Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Stupa

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The stupa is a dynamic monument

A stupa is a container of relics and a prevalent visual symbol of Buddhism. The monument,
however, is dynamic given that monuments built as stupas differ in build and function. Two
exemplary examples would be the collage stupas and Shanti stupas.

Collage Stupas (at Bodhgaya at Ratnagiri)

The term ‘collage stupas’ is derived from the apparent function that pieces or fragments of
mounds and domes with miniature Buddha images, piece together create to form a recognizable
shape of a stupa. In their literal sense, they are dilapidated or reconstructed relic mounds that as per
the definition found in Kalingabodhi Jataka must be considered as touch-relics of the Buddha.
Defining these mounds of ‘votive stupas’ that mostly date from the eighth century or later as
‘collage stupas’ is necessary to understand the reconstructed meanings of these mounds in the
contemporary Buddhist context.

While stupas usually contain relics inside, Collage stupas ‘contain’ dharmic relics on the
outside on the surface of an image or in the form of an inscription. Their immediate identification as
stupas also comes from their visual references to Sanchi and its placement at Bodhgaya imitating
the structure of the five towers of the Mahabodhi temple. Collage stupas are usually found on
prominent sites, their location provides collage stupas with a metamorphic characteristic of active
pilgrimage sites.

Shanti Stupas (at Rajgir)

After witnessing the horrendous bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second
World War, Japans Fuji Nichidatsu encouraged the building of stupas containing relics as symbols
of peace, which earned them the name of Peace Pagodas or Shanti Stupas. The first Peace Pagoda
was completed in 1954; more than seventy shanty stupas have been constructed since. The six
stupas in India too, while visually generic and identical seem to be a ‘hybrid’ of multiple visual
sources and styles.

Such intentional hybridity may mark the reinvention of stupa iconography for the future of
International Buddhism. This hybridity lends Shanti stupas two important characteristics –
religiosity and tensions over legitimacy. Since many visitors view these stupas as icons of peace
rather than just Buddhist structures, Shanti stupas are transforming the significance of the stupa
from a monument to a promoter of Buddhism as a peaceful religion. Since Stupas may be built by
foreign groups they may also cause tension over legitimacy. The Ladakh Sanchi stupa, while
containing extremely localised motif is an incredible example of Buddhist sites incorporating visual
elements of local nature but that begs the question of where Fujis original Japanese identity may fit
in or whether the inclusion of localised ideal may conflict with such ‘contemporary’ yet original
notions of the Peace Pagodas.

The given examples may prove that despite the eccentricity of their shape and function, a
varied idea of what a stupa may be has developed but that does not seem to decrease its
authenticity or importance.

You might also like