Principles of Insurance PDF
Principles of Insurance PDF
Principles of Insurance PDF
Information in this text may have changed or been updated since its publication date.
For current updates visit www.loma.org.
Project Managers: Jennifer W. Herrod, FLMI, PCS, AIAA, PAHM, ARA, AIRC
Gene Stone, FLMI, ACS, CLU
Workflow Coordinator: Shawn Cuthbert
Text Authors: Lisa M. Kozlowski, FLMI, ASRI, CLU, ChFC, RICP, AIRC, ARA
Ethan Skemp, FLMI, ACS
Manuscript Editor: Mary B. Naismith, J.D., FLMI, FFSI, CLU, AIRC, ACS, AIAA,
PAHM, AAPA, ARA
Examinations Editor: Martha Parker, FLMI, ACS, ALHC, AIAA
Permissions: Carol Wiessner, ALMI, AIRC, AIAA, ACS
Citations Editor: Sandra C. Fowler, FLMI, ACS
Copy Editor: Robert D. Land, FLMI, ACS
Production Proofreader: Natalie K. Cape Sanders, ALMI, ACS
Indexer: Robert D. Land, FLMI, ACS
Lead Graphic Designer: Marlene McAuley
Text Designer: Amy Stailey, ACS, ALMI
Production Coordinator: Amy Stailey, ACS, ALMI
Cover Design: Amy Stailey, ACS, ALMI
Portal Design: Jack Coram
Amy Stailey, ACS, ALMI
Learning Aids: Sean Schaeffer Gilley, FLMI, ACS, AIAA, AIRC, FLHC, AAPA,
ARA, CEBS, HIA, MHP, PAHM
Top Ten Tough Topics: Lisa M. Kozlowski, FLMI, ASRI, CLU, ChFC, RICP, AIRC, ARA
Publication Distribution: Carol Wiessner, ALMI, AIRC, AIAA, ACS
25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
This text, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
recording, storage in an information retrieval system, or otherwise, without
the prior written permission of the publisher.
While a great deal of care has been taken to provide accurate, current, and
authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered in this book,
the ideas, suggestions, general principles, conclusions, and any other informa-
tion presented here are for general educational purposes only. This text is sold
with the understanding that it is neither designed nor intended to provide the
reader with legal, accounting, investment, marketing, or any other types of
professional business management advice. If legal advice or other expert assis-
tance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
This text contains a number of examples and hypothetical scenarios. The
names, characters, organizations, and events in these examples and scenarios
are fictional. Any resemblance to any actual persons, living or dead, or actual
organizations or events is entirely coincidental.
ISBN 978-1-57974-455-7
Contents
Preface.................................................................................................PREF.1
Acknowledgments................................................................................ PREF.1
LOMA 280 Text Review Panel.........................................................PREF.1
LOMA 280 Course Project Team......................................................PREF.3
Introduction.................................................................. INTRO.1
Using the Test Preparation Guide................................................... INTRO.2
Glossary......................................................................... GLOSS.1
Index.............................................................................. INDEX.1
Preface
Principles of Insurance, Second Edition is designed to give readers an understand-
ing of the basic principles that underlie the operation of life and health insurance
companies throughout the world. The text describes the products that are most
widely marketed by life and health insurance companies, and it explains the fea-
tures of those products. The text is divided into five modules:
Module 1: Basic Principles of Insurance (Chapters 1–4)
Module 2: Individual Life Insurance (Chapters 5–7)
Module 3: Individual Life Insurance Policy Provisions and Ownership Rights
(Chapters 8–9)
Module 4: Annuities, Individual Retirement Arrangements, and Health
Insurance (Chapters 10–12)
Module 5: Group Life Insurance and Group Retirement Plans (Chapters 13–14)
Acknowledgments
Principles of Insurance, Second Edition is the result of the combined efforts of
industry experts who served on a text development panel and LOMA staff and
consultants. The LOMA 280 authors wish to express gratitude for the dedication,
knowledge, expertise, and guidance provided by all of these individuals through-
out the writing of this text.
Atlanta, Georgia
2017
Introduction
The purpose of Principles of Insurance, Second Edition is to provide an overview
of the basic products and principles of life insurance, annuities, and health insur-
ance. Enrollment in the course includes access to an online Course Portal via
LOMA’s learning system. The Course Portal gives learners access to everything
they need to study and prepare for the course examination. The Course Portal
organizes the assigned text material into convenient Modules—chapter clusters
that help to focus the learning process by breaking up the course content into
meaningful sections. In addition to the assigned study materials, the Course Portal
provides access to an array of blended learning resources, including multimedia
features designed to enhance the learning experience. The Course Portal provides
access to
PDFs of the assigned text and Test Preparation Guide, which can be printed
or read online
An interactive version of the Test Preparation Guide’s Practice Questions and
Sample Exam
Review tools, including Learning Aids—animations of important concepts—
and a “Top Ten Tough Topics” tutorial
Recommended study plans to help you set goals and manage your learning
experience
Related links which help you apply the course instruction to the real world
Students preparing to take the examination for this course will find that the
assigned study materials include many features designed to help learners more
easily understand the course content, organize their study, and prepare for the
examination. As we describe each of these features, we give you suggestions for
studying the material.
Learning Objectives. Each chapter lists the chapter’s learning objectives to
help you focus your studies. Before reading each chapter, review these learn-
ing objectives. Then, as you read the chapter, look for material that will help
you meet the learning objectives. The interactive version of the Test Prepara-
tion Guide’s Practice Questions and Sample Exam questions (accessible from
the Course Portal) is linked to the learning objectives to give you an idea of
how each learning objective might be measured on an examination, as well as
to help you assess your mastery of the learning objectives.
Chapter Outline. Each chapter contains an outline of the chapter. Review this
outline to gain an overview of the major topics that will be covered; then scan
through the chapter to become familiar with how the information is presented.
By looking at the headings, you can gain a preview of how various subjects in
each chapter relate to each other.
Figures. We include figures throughout the text to illustrate and bring a real
world perspective to the text’s discussion of selected topics. Information con-
tained in figures may be tested on the examination for the course.
Learning Aids. Learning Aids enhance your learning experience by helping
you to visualize concepts described in the text and allowing you to see those
concepts in action. This icon in the margin of the text indicates that there is a
Learning Aid on the Course Portal that relates to the topic in the text. If you
are reading the text in PDF format, click on the Learning Aid icon to go to that
LEARNING AID Module’s Learning Aid collection. If you are reading a printed copy of the text,
use the Learning Aid icon as a visual cue that the Course Portal holds more in-
formation on the topic. Information contained in Learning Aids may be tested
on the examination for the course.
Glossary and Key Terms. This text explains key terms that apply to the text
material and, where appropriate, reviews key terms previously presented in
LOMA courses. Each key term is highlighted with bold italic type when the
term is defined and is included in a list of key terms at the end of each chapter.
All key terms also appear in a comprehensive glossary at the end of the PDF
of the text. As you read each chapter, pay special attention to the key terms.
Top Ten Tough Topics. The Top Ten Tough Topics tutorial, found on the
Course Portal, contains animations and study tips for topics that learners of-
ten find difficult when answering questions on the examination. This tutorial
enhances the learning experience, appeals to a variety of learning styles, and
offers a great way for learners to advance their understanding and retention of
course content.
LOMA may periodically revise the assigned study materials for this course.
To ensure that you are studying from the correct materials, check the current
LOMA Education and Training Catalog available at www.loma.org. Also be sure
to visit the Announcements page on the Course Portal to learn about important
updates or corrections to the assigned study materials.
Chapter 1
Introduction to
Risk and Insurance
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
1A Distinguish between speculative risk and pure risk
1B Describe four methods used to manage financial risk
1C Identify the five characteristics of insurable risks
1D Define antiselection and give examples of two factors that can increase
or decrease the likelihood that an individual will suffer a loss
1E Identify four risk classes for proposed insureds
1F Define insurable interest and determine in a given situation whether the
insurable interest requirement is met
Outline
The Concept of Risk Insurance
Risk Management Managing Risks through Insurance
Avoiding Risk Characteristics of Insurable Risks
Controlling Risk Insurance Underwriting
Transferring Risk Insurable Interest Requirement
Accepting Risk
L
ife is full of risk. You take risks when you travel, when you engage in recre-
ational activities, even when you breathe. Some risks are significant; others
are not. When you decide to leave your umbrella at home, you are taking
the risk that you might get wet in a rain shower. Such a risk is insignificant and
will probably not cause you a financial loss. Other risks, however, such as the risk
of a severe illness or the destruction of your home, may result in substantial—even
ruinous—financial loss. Risk is the chance or possibility of an unexpected result,
either a gain or a loss. To understand insurance and how it works, you first need to
understand the concept of risk.
Risk Management
Because the effects of an unexpected financial loss can be severe, individuals and
businesses usually seek to minimize their exposure to risk whenever possible.
LEARNING AID
Risk management is the process in which individuals and businesses identify and
assess the risks they face and determine how to deal with their exposure to these
risks. Four general methods can be used to manage risk: (1) avoiding the risk,
(2) controlling the risk, (3) transferring the risk, and (4) accepting the risk.
Avoiding Risk
The first, and perhaps most obvious, method of managing risk is simply to avoid it
altogether. We can avoid the risk of personal injury that may result from a motor-
cycle accident by not riding a motorcycle, and we can avoid the risk of financial
loss in the stock market by not investing in stocks. Sometimes, however, avoiding
risk is not practical.
Controlling Risk
We can try to control risk by taking steps to prevent or reduce potential losses. For
example, people can reduce the likelihood of contracting certain diseases by exer-
cising regularly, eating a healthy diet, and not smoking. People who become ill can
often reduce the severity of the illness by taking proper medication or following
a prescribed course of medical treatment. Similarly, a business can install smoke
detectors and sprinkler systems in its office buildings to reduce the likelihood of
fire damage and lessen the severity of any damage that might occur.
Transferring Risk
Another method of managing risk is to transfer it. When you transfer risk to
another party, you are shifting the liability associated with that risk to the other
party, usually through financial products that involve a fee for the transfer. As we
shall see, the most common way for individuals, families, and businesses to trans-
fer risk is to purchase insurance coverage.
Accepting Risk
The final method of managing risk is to accept, or retain, risk. Simply stated, to
accept a risk is to assume all financial responsibility for that risk. Sometimes, as
in the case of an insignificant risk—such as losing an umbrella—the financial loss
is not great enough to warrant much concern. We assume the cost of replacing the
umbrella ourselves.
Some people consciously choose to accept more significant risks. For example,
a couple may decide not to purchase disability income insurance because they
believe they can reduce their standard of living if one of them becomes disabled.
Alternatively, accepting a risk can be an unconscious decision. Any risk you
face that is not managed by other methods is always accepted, whether you are
aware of it or not. For example, for a number of years, many people and busi-
nesses were unaware that hackers could gain access to the data on their computers.
Because they were unaware of this risk and therefore took no steps to manage it,
they often suffered significant financial losses if their information systems were
hacked. People and businesses can prevent the inadvertent acceptance of poten-
tially disastrous risks through risk management, which requires identifying all sig-
nificant potential risks and then determining the methods to use to manage them.
Note that individuals and businesses often use several risk management meth-
ods in combination. For example, to reduce the risk of an accidental injury, many
people avoid certain hazardous activities, such as sky diving. People also use
safety devices, such as automobile seat belts, to help control the risk of accidental
injuries. Finally, people purchase insurance to transfer the risk of financial loss
resulting from any injuries they do receive. Figure 1.1 illustrates the four methods
of risk management.
Insurance
In simple terms, insurance is a method in which an individual or entity transfers to
another party the risk of financial loss from events such as accident, illness, prop-
erty damage, or death. A company that accepts risk and makes a promise to pay
a policy benefit if a covered loss occurs is an insurer or an insurance company.
