
contains osteoid matrix.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
supra-acetabular lytic lesion
with indistinct borders.
and a similar femoral HI
lesion. The combination of
multiple lytic lesions with
cortical and trabecular
indistinctness is lypical of
Brown tumors.
Fibrosarcoma
(Left) Anteroposterior
lobulated lesion =
radiograph shows a large,
with a
scferotic border in the
supra-acetabular region. This
lesion has a faint
ground-glass appearance. A
similar lesion in the proximal
FemurlID produces a
shepherd's crook deformity.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows severe and
rapid progression of bone
destruction" with an
obvious sort tissue mass
as well as pathologic
-=
fracture. This case is classic
for fibrosarcoma.
I
333
£
.gl
PROTRUSIO ACETABULI
£
I-
-0
C
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Protrusio is more frequent in RA, but OA
ro
a. is so much more common than RA that,
I Common in absolute numbers, protrusio is more
"C
Q)
• Arthritis common in OA
VI
III
o Osteoarthritis • Axial or medial femoral head migration,
aJ o Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hip
>- joint space narrowing
E o Ankylosing Spondylitis • Normal mineralization; osteophytes
•...o
III
o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA) • May be asymmetric, unilateral
C
o Crystalline Arthropathy
« o Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hip
• Trauma .• Osteopenia, erosions of femoral head &
• Paget Disease acetabulum
Less Common • Axial femoral head migration; bilateral &
• Renal Osteodystrophy symmetrical joint space loss
• Septic Joint o Ankylosing Spondylitis
• Osseous Neoplasm • Axial femoral head migration with
uniform, symmetric joint space loss;
Rare but Important
femoral neck ring osteophytes
• Sickle Cell Anemia
• Hint: Look at adjacent sacroiliac joints
• Otto Disease for erosion or fusion
• Hyperparathyroidism
o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
• Osteomalacia
• Due to erosions & mechanical
• Rickets
remodeling from compressive forces
• Idiopathic Chondrolysis
• Periarticular osteopenia
• Hypophosphatasia
o Crystalline Arthropathy
• Collagen Vascular Disorders
• Pyrophosphate arthropathy: Axial
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta
femoral head migration, osteophytes
• Fibrous Dysplasia
• Hint: Look for rapid fragmentation &
destruction of both femoral head &
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION acetabulum with resultant protrusio
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Trauma
o Protrusio may result from
• Acetabular protrusion = intrapelvic bulging
• Acute trauma: Periacetabular fracture,
of acetabular wall, ± joint space loss
particularly quadrilateral plate
o Diagnosis of dramatic contour
• Late complications: Malalignment at
abnormalities (acetabular wall/femoral
time of healing; secondary osteoarthritis
head protruding into pelvis) are not
difficult • Post-operative complications: Hardware
failure due to loosening, infection, etc.
o Diagnosis of subtle or early changes may
o Underlying osteoporosis increases risk of
be challenging
protrusio development
o Hint: Acetabular line projecting medial to
• Paget Disease
ilioischialline is most reliable sign
o Patchy lytic, sclerotic pattern with relative
• Adults: Male> 3 mm; female> 6 mm
overgrowth of involved bone
• Children: Male> 1 mm; female> 3 mm
o Osteoarthritis changes with medial/axial
o Hint: Other methods are less accurate in
joint space loss & axial femoral head
evaluating subtle protrusio including
migration
center edge angle of Wiberg> 4S 0,
o Protrusio may result from inherently
teardrop "crossing"
weakened acetabular bone or associated
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses osteoarthritis
• Arthritis o Hint: Look for trabecular thickening,
o Osteoarthritis particularly along iliopectineal line
• Most common cause of protrusio
I
334
PROTRUSIO ACETABULI »
:J
..•o
III
Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis
-'"
o
c
<l:
head migration with small
erosions but no osteophytes.
Note diffuse osteopenia &
mild protrusio EilI. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows bilateral hip joint
space narrowing & erosion
III with protrusio acetabuli
on the right EilI. The bilateral
sacroiliac fusion ~ confirms
ankylosing spondylitis.
Trauma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows secondary
osteoarthritis. & protrusio
HI from comminuted
acetabular fracture treated
with multiple plates & screws
that are loose, with screws
III projecting into the pelvic
soft tissues. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows Paget disease with
marked thickening of cortical
& trabecular bone. as well
as disuse osteoporosis,
Despite the apparenl
thickening, the bone is weak
& protrusio EilI results.
I
JJ6
:>
PROTRUSIO ACETABULI
..
:l
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
VI
Renal Osteodystrophy to
(Left) Posteroanterior a.
radiograph shows residua I
from renal osteodystrophy
with bone resorption of 2° "::J
Q)
hyperparathyroidism & a.
osteomalacia resulting in a -I
::r
shepherd crook deformity
<0
IllIl & protrusio ElII. (Right) ::r
Coronal reformation NECT
shows extensive (emoral
head. & acetabular
destruction E±I with a large
joint effusion ail & protrusio
ElII in this patient with septic
arthritis/osteomyelitis.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows severe
osteopenia, protrusio •. &
disordered bone formation.
There is widening of the
zone of provisional
ossification at the femoral
head metaphysis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows diffuse expansile lytic
lesions. throughout pelvis
& femora with ground-glass
matrix typical of fibrous
dysplasia with marked
deformity of femoral necks &
bilateral protrusio EiIl
I
337
.c
.Ql COXA MAGNA DEFORMITY
.c
r-
"0
c DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Subtle DDH does not show coxa magna,
CIl
a. but seen as ~ center-edge angle of Wiberg
I Common o Hint: Shallow acetabulum distinguishes
"tl
(l)
• Developmental Dysplasia Hip (DDH) coxa magna of DDH from other etiologies
III
CIl
al
less Common of coxa magna
>. • Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
-
«
E
o
CIl
c
• Legg-Calve-Perthes (LCP)
Rare but Important
• Septic Hip
• Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE)
o Femoral capital epiphysis slips medially &
posteriorly
• Hip/Femur Trauma • As head slips, appears short & broad, on
a short & broad neck
o Most frequently occurs 8-14 years of age
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Hint: Position of femoral head on neck &
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues a normal acetabulum distinguish coxa
• Coxa magna: Short broad femoral head magna of SCFE from other etiologies
sitting on a short broad femoral neck • Legg-Calve-Perthes (LCP)
o Results in limb length discrepancy o Avascular necrosis femoral head in a child,
o Relatively proximal displacement of generally 4-8 years of age
greater & lesser trochanters o Flattening of head leads to coxa magna
• Coxa magna is secondary to an insult to deformity
femoral head or epiphysis o Hint: Head remains centered on femoral
neck & acetabulum is normal,
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
distinguishing this etiology of coxa magna
• Developmental Dysplasia Hip (DDH) from others
o Lack of coverage of femoral head during
development due to deficient acetabulum Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Without coverage, head cannot develop • Septic Hip
spherical shape o Chronic hip infection during childhood
• Head becomes short, broad • Hyperemia results in overgrowth of
• With head & neck shortening, limb femoral head & neck
becomes short, with proximal • Hip/Femur Trauma
displacement of both trochanters o Resorption/impaction of neck or
o Congenital abnormality malalignment mimics coxa magna
• Severe DDH develops coxa magna o Salter fracture with early fusion
3
'<
[II
III
I
339
.r::c
.Q>
HIP lABRAl TEARS, ETIOLOGY
.r::c
I-
-0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • DDH results in several abnormalities that
Q. can result in impingement & subsequent
I Common labral tears
-0
(I)
• Degenerative o Hint: DDH morphologic abnormalities can
/J)
o Osteoarthritis (OA) be very subtle, and must be carefully
'"
CO • Femoral Acetabular Impingement, sought out
>-
-E
o
«'"
c
CAM-Type
o Lateral Femoral Neck "Bump"
o Elliptical Femoral Head Morphology
• May make diagnosis on routine MR, but MR
arthrograph increases specificity &
confidence
• Femoral Acetabular Impingement, o Consider traction on hip during
Pincer-Type arthrography to better visualize cartilage
o Retroverted Acetabulum • Note that different morphologic
• Hip Dysplasia (DDH) abnormalities resulting in CAM or pincer
o Acetabular Dysplasia FAlor DDH may be more or less common;
o Coxa Valga hence, examples of FAI and DDH are found
Less Common in "common", "less common", and "rare" lists
• Femoral Acetabular Impingement, Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
CAM-Type • Osteoarthritis (OA)
o Slipped Femoral Capital Epiphysis (SCFE) o OA is most common abnormality of hip
o Legg-Perthes, Coxa Magna o Cartilage damage in weight-bearing region
o Femoral Neck Fracture, Malunited o Advanced disease usually results in
• Femoral Acetabular Impingement, superolateral subluxation of femoral head
Pincer-Type • Shear stress may result in labral tear
o Hip Protrusio, Secondary o Though labral & cartilage damage are
o Otto Disease common, advanced imaging generally not
o Ossification of Acetabular Rim utilized for OA
o Overcorrection Osteotomy for DDH • Salvage or arthroplasty situation rather
Rare but Important than surgical reconstruction
• Hip Dysplasia • Lateral Femoral Neck "Bump"
o Reduced Femoral Anteversion o Etiology of the bump unknown
o ! Cutback at femoral head/neck junction
o Conflict between bump & labrum when
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION hip in flexion, internal rotation,
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues adduction: "Cam" mechanism of FAI
• Labral tears likely are common in OA, but o Cartilage damage earlier than labrum
are rarely specifically imaged o Labral injury is often detachment
• Cartilage damage is as important as labral • Elliptical Femoral Head Morphology
damage, but more difficult to accurately o Functions the same as the lateral femoral
diagnose neck bump
• Femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) is an • ! Cutback at femoral head/neck junction
important etiology of labral tears • "Cam" mechanism of FAI
o Hint: Important to diagnose morphologic • Retroverted Acetabulum
abnormalities early in order to avoid early o Acetabulum is generally anteverted
damage and development of osteoarthritis o Usually only the cranial portion is
at a young age retroverted in FAI
• Impingement has been separated into "cain" • Seen as crossover sign of anterior rim
and "pincer" types, based on different hip overlapping posterior rim on X-ray
morphologies & etiologies • Directly visualized on axial MR or CT
o Hint: There is often overlap between "cam" o - Focal acetabular rim overcoverage
=.
Coronal T1WI F5 MR arthrogram shows osteoarthritis
with osteophytes lit cartilage loss and a detached
AP radiograph shows a lateral remoral neck "bump" =
causing cam type impingement; note the lack or normal
I
labrum 11II. OA is the most common etiology or cutback at the remoral head/neck junction. This is the
cartilage & labral damage but is rarely imaged with MR. most common type or remoral acetabular impingement.
341
.<::
.Ql HIP LABRAL TEARS, ETIOLOGY
.<::
I-
"0
C
'a" .
I
Elliptical Femoral Head Morphology
1:l (Left) AP radiograph shows
Ql
VI an elliptical morphology of
CIl
lJl the femoral head, with small
>- lateral femoral neck bump
..
E
o
CIl
C
_ There is no femoral
head/neck cutback. This
appearance has been likened
< to a pistol, also called pistol
grip deformity. (Right)
Coronal TlWI FS MR
arthrogram in the same
patient shows the elliptical
head morphology, along
with a complex labral tear
=. This was a young adult
with early onset of hip pain
related to femoral acetabular
impingement
I
342
HIP LABRAL TEARS, ETIOLOGY »
:J
...•
Ql
o
3
'<
lD
Ql
t/l
Acetabular Dysplasia Acetabular Dysplasia <l>
(Left) Coronal T1 WI FS MR a.
arthrogram of the same I
patient shows the shallow
acetabulum. that does not ":J
OJ
cover the femoral head. The a.
labrum is hypertrophied, and -i
there is an extensive lear ••.
::T
<6.
which continued over a ::T
significant distance. (Right)
Axial TlWI FS MR
arthrogram of the same
patient shows a
hypertrophied ligamentum
teres •. This and a
hypertrophied pulvinar
occupy medial joint space in
patients with DOH.
I
343
.c HIP LABRAL TEARS, ETIOLOGY
.~
.c
I-
"0
c::
ro
a.
:r: Hip Protrusio, Secondary Otto Disease
"
Q)
VI
(Left) AP radiograph shows
protrusio of the right hip.
'"
CO (due to old acetabular
>. fracture) compared to a
E normal left hip. This results
-'"
o
c::
<l:
in relative overcoverage
the right femoral head &
neck B resulting in a
of
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows abnormal
excessive ossification of the
acetabular rim = that can
cause a pincer-type of FAI.
Note there is also a lateral
femoral bump III
contributing to a earn
impingement. These often
coexist. (Right) Coronal
TI WI FS MR arthrogram
shows the overgrown
acetabular rim to be
fragmented III The femoral
neck bump is seen as well
1Iiil. Both contributed to the
labral tear and cartilage
damage found at surgery.
I
~44
HIP lABRAl TEARS, ETIOLOGY l>
:J
...•
III
o
3
'<
!Xl
III
Overcorrection Osteotomy for DOH Overcorrection Osteotomy for DOH t/I
III
(Left) AP radio8faph shows a.
left hip DOH, with coxa I
magna deformity. The
patient had a Salter opening ":J
Q)
I
345
OJ
Ql ENLARGEMENT OF INTERCONDYLAR NOTCH DISTAL FEMUR
-l
~
Ql
:: • Hyperemia, epiphysis overgrowth, notch
o
-l
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
"0 widening, minimal erosion or cysts
C
ell
Common initially
Ql
Ql
• Post-Operative (Notchplasty) • Late disease mimics hemophilia
c • Hemophilia: MSK Complications
~ o Rheumatoid arthritis
'0 • Inflammatory Arthritis • Profound osteopenia, erosions, bilateral
Ql
I/)
Ol Less Common Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
al
>. • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)
E • Septic Joint o Nodular soft tissue masses, ± ~ SI on all
-
o
Ol
c:
<l:
Rare but Important sequences due to hemosiderin
• Septic Joint
• Gout I
Post-Operative (Notchplasty)
3
'<
OJ
III
VI
Hemophilia: MSK Complications Inflammatory Arthritis (t)
(Left) AP radiograph shows a.
femoral condylar overgrowth A
with widened notch •. ::J
(l)
Significant erosions ~ & (l)
I
347
PATElLAR LYTIC LESIONS
~
Q)
;;:
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Cysts may be large, mimicking lytic lesion
~
"0 • Generally in tibia rather than femur or
C
C1l
Common patella
Q)
Q)
• Subchondral Cyst, Osteoarthritis • Watch for osteophytes & other cysts
C
~ • Subchondral Cyst, Pyrophosphate • Subchondral Cyst, Pyrophosphate
"0 Arthropathy Arthropathy
Cll
I/)
C1l
• Gout o Pyrophosphate arthropathy develops
III • Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor (HPTH) particularly large cysts
>-
E Less Common • Generally in tibia rather than femur or
•..
o
C1l • Amyloid Deposition patella
c • Watch for chondrocalcinosis,
« • Chondroblastoma (CB)
• Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) prominence of patellofemoral disease
• Paget Disease • Gout
• Pigmented ViIlonodular Synovitis (PVNS) o Lytic, often well-defined lesion
• Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) o Often associated disease such as end-stage
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) renal disease (ESRD)
• Metastases, Bone Marrow • With ESRD, lytic lesions may be due to
• Dorsal Defect of Patella (Mimic) gout, amyloid deposition, or Brown
• Osteomyelitis tumor
o MR inhomogeneous low T2 signal;
Rare but Important
enhances with contrast
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
• Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor
• Vascular Tumors (HPTH)
• Lymphoma o Radiographic appearance depends on stage
• Osteoblastoma • Active stage: Lytic, often well-defined
• Osteosarcoma • Healing stage: Various degrees of
ossification in lesion; may be entirely
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION hyperossified
o MR inhomogeneous low T2 signal; may
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
enhance with contrast
• Patellar tumor distribution published by o Often has associated ESRDfindings
Kransdorf
• Abnormal bone density, disordered
o Benign: 38% chondroblastoma, 19% GCT, trabeculae
others: UBC, hemangioma, exostosis, • Quadriceps tendon rupture
osteoblastoma
o Malignant: Lymphoma> Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
hemangioendothelioma • Amyloid Deposition
• Patellar tumor distribution published by o Often secondary (ESRD, myeloma,
Mercuri rheumatoid arthritis)
o Benign: 33% GCT, 16% chondroblastoma, o Lytic, well-defined lesion
others: Enchondroma, ABC, osteoid o MR inhomogeneous low T2 signal;
osteoma, osteoblastoma, hemangioma enhances with contrast
o Malignant: Osteosarcoma> lymphoma> o Watch for thickening of tendons, soft
hemangioendothelioma tissue deposits with same MR
• Some arthritides result in prominent characteristics
subchondral cyst formation; may mimic • Chondroblastoma (CB)
lytic lesion o Lytic, well-marginated lesion
o In correct age group, may be more likely o MR: Lobulated high T2 signal, typical of
diagnosis than neoplasm cartilage
o Typically seen in skeletally immature or
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
young adult patient
• Subchondral Cyst, Osteoarthritis • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
I
348
PATELLAR LYTIC LESIONS :l>
:J
..•o
Ql
I
350
PATElLAR LYTIC LESIONS »
::::l
..•o
Ql
3
'<
to
Ql
t/I
Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) lD
(Left) Sagittal TlWIFS MR of C.
the patient shown in the ;:>\
previous image demonstrates ::::l
<ll
the lesion to be <ll
inhomogeneously high OJ
::::l
signal, containing patchy 0-
areas of low signal III. This r
o
is a typical T2 appearance :1i'
<ll
for giant cell tumor. (Right) ~
Lateral radiograph shows a r
<ll
lytic lesion with (Q
pseudotrabeculations. The
patient is middle-aged, so it
;s surprising that this lesion
proved to be a unicameral
bone cyst at biopsy. GCT or
cartilage tumor would be
more likely in this age group.
I
351
OJ
Q) TIBIAL BOWING
-I
~
Q)
o 50% of tibial pseudoarthroses associated o Rare anterior tibial lesion that may cause 3
'<
with neurofibromatosis bowing (lytic or with osteoid matrix) lD
OJ
-
E
o
I1l
c
«
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows osteoporosis
physis =
from vertical orientation
Final result is a
severe varus deformity of the
of
=
and often results in tibial
bowing
Neurofibromatosis Neurofibromatosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows dysplastic
bone of the tibia, with
incomplete transverse
fractures that are resistant to
normal healing _ With
continued weight bearing,
the tibia bows laterally.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows severe
lateral bowing" in bone
that otherwise appears
normal. The tibia is the most
frequently involved long
bone in the dysplastic
process seen with
neurofibromatosis.
I
354
TIBIAL BOWING :t>
::::I
...•
III
o
3
'<
ll:J
III
III
(l)
(Left) Anteroposterior a.
radiograph shows complete A
fracture through the ::::I
<1l
mid-tibia and fibula at the <1l
junction of the mid and distal OJ
::::I
1/3 of the diaphyses". The C.
fracture margins are r
o
smoothly tapered, without :E
callus. This appearance is <1l
~
classic for congenital r
<1l
pseudoarthrosis. (Right) to
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a gracile tibia & fibula
with medial bowing" and
hypertrophic callus bridging
them in a patient with typical
osteogenesis imperfecta
tarda.
I
355
Ol
Q)
FLUID COLLECTIONS ABOUT THE KNEE
--'~
Q)
-E
o
m
c
<t
injuries are common in this
population. (Right) Coronal
T2WI MR shows a large
multi/obulated cyst arising
from a meniscal tear of the
medial meniscus. The cyst is
distorting the pes anserinus
tendons Ell. Medial
meniscus cysts Frequently
dissect far from the original
meniscal tear.
I
358
flUID COLLECTIONS ABOUT THE KNEE >
::l
...•
Ql
o
3
'<
Mucoid Degeneration, Cruciate [lJ
Ql
Ligament Medial Bursitis, Pes Anserine rn
<D
(Leh) Axial PO FSEFS MR Cl.
shows fluid signal within the A
anterior crudale ligament ::J
CD
that displaces fibers that are CD
Q)
otherwise intact'" Thisis a ::J
typical appearance of a.
mucoid degeneration. The r
o
normal posterior cruciate :E
ligament is seen as well Ell. CD
~
(Right) Sagittal T2WI FS MR r
CD
located far medially shows CO
fluid surrounding the
tendons of the pes anserinus
IIlI as they approach their
insertion site.
I
359
Ol
Ql
FLUID COLLECTIONS ABOUT THE KNEE
-J
•...
Ql
~
o
-J
"0
C
ro
Ql (Left) Sagittal T2WI FS MR
Ql
c shows increased fluid
~ surrounding the
"0 musculotendinous junction
CII
Ul of the popliteus. in a
III
en patient with posterolateral
>. corner injury. Edema in the
E fabella EiII indicates
-o
III
C
<t
fabellofibular ligament injury.
Edema in the anterior
III suggests hyperextension
tibia
I
360
flUID COllECTIONS ABOUT THE KNEE l>
-
::J
III
o
3
'<
CJ
III
Infectious Bursitis Semimembranosus Bursitis VI
<ll
(Leh) Sagittal T I C+ Fs MR Co
shows irregular thick
enhancing
collection"
rim about a
within the
fluid '"
::l
<1>
<1>
pre-patellar bursa. There is III
::l
surrounding edema; this c-
represents infectious bursitis. o
o
(Right) Axial T2WI MR :E
<1>
shows fluid" surrounding ~
the semimembranosus o
<1>
tendon •. indicating (Q
semimembranosus bursitis.
The configuration of the fluid
is typically U-shaped in this
entity.
I
361
OJ
OJ POPLITEAL MASS, EXTRAARTlCUlAR
-'~
OJ
>:a DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Cyst may appear complex, containing
-'
"0 nodular densities, especially along lining
C
co Common o Watch for osseous erosions
OJ
OJ
• Popliteal Cyst o Watch for similar appearance of synovitis
C
~ • Popliteal Cyst, Ruptured in suprapatellar bursa
'tl • Popliteal Cyst, Synovitis • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)
Q)
Vl • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) (Mimic)
ra
CO (Mimic) o PVNS occasionally appears as a focal mass
>. • Osteosarcoma, Conventional o If mass is located posteriorly in joint, it
-
E
o
ell
s::
<
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal
• Synovial Sarcoma
• Benign Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
may mimic extraarticular popliteal mass
• Watch for overlying capsule to define
intraarticular position
(BPNST) o Usually inhomogeneously low signal on
• Lymph Node (Mimic) T2 MR; enhances
• Soft Tissue Abscess • "Blooms" on gradient echo imaging due
less Common to hemosiderin deposition
• Gastrocnemius Muscle Variant • Osteosarcoma, Conventional
• Hemangioma, Soft Tissue o Most common malignant osseous tumor in
o Enhancing rim about fluid collection o May have target sign on T2 imaging (as A
:::>
CD
o Watch for adjacent osteomyelitis & does BPNST) CD
o Often seen in association with
Q)
reactive bone formation :::>
0-
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses neurofibromatosis r
o
• Watch for dominant mass & multiple :E
• Gastrocnemius Muscle Variant CD
smaller masses associated with nerve ~
o Aberrant origin of a portion of r
tissue CD
gastrocnemius <0
-E
o
ns
c
oCt
patiene has rheumatoid
arthritis. (Right) Sagittal PO
FSE MR shows a mass
posterior to the cruciate
ligaments 1IIiI. Low signal
persisted in T2 & eRE
imaging, & this proved to be
PVNS, which may appear
mass-like. It is a mimic;
however, as it is actually
intraarticular.
I
364
POPLITEAL MASS, EXTRAARTICULAR »
-
::::l
Dl
o
3
'<
[ll
Dl
<II
Soft Tissue Abscess Hemangioma, Soft Tissue <ll
(Left) Sagittal T1 C+ MR C.
shows a thick enhancing rim A
surrounding an abscess HI ::::l
(1)
in the popliteal fossa. There (1)
Synovial Osteochondromatosis,
Semimembranosus Bursa Extraarticular
(Left) Axial T2WI MR shows
a typical U-shaped fluid
collection "that surrounds
the semimembranosus
tendon just prior to its
insertion on the posterior
tibia. This is in an
extraarticular position.
(Right) Sagittal T1 C+ FS MR
shows large extraarticular
popliteal masses that contain
calcified bodies Ell. Similar
masses are seen
intraarticularly" This
palientha5synov~1
osteochondromatosis, which
may rarely extend into an
extraarticular location.
I
36S
Cl
(l) ALTERATIONS IN MENISCAL SIZE
-'~
(l)
;;: • Morphology of posterior horn tends to
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
-'
"0 be abnormal, with popliteal hiatus and
C
CO
Common popliteus tendon more prominent
(l)
(l)
• Enlarged, Medial (MM) or Lateral (LM) • Diagnosis most often suggested when
C
~ o Discoid Meniscus sagittal plane shows body of meniscus
"0 o Lateral Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tear with over more than 3 images (bow-tie)
Q)
III Flipped Fragment (Mimic) • Confirmed on coronal or axial imaging
l'll
ell • Diminutive Meniscus o Generally diagnosed at a younger age than
>- o Post-Operative Meniscus Change routine traumatic meniscal injury
E
-
o
l'll
C
o Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tear
o Meniscal Degeneration
o Enlarged meniscus is at t risk for tear
o Hint: If a portion of the meniscus appears
< o Meniscal Extrusion (Mimic) too wide from peripheral to central,
Less Common consider discoid meniscus
• Enlarged Meniscus • Lateral Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tear with
o Chondrocalcinosis Flipped Fragment (Mimic)
o Meniscal Ossicle o Vertical tear continuing over a significant
o Intrameniscal Cyst longitudinal extent that detaches at either
o Meniscal Flounce (Mimic) anterior or posterior end
o Ligament Merging with LM (Mimic) o Detached end of meniscus, often with a
• Diminutive Meniscus large amount of meniscal tissue, may flip
o Small Anterior Root, MM (Mimic) over the opposite end of meniscus
• Flipped meniscal fragment generally is
Rare but Important superimposed on native anterior horn,
• lntraarticular Air (Mimic) making it appear to be double in size (t
height from superior to inferior)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Flipped fragment may be obliquely
superimposed (t in size both height &
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues width)
• Menisci have typical normal size & • Flip from torn posterior horn,
morphology superimposed over native anterior horn
o Posterior horn is largest portion of medial is more frequent than anterior horn
meniscus (long triangle) fragment over posterior horn
o Anterior horn shorter than posterior, but • This pattern of tear with flipped
body is shortest (small equilateral triangle) fragment is more frequent in lateral
o Lateral meniscus is symmetric in size meniscus than true bucket handle
through all portions • True bucket-handle tear is more frequent
• Either enlargement or diminution of in MM than is flipped fragment
meniscus indicates pathology, with few o Hint: If one portion of meniscus appears!
exceptions & another portion appears t (height or
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses width), consider flipped fragment
• Discoid Meniscus • Post-Operative Meniscus Change
o Enlarged meniscus from peripheral to o Results in smaller meniscus in the portion
central free edge that was trimmed
• In axial plane, assumes more of a discoid o Free edge often blunt; may have adjacent
than C-shaped outline cartilage defect
• May be partial, making the diagnosis o May continue to show abnormal signal
more difficult within meniscus, extending to free edge
• Lateral more frequently involved than o Hint: If considering diagnosis of
medial post-operative change for an abnormally
• Occasionally involves both MM & LM small meniscus, watch for linear fibrotic
changes in Hoffa fat pad from arthroscope
I
366
ALTERATIONS IN MENISCAL SIZE ~
::l
...•
Ql
o
• Meniscal Bucket-Handle Tear o Chondrocalcinosis generally appears low 3
'<
o Vertical longitudinal tear that remains signal on all sequences, but infrequently lJl
Ql
intact at anterior & posterior horns, with may be high signal III
CD
fragment flipped centrally into • High signal may be solid or speckled Co
=
Q)
C shows an apparently
~ enlarged anterior horn
"0
Q)
l/l
'"
al
=
but small torn posterior horn
of the lateral meniscus.
This is a longitudinal vertical
>- tear of the posterior horn
E and body, flipped over the
-'"
o
c
<l:
anterior horn, mim;cking
enlargement. (Right) Sagittal
PO FSEMR shows an
unusual flipped body
fragment which doubles the
size of both the anterior &
posterior horns. The flipped
fragments. are
superimposed on the native
meniscus HI.
Chondrocalcinosis
(Left) Sagittal PO FSE FS MR
shows an enlarged anterior
horn containing speckled
high signal •. The signal
might be mistaken for
meniscal degeneration, but
the enlargement should
make one consider other
etiologies. (Right) Lateral
radiograph of the same
patient shows
chondrocalcinosis •.
Though meniseal
chondrocalcinosis is
generally dark or not seen on
MR, it rarely will exhibit high
signal and cause
enla,sement of the meniscus.
I
l61l
ALTERATIONS IN MENISCAL SIZE :r>
:J
III
r+
o
3
'<
[II
III
Meniscal Ossicle Meniscal Ossicle VI
(l)
(Left) Sagiltal PO FSEMR Co
shows a body with signal ;>\
identical to bone occupying :J
CD
the posterior horn medial CD
Q)
meniscus III causing mild
:J
enlargement o( that 0-
structure. The signal r
o
followed that of bone on all :;;
CD
sequences and is typical of -,
meniseal ossicle. (Right) r
CD
Lateral radiograph of the <0
same knee confirms the
ossicle ilia. Its location in the
posterior horn of the medial
meniscus is typical; it
generally results in meniscal
enlargement & degeneration.
I
369
Ol
<D GENU VALGUM (KNOCK KNEES)
....J
~
<D
3:
o
....J
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS I I ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
D
C
C1l
Common Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
<D
<D
• Idiopathic • Genu valgum: 2 measurements
C
• Arthritis a Angle described by line bisecting distal
:.::
"'C • Physeal Fractures femur & line bisecting proximal tibia
C1l
VI • Renal Osteodystrophy (Renal OD) (normal angle 6° ± 2°; valgus> 8°)
Cll
al • Rickets a Mechanical axis: Line drawn from center
>- • Osteomyelitis of femoral head to center of tibial plafond
E
•..o
Cll
Less Common • Should fall through middle of knee
c • Consider joint-related abnormalities
<l: • Fibrous Dysplasia
a Arthritis, differentially affecting lateral
• Osteochondromatosis
compartment cartilage (RA > OA)
• Fluorosis
a Morphologic abnormalities of epiphyses,
• Homocystinuria
resulting in relatively larger medial femoral
• Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
condyle or flat lateral femoral condyle
• Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia
• Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, multiple
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta
• Trevor Fairbank (Dysplasia Epiphysealis epiphyseal dysplasia, Trevor Fairbank,
Hemimelica) etc.
• Consider abnormalities differentially
• Hypophosphatasia
affecting lateral physis
• Oilier Disease
a Early bony bridging laterally following
• Nail Patella Disease (Fong)
Salter fracture or osteomyelitis
• Mucopolysaccharidoses
a Differential radiation to lateral portion of
Rare but Important knee prior to skeletal maturation
• Vitamin C Deficiency • Consider osseous abnormalities resulting in
• Pseudoachondroplasia dysmorphic change in metaphysis/diaphyses
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van -+ bowing of femur or tibia
Creveld) a Not a true genu valgus deformity, but
• Spondyloepimetaphyseal Dysplasia mimics one clinically
• Chondrodysplasia Punctata a Renal OD, rickets, hypophosphatasia,
• Cleidocranial Dysplasia fibrous dysplasia, osteochondromatosis,
• Pyle Dysplasia osteogenesis imperfecta, Ollier disease, etc.
• Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities
Arthritis
I
371
Ol
Q) GENU VARUM (BOW LEG DEFORMITY)
--'~
Q)
«'"
c
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta (01)
• Osteomyelitis
• Physiologic Bowing
o Seen in infants; occasionally persists
• Charcot, Neuropathic • Arthritis
• Osteochondromatosis o Osteoarthritis (OA) most frequently affects
• Achondroplasia medial compartment, resulting in varus
• Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia • Physeal Fractures
• Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia o Salter fx (usually III or IV) of medial
Rare but Important femoral or tibial condyle - early bony
• Turner Syndrome (Mimic) bridging medially - genu varum
• Mucopolysaccharidoses • Blount Disease
• Ollier Disease o Vertical & irregular medial tibial growth
tibial physis =-
bony bridging at the medial
With
continued growth laterally, a
genu varum deformity
develops. The underlying
cause in this case was
meningococcemia. (Right)
AP radiograph shows
destruction of the joint,
predominantly medially III
resulting in genu varum.
Note the bony debris
dissecting down fascia/tissue
planes. in thispatient with
tabes-related Charcot joint.
Achondroplasia
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
short tubular bones of the
lower extremity, with broad
dysmorphic metaphyses. The
abnormal growth at the
metaphyses often results in
genu varum in patients with
achondroplasia. (Right) AP
radiograph shows relative
underdevelopment and
flattening of the medial tibial
metaphysis" in Turner
syndrome. There is some
compensatory overgrowth of
the medial femoral condyle
Ell but varus deformity may
occur. This may mimic
Blount disease.
I
373
Q)
:;;: ACHILLES TENDON THICKENING/ENLARGEMENT
c
<{
""0
C
C1l DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Seen with degenerative tendinopathy,
oo Common
inflammatory or seronegative arthritis
LL • Haglund Syndrome
""0 • Tendinosis/Tear o Enlarged posterosuperior calcaneal process,
Q)
Ul • Retrocalcaneal Bursitis retrocalcaneal bursitis, Achilles tendinosis
Ol
III • Haglund Syndrome o Aggravated by tight shoes = "pump bump"
>.
-
E
o
Ol
C
<{
Less Common
• Post-surgical Thickening
• Arthritis
Helpful Clues for Less Common
• Post -surgical Thickening
o Marked thickening with extensive
Diagnoses
Tendinosis/Tear Tendinosis/Tear
I
375
Q)
CALCANEAL EROSIONS, POSTERIOR TUBERCLE
32
c I I
<l:
"0
C
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Inflammatory arthritis may be axial &/or
<Il I peripheral
oo Common
LL • Axial: Spondyloarthropathy,.generally
"tl
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) with bilaterally asymmetric sacroiliitis
Ql
II) • Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) • Peripheral: Foot/ankle most frequently
n:I
al • Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) involved
>. o Arthritis is mixed erosive & productive;
E Less Common
-
o
n:I
C
<l:
• Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis (IBD)
either may predominate
• Digits may show sausage swelling &
• Haglund Syndrome periostitis
• Achilles Tendinitis o Hint: Calcaneal involvement is thought to
I
l7/l
CALCANEAL EROSIONS, POSTERIOR TUBERClE :l>
:J
..•o
Gl
3
'<
OJ
Gl
VI
Achilles Tendinitis Plantar Fasciitis C1l
Sagittal PO FSE FS MR Co
(Leh)
shows high signal of Achilles ,.,o
tendinitis.
~
with adjacent
distended pre-Achilles bursa
There is mild calcaneal
edema at the insertion.
-
o
Q)
:J
a.
that may be seen as
:l>
:J
deossification on radiograph.
(Right) Sagittal STIR MR
'"CO
shows thickening & high
=
signal in the plantar fascia
with surrounding soft
tissue edema •. There is
edema within the calcaneus
EiII that may eventually
develop into a plantar spur;
at this point, it may appear
as deossification on X-ray.
Osteomyelitis
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows erosive and
destructive change in the
metaphysis of the calcaneus
as well as the apophysis _
This is typical of, and proved
to be, osteomyelitis. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
severe erosive destructive
change at the posterior
calcaneus, along with air in
the soft tissues _ This is
advanced osteomyelitis in a
diabetic patient.
I
379
(l)
o
3
'<
llJ
Ql
VI
<1l
(Leh) Lateral radiograph a.
shows diffuse osteopenia & -n
multiple small posterior o
ca/caneal erosions III in this
~
Q)
patient with rheumatoid :l
arthritis. Note the marked
a.
tibiotalar joint space »
:l
narrowing EEl & absence of 2:5:
<1l
reparative bone. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
posterior calcaneal erosions
IIlI with 50ft tissue swelling
of the reuoea/caneal bursa
Ell in this patient with
psoriatic arthritis. Note the
large tibiotalar joint effusion
=
(Leh) Sagillal bone CT
reformation shows
retrocalcaneal bursitis HI
with a mixed
erosive-productive
arthropathy in this 40 year
old man with chronic
reactive arthritis. Note the
"whiskering". of
reparative bone. (Right)
Sagittal STIR MR shows the
=
reuoea/caneal
accompanying a
bursal effusion
I
381
Q)
:;;:; SOFT TISSUE MASS IN THE FOOT
c::
«
"0
c::
ctl DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Complete tendon tear with minimal
"0 diastasis: t SI in tear defect
o
LL
Common o Tenosynovitis: Distended t SI in sheath, ±
"'C • Bursitis tendon abnormality
Q)
Ifl • Tendon, Injury • Plantar Fasciitis
III
!Xl • Plantar Fasciitis o Thickening fascia (usually medial band); ±
>- • Ganglion Cyst plantar fat pad edema, calcaneal marrow
E
•..o
III
• Plantar Fibroma edema
c: • Morton Neuroma o May lead to rupture
« • Gouty Tophus • Ganglion Cyst
• Lipoma, Soft Tissue o Thin-walled discrete fluid collection, ±
LessCommon multiseptate, often near joint line
• Charcot, Neuropathic • Plantar Fibroma
• Hemangioma, Soft Tissue o Single or multiple nodular thickenings
• Soft Tissue Abscess arising from plantar fascia
• Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath o Intermediate to ~ SI on all sequences, ±
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) enhancement
• Glomus Tumor • Morton Neuroma
o Nodule plantar to intermetatarsal
Rare but Important ligament; intermediate Tl SI, ~T2 SI, ±
• Rheumatoid Nodule enhancement
• Xanthoma (Fibroxanthoma) o May be associated with intermetatarsal
• Aneurysm bursitis
• Accessory Muscle • Gouty Tophus
• Soft Tissue Neoplasms o Soft tissue nodular calcification, ~ SI (T1 &
• Granuloma Annulare T2); osseous erosions, predilection for
• Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis Lisfranc, MTP joints
• Macrodystrophia Lipomatosa • Lipoma, Soft Tissue
• Skin & Subcutaneous Lesions o SI similar to subcutaneous fat; may have
associated calcification, ossification,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION hemorrhage, or fibrosis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues Helpful Clues for LessCommon Diagnoses
• While radiographs demonstrate the osseous • Charcot, Neuropathic
changes, MR is the imaging tool of choice o Mimics soft tissue mass due to marked
Bursitis Bursitis
-'"
E
o
c
<t:
painless. The adjacent
metatarsal is normal. (Right)
Coronal PO FSf FS MR
shows the same soft tissue
mass with slightly
heterogeneous t 51 in the
patient with an adventitious
bursa lEI & fibrosis EiIII. This
benign subcutaneous bursitis
is biopsy proven.
I
184
SOFT TISSUE MASS IN THE FOOT
I
385
Q)
:i: SOFT TISSUE MASS IN THE FOOT
c
~
"0
C
co
oo
u..
"0 (Left) Sagillal T1 WI MR
Q)
shows the typical destruction
IJl
l'll of a Charcot joint with
lD talonavicular dislocation _
>- There is joint effusion ••
E
•...o
l'll
filled with ossific debris.
this patient with diabetes.
in
C
The large distended and
~ disrupted joints may present
as a soft tissue mass. (Right)
Coronal T2WI FS MR shows
a mass composed of t 51
tubular structures. with
interdigitating fat 0 51on fat
suppression sequence) __
displacing the flexor
digitorum tendons. &
infiltrating the muscle belly.
I
186
SOFT TISSUE MASS IN THE FOOT l>
:]
...•
Dl
o
3
'<
OJ
Dl
Xanthoma (Fibroxanthoma) VI
Glomus Tumor CD
(Leh) Coronal TI WI FS MR Co
shows an intensely TI
enhancing nodule. in the o
tip of the nailbed. There was ~
Q)
subtle erosion of the distal :J
Cl.
phalanx on initial radiograph
(not shown). (Right) Axial »
:J
T1WI MR shows ~
CD
xanthofibromatosis of
Achilles tendon Ell with
slightly heterogeneous low
signal. There are similar
findings in the posterior tibial
tendon. in this patient
with hype/cholesterolemia.
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a normal
hind & midfoot, as well as
normal 4th & Sth rays _
However, there is giantism of
both the soft tissues & bones
of 1st three digits Ell typical
of macrodystrophia
lipomatosa. (Right) Sagittal
TI WI MR shows an elliptical
epidermal mass. that is ~
SI & corresponds to a slightly
flattened nodule with a small
central petechiae, typical of
a plantar wart.
I
387
~ TALAR BEAK
-'<c
<{
-0
C
ctl DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Hypertrophied Talar Ridge
(5 o Same location as talar ridge
o Common o Subjectively enlarged talar ridge, but no
LL
-0 • Talar Ridge specific size to delineate normal from
CIl
IJl • Hypertrophied Talar Ridge hypertrophied
III
lD • Osteophyte o Key finding: Bony ridge is located
>- proximal to the talar head articular surface
E Less Common
•...o
III
• Tarsal Coalition with an intervening normal segment
C o Seen in athletic patients or patients with
<l:
diffuse enthesopathy
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Osteophyte
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Located along cartilage margins
• Osseous excrescence located along the dorsal • Proximally at ankle with associated
surface of the talus anterior tibial osteophytes
• Location & size of bony outgrowth is most • Distally at talonavicular joint with
important for diagnosis associated joint space narrowing
• a.k.a., talar spur, talar lip, or talar crest o Degenerative or post-traumatic finding
• Best demonstrated on lateral radiographs & Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
sagittal MR or CT • Tarsal Coalition
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Anteriorly directed, triangular outgrowth
• Talar Ridge extending from the talar ridge to, or near,
o Located 7-14 mm from trochlear surface the level of the talar head articular surface
o Several millimeters high o May be extreme hypertrophy of talar ridge
o Straight to convex configuration o Look for osseous or fibrous union of the
• Sloped along proximal border talus & calcaneus or calcaneus & navicular
• More acute angle along distal border o Secondary signs of coalition include the
o Normal ridge of bone at junction of "C-sign" & non-visualization of the
• Ankle joint capsule subtalar joint middle facet
• Talonavicular ligament
• Anterior talofibular ligament SELECTED REFERENCES
o Largest along lateral border
1. Resnick D: Talar ridges, osteophytes, and beaks: a
o Normal, flat portion of talus between talar radiologic commentary. Radiology. 151(2):329-32, 1984
ridge & talar head articular surface
o
3
'<
OJ
Ql
VI
C1l
(Left) Sagittal TI WI FS MR Co
shows hypertrophy. of the "Tl
normal talar ridge. This is o
likely caused, at least in part, ~
OJ
by traction from a thickened :J
Q.
talonavicular ligament. in
this athletic patient. (Right) »
:J
Sagittal NECT shows a
hypertrophied talar ridge •.
'"
m
The location of the
excrescence proximal to the
talar head articular surface,
with a short intervening
normalsegment. is
typical. This patient had a CT
to characterize the
comminuted distal tibial
fracture EiII.
I
389
:>2
<1l
TARSALCYSTIC/LYTICLESIONS
c
<l:
"0
C
C1l DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Surrounding sclerotic bone
oo Common
• Preferential involvement of pressure
LL portion of joint
"0 • Subchondral Cyst o Gout
CIl
Vl o Osteoarthritis • Oval erosions with overhanging edges
C'O
o Gout
[JJ • Preserved joint spaces
>. o Rheumatoid Arthritis
E • Normal mineralization
.•..o o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA) • Soft tissue tophi
C'O
c: o Pyrophosphate Arthropathy o Rheumatoid Arthritis
<l:
o Amyloid Deposition • Inflammatory erosions located in
o Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) juxtaarticular regions
• Intraosseous Ganglion • Lack sclerotic border
• lntraosseous Lipoma • Joint space narrowing with osteoporosis
• Osteomyelitis • Lytic lesions may also be due to
• Charcot, Neuropathic secondary osteoarthritis
• Osteonecrosis o Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
Less Common • Large, widespread lesions
• Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus • Surrounding sclerotic bone
• Hemophilia, Pseudotumor • Joint space narrowing with bone collapse
• Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) o Amyloid Deposition
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst • Intraosseous amyloid collections have
• Giant Cell Tumor variable appearance on MR
• Enchondroma • May show communication with articular
• Ewing Sarcoma surface
• Hyperparathyroidism/Renal Osteodystrophy, • History of hemodialysis is common
Brown Tumor o Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
• Chondroblastoma (PVNS)
• Chondrosarcoma • Blooming signal of soft tissue masses on
• Soft Tissue Tumor, Locally Invasive gradient echo MR sequences
• Silicone-Induced Synovitis • Intraosseous Ganglion
o Single lesion with sclerotic border
Rare but Important
o ± Soft tissue mass
• Metastases, Bone Marrow • Intraosseous Lipoma
• Multiple Myeloma o Typical location in mid-calcaneus
• Paget Disease o Fat content can be confirmed with CT
• Osteosarcoma, Telangiectatic o ± Central calcification or fluid
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous • Osteomyelitis
• Hemangioendothelioma, Osseous o Osteopenia
• Sarcoidosis o Ill-defined bone erosion
o Soft tissue abscess
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Sinus tract
o ± Sequestrum
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Charcot, Neuropathic
• Subchondral Cyst o Bone collapse & fragmentation
o a.k.a., synovial cyst, geode, pseudocyst
o Joint disorganization & debris
o Rounded radiolucent lesion near bone
o Can be difficult to differentiate from
surface osteomyelitis
o Signal intensity on MR varies with cyst
• Osteonecrosis
content: Fluid, gas, fibrous, adipose, o Single or multiple lesions
myxoid, or proteinaceous material o Weight-bearing area of joint
o Osteoarthritis
o Bone collapse & fragmentation
• Joint space narrowing
I
390
TARSAL CYSTIC/lYTIC LESIONS »
o
3
'<
silicone joint prosthesis III
• Hemophilia, Pseudotumor Ql
a Normal surrounding bone mineralization VI
a Subchondral bone erosion, joint space CIl
helps exclude osteomyelitis Co
narrowing, osteopenia, & soft tissue masses
from hemorrhage Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses "o!a-
a Calcaneus: 1 of 3 most common sites of • Metastases, Bone Marrow ll)
OJ
hemophiliac pseudotumor a History of colon, genitourinary, or lung 0-
Gout
391
Q)
32 TARSAL CYSTIC/LYTIC LESIONS
c
<l:
"0
C
III
oo
U. Rheumatoid Arthritis
"0 (Left)Axial T1WI MR shows
Ql
III
periarticularerosions.
ro involving the metatarsal
ell heads. The bones were
>. osteopenic on radiographs.
E
-
o
ro
c
<l:
This is typical for rheumatoid
arthritis. (Righi) Lateral
radiograph shows severe
joint space narrowing at the
tibiotalar joint and a
moderate joint effusion •.
A few small ossifications in
the effusion are likely
intraarticuJar osteochondral
bodies. Subchondral cystic
changes. involve both the
talus and tibia.
I
192
TARSAL CYSTIC/LYTIC LESIONS
Osteomyelitis Osteomyelitis
(Left) Coronal T2WI FS MR
shows a fluid collection
located between the 3rd and
=
4th digits at the level of the
MTP joints. This collection
communicates with the joint
via a small sinus tract Ell.
Bone enhancement favors
septic arthritis and
osteomyelitis. (Right) Sagittal
TI WI MR shows irregular
destruction of the talus
and intraarlicular 50ft tissue
=
IlIIIl which extends
posteriorly in the joint space.
These findings were due to
an indolent fungal infection.
I
393
Q)
32 TARSAL CYSTIc/LYTIC LESIONS
c
«
"0
c
<Il
oo
u.. Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC)
't:l (Left) Lateral radiograph
Q) shows a lytic lesion IIIin the
Vl
III calcaneal neck. The
1XI calcaneus ;s one of the most
>. common locations of UBC ;n
•..oE
III
adults. A paucity of
trabeculae in this region, as
C an anatomic variant, can
« mimic a bone cyst. (Right)
Sagittal T I C+ FS MR shows
an ovoid lesion IIIin the
mid calcaneus. The lesion
followed fluid signal intensity
on all MR imaging
sequences. UBC typically
shows mild peripheral
enhancement. without
central enhancement.
Chondroblastoma Chondrosarcoma
(Left) Coronal oblique CECT
shows a lytic lesion with
geographic borders III
involving the right talus. The
lesion has a faintly sclerotic
border and internal
chondroid matrix EiIl
suggestive of a
chondroblastoma. (Right)
Lateralradiograph shows
multiple lytic lesions _
which cause frank
destruction of most of the
tarsal bones and metatarsal
bases. These aggressive
lesions have an associated
soft tissue mass •.
I
394
TARSAL CYSTIc/LYTIC LESIONS :>
::::J
...•
III
o
3
'<
OJ
III
III
Silicone-Induced Synovitis Metastases, Bone Marrow <l>
(Left) Anteroposterior a.
radiograph shows lucency in
the distal first metatarsal
and great toe proximal
= "
o
~
Q)
phalanx 11II. This patient with :J
rheumatoid arthritis had a a.
1st MTP joint replacement :>
:J
and a silicone prosthesis.
Prosthesis failure has led to a
'"
iD
granulomatous reaction
eroding bone. (Right) Sagittal
medial
=
T1 WI MR shows a low signal
mass destroying the
cuneiform bone.
Cortical disruption and a
subtle soft tissue mass are
present. This was due to lytic
metastatic breast carcinoma.
Angiosarcoma, Osseous
(Left) Sagittal T1WI MR
shows an abnormal talus ffi
On radiographs the
appearance was of mixed
sclerosis and lucency. The
MR best demonstrates the
cortical and trabecular
thickening with mild bone
enlargement, typical of Paget
disease. (Right) Sagittal T I WI
MR shows an extensive caSE
of polyostotic osseous
angiosarcoma. Multiple
(oca" aggressive destructive
lesions II involve, to some
extent, nearly every bone of
the right foot and ankle.
I
395
PART II
Image Based
Radiograph/Cl, Osseous
Radiograph/Cl, Soft lissue
MR, Osseous
MR, Soft lissue
MR, Joint
Ultrasound
Nuclear Medicine
CI)
:::J POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, ADULT
o
OJ
CI)
CI)
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
1-"
-
U
.r::
0-
ro
~
Common
• Enostosis (Bone Island)
• Enostosis (Bone Island)
o Bone islands may be multiple without
Q) • Metastases, Bone Marrow having a pattern that suggests
.Q
"0 • Multiple Myeloma osteopoikilosis
ro o Bone islands are densely & uniformly
0:: • Paget Disease
"0 • Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic sclerotic, differentiating them from some
Q)
II) less densely sclerotic metastases
III • Bone Infarcts
llJ o Metastases tend to be axial or shoulder
• Brown Tumor: HPTH/Renal OD
Q)
girdle/proximal humerus &
Cl
III • Enchondromas
E pelvis/proximal femora; bone islands less
• Osteochondroma, Multiple Hereditary
location -specific
Exostosis
o If questions remain, MR or PET/CT may
• Ewing Sarcoma, Metastatic
indicate inactivity of bone islands vs.
• Leukemia
activity of sclerotic metastases
• Lymphoma, Multifocal
• Caveat: This is not always reliable with
Less Common the latter
• Osteomyelitis • Multiple Myeloma
• Angiosarcoma, Osseous o Vast majority are lytic, punched out
• Hemangiopericytoma, Osseous lesions or else diffusely osteopenic
• Hemangioendothelioma, Osseous o Those presenting with osteopenia +
• Cystic Angiomatosis gammopathy are best evaluated by MR
• Tuberculosis survey
• Bacillary Angiomatosis o There may be a dominant lesion
• Sarcoidosis (plasmacytoma), with multiple smaller
• Oilier Disease lytic lesions
• Osteoma o Distribution is heavily axial (including
• Maffucci Syndrome skull), shoulder girdle/humerus, &
• Osteosarcoma, Metastatic pelvis/proximal femora
Rare but Important • Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic
o New lesions do not generally develop in
• Mastocytosis
• Giant Cell Tumor, Skull or Phalanges adults
o May see residual lesions which developed
during childhood
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Hint: Watch for residual deformities
o Young adults, with primary more likely in o Multiple lesions with either prominent
proximal flat bone than long bone trabeculae or cystic appearance
o Primary lesion will be larger, more o Expand slowly but significantly over time
aggressive in appearance ;u
Alternative Differential Approaches III
0-
o Ewing sarcoma is more likely to cr
• Consider subdividing the list into 2 which <0
metastasize to bone than other bone are easier to handle "'
III
sarcomas; equal likelihood of metastases to o Polyostotic lesions which are easily
"0
:T
bone & lung identified by imaging (when their o
.--1
o Osteosarcoma less frequent in adult
population, metastasizes to lung & local
appearance is classic) o
lymph nodes more frequently than bone
• Paget disease '"CD'"
• Fibrous dysplasia o
c
• Leukemia • Bone infarcts '"
o Focal lesions rare on X-ray; hint:
• Enchondromas
Osteoporosis inappropriate for age/gender • Osteochondromas, multiple hereditary
o Diagnosis & tumor burden determined by
exostoses
MR which shows infiltrative pattern
• Sarcoidosis
o Given normal radiographs, MR differential
• Ollier disease
is myeloma & multifocallymphoma
• Osteoma
• Lymphoma, Multifocal • Maffucci syndrome
o Lymphoma usually is monostotic in
o Polyostotic lesions which have a
adults, but often polyostotic in children moderately to severely aggressive
o Hint: Serpiginous pattern on MR suggests
appearance but are otherwise nonspecific
the diagnosis; otherwise infiltrative • Metastases, bone marrow (including
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses primary bone sarcomas)
• Vascular Tumors • Multiple myeloma
o No imaging discrimination between • Brown tumor:
angiosarcoma, hemangiopericytoma, Hyperparathyroi dism/ renal
hemangioendothelioma osteodystrophy
o Hint: Vascular tumors favor lower • Leukemia
extremity locations; polyostotic lytic • Lymphoma, multifocal
lesions predominantly involving lower • Vascular tumors
extremities should raise this consideration • Osteomyelitis (including TB)
• Cystic Angiomatosis
o'"'"
r-:-
-
u
.c
C-
ro
~ (Left) Lateralradiograph
Multiple Myeloma
Paget Disease
(Left) Lateralradiograph
shows a mixed lytic/sclerotic
lesion in a thoracic vertebra
Ill. The alert radiologist will
recognize slight enlargement
of the body and suggest
Paget disease. (Right)
Posteroanterior bone scan of
the same patient, distallo
the thoracic lesion shows an
additional Ls lesion as well
as uptake extending along
the ilioischialline of the right
hemipelvis &8 and
involvement of the right hip.
This distribution is classic,
and confirms the diagnosis.
Bone Infarcts
(Left) Oblique radiograph
shows multiple lesions, both
lytic" & ground-glass" in
the left hemipelvis. there is
no aggressive feature, and
fibrous dysplasia is the only
reasonable diagnosis to
consider. (Right) Axial T1WI
MR shows multiple
serpiginous bone infarcts,
paralleling the bone outline
••. When this is the
presentation (rather than a
subtle density change
without serpiginous outline),
the diagnosis is secure.
II
4
POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, ADULT 3
III
(Q
CD
tD
III
l/I
CD
a.
Enchondromas
(Left) AP radiograph shows a ;0
Ql
supraacetabular lesion with C-
indistinct borders _ & a o'
<0
femoral neck lesion with ~
Ql
distinct borders EiIl The -0
::T
bone density is abnormal &
trabeculae indistinct,
o
.-;
suggesting metabolic disease.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
o
l/I
l/I
shows multiple lytic lesions, CD
some containing chondroid o
C
matrix". Each is a typical l/I
II
5
'"o::l POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, ADULT
Q)
o'"'"
~
-
t)
.c
a.
ro
~ (Left) Axial TI C+ FS MR
leukemia lymphoma. Multifocal
"'"ro
Ql
Radiographs were normal,
can be the case with
as
II
6
POLYOSTOTIC lESIONS, ADULT 3
III
(0
ll)
lXJ
III
III
ll)
0-
Tuberculosis Tuberculosis
(Leh) Oblique radiograph ::0
Q)
shows a moderately 0-
aggressivelesion. with o'
(0
cortical breakthrough. This is
,
Q)
a nonspecific appearance. 1:l
::J'
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph coned from a
o
.-1
chest image of the same
patient shows a lytic lesion
o
III
III
of the rib •. The patient C1l
had complete white-out of o
C
the left lung, with III
Sarcoidosis Sarcoidosis
(Left) Coronal T1WI MR
shows multiple tiny lesions
scattered throughout the
humeral head/neck •.
These showed high signal on
fluid sensitive sequences.
There were also lesions of
similar size in the muscles.
These are sarcoid
granulomas. (Right) Oblique
radiograph shows typical
lacy lytic lesions of the
phalanges. which are
seen in osseous sarcoidosis.
II
7
rJl
:J POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, CHILD
o
Q)
rJl
rJl
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS a Both are cortically-based and
l- metadiaphyseal
-
t)
.r::
c.
ctl
~
Common
• Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma)
• Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic
a Lesion may have different appearance in
Cl
o • Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic different locations
"0
ctl
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) • Skull: Sclerotic
0::: • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric • Pelvis: Bubbly, lytic
"C
Ql
• Osteochondroma, Multiple Hereditary • Long bones: Generally central,
1I)
III Exostosis metadiaphyseal, mildly expanded, with
OJ
Ql
• Leukemia variable homogeneous ground-glass
Cl
III • Ewing Sarcoma, Metastatic density
E • Metastases, Bone Marrow • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH)
Less Common a Lesions may be lytic, geographic, &
• Lymphoma, Multifocal non aggressive
• Osteosarcoma, Metastatic a Lesions may also be extremely aggressive
• Hyperparathyroidism/Renal Osteodystrophy, in appearance: Permeative, cortical
Brown Tumor breakthrough, soft tissue mass, periosteal
• Melorheostosis reaction, with rapid growth
a Hint: Skull lesions may have beveled edge
Rare but Important appearance due to differential involvement
• Oilier Disease of inner & outer tables
• Maffucci Syndrome • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric
• Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis a Hematogenous spread usually results in
• Sarcoidosis metaphyseal sites
• Trevor Fairbank a Osteomyelitis can appear extremely
aggressive, with permeative change &
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION cortical breakthrough with soft tissue
mass: May not be distinguishable from
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues aggressive tumor
• Polyostotic nature of a lesion can narrow the a Sickle cell patients at risk for multifocal
differential substantially & is a highly osseous infection; higher predilection for
valuable characteristic Salmonella
a Information regarding multiple sites can
• Osteochondroma, Multiple Hereditary
be gained by bone scan, PET/CT, or clinical Exostosis
exam a Not a difficult diagnosis if exophytic
• Lesions listed above range from benign (cauliflower) lesions are present
(leave me alone) lesions, through "Aunt a May have only sessile exostoses at the
Minnie" lesions, through highly aggressive metaphyses which can give the appearance
lesions of a dysplasia; diagnosis often missed
a It is most reasonable to have an alternative
• Leukemia
approach to sort these out a Diffuse marrow infiltration may result in
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses appearance of osteopenia, easily
• Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) overlooked
a Benign fibrous cortical defects (same a Metaphyseal lucent bands may highlight
histologically as NOF, but smaller) are the degree of osteopenia
often multiple in children a MR shows the extent of the abnormalities
a Non-ossifying fibroma is not commonly • Ewing Sarcoma, Metastatic
multiple, except in patients with a Primary lesion usually highly aggressive:
neurofibromatosis Lytic, permeative, cortical breakthrough,
a Both have same natural history of healing large soft tissue mass
II
8
POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, CHILD 3
III
lJ:l
<ll
o May have extensive reactive bone • Polyostotic lesions which are usually to
III
formation, giving the appearance of monomelic III
<ll
osteoid, with potential confusion with o Fibrous dysplasia (generally unilateral) Q.
osteosarcoma o Melorheostosis ;0
Ql
Q.
• Reactive bone formation restricted to o Oilier disease 0'
bone, does not extend into soft tissue o Trevor Fairbank ,
<0
Ql
mass (as it does in osteosarcoma) o Maffucci syndrome '0
:J
o Most common sarcoma to have osseous • Polyostotic lesions with an intermediately ()
_--i
metastases; lung & osseous metastases aggressive appearance
o Fibrous dysplasia: Generally central, poorly
o
present with equal frequency III
III
<ll
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses marginated, but geographic o
C
o Langerhans cell histiocytosis: Appearance III
• Lymphoma, Multifocal
ranges from nonaggressive geographic to
o 50% of childhood bone lymphoma is
extremely aggressive permeative
polyostotic (much less frequent in adults)
o Hyperparathyroidism/renal
o Lesions highly aggressive: Permeative,
osteodystrophy, Brown tumor: Generally
cortical breakthrough with soft tissue mass
the lesion is geographic, but surrounding
o Generally lytic, but may have reactive
bone abnormal in density & trabecular
sclerosis within osseous lesion
o In same differential as Ewing sarcoma with
pattern
metastases, multifocal osteomyelitis, LCH, • Polyostotic lesions with an aggressive
appearance: These can be indistinguishable
& metastases
from one another by imaging!
Alternative Differential Approaches o Langerhans cell histiocytosis: Range in
• "Aunt Minnie" lesions can generally be appearance from nonaggressive to highly
identified immediately aggressive
o Fibroxanthoma (non-ossifying o Osteomyelitis
fibroma)/benign fibrous cortical defect o Leukemia
o Osteochondroma (multiple hereditary o Ewing sarcoma, metastatic
exostoses): Remember they can be sessile & o Metastases, bone marrow
resemble a metaphyseal dysplasia o Lymphoma, multifocal
o Melorheostosis o Osteosarcoma, metastatic
o Sarcoidosis (when lacy appearance is o Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis
obvious)
o Trevor Fairbank
o
t-""
-
u
.r:
0-
III
•... (Left) Anteroposterior
Cl radiograph shows mixed lytic
.2 and sclerotic lesion involving
"0
III the meta diaphysis of the
c::: femur, tibia, & fibula. The
"1:l lesions are central &
Q)
IJ) nonaggressive, typical of
l\l fibrous dysplasia. (RighI)
10
Q)
Anteroposterior radiograph
Cl shows the mildly expanded
l\l
and sclerotic, otherwise
E featureless "ground-glass"
appearance of fibrous
diaphysis =
dysplasia in the tibial
with lytic talar
lesion. in this teenager
with polyostotic fibrous
dysplasia.
II
10
POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, CHILD 3
Ql
ee
<D
to
Ql
CIl
Osteochondroma, Multiple Hereditary <D
Co
Exostosis leukemia
(Left) Anteroposterior ;lJ
OJ
radiograph shows sessile 0-
osteochondromas along the 0'
ee
~
medial femoral metaphyses OJ
• in this teenager. Note the
subluxation of the right "::J"o
femoral head 1IIIl; this was -I
proven to be an intraarUcular
exostosis. (Right) AP
o
CIl
CIl
radiograph shows diffuse <D
osteopenia & metaphyseal o
c:
lucent lines EilI in this child. CIl
=
serpiginous pattern is seen
which is typical. 50% of
children developing
lymphoma of bone present
with polyostotic lesions.
II
11
'":::lo POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, CHILD
Ql
o'"'"
r:
t) Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
:<:a. Osteosarcoma, Metastatic Osteodystrophy, Brown Tumor
(Left) Anteroposterior
~
Ol radiograph shows multiple
.Q osseous sites of amorphous
"0
ro bone lormation III within
a:: the spine and pelvis in a
"tl teenager whose lelt hip was
Ql
III disarticulated 1 year earlier
III
for osteosarcoma (note the
tlI
Ql
recurrence in the
en acetabulum ElIIi. (Right)
III
Posteroanterior radiograph
E shows severe renal
osteodystrophy in a teenager
with end stage renal disease.
Besides the subperiosteal
and tuft resorption, there are
multiple lytic lesions, Brown
tumors •.
Melorheostosis Melorheostosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows dense
sclerotic endosteal bone
extending down the femur
•• with what has been
termed a f1dripping candle
wax" appearance. This is
typical melorheostosis, a
sclerosing dysplasia. (Right)
Oblique radiograph (same
patient as previous image)
shows linear as well as
punctate regions of sclerosis
•. in a sclerotomal pattern.
The lesions are restricted to
one extremity (monomelic).
II
12
POLYOSTOTIC LESIONS, CHILD 3
Ql
(Q
lTl
lD
Ql
VI
lTl
Q.
Maffucci Syndrome
(Left) Lateral radiograph Al
OJ
shows the linear striations a.
within a lytic metaphyseal o'
co
lesion Ell; note the proximal ~
OJ
fibula is abnormal as well. -0
::r
The findings are typical of
multiple enchondromatasis.
o~
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph (same patient as
o
en
en
previous image) shows a CD
lytic lesion in the proximal o
c
humerus; as well as VI
II
13
en
::> SOLITARYGEOGRAPHIC LYTICLESIONS
o
OJ
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Need not have matrix
f- Most common lesion of the phalanx
-
o
U Common
.<: o Well-defined and may be mildly expansile
0-
ro
~
• Subchondral Cyst • Metastases, Bone Marrow
Ol
.Q
• Enchondroma o Lack of multiplicity & aggressive features
"0
ro • Metastases, Bone Marrow does not exclude metastatic disease
0:: • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma)
"tl
Ql
• Plasmacytoma o Cortically based, lobulated lesion with
VI
III • Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC) narrow zone of transition
a:l • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
Ql o No aggressive features
OJ
III • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) • Plasmacytoma
E • Fibrous Dysplasia o Solitary myeloma lesion
• Chondrosarcoma o Lytic & bubbly, often with cortical
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis breakthrough
• Chondroblastoma o Usually lacks a large soft tissue mass
• Osteomyelitis • Unicameral Bone Cyst (UBC)
Less Common o Associated fallen fragment sign
• Arthroplasty Component Wear/Particle • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
Disease o Metaphyseal lesion extending to
• Amyloid Deposition subchondral region of bone
• lntraosseous Lipoma o Lacks sclerotic margin
• Paget Disease • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC)
• Pyrophosphate Arthropathy o Expansile eccentric lesion, intact cortex
• Renal Osteodystrophy • Fibrous Dysplasia
• Osteosarcoma, Telangiectatic o Classic well-demarcated lesion with
• Osteosarcoma, Conventional "ground-glass" attenuation
o Pelvic lesions particularly may be lytic
Rare but Important
• Chondrosarcoma
• Adamantinoma o Cortical thinning or thickening; low grade
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma lesion may appear non-aggressive; no
• Tertiary Syphilis matrix necessary
• Sarcoidosis • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
• Hemophilia: Pseudotumor o Elicits periosteal reaction near the lesion
• Osteofibrous Dysplasia
• Chondroblastoma
• Benign Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor o Epiphyseal lesion with sclerotic border
• Gout o Often with associated periosteal reaction
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) along the metaphysis
• Osteomyelitis
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Well-defined foci of osteomyelitis are
typically due to tuberculosis or fungi
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Less host reaction & bone destruction
• Lucent lesion with narrow zone of transition than Staphylococcus osteomyelitis
o May be due to intraosseous lesion or
erosion of lesion into bone Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Arthroplasty Component Wear/Particle
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses Disease
• Subchondral Cyst o Location in bone adjacent to joint
o Location around synovial joints
replacement
o Associated findings of subchondral
o Associated findings of polyethylene wear:
sclerosis, marginal osteophytes, joint space Narrowing or asymmetry of the liner
narrowing
• Amyloid Deposition
• Enchondroma o Erosion of amyloid deposits into bone
II
14
SOLITARY GEOGRAPHIC LYTIC LESIONS 3
III
lC
CD
o Patients with end stage renal disease & o Anterior tibial metadiaphysis llJ
III
multiple myeloma o Multilobulated, expansile lesion VI
CD
• Intraosseous Lipoma o Associated cortical breakthrough and soft a.
o Location in long bone metaphysis and tissue mass ;;0
III
calcaneus most common a.
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma o'
<0
o Presence of fat and central calcification o Multilobulated expansile lesion without ~
III
differentiates from normal variant or cortical breakthrough "0
::T
solitary bone cyst • Hemophilia: Pseudotumor o
_-i
• Paget Disease o Pseudotumor can have significant
o Osteoporosis circumscripta of skull destruction without a permeative pattern
o
VI
VI
• Typical location in frontal & occipital CD
• Osteofibrous Dysplasia o
c::
regions o Similar to adamantinoma & VI
o
t-
-
t)
~
a.
ro (Left) AP radiograph shows
Metastases, Bone Marrow
'-
Ol an expanded lytic lesion ••
.Q in the region of the
1:)
ro acetabulum, which normally
a:: has a lucentlriangle. A
"'0 solitary lytic lesion in a
Ql
(J) woman should always lead
co to consideration of
10
metastatic breast cancer.
CI>
Cl (Right) AP radiograph shows
co a geographic lytic lesion ••
E
in the meta diaphysis of a
skeletally immature patient.
Laleral view (not shown)
shows il is cortically based,
non-aggressive and has a
narrow zone of transition.
(Left) Anteroposterior
lesion =
radiograph shows a bubbly
occupying the
superior pubic ramus and
extending well into the
acetabulum. In a patient
over 50 years of age,
metastatic disease or
myeloma should be
considered first. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a lytic lesion III with
sclerotic borders and thinned
cortices. This case a/so
shows the fallen fragment
sign. due to a fracture
fragment within the ffuid of
the lesion. rt MSK Req).
II
16
SOLITARY GEOGRAPHIC LYTIC LESIONS 3
Ql
to
<ll
III
Ql
VI
<ll
Co
Chondrosarcoma
(Left) Anteroposterior ::0
Ql
radiograph shows a bubbly c-
expansile lesion _ without o·
<Cl
aggressive features. Bubbly ~
Ql
lytic non-aggressive pelvis
lesions are typical of fibrous "o:T
dysplasia. (Right) AP .-1
radiograph shows a
completely lytic lesion in the
o
VI
VI
pelvis EiIl with a pathologic CD
fracture through the superior o
c:
acetabulum. It is important VI
to remember that
chondrosarcoma need not
show radiographic evidence
of chondroid matrix.
II
17
VI
:J SOLITARY GEOGRAPHIC lYTIC lESIONS
o
Ql
VI
VI
o
r-:-
u
:ca. Amyloid Deposition
(Leh) Sagittal T2WI MR
'"
~
Ol shows a humeral head
.Q erosion •. Rotator cu(f
""0
tendons are thick &
'"
a:: uniformly low in signal Ell.
"t:l Biopsy confirmed amyloid
Ql
VI deposition in this patient
III with end stage renal disease.
a:l (tMSK Req). (Right) Lateral
Ql
Cl radiograph shows a lucent
III
lesion" containinga
E
central calcific density Ell.
Lytic calcanea/lesions in this
location usually represent
normal variant, bone cyst, or
lipoma; a central calcific
density confirmed lipoma.
Paget Disease
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows a geographic lytic
region in the occiput _ The
skull shows a diffusely
widened diploic space Ell
Osteoporosis circumscripta is
an earfy destructive phase of
Paget disease of the skull.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
osteophyte formation,
cartilage narrowing, and a
large lytic lesion in the
medial tibial plateau •.
Chondrocalcinosis IIIl/eads
one to consider the diagnosis
of pyrophosphate
arthropathy.
II
18
SOLITARY GEOGRAPHIC LYTIC LESIONS 3
Ql
to
(t)
OJ
Ql
<II
(t)
C.
Adamantinoma Chondromyxoid Fibroma
(Left) Anteroposterior ;;0
Cll
radiograph shows an C.
expansile lytic lesion IIlI with o
CO
sclerotic margins. Cortical ~
Cll
destruction and a soft tissue
mass were visible with CT, "::T()
suggesting the diagnosis of .--1
adamantinoma. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
o
<II
<II
shows an eccentric, C1l
expansiJe, lytic lesion _ in o
C
the tibial meta diaphysis, <II
without cortical
breakthrough. The large size
is unusual (or a
chondromyxoid fibroma.
(tMSK Req).
Hemophilia: Pseudotumor
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a highly
expanded lytic lesion" of
the right iliac wing. This is
typical of pseudotumor;
despite the extensive
destructive change, there is
no permeative pattern.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows a geographic lytic
lesion" in the proximal
tibial diaphysis with cortical
breakthrough" anteriorly.
The differential diagnosis
includes chondromyxoid
fibroma, osteofibrous
dysplasia, and
adamantinoma.
II
19
VJ
::J SCLEROTIC BONE lESION, SOLITARY
o
OJ
VJ
VJ
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Low signal on all MR sequences,
I- non-enhancing
o Common
::cCl. • Stress or Insufficiency Fracture
• Enostosis (Bone Island) o Best clue is linear pattern of sclerosis;
~
<ll
OJ
o • Stress or Insufficiency Fracture fracture line may be obscured by healing
"0
<ll
• Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) callus
0::: • Bone Infarct o Fracture line seen well on Tl MR; may be
"0
C1I
• Enchondroma obscured on fluid sensitive sequences
''""
al
• Osteoma • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma)
C1I
• Osteoid Osteoma o Cortically based, metadiaphyseal; location
Cl • Osteosarcoma, Conventional is best clue
'"
E • Intraosseous Lipoma o Natural history is for the lytic lesion to
• Metastases, Bone Marrow heal; it often appears mildly sclerotic prior
less Common to development of normal trabecular
• Paget Disease pattern
• Cement & Bone Fillers • Bone Infarct
• Ewing Sarcoma o Metaphyseal, metadiaphyseal, or
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal subchondral
• Osteosarcoma, Periosteal o When dystrophic calcification is present,
(blade-of-grass) Ql
"0
o Metadiaphyseal ~
o Usually originates at one end of long bone,
advancing away from subchondral bone
o Tumor osteoid is more mature than C'i
.-f
conventional osteosarcoma, but less than
• Cement & Bone Fillers o
o Generally seen within a geographic
parosteal '"'"
CD
o Often scallops underlying cortex o
(curetted) lesion c
• Fibrous Dysplasia, Skull Base
o Cement: Homogeneous sclerosis:
o Dense homogeneous bone: May be slightly
'"
Featureless
o Bone graft: Either structural (large piece of
ground-glass & less densely sclerotic than
bone) or multiple small pieces, often osteoma
o Density is different from the mild ground
squared
glass appearance in long bones or lytic
• Ewing Sarcoma
o Lesion itself is lytic & highly permeative,
bubbly fibrous dysplasia of pelvis
o Involved bone is usually enlarged, as in all
with aggressive periosteal reaction & soft
tissue mass cases of fibrous dysplasia
o May elicit tremendous reactive bone
• Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor
o Location specific: Neck of femur
formation
o Geographic; variably sclerotic or mixed
• Reactive bone may simulate tumor
osteoid, but it is contained entirely lytic/sclerotic
within the bone • Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle
o Proximal clavicular sclerosis, without soft
• No bone formation within soft tissue
mass; differentiates from osteosarcoma tissue mass or manubrial abnormality
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o L?cation is constant: Metadiaphyseal, • Sarcoidosis
distal femur> proximal tibia> proximal o Rarely may present as focal sclerotic bone:
femur> proximal humerus Dense, inhomogeneous
o Surface lesion, but usually involves some • Mastocytosis
marrow o Focal sclerotic presentation rare
Enchondroma Osteoma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
metaphyseal lesion
containing punctate sclerotic
densities •. There is no
sclerotic margin, though the
lesion has a geographic
appearance. This chondroid
lesion is a classic
enchondroma. (Right) Axial
NECT shows a densely
sclerotic, rather featureless
lesion of the cranium •.
typical of osteoma. These
hamartomas are usually
located in a paranasal sinus
or the calvarium.
II
22
SClEROTIC BONE LESION, SOLITARY 3
Ql
to
lD
lJl
Ql
III
lD
Osteosarcoma, Conventional 0.
Osteosarcoma, Conventional
(Leh) Anteroposterior ;U
Q)
radiograph shows dense C-
osteoid formation within a o'
permeative lesion of the ..,
(Q
Q)
humerus Ea. There is a wide "0
::T
zone of transition & soft
tissue mass, as well as an
o
-i
ossified lymph node
metastasis •. (Right) o
III
III
Anteroposterior radiograph <1>
shows amorphous osteoid o
C
formation within the bone, III
Paget Disease
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows a densely sclerotic
focus in the subchondral
bone _ However, there is
an additional clue; there is
an adjacent lytic region,
demarcated by a sharp
"blade of grass" Ell making
the diagnosis of Paget
disease. (Right) AP
radiograph shows an isolated
densely sclerotic phalanx •.
The bone is expanded, with
thickened trabeculae. There
is no destructive change.
Findings are typical of Paget
disease, despite the
somewhat unusual location.
II
23
III
~ SClEROTIC BONE LESION, SOLITARY
o
Q)
III
III
o
r:
-
t)
.r:
a.
ro
~ (Leh) AP radiograph shows
Cement & Bone Fillers
Ewing Sarcoma
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
dense sclerosis of the
epiphysis .:I in a child. Axial
imaging demonstrated a 50ft
tissue mass and permeative
lytic lesion in the metaphysis,
typical of Ewing sarcoma.
Remember that this disease
can elicit tremendous
osseous reaction. (Right)
Axial NECT shows a sclerotic
lesion occupying a portion of
57 in a child _ This could
represent either osteoid
formation in osteosarcoma,
or reactive bone in Ewing
sarcoma; the laller was
proven.
Osteosarcoma, Parosteal
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows a sclerotic surface
lesion arising at the posterior
distal metaphysis .:I. Axial
imaging confirmed the
surface origin and zoning
pattern diagnostic of
paroslea/osteosarcoma.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows fairly
mature osteoid matrix arising
from the surface of the tibial
meta diaphysis _ Axial
imaging is important to
confirm the pattern of bone
formation and lack of
marrow involvement.
II
24
SCLEROTIC BONE lESION, SOLITARY 3
III
CO
C\l
III
III
VI
C\l
C.
