6 Bar Matter 702
6 Bar Matter 702
6 Bar Matter 702
FACTS:
On the theory that Shari’a Courts are co-equal with the regular Regional Trial Courts in the hierarchy of
the Philippine Judicial System, petitioner Royo M. Gampong prayed the Court that, after due notice and
hearing, to issue an order authorizing all Shari’a District Court Judges to appoint Shari’a Lawyers who
possess the qualifications and none of the qualifications as notaries public within their respective
jurisdictions.
ISSUE:
Whether or not Shari’a Lawyers are qualified to be appointed notaries public
LEGAL PRINCIPLE:
Notarial Law provides for the qualifications for appointment as notary public, thus:
Sec. 233. Qualifications for Appointment. — To be eligible for appointment as notary public, a person
must be a citizen of the Philippines (or of the United States) and over twenty-one years of age. He must,
furthermore, be a person who has been admitted to the practice of law or who has completed and passed
in the studies of law in a reputable university or school of law, or has passed the examination for the
office of the peace or clerk or deputy clerk of court, or be a person who had qualified for the office of
notary public under the Spanish sovereignty. xxx xxx xxx
CONCLUSION:
Shari'a Lawyer is not possessed of the basic requisite of "practice of law" in order to be appointed as a
notary public under Section 233 of the Notarial Law in relation to Section 1, Rule 138 of the Revised
Rules of Court.