A policy benefit is a specific amount of money the insurer agrees to pay under an
insurance policy when a covered loss occurs. An insurance policy, also known as
a policy or insurance contract, is a written document that contains the terms of the
agreement between the insurer and the owner of the policy. The premium is the
specified amount of money an insurer charges in exchange for agreeing to pay a
policy benefit when a covered loss occurs.
Avoid Control
the risk the risk
Transfer
the risk
Accept
the risk
The focus of this text is on the following life and health insurance products:
Example:
Matthew Byrne applied to the Reliable Insurance Company for a $100,000
life insurance policy covering his wife, Nancy. Reliable issued the policy
as applied for. If Nancy dies while the policy is in force, Reliable will pay
$100,000 to the Byrnes’ son, Stephen.
Analysis:
In this situation, Matthew is the applicant and policyowner of this policy,
Reliable is the insurer, Nancy is the insured, and Stephen is the beneficiary.
The policy is a third-party policy, because the policyowner, Matthew, and
the insured, Nancy, are two different people. After Nancy’s death, Stephen
can file a claim with Reliable for the policy benefit of $100,000.
If the economic losses that actually result from a given peril, such as
disability, can be spread across a large pool (or number) of people who
are all subject to the risk of such losses and the probability of loss is
relatively small for each person, then the cost to each person will be
relatively small.
On the other hand, some losses would cause financial hardship to most people
and are considered to be insurable. For example, a person injured in an accident
may lose a significant amount of income if she is unable to work. Disability income
insurance coverage is available to protect against such a potential loss.
The law of large numbers states that, typically, the more times we
observe a particular event, the more likely that our observed results will
approximate the true probability—or likelihood—that the event will
occur in the future.
A classic example of the law of large numbers is the coin toss. If you toss a
“fair” coin—one that has not been altered to influence outcomes—there is a 50-50
probability that the coin will land with the head side up. If you toss the coin 10
times, you might not get an equal number of heads and tails. However, if you toss
the coin 10,000 times, in approximately 50 percent of the tosses, the coin will land
with the head side up and the other 50 percent of the tosses will land on tails. The
more often you toss the coin, the more likely you will observe an approximately
equal proportion of heads and tails.
Insurance companies rely on the law of large numbers when they make predic-
tions about the covered losses that a given group of insureds is likely to experi-
ence during a given time period. Insurers collect specific information about large
numbers of people so that they can identify the pattern of losses that those people
experienced. For many years, for example, U.S. life insurance companies have
recorded how many of their insureds of each sex have died and how old they were
when they died.
Using these statistical records, insurance companies have been able to develop
charts—called mortality tables—that indicate with great accuracy the number
of people in a large group (100,000 people or more) who are likely to die at each
age. A mortality rate is the rate at which death occurs among a specified group
of people during a specified period, typically one year. Mortality tables show the
mortality rates that are expected to occur in a group of people at a given age.
Insurance Underwriting
Mortality and morbidity tables provide insurers with broad general statistics to
help them estimate how many people of a certain age and sex will die or become
ill in the future. However, not all individuals of the same sex and age have an equal
likelihood of suffering a loss. Individual insurance is sold on a case-by-case basis,
and insurers cannot presume that each proposed insured represents an average
likelihood of loss.
When an insurer receives an application for insurance, the company must
assess the degree of risk it will be accepting if it issues the policy. The process
of assessing and classifying the degree of risk represented by a proposed insured
and making a decision to accept or decline that risk is called underwriting or risk
selection. Insurance company employees who are responsible for evaluating pro-
posed risks are called underwriters.
Proper underwriting is vital for an insurer’s success and even its survival. The
premium rates that an insurance company establishes are based in large part on the
amount of risk the company is assuming for the policies it issues. The greater the
risk an insured represents, the higher the premium rate the insurer must charge. If
the insurer consistently underestimates the risks that it assumes, its premium rates
will be inadequate to provide the benefits promised to all its policyowners. On the
other hand, if the insurer overestimates the risks it will be assuming, its premium
rates may be considerably higher than those of its competitors, and potential cus-
tomers will purchase insurance elsewhere.
Underwriting becomes more difficult because of antiselection, also known as
adverse selection or selection against the insurer. Antiselection is the tendency of
individuals who believe they have a greater-than-average likelihood of loss to seek
insurance protection to a greater extent than do other individuals. For example,
people who believe they are in poor health are more likely to apply for life and
health insurance—and also to apply for larger amounts of coverage—than people
who believe they are in average or good health. The possibility of antiselection
requires an insurer to carefully review each application to assess the degree of risk
the company will be assuming if it issues the requested policy.
Underwriting consists of two primary stages: (1) identifying the risks that a
proposed insured presents and (2) placing the proposed insured into an appropri-
ate risk class.
Identifying Risks
Although predicting when a specific individual will die, become injured, or suffer
from an illness is impossible, insurers have identified a number of factors that can
increase or decrease the likelihood that an individual will incur a loss. The most
important of these factors are physical hazards and moral hazards. A physical
hazard is a physical characteristic that may increase the likelihood of loss.
For example, a person with a history of heart disease possesses a physical haz-
ard that increases the likelihood that the person will die sooner than a person of
the same age and sex who does not have a similar medical history. A person’s
activities or lifestyle can also present a physical hazard. Tobacco use and alcohol
or substance abuse are known to contribute to health problems, and those health
problems may result in higher-than-average medical expenses and a lower-than-
average life expectancy. Similarly, an occupation such as coal mining, which
exposes a person to a significantly greater-than-average risk of health problems
or accidental injury, can present a physical hazard. Underwriters must carefully
evaluate proposed insureds to detect the presence of such physical hazards.
Moral hazard is a characteristic that exists when the reputation, financial posi-
tion, or criminal record of an applicant or a proposed insured indicates that the
person may act dishonestly in the insurance transaction. For example, an individ-
ual who has a confirmed record of illegal or unethical behavior is more likely than
an individual without this type of background to act dishonestly in an insurance
transaction. The person may be seeking insurance for financial gain rather than as
protection against a financial loss. Therefore, an insurer must carefully consider
that fact when evaluating the individual’s application for insurance. Underwriters
also evaluate the moral hazards presented by individuals who provide false infor-
mation on their applications for insurance. In these cases, the applicants may be
trying to obtain coverage that they might not otherwise be able to obtain. When
underwriters evaluate applications, they take a variety of steps to identify pro-
posed insureds who present moral hazards.1
Classifying Risks
After identifying the risks that a proposed insured presents, the underwriter places
the proposed insured into an appropriate risk class. A risk class is a grouping of
insureds who represent a similar level of risk to the insurer. Assigning proposed
insureds to risk classes enables the insurer to establish equitable premium rates
to charge for the requested coverage. People in different risk classes are charged
different premium rates, much the same as people of different ages are charged
different rates. Without these premium rate variations, some policyowners would
be charged too much for their coverage, while others would be paying less than the
actual cost of their coverage.
Each insurer has its own underwriting guidelines, which are the general rules
it uses when assigning proposed insureds to an appropriate risk class. Individual
life insurers’ underwriting guidelines usually identify at least four risk classes for
proposed insureds: standard risks, preferred risks, substandard risks, and declined
risks.
Proposed insureds who have a likelihood of loss that is not significantly greater
than average are classified as standard risks, and the premium rates they are
charged are called standard premium rates. Traditionally, most individual
life and health insurance policies have been issued at standard premium rates.
www.loma.org Copyright © 2017 LL Global, Inc. All rights reserved.
Principles of Insurance Chapter 1: Introduction to Risk and Insurance 1.13
Insurable interest laws do not require that the beneficiary have an insur-
able interest in the policyowner-insured’s life. In other words, the laws allow a
policyowner-insured to name anyone as beneficiary. Most insurance company
underwriting guidelines, however, require that the beneficiary also have an insur-
able interest in the life of the insured when a policy is issued. As a result, life insur-
ers typically inquire into the beneficiary’s relationship to the proposed insured and
may refuse to issue the coverage if the beneficiary does not possess an insurable
interest in the proposed insured’s life.
In the case of a third-party policy, laws in many countries and in most states in
the United States require only that the policyowner have an insurable interest in
the insured’s life when the policy is issued. Most insurance company underwriting
guidelines and the laws in some states, however, require both the policyowner and
the beneficiary of a third-party policy to have an insurable interest in the insured’s
life when the policy is issued.
Certain family relationships are assumed by law to create an insurable interest
between an insured and a policyowner or beneficiary. In these cases, even if the
policyowner or beneficiary has no financial interest in the insured’s life, the bonds
of love and affection alone are sufficient to create an insurable interest. According
to the laws in most jurisdictions, the insured’s spouse, mother, father, child, grand-
parent, grandchild, brother, and sister are deemed to have an insurable interest in
the life of the insured. Figure 1.4 illustrates the family relationships that create an
insurable interest.
An insurable interest is not presumed when the policyowner or beneficiary is
more distantly related to the insured than the relatives previously described. In
these cases, a financial interest in the continued life of the insured must be demon-
strated to satisfy the insurable interest requirement.
Example:
Mary Mulhouse obtained a $50,000 personal loan from the Lone Star
Bank.
Analysis:
If Mary dies before repaying the loan, Lone Star could lose some or all
of the money it lent her. Therefore, Lone Star has a financial interest and,
consequently, an insurable interest in Mary’s life, in the amount of the
outstanding loan.
the applicant has an insurable interest in the continued health of the proposed
insured. Additionally, for disability income insurance purposes, businesses have
an insurable interest in the health of their key employees.
Example:
Didactic Training is a small company that contracts with other companies
to conduct seminars for their management staffs. Shilpa Gouda works
for Didactic as its primary seminar leader. Because Shilpa’s expertise and
teaching skills are essential to the success of the business, Didactic has
applied for disability income coverage on Shilpa and has named itself as
the beneficiary of this coverage.
Analysis:
Didactic would be unable to meet its scheduled seminar commitments if
Shilpa were ill or injured and, thus, unable to conduct seminars. Therefore,
Didactic has a financial interest in Shilpa’s continued good health. This
financial interest creates the necessary insurable interest for Didactic to
purchase disability income coverage on Shilpa.
Grandfather Grandmother
Cousin
Child’s
Niece Nephew Child Child Spouse
Grandchild
Key Terms
risk beneficiary
speculative risk claim
pure risk contract of indemnity
risk management valued contract
insurer law of large numbers
policy benefit probability
insurance policy mortality tables
premium mortality rate
personal risk morbidity tables
life and health insurance company morbidity rate
life insurance reinsurance
term life insurance direct writer
cash value life insurance reinsurer
cash value underwriting
endowment insurance underwriter
annuity contract antiselection
health insurance physical hazard
medical expense insurance moral hazard
disability income coverage risk class
long-term care insurance (LTCI) underwriting guidelines
individual insurance policy standard risk
group insurance policy standard premium rate
property/casualty (P&C) preferred risk
insurance company preferred premium rate
applicant substandard risk
policyowner substandard premium rate
insured declined risk
third-party policy insurable interest
Endnote
1. The term moral hazard is also used in the insurance industry to refer to the tendency of individuals
to alter their behavior because they have insurance. This tendency is typically of more concern with
health insurance than life insurance. For example, an injured person who has a disability income
policy with generous benefits may feel disinclined to follow a prescribed rehabilitation regime and get
back to work, and an individual in poor health who has medical expense insurance may be more likely
to pursue treatment for her medical conditions than if she had no medical expense insurance.