Fibrous Dysplasia, Skull Base
(Left) Lateral radiograph ;0
OJ
shows a sclerotic lesion in C.
the vertebral body __ 0'
demonstrated to be Hodgkin ...
CO
OJ
disease. This process is most -0
::r
frequently sclerotic; primary
lymphoma of bone may be
o
.-1
lytic or mixed. (Right) Axial
bone CT shows dense
o
VI
VI
"ground-glass" sclerosis of CIl
the maxilla and skull base o
c
_. The bones are VI
Sarcoidosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
homogeneous dense
sclerotic lesion within the
femoral head (trocar present
for biopsy). Rarely, osseous
sarcoid may present as a
sclerotic lesion. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a densely sclerotic,
enlarged diaphysis of the
clavicle __ The patient had
Gf and skin symptoms which
led to the diagnosis of
mastocytosis, biopsy proven.
II
25
(/)
:J SCLEROTIC BONE LESIONS, MULTIPLE
o
Ql
(/)
(/)
o Hint: Watch for pattern of involvement o HPTH & ROD, healing: New bone fills in
• Linear, endosteal or periosteal, Brown tumors, often appearing
monomelic hyperossified (distinct, round sclerotic
• Osteopoikilosis foci); these may remain sclerotic or
o Metaphyseal, round eventually develop normal trabeculae
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Osteoma • Sarcoidosis
o Multiple in polyposis syndromes o Rare osseous manifestation: Sclerotic foci
• Renal Osteodystrophy, Neostosis o Hint: Skin involvement highly likely;
o Renal osteodystrophy (ROD) may show pulmonary involvement less likely
focal sclerosis of bone, at various stages of • Mastocytosis
disease, with various etiologies o Rarely may develop sclerotic bone foci
• ROD, active: Generally osteopenic, but o Hint: Clinical manifestations of skin rash,
osteoblast activation may result in episodic vomiting & diarrhea
superimposed generalized sclerosis; foci • POEMS
may be seen (Rugger jersey spine) o Homogeneous sclerotic or sclerotic rim
• ROD, treated: New bone formation o Clinical: Peripheral neuropathy,
o Hint: Watch for other manifestations organomegaly, endocrinopathy, skin
• Resorptive processes: Subperiosteal, manifestations
subligamentous, subchondral
• Soft tissue calcification
-
l)
.c
a.
ro
~ (Leh) Sagittal MIP shows
Metastatic, Lung Multiple Healing Rib Fractures (Mimic)
II
28
SClEROTIC BONE LESIONS, MULTIPLE 3
III
to
(1)
OJ
III
VI
(1)
Co
Fibrous Dysplasia, Skull Metastatic, Osteosarcoma
(Left) Axial bone CT shows ::0
OJ
,ight maxilla,y &, pte'ygoid c.
replacement by ground-glass o'
to
sclerosis __ typical of ~
OJ
fibrous dysplasia of the skull.
Note the bones are enlarged. "o::T
50% of skull lesions in .-;
fibrous dysplasia are
polyostotic. (Right)
o
Anteroposterior radiograph '"'"
CD
shows amorphous bone o
c:
formation in two vertebral VI
Metastatic, Medulloblastoma
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows sclerotic ulnar lesion
with prominent sunburst
type of periosteal reaction
III This child had
medulloblastoma; osseous
metastases may be lytic,
sclerotic, or mixed. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows multiple cortically
based nonossifying fibromas,
in the sclerotic phase of
healing III. This is the
natural history of these
lesions, and they generally
eventually acquire normal
trabeculation. The patient
had neurofibromatosis.
Melorheostosis Osteopoikilosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows linear as
well as rounded sclerotic
densities which were
confined to the left
extremity. This is
meJorheostosis, one of the
sclerosing dysplasias. (Right)
Axial NECT shows multiple
small rounded sclerotic
densities. If MR were
performed, they would be
low signal on all sequences.
When bone islands are
clustered in the metaphyses
like this, it is termed
osteopoikilosis.
II
29
'"o::l SClEROTIC BONE LESIONS, MULTIPLE
Ql
'"'"
o
t-="
()
:<:0- Osteoma
ro (Left) Anteroposterior
~
OJ radiograph shows multiple
.2 osteomas arising from the
"0
ro cortex of the femur" The
a:: patient had similar lesions on
'1:l the contralateral femur.
Q)
(Right) Oblique radiograph
'"'"
!Xl
shows osteoma of the
Q)
mandible. in the same
OJ patient as previous image.
'E" Multiple osteomas may be
seen in patients with
polyposis, termed Gardner
syndrome.
II
30
SClEROTIC BONE LESIONS, MUlTIPLE 3
~
to
(1)
OJ
~
VI
(1)
C.
Metastatic, Carcinoid Sarcoidosis
(Left) Axial bone CT shows ;0
Ql
two of the multiple densely C.
sclerotic lesions in this o·
(C
patient with known ~Ql
carcinoid. The lesions are -0
::r
typical of the osseous
metastases in this disease .
o
•-1
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows two sites
o
U>
U>
of osseous sclerosis •• <1l
without other features, in a o
c
patient with sarcoidosis. U>
POEMS
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows one large
and several subcentimeter
round sclerotic skull lesions
111. Metastatic disease
should certainly be
considered, but this proved
to be POEMS, or sclerotic
myeloma. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a mixture of multiple
sclerotic lesions, and others
which are lytic with a
sclerotic rim. This is one
manifestation of POEMS, the
rare sclerosing myeloma.
(tMSK Req).
II
31
en SClEROTIC lESION WITH CENTRAL lUCENCY
:::l
o
Q)
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Fracture line not always evident
f- o Typical location in tibia and metatarsals
u Common
:cn. o Pain worsened by activity
ro • Osteoid Osteoma • Paget Disease
~
0>
o • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma) o Cortical thickening with bone
"0
ro
• Stress Fracture, Adult enlargement is typical
cr: • Paget Disease o Mixed sclerotic and lytic lesions
"tl
Ql
• Bone Infarct • Reparative phase
en
l\l less Common • More common than purely sclerotic
III
Ql • Chronic Osteomyelitis phase
Cl
l\l
• Enchondroma o Sclerotic phase causes uniform areas of
E increased density
• Loose Bodies (Mimic)
• "Cotton wool" skull
Rare but Important
• "Ivory" vertebral body
• Osteoblastoma • Bone Infarct
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o Dense bone in the medullary space
• POEMS o Serpiginous or "smoke up the chimney"
• Tertiary Syphilis outline with lucent center
o Proximal or distal long bones
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Metaphyseal most common
• Can extend to subchondral plate
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Associated with steroids, alcohol use +
• Osteoid Osteoma numerous other disease states
o Highly vascular nidus of osteoid tissue
(lucency) surrounded by reactive bone Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
(sclerosis) • Chronic Osteomyelitis
• Intracortical, intramedullary or o Mixed osteosclerotic and osteolytic lesions
subperiosteal with periosteal reaction
• Less reactive bone when intraarticular o Solitary lesion with sequestrum is classic
(femoral neck) than when located in o Can have multiple lesions
-
C)
.r:
a.
<0 (Left) Axial bone CT shows
Stress Fracture, Adult Stress Fracture, Adult
'-
Ol periosteal bone formation
.Q with focus of lucency"
"0
<0 This lucency continued
0::: longitudinally down the
"t:l femur, consistent with a
C1I
III stress fracture. Note: Osteoid
"'
al
C1I
osteoma, stress fracture &
osteomyelitis can be
Ol indistinguishable on a single
"'E axial CT image. (Right)
Coronal bone CT (same
patient as previous) shows
central longitudinal lucency
of the stress fracture ffi
surrounded by thick cortex.
This reconstruction helps
define the stress fracture.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a linear
lucency" surrounded by
sclerosis. One does not
usually visualize a stress
fracture this distinctly, but
this runner refused to rest his
leg. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows a sclerotic
vertebral body with central
lucency •. This is the mixed
phase of Paget disease, not
as advanced as the classic
II picture frame"; a bone scan
indicated the patient had
two other lesions as well.
II
34
SClEROTIC LESION WITH CENTRAL LUCENCY 3Dl
10
<tl
D:l
Dl
l/I
<tl
Co
Enchondroma
(Leh) Lateral radiograph ::0
III
shows a ring-like sclerotic C-
lesion, with apparent central o·
<C
lucency •. The sclerosis is ~III
chondroid matrix; "0
::r
occasionally the matrix is
arranged such that there is
o
.-1
central non-ca/c;{jed
cartilage. (Right) Sagittal PO
o
l/I
l/I
FSEFS MR (same patient as <1>
previous image) shows the o
C
low signal ring of calcified l/I
POEMS
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a sclerotic
lesion in the ischium with
centra/lucency _
Langerhans cell histiocytosis
normally is lytic, but this
patient was treated with low
dose radiation, and the
sclerosis indicates healing.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows multiple
lytic lesions with sclerotic
rims'" along with purely
sclerotic lesions. This is a
variant appearance of
POEMS, or sclerosing
myeloma. (tMSK Req).
II
35
en SEQUESTRATION
:J
o
<1l
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Prominent smooth surrounding sclerosis is
I- typical unless lesion is intraarticular
-
o
J::
Cl.
~
Common
• Chronic Osteomyelitis
• Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
o Geographic lesions
en • Osteoid Osteoma (Mimic) o Lack sclerotic border
.Q
-0
ro • Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis o May contain button sequestrum (especially
a: • Lymphoma skull)
-0
<1l Less Common o Polyostotic in about 25% of cases
II)
l\l
• Fibrosarcoma • Polyostotic lesions may be less aggressive
II)
<1l • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone • Lymphoma
Cl
l\l • Metastases, Bone Marrow o Permeative destruction of bone with
E sequestrum in 11%
• Removed Hardware
• Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis o Disproportionally large soft tissue mass
• Intraosseous Hemangioma (Mimic) • Intact bone cortex; may be thickened
• Charcot, Neuropathic o Metaphysis or diaphysis of long, tubular
bones, with pelvis second most common
Rare but Important
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Chordoma • Fibrosarcoma
• Tertiary Syphilis o Relatively uncommon diagnosis that
• Vascular Channel commonly has a sequestrum related to
residual bone fragment
o Eccentric, metaphyseal location typical
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Expands marrow space with endosteal
• Lytic lesions with radiodense foci can have o Similar radiographic appearance to
similar appearance to true sequestra on fibrosarcoma
radiographs & CT • Sequestrum less common in this entity
o Calcific densities due to residual bone than seen in fibrosarcoma
fragments • Residual calcification of infarct may
o Calcification from chondroid matrix mimic sequestrum
o Dystrophic calcification o Can simulate osteomyelitis
Chronic Osteomyelitis
II
38
SEQUESTRATION 3
Ql
lC
nl
l:D
Ql
III
nl
Q.
Removed Hardware Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis
(Left) Anteroposterior ;;0
Ql
radiograph shows an old thin Q.
II
39
(/)
:J TARGET LESIONS OF BONE
o
Q)
(/)
(/)
-
I-
U
~
c.
~
Common
• Osteoid Osteoma
o Sequestrum of devitalized bone
surrounded by infectious material
produces target appearance
en • Intraosseous Lipoma
o o Poorly defined lytic lesion with marked
is
C1l
• Pinhole Sequestra enhancement of surrounding tissues
0:: • Chronic Osteomyelitis o Associated findings of periosteal reaction,
"C
Ql • Fracture Healing Process sinus tract, skin ulceration
VI
• Cement & Bone Fillers, Normal o Appearance is not pathognomonic for
'"
llJ
• Cement & Bone Fillers, Complications
Ql infection, as malignancy can have an
en
Less Common identical appearance
E'"
• Metastases, Bone Marrow • Fracture Healing Process
• Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor o Irregular endosteal bone healing or
• Bone Infarct irregular external bone callus may
• Enchondroma surround bone fragments
• Chondroblastoma • Cement & Bone Fillers, Normal
• Chondrosarcoma o Can have a normal halo of lucency at
• Arthroplasty Loosening & Dislocation cement-bone interface
(Mimic) o Lucency will remain stable relative to
• Chordoma immediate postoperative images
• Pseudo hypoparathyroidism • Cement & Bone Fillers, Complications
o Tumor recurrence along border of
Rare but Important
curettage & cement packing
• Dermoid Cyst, Skull o Lucency at cement-bone interface
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst progresses from postoperative appearance
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Metastases, Bone Marrow
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Breast metastases are most likely to have
• Lytic lesion of bone with central central bone fragments
radiodensity from any cause (calcification, o Osteosarcoma" metastases produce osteoid
ossification, bone fragment) o Metastases in various stages of both
• Location & associated findings most helpful healing and progression may have
for differentiation alternating regions of lucency & sclerosis
o Associated findings of soft tissue mass,
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
cortical destruction, additional lesions of
• Osteoid Osteoma varying size
o Classic: Lucent central nidus within bone
• Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor
cortex may itself have central calcification o Classic location in proximal metadiaphysis
o Surrounding reactive bone sclerosis
of femur
• Intraosseous Lipoma o Lytic lesion containing fat & calcification,
o Well-defined lytic lesion containing fat
confirm with CT
o Typical location in the calcaneus
o Sclerotic border, no aggressive features
o Presence of central calcification
• Bone Infarct
differentiates from normal area of bone o Dense medullary bone in metaphyses of
with paucity of trabeculae long bones
• Pinhole Sequestra o Tends to have serpiginous borders, rather
o After removal of pins, screws and rods,
than smooth target appearance
central area can calcify
o No cortical destruction, soft tissue mass, or
o Infection along a hardware tract may
cortical breakthrough unless malignant
produce a bone sequestrum centrally transformation
within the pin track
• Enchondroma
II
40
TARGET lESIONS OF BONE 3
Cll
to
~
o Central chondroid matrix in medullary o Uncommon entity but common central tll
Cll
lytic lesion (cortical lesions less common) calcification of the multiple lytic lesions VI
~
Associated findings of short metacarpals & C.
o Typical location in hands o
o Associated findings of bone expansion or metatarsals and basal ganglia & dentate ;0
Q)
c.
pathologic fracture when occurring in nuclei calcification o·
to
~
small tubular bones Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses Q)
• Chondroblastoma
o Focal lytic lesion with internal chondroid
• Dermoid Cyst, Skull ":T()
o Well-defined lytic lesion containing _-i
matrix occurring at end of bone in mature skin & fat o
skeletally immature patient o Predilection for sutures & diploic region
VI
VI
ell
o Associated findings of thin sclerotic o
o No enhancement C
border, geographic bone destruction & • Aneurysmal Bone Cyst
VI
-
u
L
0-
ro
~ (Left) Anteroposterior
Pinhole Sequestra Chronic Osteomyelitis
Ol radiograph demonstrates an
.2 old, thin, pin tracl" which
"ro
a::
has widened into a round
lytic lesion with central
'tl sclerosis HI. The central
Ql
VI scleros;s is a sequestrum in
'"
al
this pin tract infection.
(Right) Laleral radiograph
Ql
Ol shows a region of irregular
'" lucency HI surrounding a
E
more sclerotic piece of bone
•. This is a focus of
osteomyelitis with a
sequestrum seen centrally.
(tMSK Req).
II
<12
TARGET lESIONS OF BONE 3
III
lC
CD
lD
III
l/I
CD
Q.
Enchondroma Chondroblastoma
(Left) AP radiograph shows a ;u
Q)
small, expansile, lytic lesion C-
=
with a small central density
that resembles a target.
This case is unusual;
o·
...
(Q
Q)
"0
::r
enchondromas are more
commonly located in the
o-;
medullary space than in the
cortex. (Right) AP radiograph
o
CIl
CIl
shows a lytic lesion in the CD
epiphysis HI containing o
c
small foci of calcific matrix CIl
•. There is prominent
dense periosteal reaction in
the metaphyseal region 11II
giving an overall appearance
of chondroblastoma. rt MSK
Req).
the patella =
density located superior to
representing
dissociation of the metal
backing from the patellar
button.
II
43
<J)
:J MATRIX-CONTAINING BONE LESIONS
o
(l)
<J)
<J)
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • If a portion of lesion shows less
1-- organization of matrix, termed
-
U
.r::
a.
ro
~
Common
• Enchondroma
"snowstorm", it is more aggressive
o Mixed osteoid and chondroid elements
Ol
.Q
• Bone Infarct • No discernible separate elements; gives
"0
ro • Osteochondroma smooth opaque ground-glass appearance
0::: • Fibrous Dysplasia • No trabeculae seen
'0
CI) • Osteosarcoma, Conventional o Dystrophic calcification (matrix mimic)
IJ)
ctl • Osteoid Osteoma • Often globular, but may be serpiginous;
CO
CI)
• Chondrosarcoma, Conventional generally denser than bone
Cl
ctl • Fibroxanthoma (Non-Ossifying Fibroma), • Hint: Use the degree of aggressiveness of the
E Healing underlying lesion as a differentiating factor
• Fracture Callus Formation, Early between benign and malignant lesions
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal
• Intraosseous Lipoma Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma, Bone • Enchondroma
o Conventional
• Periosteal Chondroma
• Osteosarcoma, Periosteal • Ranges from dense punctate matrix to
• Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor (LSMFT) fine, subtle matrix or entirely lytic
• Small bones of hand/foot or
Less Common metaphysis/metadiaphysis tubular bones
• Radiation-Induced Sarcoma • Appears geographic because of matrix,
• Paget Degeneration to Osteosarcoma but no sclerotic margin or true
• Osteoblastoma demarcating structure
• Chondroblastoma o Oilier Disease
• Chondromyxoid Fibroma • May be typical enchondroma, or may
• Oilier Disease have striated appearance in metaphyses
• Maffucci Syndrome • Generally monomelic; short extremity
o Maffucci Syndrome
Enchondroma
o
~
-
()
.c
a.
ro
~ (Left) Lateralradiograph
Bone Infarct Bone Infarct
Osteochondroma Osteochondroma
(Left)Lateralradiograph
shows punctate regions of
chondroid matrix" within
the cartilaginous cap of an
osteochondroma, with
normal bone in the stalk ~
Matrix may be seen in
osteochondroma without
implying chondrosarcoma.
(Right) Lateralradiograph
shows chondroid matrix
within the peripheral portion
III of this exostosis, but
clearly normal bone extends
from the posterior tibial
metaphysis into the stalk of
the exostosis itself HI.
(tMSK Req).
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows the rather
featureless increased density
"ground-glass" =.
which has been termed
typical of
fibrous dysplasia in tubular
bones. Note the absence of
normal trabeculae. (Right)
AxmlNECTshowsthe
smooth increased density of
ground-glass matrix HI at a
site of fibrous dysplasia in a
different patient. There is a
lesion =-
lytic focus in an adjacent
Fibrous dysplasia
often shows features of both.
II
46
MATRIX-CONTAINING BONE lESIONS
II
47
<f)
:J MATRIX-CONTAINING BONE LESIONS
o
OJ
<f)
<f)
o
t-='
-
()
.r:
a.
ro
~ (Left) AP radiograph shows a
Osteosarcoma, Parosteal
Ol large osteoid-producing
Q lesion appearing to wrap
1:)
ro around tibial metaphysis ••.
0:: Note: Matrix is not
"0 amorphous, but well-defined
OJ
<f) ElIl typical of the less
aggressive parosteal variety.
'"
!Xl
(Right) Lateral radiograph
Q)
Cl shows a well-defined lytic
ro lesion in the mid calcaneus
E E!:I containing dense
calcification'" The location
and appearance are typical
for intraosseous lipoma. The
calcification is not required
for the diagnosis. (t MSK
Req).
bone =-
arising from the surface of
which proved to
be periosteal osteosarcoma.
The malrix in this lesion
occasionally appears a bit
more aggressive than this.
(Right) AP radiograph shows
an intertrochanteric lesion
which is geographic and
contains both fat and a
ground glass matrix ••.
LSMFT usually contains a
mixture of lipomatous,
fibrous, myxomatous, and
osteoid matrix.
II
48
MATRIX-CONTAINING BONE LESIONS 3
III
to
tl>
Dl
III
t/I
tl>
Q.
Radiation-Induced Sarcoma
(Left) Y view radiograph ;0
Q)
shows a farge soft tissue Q.
Osteoblastoma Chondroblastoma
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows an expanded lesion of
C2 spinous process which
contains fairly mature
appearing osteoid matrix =.
OsteoblaslOma need not
contain matrix, but this
appearance and location are
classic. (tMSK Req). (Right)
Axial NECT shows a mostly
lytic, eccentric lesion of the
epiphysis which contains a
small amount of chondroid
matrix HI. This was a
skeletally immature patient,
and the appearance is classic
For chondroblaslOma.
II
49
fJ)
~ BENIGN OSSEOUS lESIONS THAT CAN APPEAR AGGRESSIVE
o
<l)
fJ)
fJ)
appears aggressive on fluid sequences or o Abnormal bone at risk for fx, osteomyelitis ;U
Ql
Q.
post-contrast MR o Hint: Watch for radiation port-like ,5"
(Q
• Hint: Always look at radiograph before distribution of osseous abnormalities ~
Ql
suggesting tumor in a metatarsal o Since there is a primary tumor, differential
o Sacral insufficiency fractures includes metastatic disease; MR may be
"o~
_-i
• Pattern of bilateral vertical abnormality required to evaluate for soft tissue mass
is most suggestive o Differential also includes
o
VI
VI
• Edema can obscure fracture line & even radiation-induced sarcoma; watch for (\)
o
c
vertical pattern; may be confusing if tumor osteoid or more aggressive regions VI
o'"'"
t--""
()
:<:a. Osteomyelitis, Pediatric
ro (Leh) Oblique radiograph
~
OJ shows dramatic permeative
.Q lytic destruction of the radius
"0
ro •• in this child. Periosteal
0:: reaction & soft tissue mass is
"0 present. Differential includes
Q)
aggressive tumor such as
'"
III
CD
Ewing sarcoma. (Right)
Sagittal T1 C+ MR in the
GI
OJ same case, shows diffuse
III
enhancement of the radius
E E!lI. There is an abscess.
but also so much reactive
change in the soft tissues that
it might be mistaken for soft
tissue tumor mass with
necrosis. Biopsy proved
Staphylococcal infection.
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a large,
lytic, somewhat permeative
lesion occupying the
acetabulum. The offset of
the femoral head in the cup
indicates polyethylene wear,
resulting in massive
osteolysis. (Right) AP
radiograph shows a poorly
delineated lytic lesion in the
humeral diaphysis. While
this appears moderately
aggressive, the correct
diagnosis of Brown tumor is
secured by the abnormal
bone density & resorption of
the distal clavicle ••.
II
52
BENIGN OSSEOUS LESIONS THAT CAN APPEAR AGGRESSIVE 3
III
(0
<D
OJ
III
VI
<D
Co
Insufficiency Fracture (Mimic) Stress Fracture, Metatarsal (Mimic)
(Left) Axial STIR MR shows ::0
III
diffuse high signal in both Co
sacral ala •. The actual O·
(0
fracture lines of insufficiency ~
III
fractures may be obscured -0
::T
by fluid sensitive sequences,
and are usually not seen on
o-l
radiographs. (Right) Coronal
TI C+ FS MR shows high
o
VI
fJ)
signal within the marrow" CI>
with an apparent o
c
circumferential" mass" HI fJ)
Radiation Osteonecrosis
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
moderately aggressive mixed
lyUc and sclerotic bone in a
square "port-like"
configuration. The rest of the
skeleton was normal. The
patient had axillary node
radiation for breast cancer.
Radiation osteonecrosis can
be difficult to differentiate
from metastases. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows a
giant cell tumor which is 50
expanded that the cortex is
no longer seen" Despite
the appearance, this proved
to be a benign giant cell
tumor.
II
53
f/l
:> BENIGN OSSEOUS LESIONS THAT CAN APPEAR AGGRESSIVE
o
Q)
f/l
f/l
o
1-"
-
U
.<::
a.
~ (Left) Lateral radiograph
Paget Disease Enchondroma, Phalanx
Ol shows osteoporosis
.Q circumscripta IElIl the lytic
"0
ro phase of Paget disease in the
0:: skull. The early lytic phase,
"0 or even the mixed
Q)
f/l lytic/sclerotic disordered
nl bone phase may appear
lD
Q)
aggressive. (Right) Lateral
Ol radiograph shows significant
nl
expansion, with severe
E cortical thinning and
chondroid matrix.
Enchondroma may appear
more aggressive in the
phalanges than in more
proximal locations, yet
behave in a benign manner.
II
54
BENIGN OSSEOUS lESIONS THAT CAN APPEAR AGGRESSIVE 3
III
to
(l)
Ol
III
VI
Chronic Recurrent Multifocal (l)
C.
Osteomyelitis
(Left) Lateral ,adiog,aph ::0
OJ
shows a mixed lytic and C.
sclerotic lesion in the o
to
~
vertebral body, with OJ
destruction of the posterior "0
:::T
cortex _ Ra,ely an
osteoblastoma will show this
o
.-1
degree of agg,essiveness.
(Right) Coronal T2WI FS MR
o
VI
VI
shows high signal in the CI>
sacral ala _ & iliac wing o
c
1m. The radiograph was en
normal; this is worrisome for
highly permeative lesions.
The differential for multifocal
osteomyelitis includes Ewing,
leukemia, & lymphoma.
Hemangioendothelioma, Osseous
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a moderately
aggressive osseous lesion _
There were additional
osseous lesions raising the
concern for a vascular
tumor. Hemangiopericytoma
has a spectrum ranging from
benign to malignant. (RighI)
PA radiograph shows a
highly destructive lesion of
the 2nd metacarpal. The
appearance is nonspecific.
Biopsy proved
hemangioendothelioma,
which has an appearance &
behavior ranging from
benign to malignant.
II
55
II)
METASTASES TO BONE
"Q)
o
II)
II)
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Sclerotic healing
r-: • Sclerotic or lytic progression
()
:ca. Common • Radiation osteonecrosis
ro
~
• Breast Carcinoma
Q)
• Lung Carcinoma Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
.Q
-0 • Prostate Carcinoma • Breast Carcinoma
ro
a::: • Renal Cell Carcinoma (Hypernephroma) o Lytic or sclerotic lesions
o May contain button sequestra, especially
'tl
Q) • Thyroid Carcinoma
II) in skull
ltl
In Less Common o Normal skull thickness differentiates
Q)
Q) • Lymphoma extensive metastases from Paget disease
ltl
E • Leukemia • Lung Carcinoma
• Osteosarcoma o Typically lytic lesions, but can be sclerotic
• Neuroblastoma (esp. small cell lung carcinoma)
• Ewing Sarcoma o Majority of lytic metastases to the hands &
• Malignant Melanoma feet are from lung primary
• Gastrointestinal Carcinoma • Prostate Carcinoma
• Medulloblastoma o Sclerotic lesions typical but can be lytic
• Carcinoid • Homogeneously dense vertebral body,
• Wilms Tumor "ivory vertebra"
• Testicular Carcinoma • Lack of bone enlargement differentiates
Rare but Important from Paget disease
• Retinoblastoma o Can produce long, solitary expansile rib
• Adrenal Carcinoma lesions
• Squamous Cell Carcinoma o Diffuse skeletal involvement results in
• Cervical Carcinoma "super scan" pattern on bone scan
• Uterine Carcinoma • Renal Cell Carcinoma (Hypernephroma)
• Hepatoma o Expansile, poorly demarcated osteolytic
• Transitional Cell Carcinoma lesions
• Fibrosarcoma • "Soap bubble" appearance
o Tremendously vascular metastases make
biopsy dangerous; consider embolization
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION first
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Can contain fat, producing false negative
• Demographics drop out on opposed phase MR imaging
o Metastases are far more common than • Image kidneys if multiple bone lesions
primary bone tumors (25:1) are identified on MR and are shown to
o 80% of skeletal metastases are due to lung, contain microscopic fat
breast, prostate, and kidney carcinomas • Thyroid Carcinoma
o 50% of all patients with cancer will o Expansile, poorly demarcated osteolytic
eventually develop skeletal metastases lesions
• Skeletal distribution o Often solitary and highly vascular
o Predilection for regions containing red o Similar imaging appearance to renal cell
marrow: Skull, spine, ribs, pelvis, humeri, carcinoma metastases
femora Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Typical appearance • Lymphoma
o Single or multiple lesions of varying sizes o Oval, lytic lesions
o Joint spaces & intervertebral disks o Can be faintly sclerotic
preserved o Extensive permeative lesions in Burkitt
o Periosteal reaction rare lymphoma
o Density of lesions can change with o Sclerotic lesions with Hodgkin lymphoma
response or lack of response to therapy and histiocytic lymphoma
II
56
METASTASES TO BONE 3
III
CO
• Ivory vertebral body with Hodgkin o Lytic lesions, can be large & solitary 'l"Jl
III
lymphoma • Transitional Cell Carcinoma VI
Ol radiograph demonstrates a
.2 small cortically-based lesion
"ro
0::
•. Few cortically-based
lesions are seen in older
1:1 patients, & metastases must
Q)
CIl be suspected. Lung & breast
III are the most frequent
CO
Q)
primaries causing
Ol cortically-based lesions.
III
(tMSK Req). (Right) Axial
E
bone CT shows multiple
prostate carcinoma
metastases" Even though
sclerotic metastases can
appear more dense than
cortical bone, these lesions
have an increased risk for fx.
Prostate Carcinoma
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
shows diffuse sclerosis
involving all the ribs,
vertebral bodies, and
posterior elements. The
bones are normal in size.
This remarkably
homogeneous osseous
replacement is metastatic
prostate disease. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
demonstrates a severely
destructive, lytic, and
expanded lesion III This
was a solitary lesion. It is
important to consider
metastatic kidney or thyroid
disease in older patients.
II
58
METASTASES TO BONE 3
III
(C
(1)
llJ
III
'a."
(1)
Osteosarcoma Neuroblastoma
(Left) Axial CECT shows a ;0
Q)
metastasis with osteoid C-
matrix Ell The central o·
<C
lucency may be due to ~
Q)
response to chemotherapy. "0
:::T
Osteosarcoma metastases
are typically ossified. (Right)
o
-l
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows vertebral plana of L 1
o
(f)
(f)
11:I with preservation of <1>
posterior elements, but o
c
(f)
complete flattening of the
body. In addition, there is a
paraspinous mass. as well
calcifications in the mass
superior to the right kidney
EilI representing the primary
tumor.
Hepatoma Fibrosarcoma
(Left) Axial bone CT shows a
large destructive mass.
obliterating the proximal
humerus. A thin rim of
residual bone is present
anteriorfy III. Hepatocellular
metastases to bone are
typically lytic. Most patients
have nonosseous metastatic
sites identified before skeletal
metastases develop. (Right)
Axial bone CT shows vague
medullary sclerosis and
endosteal scalloping III. The
patient had a paravertebral
50ft tissue mass as well as
other osseous lesions, any of
which could be the primary.
II
59
(/)
:J GENERALIZED INCREASED BONE DENSITY, ADULT
o
Q)
(/)
(/)
o Calcification of ligaments (esp. o Affects axial skeleton (spine & pelvis) ;:0
Q)
C-
paraspinous), tendons, soft tissues o Diffuse sclerosis seen in about 3% of O
CO
• Mastocytosis patients with plasma cell myeloma Ql
o Diffuse or focal; ± osteolysis
o Tends to be homogeneous in axial skeleton
Alternative Differential Approaches ":():J"
• Hint: Assess the extent & distribution of .-i
o ± Osteonecrosis
osteosclerosis when considering diagnosis o
• Osteopetrosis • Diffuse vs. regional sclerosis
VI
VI
<ll
o Diffuse osteosclerosis with o
o Diffuse: Metastases, renal osteodystrophy, C
undertubulation & cortical thickening; sickle cell anemia, myelofibrosis, fluorosis,
VI
o
~
-
(J
.s:::.
a.
ro
~ (Leh) Lateral radiograph
Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications Paget Disease
II
62
GENERALIZED INCREASED BONE DENSITY, ADULT 3
III
CO
CIl
OJ
III
III
CIl
Co
(pachydermoperiostosis) . o
C
(Right) Lateral radiograph III
Mastocytosis
(Lem Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse
mixed lytic & sclerotic
density. Although
mastocytosis generally
produces either focal
sclerosis or diffuse
osteoporosis, this patient has
a mixture of both. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows diffuse increased
density throughout the axial
and appendicular skeleton.
The appearance is of
"marble bone", or
osteopetrosis.
Erdheim-Chester POEMS
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
generalized increased
density in the marrow of
both the femur and tibia ••
sparing the cortices and
epiphyses Ell. The findings
were bilateral and the axial
skeleton was normal.
Appearance is typical of
Erdheim-Chester disease.
(Right) AP radiograph shows
the unusual sclerosing
pattern Ell of myeloma in
this patient with POEMS
syndrome. The sclerosis may
be focal, or more diffuse as
in this case.
II
63
<Jl
::J GENERALIZED INCREASED BONE DENSITY, CHILD
o
Q)
<Jl
<Jl
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Renal Osteodystrophy (Healing)
....: o Patchy sclerosis as unmineralized osteoid
-
u
.r:
0..
ro
~
Common
• Physiologic Periosteal Reaction of Newborn
(osteomalacia) calcifies and bone
resorption (hyperparathyroidism) heals
Ol (Mimic) o Coarsened trabeculae, periosteal new bone,
.Q
-0
ro • Renal Osteodystrophy (Healing) widened metaphyses
a: • Child Abuse (Mimic) • Child Abuse (Mimic)
"C
Ql Less Common o Average age: 1-4 years
VI
l'Cl
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications o Fractures of varying ages, metaphyseal
al
Ql • Complications of Prostaglandins (Mimic) corner fractures, periosteal new bone
Cl
l'Cl • Congenital Cyanotic Heart Disease Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
E
• Complications of Vitamin A • Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications
• Complications of Vitamin D o Bone pain begins after age 2-3
• Scurvy (Mimic) o Multiple bone infarctions may create
• Neuroblastoma (Mimic) "bone within bone" appearance
• Leukemia (Mimic) o Long bone periostitis and generalized
• Osteomyelitis patchy increased density
Rare but Important • Complications of Prostaglandins (Mimic)
• Caffey Disease (Infantile Cortical o IV prostaglandins used in
Hyperostosis) (Mimic) ductus-dependent congenital heart disease
• Idiopathic Hypercalcemia of Infancy o Soft tissue swelling, periosteal elevation
• Erythroblastosis Fetalis and extensive periosteal new bone
• Osteopetrosis • Congenital Cyanotic Heart Disease
• Pycnodysostosis o Represents 2° hypertrophic
• Polyostotic Fibrous Dysplasia osteoarthropathy
• Hypoparathyroidism o Thick, widespread periostitis in diaphysis,
• Complications of Fluoride metaphysis, and epiphysis
• Engelmann-Camurati Disease • Complications of Vitamin A
• Osteosclerotic Dysplasias o Excessive intake; occurs after age 1 year
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses new bone; extensive ligament calcification "U
=r
• Caffey Disease (Mimic) • Engelmann-Camurati Disease o
.-i
o Presents 4-12 years with waddling gait,
o Seen first 5 months o
o Involves mandible, clavicles, scapulae, ribs,
muscle weakness III
III
<1l
o Spindle-shaped with diaphyseal cortical o
tubular bones; ± asymmetric c::
o Spindle-shaped bones due to diaphyseal
thickening; metaepiphyses spared III
-
()
.c
0-
ro
~ (Left) Lateral radiograph
Child Abuse (Mimic)
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse
increased density of
diaphyses" due to
subperiosteal hemorrhage
and periosteal new bone.
Note dense metaphyseal
bands (white line of Frankel)
HI and metaphyseal
(fe/ken) fracture III (RighI)
Lateral radiograph shows
diffuse soft tissue swelling
and moth-eaten appearing
humerus with extensive
cfoaking periostitis resulting
in increased density.
Findings represent metastatic
neuroblastoma.
II
66
GENERALIZED INCREASED BONE DENSITY, CHILD 3
III
to
<tl
CD
III
VI
Caffey Disease (Infantile Cortical <tl
a.
Osteomyelitis Hyperostosis) (Mimic)
(Left) Anteroposterior ::0
OJ
radiograph shows widened a.
provisional calcification zone o'
of syphilitic osteochondritis . ..•
<0
OJ
There are lucent -0
::T
metaphyseal bands III with
subtle diaphyseal periostitis
o
_-I
EiII along the long bones,
typical of congenital syphilis.
o
en
en
(Right) Anteroposterior <1l
radiograph shows Caffey o
c
disease at age one month en
with the typical marked
thick, wavy periosteal new
bone" typical of cortical
hyperostosis. This patient's
mandible was also involved
(not shown).
Osteopetrosis Pycnodysostosis
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows uniform
increased density in
osteopetrosis. There is mild
undertubulation •. with
relative widening of the distal
femoral metadiaphyses.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph in a child with
pycnodysostosis also shows
uniformly dense bone,
similar to osteopetrosis. This
short-limbed dwarf also has
micrognathia and shortened
fingers (not shown) typical
of pycnodysostosis.
II
67
VJ
::l SCLEROSING DYSPLASIAS
o
OJ
VJ
VJ
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Mimics of bone island or generalized
I- sclerosis are relatively common
u Common
:c o Distribution of osseous abnormality,
0-
ro • Enostosis (Bone Island) clinical history, or other radiographic clues
~
Ol
.Q
• Melorheostosis (Leri-Weill) are most useful for differentiation
"0
ro
• Sclerotic Metastasis (Mimic)
a: • Osteitis Condensans Ilii (Mimic) Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
"0 • Osteitis Pubis (Mimic) • Enostosis (Bone Island)
Q)
Vl o Focal dense sclerosis, generally rounded, in
• Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle (Mimic)
'"
lD
• Osteoma (Mimic) medullary space
o Edges "fade" into normal bone, making the
Q)
Cl
• Osteopoikilosis
'E" • Hyperossified Brown Tumors (Mimic) lesion appear somewhat spiculated
o MR low signal on all sequences,
• POEMS (Mimic)
non-enhancing
Less Common • Melorheostosis (Leri-Weill)
• Osteopetrosis (Albers-Schonberg) o Irregular cortical hyperostosis; may involve
• Osteopathia Striata (Voorhoeve) either periosteal or endosteal cortical
• Engelmann-Camurati Disease (Progressive thickening, or both
Diaphyseal Dysplasia) o Usually monostotic or monomelic (single
• Ribbing Disease (Hereditary Multiple limb)
Diaphyseal Sclerosis) o May follow sclerotome distribution
• Sarcoid (Mimic) (medial or lateral distribution in limb)
Rare but Important o "Flowing" elongated pattern likened to
• Pycnodysostosis (Maroteaux-Lamy) dripping candle wax
• Erdheim-Chester Disease (Mimic) • Sclerotic Metastasis (Mimic)
• Intramedullary Osteosclerosis o Solitary: May be radiographically
• Osteosclerosis (Worth Disease) indistinguishable from bone island;
• Pyle Dysplasia enhance with MR
• Hyperostosis Corticalis Generalisata (Van o Generalized: Rarely breast or prostate
Buchem) metastases will have a symmetric
• Kenny-Caffey Syndrome (Mimic) generalized distribution making them
• Mastocytosis (Mimic) difficult to distinguish from osteopetrosis
in the pelvis or spine
• Osteitis Condensans Ilii (Mimic)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Location-specific, often bilaterally
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues symmetric
• Sclerosing dysplasias are a spectrum of o High signal on fluid-sensitive MR
disease, ranging from the innocuous bone sequences; enhancing
island through the severely disabling • Osteitis Pubis (Mimic)
osteopetrosis o Same as Osteitis Condensans Ilii
o Most are identified by their radiographic • Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle (Mimic)
distribution, which can be quite specific o Same as Osteitis Condensans Ilii
o Sclerosing dysplasias can be mixed • Osteoma (Mimic)
(particularly melorheostosis + bone o Hamartoma which may be
islands/ osteopoikilosis/ osteopathia striata) radiographically indistinguishable from
o Histology usually does not differentiate the bone island
sclerosing dysplasias from one another; o Location within paranasal sinus or
dense hamartomatous bone is nonspecific calvarium is usually diagnostic
• Aside from the two most common (bone o Familial polyposis: Cortical surface
island & melorheostosis), sclerosing osteomas in long bones
dysplasias are uncommon or rare diseases • Osteopoikilosis
o Metaphyseal or epiphyseal
II
68
SCLEROSING DYSPLASIAS 3
Cl>
(C
<ll
o Low signal on all sequences, o Affects diaphyses; over long term may III
Cl>
non-enhancing extend to metaphyses III
<ll
• Hyperossified Brown Tumors (Mimic) o Normal axial skeleton Co
II
70
SCLEROSING DYSPlASIAS 3
Cll
to
(l)
ll:J
Cll
1/1
(l)
a.
Osteitis Pubis (Mimic) Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle (Mimic)
(Left) Coronal T2WI FS MR ;;0
Q)
shows high signal within lhe Cl.
pubic rami. in a lypical <:5"
<0
MR appearance of osteitis ~
Q)
pubis. Though lhe "0
::T
radiographic appearance is
of sclerosis, lhe MR is
o
-l
dislinclly differenl from lhe
uniformly low signal of a
o
1/1
1/1
sclerosing dysplasia. (Right) (1)
(Leh) Coronal T I WI MR
shows mulliple round low
signa/lesions in a
melaphyseal dislribution lIllI.
They remained low signal on
fluid sequences, as well as
post-contrast, confirming the
diagnosis of osteopoikilosis.
(Right) Posleroanlerior
radiograph shows multiple
round sclerotic lesions III
suggesting osteopoikilosis.
This patient had a
parathyroid adenoma
removed; these are Brown
tumors, hyperossified in the
healing phase.
II
71
lfJ
::> SClEROSING DYSPLASIAS
o
Q)
lfJ
lfJ
o
r-:
u
:ca. Hyperossified Brown Tumors (Mimic) POEMS (Mimic)
ro (Left) Posteroanterior
•...
Ol radiograph shows dense
.2 sclerosis in the tuft •. Prior
"0
ro image showed a lytic lesion;
0:: the patient had a parathyroid
"0 adenoma resected and the
Ql
lfJ Brown tumor healed with
III dense ossification. (Right)
III
Q)
Anteroposterior radiograph
Ol shows diffuse sclerosis of the
III
pelvic osseous structures.
E This is a case of sclerosing
myeloma. Most cases show
more discrete round sclerotic
lesions, but occasionally they
are diffuse, mimicking
osteopetrosis.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows dense
sclerosis of the entire
skeleton. There is
undertubulation in the
proximal & distal femora ••
due to inadequate osteoclast
resorption during the
remodeling process of
growth. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows the bone-in-bone
appearance _ seen
secondary to failure of
osteoclastic activity during
growth of the bone.
II
72
SCLEROSING DYSPlASIAS 3
III
lC
<l>
tIJ
III
<n
<l>
a.
Sarcoid (Mimic) Sarcoid (Mimic)
(Left) Coronal T1 WI MR ;;0
OJ
shows multiple, round, low a.
signal metaphyseal lesions o'
•• which might mimic ...•
<0
OJ
osteopoikilosis. However,
fluid sensitive sequences "o-::r
show high signal in this case .-1
of sarcoid granulomas.
(Right) Anteroposterior
o
<n
radiograph shows dense
<n
(1)
Pycnodysostosis (Maroteaux-lamy)
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse
dense scferosis, with mild
undertubulation, suggesting
osteopetrosis. However, the
patient also had a decreased
angle of the mandible, more
typical of pycnodysostosis.
(Right) Posteroanterior
radiograph in the same
patient as previous image,
shows severe acroo5leolysis
•• along with dense
scferosis of all the bones.
This feature differentiates
pycnodysostosis from
osteopetrosis.
II
73
rJl
:J HYPERTROPHIC CALLUS FORMATION
o
Q)
rJl
rJl
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Over time decreased density, more
r-: ill-defined: Resorbs or incorporates
u Common
:c • Infection
0-
ro • Motion (Poor Immobilization) o Open fracture or open reduction (ORIF)
~
Ol
.Q
• Fracture, Nonunion o Hint: Worsening pain
"0 • Fracture, Delayed Union
CU
0:: • Bone Graft (Mimic) Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
"C
• Infection • Complications of Steroids
CIl
rJl o Insufficiency or rib fxs: Prominent callus
ns less Common
!Xl o Atrophic callus more typical
CIl
Ol
• Complications of Steroids o Generalized osteoporosis
ns • Cushing Disease
E o Spine compression fxs, AVN
• Brain and Spinal Cord injury • Cushing Disease
• Fracture with Thermal Injury, Burns o Endogenous steroid production
Rare but Important o Finding same as with steroid use
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta • Brain and Spinal Cord injury
o Disuse osteoporosis with poorly controlled
motion of body - fx & hypertrophic callus
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Fracture with Thermal Injury, Burns
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Overlying soft tissues abnormal or grafted
• Hint: External callus with hardware fixation Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
concerning for complication • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
o Infection or delayed union o Femur most common
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Generalized osteoporosis
• Motion (Poor Immobilization) o Limb, vertebral deformities
o Hardware failure or delayed treatment o Other fractures, varied ages
• Fracture, Nonunion Other Essential Information
o Rounded, sclerotic fracture edges • Degree of callus formation dependent on
• Fracture, Delayed Union age, site of fracture, type of immobilization
o Represent continuum of healing o Minimal external callus with hardware
o Time frame varies by location, type of • Diaphyseal callus> metaphyseal callus
fixation, patient age, condition of tissues • Callus thick cortex> thin cortex
• Bone Graft (Mimic) • Minimal external callus with carpal, tarsal
o Seen on post-operative images bones, bone protuberances (Le., malleoli)
Infection
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows sequelae
from hardware for tibiotalar
fusion III. Extensive external
cal/us is present around the
distal tibia EilI and is the
result of infection during
healing. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows thin, osteoporotic,
bowed tibia & fibula.
Extensive callus surrounds &
bridges between the bones.
This finding may be seen in
patients with osteogenesis
imperfecta tarda.
II
75
en
:::l BONE WITHIN BONE APPEARANCE
o
Q)
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Systemic, symmetric increase in bone
~
-
u
~
C>-
eo
~
Common
• Neonatal Spine, Normal
density
o Normal serum calcium, alkaline
phosphatase and phosphorus levels
OJ
.Q
• Osteopetrosis • Renal Osteodystrophy, Healing
-0
eo • Renal Osteodystrophy, Healing o Skeletal response to any chronic renal
0::: • Immobilization disease
"C
Ql • Paget Disease o Primary hyperparathyroidism causes
en
<ll
co Less Common sclerosis only in healing stage
Ql • Osteomyelitis, with Involucrum o Rugger jersey spine more common
01
<ll • Hypervitaminosis D appearance than "bone in bone"
E • Striped appearance of spine
• Leukemia
• Subperiosteal Hemorrhage • Dense endplates with lucent vertebral
• Bone Infarct body centers
• Acromegaly • Immobilization
• Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy o Induces osteopenia
• Linea Aspera Hypertrophy (Mimic) o Produces growth arrest and recovery lines
• Cement & Bone Fillers (Mimic) • Paget Disease
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications o Spine and iliac wings commonly affected
• Gaucher Disease o Cortical thickening producing bone
enlargement is the classic finding
Rare but Important
o Mixed sclerotic and lytic phase is more
• Tuberculosis common than purely sclerotic phase
• Heavy Metal Poisoning o Polyostotic form results in deformed,
• Erdheim Chester sclerotic skeleton in end stage
• Oxalosis
• Thorotrast Exposure Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Osteomyelitis, with Involucrum
o Infarction of bone with fibroosseous wall
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Focal disease
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Long bones
• Alternating bands of sclerosis producing • Hypervitaminosis D
similar outline of bone in marrow space o Disrupts enchondral bone formation
• During stress or severe illness, osteoblasts o Excessive calcification of cartilage cells
form a thin line under the zone of o Dense metaphyseal bands, generalized
proliferative cartilage sclerosis in children
o Line ossifies when chondroblastic and • Leukemia
osteoblastic activity resumes o Growth arrest and resumption
• "Bone within bone" appearance is not classic o Radiolucent metaphyseal bands
for any particular diagnosis without history • Bone involvement in 50% of cases
• Can be presenting radiologic appearance
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Subperiosteal Hemorrhage
• Neonatal Spine, Normal o Blood tracking along periosteum calcifies
o Approximately half of 1-2 month old
- outline of underlying bone
infants have this finding o Due to trauma, scurvy
o Spontaneously resolves
o Scurvy has radiolucent band beneath
o Ovoid vertebral shape with dense superior
widened zone of provisional calcification
and inferior endplates is normal • "TriimmerfeId zone"
• Osteopetrosis • Bone Infarct
o Primary bone dysplasia causing failure of
o Irregularly calcified lesions in medullary
osteoclast activity cavity
II
76
BONE WITHIN BONE APPEARANCE 3
Ql
(Q
<1l
o Serpiginous or streaky region of infarction • Periphery of the rod tract, without llJ
III
can follow outline of bone cortex cement, can calcify '"a.
<1l
o Most often in ends of long tubular bones o Allographic bone (fibula) is typically split
;;0
o Associated with other entities and placed superficial to native bone Q)
a.
• Sickle cell anemia, pancreatitis, collagen Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses o'
(Q
vascular disease, occlusive vascular ~
• Tuberculosis Q)
'0
disease, Gaucher disease, Caisson disease o Localized bone-in-bone changes ::T
o Enchondromas can rarely have a similar o Appearance can be related to fusion of
o
.-i
appearance bones or periostitis with bone expansion o
• Acromegaly o Slow clinical course compared with '"'"
<1l
o Additional differentiating radiographic o
bacterial osteomyelitis C
findings • Heavy Metal Poisoning '"
• Tubular bone widening in skeletally o Lead and bismuth most commonly
mature patient • Faulty resorption of calcified cartilage
• Enlarged sella on CT, MR, radiographs o Phosphorus blocks resorption of bone
• Phalangeal and heel pad thickening trabeculae
• Excessively pneumatized sinuses • Erdheim Chester
• Increased vertebral body and disk height o Symmetric patchy or diffuse osteosclerosis
• Spadelike phalangeal tufts o a.k.a. lipid granulomatosis
• Bony proliferation at entheses o Metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal cortical
• Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy thickening
o Subcortical osteoporosis
• Epiphyses relatively spared
o Predilection for this appearance in wrist
• Oxalosis
and foot o Deposition of calcium oxalate crystals -
• Linea Aspera Hypertrophy (Mimic) excessive cartilage calcification
o Dense parallel lines along middle third of
o Sclerotic metaphyseal bands
femur visible on AP radiograph o Pagetic and "woolly" sclerosis
o Longitudinal ridges along posterior femur
• Thorotrast Exposure
• Hypertrophy of medial and lateral ridge o Reticuloendothelial cells phagocytize
from muscle attachments radioactive thorium dioxide producing
• Cement & Bone Fillers (Mimic) radiation osteitis
o Associated with post-operative changes,
o Dense opacification of liver, spleen and
usually removal of pin or rod from long lymph nodes
axis of bone, with residual cement
Osteopetrosis
II
78
BONE WITHIN BONE APPEARANCE 3
III
to
CIl
OJ
III
1Il
CIl
Q.
Bone Infarct
(Left) Axial TI WI MR shows ::0
OJ
a classic bone infarct •. C-
with serpiginous low signal. O
<0
The infarct pattern matches ~OJ
the outline of the bone, and "0
::T
gives a bone-in-bone
appearance. The low signal
o-1
lesions in the patella and
condyle are Brown tumors.
o
en
en
(Right) Anteroposterior CIl
radiograph of the middle o
c:
third of the femoral diaphysis en
shows two parallel sclerotic
lines" representing the
medial and lateral lips of the
linea aspera, located along
the posterior aspect of the
femur.
Cement & Bone Fillers (Mimic) Cement & Bone Fillers (Mimic)
(Left) Oblique radiograph
shows Girdlestone anatomy
~ of the hip after removal
of a total hip prosthesis. A
longitudinal sclerotic density
• with a lucent center in
the femoral medullary space
is due to a cement fragment
left when the femoral
prosthesis stem was
removed. This mimics a
bone-in-bone appearance.
(Right) Coronal bone CT in
the same patient as previous
image, beller demonstrates
the Girdlestone configuration
of the hip HI and cement
fragment •.
Erdheim Chester
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows rectangular regions of
increased density in central
portion of each vertebral
body. from bone infarcts,
which have a faint
bone-in-bone appearance.
Central endplate depression
~ of L4 mimics sickle cell
disease. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows medullary sclerosis,
with trabecular thickening
•• producing a faint
bone-in-bone appearance.
This was bilaterally
symmetric and did not
involve the cortices.
II
79
(f)
:J OSTEOPENIA
o
<1l
(f)
(f)
Osteoporosis Osteoporosis
llJ
Ql
III
(l)
C.
Osteomalacia/Rickets Renal Osteodystrophy
(Left) Anteroposterior ;U
Q)
radiograph shows severe c.
generalized bone 1055 as well o'
ce
as metaphyseal cupping and ~
Q)
fraying" in this child with "0
:r
rickets. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
o
.-1
shows osteopenia and
dysmorphic femoral necks
o
en
en
EiII and trochanters which CD
are the result of renal o
c
osteodystrophy. The en
osteopenia in end stage renal
osteodystrophy is secondary
to a combination of
hyperparathyroidism and
osteomalacia (rickets].
Neoplasm Neoplasm
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph of the pelvis
shows diffuse osteopenia
and metaphyseal lucent lines
EiII in a child. (Right) Lateral
radiograph of the spine from
the same patient as previous
image, shows diffuse and
severe o5teopenia. A mild
compression deformity of the
L I vertebra" is also seen
which was out of proportion
to a mild injury. The findings
represent a diffuse infiltrative
process which proved to be
leukemia.
II
81
(/)
::> OSTEOPOROSIS, GENERALIZED
o
Q)
(/)
(/)
II
82
OSTEOPOROSIS, GENERALIZED 3
Ql
to
<ll
o Bone resorption: Subperiosteal, • Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria) OJ
Ql
subchondral, subligamentous, o Disc changes: Extensive mineralization, VI
<ll
subtendinous, cortical tunneling narrowing, vacuum, endplate sclerosis Q.
;;0
o Chondrocalcinosis, soft tissue calcium
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses III
Q.
deposition, Brown tumors o·
• Heparin to
• Hyperthyroidism ~
o No specific radiographic changes III
o Cortical tunneling
o Accelerated skeletal maturation
• Hypogonadism "::ro
o No specific changes -l
• Cushing Disease • Homocystinuria o
o Hypertrophic callus VI
o Scoliosis, abnormal vertebral shape VI
<ll
o Limited appendicular involvement o
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta C
• Thalassemia o Wormian bones, kyphoscoliosis, fractures
VI
Senile Osteoporosis
o'"'"
~
()
:c
0-
Steroids Non-Weightbearing
m (Left) Anteroposterior
~
C> radiograph From a renal
.Q transplant patient on steroids
"0
m shows difFuse osteopenia
0::
"'"
Q)
=
and AVN within the lunate
and proximal pole of the
scaphoid Ell. (Right) AP
III radiograph shows a patient
III
Q)
with Paget disease who has
C> been bedridden For a year.
III
The bones are severely
E osteoporotic from
non-weightbearing,
superimposed on the
sclerotic Pagetic changes.
Osteoporosis results in
de(ormities, including
protrusio •.
Diabetes Mellitus
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows vascular calcification
Ell in this young diabetic
patient. There is diFFuse
osteopenia, typically seen in
this disease, which has
resulted in calcaneal
insufficiency avulsion
Fracture _ (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows diffuse osteoporosis,
coarsening of trabeculae,
resorption of the distal
clavicle" and a large
Brown tumor _ Findings
are typical of renal
osteodystrophy.
II
84
OSTEOPOROSIS, GENERALIZED 3
l»
(Q
CD
!Xl
l»
II>
CD
C.
II
85
VI
:> OSTEOPOROSIS, GENERALIZED
o
<Il
VI
VI
o
t-
u
:c
0-
Cushing Disease
ro (Leh) Anteroposterior
'-
Cl radiograph shows diffuse
.Q osteopenia and an expansile
"0
ro lytic lesion of the right ilium
a::: • in this patient with
hyperparathyroidism and a
"
Ql
VI
nl
brown tumor of the iliac
wing. (Right) Anteroposterior
III
Ql
radiograph shows diffuse
Cl osteopenia in this patient
nl
with Cushing disease.
E Sclerosis in the femoral head
from AVN •• is present, an
uncommon finding with
endogenous steroid excess.
Thalassemia
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows typical
findings of thalassemia with
"squaring" of the bones,
especially the metacarpals
•• due to marrow packing
with accompanying thinning
of the endosteal cortex.
(tMSK Req). (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows diffuse osteoporosis,
as well as a distended hip
joint •. Erosions are seen at
the femoral head, with
collapse" This is a patient
with myeloma and focal
amyloid deposition within
the hip joint.
Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria)
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse
osteopenia and an
Erlenmeyer flask deformity of
the distal femur. These
findings are characteristic of
Gaucher disease, related to
marrow packing. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
=
calciFication within the disks
as well as diffuse
osteoporosis in a patient with
ochronosis.
II
86
OSTEOPOROSIS, GENERALIZED 3
III
(C
CD
CD
III
C/l
CD
Co
Homocystinuria Osteogenesis Imperfecta
(Left) Lateral radiograph ::0
OJ
shows severe osteoporosis C-
and early compression o'
(C
fractures in a teenager with ~OJ
homocysUnuria. Other -0
::T
images, not shown, include ()
hands showing .-l
arachnodactyly. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
o
en
en
shows severe osteopenia, CD
gracile bones with "growth" o
c
lines" in the metaphyses in en
this skeletally immature
individual with osteogenesis
imperfecta tarda.
II
87
en REGIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS
:0
o
Q)
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Large joints lower extremity: Consider
t--"' transient osteoporosis/regional migratory
u Common
:c osteoporosis
0.
CIl • Disuse/Immobilization
~ Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
OJ • Loss or Absence of Overlying Soft Tissues
.Q
-0 (Mimic) • Disuse/Immobilization
CIl
0:: o Clinically evident cause
• Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
-c o Segmental (foot, hand)
Q)
• Inflammatory Arthritis
o Larger joint (elbow, knee) involvement not
I/)
III o Rheumatoid Arthritis
to o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
common, only with distal joint
Q)
OJ o Ankylosing Spondylitis
involvement
III
E o Occurs after 6-8 weeks immobilization
o Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis
o Increased fracture risk
• Septic Joint
o Rapid bone turnover
less Common • Loss or Absence of Overlying Soft Tissues
• Regional Migratory Osteoporosis (Mimic)
• Transient Osteoporosis of the Hip o Segmental distribution
• Hemophilia o Uniform appearance
Rare but Important o Mastectomy most common cause
• Hypothyroidism o Surgical resection overlying soft tissues
• Forequarter amputation or hip
disarticulation
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Atrophy
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Stroke
• Need to correlate with clinical information • Neuromuscular disorders
• Important to determine if monoarticular or • Associated osteoporosis from disuse
polyarticular o Rotation may mimic, especially on CXR,
metaphyseal common
o Cortical tunneling & scalloping o Lower extremity more common
o Subperiosteal and endosteal resorption o Early clinical phase: Severe burning pain,
(unusual, mainly CRPS) soft tissue swelling, hypersensitivity,
• Hint: Mottled or band-like appearance sweating, vasomotor alterations
implies rapid onset; consider disuse, CRPS o Late clinical phase: Muscle atrophy, joint
Disuse/Immobilization Disuse/Immobilization
Rheumatoid Arthritis
(Leh) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows
perj·articular osteoporosis
involving the carpus and
MCP joints _ Many other
RA features are noted,
including soft tissue nodules,
joint space loss, and
marginal erosions. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows decreased bone
density for a 41 year old
male. There is diffuse joint
space loss, cortical
indistinctness and several
focal marginal erosions Ell
all typical of rheumawid
arthritis.
II
90
REGIONAL OSTEOPOROSIS 3
III
to
It)
[II
III
VI
It)
Q.
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Ankylosing Spondylitis
(Left) Lateral radiograph ;;0
III
shows decreased bone c-
density in this patient with o·
<0
j/A. Thinning of the cortices, ~
III
especially the radial head "0
::T
and capitellum is apparent
_ The patient also had
o-I
advanced maturation of
these epiphyses relative to
o
VI
VI
the opposite elbow. (t MSK CD
Req). (Right) Lateral a
c:
radiograph shows osteopenia Cf)
II
91
(/)
::J CORTICAL TUNNELING
o
<1>
(/)
(/)
-
U
.c
Cl.
co
~
Common
• Disuse Osteoporosis
• Disuse Osteoporosis and Immobilization
o Lower extremity common
o Regional pattern of osteoporosis
Ol
.Q
• Immobilization
• Rheumatoid Arthritis • Rheumatoid Arthritis
"co
0:: • Hyperparathyroidism (HVfH) o Hands, feet predominate early in disease
o Peri-articular osteopenia, marginal erosions
"t:l
Cl) • Renal Osteodystrophy
(/) o Uniform joint space narrowing
III • Osteomalacia/Rickets
al o Includes juvenile onset disease
Cl)
Cl
Less Common • Hyperparathyroidism (HPTH)
III
• Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) o Hands commonly show findings well
E
• Thyrotoxicosis o Generalized osteoporosis
• Acromegaly o Subperiosteal, subchondral,
Rare but Important subligamentous, subtendon resorption
• Hypophosphatasia • Renal Osteodystrophy
o Combination osteomalacia & HVfH
• Osteomalacia/Rickets
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Diffuse skeletal involvement
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Ill-defined, coarse trabeculae
• Hint: Usually not an isolated finding; this is o Looser zones, pseudofractures
an aggressive pattern of bone resorption & o Rickets: Metaphyseal cupping, fraying
other associated processes are likely present Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Appearance of cortical tunneling is due to • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)
widening of haversian canals o Lower extremity common
• Indicative of high bone turnover, but with o Regional pattern of osteoporosis
several different etiologies o May have trophic soft tissue changes
o t Osteoclastic activity: ' • Thyrotoxicosis
Hyperparathyroidism o Phalanges of hands, feet
o Hyperemia: CRPS o Generalized osteoporosis
o ~ Stress on bone: Disuse/immobilization • Acromegaly
osteoporosis o Generalized osteoporosis
o Un mineralized osteoid: o Spade-like phalangeal tufts
Osteomalacia/rickets o Cortical thickening, enthesopathy
92
cortex consistent with resorption of bone from the
margins of the Haversian canals Ell
hyperemia. The hyperemia leads to rapid bone
=-
turnover, in turn causing intracorucal tunneling
CORTICAL TUNNELING 3
l»
(0
III
III
l»
III
CD
C.
phalanges =
striations within the
in this patient
with renal osteodystrophy.
(fJ
Osteomalacia/Rickets Osteomalacia/Rickets
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
intracorticallucencies = in
this child with rickets. These
findings are due to
nonmineralized osteoid
lining Haversian canals.
(RighI) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows lack of
distinction between
medullary and cortical bone
=
of the distal radius and ulna
as a result of cortical
tunneling in this patent with
rickels.
II
93
(/)
:::l PSEUDOARTHROSIS
o
Q)
(/)
(/)
- ossification
t--"
u Common
.r: o Sacroiliac joint fusion
Q.
ro • Fracture, Nonunion o Enthesopathy, hip & shoulder arthritis
~
OJ
o • Failed Graft • DISH, Post-Trauma
1:l
ro Less Common o Following disruption of fused spine
0:: o Ligament ossification
"tl
• Ankylosing Spondylitis, Post-Trauma
ell
(/)
• DISH, Post-Trauma • ALL, iliolumbar, sacrotuberous,
ro
III • Fibrous Dysplasia sacrospinous, stylohyoid, OPLL
ell o Enthesopathy
Cl Rare but Important
ro o Sacroiliac joint changes
E • Neurofibromatosis • Fusion upper 1/3, bridging osteophytes
• Congenital Pseudoarthrosis • Fibrous Dysplasia
• Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria) o Mildly expansile, ground-glass matrix
• Osteogenesis Imperfecta o Well-defined ± sclerotic margins
o Monostotic or polyostotic
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Neurofibromatosis
• Hint: Similar spinal risk of pseudoarthrosis o Tibia, clavicle, radius, ulna
with ankylosing spondylitis, DISH, o Fracture by age 2
ochronosis o May be only manifestation of
neurofibromatosis
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Congenital pseudoarthrosis similar
• Post-Operative (Nonunion & Failed Graft) • Ochronosis (Alkaptonuria)
o Hint: Motion, especially in spine
o Following disruption of fused spine
o Hint: Look for hardware failure
o Vertebral osteoporosis, extensive discal
o Tibia common due to poor blood supply
mineralization
o Nonbridging callus, may be hypertrophic
o OA-like changes SI joints, hips, knees
o Smooth sclerotic margins
o Absence of osteophytes
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses • Osteogenesis Imperfecta
• Ankylosing Spondylitis, Post-Trauma o Generalized osteoporosis
o Following disruption of fused spine o Bowing & other deformities of "soft" bones
o Syndesmophytes, facet joint ankylosis o Multiple fractures of varying ages
Failed Graft
(Left) Sagittal NECT reveals a
C5 carpectomy and a strut
graft from C4 to C6 •. The
margins of the graft-C6
interface are smooth and
sclerotic. consistent
pseudoarthrosis. (RighI)
Sagittal STIR MR shows a
pronounced oblique fracture
involving the lower thoracic
spine with a fluid-filled
pseudoarthrosis Ell in this
patient with ankylosing
spondylitis.
DISH, Post-Trauma
(Left) Sagittal bone CT
demonstrates OPLL and
DISH" Fracture is present
resulting in deformity of the
inferiorvertebra" The
Fracture margins are smooth
and sclerotic consistent with
pseudoarthrosis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows two sites of osseous
dysplasia. in this child
with the cystic type of
pseudoarthrosis associated
with neurofibromatosis.
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows complete
fracture through the tibia and
fibula with smoothly tapered
fracture margins •. The
appearance is classic for
congenital pseudoarthrosis.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
intramedullary rodding of
both femora. The right
femoral rod is fractured with
pseudoarthrosis of the mid
femoral diaphysis. in this
patient with osteogenesis
imperfecta.
II
95
en ENTHESOPATHY
::>
o
Q)
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Olecranon most common site
f- o Nonspecific
-
U
.r:
a.
ro
~
Common
• Degenerative Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
OJ
• DISH • Degenerative
.Q o No specific distribution
"0
ro
• Baastrup Disease
0::: o Well-defined
• Subacromial Spur
o No erosions or soft tissue swelling
"0
Ql
• Plantar Fasciitis
II)
C'Cl • Haglund Syndrome • DISH
CO o Especially pelvis, calcaneus, patella,
Ql
• Tendon/Ligament Microtrauma with
OJ Calcification (Mimic) olecranon
C'Cl
E • Ankylosing Spondylitis • Well-defined
• Avulsion Fractures, Pelvic (Mimic) • May be "bulky"
o Ligament ossification
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis (IBD)
• Psoriatic Arthritis • Anterior longitudinal (ALL), iliolumbar,
sacrotuberous, sacrospinous, stylohyoid
less Common o Sacroiliac joint
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis • Fusion upper 1/3, osteophytes
• Rheumatoid Arthritis • Baastrup Disease
Rare but Important o Supraspinous ligament
• Fluorosis o Spinous processes abnormal
• Hypoparathyroidism • Hypertrophied
• Hypophosphatasia • Marginal sclerosis and cysts
• Hypophosphatemia (Vitamin D Resistant • Bursa between hypertrophied processes
Rickets) • Subacromial Spur
o Result of impingement
o Associated bone proliferation on greater
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION tuberosity
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Plantar Fasciitis
• Enthesis: Insertion of tendon or ligament o Well-defined plantar enthesophyte
onto bone o Enthesophyte not causative
• Enthesopathy: Bone proliferation within o Thickened plantar fascia
enthesis o Fascial, perifascial edema
• Enthesitis: Inflammation at enthesis o Bone marrow edema at insertion
o May lead to erosion, bone formation • Haglund Syndrome
• Hint: Calcaneus common site RA, o Achilles enthesophyte
seronegative spondyloarthropathies o Achilles tendinosis
o Retrocalcaneal bursitis/erosions in all o Retrocalcaneal bursitis (no erosion)
o Achilles enthesophyte in all o Prominent bump on superior surface
• Least common: Chronic reactive arthritis posterior process of calcaneus
o Plantar surface reflects overall • Tendon/Ligament Microtrauma with
characteristics of arthritis Calcification (Mimic)
• RA: Well-defined erosion, sharp o Atypical sites
enthesophytes o Consider when absence of other findings
• Seronegative: III-defined erosion, • Ankylosing Spondylitis & IBD
whiskering new bone formation, sclerosis o Pelvis, proximal femur, calcaneus, patella
o Subligamentous bone resorption plantar • Associated erosion, sclerosis at enthesis
fascia in hyperparathyroidism may mimic o Spinal fusion
• Hint: Lower extremity common • Syndesmophytes
o Especially pelvis, proximal femur • Interspinous, supraspinous ligament
o Nonspecific ossification
• Upper extremity o Sacroiliac joint fusion (synovial portion)
II
96
ENTHESOPATHY 3
III
(Q
CD
o Hips, shoulder arthritis • Rheumatoid Arthritis OJ
III
• Avulsion Fractures, Pelvic (Mimic) o Calcaneus only site of enthesopathy VI
CD
o Result of healing process • Plantar enthesophyte well-defined Co
o
r:
-
()
.c
a.
III
~ (Left) Anteroposterior
DISH Subacromial Spur
prominent" bump"
marked thickening of the
=
Haglund syndrome including
and
II
98
ENTH ESOPATHY 3
III
co
(l)
en
III
l/I
(l)
C.
Avulsion Fractures, Pelvic (Mimic) Psoriatic Arthritis
(Left) Anteroposterior :;0
Dl
radiograph shows typical C-
case of an avulsion of the O
CO
anterior superior iliac spine. ~Dl
At four weeks follow-up new -0
::T
bone formation
site •. (Right)
is seen at the
o
-l
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows extensive ill-defined
o
l/I
l/I
enthesopathy at the malleoli CD
.:II. The productive changes o
c
seen here are typical of en
either psoriatic arthritis or
chronic reactive arthritis.
II
99
(/)
::l TENDON & LIGAMENTOUS OSSIFICATION
o
Q)
(/)
(/)
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• DISH • Hypophosphatasia
o Anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) o Diffuse skeletal involvement
o Iliolumbar, sacrotuberous, sacrospinous, o Ill-defined coarse trabeculae
stylohyoid ligaments o Looser's zones, pseudofractures
o Enthesopathy • Hypoparathyroidism
o Sacroiliac joint changes o ALL
• Fusion upper 1/3, osteophytes o Diffuse sclerosis, spinal osteophytes
o 50% have OPLL o Calvarial thickening, subcutaneous
• Post-Traumatic calcifications, hypoplastic teeth
o Random sites
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows extensive
enthesopathy, or ossification
of the tendon insertions at
the ischial tuberosities 11II.
Note the fused SI joints in
this patient with ankylosing
spondylitis. (RighI) Lateral
radiograph shows
ossification of the distal
Achilles tendon, slightly
proximal to the tendinous
insertion". It is slightly
rounded and smoothly
marginated, contrasting with
the more angular plantar
fascial enthesophyte ElII.
II
101
rn
:J BONE AGE, ADVANCED
o
<1l
rn
rn
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Marked advancement in bone age is more
t-=' likely to indicate elevated sex hormones
u Common
:c Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
0-
ro • Familial Tall Stature
~ • Excessive Sex Hormone
Ol
o • Idiopathic Precocious Puberty
o Induces early growth plate maturation
"0
ro • Excessive Sex Hormone
0::: • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis alA)
"0 o Chronic hyperemia causes growth centers
Cl> • Hemophilia
Vl
• Physeal Fractures to ossify early, enlarge, & fuse prematurely
'"
ell
• Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities • Hemophilia
Cl>
Cl • Similar JIA, + dense effusion
Less Common
E'" • Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities
• Hyperthyroidism o Vascular obliteration - premature fusion
• Hypothalamic Mass o Associated with bone hypoplasia, slipped
• Pituitary Gigantism capital femoral epiphysis, scoliosis
• Adrenocortical Tumor o Watch for "port-like" distribution
• Adrenal Hyperplasia o Associated radiation-induced sarcoma
• Exogenous Obesity
• Ectopic Gonadotropin Tumor Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Polyostotic Fibrous Dysplasia, • Hypothalamic Mass
o Early onset of normal maturation process
McCune-Albright
o Hypothalamic hamartoma or mass effect
Rare but Important from suprasellar tumors
• Chronic Septic Arthritis, Non-Bacterial • Adrenocortical Tumor or Hyperplasia
• Encephalitis o Hypersecretion of androgens and cortisol
• Primary Hyperaldosteronism • Ectopic Gonadotropin Tumor
• Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome o Hepatoblastoma/teratoma/chorioepithelioma
• Polyostotic Fibrous Dysplasia
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Ground-glass bone lesions + cafe au lait
spots + precocious puberty
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
Other Essential Information
• Skeletal maturation more than two standard
deviations above the mean • MR brain to exclude hypothalamic lesion
• Determining etiology highly dependent on • Pelvic ultrasound (females) for evidence of
lab findings and clinical presentation gonadotropin/estrogen stimulation
intercondylar notch
widening [;8 which can be
seen with hemophilia or
juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Bone age was advanced.
II
103
'"o
:::J BONE AGE, DELAYED
Q)
'"'"
o
I-
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS I I ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
-
U
.r:
a.
~
Common
• Constitutional Delay of Puberty (Normal
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Skeletal maturation more than two standard
Ol Variant) deviations below the mean
.2
"0
co • Chronic Disease o Formally evaluated with serial PA
0::: o Chronic Liver Disease radiographs of left hand
"0
QI
o Renal Osteodystrophy o Standards of Greulich and Pyle classically
'"ctl
al
o Congenital Heart Disease used for comparison
o Rickets
QI Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
Ol
ctl o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
E
• Majority of common diagnoses cause
o Thalassemia
delayed bone age due to delay of puberty
o Cerebral Palsy
o Are identifiable by clinical history
• Excessive Exercise
• Malnutrition Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
o Anorexia • Lead Poisoning
o Malabsorption Conditions o Widened metaphyses, dense metaphyseal
• Complications of Steroids lines
• Fetal Alcohol Syndrome • Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)
o Additional findings = flared iliac wing, flat
Less Common
acetabular roof, c1inodactyly,
• Lead Poisoning
microcephaly, atlantoaxial instability
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)
• Cushing Disease Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Hypopituitarism • Hypogonadism
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism o Results in long limbs with
• Craniopharyngioma disproportionally short trunk
Rare but Important Alternative Differential Approaches
• HIV-AIDS: MSK Complications • Stippled epiphyses: Hypothyroidism,
• Growth Hormone Deficiency Warfarin embryopathy, chondrodysplasia
• Hypogonadism punctata, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia,
• Hypothyroidism trisomy 21, trisomy 18, prenatal infection,
• Warfarin Embryopathy Morquio syndrome
II AP ,adiogfaph shows delayed skeletal maw,alion in this AP ,adiograph shows sulxhondral resorption at the 511
cenlefS =.
5 yea' old. Note the liny femo,al head ossification
The widened metaphyses 11\:I indicate
rickets in this patient with long-term renal disease.
Ell & slipped capital femoral epiphyses from ricke15•
in this 10 year old with renal osteodystrophy
skeletal maturalion is severely delayed.
The
104
BONE AGE, DElAYED 3
III
co
(l)
CJ
III
tII
(l)
Co
Rickets Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
(Left) Posteroanterior ;;0
OJ
radiograph shows the a.
widened zone of provisional o'
CO
calcification with frayed, ~OJ
cupped metaphysis at the "0
::T
distal radius and ulna __
typical of rickets. Note that
o
-l
despite the chronologie age
of 1 year, the skeletal
o
C/l
C/l
maturation is severely Cll
delayed. (Right) o
C
Posteroanterior radiograph C/l
(Left) Coronal T1 WI MR
shows open physis __ as
well as immature bone
marrow distribution with a
crescent of red marrow in
the epiphysis" and solid
red marrow in the
meta diaphysis Ell. She is a
19 year old competitive
gymnast who practices 5
hours daily. (Right) PA
radiograph of the wrist in the
same patient as previous
image, shows open physes at
the distal radius & ulna ••.
This patient is at least 2
standard deviations younger
than her chronologie age.
Lead Poisoning
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows the
squared bones, indicating
severe marrow packing in a
patient with thalassemia.
This five year old patient also
shows delayed bone age,
related to the chronicity of
the disease. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows the dense
metaphyseal lines ••.
resulting from deposition of
lead during growth. Chronic
lead poisoning can lead to a
delay in skeletal maturation.
