Veterans Federation Party v. COMELEC
Veterans Federation Party v. COMELEC
Veterans Federation Party v. COMELEC
*
G.R. No. 136781. October 6, 2000.
______________
* EN BANC.
245
.80 representatives
246
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 2/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
247
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 3/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
248
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 4/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
249
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 5/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
Number of votes
of first party Proportion of votes of
No. of votes of
concerned party
_____________
first party
250
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 6/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
No. of votes of
first party
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 7/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
251
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 8/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
252
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 9/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
253
Same; The law does not distinguish between the first ranking
party and the rest of the other 2 percenters insofar as obtaining
additional seats is concerned.—If the formula applies only to the
first party, then it is no formula at all because it is incapable of
consistent and general application. It is even iniquitous. If a party
got 5.5 percent of the votes and is given two (2) seats, it is hard to
see why the next ranking party, which got 5 percent of the votes
should get only one (1) seat. Indeed, the law does not distinguish
between the first ranking party and the rest of the other 2
percenters insofar as obtaining additional seats are concerned.
The law provides that “those garnering, more than two percent
(2%) of the votes shall be entitled to additional seats in proportion
to their total number of votes.” The operative word is “their”
which refers to none other than the total number of votes cast for
the 2 percenters. The £lain language of the law is that the basis
for the allocation of additional seats is the total number of votes
cast for the 2 percenters. This rule applies to all parties obtaining
more than 2 percent of the votes cast for the winning parties.
Same; Republic Act 7941, §11 requires the determination of
two types of proportions—first, the determination of the proportion
of the votes obtained by a party in relation to the total number of
votes cast for the party list, and, second, is the determination of
number of votes a party obtained in proportion to the number of
votes cast for all the parties obtaining at least 2 percent of the
votes.—RA. No. 7941, §11 requires the determination of two types
of proportions. The first is the determination of the proportion of
the votes obtained by a party in relation to the total number of
votes cast for the party-list. The purpose of the rule is to
determine whether a party was able to hurdle the 2 percent
threshold. The second is the determination of number of votes a
party obtained in proportion to the number of votes cast for all the
parties obtaining at least 2 percent of the votes. The purpose for
determining the second proportion is to allocate the seats left
after the initial allocation of one (1) seat each to every 2
percenter. The total number of votes obtained by a party in
relation to the total number of votes obtained by all 2 percenters
is multiplied by the remaining number of seats.
Same; Only in a Pickwickian sense can the result of the
application of the majority “formula” be considered proportional
representation.—In essence, the majority “formula” amounts
simply to the following prescription: (1) follow the “1 seat for
every 2%” rule in allocating seats to the first ranking party only
and (2) with respect to the rest of the 2 percenters, give each
party one (1) seat, unless the first ranking party gets at least six
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 10/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
254
255
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 11/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
PANGANIBAN, J.:**
Prologue
______________
256
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 12/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
The Case
______________
257
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 13/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_____________
258
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 14/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
259
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 15/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
__________________
260
________________
261
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 17/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
1. SENIOR CITIZENS
2. AKAP
3. AKSYON
4. PINATUBO
5. NUPA
6. PRP
7. AMIN
8. PAG-ASA
9. MAHARLIKA
_________________
262
10. OCW-UNIFIL
11. FCL
12. AMMA-KATIPUNAN
13. KAMPIL
14. BANTAYBAYAN
15. AFW
16. ANG LAKAS OCW
17. WOMENPOWER, INC.
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 18/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
18. FEJODAP
19. CUP
20. VETERANS CARE
21. 4L
22. AWATU
23. PMP
24. ATUCP
25. NCWP
26. ALU
27. BIGAS
28. COPRA
29. GREEN
30. ANAKBAYAN
31. ARBA
32. MINFA
33. AYOS
34. ALL COOP
35. PDP-LABAN
36. KATIPUNAN
37. ONEWAY PRINT
38. AABANTE KA PILIPINAS
263
cumbent party-list solons (two for APEC and one each for
the 12 other qualified parties). However, for inexplicable
reasons, it abandoned said unanimous Resolution and
proclaimed, based on10its three “elements,” the “Group of 38”
private respondents.
