Process FMEA Worksheet For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est.

For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est./revision Approved by Confirmed by Prepared by

Model/Type/Model Year： K0PA/ME/2020 Process FMEA control no.： 00 Establishment 2018.3.22 中塩 ー 山口

Honda part no. ：16710-K0LA-D021-M1 Supplier part number：40ME-K0L0-00□□
Honda part name ：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Supplier part name：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：
Supplier name ：Keihin India Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. PLANT Ⅱ Supplier code： 開発：津久井／生技：吉田／製造：大村／品技：山口
Supplier address (factory location) ：SP - 90, RIICO NIC (M), Japanese Zone, Neemrana, Distt - Alwar, Rajasthan - 301705 INDIA
Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：機構品技課　山口

※Identification： Enter the symbol (Q) for the quality characteristic Honda designated as important quality characteristic (see HES A 3051)
※※Completion confirmation ：with consideration given to acceptance level of residual risks, confirm completion of a Process FMEA (no further measures required), and enter the name of the person confirmed and the date of confirmation.

Scope of risk evaluation Risk evaluation Countermeasure ( risk minimizing activities) Verification of C/M (re-evaluate risks)
Function of the process Influence if a failure mode occurs Identify Seriou Current process control method Detection Risk C/M C/M Occurrence Detection Risk
Cause of failure mode Occurrence C/M carried out PIC of Seriousness Completion
-
No. Process name (what does this process Failure mode cation sness rate (prevention/detection of probability priority Proposed C/M date application rate probability priority no. confirmation
do ?) To parts/components To Honda products (Occurrence mechanism) (O)
a failure mode) (D)
(including follow-ups) CM (S)
(O)
※ (S) （RPN） (target) date (D) (RPN) ※※

◆Rotor machining

1 Annealing treatmentDo annealing before Annealing skipPoor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Process skip 1 Check based on lot control tag/OS 1 6

Processing
lapping Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Machine：Condition setting defect 1 Check based on work start inspection 1 6
temperature
Processing
Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Machine：Condition setting defect 1 Check based on work start inspection 1 6
time

2 Lapping Rotor lapping Thickness Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：condition selection mistake 1 Check based on OS 3 18

Surface
Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：condition selection mistake 1 Check based on OS 3 18
roughness

Scratch, Dent Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Handling mistake 1 Check based on OS 3 18

Wings
Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：condition selection mistake 1 Check based on OS 3 18
chipped

3 Rough washing/Drying Washing after rotor Process skip Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Process skip 1 Check based on lot control tag/OS 1 6

lapping

4 Deburring Deburring after rotor Process skip Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Process skip 1 Check based on lot control tag/OS 1 6

（Shot） lapping

5 Washing/Drying Washing after deburringProcess skip Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Process skip 1 Check based on lot control tag/OS 1 6

6 Final Inspection Inspect finished partsScratch, Dent Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Handling mistake 1 Check based on OS 3 18

Wings
Poor accuracy Running defect 6 Man：Handling mistake 1 Check based on OS 3 18
chipped

Seriousness (S) Occurrence (O) Detection probability (D) Risk priority number (RPN) ［RPN = S×O×D］
Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria RPN Response
Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with There is no process management method capable of
10 regulations. (No predictability) 10 P（%）≧32 Frequency of occurrence 1/2 andAt
over
least once a day 10 detecting the failure mode. 436 ～ 1000 Top priority

Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with It can not be detected by the current process Urgently Implement counter counter
9 regulations. (With predictability)） 9 　＜32 1/3　and over once in 3-4 days 9 management method. measures.

8 It becomes a loss or defect of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 8 　＜13 1/8 and over once a week 8 It is extremely difficult to detect by delivery. 130 ～ 435 High priority

7 It may cause loss or failure of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 7 　＜5 1/20 and over once a month 7 It can be detected by regular sampling inspection. implement counter counter measures

6 It may cause loss or defect of function, performance or structure of Honda products . 6 　＜1.2 1/80　and over once in 3 months 6 It can be detected by routine sampling inspection. 27 ～ 129 Medium Priority

Monitor the occurrence of failure

The use or operation of Honda products is possible, but due to the failure modes of the parts, the function It can be detected by full inspection by completion
5 and performance are deteriorated. 5 　＜0.3 1/400 and over once in 6 months 5 inspection.
modes and implement appropriate
countercounter counter measures .

