University of The Cordilleras College of Law: Professor: Atty. Nestor Mondok
University of The Cordilleras College of Law: Professor: Atty. Nestor Mondok
College of Law
Professor:
Atty. Nestor Mondok
Reporters:
GROUP 1 – UDHR
Section 2-D
October 25 , 2019
University of the Cordilleras
College of Law
Human Rights Laws Fist Semester: SY2019 – 2020
Page 1 of 10
Course Title: Human Rights Law
Professor: Atty. Nestor Mondok
Reporters: Kara Karys G. Cuti, Kimberly Jhan Briones
Credit: 2 units
Topic Description: This lesson discusses the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Learning Outcomes: At the end of the lesson, the learner is expected to be able to do the
following:
Master Schedule:
Retrieved from:
Familiarize with the https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocu
main provisions of mentbank/Brown-Universal-Declaration-
UDHR Human-Rights-21C.pdf
Identify Cassin’s
Structure of the Model of the UDHR https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstr
Declaration Discern the duties eam/10603/148743/9/09_chapter
constituting the %203.pdf
entitlements
provided by the Petralba, P. (2013). Hornbook on
declaration International and Philippine Human
Rights Laws.pp 150
Recognize those
active in the
Retrieved from:
implementation of
Implementation of https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocu
UDHR
UDHR mentbank/Brown-Universal-Declaration-
Identify crucial
Human-Rights-21C.pdf
problems in UDHR
implementation
References:
Human Rights Laws Fist Semester: SY2019 – 2020
Page 2 of 10
https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/Brown-Universal-Declaration-
Human-Rights-21C.pdf
Petralba, P. (2013). Hornbook on International and Philippine Human Rights
Laws.pp 150
INTRODUCTION
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a declaration adopted by the United
Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948 at Palais de Chaillot at Paris. The UDHR is
considered a milestone document in the history of human rights against the oppression and
discrimination as it set out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally
protected,
“inherent dignity and of the equal or inalienable rights of all
members of the human family as the foundation of freedom, justice and
peace in the world” ...
There was emphasis on human rights activism and legislation as the Declaration
arose directly from the experience of the Second World War and represents the first global
expressions of rights to which all human beings are inherently entitled. It has also served as
the foundation for a growing number of national laws, international laws, and treaties, as
well institutions protecting and promoting human rights.
The UDHR is remarkable in two fundamental aspects. In 1948, the then 58 Member
states of the United Nations represented a range of ideologies, political systems and
religious and cultural backgrounds as well as different stages of economic development.
Most important of the UDHR was to be a common statement of mutual aspirations – a
shared vision of a more equitable and just world.
Obligations of States (Duty Holder): Once States have ratified human rights treaties,
there are obligations that go along with that. States have obligations to respect, protect and
fulfill the rights enshrined in the treaty they sign. The obligation to respect is a negative one
that demands States to refrain from interfering with the enjoyment of conventional rights.
The obligation to protect is positive, and it requires States to prevent others from
interfering with the enjoyment of rights. The obligation to fulfill is positive and requires the
State to adopt measures towards the full realization of rights.
The 30 Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) refers to the objects
inherent to every human being to which every state, local and international, upon their
proclamation of the UDHR as their common standard, in promoting respect for the rights
and freedoms provided in the declaration.
Objects of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)
Article 1- All human beings are born free and equal in
dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and
conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of
As Foundation Block of
brotherhood.
the portico
Article 2- Right against discrimination (in terms of race,
color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other status…)
Column Articles
-It is the duty of every human being to ensure that the
following rights and freedom are observed, respected and
protected from any misuse and abuse.
