Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Chem 321 Lecture 6 - Calibration Methods: Student Learning Objectives

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Chem 321 Lecture 6 - Calibration Methods

9/12/13

Student Learning Objectives

Calibration Methods

Most analytical methods rely on a standard. Such an approach is sometimes


referred to as a comparator method. In such a procedure, a carefully prepared
standard is run through the same analysis procedure used for the unknown samples
and the results (signals) from the standard and unknown are compared. When many
standards are run, a calibration curve is usually made in which the signal from the
standard analysis is plotted against the standard concentration. Often the relationship
between the signal and concentration is linear (i.e., the signal is directly proportional to
concentration) over some range of concentrations and a linear least-squares line is
used to fit the data. In a least-squares fit, a line is drawn through the plotted data points
so that the distance between each data point and the line is minimized. The most
common form of least-squares analysis minimizes the distance between the data points
and the line along the y-axis. This assumes that the values for the x-coordinates
generally have much less error associated with them than do the y-coordinate values.

The straight line through the data will take the form of y = mx + b, where m is the
slope of the line and b is the y-intercept. Knowledge of m and b for the calibration
curve allows one to calculate the sample concentration (x) from the sample signal (y). A
good summary of the mathematics behind the linear least=squares fitting is given in
Appendix B of the lab manual. A discussion of how to use Excel to plot and to fit data is
provided in Appendix A of the lab manual.

Check for Understanding 3.1 Solution

1. Data are fit with a least squares straight line that has a slope of -1.29872 x
104 ± 1.3190 x 103 and y-intercept of 256.695 ± 32.357. Express the slope
and intercept and their uncertainties with an appropriate number of significant
figures.

Results obtained from a calibration curve are most reliable when interpolations
are done. This is the case when the signals from the unknown samples fall between the
highest and lowest signal from the standards. Samples may need to be diluted in order
to achieve this.
Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 2

At some standard concentration the signal may no longer be directly proportional


to concentration and the calibration curve becomes non-linear. In this case, the data
points must be fit with another mathematical form, often a quadratic equation
(y = ax2 + bx + c). It is perfectly legitimate to use a non-linear calibration curve,
however, one must assume that whatever effect is causing the non-linear response in
the standard signal is also at work in the unknown samples.

For some measurements it is not possible to adequately control the quantity of


sample analyzed or the response of the instrument. Your measurements for the gas
chromatography experiment in lab are examples of this situation because you are not
able to inject the same amount of sample in each run. In order to make quantitative
measurements under these conditions, one can use an internal standard. An internal
standard is a substance not normally present in an unknown sample. It must have a
readily measured signal during analysis and it must not interfere with the analyte signal.
Typically, it is added to each unknown sample and standard so that its concentration is
the same in all samples. Then both the standards and unknowns are analyzed in the
same fashion. Each signal for the analyte is normalized by dividing the analyte signal
by the signal for the internal standard. A calibration curve is then made by plotting the
normalized standard signal versus standard concentration. This approach assumes
that there is a linear response for both the analyte and the internal standard.

In the gas chromatography experiment, you will add decane, a component not
present in your unknowns or standards, to each sample to the same concentration level.
When you analyze the samples you will get a signal (peak area) for decane and for
each component of interest. The size of the decane peak area is proportional to how
much sample you analyze (this varies from run to run). To account for differences in the
amount of sample analyzed, you divide the peak area of a component by the decane
area before comparing the signals found in a standard and unknown.

When the sample being analyzed is a rather complex matrix, other components
present in the sample can affect the analyte signal (the matrix effect). A direct
comparison to standards is not valid because it is usually impossible to duplicate the
sample matrix when preparing the standards. In such situations the method of
standard addition can be used. The underlying assumption is that the analyte signal
(I) is directly proportional to the analyte concentration ([A]). In other words, I = k[A].

One way to apply this method is to prepare a series of samples of constant


volume, each containing the same amount of the unknown with varying amounts of
added analyte standard. Then all samples are analyzed and the analyte signal is
plotted versus the concentration of the added analyte in the sample. Such a plot is
Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 3

shown below. The x-intercept of the linear least-squares fit to the data is the negative of
the concentration of the analyte in the diluted unknown. The x-intercept can be
calculated from the equation for the linear least-squares fit (y = mx + b) for y = 0.

Figure 3.1 Standard addition calibration curve

In order to see how this result is obtained, recall that for the unknown with no
added analyte Ix = k[X] where Ix is the analyte signal for the unknown, [X] is the analyte
concentration in the unknown and k is a proportionality constant. When analyte
standard is added the overall signal can be expressed as Ix+s = k[X] + k[S] where [S] is
the concentration of the added analyte in the diluted sample. Dividing these two
equations yields:
Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 4

Canceling the common term k and solving for [X] gives

At the x-intercept, Ix+s = 0 and [X] = -[S]. In order to minimize the error associated with
extrapolation of the linear least-squares line to the x-axis, the amount of added analyte
should increase the analyte signal by approximately a factor of two. This method of
standard addition will be used in the determination of fluoride experiment.

Propagation of Uncertainty with a Calibration Curve

The uncertainty in quantity x (sx) calculated from a linear least-squares line


(y = mx + b) is given by:

where sy =

m is the slope of the line

k is the number of measurements of the unknown

n is the number of data points for the calibration curve

y is the average y value for k measurements of the unknown

yG is the mean value of y for the points on the calibration curve

xi are the individual values of x for the points on the calibration curve

xG is the mean value of x for the points on the calibration curve


Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 5

The confidence interval for x is then given by ±tsx where t corresponds to the
value for n - 2 degrees of freedom. This rather daunting formula for sx is rather easily
evaluated using Excel and the LINEST function. In Excel the output of the LINEST
function includes the m, b and sy parameters needed in the calculation of sx. The other
quantities can be quickly evaluated once the calibration data are entered. Example 3.1
illustrates how all of these calculations can be done in Excel.
Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 6

Example 3.1

Problem

Determine the uncertainty in the vitamin B2 concentration of an unknown based on


the data below and find the 95% confidence interval for this measured value.

Vitamin B2 Concentration (μg/mL) Signal intensity (arbitrary units)

0.000 0.0

0.100 5.8

0.200 12.2

0.400 22.3

0.800 43.3

unknown 15.4

Solution

First, enter the data into the cells in an Excel spreadsheet as shown below and
prepare a calibration curve with a linear least-squares line (trendline).
Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 7

Example 3.1 (continued)

Solution

To use the LINEST function in Excel, follow these steps.

1) Highlight cells G6:H8

2) Type =LINEST(D5:D9,C5:C9,TRUE,TRUE)

3) For PC, press CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER

For Mac, press COMMAND+RETURN

The LINEST output should look like the following. The bolded text entries below
indicate what each item corresponds to.
Calibration Methods 9/12/13
page 8

Example 3.1 (continued)

Solution

The other quantities needed to calculate sx can now be evaluated using the
information entered in the spreadsheet. The formula used in each case is given to
the right of the cell containing the quantity.

The measured concentration and uncertainty in the unknown vitamin B2 is 0.27 ±


0.013 μg/mL. The 95% confidence interval is

0.27 μg/mL ± tsx = 0.27 μg/mL ± (3.182)(0.013 μg/mL) = 0.27 ± 0.04 μg/mL

Exercises for Calibration Methods

You might also like