Many market complaints arise about the sound of the Honda products, the appearance, the use, or the
4 operation, the feeling, etc.. 4 　＜0.05 1/2000 and over once a year 4 It can be detected in the production line. 8 ～ 26 Low Priority

If time and resources allow it,

Marketing complaints arise regarding the sound of the Honda product in combination, appearance, use, or
3 operation, feeling, etc. 3 　＜0.01 1/15,000　and over Once in 1-3 year 3 It can be detected in the next step. implement counter counter
measures.

A conflict from a limited user arises with respect to the sound of the Honda product, the appearance, the All inspection is performed by QA machine etc., and
2 use, or the operation at the time of operation etc. 2 　＜0.0007 1/150,000　and overonce in 3－5 year 2 the failure mode is automatically detected. 1～7 Accepted as residual risk

All inspection is performed by the QA machine etc.,

Correct Unnecessary counter
1 No influence or negligible. 1 　＜0.00006 1/1,500,000 and over Less than once in 5 years 1 the failure mode is automatically detected and
counter measures.
removed.

Page 　　　　1　 of 　4　　　　　　　.

Process FMEA Worksheet For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est./revision Approved by Confirmed by Prepared by

Model/Type/Model Year： Process FMEA control no.： 00 Establishment

Honda part no. ： Supplier part number：
Honda part name ： Supplier part name： Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：
Supplier name ： Supplier code：
Supplier address (factory location) ：
Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：

※Identification： Enter the symbol (Q) for the quality characteristic Honda designated as important quality characteristic (see HES A 3051)
※※Completion confirmation ：with consideration given to acceptance level of residual risks, confirm completion of a Process FMEA (no further measures required), and enter the name of the person confirmed and the date of confirmation.

Scope of risk evaluation Risk evaluation Countermeasure ( risk minimizing activities) Verification of C/M (re-evaluate risks)
Function of the process
Influence if a failure mode occurs Identify Seriou Current process control method Detection Risk C/M C/M Occurrence Detection Risk
Cause of failure mode Occurrence C/M carried out PIC of Seriousness Completion
-
No. Process name (what does this process Failure mode cation sness rate (prevention/detection of probability priority Proposed C/M date application rate probability priority no. confirmation
do ?) To parts/components To Honda products (Occurrence mechanism) (O)
a failure mode) (D)
(including follow-ups) CM (S)
(O)
※ (S) （RPN） (target) date (D) (RPN) ※※

Seriousness (S) Occurrence (O) Detection probability (D) Risk priority number (RPN) ［RPN = S×O×D］
Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria RPN Response
Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with There is no process management method capable of
10 regulations. (No predictability) 10 P（%）≧32 Frequency of occurrence 1/2 andAt
over
least once a day 10 detecting the failure mode. 436 ～ 1000 Top priority

Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with It can not be detected by the current process Urgently Implement counter counter
9 regulations. (With predictability)） 9 　＜32 1/3　and over once in 3-4 days 9 management method. measures.

8 It becomes a loss or defect of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 8 　＜13 1/8 and over once a week 8 It is extremely difficult to detect by delivery. 130 ～ 435 High priority

7 It may cause loss or failure of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 7 　＜5 1/20 and over once a month 7 It can be detected by regular sampling inspection. implement counter counter measures

6 It may cause loss or defect of function, performance or structure of Honda products . 6 　＜1.2 1/80　and over once in 3 months 6 It can be detected by routine sampling inspection. 27 ～ 129 Medium Priority

Monitor the occurrence of failure

The use or operation of Honda products is possible, but due to the failure modes of the parts, the function It can be detected by full inspection by completion
5 and performance are deteriorated. 5 　＜0.3 1/400 and over once in 6 months 5 inspection.
modes and implement appropriate
countercounter counter measures .

