51 1079 1 PB
51 1079 1 PB
51 1079 1 PB
Susanty
University of Palangka Raya
susantyrampay@yahoo.com
The position of women as a marginal part involves give and take, sacrifice and respon-
of a patriarchal society is described well by sibility and that a woman’s feelings should be
Hemingway as a girl called Jig in “Hills like taken into consideration.
White Elephants”. The female characters have On the reading of Hemingway’s short story,
the problem in her marriage and in their life we may not get the true nature of man-woman
and she tries to react and give her opinion or relationship which Hemingway approves. His
argument to reduce the problem. It is difficult stories have many meanings sometimes and
to describe the exact nature of a man-woman we have to catch the true meaning carefully.
relationship in Hemingway as the woman We may be inclined to think that Hemingway
characters are so thinly portrayed. The male deliberately makes the woman less than the
characters, on the other hand, have such gi- man and that the woman is subservient to the
gantic egos that it is not possible for them to man. To blame Hemingway as an insensitive,
achieve any but the most unsatisfactory level one-dimensional man is to condemn his art.
of relationship with their women: a relation- Objective readers, however, would recognize
ship of animal attraction or infatuation. Their that Hemingway wants his readers to focus
silly interaction of the need to protect their on the male protagonist in his fiction. This is
freedom does not justify their initial need for because the male protagonist has the courage
woman. They are largely so full of themselves that takes into account physical power, brute
that they are incapable of responding to their force and a corresponding mental freedom
female partners’ feelings and sentiments. from fear. Second, the world of Hemingway
Male character is unable to comprehend that is the world of man where the man is guided
a love-relationship is a two-way channel that by the sole yardstick of courage. The woman
REFERENCES
Aitchison, Jean. (1998). The Articulate Mam- tive comparison of child language
mal: An introduction to Psycholinguis- between Indonesian and some Euro-
tics. London: Routledge. pean languages”. A Term Paper pre-
Bellugi, Ursula. and Klima, Edward S. (2004). sented for the course of Development of
“Syntactic Regularities in the Speech Proficiency in L2 Acquisition [Unpub-
of Children”, article in First Lan- lished work]. Department of Linguis-
guage Acquisition: The essential read- tics. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
ings. pp. 344-366. Ed. Barbara C. Lust The Netherlands.
and Claire Foley. Carlton, Victoria: Gil, David. (2002). “The Acquisition of Syn-
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. tactic Categories in Malay/ Indone-
Bloom, L., S. Merken and J. Wooten. (1982). sian”, paper in International Sympo-
“Wh-Questions: Linguistic Factors sium of Linguistics and Speech-Hearing
that Contribute to the Sequence of Sciences Dept. of Audiology and Speech
Acquisition”, article in Child Develop- Sciences, FSKB, UKM Kuala Lumpur
ment 53:1084-1092. in October 22, 2002.
Cole Peter, Gil David, Gabriella Hermon, Uri Macdonald, R. Ross. (1976). Indonesian Ref-
Tadmor. (2000). “The Acquisition erence Grammar. Washington, D.C.:
of In-Situ WH-Questions and WH- Georgetown University Press.
Indefinites in Jakarta Indonesian”, Owens, Robert E. (2008). Language Develop-
paper in 25th Boston University Con- ment: An Introduction. New York:
ference on Language Development, Bos- State University of New York, Ga-
ton, MA, USA in March 11, 2000. neseo.
Dardjowidjojo, Soenjono. (2000). Echa: Kisah Peters, Ann M. (1995). “Strategies in the Ac-
Pemerolehan Bahasa Anak Indonesia. Ja- quisition of Syntax”, article in The
karta: Grasindo. Handbook of Child Language. pp.
____________. (2005). Psikolinguistik: Pengan- 462-482. Ed., Paul Fletcher & Brian
tar Pemahaman Bahasa Manusia. Cet. MacWhinney. Oxford: Blackwell
II. Edisi II. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor In- Publishers Ltd.
donesia. Pierce, Amy. (1992). Language Acquisition and
Deprez, Viviane and Pierce, Amy. (1993). Syntactic Theory: A comparative analy-
“Negation and Functional Projection sis of French and English child gram-
in Early Grammar” in Linguistic In- mars. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
quiry, Volume 24, Number 1, Winter, Slobin, Dan Isaac. (1979). Psycholinguistics.
pp. 25-67. Glenville, III.: Scoot, Foresman and
Dromi, Esther. (1987). Early Lexical Develop- Company.
ment. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni- Slobin, Dan Isaac. (2004). “Cognitive Pre-
versity Press. requisites for the Development of
Fauzi, Iwan. (2008). “The Acquisition of WH- Grammar” article in First Language
Questions in Children: A descrip- Acquisition: The essential readings.