Chapter 2
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
2A Distinguish among the three types of business organizations and
explain why insurance companies must be organized as corporations
2B Distinguish among stock insurers, mutual insurers, and fraternal benefit
societies
2C Describe the financial services industry and explain how insurance
companies function within that industry
2D Describe the roles that the federal and state governments play in
U.S. insurance regulation
2E Identify the two primary types of insurance regulation in most
countries
Outline
Insurance Company Organization Role of Government in Insurance
Types of Business Organizations Social Insurance Programs
Types of Insurance Company Regulation of Insurance
Organizations Taxation
Insurance Companies as
Financial Institutions
Financial Intermediaries
Evolution of the Financial Services
Industry
I
n some ways, a life insurance company functions just like any other busi-
ness. The company determines the needs of its customers, creates products
that meet those needs, and pursues profits to ensure its survival. Profit is the
money, or revenue, that a business receives for its products minus the expenses it
incurs to create and support the products.
What sets insurance companies apart, however, is the nature of the products
that they sell. The products of a typical life insurance company represent promises
of future payments, which may not be called upon for 20, 30, or even 50 or more
years into the future. This characteristic of a life insurance company greatly influ-
ences the way that the company is organized.
Example:
George Everett and Andrew Carter formed an equal partnership. At first,
the business was successful, and George and Andrew each received one-
half of the profits. However, the business eventually failed, and George
was unable to pay his share of the losses.
Analysis:
Because George and Andrew formed their business as an equal partner-
ship, Andrew was personally responsible for all the partnership’s debts.
If one of the partners dies or withdraws from the business, the partnership gener-
ally dissolves, although the remaining partners may form a new partnership and
continue to operate the business.
In most countries, insurance companies and most other major businesses are
organized as corporations. A corporation is a legal entity that is created by the
authority of a governmental unit (through a process known as incorporation) and
that is separate and distinct from its owners. LEARNING AID
A corporation has two major characteristics that set it apart from a sole propri-
etorship and a partnership:
As a legal entity that is separate from its owners, a corporation can sue or be
sued, enter into contracts, and own property. In addition, the corporation’s
debts belong to the corporation itself and not to its owners. The owners are not
personally responsible for the corporation’s debts.
The corporation continues beyond the death of any or all of its owners. This
characteristic of the corporation provides an element of stability and perma-
nence that a sole proprietorship and partnership cannot guarantee. Because
an insurer’s contractual obligations extend many years into the future, the
corporation is the ideal form of business organization for an insurance com-
pany. Recognizing the importance of such stability and permanence, laws in
the United States and many other countries require insurance companies to
operate as corporations.
Insurance Companies as
Financial Institutions
Insurance companies are financial institutions that function in the economy as
part of the financial services industry. A financial institution is a business that
owns primarily financial assets, such as stocks and bonds, rather than fixed assets,
such as equipment and raw materials. The financial services industry is an indus-
try that offers financial products and services to help individuals, businesses, and
governments meet their financial goals of protecting against financial losses, accu-
mulating and investing money and other assets, and managing debt and payments.
In addition to insurance companies, financial institutions include
Depository institutions, which specialize in accepting deposits from and
making loans to people, businesses, and government agencies. Commercial
banks, savings and loan associations, and credit unions are examples of depos-
itory institutions.
Finance companies, which specialize in making short- and medium-term
loans to people and businesses.
Securities firms, which specialize in the purchase and sale of securities.
A security is a financial asset that represents either (1) an obligation of indebt-
edness owed by a business, a government, or an agency, which is known as
a debt security, or (2) an ownership interest, which is known as an equity
security.
Mutual fund companies, which operate mutual funds. A mutual fund is an
investment vehicle that pools the funds of investors and uses the funds to buy
a variety of stocks, bonds, and other securities.
Fraternal
Benefit Societies Other
81 7
Mutual
Stock
Insurers
Insurers
106
636
Fraternal
Benefit Societies Other
$333,579 $165,617
Stock
Mutual Insurers
Insurers $13,774,670
$5,840,741
Source: Adapted from ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015, Copyright © 2015 American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, DC,
(November 2015, 19,) 2–3 https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Documents/FB15_All.pdf
(15 February 2016). Used with permission.
Financial Intermediaries
Financial institutions, including insurance companies, serve as financial interme-
diaries. A financial intermediary is an organization that collects funds from one
group of people, businesses, and governments, known as suppliers, and channels
them to another group, known as users. Insurers, for example, collect premiums
from policyowners and pay claims to beneficiaries. In the process of moving funds
from suppliers to users, financial intermediaries generate income for themselves.
As financial intermediaries, insurance companies take a substantial portion of
the money that their customers pay for insurance and invest that money in other
businesses and industries, primarily through the purchase of bonds issued by cor-
porations. The investments that insurers make provide funds that these businesses
need to operate and expand. For example, life insurance companies in the United
States have been the largest institutional holders of corporate bond financing since
the 1930s.1
Convergence
Historically, the financial services industry was divided into distinct sectors, often
as a result of regulatory requirements in various countries. Banks provided bank-
ing services such as checking accounts, savings accounts, and loans. Securities
firms and mutual fund companies handled investments. Insurance companies
issued and sold insurance products.
Today, however, the financial services industry is characterized by convergence,
which is a movement toward a single financial institution being able to serve a cus-
tomer’s banking, insurance, and securities needs. Financial services companies
have entered into each other’s traditional businesses, either through expansion of
operations or affiliations. Thus, the distinctions among financial institutions based
on the products they offer have blurred.
In the United States, financial services companies may affiliate by means of a
financial holding company. A holding company, also known as a parent company,
is a company that owns and controls another company or companies, which are
referred to as subsidiaries or operating units. The various subsidiaries that are
under the common control of the holding company are known as affiliates of each
other because they are affiliated within a holding company system, often operat-
ing under a single brand name. A financial holding company is a holding company
that conducts activities that are financial in nature or incidental to financial activi-
ties, such as insurance activities, securities activities, banking, and investment and
advisory services. Figure 2.2 illustrates a financial holding company structure.
Affiliation in a financial holding company system allows companies to sell one
another’s products. For example, although banks in the United States still cannot
issue—that is, accept the risk on—insurance products, an insurance company can
design a product according to a bank’s specifications and issue a product that the
bank can sell. Such affiliations also increase the ability of insurance companies to
offer a wider variety of noninsurance products, such as mutual funds.
} Tulip Life
Insurance
Company
Blueberry
National
Bank
Oleander
Securities } SUBSIDIARIES OF
PARENT COMPANY
Consolidation
In the financial services industry, the term consolidation typically refers to the
combination of financial institutions within or across sectors. This consolidation
occurs primarily through mergers and acquisitions:
A merger is a transaction in which the assets and liabilities of two companies
are combined into one company. One of the companies survives as a legal
entity, and the other company ceases to exist.
An acquisition is a transaction in which one corporation purchases a control-
ling interest in another corporation, resulting in an ownership link between
two formerly independent corporations. After the transaction, both corpora-
tions survive as separate legal entities.
Consolidation has decreased the number of traditional financial institutions
within each sector of the financial services industry. As the number of financial
institutions has decreased, many of the remaining institutions have grown in size.
Figure 2.3 illustrates how the number of life insurance companies in the United
States has decreased steadily since 1989.
Globalization
Financial institutions operate in a global environment. Large financial services
enterprises, particularly those from Western Europe and North America, increas-
ingly are expanding their customer bases worldwide. For example, Canadian
life and health insurers generated 41 percent of their premiums abroad in 2014.2
In addition, the proportion of life insurance companies operating in the United
States that are foreign-owned was 11 percent in 2014.3
2,500
Number of Companies
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
Year
Source: Adapted from ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015, Copyright © 2015 American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, DC,
(November 2015, 19,) 5 https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Documents/FB15_All.pdf
(15 February 2016). Used with permission.
Example:
In the United States, one important social insurance program is Medicare,
which pays certain health care expenses for the elderly and people with
qualifying disabilities. Most Americans age 65 and older receive Medicare
coverage. Medicare doesn’t cover all of an individual’s medical expenses,
however. To complement Medicare coverage, private insurance companies
created Medigap policies, also known as Medicare supplement insurance
policies, which pay for many medical expenses not covered by Medicare.
Regulation of Insurance
Insurance companies protect millions of individuals against economic loss and
offer them opportunities to save and invest money. Because the financial health of
insurance providers is of such importance to so many people, insurers occupy a
special position of public trust. As a result, the insurance industry is subject to reg-
ulation designed specifically to safeguard the public trust in insurance companies.
Although insurance laws vary from one country to another, many insurance
laws are similar in principle throughout the world. For example, to operate as an
insurer, a company must incorporate in one particular jurisdiction. The jurisdic-
tion in which a company incorporates becomes the company’s domicile. The com-
pany must then obtain a certificate of authority from each jurisdiction in which it
plans to conduct business. A certificate of authority, or license, grants an insurer
the right to conduct an insurance business and sell insurance products in the juris-
diction that grants the certificate. An insurer must comply with all applicable laws
in each jurisdiction in which it is licensed.
Example:
The New Englander Insurance Company, a U.S. insurer, is incorporated in
the state of Connecticut. New Englander conducts business in Connecticut,
Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.
Analysis:
Connecticut is New Englander’s domicile. New Englander must have a
certificate of authority from each state in which it conducts business—
Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. New Englander must
also comply with all applicable laws in each of these three states.
Insurance regulatory systems also vary from country to country. In many coun-
tries, insurance regulation is centralized and under the supervision of the national
government. For example, in India, authority over insurance regulation rests solely
with the national Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA). Some
countries, including the United States and Canada, have federal systems of gov-
ernment, in which a federal government and a number of lower-level governments,
known as state governments in the United States and provincial governments in
Canada, share governmental powers, including the power to regulate insurance.
Solvency Regulation
To ensure the solvency of insurance companies, most countries impose minimum
financial requirements that an insurance company must meet before it obtains a
license to transact insurance; a company that is financially unsound cannot obtain
a license. In addition, governments have the authority to act to protect the public
interest if an insurance company becomes financially unsound.
interests. The specific actions that regulators are permitted to take when an insur-
er’s solvency is in question vary from country to country. In extreme cases where
an insurer’s solvency cannot be restored, countries typically have established
procedures to liquidate the company. In each case, the protection of policyowner
interests is the primary regulatory goal.
Taxation
Many governments use taxation as a mechanism for accomplishing social, in addi-
tion to economic, goals. Through taxation, governments can influence people to
act or refrain from acting in certain ways. For example, some governments tax
tobacco heavily not only to raise revenue, but to discourage tobacco use. Govern-
ments also offer taxpayers reductions in taxable income for contributions made to
qualified charities to encourage charitable giving.
Many governments also use tax policies to encourage people to purchase vari-
ous types of private insurance and financial products. Governments, for example,
provide tax incentives to encourage people to contribute to, and employers to pro-
vide, group retirement plans. Such tax incentives can be quite effective, and they
have benefitted insurers and other financial institutions by increasing the demand
for their products.
Key Terms
profit McCarran-Ferguson Act
sole proprietorship state insurance code
partnership state insurance department
corporation insurance commissioner
stock corporation National Association of Insurance
share Commissioners (NAIC)
stockholder Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
stock insurance company Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-
stockholder dividend Frank)
mutual insurance company Federal Insurance Office (FIO)
fraternal benefit society Financial Stability Oversight Council
financial institution (FSOC)
financial services industry systemically important financial
security institution (SIFI)
financial intermediary solvent
convergence assets
consolidation liabilities
social insurance program owners’ equity
domicile capital
certificate of authority surplus
federal system Annual Statement
market conduct law
Endnotes
1. ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015 (Washington, DC: American Council of Life Insurers, 2015), 8,
https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Pages/RP15-010.
aspx (27 January 2016).
2. CLHIA, Canadian Life and Health Insurance Facts, 2015 ed. (Toronto: Canadian Life and Health
Insurance Association Inc., 2015), 5, http://clhia.uberflip.com/i/563156-canadian-life-and-health-
insurance-facts (26 January 2016).
3. ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015 (Washington, DC: American Council of Life Insurers, 2015), 2,
https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Pages/RP15-010.
aspx (26 January 2016).
Chapter 3
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
3A Distinguish between formal and informal contracts, bilateral and
unilateral contracts, commutative and aleatory contracts, and contracts
of adhesion and bargaining contracts, and identify which types
characterize an insurance contract
3B Explain the difference between a valid contract, a void contract, and a
voidable contract
3C Identify the four general requirements for the creation of a valid
informal contract and describe how each of these requirements can be
met in the formation of an insurance contract
3D Identify the property rights that a policyowner has in the insurance
policy he owns
Outline
Fundamentals of Contract Law The Policy as Property
Types of Contracts Right to Use and Enjoy Property
General Requirements for Right to Dispose of Property
a Contract
R
emember our point that life and health insurance products represent
promises—promises that, in some cases, could extend over decades?
This characteristic influences the form that such a product takes: in return
for an initial payment, an applicant typically receives an insurance policy, which
is a written record of the promise that the insurance company is making.
Recall that an individual insurance policy is an insurance policy that insures the
life or health of a named person. Some individual policies also insure the person’s
immediate family or a second named person. A group insurance policy insures the
lives or health of a specific group of people. For example, most group insurance
policies are purchased by employers to provide life or health insurance coverage to
their employees and, sometimes, to the dependents of covered employees.
Unless otherwise noted, the information presented in this chapter applies to
both individual and group insurance policies.
Types of Contracts
In Chapter 1, we described contracts of indemnity and valued contracts. As noted
LEARNING AID
in that chapter, health insurance policies typically are contracts of indemnity,
and life insurance policies are valued contracts. Contracts may be categorized in
other ways—for example as either
Formal or informal contracts
Example:
Shi-Fay Cheng contracts with the Dependable Heating Company to have
the company install a heating system in her home for a mutually agreed-
upon price. Dependable promises to perform the work, and Shi-Fay
promises to pay a stated amount in exchange for the work.
Analysis:
This contract is bilateral—both Shi-Fay and Dependable have made legally
enforceable promises. If either Shi-Fay or Dependable fails to perform its
promise, the other party can take legal action to enforce the contract.
Jean and Dylan have entered into a bargaining contract, one in which both par-
ties, as equals, set the terms and conditions of the contract.
In contrast, life and health insurance policies are contracts of adhesion. A
contract of adhesion is a contract that one party prepares and that the other party
must accept or reject as a whole, generally without any bargaining between the
parties to the agreement. Although the applicant for individual life or health insur-
ance has choices about some of the contract provisions, generally he must accept
or reject the contract as the insurance company has written it. As a result, if any
policy provision is ambiguous, the courts usually interpret the provision in what-
ever manner would be more favorable to the policyowner or beneficiary. In contrast
to individual insurance policies, group insurance agreements often are subject to
some negotiation between the parties. Nevertheless, group insurance contracts are
contracts of adhesion. Figure 3.2 lists the various types of contracts and identifies
which types characterize life and health insurance contracts.
Characterizes
Type of Contract Life and
Health
Insurance
Contracts
One party provides something of value in exchange for a conditional promise Yes
(Aleatory contract)
One party sets the terms that the other party accepts or rejects Yes
(Contract of adhesion)
In describing the legal status of a contract, the words valid, void, and voidable
are often used:
Valid. A valid contract is one that is enforceable by law. Valid contracts sat-
isfy all legal requirements.
Void. The term void is used in law to describe something that was never valid.
A void contract is one that does not satisfy one or more of the legal require-
ments to create a valid contract and, thus, is never enforceable.
Voidable. At times, one of the parties to an otherwise valid contract may have
grounds to reject, or avoid, it. A voidable contract is one in which a party has
the right to avoid her obligations under the contract.
Let’s look at the four requirements in more detail.
Mutual Assent
Whether a contract is made when the parties sign a written agreement or shake
hands, the parties involved have agreed to do something. The requirement of
mutual assent is met when the parties reach a meeting of the minds about the
terms of their agreement.
For life and health insurance policies, as well as for other contracts, mutual
assent is expressed through a process of offer and acceptance. An offer is a pro-
posal to enter into a binding contract with another party. The party that makes
the offer is the offeror, and the party to whom the offer is made is the offeree.
An acceptance of the offer is the offeree’s unqualified agreement to be bound to
the terms of the offer. If an offer is accepted according to its terms, mutual assent
has occurred.
Example:
Denise Chung said to her neighbor, Graham Spader, “I will sell you my old
lawn mower for $100.” Graham replied, “I like your lawn mower, so I will
buy it for $100.”
Analysis:
Denise’s statement to Graham was an offer, and Denise was the offeror.
Graham was the offeree. Graham’s reply was an acceptance of the offer.
Through their offer and acceptance, Denise and Graham expressed their
mutual assent to the terms of the contract.
Contractual Capacity
For an informal contract to be binding on the parties, the parties must have
contractual capacity—that is, they each must have the legal capacity to make a
contract. Individuals and insurance companies can enter into binding contracts,
but the criteria for determining contractual capacity are somewhat different for
individuals than for insurers and other corporations.
Example:
Caridad Mendoza, age 17, purchased a life insurance policy from Totem
Life Insurance Company and paid the initial premium. The minimum
permissible age to purchase life insurance in the jurisdiction in which
Caridad lives is 18 years.
Analysis:
Because Caridad is younger than the permissible age, this life insurance
policy is voidable by Caridad. She can reject the contract before she turns
18 or within a reasonable time afterward, and Totem must refund any
premiums she has paid. In contrast, as long as Caridad pays the premiums
for the policy, Totem is bound by the contract.
The person’s mental competence is impaired, but a court has not declared her
to be insane or mentally incompetent. For example, the person can be mentally
impaired as a result of being intoxicated or mentally ill. Contracts entered
into by such a person are generally voidable by that person. If the person later
regains mental competence, she may either reject the contract or require that
it be carried out. In contrast, the other party to the contract does not have the
right to reject the contract and must carry out its terms if required to do so.
Lawful Purpose
No contract can be made for a purpose that is illegal or against the public inter-
est—a contract is valid only if it is made for a lawful purpose. For example, all
jurisdictions have laws that make certain acts punishable as crimes. An agreement
between two parties to commit a criminal act, such as an agreement to kill an
individual in exchange for money, is not legally enforceable.
As we mentioned in Chapter 1, early life insurance policies were sometimes
used to gamble on an individual’s life. As a result, many jurisdictions enacted
Example:
Harvey Atkinson purchased a life insurance policy insuring his wife, Lily.
Harvey and Lily divorced several years later.
Analysis:
As Lily’s spouse, Harvey had an insurable interest in her life when the
policy was issued. Therefore, the policy remains valid and in effect as
long as premiums continue to be paid even if Harvey no longer has an
insurable interest in Lily’s life.
Mutual Assent
Contractual Capacity
Lawful Purpose
Key Terms
contract voidable contract
group policyholder mutual assent
formal contract offer
informal contract acceptance
bilateral contract contractual capacity
unilateral contract minor
commutative contract consideration
aleatory contract initial premium
conditional promise renewal premium
bargaining contract property
contract of adhesion real property
valid contract personal property
void contract ownership of property
Endnote
1. The general rule that a minor’s contract is voidable by the minor has some exceptions. One important
exception is that a minor’s contract for necessaries, which are goods and services that a minor requires
for her well-being, is valid and binding on both parties.
Chapter 4
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
4A Define policy reserves and explain the premises of the legal reserve
system
4B Define premium rate and calculate the annual premium amount for a
given life insurance policy
4C Explain how actuaries account for the cost of benefits, operating
expenses, and investment earnings in developing premium rates
4D Explain how insurers use mortality tables in pricing products and
describe the effect that mortality rates have on the cost of benefits and
the premium rate for a block of policies
4E Describe the effect of compound interest on investment earnings and
calculate the amount of interest earned on a given sum of money
4F Explain the purpose of using conservative values in financial models
4G Explain how the level premium system operates
Outline
The Legal Reserve System The Level Premium System
Establishing Premium Rates
Cost of Benefits
Operating Expenses
Investment Earnings
Financial Models
S
uppose you have just purchased a life insurance policy and made your ini-
tial premium payment. How did the insurance company decide what the
policy’s premium would be? And assuming that your policy has renewal
premiums, how did the company come up with an amount for those as well?
To determine the proper premiums to charge, insurers employ specialists
known as actuaries. An actuary is an expert in financial risk management and
the mathematics and modeling of insurance, annuities, and financial instruments.
In insurance companies, actuaries are responsible for ensuring that products are
financially sound and profitable. Actuaries accomplish this dual objective by
establishing for every product a premium rate that will enable the company to
both cover its costs of developing and administering the product and generate a
reasonable profit for the company and its owners.
Unlike previous chapters, which applied to a broader spectrum of life and
health insurance products, this chapter focuses on life insurance products.
Example:
An insurer may classify into one block all term life insurance policies to
be issued to male tobacco nonusers, age 35, with no significant medical
history.
Example:
The annual premium rate for a $500,000 life insurance policy is expressed
as $4 per $1,000 of coverage.
Analysis:
The annual premium amount for the policy is $2,000, which is calculated
as follows:
LEARNING AID
Annual Premium
Premium Rate Amount
Number of Units
(Payment per Unit × ($1,000 of Coverage)
=
(Customer’s Annual
per Year)
Payment)
500, found as
$4 × ($500,000 ÷ $1,000)
= $2,000
Note that other factors, such as the application of policy fees and policy dividends,
may affect the premium amount actually charged to a policyowner.
Cost of Benefits
The cost of benefits, sometimes known as the cost of insurance, is the value of
all the contractually required benefits a product promises to pay. For a given life
insurance product, the projected cost of benefits generally equals the sum of all
the potential benefit payments under the product multiplied by the probability that
each benefit will be payable. We can express the projected cost of a given benefit
as follows:
Projected cost of a Potential benefit Probability that the
given benefit = amount payable × benefit will be payable
The primary policy benefit payable by an insurer when an insured dies while
the policy is in force is the death benefit. Insurers determine the probability that
death benefits will be payable in a given year by referring to mortality tables,
which estimate the mortality rate for a given group of insureds.
The cost of benefits for a group of insureds depends in part on the mortality rate:
In general, the higher the mortality rate for a group of insureds of the same age
and sex, the higher the cost of benefits and, thus, the higher the premium rate.
Conversely, the lower the mortality rate for a group of insureds of the same
age and sex, the lower the cost of benefits and the lower the premium rate.
Because life expectancy and mortality rates vary widely from one country to
another, insurers usually rely on mortality tables developed for use in a particular
country. Figure 4.1 illustrates a portion of a mortality table.
Mortality Rate
Age Number Living Number Dying
per 1,000
59 100,000 1,100 11
60 98,900 1,200 12
61 97,700 1,300 13
The group of males age 59 begins the year with 100,000 members. During the year, 1,100 of the
men are expected to die. The mortality rate during the year is 11 per 1,000, calculated by dividing
the number dying at age 59 by the number living at age 59 at the beginning of the year.
According to this mortality table, 11 out of every 1,000 men are expected to die after attaining age
59 but before attaining age 60.
We can check this number—the 1,100 dying during their 59th year—by subtracting it from 100,000,
the number of men expected to be alive at the beginning of their 59th year. This calculation should
give us the number of men expected to be alive at the beginning of their 60th year:
Most mortality tables are known as sex-distinct mortality tables because they
contain separate statistics for males and females. In contrast, other mortality
tables, known as unisex mortality tables, show a single set of mortality rates to be
used for both males and females.