Many market complaints arise about the sound of the Honda products, the appearance, the use, or the
4 operation, the feeling, etc.. 4 　＜0.05 1/2000 and over once a year 4 It can be detected in the production line. 8 ～ 26 Low Priority

If time and resources allow it,

Marketing complaints arise regarding the sound of the Honda product in combination, appearance, use, or
3 operation, feeling, etc. 3 　＜0.01 1/15,000　and over Once in 1-3 year 3 It can be detected in the next step. implement counter counter
measures.

A conflict from a limited user arises with respect to the sound of the Honda product, the appearance, the All inspection is performed by QA machine etc., and
2 use, or the operation at the time of operation etc. 2 　＜0.0007 1/150,000　and overonce in 3－5 year 2 the failure mode is automatically detected. 1～7 Accepted as residual risk

All inspection is performed by the QA machine etc.,

Correct Unnecessary counter
1 No influence or negligible. 1 　＜0.00006 1/1,500,000 and over Less than once in 5 years 1 the failure mode is automatically detected and
counter measures.
removed.

Page 　　　　　　 of 　　　　　　　.

Process FMEA Worksheet For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est./revision Approved by Confirmed by Prepared by

Model/Type/Model Year： K0PA/ME/2020 Process FMEA control no.： 00 Establishment 2018.3.22 中塩 ー 山口

Honda part no. ：16710-K0LA-D021-M1 Supplier part number：40ME-K0L0-00□□
Honda part name ：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Supplier part name：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：
Supplier name ：Keihin India Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. PLANT Ⅱ Supplier code： 開発：津久井／生技：吉田／製造：大村／品技：山口
Supplier address (factory location) ：SP - 90, RIICO NIC (M), Japanese Zone, Neemrana, Distt - Alwar, Rajasthan - 301705 INDIA
Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：機構品技課　山口

※Identification： Enter the symbol (Q) for the quality characteristic Honda designated as important quality characteristic (see HES A 3051)
※※Completion confirmation ：with consideration given to acceptance level of residual risks, confirm completion of a Process FMEA (no further measures required), and enter the name of the person confirmed and the date of confirmation.

Scope of risk evaluation Risk evaluation Countermeasure ( risk minimizing activities) Verification of C/M (re-evaluate risks)
Function of the process Influence if a failure mode occurs Identify Seriou Current process control method Detection Risk C/M C/M Occurrence Detection Risk Completion
- Cause of failure mode Occurrence C/M carried out PIC of Seriousness
No. Process name (what does this process Failure mode cation sness rate (prevention/detection of probability priority Proposed C/M date application rate probability priority no. confirmation
do ?) To parts/components To Honda products (Occurrence mechanism) (O)
a failure mode) (D)
(including follow-ups) CM (S)
(O)
※ (S) （RPN） (target) date (D) (RPN) ※※

◆部品小組　

1 ターミナル圧入 　インシュレーターにターミナ ターミナル　誤組/欠品

組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：逆組/誤組/セットミス 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 1 6

　を圧入する 6 設備：治具/設備設定ミス 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 6

ターミナル圧入
強度不足 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：圧入部寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 36
部強度不足

6 設備：調整ミス(芯ズレ/ST過不足) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

ターミナル圧入
強度不足 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：圧入部寸法NG 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 18
割れ

6 設備：調整ミス(芯ズレ/ST過多) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

インシュレーター　
2 インシュレーター組付け
コアにインシュレーターを 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 18
誤組/欠品

挿入する

3 巻き線 コアにエナメル線を巻きつけ 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 1 6

巻き数過不足 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 5 人：設備PRG設定ミス 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 5

5 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 5

巻き緩み/乱れ 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 5 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 15

巻き線切れ 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 7 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 7

巻き線キズ/ピンホール 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 2 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 8 16

4 電着 エナメル線を熱で溶着 巻き線切れ 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 7 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 21

電着不良(過/不足) 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 7 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 21

5 外観検査 　外観、識別マーク等を 誤組/欠品 【組付け不良】→【走る機能欠陥】 【組付け不良】→【走る機能欠陥】 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 18

　確認する キズ/打痕 【商品性】 【商品性】 2 人：ヒューマンエラー 2 作業標準に基づき確認 3 12

外観異常 【性能不良】→【走る機能欠陥】 【性能不良】→【走る機能欠陥】 2 人：ヒューマンエラー 2 作業標準に基づき確認 3 12

Seriousness (S) Occurrence (O) Detection probability (D) Risk priority number (RPN) ［RPN = S×O×D］
Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria RPN Response
Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with There is no process management method capable of
10 regulations. (No predictability) 10 P（%）≧32 Frequency of occurrence 1/2 and At
over
least once a day 10 detecting the failure mode. 436 ～ 1000 Top priority

Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with It can not be detected by the current process Urgently Implement counter counter
9 regulations. (With predictability)） 9 　＜32 1/3　and over once in 3-4 days 9 management method. measures.

8 It becomes a loss or defect of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 8 　＜13 1/8 and over once a week 8 It is extremely difficult to detect by delivery. 130 ～ 435 High priority

7 It may cause loss or failure of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 7 　＜5 1/20 and over once a month 7 It can be detected by regular sampling inspection. implement counter counter measures

6 It may cause loss or defect of function, performance or structure of Honda products . 6 　＜1.2 1/80　and over once in 3 months 6 It can be detected by routine sampling inspection. 27 ～ 129 Medium Priority

Monitor the occurrence of failure

The use or operation of Honda products is possible, but due to the failure modes of the parts, the function It can be detected by full inspection by completion
5 and performance are deteriorated. 5 　＜0.3 1/400 and over once in 6 months 5 inspection.
modes and implement appropriate
countercounter counter measures .

Many market complaints arise about the sound of the Honda products, the appearance, the use, or the
4 operation, the feeling, etc.. 4 　＜0.05 1/2000 and over once a year 4 It can be detected in the production line. 8 ～ 26 Low Priority

If time and resources allow it,

Marketing complaints arise regarding the sound of the Honda product in combination, appearance, use, or
3 operation, feeling, etc. 3 　＜0.01 1/15,000　and over Once in 1-3 year 3 It can be detected in the next step. implement counter counter
measures.

A conflict from a limited user arises with respect to the sound of the Honda product, the appearance, the All inspection is performed by QA machine etc., and
2 use, or the operation at the time of operation etc. 2 　＜0.0007 1/150,000　and overonce in 3－5 year 2 the failure mode is automatically detected. 1～7 Accepted as residual risk

All inspection is performed by the QA machine etc.,

Correct Unnecessary counter
1 No influence or negligible. 1 　＜0.00006 1/1,500,000 and over Less than once in 5 years 1 the failure mode is automatically detected and
counter measures.
removed.

Page 　　　　1　 of 　4　　　　　　　.

Process FMEA Worksheet For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est./revision Approved by Confirmed by Prepared by

Model/Type/Model Year： K0PA/ME/2020 Process FMEA control no.： 00 Establishment

Honda part no. ：16710-K0LA-D021-M1 Supplier part number：40ME-K0L0-00□□
Honda part name ：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Supplier part name：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：
Supplier name ：Keihin India Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. PLANT Ⅱ Supplier code： 開発：津久井／生技：吉田／製造：大村／品技：山口
Supplier address (factory location) ：SP - 90, RIICO NIC (M), Japanese Zone, Neemrana, Distt - Alwar, Rajasthan - 301705 INDIA
Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：機構品技課　山口

※Identification： Enter the symbol (Q) for the quality characteristic Honda designated as important quality characteristic (see HES A 3051)
※※Completion confirmation ：with consideration given to acceptance level of residual risks, confirm completion of a Process FMEA (no further measures required), and enter the name of the person confirmed and the date of confirmation.

