Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: PRINCIPAL I-IV Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS RATING SCORE
Timeliness)
Improved NAT 1. Instructional  Performed JANUARY 20% 5- Collected, analyzed and utilized
data to identify and plan needed
performance and Leadership instructional to interventions
supervision to DECEMBE -Recommended localized curriculum
acceptable GSA (mother tongue based) for instruction
achieve learning R, -Developed standards for outstanding
teacher and pupil performance
outcomes 2014 -organizes appopriate class programs,
ADM, flexible learning options as stop-
gap measures Consolidates reports on
learning difficulties, home visitations
and peculiar incidents used for
planning and implementing
apppropriate interventions
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident
5-Produced a school strategic plan/SIP
and AIP through the strategic planning
process – conduct of school situational
 Performed data-based analysis, SWOT, determining strategies
through prioritizing strategic options,
strategic planning resource and facilities planning and
formulation of PAPs based of analyses
-Strategic Plan was based on Deped
vision, contextualized in school vision
and mission-all school stakeholders
were engaged in the strategic planning
process
-M&E for process and outcomes
checkpoints were developed and
utilized
130% and above accomplishment of
school targets (with evidence
contained in school report card-School
report card presented to all
stakeholders
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident
 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: PRINCIPAL I-IV Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS RATING SCORE
Timeliness)
2. Learning  Provided safe and JANUARY 20% 5- 130% and above accomplishments
Safe and child Environment to
on the following (supported by
friendly learning child friendly learning evidence such as school policy,
reports,information materials,
and school environment DECEMB
and school ER,
advocacy activities, regular meetings,
environment for students/learners inventory). Adhered to Child-Friendly
environment standards and
2014 Programs-Institutionalized child
protection mechanisms and processes
(per Deped Order 40, s. 2012)
-Provided ICTfacilities/workshop
rooms as learning support systems,
Has clear DRRM mobilization plans
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident
3. Human 20%
Technical Resource 5-130% and above of teachers
Assistance/Instru Management  Provided technical provided with technical assistance with
corresponding evidences:
ctional and assistance to teachers teacher portfolio containing
Supervision Development on matters pertaining to observation reports, TSNA results,
performance analysis and
enhancement of recommendations for development
interventions, performance contracts,
classroom and performance evaluation results in
management, skills and prescribed tools
Performed RPMS processes among
instructional 130% and above school personnel with
competence and to the following as evidences:
performance contracts, and
non-teaching personnel performance evaluation results in
for support services prescribed tools and proposed
development plans
within the RPMS cycle 4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident
 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: PRINCIPAL I-IV Position:
Review Period: Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, RESULTS RATING SCORE
Timeliness)
Stakeholders 4. Parents’ Established school and JANUARY 20% 5- Has stakeholders
partnership/mobilization plan
partnership and Involvement and family and community to (complete with reports and
mobilization plan Community partnership for DECEMBE documentations of meetings,
agreements)
(PTA sponsored Partnership performance R, -Organized programs with
stakeholders, esp. parents for
projects/events) 2014 academic and other purposes (esp.
Strategic planning)
-Obtained resources for the school
through stakeholders partnership
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
SIP/AIP 5. School Performed school 20% 1-Indicators not evident
Leadership, leadership, 5-With clear financial management
system for the school supported by
Management management and evidences such as reports, account
and Operations operations functions logs, database sytem
Allocated/Prioritized funds for
programs and school facilities
improvement and maintenance
Monitored, accounted and reported
utilization of school fund
Reported sources and uses of funds
Ensured quality standards for
facilities given to the school
Coordinated with stakeholders on
resource mobilization
Maintained school EMIS and regularly
submit MIS reports to the Division
Office
4- Only 115-129% is evident
3-Lacking 1 indicator
2-Lacking 2indicators
1-Indicators not evident

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLI-
SHMENTS

Rater Ratee