Mortality statistics show that, at nearly all ages, females have lower mortality
rates than males of the same age. To reflect this difference, most insurers set lower
life insurance premium rates for equivalent coverage for women than for men of
the same age and underwriting risk. Figure 4.2 shows the differences in average
life expectancies at birth by country and by sex, as of 2013.
Most mortality tables that insurers use to price products divide the mortality
rates into two additional categories: tobacco users and tobacco nonusers. In other
words, sex-distinct mortality tables often show mortality rates for four catego-
ries of people: male tobacco users, male tobacco nonusers, female tobacco users,
and female tobacco nonusers. A mortality table that does not show separate mor-
tality rates for tobacco users and tobacco nonusers is referred to as a composite
mortality table. For the purpose of setting premium rates, mortality tables in some
countries, such as the United States and Canada, are also divided into even more
categories, such as preferred, standard, and substandard risk classifications.
Source: From Global Health Observatory Data Repository: Life expectancy—Data by country. http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.
main.688?lang=en Chapter 4. Figure 4.2. displayed as a chart showing Male and Female Life expectancy at Birth for countries
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Spain, United States
Operating Expenses
For life insurance companies, operating expenses are the costs of operations other
than expenses for contractual benefits, or the cost of benefits. In setting a premium
rate for a product, the insurer must estimate the expenses associated with develop-
ing the product, selling it, and supporting it over the years it is expected to remain
in force. Examples of these expenses include
Product development costs
Distribution and promotion costs
Payroll costs for staff, as well as employee benefit costs
The costs of providing customer service to policyowners, such as producing
and mailing account statements and answering customer service phone calls
The costs associated with maintaining the company’s offices and its computer
systems
In general, insurers spend considerably more on benefit payments to customers
than on their operating expenses. Figure 4.3 shows the typical portion of insurance
company expenses that was attributable to paying benefits and the portion that was
attributable to operating expenses.
A significant risk associated with an insurer’s operating expenses is that custom-
ers will terminate or reduce the value of a life insurance policy before the policy
becomes profitable. During the policy’s early years, the insurer incurs substantial
product expenses. Underwriting expenses and other expenses are incurred when
an insurer issues a policy. For example, insurers often pay a substantial portion of a
policy’s initial premium as a commission to the producer who sold the policy. Thus,
a policy generally must remain in force for several years for it to be profitable.
Operating
expenses
13%
Investment
expenses
1%
Taxes
3%
Additions to
policy reserves
17% Benefit
Payments
66%
Source: Adapted from ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015, Copyright © 2015 American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, DC,
(November 2015, 19,) 50 https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Documents/FB15_All.pdf
(15 February 2016). Used with permission.
Example:
The Reliable Insurance Company had a block of 10,000 life insurance
policies in force at the beginning of last year. During the year, 1,000 of the
policies lapsed.
Analysis:
For last year, the actual lapse rate for this block of policies was 10%, found
as follows:
1,000 lapses ÷ 10,000 policies in force = 10% lapse rate
If this 10% lapse rate exceeded the rate that Reliable’s actuaries built into
the product’s premium rate, Reliable may have lost money on this product.
Investment Earnings
In setting a product’s premium rate, an insurer must take into account investment
earnings—the money the insurer earns from investing the funds it receives from
customers. Many life insurance policies remain in force for a number of years
before benefits become payable. During that time, the funds paid for these policies
are available for the insurer to invest. The earnings on these investments allow
insurance companies to charge policyowners less than if companies relied solely
on the premiums and charges that policyowners paid.
As financial intermediaries, insurance companies invest the funds received
from customers in many different ways—in government and corporate bonds,
mortgages, real estate, and corporate stock. In fact, insurance companies can place
money in any safe investment that is likely to provide good earnings and is not
prohibited by government regulation.
Example:
Casper O’Hare loaned Riley Nugent $1,000 for two years at an annual
interest rate of 10%. Riley did not repay any of the principal or interest on
the loan for two years.
Analysis:
At the end of one year, Riley owed Casper $1,100, calculated as
$1,000 principal + ($1,000 principal × 0.10)
At the end of two years, Riley owed Casper another $100 in interest,
calculated as
$1,000 principal × 0.10 = $100
Therefore, at the end of the second year, Riley owed Casper a total of
$1,200, calculated as
$1,100 + $100
Calculating interest on both the principal and the accrued interest is called
compounding, and the interest in this case is called compound interest.
Today, the interest on most loans and investments is compound interest. When
interest is compounded, the interest earned each investment period is equal to the
accumulated balance at the beginning of the period multiplied by the interest rate.
The amount of interest earned that period is then added to the accumulated bal-
ance to determine the beginning balance on which interest will be paid during the
next period. In this way, interest is earned on both the original principal and on all
accumulated interest.
Example:
Olivia Sandoval loaned Shu-Ling Lee $1,000 at an interest rate of 10%,
compounded annually. Shu-Ling did not repay any of the principal or
interest on the loan for two years.
Analysis:
At the end of the first year, Shu-Ling owed Olivia $1,100, calculated as
At the end of the second year, Shu-Ling owed Olivia $110 in interest,
calculated as
Therefore, at the end of the second year, Shu-Ling owed Olivia a total of
$1,210, calculated as
$1,100 + $110
The interest in this example was compounded annually. However, interest can be
compounded with any frequency—quarterly, monthly, or daily, for example.
Although the additional $10 earned by compounding interest in the previous
example may seem small, over a long period of time, compounding interest has a
dramatic effect on the total amount of interest that is earned.
Example:
Kalinda Patel deposited $1,000 in a bank account that pays 5% simple
interest. She made no other deposits for the next 25 years.
Analysis:
After 25 years, Kalinda’s account earned $1,250 in simple interest ($50
× 25). Had her account paid compound rather than simple interest, she
would have earned a total of $2,386 in compound interest at the end of
the 25-year period.
The example of the bank account shows how much money a single amount
can earn over time. Many insurance policies require annual premium payments,
which usually allow the insurer to invest an additional amount from premiums
every year the policy remains in effect. Figure 4.4 shows the amount of money that
can be earned over various periods of time by investing $1,000 a year at 5 percent
interest, compounded annually.
$60,000
Principal +
Compound Interest
Principal
$50,000
Value of Investment
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
1 5 10 15 20 25
Number of Years
Value of Investment
1 year Principal $1,000 Interest $50 Total $1,050
5 years Principal $5,000 Interest $802 Total $5,802
10 years Principal $10,000 Interest $3,207 Total $13,207
15 years Principal $15,000 Interest $7,657 Total $22,657
20 years Principal $20,000 Interest $14,719 Total $34,719
25 years Principal $25,000 Interest $25,113 Total $50,113
Example:
Reliable Insurance Company purchased stock in the Mimosa Corporation
for $100,000. One year later, Reliable sold the Mimosa stock for $120,000.
Analysis:
Reliable earned a return of $20,000 on its investment ($120,000 - $100,000).
The percentage rate of return on the investment was 20% ($20,000 return
÷ $100,000 = 0.20 or 20%).
Financial Models
Actuaries need to be able to establish premium rates for products that will satisfy
the company’s objectives over the many years that the products are expected to be
in force. Product outcomes can vary, however, based on economic conditions, the
insurer’s claim experience, policy terminations, and other factors. Companies can
evaluate the potential effects of various future conditions on a product’s financial
values by using financial models. In general, a financial model is a computer-
based mathematical model that approximates the operation of real-world financial
processes. Companies use product development software that simulates the poten-
tial financial processes likely to occur over the time that a product is expected to
remain in force.
Examples of financial values that insurers use in modeling are values for inter-
est rates, mortality rates, expenses, and lapses. A typical financial model runs hun-
dreds or even thousands of scenarios, with each scenario representing a different
set of financial values that the product is likely to experience.
Insurers build into their financial models the risk that they will face unexpected
outcomes. One way they do this is by using projections that are designed to be
more than adequate; such projections are said to be conservative.
Conservative values for specific life insurance product elements generally take
the form of
Mortality rates that are higher than expected
Example:
An insurer may project mortality rates that are 10% higher than expected
to ensure that the premium rate for a product will be more than adequate.
Figure 4.5 Level Premiums Contrasted with One-Year Term Life Premiums
Age
Key Terms
actuary investment earnings
legal reserve system interest
policy reserves principal
block of policies simple interest
premium rate compounding
cost of benefits compound interest
death benefit rate of return
operating expenses financial model
lapse level premium system
lapse rate
Chapter 5
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
5A Identify the common personal and business needs that life insurance
can meet
5B Describe the coverage provided by level term, decreasing term, and
increasing term life insurance policies, and explain when the premium
charged for term life insurance coverage may increase
5C Describe renewable term life insurance and convertible term life
insurance
5D Describe the operation of a return of premium (ROP) term policy
Outline
Needs Met by Life Insurance Term Life Insurance
Personal Needs Characteristics of Term Life
Business Needs Insurance Products
Plans of Term Life Insurance
Coverage
Features of Term Life Insurance
Policies
I
n this chapter, we describe various types of term life insurance products. Term
life insurance is distinct in that it remains in force for a specific period of time,
rather than for the entire life of the insured. Why would a person choose to be
covered for only a portion of her life? It depends on what her needs are.
Many products, life insurance included, meet different needs for different peo-
ple. One clear example is the automobile. One person might purchase a vehicle
with four-wheel drive and high ground clearance to carry heavy loads over dirt
roads. Another may need a small, fuel-efficient vehicle for an urban commute—
until she starts a family, when she decides a larger vehicle with comprehensive
safety features is more important. Financial products such as life insurance also
cover a wide variety of needs. A person’s financial needs can be very different
from his neighbor’s. They can even be very different from what his needs were
when he was younger, or what his needs will be in the future.
Personal Needs
People’s needs for life insurance coverage vary greatly, but most buyers share a
number of common reasons to purchase life insurance. Among the most common
of these needs are dependents’ support, paying debts and final expenses, and estate
planning.
Dependents’ Support
If a person who supports or helps support a family dies, the surviving dependents
may face serious problems after the person’s death. Household expenses persist;
rent or mortgage payments still come due; utility bills continue to arrive; food and
clothing remain necessities. The death may create additional expenses, such as the
need to provide child care or household upkeep. To make matters worse, surviving
family members often must make difficult financial decisions while they are still
coping with the emotional effects of the loss of a loved one.
Many people save money for unexpected expenses. But relatively few have
sufficient funds to pay their usual expenses for an extended period of time if the
regular family income is reduced substantially or ceases altogether. Even those
who possess sufficient savings may worry that using those savings to pay house-
hold expenses will make it more difficult for them to meet future financial needs,
such as providing for retirement.
Life insurance can provide funds to support dependents until they obtain new
methods of support or adjust to living on a lower income. It also can fund the edu-
cation of the insured’s dependents.
Example:
Derek Chau purchased a $250,000 life insurance policy. At the time of
his death, he had a wife, Kelly—the policy beneficiary—and two teenage
children.
Analysis:
The policy was in force upon Derek’s death, so the insurer paid $250,000
to Kelly. Kelly used $15,000 of the proceeds to pay Derek’s final expenses
and put $100,000 toward college funds for the children. She placed the
remaining $135,000 in the bank to help her make mortgage payments
and cover household expenses for the next few years.
In many jurisdictions, when an insurer pays the death benefit of a life insurance
policy in a lump sum to a beneficiary following the death of the insured, that ben-
efit usually is not considered taxable income to the beneficiary. Regulators provide
this tax benefit to encourage people to protect their dependents with life insurance.
By doing so, they hope to lessen potential reliance on government aid.
Example:
Monica LeBeau died with a will in place and an estate worth $600,000,
including a home worth $200,000. She also had $120,000 in final expenses,
mortgage debt, and credit card debt. Her will specified that her oldest
child, Reba, would receive the family home, and the remainder of her
estate would be divided between her two younger children, Ben and Luke.
Analysis:
Monica’s executor paid off her debts from her estate. After the debts
were settled, the remaining estate was worth $480,000, including the
home. Reba received the home, and Ben and Luke divided the remaining
$280,000 worth of Monica’s estate between them.
If Monica’s final expenses and debt had been $420,000, the executor
would not have been able to pay them out of her estate without selling
the family home, and Monica would not have been able to leave the home
to Reba.
However, if a life insurance policy is included in the deceased’s estate plan, the
proceeds can help pay those remaining debts. The personal representative then can
distribute the deceased’s assets in accordance with the deceased’s wishes.
In some cases, other people, such as a spouse or parent, may be personally
liable for a particular debt of the deceased. For example, a spouse or parent may
have co-signed a loan with the deceased and be jointly liable with the deceased
for its repayment. Insurance benefits can help pay off any such debts, easing the
burden on the deceased’s loved ones.
Figure 5.1 describes some methods for determining how much life insurance an
individual should purchase.
Business Needs
Businesses also have needs that life insurance can meet. Two common reasons for
a business—or an individual who owns a business—to purchase life insurance are
(1) to provide funds to ensure that the business continues in the event of the death
or disability of an owner, partner, or other key person, and (2) to provide benefits
for its employees.
The loss of a key person’s expertise and services may seriously affect the com-
pany’s earnings. During the period following the death of a key person, sales may
drop off, and morale and productivity can decline. Creditors, customers, and sup-
pliers may become uneasy. The business almost certainly incurs the cost of finding
or training a replacement for the key person. Key person life insurance helps offset
those costs. In addition, if the company’s creditors, customers, and suppliers know
that the business has protected itself by insuring the lives of its key employees,
they may be more confident about the company’s future.
Example:
Electric Galaxy Software Solutions considers its owners and executives to
be key persons. It also identifies its lead software engineer, Rebecca Sloe,
as a key person. Rebecca is well-known in the industry for her innovative
work. The business purchases key person life insurance on Rebecca as well
as on its owners and executives.
Analysis:
If Rebecca were to die, the proceeds from her policy would provide a
source of cash to supplement the company’s earnings while it searches for
and trains a replacement for her. In addition, if Electric Galaxy’s customers
and suppliers know about the key person life insurance, they may be more
confident about the company’s future and may agree to continue their
business relationships with Electric Galaxy on the same basis as before
Rebecca’s death.
Buy-Sell Agreements
The owner of a small business may want to ensure that the business can continue
to operate under new ownership after his death. A buy-sell agreement is an agree-
LEARNING AID ment in which (1) one party agrees to purchase the financial interest that a second
party has in a business following the second party’s death, and (2) the second party
agrees to direct his estate to sell his interest in the business to the purchasing party.
One or more of the parties to a buy-sell agreement often purchase life insurance
to fund the buy-sell agreement. Life insurance can be used to fund buy-sell agree-
ments for sole proprietorships, partnerships, or corporations with a small number
of shareholders.
Example:
Emmett Jackson is the sole owner of Reliable & Timely Services. Emmett
entered into a buy-sell agreement with one of his employees, Kareena
Singh. Under the agreement’s terms, Kareena agreed to buy the business
for $1,000,000 in the event of Emmett’s death. She purchased a $1,000,000
life insurance policy on Emmett’s life, naming herself as the beneficiary.
Analysis:
Should Emmett die, the proceeds of the life insurance policy would be
paid to Kareena. Kareena could use the proceeds to purchase Reliable &
Timely Services from Emmett’s estate, which has been directed to sell the
business to Kareena in this situation.
Employee Benefits
Many businesses provide various financial products, including life insurance, for
their employees as an employee benefit. These compensation packages enable
businesses to attract and retain qualified personnel. Many employers provide
health insurance and retirement plans, which we’ll explore later in the text; group
term life insurance is also very common, as we’ll discuss below.
20 Year 1990 1995 1999 2001 2005 2008 2010 2012 2014 2015
1 Year 62 37 13 9 5 7 6 7 6 6
10 Year 9 14 21 23 20 18 16 19 20 21
20 Year 1 3 18 35 38 41 36 39 37 38
Other 28 46 48 33 37 34 42 35 37 35
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Source: LIMRA’s U.S. Individual Life Buyer Study and Quarterly Individual Life Sales Survey.
Another common type of term insurance policy covers the insured until she
reaches a specified age, usually age 65 or 70. For example, a term insurance policy
that covers an insured until age 65 is referred to as term to age 65. However, the
policy does not expire on the actual date when the insured reaches the specific age.
Instead, the policy’s coverage expires on the policy anniversary that falls either
closest to, or immediately after, the insured person’s 65th birthday, depending on
the terms of the policy.
Example:
Twin brothers Alex and Byron Freeman were born on September 4, 1980.
Both purchased term to age 65 policies, effective on the same day, July 7,
2011. Alex’s coverage expires on the policy anniversary closest to his 65th
birthday, while Byron’s expires on the policy anniversary immediately after
his 65th birthday. Both plan to pay all renewal premiums as they come
due.
Analysis:
Alex’s policy will expire on July 7, 2045, the anniversary date closest to his
65th birthday of September 4, 2045. Byron’s policy will expire on July 7,
2046, the first policy anniversary immediately after his 65th birthday.
erm
Level Term De c in gT
r ea r eas
sing I nc
Ter
$
$
m
Benefit Premium
Example:
Andrea Kovachev owns a 10-year level term policy that provides $250,000
of coverage. The initial premium was $500, and the policy features level
premiums.
Analysis:
The insurer agrees to pay $250,000 if Andrea dies at any time during the
10-year period that the policy is in force. Each renewal premium also will
be $500 throughout the policy term.
The renewal premiums for a decreasing term policy usually remain the same
throughout the policy term. However, they are usually less than the renewal pre-
miums for a comparable level term policy.
Decreasing term policies are typically designed to meet specific needs that
decrease over a period of time. For example, many people borrow money to pur-
chase houses or cars, and as they repay those loans, their liabilities decrease. Sim-
ilarly, a family’s expenses decrease as children grow up and move away from
home. A decreasing term policy usually is specifically intended to shield depen-
dents from inherited debts such as a mortgage, car payments, or credit card debts.
Three common plans of decreasing term insurance are mortgage life insurance,
credit life insurance, and family income insurance.
Example:
When Hector Ruiz purchased his home, he also bought a mortgage life
insurance policy from Enduring Life Insurance Company. Hector named
his wife, Alisa, as beneficiary.
Anna Zolkozky purchased a house at the same time and applied for
a mortgage loan from Grandiose Banking. As a condition of the loan,
Grandiose required Anna to purchase a mortgage life insurance policy
naming Grandiose as the beneficiary, and to maintain the coverage during
the mortgage term. Anna purchased her policy from Enduring Life.
Seven years later, both Hector and Anna died, and the death benefit on
each of their mortgage life insurance policies was $120,000.
Analysis:
In both cases, Enduring Life was obligated to pay the $120,000 to the
beneficiary. In Hector’s case, his beneficiary, Alisa, could use the benefit
to pay off the remaining balance on the mortgage loan or put it toward
another purpose, such as a college fund for their children. As the
beneficiary of Anna’s policy, Grandiose used the benefit to pay off her
mortgage.
Many mortgage loans are obtained jointly by two people, both of whose
incomes are required to make the monthly mortgage payments. For that reason,
insurers offer joint mortgage life insurance, which provides the same benefit as
a mortgage life insurance policy except the joint policy insures the lives of two
people. If both insureds survive until the end of the policy term, the joint mortgage
life policy expires. But if one of the insureds dies while the policy is in force, the
insurer pays the death benefit to the beneficiary, who typically is the surviving
insured. Again, the beneficiary is not required to use the benefit to pay off the
mortgage.
Example:
Kofi and Jenna Morant purchased a joint mortgage life policy soon after
buying their house. Kofi named Jenna as his beneficiary, and Jenna named
Kofi as hers.
Analysis:
If Kofi dies while the policy is in force, the insurer will pay an amount equal
to the mortgage loan’s balance to Jenna. If Jenna dies instead, the insurer
pays the amount to Kofi. Either one would be free to use the benefit
amount to pay off the remaining balance on the mortgage loan or to use
it for other purposes.
Example:
Arnold Kim purchased 10-year family income coverage that provides for
a $1,000 monthly income benefit payable to his wife, Nari. His coverage
specifies that the income benefit will be paid for at least 3 years if he dies
during the 10-year term of coverage.
Analysis:
If Arnold dies 2 years after buying the family income coverage, the insurer
will pay to Nari a total of $96,000 in monthly income benefits ($1,000 x
8 years x 12 months). If he dies 8 years after buying the coverage, the
insurer will pay the monthly income benefit for 3 years, for a total of
$36,000 ($1,000 x 3 years x 12 months). If he dies 11 years after purchasing
the coverage, no monthly income benefit would be paid because the
coverage expired a year before his death.
Example:
Ten years ago, Maria Donato purchased a ten-year renewable term policy
from Wellbeing First Insurance Company. Eight years ago, she began
smoking again, and three years ago she was placed under observation for
cardiac arrhythmia.
Analysis:
Maria may renew her term insurance policy by paying the required renewal
premium. Ordinarily, Wellbeing First would have declined an application
for insurance from an applicant with Maria’s health history at the time of
renewal. But the renewal provision of Maria’s policy gives her the right to
renew without proof that she continues to be an insurable risk.
Example:
Douglas Woo purchased a 10-year renewable term life insurance policy
on his wife Ellen, age 36. The policy states that coverage is not renewable
after the insured has reached the age of 65. The policy’s annual premium
is $260.
Analysis:
On the policy anniversary at the end of the first 10-year term, Douglas
has the right to renew Ellen’s coverage without Ellen having to provide
evidence of insurability. The coverage will be for the same face amount
as the original policy and for the same 10-year term. The new premium
amount, however, will increase to reflect Ellen’s attained age at the time of
renewal—age 46. Douglas will pay this higher premium each year during
the 10-year renewal period. At the end of the second 10-year period,
he will have the option to renew the policy again, but the premiums will
increase a second time to reflect Ellen’s attained age of 56. At the end of
the third 10-year period, he will no longer be able to renew this policy, as
it will be the policy anniversary date after her 65th birthday.
The renewal feature can lead to some antiselection; insureds in poor health are
more likely to renew their policies because they may not be able to obtain other life
insurance. Because of this risk, the premium for a renewable term life insurance
policy usually is slightly higher than the premium for a comparable nonrenewable
term life insurance policy.
Most one-year term insurance policies and riders are yearly renewable term
(YRT) insurance or annually renewable term (ART) insurance, which means they
are renewable each year for a stated number of years. Yearly renewable term poli-
cies typically are renewable for periods of 10 to 30 years, depending on the age of
the insured. As the insured ages, however, the renewal premiums for YRT cover-
age can become considerably more expensive than premiums for comparable 5- or
10-year level premium policies. For that reason, most renewable term insurance
policies sold today have policy terms of from 5 to 30 years. Figure 5.4 illustrates
the difference in premium costs between a YRT policy, a 5-year term policy, and
a 30-year term policy as an insured ages.
Figure 5.4 Relative Premium Costs of a YRT Policy, a 5-Year Term Policy,
and a 30-Year Term Policy
1,200
1,000
Premium
800
600
400
200
35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Age
When a term insurance policy is converted to a cash value policy, the new
premium rate is higher than the premium rate the policyowner paid for the term
insurance policy. This increase is required because the premium charged for a
cash value life insurance policy is higher than the premium charged for a compa-
rable term insurance policy. However, the premium a policyowner is charged for
the cash value policy cannot be based on any increase in the insured’s mortality
risk, except with regard to an increase in the insured’s age.