Scope of risk evaluation Risk evaluation Countermeasure ( risk minimizing activities) Verification of C/M (re-evaluate risks)
Function of the process Influence if a failure mode occurs Identify Seriou Current process control method Detection Risk C/M C/M Occurrence Detection Risk Completion
- Cause of failure mode Occurrence C/M carried out PIC of Seriousness
No. Process name (what does this process Failure mode cation sness rate (prevention/detection of probability priority Proposed C/M date application rate probability priority no. confirmation
do ?) To parts/components To Honda products (Occurrence mechanism) (O)
a failure mode) (D)
(including follow-ups) CM (S)
(O)
※ (S) （RPN） (target) date (D) (RPN) ※※

◆組立 1

6 CHK.V組付け 　ターミナルホルダーに 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 18

CHK.V /SPG /セットカ
ラー　を組付ける

口元を熱カシメし　組付け
7 CHK.V熱カシメ カシメ寸法NG 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 3 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 9
部品を固定する

未カシメ 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 18

カシメ状態 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 3 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 9

CHK.Vシート洩れ
8 CHK.Vシートにエアーリー シート洩れNG 【リークNG】 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 作業標準に基づき確認 1 6
検査
ク　テスターで洩れ量を検
査 6 設備：設備条件不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 6

9.BRG圧入(T.ホル
9 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 3 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 9
ダ側) 　ターミナルホルダーに
BRGを　圧入する
圧入割れ 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 18

3 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 6 18

圧入部ガタ 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 18

3 設備：条件設定不備(芯ズレ、カジリ) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 6 18

圧入寸法NG 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 18

3 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 6 18

10 ステーター圧入 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 7 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 21

ケースにステーターcomp
を圧入する
圧入による変形 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 3 9

3 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 9

抜け強度NG 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 18

3 設備：条件設定不備(芯ズレ、カジリ) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 6 18

圧入寸法NG 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 3 18

6 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

Seriousness (S) Occurrence (O) Detection probability (D) Risk priority number (RPN) ［RPN = S×O×D］
Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria RPN Response
Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with There is no process management method capable of
10 regulations. (No predictability) 10 P（%）≧32 Frequency of occurrence 1/2 and At
over
least once a day 10 detecting the failure mode. 436 ～ 1000 Top priority

Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with It can not be detected by the current process Urgently Implement counter counter
9 regulations. (With predictability)） 9 　＜32 1/3　and over once in 3-4 days 9 management method. measures.

8 It becomes a loss or defect of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 8 　＜13 1/8 and over once a week 8 It is extremely difficult to detect by delivery. 130 ～ 435 High priority

7 It may cause loss or failure of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 7 　＜5 1/20 and over once a month 7 It can be detected by regular sampling inspection. implement counter counter measures

6 It may cause loss or defect of function, performance or structure of Honda products . 6 　＜1.2 1/80　and over once in 3 months 6 It can be detected by routine sampling inspection. 27 ～ 129 Medium Priority

Monitor the occurrence of failure

The use or operation of Honda products is possible, but due to the failure modes of the parts, the function It can be detected by full inspection by completion
5 and performance are deteriorated. 5 　＜0.3 1/400 and over once in 6 months 5 inspection.
modes and implement appropriate
countercounter counter measures .

Many market complaints arise about the sound of the Honda products, the appearance, the use, or the
4 operation, the feeling, etc.. 4 　＜0.05 1/2000 and over once a year 4 It can be detected in the production line. 8 ～ 26 Low Priority

If time and resources allow it,

Marketing complaints arise regarding the sound of the Honda product in combination, appearance, use, or
3 operation, feeling, etc. 3 　＜0.01 1/15,000　and over Once in 1-3 year 3 It can be detected in the next step. implement counter counter
measures.

A conflict from a limited user arises with respect to the sound of the Honda product, the appearance, the All inspection is performed by QA machine etc., and
2 use, or the operation at the time of operation etc. 2 　＜0.0007 1/150,000　and overonce in 3－5 year 2 the failure mode is automatically detected. 1～7 Accepted as residual risk

All inspection is performed by the QA machine etc.,

Correct Unnecessary counter
1 No influence or negligible. 1 　＜0.00006 1/1,500,000 and over Less than once in 5 years 1 the failure mode is automatically detected and
counter measures.
removed.

