IPA, How To Detect Propaganda
IPA, How To Detect Propaganda
IPA, How To Detect Propaganda
Source: Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (1915-1955), Vol. 24,
No. 1 (Jan., 1938), pp. 49-55
Published by: American Association of University Professors
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40219502
Accessed: 31-10-2019 17:21 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CATALOGUE 49
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
5O AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS
Name Calling
"Name Calling" is a device to make us form a judgment with-
out examining the evidence on which it should be based. Here
the propagandist appeals to our hate and fear. He does this by
giving "bad names" to those individuals, groups, nations, races,
policies, practices, beliefs, and ideals which he would have us con-
demn and reject. For centuries the name "heretic" was bad.
Thousands were oppressed, tortured, or put to death as heretics.
Anybody who dissented from popular or group belief or practice
was in danger of being called a heretic. In the light of today's
knowledge, some heresies were bad and some were good. Many
of the pioneers of modern science were called heretics; witness the
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
HOW TO DETECT PROPAGANDA 5 I
Glittering Generalities
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
52 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS
tion, race, policy, practice, or belief with such ideals, seeks to win
us to his cause. As Name Calling is a device to make us form a
judgment to reject and condemn, without examining the evidence,
Glittering Generalities is a device to make us accept and approve,
without examining the evidence.
For example, use of the phrases, "the right to work" and "social
justice" may be a device to make us accept programs for meeting
the labor-capital problem which, if we examined them critically,
we would not accept at all.
In the Name Calling and the Glittering Generalities devices,
words are used to stir up our emotions and to befog our thinking.
In one device "bad words" are used to make us mad; in the other
"good words" are used to make us glad. (See "The Tyranny of
Words," by Stuart Chase, in Harpers Magazine for November,
1937).
The propagandist is most effective in use of these devices when
his words make us create devils to fight or gods to adore. By his
use of the "bad words," we personify as a "devil" some nation,
race, group, individual, policy, practice, or ideal; we are made
fighting mad to destroy it. By use of "good words," we personify
as a god-like idol some nation, race, group, etc. Words which are
"bad" to some are "good" to others, or may be made so. Thus, to
some the New Deal is "a prophecy of social salvation" while to
others it is "an omen of social disaster."
From consideration of names, "bad" and "good," we pass to
institutions and symbols, also "bad" and "good." We see these
in the next device.
Transfer
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
HOW TO DETECT PROPAGANDA 53
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
54 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS
tillers use the device. "It's our family's whiskey, neighbor; and
neighbor, it's your price."
Card Stacking
"Card Stacking" is a device in which the propagandist employs
all the arts of deception to win our support for himself, his group,
nation, race, policy, practice, belief, or ideal. He stacks the cards
against the truth. He uses under-emphasis and over-emphasis
to dodge issues and evade facts. He resorts to lies, censorship,
and distortion. He omits facts. He offers false testimony. He
creates a smoke-screen of clamor by raising a new issue when he
wants an embarrassing matter forgotten. He draws a red herring
across the trail to confuse and divert those in quest of facts he does
not want revealed. He makes the unreal appear real and the real
appear unreal. He lets half-truth masquerade as truth. By the
Card Stacking device, a mediocre candidate, through the "build-
up," is made to appear an intellectual titan; an ordinary prize
fighter a probable world champion; a worthless patent medicine
a beneficent cure. By means of this device propagandists would
convince us that a ruthless war of aggression is a crusade for right-
eousness. Some member nations of the Non-intervention Com-
mittee send their troops to intervene in Spain. Card Stacking
employs sham, hypocrisy, effrontery.
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
HOW TO DETECT PROPAGANDA 55
This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 31 Oct 2019 17:21:09 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms