116 PDF
116 PDF
116 PDF
net/publication/292962038
CITATION READS
1 9,929
1 author:
Gerald Sumari
Moshi Co-operative University (MoCU)
6 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Feasibility study on formation of housing cooperative in rural Mhungwe village View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gerald Sumari on 03 February 2016.
Absanto, Gerald
Institute of Continuing Cooperative Development and Education, Moshi University College of
Cooperative and Business Studies, Tanzania
geraldsumari @yahoo.com
Nnko, Elisifa
Moshi University College of Cooperative and Business Studies, Tanzania
Abstract
Growth is the most frequently used corporate strategy. It means increasing sales, assets, net
profits and a chance to take advantage of the experience curve to reduce the per unit cost of
products sold and thereby increasing profits. Business growth can be realized through several
different indicators. The indicators can be grouped under four categories namely; business
outcomes, business outputs, capacity and qualitative indicators. In most recent years it has
been argued that most of Tanzanian companies have been experienced a slanted growth the
situation which is reflected in few companies being listed in the country’s stock exchange
company, the Dar es Salaam stock exchange (DSE). Among the reason sought for few
companies listed on DSE are most of the companies failing to grow in terms of profit for three
consecutive years which is one of the conditions for a company to be listed and inability of most
of company managers to execute growth strategies effectively.
Limited studies have been done to explore the application of growth strategies for Tanzania
companies. This paper analyses the application and implementation of different business
growth strategies in Tanzania context. It highlights how different businesses have benefited
from these growth strategies.
Keywords: Growth, Strategies, Tanzania
INTRODUCTION
Background
“The term growth means increase in size, or an improvement in quality as a result of a process
of development in which an interacting series of internal changes leads to increases in size
accompanied by changes in the characteristics in the growing object” (Penrose 1959). Growth is
the most frequently used corporate strategy. It means increasing sales, assets, net profits and a
chance to take advantage of the experience curve to reduce the per unit cost of products sold
and thereby increase profits. The cost reduction is very crucial if a firm’s industry is growing
quickly and competitors are engaged in price wards in attempts to increase their market shares.
Those firms which do not gain the necessary economy of large scale productions normally face
large loses unless they can find and fill a small but profitable niche where higher prices can be
offset by special product or service features.
Not every growth strategy is appropriate for every business. The key to finding the right growth
strategy is properly matching it to your company and its specific marketplace. Since the wrong
strategy can devastate your business, it's important to determine whether you are selling new or
emerging products in a new or existing market.
Generally these are some important indicators which can be used to assess the business
growth. It is important for the strategists to understand whether the business is growing or not
and at what rate is it growing. Under this knowledge the strategists will be in a position to
choose the best growth strategy for their business at a particular time.
New Market
However there are other growth strategies apart from the four on the figure above, joint
venture, concentric diversification, conglomerate diversification, horizontal and vertical
integrations and mergers and acquisitions. Generally the role of each of the growth strategies
has been discussed below with vivid examples.
markets. This can supercharge company’s growth prospects. And perhaps the biggest reason
for doing it is to extend a brand reputation into other markets, making the business bigger than
one ever imagined. Take an example of General Electric Company.
Concentric diversification
It is the addition to a corporation of related products or divisions. The corporation’s lines of
business still poses some common thread that serves to relate them in some manner. The
common thread may be similar technology, customer usage, distribution, managerial skills or
product similarity. This type of diversification is appropriate for companies wishing to take
advantage of their competitive position strategies..
highly related. The company has introduced the M-Pesa services and internet services, these
services are highly related to the primary product the voice communication. M-PESA is an
innovative money transfer solution that enables customers to send money to any mobile
customer in Tanzania and also pay various bills via a simple phone transaction.
Conglomerate diversification
A conglomerate is a combination of two or more corporations engaged in entirely different
businesses together into one corporate structure, usually involving a parent company and
several subsidiaries. Often, a conglomerate is a multi-industry company. Conglomerates are
often large and multinational. In other cases, conglomerates are formed for genuine interests of
diversification rather than manipulation of paper ROI. Companies with this orientation would
only make acquisitions or start new branches in other sectors when they believe this will
increase profitability or stability. A good example here is Bakhresa group of companies
Mergers
A merger happens when two firms agree to go forward as a single new company rather than
remain separately owned and operated. This kind of action is more precisely referred to as a
merger of equals. The firms are often of about the same size. Both companies' stocks are
surrendered and new company stock is issued in its place. In practice, however, actual mergers
of equals don't happen very often. Usually, one company will buy another and, as part of the
deal's terms, simply allow the acquired firm to proclaim that the action is a merger of equals,
even if it is technically an acquisition. Being bought out often carries negative connotations,
therefore, by describing the deal euphemistically as a merger, deal makers and top managers
try to make the takeover more palatable. A purchase deal will also be called a merger when
both CEOs agree that joining together is in the best interest of both of their companies. But
when the deal is unfriendly i.e. when the target company does not want to be purchased, it is
always regarded as an acquisition.