II
105
<ll
::J SOFT TISSUE OSSIFICATION
VJ
VJ
i=
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Timing & zoning identical to heterotopic
(f)
ossification
I- Common
-
U
£
0-
ro
~
• Heterotopic Ossification
o Myositis Ossificans (Late)
• Loose Bodies
o Ossified round to oval masses located in &
around joints
OJ
o • Loose Bodies • May migrate away from joint within
'6
ro less Common tendon sheath
0:::
'0 • Fracture Fragment (Mimic) o Location & typical appearance can be
Ql
III • DISH confirmed with CT, MR
III
OJ • Leiomyoma, Deep Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
Ql
Cl • Cement & Bone Fillers (Mimic) • Fracture Fragment (Mimic)
III
E • Hematoma o Borders of bone fragment angular when
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis acute, rounded when chronic
• OPLL o Donor site usually has identifiable
• Osteosarcoma, Parosteal deformity
• Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma o Cartilage fragments mayor may not ossify
• Osteosarcoma, Metastasis • DISH
Rare but Important o Enthesopathic changes in spine and pelvis
• Liposarcoma, Soft Tissue predominate
• Lipoma, Soft Tissue • Flowing ossification anterior to vertebral
• Post-Operative Scar bodies
• Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal o Ligamentous ossification, with iliolumbar
• Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva most common
• Giant Cell Tumor, Soft Tissue Implants • Leiomyoma, Deep
o Smooth muscle benign neoplasm with
dense popcorn ossification
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Very commonly seen on pelvic imaging
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues due to uterine fibroids
• Calcification is not the same as ossification • Cement & Bone Fillers (Mimic)
o Ossification has mature features, such as o Bone graft may extrude into soft tissues
trabeculae and cortex o Cement extravasation may mimic bone
• Hematoma
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Peripheral ossification if chronic
• Heterotopic Ossification • Most commonly involving intracranial
o Numerous causes of soft tissue ossification
epidural hematomas
• Blunt trauma, tendon tear, burns, o Subperiosteal hemorrhage ossifies with
paralysis, tumor, neurologic infection more mature bone in the periphery
(poliomyelitis, tetanus, Guillain-Barre)
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis
o Calcifies at approximately one month post
o Intraarticular ossified masses may appear
insult, then ossifies later to be in soft tissue, depending on imaging
o Ossification is most mature peripherally,
plane
with center less mature o Extraarticular extension into surrounding
o Common sites of injury may suggest this
soft tissues may occur
diagnosis when changes are early o Bursal synovial osteochondromatosis
• Thigh after trauma and hip after joint projects outside joint on radiographs
replacement or paralysis
• OPLL
• Myositis Ossificans (Late) o Multilevel ossification of posterior
o Implies muscle ossification
longitudinal ligament in spine
• Term is sometimes used interchangeably • Mid cervical spine level most commonly
with heterotopic ossification involved
o Look for changes of myelopathy on MR
II
106
SOFT TISSUE OSSIFICATION 3
III
to
C1l
o Difficult to differentiate from other soft o Soft tissue mass with metaplastic foci of
tissue sarcomas ossification
• 50% demonstrate mineralization • Mass may invade adjacent bone
• Separate from adjacent bone • Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
o Lower extremities & pelvis most o Abnormal ossification of the soft tissues
commonly involved • Accelerated by minor trauma
o Metastases common at diagnosis o Ossification fatally limits respiratory
• Osteosarcoma, Metastasis movement
o Metastases ossify in a similar fashion to the o Associated finding of short great toe with
primary tumor valgus orientation
o Lung and nodal soft tissue masses most • Giant Cell Tumor, Soft Tissue Implants
common o Foci of benign giant cell tumor implanted
o Other "bone forming metastases" into soft tissue
(including breast, colon and urinary tract • Iatrogenic from surgery or biopsy
carcinomas), tend to calcify, rather than • Post-traumatic from pathologic fracture
ossify through primary lesion
o Characteristic peripheral ossification in
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Liposarcoma & Lipoma, Soft Tissue 1-2% of soft tissue implants
o Fat-containing soft tissue mass
• Ossification histologically identifiable in
high proportion of soft tissue implants
=
AnterofXJsterior radiograph shows mature ossification
involving the medial thighs in this horseback rider.
Note the peripheral cortex and central trabeculae,
Anteroposterior
mature
radiograph shows a solid sheet of
ossificaUoll
space is narrowed •
III around the hip. The hip joint
and there is a suprapubic
II
suggesting it is likely at least several months old catheter E!iI in place. suggesting paralysis.
107
Q)
:::J SOFT TISSUE OSSIFICATION
Ul
Ul
i=
;t:
o
en
~
-
t)
.<::
a.
ro
~
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a grade III
Heterotopic Ossification Myositis Ossificans (late)
OJ acromioclavicular
.Q dislocation, with elevation of
"0
ro the clavicle. relative to the
0:: acromion. Ossification 111
"0 between the clavicle and
Q)
Ul coracoid indicates disruption
CIl of the coracoclavicular
lD
ligaments. (Right) Axial bone
CI>
Ol
CIl
CT shows osseous matrix =
at the surface of the scapula.
E Ossification zoning, with
mature peripheral
ossification, is typical of
myosWs. Osteosarcoma
typically has more mature
matrix centrally.
II
108
SOFT TISSUE OSSIFICATION 3
III
(Q
tD
OJ
III
VI
tD
Co
Osteosarcoma, Parosteal Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma
(Left) Anteroposterior ;0
OJ
radiograph shows a.
=
well-differentiated
ossification wrapping
around and appearing
0·
(Q
iil
1:l
:::r
"pasledrr on the metaphyseal
region of the tibia. The tumor
o
.-1
bone is quite mature. (Right)
=
(J)
Axial NECT shows a large o
;::l>
mass between the right
:j
gluteus maximus and medius VI
muscles. The mass contains VI
C
areas of dense calcification (1)
or ossification =.
Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is
seen in older patients than
conventional osteosarcoma.
lymph node =
ossification of an enlarged
from
metastatic osteosarcoma.
This showed increased
radiotracer uptake on bone
scan.
II
109
Q)
:J NODULAR CALCIFICATION
(/)
(/)
i=
.t=o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Maintain a high suspicion for malignancy
(fJ when calcification is present with a mass
1-- Common
<.) Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
::c0- • Phlebolith
m • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy • Phlebolith
~
Q) o Small round calcification in vessel
.2 • Tendinitis, Calcific
"0
• Bursitis, Calcific o Characteristic central lucency
m
0::: o Common in lower extremities & pelvis
• Injection Granuloma
't:l
Ql • Myositis Ossificans (Early) • Pyrophosphate Arthropathy
(/)
o Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD)
01 • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis
Cll
Ql • Loose Body (Mimic) crystal deposition
Cl o Chondrocalcinosis in knee menisci, wrist
01
E Less Common TFCC & hip labrum can be nodular
• Gout • Tendinitis, Calcific
• Avulsion Fractures (Early) o Hydroxyapatite Deposition Disease
• Dermatomyositis (HADD) in tendons
• Hyperparathyroidism/Renal Osteodystrophy o Additional deposition in capsule,
• Mixed Connective Tissue Disease ligaments & bursae
• Hypervitaminosis D • Bursitis, Calcific
• Hematoma o HADD involving the bursa
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis o Shoulder & hip most common
• Rheumatoid Nodule • Injection Granuloma
• Soft Tissue Tumors Containing Nodular o Classic gluteal location; central lucency
Calcification • Myositis Ossificans (Early)
o Hemangioma, Soft Tissue o Amorphous calcification one month post
• Maffucci Syndrome trauma, before ossification
o Uterine Fibroid o Radiolucent zone between bone and
o Synovial Sarcoma myositis, unlike malignancy
o Hemangiopericytoma o Correlate with history of regional trauma,
Rare but Important although patients may not recall trauma
• Metastatic Calcification • Progressive Systemic Sclerosis
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus o Lobulated calcifications + tuft resorption
• Calcific Myonecrosis • Loose Body (Mimic)
• Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis o lntraarticular; features of ossification
• Trevor Fairbank (Dysplasia Epiphysealis Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Hemimelica) • Gout
• Thermal Injury, Burns o Calcified tophi - pressure erosions &
• Sarcoidosis intraosseous collections
• Chondrodysplasia Punctata (Mimic) o First MTP joint, Achilles tendon insertion
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism & olecranon bursa common
• Parasites • Avulsion Fractures (Early)
• Melorheostosis o Cartilaginous fragments may calcify
o Small osseous fragments can mimic
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION calcification
• Dermatomyositis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Inter- & intramuscular calcification
• Overlap in radiographic appearance of • Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
calcified collections Osteodystrophy
o Calcification = structureless density o Subperiosteal resorption, vascular
o Ossification = organized density with calcification & evidence of renal failure
cortex and/or trabeculae o Wrist, knee, hip, shoulder & elbow
• Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
II
110
NODULAR CALCIFICATION 3
III
(Q
CD
o Dermatomyositis & scleroderma findings o Disturbance of calcium or phosphorus lJl
III
• Hypervitaminosis D metabolism (can resolve with treatment)
o Large, calcified, periarticular masses • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
'"
CD
Co
Phlebolith
i=
;;=
o
(f)
r-:
-
(,)
.c
a.
ro
~
(Left) Anceroposterior
radiograph shows nodular
Tendinitis, Calcific
Ol calcification. in the
.Q expected region of the distal
"0
ro supraspinatus tendon,
a:: consistent with calcific
"tl tendonitis. (Right)
CIl
VI Anceroposterior radiograph
shows a nodular calcific
'"
CO
deposit. located superior
CIl
Cl to the greater tuberosity.
'"
E While the deposit looks solid
in this radiograph, the
distribution became linear on
internal rotation, confirming
location in the bursa, rather
than tendon, as is illustrated
in the prior case.
Injection Granuloma
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows several
peripherally calcified lesions
11II in the right gluteal region
from prior injections. The
central lucency is commonly
seen but can also be presenc
in phleboliths. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows early
myositis in the antecubital
fossa & forearm. Note that
the early bone formation is
amorphous __ appearing
nodular & calcified at this
lime. This appearance
suggests an injury 4-8 weeks
earlier, possibly an elbow
dislocation.
II
112
NODULAR CALCIFICATION 3
Ql
to
III
OJ
Ql
/JI
III
Co
Gout Avulsion Fractures (Early)
(Left) Oblique radiograph ;:0
Q)
shows an impressive soft c.
tissue tophus _ containing o
<0
density typical of sodium ~
Q)
urate deposition. There is a "0
:::r
large erosion at the PIP ()
which has resulted in a -l
classic overhanging edge Ell. (f)
(Right) Lateral radiograph o
;::l>
shows an avulsion fracture
• from the base of the =i
/JI
middle phalanx. This is a /JI
C
volar plate fracture, most CD
commonly seen following
dorsal dislocation. The size
of the fracture fragment
varies from a sliver of bone
to a sizable fragment.
Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
Dermatomyositis Osteodystrophy
(Left) Axial NECT shows
extensive myofascial
calcification with focal areas
of more confluent nodular
calcification •. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows severe osteopenia,
prominent vascular
calcification and globular
50ft tissue calcification"
suggesting
hyperparathyroidism. The
patient proved to have a
parathyroid adenoma.
Rheumatoid Nodule
(Left) Axial bone CT shows
numerous, rounded,
calcified bodies within the
knee joint" as well as
extension of the collection
into the posterior soft tissues
•• of the knee. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows a focal nodular
density. which causes
scalloping of the underlying
bone Ell. While this could
represent a giant ce/J tumor
of the tendon sheath,
narrowing of the second
MCP joint and a marginal
erosion" suggests
rheumatoid arthritis.
II
113
NODULAR CALCIFICATION
II
114
NODULAR CALCIFICATION 3
III
to
ll>
III
III
C/l
ll>
C.
Metastatic Calcification Systemic lupus Erythematosus
(Left) Anteroposterior ::0
OJ
radiograph shows extensive C.
amorphous calci(ication __ o
(Q
consistent with metastatic ~
OJ
calcium deposition, around -0
::T
the shoulder in a dialysis
patient. Amorphous calcium
o
.--1
deposition is commonly (f)
bilateral and asymptomatic. o
(Right) Frog lateral
~
radiograph shows dense
::j
en
globular sort tissue en
c:
calcifications. around the C1l
II
115
Q)
:::J LINEAR AND CURVILINEAR CALCIFICATION
l/l
l/l
i=
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Most commonly seen type of
o
en arteriosclerosis on extremity radiographs
f-" Common • Pipe stem appearance with contiguous,
o
:!: • Arteriosclerosis granular calcification
0-
ro
~ • Chondrocalcinosis • Medium-sized vessels involved
Ol
.2 • Aneurysm • Common in diabetics
"0
ro • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue • No narrowing of vessel lumen
0:: • Hyperparathyroidism/Renal Osteodystrophy o Arteriolar sclerosis involves small arteries
"C
Ql
l/l
• DISH and arterioles
C1l
al Less Common • Causes wall thickening and luminal
Ql
• Dermatomyositis narrowing
Cl
C1l
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis • Predominantly affects kidneys
E
• Synovial Sarcoma • Chondrocalcinosis
o Nonspecific cartilage calcification
• Hypercalcemia
• Calcified Chronic DVT • Involves hyaline or fibrocartilage
• Thermal Injury, Burns • Linear to globular configuration
depending on location
Rare but Important o Common in knee menisci, wrist triangular
• OPLL fibrocartilage complex, symphysis pubis
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus o Can involve joint capsule, synovium,
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism ligaments, and tendons
• Cysticercosis o Associated with numerous entities
• Echinococcal Cyst • Calcium pyrophosphate deposition
• Filariasis disease (CPPD), gout, hemochromatosis,
• Leprosy hyperparathyroidism, ochronosis,
• Dracunculiasis oxalosis, acromegaly, Wilson disease,
• Complications of Fluoride degenerative/idiopathic causes
• Armillifer Armillatus Infection • Aneurysm
o Arteriosclerosis outlines a larger than
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION expected caliber for vessel on radiographs
o Attention to aorta on chest, thoracic, and
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues lumbar studies
• Extremely common finding o Attention to popliteal artery on lateral
• Key factors: Location & pattern of knee radiographs
calcification • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Soft tissue mass consisting of abnormal
• Arteriosclerosis blood vessels
o Follows expected course of blood vessels • 7% of all benign soft tissue masses
o Three types: Atherosclerosis, Monckeberg o Usually intramuscular
arteriosclerosis, arteriolar sclerosis o Curvilinear calcification of blood vessels
o Atherosclerosis consists of intimal plaques o Linear dystrophic calcification in
that narrow the vessel lumen thrombus
• Coarse, irregular, patchy calcifications o Partially/completely calcified phleboliths
• Morbidity and mortality with • Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
involvement of aorta, coronary and Osteodystrophy
cerebral arteries o Cartilage calcification in wrist, knee, hip,
• Plaques can cause ulceration, thrombosis or shoulder in 20-40%
and embolic complications o Also, Rugger jersey spine, distal clavicular
o Monckeberg (medial) arteriosclerosis refers osteolysis, subperiosteal bone resorption,
to calcification of the middle vessel wall Brown tumors, or salt-and-pepper skull
(media)
II
116
LINEAR AND CURVILINEAR CALCIFICATION 3
III
lQ
<D
o Calcifications can outline venous valves OJ
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses III
• Thermal Injury, Burns VI
• Dermatomyositis <D
o Fine, stippled linear calcification Co
o Irregular calcification with wide variety of
o Localized to area of injury or can extend
appearances
along contracture bands
o Involves striated muscle, fascia, and skin
o Can be extensive, involving the trunk and Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
extremities • Cysticercosis
o Associations: Muscle atrophy and/or o "Rice grain" linear to oval calcifications
osteoporosis • Noncalcified central area
o Other findings include interstitial lung o Oriented parallel to muscle fibers
disease, esophageal dysmotility o Intracranial calcifications seen on CT
o Sometimes seen with occult neoplasm in • EchinococcaI Cyst
patients> SO years old o Hydatid cysts in organs, muscle, or
• Progressive Systemic Sclerosis subcutaneous tissue peripherally calcify
o Synonym: Scleroderma • Filariasis
o Elongated globular calcifications most o Dead coiled or linear worms calcify
common o Very fine calcifications best seen in web
• Curvilinear appearance early spaces of hands and feet
o Associated findings • Leprosy
• DIP and PIP erosions o Linear calcification of affected nerves
• Soft tissue atrophy • Dracunculiasis
• Acroosteolysis o Small crescentic calcifications
• Hypercalcemia • Complications of Fluoride
o Extensive clinical differential diagnosis o Iliolumbar, sacrotuberous, and paraspinal
• 90% due to hyperparathyroidism or ligamentous calcification most common
malignancy • Armillifer Armillatus Infection
• Differentiate with associated lab o Snake parasite larvae calcifies in soft tissues
abnormalities • Liver, mesentery, intestinal wall, lung,
o Cartilage calcification caused by pleura, scrotum
hyperparathyroidism is most common o West Africa infection rate 23% (visible on
• Calcified Chronic DVT radiographs in up to 7%)
o Irregular calcifications along venous 04-8 mm coiled, horseshoe, crescentic, or
distribution linear calcifications
~
-
()
.r:
a.
ro
~
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph of the knee
Chondrocalcinosis Chondrocalcinosis
Hyperparathyroidism/Renal Hyperparathyroidism/Renal
Osteodystrophy Osteodystrophy
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse,
intermediate density soft
tissue calcification •. This is
a prominent feature in
hyperparathyroidism. (Right)
Axial NEeT of the symphysis
pubis shows
chondroca/cinosisllII due to
renal osteodystrophy from
this patient's end stage renal
disease.
II
118
LINEAR AND CURVILINEAR CALCIFICATION 3
III
(Q
CIl
CD
III
VI
CIl
Co
(Left) Anteroposterior ;u
III
radiograph shows C>-
sacrotuberous ligament o
(Q
calcification. which is ~
III
seen in DISH; sacrospinous "0
::T
ligament
seen as
calcification
well. (Right)
may be
o
--i
Anteroposterior radiograph
(fJ
shows iliolumbar o
;:l>
ligamentouscalcification. --i
frequently seen in DISH. (ij.
Note the fusion of the VI
C
non-articular portions of the Cl>
sacroiliac joints as well HI
Dermatomyositis
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows ossification of the
posterior longitudinal
ligament" Though this is
seen more frequently on
OPLL, it may be seen in
DISI-/ as well. Note the
flowing anterior osteophytes
which have effectively fused
the spine Ell. (t MSK Req).
(Right) Lateral radiograph of
the right thigh shows
extensive, sheet-like
dermatomyositis.
II
119
Q)
:> LINEAR AND CURVILINEAR CALCIFICATION
en
en
t=
.t=o
Cf)
....-
-
t)
.r:
a.
ro
~
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows curvilinear
Ol calcification in an
.Q extraarticular location
"0
ro posterior 10 the knee •.
a: Though any 50ft tissue tumor
"C may COnlain dySlrophic
Ql
II) calcification~it occurs most
l'll frequenlly in synovial
III
sarcoma. (tMSK Req).
Ql
Cl (Right) AP radiograph shows
l'll
chondrocalcinosis in the
E pubic symphysis & labrum of
the hip III as well as
juxtaarticular calcifications
III in a patient with
paraneoplastic syndrome &
hypercalcemia.
OPLL
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows linear ossification of
the posterior longitudinal
ligament" typical of the
disease termed OPLL.
Although it is quite obvious
in this case, the ossification
may be thinner and much
more subtle. (t MSK Req).
(Right) Axial bone CT
confirms the ossification seen
in the previous image to be
of the posterior longitudinal
ligament" and
demonstrates the degree of
stenosis suffered by this
patient.
II
120
LINEAR AND CURVILINEAR CALCIFICATION 3
III
(0
<D
tlJ
III
VI
<D
Q.
Systemic lupus Erythematosus Pseudo hypoparathyroidism
(Left) Anteroposterior ::0
Ql
radiograph shows both Q.
Cysticercosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
=
rice-shaped calcified bodies
within the soft tissues.
The size and shape of these
bodies is typical of the
parasite Cysticercosis.
(Right) Axial NECT
demonstrates a dominant
cyst IlIII with an adjacent
daughter cyst III in the
spleen, due to infection with
the Echinococcus tapeworm
resulting in hydatid disease
(echinococcosis).
II
121
QJ
:J SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASM CONTAINING CALCIFICATION
'"'"
i=
<l=
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • 4-10 weeks: Earliest formation of osteoid;
(f) appears subtle, not dense, amorphous
I- Common • 10 weeks-6 months: Progressive
o • Myositis Ossificans (Mimic)
:2C- maturation; with maturation, develops
eo
~ • Synovial Sarcoma the zoning typical of myositis (immature
Ol
.Q • Periosteal Chondroma (Mimic) at center, mature bone peripherally)
-0
eo • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue • 6+ months: May begin to resolve and
0:: • Soft Tissue Chondroma decrease in size
"co
QJ • Intraarticular Chondroma o Time of greatest risk for confusion: 4-10
'"
CO Less Common weeks post trauma, when the osteoid
QJ
Cl • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma (MFH) formation is amorphous and appears
co similar to aggressive tumor bone formation
E • Liposarcoma, Soft Tissue
• Nerve Sheath Tumors o MR shows the halo of more mature bone,
• Osteosarcoma, Periosteal or Surface (Mimic) even at 4-10 weeks post trauma; helps to
• Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma differentiate from tumor
• Dystrophic Calcification within any Soft • Be aware that there may be periosteal
Tissue Tumor reaction adjacent to myositis, with
• Parosteal Lipoma marrow and soft tissue edema; this may
mimic a greater level of aggressiveness
Rare but Important
• Synovial Sarcoma
• Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma o Relatively common soft tissue sarcoma
• Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma (though less frequently seen than
malignant fibrous histiocytoma or
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION liposarcoma)
o Most frequent soft tissue sarcoma to
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues contain dystrophic calcification
• Hint: Whenever possible, determine the • 50% of synovial sarcomas contain
nature of the calcification dystrophic calcification
o If calcification can be identified as either
• Pattern of calcification is linear or
osteoid, chondroid, or dystrophic, go to globular, central or peripheral; therefore,
the alternative differential approach not predictable .
(below), segmented by type o Preferential location: Extraarticular, lower
o Calcified osteoid: Amorphous, less dense
extremity
than bone o Prime age group is young to middle aged
o Calcified chondroid: Denser than bone, adult; generally younger than patients
rings and arcs or punctate with MFH or liposarcoma
o Dystrophic calcification: Often globular,
o Hint: Soft tissue mass in the lower
very dense extremity containing dystrophic
• Hint: Be very careful to avoid confusing calcification in a young to middle aged
early myositis ossificans with tumor! adult is most likely synovial sarcoma
o To differentiate, use zoning pattern and
• Periosteal Chondroma (Mimic)
timing of bone formation o Considered a mimic since it is an osseous
o Biopsy of myositis in its early amorphous
surface lesion rather than soft tissue mass
phase mimics osteosarcoma histologically o Chondroid matrix adjacent to osseous
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses cortex; often causes underlying scalloping
• Myositis Ossificans (Mimic) (but not invasion) of bone
o Related to trauma which may not be • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue
recalled by patient (or may be denied) o Phleboliths (central lucency within round
o Appearance varies significantly with time calcifications) in tangle of vessels;
• 0-4 weeks: Doughy mass, but no lipomatous stroma
calcification • Soft Tissue Chondroma
II
122
SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASM CONTAINING CALCIFICATION 3
III
(Q
CD
o Generally dense rings and arcs pattern of o May have associated bone formation, often III
III
chondroid in a painless soft tissue mass arising from the underlying cortex III
CD
• Intraarticular Chondroma o Bone may extend horizontally from the Cl.
o Usually site-specific; arises in Hoffa fat pad osseous cortex, giving the appearance of a :;0
Ql
AnlerofXJsterior
(ormation
radiograph
in the soft tissues
shows
HI
amorphous
wM,
osteoid
dense periosteal
Oblique radiograph shows dense dystrophic
calcification surrounding and within a round soft tissue
II
reaction elicited in the adjacent femoral shaft •. This is mass •. Synovial sarcoma is the most frequent soft
myositis, but mimics a surface osteosarcoma. tissue sarcoma to contain calcium. rtMsK Req).
123
Q)
::> SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASM CONTAINING CALCIFICATION
(/)
(/)
t=
0:=
o
CJJ
r:
() Periosteal Chondroma (Mimic) Hemangioma, Soft Tissue
:c
0-
(Left) Anteroposterior
ro radiograph shows an
~ apparent soft tissue lesion
0>
.Q containingtumor matrix.
"0
ro causing extrinsic scalloping
0:: of the underlying humerus
"tl HI. While it mimics a 50ft
Q)
(/) tissue neoplasm, it is actually
ltl a surface lesion of bone.
al
Q)
(Right) Anteroposterior
Cl radiograph shows a 50ft
ro tissue mass containing round
E calcific densities which have
a distincllucenl center _.
These are typical phleboliths,
seen in hemangioma.
II
124
SOFT TISSUE NEOPLASM CONTAINING CALCIFICATION 3
III
to
<l>
lJl
III
VI
Osteosarcoma, Periosteal or Surface <l>
Co
Nerve Sheath Tumors (Mimic)
(Left) Axial NECT shows AI
OJ
eccentrically located C-
dystrophic calcification O
II
125
'"o
::J BONE MARROW EDEMA SYNDROMES (pROXIMAL FEMUR)
Q)
'"'"
o o Failure of the tensile trabeculae
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
0::: o Tends to occur in older and/or physically
~ Common inactive patients
"C
Ql • Arthritis o Radiograph key to evaluate bone density
VI
l'll • Insufficiency Fracture • Osteonecrosis, Hip
CD
Ql
• Osteonecrosis, Hip o Stages of osteonecrosis
Cl
l'll
• Stress Reaction • Ill-defined subchondral and femoral
E • Stress Fracture head edema, may be mistaken for
• Metastases, Bone Marrow transient bone marrow edema
Less Common • Progresses to well-defined, slightly
• Transient Bone Marrow Edema heterogeneous lesions
• Septic Joint • May develop subchondral fracture and
• Osteomyelitis subsequently collapse
• Rapidly Destructive Osteoarthritis of Hip • Develops secondary osteoarthritis
o Tends to exclude joint space and
Rare but Important acetabulum until late stages
• Peritumoral Reactive Marrow Edema o Hint: Look at both hips; often bilateral
• Leukemia even when symptoms initially present
• Lymphoma unilaterally
• Stress Reaction
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Ill-defined endosteal edema parallels the
medial femoral cortex/calcar region
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o No definable fracture
• Bone marrow edema is a nonspecific MR o Represents microtrabecular fracture along
appearance compressive trabeculae
• Presents as low signal on Tl; high signal on o Result of abnormal stress on normal bone;
T2 & fluid sensitive sequences seen in distance runners, military recruits
• Hint: Survey surrounding structures • Stress Fracture
including acetabulum, soft tissues, etc. when o Marrow edema along medial femoral neck
considering differential diagnosis and/or proximal femur may mask cortical
• Hint: Correlate appearance with patient age break
& relevant history o Cortical break often best seen on Tl MR
• Hint: Radiograph appearance will assist with o Typically located along the medial femoral
diagnosis neck and proximal femur (compressive
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses trabeculae)
• Arthritis o Occurs as a result of abnormal stress on
o Marrow edema often results from reactive normal bone; seen in distance runners,
marrow related to adjacent cartilage military recruits
damage • Metastases, Bone Marrow
o Most common: Osteoarthritis o Consider age, history of primary neoplasm
o Other arthropathies: Inflammatory o Lesion may be infiltrative without or with
arthritis, crystalline arthritis (gout & cortical breakthrough and soft tissue mass
CPPD), spondyloarthropathies o Hint: Lesions in lesser trochanter should
o Both femoral head and acetabulum show be considered metastatic disease until
abnormalities including joint space proven otherwise
narrowing, subchondral edema & o Hint: Look for additional osseous lesions
eburnation, subchondral cyst formation & Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
osteophytic ridging • Transient Bone Marrow Edema
• Insufficiency Fracture o Acute onset hip pain, most common in
o Typically originates in the lateral femoral
middle-age men
neck & propagates medially o Joint space normal; no arthritis present
II
126
L BONE MARROW EDEMA SYNDROMES (PROXIMAL FEMUR) 3
III
(Q
o Small joint effusion often present o Resembles a neuropathic or infected joint 'I"II
III
• Mimics septic arthritis or acute gout or • Hip aspiration needed to exclude these VI
II
128
BONE MARROW EDEMA SYNDROMES (PROXIMAL FEMUR) 3
Dl
(Q
<D
lD
Dl
CII
<D
0-
Septic Joint Osteomyelitis
(Left) Coronal STIR MR s:
shows moderate right hip ;;0
joint effusion. with o
en
arthritis. There is mild en
femoral head reactive CD
o
marrow edema _ Hip c
en
aspirate yielded
Staphylococcus aureus.
(Right) Coronal T2WI MR
shows Girdles tone
arthroplasty following
infection of THA. Prosthesis
is removed & replaced by
multiple antibiotic-
impregnated beads EllI.
Intense edema of proximal
femoral shaft" confirms
ongoing osteomyelitis.
II
129
C/)
::l SUBCHONDRAL EDEMATOUS-LIKESIGNAL
o
Q)
C/)
C/)
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Osteochondral fragment may stay in place,
0::: become flattened, or become completely
:2 Common loose & displaced
"0
Ql • Trauma • Reactive Marrow Edema
l/l
co o Bone Bruise o Bone & adjacent cartilage normal but
II)
Ql
o Osteochondral Fracture adjacent tissues are not (e.g., meniscal tear)
Cl
co o Reactive Marrow Edema • Arthritis
E • Arthritis o Osteoarthritis: Cartilage loss; osteophytes
o Osteoarthritis o Inflammatory: Marrow edema ± cartilage
o Inflammatory Arthritis defects; effusions; erosions
o Crystalline Arthropathy o Crystalline: Crystals penetrating
• Insufficiency Fracture cartilage/subchondral bone with resultant
• Osteonecrosis edema; ± erosions or osteophytes
less Common • Insufficiency Fracture
• Transient Bone Marrow Edema Syndrome o Intense edema out of proportion to
• Septic Joint arthritis; may obscure fracture line
• Osteomyelitis • Osteonecrosis
o Subchondral edema may progress to
• Peritumoral Edema
hemorrhage & fluid in fracture/collapse
stage; late subchondral edema from
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION cartilage loss & secondary OA
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
• Signal intensity: Hypointense Tl WI; • Transient Bone Marrow Edema Syndrome
hyperintense T2WI, STIR just deep to o Diagnosis of exclusion; acute onset pain,
osteochondral interface typically in middle aged men
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Septic Joint vs. Osteomyelitis
o Septic joint: Effusion, synovial thickening
• Bone Bruise
o Compression or impaction injury o Osteomyelitis: Edema on one side of joint,
o Hint: Look for associated soft tissue injury marginal erosions, periostitis
• Osteochondral Fracture • Peritumoral Edema
o Injury crossing chondral plate into o Osteoid osteoma, giant cell tumor,
Bone Bruise
Insufficiency Fracture
(Left) Sagittal PO FSf MR
shows hypointense posterior
lateral femoral condylar
signal. paralleling the
articular surface with slight
flattening of the articular
surface due to an
insufficiency fracture. (Right)
Coronal PO FSf F5 MR
shows high signal within
multiple carpal bones. &
multiple joint effusions with
synovial thickening Ell. This
proved to be Staphylococcus
septic arthritis.
II
131
en ABNORMAL EPIPHYSEAL MARROW SIGNAL
:::l
o
Q)
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o History of acute or subacute trauma
a::: o Hint: Look for adjacent soft tissue injury
~ Common • Fracture
"t:l
Q)
• Reactive Marrow Edema o Intense diffuse edema may obscure
en
ra • Bone Bruise fracture line
a:l • Fracture
Q) o Traumatic - Hint: Look for adjacent soft
Cl • Osteonecrosis
ra tissue injury
E • Transient Bone Marrow Edema o Insufficiency - Hint: Look for articular
• Legg-Calve-Perthes surface flattening
• Osteomyelitis • Osteonecrosis
• Septic Joint o Serpentine margin between normal &
• Arthritis avascular bone
o Osteoarthritis o "Double line" sign: Outer margin low
o Inflammatory Arthritis . signal while inner margin high signal
o Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) • Transient Bone Marrow Edema
Less Common o Diagnosis of exclusion; may require hip
• Anemia aspiration to exclude septic arthritis
• Neoplasm o History is key: No trauma, minimal
o Metastases, Bone Marrow arthritis, acute onset
o Primary Bone Neoplasm • Legg-Calve-Perthes
• Stem Cell Stimulation o Edema which may progress to femoral
head low signal & flattening
Rare but Important o Small femoral ossification center;
• Myelofibrosis thickened articular cartilage
• Gaucher Disease o Boys> girls; age 4-8 at risk as foveal
arteries regress
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Osteomyelitis
o May be difficult to distinguish from septic
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues joint in early stages
• Epiphyses convert to fatty (yellow) marrow o Marrow edema on one side of joint,
before 1 year of age marginal erosions, periostitis; ± bone or
• Abnormal epiphyseal marrow defined as soft tissue abscess
change in normal fatty signal o Brodie abscess: Abscesses may be
o Normal: Tl WI - hyperintense; T2WI - epiphyseal or in carpals/tarsals in infants;
intermediate; fat-suppression - meta-epiphyseal in children
hypointense • Septic Joint
• Differential diagnoses include epiphysis, o Effusion, synovial thickening, ± adjacent
apophyses or epiphyseal equivalent (carpals, marrow edema
tarsals) • Arthritis
• Other differentials may be tailored to o Osteoarthritis: Cartilage loss, osteophytes,
location, such as proximal femur subchondral edema &/or cysts
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Inflammatory: Marrow edema, effusion, ±
• Reactive Marrow Edema erosions, ± cartilage loss
o Marrow edema typically related to o Juvenile idiopathic: Soft tissue swelling,
adjacent abnormality (e.g., tendon or periostitis, erosions are late finding
meniscal tear) Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
o No history of direct trauma; no cartilage
• Anemia
damage, infection or neoplasm o Marrow undergoes reconversion from fatty
• Bone Bruise to hematopoietic marrow in an orderly
o Marrow contusion related to fashion
microtrabecular fracture
II
132
ABNORMAL EPIPHYSEAL MARROW SIGNAL 3
III
(C
C1l
o Epiphyses are last to reconvert; thus o Fibrosis most common in areas of normal OJ
III
epiphyseal involvement is indicative of adult hematopoiesis (spine, pelvis, ribs) <II
C1l
chronic long standing anemia o Associated anemia results in reconversion Q.
o Sickle cell anemia & thalassemia at risk for of fatty marrow including epiphyses s:
;u
osteonecrosis o Epiphyses subsequently become fibrotic
with trabecular thickening & sclerosis
o
• Neoplasm <II
<II
<1>
o May be primaq or secondary (metastatic) • Gaucher Disease o
C
o Epiphyseal involvement is less common o Marrow packing disorder results in anemia, <II
"
Gl
lI)
III
(Left) Axial T2WI FS MR
shows a serpentine udouble
lD line" sign of avascular
Gl necrosis with outer low HI &
en inner high II signal intensity
III
E marking the avascular
region. Note adjacent
reactive marrow edema _.
(Right) Coronal T2WI FS MR
=
shows diffuse marrow
in the lateral femoral
condyle. Prior his lOry of
edema
Osteomyelitis
(Left) Coronal T1WI MR
shows capital femoral
epiphysis flattening with a
well-demarcated
hypointense III ischemic
area in Legg-Calve-Perches.
Mild coxa magna deformity
is present (Right) Coronal
STIR MR shows diffuse
metaphysis =
edema of epiphysis &
with a
discrete rim·enhancing lesion
III spanning the physis,
representing a subacute
osteomyelitis/Brodie abscess.
There is mild periosteal
edema Ell.
II
134
ABNORMAL EPIPHYSEAL MARROW SIGNAL 3
III
u:l
<l>
OJ
III
IJl
<l>
Co
Anemia Metastases, Bone Marrow
(Left) Coronal T2WI MR ~
shows absence of normal
;0
fatly marrow signal. This o
IJl
sickle cell patient's marrow is IJl
(\)
fully hematopoietic including o
the normal fatty epiphyses C
IJl
ElII. Note left femoral head
avascular necrosis with
=-
edema, flattening & collapse
(Right) Axial Tf C+ FS
MR shows a renal cell
metastatic lesion in the
trochlear epiphyseal region
with marrow replacement
ElII & cortical breakthrough
• with a soft tissue mass III
in the joint. Moderate
enhancement is present.
(Left) Coronal Tf WI MR
shows bland intermediate
marrow replacement
including the epiphyses,
which are normally high
signal on Tf WI. This is
fibrotic marrow typical of
myelofibrosis. Note the small
islands or retained normal fat
•. (Right) Coronal Tf WI
MR shows slightly speckled,
intermediate
Gaucher infiltration
is complicated by
=-
signal of diffuse
This
osteonecrosis HI of the
femoral head, neck &
acetabulum.
II
135
rJ)
:J INCREASED MARROW FAT
o
Q)
rJ)
rJ)
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Primary trabecular struts thicken as
cr secondary trabeculae are resorbed
:2; Common o May be diffuse or focal
"0
Q) • Osteoporosis • Normal Aging
rJ)
• Normal Aging o Diffuse increased yellow marrow in aging
'"
aJ
• Focal Fatty Deposition
Q) population
Cl
• Discogenic Endplate Changes o Retains hematopoietic elements in
E'" proximal femurs, flat bones of pelvis &
Less Common
• Intraosseous Hemangioma spine longer than in the extremities
• Intraosseous Lipoma o Minimal osteopenia by radiograph
• Steroid-Induced Increased Fat • Focal Fatty Deposition
• Radiation-Induced Increased Fat o Typically visible in those of advancing age
• Osteonecrosis o Tend to be rounded and discrete lesions in
the vertebral bodies but can involve entire
Rare but Important
vertebral body
• Bone Marrow Failure o Trabeculae are normal within and around
• Anorexia the lesion
• Liposclerosing Myxofibrous Tumor o T2 signal may be low, intermediate, or
• Hypopituitarism high SI
• Weightlessness • Discogenic Endplate Changes
o Degenerative changes in vertebral end plate
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION resulting from red marrow being replaced
by fatty yellow marrow
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Also known as Modic type 2 changes
• Increased marrow fat may be focal or diffuse o Modic degenerative end plate types
o Represents either a true increase in fat or a
• Type 1: Low SI T1 and high SI T2
marked decrease in hematopoietic marrow • Type 2: High SI Tl and isointense SI T2
elements
• Type 3: Low SI T1 and T2
• Normal adult marrow
o Hematopoietic (red) marrow content: 40% Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
fat, 40% water, 20% protein • Intraosseous Hemangioma
• Intermediate signal intensity (SI) on T1, o Most common in vertebra and skull
T2 & fluid-sensitive sequences o High SI T1 due to fat in interstices of
o Fatty (yellow) marrow content: 80% fat, tumor
15% water, 5% protein o High SI T2 due to vascular components
• High SI on T1 and interstitial edema
• Lower SI on T2 & fluid-sensitive o Mayor may not enhance
sequences o Radiographs show intralesional vertical
• Normal red vs. yellow marrow distribution striations due to thickened trabeculae
o Predominantly red marrow at birth • Intraosseous Lipoma
o Epiphyses/apophyses convert to yellow o Most common in proximal femur and
marrow in 1st year of life calcaneus
o Red to yellow marrow proceeds distal to o Appears predominantly high SI while
proximal; appendicular to axial skeleton adipocytes viable but becomes cystic with
• Hint: Radiographs may be useful in dystrophic calcification as it evolves due to
differential diagnosis ischemia and necrosis
o Radiographs show well-circumscribed,
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses mildly expansile lucent lesion with
• Osteoporosis variable dystrophic calcification
o Pronounced osteopenia may be confirmed
• Steroid-Induced Increased Fat
by radiograph o Corticosteroids shown to actually enlarge
the adipocytes
II
136
INCREASED MARROW FAT 3
III
(0
<1>
o At increased risk for AVN, insufficiency • Anorexia III
III
fractures o Radiographs show marked osteopenia VI
<1>
o Hint: Look for fat deposition in o Hint: Look for marked soft tissue and Co
II
138
INCREASED MARROW FAT 3
Ql
to
lD
[ll
Ql
tII
lD
Co
(Left) Sagittal T/ WI MR s:
shows diffuse increased
;:0
signal in the lumbar spine o
and sacrum with sharp
demarcation between
''""
C1l
o
irradiated and non-irradiated c
bone at the T/2-L7 level E!lI. '"
Note two associated
insufficiency fractures =.
(Right) Coronal T/WI MR
shows increased (atty
marrow HI in the Femoral
shaft, surrounded by a thin,
serpentine rim of calcium
(low signal, IDI. This is
chronic bone infarction in
Gaucher disease.
(Left) Sagittal T/ WI MR
shows a paucity of cellular
elements in this 68 year old
with aplastic anemia. This
results in an apparent
increase in marrow fat. Note
the prominent basivertebral
plexus =. (Right) Sagittal
T/ WI MR reveals diffuse
increased fatty marrow in a
patient status post L4-5
anterior Fusion•. There is a
paucity of subcutaneous fat
iii in this anorexic female
who is 4'/0" & weighs 78
pounds.
II
139
en MARROW HYPERPLASIA
:::J
o
(!)
en
en
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Osteopenia often a key radiographic
e::: feature
:2: Common o Selected types of anemia are discussed
"'C
Ql • Anemia below
en
• Complications of Smoking • Complications of Smoking
'"
II)
• Sports Anemia
Ql o Seen in smokers; mild to moderate obesity;
Cl
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications female> male
'E" • Thalassemia o Etiology unknown; mild leukocytosis
less Common noted
• Hematopoietic Stimulation o Patchy reconversion marrow in distal
• Polycythemia Vera femoral metaphysis
• Leukemia • Sports Anemia
• Myelofibrosis o Seen in marathon runners & other
high-performance athletes
Rare but Important
o Group known to have chronic low grade
• Anti-Viral Drug Effect anemia of uncertain etiology
• Spherocytosis o Patchy metaphyseal hematopoiesis in
distal femur/proximal tibia with
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION epiphyseal sparing
• Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Inherited anemia
• Marrow hyperplasia results from an increase o Radiographs: Osteopenia, widening of
in one or more marrow cell lines including medullary spaces, trabecular & cortical
RBC, WBC, platelets or their precursors thinning
• Hematopoietic (red or cellular) versus fatty o MR: Widespread marrow reconversion or
(yellow) marrow failure of initial red to yellow marrow
• Marrow appearance should be age conversion
appropriate o Bone infarction more common than in
o Predominantly red marrow at birth thalassemia
o Epiphyses/apophyses convert to yellow
• Thalassemia
marrow in 1st year o Inherited anemia
o Red to yellow marrow conversion proceeds
o MR: Marked increased hematopoietic
from distal to proximal; appendicular to marrow may include epiphyses
axial skeleton o Radiographs: Osteopenia, widened
• Hint: In diffuse hyperplasia, look for medullary space, cortical thinning,
"flip-flop" sign-vertebral body marrow darker coarsened trabeculae, Erlenmeyer flask
than adjacent discs on T1 WI deformity
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Bone scan: Generalized decreased uptake
• Anemia Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
o Three main classes: Acute loss, excessive
• Hematopoietic Stimulation
destruction, decreased production o Marrow stem cell stimulation (e.g.,
o Marrow capable of response will do so in
erythrocyte or granulocyte
predictable pattern colony-stimulating factor)
• Fatty marrow "re-converted" to red o Used in chemotherapy, anemia of chronic
marrow in reverse order disease, renal disease
• Reconversion proceeds from axial to o Typically stimulates somewhat patchy
appendicular skeleton; proximal to distal reconversion of marrow which may
long bones simulate metastatic disease
• Epiphyses/apophyses recruit late in • Hint: In- & out-of-phase imaging may
process help distinguish normal versus
neoplastic marrow
II
140
MARROW HYPERPLASIA 3
III
to
ID
o Reconversion proceeds axial to • Chronic: Osteopenia, may progress to OJ
III
appendicular, proximal to distal, ± myelofibrosis, diffuse marrow infiltration <II
ID
Co
epiphyseal involvement • Myelofibrosis
• Polycythemia Vera o Chronic myeloproliferative disease s:
;0
o Erythrocytosis, leukocytosis, o Cellularity varies ranging from
hypercellularity to marked hypocellularity
o
thrombocytosis affects older adults <II
<II
ID
o Marrow reconversion in proximal long as fibrosis worsens o
C
bones typically spares o Marrow infiltration typically follows <II
o'"'"
a:::
~
Sports Anemia Sports Anemia
"0
Q) (Left) Sagittal PO FSE FS MR
'" shows patchy, somewhat
=
I'll
CO striated intermediate signal
Q) in the distal femoral
Cl
I'll metaphysis representing
E reconversion marrow in this
27 year old marathon
runner. (Right) Sagittal STIR
=
MR shows a stress fracture
of the plantar calcaneus.
The marrow shows diffuse
intermediate marrow signal
BI. This is related to
significant marrow
hyperplasia in this 2S year
old anorexic female who
runs to "control her weight".
Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications Sickle Cell Anemia: MSK Complications
(Left) Coronal STIR MR
shows fatty marrow
replacement in the pelvis &
signal =
proximal femur BI. High
results from an
apophyseal bone infarction
in this sickle cell patient.
Epiphyseal fatty marrow !lIEI
is still present. (Right)
Sagittal TI WI MR shows
homogeneous vertebral body
signal lower than adjacent
discs, related to patient's
sickle cell anemia &
hemosiderin from multiple
transfusions. Vertebral body
signal should be higher than
discs on T 7 sequence.
Thalassemia Thalassemia
(Left) AP radiograph shows
the radiographic pattern of
marrow hyperplasia in this
11 year old thalassemic.
Cortical thinning, "squaring"
of small hand bones &
profound osteopenia BI are
due to a marrow space
packed with cells. (tMSK
Req). (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows medullary
(diploic) space widening &
trabecular thickening
resulting in "hair on end"
appearance.
II
142
MARROW HYPERPLASIA 3
Ql
to
<1l
[Jl
Ql
IJl
<1l
0.
leukemia leukemia
(Left) Coronal TtWI MR
shows profound marrow
hyperplasia with bland
intermediate signal marrow
Ell in all visualized bones.
Note the marked
lymphadenopathy E±J in this
case of chronic lymphocytic
leukemia in this 75 year old.
(Right) Coronal TlWI MR
shows diffuse leukemic
infiltration with hypointense
meta diaphyses •• & patchy
epiphyseal involvement Ell.
Note the similarity to the first
image in this series,
hemolytic anemia. Clinical
history is key in diagnosis.
(Left) 5agiLtai TI WI MR
shows typical diffuse dark T I
marrow of myelofibrosis.
This results from a mix of
hypercellularity & developing
fibrosis. Note vertebral
bodies are darker Ell than
discs. the so-called
"flip-flop" sign. (Right)
5agittal TlWI MR shows
profound diffuse marrow
hyperplasia with only a few
remnants of normal marrow
fat at the endplates • &
basivertebral plexus Ell. This
is multifactorial due to AtD5
& long term anti-viral therapy
in this 52 year old.
II
143
(/l
:J BONE LESIONS WITH FLUID/FLUID LEVELS
o
Q)
(/l
(/l
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Less permeative appearance than
a::: conventional osteosarcoma
2 Common o Can be entirely lytic and mimic ABC
"tl
Ql
• Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) o Watch for any hint of aggressiveness
(/l
C1l • Osteosarcoma, Telangiectatic
00 Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Ql
0)
Less Common • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT)
C1l • Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) o Expansile subchondral lesion in skeletally
E
• Unicameral Bone Cyst mature patient lacking a sclerotic border
• Chondroblastoma o May coexist with aneurysmal bone cyst
Rare but Important • Unicameral Bone Cyst
• Hyperparathyroidism, Brown Tumor o Centrally located, well-defined, lytic lesion
fluid-fluid levels=
sofllissues. Scattered
II
145
OJ
:J LESION WITH BRIGHT 11 SIGNAL
Cf)
Cf)
i=
.;=o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Atypical Lipomatous Tumor
(fJ o Appearance of fatty mass can be similar to
0::: Common lipoma or liposarcoma
::;;:
• Lipoma, Soft Tissue • May have thickened septae or nodularity
"'C
Ql • Atypical Lipomatous Tumor o Needs biopsy or excision to exclude
VI
ra • Hematoma, Subacute malignancy
In
Ql • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue • More cellular than typical lipoma upon
Cl
ra less Common pathologic examination
E
• Liposarcoma, Soft Tissue • Hematoma, Subacute
• Liposarcoma, Myxoid o Subacute musculoskeletal hemorrhage has
• Fat Necrosis high T1 signal
• Hemangiopericytoma • Acute & chronic blood has low T1 signal
• Intervertebral Disc Calcification o Must prove lack of underlying malignancy
• Chondrocalcinosis before dismissing as simple hematoma
• Lipomatosis • Resolution or significant decrease in size
on follow-up
Rare but Important • Lack of enhancement with subtraction
• Lipoma Arborescens, Knee post-processing helpful
• Lipomatosis, Nerve • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue
• Hibernoma o Vascular mass, classically containing fat
and phleboliths
I ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Small lesions are less likely to contain fat
than larger lesions
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o May be associated with erosion or cortical
• Bright T1 signal = higher signal intensity thickening of underlying bone
than skeletal muscle on T1WI o Maffucci syndrome when present with
• Relatively short list of entities that have multiple enchondromas
high T1 signal on MR
o Fat Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
o Blood • Liposarcoma, Soft Tissue
o Protein o Complex fatty mass
Fat Necrosis
(Left) Axial TI WI MR shows
a posterior thigh mass.
with inhomogeneous signal
intensity. Areas of high TI
signal intensity Ell represent
the lipomatous portion of the
tumor, which is unusually
large in this example. (Right)
Axial TlWI MR shows a
well-defined mass.
composed of high T I signal,
similar to subcutaneous fat,
overlying the trochanteric
region 0( the hip. This was
excised due to pain, history
0( malignancy and thickened
capsule. The location is
classic for fat necrosis.
II
148
lESION WITH BRIGHT 11 SIGNAL 3
III
to
(l)
OJ
III
VI
(l)
a.
Fat Necrosis Intervertebral Disc Calcification
(Leh) Coronal T1WI MR s:
shows numerous bilateral ;U
masses in the gluteal (f)
o
subcutaneous fat. Some of ~
these masses have purely rat :j
signal intensity. and en
en
represent fat necrosis from c
C1l
medication injection. (Right)
Sagittal T1WI MR shows
hyperintense signal within
every lumbar intervertebral
disc •. There is typical
squaring or the lumbar
vertebral bodies in this
patient with ankylosing
spondylitis.
II
149
Q)
::l SOFT TISSUE LESIONS WITH PREDOMINATElY LOW 11 & 12 SIGNAL
rJ)
rJ)
F
;l:'
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Foreign Body
(f) a Endless variety of material embedded in
0::: Common body, patient may not recall event
:2 • Post-Operative Changes a Often has intense surrounding
"'C
Q)
rJ)
• Foreign Body inflammatory reaction
III • Hematoma, Chronic • Hematoma, Chronic
In
Q) • Flow Voids a Acute high signal serum has resorbed
Cl
III • Densely Calcified/Ossified Lesions leaving debris & fibrous tissue
E • Plantar Fibromatosis a Peripheral or central calcification often
• Gout present
• Air • Flow Voids
• Aneurysm a Rapidly flowing blood produces flow voids
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) a Blood excited by 90 degree pulse has left
• Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath the slice before the refocusing pulse, thus
• Arteriovenous Fistula no echo (no signal)
Less Common • Densely Calcified/Ossified Lesions
a Heterotopic ossification, synovial sarcoma,
• Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis
• Elastofibroma injection granulomas, extraskeletal
• Fibroma of Tendon Sheath osteosarcoma, osteosarcoma metastases,
• Metastases, Hemorrhagic progressive systemic sclerosis,
• Amyloid Deposition fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva,
• Melanoma melorheostosis
• Gout
Rare but Important a Low signal seen on all sequences is typical
• Infection, Calcified or Fungal of sodium urate deposition in tophi
• Arteriovenous Malformation a Tophi have variable moderate
• Cavernous Hemangioma inhomogeneous enhancement
• Extramedullary Hematopoiesis
• Air
• Concentrated Gadolinium a Lack of protons for excitation
a Causes include: Trauma,
a Micrometallic artifact occurs from scalpel tendon sheath, see characteristics above
use, drilling, sawing, scraping a Similar imaging appearance to fibroma of
Foreign Body
a:::
~
(Left) Axial TI C+ MR shows
'0
G> regions allow signal.
1Il surrounded by areas of mild
ltI
In enhancement. within the
G> deltoid muscle. This is a
Cl
ltI foreign body reaction,
E related to the multiple
injections received. (Right)
Coronal TlWI MR shows
bilateral injection
granulomas" in the gluteal
subcutaneous fat. These low
signal foci are common and
are due to a variety of
medications.
Plantar Fibromatosis
(Left) Sagittal PO FSEMR
shows a focal/ow intensity
mass. in the lateral band
of the plantar fascia at the
level of the calcaneus. Low
signal was also present on
T 1 WI. The lesion showed
mild enhancement
post-contrast. (Right)
Coronal T2WI MR shows a
homogeneous low signal
malleolus =-
mass distal to the medial
The mass is
immediately adjacent to the
bone, with the adjacent
tendons displaced medially.
II
152
SOFT TISSUE LESIONS WITH PREDOMINATELY LOW T1 & T2 SIGNAL 3
III
(0
<1l
OJ
III
t/l
<1l
Co
Giant Cell Tumor Tendon Sheath Arteriovenous Fistula
(Left) Axial T2WI MR shows s:
a lobular mass 11:I with ;U
relatively low T2 signal that (f)
II
153
<ll
::J SOFT TISSUE LESIONS WITH FLUID/flUID LEVElS
en
en
i=
¢::
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Fat admixed with joint fluid and blood due
(f)
to fracture
cr Common • Superior layer is fat, central layer is fluid,
:2
• Hematoma dependent layer is blood cells
"0
Ql • Hemarthrosis/Lipohemarthrosis • Vascular & Lymphatic Malformations
II)
Ol
en • Vascular & Lymphatic Malformations o Cavernous fluid-filled spaces
Ql • Medication Injection o May also contain regions of fat
Cl
Ol
Less Common o Lymphangioma does not have central
E
• Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis enhancement like hemangioma
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis o Difficult to differentiate benign
• Malignant Neoplasm hemangioma from malignant
• Non-Neoplastic Structure hemangioendothelioma with imaging
• Neoplasm, Mixed Fluid Contents alone
• Synovial Sarcoma, Cystic • Medication Injection
• Ganglion or Synovial Cyst o Typical distribution in subcutaneous fat of
Hematoma Hematoma
t=
0:::
o
(j)
Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis
(Left) Axial NECT shows
bilateral sheet-like
calcification Ell of the
muscles and fascial planes of
the thighs, with scattered
ffuid-ffuid levels ~ due 10
dermatomyositis. (Right)
Axial T2WI FS MR shows a
very large, heterogeneous
mass Ell in the posterior
thigh. The mass contains
areas of signal intensity
higher and lower than
subcutaneous fat. Fluid-ffuid
levels" suggest
hemorrhage within a portion
of the mass.
II
156
SOFT TISSUE lESIONS WITH flUID/flUID LEVElS 3
III
to
11l
llJ
III
III
11l
C.
Non-Neoplastic Structure Synovial Sarcoma, Cystic
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR ~
shows a low signal fluid-fluid ?J
level" in caudal thecal sac (fJ
from subarachnoid
o
;:1'
hemorrhage. The dependent ::j
blood was relatively lJl
lJl
isointense on T1WI. (Right) C
CD
Axial NEeT shows a soft
tissue mass arising in or
immediately adjacent to the
anterior abdominal muscles
Ell. Note that there is a
prominent fluid level" in
this synovial sarcoma.
II
157
QJ
:J TARGET LESION OF SOFT TISSUES
en
en
i=
<l::
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
UJ
0::: Common • Schwannoma, Conventional
~ • Neurofibroma, Cellular o Target sign less common than in
"0
QJ
neurofibroma
en Less Common o Ovoid mass draped over nerve
t'll
In • Schwan noma, Conventional o Deep location & larger nerve involvement
QJ
Cl • Centrally Calcified Mass favors schwannoma over neurofibroma
t'll
E • Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor • Centrally Calcified Mass
• Metastasis o Meningioma, synovial sarcoma
• Aneurysm o Any soft tissue mass may calcify
Rare but Important • Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
• Amyloid Deposition o Can be indistinguishable from benign
• Melanoma nerve sheath tumor on imaging
• Epithelioid Sarcoma o Ill-defined borders suggest malignancy
• Metastasis
o Variable calcification or ossification can
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION produce low signal center
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Aneurysm
• Target lesion = mass with low signal o Lamellated appearance due to mural
intensity centrally surrounded by high thrombus + rapid or turbulent blood flow
signal intensity (or reverse pattern) Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Discussion limited to musculoskeletal MR • Amyloid Deposition
o Radiologic target sign on radiographs, o Paramagnetic effect may cause blooming
ultrasound & CT due to different entities on gradient echo sequences
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Central calcification is rare
• Neurofibroma, Cellular • Melanoma
o Fusiform mass in subcutaneous tissues o Rim-enhancement with variable
o Target sign on T2WI is classic finding paramagnetic effect from melanin
o Diffusely involves affected nerve • Epithelioid Sarcoma
o Marked tenderness to palpation can o Rare tumor, most common in distal upper
suggest neurogenic tumor over other soft extremity
tissue masses o Mimics appearance of peripheral nerve
sheath tumor
ell
Ql
l/I
(1)
=
Axial T2WI MR shows a mass
in the medial thigh with
high peripheral signal and
inhomogeneous low central
signal on T2WI. This was a
peripheral nerve sheath
tumor with central
calcification.
II
159
<ll
:J CYSTIC MASSES
en
en
i=
.t=o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Lies between medial head gastrocnemius
(f)
& semimembranosus in popliteal fossa
0:: Common • Smooth border with teardrop to rounded
~ • Ganglion Cyst
't:l
shape
Q) • Synovial Cyst • Irregular border when cyst ruptures into
III
<Il o Popliteal Cyst proximal calf or distal thigh
al
Q) o Meniscal Cyst o Meniscal Cyst
Cl
<Il o Labral Cyst • lntraarticular knee synovial cyst,
E • Sebaceous Cyst adjacent to meniscus
• Soft Tissue Abscess • Suggests underlying meniscal tear
• Bursitis o LabraI Cyst
• Hematoma • Synovial cyst in shoulder or hip
• Malignant Tumor, Necrotic • Suggests underlying labral tear
• Hemangioma, Soft Tissue • Sebaceous Cyst
Less Common o Well-defined round mass in subcutaneous
• Lymphangioma fat
• Myxoma (Mimic) o Common lesion but uncommonly purely
• Sarcoma, Soft Tissue (Mimic) cystic
o No central enhancement
Rare but Important
• Soft Tissue Abscess
• Hydatid Cyst o Ill-defined, ragged borders
• Eccrine Hidradenoma o Irregular, thick peripheral enhancement
• Bursitis
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Well-defined, smooth-bordered fluid
collection in region of bursa
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Anatomic bursae around joints
• Cystic soft tissue masses have high T2WI & • Pseudobursa due to pressure, for example
low T1WI signal over osteochondroma
o Border of lesion may enhance o Presence of rice bodies suggests
o May have complex, but nonenhancing,
rheumatoid arthritis
central contents o May also have thickening of associated
• Enhancement pattern is extremely tendons
important o Greater trochanteric bursitis at hip
o Some soft tissue masses appear cystic on
• Mild amount of fluid adjacent to each
T1WI & T2WI images but are solid greater trochanter may be asymptomatic
o Central enhancement confirms solid mass o Subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis at shoulder
& malignancy must be excluded • Fluid from joint may extend through full
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses thickness rotator cuff tear
• Ganglion Cyst o Pes anserine bursitis at anteromedial knee
o Well-defined border, often multiloculated o Patellar bursitis at anterior knee
o Lacks synovial lining & contains viscous or • Superficial to patellar tendon
mucinous fluid o Iliopsoas bursitis most likely to mimic
o Similar appearance to synovial cyst on cystic neoplasm
imaging • Lateral to femoral vessels & iliopsoas
• Synovial Cyst muscle and tendon
o Well-defined, smooth border • Medial to the anterior inferior iliac spine
o Connects to joint or tendon sheath • Extends proximally into deep pelvis &
o Has synovial lining & contains synovial can simulate adnexal mass on ultrasound
fluid • May have complex internal contents
o Popliteal Cyst (synovium, debris)
• Synovial cyst in popliteal fossa
II
160
CYSTIC MASSES 3
III
(Q
CD
• Higher incidence with prior hip surgery o Well-defined to infiltrative, multiloculated III
III
& hip joint disease producing large masses VI
CD
effusion o May erode or cause resorption of adjacent a.
• Hematoma bone s:
;0
o Well-defined to irregular mass o Calcifications are rare
en
o No internal enhancement • Myxoma (Mimic) o
;::
o Complex internal contents common o Well-defined, round to oval mass in --i
(ii'
• Acute blood causes increased muscle VI
C
Tl-weighted signal o Contains central areas of enhancement CD
Meniscal Cyst
(Left) Axial PO FSf FS MR
shows high signal fluid lEI
dissecting through the
posterior soft tissues of the
knee. This collection merged
into the popliteal cyst
(shown on previous image).
A ruptured popliteal cyst can
look somewhat infiltrative at
the point of rupture. (Right)
Coronal T2WI MR shows a
a meniseal cyst =-
meniseal tear IlIl as well as
Medial
meniscal cysts often migrate
further from the meniscal
tear than is seen with lateral
meniscal cysts.
II
162
CYSTIC MASSES 3
Ol
CO
CD
llJ
Ol
VI
CD
C.
Soft Tissue Abscess
(Leh) Axial Tl C+ FS MR ~
shows a thick enhancing rind ;0
surrounding fluid within the (j)
Bursitis Bursitis
(Leh) Coronal T2WI FS MR
demonstrates a fluid
collection • lateral to the
left greater femoral
trochanter, consistent with
greater trochanteric bursitis.
The iliotibial band E!lI is
located just lateral to the
inflamed bursa. (Right) Axial
T2WI MR shows a cyst E!lI
adjacent to the pes
anserinus, wrapping around
the tibia. There were several
components of the cyst,
involving all three tendons of
the pes anserinus.
Bursitis Bursitis
(Left) Coronal T2WI FS MR
shows a large bursa E!lI
complicating an
osteochondroma _. The
bursa is high in signal
intensity and contains
inhomogeneous areas. The
periphery of the bursa
enhanced. (Right) Coronal
PO FSf FS MR shows the
typical tear-drop-shaped
fluid collection within the
iliopsoas bursa _ extending
proximally, traveling medial
to the anterior inferior iliac
spine ~ and lateral to the
iliopsoas muscle and tendon
~
II
163
Q)
::J CYSTIC MASSES
V>
V>
i=
4::
eno
ci Hematoma Hematoma
~
(Left) Axial T2WI FS MR
"0
CI>
V>
CO
en
=
shows a heterogeneous mass
lying between the medial
head of the gastrocnemius
CI> and the soleus due to
Cl plantaris tendon rupture.
CO
E Increased signal within the
medial head of the
gastrocnemiusmuscle. is
consistent with partial
thickness tearing. (Right)
Axial T2WI FS MR shows a
hyperintense collection _
extending from a defect at
the site of the medial
gastrocnemius rupture. The
plantaris tendon has
ruptured and retracted.
II
164
CYSTIC MASSES 3
III
CO
C1l
OJ
III
III
C1l
C.
Myxoma (Mimic) Myxoma (Mimic)
(Leh) Axial T2WI MR shows ;;::
a solitary, high signal AI
intramuscular mass" with (J)
o
septae. (Right) Axial T1 C+ ~
F5 MR in the same patient as -;
C:;;.
previous image, shows areas C/l
of irregular enhancement 11m C
Cll
within the lesion 1IlI.
Histologically these lesions
consist of myxoid matrix and
spindle-shaped stromal cells.
Multiple intramuscular
myxomas suggests
Mazabraud syndrome.
II
165
OJ
::J SUBCUTANEOUS MASS
C/l
C/l
f=
4=
o
(/J
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS I I ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
a::: Common Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
::2: • Sebaceous Cyst • Extensive differential diagnosis for
"0
C1> • Varicose Veins subcutaneous masses
VI
III • Hematoma • Many entities are not possible to
CO
C1> • Lipoma, Soft Tissue differentiate from each other on the basis of
Cl
III • Adenopathy imaging alone
E • Abscess • Benign and malignant masses can have an
• Fat Necrosis identical appearance on MR
• Foreign Body o Imaging should not dissuade from biopsy
• Gout or excision unless the mass is clearly a
• Epidermoid Inclusion Cyst blood vessel or simple lipoma
• Glomus Tumor • Subcutaneous location allows safe & easy
• Neurofibromatosis excisional procedures
• Melanoma Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma • Sebaceous Cyst
• Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis o a.k.a., Epidermoid cyst, keratinous type
• Vascular Malformation o Slightly hyperintense to muscle on T1WI
Less Common o High signal on T2WI + may contain
• Lymphoma angular low signal foci
• Atypical Lipomatous Tumor o Lacks central enhancement
• Liposarcoma, Soft Tissue • Varicose Veins
• Metastases, Subcutaneous o Tubular configuration is easily identifiable
• Tumor Recurrence as a blood vessel
• Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans o Enhancement characteristics altered if
• Venom Induced Complications vessels are thrombosed
• Synovial Sarcoma • Hematoma
• Spindle Cell Lipoma o Correlate with history of trauma
• Leiomyoma o Must be vigilant to exclude underlying
• Lipodystrophy hemorrhagic malignancy
• Kaposi Sarcoma • Lack of enhancement and/or interval
Rare but Important follow-up
• Lipoma, Soft Tissue
• Multiple Myeloma
o Follows fat signal intensity on all
• Squamous Cell Carcinoma
sequences ± low signal capsule
• Merkel Cell Carcinoma
o May have thin septations measuring less
• Pilomatrixoma/Pilomatrix Carcinoma
than 2 mm in diameter
• Mycosis Fungoides (T-Cell Lymphoma)
• Spindle Cell Sarcoma • Adenopathy
o Typical location of lymph nodes
• Angiosarcoma of Soft Tissue
o Enlargement & obliterated fatty hilum
• Granuloma Annulare
suggests neoplastic involvement
• Myxofibrosarcoma
• Fibrous Hamartoma of Infancy • Fat Necrosis
o a.k.a., Post-traumatic pseudolipoma
• Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma
o Follows fat signal intensity on all
• Periosteal Chondroma
sequences similar to lipoma
• Soft Tissue Chondroma
o May contain fibrosis & septations
• Heterotopic Ossification
suggesting an atypical lipoma or
• Eccrine Hidradenoma
liposarcoma
o Predominantly located over pressure
points or bony protuberances in the body
II
166
SUBCUTANEOUS MASS
Fat Necrosis
(Left) Coronal Tl WI MR
=
shows a subcutaneous mass
having a very similar
appearance to a lipoma. The
diagnosis of fat necrosis was
made after excision and is
suggested on imaging by the
thick surrounding capsule
and location over the greater
trochanter. (Right) Coronal
Tl C+ FS MR shows two
foreign bodies with
surrounding intense
enhancement. located
beneath the metatarsal
heads. This was due to
embedded glass shards.
II
168
SUBCUTANEOUS MASS 3
Ql
<0
<Il
CD
Ql
'"
<Il
Co
Glomus Tumor Neurofibromatosis
(Leh) Axial TI C+ FS MR s:
;;0
shows a small, round,
homogeneously enhancing (J)
o
mass" along the radial side ;::I>
of the index finger. The mass -l
(jj'
had high signal on T2Wf and
enhanced slightly more '"
c
CD
prominently than the
adjacent nail bed Ill. (Right)
Axial T2WI FS MR shows an
oval subcutaneousmass.
along the dorsum of the
hand. The mass has fairly
homogeneous high signal on
T2Wf but lacks the classic
target sign of benign
peripheral nerve sheath
tumors.
II
169
Q)
:J
(/)
SUBCUTANEOUS MASS
(/)
i=
.:t=
o
CIl
a:: Metastases, Subcutaneous
~ Tumor Recurrence
(Left) Axial T2WI MR shows
"Cl
Q) a subcutaneous mass. in
(/)
the left paraspinous region
III
CO with heterogeneous
Q) increased signal on T2WI.
Cl
III This mass had low signal on
E T1 WI and enhanced
diffusely. Pathology revealed
metastatic high grade
gastrointestinal carcinoma.
(Right) Axial NEeT shows an
irregular subcutaneous mass
• in the anterior chest wall.
This was recurrent breast
carcinoma in the
mastectomy surgical site.
II
170
SUBCUTANEOUS MASS 3
III
to
ID
OJ
III
VI
ID
0-
Pilomatrixoma/Pilomatrix Carcinoma
(Left) Axial T1 C+ FS MR s:
;0
shows a heterogeneously
enhancing subcutaneous (f)
II
171
ENLARGED MUSCLE
Hematoma
Denervation Hypertrophy
(Left) Coronal T1 C+ MR
shows enlargement o( the
gastrocnemiusmuscle.
with mild diffuse
enhancement and mild
increase in intramuscular fat
resulting from denervation
hypertrophy. (Right) Coronal
T1 WI MR shows primary 50ft
tissue lymphoma enlarging
the right gluteus minimus
and gluteus medius muscles
with distortion of the internal
muscle architecture.
II
174
ENLARGED MUSClE 3
III
CO
CIl
CD
III
VI
CIl
Co
Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma
(Left) Axial T1WI MR shows s:
a malignant fibrous
;U
histiocytoma creating focal (f)
II
175
Q)
:J MUSCLE ATROPHY
C/l
C/l
i=
<l=
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Atrophy, such as in the rotator cuff, may
(f)
have preceded surgery
0:: Common • Immobilization
~ • Post-Operative
"0
o Muscle atrophy begins after 10 days of
Q)
C/l
• Immobilization immobilization
Ol
CO
• Tendon, Injury • Correlate findings with time of injury
Q) • Spinal Cord Injury o Atrophy from prolonged immobilization
01
Ol • Peripheral Nerve Injury (> 4 months) may be irreversible,
E • Neuropathy especially in elderly patients
• Complications of Steroids • Tendon, Injury
• Diabetes: MSK Complications o Common involving the rotator cuff and
less Common gluteus minimus tendons
• Muscle Injury • Full thickness tendon tear results in
• Neurofibromatosis atrophy of the associated muscle
• Cushing Disease • Spinal Cord Injury
• Muscular Dystrophy o Rapid muscle atrophy below level of injury
• Thermal Injury, Burns • 18-46% decrease in muscle cross
• Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease sectional area 6 weeks post injury
• Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis o Associated findings: Cord atrophy, cord
• Guiliain-Barre Syndrome disruption, tethered cord, myelomalacia,
• Meningomyelocele syrinx
• Peripheral Nerve Injury
Rare but Important
o Often possible to identify the abnormal
• Polio nerve based on muscle denervation pattern
• Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
• Neuropathy
(Pseudoachondroplasia) o Associated neuropathic changes in joints
• Tethered Cord Syndrome include distention, debris, disorganization,
• Arthrogryposis deformity, dislocation
• Werdnig-Hoffmann Disease • Complications of Steroids
• Farber Disease o Myopathy with high-dose steroid therapy
• Progeria o Weakening of bone leads to increased
fractures with resultant immobilization
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Diabetes: MSK Complications
o Multiple potential causes for atrophy
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Neuropathy, muscle infarction, increased
• Replacement of muscle fibers by fat incidence of fracture leading to
produces high signal on Tl WI and low immobilization, infection
signal on fat-suppressed sequences
o Muscle atrophy may also present as a Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
decrease in muscle volume without • Muscle Injury
interdigitating fat o Myonecrosis
• High signal on T2WI FS MR in the • Compartment syndrome
remaining atrophic muscle may represent • Diabetic myonecrosis
ongoing de nervation or inflammation • Trauma
• Distribution, history and associated findings • Neurofibromatosis
are most helpful for differentiating etiologies o Peripheral neuropathies associated with
involvement of large nerve root and
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses subcutaneous neurofibromas
• Post-Operative • Cushing Disease
o Associated with micrometallic artifact or
o Proximal muscles more severely affected
other evidence of surgical intervention than distal
II
176
MUSCLE ATROPHY 3
III
~
(l)
o Associated clinical findings: Cushingoid o Associated findings: Posterior spinal defect tIl
III
facial appearance, truncal obesity, skin (or post-operative repair), low lying spinal C/l
(l)
atrophy cord Co
Post-Operative Immobilization
atrophy =
disproportionate fatty
of the teres
minor muscle without
tendon tea; The adjacent
infraspinatus muscle. is
normal. (Right) Coronal
T1WI MR shows enlarged
medial ~ and lateral 11II
plantar branches of the
posterior tibial nerve. Muscle
atrophy ~ is present. Nerve
entrapment in this case is
probably due to scarring and
thickening of the retinaculum
HI
II
178
MUSClE ATROPHY 3
III
<C
<D
OJ
III
VI
<D
Co
Neurofibromatosis
(Left) Coronal TI WI MR ~
shows fally infiltration HI of ?J
the right calf musculature (fl
due to subacule
o
;:1'
gastrocnemius soleus strain. -;
Compare the paltern of (ii.
VI
"marbling" seen in the C
C1l
norma"efl leg. with the
abnormal righlleg. (Right)
Axial T1WI MR shows
marked fally atrophy. of
posterior calf muscles in a
patient wilh
neurofibromatosis and
mulliple prior thigh surgeries.
Peripheral neuropathy and
posl-operative changes likely
contribute to alrophy.
Meningomyelocele Polio
(Left) Sagillal T2WI MR
shows profound chronic fally
alrophy • of the paraspinal
muscles in a patient with a
repaired meningomyelocele.
The atrophy is due to severe
chronic denervation. (Right)
Axial T2WI MR of both
thighs shows near complete
replacemenl of the righl
thigh musculature with
hyperinlense fat _ The
appearance of the leftlhigh
• is normal. Chronic
denervalion and atrophy of
lhe right thigh is due to a
remote history of polio.
II
179
Q)
:J INTERMUSCULAR EDEMA
C/)
C/)
F
¢:'
o DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Venous Insufficiency
en o Best diagnosed with ultrasound
0:: Common examination
::?: • Trauma
"'C
• Venous flow reversal, enlarged deep to
Q)
C/)
• Intramuscular Injection superficial perforating vessels
<ll
al
• Venous Insufficiency o Range of soft tissue changes from mild
Ql • Popliteal Cyst, Rupture subcutaneous edema to soft tissue
Cl
<ll • Tendon Tear ulceration
E • Bursitis • Popliteal Cyst, Rupture
• Deep Venous Thrombosis o Classic location of popliteal cyst between
less Common medial head of gastrocnemius and
• Soft Tissue Abscess semimembranosus in popliteal fossa
• Syndesmosis Sprain o Ruptured fluid may track proximally and
• Infectious Myositis distally in leg
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis o Symptomatic and often associated with
• Soft Tissue or Bone Neoplasm underlying knee pathology
• Radiation-Induced Non-Neoplastic Soft o Hint: If the fluid is not contiguous with a
Tissue Abnormalities popliteal cyst, evaluate for venous
• Complications of Iodinated Contrast thrombosis
• Diabetes: MSK Complications • Tendon Tear
• Compartment Syndrome o Inflammatory fluid from tendon tear
tracks along the fascial planes of the
Rare but Important associated and surrounding muscles
• Necrotizing Fasciitis
• Bursitis
• Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis o Fluid in unexpected areas may still
represent an obscure or pseudo-bursa
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Fluid extends along fascial planes from
location of bursa when ruptured
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Deep Venous Thrombosis
• Look for an underlying cause and evaluate o Marked edema within and between
for pertinent history to differentiate similar muscles and soft tissues
appearing etiologies o Can produce pain and be clinically
• Intermuscular and intramuscular edema unsuspected
often coexist o May involve dominant deep venous
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses structure or intramuscular plexus
• Trauma • Examine vessels for lack of t T2 signal
o Edema and hemorrhage tracks along facial • Peripheral enhancement of thrombus
planes from injury site Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
o Intermuscular edema can be located • Soft Tissue Abscess
proximal, distal and at the injury site o Thick, enhancing rind of tissue around
o Edema associated with fracture is obvious
abscess
o Injury with hematoma may simulate
• Surrounding inflammatory fluid may
neoplasm especially if injury is not track beyond extent of infection
remembered by patient • Central, nonenhancing necrotic center
• Necessitates follow-up to exclude • Syndesmosis Sprain
hemorrhagic malignancy o Tear or partial tear of ankle syndesmotic
• Intramuscular Injection ligaments
o Commonly has linear edema extending • Anterior and posterior tibiofibular
from skin surface due to needle tract ligaments, transverse tibiofibular
o Medication will diffuse within muscle and
ligament, interosseous membrane
along fascial planes o Widened tibiofibular space (diastasis)
II
180
INTERMUSCULAR EDEMA 3
III
fO
CIl
a Wide range of etiologies produces a wide ischemia and absent with infarction ~
;u
range of severity a Commonly bilateral & involving thighs
(fl
• Viral, bacterial, fungal, parasitic a Difficult to differentiate from traumatic, o
;:r
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis infectious or inflammatory muscle ::!
a Abnormal muscle & subcutaneous fat from conditions on imaging alone '"c'"
(1)
inflammation, edema & calcification • Compartment Syndrome
a Typical sheet-like involvement of muscles a High T2 signal and enlargement of all
and subcutaneous tissues with calcification muscles in compartment
evident on radiographs/CT a Lower extremity (calf, foot) most
• Soft Tissue or Bone Neoplasm commonly involved
a Any bone or soft tissue malignancy may a Muscle herniation may be present
induce an inflammatory response, with a Findings necessitate clinical measurement
adjacent edema in soft tissues of compartment pressures
• Radiation-Induced Non-Neoplastic Soft Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
Tissue Abnormalities • Necrotizing Fasciitis
a High T2 signal involving soft tissues in
a Gas tracking along fascial planes is classic
region of radiation therapy o Thickened deep and superficial fascia
a Lack of enhancement and non mass-like
o Fascial enhancement is patchy or uniform
appearance differentiates from residual or a Is a clinical diagnosis, although imaging
recurrent tumor can be suggestive
• Complications of Iodinated Contrast • Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis
a Extravasation of IV contrast material into
a Low T1 and high T2 signal in skeletal
soft tissues is almost always apparent at muscle, intermuscular fascia and skin
time of imaging a Correlate with history of relatively recent
a Instruct patient to report signs of
gadodiamide administration (within 3
persistent or increasing pain, skin months) and renal insufficiency
blistering, numbness, tingling, or increased a Similar appearance to polymyositis
swelling - surgical consult a Severe muscle swelling can mimic
• Diabetes: MSK Complications necrotizing fasciitis
a Muscle ischemia and infarction due to
diabetes is uncommon
Trauma
i=
~
o
(f)
Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis
(Left) Coronal STIR MR
shows disruption of the ankle
syndesmosis, including not
only the anterior tibiofibular
ligament but also the
interosseous membrane •.