Insurers can use two different types of conversions. The more common conver-
sion is known as an attained age conversion, in which the premium rate for the
cash value policy is based on the insured’s age at the time the policy is converted.
Alternately, under an original age conversion, the premium rate for the cash value
policy is based on the insured’s age when the original term policy was issued.
The renewal premium rate charged for cash value insurance is lower under an
original age conversion than under an attained age conversion. This difference
occurs because the premium rate is based on a younger age. For that reason, you
would think that a policyowner would always prefer an original age conversion to
an attained age conversion. However, under an original age conversion, the poli-
cyowner also must pay an additional lump sum at the time a policy is converted.
The lump sum is based on the difference between the lower premiums the
policyowner actually paid for the term insurance policy and the higher premiums
that he would have paid if he had purchased a cash value policy originally. This
lump sum can be substantial, and as a result, attained age conversion is much more
common than original age conversion.
Example:
Henrik Swenson bought a convertible term life policy at age 35 and
converted it to a cash value policy at age 39, using an attained age
conversion. Constance Braddock also bought a convertible term life policy
at age 35, and converted it to a cash value policy at age 39, but her policy
used an original age conversion.
Analysis:
At conversion, the insurer charges Henrik the same premium it would
charge a 39-year-old man for a comparable cash value policy. Constance’s
insurer charges her the same premium rate it would charge for a
comparable cash value policy issued to a 35-year-old woman. However,
her insurer also requires a lump sum payment based on the difference
between the premiums she paid for the last four years and the premiums
she would have paid if she had purchased a cash value policy.
Like the renewal feature, the conversion privilege can lead to some antiselec-
tion. Insureds in poor health are more likely to convert their coverage because
they may not be able to obtain other life insurance, or the premium rate for a new
policy would be prohibitively expensive. As a result, insurers usually charge a
higher premium rate for a convertible term policy than they charge for a compa-
rable nonconvertible term policy. In addition, insurers usually limit the conversion
privilege in some way. For instance, some policies do not permit conversion after
the insured has attained a specific age, such as 55 or 65, or after the term policy has
been in force for a specified time. For example, a 10-year term policy may permit
conversion only during the first 7 or 8 years of the term. In many cases, insurers
place additional limits on original age conversions. Under a 20-year term policy,
an insurer might permit an attained age conversion for the first 10 years of the
policy term, but permit an original age conversion only during the first 5 years of
the policy term.
Example:
Helene Nikos, age 38, is the policyowner-insured of a $500,000 30-year
ROP term policy from Azure Insurance. Helene paid all the required annual
premiums of $1,150 and was alive when the policy expired.
Analysis:
Azure would return to Helene the premiums she has paid for the coverage,
a total of $34,500 ($1,150 x 30 years).
Some ROP term policies provide a partial return of premiums if the policy is
kept in force for a stated period of time but then canceled before the end of the
term. The longer these policies are kept in force, the greater the percentage of the
premium that is returned. Under such a policy, if the insured dies during the policy
term, the beneficiary receives the death benefit only; there is no additional partial
return of premiums.
Most insurers offer ROP term policies for terms of only 15 years or longer. The
premium for an ROP term policy varies by insurer. The premium is usually more
than 25 percent higher than for a comparable term policy without a return of pre-
mium feature, and sometimes as much as three times as high.
Renewability, convertibility, and return of premium features are of obvious
potential value to the policyowner, but they also are of value to the insurance
company. Most policyowners who renew or convert their term life insurance poli-
cies do so not because they are in poor health, but because they want to continue
their insurance protection. Regulatory changes have led to fewer insurers in the
United States carrying the return of premium feature, but this feature also gives
policyowners substantial motivation to keep a policy in effect.
Key Terms
estate family income coverage
will policy rider
estate plan family income policy
business continuation insurance plan increasing term life insurance
key person renewable term insurance policy
key person life insurance evidence of insurability
buy-sell agreement renewal provision
face amount attained age
policy term yearly renewable term (YRT) insurance
policy anniversary convertible term insurance policy
level term life insurance conversion privilege
decreasing term life insurance attained age conversion
mortgage life insurance original age conversion
joint mortgage life insurance return of premium (ROP) term
credit life insurance insurance
Endnotes
1. ACLI, Life Insurers Factbook 2015 (Washington, DC: American Council of Life Insurers, 2015), 64,
https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Pages/RP15-010.
aspx (30 August 2016).
2. The term “mortgage insurance” is sometimes used to refer to a type of property/casualty insurance
more commonly referred to as private mortgage insurance (PMI) or lenders mortgage insurance
(LMI). PMI is insurance that pays the lender if the borrower fails to make mortgage payments as
required. PMI is not a form of life insurance.
3. Some insurers offer an alternative to the family income policy called a family maintenance policy,
which is a cash value life insurance policy that contains a level-term monthly income benefit rider.
If the insured dies during the term of the monthly income benefit rider, the beneficiary receives
monthly income payments for a fixed number of years. For example, assume that an insured pur-
chased a family maintenance policy with a 10-year term that provides for $1,000 monthly payments.
If the insured dies during that 10-year term, the beneficiary would receive both the death benefit and
a $1,000 monthly benefit for a total of 10 years, regardless of whether the insured dies in the first year
or the 10th year of the policy. If the insured dies after the 10-year term expires, no monthly benefits
are payable, but the beneficiary still receives the death benefit, as long as the policy remains in force.
4. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures the change in the price of a fixed list of items (a “basket
of goods”) bought by a typical consumer. The goods included in the CPI include food, transportation,
housing, utilities, clothing, and medical care.
Chapter 6
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
6A Define cash value life insurance and distinguish it from term life
insurance
6B Identify the common characteristics of whole life insurance, modified
whole life insurance, and joint whole life insurance, and describe the
features that differentiate these types of whole life insurance
6C Explain how universal life insurance differs from whole life insurance
in terms of its separate policy elements and its flexible face amount,
death benefit, and premiums
6D Explain how indexed universal life insurance differs from universal life
insurance
6E Describe how variable life insurance allows policyowners to decide
how their premiums and cash values are invested
6F Describe the features that variable universal life insurance products
share with universal life insurance and variable life insurance products
6G Describe the characteristics of endowment insurance
Outline
Whole Life Insurance Flexibility Features
Premium Payment Periods Periodic Statements
Modified Whole Life Insurance Indexed Universal Life Insurance
Whole Life Insurance Covering
Variable Life Insurance
More Than One Insured
Variable Universal Life Insurance
Universal Life Insurance
Separation of Policy Elements Endowment Insurance
Operation of a Universal Life
Insurance Policy
W
hile term life insurance policies meet many specific financial needs,
they are limited in their ability to meet other needs, such as contribut-
ing to long-term savings. Therefore, insurance companies also offer
cash value life insurance products. As you may recall from Chapter 1, cash value
life insurance has two characteristics that distinguish it from term life insurance.
First, cash value life insurance provides insurance coverage for the entire lifetime
of the insured, as long as the policy remains in force. Second, cash value life insur-
ance provides a savings element, known as the cash value, that a policyowner can
use to meet financial needs during the insured’s lifetime.
The various types of cash value life insurance accounted for nearly two-thirds
of individual life insurance policies sold in the United States in 2014.1 Figure 6.1
shows the trends in recent years in U.S. life insurance sales among the various
types of insurance by premium dollars.
While cash value life insurance is designed for long-term financial needs, it
can also be useful in the short term. The owner of a policy that has accumulated
a cash value can use the cash value as security for a policy loan from the insurer.
If the insured dies before a policy loan is repaid, however, the unpaid amount
of the loan—plus any interest outstanding—is subtracted from the death benefit.
Alternatively, the policyowner can use the cash value as collateral for a loan from
another financial institution.
A policyowner can also surrender—or terminate—a cash value policy for its
cash value during the insured’s lifetime. If a policyowner chooses not to keep
a cash value life insurance policy in force until the insured’s death, the insurer
agrees to pay the cash surrender value to the policyowner. The cash surrender
value is the amount that a policyowner is entitled to receive upon surrendering the
policy, before adjustments for factors such as policy loans and applicable charges.
Other terms for the cash surrender value are the surrender value or surrender
benefit.
Cash surrender values and policy loans are discussed in more detail in Chapter 8.
As you can see, the savings element of a cash value policy can offer useful
financial options. In addition, in the United States, while the policy remains in
force, the government does not collect income tax on interest or other earnings
credited to the policy’s cash value, nor does it collect income tax on funds bor-
rowed from the cash value through a policy loan.2 Further financial advantages of
a cash value policy depend on the type of cash value life insurance a person owns.
90
Whole life
Term life
80
Universal life
Variable life
Percentage of Total Premium Sold 70
Variable
universal life
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1984 1994 2004 2014
YEAR
•• 1984: Whole life 55%, Term life 12%, Universal life 30%, Variable life 3%,
Variable universal life 0%.
•• 1994: Whole life 48%, Term life 14%, Universal life 22%, Variable Life 3%,
Variable universal life 13%.
•• 2004: Whole life 24%, Term life 23%, Universal life 37%, Variable Life 1%,
Variable universal life 15%.
•• 2014: Whole life 35%, Term life 21%, Universal life 37%, Variable Life <½%,
Variable universal life 7%.
Source: Adapted from Ashley V. Durham and Benjamin Baldwin, U.S. Individual Life Insurance Sales Trends, 1975–2014
(Windsor, CT: LL Global, Inc., © 2015). Used with permission; all rights reserved.
Note that the term whole life is not used consistently in the insurance industry.
Sometimes, whole life refers to the broad classification of insurance products that
are considered to be cash value life insurance. However, this text uses whole life to
refer to a specific type of cash value life insurance product.
The size of a whole life insurance policy’s cash value at any given time depends
on a number of factors, such as the policy’s face amount, the length of time the
policy has been in force, and the length of the policy’s premium payment period.
Depending on factors that we discuss later in this chapter, a life insurance policy’s
face amount may or may not be the same as its death benefit.
Most whole life policies do not accumulate a cash value until the policy has
been in effect for a minimum length of time, typically two or three years. The cash
value then increases throughout the life of the policy, slowly at first, and then more
rapidly in later years. During the policy’s early years, the cash value is less than
the policy’s reserve, which is also increasing over time. Eventually, at the last year
of the mortality table used to calculate premiums for that policy, both the reserve
and the cash value equal the face amount of the policy. At that point, the insurer
typically pays the face amount of the policy to the policyowner, even if the insured
is still living.
A whole life insurance policy includes a table that illustrates how the policy’s
cash value grows over time. Figure 6.2 provides an example of a table of cash values.
Continuous-Premium Policies
Most whole life insurance policies sold today are continuous-premium whole life
policies. Under a continuous-premium whole life insurance policy (sometimes
referred to as a straight life insurance policy or an ordinary life insurance policy),
premiums are payable until the death of the insured. Because premiums are pay-
able over the life of the policy, the amount of each premium payment required for a
continuous-premium whole life policy is lower than the premium amount required
under any other premium payment schedule for a whole life policy.
Limited-Payment Policies
A limited-payment whole life insurance policy is a whole life policy for which
premiums are payable only for a stated period of time or until the insured’s death,
whichever occurs first. Many limited-payment policies provide for premiums to
be payable for a specific number of years. For example, a 20-payment whole life
insurance policy is a policy for which premiums are payable for 20 years. Other
limited-payment policies provide for premiums to be payable until the insured
reaches a specified age. For instance, a paid-up-at-age-65 whole life insurance
policy provides that premiums are payable until the insured reaches the policy
* This table assumes premiums have been paid to the end of the policy year shown. These values do not include
any dividend accumulations, paid-up additions, or policy loans.