The twelve (12) parties and organizations, which had
earlier been proclaimed winners on the basis of having
obtained at least two percent of the votes cast for the party-
list system, objected to the proclamation of the 38 parties
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 19/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
________________
264
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 20/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
265
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 21/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
The Issues
______________
266
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 22/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
267
16
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 23/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
16
This formulation means that any increase in the number
of district representatives, as may be provided by law, will
necessarily result in a corresponding increase in the
number of party-list seats. To illustrate, considering that
there were 208 district representatives to be elected during
the 1998 national elections, the number of party-list seats
would be 52, computed as follows:
208
_________ x .20 = 52
.80
_________________
268
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 24/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
269
______________
270
Second Issue
The Statutory Requirement
and Limitation
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 26/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
271
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 27/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_________________
272
_____________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 28/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
273
_______________
24 Supra.
274
_______________
25 In its en banc Resolution No. 2847 dated June 25, 1996, Comelec
adopted this simple formula, but discarded it in the assailed Resolutions.
275
The next step is to distribute the extra seats left among the
qualified parties in the descending order of the decimal
portions of the resulting products. Based on the 1998
election results, the distribution of party-list seats under
the Niemeyer method would be as follows:
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 31/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
______________
277
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 32/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
278
_______________
27 214 SCRA 789, October 20, 1992; 219 SCRA 329, March 1, 1993
(Resolution on the Motion for Reconsideration).
279
Number of votes
of first party Proportion of votes of
—————— = first party relative to
Total votes for total votes for party-list system
party-list system
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 34/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
less than four percent, then the first party shall not be
entitled to any additional seat.
We adopted this six percent bench mark, because the
first party is not always entitled to the maximum number
of additional seats. Likewise, it would prevent the
allotment of more than the total number of available seats,
such as in an extreme case wherein 18 or more parties tie
for the highest rank and are thus entitled to three seats
each. In such scenario, the number of seats to which all the
parties are entitled may exceed the maximum number of
party-list seats reserved in the House of Representatives.
Applying the above formula, APEC, which received 5.5%
of the total votes cast, is entitled to one additional seat or a
total of two seats.
Note that the above formula will be applicable only in
determining the number of additional seats the first party
is entitled to. It cannot be used to determine the number of
additional seats of the other qualified parties. As explained
earlier, the use of the same formula for all would
contravene the proportional representation parameter. For
example, a second party obtains six percent of the total
number of votes cast. According to the above formula, the
said party would be entitled to two additional seats or a
total of three seats overall. However, if the first party
received a significantly higher amount of votes—say,
twenty percent—to grant it the same number of seats as
the second party would violate the statutory mandate of
proportional representation, since a party
280
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 35/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
No. of votes of
Additional seats concerned party No. of additional
for concerned ——————— = x֫seats
allocated to
party No. of votes of the first party
first party
No. of votes
Additional seats of ABA No. of additional
for concerned = ——————— x seats allocated to
party (ABA) No. of votes of the first party
first party (APEC)
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 36/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
282
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 37/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
Epilogue
283
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 38/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
______________
284
285
PUNO, J.:
I. Prefatory Statement
II. Issues
286
III. Submissions
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 41/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
287
“What does that mean? It means that any group or party who
has a constituency of, say, 500,000 nationwide gets a seat in the
National Assembly. What is the justification for that? When we
allocate legislative districts, we are saying that any district that
has 200,000 votes gets a seat. There is no reason why a group that
has a national constituency, even if it is a sectoral or special
interest group, should not have a voice in the National Assembly,
x x x If each of them gets only one percent or five of them get one
percent, they are not entitled to any representative. So, they will
begin to think that if they really have a common interest, they
should band together, form a coalition and get five percent of the
vote and, therefore, have two seats in the Assembly. Those are the
dynamics of a party list system.
“We feel that this approach gets around the mechanics of
sectoral representation while at the same time making sure that
those who really have a national constituency or sectoral
constituency
1
will get a chance to have a seat in the National
Assembly.
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 42/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
288
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 43/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
3 Id., p. 256.
4 Id., p. 562.
5 Record of the Senate, Vol. II, No. 33, p. 143.
289
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 44/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
then, of course, they would not have any seat in the category in
which they are.
“Senator Gonzales: That is why in my interpellation during our
last session, I suggested that, probably, it would be better to set a
minimum percentage of votes to be received by them in order to
qualify for a seat so that we can, more or less, limit the party-list
members to those who obtain a substantial portion of the votes
cast, Mr. President.8
______________
6 Id., p. 145.
7 Id., No. 34, p. 164.
8 Id., p. 186.
9 Id., p. 343.
10 Id., No.37, p. 349.
290
_______________
291
_______________
292
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 47/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
______________
293
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 48/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
294
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 49/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
295
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 50/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_____________
296
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 51/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