There was extensive
surrounding edema lEI in the
subcutaneous fat and
between the muscles,
without evidence of a
fracture. (Right! Axial T2WI
FS MR shows high T2 signal
from edema" both in and
around the thigh muscfes in
a dermatomyositis patient.
CT showed these areas to be
partially calcified.
II
182
INTERMUSCULAR EDEMA 3
III
to
(l)
o:l
III
<II
Radiation-Induced Non-Neoplastic Soft (l)
Co
Soft Tissue or Bone Neoplasm Tissue Abnormalities
(Lefl) Axial T2WI FS MR :s:
shows a low signal mass E!II
;U
expanding the proximal CIl
fibula, with edema III
o
;::I>
tracking between the -i
adjacent muscles. This was a iii'
(f)
desmoplastic fibroma but c:
(l)
any neoplasm may incite
inflammatory fluid. (RighI)
Axial T2WI FS MR shows
intermuscular edema III in
the posterior thigh. The
patient had a prior medial
thigh sarcoma resEction that
was treated with radiation.
Lack of enhancement made
recurrence or metastasis
unlikely.
II
183
Q)
:J TENOSYNOVITIS/TENOSYNOVIAL FLUID
II)
II)
i=
<:::
a DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Sheath fluid without synovial thickening
(f)
• Arthritis
a::: Common o Most common: Inflammatory (RA),
~ • Normal Variant
"'C
crystalline (gout) or seronegative
Q)
I/)
• Tendon, Injury o Look for associated arthropathy features
C1l
al
• Arthritis (e.g., erosions, osteophytes, osteopenia)
Q)
Cl Less Common Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
C1l
E • Repetitive Trauma • Repetitive Trauma
• Infection o Variable sheath fluid; ± normal tendon
• Iatrogenic o Correlate with mechanism of injury (e.g.,
Rare but Important FHL in ballet dancers)
• Giant Cell Tumor, Tendon Sheath • Infection
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis o Pyogenic, fungal or tuberculous
• Fibroma of Tendon Sheath o Look for co-existing medical problems,
immunocompromise, etc.
o Extensive fluid, often in multiple sheaths
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION & joints; thick enhancing synovium
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Iatrogenic
• All tendons covered by sheath except o History of recent injection, or prior surgery
Achilles tendon which may result in tenosynovitis
• Evaluate by X-ray, ultrasound, CT or MR Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Stenosing tenosynovitis: Adhesions restrict • Giant Cell Tumor, Tendon Sheath
tendon & fluid motion in sheath o Multiple heterogeneous nodules; variable
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses enhancement; normal tendon; fluid rare
• Normal Variant o Hemosiderin may cause GRE "blooming"
o A small amount of fluid is normal • Synovial Osteochondromatosis
o Tendons communicating with joint may o Extensive sheath fluid with multiple small
have sheath fluid reflecting joint effusion ovoid bodies
(e.g., long head biceps & shoulder joint or • Fibroma of Tendon Sheath
flexor hallucis longus and tibiotalar joint) o Ovoid hypodense enhancing intrasheath
• Tendon, Injury mass < 2.5 em; fluid rare
o Look for tendon thickening, thinning or o Mild adjacent osseous erosion
complete disruption
Normal Variant
Infection
(Left) Axial STIR MR shows
fluid ElII in flexor tendon
sheaths, fCU & distal
radioulnar joint with synovial
pannus & debris. in this
steroid dependent woman
infected with
Mycobacterium marinum.
(Right) Coronal STIR MR
shows ulnar" mass which is
/I
II
185
Ql
:J ENLARGED PERIPHERAL NERVES
en
en
i=
~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Clinical symptoms should alert you to
o
(f)
possibility of nerve mass or disturbance
a::: Common o "Shocking" sensation is elicited when a
~ • Neurofibromatosis
"t:l
neurogenic tumor is tapped
Ql
en
• Tunnel Syndromes (Carpal, Ulnar, Tarsal) o Similar sensation is found with entrapped
nl • Trauma
al nerves (signs elicited for tunnel
Ql • Morton Neuroma syndromes)
Cl
nl • Traumatic Neuroma o Percutaneous biopsy of a neurogenic
E • Benign Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor tumor is exquisitely painful
(Benign PNST) • Hints for MR imaging of nerves
• Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor "neurograms"
(MPNST) o TI without fat-saturation is extremely
Less Common helpful in locating the course of the nerve
• Lipomatosis, Nerve (Fibrolipomatous • Perform at least one TI sequence without
Hamartoma) fat-saturation; axial often most useful
• Macrodystrophia Lipomatosa o Fluid sensitive sequences are useful in
• Charcot Marie Tooth identifying enlargement and/or
hyperintensity of nerve
Rare but Important
o Post-contrast imaging is useful in
• Cystic Lymphangioma (Mimic) identifying an irritated nerve; normal
• Neurogenic Sarcoma nerves do not enhance
• Perineurioma, Intraneural o Imaging planes deserve attention; choose
• Acromegaly plane that will best follow the course of
nerve of interest
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Sciatic nerve with reference to piriformis:
Sagittal plane especially useful
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Sciatic nerve roots: Angled coronal of
• Anatomy & morphology should alert you to sacrum shows all nerve roots
neural origin of these lesions • Nerves following a curved course around
o Any lesion in or adjacent to a
a joint (e.g., peroneal around fibular
neurovascular bundle should make a neck or ulnar through ulnar tunnel of
neural lesion a consideration elbow): Axial plane may be most useful
o Hint: Neural lesions tend to be elongated,
or oval/teardrop-shaped Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
o Hint: The associated nerve is often seen • Neurofibromatosis
entering or exiting lesion o Generalized longitudinal enlargement of
o Hint: "Target" sign should raise suspicion nerve fascicles may be seen
for tumor of neurogenic origin o Any nerve may be involved
• Target seen as low signal centrally o May have additional "beaded" appearance
surrounded by high SI on T2 imaging due to focal neurofibromas
• Target highly suggestive of neural tumor, • Tunnel Syndromes (Carpal, Ulnar, Tarsal)
but not exclusive to this type of lesion o Tunnels with transiting nerves, restricted
• Target sign originally described in by retinacula, are at risk
neurofibroma o Nerves may be compressed by lipoma,
• Target sign may be seen in neurofibroma, ganglion cyst, displaced fractures most
schwannoma, or MPNST; not specific frequently
o Hint: Watch for associated muscle • Nerves usually are compressed but less
abnormalities (know innervation patterns) frequently may be enlarged,
• Denervation hypertrophy hyperintense, and enhance with contrast
• Muscle atrophy • Trauma
• Hyperintense muscle o Direct trauma may transect nerve
II
186
ENLARGED PERIPHERAL NERVES 3
Ql
(Q
lD
o If not transected, nerve may swell & o Some degree of macrodactyly is present in lJl
Ql
become hyperintense 2/3 of patients In
lD
C.
• Morton Neuroma o MR is characteristic & pathognomonic
o Perineural fibrosis causes enlargement of • Cable-like longitudinal configuration of s:
::0
interdigital nerve enlarged nerve fascicles within (j)
=-
mass in the posterior thigh
which proved to be a
MPNST of the sciatic nerve.
Note the enlargement and
nodularity of the proximal &
distal nerves, representing
multiple neurofibromas 11II.
ItMSK Req).
II
188
ENLARGED PERIPHERAL NERVES 3
III
(Q
C1l
[II
III
l/I
Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath lipomatosis, Nerve (Fibrolipomatous C1l
Co
Tumor (MPNST) Hamartoma)
(Left) Coronal oblique T7 C + ~
FS MR shows enhancement
;:0
& enlargement of multiple en
sacral nerve roots" in a
o
;:l>
patient who had a sciatic
=!
l/I
MPNST resected 6 months en
earlier. This represents c
CO
recurrence extending
proximally up all the
contributing nerve roots.
(Right) Axial T7WI MR
shows mild enlargement of
the individual fascicles of the
median nerve HI with
surrounding lipomatous
stroma. The mass displaces
the flexor tendons IJIID. The
appearance is typical.
==
and enlargement of fascicles
in the tibial and peroneal
nerves all typical of
macrodystrophia lipomatosa.
(Right) Axial PO FSEFS MR
shows enlargement of the
tibial nerve Eill as well as
denervation edema of the
muscles of the posterior
compartment of the leg. The
patient had a cavus foot
deformity, typical of Charcot
Marie Tooth.
Neurogenic Sarcoma
(Left) Axial STIR MR shows
multiple perineural cysts
located adjacent to the tibial
=
..'~'
nerve Hl which itself is
normal in size. The cysts did
. e2:'- ..
not enhance, proving their
' . '
cystic nature, and their
mimicking of tibia! nerve
.~~ ,_.r~
;"
•..,.•••.
'~
enlargement. (Right) Axial
T7WI MR shows a tubular
.. . '
..... - subcutaneous mass III.
deviating the flexor tendons,
II
189
INTRAARTICULAR LOW SIGNAL MATERIAL, ALL SEQUENCES
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) o May have some high signal components CD
III
o Nodular deposits may be scattered on T2 and post-contrast VI
Cl)
II
192
INTRAARTICULAR LOW SIGNAL MATERIAL, ALL SEQUENCES 3
OJ
to
~
OJ
OJ
II>
~
Co
Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)
(Leh) Sagittal PO FSE MR
shows a large effusion
containing multiple nodular
bodies". The radiograph
was normal. These bodies
remained low signal on T1
and nWI. (Right) Sagittal
n° CRE MR (same knee as
previous image) shows
"blooming" of the areas of
low signal, now seen to be
lining the suprapatellar bursa
•• Hoffa fat pad" &
posterior capsule Ell. This
wide articular distribution, as
well as the blooming effect
on CRE confirms the
diagnosis of PVNS.
Nodular Synovitis
(Leh) Sagittal T2WI FS MR
shows predominantly low
signal within a discrete mass
adjacent to Hoffa fat pad ••.
This signal characteristic,
along with the location,
make the diagnosis of
nodular synovitis highly
probable. (Right) Sagittal
T2WI MR shows low signal
material within an
erosion/subchondral cyst
Ell. as well as densely &
diffusely thickened rotator
cuff tendons" This patient
has end stage renal disease;
the imaging is typical of
amyloid.
II
193
-0
C ANECHOIC MASS
~
o
IJ)
CO
E DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Synovium thickness variable depending on
=> chronicity, underlying cause
"tl
Q)
Common • Bursitis
VI
C'll • Ganglion Cyst o Acute: Thin wall, anechoic (chronic
III
Q)
• Synovial Cyst becomes more echogenic)
en • Joint Effusion (Mimic)
C'll • Tenosynovitis (Mimic)
E • Bursitis o Fluid surrounding tendon; ± synovial
• Tenosynovitis (Mimic) thickening; ± tendon injury
• Hematoma • Hematoma
• Soft Tissue Abscess o Acute: Hyperechoic
• Muscle Injury (Mimic) o Subacute (3+ days): Anechoic
Less Common o Subacute (organizing): Echogenic
• Aneurysm (Mimic) o Chronic (liquifying): Anechoic
• Pseudoaneurysm • Soft Tissue Abscess
• Seroma o Thickened, irregular wall
• Lymphocele • Muscle Injury (Mimic)
o Partial: Irregular cavity, accentuated with
Rare but Important
muscle contraction
• Myxoma o Complete: Muscle retracted, hematoma
• Hemophilic Pseudotumor creates "mass"
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Aneurysm (Mimic)
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Saccular or fusiform, ± luminal thrombus
• Anechoic: Minimal echoes, + o Pseudoaneurysm: History of
thru-transmission & posterior enhancement catheterization
• Seroma/Lymphocele
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o History of prior surgery
• Ganglion Cyst
o Ovoid or lobulate; thin-walled; ± Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
septations • Myxoma
o Synovial cysts communicate with joint & o Discrete hypoechoic mass, ± cystic areas
ganglia do not • Hemophilic Pseudotumor
• Joint Effusion (Mimic) o Masses may be anechoic or more complex
o Follows pattern of hematoma
II Transverse ultrasound shows a discrete anechoic mass Dual ultrasound shows a thin-walled, multiseptate,
194
•• with posterior enhancement
ganglion cyst.
III superficial to the
index finger flexor digilorum tendon Ell This is a the gastrocnemius =
anechoic mass interposed between the medial head of
'a."
lD
II
195
PHOTOPENIC LESIONS & FALSENEGATIVE SCANS
lJl
III
l/I
(I)
Co
Post-Radiation
(Left) Anterior and posterior Z
c
bone scans demonstrate Q.
geographic defect involving CD
=
OJ
severa/thoracic vertebral ~
bodies and adjacent ribs s:
CO
corresponding to previous Co
II
197
SOFT TISSUE UPTAKE ON BONE SCAN
o Commonly peri-articular Z
compartment syndrome, diabetic c
(")
rhabdomyolysis, snake venom, infection • Metastatic calcification co
OJ
especially anaerobic o Any condition leading to hypercalcemia ~
• Common etiologies: Renal $:
C1>
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses Q.
osteodystrophy, HPTH, Q.
• Osteosarcoma :::J
hypoparathyroidism, cases of extensive C1>
o Both extraskeletal primary & metastases
bone destruction
o Lungs common site of metastases
o Common sites include Gl tract especially
Alternative Differential Approaches stomach, kidney, lungs, peri-articular soft
• Discussion of the various causes is best tissues
focused around the mechanism of • Neoplasm with calcification
radiopharmaceutical uptake o Primarily adenocarcinomas, especially
• List presented below includes many specific mucinous
sites & etiologies typically seen although o Mechanisms not always clear
there are many potential causes • May be dystrophic
• Dystrophic calcification • Psammomatous
o Occurs at sites of previous tissue damage • Enchondral (chondroid tumors)
with random sites of involvement o Colon, breast, ovary (mucinous), Gl,
o Hematoma, abscess, trauma, necrosis, neuroblastoma, endometrial
infarction, tuberculosis, vascular o Soft tissue chondroid tumors
abnormalities o Primary tumor and metastases can calcify
• Ossification • Calcified metastases most commonly
o Neoplastic ossification occurs in seen in liver
osteosarcoma, may be primary o Wide differential diagnosis for soft tissue
extraskeletal or metastatic disease neoplasm containing calcification
o Nonneoplastic ossification
• Wide differential diagnosis for
heterotopic ossification
• Wide differential diagnosis for soft tissue
ossification
• Idiopathic pulmonary ossification
~
ro
Q)
13 Urine Contamination (Mimic) Dilated Pelvicaliceal System (Mimic)
:::l
Z (Leh) Anterior bone scan
shows an amorphous
"Ql
III
accumulation of activity
the perineal region and
in
'"
CD upper thigh consistent with
Ql
Cl urine contamination ffi
(Right) Anterior and
'"
E posterior bone scan shows
accumulation of radioisotope
within a dilated left
pelvocaliceal system ~ and
normal activity within the
right renal parenchyma Ii8
II
200
SOFT TISSUE UPTAKE ON BONE SCAN 3
III
CO
CIl
III
III
VI
CIl
Co
Calcification within Neoplasm Calcification within Neoplasm
(Left) Lateralbone scan Z
c
centered over the knee £t
demonstrates uptake in the ctl
III
distal thigh _ The ~
orthogonal view helped to s:
ctl
confirm that the activity was c.
located in the solt tissue & Q.
:J
not osseous. (Courtesy K. ctl
Morton, MOJ. (Right) Axial
CECT in the prone position
01 the same patient shows
soft tissue sarcoma with
multiple loci 01calcification
_ this results in local
accumulation of activity on
bone scan.
II
201
SOFT TISSUE UPTAKE ON BONE SCAN
~
co
Ql
<3
:::J
Z (Left) Posterior bone scan
't:l reveals asymmetric activity
Ql within the hemithoraces with
III
III greater activity on the right
al 6B The uptake is not focal
Ql
Cl and is consistent with a
III malignant pleural effusion.
E (Right) Anterior bone scan
shows a protuberant
abdomen. containing
amorphous activity. This
patient has malignant asc;tes.
Note lhe negative defecl of
the bowel within the ascites
ElII. (Courtesy K. Morron,
MO).
II
202
SOFT TISSUE UPTAKE ON BONE SCAN 3
III
to
l1>
OJ
III
VI
l1>
Q,
Soft Tissue Ossification, Any Cause Soft Tissue Ossification, Any Cause
(Left) Posterior bone scan Z
c
shows amorphous foci of C'l
uptake within both r0-
O>
hemithoraces, especially at ~
the lung bases _ This s:
Cll
patient has idiopathic c.
pulmonary ossification. Q.
:J
(Right) Posteroanterior Cll
radiograph in the same
patient as previous image,
shows density at both lung
bases. secondary lO
idiopathic pulmonary
ossification.
Neuroblastoma Osteosarcoma
(Left) Posterior bone scan
shows uptake in a right
adrenal mass. most likely
related to microcalcificalions
;n this patient with
neuroblaslOma. (Right)
Anterior and posterior bone
scan shows a case of
metastatic osteosarcoma
with radioisotope uptake
within a left lower lobe mass
•. A calcified mass was
evident on chest x-ray. In this
case the uptake mimics
cardiac uptake.
Osteosarcoma Osteosarcoma
(Left) Anterior bone scan
shows intense activity
throughout the right
hemithorax. mimicking
the shape of the lung due lO
a large osteosarcomatous
mass within the pleural
space. (Courtesy K. MarlOn,
MO). (Right) Axial CECT
shows a large osteosarcoma
which has arisen in the
pleural space _ (Courtesy
K. MarlOn, MO).
II
203
SUPERSCAN
OJ
III
tII
(l)
Co
Mastocytosis leukemia
(Left) Bone scan shows the
nonspecific appearance of a
superscan in this patient with
mastocytosis. (Right)
Anterior bone scan shows
extremely intense uptake
throughout the skeleton. The
limited renal activity helps to
put the skeletal uptake into
perspective in this patient
with CML blast crisis.
Osteopetrosis Osteopetrosis
(Left) Anterior and posterior
bone scan shows diffuse
intense uptake throughout
the axial and appendicular
skeleton in this patient with
osteopetrosis. (RighI) Axial
bone CT shows a typical
case of osteopetrosis with
diffuse sclerosis throughout
the entire skeleton including
the pelvis as shown here. It is
easy to appreciate the diffuse
skeletal uptake on bone scan
seen in these patients.
II
205
PART III
Clinically Based
Shoulder Girdle and Upper Arm
Elbow and Forearm
Wrist and Hand
Pelvis, Hip, and Thigh
Knee and Leg
Ankle and Foot
Spine
Systemic Disease
PAINFUL OR ENLARGED STERNOCLAVICULAR JOINT
:Q
::> Less Common • Psoriatic Arthritis: Bilateral asymmetric,
o joint space narrowing, erosions, periostitis,
.s::
(f)
• Septic Joint
• Metastatic Calcification enthesopathy
"tl
Q)
• Ankylosing Spondylitis • Rheumatoid Arthritis
III
• Psoriatic Arthritis o Bilateral symmetric erosive arthritis
'"
tlI
• Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle
>. • Rheumatoid Arthritis
• Osteitis Condensans of Clavicle o Unilateral, seen in middle aged women
'"
u
o Hint: Sclerosis in inferior aspect clavicular
r:: • Sternoclavicular Hyperostosis/SAPHO
U head, inferomedial osteophyte
Rare but Important
• Sternoclavicular Hyperostosis/SAPHO
• Mucopolysaccharidoses o Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis,
• Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis Osteitis
• Ischemic Necrosis of the Clavicle o Older teenagers & adults, primarily men
o Unilateral or bilateral sclerosis clavicle,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION sternum or both, enthesitis
o ± Manubriosternal, & 1st, 2nd
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses costochondral articulations
• Osteoarthritis: Joint space narrowing, o Chronic recurrent multifocal osteoarthritis
subchondral sclerosis & cysts, osteophytes (CRMO) is variant seen in children,
• Post-Traumatic: Clavicular head fx may adolescents; bone destruction, extensive
lead to malunion, unilateral osteoarthritis sclerosis leads to enlarged clavicle
• Dislocation: Majority anterior; if posterior
concern for trachea, neurovascular injury Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Mucopolysaccharidoses: Wide clavicles
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses • Tumoral (Idiopathic) Calcinosis
• Septic Joint o Peri-articular calcium deposition
o Unilateral, peri-articular osteoporosis, joint
• Ischemic Necrosis of Clavicle: Clavicular
space narrowing, bone destruction head sclerosis in children 2° trauma, emboli
Post-Traumatic Dislocation
Anteroposterior radiograph shows fracture of the medial Frontal bone CT with 3D reconstruction shows a
head of the clavicle III with inferior displacement posterior dislocation of the right clavicle III relative to
which presented as a painful lump. the manubrium. The vascular structures are at risk in this
dislocation.
2
PAINFUL OR ENLARGED STERNOClAVICULAR JOINT n
~
o
III
-<
OJ
III
Septic Joint
(Left) Axial STIR MR shows
'"
~
Co
abnormal signal within the CJl
distal clavicle. along with ::T
o
an effusion EiII in this drug c::
abuser with septic arthritis of a:
CD
the right sternoclavicular ~
joint. (Right) Axial bone CT
shows erosive change at the
sternoclavicularjoints.
and complete fusion at the
costovertebral. and
costochondral EiII joints in
this patient with ankylosing
spondylitis.
III
3
ROTATOR CUFF SYMPTOMS
:l
(i'
III
o Following dislocation, may have (reverse) • Ring osteophyte around glenoid; ring
Hill Sachs and/or (reverse) Bankart injuries osteophyte at anatomic humeral neck
-<
llJ
III
• May result in subtle subluxation; watch margin, largest inferiorly IJl
tD
for this on axial MR imaging • Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Co
increased density weight-bearing portion erosion medial humeral neck - at risk for CD
Ql
(superomedial head) surgical neck fracture :l
a.
o MR: Subchondral, ± serpiginous double • Hydroxyapatite Deposition Disease C
'0
line sign of osteonecrosis (HADD) (a.k.a., Milwaukee Shoulder) '0
..,
CD
• Fracture o Aggressive joint destruction otherwise
o Direct impact or related to dislocation mimicking osteoarthritis
o Greater tuberosity fracture (nondisplaced) o Consider with shoulder appearance of OA
may be occult radiographically but without history of trauma
o Presents with limited range of motion & • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS)
pain; often present for MR as presumed o When peripheral joints are involved, it
rotator cuff injury tends to be hip or shoulder
• AC Joint Separation o Osteoporotic, erosive ± productive
o Pain and limited range of motion (ROM), • Polymyalgia Rheumatica
but generally should be differentiated from o Pain, weakness, & stiffness, especially hip
rotator cuff symptoms and shoulder; no structural abnormalities
o Grade 11:AC joint widened; grade Ill: AC
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
and coracoclavicular joints widened
• Septic Joint
• Osteoarthritis (OA) o Swelling, abscess, effusion, ± bone &
o Slowly progressive pain and limited ROM
cartilage destruction
o Often antecedent trauma
• Adhesive Capsulitis, Shoulder
• If no such history, consider deposition o Painful limited ROM; mimics RCT disease
etiologies (HADD or pyrophosphate) o Thickened & edematous inferior capsule
o Typical findings of OA: Cartilage thinning,
o Restricted capsule with arthrography, no
subchondral cysts filling of axillary or subscapularis bursae
Osteonecrosis Fracture
(Left)Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a
subchondral fracture III in
the weight-bearing portion of
the humeral head. This is a
typical appearance of
osteonecrosis; the patient
used steroids for asthma.
(Right) Coronal TlWI MR
shows, bone marrow edema
III & linear fracture line E±I
in the greater tuberosity. This
nondispJaced fracture was
radiographically occult; MR
was requested to evaluate
for rotator cuff tear. The cuff
and remainder of the
shoulder were normal.
III
6
ROTATOR CUFF SYMPTOMS ()
:l
o
III
-<
OJ
III
Osteoarthritis (OA) VI
<II
(Left) Anteroposterior Q.
radiograph shows grade 3 (f)
AC separation __ ::T
o
Heterotopic bone is formed c
between the clavicle and a:
C1l
coracoid. indicating ~
coracoclavicular ligament
injury. (Right) Coronal T1 WI
MR shows complete
cartilage loss 11II and huge
osteophytes ringing the
margin of the joint Ell; this
ring osteophyte is
particularly large
inferomedially. The rotator >
cuff remains intact. 3
III
7
SHOULDER INSTABILITY
on routine MR, but often best seen with MR dislocation (occurs in up to 50%)
arthrogram o Rare as an isolated lesion
o Distension with arthrogram is useful, • Associated capsular stretching or tear
especially when there is a rotator cuff tear • Often associated Hill Sachs and Bankart
which decompresses the natural effusion or labral tear
III
8
SHOULDER INSTABILITY
III
10
("')
SHOULDER INSTABILITY
j
n
Dl
-<
III
Dl
Glenoid Fracture Biceps Tendon Tear VI
l1>
(Left) Axial TI WI FS MR Q.
shows reverse bony Bankart (f)
Fracture"'. Note the ::T
o
cartilage disruption as well c::
Ell. The humeral head is c:
ro
posteriorly subluxated, ~
indicating at least a posterior G)
instability. (Right) Axial TI WI
~
0-
FS MR arthrogram shows a ro
Dl
partial biceps tear'" with :::J
dislocation into partial 0-
undersurface lear of the C
subscapularis tendon III
Note the empty bicipital
"
"ro~
groove Ell. The biceps
dislocation and subscapularis
injury contribute to anterior
instability.
Crystalline Arthropathy
(Left) Coronal PO FSf FS MR
in a paUent with rheumatoid
arthritis shows a rotator cuff
tear'" patulous joint ElIl &
extensive synovitis with rice
bodies. The combination
may lead to instability.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
pyrophosphate arthropathy,
with a chronic RCT and
degenerative change. HAOO
(Milwaukee shoulder) oFten
shows more destruction as
well as calciFicdeposits than
is seen here and is more
likely to be unstable.
III
11
ANTEROINFERIOR lABRAl/CAPSUlE INJURY
"0
• HAGL Lesion • GLAD Lesion
Ql
Vl Rare but Important o Glenoid Labrum Articular Disruption
'"
[JJ • Congenital Hypermobility Syndrome o Labrum partial tear & adjacent cartilage
~ damage
'"c": ESSENTIAL INFORMATION Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
U • ALPSA Lesion
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Anterior Labroligamentous Periosteal
• Hint: Watch for radiographic abnormality Sleeve Avulsion
o Hill-Sachs impaction deformity o Bankart but periosteal sleeve intact
o Glenoid fracture fragments o Acute: Torn labroligamentous complex
• CT: Malalignment, glenoid hypoplasia rolls medial & inferior
• MR: Marrow and soft tissue edema, labral o Chronic: Fibrotic medial "mass"
tears; sensitivity/specificity (S/S): 80/45-80% • Perthes Lesion
• MR/CT with intra-articular contrast: t o Bankart & intact but redundant periosteal
conspicuity; S/S: 95/86% sleeve
• ABduction External Rotation (ABER) view • HAGL Lesion
o Inferior glenohumerallabroligamentous o Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral
(IGHL) structures taut for improved Ligament
visibility, eliminates magic angle o Capsule avulsion of IGHL from humeral
o Position gently to avoid re-dislocation attachment without subscapularis tear; no
• Young adult dislocation: Bankart, variants age predilection
• Older adult dislocation = 1/3 supraspinatus
Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
tear; 1/3 greater tuberosity fracture; 1/3
subscapularis/capsular avulsion • Congenital Hypermobility Syndrome
o Diagnosis of exclusion
III
13
NERVE ENTRAPMENT, SHOULDER
::;,
n
III
-<
OJ
III
Suprascapular Nerve Entrapment VI
C1l
(Left) Coronal T2Wl FS MR Q.
shows a paralabral cyst Ell (j)
extending into the ::T
suprascapular notch" &
o
C
compressing the 0..
(1)
suprascapular nerve, ~
resulting in edema of the
supraspinatus & infraspinatus
muscles (not shown). (Right!
Sagittal PO FSEFS MR shows
a multiseptate cyst ••
compressing the
infraspinatus branch the or
suprascapular nerve as it
passes through the »
spinoglenoid notch Ell with 3
resultant infraspinatus
weakness.
(Left) Sagittal TI WI MR
shows the normal
relationship of the axillary
nerve" to the adjacent
joint structures including the
humerus [;8 subscapularis
Hl & teres minor !Ill
muscles. (Right! Sagittal TI
C+ FS MR shows the axillary
nerve. being compressed
superiorly toward the normal
shoulder structures including
the humeral head !Ill by a
large heterogeneous
liposarcoma presenting with
fatty Ell & solid ~
components.
III
15
§ ElBOW DEFORMITIES IN CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS
'~"
QJ
o
LL
"0
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
C
Common • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
'~" o Epiphyseal overgrowth, especially radius;
o • Complication of Fracture Healing
.0
peri-articular osteoporosis, uniform joint
W • Physeal Bar
space narrowing, marginal erosions,
"
<Il
III
III
Less Common periosteal new bone formation
CO • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) • Hemophilia
~ • Hemophilia o Epiphyseal overgrowth (may result in
III
.!:!
• Nontraumatic Radial Head Dislocation deformity), especially radius; peri-articular
c osteoporosis, uniform cartilage loss,
Rare but Important
u subchondral cysts, dense effusion
• Radiation-Induced Growth Deformities
• Radiation Osteonecrosis • Nontraumatic Radial Head Dislocation
• Congenital Cubitus Valgus o Congenital: Hypoplastic capitellum, radial
III =
Anteroposterior radiograph shows a fracture of the
lateral condyle with proximal displacement, resulting =-
AP radiograph shows old Salter IV fracture of the lateral
condyle with proximal displacement of the
in a cubitus valgus deformity. Reformatted CT (not fragment. The displaced fragment allowed formation of
shown) demonstrated nonunion. a physeal bar, resulting in a cubitus valgus deformity.
16
ElBOW DEFORMITIES IN CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS (")
j
o
III
'<
OJ
III
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (]IA) Hemophilia VI
ltl
(Left) Lateral radiograph Co
shows osteoporosis & m
overgrowth of capitellum •. r::T
When compared to the o
::i
opposite side there is OJ
advanced maturation of :>
a.
radius Ell & olecranon III in "Tl
this patient with }fA. (t MSK o
~
Req). (Right) Oblique CD
OJ
radiograph shows
overgrowth of the radial 3
head epiphysis ••
peri·articular osteoporosis, &
subchondral cysts. in this
individual with hemophilia.
Asymmetric overgrowth may
result in alignment
abnormalities.
III
17
E
~ LATERALELBOW PAIN
<tl
Q)
~
o
u..
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Anterolateral head vulnerable to fracture
"0
C
<tl
due to less supporting bone
;:
Common o CT to assess for occult fracture or
o • Lateral Epicondylitis
.0 associated fractures
W • Radial Head/Neck Fracture • Fall on outstretched hand may also be
"C
Q)
• Radial Head Dislocation associated with scaphoid fracture
VI
III • Capitellar Osteochondritis o Radial head fracture is common in adults
CD
>.
• Capitellar Osteonecrosis • Fracture of the radial neck is more
III • Lateral Condylar Fracture common in children & teenagers
.!:! • Common Extensor Mechanism Injury o Essex-Lopresti fracture
c
u Less Common • Radial head or neck fracture
• Capitellum Fracture • Disrupted forearm interosseous
• Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury membrane
• Radial Head Subluxation (Nursemaid Elbow) • Unstable distal radioulnar joint
• Neoplasm, Bone • Radial Head Dislocation
• Neoplasm, Soft Tissue o Posterior dislocation
• ± Lateral ligament & common extensor
Rare but Important tendon tears
• Radial Neuropathy • ± Capitellar or coronoid fracture
• Synovial Fringe • Capsular disruption
• Hemorrhage
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Secondary osteoarthritis occurs late
• Capitellar Osteochondritis
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Focal lucency in the capitellum on
• Clinical history of trauma or overuse helpful radiographs
for directing workup o Flattened capitellar articular surface
• Presence of significant effusion favors o Loose bodies in joint
fracture (even when not visible) or an o Check for bilaterality (20%)
inflammatory etiology o Variable signal intensity on MR
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • May have internal & surrounding edema
• Lateral Epicondylitis • Hyperintense fluid deep to lesion on
o a.k.a., "tennis elbow" T2WI indicates a loose fragment
o Radiographs demonstrate soft tissue o Teenage athletic patients
swelling or are normal • Capitellar Osteonecrosis
o Thickening & increased signal of the o Sclerosis of capitellum in younger patient
common extensor tendon on MR than osteochondritis
• Extensor carpi radialis brevis most o More likely to involve the entire
susceptible to tearing/degeneration capitellum than osteochondritis
• Fluid signal intensity is consistent with o Less likely than osteochondritis to have
partial thickness tearing intraarticular loose bodies
o ± Tearing & degeneration of lateral ulnar • Lateral Condylar Fracture
collateral ligament complex o Pediatric: Second most common elbow
o CT arthrography shows contrast fracture
extravasation if capsule is disrupted • Attached common extensor tendon may
• Radial Head/Neck Fracture produce distal retraction of fracture
o Joint effusion almost invariably present fragment
• Anterior fat pad elevated, "sail sign" • MR to evaluate physeal injury
• Posterior fat pad visible o Adult: Lateral condyle fracture involves
o Lucent fracture line(s) on radiographs capitellum ± lateral trochlea
o Low signal fracture line with high signal • May have disruption of lateral collateral
surrounding edema on MR ligament & common extensor tendon
III
18
LATERALELBOW PAIN
o Positive fat pad sign due to effusion o Radial head slips beneath the annular
• Common Extensor Mechanism Injury ligament, which normally lies over the
o Degeneration or tear of common extensor radial neck, becoming trapped between the
tendon components radial head & capitellum
• Extensor carpi radialis brevis has most o Clinically, the joint is held fixed in
lateral location & is injured most often pronation
o Imaging is not typically necessary for
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
reduction (often occurs with supination)
• Capitellum Fracture
o Fracture usually in the coronal plane
• Neoplasm, Bone
o Lesions in or near the end of bone
• Best seen on sagittal images
• Variable anterior displacement of • Giant cell tumor, chondroblastoma,
capitellar fracture fragment aneurysmal bone cyst, osteoid osteoma,
o Positive fat pad sign
chondrosarcoma, metastasis, myeloma
o Very uncommon in children
• Neoplasm, Soft Tissue
o Synovial sarcoma, nerve sheath tumors,
o Evaluate for associated radial head fracture
malignant fibrous histiocytoma
• Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury
o Components: Radial collateral ligament & Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
lateral ulnar collateral ligament • Radial Neuropathy
o History of trauma or chronic overuse o Look for denervation edema or atrophy in
o Radiographs may be normal or show muscles supplied by radial nerve
malalignment to dislocation • Increased signal on T2WI
• Fractures of coronoid process, capitellum o Associated symptoms of radial tunnel
and/or radial head syndrome
o Arthrography demonstrates extravasation • Pain anterolateral proximal forearm (no
via lateral capsular defect sensation deficit or weakness)
o MR shows disruption of ligament fibers • May be an early posterior interosseous
• Radial Head Subluxation (Nursemaid nerve syndrome
Elbow) o ± Fracture of the humerus
o Radiographs are usually normal • Synovial Fringe
• Radial head subluxation or joint o Thickened triangular synovial fold (plica)
widening is uncommon between radial head & capitellum on MR
o Radiographs & CT may show associated
capite liar lucency or sclerosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a focal
lucentregion. in the
capitellum without collapse
of the articular surface. This
area of lucency was
enlarging in a teenaged
throwing athlete. (Right)
Sagittal T1WI FS MR
arthrogram in the same
patient a5 the prior image
shows the osteochondral
lesion" in the capitellum.
It is located slightly anterior
along the articular surface.
The lack of fluid extending
beneath the lesion indicates
that it is stable.
Capitellar Osteonecrosis
(Left) Coronal NECT shows
sclerosis and fragmentation
•• of the entire capitellum.
Small fracture fragments .:I
are loose in the joint.
Osteonecrosis began before
the patient was a teenager.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a fracture
•• involving the lateral
condyle of the humerus.
These fractures can be
difficult to detect and it can
be helpful to obtain
radiographs of the opposite
elbow.
III
20
LATERAL ELBOW PAIN C1
::l
C'l
III
'<
[II
III
Common Extensor Mechanism Injury Capitellum Fracture t/l
CD
(Left) Comnal T2WI FS MR c.
shows a focus of high signal
• in the common extensor
!:!!
rr
tendon near the origin on the o
::;:
lateral epicondyle. Fluid III
signal within the tendon :J
a.
indicates a partial thickness "Tl
tear. (Right) NEeT o
~
reformatted 3D VRT shows a CD
OJ
fracture of the capitellum
m. The dominant fracture 3
fragment .:I has flipped
anterior to the radial head.
III
21
§ MEDIAL ElBOW PAIN
ro
Q)
~
o
LL
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Peritendon inflammation
"0
C
ro
• Epicondyle marrow edema
Common • Intermediate to bright T2WI signal
~
o • Medial Epicondylitis
..0 within tendon
W • Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) Injury • Tendon thickening
"0
Q) • Olecranon Fracture • Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) Injury
VI
l'Cl • Common Flexor Mechanism Injury o Chronic repetitive trauma
en • Medial Epicondyle Avulsion, Pediatric
>. o Injury to anterior bundle most common,
l'Cl • Coronoid Process Fracture most significant; anterior bundle most
<.l
c • Medial Condylar Fracture important stabilizer in valgus stress
U • Ulnar Neuropathy o Radiographs
• Little Leaguer's Elbow • Ossification late finding
• C8-Tl Radiculopathy (Mimic) oMR
• Median Neuropathy • Periligamentous edema
less Common • Bright T2WI signal within ligament
• Triceps Tendon Rupture • Ligament thickening or discontinuity
• Anconeus Epitrochlearis • Ossification
o MR arthrography
Rare but Important
• "T" sign (extension of contrast between
• Cat Scratch Disease MCL and coronoid process), though may
be normal
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Intraligamentous contrast or
extravasation indicative of tear
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o US with valgus stress demonstrates
• Common mechanism is valgus stress instability with medial joint widening
o Hint: In skeletally immature athlete injury
o Avulsion of sublime tubercle
to physis most common; in adult one sees • Attachment site of anterior band of
injury to medial (ulnar) collateral ligament medial collateral ligament on coronoid
(MCL) and/or flexor-pronator muscle process
group • Olecranon Fracture
o UCL injuries and injuries to
o Fall on outstretched hand with flexed
flexor-pronator group often co-exist elbow or direct blow
• Typically present with medial elbow pain, • Triceps pull creates distraction forces at
may also have loss of grip strength fracture site & may require internal
• Usually in dominant upper extremity fixation
• Flexor-pronator group: Common tendon • Common Flexor Mechanism Injury
origin arising from the medial epicondyle o Sequelae of overuse injury and
o Flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris,
tendonitis/inflammation within the
flexor digitorum superficialis, palmaris flexor-pronator group
longus, pronator teres muscles o Ranges from partial to full thickness tears
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses oMR
• Medial Epicondylitis • Peri tendon edema
o Valgus stress overuse injury of • Intratendinous bright T2WI signal
flexor-pronator group • Discontinuity, wavy fibers, gap
• Golf, baseball, tennis o MR arthrography not useful
o Range: Acute inflammation to tendinosis o Ultrasound may identify tear
• May progress to common flexor partial • Medial Epicondyle Avulsion, Pediatric
or full thickness tear o Ossification center appears age 4-6 years
o Associated ulnar neuropathy o 50% associated with elbow dislocation
o MR: Multitude of appearances o Other mechanism: Sudden forceful
• Intermediate Tl WI signal contraction with onset of pain
III
22
MEDIAL ELBOW PAIN (")
='o
III
a Hint: When fragment displaced into joint, a Irregular ossification or overgrowth of
-<
mimics trochlear ossification center medial epicondyle apophysis; widening, tll
III
• Always identify epicondyle ossification irregularity, edema in growth plate III
<ll
center when evaluating pediatric elbow • C8-Tl Radiculopathy (Mimic) C.
Medial Epicondylitis
III
24
MEDIAL ElBOW PAIN C"l
::J
n
Ql
-<
OJ
Ql
Anteroposterior radiograph a
~
shows distal humerus <1l
OJ
fracture with a large medial
condyle fragmenl •• which 3
is displaced and impacted.
Anconeus Epitrochlearis
(Leh) Sagittal T2WI FS MR
shows increased signal
intensity within the distal
triceps tendon as well as
retraction and surrounding
hemorrhage, consistent with
a complete tear. (Righi) Axial
T2WI MR shows large
anconeus epitrochlearis
muscle found incidenlally on
MR imaging". The muscle
overlies the cubital tunnel.
The ulnar nerve is normal in
caliber •.
III
25
Eco OLECRANON BURSITIS
~
Q)
o
LL
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o May see marginal, peri-articular,
"0
C
CO
nonarticular erosions which are
:: Common well-defined, with sclerotic margin &
o • Post-Traumatic
.0 overhanging edges; < 15% calcify
W • Wire/Cerclage Fixation • Rheumatoid Arthritis
"0
Q)
• Infectious Bursitis o Commonly bilateral
Ie''""
• Gout o Nodules within bursa may be palpable
>.
• Rheumatoid Arthritis o ± Arthritic changes: Uniform joint space
Less Common narrowing, marginal erosions, osteoporosis
'"
o
c • Rheumatoid Nodule (Mimic) Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
U • Tophus (Mimic) • Rheumatoid Nodule (Mimic)
• Xanthoma (Mimic) o Firm, smooth, mobile, painless
Rare but Important o May cause pressure erosions, rarely calcify
• Triceps Tendon Rupture o ± Arthritic changes
• Calcific Bursitis o MR: Nonspecific low to intermediate Tl,
bright T2, enhances, ± cystic component
• Tophus (Mimic)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o MR: Low to intermediate T1 WI, variable
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses on T2WI, diffusely enhance; ± Erosions
• Post-Traumatic • Xanthoma (Mimic)
o Acute or chronic repetitive trauma o Usually bilateral
o Dialysis elbow: Chronic repetitive trauma o Familial hypercholesterolemia,
from pressure on elbow during dialysis cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis
o With acute trauma mayor may not have o US: Hypoechoic lesions
fracture; bursitis may be hemorrhagic o MR: Stippled/speckled signal ± tendon
• Wire/Cerclage Fixation enlargement
o Irritation - bursal inflammation Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
• Infectious Bursitis • Triceps Tendon Rupture
o Unilateral o Hemorrhage may extend into bursa
o Often has preceding history of trauma o Tendon fibers thickened, wavy; ± gap
• Commonly related to direct puncture • Calcific Bursitis
• Gout o Hydroxyapatite deposition disease
o Commonly bilateral o Triceps rupture uncommon complication
-<
OJ
Ql
Rheumatoid Arthritis VI
tD
(Left; Sagittal T1 WI FS MR C.
shows a predominantly
[!}
fluid-signal mass posterior to CT
the olecranon __ The o
triceps tendon is seen
~
III
anteriorto the bursa. in :J
C.
this patient with olecranon 0]
bursitis secondary to gout. o
~
Marker is seen posteriorly CTl
III
Ell (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows 50ft tissue 3
swelling in the region of the
olecranonbursa.
consistent with bursitis, a
typical site of involvement in
rheumatoid arthritis.
Xanthoma (Mimic)
(Left; Lateral radiograph
shows a large sort tissue
mass posterior to the elbow
•• in this patient with
tophaceous gout. The mass
has eroded the olecranon HI
and has calcified III an
uncommon finding. (Right)
Lateral radiograph with 50ft
tissue windowing, shows a
subtle 50ft tissue mass along
the extensor surface of the
elbow Ill. This is a common
location for xanthoma (an
uncommon lesion itself,
which was proven in this
case).
Calcific Bursitis
,.
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR
shows partial tear of the
posterior fibers of the triceps
• -:\-1. Co
< tendon with hematoma HI
interposed between the torn
III and intact III portions of
the tendon, mimicking
olecranon bursitis. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows
extensive dense
mineralization in the region
of the olecranonbursa.
indicative of hydroxyapatite
deposition disease.
III
27
§ NERVE ENTRAPMENT, ELBOW & WRIST
C1l
Q)
~
a
LL
"0
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o MR: Median nerve enlargement ±
C
C1l
flattening, t SI; flexor retinacular bowing
;:
Common o Post-operative findings
a • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
.0 • Symptom free: Flexor retinaculum
w • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome completely disrupted with palmar
'0
ell
l/l
Less Common migration of tunnel contents
III
ell • Pronator Syndrome • Recurrent symptoms: Look for
>- • Radial Entrapment Neuropathy incomplete release, post-op scarring,
III
(,J o Radial Tunnel Syndrome nerve enlargement, tenosynovitis
C o Posterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
(.)
• Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome o Ulnar nerve at elbow; 2nd most common
upper extremity entrapment
Rare but Important
o Symptoms
• Wartenberg Syndrome • Pain/paresthesias radiating from forearm
• Kiloh Nevin Syndrome to 4/Sth fingers & aggravated by
prolonged elbow flexion
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Entrapment sites
• Struthers arcade, intermuscular septum
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues medial edge, thickened arcuate ligament,
• Entrapment neuropathy: Short segment anconeus epitrochlearis, deep flexor
nerve compression at a specific site, often aponeurosis
while passing through fibroosseous tunnel, o MR: t SI & nerve enlargement; ± ulnar
muscle or fibrous tissue nerve subluxation
• Symptoms: Muscle weakness, paresthesias, o Denervation patterns: Flexor carpi ulnaris,
atrophy flexor digitorum profundus muscles;
• MR appearance: Look for nerve signal, interossei muscle wasting
course & contour (adjacent vessels may
provide landmarks); muscle signal intensity Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
(SI) & distribution • Pronator Syndrome
• Look for: Ganglia, tumors, inflammation, o Median nerve at elbow
post-trauma, scarring, edema, anomalies o Symptoms
• Muscle SI in entrapment/denervation • Volar forearm pain, worse with exercise;
o Acute « 1 month): T1 - normal; STIR- t SI; thenar muscle weakness; radial-sided (1st
enhancement: + - radial 4th fingers) paraesthesias
o Subacute (1-6 months): T1 - ± normal; STIR o Entrapment sites
III
30
NERVE ENTRAPMENT, ElBOW & WRIST n
j
n
III
'<
tll
III
Pronator Syndrome Radial Entrapment Neuropathy t/I
(l)
(Left) Axial T2WI FS MR Q.
shows pronator teres edema
[!J
•• in a patient with pronator c-
syndrome due to median O
:E
nerve entrapment following Ql
humerus fracture. There is no :>
muscle atrophy on T1WI, ,.,
0-
suggesting a reversal o
~
neuropathy. (Right) Coronal C1l
Ql
T1WI MR shows the normal
sharp proximal margin o( the 3
supinator;, the arcade of
Frohse III under which the
radial nerve, deep branch,
~ must pass. This is a
frequent site of radial nerve
entrapment.
III
31
"0
C WRIST CliCKI NG/ClU N KING/I NSTABILITY
co
I
"0
C
co DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Scapholunate Ligament Tear
en o Arthrography: Visible contrast through
Common scapholunate (SL) space; ± SL widening> 4
~
"'C
• Triangular Fibrocartilage Tear mm
ell
l/)
• Scapholunate Ligament Tear o MR or CT arthrography: Sensitivity for
'"
CO • Lunotriquetral Instability complete & partial tears - 80-95%; MR
Z. • Carpal Instabilities without arthrography - 70%
o Dorsal Intercalated Segment Instability
.~
'"
c
o May have tear without malalignment or
o Volar Intercalated Segment Instability symptoms due to degenerative attrition
U o Palmar Midcarpal Instability o SL dissociation with scaphoid rotatory
• Perilunate Instability subluxation
• Osteonecrosis • Widening of SL space, scaphoid volar tilt
Less Common creates a "ring" of distal scaphoid pole
• Tendon, Injury • Lunotriquetral Instability
• Ganglion Cyst, Wrist o Lunotriquetral (LT) tear contributes to
• Fracture, Malunion several carpal instability patterns
• Hardware Complications o Arthrography: Visible contrast flow
• Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability between lunate & triquetrum
o MR or CT arthrography: Sensitivity
Rare but Important
70-90%; MR without arthrography 45%
• Carpal Translocation • Carpal Instabilities
• Madelung Deformity o Dorsal Intercalated Segment Instability
• (DlSI): Seen in SL tear, RA, CPPD,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION scaphoid fracture
• Lunate dorsal tilt> 20°; SL angle> 70°;
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues capitolunate (CL) angle> 20°; lunate
• Instability - joint malalignment may be triangular on AP X-ray
static or dynamic o Volar Intercalated Segment Instability
• Due to trauma, chronic attenuation of • (VISI): Seen in LT tear, RA, CPPD
supporting ligaments, arthritis • Lunate volar tilt> 20°; SL angle < 30°; CL
• Click/clunk may be audible/palpable; ± angle> 20°; lunate rounded on AP x-ray
painful o Palmar Midcarpal Instability
• Imaging techniques • Distal carpal row translated volarly while
o Radiography should include neutral &
proximal row stays flexed; extreme ulnar
stress views deviation - proximal row snaps back
o Videofluoroscopy to evaluate motion of
• Failure of volar (arcuate,
proximal, distal carpal rows through range triquetrohamate, capitolunate) & dorsal
of motion (ROM) (radiotriquetral) ligaments
o Arthrography (± digital subtraction) to
o Other instability patterns:
evaluate ligament integrity Triquetrohamate, triquetrolunate related
o CT to evaluate fractures; alignment
to stabilizing ligament disruption
o MR ± arthrography to evaluate ligament,
• Perilunate Instability
tendon integrity; alignment o Fracture/dislocations disrupt key
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses perilunate ligaments in predictable order
• Triangular Fibrocartilage Tear o 1: SL tear ± scaphoid rotatory subluxation
o May be traumatic or attritional ranging o 2: Radiocapitate tear; perilunate
from mild wear to full tear with ulnocarpal dislocation
abutment o 3: Volar radiotriquetral, dorsal radiocarpal
o Ulnocarpal abutment: Ulnar positive (plus) tears; midcarpal dislocation
variant, triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) tear, o 4: Dorsal radiocarpal tear; lunate
lunate/triquetral edema, cyst, osteophytes dislocation
III
32
WRIST ClICKI NG/ClU NKI NG/I NSTABILITY
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
scapholunate interval
widening> 4 mm ~ when
hand is fisted & radially
deviated, consistent with SL
ligament tear. (Right)
Coronal T2' CRE MR
following a radiocarpal
arthrogram shows contrast
flowing into the midcarpal
compartment through a
defect in the SL ligament _
The TFCis intact •.
III
34
WRIST CLiCKI NG/CLU NKI NG/I NSTABI L1TY ()
::J
o
III
'<
DJ
III
Osteonecrosis Tendon, Injury VI
Cll
(Left) Coronal T1 WI MR a.
shows scaphoid
osteonecrosis III (~51 with
flattening & early collapse)
from prior midwaist
scaphoid fracture" Note
the triangular lunate contour
&II due to associated 0151
deformity. (Right) Axial PO
F5E F5 MR shows marked
tendon thickening & t 51 01
APL & EPB (1st extensor
compartment) &II with
surrounding edema, typical
of De Quervain
tendinitis/tenosynovitis. ECU
tenosynovitis. is also
present.
Hardware Complications
(Left) Axial NECT shows a
bicorticalscre\1Y, used to
secure a volar plate that
stab;J;zes a distal radial
fracture. The screw extends
beyond the radial dorsal
cortex'" & impinges 2nd &
3rd extensor compartment
tendons &II during normal
ROM. (RighI) PA radiograph
shows carpal ulnar
translocation, defined as
lunate articulating> 50%
with ulna &II. Radiocarpal
joint space loss •. scaphoid
rotation & erosion EB ulnar
capping. & osteopenia are
typical of RA.
III
35
"0
C ULNAR SIDED WRIST PAIN
C1l
I
"0
C
C1l DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Early: Juxta-articular osteopenia, soft
en tissue swelling
Common • Later: Diffuse osteopenia, accelerated
~
• Arthritis maturation, enlarged carpals with
• Triangular Fibrocartilage Tear irregular margins (crenulation), ankylosis
• Lunotriquetral Instability • Triangular Fibrocartilage Tear
• Ulnocarpal Abutment o Traumatic: Hyperrotation, distraction or
Less Common axial loading; associated with distal
• Tendon Injury forearm fractures
• Fractures o Degenerative: Ranges from mild wear to
• Carpal Dislocations fuIl tear with ulnocarpal abutment; many
• Osteonecrosis are asymptomatic
• Infection o X-ray: Look for ulnar plus variant
o Arthrography (± digital subtraction):
Rare but Important Visible contrast flow through TFCC
• Vascular Abnormalities o MR or CT arthrography: Sensitivity
• Osseous Neoplasm 80-95%; MR without arthrography 30-45%
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm • Lunotriquetral Instability
• Madelung Deformity o Tears due to trauma with hyperextension
& radial deviation
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Volar intercalated segment instability
(VISI) results in volar flexed lunate,
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues scapholunate angle < 30°, capitolunate
• Ulnar & radial wrist pain etiologies often angle> 20°
overlap o Arthrography (± digital subtraction):
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses Visible contrast flow between lunate &
• Arthritis triquetrum
o Rheumatoid arthritis o MR or CT arthrography: Sensitivity
• Early: Symmetric swelling, juxta-articular 70-90%; MR without arthrography 30-45%
osteopenia, subtle erosions • Ulnocarpal Abutment
• Late: Diffuse osteopenia, joint space loss, o Swelling & tenderness localized to TFCC,
large erosions, ulnar carpal translocation, LT joint
ulnar capping o X-ray: Ulnar plus variant, triquetral &
• Contrast-enhanced MR: Effusions, lunate cysts, sclerosis, osteophytes
synovitis, synovial hypertrophy, active o MR: TFCC tear, triquetral & ulnar side of
(enhancing) & inactive (nonenhancing) lunate chondromalacia, edema, cysts
erosions Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
o Osteoarthritis
• Tendon Injury
• Normal bone density, joint space loss, o Ranges from tendinosis (thickening &
subchondral sclerosis, osteophytes; intra substance t SI) to complete disruption
typically due to trauma (tear or avulsion)
o Pyrophosphate arthropathy
o Tenosynovitis results from trauma,
• Multiple well-defined intraosseous cysts, arthritis, or infection in tendon sheath
radiocarpal & capitolunate joint space o Extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU)
narrowing, TFCC chondrocalcinosis tendinitis/tenosynovitis: Thickened
o Gout
tendon ± sheath fluid
• Normal bone density, soft tissue swelling o ECU subluxation: Occurs in supination
& calcifications, punched-out erosions due to ECU subsheath tear; tendon
with sclerotic borders, especially in displaced ulnarward out of ulnar groove
CMCs • Fractures
o Juvenile idiopathic arthritis o Triquetrum: Commonly fractured
III
36
ULNAR SIDED WRIST PAIN (")
:l
o
III
• Joint capsule avulsion or ulnar styloid o History of diabetes, inflammatory arthritis,
immunocompromise, puncture wounds,
-<
impaction results in small dorsal III
III
fragment best seen on lateral X-ray open fracture VI
lD
• Body fractures typically associated with o Septic joint: Extensive effusion of one or a.
other injuries, e.g., perilunate more compartments, ± carpal edema .~,
transtriquetral fracture dislocation o Osteomyelitis: Marked osteopenia; cortical ~
o Hamate loss, joint mal alignment OJ
:l
0.
• Hook: Direct blow or repetitive stress, Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses I
e.g., carpenters, golfers, racquet sports; • Vascular Abnormalities
OJ
:l
0.
best seen on carpal tunnel view or CT o Hypothenar hammer syndrome:
• Body: Rare; often associated with 4th, Thrombosis, spasm, or aneurysm of ulnar
5th CMC fractures artery due to repetitive trauma; may
o Ulnar styloid: Isolated or in combination
compress adjacent ulnar nerve
with other injuries o Arteriography: Narrowing, occlusion, or
• Nonunion common but rarely aneurysm of ulnar artery adjacent to
symptomatic hamate hook
• If fracture at styloid base & TFCC
• Osseous Neoplasm
disrupted, distal radioulnar joint may be o Benign: Giant cell tumor, enchondroma,
unstable osteoid osteoma
• Carpal Dislocations o Malignant: Squamous cell metastases
o Occur in combination with fractures as an
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm
ulnarward extension of scapholunate (SL) o Benign: Ganglion, GCTTS, hemangioma,
instability/trauma tendon sheath fibroma, neurogenic tumor
• Osteonecrosis o Malignant: MFH, synovial sarcoma,
o Lunate: Kienbock disease (lunatomalacia);
angiosarcoma, fibrosarcoma
associated with ulnar minus, trauma
• Madelung Deformity
o Stage 1: X-ray-normal; MR T1 ~ SI & T2 t SI
o Radius: Dorsal/ulnar curvature; decreased
o Stage 2: X-ray-sclerosis; MR T1 ~ & T2 t SI
radius length; triangular radial epiphysis
o Stage 3: X-ray-collapse, proximal capitate
o Ulna: Dorsal subluxation, ulnar head
migration, SL dissociation, scaphoid enlargement
rotatory subluxation; MR T1 & T2 ~ SI o Carpals wedging between radius & ulna
o Stage 4: X-ray-secondary osteoarthritis of
with lunate at apex
surrounding carpus MR T1 & T2 ~ SI
• Infection
Arthritis Arthritis
Arthritis
(Left) Posteroanterior
radiograph shows
osteoarthritis with distal
radioulnar joint space
narrowing & a small
osteophytic ridge. along
the proximal ulnar head in
this patient with prior distal
radial fracture treated by
ORIF Ii8. (Right) Sagittal PO
FSEFS MR shows
pisotriquetral osteoarthritis
with joint space narrowing
=-
and a small osteophytic ridge
as well as joint effusion
E!!I & a small loose body ~
in the proximal capsular
recess.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph arthrogram
shows typical triangular
fibrocartilage tear,
highlighted by radiocarpal
contrast flowing through the
tear ~ and filling the distal
radioulnar joint E!!I. (Right)
Coronal T2* CRE MR shows
a central triangular
fibrocartilage tear EiIl This is
well· visualized, in part due
to effusions in all three wrist
compartments _
III
38
ULNAR SIDED WRIST PAIN
Lunotriquetrallnstability Lunotriquetrallnstability
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph arthrogram
shows flow of radiocarpal ~
::!.
contrast between the lunate !e.
& triquetrum. intothe OJ
:::J
midcarpal compartment a.
through the lorn I
OJ
lunotriquetralligament. :::J
(Right) Coronal MR a.
arthrogram (T7 WI F5) in the
same patient shows
gadolinium extending
through the lunouiqueual
ligament. & into
midcarpal compartment. The
scapholunate ligament III &
triangular fibrocartilage E!II
are intact.
III
39
ULNAR SIDED WRIST PAIN
Fractures Fractures
(Left) Lateral radiograph
'tl
Cll shows dorsal soft tissue
VI
III swelling & a small fracture
al fragment from the dorsal
~ triquetrum •. This may
III result from capsular avulsion
o
or direct impact of the ulna
c::
on the triquetrum. (Right)
U Axial NECT shows an acute
fracture ~ of the hamate
hook Ii8 This is a
nondisplaced fracture & may
result from direct impact
during activities such as golf
(impact from club hitting the
turf).
Fractures Fractures
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
comminuted intraarlicular
5th metacarpal base fracture
EiII with slight ulnarward
subluxation. CT (not shown)
confirmed this as an isolated
fracture. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a well-corticated
osseous fragment. near
the ulnar styloid"
representing a chronic
non-union. Mild
osteoarthrWs of the adjacent
distal radiocarpal joint is
present with a small
osteophytic ridge Ii8
III
40
ULNAR SIDED WRIST PAIN
Osteonecrosis Osteonecrosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows increased
density of the lunate Ell with
no contour abnormality or
fragmentation. This is stage 2
Kienbock disease. (Right)
Coronal TlWI MR shows
grade 3 Kienbock disease
with partial collapse Ell of
the lunate. The scapholunate
ligament is still intact, but the
cortical fragmentation IIlI
indicates more advanced
disease.
III
41
D
c: RADIAL SIDED WRIST PAIN
ro
I
D
c:
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Late: Diffuse osteopenia, joint space loss,
iii large erosions, ulnar carpal translocation
Common • Contrast-enhanced MR: Effusions,
~
• Fracture synovitis, synovial hypertrophy, active
• Arthritis (enhancing) & inactive (nonenhancing)
• Ganglion Cyst, Wrist erosions
• Tendon, Injury a Osteoarthritis
• Scapholunate Ligament Tear • Normal bone density, joint space loss,
Less Common subchondral sclerosis, osteophytes;
• Carpal Instabilities particularly in 1st CMC,
• Carpal Dislocations scaphoid-trapezium area
• Osteonecrosis, Wrist (Scaphoid & Lunate) • Carpal boss: Prominent dorsal ridge 2nd
• Infection CMC best seen on CT; ± symptomatic
a Pyrophosphate arthropathy
Rare but Important • Multiple well-defined carpal cysts,
• Osseous Neoplasm radiocarpal & capitolunate joint space
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm loss
• Madelung Deformity • Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC)
wrist: SL dissociation, lunate
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION dorsiflexion, radioscaphoid joint loss,
capitate between scaphoid & lunate
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues a Gout
• Radial & ulnar wrist pain etiologies often • Normal bone density, soft tissue swelling
overlap & calcifications, punched-out erosions
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses with sclerotic borders, especially in
• Fracture CMCs
a Fall on an outstretched hand (FOOSH) a Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
• 4-10: Distal radial metaphysis buckle • Early: Juxta-articular osteopenia, STS
• 11-16: Distal radius Salter II • Later: Diffuse osteopenia, accelerated
• 17-40: Scaphoid, ± triquetrum maturation, enlarged carpals, irregular
• 40: Colles fracture, distal radius margins, ankylosis
a Scaphoid: Most common carpal fracture • Ganglion Cyst, Wrist
• Early: X-ray - loss of scaphoid fat pad, a Thin-walled ± septations, usually solitary;
subtle cortical irregularity; MR - t SI commonly dorsal near SL ligament
edema; more sensitive • Tendon, Injury
• Healing: Midwaist/proximal pole fracture a Ranges from tendinosis (thickening &
complications-AVN, delayed or intrasubstance t SI) to complete disruption
non-union (tear or avulsion)
• Delayed/non-union: Sclerosis, cysts, a Tenosynovitis results from trauma,
Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses • Stage 4: X-ray-secondary OA; MR - T1 & Co
T2 ~ SI ~
• Carpal Instabilities ::::l.
o Volar intercalated segment instability
• Infection !e-
o History of diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, Q)
::::l
(VISI): Seen in LT tear, RA, CPPD a.
immunocompromise, puncture wounds,
• Lunate volar tilt> 200; SL angle < 300; CL I
angle> 200; lunate rounded on AP open fracture Q)
::::l
a.
o Septic joint: Extensive effusion of one or
o Dorsal intercalated segment instability
more compartments, ± carpal edema
(DISI): Seen in SL tear, RA, CPPD
o Osteomyelitis: Marked osteopenia; cortical
• Lunate dorsal tilt> 200; SL angle> 700;
loss, joint malalignment
CL angle> 200; lunate triangular on AP
• Carpal Dislocation Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Stages due to perilunate ligament injury; • Osseous Neoplasm
look for accompanying fractures o Benign: Giant cell tumor, enchondroma,
• I: SL tear ± scaphoid rotatory osteoid osteoma
subluxation o Malignant: Squamous cell metastases
• 2: Radiocapitate tear; perilunate • Soft Tissue Neoplasm
dislocation o Benign: Ganglion, giant cell tumor of
• 3: Volar radiotriquetral, dorsal tendon sheath, hemangioma, tendon
radiocarpal tears; midcarpal dislocation sheath fibroma, lipoma
• 4: Dorsal radiocarpal tear; lunate o Malignant: MFH, synovial sarcoma,
dislocation angiosarcoma, liposarcoma, fibrosarcoma
• Osteonecrosis, Wrist (Scaphoid & Lunate) • Madelung Deformity
o Scaphoid proximal pole AVN due to o Radius: Dorsal/ulnar curvature; decreased
trauma radius length; triangular radial epiphysis
o Lunate: Kienbock disease (lunatomalacia); o Ulna: Dorsal subluxation, ulnar head
associated with ulnar minus, trauma enlargement
• Stage I: X-ray - normal; MR - TI ~ SI, T2 o Carpals wedging between radius & ulna
t SI with lunate at apex
• Stage 2: X-ray - sclerosis; MR - T1 ~ SI, T2
t SI
Fracture Fracture
Fracture Fracture
(Left) Coronal CT
"0
QI reformation shows midwaist
II)
ell scaphoid fracture with cystic
a:l margins. & proximal pole
~ scferosis EllIs months
ell Following acute fracture.
U
While there is not
!:
mafalignment, sclerosis
U suggests underlying AVN.
(Right) Coronal T1WI MR in
the same patient shows focaf
~ 51 ElII in the scaphoid
proximal pole on both T1 &
STIR (not shown), consistent
with osteonecrosis following
scaphoid fracture.
Arthritis Arthritis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid
& 1st CMC joint space
narrowing =:I & osteophytic
ridges [ig with small
subchondral cysts~. This is
cfassic osteoarthritis. (Right)
Coronal STIR MR shows
osteoarthritis with
scaphoid-crapezium-trapezoid
& 1st CMC joint space loss
• small joint effusions ElII
& subchondral reactive
marrow edema (t 51) =:I.
Arthritis
(Left) Coronal T1 C+ FS MR
shows an enhancing distal
scaphoid erosion [ig with
surrounding osteitis Ell as
well asjoint effusions. in
the midcarpal, radiocarpal &
distal radioulnar joints in 59
year old with rheumatoid
arthritis. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows long-standing
rheumatoid arthritis with
diffuse 50ft tissue swelling
EiII, osteopenia, midcarpal &
radiocarpal joint space 1055
~ & proximal carpal row
collapse~
III
44
RADIAL SIDED WRIST PAIN n
::l
o
III
-<
OJ
III
Arthritis Arthritis IJl
lTl
(Left) Coronal T7 C+ FS MR Co
shows scapholunate
dissociation. with capitate ~
::>.
EllI moving toward distal ~
radius, resulting in Ql
::l
scapholunate advanced a.
collapse (SLAG This I
Ql
deformity occurs in ::J
pyrophosphate arthropathy a.
or post-trauma. (Right)
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows juvenife idiopathic
arthritis with profound
diffuse osteopenia, carpal
enlargement & ankylosis 6H
Irregular/eroded distal radial
Ell & trapezium .:I cortices
are also present.
III
45
RADIAL SIDED WRIST PAIN
III
46
RADIAL SIDED WRIST PAIN n
:J
(1
III
'<
Osteonecrosis, Wrist (Scaphoid & OJ
III
Carpal Dislocations lunate) l/I
m
(Left) Lateralradiograph Q.
shows lunate dislocation
with the lunate Ell displaced ~
~
into the volar soft tissue & ~
the capitate" approaching III
:J
the radius articular surface Q.
•• There is an associated I
III
scaphoid (racture ffi :J
resulting in a transcaphoid a.
lunate (racture dislocation.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows multiple
bone osteonecrosis related to
steroid use. There is
scaphoid sclerosis Ell with
collapse" as well as lunate
sclerosis ••
III
47
.c
Ol GROIN/HIP PAIN
.c
I-
-0
c:
C1l DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • If anterior pelvic fractures are seen, look
ci for sacral fractures
I Common o Hint: Marrow edema may mask fracture
• Fracture line; use T1 to identify fracture line
• Arthritis • Arthritis
• Osteonecrosis, Hip o Osteoarthritis
• Muscle Strain, Hip • Asymmetric joint space loss (usually
• Tendon, Injury superior), articular flattening,
• Labral Tear, Hip subchondral sclerosis & cyst formation, ±
• Bursitis loose bodies
Less Common o Inflammatory: Rheumatoid, ankylosing
• Hardware Failure spondylitis, psoriatic
• Transient Bone Marrow Edema • Uniform joint loss, ± erosions or
• Infection osteophytes, ± rice bodies
o Septic Joint o Crystalline: Gout, CPPD
o Osteomyelitis • Chondrocalcinosis, joint space loss
o Soft Tissue Abscess symmetric or asymmetric, osteophytes
• Intraosseous Neoplasm • Osteonecrosis, Hip
• Osteitis Pubis o X-rays: Focal sclerosis, crescentic
• Hip Malformation subchondral lucency (fracture), flattened
• Sciatica articular surface
o MR: Serpentine "double line" sign with the
Rare but Important
paralleling ~/t SI of reparative & necrotic
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm tissue, crescentic subcortical fluid
• Kidney Stones (fracture), flattened joint surface
• Testicular/Scrotal Pathology • Muscle Strain, Hip
• Adnexal Pathology o Muscle injury ranges from minimal fiber
• Nerve Entrapment tear (grade 1) to complete fiber disruption
(grade 3) with retraction & edema
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Hematoma
• Acute « 48 hrs): T1 isodense to muscle
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Subacute « 30 days): t SI on Tl & T2
• X-rays: Essential for initial evaluation (methemoglobin)
• CT: Best for bone detail • Chronic (> 30 days): Heterogeneous; ~SI
• MR: Best for marrow, soft tissues if hemosiderin deposition
• Bone scan: Useful for screening • Tendon, Injury
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o Most common: Adductors, pectineus,
• Fracture obturators, hamstrings
o Avulsion: Common in skeletally immature o Range from tendinosis (thickening &
• Common locations: Adductor & intra substance signal) to complete tear
hamstring origins (tendon disruption & retraction)
• X-rays: Thin curvilinear fragment o Sports hernia: Rectus abdominus/adductor
• MR: Marrow & soft tissue edema mask aponeurosis avulsion from anterior pubis
fragment periosteum
o Stress: Abnormal stress ...•normal bone • Labral Tear, Hip
• Common locations: Medial femoral o MR arthrography with dilute gadolinium
neck, subtrochanter, symphysis (1:200) facilitates diagnosis
o Insufficiency: Normal stress ...•abnormal o Ranges from blunting of labrum through
bone intrasubstance signal & tear to detachment
• Common locations: Symphysis, pubic o Paralabral cyst indicates labral tear
rami, acetabulum, femoral head & neck • Bursitis
III
48
GROIN/HIP PAIN o
='
C'l
Ql
o t SI on fluid sensitive sequences in o Painful symphysis; related to GU surgery,
'<
potential spaces between tendons, pregnancy, infection llJ
Ql
ligaments, bony protuberances o X-ray: Irregular symphyseal cortex with VI
CD
o Common sites: Iliopsoas, obturator canal resorption, subchondral eburnation Q.
Fracture
Anteroposterior
avulsion fragment =
oblique radiograph shows a small
at the adductor brevis origin in
this 14 year old soccer player,
Anteroposterior
ischial growth
radiograph shows widening of the left
plate EllI in this young patient with
chronic hamstring apophyseal stress injury.
III
49
GROIN/HIP PAIN
Fracture Fracture
(Lefl) Coronal STIR MR in
this elderly female shows
extensive linear t 51. of a
transcervical incomplete
fracture with
insufficiency
edema 0 51~in the
femoral head. (RighI) Axial
NECT shows a non-displaced
posterior rim fracture. in
this patient who had a recent
transient posterior
dislocation. Note the small
intra capsular loose fragment
••
Arthritis Arthritis
(Left) Coronal PO F5E F5 MR
shows osteoarthritis
characterized by joint space
loss with flattening of the
articularsurface.
subchondral edema & cyst
formation HI. Note the
medial femoral neck
osteophyte" (RighI)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows severe uniform
cartilage loss .:I & diffuse
osteopenia. Note the lack of
osteophyte development in
this patient with psoriatic
arthritis. The right 51joint
(not shown) is fused.
III
50
GROIN/HIP PAIN
(Left) Coronal T1 WI FS MR
shows labral tear of the
superior acetabular labrum
with contrast EiII interposed
between the acetabular rim
& the torn labrum ••.
(Right) Sagittal PO FSf FS
MR shows a thin-walled
multiseptate paralabral cyst
•• tracking along the
superior acetabulum is this
patient with a small
associated anterior labral
tear (not shown).
III
51
.r: GROIN/HIP PAIN
OJ
:c
~
"0
C
ro
a.
I Bursitis Hardware Failure
(Left) Axial PO FSE FS MR
shows obturator extern us
bursitis with a multifoculate
fluid collection ••
interposed between the
obturator extemus Ell & the
ischiofemoral capsular
ligament IIIl (Right) AP CT
scanogram demonstrates
failure of a 'e(t THA with
eccentric polyethylene wear
•• & a large lytic lesion IIIIlI
in the acetabulum confirmed
to be foreign body osteolysis
at surgery.
III
52
GROIN/HIP PAIN
Intraosseous Neoplasm
(Left) Coronal TI C+ MR
shows multiloculated abscess
in the thigh IElII with adjacent
cortical reaction in the femur
•• and cellulitis_ This
patient had slowly worsening
groin pain and swelling over
several months. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows multiple hereditary
exostoses with both
pedunculated all & sessile
••• lesions which deform the
hip contours, resulting in
mechanical impingement.
Malignant degeneration
occurs in up to 20% of
patients.
Intraosseous Neoplasm
(Left) Frogleg lateral
radiograph shows an
aggressive lytic lesion
extending to the joint
surfaces of the hip & 51joint
•. There is no internal
matrix. Cortical breakthrough
& soft tissue mass Ell are
seen medially. This is a
plasmacytoma. (Right)
Coronal STIR MR shows
intense t 51of the symphysis
pubis & bilateral superior
pubic rami" with minimal
fluid in the joint 1ElII. This is a
traumatic osteitis pubis in
this young male athlete.
III
53
LATERALHIP PAIN
Bursitis
III
56
LATERAL HIP PAIN
=
femoral head/neck nonunion
proven by CT. (Right)
Coronal STIR MR shows
focal curvilinear t SI. in
subcutaneous fat superficial
to greater trochanter. This
hematoma resulted after a
recent fall on the left hip in
an anticoagulated patient.
Intraosseous Neoplasm
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a mildly
expanded, partially
we/J-circumscribed lytic
lesion in the acetabulum III
without associated matrix,
which proved to be breast
metastasis. Note a slightly
more sclerotic lesion in the
ischium EiIl (Right) Axial
T2WI F5E MR shows an
intermediate 51 mass
enlarging the gluteus
minimus III & medius ~ &
displacing the maximus =.
It extends through the sciatic
notch Ell. This is a
non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
III
57
SNAPPING HIP
:J
n
III
'<
III
III
VI
ltl
(Left) Transverse ultrasound Cl.
in flexion, abduction, -u
external rotation shows the CTl
IPT" lying lateral to the <"
en·
iliopectineal eminence RI.
Note the slightly hypoechoic I
"0
iliac muscle I!Ii:I superficial to
Q)
the tendon. (Right) :J
Transverse ultrasound in Cl.
III
59
.c THIGH PAIN
.~
.c
t-
"0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Grading of muscle injury
a. • Grade 1: Minimal fiber tear; diffuse t SI
I Common • Grade 2: Tear of < 50% of fibers; t SI in
(/) • Acute Fracture tear defect
~ • Stress Reaction
Q)
• Grade 3: Complete tear; t SI with large
0-
• Muscle Injury defect & muscle retraction
"'C
Ql o Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness o Muscle atrophy
VI
1tI o Compartment Syndrome • Decreased bulk; ± edema; ± fatty
al
~ • Hematoma infiltration
1tI • Tendon, Injury o Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness
.!:!
c • Arthritis (Hip or Knee) • Muscle soreness & tenderness occurs 1-3
u • Neurogenic Claudication days after exertion
• Sciatica • Follows a grade I muscle strain pattern
• Metastases o Compartment Syndrome
less Common • MR/CT: Swelling, loss of normal
• Hardware Complications fat/fascial planes; stranding of adjacent
• Fracture, Malunion fat planes; muscle t SI
• Osteonecrosis • May lead to myonecrosis in acute setting
• Septic Arthritis • Hematoma
• Osteomyelitis o Intramuscular or along fascial planes;
resulting from direct blow, muscle or
Rare but Important
tendon tear
• Complications of Statins o Acute « 48 hrs): T1 isointense to muscle
• Nerve Entrapment o Subacute « 30 days): t SI on T1 & T2
• Polymyositis/Dermatomyositis (methemoglobin)
• Thrombophlebitis o Chronic (> 30 days): Heterogeneous; • SI if
• Leriche Syndrome hemosiderin
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm o May evolve to heterotopic ossification
• Intraosseous Neoplasm
• Tendon, Injury
o Tendinosis: Tendon thickening, ±
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION intrasubstance t SI
o Partial tear: Partial fiber tear, t SI ±
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues surrounding edema
• Consider both primary and referred sources o Complete tear: Full fiber tear with
when evaluating thigh pain retracted tendons
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses o ± Associated muscle injury
• Fracture • Arthritis (Hip or Knee)
o Acute Fracture o Arthritic complaints related to hip or knee
• MR-most sensitive; CT-best bone detail may present as thigh pain
o Stress Reaction o Hint: Look for joint narrowing,
• Grade 1: X-ray -; bone scan +; MR subchondral cysts, joint effusion
periosteal edema t SI (signal intensity) • Neurogenic Claudication
• Grade 2: X-ray -; bone scan +; MR o Central spinal stenosis at L3-4 &/or L4-5
periosteal/endosteal edema t SI STIR • Sciatica
• Grade 3: X-ray ± periosteal reaction; o Possible neural impingement in lateral
bone scan +; MR t SI on T1 & STIR recesses, neural foramina, particularly at
• Grade 4: X-ray + fracture; bone scan +; L3, L4, &/or L5
MR fracture + t Sl edema • Metastases
• Hint: Edema may be so extensive that it o Hint: Look for bone marrow replacement,
obscures the underlying fracture particularly near the lesser trochanter
• Muscle Injury
III
60
THIGH PAIN (")
~
(i0
=
linear band ffi periosteal
and endosteal/medullary
edema BI. (Right) Axial PO
FSE FS MR shows
heterogeneous high signal
and swelling of a partial
(grade 2) vaslus medialis
muscle tear. This high signal
represents a combination of
edema (t 51) • and
hemorrhage (. 51) BI.