Acquisition
An acquisition is the purchase of one company by another company. An acquisition may be
private or public, depending on whether the acquiree is or isn't listed in public markets. An
acquisition may be friendly or hostile. Whether a purchase is perceived as a friendly or hostile
depends on how it is communicated to and received by the target company's board of directors,
employees and shareholders. It is quite normal for acquisition deal communications to take
place under confidentiality situation whereby information flows are restricted due to
confidentiality agreements (Harwood, 2005).
In the case of a friendly transaction, the companies cooperate in negotiations while in the case
of a hostile deal, the takeover target is unwilling to be bought or the target's board has no prior
knowledge of the offer. Acquisition usually refers to a purchase of a smaller firm by a larger one.
Sometimes, however, a smaller firm will acquire management control of a larger or longer
established company and keep its name for the combined entity. This is known as a reverse
takeover.
The Joint-Venture
A Joint Venture on a continuing basis is the normal business undertaking. The term Joint
venture refers to the purpose of the entity and not to a type of entity. Therefore, a joint venture
may be a corporation, a limited liability enterprise, a partnership or other legal structure,
depending on a number of considerations such as tax and tort liability. Joint Ventures are
normally formed both inside one's own country and between firms belonging to different
countries. Joint Ventures are usually formed in order to combine strengths or to bypass legal
restrictions within a country. Some Joint Ventures are also formed because the law of a country
allows dispute settlement, should it occur, in a third country. They are also formed to minimize
business, tax and political risks. The Joint Venture is an alternative to the parent-subsidiary
business partnership in emerging countries, discouraged, on account of ignoring national
objectives, slow-growth, parental control of funds and disallowing competition. Joint Ventures
can be in the manufacture of goods, services, travel space, banking, insurance, web-hosting
business, etc. Today, the term 'Joint Venture' applies to more occasions than the choice of Joint
Venture partners; for example, an individual normally cannot legally carry out business without
finding a national partner to form a Joint Venture as in many Arab countries. Also, the Joint
Venture may be an easier first-step to franchising, as McDonald's and other fast foods found out
in China in the early difficult stage of development. Other reasons for forming a Joint Venture
are: reducing entry risks by using the local partner's assets, inadequate knowledge of local
institutional or legal environment, access to local borrowing powers, perception that the goodwill
of the local partner is carried forward. In strategic sectors, the county's laws may not permit
foreign nationals to operate alone, access to local resources through participation of national
partner and influence of local partners on government officials (Mital, Robinson Jr, Pearce II,
2008).
Resolute Ltd, Ashanti Goldfields in joint venture with AngloGold, Barrick Gold Corp
The vivid examples of joint venture in Tanzania are those in mining industry: The Resolute Ltd;
Ashanti Goldfields in joint venture with AngloGold; Barrick Gold Corp; and the other joint venture
is between Placer Dome Inc; Meremeta Ltd; and Pangea Goldfields Inc in joint venture with
Miniere du Nord. The joint venture AngloGold Ashanti owns 50% of the Geita mine in Tanzania.
The mine which started production in August 2000 produced a record 661,045 oz at a cash
operating cost of US$170/oz in 2003, compared with 579,043 oz at US$163/oz in 2002. the joint
venture has increased sales and profits to the parts in the joint venture. Without joint venture
neither part could be in a position to secure the mining project alone. (www.tanzaniagold.com)
Concentration
Concentration is the growth strategy which emphasizes a single product or product line, single
market or single technology. It allows a firm to put more time, energy and resources into the
development of attractive industry. Regarding a product line, market or technology a business
can opt to grow by either acquiring or merging with the competitor in the market or acquiring the
supplier, distributor or both of them. There are two concentration strategies; horizontal and
vertical growth.
Horizontal integration
The term horizontal integration is a strategy used by a business or corporation that seeks to sell
a type of product in numerous markets. Horizontal integration in marketing is much more
common than vertical integration is in production. Horizontal integration occurs when a firm is
being taken over by, or merged with, another firm which is in the same industry and in the same
stage of production as the merged firm, e.g. a car manufacturer merging with another car
manufacturer. In this case both the companies are in the same stage of production and also in
the same industry. This process is also known as a buy out or take-over (David and Henry,
2003). A term that is closely related with horizontal integration is horizontal expansion. This is
the expansion of a firm within an industry in which it is already active for the purpose of
increasing its share of the market for a particular product or service. The strategy is appropriate
for a firm with average competitive position wishing to increase its presence in an attractive
industry. The firm spreads into other segments of its current market or into other geographic
areas. The aim is to increase the sales and profits of the firm’s current business, through larger
economies of scale in production and marketing, and at the same time reduce current or
potential competition for customers and supplies. A firm can grow horizontal through internal or
external means. External horizontal growth is called horizontal integration and is the acquisition
by one corporation of another corporation or business unit in the same industry.
Vertical integration
Vertical growth strategy: it is commonly called vertical integration. It happens when a
corporation enters one or more businesses that provide goods or services necessary to the
manufacture and distribution of its own products but which were previously purchased from
other companies. These can range from obtaining of raw materials to the merchandising of the
product (Folsom, Burton, 2007). In other ways Vertical integration is the degree to which a firm
owns its upstream suppliers and its downstream buyers. Vertical integration is typified by one
firm engaged in different parts of production e.g. growing raw materials, manufacturing,
transporting, marketing, and/or retailing. There are three varieties: backward (upstream) vertical
integration, forward (downstream) vertical integration, and balanced (both upstream and
downstream) vertical integration. A company exhibits backward vertical integration when it
controls subsidiaries that produce some of the inputs used in the production of its products. For
example, an automobile company may own a tire company, a glass company, and a metal
company. Control of these three subsidiaries is intended to create a stable supply of inputs and
ensure a consistent quality in their final product.
A company tends to exhibit forward vertical integration when it controls distribution centers
and retailers. This is very common when the business wants to expand in the market where
there are strong distributors. See how Mohamed Enterprises Ltd applied this strategy in their
domain.
Balanced vertical integration means a firm controls all of these components, from raw
materials to final delivery. So METL can still stand as the best example of this strategy. METL
has employed both backward and forward vertical integration. While the above explanation
shows how the company integrated vertically forward wise, still METL Group embarked
backward vertical integration strategy as well. It entered the manufacturing field in late 1990’s
with a view to process locally available raw materials like cotton, maize, rice, edible oils, sisal
etc and to strengthen the manufacturing of processed products within the country together with
agriculture. The strategic vertical integration programme was designed to complement METL’s
core trading business and wide range of products from beverages to bicycles. The company’s
culture within the sector is to produce quality products that are affordable and meet the needs of
about 40 million Tanzanians. Major projects in the pipeline include development of a complete
supply chain for textiles, including cotton farming, ginning and expansion of capacities in the
spinning, weaving and processing sections (www.metl.net).
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Not every growth strategy is appropriate for every business, so the challenge to find which right
growth strategy is properly matching to the company and its specific marketplace can only be
overcame by innovative strategists in the business. Since the wrong strategy can devastate the
business, it's important to determine whether the business is selling new or emerging products
in a new or existing market. On the other hand not all the time business needs growth
strategies, sometimes the business might require other strategies to survive. It might be in need
of stability, retrenchment and any other strategies, to decide which strategy is better for the
business at the particular time requires innovative people.
REFERENCE
Ansoff, I. H. (1957), Strategies for Diversification, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, p.
113-124.
Ansoff, I. (1989), Corporate Strategy, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Bennett, A. R. (1994), Business Planning: Can the Health Service Move from Strategy into Action,
Journal of Management in Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 2.
Christensen, C. & Cook, S. & Hall, T. (2005), Marketing Malpractice: The Cause and the Cure, Harvard
Business Review.
David and Henry (2003), Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition Rethinking,
Cambridge, MA: MIT. Press, London.
th
Fair competition Commission Tanzania (2011), www.competition.or.tz/, Last accessed on 13 May 2012
Folsom, Burton, (2007), The Myth of the Robber Barons 5th edition. Oxford University Press, London
2007
th
http/www.bakhresa.com, Last accessed on 26 December 2010
st
http/www.electronista.com, Last accessed on 1 January 2011
th
http/www.ibtimes.com, Last accessed on 27 December 2010
th
http/www.metl.net, Last accessed on 27 December 2010
th
http/www.tanzaniagold.com, Last accessed on 26 December 2010
Kotler P, G. Armstrong, J. Saunders, V. Wong (1999). Principles of Marketing; Prentice Hall Europe,
London.
Louis, J.C et al (1980) "The Cola Wars", Everest House, Publishers, New York, NY, USA
Olomi (2004).African entrepreneurship and small business development, Otme Company ltd, Dar es
Salaam.
Pearce II, J.A., Robinson Jr., RB and Mital, A (2008). Strategic Management: Formulation,
Implementation and Control, 10th Ed., Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi.
R. Penrose (1959).The theory of the Growth of the firm, Oxford University Press, London.