____________
29 Id., p. 335.
297
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 52/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_____________
298
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 53/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
299
________________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 54/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
300
_______________
301
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 55/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
IV. Conclusion
___________________
302
303
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 57/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
304
_________________
305
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 59/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_________________
306
Table 1
DETERMINATION OF 2 PERCENTERS AND INITIAL
DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS TO THEM
Group Actual Percentage Guaranteed
votes of
received votes cast seat
for
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 60/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
party-list
1. APEC 503,487 5.50% 1
2. ABA 321,646 3.51% 1
3. ALAGAD 312,500 3.41% 1
4. VETERANS 304,902 3.33% 1
FEDERATION
5. PROMDI 255,184 2.79% 1
6. AKO 239,042 2.61% 1
7. NCSFO 338,303 2.60% 1
8. ABANSE! PINAY 235,548 2.57% 1
9. AKBAYAN! 232,376 2.54% 1
10. BUTIL 215,643 2.36% 1
11. SANLAKAS 194,617 2.13% 1
12. COOP-NATCCO 189,802 2.07% 1
13. COCOFED 186,388 2.04% 1
14. SENIOR 143,444 1.57%
CITIZENS
15. Other Parties 5,582,427 Each with
less than
2%
Tota l9,155,309 100% 13
307
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 61/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
39x503,487
——————— = 5.73
3,429,438
Table 2
SECOND DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS
Group Total Guaranteed Additional Extra Total
votes
obtained seats seats seats
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1. APEC 503,487 1 5.73 1 7
2. ABA 321,646 1 3.66 1 5
3. ALAGAD 312,500 1 3.55 4
4. VETERANS 304,902 1 3.47 4
FEDERATION
5. PROMDI 255,184 1 2.90 1 4
6. AKO 239,042 1 2.72 1 4
7. NCSCFO 238,303 1 2.71 1 4
8. ABANSE! 235,548 1 2.68 1 4
PINAY
9. AKBAYAN! 232,376 1 2.64 1 4
10. BUTIL 215,643 1 2.45 3
308
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 62/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_________________
309
LDP - 15 senators
NPC - 5 senators
LAKAS-NUCD - 3 senators
LP-PDP-LABAN - 1 senator
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 63/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
310
Table 3
FINAL DISTRIBUTION
OF SEATS
Party/organization/ Total Seats in Total
number of excess number
coalition seats of 3 seats
obtained allowed
1. APEC 7 4 3
2. ABA 5 2 3
3. ALAGAD 4 1 3
4. VETERANS 4 1 3
FEDERATION
5. PROMDI 4 1 3
6. AKO 4 1 3
7. NCSCFO 4 1 3
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 64/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
Table 3
8. ABANSE! 4 1 3
PINAY
9. AKBAYAN! 4 1 3
10. BUTIL 3 - 3
11. SANLAKAS 3 - 3
12. COOP- 3 - 3
NATCCO
13. COCOFED 3 - 3
TOTAL 52 13 39
311
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 65/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
II
_______________
312
313
314
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 68/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
315
________________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 69/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
316
Consolidated Table
DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS
Group (1) (2) (3)Guaranteed
9
(4) (5) (6) 12 (7) (8)
Actual Percentage seat Additional
10
Extra11
Total Seats Total
votes 7 of votes seats seats in number
received cast for 8 excess of seats
party list of 3 allowed
1 APEC 503,487 5.50% 1 5.73 1 7 4 3
2. ABA 321,646 3.51% 1 3.66 1 5 2 3
3 ALAGAD 312,500 3.41% 1 3.55 4 1 3
4. VETERANS 304,902 3.33% 1 3.47 4 1 3
FEDERATION 1
5. PROMDI 255,184 2.79% 1 2.90 1 4 1 3
6.AKO 239,042 2.61% 1 2.72 1 4 1 3
7.NCSFO 338,303 2.60% 1 2.71 1 4 1 3
8.ABANSE! 235,548 2.57% 1 2.68 1 4 1 3
PINAY 1
9.AKBAYAN! 232,376 2.54% 1 2.64 4 1 3
10. BUTIL 215,643 2.36% 1 2.45 3 - 3
11.SANLAKAS 194,617 2.13% 1 2.21 3 - 3
12. COOP- 189,802 2.07% 1 2.16 3 -
NATCCO 3
13. COCOFED 186,388 2.04% 1 2.12 3 3
14. SENIOR 143,444 1.57% 3
CITIZENS 3
15. Other 5,582,427 Each
Parties with less
than 2%
TOTAL 9,155,309 100% 13 32 7 52 3 39
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 70/71
9/20/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 342
_______________
317
——o0o——
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d4f19265dc97d8ef1003600fb002c009e/p/ARM796/?username=Guest 71/71