III
62
THIGH PAIN (")
::l
C'l
III
'<
lJl
III
Metastases Hardware Complications 1Il
(t)
(Left) Coronal T1WI MR C.
shows multiple punctate foci -U
• of marrow replacement ~
(representing breast :S.
1Il
metastases) on the
background of normal fatty I
-0
marrow. A larger lesion is
OJ
located in the left ilium Ell. ::l
(Right) NECT scanogram 0-
shows a cementless THA in -I
::T
patient with persistent thigh <5'
pain. Note eccentric femoral ::T
head position related to
polyethylene wear Ell and
subtle endosteal remodeling
•• near the femoral stem,
indicative of loosening.
Osteonecrosis Osteomyelitis
fLeft) Coronal PO FSEFS MR
shows diffuse serpentine
heterogeneoussignal. in
the bilateral metadiaphyses
(left> right), representing
medullary osteonecrosis in
patient with Gaucher
disease. (Right) Coronal STIR
MR shows a Girdlestone
arthroplasty resulting from
infection of a THA. The
metal prosthesis is removed
and replaced with
antibiotic-impregnated beads
•. There is extensive
marrow t 51 Ell of femur
and acetabulum due to
ongoing osteomyelitis.
III
63
.J:: NERVE ENTRAPMENT, LOWER EXTREMITY
OJ
.J::
t--
-0
C
<Il DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Entrapment site: Fibular neck or as nerve
a. pierces peroneus longus (PL)
I Common o Denervation: Leg, anterior & lateral
• Peroneal Tunnel Syndrome compartments
• Morton Neuroma • Morton Neuroma
Less Common o Interdigital nerve fibrotic nodule, 2nd or
• Sciatic Neuropathy 3rd intermetatarsal space most common
• Iliacus Muscle Syndrome o Entrapment site: Transverse metatarsal
• Meralgia Paresthetica ligament
• Saphenous Nerve Syndrome o MR: Ovoid mass centered on nerve &
• Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome plantar to transverse metatarsal ligament,
• Superficial Peroneal Nerve Entrapment Tl & T2 ~ SI, ± enhancement; ± bursitis
• Anterior Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
Rare but Important • Sciatic Neuropathy
• Piriformis Syndrome o Sciatic nerve at pelvis
• Obturator Tunnel Syndrome o Symptoms: Flail leg with foot drop, loss of
• Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome ankle/toe inversion/eversion, sensory
• Sural Nerve Syndrome deficits in lateral leg, dorsal & plantar foot;
• Calcaneal Nerve Entrapment after trauma including iatrogenic (Le., hip
• Jogger's Foot surgery)
• Jogger's Heel o Entrapment site: Sciatic notch, hip
o Denervation: Anterior tibialis (AT),
peroneus longus (PL) & brevis (PB)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Iliacus Muscle Syndrome
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o Femoral nerve at pelvis
• Entrapment neuropathy: Short segment o Symptoms: Decreased hip flexion, absent
nerve compression at a specific site, often knee jerk, pain &/or paresthesias in
while passing through fibroosseous tunnel, anteromedial thigh, medial knee, calf,
muscle or fibrous tissue foot; seen after trauma including
• Symptoms: Muscle weakness, paresthesias, iatrogenic (Le., femoral artery
muscle atrophy catheterization, hip surgery)
• MR appearance: Look for nerve signal & o Entrapment site: Iliacus tunnel formed by
contour, adjacent vessels may serve as iliac bone/iliopsoas (floor) & iliopectineal
landmark; muscle signal intensity (SI) & arch/inguinal ligament (roof)
distribution o Denervation: Quadriceps, iliopsoas
• Look for: Ganglia, tumors, inflammation, • Meralgia Paresthetica
post-trauma, scarring, edema, anomalies o Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve at pelvis
III
66
NERVE ENTRAPMENT, lOWER EXTREMITY
III
67
.<: HIP PAIN, ElDERLY PATIENT
OJ
.<:
I-
"0
C
co DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Bone scan useful but takes up to 24 hrs to
c. be positive
I Common o Know where to look
• Fracture • Femoral head: May mimic AVN or OA;
• Arthritis look for articular surface collapse
• Tendon, Injury • Femoral neck: Subcapital, transcervical or
• Bursitis basicervical; fracture tends to propagate
• Muscle Strain, Hip from lateral to medial
• Metastases, Bone Marrow • Trochanteric: Infrequent, related to
Less Common direct blow or avulsion often due to fall;
• Osteonecrosis, Hip evaluate for intertrochanteric extension
• Hardware Failure • Intertrochanteric: Complete or
• Hematoma incomplete; single discrete fracture
• Infection without displacement or comminuted
o Septic Joint • Subtrochanteric/proximal femoral shaft:
o Osteomyelitis, Adult Atypical fractures may be seen in
o Soft Tissue Abscess patients treated with bisphosphonates
• Fracture, Malunion • Pelvis fractures: Symphysis,
• Sciatica superior/inferior pubic rami
• Osteoarthritis, Knee • Look for additional fractures in sacrum if
anterior pelvic ring fractured & vice versa
Rare but Important
• Superior acetabular: Insufficiency
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm fracture horizontal to 1 trabecula
0
a Ranges from minimal fiber tear (grade 1) to • Requires aspiration to confirm infection ;(
(jj.
complete disruption of muscle (grade 3) a Osteomyelitis, Adult
I
with retraction • Cortical disruption, ± periostitis & soft
a Fatty atrophy of associated muscle tissue involvement "::J
Cll
Fracture Fracture
Fracture
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows multiple
fractures sustained in ground
level fall including left
symphysis, inferior pubic
ramus Ell & acetabulum ffi
as well as a vertical right
sacral body fracture ••
(Right) Coronal bone CT
shows bilateral subacute
transverse incomplete
subtrochanteric fractures.
in this 70 year old female
being treated with
bisphosphonates for
osteopenia. This site is
typical for bisphosphonate
related Fractures.
Arthritis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows superior
joint space loss •.
subchondral sclerosis, &
femoral head flattening Ell.
as well as acetabular
osteophytes •. along with
diffuse osteopenia in this
elderly patient with
osteoarthritis. (Right)
Coronal STIR MR shows
typical MR appearance of
osteoarthritis with bilateral
superior joint space loss from
subtle cartilage thinning ••
& acetabular subchondral
cysts Ell. There is a minimal
right hip effusion •.
III
70
(")
HIP PAIN, ELDERLY PATIENT
~
C"l
III
-<
to
III
Arthritis III
It)
(Left) Anteroposterior Co
radiograph shows ankylosing -U
spondylitis with fusion of ~
bilateral 51 join15 EiIIl Note :S.
(f)
the rather uniform joint
space na"owing of the left
hip •. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
after a hip arthrogram
(needle in place Ell! in a
patient with known
rheumatoid arthritis. Uniform
cartilage 1055 ~ is
accompanied by large
acetabular & femoral
erosions •. Osteophytes •
represent secondary
osteoarthritis.
III
71
.£
.gl HIP PAIN, ElDERLY PATIENT
.£
f-
"0
C
m
a.
:r:
IJ) (Leh) Anteroposterior
'S; radiograph shows sclerosis of
a;
Cl. the lesser trochanter with
"0 cortical disruption" in this
QI elderly patient with prostate
IJ)
metastasis. A more subtle
'"
al lesion is located in the
>- ischium ~ (Right) Coronal
TlWI MR shows multiple
'"
.5:1 small ~ 51lesions in the
c
proximal femurs" with a
u larger lesion in the left ilium
E!lI in this patient with breast
metastases.
III
72
HIP PAIN, ELDERLY PATIENT ()
::J
"
III
'<
III
III
Septic Joint Osteomyelitis, Adult III
11l
(Left) Coronal STIR MR Q.
iI~' . ..
.,.~ shows early MR appearance \J
'j.'.-::>~' . :..<' .
year old male. (Right) Axial
bone CT shows right
"
~. -~_.._
.
'-"'. ,••- ;,'
.!'C. .• '., I·," ., .' p
n.
acetabulum
destruction.
cortical
with soft
tissue swelling EiII in this BS
. _ ' ':.f' '. '
"~' ' '~
'.:' ...
year old female who had
~.~- . - .,
"'~ .. '
increasing hip pain several
months following hip
~~l.>"- . ~ . arthroplasty. This proved to
be osteomyelitis at surgery
.;.
III
73
.r: PAINFUL HIP REPLACEMENT
.Ql
.r:
I-
"0
<=
co DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Choose landmarks to measure for
Cl.
superior or inferior subsidence of either
I
Common component
• Arthroplasty Loosening • Arthroplasty Dislocation
• Arthroplasty Dislocation o Femoral head dislocation is obvious; must
• Component Malposition look for component malposition as
• Septic Joint underlying etiology (see Component
• Arthroplasty Component Wear Malposition below)
• Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis • Component Malposition
• Stress Shielding (Mimic) o May result in pain and/or dislocation
• Heterotopic Ossification o Lateral opening of cup should be 400 ± 100;
Less Common excess in either direction puts at risk for
• Arthroplasty Hardware Failure dislocation
• Periprosthetic Fracture o Limb lengths should be equal (usually
• Iliopsoas Bursitis assessed by measuring distance of lesser
trochanter to transischialline and
comparing to contralateral side)
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • If component placement results in
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues over-lengthening, at risk for spasm and
• Total hip arthroplasty (THA) complications dislocation
are common but may be subtle initially • If component placement results in
• To avoid missing subtle complications, must shortening, muscles are inefficient
compare image with both o Cup should be anteverted 150 ± 100; this is
o Index radiograph (initial post-operative evaluated on groin lateral radiograph
image) • Retroversion puts patient at risk for
o Most recent comparison radiograph dislocation
• Make use of transischialline as baseline for • Excessive anteversion puts patient at risk
measuring angulation of acetabular for dislocation
component & relative limb length (generally o Cup should not be placed excessively
compare level of lesser trochanters) laterally; if center of rotation is lateral to
iliopsoas tendon as it crosses joint, flexion
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses places it at risk for dislocation
• Arthroplasty Loosening • Septic Joint
o For cemented components, 2 mm lucency o Usually no radiographic signs; if septic
at bone-cement interface surrounding joint is suspected, must aspirate
component is diagnostic o Rarely, serpiginous tracking and periosteal
o For cementless components, 2 mm lucency reaction are seen (late findings)
at bone-component interface (usually with o Occasionally fluffy, amorphous
surrounding sclerotic line) surrounding heterotopic bone formation heralds
component is diagnostic infection
o For any component, change in position is • Arthroplasty Component Wear
diagnostic o Wear generally occurs in polyethylene
• Positional change may be a new tilt or liner
angulation of component o Wear is on most frequent weight-bearing
• Acetabular components tend to subside portion of liner (superolateral)
superiorly o Wear is visualized by femoral head
• Femoral components tend to subside placement within the cup; if the head is
inferiorly down shaft asymmetric and superolateral, that
o To evaluate subtle change in position, indicates polyethylene liner wear
compare with index radiograph and use • Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis
transischialline as reference
• Measure angle of lateral cup opening
III
74
PAINFUL HIP REPLACEMENT
III
76
PAINFUL HIP REPLACEMENT n
j
o
III
'<
OJ
III
Arthroplasty Dislocation III
CD
(Left) AP radiograph shows Co
no loosening, but dislocation -U
o( the component. Note the (l)
III
77
.c. PAINFUL HIP REPLACEMENT
.2>
.c.
I-
"0
C
ell
a.
I Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis
en (Left) AP radiograph shows
.;;;
offset of the head within the
Qi
Il. cup, indicating polyethylene
wear. Additionally, there is
"en
CI>
III
massive osteolysis in the
surrounding bone". This
aJ osteolysis develops due to
>- polyethylene particles.
III (Right) AP radiograph shows
l.l
U
C
acetabulum =-
massive osteolysis in the
polyethylene wear.
There is no
III
78
PAINFUL HIP REPLACEMENT n
::l
C'l
Ql
-<
OJ
Ql
Arthroplasty Hardware Failure Arthroplasty Hardware Failure VI
(1)
(Leh) AP radiograph shows Q.
(racture of the femoral -U
component". The femur (1)
Iliopsoas Bursitis
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows total hip
without malposition.
However. lucency is seen,
thinning the iliac wing •.
Concern was for a
destructive lesion. (Right) CT
in the same patient, above
the level of the arthroplasty
shows significant thinning of
the iliac wing. explaining
the radiographic appearance
of a "lytic lesion". Aspiration
of the iliac bursal mass (note
needle in position) showed
thick synovial fluid,
decompressed from the
arthroplasty.
III
79
Ol
<I) ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN
-'
"0
C
CIl
<I) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Arthritis
<I)
C
o Osteoarthritis: Cartilage loss, subchondral
~ Common cysts, osteophytic ridging, ± osteopenia
"0
CIl
• Patellofemoral Syndrome o Crystalline
III
CIl • Meniscal Tear • Pyrophosphate arthropathy:
llJ • Meniscal Cyst
Z. Chondrocalcinosis, cartilage loss -
01 • Arthritis patellofemoral > tibiofemoral, ±
,!:!
c Less Common osteopenia
u • Transient Patellar Dislocation • Gouty arthropathy: Patellar erosion, ±
• Patellar Fracture osteopenia
• Patellar Malalignment o Inflammatory: Effusion, synovial
o Patellar Subluxation hypertrophy, osteopenia
o Patella Alta Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
o Patella Baja • Transient Patellar Dislocation
• Bursitis o Medial patella & anterolateral femoral
• Patellar Tendon Tears & Tendinosis bone bruise
• Quadriceps Tendon Tear o Look for impaction or avulsion fractures
• Infection o May sprain medial retinaculum or sprain
• Medial Plica Syndrome vastus medialis
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) • Patellar Fracture
• Post-Operative Fibrosis o Fracture patterns: Transverse, marginal,
Rare but Important osteochondral, vertical
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis o Evaluate articular surface congruity,
• Intraarticular Chondroma extensor mechanism
• Osgood-Schlatter Disease o Distinguish normal variants
with planted foot, flexed knee o Heterogeneous mass with cartilage (t 51)& III
=
shows a chondral fracture
III
CO
III ElII with undercutting of
~ the surface, creating a
co chondral flap. (Right) Sagittal
u PO FSEMR shows a
c macerated tear" of the
U lateral meniscus anterior
horn. Note the adjacent
femoral trochlear cartilage
loss ElII.
82
ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN C"l
:J
(')
III
-<
OJ
III
Bursitis Bursitis
(Left) Sagittal STIR MR
shows a well-circumscribed
fluid collection EilI contained
within the bursa superficial
to the patella resulting from a
fall S months earlier.
Aspiration revealed sterile
sero-sanguinous fluid. (RighI)
Sagittal PO FSEFS MR shows
fluid in the deep infrapatellar
bursa ElIl resulting from
recent trauma.
III
83
OJ
CIl ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN
-l
"0
C
ro
CIl
CIl
C
~
Patellar Tendon Tears & Tendinosis
"0
Ql
(Left) Sagittal PO FSEMR
l/I shows thickening of the
III
III proximal patellar tendon Ell
~ with high tendon signal.
III in this young volleyball
o player, consistent with
C
patellar tendinosis (jumper's
U knee). (Right) Sagittal PO
FSEMR shows a high grade
partial tear of the quadriceps
tendon with minimal
retraction. There is fluid Ell
in the gap created by the
tendon fiber disruption •.
84
(")
ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN
:l
C'l
III
'<
OJ
III
Osgood-Schlatter Disease Sinding larsen Johansson Disease
(Left) Lateral radiograph
'"
(1)
Q.
shows libial tubercle A
fragmentation III & sofl :::J
(1)
tissue swelling Ell (1)
III
85
Ol
Q) MEDIAL KNEE PAIN
--'"0
C
co Pellegrini Stieda: Ossification at femoral
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o
Q)
c origin; indicates prior injury
:.:: Common • Medical Meniscus Tear
"0
Ql
• Medial Collateral Ligament Sprain o Medial tears are most common
Vl
ro • Medial Meniscus Tear o Orientations: Horitzontal, horizontal
aJ o Medial Meniscal Cyst
.2- oblique, radial, vertical longitudinal
ro • Arthritis • Medial Meniscal Cyst
u o Osteoarthritis
c o Medial parameniscal cysts are most
o Rheumatoid Arthritis common
U
o Pyrophosphate Arthropathy o Typically multiloculated mucin-filled cyst
• Insufficiency Fracture o Look for the associated meniscal tear
• Acute Trauma, Fracture • Arthritis
• Hardware Failure, Post-Operative o Osteoarthritis: Cartilage loss, subchondral
less Common cysts, osteophytic ridging, loose bodies, ±
• Pes Anserine Bursitis osteopenia
• Medial Collateral Ligament Bursitis • Loose bodies range in size, shape,
• Osteochondritis Dissecans appearance
• Osteonecrosis o Inflammatory arthritis: Effusion, synovial
• Medial Plica Syndrome hypertrophy, osteopenia, rice bodies
• Septic Joint • Rice bodies are small, regular
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) o Crystalline arthritis: Effusion, subchondral
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis edema, soft tissue chondrocalcinosis,
• Hip Pathology usually not osteopenic until endstage
• Insufficiency Fracture
Rare but Important
o Acute pain with no trauma; osteopenia
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm o Linear low signal subchondral band
• Intraosseous Neoplasm parallels articular surface with extensive
• Nerve Impingement (Saphenous Neuritis) surrounding edema
o May be located at mid femoral condyle
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION (formerly discussed as spontaneous
osteonecrosis of knee)
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o May be located at medial proximal tibial
• Diagnoses may occur in combination condyle
• Hint: Don't let satisfaction of search keep • Acute Trauma, Fracture
you from looking for all the possible causes o Appropriate mechanism of injury
of medial knee pain o Look for associated injuries in ligaments,
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses menisci, cartilage
• Medial Collateral Ligament Sprain • Hardware Failure, Post-Operative
o Most commonly injured ligament o Look for lucency at
o Composed of deep & superficial layers bone-cement-prosthesis interfaces;
• Superficial layer originates from medial fractures; ± effusion
femoral epicondyle; inserts tibial Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
metaphysis 4-5 cm distal to joint line • Pes Anserine Bursitis
• Deep layer attaches to medial meniscus o Bursa between MCL & distal sartorius,
body with meniscofemoralligament gracilis, semitendinosus tendons as they
proximally & meniscotibialligament insert on anteromedial tibia
distally o Seen in distance runners
o Ligament sprain grading
• Medial Collateral Ligament Bursitis
• 1: Few torn fibers; structurally intact o Bursa between deep & superficial MCL
• 2: Incomplete tear; no joint laxity layers
• 3: Complete tear; joint laxity
III
86
(")
MEDIAL KNEE PAIN
::l
C'l
III
Vertical elongate fluid collection o Multiple small ovoid intra-articular bodies
o -<
paralleling superficial MCL ± ossification [Jl
III
• Osteochondritis Dissecans • Hip Pathology IJI
~
o Fragmentation ± separation of a part of o Referred pain pattern Co
;:<:
articular surface Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses :J
<l>
o Most common in the lateral aspect of • Soft Tissue Neoplasm <l>
III
medial femoral condyle o May be difficult to distinguish benign :J
a.
o May be cartilage, cartilage & bone, or bone from malignant r
<l>
alone o Evaluate patient age, tumor size, location, to
• Osteonecrosis imaging characteristics, enhancement
o Serpentine, demarcated heterogeneous patterns
lesions in metadiaphysis may extend to o MR/CT allows delineation of involved
subchondral epiphyses anatomy, especially the neurovascular
o Look for risk factors: Steroids, alcohol,
bundle
sickle cell anemia, Gaucher disease, trauma • Intraosseous Neoplasm
• Medial Plica Syndrome o Pain tends to be gradual and insidious
o Thickened medial plica results from
o Acute onset pain, look for pathologic
fibrosis & impinges the medial femoral fracture
condyle causing pain with normal range of o Benign
motion • Epiphyseal/subchondral: Giant cell
o Due to inflammation from trauma, OCD,
tumor, chondroblastoma
inflammatory arthritis • Metaphyseal: Enchondroma, exostosis,
• Septic Joint nonossifying fibroma, fibrous dysplasia
o Effusion, synovial thickening, avid
o Malignant
enhancement
• Secondary neoplasm is most common &
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) includes metastasis, multiple myeloma
o Focal or diffuse villous &/or nodular
• Primary neoplasm is less common &
synovial thickening; effusion; bone
includes osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma,
erosion
Ewing sarcoma
o May have marked low signal due to
• Nerve Impingement (Saphenous Neuritis)
hemosiderin deposition
o May result from impingement at the
o Heterogeneous enhancement
adductor canal
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis
o Mimics medial meniscus tear or arthritis
o Cartilaginous metaplasia
III
88
MEDIAL KNEE PAIN n
::l
(")
III
-<
llJ
III
en
<D
(Left) AP radiograph shows a.
chondrocalcinosis ••
~
normal bone density, & a ::l
(1)
large subchondral cyst within (1)
III
89
Ol
Q)
...J
"0
c:
[- MEDIAL KNEE PAIN
ro
Q)
Q)
c:
~
Medial Collateral Ligament Bursitis Osteochondritis Dissecans
'tl (Left) Coronal STIR MR
Ql
fJl shows fluid" interposed
III
al between the superficial
~ portion of the MCL HI & the
III adjacent proximal tibial
U metaphysis, representing
c: medial collateral ligament
U bursitis. (Right) Sagittal PO
FSf MR shows a medial
OCO lesion HI in a 14 year
old. The discrete fragment is
covered by intact cartilage
lI:I & does not appear loose,
though the cystic changes at
the margin are concerning.
Careful scrutiny in multiple
planes is important.
III
90
()
MEDIAL KNEE PAIN
::l
(')
Ql
-<
to
Ql
Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) III
<1l
(Leh) Coronal T2" CRE MR a.
shows nodular synovial ~
thickening" in this 13 year ::l
<ll
old with a large joint <ll
effusion. On CRE, the OJ
::l
nodules are low signal with 0-
"blooming" artifact, typical r
<ll
o( hemosiderin deposit & <0
classic for PVNS. (Right)
Sagiual PO FSEMR shows a
discrete intracapsular slightly
heterogeneous mass ElIII. This
is biopsy proven PVNS but
without the typically more
prominent hemosiderin
deposition.
Intraosseous Neoplasm
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows an
eccentric lytic geographic
lesion, typical (or giant cell
tumor III. The lesion is
metaphyseal, approaches the
subchondral bone & expands
the medial cortex. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows a
epiphyseal lesion =
nonaggressive malrix·forming
in the
posteromedial tibia which is
Jow signal intensity on T2
MR (not shown). Note the
associated periosteal
reaction III incited by this
chondroblaslOma.
III
91
Ol
Q) CALF PAIN
-l
-0
C
<Il
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Baker cyst most common; arises from
Q)
C
posterior medial capsule between
~ Common semimembranosus & gastrocnemius
"tl
Q)
• Fracture (medial head) tendons
l/l
Rl • Popliteal Cyst o Simple or complex with multiple
III
• Muscle Injury septations; ± loose bodies
~ o Muscle Strain
Rl o May decompress into surrounding soft
l.l
o Compartment Syndrome tissues with symptoms mimicking DVT
C
o Calcific Myonecrosis o DVT may co-exist in - 10% of
U
• Hematoma symptomatic patients
• Arthritis of Knee or Ankle • Muscle Injury
• Sciatica o Muscle Strain
• Neurogenic Claudication • Ranges from mild edema (grade 1) to
Less Common complete fiber disruption (grade 3) with
• Tendon, Injury retraction
• Vascular Abnormalities o Compartment Syndrome
o Arterial Insufficiency • Elevated pressure in confined space may
o Deep Venous Thrombosis irreversibly damage muscle & nerves
o Venous Insufficiency • MR or CT: Swelling, edema, loss of
• Infection normal muscle markings
• Fracture, Malunion o Calcific Myonecrosis
• History of trauma; residua of
Rare but Important
compartment syndrome & nerve injury;
• Intraosseous Neoplasm anterior compartment most common
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm • Fusiform mass with plaque-like
• Nerve Entrapment amorphous calcifications
• Hematoma
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Acute « 48 hours): T1 isointense to muscle
o Subacute « 30 days): t SI on T1 & T2
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses (methemoglobin)
• Fracture o Chronic (> 30 days): Heterogeneous; ~ SI if
o May result from high energy trauma or
hemosiderin present
repetitive stress (abnormal stress on • Arthritis of Knee or Ankle
normal bone) or from insufficient bone o Referred pain
(normal stress on abnormal bone)
• Sciatica
o Radiographs/CT delineate fracture
o Referred pain; neural impingement at L4,
alignment, healing & potential LS &/or Sl
complications • Neurogenic Claudication
o Bone scintigraphy useful for identifying
o Referred pain from central stenosis at L4,
injury but poor resolution LS or S; typically bilateral & symmetric
o MR sensitive to early stress response,
pain
surrounding soft tissue injury
o Stress response grading Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Grade 1: Periosteal edema; t SI T2/STIR • Tendon, Injury
• Grade 2: Endosteal/periosteal edema; t SI o Most common: Achilles, plantaris
T2/STIR o Range from tendinosis (thickening &
• Grade 3: Endosteal/periosteal edema; t SI intrasubstance signal) to complete tear
T2/STIR & ~ SI T1 (tendon disruption & retraction) with
• Grade 4: Discrete cortical fracture associated hematoma
perpendicular to long bone surface • Vascular Abnormalities
• Popliteal Cyst
III
92
CALF PAIN n
::l
o
III
o Duplex ultrasound (Duplex = 2D US • MR will better delineate osseous & soft
tissue involvement
-<
combined with Doppler flow detection) CD
III
highly sensitive to vessel disease o Brodie abscess VI
(l)
o Radiograph: Look for arterial calcification, • Subacute osteomyelitis, variable Q.
Fracture Fracture
"
C
<tl
Q)
Q)
C
~ Fracture Fracture
"tl (Leh) Axial STIR MR shows
=
C1l
Ul subtle t 51 of the periosteum
<tl
CD & a crescent of t 51 in
~ the endosteum Ell of the mid
<tl tibia in this athlete with
o intermittent "shin" pain. This
C is a grade 2 stress injury.
U (Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows an
incomplete insufficiency
fracture of the proximal
medial tibial meta diaphysis
with sclerosis. at the
fracture site & adjacent
subtle periostitis Ell due to
healing.
Muscle Strain
(Leh) Two contiguous
longitudinal views of the
posterior medial knee!ca/f
demonstrate a farge,
thin-walled multiseptate Ell
chronic Baker cyst with
dissection along the
superficial fascial of the
gastrocnemius ~ (Right)
Axial STIR MR shows a
typical case of gastrocnemius
soleus strain with a pattern of
diffuse muscle edema.
without clear pattern of
myofibril disruption,
consistent with grade 7
muscle strain.
III
94
CALF PAIN C'l
:l
C'l
III
0<:
OJ
III
Compartment Syndrome Calcific Myonecrosis III
CD
(Lefl) Axial Tf C+ FS MR Co
shows patchy enhancement A
(t 51) o( the swollen anterior :l
CD
tibialis ~ & extensor hallucis CD
longus ~ with interosseous III
OJ
membrane bowing fa in this Co
compartment syndrome. The r
CD
enhancement suggests some to
remaining viability of the
injured muscle. (RighI)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows calcific myonecrosis
of lower leg anterior
compartment with diffuse
amorphous plaque-like
calcifications II] in areas of
necrosis & prior hemorrhage.
Arterial I nsufficiency
(Lefl) Sagittal 5T1R MR
shows complete Achilles
tendon rupture =
at
musculotendinous junction
with acute hemorrhage (t
51) SI & retraction of
muscle. There is underlying
tendinosis with marked
thickening & heterogeneity
!J::l. (RighI) CT angiogram
(aortic runoff) shows
occlusion of left popliteal
artery ~ with extensive
distal collateral flow !J::l in
this 82 year old with
intermittent claudication.
Note normal right leg runoff
~.
III
95
OJ
Q) CALF PAIN
-'
-0
C
ctl
Q)
Q)
c
:>::: Arterial Insufficiency Arterial Insufficiency
"tl (Leh) Axial T2WI FSf MR
CIl
l/I shows popiteal artery
<a
tll entrapment due 10 a large
~ aberrant slip of the medial
<a head of gaslrocnemius =:I
o lateral to popliteal
l: neurovascular bundle 81 & a
U smaller slip !:ll medial 10 the
vessels. (RighI) Coronal MRA
shows deviation of the
popliteal artery C12; the
medial displacement results
from an aberrant slip of the
medial head of the
gastrocnemius. The patient
had symplOms of
claudication in the calf.
Infection
(Lefl) Coronal STIR MR
shows a Brodie abscess in
this skeletally immature
patient with a
meta-epiphyseal t SI
well-defined fluid-filled lesion
1:]1 with intense surrounding
edema 81 including
periosteal edema !:ll. (RighI)
Sagittal T7 C+ FS MR shows
avidly enhancing anterior
subperiosteal soft tissue !:ll
lifting the periosteum =:I.
Adjacent intramedullary
edema ~ is present as well
as a soft tissue abscess with a
thickened, shaggy rim 81.
III
96
CALF PAIN (")
::l
(i'
ll>
'<
OJ
ll>
Infection VI
Infection <l>
(Left) Lateral radiograph Co
shows tuberculosis A
osteomyelitis with an :J
ill-defined Iylic lesion
the proximal tibial
in= <tl
<tl
Intraosseous Neoplasm
(Left) Sagittal CT reformation
shows a permeative distal
fibular lesion
diagnosed
=originally
as stress fracture.
However, delayed healing
with aggressive periostitis ~
led to biopsy, confirming
lymphoma. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows an aggressive lytic
lesion of the proximal Fibular
metaphysis with extensive
periosteal reaction There
is bone expansion, cortical
breakthrough Ell & a large
50ft tissue mass =. This is
Ewing sarcoma.
III
97
OJ
Q) PAINFUL KNEE REPLACEMENT
....J
"0
C
ctl
Q) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • If medial and lateral collateral ligaments
Q)
c are stretched, may use a wider
~ Common polyethylene spacer on tibial tray to
"0
CIl
• Arthroplasty Loosening eliminate soft tissue slack
I/)
01 • Knee Instability • Stability also conferred by concave shape
[Q
• Component Malpositioning of polyethylene spacer, which partially
~
01 • Arthroplasty Dislocation conforms to the femoral component
U
C
• Septic Joint • Component Malpositioning
U
• Stress Shielding (Mimic) o TKAplacement designed to duplicate the
• Arthroplasty Component Wear normal knee
• Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis • Femoral component placed without
• Arthroplasty Hardware Failure angulation on distal femur
• Periprosthetic Fracture • Tibial component positioned to produce
Less Common
0
7 ± 3 valgus angulation overall
0
98
(")
PAINFUL KNEE REPLACEMENT
:J
o
III
• Stress Shielding (Mimic) • Arthroplasty Hardware Failure
o Fracture of femoral or tibial hardware rare
-<
o Weight-bearing through knee is altered CJ
III
with TKA,with less anteriorly and more o Fracture of metal-backed patellar buttons VI
C1l
posteriorly through femoral metaphysis may occur & may contribute to metallosis C.
III
lOa
PAINFUL KNEE REPLACEMENT (")
:l
o
Dl
-<
OJ
Dl
Stress Shielding (Mimic) Stress Shielding (Mimic) Ul
CD
(Leh) Lateral radiograph a.
shows a relative lucency in ;,.;;
the anterior metaphysis Ell :l
<ll
of this patient who is not <ll
symptomatic. This is III
:l
expected in knee a.
arthroplasties, and should be r
<ll
followed as stress shielding. <0
(Right) Lateral radiograph of
the same patient 1 year later,
shows more pronounced
lucency Ell and increased
bone density streaming
posteriorly from the femoral
peg to the posterior cortex
_ Stress shielding occurs
because of altered
weight-bearing.
III
101
Ol
Q) PAINFUL KNEE REPLACEMENT
-l
"'0
c:
ro
Q)
Q)
c:
~
Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis Particle Disease/Massive Osteolysis
"C (Left) Coronal CT reformat
CIl
1/1
III
[JJ
>.
osteolysis =
shows the extent of massive
in this patient
who had polyethylene wear.
III The large region of osteolysis
U puts the patient at risk for
c: fracture. (Right) Coronal CT
U reformat in the same patient,
obtained more posteriorly,
shows healing attempt of
pathologic fracture. due
to the large region of
osteolysis. The fracture was
not seen on radiographs.
button =
metallic ring of the patellar
which has
fractured and displaced.
III
102
(')
PAINFUL KNEE REPLACEMENT
:l
n
III
-<
III
III
Peri prosthetic Fracture VI
Periprosthetic Fracture lD
(Left) Lateral radiograph a.
shows fracture of the ;:>\
superior pole of the patella :J
C1l
•. It is important to protect C1l
this patella, so that it does OJ
:J
not displace. (Right) Lateral 0-
radiograph shows fracture r
C1l
and displacement of the (Q
Periprosthetic Fracture
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows linear
sclerosis. indicating
subacute fracture.
Periprosthetic fractures are
subtle but important to
identify. Note the screws __
located in a position which
indicates that the patient had
a tibial tubercle transfer.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows linear sclerosis of a
periprosthetic fracture III in
a patient who had a prior
tibial tubercle transfer. That
procedure reportedly places
the patient at additional risk
for fracture.
III
103
oo ANTERIOR ANKLE PAIN/IMPINGEMENT
LL
-0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Anterior tibiofibular ligament thickened or
Ql
:>2c discontiouous
Common
« • Injury may extend into interosseous
"C
• Anterior Impingement ligament
ell
f/) • Anterolateral Impingement
01
• Syndesmosis Sprain Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
aI
~ • Stress Fracture, Tibia & Talus
01
less Common o Insufficiency fractures: Poor quality bone
o • Stress Fracture, Tibia
C such as osteoporosis, normal stress
U
• Stress Fracture, Talus o Fatigue fractures: Normal bone, excessive
• Tibialis Anterior Tendinosis stress such as overuse
• Tibialis Anterior Tendon Tear o MR appearance can be divided into stress
• Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the Talus response & stress fracture
• Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus • Stress response: Focal area of marrow
• Navicular Fractures edema in typical location & appropriate
• Loose Body history; may have generalized linear
• Talus Fractures configuration
• Stress fracture: Low signal fine line
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION within focus of marrow edema; sequence
on which the line is visible varies
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues between patients
• Difficult to differentiate on physical o Radiographs show ill-defined, somewhat
examination thickened, linear region of sclerosis
• Clinical history will help narrow the o Periostitis not seen on talus, rarely seen on
differential diagnosis distal tibia
• Begin imaging evaluation with radiographs o Tibia
• MR preferred for advanced imaging • Fatigue fracture at base of medial
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses malleolus
• Anterior Impingement • Insufficiency fracture occurs in distal
o Symptoms worse in dorsiflexion metaphysis
o Result of chronic repetitive trauma with • Tibialis Anterior Tendonosis
talus impinging upon anterior tibia o Pain with dorsiflexion
III
104
ANTERIOR ANKLE PAIN/IMPINGEMENT
Anterior Impingement
III
106
ANTERIOR ANKLE PAIN/IMPINGEMENT
III
107
(5 MEDIAL ANKLE PAIN
o
LL
"0
C
ro DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Imaging shows fluid restricted to one
Q)
:;;:: portion of tendon sheath
c Common • Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus
«
"0
• Tendon, Injury o Entity is traumatic or atraumatic
Q)
l/l • Tenosynovitis (including osteochondritis dissecans,
l'll
III • Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus thought to be due to ischemic necrosis)
~ • Arthritis • Trauma history in 85%; often with
l'll
• Fracture ligament laxity
C" Less Common o Represents variable articular cartilage &
(,)
• Hardware Failure subchondral bone fracture injury
• Infection o Staged as follows
• Tarsal Coalition • Stage 1: Articular cartilage injury only
• Os Trigonum Syndrome • Stage 2: Cartilage injury + subchondral
• Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome fracture
• Stage 3: Detached (but nondisplaced)
Rare but Important fragment
• Transient Bone Marrow Edema • Stage 4: Detached & displaced fragment
• Osteonecrosis • Stage 5: Subchondral cyst formation
• Deltoid Ligament Sprain • Arthritis
• lntraosseous Neoplasm o Osteoarthritis: Joint space narrowing,
• Soft Tissue Neoplasm osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis & cysts,
± effusions
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Rheumatoid arthritis: Juxta-articular
osteoporosis, symmetric joint space
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses narrowing, erosions, effusions
• Tendon, Injury o Gout: Corticated erosions, soft tissue
o Tendinopathy: Intrasubstance signal,
masses, relatively normal mineralization
thickening, central or delaminating o Neuropathic: Joint dissolution, debris,
o Tear patterns may seen on ultrasound (US)
dislocation, subluxation, distention; occurs
&MR in diabetics
• Type 1: Partial with contour hypertrophy • Fracture
• Type 2: Partial with contour attenuation o Traumatic: Look for appropriate
• Type 3: Complete with retraction mechanism of injury
o Medial (flexor) tendons: Posterior tibialis
o Insufficiency: Osteoporosis, fracture line
(PTT), flexor hallucis longus (FHL), flexor perpendicular to major trabeculae/cortex
digitorum longus (FDL), anterior tibialis o Symptomatic accessory navicular
(ATT) synchondrosis: Edema/inflammation due
o May see marrow edema (t SI) at or near
to PIT traction or direct impingement
tendon attachments (ill-fitting shoes, etc.)
• Tenosynovitis
o Inflammation due to trauma, arthritis or Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
infection in tendon sheath ± visible • Hardware Failure
tendon pathology o Look for lucency surrounding hardware,
o Small amount of fluid normal in tendon loosening & withdrawal, failure of fusion
sheaths or fracture healing
o FHL communicates with tibiotalar joint & • Infection
may have fluid related to joint effusions; o Osteomyelitis
look for t fluid volume out of proportion • Lytic lesions, cortical loss, periosteal
to joint fluid reaction, ± sinus tracts
o Stenosing tenosynovitis o Septic arthritis
Tendon, Injury
Tenosynovitis
(Left)Sagittal PO FSf FS MR
shows FHL• tenosynovitis
with a large volume of
tendon sheath fluid Ell Note
tendon sheath constriction
•• at the calcaneocuboid
joint representing stenosing
tenosynovitis. (Right)
Oblique radiograph shows a
medial talus osteochondral
lesion" with lucency
surrounding a detached but
nondisplaced fragment
(stage 3).
III
110
MEDIAL ANKLE PAIN (")
::l
n
III
'<
OJ
III
Arthritis Arthritis VI
m
(Left) Sagittal CT reformation Co
shows marked posterior
~
subtalar join! space :J
narrowing Ell with small
subchondral cysts. &
'"
r0-
ll)
osteophytic ridging 11II as :J
a.
well as profound osteopenia -n
in this posttraumatic o
osteoarthritis. (Right) Sagittal ~
T1 C+ FS MR shows a
moderate join! effusion _
joint space narrowing with
an enhancingerosion. &
periarticular bone marrow
edema. in rheumatoid
arthritis. The contralateral
ankle had similar findings.
Arthritis Arthritis
(Left) Lateralradiograph
shows a large & radiodense
soft tissue mass. in the
tibiota/ar joint representing
tophaceous gout with large
associated erosions HI in the
tibiotalar, subtalar &
intertarsal joints. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows a
typical neuropathic
(Charcot) joint in a diabetic
patient with distention ••
disorganization EB debris
•. & joint dislocation Ell
(talonavicular). Aspiration
may be necessary to exclude
infection.
Fracture Fracture
(Left) Oblique radiograph
shows a nondisplaced
vertical navicular fracture
•. The lateral & AP
radiographs (not shown)
appeared completely
normal. This may occur in
athletes in jumping &
sprinting sports. (Right)
Coronal oblique T1 WI MR
shows an incomplete
insufficiency fracture Ell of
the posterior medial plantar
calcaneus with surrounding
edema. in this 39 year old
anorexic female runner.
III
111
oo MEDIAL ANKLE PAIN
u..
"0
c:
CO
Q)
~
c:
<t: Hardware Failure
"0 (Left) Axial T2WI FS MR
Gl shows a symptomatic
'"
nl
aJ
accessory navicular with t Sf
in both the navicular .:II &
~ the accessory navicular HI
nl with a small amount of fluid
.~ in the synchondrosis _.
c:
(Right) Sagittal CT
(,)
reformation shows a
dome-shaped metal
trabecular ingrowth implant
EiIl initially placed to
fac;J;tate tibiotafar
arthrodesis. Instead, the
metal has become a
wedge-inhibiting fusion ~
and requires removal.
periosteal reaction
surrounding soft tissue
=
indicates loosening. Note the
&
III
112
MEDIAL ANKLE PAIN n
:::l
n
III
'<OJ
III
VI
Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome Transient Bone Marrow Edema ClI
(Left) Axial TlWI FS MR C.
shows a ganglion cyst III in
the tarsal tunnel, deep to the
»
:::l
flexor retinaculum, impinging '"
10
on the neurovascular bundle III
III with resultant pain in the :::l
C.
medial ankle. (Right) Sagittal "Tl
PO FSEFS MR shows mild o
diffuse navicular edema •. ~
The patient has had similar
episodes of isolated edema
in the talus & medial
cuneiform, which
spontaneously resolved. This
represents transient regional
bone marrow edema.
Osteonecrosis
(Left) Sagittal PO FSEFS MR
shows heterogeneous
serpentine t 51 (edema) ••
& ~ 51 (preserved marrow
fat) ~ throughout the talus
& subtle articular surface
flattening Ell. This patient's
primary risk factor for
osteonecrosis was alcohol
abuse. (Right) Coronal STIR
MR shows edema (t Sf)
within the posterior UbiotaJar
Ell & tibiocalcaneal ~
portions of deltoid ligament
as well as medial malleolar
marrow edema III resulting
from an acute pronation
eversion injury.
III
113
oo LATERALANKLE PAIN
LL
"0
r:::
C'O
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Jones (dancer's) fracture: Transverse thru
(l)
~ proximal shaft, nonunion common
r::: Common
« • Traumatic Fracture, Fibula
"C
• Anterior Talofibular Ligament Tear a Weber classification aids in surgical
Ql
III • Fracture, Base 5th Metatarsal decision making
<ll
CO • Traumatic Fracture, Fibula • Weber A: Below tibiotalar joint, typically
~ • Fracture, Anterior Process Calcaneus avulsion of tip of lateral malleolus
<ll
o • Cuboid Fracture • Weber B: At level of the tibiotalar joint
c: • CaIcaneofibular Ligament Tear • Weber C: Above the tibiotalar joint
U • Peroneal Tendinosis/Tear/Tenosynovitis • Fracture, Anterior Process Calcaneus
• Subtalar Arthritis a Avulsion of bifurcate ligament
• Insufficiency Fracture, Fibula a Seen on lateral view
• Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus • Cuboid Fracture
• Extensor Digitorum Brevis Avulsion a Usually small fractures from lateral margin
o Stable: Overlying articular cartilage intact o Trauma most common cause, also gout,
o Unstable: Displaced fragment, bright signal osteoarthritis
or contrast at fragment margin o MR shows sinus edema/inflammation
• Extensor Digitorum Brevis Avulsion o Talocalcaneal & cervical ligaments may be
o Small flake of bone from lateral margin of edematous or disrupted
calcaneus near anterior process o Late findings are subchondral sclerosis &
o Seen on AP,mortise views cysts in adjacent talus
• Fracture, Lateral Process of Talus
Helpful Clues for LessCommon Diagnoses
o Commonly seen in snowboarders
• Tarsal Coalition
o Best seen on mortise view
o Flatfoot, pain especially after activity
o Vertically oriented fracture
o Talocalcaneal or calcaneonavicular
o Fragment of variable size
o Fibrous, cartilaginous, or osseous
• May involve subtalar articular surface
o Lateral pain due to spasm of peroneals
• Anterolateral Impingement Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Injury leads to inflammation, thickening • Peroneus Quartus Muscle
of ATFL,formation of meniscoid lesion o Variable origin & insertion
• Meniscoid lesion: Hyalinized tissue o Crowds peroneus longus, brevis in
extending into joint from ATFL retromalleolar groove leading to
• Tillaux Fracture tendinosis, tears, subluxation
o Avulsion of anterior tibiofibular ligament • Syndesmosis Sprain
from anterior tibia o Abduction, external rotation, dorsiflexion
• Variant: Wagstaffe-LeFort fracture, o Anterior tibiofibular ligament thickened or
avulsion of ligament from fibula discontinuous
o Juvenile Tillaux: Salter III tibial fracture o Injury may extend into interosseous
occurs at stage where medial physis closed, ligament
lateral physis open, around age 14 o Adjacent edema if acute
• Peroneal Tendon Subluxation • Syndesmotic Impingement
o Creates snapping sensation o Sequelae of syndesmotic sprain
o Retinaculum avulsion from posterolateral o ATFL,posterior tibiofibular ligament,
margin of lateral malleolus may create interosseous membrane involved in
small osseous fragment isolation or combination
• Sinus Tarsus Syndrome o Ligamentous thickening, synovial
proliferation responsible for symptoms
III
116
LATERAL ANKLE PAIN
Subtalar Arthritis
(Left) Coronal reformatted
CT shows significant
degenerative change at the
posterior (latera/) facet of the
subtalar joint •. Note the
associated sort tissue
swelling ElIIl centered distal
to the fibula. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows moderately severe
osteopenia in this patient
with rheumatoid arthritis. An
insufficiency fracture is
present in the fibular
diaphysis •.
III
117
oo LATERAL ANKLE PAIN
u..
"0
c
<0
Q)
:i:
c
< Tarsal Coalition Tarsal Coalition
"0 (Left) Coronal PO FSEFS MR
Q)
shows typical MR
III
Ol appearance of a
III talocalcaneal coalition. The
~ middle facet is hypoplastic
Ol HI and the joint ;5 narrowed
U
c without definite osseous
bridging _ (Right) Lateral
U
radiograph shows a large
talar beak EilI which results
from constant traction by the
talonavicular ligament. The C
sign is a continuous curve
from the talar dome to the
sustentaculum tali =-
It is
an insensitive but specific
sign of talocalcaneal
coalition.
118
LATERAL ANKLE PAIN
119
(5 HEEl PAIN
o
LL
"0
C
CO
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Avulsed posterior tubercle of calcaneus
<ll
32 • May see associated vascular calcifications
c Common • Calcaneal Stress Fracture
<l:
"tl
• Plantar Fasciitis o Similar appearance as calcaneal
Cll
III • Calcaneal Insufficiency Fracture insufficiency fractures
ro
OJ • Calcaneal Stress Fracture o Differentiate by clinical presentation
>- • Calcaneal Fracture, Traumatic
ro • Stress fx: Younger patient, overuse
.!:!
• Achilles Tendon Tear & Tendinopathy • Insufficiency fx: Older, osteopenic
c • Osteomyelitis
U
• Calcaneal Fracture, Traumatic
less Common o Several classification schemes; Sanders
• Retrocalcaneal or Retro-Achilles Bursitis classification most often used
• Plantar Fascia Rupture o Key features for classification
• Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome • Intraarticular or extraarticular
• Haglund Syndrome • Extension into subtalar joint
• Foreign Body • Number of fracture fragments in subtalar
• Heel Pad Atrophy joint on coronal images
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis (CRA) • Medial to lateral location of the subtalar
• Rheumatoid Arthritis joint fractures
• Sever Disease • Achilles Tendon Tear & Tendinopathy
• Psoriatic Arthritis (PSA) o Tendon thickening appears as round
configuration on axial images
Rare but Important
o Increased signal on Tl WI & T2WI
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis (IBD)
o Watershed area 2-6 cm proximal to
• Sarcoidosis
calcaneal insertion is prone to tear
• Neoplasm, Bone
o Location of tear, cross-sectional area
• Tarsal Coalition
involvement & extent are important for
• Paget Disease surgical planning
• Traumatic Neuroma
• Osteomyelitis
• Bone Infarct
o Abnormal bone marrow edema &
• Hemophilic Pseudotumor
enhancement on MR
• Radiation Osteonecrosis
o Progressive destruction of bone seen on
serial radiographs
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Look for abscess or sinus tract extending
from skin surface to bone
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
• Plantar Fasciitis Helpful Clues for less Common Diagnoses
o Intermediate to high signal in the • Retrocalcaneal or Retro-Achilles Bursitis
normally low signal plantar fascia o Focal collections of fluid around the
o Continuum from thickening & calcaneus & Achilles tendon
degeneration to partial thickness tear o Retrocalcaneal bursa located at
o Most commonly involves the medial band posterosuperior aspect of calcaneus,
plantar fascia near calcaneal attachment dorsally bordered by Achilles tendon
o May have reactive edema in the calcaneus o Retro-Achilles bursa located dorsal to
& surrounding soft tissue edema Achilles tendon, deep to subcutaneous fat
• Calcaneal Insufficiency Fracture • Plantar Fascia Rupture
o Oriented perpendicular to the bone o High signal, fluid-filled gap along the
trabeculae/long axis of bone course of plantar fascia
o Most common location: Posterior tubercle o Rupture at proximal or mid portion
o Second most common location parallels • Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome
the subtalar joint o Mass or scar along course of posterior tibial
o Variant: Diabetic calcaneal insufficiency nerve, deep to flexor retinaculum
avulsion fracture o Edema in tarsal tunnel on MR
120
HEEl PAIN
o Associated clinical findings of pain & Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
muscle weakness
• Sarcoidosis
• Haglund Syndrome o Bilateral heel pain with or before arthritis
o Enlarged calcaneal tuberosity
• Neoplasm, Bone
• a..k"a., pump bump " o Some neoplastic entities are not painful
o Retrocalcaneal & retro-Achilles bursitis
unless bone cortex is traversed or
• Foreign Body associated with pathologic fracture
o Wide variety of foreign bodies may be
o Simple bone cyst, intraosseous lipoma,
embedded in heel during walking Ewing sarcoma, metastases,
o Foreign object may not be visible on
chondroblastoma, chondrosarcoma,
imaging, especially organic material osteosarcoma
o Surrounding edema on MR
• Tarsal Coalition
• Heel Pad Atrophy o Talocalcaneal or calcaneonavicular may
o Atrophy of the subcutaneous fat
cause hindfoot pain
o May have history of steroid injections
o Bony, cartilaginous or fibrous fusion
o Associated with plantar fascia rupture
• Paget Disease
• CRA, PSA, IBD Arthritis o Sclerotic stage has thickened cortex &
o Calcaneus involved in 50% of cases CRA
coarsened trabeculae
o Erosions & reactive spurring at Achilles
o Calcaneal involvement in 3-10% of cases
tendon and plantar aponeurosis
• Traumatic Neuroma
• Rheumatoid Arthritis o Focal mass along course of nerve
o Erosions involving the calcaneus are
o Area of amputation or trauma
located near the plantar aponeurosis &
• Bone Infarct
Achilles tendon attachments o Serpiginous sclerosis within bone
o Look for classic rheumatoid erosions in
o Predilection for posterior half of the
metacarpal & metatarsal heads calcaneus
• Sever Disease • Hemophilic Pseudotumor
o Calcaneal apophysitis in preteen patients
o Calcaneus one of 3 top locations
o Sclerosis & fragmentation of the calcaneal
• Radiation Osteonecrosis
apophysis on radiographs is somewhat o Delineated by location of radiation port
unreliable due to anatomic variation o Mixed lytic and sclerotic changes in bone
o Calcaneal apophysis edema on MR
may mimic an aggressive entity
Plantar Fasciitis
III
122
HEEL PAIN
Foreign Body
(Left) Sagittal T2WI FS MR
shows tremendous
thickening o( the distal
Achilles tendon _ There is
an enthesophyte arising at
the tendon insertional site iii
and an increased amount of
fluid within the
retrocalcaneal bursa •.
(Right) Oblique radiograph
shows a subtle linear lucency
•• in the soft tissues of the
heel. The round skin
entrancesite. of the
embedded golf tee is beller
seen.
III
123
15 HEEL PAIN
o
LL
-0
C
ro
Q)
:;;<
c
«
"0
(Leh) Lateral radiograph
Ql shows severe erosive disease
f/l
•. as well as soft tissue
'"
CD swelling & obliteration of the
~ pre-Achilles fat pad. Though
this could represent any
'"
o
c inflammatory arthritis, it is
rheumatoid arthritis in this
U case. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows erosions
•• involving the plantar
aspect of the calcaneus
adjacent to the attachment
of the plantar aponeurosis,
as well as 50ft tissue
inflammation III all
secondary to rheumatoid
arthritis.
Sever Disease
(LehJ Sagittal T2WI FS MR
shows inflammatory change
with edema in the calcaneal
apophysis ElII and
metaphysis •.
Retrocalcanealbursitis.
and retro-Achilles edema are
present in this child with
Sever disease, or calcaneal
apophysitis. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows mixed
erosive" and productive
•• change involving the
posterior calcaneus. This
patient has psoriatic arthritis
with involvement of the heel.
III
124
HEEL PAIN
Neoplasm, Bone
(Left) Sagittal T1 C+ FS MR
shows rim-enhancement
around a unicameral bone
cyst •. This is a common
location for this lesion; it
becomes painful if a
pathologic hacture develops.
(RighI) Lateral radiograph
shows a lytic lesion EiIII
involving the portion of the
calcaneus typically seen with
intraosseous lipoma or
unicameral bone cyst. The
central calcific density.
proves the former diagnosis.
This lesion may be
asymptomatic unless it
develops pathologic fraclure.
III
125
(5 PAIN IN THE BALLOF THE FOOT
o
LL
"C
ell
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o Especially phalangeal, MT neck fractures
OJ
32 • Stress Fracture
c Common o Especially 2, 3, 4 metatarsals
<l:
't:l
• High Impact Activities • Sesamoids less commonly involved
Ql
Vl • Obesity o Radiographs, CT may be negative
'"
lD • Improperly Fitting Shoes o MR shows soft tissue & marrow edema ±
~ • High Heel Shoes fracture line
'"
l.l • Osteoarthritis • Hallux Valgus Deformity & Other
c • Aging Malalignment Deformities
C,)
• Acute Trauma o Requires weight-bearing views to diagnose
• Stress Fracture o Hallux valgus angle: Angle between long
• Hallux Valgus Deformity & Other axis 1st metatarsal & 1st proximal
Malalignment Deformities phalanx, abnormal> 15°
• Morton Neuroma o Associated bunion, 1st MTP osteoarthritis,
• Vascular Insufficiency sesamoid subluxation
• Gout • Bunion: Bone proliferation or bursa over
• Cellulitis/Ulcer/Abscess medial eminence 1st metatarsal head
• Osteomyelitis & Septic Arthritis o Morton toe: Short 1st metatarsal, long 2nd
• Diabetes: MSK Complications toe alters mechanics
• Bursitis o Hammertoe: MTP neutral/extended, PIP
Less Common flexion
o Claw toe: MTP extension, PIP & DIP
• Freiberg Infarction
• Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) flexion
• Sesamoiditis • Morton Neuroma
o Perineural fibrosis plantar digital nerve
• Foreign Body
o Intermittent pain
• Plantar Plate Rupture
o Common site is third web space
• Neuralgia
o MR: Low to intermediate on Tl & T2WI,
• Psoriatic Arthritis
most conspicuous on Tl, diffusely
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis
enhances
• High Arch
• Plantar Fibromatosis • Gout
o Synovitis in acute phase, early disease
• Heel Cord Contracture
o May develop 2° osteoarthritis
Rare but Important o Tophi: Soft tissue or intra-osseous
• Coalition • Create erosions which may be marginal,
peri-articular, nonarticular; have sclerotic
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION margins, overhanging edges; < 15%
calcify
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • MR intermediate to low on Tl WI,
• Underlying factors include excessive activity, variable on T2Wl, diffuse enhancement
abnormal forces or altered foot mechanics • Cellulitis/Ulcer/Abscess
• Many entities on the list are clinical only, o Diabetics: Vascular insufficiency
may cause pain without imaging o Cellulitis: Subcutaneous edema
abnormality or may predispose to other o Ulcer: Soft tissue defect, may contain air
conditions with imaging abnormalities o Abscess: Rim-enhancing fluid collection
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Osteomyelitis & Septic Arthritis
o Diabetics: Vascular insufficiency
• Osteoarthritis
o Especially 1st MTP & sesamoids o Direct spread from soft tissue infection
o Joint space narrowing, subchondral o Over pressure points especially 1st, 5th
Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis
Hallux Valgus Deformity & Other Hallux Valgus Deformity & Other
Malalignment Deformities Malalignment Deformities
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a hallux
valgus deformity. Bone
proliferation is present on the
medial eminence of the 1st
metatarsal head consistent
with bunion lID. Altered
mechanics has lead to
Freiberg infarction of the 2nd
metatarsal head Ell. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a Morton toe
configuration. The first
metatarsal is short and the
second toe is longer than the
first. A mild hallux valgus
deformity is present as well.
III
128
(')
PAIN IN THE BAll OF THE FOOT
:;]
o
III
-<
OJ
III
Gout VI
Gout <l>
(Left) Anteroposterior Co
radiograph shows typical
changes of gout in the foot.
»
:;]
Osseous erosions from tophi
~
CD
are seen within the articular III
::J
surface of the proximal n.
phalangeal head and along .,.,
the shaft B. The 3rd toe is o
also involved E!!I. (Right)
~
Sagittal T2WI MR shows
severe circumferential
destruction of the neck of
the 1 st metatarsal with an
associated soft tissue mass
B. The mass shows low
signal on this T2 weighted
image, typical of a tophus.
Sesamoiditis Sesamoiditis
(Leh) Coronal T1WI MR
shows an acute fracture of
the medial sesamoid. Diffuse
marrow edema is present in
the tibial sesamoid E!iI. The
fracture line was seen on
other images. (Right)
Coronal T1WI MR shows
avascular necrosis of the
lateral hallux sesamoid __
with sclerosis and resultant
low signal intensity of the
marrow on all imaging
sequences.
130
(")
PAIN IN THE BAll OF THE FOOT
::::l
n
III
0<:
CJ
III
Psoriatic Arthritis VI
Plantar Plate Rupture tD
(Leh) Sagilfal T2WI FS MR C.
shows disruption of the
plantar plate of the great toe
»
::::l
with discontinuity" and
~
Cll
diffuse internal signal HI A III
joint effusion is also present :J
C.
_ (Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows diffuse "!?
o
MTP erosive change, with
early pencil-in-cup erosions
typical of psoriatic arthritis.
Note the periostitis; psoriatic
arthritis often shows mixed
erosive and productive
changes.
131
<5o PES PLANO VALGUS (FLATFOOT)
U.
"0
C
<Il
<ll
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
:;;: • Pes Planus (Mimic)
C Common
« o "Low arch foot"
"0
• Pes Planus (Mimic)
o Not synonymous with unstable
Q)
VI • Pes Planovalgus (Flexible Flatfoot)
ItS
• Tibialis Posterior Tendon Tear hypermobile pes valgus deformity
CD
~ • Diabetic Foot o Not necessarily a pathologically pronating
ItS
• Traumatic Lisfranc Ligament Disruption foot & may have no other morphological
.!:!
c abnormalities
u
Less Common o Generally does not require treatment
• Tarsal Coalition • Pes Planovalgus (Flexible Flatfoot)
• Congenital Vertical Talus (Rocker Bottom o Common abnormality
Foot) o Requires weight-bearing radiographs to
Rare but Important make the diagnosis
• Marfan Syndrome • Hindfoot shows valgus deformity
• Ehlers Danlos (increased talocalcaneal angle on both
• Rheumatoid Arthritis AP and lateral weight-bearing
radiographs)
• Forefoot shows pronation/valgus
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION deformity (on lateral, metatarsals are
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues superimposed, with ~ inclination angle
• Terminology of "flatfoot deformity" is 1st MT; on AP, ~ convergence at bases of
variable & confusing metatarsals
o Pes planus, pes valgus, congenital • No equinus
hypermobile flatfoot, talipes o Flexible (non-fixed) deformity:
calcaneovalgus, compensated talipes Non-weight-bearing radiographs are
equinus, collapsing pes valgo planus completely normal
• Multiple etiologies are recognized & even • Tibialis Posterior Tendon Tear
more are theorized o Most common etiology of new onset
• Clinically, the foot is recognized as having flatfoot deformity in middle-aged to
some or all of the following elderly women
o Everted heel o Tibialis posterior tendon characteristics
o Abduction of forefoot on hindfoot leading to flatfoot deformity
o Collapse of medial column • Tibialis posterior tendon has the longest
o Flexibility of foot with reducibility of lever arm & is the most efficient
deformity supinator of foot
• Support of arch depends on several factors, • Arch-stabilizing effect also attributed to
both dynamic & static its extensive ligamentous support
o Osseous architecture provided by its many deep insertions
o Intrinsic & extrinsic musculature/tendons • Damaged tendon prevents normal
o Fascia & ligaments resupination of foot when walking -
• Basic definitions and measurements leads to pronated foot & flexible pes
o Hindfoot valgus: t Talocalcaneal angle planovalgus
• On lateral, T-C angle normally 25-55° o MR appearance of tear may be variable
• On AP,T-C angle normally 15-40° • Complete rupture w/retraction is unusual
o Calcaneal pitch angle: 20-30° • Altered morphology: Usually
o Forefoot pronation: On AP, metatarsals do enlargement of the tendon, but may be
not converge at bases thin (note, tibialis posterior tendon is
o Forefoot pronation on lateral: Angle of normally twice as large in diameter as
inclination decreases for metatarsals 1-4 flexor digitorum)
• Increased signal within tendon
• Diabetic Foot
132
PES PLANO VALGUS (flATFOOT) (")
::l
n
III
o Neuropathic joints generally result in • Indirect sign of coalition: Talar beak -<
collapse of longitudinal arch • Indirect sign of calcaneonavicular OJ
III
• Lisfranc (tarso-metatarsal joints) coalition: "Anteater" extension of VI
~
• Mid-tarsal joints anterior calcaneus on lateral a.
• Chopart articulation (midfoot-hindfoot: • Indirect sign of talocalcaneal coalition: »
::l
Calcaneocuboid & talonavicular) "C" sign of subtalar sclerosis on lateral '"en
o Associated abnormalities radiograph Ql
::l
• Congenital Vertical Talus (Rocker Bottom a.
• Vascular calcifications
"
• Fragmentation & dislocation of joints
• Large fluid collections
• Traumatic Lisfranc Ligament Disruption
Foot)
o Rigid flatfoot deformity
o Four required abnormalities
-
o
o
U1teralradiograph shows a low arch, but no evidence of U1teral weight-bearing radiograph shows a valgus
hindfoot valgus and no suggestion of pronation. This is hindfoot (t talocalcaneal angle) and pronated forefoot
the full extent of the abnormalities in this patient, and (superimposed metatarsals, decreased metatarsal
does nol need surgical treatment. inclination angle). This is a flexible flatfoot deformity.
133
o
o PES PLANO VALGUS (FLATFOOT)
u..
"0
c
ro
Q)
:;;;::
c
« Pes Planovalgus (Flexible Flatfoot) Pes Planovalgus (Flexible Flatfoot)
"0 (Left) AP weight-bearing
Q)
radiograph shows increased
Ul
ell talocalcaneal angle,
CO indicating valgus hindfoot.
Z. The metatarsals do not show
ell normal convergence at the
.!:!
c bases/ indicating pronation.
(Right) AP
u non-weight-bearing
radiograph of the same
patient, taken on the same
day as the prior image,
shows the flexible nature of
this deformity. The hindfoot
valgus as well as forefoot
pronation have completely
reduced.
134
(")
PES PLANO VALGUS (FLATFOOT)
:J
o
Cll
'<
OJ
Cll
Traumatic Lisfranc Ligament Disruption Traumatic Lisfranc Ligament Disruption
(Leh) AP weight-bearing
'"
CD
Co
radiograph shows a chronic »
untreated Lisfranc disruption. :J
Note particularly the offset at '"
m
the second Ell and third. t\)
tarsometatarsal joints. There :J
Co
is also significant pronation; -n
note the lack of overlap at o
the metatarsal bases. (Right) ~
Lateral radiograph in the
same patient shows collapse
of the midfoot" a typical
long-term effect of untreated
Lisfranc injury. The forefoot
is pronated; note the
abnormal MT inclination
angles.
Tarsal Coalition
(Leh) Lateral weight-bearing
radiograph shows flattening
of the longitudinal arch.
There is prominence &
elongation of the anterior
process of the calcaneus III
termed the "anteater sign",
indicating calcaneonavicular
coalition. (Right) Oblique
radiograph of the same
patient as previous image,
confirms the
calcaneonavicufar coalition
Ell Tarsal coalition results in
flatfoot deformity due to
peroneal muscle spasticity &
resultant pronation.
135
"0 CAVUS FOOT DEFORMITY
o
LL
"0
C
co DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS • Increased talocalcaneal angle (high
Ql
32 calcaneal pitch)
c Common • Unusual profile view of talus
«
"C
• Idiopathic • Mid talus-first metatarsal lines form
Q)
IJl • Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease angle with apex upward (first ray
III
al • Cerebral Palsy plantarflexed)
~ • Fracture, Malunion • Hindfoot varus or valgus (less common)
III
U • Muscular Dystrophy • Claw toe deformities
C
• Spina Bifida • Pes cavus & hindfoot varus are commonly
U
Less Common associated findings
• Stroke • Findings are typically due to imbalance of
• Compartment Syndrome intrinsic & extrinsic muscles ± contraction
• Thermal Injury, Burns of plantar fascia & soft tissues
• Spinal Cord Injury Helpful Clues for Diagnoses
• Spinal Cord Tumor • Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
• Syringomyelia o Classic neuromuscular cause of pes cavus
• Meningocele o Forefoot pronation, first metatarsal
• Friedreich Ataxia pronation & plantar flexion
• Polio • Fracture, Malunion
• Spinal Dysraphism o Hindfoot-midfoot deformity
• Arthrogryposis o Talar neck fracture malunion with varus
Rare but Important rotation of talar head
• Bound Foot • Compartment Syndrome
o Deep posterior compartment of calf
• Muscle atrophy & calcification
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o May occur in foot after calcaneal fracture
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues o May have evidence of prior tibia, fibula,
• Radiographic findings are diagnostic but hindfoot or midfoot fracture
nonspecific as to cause • Polio
o Anteroposterior view = normal or forefoot o Increased calcaneal pitch angle due to
adduction & supination gastrocnemius-soleus complex weakness
o Lateral view, standing o ± Normal forefoot alignment
136
CAVUS FOOT DEFORMITY ('")
::l
(:;'
III
-<
llJ
III
Cerebral Palsy Muscular Dystrophy VI
CD
(Left) Lateral radiograph C.
shows valgus and mild
equinus of the hindfoot _.
»
::l
The forefoot shows ~
CD
supinationand varus. III
which is quite severe. The ::l
C.
combination of varus and
valgus is usually seen in a
spastic foot, and is not
o"
Sl.
otherwise specific. (Right)
Lateral radiograph shows a
cavus foot deformity and
diffuse osteopenia. Note the
high calcaneal pitch _ and
atrophied 50ft tissues in this
child with muscular
dystrophy.
Meningocele
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a high arch and claw
toe Ell deformities. Note that
the talonavicular and
calcaneocuboid joints
appear stacked 11:I and
almost the entire subia/ar
joint 1m is visible. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows foot asymmetry due
to an occult inlrasacral
meningocele with tethered
spinal cord. In addition to
the smaller size of the foot,
the metatarsals are mildly
adducted 1m due to forefoot
varus and claw toe
deformities are present 1m.
III
137
oo CONGENITAL FOOT DEFORMITY
u..
Lateral radiograph shows increased plantarflexion of the AP radiograph, same patient, shows a wide Fe angle
III
talus III forming hindfoot valgus. There is also
pronation of the forefoot, with superimposition of the
metatarsals & decreased inclination angle of MT 1-]=. metatarsal bases =
(hindfoot valgus), with lack of convergence at the
(forefoot pronation/valgus). The
abnormalities reduce on non-weightbearing.
139
"0 CONGENITAL FOOT DEFORMITY
o
u...
-0
c
<tl
<Il
:;;<
c Club Foot (Talipes Equinovarusl
Club Foot (Talipes Equinovarus)
<
-0 (Left) AP radiograph shows
Q) near superimposition of talus
Ul
<tl •• & calcaneus III
tQ (decreased talocalcaneal
~ angle, hindfoot varus). There
<tl is increased convergence at
o
C
the bases of the metatarsals
Bl typical of forefoot
U supination/varus. (Right)
Lateral radiograph in the
same paUent, shows equinus
of the calcaneus •. The
calcaneus & talus are nearly
parallel, confirming hindfoot
varus. The forefoot shows
metatarsals =
severe supination, with the
appearing
stacked, typical of clubfoot.
=
region of the subta/ar joint
which is highly
suggestive. (Right) Angled
axial bone CT shows the
broad and sclerotic
talocalcaneal coalition at the
middle facet _ compared
with the normal left side Bl
Talocalcaneal coalitions most
frequently involve this
portion of the subtalar joint.
III
140
CONGENITAL FOOT DEFORMITY
••
Pes Cavus (Mimic) Polio (Mimic)
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows abnormal dorsiflexion
of the calcaneus. and
varus deformity of the
Forefoot. This cavovarus
pattern is typically seen in
Charcot Marie Tooth, as in
this case, but may be seen
with other spastic conditions
as well. (Right) Lateral
radiograph shows a mixed
pattern of hindfoot valgus
(increased talocalcaneal
angle) and forefoot
varus/supination. This
unusual combination is seen
in spastic conditions,
incfuding polio.
III
141
ao DIABETIC FOOT COMPLICATIONS
l.L.
"0
C
ctl
Q)
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses
:;;:: • Ulceration/Cellulitis/Soft Tissue Abscess
c Common
« • Ulceration/Cellulitis/Soft Tissue Abscess
a Plantar aspect, or at the site of any
"0 deformity of foot
Q)
<Jl • Osteomyelitis, Adult
ctl a May have foreign bodies present without
co • Charcot, Neuropathic
• Insufficiency Fracture, Tarsal & Metatarsal patient's knowledge
~
ctl a Air seen in sinus tract, outlined by
o • Calcaneal Insufficiency Fracture
c enhancing tissue
o a Surrounding cellulitis is common, as are
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION soft tissue abscesses
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Osteomyelitis, Adult
a If sinus tract is demonstrated extending to
• All complications of the diabetic foot are
osseous destruction, diagnosis is secure
common
a Otherwise, may have reactive osseous
• Watch for vascular calcification in foot as a
hint of underlying diabetic condition edema to adjacent soft tissue abscess or
ulceration which is not truly osteomyelitis
• Many may be subtle; knowledge of expected
• "Confluent" rather than "reticulated" low
sites of complication should allow early
signal on T1 imaging may help
detection
differentiate osteomyelitis from reaction
a Charcot sites in foot: Lisfranc (tarsal
• Either osteomyelitis or osseous reaction
metatarsal) > talonavicular> Chopart
will be hyperintense and enhance with
(hindfoot/midfoot)
contrast; again, confluence of MR
a Insufficiency fractures (isolated, not
abnormality may make osteomyelitis a
associated with Charcot) most frequently
stronger consideration
seen in metatarsals & posterior calcaneal
tubercle; tarsals less common • Charcot, Neuropathic
a Fragmentation, debris (though may be
• Ulcers and cellulitis are common
atrophic in diabetic foot), large soft tissue
a Must differentiate from osteomyelitis
fluid collections, disruption of joint
a Osseous structures may show reactive
a Because of abnormal mechanics, there is
edema which simulates osteomyelitis
osseous hyperintensity & enhancement
• It may not be possible to distinguish an
a May be impossible to differentiate
uncomplicated Charcot joint from one
uncomplicated from infected Charcot joint
complicated by osteomyelitis; both may
have similar features
III
143
<ll
c: PAINFUL SCOLIOSIS
"0.
(f)
"0
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS o See "Presentation" above
ell
• Variable neurologic manifestations
co''"" Common include incontinence, paralysis
>.
• Degenerative o Radiographs, CT, nuclear medicine studies
'"
o
c:
• Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis negative in early & isolated disease
• Epidural Abscess o MR preferred imaging examination
U
• Iliopsoas Abscess • Epidural mass with rim-enhancement
• Osteoid Osteoma • Difficult to identify without gadolinium
• Epidural Hematoma • Mass effect not always present
• Asymmetric Vertebral Body Fracture • Iliopsoas Abscess
Less Common o Usually 2° vertebral osteomyelitis
• Spinal Fatigue Syndrome • See "Presentation" above
• Paraspinal Muscle Injury o Typically unilateral, may be bilateral
o MR preferred, CT may be useful
• Ewing Sarcoma
• Osteoblastoma • Rim enhancing fluid-filled mass
• Intraspinal Tumors • Near infected disc
• Metastases, Bone Marrow • Osteoid Osteoma
• High Thoracic Scoliosis: Neurofibromatosis o Pain worse at night, after activity, relieved
by aspirin
Rare but Important o Commonly located in posterior elements
• Septic Facet Joint • Most lesions based in cortex
o Radiographs & CT
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Sclerotic pedicle, non-rotational scoliosis
• Central lucent nidus, variable central
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues mineralization
• Hint: Lesion along concavity of the curve • Nidus may only be seen on CT or MR,
• Hint: In adult history is critical; infection, rarely greater than 1.5 cm
trauma, long standing (degenerative) o Intense uptake on bone scan
• Hint: Child, osteoid osteoma most common o MR: Nidus: Isointense Tl WI, slightly more
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses intense T2WI
• Degenerative • Peripheral low signal rim all sequences
o Long history of pain • Adjacent marrow & soft tissue edema
o Most common cause in adult • Epidural Hematoma
• Vertebral Body Osteomyelitis o Surgical emergency
o Presentation o Focal back pain ± radiculopathy,
• Acute onset, severe unrelenting pain incontinence
• Fever, chills, elevated WBC • May rapidly progress to paralysis
• No neurologic deficits unless associated o History often includes anticoagulation or
epidural abscess recent spine procedure
o Radiographs & CT negative early in disease • Trauma usually has fractures
• Late: Adjacent end plate edema & • Underlying AVM may be cause
destruction, cysts, sclerosis; differentiate o Radiographs, nuclear scans not helpful
from mechanical disc destruction o CT limited: Epidural soft tissue mass
o Gallium scans preferred to labeled white o MR preferred imaging modality
cell scans • Tl WI: Epidural soft tissue mass, diffuse
o MR preferred imaging modality bright signal if acute, peripheral bright
• Endplate marrow edema & soft tissue rim if subacute
edema, gadolinium enhancement of disc • Asymmetric Vertebral Body Fracture
o May have iliopsoas and/or epidural abscess o History of trauma with lateral compression
• Epidural Abscess Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
o Isolated or 2° vertebral body osteomyelitis
• Spinal Fatigue Syndrome
III
144
PAINFUL SCOLIOSIS
'tl
Q)
III
CO
ell
Iliopsoas Abscess Osteoid Osteoma
2:- (Left) Axial TI C+ MR shows
CO
o rim enhancing abscesses in
c both psoas muscles ElIl
U Enhancement is present
within the adjacent disc
space indicative of vertebral
body osteomyelitis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a long thoracolumbar
scoliosis, convex left, without
associated rotation. This;s
the classic curve associated
with osteoid osteoma. The
lytic nidus may be
impossible to identify on
radiograph, so suspicion
must be high.
Epidural Hematoma
(Left) Axial bone CT shows
classic location of osteoid
osteoma" in the pedicle
with ill-defined sclerosis in
the adjacent bone EllII. This
caused a painful scoliosis;
concave on the side with the
osteoid osteoma nidus.
(Right) Sagittal TlWI MR
shows lentiform-shaped mass
•• which creates moderate
canal stenosis. The mass is
diffusely bright, indicative of
an acute epidural
hematoma. This may be a
surgical emergency,
depending on location &
extent.
Ewing Sarcoma
(Left) Sagittal STIR MR
shows diffuse edema within
the paraspinal musculature
• with associated
hematoma. in thispatient
with paraspinal muscle injury
resulting from motor vehicle
accident. Painful splinting
creates a scoliosis. (Right) AP
radiograph shows a mild
scoliosis concave left. There
is destruction of a pedicle ••
and asymmetric compression
of the vertebral body due to
a lytic lesion. This 13 year
old proved to have Ewing
sarcoma.
III
146
PAINFUL SCOLIOSIS C)
:J
o
III
'<
III
III
Osteoblastoma Osteoblastoma VI
<D
(Left) Anteroposterior Co
radiograph shows (j)
destruction of the right '2.
vertebral body cortex and :J
<ll
pedicfe. in this patient
with an asteoblastoma. Note
the location of the lesion
along the concavity of a mild
leftward curve. (Right)
Coronal T2WI MR shows
osteoblastoma Ell of the
right L2 lamina along the
concavity of a 'eftward
curve. The lesion is a
heterogeneous moderately
enhancing mass expanding
the lamina.