Page 　　　　2　 of 　4　　　　　　　.

Process FMEA Worksheet For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est./revision Approved by Confirmed by Prepared by

Model/Type/Model Year： K0PA/ME/2020 Process FMEA control no.： 00 Establishment

Honda part no. ：16710-K0LA-D021-M1 Supplier part number：40ME-K0L0-00□□
Honda part name ：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Supplier part name：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：
Supplier name ：Keihin India Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. PLANT Ⅱ Supplier code： 開発：津久井／生技：吉田／製造：大村／品技：山口
Supplier address (factory location) ：SP - 90, RIICO NIC (M), Japanese Zone, Neemrana, Distt - Alwar, Rajasthan - 301705 INDIA
Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：機構品技課　山口

※Identification： Enter the symbol (Q) for the quality characteristic Honda designated as important quality characteristic (see HES A 3051)
※※Completion confirmation ：with consideration given to acceptance level of residual risks, confirm completion of a Process FMEA (no further measures required), and enter the name of the person confirmed and the date of confirmation.

Scope of risk evaluation Risk evaluation Countermeasure ( risk minimizing activities) Verification of C/M (re-evaluate risks)
Function of the process Influence if a failure mode occurs Identify Seriou Current process control method Detection Risk C/M C/M Occurrence Detection Risk Completion
- Cause of failure mode Occurrence C/M carried out PIC of Seriousness
No. Process name (what does this process Failure mode cation sness rate (prevention/detection of probability priority Proposed C/M date application rate probability priority no. confirmation
do ?) To parts/components To Honda products (Occurrence mechanism) (O)
a failure mode) (D)
(including follow-ups) CM (S)
(O)
※ (S) （RPN） (target) date (D) (RPN) ※※

11 液体洗浄 切粉残留 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 3 人　：ﾋｭｰﾏﾝｴﾗｰ 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 9

ケースcompを液体洗浄
3 設備：設備異常（条件不備） 1 設備始業点検にて規定 3 9

12 ハウジング圧入 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 7 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 21

ケースcompにハウジング
を圧入する
圧入による変形 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 18

3 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 9

抜け強度NG 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 36

6 設備：条件設定不備(芯ズレ、カジリ) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

圧入寸法NG 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 3 材料：部品寸法NG 1 構成部品単品出来映え確認 6 18

3 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 6 18

13 電気テスト 抵抗値NG 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：巻き線/電着部通電不良 1 作業標準に基づき確認 1 6

ステーターcomp状態の　
電気特性を検査する
6 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 6

着磁(磁力)不
14 着磁 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 5 材料：マグネット材料不備 1 作業標準に基づき確認 1 5
マグネットcompに電圧を 足
かけ、着磁する
5 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 5

マグネット欠け、
組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 5 人：ヒューマンエラー(取扱い) 1 作業標準に基づき確認 1 5
割れ

5 材料：マグネット材料不備 1 メーカー保証 1 5

モーターローター組
15 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 5 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 15
付け ケースcompにローターを
挿入する マグネット欠け、
組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 5 人：ヒューマンエラー(取扱い) 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 15
割れ

5 材料：マグネット材料不備 1 メーカー保証 1 5

Seriousness (S) Occurrence (O) Detection probability (D) Risk priority number (RPN) ［RPN = S×O×D］
Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria RPN Response
Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with There is no process management method capable of
10 regulations. (No predictability) 10 P（%）≧32 Frequency of occurrence 1/2 and At
over
least once a day 10 detecting the failure mode. 436 ～ 1000 Top priority

Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with It can not be detected by the current process Urgently Implement counter counter
9 regulations. (With predictability)） 9 　＜32 1/3　and over once in 3-4 days 9 management method. measures.