One (1) Art. 3 Right to Life, Liberty, Personal Security
Art. 4 Freedom from slavery
Art. 5 Freedom from torture and degrading treatment
Art. 6 Right to recognition as a person before the law
Art. 7 Right to equality before the law
Art. 8 Right to remedy by competent Tribunal
Art. 9 Freedom from arbitrary arrest and exile
Art. 10 Right to fair public hearing
Art. 11 Right to be considered innocent until proven guilty
Two (2) Art. 12 Freedom from interference with privacy, family, home
and correspondence
Art. 13 Right to free movement in and out of the country
Art. 14 Right to Asylum in other countries from persecution
Art. 15 Right to a nationality and the freedom to change it
Art. 16 Right to marriage and family
Art. 17 Right to own property
Three (3) Art. 18 Freedom of belief and religion
Art. 19 Freedom from opinion and information
Art. 20 Right of peaceful assembly and association
Art. 21 Right to take part in the government
Four (4) Art. 22 Right to social security
Art. 23 Right to work
Art. 24 Right to rest and leisure
Art. 25 Right to adequate standard of living
Art. 26 Right to education
Art. 27 Right to freely participate
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is generally agreed upon as the basis of
international human rights law. It continues to be an inspiration to all of us, both in
handling injustice, in times of conflict, in oppressed communities, and in our efforts to
achieve universal enjoyment of human rights.
It is a universal recognition that fundamental rights and fundamental freedoms are
inherent in all human beings, irreversible and equally applicable to all, and that each one of
us is born free and equal to dignity and rights.
The UDHR is not a treaty so it doesn’t have any binding legal obligations. Roosevelt
described the Declaration as being a “statement of principles setting up a common standard
of achievement for all peoples and all nations” and “not a treaty or international
agreement”. However, the document is a paramount expression of the fundamental values
which are meant to be shared by all members of the international community.
International human rights law establishes obligations that countries must respect.
By becoming parties to international treaties, states assume obligations and obligations
under international law to respect, protect and fulfill human rights. The obligation to fulfill
means that the state must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of human rights.
Therefore, the domestic legal system provides the ultimate legal protection of
human rights guaranteed under international law. If domestic legal proceedings fail to
address human rights violations, mechanisms and procedures for individual and group
complaints are available at the regional and international levels to ensure that international
human rights standards are respected, implemented and implemented at the local level.
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around
the world. They investigate and expose human rights violations, hold abusers
accountable, and challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive
practices and respect international human rights law.
HRWF focuses on monitoring, research and analysis in the field of human rights, as
well as promotion of democracy and the rule of law on the national and
international level.
The Asian Human Rights Commission works to achieve the following priorities,
among others: to protect and promote human rights by monitoring, investigating,
advocating and taking solidarity actions.
Problems on implementation
In the 70 years since its announcement, the document has profoundly influenced the
development of international human rights law. It advanced regional frameworks, each
binding to differing degrees, such as the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) and
the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Furthermore, the declaration has also
been constantly invoked by countries. To some legal scholars, this perpetual reliance on the
UDHR has been sufficient enough to promote it to the status of (legally) binding customary
international law.
In 2004, however, the United States Supreme Court stated during the conclusion of Sosa v
Alvarez-Machain, “the Declaration does not of its own force impose obligations as a matter of
international law”. Thus, the UDHR still remains in that limbo that many non-binding
international standards exist within.
Time and again one of the crucial problems of the UDHR has been its non-binding
nature, as this drastically reduces accountability. Additionally, human rights enforcement
today extends way beyond the UDHR. In fact, the nine “core” international human rights
instruments designed to “monitor implementation of the treaty provisions by its States
parties,” stand separate from the UDHR.
This shows that where the UDHR is non-binding state parties have often violated it.
Even where treaties it has influenced are binding, crucial states, such as the US, consistently
fail to ratify them, thus dodging obligations. While smaller, less powerful states are checked
through political pressures, history has shown that countries such as the US, Russia and
China often violate their legal obligations with few consequences.
Second, another problem for the UDHR is the issue of cultural relativism, which
refers to the concept whereby a person’s beliefs, values and practices need to be
understood under the purview of his/her culture rather than the criteria of an overarching
belief system. Due to the same, characterizing human rights as “common” becomes
problematic. Indeed, in many non-western states, the human rights framework has often
been dismissed as ‘western propaganda’ meant to establish the ‘superiority of the west’ at
the cost of local cultures and traditions.
With these factors in mind, it is very difficult to answer the question of whether the
UDHR and related documents have been “successful”. While the current political
atmosphere certainly presents a pessimistic stance especially with the Trump
administration’s decision to reduce its commitments to international treaties, it is naive to
dismiss the system as a complete failure. While imperfect, we would certainly be
disadvantaged without the UDHR. As we approach the 70th anniversary of the
implementation of the Declaration we must exercise great caution to preserve and build
upon the system.