III
147
<ll
en ARTHRITIS IN A TEENAGER
ro
<ll
.!!1
o • Enlarged metaphyses & epiphyses
.502
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E ("balloon joints") due to overgrowth
<ll Common secondary to hyperemia from
U;
>. • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA)
(f) inflammatory process
"0 • Ankylosing Spondylitis • Cartilage narrowing & widened notches
Cl>
en • Psoriatic Arthritis related to pannus formation & erosion
III
In • Septic Joint • Often asymmetric
~ • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) o Other distinguishing features
III
.!:! • Femoral Acetabular Impingement (FAI) • Periostitis may be first manifestation in a
c: • Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip young child
u
Less Common • Fusion frequently occurs in the carpals
• Hemophilia: MSK Complications • Interbody fusion in the cervical spine
• Synovial Osteochondromatosis limits growth of vertebral bodies, giving
• Legg-Calve-Perthes, Secondary Changes the "waisted" appearance
• Chronic Reactive Arthritis • Ankylosing Spondylitis
• Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis o Earliest manifestations (clinical &
• Osteoid Osteoma of Hip, 2° Changes radiographic) occur during teenage years
o Spinal manifestations initiate the
Rare but Important
radiographic disease process
• Congenital Insensitivity/Indifference to Pain • Osteitis at the anterior corners of
vertebral bodies
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • SI joint widening & erosions; may be
asymmetric initially
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Teenagers normally have wide Sl joints
• Surprising number of arthridities originate with indistinct cortices; do not overcall!
during childhood or teenage years o Appendicular disease most frequently is in
• Early & accurate diagnosis is important to large proximal joints, particularly hips;
initiate treatment & avoid later debilitating may be erosive or productive
joint disease o Inflammatory Bowel Disease Arthritis
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Less frequent, but manifestations are
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis OIA) similar to AS
o May have one of several manifestations • Psoriatic Arthritis
• 5% appear indistinguishable from adult o 30-50% of psoriatic patients develop
rheumatoid arthritis (RA): Most become spondyloarthropathy
seropositive • Bilateral asymmetric erosive disease; may
• 40% are pauciarticular, affecting the eventually fuse
knee, elbow & ankle most frequently; o 20% of psoriatic patients develop
seronegative; 25% develop iridocyclitis arthropathy prior to skin and nail changes
• 20% have Still disease: Acute systemic o Distinguishing features
disease with fever, anemia, • May have sausage digit with periostitis
hepatosplenomegaly; 25% of these have • DIP disease predominates; hands> feet
polyarticular destructive arthritis, • Aggressive erosive disease (pencil-in-cup)
affecting small and large joints alike & eventual fusion
• 25% have seronegative polyarticular o Chronic Reactive Arthritis
disease, symmetric & widespread in adult • Rare compared with psoriatic arthritis;
distribution; no systemic complaints & appendicular manifestations usually
seronegative foot/ankle
o Specific features generally distinguishing • Septic Joint
JIA from other teenage arthridities o Monostotic; cartilage damage and osseous
deformity eventually leads to secondary
OA
III
148
(')
ARTHRITIS IN A TEENAGER
::I
n
III
o If longstanding & slow process in a child o Similar appearance to JIA, with "balloon"
overgrowth of epiphyses/metaphyses due
-<
(especially tuberculous or fungal septic III
III
joint), hyperemia leads to overgrowth of to hyperemia Ul
CD
epiphyses & metaphyses: "Balloon" joint o Pauciarticular; knee> elbow> ankle a.
• Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) o Hemosiderin deposits lead to low signal on (J)
'<
o Monoarticular; nodular mass or nodules MR, blooming on GRE sequence Ul
en
lining synovium • Osteoid Osteoma of Hip, 2° Changes 3
()"
o Causes erosion if longstanding o Intraarticular 00 elicits synovitis ~ o
o Large effusion; iron deposition results in subluxation of joint ~ altered weight Ul
CD
III
foci of low signal which bloom on GRE bearing & development of osteophytes Ul
CD
• Femoral Acetabular Impingement (FAI) Alternative Differential Approaches
o Often bilateral abnormalities, though
• Consider number of joints involved (some
complaints usually begin unilaterally diagnoses belong in more than one)
o Morphologic abnormalities of femoral
o Monoarticular
head, neck, or acetabulum ~ impingement
• Septic joint
• Lateral femoral neck "bump", limiting • Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS)
the normal head/neck cutback: Cam type • Synovial osteochondromatosis
• Acetabular rim overgrowth or • Osteoid osteoma of hip, 2° changes
retroversion: Pincer type o Pauciarticular
• Multiple etiologies: Trauma, DDH, SCFE • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis alA)
• ~ Labral tear & cartilage damage; ~ early • Ankylosing spondylitis
osteoarthritis
• Psoriatic arthritis
• Onset of complaints 2nd or 3rd decade • Femoral acetabular impingement (FAI)
• Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip • Developmental dysplasia of the hip
o Multiple types of dysplasia
• Hemophilia: MSK complications
• Shallow acetabulum • Legg-Calve-Perthes, secondary changes
• Femoral varus or valgus • Chronic reactive arthritis
• Acetabular or femoral retroversion • Inflammatory bowel disease arthritis
o Develop labral hypertrophy; with shear
• Congenital insensitivity/indifference to
stress, the labrum tears; eventual cartilage pain
damage & early osteoarthritis o Polyarticular
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses • Juvenile idiopathic arthritis OIA)
• Hemophilia: MSK Complications • Psoriatic arthritis
(5
.~
E
Q)
iil Psoriatic Arthritis
>- (Left) AP radiograph shows
(j)
near complete loss of
"0
Q) cartilage in this 17 yo
(/)
nl female's hip" with mild
co erosive change. There were
~ hand and foot erosions, but
nl a/50 one site of periostitis
.!:! and unilateral sacroiliitis. The
c: patient developed psoriatic
u skin changes within a year.
(Right) AP radiograph shows
a chronic septic hip. in a
teenager with L2 paraplegia
and chronic decubitus ulcer
leading to the hip joint
There is complete cartilage
destruction, with associated
osseous deformity_
III
150
(")
ARTHRITIS IN A TEENAGER
::J
(1
III
-<
to
III
Synovial Osteochondromatosis <II
(!)
(Left) Lateral radiograph a.
shows multiple loose bodies (J)
within a distended elbow '<
<II
joint of a 12 yo. Note the CD
bodies distending the 3
anterior III as well as (1
Congenital Insensitivity/Indifference to
Osteoid Osteoma of Hip, r Changes Pain
(Left) AP radiograph in a 17
yo shows surprising findings
of femoral neck osteophytes
• & calcar buttressing HI.
These relate to the chronic
synovitis developed in
conjunction with an
intraarticufar osteoid
neck =-
osteoma, faintly seen in the
(t MSK Req)
(Right) Lateral radiograph in
a 16 yo shows severe
destruction of the foot &
ankle. He had congenital
indifference to pain; (he felt
pain with ambuJation, but
continued to walk on it,
destroying the joints).
III
151
Q)
f/l ANEMIA WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIFESTATIONS
ro
Q)
.!!1
o o Associated findings of renal
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E osteodystrophy
Q) Common • Rugger jersey spine
1ii
>-
en • Iron or Vitamin Deficiency Anemia • Osteosclerosis or osteopenia
'0 • Chronic Renal Disease o Associated findings of
4)
VI • Anemia of Chronic Disease hyperparathyroidism
IV
l:Il • Sickle Cell Anemia • Subperiosteal bone resorption
~ • Cortical thinning
IV Less Common
U
• Lead Poisoning • Erosion of end plates, sacroiliac joints,
c:
• Myelofibrosis en theses
o
• Thalassemia • Brown tumors
• Hypothyroidism • Anemia of Chronic Disease
• Polycythemia Vera o Any chronic disease may produce anemia
• Aplastic Anemia • Rheumatoid arthritis, HIV, cirrhosis,
malignancy
Rare but Important
o Musculoskeletal findings are specific to the
• Osteopetrosis underlying disease & unrelated to anemia
• Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21) unless inducing red marrow reconversion
• Erythroblastosis Fetalis • Sickle Cell Anemia
• Engelmann Disease (Engelmann-Camurati) o Bone infarcts = serpiginous low signal on
• Fanconi Anemia Tl WI & high signal on T2WI
o Avascular necrosis = double line around
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION necrotic region in weight-bearing region
• Femoral head & humeral head are most
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues commonly involved
• Musculoskeletal findings are often unrelated o Red bone marrow reconversion = fatty
to anemia but are associated with the marrow signal replaced by low signal on
underlying disease state, thus are helpful for TlWI
imaging differential diagnosis o "H-shaped" vertebral body = collapse of
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses central portion of vertebral end plates
• Iron or Vitamin Deficiency Anemia o Autosplenectomy = absent spleen allows
o Most common cause of anemia bowel to collect in left upper quadrant of
o Red bone marrow reconversion involves abdomen
central to peripheral skeleton o Dactylitis = periosteal reaction can mimic
• Can be confluent, patchy or mass-like osteomyelitis
o Reconverted red marrow tends to preserve
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
some fatty marrow signal producing • Lead Poisoning
higher signal than muscle on T1 WI o Anemia caused by a variety of mechanisms
o Red marrow shows signal drop out on
o Musculoskeletal findings unrelated to
opposed phase imaging anemia
o Red marrow lower signal than
o Dense metaphyseal lines at ends of bones
intervertebral disc on T1 WI • Involvement of the fibula favors lead
o Gadolinium enhancement not definitive poisoning over physiologic dense
for differentiating benign from malignant metaphyseal bands
bone marrow infiltration since both have o May identify ingested flakes of lead paint
variable enhancement on abdominal imaging
• Chronic Renal Disease o Erlenmeyer flask deformities
o Deranged erythropoietin production o Undertubulation of bone diaphyses, late
o Musculoskeletal findings are related to the o Separation of cranial sutures
disease state, not the anemia • Myelofibrosis
III
152
ANEMIA WITH MUSCULOSKElETAL MANIFESTATIONS (')
:]
r;'
l\l
o Osteosclerosis from replacement of the o Skeletal manifestations are related to the .;;:
fatty marrow with fibrous tissue cause of aplastic anemia OJ
l\l
• Lower marrow signal intensity on Tl WI • Chemotherapy, infection, radiation, VI
C1l
than red marrow toxic exposure C.
III
154
ANEMIA WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIFESTATIONS (")
:J
c;'
III
.:c:
OJ
III
Thalassemia VI
Myelofibrosis CD
(Left) Anteroposterior a.
radiograph shows diffuse en
medullary space '<
VI
osteosclerosis. that CO
involved the axial skeleton as 3
well as the tubular bones. o'
The lack of thickening of the o
VI
endosteal cortex is typical of (1)
Thalassemia Thalassemia
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a paravertebral mass
•. This mass is a site of
extramedullary
hematopoiesis and is found
in the most common
location for this occurrence.
(Right) Axial NECT shows
obliteration of the maxillary
sinuses" Thisobliteration
is a result of marrow
hyperplasia. Generalized
expansion of the sinuses is
present. This expansion leads
to a distortion of the facial
features which is typical of
thalassemia and is known as
rodent facies.
Thalassemia Osteopetrosis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows "squaring"
•• involving the bones of
the hand, or loss of their
normal tubular morphology
due to marrow packing.
There is associated thinning
of the endosteal cortex.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph of severe
autosomal recessive
osteopetrosis shows the
bones to be diffusely and
densely sclerotic. Note that
the long bones are
undertubulated with relative
widening of the proximal
humerus •.
III
155
Q)
VI AVASCULAR NECROSIS
ro
Q)
.!!1
o • Watch for soft tissue calcifications
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E suggesting dermatomyositis
Q)
Common • Watch for staple lines of ileoanal
tl
>- • Steroids
(jJ pull-through and sacroiliitis suggesting
"C • Hip Dislocation inflammatory bowel disease, requiring
Ql
VI • Femoral Neck Fractures steroid use
ltl
lrl • Post-Traumatic, Wrist • Watch for uniform cartilage narrowing &
~ • Alcohol Abuse erosive disease suggesting rheumatoid
ltl
o • Sickle Cell Anemia arthritis, commonly treated with steroids
l::
• Radiation Osteonecrosis o Systemic steroid use increases size of fat
U
• Systemic Lupus Erythematosus cells; in sites at risk for AVN, these
Less Common compromise blood flow
• Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis • Particularly femoral head, humeral head,
• Legg-Calve-Perthes talus, vertebral bodies
• Post-Traumatic, Ankle (Talus & Navicular) o Direct intraarticular injection of steroids
• Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip may result in both AVN and intraarticular
• AIDS Drug Therapy calcification
• Chemotherapeutic Drugs • Hip Dislocation
• Idiopathic o Because of tenuous blood supply to
femoral head, a hip which remains
Rare but Important
dislocated> 12 hours is at significant risk
• Gaucher Disease of developing AVN
• Cushing Disease • Femoral Neck Fractures
• Embolic Disease o In adults, artery of ligamentum teres is no
• Pancreatitis longer patent; femoral head depends on
• Caisson Disease circumflex artery at femoral neck
• Osteomyelitis, Pediatric o Subcapital fracture puts artery & blood
supply at risk; basi cervical or
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION intertrochanteric fractures do not have a
comparable risk of AVN
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
• Displaced subcapital fracture is at greater
• Though "idiopathic" is found at the top of risk for AVN than non-displaced
the list for etiology of AVN in many • Post-Traumatic, Wrist
discussions, in the author's experience, o Scaphoid fractures
another etiology can usually be found • Waist or proximal pole fractures are at
o Hint: Watch for clues in the soft tissues &
risk for AVN; distal pole fractures are not
bones to discover the etiology of AVN at similar risk
• Hint: The most frequent etiologies of AVN • AVN may be difficult to evaluate in
in developed countries includes steroid use, scaphoid fracture; relative increase in
alcohol use, sickle cell disease, and trauma radiographic or CT density alone may
• Hint: Bones which are mostly covered by not signify the fragment is avascular
cartilage are particularly at risk for • T1 and post-contrast MR is most reliable
developing AVN means of predicting fragment viability
o Femoral head, humeral head, scaphoid,
o Lunate injuries
lunate, talus, navicular • Direct fracture is rarely a cause of lunate
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses malacia
• Steroids • Most frequent traumatic cause of lunate
o Multiple reasons for steroid use; these may AVN is ulnar negative variance, which
sometimes be noted on the images results in shift of weight-bearing through
• Watch for reniform soft tissue mass in lunate from being shared by ulna to
iliac fossa, indicating renal transplant entirely radial
III
156
AVASCULARNECROSIS n
::l
o
III
• Repetitive microtrauma results in AVN • Post-Traumatic, Ankle (Talus & Navicular)
-<
• Alcohol Abuse o Body of talus at risk for AVN following lJl
III
o Common cause of AVN; patients must be neck fracture; watch for Hawkins sign VI
(l)
consume daily to ascertain the truth o Muller-Weiss: Bilateral (usually) AVN of CIl
'<
VI
o Other possible hints on radiograph: navicular, related to stress fracture en
Pancreatic calcifications • Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip 3
C'i"
• Sickle Cell Anemia o Infrequently develops AVN o
o Sickled cells sludge in small vessels, • AIDS Drug Therapy iii"
<1>
Q)
causing occlusion o Antiretroviral therapy results in low MR (J)
<1>
o Femoral head and humeral head are at signal throughout osseous structures
significant risk o Rarely, AVN is also seen
o Vertebral body endplates are at risk • Chemotherapeutic Drugs
• Small vessels form terminal loops o Cytotoxic therapy rarely results in bone
beneath vertebral endplates, at risk for infarcts & AVN
sludging by abnormal red blood cells Alternative Differential Approaches
• Once endplates lose vascularity, they • AVN with diffusely abnormal marrow
collapse, often in "H-shaped" o Sickle cell anemia: Diffuse bone infarcts
configuration; may also be biconcave o Systemic lupus erythematosus: May show
o Watch for other signs of sickle cell anemia
diffuse osteoporosis
• Diffuse increased bone density from o Steroids: Marrow may show diffuse
diffuse infarcts osteoporosis
• Small or auto-infarcted spleen o AIDS drug therapy: Diffuse low marrow
• Gallstones signal
• Pulmonary infarcts; increased lung o Chemotherapeutic drugs: Diffuse infarcts
vascularity from anemia o Cushing disease: Diffuse osteoporosis
• Radiation Osteonecrosis • AVN with focally abnormal marrow (beyond
o Port-like region of sclerotic bone indicates
necrotic site)
focal region of osteonecrosis related to RT o Radiation osteonecrosis: Port-like
Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses abnormal marrow in adjacent bones
• Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis o Gaucher disease: Shows marrow
o Usually only develop coxa magna replacement at other sites (spine, distal
deformity, but occasionally AVN femora)
Steroids Steroids
heads =
AP radiograph shows end stage AVN of the femoral
due to steroid use. The paUent had a renal
fIanspJanl; note the reniform so(t Ussue mass in the iliac
AP radiograph shows AVN of the left hip 1IIlI. Other
findings include staple lines (from ileoanal pull-through
&I), & bilateral sacroiliac joint disease •. The patient is
III
fossa E!il along with the surgical clips. on steroids for inflammatory bowel disease.
157
Q)
AVASCULAR NECROSIS
'"
OJ
Q)
o'"
.~
E
Q)
III
158
AVASCULAR NECROSIS (")
:J
o
III
'<
OJ
III
Alcohol Abuse Alcohol Abuse
(Left) Coronal T2WI MR
'Co"
n>
shows subchondral fracture (f)
• indicating AVN. The '<
(f)
patient was clinically in
diagnosed as femoral 3
acetabular impingement? but o·
upon questioning, admitted o
(f)
to excessive alcohol use. <1>
(Right) Lateral radiograph tll
(f)
shows air within a fractured <1>
vertebral body _. This
represents AVN as the
etiology of the fracture. Most
frequently this is seen in
patients with rheumatoid
arthritis on steroids, but in
this case is due to alcohol
abuse.
III
159
CIl
(J) AVASCULAR NECROSIS
ro
CIl
(J)
is
.2
E
CIl
en>- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
U) (Left) Coronal T1WI MR
shows the serpiginous
"t:l
CIl pattern of multiple bone
(J)
infarcts, as well as AVN of
'"
llJ both femoral condyles and
>- tibial condyles. This patient
has 5LEas the underlying
'l::"
U
disease, and is being treated
with steroids. (Right) AP
U radiograph shows AVN of
both the lunate" and the
scaphoid Ell in a patient
with 5LE. There was no
trauma to suggest another
etiology
III
160
AVASCULAR NECROSIS (")
::l
n
01
-<
lJl
01
AIDS Drug Therapy VI
C1l
(Leh) Coronal STIR MR 0-
shows typical appearance of
en
AVN in the hips of an AIDS '<
VI
patient on anliretroviral
therapy. The right hip has
m
3
more advanced disease. n
plus effusion III the left hip o
V>
BI is asymptomatic. (Right) C1l
Coronal T2WI FS MR shows OJ
V>
multiple bone infarcts Cll
throughout the hip.
including femoral head AVN.
This process appeared
following chemotherapy for
non-Hodgkin lymphoma & is
presumed secondary to
cytotoxic injury.
III
161
Q)
(f)
HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION
ro
Q)
(f)
o
.~
E
Ql
1ii Trauma Trauma
>- (Left) Axial T2WI FS MR in
en
-g
the same patient as prior
Ql shows that the oval focus of
(/)
III heterotopic ossification.
10 has intermediate to high
>- signal, with a suggestion of a
III fluid-fluid level, and
(.)
prominent surrounding
c: edema" (Right) Axial T1
U C+ FS MR in the same
patient shows
inhomogeneous
enhancement of the lesion
_ The MR appearance of
heterotopic ossification can
suggest an aggressive
process due to enhancement
and edema.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
heterotopic ossification ••
forming between the clavicle
and coracoid due to
disruption of the
coracoclavicular ligaments in
this grade /II
acromioclavicular dislocation
Ell. (Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows an osseous
mass .:II which is moderately
mature. The mass is most
mature at its periphery. The
MR showed nonspecific low
T1 and high T2 signal, but
the radiograph is diagnostic
of myositis o5sificans.
Trauma
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows development of
heterotopic ossification. in
the antecubital fossa. This is
a common location for
myositis, particularly
fof/owing elbow dislocation.
Note that the bone formation
is amorphous. suggesting
an injury 4-8 weeks earlier.
(Right) Lateral radiograph
shows a mature osseous
mass, with a very distinct
and smooth outer cortex.
but less defined center.
There is a cleavage plane
between the mass and the
underlying humerus.
III
164
HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION (")
::::l
C:;'
III
'<
III
III
Trauma Post-Operative /II
CD
(Left) Anteroposterior Q.
radiograph shows en
heterotopic ossification. '<
VI
extending from the ischial CD
tuberosity to the proximal 3
femur, corresponding to the 0'
location of the quadratus o
femoris muscle, This is likely
iii'
CD
due to a remote injury. OJ
VI
(Right) Anteroposterior CD
radiograph shows mature
heterotopic ossification.
surrounding a noncemented
right total hip prosthesis,
Heterotopic ossification after
hip arthroplasty is very
common, but rarely causes
significant clinical symptoms.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a sheet of
heterotopic bone. anterior
to the left hip, Neurologically
injured patients, especially
paraplegics, are at high risk
for developing heterotopic
ossification, especially
around the hips, (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a pin tract. through
the distal femoral diaphysis,
related to pinning for
suspension of the burned
extremity. There is classic
heterotopic o5s;{;cation =
surrounding the pin tracl.
III
165
<ll
(/)
RICKETS& OSTEOMALACIA
ro
<ll
.!!1
o • Bone resorption: Subperiosteal,
.~
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E subchondral, subligamentous,
<ll Common subtendinous, cortical tunneling
Ui
>-
en • Renal Failure (Renal Tubular Disease) • Brown tumors, osteoporosis
"C
• Chronic Liver Disease o Osteosclerosis, Rugger jersey spine
Ql
VI • Chronic Pancreatitis o Atrophic kidneys, dialysis catheter
ro
llJ Less Common • Chronic Liver Disease & Chronic
~ Pancreatitis
ro • Intestinal Malabsorption
l.l
• Rickets of Prematurity o No differentiating radiographic features
c:
• Aluminum Toxicity o History essential to diagnosis
U
Rare but Important Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
• Vitamin D Deficiency • Intestinal Malabsorption
• Oncogenic Osteomalacia o Underlying disorders include gluten
• Dilantin sensitive enteropathy, sprue, regional
• Phenobarbital enteritis, scleroderma, obesity surgery,
• Vitamin D Dependent Rickets short gut syndrome, partial gastrectomy
• Hypophosphatemic Rickets (X-Linked) o Regional enteritis; seronegative
• Hypophosphatasia (Mimic) spondyloarthropathy including spinal
• Pseudohypoparathyroidism / fusion, SI joint ankylosis, enthesopathy
Pseudo-pseudohypopara thyroidism o Scleroderma: Soft tissue calcification,
• Atypical Axial Osteomalacia acroosteolysis, polyarthritis (most
• Metaphyseal Chondrodysplasia (Mimic) common is co-existent rheumatoid
arthritiS)
• Rickets of Prematurity
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o s 1,000 gm; s 28 weeks EGA
Key Differential Diagnosis Issues • Aluminum Toxicity
• Radiographic manifestations common to all o In past main source of aluminum was
o Osteopenia dialysate, now it is oral phosphate binders
o Coarse, ill-defined trabecula o Features which may help differentiate from
o Looser's zones, pseudofractures renal osteodystrophy
o Cortical tunneling • Less pseudofractures, bone resorption,
o Rickets osteosclerosis
• Metaphyseal cupping & fraying • Increased incidence of infarction
• Growth retardation, short stature following renal transplantation
• Bowing, protrusio & other deformities 2° Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
to "soft bones" • Vitamin D Deficiency
• Changes most pronounced in wrists & o Nutritional rickets uncommon in US today
knees • Consider in immigrant populations &
• More severe than adult onset disease individuals in poverty conditions
• Pertinent laboratory values: Serum calcium, • May be seen with limited exposure to
serum phosphate, serum alkaline sunlight
phosphatase o Decreased serum calcium & phosphate,
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses elevated alkaline phosphatase
• Renal Failure (Renal Tubular Disease) • Oncogenic Osteomalacia
o Decreased serum calcium, elevated o Hemangiopericytoma most common
phosphate is unique finding underlying tumor
o Associated hyperparathyroidism o Also hemangioma, giant cell tumor,
• Soft tissue calcium deposits nonossifying fibroma, osteoblastoma
o Osteomalacia resolves after tumor
resection
• Dilantin & Phenobarbital
III
166
RICKETS & OSTEOMALACIA (")
::I
n
III
o No distinguishing radiographic features • Decreased serum calcium, elevated serum 0<:
o History essential to diagnosis phosphate, parathyroid hormone OJ
III
• Vitamin D Dependent Rickets elevated III
CD
o Manifests in infancy • Obesity, developmental delay Co
Anteroposterior
oSleodyslJophy
radiograph shows
There is metaphyseal
severe renal
cupping and
l.iJteral radiograph shows dense lines at the endplates of
the vertebral bodies" which create the appearance
III
fraying •. The femoral capital epiphysis" is smal/, known as Rugger Jersey spine in this patient with renal
indicaUve of delayed skeletal maturaUon. osteodystrophy.
167
Ql
l/) RICKETS & OSTEOMALACIA
ro
Ql
l/)
o
.~
E
Ql
(;) Chronic Liver Disease
en>- (Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows typical
"tl
Ql changes of renal
l/)
III osteodystrophy.
aJ Radiographic findings
~ include osteopenia,
III ill-defined trabecula and
o dysmorphic femoral necks &
c: trochanters Ell. (Right)
o Anteroposterior radiograph
shows a typical case of
rickets in a child with biliary
atresia. Abnormal
metaphyses" are present
with cupping and fraying.
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows
enlargement of femoral and
tibial metaphyses _ This
finding contributes to the
enlarged knees seen on
physical examination in
patients with rickets such as
this child with biliary atresia.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a typical
pseudofracrure ••.
Pseudofracture is a
nonspecific radiographic
abnormality of osteomalacia
a5 seen in this patient with
regional enteritis.
III
168
RICKETS & OSTEOMALACIA (")
:;,
o
01
-<
CD
01
Dilantin Vitamin D Dependent Rickets tIl
(1)
(Left) Axial NEeT shows the C.
coarse iII-delined trabecula Ul
of anti-convulsant associated '<
(fJ
osteomalacia. Note poor CD
definition between cortical 3
and medullary bone in part o·
due to cortical tunneling. o
(fJ
(Right) Anteroposterior (1)
III
169
Q)
en SOFT TISSUE CONTRACTU RES
'"
Q)
en
o
.~
E
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS I I ESSENTIAL INFORMATION
Q)
Common Key Differential Diagnosis Issues
U5
>-
(j) • Immobility • Soft tissue contractures have a relatively
"0 • Dupuytren Contracture nonspecific appearance on imaging
Q)
en • Trauma • Correlation with history is most useful:
ra
a:l • Post-Operative Contracture Immobility, trauma, burns, radiation,
~ • Thermal Injury, Burns inflammatory process, syndromes
ra
u • Volkmann Ischemic Contracture Helpful Clues for Diagnoses
t:
• Rheumatoid Arthritis • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
U
• Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis o Three phase bone scan useful for diagnosis
• Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
• Cerebral Palsy
• Radiation-Induced Non-Neoplastic Soft o Pseudoacetabulum, femoral head
Tissue Abnormalities deformity, hip subluxation or dislocation,
Less Common thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis,
• Cerebral Palsy scoliosis, comma-shaped patella, foot
• Infection equinus
• Myelomeningocele • Parsonage-Turner Syndrome, Late
• Marfan Syndrome o MR in acute setting shows high signal in
• Diabetes: MSK Complications muscles on T2WI without tendon tear
• Parsonage-Turner Syndrome, Late o Joint contractures may occur late in the
• Fibromatosis Colli process without physical therapy
Rare but Important • Fibromatosis Colli
o Ultrasound is imaging modality of choice
• Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis
to evaluate torticollis in neonate; compare
• Arthrogryposis
with unaffected side
• Linear Morphea
• Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva • Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis
o Skin thickening & tendon fibrosis
• Nail Patella Disease (Fong)
o Bone scintigraphy shows radiotracer
• Mucopolysaccharidoses
uptake in extremity soft tissues
• Holt-Oram Syndrome
• Camptodactyly • Leprosy
o Linear calcification of peripheral nerves
• Leprosy
can be visible on radiographs & CT
• Myotonic Dystrophy
170
SOFT TISSUE CONTRACTU RES o
::;,
(")
III
-<
I:D
III
Trauma Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis l/l
(1)
(Left) Sagittal T2WI MR a.
shows separation of the (f)
flexor profunda and '<
l/l
superficialis tendons. from CD
the proximal interphalangeal 3
joint. indicating rupture o·
of the A2 and A3 pulleys. o
l/l
This represen15 flexor annular CD
pulley tears from remote ClJ
en
lrauma. (Right) CD
Posteroanterior radiograph
shows flexion deformities.
carpal fusion Ell and erosive
changes _ Note that the
patient is still skeletally
immature, despite her age of
22 years.
Arthrogryposis
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows a fixed
abducted right hip. and
chronically dislocated left
hip al. Note that the hip
capsules are relatively dense.
Arthrogryposis represents a
heterogeneous group of
disorders which have in
common fixed joint
contractu res. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows mature bone bridging
the soft tissue between the
lumbar spine and pelvis EiIII
III
171
Q)
en SHORT LIMB, UNILATERAL
ell
Q)
en
o • Component (cup, femoral head, femoral
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E neck) may be mis-sized, resulting in
Q) Common relative shortening
ii)
>-
(/)
• Physeal Fractures, Pediatric o Arthroplasty loosening with subsidence of
"C • Arthroplasty Malpositioning components results in relative shortening
Ql
VI • Osteomyelitis, Pediatric • Cup subsides superiorly, femoral stem
l'tl
m • Legg-Calve-Perthes subsides into shaft
>- • Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
III
• Osteomyelitis, Pediatric
••• • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis o Metaphyseal osteomyelitis may result in
c: • Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip slipped epiphysis & resultant shortening
U • Fibrous Dysplasia o Epiphyseal osteomyelitis may result in
Less Common epiphyseal destruction, hyperemia and
• Meningococcemia early physeal fusion - shortening
• Embolic Disease, During Infancy • Legg-Calve-Perthes
• Neurofibromatosis o AVN in child results in flattening of
• Compartment Syndrome, Insult Prior to deformity, with short broad femoral neck
Skeletal Maturity as well as head, further contributing to
• Hemophilia shortening
• Oilier Disease • Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis
• Maffucci Syndrome o Capital femoral epiphysis slips posteriorly
legg-Calve-Perthes
(Left)AP radiograph shows
obvious metaphyseal
destruction. in a child
with staphylococcus
osteomyelitis. The infection
has crossed the physis,
showing subtle epiphyseal
destruction _ This may
result in growth disturbance
and shortening of the limb.
(Right) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows Lei>;
which results in a coxa
magna deformity: Short,
broad femoral head III as
well as short, broad femoral
neck HI. This results in limb
shortening.
III
174
SHORT LIMB, UNILATERAL C"l
:l
(')
III
-<
OJ
III
t/l
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis CD
(Left) AP radiograph shows e-
severe erosion of the right en
hip in a patient with j/A. '<
t/l
Besides erosions, limb length in
may be affected by 3
premature closure of (i'
epiphyses secondary to o
iii'
chronic hyperemia in this (1)
Q)
disease process. (Right) AP t/l
radiograph shows DOH on (1)
Meningococcemia
(Leh) AP radiograph shows
bilateral involvement with
fibrous dysplasia. Note the
pelvic tilt and the differential
levels of the lesser
lrochanlers •. This is due to
the shepherd's crook
deformity of the right femoral
neck _ resulting in a
shortened femur. (Right) AP
radiograph shows signiFicant
deformity of the left femoral
metaphysis & epiphysis EiIl
with short varus neck. This is
due to thrombotic disease in
meningococcemia. The left
limb is short (compare lesser
trochanter levelsllli.
III
175
Q)
(/) SHORT LIMB, UNILATERAL
III
Q)
.!!1
o
u
E
Q)
Vi Neurofibromatosis Congenital Pseudarthrosis Tibia
en>- (Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows significant
"0
Ql bowing of both the tibia and
(/)
III fibula" in a patient with
lD neurofibromatosis. In this
~ disease, these bones are
III frequently dysplastic, which
o can result in bowing
c: deformities or
U pseudarthroses. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows fracture of both the
tibia and fibula IIIat the
distal 7/3 of the leg, with
smooth, tapered ends. This is
a congenital pseudarthrosis,
and results in limb
shortening.
III
176
SHORT LIMB, UNILATERAL C'l
:J
(i.
III
-<
OJ
III
Oilier Disease Oilier Disease en
CO
(Left) Lateral radiograph Co
shows short ulna with en
enchondroma Ell and '<
en
associated dislocation of the CD
radial head Ea. This 3
combination is seen in Oilier (l
both metaphyses
of multiple
=-
expanded lytic lesions in
typical
enchondromatosis. The
disease is usually unilateral,
resulting in a short limb. The
plate and screws are from a
limb lengthening procedure.
amniotic
=
multiple coned or abnormal
epiphyses due to
band (not shown
here). By restricting blood
supply, amniotic bands can
cause limb shortening.
III
177
Q)
rJ) HEMIHYPERTROPHY
l\l
Q)
.!!1
o o Overstimulation during development
.>< DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E o Focal gigantism more common
Q)
Common • Vascular Malformation (Mimic)
U;
>-
(fJ
• Idiopathic/Congenital o Tangled dilated vessels, phleboliths, no
"0 • Neurofibromatosis discrete mass, ± intra-osseous extension
Q)
rJ) • Lipomatosis (Mimic)
ltl Helpful Clues for Less Common Diagnoses
[0 • Hyperemia, Any Cause
~ • Vascular Malformation (Mimic) • Lymphangioma (Mimic)
ltl o Soft tissue mass with multiple cyst spaces
U
c: Less Common • Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome
U • Lymphangioma (Mimic) o Macroglossia, enlarged abdominal organs,
• Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome umbilical hernia, Wilms tumor
• Neurocutaneous Syndrome, Uncommon • Tuberous Sclerosis
o Tuberous Sclerosis o Seizures, mental retardation, cutaneous
o Sturge- Weber Disease abnormalities
o Von Hippel-Lindau Disease o Facial angiofibromas, subungual fibromas,
Rare but Important shagreen patches, ash leaf spots, cortical
• Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome tubers, subependymal nodules
• Sturge-Weber Disease
o Seizures, mental retardation, glaucoma,
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION port wine stain, leptomeningeal angioma
Helpful Clues for Common Diagnoses • Von Hippel-Lindau Disease
• Idiopathic/Congenital o Angiomatosis especially retinal, renal cell
o Increased risk childhood cancer carcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors
• Wilms tumor most common Helpful Clues for Rare Diagnoses
o Associated renal disorders • Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome
o Leg-length discrepancy is mild form o Capillary hemangioma, varicose veins,
• Neurofibromatosis gigantism, ± arteriovenous malformation
o Plexiform neurofibromas & mesodermal • Focal gigantism more common
dysplasia, cafe-au-lait spots, optic glioma,
Other Essential Information
Lisch nodule
• Hemihypertrophy: Enlargement of one side
• Lipomatosis (Mimic)
o Diffuse increase adipose tissue
of body or one extremity vs. focal gigantism
(macrodactyly) with enlarged
• Hyperemia, Any Cause
digit(s)/portion of extremity
Neurofibromatosis
;,
o
III
-<
III
III
Neurofibromatosis Vascular Malformation (Mimic) III
(l)
(Leh) Anteroposterior Q.
radiograph shows (J)
asymmetric increased soft '<
III
tissue of the right lower CO
extremity" along with mild 3
limb length discrepancy, n
right leg slighlly longer than o
III
the left. This patient's (l)
hemihypertrophy is QJ
III
secondary to (l)
neurofibromatosis. (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows bulky soft tissues of
the forearm and hand" in
this one day old with a large
soft tissue hemangioma.
Lymphangioma (Mimic)
(Left) Coronal T2WI MR
from a patient with a large
lymphangioma shows a high
signal mass with multi
septate cysts involving the
left chest waif and upper
extremity _ (Right)
Anteroposterior CT
scanogram shows left leg
hemihypertrophy with
enlargement of the bones
and soft tissues of the left leg
(compared to the right) in
this patient with
Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber
syndrome.
III
179
Q)
(/) FOCAL GIGANTISM/MACRODACTYLY
ro
Q)
.!!?
o o Other disease manifestations
.>! DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E • Monoarticular to polyarticular disease
Q) Common • Small joints, hands, feet; also wrist,
Ul
>-
(fJ
• juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (Epiphyses) elbow, knee, shoulder, ankle
"C
• Hemangioma, Soft Tissue • Peri-articular osteoporosis
Ql
VI • Arteriovenous Malformation • Marginal erosions
III
III • Lymphangioma • Periosteal new bone formation
J?:- • Neurofibromatosis • Uniform joint space narrowing
III
l.l
Less Common • Hemangioma, Soft Tissue
c:
• Macrodystrophia Lipomatosa o Soft tissue mass
U
• Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome (KTW) • Phleboliths
• Oilier Disease (Phalanges) • Variable amount of fatty stroma
• Maffucci Syndrome (Phalanges) o Osseous changes variable
'"
(5
.~
E
Q)
(i) Hemangioma. Soft Tissue Arteriovenous Malformation
en>- (Left) Lateral radiograph
shows bulky soft tissues of
"C
Cll the forearm and hand"
'"ro
!Xl
secondary to soft tissue
hemangioma. Associated
>. overgrowth of the first and
CV second digits was present
••• but is not seen on this image.
c: (RighI) Anteroposterior
U radiograph shows focal
overgrowth of the second
digit of the left foat _ The
overgrowth was due to
hyperemia from a vascular
malformation.
III
182
FOCAL GIGANTISM/MACRODACTYlY n
::s
o
III
«:
Cl
III
tIl
Oilier Disease (Phalanges) Maffucci Syndrome (Phalanges) (l)
(Left) Oblique radiograph Q.
shows a skeletally immalure (j)
child with mulliple '<
tIl
enchondromas. consistent CD
with Oilier disease. The 3
lesions are expansile o
especially in the fifth o
tIl
metacarpal. (Right) PA C1l
radiograph shows bizarre Cl
tIl
expansion of all the bones of C1l
the hand, associated with
multiple phleboliths. The
diagnosis is Marucci
syndrome, but clinically it
manifests as focal gigantism
of the hand.
Hemophilia (Epiphyses)
(Leh) Anteroposterior
radiograph shows capitellar
overgrowth" in this patient
with hemophilia. Associated
changes include subchondral
cyst formation and joint
space narrowing. (Right)
Axial radiograph shows
left patella=
relative overgrowth of the
compared to
the right Ell resulting from a
patellar fraclure which
occurred prior to skeletal
maturation.
III
183
Q)
en DWARFISM WITH MAJOR SPINE INVOLVEMENT
ctl
Q)
.!!1
o • Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E o Ovoid or pear-shaped vertebrae in infancy
Q) Common o Central, anterior vertebral body beak
U5
>- • Achondroplasia o Odontoid hypoplasia
en
-c • Thanatophoric Dwarf • Hypothyroidism, Child (Mimic)
C1l
VI • Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia o Congenital vertebral anomalies:
ctl
al less Common Hemivertebrae, abnormal rib-vertebral
Z.
l'Cl • Hypothyroidism, Child (Mimic) articulations, platyspondyly
U
• Noonan Syndrome • "Sail vertebrae" = upper lumbar vertebra
c:
• Morquio Syndrome with wedge or hook shape
U
• Hurler Syndrome • Noonan Syndrome
• Hunter Syndrome o Klippel-Feil anomaly
o Scoliosis & kyphosis
Rare but Important
• Morquio Syndrome
• Progeria o Extensive vertebra plana
• Hypochondroplasia o Central, anterior vertebral body beak
• Metatropic Dwarfism o Diminutive or disappearing dens of axis
• Diastrophic Dwarfism • Hurler Syndrome
• Kniest Dysplasia o Anterior inferior vertebral body beak
• Camptomelic Dysplasia o Oval to biconvex vertebral bodies
• Osteoglophonic Dysplasia o Absent dens -+ atlantoaxial subluxation
• Dyssegmental Dysplasia • Hunter Syndrome
o Inferior beak similar to Hurler syndrome
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Posterior vertebral body scalloping
• Progeria
Helpful Clues for Diagnoses o Infantile central notching retained
• Achondroplasia • Hypochondroplasia
o Short, flat vertebral bodies; decreasing
o Decreased interpediculate distance L1 -+ LS
interpediculate distance L1 -+ LS • Kniest Dysplasia
o Posterior vertebral body scalloping
o Platyspondyly with narrow interpediculate
o Hypoplastic upper lumbar vertebral bodies
distance
• Thanatophoric Dwarf o Coronal vertebral body clefts, infants
o Platyspondyly with rounded anterior
• Camptomelic Dysplasia
vertebral bodies o Hypoplastic cervical vertebrae
Achondroplasia Achondroplasia
184
DWARFISM WITH MAJOR SPINE INVOLVEMENT n
::l
o
!!!.
-<
OJ
III
Thanatophoric Dwarf
(Left) Lateral radiograph
'"
<II
Co
shows the classic en
platyspondyly" with '<
(/)
widened intervertebral disk ro
spaces" Thus, the normal 3
truncal length is maintained o
despite the flat vertebral o
bodies. This is a lethal form
of dwarfism. (RighI)
'"
<1l
Ql
(/)
Anteroposterior radiograph <1l
shows universal
platyspondyly and scoliosis.
Images of the extremities
showed severely deformed
epiphyses. The combination
of findings helps make the
diagnosis.
Morquio Syndrome
(Left) Lateral radiograph
shows a Klippel-Feil anomaly
that is typical in Noonan
syndrome but is also seen
incidentally, as in this
patient. The cervical
vertebral bodies are small
and fused" and there is an
adjacent omovertebral bone
•. (RighI) Lateral
of the odontoid =-
radiograph shows hypoplasia
This
anomaly can contribute to
atlantoaxial subluxation in
these patients.
III
185
Q)
rn DWARFISM WITH SHORT EXTREMITIES
ro
Q)
.~
o • Chondrodysplasia Punctata
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E o Punctate calcifications in cartilage &
Q)
Common periarticular regions
en>-
(f)
• Achondroplasia • Dyschondrosteosis
"t:l • Pseudoachondroplasia o Madelung deformity of forearms
Q)
rn • Achondrogenesis o Beaking of medial tibial metaphysis
'"
CC • Chondrodysplasia Punctata • Mesomelic Dysplasia
2- • Dyschondrosteosis o Hypoplastic fibula
'"
o • Mesomelic Dysplasia • Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia
c: • Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia o Marked epiphyseal ossification delay
U
Less Common o Small, fragmented epiphyses
• Hypochondroplasia o Femoral head avascular necrosis
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van • Hypochondroplasia
Creveld) o Shortened long bones with wide diaphyses
• Camptomelic Dysplasia o Brachydactyly
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van
Rare but Important
Creveld)
• Thanatophoric Dwarf o Short, heavy tubular bones
• Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy of ]eune o Spur at medial distal humeral metaphysis
• Kniest Dysplasia o Cone-shaped epiphyses of middle
phalanges & polydactyly
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION • Camptomelic Dysplasia
o Fifth digit clinodactyly
Helpful Clues for Diagnoses
• Thanatophoric Dwarf
• Achondroplasia o Short, bowed limbs, "French telephone
o Short, thick tubular bones with flared
receiver femurs"
metaphyses o Flared metaphyses
o Hemispheric femoral head
• Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy of
o Overgrown fibulae
Jeune
• Pseudoachondroplasia o Hands with cone-shaped epiphyses
o Splayed, fragmented, irregular metaphyses
o Handlebar clavicles
• Achondrogenesis • Kniest Dysplasia
o Short tubular bones & long bones
o "Swiss cheese" cartilage dysplasia
o Non-ossified sacrum & pubis
o Short, dumbbell-shaped long bones
Pseudoachondroplasia
Anleroposlerior radiograph of the lower legs shows Anteroposterior radiograph shows delayed skeletal
flaring of the lower femoral metaphyses _ The fibulae maturation, with abnormal epiphyses • resulting in
III are longer than the tibiae, a reversal of the normal shorl, stubby long bones. Note the excrescences arising
relationship. from lhe metaphyses Ill.
186
(")
DWARFISM WITH SHORT EXTREMITIES
::::J
(")
III
.:c
Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van lJl
III
Creveld) VI
Chondrodysplasia Punctata lTl
(Left) Anteroposterior C.
radiograph shows diffuse (f)
stippling" in the pelvis and '<
VI
epiphyses of the lower en
extremities. These patients 3
also have long fibulae with (")
Thanatophoric Dwarf
(Left) Anteroposterior
radiograph of the pelvis and
legs shows the short, bowed
tubular bones III. These
have been likened to
telephone receivers (the old
fashioned, pre-cell phone
types) (Right)
Anteroposterior radiograph
shows short, bowed tubular
bones". Flaringof the
metaphyseal regions is a
typical finding This infant
died shortly after birth. On
prenatal ultrasound, the
femurs may appear short or
curved.
187
Ql
If) DWARFISM WITH SHORT RIBS
<1l
Ql
.!i1
o • Mucopolysaccharidoses
.~ DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
E o Oar-shaped, short ribs
Ql Common o Short clavicles
UJ
>. • Achondroplasia
Cf) o Morquio syndrome = thin posterior
"tl
Ql
Less Common portion of rib
II)
III • Cleidocranial Dysplasia • Thanatophoric Dwarf
aJ o Short ribs with cupped costochondral
>.
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van
III
Creveld) junctions
<J o Long trunk with small chest
'c Rare but Important
U
• Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy of
• Mucopolysaccharidoses Jeune
• Thanatophoric Dwarf o Horizontal, short ribs with bulbous ends
• Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy of Jeune o Bell-shaped thoracic cage
• Camptomelic Dysplasia o Handlebar clavicles
• Achondrogenesis • Camptomelic Dysplasia
• Mucolipidosis II and III o Bell-shaped thorax
• Otopalatodigital Syndrome o 11 pairs of shortened ribs
• Short-Rib Polydactyly Syndrome o Hypoplastic cervical vertebrae
• Achondrogenesis
ESSENTIAL INFORMATION o Short tubular bones & long bones
o Minimal mineralization of vertebral bodies
Helpful Clues for Diagnoses
• Mucolipidosis II and III
• Achondroplasia o Short, wide ribs similar to
o Short trunk with short, wide ribs that do
mucopolysaccharidoses
not extend around the chest
• Otopalatodigital Syndrome
• Cleidocranial Dysplasia o Ribs are short, wavy & angled
o Cone-shaped chest with short ribs due to
o Long scapular bodies
long cartilaginous segments o Precocious fusion of sternum
o Hypoplastic clavicles
o Sloped clavicles
o Small scapulae
• Short-Rib Polydactyly Syndrome
• Chondroectodermal Dysplasia (Ellis-van o Very short, horizontal ribs
Creveld) o Deformed, elevated clavicles
o Short, heavy tubular bones (including ribs)
o Small scapulae
o Handlebar clavicles
o Polydactyly
!III. A midline
or
as well as hypoplasUc glenoid fossae
defecl was also present at lhe pubic
in the lumbar region EiII. symphysis.
188
DWARFISM WITH SHORT RIBS ("')
::l
n'
III
-<
OJ
Mucopolysaccharidoses III
Mucopolysaccharidoses CIl
Cl>
(Leh) Anteroposterior Co
radiograph shows wide, (IJ
short, paddle-shaped ribs 11II '<
(f)
with relatively small
intercostal spaces in this
m
3
patient with Morquio o'
syndrome. (Right) o
Anteroposterior radiograph en'
CD
shows wide ribs 11II with OJ
(f)
narrow intercostal spaces. CD
Additional findings include
humeral neck varus and
short thick clavicles, which
are typical skeletal findings
of Hurler syndrome.
III
189
l1> DWARFISM WITH HORIZONTAL ACETABULAR ROOF
'"l1>
ro
wings =
Anteroposterior radiograph shows short, wide iliac
and horizontal acetabular roofs with the inner
margin of the pelvis EllI resembling a champagne glass.
in the pubic =. hip =
Anteroposterior radiograph shows stippled calcification
and sacral EllI regions that is
typical for chondrodysplasia punctata. Each acetabular
There is coxa valga with short {emoral necks. roof has a horizontal orientation.
190
()
DWARFISM WITH HORIZONTAL ACETABULAR ROOF
j
n
III
'<
Asphyxiating Thoracic Dystrophy of OJ
III
Thanatophoric Dwarf Jeune
(Left) Anteroposterior
'0-"
a>
radiograph shows short, m
small iliac bones ffi '<
C/l
horizontal acetabular roofs CD
• "French telephone 3
receiver" shaped femora •. o·
and bowed long bones with o
C/l
irregular (Iared metaphyses Cll
Q)
HI. (Right) Anteroposterior C/l
radiograph shows short, CD
flared iliac wings EiIlI and
horizontal acetabular roofs
• with a trident margin due
to an inferolateral spur along
the scialic notch •.
191
INDEX
A
Abscess, soft tissue supra-acetabular iliac destruction, 1:330-333
anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195 Achilles tendon
ball of foot pain related to, 111:126, 129 idiopathic ossification, tendon and ligament
cystic masses vs., 11:160, 163 ossification vs., 11:100, 101
diabetic foot complications vs., 111:142 repair (mimic), calcaneal erosions, posterior
epidural abscess, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, tubercle vs., 1:377, 379
145 retro-Achilles bursitis, heel pain related to,
extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363, 365 111:120
groin/hip pain related to, 111:49,53 tear/tendinopathy
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 11I:69, 73 heel pain related to, 111:120, 122
iliopsoas abscess, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380
146 thickening/enlargement vs., 1:374
intermuscular edema vs., 11:180, 182 tendinitis, calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle
knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, 360 vs., 1:377, 379
lateral hip pain related to, IIl:55, 57 thickening/enlargement, 1:374-375
medial ankle pain related to, 11I:109 Achondrogenesis
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223, 225 dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs.,
soft tissue lesions with f1uid/fluid levels vs., 111:190
11:155, 157 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240 dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 386 Achondroplasia
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:168 bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body
subperiosteal, long bone surface (juxtacortical) beaking vs., 1:282
lesion vs., 1:61, 65 dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs.,
Abutment, ulnar. See Ulnar abutment. 111:190
Accessory muscle, soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383, dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
387 111:184
Accessory ossicle, ossification/calcification anterior dwarfism with short extremities vs., 1Il:186
to C1 vs., 1:274, 275 dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188
Accessory soleus (mimic), Achilles tendon genu varum (bow leg deformity) vs., 1:373
thickening/enlargement vs., 1:374 homozygous, childhood platyspondyly vs.,
Acetabulum 1:284
dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof, long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30, 31
111:190-191 long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97,99
dysplasia, hip labral tear related to, 1:341, mimic, long bone overtubulation vs., 1:103, 105
342-343 short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261,
femoral acetabular impingement 263
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
1:167, 169 Acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma, soft
in teenagers, 111:149, 150 tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241
ossification of rim, hip labral tear related to, Acromegaly
1:341,344 bone within bone appearance vs., II:77
protrusio acetabuli, 1:334-337 cortical tunneling vs., 11:92
differential diagnosis, 1:334-337 discalmineralization vs., 1:271
hip labral tear related to, 1:341 generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83
secondary, hip labral tear related to, 1:341, long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
344 vs., 1:91
retroverted, hip labral tear related to, 1:340, 342 spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298
INDEX
>< widened joint space related to, 1:171, 175 carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232,233
QJ
"'0 Acromioclavicular joint separation discal mineralization vs., 1:27]
r:::: mimic, distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212, erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 150
213 generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83, 86
rotator cuff symptoms vs., IIL5, 7 interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., 1:195,
Acroosteolysis, 1:246-249 197
Acroosteosclerosis, 1:250-25 1 intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:191, 193
Adamantinoma long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
long bone aggressive diaphyseal lesion vs. lytic lesion vs., 1:22, 25
adult, 1:71 patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348, 350
child, 1:75, 77 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253, 257
long bone cortically based lytic diaphyseal shoulder fluid collections VS., 1:223
lesion vs., 1:85, 87 soft tissue lesions with predominately low Tl &
long bone cortically based metaphyseal lesion T2 signal vs., 11:151
vs., 1:57,59 soft tissue target lesions vs., 11:158, 159
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 19 soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:198,200
tibial bowing vs., 1:353, 355 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14-15, 18
tibial metadiaphyseal cortically based lesion vs., tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390
1:94,95 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, muscle atrophy vs.,
Adenopathy, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:166 II: 177
Adhesive capsulitis, rotator cuff symptoms vs., Anconeus epitrochlearis, medial elbow pain related
111:5,7 to, 111:23,25
Adipocytes Anechoic mass, 11:194-195
radiation-induced increase, increased marrow Anemia
fat vs., 11:136-137, 139 abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., 11:132-
steroid-induced increase, increased marrow fat 133,135
vs., 11:136-137, 138 aplastic
Adrenocortical tumor/hyperplasia, advanced bone anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations
age vs., 11:102 vs., 111:153
Aging, normal, increased marrow fat vs., 11:136, superscan vs., II:204
137 bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:140, 141
AIDS drug therapy, avascular necrosis related to, Fanconi anemia, 111:153
11I:157, 161 iron or vitamin deficiency, ]11:152, 153
Air musculoskeletal manifestations, 111:152-155
intraarticular (mimic), meniscal size alteration of chronic disease, 11I:152, 154
vs., 1:367 sickle cell. See Sickle cell anemia,
soft tissue lesions with predominately low Tl & musculoskeletal complications.
T2 signal vs., 11:150, 152 Aneurysm
Alcohol abuse, avascular necrosis related to, 11I:157, linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:116,
159 118
Alkaptonuria. See Ochronosis. mimic, anechoic mass vs., 11:194
ALPSA (anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve popliteal artery
avulsion), anteroinferior labral/capsule injury extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363, 365
vs., 111:12,13 knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, 361
Aluminum toxicity, rickets and osteomalacia soft tissue lesions with predominately low Tl &
related to, 111:166 T2 signal vs., 11:150
Aminopterin fetopathy, long bone metaphyseal soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383
bands and lines vs., 1:27 soft tissue target lesions vs., ]]:158, 159
Amniotic band syndrome Aneurysmal bone cyst
acroosteolysis vs., 1:247,249 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
unilateral short limb related to, 111:173, 177 appearance vs., 11:51, 53
Amputation, acroosteolysis vs., 1:246 bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:144
Amyloid deposition flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155, lesion vs., 1:2, 4
157 lesions originating in posterior vertebral
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139, 141 elements vs., 1:306, 307
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:167 long bone diaphyseal cortically based lytic
lesion vs., 1:85,87
II
INDEX
long bone metaphyseal lesions vs. arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:168
bubbly, 1:44,46 arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:143, 144
cortically based, 1:57, 59 calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:376,
eccentric 378
aggressive, 1:53, 55 discal mineralization vs., 1:270-271, 273
non-aggressive, 1:48, 50 effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222,
mimic 223
bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs., enthesopathy vs., 11:96-97, 98
1:123 erosive arthritis vs., 1:146, 148
long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:82,85
1:60,63 groin/hip pain related to, 111:48
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:208,210 hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68,71
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349 in teenagers, 1lI:148, ]49
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 254 linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280,
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 16 281
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331, 332 long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs.,
target lesions of bone vs., II:41 1:27,29
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:394 mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152, 153
thin bone painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs.,
long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive 1lI:2, 3
lesion vs., 1:67, 68 post-traumatic, pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94, 95
long bone central metaphyseal non- protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334, 336
aggressive lesion vs., 1:35, 38 regional osteoporosis vs., 11:89, 9]
Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:5
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., sacroiliitis vs.
11:154 bilateral asymmetric, 1:320, 32]
subcutaneous mass vs., II:171 bilateral symmetric, 1:3]6, 3]7-3]8
Angiomatosis unilateral, 1:322, 323
bacillary, cortically based lytic diaphyseal lesion squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290, 292
vs., 1:85,89 symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, 328
cystic symphysis pubis with productive changes/
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:2-3, 6 fusion vs., 1:324, 325
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100, 101
lesion vs., 1:3, 5 Ankylosis, 1:176-179
soli tary rib lesion vs., 1:313 Anorexia
Angiosarcoma, osseous generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:82,84
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:3, 6 increased marrow fat vs., 11:137, 139
aggressive periostitis vs., 1:113, 115 Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, cyclops
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, 11 lesion associated with, intraarticular mass vs.,
long bone central metaphyseal aggressive lesion 1:202,204
vs., 1:41,43 Anti-viral drug effect, bone marrow hyperplasia vs.,
long bone diaphyseal aggressive adult lesion vs., 11:141, 143
1:71 Anus, imperforate, symphysis pubis widening vs.,
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391, 395 1:327,329
Ankle. See also Achilles tendon; Talus; Tarsal Aorta
entries. calcification, linear ossification along anterior
anterior pain/impingement, 1l1:104-1O7 spine vs., 1:280
arthritis obstruction, low, inferior rib notching vs., 1:308
calf pain related to, 1lI:92 Aortic coarctation, thoracic
medial ankle pain related to, 1Il:108, ]]] inferior rib notching vs., 1:308-309
lateral pain, 111:114-119 superior rib notching vs., 1:310
medial pain, 111:108-113 Aplastic anemia
post-traumatic, avascular necrosis related to, anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs.,
111:157 111:153
Ankylosing spondylitis superscan vs., 11:204
ankylosis vs., 1:177, 178 Aponeurotic fibroma, juvenile, bizarre horizontal
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 140 periosteal reaction vs., 1:123, 124
III
INDEX
)( Arachnodactyly, 1:238-239 genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:370
QJ
""0 congenital contractural, 1:238 medial knee pain related to, 111:86
r::: Arch, high, ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 131 metacarpophalangeal-predominant, 1:192-193
Armillifer armillatus infection, linear and mixed erosive/productive, I: 152-153
curvilinear calcification vs., II:1l7 monoarthritis, I: 198-201
Arterial insufficiency, calf pain related to, 111:93, mutilans, 1:162-163
95-96 protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334
Arteriosclerosis, linear and curvilinear calcification psoriatic. See Psoriatic arthritis.
vs., II:Il6, Il7 rheumatoid. See Rheumatoid arthritis.
Arteriovenous fistula, soft tissue lesions with sesamoiditis vs., 1:258, 259
predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., 11:150, subchondral edematous-like signal vs., 11:130,
152 131
Arteriovenous malformations. See also Vascular subtalar, lateral ankle pain related to, 111:117
malformations. tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184, 185
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 11/:180, thigh pain related to, 11I:60
182 tuberculosis-related, atrophic joint destruction
inferior rib notching vs., 1:308 vs., 1:159, 161
soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1 & with large subchondral cysts, 1:154-157
T2 signal vs., 11:151, 152 with normal bone density, 1:134-137
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241, 245 with osteopenia, 1:138-141
Arthritis. See also Ankylosing spondylitis; Chronic with preserved cartilage space, 1:166-169
reactive arthritis; Inflammatory bowel with productive changes, 1:142-145
disease arthritis; Juvenile idiopathic arthritis; wrist pain related to
Osteoarthritis; Psoriatic arthritis; Rheumatoid radial-sided, 11I:42, 44-45
arthritis; Septic joint. ulnar-sided, 11I:36, 37-38
Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs., Arthritis mutilans, 1:162-163
1:374 Arthrogryposis
ankle abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:236
calf pain related to, m:92 long bone overtubulation vs., 1:103, 104
medial ankle pain related to, II1:108, 111 muscle atrophy vs., 11:177
bone marrow edema syndromes vs., II: 126, 127 soft tissue contractu res related to, 111:171
erosive, I:146-1 5 1 Arthropathy. See also Osteoarthropathy.
fungal crystalline. See Crystalline arthropathy.
atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:159, 161 hemophilic, intraarticular low signal material
monoarthritis vs., 1:199, 201 vs., 11:191, 193
genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:372 inflammatory, shoulder instability related to,
groin/hip pain related to, 11I:48, 50 111:9, 11
heel pain related to, 111:121, 124 Jaccoud
hip mimic, metacarpophalangeal-predominant
lateral hip pain related to, m:54, 56 arthritis vs., 1:192
pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68, ulnar deviation of MCP joints vs., 1:264
70-71 neuropathic, non-diabetic, arthritis with normal
HIV-related bone density vs., 1:135, 137
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139 pyrophosphate. See Pyrophosphate arthropathy.
erosive arthritis vs., 1:150 silastic implant, arthritis with preserved
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., cartilage space vs., 1:167, 169
1:195, 196 Arth roplasty
swelling and periostitis of digit (dactylitis) adjacent metastasis/primary neoplasm,
vs., 1:266, 267 arthroplasty with lytic/cystic lesions vs.,
in teenagers, 111:148-151. See also Juvenile 1:206,207
idiopathic arthritis. infection, arthroplasty with lytic/cystic lesions
interphalangeal-predominant, 1:194-197 vs., 1:206,207
juvenile idiopathic. See Juvenile idiopathic prior lucencies in revision, arthroplasty with
arthritis. lytic/cystic lesions vs., 1:206, 207
knee shoulder, mechanical impingement on, medial
anterior knee pain related to, 111:80,82 metaphyseal erosion of proximal humerus
calf pain related to, 11I:92 vs., 1:214
with lytic/cystic lesions, 1:206-207
IV
INDEX
Arthroplasty components. See also Hardware. dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188, 189
hardware failure nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209,211
hip pain related to, 111:75,78-79 Atrophic joint destruction, 1:158-161
knee pain related to, Ill:99, 102 Avascular necrosis, 11I:156-161
instability, painful knee related to, 1lI:98, 100 differential diagnosis, 1Il:156-161
loosening and dislocation talar, anterior ankle pain/impingement related
arthroplasty with lytic/cystic lesions vs., to, 111:104-105, 107
1:206 Avulsion
hip pain related to, IJl:74, 75-77 epicondylar, medial, pediatric, medial elbow
knee pain related to, 111:98,99, 100 pain related to, IIl:22-23, 24
mimic, target lesions of bone vs., 11:41, 43 extensor digitorum brevis, lateral ankle pain
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330 related to, 11I:115, 117
malposition humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligament,
painful hip related to, 1lI:74, 77 anteroinferior labral/capsule injury vs.,
painful knee related to, 11I:98, 100 1Il:12, 13
unilateral short limb related to, 1Il:172, 174 labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion,
massive osteolysis anterior, anteroinferior labral/capsule injury
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., vs., llI:12, 13
1:154-155, 156 tibial stress syndrome/adductor insertion
arthroplasty with lytic/cystic lesions vs., avulsion syndrome, cortically based,
1:206 sclerotic diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:80, 82
hip pain related to, 1Il:74-75, 78 Avulsion fractures
knee pain related to, 111:99,101-102 early, nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 113
peri prosthetic fracture intraarticular, calcified intraarticular body/
hip pain related to, 11I:75, 79 bodies vs., 1:180, 182
knee pain related to, 111:99,103 ossification/calcification anterior to C1 vs.,
photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs., 1:274,275
11:196 pelvic (mimic), enthesopathy vs., 11:97, 99
stress shielding (mimic) Axial osteomalacia
arthroplasty with lytic/cystic lesions vs., atypical, rickets and osteomalacia vs., 111:167
1:206,207 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293
hip pain related to, Ill:75, 78 Axillary nerve injury, shoulder instability related
knee pain related to, 111:99,101 to, 111:9
wear/particle disease
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs.,
1:154-155, 156 B
arthroplasty with lytic/cystic lesions vs., Baastrup disease, enthesopathy vs., 11:96
1:206 Bacillary angiomatosis, long bone diaphyseal
benign osseous lesions with aggressive lesion vs., cortically based, lytic, 1:85, 89
appearance vs., 1I:50, 52 Ball of foot pain, II1:126-131
erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 149 Bankart lesion, anteroinferior labral/capsule injury
hip pain related to, 1lI:74-75, 77-78 vs., 111:12-13
knee pain related to, 111:99,101-102 Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome,
long bone eccentric metaphyseal non- hemihypertrophy related to, 111:178
aggressive lesion vs., 1:49, 50 Biceps labral complex, types 1-3, anterosuperior
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 255 labral variations/pathology vs., 1:219,221
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 17 Biceps tendon tear, shoulder instability related to,
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330, 111:9,11
332 Bicipital tenosynovitis, shoulder fluid collections
Artifact, photopenic lesions and false negative vs., 1:222
scans vs., 11:196 Bisphosphonates
Ascites, malignant, soft tissue uptake on bone scan complications, childhood platyspondyly vs.,
vs., 11:202 1:285,287
Askin tumor, solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313,315 osteonecrosis related to, sequestration vs., 11:37,
Asphyxillting thoracic dystrophy of Jeune 39
dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs., Bladder ex trophy, symphysis pubis widening vs.,
111:190, 191 1:327
dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186, 187 Blount disease
v
INDEX
genu varum (bow leg deformity) vs., 1:372, 373 bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:126-
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., 127, 128
1:109, 110 groin/hip pain related to, I1I:49, 52
mimic, long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ medial ankle pain related to, 111:109,] 13
ballooning vs., 1:16, 17 Bone marrow edema syndromes (proximal femur),
tibial bowing vs., 1:352, 354 11:126-129
Bone age differential diagnosis, II:126- ]29
advanced,II:102-103 transient, subchondral edematous-like signal
delayed, 11:104-105 vs., 11:130
Bone bruise Bone marrow metastases
abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., 11:132 abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., 11:135
subchondral edematous-like signal vs., 11:130 bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:126, ]28
Bone cysts. See Aneurysmal bone cyst; Unicameral flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6, 7
bone cyst. generalized increased bone density vs., adult,
Bone density, generalized increased, adult, 11:60-63 11:60,61
Bone graft hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69,72
failed, pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94,95 lesions originating in posterior vertebral
mimic, hypertrophic callus formation vs., 11:74, elements vs., 1:306
75 long bone central metaphyseal lesions vs.
Bone infarct aggressive, 1:40, 41
bone within bone appearance vs., 11:76-75, 79 non-aggressive, [:35, 37
heel pain related to, 111:121,125 long bone diaphyseal lesions vs.
long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive aggressive
lesion vs., 1:69 adult, 1:70, 71
long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive child, 1:74, 76
lesion vs., 1:34,36 cortically based
long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-aggressive lytic, 1:84, 85
lesion vs., 1:48, 50 sclerotic, 1:8]
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:44,46 long bone eccentric metaphyseal aggressive
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:26,28 lesion vs., 1:52, 54
sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs., long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
11:32,34 lytic lesion vs., 1:23, 24
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 1I:20, 22 medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal
target lesions of bone vs., 1I:40, 42 humerus vs., 1:2]4, 215
Bone island. See Enostosis (bone island). painful scoliosis vs., 1II:145, 147
Bone lesions patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349
with bright T1 signal, 11:146-149 polyostotic lesions vs.
with fluid/fluid levels, 1I:144-145 adult, 11:3
Bone marrow childhood,lI:ll
failure, increased marrow fat vs., 11:137, 139 sequestration vs., 11:36,38
hyperplasia, 11:140-143 solitary geographic lytic lesions VS., 11:14,16
increased fat, II:136-139 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:23
Bone marrow edema supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., [:330,331
abnormal epiphyseal signal, 11:132-135 target lesions of bone vs., 11:40,42
peritumoral reactive tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., [:391, 395
bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:127, Bone neoplasms. See also Intraosseous neoplasms.
129 adjacent to arthroplasty, arthroplasty with Iytic/
subchondral edematous-like signal vs., cystic lesions vs., 1:206, 207
11:130,131 epiphyseal marrow signal vs., abnormal, 11:133,
reactive 135
abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288, 289
11:132, 133 heel pain related to, 1II:121, 124-125
subchondral edematous-like signal vs., intermuscular edema vs., 11:181, 183
11:130, 131 intraarticular mass, 1:202-205
transient lateral elbow pain related to, 111:19,21
abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., metastatic, 11:56-59
11:132, 134 osteopenia vs., 11:80,81
VI
INDEX
polyostotic aggressive, periostitis of multiple olecranon bursitis vs., 1II:26
bones in children vs., 1:130, 132 intermuscular edema vs., H:180, 182
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335, 337 knee, anterior knee pain related to, 111:80, 83
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223, 225 medial collateral ligament
wrist pain related to knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 359
radial-sided, 1II:43, 47 medial knee pain related to, 1lI:86, 90
ulnar-sided, III:37, 41 olecranon, III:26-27
Bone scan, soft tissue uptake on, 11:198-203 patellar, anterior, knee fluid collections vs.,
Bone within bone appearance, 11:76-79 1:356,358
Bound foot, cavus foot deformity vs., 1II:137 pes anserine
Brain infarct, soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., medial, knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 359
11:201 medial knee pain related to, m:86, 89
Brain injury retro-Achilles, heel pain related to, 1II:120
heterotopic ossification vs., 1II:162 retrocalcaneal, 1:380-381
hypertrophic callus formation vs., 11:74 Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs.,
Breast carcinoma 1:374,375
metastatic differential diagnosis, 1:380-381
bone cancer vs., 11:56, 57 heel pain related to, 1Il:120
photopenic lesions and false negative scans semimembranous tendon
vs., 11:196 extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363, 364
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:198, 201 knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, 361
Brodie abscess, long bone cortically based sclerotic shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222
diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:81, 83 soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
Brown tumor. See Hyperparathyroidism, with 11:155, 157
brown tumor; Renal osteodystrophy, with soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 383-384
brown tumor. subacromial, rotator cuff symptoms vs., 1II:4, 6
Buford complex, anterosuperior labral variations/ surrounding osteochondroma, knee fluid
pathology vs., 1:219, 221 collections vs., 1:357, 360
Burns
acroosteolysis vs., 1:246, 248
heterotopic ossification vs., 111:162, 165 c
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., H:117, Caffey disease
120 long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
long bone growth plate premature physeal vs., 1:91, 93
closure vs., 1:106, 107 long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 101
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32 mimic, generalized increased bone density in
muscle atrophy vs., II: 177 child vs., [[:65, 67
nodular calcification vs., 11:111 nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187 periostitis of multiple bones in children vs.,
Bursitis 1:131, 133
anechoic mass vs., H:194 solid periostitis vs., 1:117
ball of foot pain related to, 1Il:127, 129 Caisson disease, avascular necrosis related to,
calcific 1II:161
nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112 Calcaneal nerve entrapment, lower extremity nerve
olecranon bursitis vs., 1Il:26, 27 entrapment vs., 1II:65
periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 188 Calcaneofibular ligament tear, lateral ankle pain
cystic masses vs., [[:160-161, 163 related to, 1II:114, 116
hip Calcaneus
groin/hip pain related to, 1ll:48-49, 52 apophysitis (Sever disease), retrocalcaneal
lateral hip pain related to, 111:54, 55 bursitis vs., 1:380, 381
pain in elderly patients related to, 1II:68-69, erosions, posterior tubercle, 1:376-379
71 fractures
iliopsoas, painful hip replacement related to, anterior process, lateral ankle pain related to,
[[1:75, 79 111:114, 116
iliotibial, knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, 360 insufficiency
infectious diabetic foot complications vs., m:143
knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, 361 heel pain related to, Ill:120, 121-122
VII
INDEX
retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380,381 soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
stress, heel pain related to, 111:120, 122 11:154, 156
traumatic, heel pain related to, 111:120, 122 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240,244
retrocalcaneal bursitis, 1:380-381 soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383
Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs., Calcium deficiency, generalized osteoporosis vs.,
1:374,375 11:83
differential diagnosis, 1:380-381 Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease,
Calcific bursitis ossification/calcification anterior to C1 vs.,
nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112 1:274
olecranon bursitis vs., 1Il:26, 27 Callus formation
periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 188 early, matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:45,
Calcific myonecrosis 47
calf pain related to, 11I:92, 95 hypertrophic, 11:74-75
mimic, heterotopic ossification vs., 111:163 Camptomelic dysplasia
nodular calcification vs., 1!:l11, 115 dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
Calcific tendinitis 111:184
nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186
periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 187 dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188
Calcification forearm deformity vs., 1:229
central mass, soft tissue target lesions vs., 11:158, Capitellar fracture, lateral elbow pain related to,
159 III :21
dense soft tissue lesions with predominately low Capitellar osteonecrosis, lateral elbow pain related
1'1 & T2 signal vs., 11:150 to, 1I!:l8, 20
dystrophic Capsular laxity, shoulder instability related to, 111:8,
soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs., 10
11:125 Capsule/labral injury, anteroinferior, 111:12-13
soft tissue sarcoma, periarticular calcification Carcinoid, metastatic, multiple sclerotic bone
vs., !:l87, 190 lesion vs., 11:31
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:199, Carpal bones
202 coalition, ankylosis vs., !:l77, 179
infection, soft tissue lesions with predominately cystic/lytic lesions, 1:232-233
low 1'1 & T2 signal vs., 11:151 dislocations
linear and curvilinear, 11:116-121 radial-sided wrist pain related to, 1Il:43,
metastatic 46-47
nodular calcification vs., 11:111, 115 ulnar-sided pain wrist related to, 111:37,40
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., instability
1Il:2 dorsal intercalated segment, 11I:32
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., U:199 dorsal midcarpal, 111:32
neoplastic, soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., palmar midcarpal, 111:32
11:200,201 radial-sided wrist pain related to, 111:43,46
ossification/calcification anterior to C1, 1:274- volar intercalated segment, 111:32
275 wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to,
paravertebral ossification and calcification, 111:32
1:276-279 translocation, wrist clicking/clunking/instability
periarticular, 1:186-191 related to, 111:33,35
soft tissue neoplasms, 11:122-125 Carpal tunnel syndrome
Calcified intraarticular body/bodies, 1:180-183 elbow/wrist nerve entrapment vs., 111:28,29-30
Calcinosis enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:186, 187
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., U:199 Cast, hanging, glenohumeral malalignment related
tumoral to, 1:216
idiopathic, periarticular calcification vs., Cat scratch disease, medial elbow pain related to,
1:187, 191 111:23
nodular calcification vs., 1!:l11, 115 Caudal regression syndrome
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs.,
1Il:2 111:191
paravertebral ossification and calcification long bone overtubulation vs., 1:103, 105
vs., 1:276-277, 278 Cavernous hemangioma, soft tissue lesions with
VIII
INDEX
predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., 11:151 spinal, neuropathic osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164,
Cavus foot deformity, 111:136-137 165
Cellulitis tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390,393
ball of foot pain related to, 111:126, 129 ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:264
in diabetic foot complications, 1lI:142 with syphilis, neuropathic osteoarthropathy vs.,
Cement and bone fillers 1:165
long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:18, 20 with syringomyelia
mimic atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 160
bone within bone appearance vs., 11:77, 79 neuropathic osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164
soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106, 108 Chemical ingestion, long bone metaphyseal bands
vertebroplasty cement, discal mineralization and lines vs., 1:26, 28
vs., 1:270, 272 Chemotherapeutic drugs
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs., avascular necrosis related to, 111:157, 161
1:276,277 complications, periostitis of multiple bones in
photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs., children vs., [:131
11:196 long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:26
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 1J:21, 24 Child abuse
target lesions of bone vs., 11:40, 42 metaphyseal fracture
Cerebral palsy long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30
cavus foot deformity related to, 111:137 long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32, 33
long bone overtubulation vs., 1:102, 103 mimic, generalized increased bone density in
mimic, congenital foot deformity related to, child vs., 11:64, 66
1J1:139, 141 periostitis of multiple bones in children vs.,
shoulder instability related to, 111:9 1:130,131-132
soft tissue contractu res related to, 111:170, 171 Chondroblastoma
Cervical carcinoma, metastatic, bone cancer vs., bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:144,
11:57 145
Cervical vertebrae flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
ossification/calcification anterior to Cl, 1:274- lesion vs., 1:3, 5
275 long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:18,
radiculopathy, rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:4 20-21
Charcot joint, neuropathic long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 111:108, III lytic lesion vs., 1:22, 23
arthritis mutilans vs., 1:162 long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., 1:45,
benign osseous lesions with aggressive 47
appearance vs., 11:55 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:49
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181, mimic, long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-
182-183 aggressive lesion vs., 1:49, 51
cavus foot deformity vs., 111:136 patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348
diabetic, 111:142, 143 solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 119
arthritis with osteopenia vs., I: 138, 139 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., [1:14, 17
atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 160 supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331
effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222, target lesions of bone vs., 11:41,43
224 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391,394
enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:187, 189 Chondrocalcinosis, 1:184-185
genu varum (bow leg deformity) vs., 1:373 bone lesions with bright T1 signal vs., 11:147
intraarticular steroid therapy, neuropathic calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., [:180-
osteoarthropathy vs., 1:165 181, 182
mimic, erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 149 differential diagnosis, [:184-185
monoarthritis vs., 1:198-199, 200 idiopathic, 1:185
muscle atrophy vs., 11:177 linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:116,
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs., 118
1:276,278 meniscal size alteration vs., 1:367,368
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 190 Chondrodysplasia punctata
sequestration vs., 11:37, 39 dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs.,
shoulder instability related to, 11I:9, 11 111:190
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 386 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 11[:186, 187
IX
INDEX
)( irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs., flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
Q.I
"'0 1:13,15 lesion vs., 1:2-3, 4
c: metaphyseal flat bones with permeative lesions vs., [:6, 9
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32 lesions originating in vertebral body vs.,
mimic, rickets and osteomalacia vs., 11I:167 [:301,305
tibial bowing vs., 1:353 long bone central metaphyseal lesion vs.
nodular calcification vs., 11:111 aggressive, 1:40, 42
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261 non-aggressive, 1:34-35, 36
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327 long bone diaphyseal lesion vs., aggressive
Chondroectodermal dysplasia (Ellis-van Creveld adult, 1:71, 73
syndrome) child, 1:75, 77
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., [:235, 237 with endosteal thickening, 1:78, 79
dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs., long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs.,
111:191 1:45,46
dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186, 187 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:45,47
dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188 paravertebral ossification and calcification
Chondrolysis vs., 1:277, 279
idiopathic, protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335 parosteal, long bone surface (juxtacortical)
post-traumatic lesion vs., 1:61
atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:159,161 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241
monoarthritis vs., 1:199, 201 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., II: 14, 17
Chondroma solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313, 315
in traarticula r target lesions of bone vs., II:41, 43
anterior knee pain related to, 111:81, 84 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391, 394
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181, vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293, 297
183 mesenchymal, soft tissue neoplasms with
intraarticular mass vs., 1:203,205 calcification vs., 11:125
soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs., synovial
11:123, 124 calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181
periosteal intraarticular mass vs., 1:203
long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., Chordoma
[:60,62 lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268, 269
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:48 lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301,
medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal 305
humerus vs., 1:215 paravertebral ossification and calcification vs.,
mimic, soft tissue neoplasms with 1:277,279
calcification vs., 11:122, 124 sequestration vs., 11:37, 39
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 189 target lesions of bone vs., 11:41, 43
soft tissue vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293,296
soft tissue mass of finger vs., [:241, 245 Chronic disease
soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs., anemia related to, 1lI:152, 154
11:122-123,124 delayed bone age vs., 11:104
Chondromatosis, tenosynovial, soft tissue mass of long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:26
finger vs., 1:241, 245 rickets and osteomalacia related to, 111:166, 168
Chondromyxoid fibroma Chronic reactive arthritis
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly ankylosis vs., 1:177, 179
lesion vs., 1:3, 5 arthritis mutilans vs., 1:163
long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-aggressive arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:135,
lesion vs., 1:49, 51 137
long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., 1:45, arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139, 140
47 arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:169
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:49 arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:143, 145
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 19 ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 131
Chondrosarcoma calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:376,
clear cell, long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal! 378
subchondral lytic lesion vs., 1:23 enthesopathy vs., 11:97, 99
conventional erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 150
x
INDEX
heel pain related to, 111:121, 123 lateral, injury of, lateral elbow pain related to,
in teenagers, 11I:148, 151 111:19,21
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., medial
1:194-195,196 bursitis
linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280 knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 359
mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152, 153 medial knee pain related to, 1II:86-87, 90
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs., injury, medial elbow pain related to, 111:22,
1:276,278 24
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., sprain, medial knee pain related to, III:86,
1:127, 129 87-88
sacroiliitis vs. Common extensor tendon mechanism injury,
bilateral asymmetric, 1:320, 321 lateral elbow pain related to, 111:19, 21
bilateral symmetric, 1:317, 319 Common flexor mechanism injury, medial elbow
unilateral, 1:322 pain related to, 111:22,24
"sausage digit," swelling and periostitis of digit Compartment syndrome
(dactylitis) vs., 1:266, 267 calf pain related to, III:92, 95
solid periostitis vs., [:116, 120 cavus foot deformity vs., 111:136
squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290 enlarged muscle vs., 11:173, 174
Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis. See intermuscular edema vs., 11:181, 183
Osteomyelitis, chronic recurrent multi focal. thigh pain related to, II1:60, 62
Chronic repetitive trauma. See Repetitive trauma, unilateral short limb related to, 111:173, 176
chronic. Complex regional pain syndrome
Claudication, neurogenic bone within bone appearance vs., 11:77
calf pain related to, 11I:92 cortical tunneling vs., 11:92, 93
thigh pain related to, 111:60 regional osteoporosis vs., 11:88, 90
Clavicle soft tissue contractures related to, 111:170
distal resorption, 1:212-213 Compression fracture, acute, vertebral body
fracture, nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., sclerosis vs., 1:292,294
1:208,209-210 Condylar fracture
ischemic necrosis, painful or enlarged lateral elbow pain related to, 111:18, 20
sternoclavicular joint vs., 11I:2 medial elbow pain related to, 111:23,25
nonarticular lesions, 1:208-211 Connective tissue disease, mixed, nodular
osteitis condensans calcification vs., 11:110-111
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209, 211 Contractural arachnodactyly, congenital, 1:238
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., Contractures
111:2,3 Dupuytren contracture, 111:170
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 71 soft tissue, II I: 170-171
solid periostitis vs., 1:117,120 Copper deficiency
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:21,25 infantile, long bone metaphyseal fraying vs.,
Cleidocranial dysplasia 1:32
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234 long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188 1:109
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209,211 Cornelia de Lange syndrome
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327, 329 forearm deformity vs., 1:229
Clubfoot (talipes equinovarus), congenital foot radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226
deformity vs., 111:138, 140 Coronoid process fracture, medial elbow pain
Clubhand related to, 111:23, 25
radial, forearm deformity vs., 1:229 Cortical tunneling, 11:92-93
ulnar Cortical/endosteal thickening, long bones, diffuse,
forearm deformity vs., 1:229 1:90-93
radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226, 227 Coumadin (warfarin) complications, irregular or
Coarctation of aorta, thoracic stippled long bone epiphysis vs., 1:12-13, 15
inferior rib notching vs., 1:308-309 Coxa magna deformity, 1:338-339
superior rib notching vs., 1:310 differential diagnosis, 1:338-339
Collagen vascular disorders, protrusio acetabuli vs., hip labral tear related to, 1:341, 343
1:335 Coxa valga, hip labral tear related to, 1:341, 343
Collateral ligament Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (Pyle dysplasia), long
XI
INDEX
>< bone undertubulation vs., 1:97 Denervation hypertrophy, enlarged muscle vs.,
QJ
"'C Cruciate ligament 11:173,174
c: anterior, reconstruction of, cyclops lesion Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, subcutaneous
associated with, intraarticular mass vs., mass vs., 11:170
1:202,204 Dermatomyositis
mucoid degeneration, knee fluid collections vs., intermuscular edema vs., 11:181, 182
1:356,358-359 linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:117,
Crystalline arthropathy 119
effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222 mimic, heterotopic ossification vs., III:163
groin/hip pain related to, 11I:48 nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 113
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68 periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 189
knee soft tissue lesions with f1uid/fluid levels vs.,
anterior knee pain related to, 111:80 11:154,156
medial knee pain related to, 11I:86 thigh pain related to, 111:61,63
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334 Dermoid cyst, skull, target lesions of bone vs., 11:41
shoulder instability related to, 11I:9, 11 Desmoplastic fibroma
Cubital tunnel syndrome, elbow/wrist nerve long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
entrapment vs., 11I:28, 30 lesion vs., 1:69
Cubitus valgus, congenital, elbow deformities vs., long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive
111:16 lesion vs., 1:35, 36
Cuboid fracture, lateral ankle pain related to, Developmental dysplasia, hip. See Hip,
111:114, 116 developmental dysplasia.