8 It becomes a loss or defect of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 8 　＜13 1/8 and over once a week 8 It is extremely difficult to detect by delivery. 130 ～ 435 High priority

7 It may cause loss or failure of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 7 　＜5 1/20 and over once a month 7 It can be detected by regular sampling inspection. implement counter counter measures

6 It may cause loss or defect of function, performance or structure of Honda products . 6 　＜1.2 1/80　and over once in 3 months 6 It can be detected by routine sampling inspection. 27 ～ 129 Medium Priority

Monitor the occurrence of failure

The use or operation of Honda products is possible, but due to the failure modes of the parts, the function It can be detected by full inspection by completion
5 and performance are deteriorated. 5 　＜0.3 1/400 and over once in 6 months 5 inspection.
modes and implement appropriate
countercounter counter measures .

Many market complaints arise about the sound of the Honda products, the appearance, the use, or the
4 operation, the feeling, etc.. 4 　＜0.05 1/2000 and over once a year 4 It can be detected in the production line. 8 ～ 26 Low Priority

If time and resources allow it,

Marketing complaints arise regarding the sound of the Honda product in combination, appearance, use, or
3 operation, feeling, etc. 3 　＜0.01 1/15,000　and over Once in 1-3 year 3 It can be detected in the next step. implement counter counter
measures.

A conflict from a limited user arises with respect to the sound of the Honda product, the appearance, the All inspection is performed by QA machine etc., and
2 use, or the operation at the time of operation etc. 2 　＜0.0007 1/150,000　and overonce in 3－5 year 2 the failure mode is automatically detected. 1～7 Accepted as residual risk

All inspection is performed by the QA machine etc.,

Correct Unnecessary counter
1 No influence or negligible. 1 　＜0.00006 1/1,500,000 and over Less than once in 5 years 1 the failure mode is automatically detected and
counter measures.
removed.

Page 　　　　3　 of 　4　　　　　　　.

Process FMEA Worksheet For Honda use only Revision No. Description of revision Date of date est./revision Approved by Confirmed by Prepared by

Model/Type/Model Year： K0PA/ME/2020 Process FMEA control no.： 00 Establishment

Honda part no. ：16710-K0LA-D021-M1 Supplier part number：40ME-K0L0-00□□
Honda part name ：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Supplier part name：PUMP ASSY,FUEL Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：
Supplier name ：Keihin India Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. PLANT Ⅱ Supplier code： 開発：津久井／生技：吉田／製造：大村／品技：山口
Supplier address (factory location) ：SP - 90, RIICO NIC (M), Japanese Zone, Neemrana, Distt - Alwar, Rajasthan - 301705 INDIA
Process FMEA was carried out by (dept or person) ：機構品技課　山口

※Identification： Enter the symbol (Q) for the quality characteristic Honda designated as important quality characteristic (see HES A 3051)
※※Completion confirmation ：with consideration given to acceptance level of residual risks, confirm completion of a Process FMEA (no further measures required), and enter the name of the person confirmed and the date of confirmation.

Scope of risk evaluation Risk evaluation Countermeasure ( risk minimizing activities) Verification of C/M (re-evaluate risks)
Function of the process Influence if a failure mode occurs Identify Seriou Current process control method Detection Risk C/M C/M Occurrence Detection Risk Completion
- Cause of failure mode Occurrence C/M carried out PIC of Seriousness
No. Process name (what does this process Failure mode cation sness rate (prevention/detection of probability priority Proposed C/M date application rate probability priority no. confirmation
do ?) To parts/components To Honda products (Occurrence mechanism) (O)
a failure mode) (D)
(including follow-ups) CM (S)
(O)
※ (S) （RPN） (target) date (D) (RPN) ※※

ターミナルホルダー圧
16 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 5 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 15
入 ケースcompにターミナル
ホルダーを圧入する
圧入による変形 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 5 材料：部品寸法NG 1 メーカー保証 3 15

5 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 15

抜け強度NG 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 5 材料：部品寸法NG 1 メーカー保証 3 15