Cushing disease Diabetes mellitus, musculoskeletal complications.
avascular necrosis related to, 11I:161 See also Diabetic foot complications.
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285, 287 arthritis mutilans vs., 1:162
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83, 86 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 139
hypertrophic callus formation vs., 11:74 enlarged muscle vs., 11:172, 174
muscle atrophy vs., 11:176-177 generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:84
Cyanotic heart disease, congenital, generalized intermuscular edema vs., 11:181, 183
increased bone density in child vs., 11:64 muscle atrophy vs., 11:176, ] 78
Cyclops lesion, ACL reconstruction, intraarticular neuropathic osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164
mass vs., 1:202,204 Diabetic foot complications, 111:142-143
Cystic angiomatosis acroosteolysis vs., 1:247
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:2-3, 6 ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 129
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly Charcot neuropathy in, 111:142, 143
lesion vs., 1:3, 5 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 139
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313 atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 160
Cystic fibrosis, hypertrophic, periostitis of multiple differential diagnosis, 111:142-143
bones in children vs., 1:131 pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 111:132-133, 134
Cystic lymphangioma (mimic), enlarged peripheral Diaphyseal lesions, long bones
nerves vs., 11:187, 189 aggressive
Cystic masses, 11:160-165 adult, 1:73
Cysticercosis, linear and curvilinear calcification child, 1:74-77
vs., 11:117,121 with endosteal thickening, 1:78-79
Cysts, arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., cen tral, non-aggressive, 1:66-69
1:155,156 cortically based
lytic, 1:84-89
sclerotic, 1:80-83
D Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH)
Dactylitis, 1:266-267 ankylosis vs., 1:176-177,178
Deep venous thrombosis discal mineralization vs., 1:270, 272
calcified chronic, linear and curvilinear enthesopathy vs., 11:96, 98
calcification vs., 11:117, 120 linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:119
calf pain related to, 111:93,96 linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280
intermuscular edema vs., 11:180, 182 mimic
Deltoid ligament sprain, medial ankle pain related arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:135,
to, 111:109, 113 136
XII
INDEX
arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:]43, with short extremities, 111:186-187
144 with short ribs, 1II:188-189
bilateral symmetric sacroiliitis vs., 1:3]6, 318 Dyggve-Melchior-Clausen syndrome, symphysis
spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298 pubis widening vs., 1:327
pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94, 95 Dyschondrosteosis
soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106, 108 abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:235,237
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186
fusion vs., 1:324 forearm deformity vs., 1:229
tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100 radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226
Digits. See Fingers and toes. Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica. See Trevor
Dilantin therapy, rickets and osteomalacia related Fairbank disease.
to, 1Il:166-167, 169 Dystrophic calcification. See Calcification,
Discal mineralization, 1:270-273 dystrophic.
Discectomy, anterior cervical, with fusion, squaring
of vertebra vs., 1:290
Discogenic endplate changes, increased marrow fat E
vs., 11:136, 138 Eagle-Barrett (prune belly syndrome)
Discogenic sclerosis, vertebral body sclerosis vs., symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
1:292,293 with stylohyoid ligament ossification, tendon
Discs, intervertebral. See Intervertebral disc. and ligament ossification vs., 11:100, 101
DISH. See Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis Eccrine hidradenoma
(DISH). cystic masses vs., 11:161, 165
Dislocations subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 171
arthroplasty components. See Arthroplasty Echinococcal cyst/disease
components, loosening and dislocation. lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301,
carpal bones 305
radial-sided wrist pain related to, 111:43, linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:117,
46-47 121
ulnar-sided pain wrist related to, 1II:37, 40 Edema
hip, avascular necrosis related to, 111:156, 158 bone marrow. See Bone marrow edema.
patella, transient, anterior knee pain related to, intermuscular, 11:180-183
111:80,82 subchondral edematous-like signal, 11:130-131
shoulder Effusions
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., arthritis-related, shoulder fluid collections vs.,
111:2 1:222,223
rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:4-5, 6 joint
widened joint space related to, 1:170, 173 mimic, anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195
Disuse osteoporosis. See Osteoporosis, disuse. unspecified, widened joint space related to,
Down syndrome (trisomy 21) 1:171,173
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234-235 pericardial, malignant, soft tissue uptake on
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs., bone scan vs., 11:202
111:153 pleural, malignant, soft tissue uptake on bone
bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body scan vs., 11:202
beaking vs., 1:282 Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
delayed bone age vs., 11:104 arachnodactyly vs., 1:238
mimic, dwarfism with horizontal acetabular pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 111:133
roof vs., 111:191 shoulder instability related to, 1II:9
Dracunculiasis, linear and curvilinear calcification symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
vs., 11:117 ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:264
Drug therapy, high dose, complications, long bone widened joint space related to, 1:171
metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 Elastofibroma, soft tissue lesions with
Dupuytren contracture, soft tissue contractures predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., 11:151,
related to, 111:170 152
Dwarfism. See also Thanatophoric dwarf. Elbow
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285,287 deformities in children and young adults,
with horizontal acetabular roof, 111:190-]91 111:16-17
with major spine involvement, 111:184-185 nerve entrapment, 111:28-31
XIII
INDEX
>< olecranon bursitis, 1l1:26-27 Epicondylar avulsion, medial, pediatric, medial
Q.I
"'C pain elbow pain related to, 111:22-23,24
C lateral,III:18-21 Epicondylitis
medial, 1l1:22-25 lateral elbow pain related to, 111:18,19
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome (chondroectodermal medial elbow pain related to, 111:22,23
dysplasia) Epidermal inclusion cyst
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:235, 237 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253, 256
dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs., soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:243
111:191 subcutaneous mass vs., 1l:167
dwarfism with short extremities vs., 1l1:186, 187 Epidermal nevus syndrome, focal gigantism/
dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188 macrodactyly related to, 111:181
Embolic disease, during infancy, unilateral short Epidermolysis, long bone overtubulation vs., I: 103
limb related to, 1l1:173, 175 Epidural space
Enchondroma abscess, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, 145
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:5 hematoma, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, 145
benign osseous lesions with aggressive Epiphyseal dysplasia. See also Spondyloepiphyseal
appearance vs., II:54 dysplasia.
long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ballooning
lesion vs., 1:66, 67 vs., 1:16, 17
long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive multiple
lesion vs., 1:34, 35 abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 236
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:44, 45 dwarfism with short extremities vs., II1:186
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 253 irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs.,
phalanx, long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion 1:13
vs., 1:45, 47 Epiphysis, long bones
sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs., epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral lytic lesion,
11:32,35 1:22-25
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 15 fracture, pediatric, long bone epiphyseal
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312,314 overgrowth/ballooning vs., 1:16, 17
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:20, 22 irregular or stippled, 1:12-15
target lesions of bone vs., 11:40-41,43 overgrowth/balloon ing, I:16-17
Endplate changes, discogenic, increased marrow fat sclerosis/ivory, 1:18-21
vs., 1l:136, 138 slipped capital femoral epiphysis. See Slipped
Engelmann-Camurati disease capital femoral epiphysis.
generalized increased bone density vs. Epithelioid sarcoma, soft tissue target lesions vs.,
adult, 11:61 11:158
child, 11:65, 67 Epitrochlearis, anconeus, medial elbow pain related
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening to, 111:23,25
vs., 1:90-91, 93 Erdheim-Chester disease
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 100-101 bone within bone appearance vs., 1l:77, 79
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:69, 72 generalized increased bone density vs., adult,
solid periostitis vs., 1:117, 121 11:61,63
Enlarged, painful sternoclavicular joint, 111:2-3 mimic, sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:69, 73
Enlarged muscle, 1l:172-175 Erosive arthritis, 1:146-151. See also Osteoarthritis,
Enlarged peripheral nerves, 11:186-189 erosive.
Enostosis (bone island) Erythroblastosis fetalis
long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs.,
lesion vs., 1:34, 35 111:153
long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-aggressive generalized increased bone density in child vs.,
lesion vs., 1:48, 49 11:65
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:26 long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27
polyostotic lesions vs., 1l:2, 3 Estrogen deficiency, generalized osteoporosis vs.,
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 69 11:83
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:20, 21 Ewing sarcoma
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 294 aggressive periostitis vs., 1:112, 114
Enthesopathy, 11:96-99 childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 286
degenerative, 11:96, 97 flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6, 8
differential diagnosis, 1l:96-99
XIV
INDEX
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301, Feet. See Foot.
305 Femoral acetabular impingement
long bone central metaphyseal aggressive lesion arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:167,
vs., 1:41,43 169
long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion vs. in teenagers, III:149, 150
adult, 1:70, 72 Femoral epiphysis, slipped capital. See Slipped
child, 1:74, 76 capital femoral epiphysis.
with endosteal thickening, 1:78, 79 Femoral head, elliptical morphology, hip labral tear
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening related to, 1:340, 342
vs., 1:91, 93 Femoral neck
long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:18- fractures
19,21 avascular necrosis related to, 111:156, 158
metastatic malunion, hip labral tear related to, 1:341,
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:2-3, 5 343
bone cancer vs., 11:57 lateral bump, hip labral tear related to, 1:340,
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 1l:8-9, 11 341
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209, 211 Femur
painful scoliosis vs., 11I:145, 146 distal, enlargement of intercondylar notch,
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313, 315 1:346-347
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:21, 24 proximal
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330 bone marrow edema syndromes, 11:126-129
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391 focal deficiency, unilateral short limb related
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293, 297 to, J!I:173, 177
Exercise, excessive, delayed bone age vs., 1l:105 reduced anteversion, hip labral tear related to,
Exostosis. See Multiple hereditary exostosis. 1:341,345
Extensor digitorum brevis, avulsion, lateral ankle trauma, coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338, 339
pain related to, 111:115, 117 Fetal alcohol syndrome, short metacarpal/
Extensor tendon mechanism injury, lateral elbow metatarsal bones vs., 1:260-261
pain related to, 111:19 Fibroblastic sarcoma, acral myxoinflammatory, soft
Extramedullary hematopoiesis, soft tissue lesions tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241
with predominately low Tl & T2 signal vs., Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
11:151 heterotopic ossification vs., 1lI:163, 165
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs.,
1:277,279
F soft tissue contractures related to, 1Il:171
Fabella, stress fracture, painful knee replacement soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107, 109
related to, 111:99 Fibrolipomatous hamartoma, enlarged peripheral
Fabry disease (vertebral bodies), generalized nerves vs., 1l:187, 189
osteoporosis vs., 11:83 Fibroma
Facet joint, septic, painful scoliosis vs., 111:145, 147 chondromyxoid
False negative scans and photopenic lesions, flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
11:196-197 lesion vs., 1:3, 5
Familial Mediterranean fever, arthritis with long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-
osteopenia vs., 1:139 aggressive lesion vs., 1:49, 51
Fanconi anemia long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs.,
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs., 1:45,47
111:153 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:49
forearm deformity vs., 1:228 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 19
radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226 desmoplastic
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261, long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
263 lesion vs., 1:69
Fat cells. See Adipocytes. long bone central metaphyseal non-
Fat necrosis aggressive lesion vs., 1:35, 36
bone lesions with bright T1 signal vs., 11:146- juvenile aponeurotic, bizarre horizontal
147, 148 periosteal reaction vs., I:123, 124
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:166, 168 tendon sheath
Fatty deposition, focal, increased marrow fat vs., soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1
11:136, 138 & T2 signal vs., [[:151, 152
xv
INDEX
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 243 advanced bone age vs., II:102, 103
tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184 childhood polyostotic lesions vs., II:8, 10
Fibromatosis generalized increased bone density in child
bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs., 1:123, vs., 11:65, 67
124 protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335,337
desmoid-type, soft tissue lesions with pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94
predominately low Tl & T2 signal vs., skull, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:26-
II:151,152 27, 29
plantar skull base, solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs.,
ball of foot pain related to, Ill:127 II:21,25
soft tissue lesions with predominately low Tl solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 17
& T2 signal vs., 11:152 solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312, 313
Fibromatosis colli supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331,333
enlarged muscle vs., II:173, 175 tibial bowing vs., 1:352, 354
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209 tibial metadiaphyseal cortically based lesion vs.,
soft tissue contractures related to, III:170, 171 1:94
Fibroosseous pseudotumor of digits, swelling and unilateral short limb related to, 11I:172-173,175
periostitis of digit (dactylitis) vs., 1:266, 267 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 296
Fibrosarcoma Fibrous hamartoma of infancy, subcutaneous mass
aggressive periostitis vs., 1:113, 115 vs., 11:167
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:11 Fibrous histiocytoma
long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion vs., 1:71, angiomatoid
73 soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
metastatic, bone cancer vs., 11:57, 58 II:154
myxofibrosarcoma subcutaneous mass vs., II:l71
acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic, soft of bone, malignant. See Malignant fibrous
tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241 histiocytoma.
subcutaneous mass vs., II:171 Fibroxanthoma
sequestration vs., 11:36, 38 Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs.,
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 1:374,375
1l:154 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:333 appearance vs., II:54
Fibrosis childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:8
post-operative, anterior knee pain related to, healing, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27,
Ill:81 29
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:297 long bone diaphyseal lesions vs.
Fibrous dysplasia central, non-aggressive, 1:67,68
benign osseous lesions with aggressive cortically based
appearance vs., II:54 lytic, 1:84, 85
genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:371 sclerotic, 1:81, 83
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301, long bone metaphyseal lesions vs.
304 bubbly, 1:44, 45
long bone diaphyseal lesions vs. cortically based, 1:57, 59
aggressive adult, 1:71, 73 eccentric, non-aggressive, 1:48, 49
central, non-aggressive, 1:66, 68 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., II:47
cortically based mimic, olecranon bursitis vs., 11I:27
lytic, 1:84,86-87 sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
sclerotic, 1:81 11:32,33
long bone metaphyseal lesions vs. soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383,387
central, non-aggressive, 1:35, 37 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., II:14, 16
cortically based, 1:57,59 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., II:20, 22
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96, 98 thin bone, long bone central metaphyseal non-
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:44, 46 aggressive lesion vs., 1:35, 38
pelvis, flat bones with focally expanded or Fibular fracture, lateral ankle pain related to,
bubbly lesion vs., 1:2,4 III:114,117
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253 Filariasis, linear and curvilinear calcification vs.,
polyostotic 11:117
adult polyostotic lesions vs., II:2, 4 Fingers and toes
xvi
INDEX
acroosteolysis, 1:246-249 11:136,138
acroosteosclerosis, 1:250-251 Focal gigantism/macrodactyly, 111:180-183
arachnodactyly, 1:238-239 Fong disease. See Nail patella syndrome (Fong).
congenital contractural, 1:238 Foot. See also Ankle; Calcaneus; Fingers and toes;
dactylitis, 1:266-267 Talus; Tarsal entries.
fibroosseous pseudotumor of digits, swelling Achilles tendon. See Achilles tendon.
and periostitis of digit (dactylitis) vs., 1:266, ball of foot pain, 111:126-131
267 bound, cavus foot deformity vs., 11I:137
focal gigantism/macrodactyly, 111:180-183 calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle, 1:376-379
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis, 1:194- cavus foot deformity, 11I:136-137
197 congenital deformity, 111:138-141
metacarpophalangeal-predom inan t arthri tis, diabetic complications. See Diabetic foot
1:192-193 complications.
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions, 1:252-257 flatfoot. See Pes planovalgus (flatfoot).
sesamoiditis, 1:258-259 heel pain, 11I:120-125
short metacarpal/metatarsal, 1:260-263 nerve entrapment syndromes, lower extremity
short rib polydactyly, childhood platyspondyly nerve entrapment vs., 111:65
vs., 1:285 rocker bottom (congenital vertical talus)
sickle cell dactylitis, periostitis of multiple bones congenital foot deformity vs., 111:139,141
in children vs., 1:131, 133 pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 11I:133,135
soft tissue mass in, 1:240-245 soft tissue mass, 1:382-387
swelling and periostitis of digit (dactylitis), Forearm deformity, 1:228-231
1:266-267 Foreign body
ulnar deviation of metacarpophalangeal joints, acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:251
1:264-265 ball of foot pain related to, 11I:127,130
Fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288-289 heel pain related to, 11I:121, 123
Flat bones metallic, intraarticular low signal material vs.,
focally expanded or bubbly lesion, 1:2-5 11:190, 191
permeative lesion, 1:6-11 overlying metallic, photopenic lesions and false
Flatfoot. See Pes planovalgus (flatfoot). negative scans vs., 11:196
Flexor mechanism injury, medial elbow pain soft tissue lesions with predominately low Tl &
related to, 11I:22,24 T2 signal vs., 11:150, 151-152
Flow voids, soft tissue lesions with predominately soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 242
low Tl & T2 signal vs., 11:150 subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167,168
Fluid collections Fracture healing
knee, 1:356-361 aggressive periostitis vs., 1:113, 114
shoulder, 1:222-225 complications, elbow deformities vs., 111:16
Fluoride complications. See also Fluorosis. solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 117
generalized increased bone density vs. solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312, 313
adult, 11:60,62 target lesions of bone vs., 11:40
child, 11:65 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:121 Fractures
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 11I:108,
vs., 1:91 lll-112
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 avulsion
solid periostitis vs., 1:117 anterior arch C1, ossification/calcification
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ anterior to C1 vs., 1:274
fusion vs., 1:324 early, nodular calcification vs., 11:110,113
tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:101 intraarticular, calcified intraarticular body/
Fluorosis bodies vs., 1:180, 182
ankylosis vs., 1:177 OSSification/calCification anterior to C1 vs.,
enthesopathy vs., 11:97 1:274,275
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., pelvic (mimic), enthesopathy vs., 11:97,99
1:127 calcaneal. See Calcaneus, fractures.
spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298 calf pain related to, 11I:93-94
tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100 callus formation. See Callus formation.
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293 capitellar, lateral elbow pain related to, 11I:21
Focal fatty deposition, increased marrow fat vs.,
XVII
INDEX
clavicle, nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69
1:208, 209-210 thigh pain related to, 1II:61
compression fracture, acute, vertebral body tibial bowing vs., 1:352, 353
sclerosis vs., 1:292, 294 wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to,
condylar 11I:33
lateral elbow pain related to, III:18, 20 metaphyseal
medial elbow pain related to, III:23, 25 in child abuse, long bone metaphyseal
coronoid process, medial elbow pain related to, fraying vs., 1:32, 33
1Il:23, 25 long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30
cuboid, lateral ankle pain related to, 1Il:116 metatarsal, lateral ankle pain related to, 1Il:114,
delayed union of, hypertrophic callus formation 115
vs., 11:74 motion of, hypertrophic callus formation vs.,
entrapped soft tissue in, widened joint space 11:74-75
related to, 1:170 navicular
epiphyseal, long bones, pediatric, long bone anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
epiphyseal overgrowth/ballooning vs., 1:16, III:105, 107
17 avascular necrosis related to, 1II:157
epiphyseal marrow signal, abnormal, vs., 11:132 medial ankle pain related to, 1II:111-112
femoral neck nonunion of
avascular necrosis related to, Ill: 156, 158 hypertrophic callus formation vs., 11:74,75
malunion, hip labral tear related to, 1:341, pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94
343 olecranon, medial elbow pain related to, III:22,
fibula, lateral ankle pain related to, 111:114 24
fragments osteochondral, subchondral edematous-like
impaction, calcified intraarticular body/ signal vs., 11:130
bodies vs., 1:180, 181 patellar, anterior knee pain related to, III:80, 83
mimic, soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106, 108 pelvis, groin/hip pain related to, 1II:48
retained, widened joint space related to, peri prosthetic
1:170,172 hip pain related to, III:75, 79
glenoid, shoulder instability related to, IIl:9, 11 knee pain related to, IIl:99, 103
growth plate premature physeal closure vs., physeal
1:106 advanced bone age vs., 11:103
hip genu varum (bow leg deformity), l:372
groin/hip pain related to, 11I:48,49-50 long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
lateral hip pain related to, III:54, 56 1:108, 109
pain in elderly patients related to, 11I:68, pediatric
69-70 long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32,
humeral head, shoulder instability related to, 33
111:8,10 unilateral short limb related to, Ill: 172,
humeral neck, surgical, glenohumeral 173
malalignment vs., 1:216, 217 radial head/neck, lateral elbow pain related to,
hyperextension (teardrop), ossification/ 111:18,19-20
calcification anterior to C1 vs., 1:274, 275 scaphoid, avascular necrosis related to, 1Il:156,
in burns, hypertrophic callus formation vs., 158
11:74 sesamoiditis vs., 1:258, 259
infection of, hypertrophic callus formation vs., shoulder, rotator cuff symptoms vs., IIl:5, 6
11:74,75 stress reaction, thigh pain related to, 111:60,62
insufficiency. See Insufficiency fractures. subcapital, Garden IV (mimic), benign osseous
knee, medial knee pain related to, 1Il:86 lesions with aggressive appearance vs., II:55
lower extremity talar
calf pain related to, 1Il:92 anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
thigh pain related to, TII:60, 61 1Il:105, 107
malunion lateral process, lateral ankle pain related to,
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 235 IIl:115, 119
calf pain related to, 1lI:93 Tillaux, lateral ankle pain related to, 111:115,118
cavus foot deformity vs., IlI:136 vertebral body, asymmetric, painful scoliosis vs.,
forearm deformity vs., 1:228, 229 Ill: 144
XVIII
INDEX
wrist supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331 ::s
radial-sided pain related to, 111:42,43 Generalized increased bone density, adult, 11:60-63 Q..
1'0
ulnar-sided pain related to, 111:36,39 Genu valgum (knock knees), [:370-371 X
Freiberg infarction, ball of foot pain related to, Giant cell tumor
111:127, 130 aggressive, long bone central metaphyseal
Friedrich disease, nonarticular clavicular lesions lesion vs., aggressive, 1:41, 43
vs., 1:209 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
Frostbite appearance vs., 11:51, 53
acroosteolysis vs., 1:246, 248 bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:144,
acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250, 251 145
irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs., flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
1:13 lesion vs., 1:2, 3
Fungal infections lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268
arthritis related to lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301,
atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:159, 161 304
monoarthritis vs., 1:199, 201 long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
low virulence, arthritis with preserved cartilage lytic lesion vs., [:22, 23
space vs., 1:167 long bone metaphyseal lesions vs.
soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1 & T2 bubbly, 1:44, 46
signal vs., 11:151 central
aggressive, 1:41,43
non-aggressive, 1:35, 38
G eccentric
Gadolinium, concentrated, soft tissue lesions with aggressive, 1:52, 54
predominately low 1'1 & T2 signal vs., 11:151 non-aggressive, 1:48, 50
Ganglion cyst mimic, inferior rib notching vs., 1:309
anechoic mass vs., 11:194 patellar lytic lesions vs., [:348-349, 350-351
cystic masses vs., 11:160, 161 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 255
intraosseous soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 16
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390 solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313,315
knee fluid collections vs., 1:357,360 supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331,333
radial-sided wrist pain related to, 111:42,45 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223, 225 tendon sheath
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs.,
II: 155 1:157
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 385 long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal!
su bperiostea I subchondral lytic lesion vs., 1:23,25
bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs., mimic, arthritis with large subchondral cysts
[:123,125 vs., 1:155
long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., monoarthritis vs., 1:199,201
1:61,64 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252-253,
wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to, 256
111:33,35 soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1
Gastrocnemius & T2 signal vs., 11:150, 152
strain, knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 359 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 241
variant, extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363 soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 386
Gaucher disease tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184,
abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., 11:133, 185
135 Giantism, localized (mimic), arachnodactyly vs.,
avascular necrosis related to, III:161 1:238,239
bone within bone appearance vs., 11:79 Gigantism, focal, 111:180-183
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288 differential diagnosis, 111:180-183
generalized increased bone density vs., adult, long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
11:60,62 1:109
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83, 86 GLAD (glenoid labrum articular disruption),
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96,98 anteroinferior labral/capsule injury vs., [[[:12,
13
XIX
INDEX
>< Glenohumeral ligament solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 19
QJ
"'C humeral avulsion of (HAGL), anteroinferior subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167
c: labral/capsule injury vs., JJJ:12, 13 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390, 391
tear, shoulder instability related to, 111:8-9, 10 widened joint space related to, 1:171, ] 74
Glenohumeral malalignment, 1:216-217 wrist pain related to
Glenoid cavity radial-sided, 1ll:42
fracture, shoulder instability related to, 111:9, 11 ulnar-sided, 1II:36, 38
malformation, shoulder instability related to, Gouty tophus, soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382,
111:9, 11 385
Glenoid labrum articular disruption (GLAD), Granulation tissue, soft tissue mass of finger vs.,
anteroinferior labral/capsule injury vs., 11I:12, 1:242
13 Granuloma, injection, nodular calcification vs.,
Glomus tumor 1J:11O, 112
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253, 256 Granuloma annulare, soft tissue mass of foot vs.,
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 243 1:383
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383, 387 Graves disease, orbit, enlarged muscle vs., 1J:173
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 169 Groin/hip pain, 11I:48-53
Gonadotropin tumor, ectopic, advanced bone age Growth arrest lines, long bone metaphyseal bands
vs., 11:102 and lines vs., 1:26, 27
Gout Growth deformities, radiation-induced
ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 111:108, 111 advanced bone age vs., 11:102, 103
arthritis mutilans vs., 1:163 bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:154, beaking vs., 1:282, 283
156 elbow deformities vs., 111:]6
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:134, growth plate premature physeal closure vs.,
136 1:106, 107
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:166, unilateral short limb related to, 111:173, ] 76
]69 Growth plate
arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:142, 143 premature physeal closure, 1:106-107
ball of foot pain related to, JJJ:126, ]29 widened physis, 1:108-111
calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:377, Guillain-Barre syndrome, muscle atrophy vs.,
379 11:177
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232, 233
chondrocalcinosis vs., 1:184, 185
distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement H
vs., 1:346,347 HAGL (humeral avulsion of glenohumeral
erosive arthritis vs., 1:146, 148 ligament), anteroinferior labral/capsule injury
groin/hip pain related to, 11[:48 vs., 111:13
intraarticular low signal material vs., II:] 90, 192 Haglund syndrome
intraarticular mass vs., 1:203, 204 Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs.,
knee, anterior knee pain related to, 111:80 1:374,375
long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:377,
lytic lesion vs., 1:22, 25 378
mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152, 153 enthesopathy vs., 11:96, 98
monoarthritis vs., 1:198,200 heel pain related to, 111:121, 123
nodular calcification vs., [1:110, 113 retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380
olecranon bursitis vs., 111:26,27 Hajdu-Cheney acroosteolysis syndrome, 1:247
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348, 350 Hallux valgus deformity, ball of foot pain related
periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 188 to, 111:126, 128
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 254 Hamartoma
retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., [:380 fibrolipomatous, enlarged peripheral nerves vs.,
sacroiliitis vs. 11:187, 189
bilateral asymmetric, 1:320 of infancy, fibrous, subcutaneous mass vs.,
unilateral, 1:322 11:167
soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1 & Hamate fracture, ulnar-sided pain wrist related to,
T2 signal vs., 11:150, 152 111:37,40
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 242 Hardware. See a/so Arthroplasty components.
xx
INDEX
complications spine, benign osseous lesions with aggressive
thigh pain related to, IJI:61, 63 appearance vs., 11:54
wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to, synovial
111:33, 35 distal femur intercondylar notch
reactive changes, long bone cortically based, enlargement VS., 1:346, 347
lytic diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:85,89 intraarticular mass VS., 1:203, 205
removed, sequestration vs., 11:36, 39 soft tissue lesions with f1uid/fluid levels vs.,
Hardware failure 11:155
ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 1II:108, 112 Hemangiopericytoma
hip adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:3
groin/hip pain related to, 111:49, 52 bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs., 11:147
lateral hip pain related to, 111:54, 57 nodular calcification VS., 11:111, 114
pain in elderly patients related to, m:69, 72 osseous
painful hip replacement related to, m:75, benign osseous lesions with aggressive
78-79 appearance vs., 11:55
knee supra-acetabular iliac destruction VS., 1:331
medial knee pain related to, 111:86,89 Hemarthrosis
painful knee related to, 111:99 shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222-223
Heart disease, congenital, repaired, inferior rib soft tissue lesions with f1uid/fluid levels vs.,
notching vs., 1:308 11:154, 156
Heavy metal poisoning widened joint space related to, 1:170,172
bone within bone appearance vs., 11:77 Hematoma
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195
1:26,28 calf pain related to, 1II:92, 95
Heel pad atrophy, heel pain related to, 11I:121 chronic, soft tissue lesions with predominately
Heel pain, 111:120-125. See also Calcaneus. low Tl & T2 signal vs., 11:150
Helmut sclerosis, vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293 cystic masses vs., 11:161, 164
Hemangioendothelioma, osseous enlarged muscle VS., 11:172,173
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:3, 6 epidural space, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, 145
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391 hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69, 72
Hemangioma knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 358
cavernous, soft tissue lesions with lateral hip pain related to, 111:55, 57
predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., nodular calcification VS., 11:111
11:151 shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223, 224
in traosseous soft tissue lesions with f1uid/fluid levels vs.,
increased marrow fat vs., 11:136, 138 11:154,155
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240
1:300,301 soft tissue ossification VS., 11:106
mimic, sequestration vs., 11:37,39 subacute, bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs.,
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 294 11:146,148
skull (mimic), bizarre horizontal periosteal subcutaneous mass vs., 11:166, 168
reaction vs., 1:123, 125 thigh pain related to, 111:60, 62
soft tissue Hematopoiesis, extramedullary, soft tissue lesions
bone lesions with bright T1 signal vs., 11:146, with predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs.,
148 11:151
cystic masses vs., 11:161, 164 Hematopoietic stimulation, bone marrow
enlarged muscle vs., 11:175 hyperplasia vs., 11:140-141, 143
extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363, 365 Hemihypertrophy, 111:178-179
focal gigan tism/macrodactyly related to, Hemochromatosis
111:180, 182 arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155,
linear and curvilinear calcification VS., 11:116, 157
118 arthritis with normal bone density VS., 1:137
nodular calcification vs., 11:111,114 arthritis with productive changes VS., 1:142
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 189 carpal cystic/lytic lesions VS., 1:232
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241,245 discal mineralization vs., 1:271
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 386 linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280
soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs., metacarpophalangeal-predominant arthritis vs,/
11:122, 124 1:192, 193
XXI
INDEX
mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152, 153 arthritis
primary, generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83 lateral hip pain related to, 1Il:54, 56
Hemophilia, musculoskeletal complications pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68,
advanced bone age vs., 11:102, 103 70-71
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155, coxa magna deformity, 1:338-339
157 developmental dysplasia
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:141 avascular necrosis related to, 111:157,159
atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 161 coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338
distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement in teenagers, 111:149,150
vs., 1:346, 347 lateral hip pain related to, 1II:55, 57
early, arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., overcorrection osteotomy for, hip labral tear
1:166, 168 related to, ]:341, 345
elbow deformities vs., 111:16,17 unilateral short limb related to, 111:172,175
erosive arthritis vs., 1:150 widened joint space related to, 1:171,
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly 173-174
lesion vs., 1:3, 5 dislocation, avascular necrosis related to,
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 1Il:181, 111:156,158
183 fractures
in teenagers, 1Il:149, 150 groin/hip pain related to, 11I:48,49-50
long bone diaphyseal lesions vs. lateral hip pain related to, 11I:54,56
aggressive pain in elderly patients related to, 1II:68,
adult, 1:71 69-70
child,I:75 groin/hip pain, 11I:48-53
cortically based, lytic, 1:85, 89 ~b~l~aLSa~b~l~a~h~.
long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ballooning lateral pain, 11I:54-57
vs., 1:16 malformation, groin/hip pain related to, 11I:49,
long bone growth plate premature physeal 53
closure vs., 1:106 osteoarthritis
long bone overtubulation vs., 1:102-103, 104 lateral hip pain related to, 111:56
monoarthritis vs., ]:199, 201 pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68,70
regional osteoporosis vs., 11:89 rapidly destructive
unilateral short limb related to, 111:172,176 atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:159, 161
Hemophilic arthropathy, intraarticular low signal bone marrow edema syndromes vs.,
material vs., 11:191, 193 11:127, 129
Hemophilic pseudotumor pain in
anechoic mass vs., 11:194 groin/hip pain, 1II:48-53
benign osseous lesions with aggressive in elderly patients, 111:68-73
appearance vs., 11:55 lateral pain, 111:54-57
bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs., 1:122, with hip replacement, 1II:74-79
124 pathology (referred pain), medial knee pain
heel pain related to, 111:121,125 related to, 11I:87
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15,19 protrusio acetabuli, 1:334-337
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331 differential diagnosis, 1:334-337
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., ]:391, 393 secondary, hip labral tear related to, 1:341,
Hemorrhage, subperiosteal, bone within bone 344
appearance vs., 11:76 septic, coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338, 339
Heparin therapy, generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83 snapping hip, 11I:58-59
Hepatoma, metastatic, bone cancer vs., 11:57,58 tendon impingement, snapping hip related to,
Heterotopic ossification. See Ossification, 111:58-59
heterotopic. trauma, coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338,339
Hibernoma, bone lesions with bright T1 signal vs., HIV-related arthritis
11:147, 149 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139
Hidradenoma, eccrine erosive arthritis vs., 1:150
cystic masses vs., 11:161, 165 interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., 1:195,
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167,171 196
Hip. See also Arthroplasty components; Hardware swelling and periostitis of digit (dactylitis) vs.,
failure. 1:266,267
XXII
INDEX
Hodgkin disease, solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., Hyperextension (teardrop) fracture, ossification/
11:25 calcification anterior to C1 vs., 1:274, 275
Hoffa disease, anterior knee pain related to, 1ll:81 Hypermobility syndrome, congenital,
Holt-Oram syndrome anteroinferior labral/capsule injury vs., 111:12
forearm deformity vs., 1:228 Hyperparathyroidism
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209 acroosteolysis vs., 1:246, 247
radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226, 227 arthritis mutilans vs., 1:163
Homocystinuria cortical tunneling vs., 11:92,93
arachnodactyly related to, 1:238,239 discal mineralization vs., 1:271, 273
childhood platyspondyly related to, 1:285, 287 distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212, 213
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra related to, fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra vs., 1:288
1:288 generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:82-83, 85-86
generalized osteoporosis related to, 11:83, 87 linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280,
phalanges, long bone overtubulation related to, 28]
1:103, 105 long bone diaphyseal lesion vs., cortically based,
Humeral avulsion of glenohumeral ligament lytic, 1:85, 89
(HAGL), anteroinferior labral/capsule injury medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal
vs., 111:]2, 13 humerus vs., 1:214, 215
Humeral head mimic
fracture, shoulder instability related to, 1Il:8, 10 erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 149
retroversion, shoulder instability related to, 1Il:9 inferior rib notching vs., 1:308,309
rotation (mimic), glenohumeral malalignment interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs.,
vs., 1:216, 217 1:194,196
Humeral neck fracture, surgical, glenohumeral multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27, 30
malalignment vs., 1:216,217 superior rib notching vs., 1:310
Humerus symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326
instability, glenohumeral malalignment related protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335
to, 1:216, 217 superscan vs., 11:204
normal variant ("upper humeral notch"), supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331, 333
medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal symphysis pubis with productive changes/
humerus vs., 1:214 fusion vs., 1:324,325
proximal, medial metaphysis erosion, 1:214-215 treated, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27,
Hunter syndrome, dwarfism with major spine 30
involvement vs., 111:184 with brown tumor
Hurler syndrome acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:251
bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:2,5
beaking vs., 1:282, 283 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
dwarfism with major spine involvement vs., appearance vs., 11:50, 52
111:]84, 185 bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., Il:144,
Hydatid cyst, cystic masses vs., 11:16] 145
Hydroxyapatite deposition disease carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232
ossification/calcification anterior to Cl vs., childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:12
1:274-275 flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
rotator cuff symptoms vs., 11I:5 lesion vs., 1:3, 5
Hyperalimentation. See Total parenteral nutrition. flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, ]0
Hypercalcemia healing, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs.,
idiopathic, long bone metaphyseal bands and 11:27,28
lines vs., 1:27 hyperossified (mimic), sclerosing dysplasias
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:117, vs., 11:69, 71-72
120 lesions originating in posterior vertebral
of infancy, idiopathic, generalized increased elements vs., 1:306, 307
bone density in child vs., 11:65 long bone diaphyseal lesions vs.
Hyperemia aggressive, adult, 1:70-71, 72
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 1ll:181, central, non-aggressive, 1:67, 69
183 long bone metaphyseal lesions vs.
hemihypertrophy related to, 111:178 central, non-aggressive, 1:34, 36
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:26 non-aggressive, 1:49,51
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348, 350
XXIII
INDEX
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 255 Hypophosphatemic rickets (X-linked), [II: 167
with renal osteodystrophy. See Renal Hypopituitarism, increased marrow fat vs., 11:137
osteodystrophy, with hyperparathyroidism. Hypoplastic/aplastic pedicle, lesions originating in
Hyperphosphatasia (juvenile Paget), generalized posterior vertebral elements vs., 1:306
increased bone density in child vs., 11:65 Hypospadias, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
Hyperthyroidism, generalized osteoporosis vs., Hypothalamic mass, advanced bone age vs., 11:102
11:83 Hypothyroidism
Hypertrophic callus formation, II:74-75 anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs.,
Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. See 111:153
Osteoarthropathy, hypertrophic. child (mimic), dwarfism with major spine
Hypervitaminosis A involvement vs., 111:184
long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30 congenital, bullet shaped vertebra/anterior
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209 vertebral body beaking vs., 1:282
periostitis of multiple bones in children vs., irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs.,
1:130-131,132 1:12, 14
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
1:127 [:109, 111
Hypervitaminosis D regional osteoporosis vs., 11:89
bone within bone appearance vs., 1T:76 short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:260,
nodular calcification vs., II: III 262
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., treated, long bone metaphyseal bands and lines
1:127 vs., 1:27
Hypochondroplasia
dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
111:184 I
dwarfism with short extremities vs., 11I:186 Iatrogenic
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., [:261 growth plate premature physeal closure vs.,
Hypogonadism 1:106, 107
delayed bone age vs., 11:104 shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83 tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184, 185
Hypoparathyroidism. See also Ichthyosis syndrome, arachnodactyly vs., 1:239
Pseudo h ypopa ra th yroidism. Iliac destruction, supra-acetabular, 1:330-333
enthesopathy vs., 11:97 Iliacus muscle syndrome, lower extremity nerve
generalized increased bone density vs. entrapment vs., 111:64, 66
adult, 11:60-61,63 Iliopsoas muscle/tendon
child, 11:65 abscess, painful scoliosis vs., 11I:144, 146
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 bursitis, painful hip replacement related to,
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., [:260, 111:75, 79
262 tendon impingement, snapping hip related to,
spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298 111:58,59
tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100 Iliotibial band, snapping hip related to, 111:58, 59
Hypophosphatasia Iliotibial bursitis, knee fluid collections vs., 1:357,
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285, 287 360
cortical tunneling vs., 11:93 Immobilization
enthesopathy vs., 11:97,99 bone within bone appearance vs., 11:76, 78
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., muscle atrophy vs., 11:176, 177
1:109, 111 osteoporosis due to
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 cortical tunneling vs., 11:92
long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., [:30,31 generalized, 11:84
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32, 33 regional, 11:88, 89-90
long bone overtubulation vs., I: 103, 105 prolonged, long bone metaphyseal cupping vs.,
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 101 1:30
mimic, rickets and osteomalacia vs., 11I:167, 169 soft tissue contractures related to, 111:170
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335, 337 with polio, long bone metaphyseal cupping vs.,
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327, 329 1:30
tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100 Imperforate anus, symphysis pubis widening vs.,
tibial bowing vs., 1:353 1:327,329
xxiv
INDEX
Infantile cortical hyperostosis. See Caffey disease. with Charcot neuropathy, neuropathic
Infection osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164, 165
ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 111:108-109, Insufficiency fractures
112 appendicular, long bone cortically based
anterior knee pain related to, 111:81 metaphyseal lesion vs., 1:56, 57
calcified or fungal, soft tissue lesions with benign osseous lesions with aggressive
predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., appearance vs., 11:50-51, 53
11:151 bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:126, 127
calf pain related to, IlI:93, 96-97 calcaneal
congenital, long bone metaphyseal bands and diabetic foot complications vs., 111:143
lines vs., 1:27, 29 heel pain related to, 111:120, 121-122
fungal. See Fungal infections. calf pain related to, 111:94
groin/hip pain related to, 1lI:49, 52 fibula, lateral ankle pain related to, 111:114, 117
heterotopic ossification vs., 111:162 medial knee pain related to, 111:86, 89
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:20,21
neurologic, heterotopic ossification vs., [11:162- subchondral edematous-like signal vs., 11:130,
163 131
sesamoiditis vs., 1:258,259 tarsal and metatarsal bones, diabetic foot
shoulder fluid collections related to, 1:223 complications vs., 111:143
tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184, 185 Insult prior to skeletal maturity, unilateral short
with low virulence organisms, arthritis with limb related to, 11l:173, 176
preserved cartilage space vs., 1:167 Intercalated segment instability
wrist pain related to dorsal, 111:32, 34
radial-sided, 111:43, 47 volar, 11I:32, 34
ulnar-sided, 111:37,41 Intercondylar notch
Infectious bursitis, olecranon bursitis vs., 1I!:26 cyst, knee fluid collections vs., 1:356-357
Inflammatory arthritis. See Ankylosing spondylitis; enlargement, distal femur, 1:346-347
Chronic reactive arthritis; Juvenile idiopathic Intermuscular edema, 1I:180-183
arthritis; Psoriatic arthritis; Rheumatoid Interosseous nerve syndrome
arthritis. elbow/wrist nerve entrapment vs., 111:31
Inflammatory bowel disease arthritis posterior, elbow/wrist nerve entrapment vs.,
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139, 141 1I!:29
arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:145 Interphalangeal-predominant arthritis, 1:194-197
calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:376, Intervertebral disc. See also Vertebrae and vertebral
378 body.
erosive arthritis vs., 1:150 calcification, bone lesions with bright Tl signal
heel pain related to, IlI:121, 124 vs., 11:147
in teenagers, 111:148, 151 disc disease, spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298, 299
linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280, discal mineralization, 1:270-273
28] discectomy, anterior cervical, with fusion,
mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:153 squaring of vertebra vs., 1:290
regional osteoporosis vs., 11:89 discography (mimic), discal mineralization vs.,
sacroiliitis vs. 1:270,272
bilateral asymmetric, [:320, 321 fusion (congenital), discal mineralization vs.,
bilateral symmetric, 1:316-317, 318-319 1:270,272
squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290,292 fusion (surgical)
Injection discal mineralization vs., 1:270,271-272
intramuscular, intermuscular edema vs., 11:180 lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268
medication, soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid paravertebral ossification and calcification
levels vs., 11:154, 156 vs., 1:276
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:199 lesions crossing disc space, 1:268-269
Injection granuloma, nodular calcification vs., paravertebral ossification and calcification,
11:110, 112 1:276-279
Insensitivity/indifference to pain, congenital Intestinal malabsorption, rickets and osteomalacia
acroosteolysis vs., 1:247 related to, 1lI:1 66, 168
arthritis mutilans vs., 1:]62, ]63 Intraarticular air/gas
in teenagers, 11I:151 intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:191, 193
xxv
INDEX
>< mimic, meniscal size alteration vs., 1:367 Juvenile idiopathic arthritis
~
"'C Intraarticular body/bodies, calcified, 1:180-183 advanced bone age vs., 11:102
C Intraarticular chondroma. See Chondroma, ankylosis VS., 1:176,178
intraarticular. arthritis mutilans VS., 1:163
Intraarticular fluid arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155,
glenohumeral malalignment related to, 1:217 157
glenohumeral malalignment vs., 1:216 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 140
Intraarticular low signal material, all sequences, calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:377
11:190-193 delayed bone age vs., U:105
Intraarticular mass, 1:202-205 diagnostic clues, 111:148, 149
differential diagnosis, 1:202-205 discal mineralization vs., 1:271,273
glenohumeral malalignment related to, 1:216, distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement
217 vs., 1:346, 347
Intraarticular neoplasm, shoulder instability early, arthritis with preserved cartilage space VS.,
related to, 111:9 1:166, 168
Intracondylar notch cyst, knee fluid collections vs., effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222,
1:356-357,360 223
Intraosseous ganglion cyst elbow deformities vs., 111:16,17
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232 epiphyseal marrow signal vs., abnormal, 11:132,
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390 134
Intraosseous hemangioma. See Hemangioma, erosive arthritis vs., 1:147,149
in traosseous. focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 111:180,
Intraosseous lipoma. See Lipoma, intraosseous. 181
Intraosseous neoplasms generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:82, 85
anterior knee pain related to, 111:85 linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280,
calf pain related to, 1II:93, 97 281
groin/hip pain related to, 11I:49, 53 long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
knee, anterior knee pain related to, 1Il:81 vs., 1:90
lateral hip pain related to, 11I:55, 57 long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ballooning
medial ankle pain related to, 1II:109, 113 vs., 1:16
medial knee pain related to, 1II:87, 91 long bone growth plate premature physeal
rotator cuff symptoms vs., Ill:7 closure vs., 1:106, 107
thigh pain related to, [11:61 long bone irregular or stippled epiphysis vs.,
Intrapelvic mass, hip pain in elderly patients 1:12,14
related to, 111:69,73 long bone metaphyseal bands and lines VS.,
Intraspinal tumors, painful scoliosis vs., Ill:145, 1:26-27
147 long bone overtubulation VS., 1:102,104
Iodinated contrast, complications, intermuscular metacarpophalangeal-predominant arthritis vs.,
edema vs., 11:181, 183 1:192,193
Iron deficiency anemia, IIJ:152, 153 periostitis of multiple bones in children VS.,
1:130, 132
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334, 336
J radial-sided wrist pain related to, 111:42
Jaccoud arthropathy regional osteoporosis vs., 11:89, 91
mimic, metacarpophalangeal-predominant retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380,381
arthritis vs., I:] 92 sacroiliitis vs., bilateral asymmetric, 1:320
ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:264 short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:260,
Jogger's foot/heel, lower extremity nerve 262
entrapment vs., 111:65 soft tissue contractures related to, III:171
Joint destruction, atrophic, 1:]58-]6] solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 119
Joint effusion squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290, 292
mimic, anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195 swelling and periostitis of digit (dactylitis) vs.,
unspecified, widened joint space related to, 1:266,267
1:171,173 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:392
Joint space, widened, 1:170-175 ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:264
Juvenile aponeurotic fibroma, bizarre horizontal unilateral short limb related to, 1I1:172, 175
periosteal reaction vs., 1:123, 124 wrist pain related to
XXVI
INDEX
radial-sided, 11I:42, 45 lateral hip pain related to, 111:56
ulnar-sided, 111:36 lateral hip pain vs., 111:54
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. See juvenile snapping hip related to, 111:58
idiopathic arthritis. shoulder instability related to, 111:8,9-10
juxtacortical chondroma. See Chondroma, Labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion,
periosteal. anterior, anteroinferior labral/capsule injury
vs., 111:12, 13
Labrum
K anterosuperior, variations/pathology, 1:218-221
Kaposi sarcoma, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167 labral/capsule injury, anteroinferior, 111:12-13
Kidney. See Renal entries. pseudo-SLAP lesion, anterosuperior labral
Kiloh Nevin syndrome, elbow/wrist nerve variations/pathology vs., 1:219
entrapment vs., 11I:29 SLAP lesions
Klinefelter syndrome, forearm deformity vs., 1:229 type I-IV, 1:218-219, 220
Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome type V-X, 1:219, 220
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 111:181 sublabral foramen
hemihypertrophy related to, 111:178, 179 anterosuperior labral variations/pathology
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241,245 vs., 1:218
Knee. See also Arthroplasty components; Hardware with superior sublabral recess (sulcus),
failure; Meniscus. anterosuperior labral variations/
arthritis pathology vs., 1:219, 221
anterior knee pain related to, 11I:80, 82 superior sublabral recess (sulcus), anterosuperior
calf pain related to, 111:92 labral variations/pathology vs., 1:218,219
genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:370 Langerhans cell histiocytosis
medial knee pain related to, 111:86 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
fluid collections, 1:356-361 appearance vs., 11:50, 52
genu valgum (knock knees), 1:370-371 childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 285
genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:372-373 childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:8, 10
intercondylar notch enlargement, distal femur, flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
1:346-347 lesion vs., 1:3
lipoma arborescens flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6, 9
anterior knee pain related to, 111:81,85 lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301,
bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs., 11:147, 304
149 long bone diaphyseal lesions vs.
intraarticular mass vs., 1:203, 205 aggressive, child, 1:74, 76
widened joint space related to, 1:171, 175 central, non-aggressive, 1:66, 68
pain cortically based, lytic, 1:85, 89
anterior, III:80-85 long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
medial, III:86-91 lytic lesion vs., 1:23, 24
painful knee replacement, 111:98-103 long bone metaphyseal lesions vs.
patellar lytic lesions, 1:348-351 central
synovitis, knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 358 aggressive, 1:41, 43
Kniest dysplasia non-aggressive, 1:35, 37
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285 cortically based, 1:57, 59
dwarfism with major spine involvement vs., eccentric
111:184 aggressive, 1:52-53, 54
dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186, 187 non-aggressive, 1:49, 51
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349,351
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253, 257
L sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
Labral cyst 11:33,35
cystic masses vs., II:160, 162 sequestration vs., 11:36,38
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222,224 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., II:14, 17
Labral tear solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313,315
hip symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327, 329
etiology, 1:340--345 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 295
groin/hip pain related to, 111:48, 51 Larsen syndrome, abnormal radiocarpal angle vs.,
1:235,237
INDEX
Lead poisoning polyostotic lesions vs.
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs., adult, 1I:2-3, 6
111:152,154 childhood, [[:8, 11
delayed bone age vs., 11:104, 105 superscan vs., [[:204, 205
Legg-Calve-Perthes disease Ligament injury
abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., 11:132, tendon/ligament microtrauma, with
134 calcification, enthesopathy vs., 11:96, 98
avascular necrosis related to, 1ll:159 widened joint space related to, 1:170, 171
coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338,339 Ligamentum teres tear, snapping hip related to,
hip labral tear related to, [:341, 343 111:58
in teenagers, 111:151 Limbus vertebra (mimic), lesions originating in
long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., [:19, 21 vertebral body vs., 1:300, 303
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., Linea aspera hypertrophy (mimic), bone within
1:108-109,110 bone appearance vs., 1I:77, 79
long bone irregular or stippled epiphysis vs., Linear and curvilinear calcification, 11:116-121
1:12, 14 Linear ossification along anterior spine, 1:280-281
unilateral short limb related to, H!:l72, 174 Lipodystrophy, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167
widened joint space related to, [:171,175 Lipohemarthrosis, soft tissue lesions with fluid/
Leiomyoma fluid levels vs., 1I:154, 156
deep, soft tissue ossification vs., [[:106 Lipoma
subcutaneous mass vs., II: 170 atypical, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167
Leiomyosarcoma, soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid in traosseous
levels vs., 11:154 increased marrow fat vs., 11:136, 138
LEOPARD syndrome, abnormal radiocarpal angle long bone central metaphyseal lesion vs.,
vs., 1:235 non-aggressive, 1:35, 37
Leprosy matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:48
acroosteolysis vs., 1:247, 249 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 1I:l5, 18
arthritis mutilans vs., 1:163 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:23
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:117, target lesions of bone vs., 11:40, 41
121 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390, 392
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 191 parosteal
soft tissue contractures related to, [[[:170 bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs.,
Leriche syndrome, thigh pain related to, [[[:61 1:122, 124
Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis. See long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs.,
Dyschondrosteosis. 1:61,65
Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, acroosteolysis vs., 1:247 soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs.,
Leukemia 11:123, 125
aggressive periostitis vs., 1:113 soft tissue
bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 1I:127 bone lesions with bright T1 signal vs., 11:146,
bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:141, 143 147
bone within bone appearance vs., 1I:76 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 286 soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 385
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, 10 subcutaneous mass vs., 11:166, 168
long bone central metaphyseal lesion vs., soft tissue ossification vs., II:I07
aggressive, 1:41,43 spindle cell, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:170
long bone diaphyseal lesion vs., aggressive, Lipoma arborescens, knee
child, 1:74, 76 anterior knee pain related to, 111:81,85
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs., 11:147
1:26,29 intraarticular mass vs., 1:203,205
medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal widened joint space related to, !:l71, 175
humerus vs., 1:214,215 Lipomatosis
metastatic, bone cancer vs., 11:57 mimic, hemihypertrophy related to, 11I:l78
mimic, generalized increased bone density in nerve
child vs., 11:64 bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs., 11:147,
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209, 211 149
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., enlarged peripheral nerves vs., II: 187, 189
1:127 Lipomatous tumor, atypical, bone lesions with
bright Tl signal vs., 11:146, 147
INDEX
Liposarcoma central
atypical, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167 aggressive, 1:40-43
enlarged muscle vs., 11:175 non-aggressive, 1:34-39
myxoid, bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs., cortically based, 1:56-59
11:146, 148 eccentric
soft tissue lesions vs. aggressive, 1:52-55
bone lesions with bright Tl signal vs., 11:146, non-aggressive, 1:48-51
148 Long thoracic nerve syndrome, nerve entrapment
soft tissue neoplasms with calcification, of shoulder vs., 111:14
11:123, 124 Loose bodies
with fluid/fluid levels, 11:154 anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107, 109 11I:105, 107
Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:180,
increased marrow fat vs., 11:137, 139 18]
long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive hip, snapping hip related to, TII:58, 59
lesion vs., 1:38 intraarticular low signal material vs., Il:190, 192
long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-aggressive intraarticular mass vs., 1:202, 203
lesion vs., 1:49, 51 mimic, sclerotic bone lesion with central
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:48 lucency vs., 11:32-33, 35
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:21, 25 nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112
target lesions of bone vs., 11:40, 42 soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106
Lisfranc ligament disruption, traumatic, pes Lower extremities. See a/50 Ankle; Foot; Hip; Knee.
planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 11I:133, 135 calf pain, 111:92-97
Little Leaguer's elbow, medial elbow pain related dwarfism with short extremities, 111:186-187
to, 111:23 extraarticular popliteal mass, 1:362-365
Liver disease, chronic, rickets and osteomalacia intercondylar notch enlargement, distal femur,
related to, 111:166, 168 1:346-347
Long bones nerve entrapment, 111:64-67
diffuse cortical/endosteal thickening, 1:90-93 thigh pain, 111:60-63
growth plate tibial bowing, 1:352-355
premature physeal closure, 1:106-107 Lunate injuries, avascular necrosis related to,
widened physis, 1:108-111 111:156, 158
overtubulation, 1:102-105 Lung carcinoma, metastatic
surface (juxtacortical) lesion, 1:60-65 bone cancer vs., 11:56, 57-58
tibial metadiaphyseal cortically based lesion, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:28
1:94-95 Lunotriquetral instability
undertubulation, 1:96-101 ulnar-sided pain wrist related to, 111:36,39
Long bones, diaphyseal lesions wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to,
aggressive 11I:32, 34
adult, 1:73 Lupus erythematosus, systemic. See Systemic lupus
child, 1:74-77 erythematosus.
with endosteal thickening, 1:78-79 Lymph node (mimic), extraarticular popliteal mass
central, non-aggressive, 1:66-69 vs., 1:363
cortically based Lymphangioma
lytic, 1:84-89 cystic (mimic), enlarged peripheral nerves vs.,
sclerotic, 1:80-83 11:187, 189
Long bones, epiphyseal cystic masses vs., 11:161, 164
epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral lytic lesion, focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 111:180
1:22-25 mimic, hemihypertrophy related to, 111:178,179
irregular or stippled, 1:12-15 Lymphatic malformations, soft tissue lesions with
overgrowth/ballooning, 1:16-17 fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:154, 156
sclerosis/ivory, I:18-21 Lymphocele, anechoic mass vs., 11:194
Long bones, metaphyseal Lymphoma
bands and lines, 1:26-29 aggressive periostitis vs., 1:113, 115
cupping, 1:30-31 bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:127
fraying, 1:32-33 enlarged muscle vs., 11:174
Long bones, metaphyseal lesions flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6-7, 10
bubbly, 1:44-47 . lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268,269
XXIX
INDEX
>< lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:300- polyostotic lesions vs.
QJ
"'0 301,303 adult, 11:7
= long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesions vs.
adult, 1:70, 72
childhood, 11:12
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261,
child, 1:74-75, 76 263
with endosteal thickening, 1:78, 79 tibial bowing vs., 1:353
long bone eccentric metaphyseal aggressive unilateral short limb related to, 111:173,177
lesion vs., 1:53, 55 Malabsorption, intestinal, rickets and osteomalacia
long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral related to, 111:166,168
lytic lesion vs., 1:23,24 Malignant fibrous histiocytoma
metastatic adult, 1:71, 73
bone cancer vs., 11:56-57, 58 aggressive periostitis vs., 1:112, 114
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:30 child, 1:75, 77
multifocal enlarged muscle vs., 1l:175
adult polyostotic lesions vs., 11:2-3, 6 flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6, 9
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:9, 11 long bone central metaphyseal aggressive lesion
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209,211 vs., 1:40-41, 42
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349 long bone eccentric metaphyseal aggressive
sequestration vs., 11:36, 38 lesion vs., 1:53, 55
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:25 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:45, 48
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:169 sequestration vs., 11:36,38
superscan vs., 11:204 soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331, 333 11:154
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 295 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241
Lytic lesions, solitary geographic, 11:14-19 soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs.,
11:123, 124
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 169
M Malnutrition
Macrodactyly, 111:180-183 generalized osteoporosis vs., II :82, 84
Macrodystrophia lipomatosa long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:26
enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:187, 189 Marfan syndrome
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 236
111:180-181,182 arachnodactyly vs., 1:238
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383,387 pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 111:133, 135
Madelung deformity phalanges, long bone overtubulation vs., 1:103,
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 235 104
forearm deformity vs., 1:228,230 shoulder instability related to, Ill:9
wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to, superior rib notching vs., 1:310
111:33 symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
wrist pain related to widened joint space related to, 1:171, 175
radial-sided, 111:43 Mastocytosis
ulnar-sided, 111:37, 41, 47 generalized increased bone density vs., adult,
Maffucci syndrome IJ:61,63
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234 generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83, 87
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 111:181, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:31
183 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:21,25
forearm deformity vs., 1:228,231 superscan vs., 11:204, 205
long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293, 297
lesion vs., 1:39 Matrix-containing bone lesions, 11:44-49
long bone growth plate premature physeal Medial collateral ligament. See Collateral ligament,
closure vs., 1:106, 107 medial.
long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., 1:47 Median neuropathy, medial elbow pain related to,
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 101 111:23,25
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:44 Mediterranean fever, familial, arthritis with
nodular calcification vs., 11:114 osteopenia vs., 1:139
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 191 Medulloblastoma, metastatic
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253,257 bone cancer vs., 11:57, 58
xxx
INDEX
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:29 flounce (mimic), meniscal size alteration vs.,
Melanoma 1:367,369
metastatic, bone cancer vs., 11:57, 58 fragments, intraarticular mass vs., 1:202-203,
soft tissue lesions with predominately low Tl & 204
T2 signal vs., 1l:151 intraarticular air (mimic), meniscal size
soft tissue target lesions vs., 11:158 alteration VS., 1:367, 369
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 169 ligament merging with lateral meniscus
Melorheostosis (mimic), meniscal size alteration vs., 1:367,
acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:251 369
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 1l:12 small anterior root, medial meniscus (mimic),
generalized increased bone density in child vs., meniscal size alteration VS., 1:367
11:65 Menkes kinky-hair syndrome. See Copper
long bone cortically based sclerotic diaphyseal deficiency.
lesion vs., 1:81, 83 Meralgia paresthetica
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening lateral hip pain related to, 11J:55
vs., 1:90,92 lower extremity nerve entrapment vs., 111:64
mimic, solid periostitis vs., 1:117, 120 Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, soft tissue
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27, 29 neoplasms with calcification vs., 11:l25
nodular calcification vs., 11:111 Mesomelic dysplasia
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 70 abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:237
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:297 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186
Meningocele, cavus foot deformity related to, forearm deformity VS., 1:229
111:137 Metacarpal/metatarsal, short, 1:260-263
Meningococcemia Metacarpophalangeal joints, ulnar deviation,
acroosteolysis vs., 1:247 1:264-265
long bone growth plate premature physeal M etacarpophalangeal-predom ina n t a rth ri tis,
closure vs., 1:107 1:192-193
mimic, long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ Metadiaphyseal cortically based lesion, tibial,
ballooning VS., 1:17 1:94-95
unilateral short limb related to, 11l:173, 175 Metaphyseal bar, congenital foot deformity vs.,
Meningomyelocele, muscle atrophy vs., 11:177, 179 1ll:139, 141
Meniscal cyst Metaphyseal chondrodysplasia
anterior knee pain related to, 11I:80, 82 long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32
cystic masses VS., 11:160, 162 mimic, rickets and osteomalacia vs., 111:167
intrameniscal, meniscal size alteration vs., 1:367, tibial bowing vs., 1:353
369 Metaphyseal dysplasia
knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 358 long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
medial knee pain related to, 1l1:86, 88 1:109
Meniscalossicle long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30,31
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181, Metaphyseal erosion, medial, of proximal
183 humerus, 1:214-215
meniscal size alteration vs., 1:367, 369 Metaphyseal fracture
Meniscal tears child abuse, long bone metaphyseal fraying vs.,
anterior knee pain related to, 111:80, 82 1:32,33
bucket handle long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30
meniscal size alteration vs., 1:367,368 Metaphyseal lesions, long bones
with flipped fragment (mimic) bubbly, 1:44-47
alteration of meniscaJ size vs., 1:366 central
meniscal size alteration vs., 1:368 aggressive, 1:40-43
medial knee pain related to, 111:86,88 non-aggressive, 1:34-39
Meniscus cortically based, 1:56-59
alteration of size, 1:366-369 eccentric
degeneration, alteration of meniscal size vs., aggressive, 1:52-55
1:367 non-aggressive, 1:48-51
discoid, alteration of meniscal size vs., 1:366 Metaphysis, long bones
extrusion (mimic), alteration of meniscal size bands and lines, 1:26-29
vs., 1:367 cupping, 1:30-31
XXXI
INDEX
fraying, 1:32-33 long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs.,
Metastatic calcification. See Calcification, 1:44,46
metastatic. transitional cell carcinoma, bone cancer vs.,
Metastatic disease 11:57
adjacent to arthroplasty, arthroplasty with Iytic/ treated, solid periostitis vs., 1:1l7, 120
cystic lesions vs., 1:206,207 uterine carcinoma, bone cancer vs., 11:57
aggressive periostitis vs., I:112-113, 114 Metatarsal bones
blastic, vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 294 fractures
bone, 11:56-59 insufficiency, diabetic foot complications vs.,
bone marrow. See Bone marrow metastases. 11I:143
carcinoid, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., lateral ankle pain related to, 111:114,115
11:31 short, 1:260-263
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284 Metatarsus adductus, congenital foot deformity vs.,
diffuse, superscan vs., 11:204 111:138
Ewing's sarcoma. See Ewing sarcoma, metastatic. Metatropic dwarf, childhood platyspondyly vs.,
hemorrhagic, soft tissue lesions with 1:285
predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., Methotrexate complications, periostitis of multiple
11:151 bones in children vs., 1:131
lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:269 Midcarpal instability, palmar, 111:32
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:300, Milwaukee shoulder (hydroxyapatite deposition
302 disease), rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:5
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 Mixed connective tissue disease
lung carcinoma arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139
bone cancer vs., 11:56,57-58 nodular calcification vs., 11:110-111
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27,28 ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:264
lymphoma Monoarthritis, 1:198-201
bone cancer vs., 11:56-57,58 Morquio syndrome
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:30 abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:237
medulloblastoma bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body
bone cancer vs., 11:57, 58 beaking vs., 1:282, 283
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:29 dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:208, 210 111:184, 185
osteolytic, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, Morton neuroma
328 ball of foot pain related to, 111:126, 128
osteosarcoma enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:187, 188
bone cancer vs., 11:57, 58 lower extremity nerve entrapment vs., 111:64,66
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:12 soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 385
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:29 Mucoid cysts, soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240
soft tissue ossification vs., 1I:107, 109 Mucolipidosis II and III, dwarfism with short ribs
renal cell carcinoma vs., 111:188
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly Mucopolysaccharidoses
lesion vs., 1:2, 4 abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:237
long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 286
1:44,46 dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188, 189
sclerotic long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
mimic, sclerosing dysplasia vs., 11:68, 70 1:109,111
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 1I:26 long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96,98
soft tissue target lesions vs., 11:158 nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209,211
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312,314 painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs.,
subcutaneous, soft tissue mass of finger vs., 111:2
1:241,245 short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261,
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 170 262
thigh pain related to, 111:60,63 Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis. See
thyroid Reticu loh istiocytosis, 111 ul ticen tric.
bone cancer vs., 11:56, 58 Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 236
lesion vs., 1:2, 4 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186
XXXII
INDEX
irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs., enlarged muscle vs., 11:173
1:13 long bone overtubulation vs., 1:103
Multiple hereditary exostosis muscle atrophy vs., 11:177, 179
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., [:234, 236 Mycobacterium marinum, swelling and periostitis
forearm deformity vs., 1:228, 230 of digit (dactylitis) vs., 1:266
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96, 97 Mycosis fungoides, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:171
mimic, superior rib notching vs., 1:311 Myelofibrosis
polyostotic lesions vs. abnormal epiphyseal marrow signal vs., 11:133,
adult, 11:5 135
childhood, 11:8, 11 anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs.,
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261, 111:152-153, 154-155
262 bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:141, 143
Multiple myeloma generalized increased bone density vs., adult,
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288, 289 11:60, 62
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, 10 superscan vs., Il:204
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:82, 84 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293, 296
lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268 Myeloma, plasma cell, vertebral body sclerosis vs.,
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:300, 1:293
303 Myocardial infarction, soft tissue uptake on bone
long bone central metaphyseal aggressive lesion scan vs., 11:200
vs., 1:40, 42 Myonecrosis
long bone diaphyseal aggressive adult lesion vs., calcific
1:70,72 calf pain related to, 111:92,95
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:208 mimic, heterotopic ossification vs., 111:163
osteopenia vs., IT:80, 81 nodular calcification vs., 11:111, 115
photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs., enlarged muscle vs., 11:172, 174
11:196,197 soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:199
polyostotic lesions vs., 11:2, 4 Myositis, infectious, intermuscular edema vs.,
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312,314 II:181
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167 Myositis ossificans
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330, 332 early, nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391, 395 late, soft tissue ossification vs., II:106, 108
Muscle mimic
accessory, soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383, 387 long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs.,
atony, widened joint space related to, 1:170, 171 1:60,62
atrophy, 11:176-179 soft tissue neoplasms containing calcification
enlargr"j,II:172-175 vs., II:122, 123
soren< jS, delayed onset, thigh pain related to, periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 188
11I:62 soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
Muscle hypertrophy, 11:172-175 11:155
compensatory hypertrophy vs., 11:172, 173 Myxofibrosarcoma
differential diagnosis, II:172-175 acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic, soft tissue
exercised-induced,II:172 mass of finger vs., 1:241
Muscle injury subcutaneous mass vs., 11:171
calf pain related to, 111:92 Myxofibrous tumor, liposclerosing. See
lower extremity, thigh pain related to, 11I:60, 62 Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor.
mimic, anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195 Myxoid liposarcoma, bone lesions with bright T1
muscle atrophy vs., 11:176, 179 signal vs., 11:146, 148
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223, 225 Myxoma
Muscle strain anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195
calf pain related to, 111:92,94 mimic, cystic masses vs., 11:161, 165
hip
groin/hip pain related to, 111:48,51
lateral hip pain related to, 111:54,56 N
pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69,71 Nail patella syndrome (Fong)
Muscular dystrophy forearm deformity vs., 1:229,231
cavus foot deformity related to, 111:137 irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs.,
1:13,15
XXXIII
INDEX
)( mimic, dwarfism with horizontal acetabular Neurofibroma, cellular, soft tissue target lesions vs.,
Q.I
"C roof vs., 1lJ:191 Tl:158
c:: radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:227 Neurofibromatosis
Navicular fractures enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:186, 187
anterior ankle pain/impingement related to, hemihypertrophy related to, 111:178-179
111:105, 107 inferior rib notching vs., 1:308, 309
avascular necrosis related to, 1Il:157 long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
medial ankle pain related to, 11I:111-112 lesion vs., 1:67
Necrotizing fasciitis, intermuscular edema vs., long bone overtubulation vs., 1:102, 104
11:181,183 muscle atrophy vs., 11:176, 179
Neonatal spine, normal, bone within bone pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94, 95
appearance vs., 11:76, 77 subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 169
Neoplasms. See also specific type. superior rib notching vs., 1:310, 311
Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs., tibial bowing vs., 1:352-353, 354
1:374 unilateral short limb related to, 111:173, 176
anaplastic and aggressive, photopenic lesions with high thoracic scoliosis, painful scoliosis
and false negative scans vs., 11:196,197 vs., 111:145, 147
bone. See Bone neoplasms. Neurogenic claudication
intraarticular, shoulder instability related to, calf pain related to, 111:92
111:9 thigh pain related to, 111:60
intramuscular, enlarged muscle vs., 11:173 Neurogenic sarcoma, enlarged peripheral nerves
intraosseous. See Intraosseous neoplasms. vs., 11:189
intraspinal tumors, painful scoliosis vs., 111:145, Neurologic infection, heterotopic ossification vs.,
147 11I:162-163
malignant Neurologic injury, glenohumeral malalignment vs.,
necrotic, cystic masses vs., 11:161, 164 1:216
soft tissue lesions with fluid!f1uid levels vs., Neuroma, Morton. See Morton neuroma.
11:154, 156 Neuroma, traumatic
metastatic. See Metastatic disease. enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:187, 188
mixed fluid contents, soft tissue lesions with heel pain related to, 111:121
fluid!f1uid levels vs., 11:155 Neuropathic arthropathy
recurrence, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 170 non-diabetic, arthritis with normal bone density
sesamoiditis vs., 1:258 vs., 1:135, 137
ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:265 osteoarthropathy, 1:164-165
with calcification, soft tissue uptake on bone Neuropathic Charcot joint. See Charcot joint,
scan vs., 11:199,201 neuropathic.
Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis Neuropathic disease, long bone metaphyseal
intermuscular edema vs., 11:181 fraying vs., 1:32
soft tissue con tractures related to, III: 170 Neuropathy
Nerve entrapment. See also Carpal tunnel muscle atrophy vs., 11:176
syndrome; Tarsal tunnel syndrome; Ulnar suprascapular, rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:4,6
tunnel syndrome. "tall man" insensate, neuropathic
calf pain related to, 111:93 osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164, 165
elbow and wrist, 111:28-31 Niemann Pick disease, long bone undertubulation
groin/hip pain related to, 111:49 vs., 1:96
lower extremity, 111:64-67 Nodular calcification of soft tissue, 11:110-115
thigh pain related to, 111:61 Nodular synovitis
shoulder, 1Il:14-15 intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:191, 193
Nerve injury, unspecified, widened joint space intraarticular mass vs., 1:203, 204
related to, 1:171,174 Non-neoplastic structure
Nerve sheath tumors, soft tissue neoplasms with mixed fluid contents, soft tissue lesions with
calcification vs., 11:123, 125 fluid!f1uid levels vs., 11:154-155
Neuroblastoma soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
metastatic, bone cancer vs., 11:57,58 11:157
mimic, generalized increased bone density in Noonan syndrome
child vs., 11:64, 66 dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:198-199, 111:184,185
203
XXXIV
INDEX
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:260 OPLL. See Ossification of posterior longitudinal ::s
Normal variant tendon. Q.
~
acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250 Orbital pseudotumor, enlarged muscle vs., 11:173, ><
child (mimic), irregular or stippled long bone 175
epiphysis vs., 1:12, 13 Os trigonum syndrome, medial ankle pain related
humerus ("upper humeral notch"), medial to, 11I:109, ]]2
metaphyseal erosion of proximal humerus Osgood-Schlatter disease, anterior knee pain
vs., 1:214 related to, III:81, 85
inferior rib notching vs., 1:308 Osseous angiosarcoma. See Angiosarcoma, osseous.
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., Osseous lesions, benign, with aggressive
1:26,28 appearance, 11:50-55
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:260 Osseous neoplasms. See Bone neoplasms.
squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290, 292 Ossification
tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184 acetabular rim, hip labral tear related to, 1:341,
344
heterotopic, 111:162-165
o differential diagnosis, III:] 62-] 65
Obturator tunnel syndrome, lower extremity nerve painful hip replacement related to, 11I:75, 78
entrapment vs., 111:65,67 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240-241, 244
Occupational acroosteolysis, 1:247 soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106, 107-108
Ochronosis soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:202
ankylosis vs., 1:177 linear ossification along anterior spine, 1:280-
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139, 14] 281
discal mineralization vs., 1:271, 273 ossification/calcification anterior to Cl, 1:274-
erosive arthritis vs., 1:147,151 275
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83, 86 paravertebral ossification and calcification,
linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280, 1:276-279
281 posterior longitudinal tendon. See Ossification
pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94 of posterior longitudinal tendon.
spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298, 299 post-traumatic, tendon and ligament
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ ossification vs., 1]:100, 10]
fusion vs., 1:324, 325 soft tissue, 11:106-109
Olecranon bursitis, 11I:26-27 differential diagnosis, 11:106-109
Olecranon fracture, medial elbow pain related to, soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:203
1ll:22, 24 tendon and ligament, 11:100-101
Oilier disease Ossification of posterior longitudinal tendon
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 236 linear and curvilinear calcification vs., TI:120
focal gigantism/macrodactyly related to, 1ll:181, mimic
182-183 ankylosis vs., ]:177
forearm deformity vs., 1:228, 231 arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:135,
long bone growth plate premature physeal 136
closure vs., 1:106, 107 arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:143
long bone metaphyseal lesions vs. soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106
bubbly, 1:47 tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100, 101
central, non-aggressive, 1:39 Ossified lesions, dense, soft tissue lesions with
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, ] 00 predominately low T1 & T2 signal vs., 11:150
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:44, 49 Osteitis condensans, clavicle
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., [:253,257 nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., ]:209, 211
polyostotic lesions vs. painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs.,
adult,II:7 111:2,3
childhood, 11:12 sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 71
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261, solid periostitis vs., 1:117,120
262 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:21, 25
tibial bowing vs., 1:353 Osteitis condensans ilii (mimic)
unilateral short limb related to, III:] 73,177 sacroiliitis vs., bilateral symmetric, 1:316, 318
Oncogenic osteomalacia, rickets and osteomalacia sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 70
vs., 111:166, 168 Osteitis pubis
groin/hip pain related to, 111:49,53
xxxv
INDEX
mimic, sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 71 fusion vs., 1:324
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, 327 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ wrist pain related to
fusion vs., 1:324, 325 radial-sided, 111:42, 44
Osteoarth ritis ulnar-sided, 111:36, 38
ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 111:108, 111 Osteoarthropathy
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:154, extra thoracic hypertrophic, periostitis of
155 multiple bones/acropachy vs., 1:126, 128
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:134, hypertrophic
135 bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs.,
arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:142, 143 1:122, 123
ball of foot pain related to, 111:126, 127 long bone diffuse cortical endosteal
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232 thickening vs., 1:90, 92
chondrocalcinosis vs., 1:184 mimic, generalized increased bone density
early, arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., vs., adult, 11:60, 63
1:166, 167 periostitis of multiple bones in children VS.,
effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222, 1:131
223 solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 118
epiphyseal marrow signal vs., abnormal, 11:132, hypertrophic pulmonary, periostitis of multiple
134 bones/acropachy vs., 1:126, 127
erosive neuropathic, 1:164-165
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:134, Osteoblastoma
135 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
erosive arthritis vs., I: 146, 148 appearance vs., 11:55
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:144
1:194,196 flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152 lesion vs., 1:3
groin/hip pain related to, 111:48,50 lesions originating in posterior vertebral
hip elements vs., 1:306, 307
lateral hip pain related to, 111:56 long bone central metaphyseal lesion vs., non-
pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68, 70 aggressive, 1:39
rapidly destructive matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:49
atrophic joint destruction vs., I: 1 59, 161 painful scoliosis vs., 11I:145,147
bone marrow edema syndromes vs., paravertebral ossification and calcification vs.,
11:127, 129 1:277,279
hip labral tear related to, 1:340, 341 patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., 1:194, sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
195 11:33, 35
knee Osteochondral fracture, subchondral edematous-
anterior knee pain related to, 11I:80 like signal vs., 11:130
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69 Osteochondral lesion
medial knee pain related to, 11I:86, 88 talar
long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
lytic lesion vs., 1:22 111:105, 107
mimic, sacroiliitis vs. lateral ankle pain related to, 111:114-115,117
bilateral asymmetric, 1:320, 321 medial ankle pain related to, 111:108, 110
bilateral symmetric, 1:316, 318 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:393
unilateral, 1:322 Osteochondri~is dissecans, medial knee pain
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., related to, 111:87, 90
III :2 Osteochondroma
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252,254 bursitis surrounding, knee fluid collections vs.,
post-traumatic, monoarthritis vs., 1:198,200 1:357,360
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334, 335 hip, snapping hip related to, 111:59
rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:5, 7 lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301,
sesamoiditis vs., 1:258 305
subchondral cyst, patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348, long bone cortically based metaphyseal lesion
349 vs., 1:57, 58
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:44, 46
XXXVI
INDEX
mimic, long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., long bone cortically based diaphyseal lesions
1:60,63 vs.
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs., lytic, 1:84, 86
1:277,278 sclerotic, 1:80-81, 82
polyostotic lesions vs. long bone cortically based metaphyseal
adult, 11:5 lesions vs., 1:56-57,58
childhood, 11:8, 11 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:47
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312-313, 314 mimic, sequestration vs., 11:36,37
Osteochondromatosis painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, 146
genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:371 periosteal, long bone surface (juxtacortical)
synovial. See Synovial osteochondromatosis. lesion vs., 1:61
Osteochondromatous proliferation, bizarre, long bone sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., 1:61,64 11:32,33
Osteodystrophy. See Renal osteodystrophy. solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 119
Osteofibrous dysplasia solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:20,22
long bone cortically based metaphyseal lesion vs., target lesions of bone vs., JT:40, 4]
1:57,59 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:20, 22
long bone diaphyseal cortically based lytic lesion Osteomalacia. See also Rickets and osteomalacia.
vs., 1:85,88 axial
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., [1:15, 19 atypical, rickets and osteomalacia vs., 111:167
tibial bowing vs., 1:353, 355 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293
tibial metadiaphyseal cortically based lesion vs., fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288
1:94,95 hypophosphatemic, linear ossification along
Osteogenesis imperfecta anterior spine vs., 1:280
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 286 oncogenic, rickets and osteomalacia vs., 111:166,
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288 ]68
forearm deformity vs., 1:228, 23] protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83,87 Osteomyelitis
genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:372,373 adult
hypertrophic callus formation vs., 11:74, 75 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., 1:109, appearance vs., 11:50,51
111 long bone central metaphyseal aggressive
long bone overtubulation vs., 1:103, 104-105 lesion vs., 1:40, 42
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 100 long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335 subchondral lytic lesion vs., 1:23,25
pseudoarthrosis vs., 11:94, 95 polyostotic lesions vs., Ir:6
superior rib notching vs., 1:3]0 supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330,
tibial bowing vs., [:353, 355 332
Osteogenesis imperfecta tarda, periostitis of multiple ankle, medial ankle pain related to, IrI:108
bones/acropachy vs., 1:127, 129 ball of foot pain related to, 111:126-127, 129
Osteoid osteoma. See Osteoma, osteoid. benign osseous lesions with aggressive
Osteolysis appearance vs., 11:50
metastatic, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:]27, 129
328 calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:377,
post-traumatic, distal clavicular resorption vs., 379
1:212,213 chronic
Osteoma acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250, 25]
long bone cortically based sclerotic diaphyseal long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
lesion vs., 1:81,83 lesion vs., 1:67, 68
long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., 1:61, 65 long bone central metaphyseal non-
mimic, sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 71 aggressive lesion vs., 1:34, 36
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27, 30 long bone cortically based sclerotic
osteoid diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:81,83
hip, in teenagers, 11I:149 long bone eccentric metaphyseal non-
in teenagers, 1II:151 aggressive lesion vs., 1:49, 51
lesions originating in posterior vertebral long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96-97, 99
elements vs., 1:306, 307 sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
11:32,34
XXXVII
INDEX
>< sequestration vs., 11:36,37 photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs.,
ClJ
"'C solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 118 11:196
c::: target lesions of bone vs., Il:40, 42 retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380, 381
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 295 septic joint vs., Il:130, 131
chronic recurrent multifocal solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., [[:14, 17
benign osseous lesions with aggressive solitary rib lesion vs., 1:312,314
appearance vs., 11:55 subchondral edematous-like signal vs., [[:130,
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:12 131
long bone central metaphyseal aggressive tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390, 392-393
lesion vs., 1:41 thigh pain related to, 111:61,63
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal vertebral, granulomatous, paravertebral
thickening vs., 1:90,92 ossification and calcification vs., 1:277, 279
solid periostitis vs., 1:117, 121 vertebral body
diabetic foot complications vs., m:142, 143 lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268
digital swelling and periostitis (dactylitis) vs., lesions originating in vertebral body vs.,
1:266,267 1:300
epiphyseal marrow signal vs., abnormal, 11:132, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144, 145
134 pyogenic, paravertebral ossification and
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6, 8 calcification vs., 1:276, 277
forearm deformity vs., 1:228, 230 with involucrum, bone within bone appearance
genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:371 vs., 11:76, 78
genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:373, 375 Osteonecrosis
groin/hip pain related to, m:49 ankle, medial ankle pain related to, IIl:109, 113
heel pain related to, 111:120, 122 bisphosphonate-related, sequestration vs., 11:37,
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69,73 39
irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs., capitellar, lateral elbow pain related to, 111:18,20
1:12, 15 epiphyseal marrow signal vs., abnormal, 11:132,
long bone diaphyseal lesions vs. 134
aggressive hip
adult, 1:70, 71 bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:126,
with endosteal thickening, 1:78 128
cortically based, lytic, 1:84, 86 groin/hip pain related to, 111:48,51
long bone eccentric metaphyseal lesion vs., pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69,72
aggressive, 1:52, 54 snapping hip related to, 111:58
long bone growth plate premature physeal knee, medial knee pain related to, m:87, 90
closure vs., 1:106 lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:300,
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., 303
1:108, 110 long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:18, 19
multifocal, periostitis of multiple bones in long bone irregular or stippled epiphysis vs.,
children vs., 1:130, 132 1:12, 14
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349, 351 marrow fat increase vs., 11:137, 139
pediatric mimic
benign osseous lesions with aggressive arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs.,
appearance vs., 11:50, 52 1:167, 169
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., Jl:8, 10 with secondary osteoarthritis, arthritis with
generalized increased bone density vs., productive changes vs., 1:143, 145
[[:64-65, 67 photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs.,
long bone central metaphyseal aggressive 11:196, 197
lesion vs., 1:40,42 rad iation-i nd uced
long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion vs., avascular necrosis related to, 111:157,159
1:74,75 benign osseous lesions with aggressive
long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/ appearance vs., 11:51,53
subchondral lytic lesion vs., 1:22-23, 24 elbow deformities vs., 111:16
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32,33 flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, 11
unilateral short limb related to, 11[:172, 174 heel pain related to, [11:121, 125
periostitis vs., aggressive, 1:113, 114-115 long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:252, 255 lesion vs., 1:67, 69
INDEX
mimic, generalized increased bone density osteopenia vs., 1l:80
vs., 11:60,62 regional, 1]:88-91
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:208, 210 regional migratory, regional osteoporosis vs.,
superior rib notching vs., 1:310, 311 11:89,91
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330 senile
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326 fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288
rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:5,6 generalized osteoporosis vs., 1l:82, 83
sesamoiditis vs., 1:258, 259 transient
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:260, hip, regional osteoporosis vs., 1l:89, 91
261 mimic, arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139,
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390 141
thigh pain related to, 1Il:61, 63 Osteosarcoma
wrist conventional
clicking/clunking/instability related to, aggressive periostitis vs., I:112, 113
I1I:33, 35 extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 364
radial-sided wrist pain related to, 111:43,47 flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:6, 8
ulnar-sided wrist pain related to, 1Il:37, 41 long bone central metaphyseal aggressive
Osteopathia striata lesion vs., 1:40, 42
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion vs.,
sclerosing dysplasias vs., II:69 1:71,73
Osteopenia, 11:80-81 long bone eccentric metaphyseal aggressive
with arthritis, 1:138-141 lesion vs., 1:52, 53-54
Osteopetrosis long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:19,
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs., 21
1II:153, 155 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:45,47
bone within bone appearance vs., 11:76,77-78 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15
generalized increased bone density vs. solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:20,23
adult, 11:61,63 extraskeletal
child, 11:65,67 soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs.,
long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:19, 21 11:123, 125
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107,109
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 100 high grade surface, long bone surface
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:69,72 (juxtacortical) lesion vs., [:61, 64
superscan vs., 11:204,205 lesions originating in vertebral body vs., ]:301,
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293, 296 305
Osteophytes long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion in child
spinal, 1:298-299 vs., 1:74, 76
talar beak vs., 1:388, 389 metastatic
Osteopoikilosis bone cancer vs., 11:57,58
acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250 childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:12
long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:19, 21 multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:29
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 1l:27, 29 soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107, 109
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68-69, 71 mimic, bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs.,
Osteoporosis 1:123, 124
disuse paravertebral ossification and calcification vs.,
benign osseous lesions with aggressive 1:277, 279
appearance vs., II:53 parosteal
cortical tunneling vs., 11:92 extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 364
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs.,
1:26,28 1:60,61-62
regional osteoporosis vs., 11:88,89-90 matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 1l:45, 48
generalized, I1:82-87 mimic, tibial metadiaphyseal cortically based
idiopathic juvenile lesion vs., 1:94, 95
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285 soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107, 109
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83,87 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 1l:21, 24
increased marrow fat vs., 11:136, 137 patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 periosteal
XXXIX
INDEX
long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion vs., generalized increased bone density vs., [[:60, 62
[:60-61,63 heel pain related to, [[1:121
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 1I:45, 48 lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:300,
mimic 302
aggressive periostitis vs., 1:113, 115 long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive
tibial metadiaphyseal cortically based lesion vs., 1:34,36
lesion vs., [:94, 95 long bone diaphyseal lesions vs.
soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs., central, non-aggressive, [:66, 67
[[:125 cortically based
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 1[:21,24 lytic, [:84, 86
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., [[:199, 203 sclerotic, 1:8]
solitary rib lesion vs., 1:313, 315 long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331, 333 vs., 1:90, 91
surface, soft tissue neoplasms with calcification mimic, long bone undert.ubulation vs., 1:96, 98
vs., [[:125 multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:26, 28
telangiectatic nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:208, 210
bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., polyostotic lesions vs., [[:4
[1:144-145 protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334, 336
long bone eccentric metaphyseal lesion vs. sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
aggressive, 1:53, 55 [1:32,34
non-aggressive, 1:49 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 18
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., [1:15, 18 solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:21, 23
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391 squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290, 29]
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293, 297 supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330, 332
Osteosclerosis, intramedullary tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391, 395
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening tibial bowing vs., [:352, 353
vs., 1:91, 93 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 295
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 1l:69, 73 Paget sarcoma, flat bones with permeative lesions
Osteosclerotic dysplasia, generalized increased vs., 1:7,1]
bone density in child vs., 11:65 Pain, congenital insensitivity/indifference
Otopalatodigital syndrome, dwarfism with short acroosteolysis vs., 1:247
ribs vs., 1[[:188 arthritis mutilans vs., 1:162, 163
Otto disease in teenagers, [[1:151
hip labral tear related to, 1:341, 344 with Charcot neuropathy, neuropathic
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335, 337 osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164, 165
Overtubulation, long bones, 1:102-105 Paint gun injury, soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:242
Oxalosis Pancoast tumor, solitary rib lesion vs., [:312, 314
bone within bone appearance vs., [[:77 Pancreatitis, chronic, rickets and osteomalacia
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209 related to, 111:166
primary, long bone metaphyseal bands and lines Para neoplastic syndrome
vs., 1:27 chondrocalcinosis vs., [:185
periarticular calcification vs., 1:190
Paraplegia
p complications, superior rib notching vs., [:3]]
Pach yde rm operiostosis discal mineralization vs., 1:271
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280
vs., 1:91 paravertebral ossification and calcification vs.,
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., 1:276,278
[:127, 129 with Charcot neuropathy, neuropathic
solid periostitis vs., 1:117,12] osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164, 165
Paget disease Parasites, nodular calcification vs., 11:111
benign osseous lesions with aggressive Paraspinal abnormalities
appearance vs., [1:54 linear ossification along anterior spine, 1:280-
bone within bone appearance vs., [[:76, 78 281
degeneration to osteosarcoma, matrix- ossification/calcification anterior to Cl, 1:274-
containing bone lesions vs., [[:49 275
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288, 289 paravertebral ossification and calcification,
forearm deformity vs., 1:229, 231 1:276-279
xl
INDEX
Paraspinal muscle injury, painful scoliosis vs., multiple bones/acropachy, adult, 1:126-129
111:]45 physiologic
Paravertebral ossification and calcification, 1:276- lower extremity, solid periostitis vs., 1:] 17,
279 121
Parsonage-Turner syndrome periostitis of multiple bones in children vs.,
late, soft tissue contractures related to, J1I:170 1:130, 131
nerve entrapment of shoulder vs., 111:14, 15 solid, 1:116-121
Patella Peripheral nerve injury, muscle atrophy vs., 11:176,
bursitis (anterior), knee fluid collections vs., 178
1:356,358 Peripheral nerve sheath tumor
dorsal defect (mimic), patellar lytic lesions vs., benign
1:349, 351 enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:187, 188
fracture, anterior knee pain related to, 1II:80, 83 extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 364
lytic lesions, 1:348-351 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 19
subluxation, anterior knee pain related to, malignant
111:80, 83 enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:188-189
transient dislocation, anterior knee pain related extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363,364
to, 111:80, 82 soft tissue lesions with fluid!f1uid levels vs.,
Patella alta, anterior knee pain related to, III:80, 83 11:155, 157
Patella baja, anterior knee pain related to, 11I:80, 83 soft tissue target lesions vs., 11:158, 159
Patellar tendon tears/tendinosis, anterior knee pain Peripheral nerves, enlarged, 11:186-189
related to, Ill:80-81, 84 Peroneal nerve
Patellofemoral syndrome, anterior knee pain entrapment, superficial, lower extremity nerve
related to, 111:80,81-82 entrapment vs., I11:65, 67
Pedicle. See Vertebral pedicle. injury, painful knee replacement related to,
Pelvic injury, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, 11]:99
327-328 Peroneal tendon
Pelvicaliceal system, dilated, soft tissue uptake on subluxation, lateral ankle pain related to,
bone scan vs., 11:200 Ill:1l5, 118
Pelvis tendinosis/tear/tenosynovitis, lateral ankle pain
fibrous dysplasia, flat bones with focally related to, Ill: 114, 117
expanded or bubbly lesion vs., 1:2, 4 Peroneal tunnel syndrome, lower extremity nerve
groin/hip pain, 11I:48-53 entrapment vs., 1\I:64, 65
intrapelvic mass, hip pain in elderly patients Peroneus quartus muscle disorder, lateral ankle
related to, 111:69, 73 pain related to, 111:115
sacroiliitis Pertechnetate, gastric secretion of, soft tissue
bilateral asymmetric, 1:320-321 uptake on bone scan vs., 11:200
bilateral symmetric, 1:316-319 Perthes lesion, anteroinferior labral/capsule injury
unilateral, 1:322-323 vs., Ill: 12, 13
supra-acetabular iliac destruction, 1:330-333 Pes anserine bursitis
symphysis pubis medial, knee fluid collections vs., 1:356, 358-
widening, 1:326-329 359
with productive changes/fusion, 1:324-325 medial knee pain related to, 1l1:86, 89
Periarticular calcification, I:186-] 9] Pes cavus (mimic), congenital foot deformity vs.,
Pericardial effusion, malignant, soft tissue uptake 1Il:139, 141
on bone scan vs., 11:202 Pes planovalgus (flatfoot), 1Il:132-135
Perilunate instability, wrist c1icking/c1unking/ differential diagnosis, III: 132-135
instability related to, 111:32, 34 flexible
Periosteal reaction congenital foot deformity vs., 1l1:138, 139
bizarre horizontal, 1:122-]25 pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 1II: 132, 133-
of newborn, physiologic (mimic), generalized 134
increased bone density vs., 11:64, 65 Pes planus (mimic), pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs.,
Periostitis 1Il:132, 133
aggressive, 1:112-115 Phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions, 1:252-257
digits (dactylitis), 1:266-267 Phalanges. See Fingers and toes.
florid reactive, long bone surface (juxtacortical) Phenobarbital therapy, rickets and osteomalacia
lesion vs., 1:61, 64 related to, 1Il:166-167
multiple bones, child, 1:130-133 Phlebolith, nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 1]]
xli
INDEX
Photopenic lesions and false negative scans, Plantar fibromatosis
11:196-197 ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 131
Physeal bar, elbow deformities vs., 111:16 soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1 &
Physeal fractures T2 signal vs., 11:152
advanced bone age vs., 11:103 Plantar plate
genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:372 rupture, ball of foot pain related to, 111:127,
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., 130-131
1:108,109 tear, sesamoiditis vs., 1:258, 259
pediatric Plasma cell myeloma, vertebral body sclerosis vs.,
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32, 33 1:293,296
unilateral short limb related to, 111:172, 173 Plasmacytoma
Physiologic periosteal reaction of newborn, flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
generalized increased bone density in child vs., lesion vs., 1:2, 3
11:64,65 flat bones with permeative lesions vs., [:11
Pigmen ted villonodular synovi tis lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 1:301,
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155, 304
156 long bone central metaphyseal lesion vs.
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:135, aggressive, 1:41, 43
137 non-aggressive, 1:35, 37
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:167 long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion vs., 1:72
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232,233 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 16
distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330, 332
vs., 1:346,347 Platyspondyly, childhood, congenital and
erosive arthritis vs., 1:146, 148 acquired, 1:284-287
extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 364 Pleural effusion, malignant, soft tissue uptake on
in teenagers, 111:149, 150 bone scan vs., 11:202
intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:191, 193 Plica syndrome, medial
intraarticular mass vs., 1:202, 204 anterior knee pain related to, 111:81,84
knee pain related to medial knee pain related to, 1lI:87, 90
anterior, 111:81,84 POEMS syndrome
medial, 111:87,91 generalized increased bone density vs., adult,
long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral 11:61,63
lytic lesion vs., 1:22, 24 multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27, 31
monoarthritis vs., 1:199, 200 sclerosing dysplasias vs., [1:72
patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349 sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs.,
soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1 & IT:33, 35
T2 signal vs., 11:150, 152 Poland syndrome, short metacarpal/metatarsal
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 386 bones vs., 1:261
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15 Polio
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390, 392 cavus foot deformity vs., 111:136, 137
ulnar deviation of Mep joints vs., 1:264 discalmineralization vs., 1:271
widened joint space related to, 1:170, 173 long bone overtubulation vs., 1:102, 103
within bursa, knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, mimic, congenital foot deformity vs., 1lI:139,
361 141
Pilomatrixoma/pilomatrix carcinoma, muscle atrophy vs., II: 177, 179
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:167, 171 superior rib notching vs., 1:310
Piriformis syndrome, lower extremity nerve unilateral short limb related to, 111:173, 177
entrapment vs., 111:65,67 with prolonged immobilization, long bone
Plantar fascia rupture, heel pain related to, 111:120, metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30
123 Polycythemia vera
Plantar fasciitis anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs.,
calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:377, !I1:153
379 bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:141, 143
enthesopathy vs., 11:96, 98 Polymyalgia rheumatica, rotator cuff symptoms
heel pain related to, 111:120, 121 vs., /lI:5
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 384 Polymyositis
Plantar fibroma, soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, intermuscular edema vs., 11:181, 182
385
xlii
INDEX
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 189 Progeria
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
II: 154, 156 111:]84
thigh pain related to, 111:61,63 muscle atrophy vs., 11:177
Polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M superior rib notching vs., 1:310
proteins, skin changes. See POEMS syndrome. Progressive osseous heteroplasia, heterotopic
Polyostotic aggressive bone tumor, periostitis of ossification vs., 111:163
multiple bones in children vs., 1:130, 132 Progressive systemic sclerosis
Polyostotic lesions acroosteolysis vs., 1:246, 247
adult, 11:2-7 acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250
child, 11:8-13 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138-139, 140
Polyvinyl-chloride exposure, acroosteolysis vs., chondrocalcinosis vs., 1:184, 185
1:247,249 distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212
Popliteal artery aneurysm erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 151
extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363, 365 linear and curvilinear calcification vs., II:117,
knee fluid collections vs., 1:357, 361 119
Popliteal cyst mimic, heterotopic ossification vs., 1lI:163
calf pain related to, 111:92,94 nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112
cystic masses vs., 11:160, 162 ossification/calcification anterior to Cl vs.,
extraarticuJar popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 363 1:274,275
knee fluid collections vs., 1:356,357 paravertebral ossification and calcification vs.,
ruptured 1:277,278
extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 363 periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 189
intermuscular edema vs., 11:180, 18] soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 243-244
knee fluid collections vs., 1:356,357 Pronator syndrome, elbow/wrist nerve entrapment
synovitis, extraarticular popliteal mass vs., vs., !lI:28, 30-31
1:362,364 Prostaglandin complications
Popliteal entrapment syndrome, lower extremity long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
nerve entrapment vs., 111:65 vs., 1:90,92
Popliteal mass, extraarticular, 1:362-365 mimic, generalized increased bone density in
Popliteus myotendinous injury, knee fluid child vs., II:64, 66
collections vs., 1:356, 359-360 periostitis of multiple bones in children vs.,
Posterior longitudinal tendon ossification. See 1:131,133
Ossification of posterior longitudinal tendon. Prostate carcinoma, metastatic, bone cancer vs.,
Post-operative changes 11:56,58
Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs., Proteus syndrome, focal gigantism/macrodactyly
1:374,375 related to, Ill: 181
clavicle, distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212 Protrusio acetabuli, 1:334-337
fibrosis, anterior knee pain related to, 11I:81 differential diagnosis, 1:334-337
forearm deformity vs., 1:228, 230 secondary, hip labral tear related to, 1:341,344
heterotopic ossification vs., 111:162, 165 Proximal femur bone marrow edema syndromes,
inferior rib notching vs., 1:308, 309 11:126-129
intercondylar notch enlargement, distal femur, Prune belly syndrome (Eagle-Barrett syndrome)
1:346 symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
meniscal size alteration vs., 1:366, 368 with stylohyoid ligament ossification, tendon
muscle atrophy vs., 11:176,177 and ligament ossification vs., 11:100, 101
photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs., Pseudoachondroplasia
11:196 bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body
soft tissue lesions with predominately low T1 & beaking vs., 1:282, 283
T2 signal vs., 11:150, 151 childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 286
soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 111:186
superior rib notching vs., 1:311 irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs.,
Post-traumatic. See Trauma. 1:13
Pregnancy, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326 muscle atrophy vs., 11:177
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor, soft tissue Pseudoarthrosis, 11:94-95
lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:154 congenital
nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., 1:209
xliii
INDEX
tibial, unilateral short limb related to, 111:173, sacroiliitis vs.
176 bilateral asymmetric, 1:320
tibial bowing vs., 1:353, 355 bilateral symmetric, 1:317, 319
tibial fracture in, 11:95 unilateral, 1:322, 323
differential diagnosis, 11:94-95 "sausage digit," swelling and periostitis of digit
lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268, 269 (dactylitis) vs., 1:266
Pseudo h ypopa rath yroi d ism solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 118
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:121 squaring of one or more vertebra vs., 1:290
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27 symphysis pubis with productive changes/
nodular calcification vs., 11:111, 115 fusion vs., 1:324
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 191 ulnar deviation of Mep joints vs., 1:264, 265
rickets and osteomalacia vs., III:167, 169 Pubalgia, groin/hip pain related to, 111:49
sequestration VS., 11:37, 39 Pulmonary blood flow, decreased, inferior rib
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261, notching vs., 1:308
263 Pulmonary osteoarthropathy, hypertrophic,
target lesions of bone VS., 11:41,43 periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs.,
Pseudo- pseudo hypopara th yroid ism 1:126, 127
rickets and osteomalacia vs., III:167, 169 Pycnodysostosis
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261, acroosteolysis vs., 1:247,249
263 generalized increased bone density vs.
Pseudo-SLAP lesion, anterosuperior labral adult, 11:61
variations/pathology vs., 1:219 child, 11:65, 67
Pseudotumor long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:19
fibroosseous of digits, swelling and periostitis of long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, 101
digit (dactylitis) VS., 1:266, 267 sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:69, 73
hemophilia-related symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331 Pyle dysplasia, long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391, 393 Pyomyositis, enlarged muscle vs., 11:172, 174
orbital, enlarged muscle vs., 11:173, 175 Pyrophosphate arthropathy
Psoriatic arthritis arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:154,
acroosteolysis vs., 1:246-247,248 155-156
acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250 arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:135,
ankylosis vs., 1:176, 177 136
arthritis mutilans vs., 1:162 arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:142, 144
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:134- carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232
135,136 chondrocalcinosis vs., 1:]84
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:168 discal mineralization vs., 1:270, 273
arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:143, 144 early, arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs.,
ball of foot pain related to, III:127, 131 1:166, 168
calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., 1:376, erosive arthritis vs., 1:146-]47, 149
378 knee, anterior knee pain related to, IIl:80, 82
effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222, linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280
223 long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
enthesopathy vs., 11:97, 99 lytic lesion vs., 1:22, 24
erosive arthritis vs., 1:146, 148 medial knee pain related to, 111:89
groin/hip pain related to, 11[:48, 50 metacarpophalangeal-predominant arthritis vs.,
heel pain related to, III:121, 124 1:]92, 193
in teenagers, 111:148, 150 mimic, periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 188
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., I:194, mixed erosive/productive arthritis VS., 1:152
195 nodular calcification vs., [1:110, ] 11
linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280 soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241
mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152, 153 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:]5,18
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., subchondral cyst, patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348,
111:2 349
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs., tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390
1:276 wrist pain related to
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., radial-sided, 111:42,45
1:127, 128 ulnar-sided, 111:36,38
xliv
INDEX
Reactive arthritis, chronic. See Chronic reactive
Q arthritis.
Quadriceps tendon tear
Reactive sclerosis, pedicle, lesions originating in
anterior knee pain related to, 111:81,84
posterior vertebral elements vs., 1:307
painful knee replacement related to, 111:99
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. See Complex
Quadrilateral space syndrome, nerve entrapment
regional pain syndrome.
of shoulder vs., 111:14,15
Reiter disease. See Chronic reactive arthritis.
Renal cell carcinoma, metastatic
R bone cancer vs., 11:56, 58
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
Radial aplasia/hypoplasia/dysplasia, 1:226-227
lesion vs., 1:2, 4
differential diagnosis, 1:226-227 long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., 1:44,
elbow deformities vs., 111:16,17
46
Radial clubhand, forearm deformity vs., 1:229 Renal disease, chronic, anemia related to, 111:152,
Radial entrapment neuropathy, elbow/wrist nerve
153
entrapment vs., 111:28-29,31
Renal failure
Radial head
rickets and osteomalacia related to, 111:166,
dislocation
167-168
elbow deformities vs., TII:16, 17
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., II: 198
lateral elbow pain related to, 111:18,20
Renal osteodystrophy
head/neck fracture, lateral elbow pain related to,
delayed bone age vs., 11:104
111:18,19-20
distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212, 213
subluxation (nursemaid elbow), lateral elbow
genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:370
pain related to, 111:19
healed/healing
Radial neuropathy, lateral elbow pain related to,
bone within bone appearance vs., 11:76, 78
llJ:19,21
generalized increased bone density vs.
Radial tunnel syndrome, elbow/wrist nerve
adult, 1I:60, 61
entrapment vs., 111:29
child, 11:64,65
Radial-sided wrist pain, 111:42-47
with brown tumor, multiple sclerotic bone
Radiation effects
lesion vs., 11:28
adipocyte increase, increased marrow fat vs
11:136-137, 139 ., long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
vs., 1:90, 92
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284, 286
long bone epiphyseal sclerosis/ivory vs., 1:18, 20
growth deformities. See Growth deformities
long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
radiation-induced. '
1:108,110
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:26
medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal
long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30
humerus vs., 1:214, 215
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32
mimic
long bone overtubulation related to, 1:103, 105
periostitis of multiple bones in children vs.,
osteonecrosis. See Osteonecrosis, radiation-
1:131, 133
induced.
sacroiliitis vs.
photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs.,
bilateral asymmetric, 1:320, 321
11:196, 197
bilateral symmetric, 1:317, 319
sarcoma. See Sarcoma, radiation-induced.
neostosis
soft tissue abnormalities, intermuscular edema
bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs.,
vs., lJ:181, 183
1:122, 123
Radiculopathy, C8-Tl (mimic), medial elbow pain
multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:27,30
related to, 111:23
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs.,
Radiocarpal angle, abnormal, 1:234-237
1:126-127, 128
Radiographic technique (mimic), osteopenia vs.
solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 119
11:80 '
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 295
Radioulnar joint instability, distal, wrist clicking/
with brown tumor
clunklllg/instability related to, 111:33
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, 10
Radioulnar synostosis
healing, multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs.,
forearm deformity vs., 1:228
11:28
radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:227
hyperossifled (mimic), sclerosing dysplasias
Raynaud disease, acroosteolysis vs., 1:249
vs., 11:69
INDEX
><
QJ
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., or retro-Achilles tendon bursitis, heel pain
"'C 1:301 related to, III: 120
s::: polyostotic lesions vs. Rhabdomyolysis, enlarged muscle vs., [1:172, 174
adult, 11:2, 5 Rhabdomyosarcoma
childhood,II:12 embryonal, soft tissue ossification vs., II: 107
solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:15, 18 soft tissue, enlarged muscle vs., 1I:175
with hyperparathyroidism Rheumatoid arthritis. See also Juvenile idiopathic
chondrocalcinosis vs., 1:184, 185 arthritis; Still disease, adult.
cortical tunneling vs., 11:92, 93 acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288 ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 111:108,111
generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:82, 84 ankylosis vs., 1:177, 179
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:116, arthritis mutilans vs., 1:162
118 arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., [:154,
linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 156
1:280 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 139
long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30 atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 159-160
nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 113 ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 130
osteopenia vs., 11:80, 81 calcaneal erosions, posterior tubercle vs., [:376,
periarticular calcification vs., I:186, 189 377
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335, 337 carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232, 233
superscan vs., 11:204, 205 cortical tunneling vs., 11:92
tibial bowing vs., 1:352, 354 distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212,213
Renal stones, groin/hip pain related to, III:49 distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement
Repetitive trauma, chronic vs., 1:347
arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155, early
156 arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs.,
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:232,233 1:166, 167
chondrocalcinosis vs., 1:184, 185 symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222,
1:108, 109 223
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32 enthesopathy vs., 11:97
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326 erosive arthritis vs., I:146, 147
tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., II:184, 185 generalized osteoporosis vs., 1I:82, 85
Reticuloh istiocytosis groin/hip pain related to, 11I:48
acroosteolysis vs., 1:249 heel pain related to, 1Il:121, 124
multicentric hip
acroosteolysis vs., 1:247, 249 pain in elderly patients related to, 111:68,71
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:135, protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334, 336
137 knee, medial knee pain related to, 111:86,88
erosive arthritis vs., 1:15] medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., humerus vs., 1:214
1:195,197 metacarpophalangeal-predominant arthritis vs.,
ulnar deviation of Mer joints vs., 1:265 1:192
Retinoid complications olecranon bursitis vs., 111:26,27
linear ossification along anterior spine vs., [:280, pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 111:133
281 regional osteoporosis vs., 11:88-89, 90
periostitis of multiple bones in children vs., retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380, 38]
1:131 robust
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs.,
1:127 1:155, 157
spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298, 299 arthritis with normal bone density vs., [:135,
spondyloarthropathy (mimic), arthritis with 137
productive changes vs., 1:143 erosive arthritis vs., 1:151
Retrocalcaneal bursitis, 1:380-381 metacarpophalangeal-predomi nant arthritis
Achilles tendon thickening/enlargement vs., vs., 1:192, 193
1:374 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253,257
differential diagnosis, 1:380-381 rotator cuff symptoms vs., 1I1:5, 7
xlvi
INDEX
sacroi Iiitis vs. Rocker bottom foot (congenital vertical talus)
bilateral asymmetric, 1:320 congenital foot deformity vs., IlI:139, 141
bilateral symmetric, 1:317 pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., I1I:133, 135
unilateral, 1:322 Rotator cuff atrophy, glenohumeral malalignment
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ vs., 1:216
fusion vs., 1:325 Rotator cuff symptoms, 111:4-7
tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390, 392 Rotator cuff tendinosis/tear
ulnar deviation of MCP joints vs., 1:264 chronic
wheelchair, superior rib notching vs., 1:310,311 distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212
widened joint space related to, 1:170, 172 medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal
wrist pain related to humerus vs., 1:214
radial-sided, 111:42,44 glenohumeral malalignment vs., 1:216
ulnar-sided, 111:36,37 rotator cuff symptoms vs., 1Il:4, 5-6
Rheumatoid nodule shoulder instability related to, III:8, 9
mimic, olecranon bursitis vs., 111:26
nodular calcification vs., 11:111, 113
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 243 s
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383 Sacrococcygeal teratoma, bone lesions with fluid/
Rhomboid fossa (mimic), nonarticular clavicular fluid levels vs., 11:144, 145
lesions vs., 1:208,210 Sacroiliac dysfunction, lateral hip pain related to,
Rib notching 11[:55, 57
inferior, 1:308-309 Sacroi Iiitis
superior, 1:310-311 bilateral asymmetric, 1:320-321
Ribbing disease bilateral symmetric, [:316-319
generalized increased bone density in child vs., Saphenous nerve syndrome
11:65 lower extremity nerve entrapment vs., [1[:64-65
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening medial knee pain related to, 111:87
vs., 1:91 SAPHO. See Synovitis, acne, palmoplantar
sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:69 pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO).
Ribs Sarcoid, sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:73
dwarfism with short ribs, 111:188-189 Sarcoidosis
fractures, multiple healing (mimic), multiple acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250
sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:26, 28 carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., [:232
solitary lesion, 1:312-315 heel pain related to, 111:121
Rickets and osteomalacia, 111:166-169 long bone central metaphyseal lesion vs., non-
atypical axial osteomalacia, 111:167 aggressive, [:39
cortical tunneling vs., 11:92,93 multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:31
delayed bone age vs., 11:105 nodular calcification vs., 1l:l11
genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:371 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253, 256
healing, long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97, polyostotic lesions vs.
100 adult, II:7
hypophosphatemic rickets (X-linked), I1I:167 childhood,II:12
irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs., solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., n:21, 25
1:12, 14 swelling and periostitis of digit (dactylitis) vs.,
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., 1:266
1:108, 110 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:391
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., Sarcoma
1:26,28 acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic, soft tissue
long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30, 31 mass of finger vs., 1:241
long bone metaphyseal fraying vs., 1:32, 33 chondrosarcoma. See Chondrosarcoma.
oncogenic osteomalacia related to, 111:166, 168 epithelioid, soft tissue target lesions vs., 11:158
osteopenia vs., II:80, 81 Ewing. See Ewing sarcoma.
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335 fibrosarcoma. See Fibrosarcoma.
rickets of prematurity, 111:166 Kaposi, subcutaneous mass vs., [1:167
tibial bowing vs., 1:352, 354 leiomyosarcoma, soft tissue lesions with fluid/
vitamin D dependent, [II:167, 169 fluid levels vs., [1:154
vitamin D resistant, enthesopathy vs., 11:97, 99 lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268, 269
x/vii
INDEX
liposarcoma. See Liposarcoma. multiple sclerotic bone lesion vs., 11:26
myxofibrosarcoma sclerosing dysplasias vs., 11:68, 70
acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic, soft Scoliosis
tissue mass of finger vs., 1:241 high thoracic, with neurofibromatosis, painful
subcutaneous mass vs., 11:171 scoliosis vs., 111:145,147
neurogenic, enlarged peripheral nerves vs., painful, 111:144-147
11:189 Scurvy
osseous angiosarcoma. See Angiosarcoma, generalized osteoporosis vs., 11:83,87
osseous. healing, long bone undertubulation vs., 1:97,
osteosarcoma. See Osteosarcoma. 101
Paget, flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, long bone growth plate widened physis vs.,
11 1:109,111
radiation-induced long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs.,
flat bones with permeative lesions vs., 1:7, 11 1:27,29
long bone diaphyseal aggressive lesion vs. long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30, 31
adult, 1:71, 73 mimic, generalized increased bone density in
child,I:75 child vs., 11:64, 66
long bone eccentric metaphyseal aggressive periostitis of multiple bones in children vs.,
lesion vs., 1:53 1:131,133
matrix-containing bone lesions vs., 11:49 solid periostitis vs., 1:117, 121
rhabdomyosarcoma Sebaceous cyst
embryonal, soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107 cystic masses vs., 11:160
soft tissue, enlarged muscle vs., 11:175 subcutaneous mass vs., 11:166, 167
soft tissue Semimembranous tendon bursitis
dystrophic calcification in, periarticular extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:363, 364
calcification vs., 1:187, 190 knee fluid collections vs., 1:357,361
mimic, cystic masses vs., 11:161, 165 Septic joint
synovial. See Synovial sarcoma. ankle, medial ankle pain related to, 11I:108-109
Saturday night palsy, nerve entrapment of shoulder ankylosis vs., 1:177, 179
vs., Ill: 14 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 140
"Sausage digit," swelling and periostitis of digit atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 160
(dactylitis) vs., 1:266, 267 ball of foot pain related to, 111:126-127, 129
Scaphoid fractures, avascular necrosis related to, bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:127, 129
111:156, 158 distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212
Scapholunate ligament tear distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement
radial-sided wrist pain related to, 11I:42-43, 46 vs., 1:346
wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to, early, arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs.,
11I:32, 34 1:166, 168
Schmorl node epiphyseal marrow signal vs., abnormal, 11:132
mimic, lesions originating in vertebral body vs., erosive arthritis vs., 1:147,149,151
1:300,302 facet, painful scoliosis vs., 111:145, 147
vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:292, 293 fungal, with tuberculosis, arthritis with
Schwannoma, conventional, soft tissue target osteopenia vs., 1:139
lesions vs., 11:158-159 groin/hip pain related to, 111:49,52
Sciatic neuropathy, lower extremity nerve hip
entrapment vs., 11I:64, 66 coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338, 339
Sciatica pain in elderly patients related to, 111:69,73
calf pain related to, 11I:92 in teenagers, 11I:148-149, 150
groin/hip pain related to, 111:49 knee, medial knee pain related to, 11I:87, 90
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 11I:69 long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ballooning
lateral hip pain related to, 111:55 vs., 1:16, 17
thigh pain related to, 11I:60 long bone growth plate premature physeal
Sclerosing dysplasias, 11:68-73 closure vs., 1:106
Sclerotic bone lesion monoarthritis vs., 1:198, 199
multiple, 11:26-31 osteomyelitis vs., 11:130, 131
solitary, 11:20-25 painful hip replacement related to, 111:74,77
with central lucency, 11:32-35 painful knee replacement related to, 111:98
Sclerotic metastases
INDEX
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288, 289
III :2, 3 generalized increased bone density vs.
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335, 337 adult, 11:60,62
regional osteoporosis vs., 11:89,91 child, 11:64, 66
rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:5,7 generalized osteoporosis vs., II:82, 85
sacroiliitis vs., unilateral, 1:322, 323 "hand-foot," swelling and periostitis of digit
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223 (dactylitis) vs., 1:266, 267
subchondral edematous-like signal vs., 11:130, long bone diaphyseal lesions vs.
131 aggressive, child, 1:7S, 77
symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, 328 central, non-aggressive, 1:67, 69
symphysis pubis with productive changes/ long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
fusion vs., 1:324 vs., 1:90, 92
thigh pain related to, 11I:61 long bone metaphyseal cupping vs., 1:30
ulnar deviation of Mep joints vs., 1:264 long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96,99
widened joint space related to, 1:170, 172 protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:335
Sequestra, pinhole, target lesions of bone vs., 11:40, solid periostitis vs., 1:1]6-117,120
42 spleen, soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs.,
Sequestration, 11:36-39 11:198,200
Seroma, anechoic mass vs., 11:194 Silastic implant
Sesamoiditis, 1:258-259 arthropathy, arthritis with preserved cartilage
ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 130 space vs., 1:167, 169
differential diagnosis, 1:258-259 intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:190, 192
Sever disease Sinding Larsen Johansson disease, anterior knee
heel pain related to, 111:121, 124 pain related to, 11I:81,85
retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380, 381 Sinus tarsus syndrome, lateral ankle pain related
Sex hormones, excessive, advanced bone age and, to, 111:115, 118
11:102 Skeletal disorders, inherited, distal femur
Short limb, unilateral, 111:172-177 intercondylar notch enlargement vs., 1:346
Short metacarpal/metatarsal bones, 1:260-263 Skin and subcutaneous lesions, soft tissue mass of
Short rib polydactyly foot vs., 1:383, 387
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285 Skull hemangioma (mimic), bizarre horizontal
dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188 periosteal reaction vs., 1:123, 125
Shoulder girdle and upper arm. See also Clavicle; SLAP lesions
Humerus; Labrum. type I-IV, 1:218-219, 220
anteroinferior labral/capsule injury, 11I:12-13 type V-X, 1:219,220
arthroplasty impingement, medial metaphyseal Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
erosion of proximal humerus vs., 1:214 avascular necrosis related to, 111:]57, 159
fluid collections about the shoulder, 1:222-225 coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338
fracture, rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:5,6 growth plate widened physis vs., 1:108, 110
glenohumeral malalignment, 1:216-217 hip labral tear related to, 1:341, 343
intraarticular fluid, glenohumeral malalignment unilateral short limb related to, 111:172, 174
vs., 1:216,217 Smoking, complications, bone marrow hyperplasia
nerve entrapment, 111:14-15 vs., 11:140, 141
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint, Snapping hip, 111:58-59
111:2-3 Soft tissue
rotator cuff symptoms, 111:4-7 abnormalities, radiation-induced, intermuscular
shoulder instability, 1II:8-]] edema vs., 11:181, 183
subluxation/dislocation, rotator cuff symptoms abscess. See Abscess, soft tissue.
vs., 111:4-5,6 contractures, III:170-171
unilateral short limb, 111:172-177 hematoma. See Hematoma.
Sickle cell anemia, musculoskeletal complications impingement, painful knee replacement related
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs., to, 111:99
111:152,154 implants, soft tissue ossification vs., 11:107
avascular necrosis related to, 111:157, 159 lesions
bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:140, 142 with fluid/fluid levels, 11:154-157
dactylitis, periostitis of multiple bones in with predominately low T] & T2 signal,
children vs., 1:131, 133 11:150-153
xlix
INDEX
)( mass erosion (mimic) long bone epiphyseal/ Intervertebral disc; Vertebrae and vertebral
QJ
"'0 apophyseal/subchondral lytic lesion vs., body.
c: 1:23,25 congenital and acquired childhood
mass invasion (mimic), long bone cortically platyspondyly, 1:284-287
based lytic diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:85, 88 dwarfism with major spine involvement,
neoplasms. See Soft tissue neoplasms. 111:184-185
nodular calcification, 11:110-115 injury, heterotopic ossification vs., 11I:162, 165
ossification, 11:106-109 linear ossification along anterior spine, 1:280-
soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:203 281
overlying, loss or absence (mimic), regional neonatal, normal, bone within bone appearance
osteoporosis vs., II:88, 90 vs., 11:76, 77
target lesions, 11:158-159 ossification/calcification anterior to C1, 1:274-
uptake on bone scan, 11:198-203 275
Soft tissue neoplasms osteophytes, 1:298-299
adjacent to bone, bizarre horizontal periosteal painful scoliosis, 111:144-147
reaction vs., 1:123, 125 paralysis, spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298
anterior knee pain related to, 111:85 paravertebral ossification and calcification,
calcification in, 11:122-125 1:276-279
calf pain related to, 1II:93, 97 with Charcot neuropathy, neuropathic
excavation (mimic), long bone cortically based osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164, 165
metaphyseal lesion vs., 1:57, 59 Spondyloarthropathy
fingers, 1:240-245 arthritis with large subchondral cysts vs., 1:155
foot, 1:382-387 arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:166
groin/hip pain related to, 111:49,53 retinoid (mimic), arthritis with productive
hemangioma. See Hemangioma, soft tissue. changes vs., 1:143
hip pain in elderly patients related to, 1II:69, 73 seronegative
intermuscular edema vs., 11:181, 183 mimic, spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298,299
knee, anterior knee pain related to, 1II:81 retrocalcaneal bursitis vs., 1:380, 381
lateral elbow pain related to, Ill: 19 Spondyloepi physeal dysplasia
lateral hip pain related to, 1lI:55, 57 childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284-285, 287
lipoma, bone lesions with bright T1 signal vs., dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
11:146, 147 111:184, 185
locally invasive, tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:371
1:391 genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:372
medial ankle pain related to, 11I:109, 113 irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs.,
medial knee pain related to, 11I:87, 91 1:13,15
periarticular calcification vs., 1:190 muscle atrophy vs., 11:177
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383, 387 symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:327,329
thigh pain related to, 1lI:61, 63 Spondylosis
wrist pain related to degenerative, discal mineralization vs., 1:270,
radial-sided, 111:43,47 271
ulnar-sided, 111:37,41 lesions originating in posterior vertebral
Soleus, accessory (mimic), Achilles tendon elements vs., 1:306
thickening/enlargement vs., 1:374 Spondylosis deformans, spinal osteophytes vs.,
Solitary geographic lytic lesions, 11:14-19 1:298
Solitary sclerotic bone lesion, 11:20-25 Sports anemia, bone marrow hyperplasia vs.,
Spherocytosis, bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:141 11:140, 142
"Spina ventosa," swelling and periostitis of digit Squamous cell carcinoma
(dactylitis) vs., 1:266 metastatic, bone cancer vs., 11:57
Spinal cord injury subcutaneous mass vs., II: 170
cavus foot deformity related to, 111:137 Statins, complications of, thigh pain related to,
hypertrophic callus formation vs., 11:74 11I:61
muscle atrophy vs., 11:176 Stem cell stimulation, abnormal epiphyseal
Spinal fatigue syndrome, painful scoliosis vs., marrow signal vs., 11:133
111:144-145 Sternoclavicular hyperostosis/SAPHO
Spindle cell lipoma, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:170, linear ossification along anterior spine vs., 1:280
171 painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs.,
Spine. See also Ankylosing spondylitis; 111:2,3
INDEX
spinal osteophytes vs., 1:298 with Eagle-Barrett syndrome, tendon and
Sternoclavicular joint, painful or enlarged, 111:2-3 ligament ossification vs., 11:100, 101
Steroid therapy Subacromial bursitis
avascular necrosis related to, 11I:156,157 rotator cuff symptoms vs., 111:4, 6
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181 shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222,224
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra related to, Subacromial spur, enthesopathy vs., 11:96,98
1:288,289 Subcapital fracture, Garden IV, benign osseous
generalized osteoporosis related to, 11:82, 84 lesions with aggressive appearance vs., 11:54
hypertrophic callus formation related to, II: 74 Subchondral cyst
increase of fat cells due to, increased marrow fat large, with arthritis, 1:154-157
vs., 11:136-137, 138 long bone epiphyseal/apophyseal/subchondral
muscle atrophy due to, I1:176 lytic lesion vs., 1:22
Still disease, adult metaphyseal extension, long bone eccentric
ankylosis vs., 1:177, 179 non-aggressive metaphyseal lesion vs., 1:49,
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139, 141 50
erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 151 osteoarthritis, patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:348,
interphalangeal-predominant arthritis vs., 1:195, 349
197 pre-operative, arthroplasty with lytic/cystic
Stress fractures lesions vs., 1:206, 207
adult pyrophosphate arthropathy, patellar lytic
long bone cortically based metaphyseal lesions vs., 1:348, 349
lesion vs., 1:56, 58 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 15
long bone cortically based sclerotic supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:330, 33]
diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:80, 81 tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:390
long bone eccentric metaphyseal lesion vs., Subchondral edematous-like signal, 11:130-131
non-aggressive, 1:48, 50 Subclavian artery obstruction, inferior rib notching
mimic, symphysis pubis with productive vs., 1:308
changes/fusion vs., 1:325 Subcutaneous mass, 11:166-171
sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs., Subia bra I foramen
11:32,34 anterosuperior labral variations/pathology vs.,
ball of foot pain related to, 111:126, 128 1:2]8
benign osseous lesions with aggressive wi th superior sublabral recess (sulcus),
appearance vs., 11:50-51, 53 anterosuperior labral variations/pathology
bisphosphonate-related, long bone diaphyseal vs., 1:219, 221
lesion vs., cortically based, sclerotic, 1:81,83 Sublabral recess, superior (sulcus)
bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:126, 128 anterosuperior labral variations/pathology vs.,
calcaneal, heel pain related to, 111:120, 122 1:218,219
fabella, painful knee replacement related to, with sublabral foramen, anterosuperior labral
111:99 variations/pathology vs., 1:219,221
malunion, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, Subluxation
328 patella, anterior knee pain related to, 111:80, 83
pediatric, long bone cortically based sclerotic peroneal tendon, lateral ankle pain related to,
diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:80, 82 11I:115, 118
solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 119 radial head (nursemaid elbow), lateral elbow
solitary sclerotic bone lesion vs., I1:20, 2] pain related to, 1II:19
talus, anterior ankle pain/impingement related shoulder girdle, rotator cuff symptoms vs.,
to, 111:104, 106 111:4-5,6
tibia, anterior ankle pain/impingement related widened joint space related to, I:] 70, 173
to, 111:104, 106 Subperiosteal hemorrhage, bone within bone
Stress reaction appearance vs., 1I:76
bone marrow edema syndromes vs., 11:126, 128 Subperiosteal resorption (mimic), periostitis of
sesamoiditis vs., 1:258, 259 multiple bones/acropachy vs., 1:126, 128
Sturge-Weber disease, hemihypertrophy related to, Superior labral anteroposterior lesions (SLAP)
111:178 types 1-1\1,1:218-219, 220
Stylohyoid ligament ossification types V-X, 1:219, 220
mimic, ossification/calcification anterior to C1 Superscan, 11:204-205
vs., 1:274, 275 Suprascapular nerve entrapment, nerve
Ii
INDEX
entrapment of shoulder vs., 1II:14, 15 monoarthritis vs., 1:199, 200
Suprascapular neuropathy, rotator cuff symptoms nodular calcification vs., [[:111, 113
vs., 111:4,6 shoulder fluid collections vs., [:223, 225
Sural nerve syndrome, lower extremity nerve soft tissue ossification vs., 11:106, 108
entrapment vs., ([[:65, 67 soft tissue uptake on bone scan vs., 11:198
Surgical resection tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., 11:184, 185
growth plate premature physeal closure vs., widened joint space related to, 1:17l, 174
1:106, 107 within bursa, knee fluid collections vs., 1:357,
photopenic lesions and false negative scans vs., 361
11:196 Synovial process, proximal tibio-fibular joint, knee
Symphysis pubis fluid collections vs., 1:357, 361
widening, 1:326-329 Synovial sarcoma
with productive changes/fusion, 1:324-325 cystic, soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels
Syndesmosis sprain vs., 11:155, 157
anterior ankle pain/impingement related to, extraarticular popliteal mass vs., 1:362, 364
([[:104, 106 linear and curvilinear calcification vs., 11:120
intermuscular edema vs., 11:180, 182 nodular calcification vs., II: 111, 1] 4
lateral ankle pain related to, ([[:115, 119 periarticular calcification vs., [:187, 190
Syndesmotic impingement, lateral ankle pain soft tissue neoplasms with calcification vs.,
related to, 11I:115, 119 11:122, 123
Synovial chondromatosis, soft tissue mass of finger Synovitis. See also Tenosynovitis.
vs., 1:241 intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:190, 192
Synovial chondrosarcoma knee, knee fluid collections vs., [:356, 358
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181 nodular
intraarticular mass vs., 1:203 intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:191,
Synovial cyst 193
anechoic mass vs., 11:194 intraarticular mass vs., 1:203,204
cystic masses vs., 11:]60,162 pigmented villonodular. See Pigmented
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:223,225 villonodular synovitis.
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., popliteal cyst, extraarticular popliteal mass vs.,
11:155 1:362,364
Synovial fringe, lateral elbow pain related to, 111:19, silicone-induced, tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs.,
21 [:391,395
Synovial hemangioma viral (toxic)
distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement monoarthritis vs., 1:]99,20]
vs., 1:346, 347 widened joint space related to, [:170, 173
intraarticular mass vs., 1:203, 205 Synovitis, acne, palmoplantar pustulosis,
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO)
11:] 55 arthritis with productive changes vs., [:143, 145
Synovial osteochondromatosis mixed erosive/productive arthritis vs., 1:152
anterior knee pain related to, 11I:81, 84 nonarticular clavicular lesions vs., [:208-209
arthritis with normal bone density vs., 1:134, sternoclavicular hyperostosis in
136 linear ossification along anterior spine vs.,
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:167 [:280
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:180, painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs.,
182 111:2,3
distal femur intercondylar notch enlargement spinal osteophytes vs., [:298
vs., 1:346, 347 Syphilis
erosive arthritis vs., 1:146, 148 congenital, long bone diaphyseal lesion vs.,
extraarticular, periarticular calcification vs., aggressive, child, 1:75
[:187, 191 medial metaphyseal erosion of proximal
extraarticular popliteal mass vs., [:363, 364 humerus vs., [:215
hip, snapping hip related to, 11[:58,59 secondary
in teenagers, 111:151 solid periostitis vs., [:117
intraarticular low signal material vs., 11:190, 192 supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331
intraarticular mass vs., 1:202, 203-204 swelling and periostitis of digit (dactylitis)
medial knee pain related to, 111:87, 91 vs., 1:266
tertiary
Iii
INDEX
sclerotic bone lesion with central lucency vs., avascular necrosis
11:33 anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
sequestration vs., 11:37 111:104-105, 107
supra-acetabular iliac destruction vs., 1:331 post-traumatic, III: IS 7
tibial bowing vs., 1:353, 355 congenital vertical (rocker bottom foot)
with Charcot neuropathy, neuropathic congenital foot deformity vs., 111:139, 141
osteoarthropathy vs., 1:165 pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 111:133, 135
Syringomyelia, with Charcot joint fractures
atrophic joint destruction vs., 1:158, 160 anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
neuropathic osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164 111:105, 107
Systemic diseases lateral process, lateral ankle pain related to,
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations, 111:115,119
111:152-155 osteochondral lesion
arthritis in teenagers, 111:148-151 anterior ankle pain/impingement related to,
avascular necrosis, III:156-161 111:105, 107
dwarfism. See Dwarfism. lateral ankle pain related to, 11I:114-115, 117
focal gigantism/macrodactyly, 11I:180-183 medial ankle pain related to, I11:108, 110
hemihypertrophy, 1ll:178-179 stress fracture, anterior ankle pain/impingement
heterotopic ossification, 111:162-165 related to, 111:104, 106
rickets and osteomalacia, 111:166-169 subtalar arthritis, lateral ankle pain related to,
short limb, unilateral, 111:172-177 111:114,117
soft tissue contractures, 111:170-171 talar beak, 1:388-389
Systemic fibrosis, nephrogenic Target lesions
intermuscular edema vs., 11:181 of bone, 11:40-43
soft tissue contractu res related to, III:170 of soft tissue, I1:158-159
Systemic lupus erythematosus Tarsal bones
arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:138, 140 cystic/lytic lesions, 1:390-395
arthritis with preserved cartilage space vs., 1:167, insufficiency fracture, diabetic foot
169 complications vs., 111:143
avascular necrosis related to, 1II:159 Tarsal coalition
effusions, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222, ankylosis vs., 1:177,179
223 ball of foot pain related to, 111:127, 131
erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, ISO congenital foot deformity vs., II1:138-139, 140
linear and curvilinear calcification vs., II:121 heel pain related to, 111:121, 125
mimic lateral ankle pain related to, 1I1:115, 118
heterotopic ossification vs., 111:163 medial ankle pain related to, 1II:109, 112
metacarpophalangeal-predominant arthritis pes planovalgus (flatfoot) vs., 1Il:133, 135
vs., 1:192, 193 talar beak vs., 1:388, 389
nodular calcification vs., 11:111, 115 Tarsal tunnel syndrome
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 190 anterior, lower extremity nerve entrapment vs.,
superior rib notching vs., 1:310 111:65,67
ulnar deviation of MCr joints vs., 1:264, 265 enlarged peripheral nerves vs., II:186, 187
Systemic sclerosis, progressive. See Progressive heel pain related to, 11I:120-121, 123
systemic sclerosis. lower extremity nerve entrapment vs., 1Il:65,
66-67
medial ankle pain related to, 11I:109, 113
T Teenagers, arthritis in, 111:148-151. See also Juvenile
Talar ridge idiopathic arthritis.
hypertrophied, talar beak vs., 1:388, 389 Telangiectatic osteosarcoma. See Osteosarcoma,
talar beak vs., 1:388 telangiectatic.
Talipes equinovarus (club foot), congenital foot Tendinitis, calcific
deformity vs., 111:138, 140 nodular calcification vs., 11:110, 112
"Tall man" insensate neuropathy, neuropathic periarticular calcification vs., 1:186, 187
osteoarthropathy vs., 1:164, 165 Tendon and ligament ossification, 11:100-101
Talofibular ligament tear, anterior, lateral ankle Tendon injury
pain related to, 111:114, 115 calf pain related to, III:92, 95
Talus hip
groin/hip pain related to, 1Il:48, 51
liii
INDEX
>< lateral hip pain related to, IIl:54, 56 Thanatophoric dwarf
~
"'C pain in elderly patients related to, 11I:68, 71 childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:285,287
c: lower extremity, thigh pain related to, III:60, 62 dwarfism with horizontal acetabular roof vs.,
medial ankle pain related to, IlI:108, 109 1II:190, 191
muscle atrophy vs., 11:176,178 dwarfism with major spine involvement vs.,
sesamoiditis vs., 1:258 11I:184, 185
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 384 dwarfism with short extremities vs., 1II:186, 187
tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., I1:184 dwarfism with short ribs vs., 111:188, 189
tug lesion Thermal injuries. See Burns; Frostbite.
long bone diaphyseal cortically based lytic Thigh pain, 11l:60-63
lesion vs., 1:85, 88 Thoracic nerve syndrome, long, nerve entrapment
mimic, long bone surface (juxtacortical) of shoulder vs., 111:14
lesion vs., 1:61, 64 Thoracic outlet syndrome, nerve entrapment of
wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to, shoulder vs., III:14
III:33, 35 Thorotrast exposure, bone within bone appearance
wrist pain related to vs., 11:77
radial-sided, 111:42,45 Thrombocytopenia-absent radius syndrome,
ulnar-sided, 111:36,39 forearm deformity vs., 1:228
Tendon sheath. See Fibrobroma, tendon sheath; Thrombophlebitis, thigh pain related to, 1II:61
Giant cell tumor, tendon sheath. Thrombosis, deep venous
Tendon tear calcified chronic, linear and curvilinear
intermuscular edema vs., 11:180, 182 calcification vs., I1:117, 120
shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222, 224 calf pain related to, 111:93,96
Tendon/ligament microtrauma, with calcification, intermuscular edema vs., 1l:180, 182
enthesopathy vs., 11:96, 98 Thyroid acropachy
Tenosynovial chondromatosis, soft tissue mass of long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening
finger vs., 1:241, 245 vs., 1:91
Tenosynovitis periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs.,
bicipital, shoulder fluid collections vs., 1:222 1:127,129
infectious, soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, solid periostitis vs., I:] 17,121
242 Thyroid neoplasm, metastatic
medial ankle pain related to, 1II:108, 110 bone cancer vs., 1l:56, 58
mimic, anechoic mass vs., 11:194, 195 flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly
peroneal, lateral ankle pain related to, 11I:114, lesion vs., 1:2, 4
117 long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., 1:44,
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 46
II:155 Thyrotoxicosis, cortical tunneling vs., 1l:92
Tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid, II: 184-185 Tibia
Teratoma, sacrococcygeal, bone lesions with fluid/ bowing of, 1:352-355
fluid levels vs., 1l:144, 145 congenital pseudarthrosis, unilateral short limb
Testicular/scrotal/adnexal pa thology related to, IlI:173, 176
groin/hip pain related to, 1ll:49 stress fracture, anterior ankle pain/impingement
hip pain in elderly patients related to, III:69, 73 related to, Ill:104, 106
Thalassemia Tibialmetadiaphyseal cortically based lesion, long
anemia with musculoskeletal manifestations vs., bones, 1:94-95
111:153, 155 Tibial stress syndrome/adductor insertion
bone marrow hyperplasia vs., 11:140, 142 avulsion syndrome, cortically based, sclerotic
delayed bone age vs., 11:105 diaphyseal lesion vs., 1:80, 82
generalized osteoporosis vs., I1:83, 86 Tibialis anterior tendon
inferior rib notching vs., 1:308 tear, anterior ankle pain/impingement related
long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96, 99 to, IIJ:104, 106
mimic, bizarre horizontal periosteal reaction vs., tendinosis, anterior ankle pain/impingement
1:123, 125 related to, Ill: 104, 106
Thalassemia major, fish (biconcave) or H-shaped Tibialis posterior tendon tear, pes planovalgus
vertebra vs., 1:288 (flatfoot) vs., Ill:132, 134
Thalidomide embryopathy, forearm deformity vs., Tibio-fibular joint, proximal synovial process, knee
1:229 fluid collections vs., 1:357, 361
liv
INDEX
Tillaux fracture, lateral ankle pain related to, genu valgum (knock knees) vs., 1:371
1lI:115, 118 intraarticular mass vs., 1:203, 205
Toe(s). See Fingers and toes. irregular or stippled long bone epiphysis vs.,
Tophus [:13,15
gouty, soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:382, 385 nodular calcification vs., II:111, 115
mimic, olecranon bursitis vs., 111:26,27 Triangular fibrocartilage tear
Total parenteral nutrition ulnar-sided wrist pain related to, 111:36,38
long bone growth plate widened physis vs., wrist clicking/clunking/instability related to,
[:109,111 11I:32,33
prolonged, long bone metaphyseal bands and Triceps tendon rupture
lines vs., 1:26 medial elbow pain related to, III:23, 25
Transitional cell carcinoma, metastatic, bone olecranon bursitis vs., 11I:26,27
cancer vs., 1I:57 Triquetral fracture, ulnar-sided wrist pain related
Trauma to, 11I:36-37,40
acute Trisomy 13-15
ball of foot pain related to, 111:126,128 forearm deformity vs., 1:229
lesions originating in posterior vertebral radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226
elements vs., 1:306, 307 Trisomy 18
medial knee pain related to, 11I:86,89 forearm deformity vs., 1:229
ankle (talus and navicular), avascular necrosis radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226, 227
related to, 1lI:157 ulnar deviation of Mer joints vs., 1:265
childhood platyspondyly vs., 1:284 Trisomy 21. See Down syndrome (trisomy 21).
chondrolysis after Tuberculosis
atrophic joint destruction vs., [:159, 161 and fungal septic joint
monoarthritis vs., 1:199, 201 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139
clavicular, distal clavicular resorption vs., 1:212, erosive arthritis vs., 1:147, 151
213 arthritis associated with, atrophic joint
enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:186-187, 188 destruction vs., 1:159, 161
femur, coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338, 339 bone within bone appearance vs., 11:77
fingers and toes, short metacarpal/metatarsal discal mineralization vs., 1:271, 273
bones vs., [:260, 261 long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
heterotopic ossification vs., 11I:162, 163-165 lesion vs., 1:67, 69
hip, coxa magna deformity vs., 1:338, 339 long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive
insult prior to skeletal maturity, unilateral short lesion vs., 1:39
limb related to, 111:173,176 low virulence, arthritis with preserved cartilage
intermuscular edema vs., 1I:180, 181 space vs., 1:167
long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., monoarthritis vs., 1:199,201
1:26,28 polyostotic lesions vs., II:7
olecranon bursitis vs., 11I:26 "spina ventosa," swelling and periostitis of digit
osteoarthritis related to, monoarthritis vs., (dactylitis) vs., 1:266
1:198,200 widened joint space related to, 1:171,174-175
painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., Tuberous sclerosis
111:2 acroosteosclerosis vs., 1:250, 251
pelvic, symphysis pubis widening vs., 1:326, generalized increased bone density in child vs.,
327-328 11:65
protrusio acetabuli vs., 1:334, 336 hemihypertrophy related to, 1lI:178
repetitive, tenosynovitis/tenosynovial fluid vs., periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs.,
1I:184, 185 1:127, 129
soft tissue contractures related to, 1lI:171 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., [:253
tendon and ligament ossification vs., 11:100,101 vertebral body sclerosis vs., 1:293
wrist, avascular necrosis related to, IlI:156, 158 Tug lesion
Traumatic neuroma, enlarged peripheral nerves vs., long bone diaphyseal lesion vs., cortically based,
11:187,188 lytic, 1:85, 88
Trevor Fairbank disease mimic, long bone surface (juxtacortical) lesion
calcified intraarticular body/bodies vs., 1:181, vs., 1:61,64
183 Tumoral calcinosis
childhood polyostotic lesions vs., 11:12 idiopathic, periarticular calcification vs., 1:187,
191
Iv
INDEX
><
QJ
nodular calcification vs., 11:111, 115 long bone metaphyseal bubbly lesion vs., 1:45,
"'C painful or enlarged sternoclavicular joint vs., 47
r:: 111:2 long bone undertubulation vs., 1:96, 98
paravertebral ossification and calcification vs., patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349, 351
1:276-277,278 phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs., 1:253, 256
periarticular calcification vs., 1:187, 191 solitary geographic lytic lesions vs., 11:14, 16
soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., tarsal cystic/lytic lesions vs., \:394
11:154, 156 Unilateral short limb, 11I:172-177
soft tissue mass of finger vs., 1:240, 244 Upper extremities. See Elbow; Fingers and toes;
soft tissue mass of foot vs., 1:383 Forearm deformity; Shoulder girdle and upper
Tunnel syndromes. See Carpal tunnel syndrome; arm.
Tarsal tunnel syndrome; Ulnar tunnel Urethral duplication, symphysis pubis widening
syndrome. vs., 1:327
Turner syndrome Urine contamination (mimic), soft tissue uptake on
abnormal radiocarpal angle vs., 1:234, 236 bone scan vs., 11:199-200
mimic Uterine carcinoma, metastatic, bone cancer vs.,
genu varum (bow leg deformity), 1:372, 373 11:57
long bone epiphyseal overgrowth/ballooning Uterine fibroid, nodular calcification vs., 11:111,
vs., 1:16, 17 114
tibial bowing vs., 1:353, 355
short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:260, 262
v
Van Buchem disease, generalized increased bone
u density in child vs., 11:65
Ulcer/ulceration Varicose veins, subcutaneous mass vs., 11:166, 168
ball of foot pain related to, IlI:126, 129 Vascular abnormalities
in diabetic foot complications, III:142 calf pain related to, m:92-93
Ulnar abutment ulnar-sided wrist pain related to, 111:37, 41
arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:142-143, Vascular channel, sequestration vs., 11:37
144 Vascular compromise, photopenic lesions and false
carpal cystic/lytic lesions vs., [:232, 233 negative scans vs., 11:196
ulnocarpal, ulnar-sided wrist pain related to, Vascular insufficiency. See Venous insufficiency.
111:36,39 Vascular malformations. See also Arteriovenous
Ulnar aplasia/hypoplasia, elbow deformities vs., malformations.
111:16,17 mimic, hemihypertrophy related to, 111:178, 179
Ulnar clubhand soft tissue lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs.,
forearm deformity vs., 1:229 11:154, 156
radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:226, 227 subcutaneous mass vs., 11:169
Ulnar deviation of metacarpophalangeal joints, Vascular tumors
1:264-265 long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive
Ulnar neuropathy, medial elbow pain related to, lesion vs., 1:67
111:23,25 long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive
Ulnar styloid fracture, ulnar-sided wrist pain lesion vs., 1:39
related to, 11I:37, 40 osseous, phalangeal cystic/lytic lesions vs.,
Ulnar tunnel syndrome 1:253,257
elbow/wrist nerve entrapment vs., III:29, 31 patellar lytic lesions vs., 1:349
enlarged peripheral nerves vs., 11:186, 187 polyostotic lesions vs., 11:3
Ulnar-sided wrist pain, 11I:36-41 Vasculitis, acroosteolysis vs., 1:247,248
Undertubulation, long bones, 1:96-101 VATER association
Unicameral bone cyst forearm deformity vs., 1:229, 231
bone lesions with fluid/fluid levels vs., 11:144, radial dysplasia/aplasia vs., 1:227
145 short metacarpal/metatarsal bones vs., 1:261,
flat bones with focally expanded or bubbly 263
lesion vs., 1:3, 4 Venous distension (mimic), shoulder fluid
long bone central diaphyseal non-aggressive collections vs., 1:223
lesion vs., 1:66-67, 68 Venous insufficiency
long bone central metaphyseal non-aggressive calf pain related to, III:93, 96
lesion vs., 1:35,37
Ivi
INDEX
intermuscular edema vs., 11:180 Vertical talus, congenital. See Talus, congenital
periostitis of multiple bones/acropachy vs., vertical (rocker bottom foot).
1:126, 128 Vitamin A complications. See also
Venous stasis Hypervitaminosis A.
long bone diffuse cortical endosteal thickening generalized increased bone density in child vs.,
vs., 1:90, 91 11:64,66
solid periostitis vs., 1:116, 117 growth plate premature physeal closure vs.,
Vertebrae and vertebral body. See also Intervertebral 1:106
disc. solid periostitis vs., 1:117,120
asymmetric fracture, painful scoliosis vs., 111:144 Vitamin 0 complications. See also
augmentation (mimic), vertebral body sclerosis Hypervitaminosis D.
vs., 1:292, 294 bone within bone appearance vs., 11:76
block vertebra (congenital fusion), squaring of generalized increased bone density in child vs.,
one or more vertebra vs., 1:290, 291 11:64
bullet shaped vertebra/anterior vertebral body long bone metaphyseal bands and lines vs., 1:27
beaking, 1:282-283 nodular calcification vs., 11:111
cervical vertebrae solid periostitis vs., 1:117
ossification/calcification anterior to Cl, Vitamin 0 deficiency, rickets and osteomalacia
1:274-275 related to, 111:166, 168
radiculopathy, rotator cuff symptoms vs., Vitamin D dependent rickets, 111:167, 169
111:4 Vitamin deficiency anemia, 111:152, 153
congenital and acquired childhood Von Hippel-Landau disease, hemihypertrophy
platyspondyly, 1:284-287 related to, 111:178
discogenic end plate changes, increased marrow
fat vs., 11:136, 138
discogenic sclerosis, vertebral body sclerosis vs., w
1:292,293 Warfarin (coumadin) complications, irregular or
Fabry disease (vertebral bodies), generalized stippled long bone epiphysis vs., 1:12-13, 15
osteoporosis vs., II :83 Wartenberg syndrome, elbow/wrist nerve
fish (biconcave) or H-shaped vertebra, 1:288-289 entrapment vs., 111:29
fusion, posterior, squaring of one or more Weightlessness, increased marrow fat vs., 11:137
vertebra vs., 1:290 Werdnig-Hoffmann disease, muscle atrophy vs.,
lesions originating in posterior vertebral 11:177
elements, 1:306-307 Wilson disease
lesions originating in vertebral body, 1:300-305 arthritis with osteopenia vs., 1:139
limbus vertebra (mimic), lesions originating in arthritis with productive changes vs., 1:143, 145
vertebral body vs., 1:300, 303 Wire/cerclage fixation, olecranon bursitis vs., 111:26
osteomyelitis Wrist
granulomatous, paravertebral ossification clicking/clun king/instabil ity, 1I1:32-35
and calcification vs., 1:277, 279 nerve entrapment, 111:28-31
lesions crossing disc space vs., 1:268 post-traumatic, avascular necrosis related to,
lesions originating in vertebral body vs., 111:156, 158
1:300 radial-sided pain, 1Il:42-47
painful scoliosis vs., III: 144,145 ulnar-sided pain, 111:36-41
pyogenic, paravertebral ossification and
calcification vs., 1:276, 277
paravertebral ossification and calcification, x
1:276-279 Xanthoma. See Fibroxanthoma.
spinal osteophytes, 1:298-299
squaring of one or more vertebra, 1:290-291
vertebral body sclerosis, 1:292-297
Vertebral pedicle
hypoplastic/aplastic, lesions originating in
posterior vertebral elements vs., 1:306
reactive sclerosis, lesions originating in posterior
vertebral elements vs., 1:306, 307
Vertebroplasty cement (mimic), discal
mineralization vs., 1:270, 272
Ivii