5 設備：条件設定不備(芯ズレ、カジリ) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 15

圧入寸法NG 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 5 材料：部品寸法NG 1 メーカー保証 3 15

5 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 15

サイドクリアランス測
17 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 1 6
定 ローターを組付け、サイドク
リアランスを測定する
サイドクリアランスNG(過不足) 測定、調整不良 走る機能欠陥 5 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 作業標準に基づき確認 1 5

5 設備：条件設定不備(測定治具) 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 5

カバー組付、ケース
18 誤組/欠品 組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 部品チェック表/作業標準に基づき確認 3 18
カシメ カバーを組付け、ケースの
両端をカシメ、固定する
カシメ寸法NG 強度不足 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 メーカー保証 3 18

6 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

カシメによる割れ
組付け不良 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 18
/変形

6 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

19 流量性能テスト 吐出流量不足 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 メーカー保証 3 18

全数性能検査を実施
6 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

締切り圧NG 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 6 材料：部品寸法NG 1 メーカー保証 3 18

6 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 3 18

20 テスト液抜き テスト液残留 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 5 設備：条件設定不備 1 設備/治具検証で確認 1 5

FFP内部残留テスト液を
除去

21 完成品検査 誤組、欠品 性能不良 走る機能欠陥 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 18

外観、検査識別マークを
確認
傷、打痕 商品性 － 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 18

識別未塗布 商品性 － 6 人：ヒューマンエラー 1 作業標準に基づき確認 3 18

Seriousness (S) Occurrence (O) Detection probability (D) Risk priority number (RPN) ［RPN = S×O×D］
Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria Rank Evaluation criteria RPN Response
Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with There is no process management method capable of
10 regulations. (No predictability) 10 P（%）≧32 Frequency of occurrence 1/2 and At
over
least once a day 10 detecting the failure mode. 436 ～ 1000 Top priority

Honda products lose safety and lead to accidents involving human lives or non-compliance with It can not be detected by the current process Urgently Implement counter counter
9 regulations. (With predictability)） 9 　＜32 1/3　and over once in 3-4 days 9 management method. measures.

8 It becomes a loss or defect of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 8 　＜13 1/8 and over once a week 8 It is extremely difficult to detect by delivery. 130 ～ 435 High priority

7 It may cause loss or failure of important functions, performance or structure of Honda products. 7 　＜5 1/20 and over once a month 7 It can be detected by regular sampling inspection. implement counter counter measures

6 It may cause loss or defect of function, performance or structure of Honda products . 6 　＜1.2 1/80　and over once in 3 months 6 It can be detected by routine sampling inspection. 27 ～ 129 Medium Priority

Monitor the occurrence of failure

The use or operation of Honda products is possible, but due to the failure modes of the parts, the function It can be detected by full inspection by completion
5 and performance are deteriorated. 5 　＜0.3 1/400 and over once in 6 months 5 inspection.
modes and implement appropriate
countercounter counter measures .

Many market complaints arise about the sound of the Honda products, the appearance, the use, or the
4 operation, the feeling, etc.. 4 　＜0.05 1/2000 and over once a year 4 It can be detected in the production line. 8 ～ 26 Low Priority

If time and resources allow it,

Marketing complaints arise regarding the sound of the Honda product in combination, appearance, use, or
3 operation, feeling, etc. 3 　＜0.01 1/15,000　and over Once in 1-3 year 3 It can be detected in the next step. implement counter counter
measures.

A conflict from a limited user arises with respect to the sound of the Honda product, the appearance, the All inspection is performed by QA machine etc., and
2 use, or the operation at the time of operation etc. 2 　＜0.0007 1/150,000　and overonce in 3－5 year 2 the failure mode is automatically detected. 1～7 Accepted as residual risk

All inspection is performed by the QA machine etc.,

Correct Unnecessary counter
1 No influence or negligible. 1 　＜0.00006 1/1,500,000 and over Less than once in 5 years 1 the failure mode is automatically detected and
counter measures.
removed.

Page 　　　　4　 of 　4　　　　　　　.