Example:
Ellen Yelk, who was born on January 6, 1973, purchased a paid-up-at-
age-65 whole life policy with a policy date of February 1, 2015. According
to the terms of Ellen’s policy, premiums are payable until she reaches the
policy anniversary nearest her 65th birthday.
Analysis:
Ellen’s last premium payment will be on February 1, 2038, the policy
anniversary nearest her 65th birthday. At that time, if Ellen has made all
required premium payments, she will have a paid-up policy that requires
no further premium payments and will provide life insurance coverage for
the rest of her life.
Single-Premium Policies
A single-premium whole life insurance policy is a type of limited-payment pol-
icy that requires only one premium payment. The single premium is substantially
larger than premiums for most limited-payment policies, and a sizable cash value
is available immediately on any single-premium policy.
Example:
Ahmad Brooks, a 50-year-old male, purchases a whole life policy insuring
his own life with a single premium of $50,000. The insurer calculates his
death benefit to be $200,000.
Analysis:
Ahmad’s policy will be in force until his death, and no other premiums are
required to prevent the policy from lapsing. In addition, Ahmad’s policy
has a cash value that is available immediately, allowing him to take out
policy loans or withdraw a portion of the cash value without waiting for
the cash value to build over time.
under which either (1) the amount of the premium payments required changes
at some point during the life of the policy or (2) the face amount of the coverage
changes during the life of the policy.
Modified Premiums
A modified-premium whole life insurance policy is a policy for which the annual
premium amount changes after a specified initial period (typically 5 or 10 years).
The initial annual premium for a modified-premium policy is less than the initial
annual premium for a similar continuous-premium whole life policy. After the
specified period, the annual premium for a modified-premium policy increases to
an amount that is somewhat higher than the usual (nonmodified) premium would
have been. This new increased annual premium is then payable for as long as the
policy remains in force.
The face amount of a modified-premium whole life policy remains level
throughout the life of the policy. For example, a $100,000 continuous-premium
whole life policy issued on the life of a 25-year-old man might have an annual
premium of $700. The annual premium for a modified-premium whole life policy
for the same face amount could be $420 for the first five years, with the premium
increasing to $900 per year thereafter for the rest of the life of the policy. Figure
6.3 illustrates this example.
So why would a person choose a modified-premium policy over a continu-
ous-premium policy of the same face amount? The primary advantage of a
modified-premium policy is that it allows a person to purchase a larger amount
of life insurance than he otherwise could afford. The premium payments become
larger later, presumably when the policyowner’s earnings have also increased. The
chief disadvantage of a modified-premium whole life policy is that the cash value
builds more slowly under this type of policy than it would under a continuous-
premium whole life policy.
Modified Coverage
Many people find that the amount of life insurance they need decreases as they
grow older. As a person grows older, she may pay off debts and mortgages, her
children may leave home, and her financial obligations may decrease. In addition,
she may have accumulated substantial savings and other assets over the years,
making it even less likely she needs the same amount of life insurance. A modified
coverage whole life insurance policy is a whole life policy under which the amount
of insurance provided decreases by specific percentages or amounts either when
the insured reaches certain stated ages or at the end of stated time periods. For
example, the face amount of a modified coverage whole life policy may begin at
$250,000, decrease to $150,000 when the insured reaches age 60, decrease further
to $100,000 at age 70, and then remain level for the rest of the insured’s lifetime.
The annual premium for a modified coverage whole life policy is lower than
for a continuous-premium whole life policy having the same initial face amount.
The reason for the lower premium is that during the period of the greatest risk of
death—the period when the insured is at an advanced age—the face amount of the
policy will be at its lowest level.
Continuous-
Premium
Policy
Premium (in dollars)
$900
900
$700
600
$420
300
Modified Premium Policy
0
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Age
Family Policies
Some insurers market a family policy, which is a whole life insurance policy that
includes term life insurance coverage on the insured’s spouse and children. The
amount of term insurance coverage provided on the insured’s spouse and children
is a fraction—generally one-fourth or one-fifth—of the amount of the insured’s
whole life insurance coverage.
Example:
Simon Park purchases a family policy with Flashstone Insurance to cover
himself, his wife Linda, and their two children. Simon is the primary insured,
and the family policy provides $100,000 of whole life coverage for Simon.
Analysis:
Assuming the policy remains in force, it will pay out $100,000 in the event
of Simon’s death. As the primary insured’s spouse, Linda has $25,000
of term insurance coverage (one-fourth of the amount of the coverage
on the primary insured). Each child also has $20,000 of term insurance
coverage (one-fifth of the amount of coverage on the primary insured).
Thus, this one family policy provides the Parks with $165,000 of life
insurance coverage.
Typically, the applicant for a family policy must provide evidence that all family
members are insurable. Once the policy is issued, however, each child born to or
adopted by the family thereafter is automatically covered by the policy, although
the additional term life coverage often is not effective until the child reaches age
15 days. Some insurers charge an additional premium for the additional coverage.
However, because mortality rates are low for children older than 15 days, some
family policies provide automatic coverage for additional children without any
additional premium charge.
Mortality Charges
The insurer periodically deducts a mortality charge from a universal life insur-
ance policy’s cash value. The mortality charge is the amount needed to cover the
mortality risk the insurer has assumed in issuing the policy. In other words, the
mortality charge is the actual cost of the life insurance coverage.4 For this reason,
some universal life policies refer to the mortality charge as the cost of insurance.
The amount of the mortality charge usually is based on the insured’s age, sex,
and risk classification, and this charge typically increases each year as the insured
ages. Universal life policies guarantee that the mortality charge will never exceed
a stated maximum amount. In addition, these policies usually provide that the
mortality charge will be less than the specified maximum if the insurance com-
pany’s mortality experience is more favorable than expected.
Universal life policies express the mortality charge as a charge per thousand
dollars of net amount at risk. A life insurance policy’s net amount at risk is the
amount of the insurer’s funds that would be required at any given time to pay the
policy death benefit. Although the net amount at risk for most life insurance poli-
cies at any given time is equal to the policy’s face amount minus its reserve, the
net amount at risk for a universal life insurance policy depends on whether the
death benefit payable is level or varies with changes in the policy’s cash value or
premiums paid. We discuss this topic in more detail later in this section.
Interest Rate
In the United States, universal life policies incorporate a guaranteed minimum
interest-crediting rate, which is the minimum interest rate that an insurer must
pay on a universal life policy’s cash value. The policy also provides that the insurer
will pay a higher interest rate if economic and competitive conditions warrant.
This rate, known as the current interest-crediting rate, is the rate of interest that
an insurer declares and pays on a universal life insurance policy’s cash value for a
specified period of time. Usually, the insurer bases the current interest rate on the
return that its own investments are earning. However, some policies state that the
current interest rate will be tied to the rate paid on a standard investment, such as
a specific type of government bond. The current interest-crediting rate is declared
annually, and guaranteed to never be below the guaranteed minimum interest-
crediting rate.
Expenses
Each universal life insurance policy lists the expense charges that the insurance
company will impose to cover the costs it incurs in connection with the policy.
Insurers commonly impose the following types of expense charges:
A percentage of each premium (such as 4 percent) to cover expenses
Specific charges for other services such as duplicate policy copies, coverage
changes, or policy withdrawals
INSURER
Premiums
n s ble
es
pe ca
E x p li
Ap
Interest
CASH VALUE
Ot
rg es Lo h
an e r C
C ha s , W ha
a l it y it h r g e s
d ra ,
M or t wa
ls
Flexibility Features
A universal life insurance policy gives the policyowner a great deal of flexibility,
both at the time of purchase and over the life of the policy. When he purchases
the policy, the policyowner decides, within certain limits, what the policy’s face
amount will be, the amount of the death benefit payable, and the amount of the pre-
miums he will pay for that coverage. The policyowner can change these amounts
during the life of the policy, but the insurer must approve certain types of changes.
Premiums
A universal life policy may feature either flexible premiums or fixed premiums.
A flexible-premium universal life insurance policy allows the policyowner to
alter the amount and frequency of premium payments, within specified limits.
Within these limits, the policyowner can determine how much to pay for the initial
premium and for each renewal premium. The insurer requires payment of at least a
stated minimum initial premium, and for administrative purposes, the insurer may
also impose a minimum limit on the size of any renewal premium payment. One
of the main advantages to flexible premiums is the ability to pay a larger premium
than required and directly add to the policy’s cash value. However, the insurer
must impose maximum limits on the amounts of the initial and renewal premi-
ums to ensure the policy meets the regulatory requirements described later in this
section. The policyowner has great flexibility in deciding when to pay renewal
premiums. As long as the policy’s cash value is large enough to pay the periodic
mortality and expense charges the insurer imposes, the policy remains in force
even if the policyowner does not pay renewal premiums.
A fixed-premium universal life insurance policy requires a series of sched-
uled premium payments of a specified amount for a specified length of time (typi-
cally 8 to 10 years) or until the insured’s death, whichever comes first. However,
the owner of a fixed-premium universal life policy does not have a paid-up policy
at the end of the premium payment period. Sometimes, a product’s actual experi-
ence is less favorable than the insurer projected when it designed the product. For
example, the insurer’s investments may earn a lower rate of return than the insurer
projected, which reduces the current interest rate the insurer pays on the product’s
cash values. If that occurs, a fixed-premium universal life policy’s cash value will
be lower than projected and may not be large enough to pay the periodic mortal-
ity and expense charges. If the cash value is not large enough to pay the periodic
charges, the policyowner must take action or the policy will lapse.
150
Face Amount (in thousands of dollars)
OPTION A PLAN
Death Benefit
Death benefit = Face amount Cash Value
0
0 10 20
Duration of Coverage
(
Face
Death benefit = amount ( ( (
+
Cash
value
100
Net amount at risk = Face amount
Death Benefit
Cash Value
50
0
0 10 20
Duration of Coverage
Periodic Statements
Because so many aspects of a universal life insurance policy change over the
course of a year, insurers send each policyowner an annual, semiannual, or quar-
terly statement containing the policy’s current values and benefits. Examples of
the values and benefits that typically appear in this report are the amount of the
death benefit, the amount of the policy’s cash value, the amount and type of any
charges deducted, and the amount of the premiums paid during the period.
The policyowner decides how to allocate premium payments between the two
types of accounts.
The crediting rate for the index account—known as the index crediting rate—
is subject to a guaranteed minimum crediting rate, typically called the floor or the
growth floor, and a maximum crediting rate, typically called the cap or the growth
cap. For IUL insurance, the floor limits the product’s investment risk, whereas the
cap limits the product’s growth potential.
The index performance rate is the change in the index’s value over the policy’s
index term. Most index terms are one year, though some insurers offer two-year,
three-year, or five-year terms. To determine the index crediting rate, the index
performance rate is multiplied by the participation rate, which is the percentage
of the index performance rate that is counted in calculating the crediting rate.
For example, a participation rate of 80 percent means that 80 percent of the index
performance rate is considered.
Example:
Joseph Madaki purchased an indexed universal life policy from Begemot
Insurance with a starting cash value of $10,000 in the index account.
The policy’s terms include a participation rate of 90%, a cap of 12%, and a
floor of 0%. Over the first index term of the policy, the index’s value rose
by 20%. Over the second index term, the index’s value fell by 10%.
Analysis:
At the end of the first index term, the index crediting rate was 12%
(20% index performance rate × 90% participation rate = 18%, which is
subject to the cap of 12%). Begemot applied this 12% index crediting rate
to the portion of the cash value in the index account. Therefore, this value
rose by $1,200 ($10,000 × 0.12).
At the end of the second index term, the index crediting rate was 0%
(–10% index performance rate × 90% participation rate = –9%, which is
subject to the floor of 0%). The portion of the cash value in the index
account did not increase in value. Thanks to the policy’s floor, neither
did it lose any value from index losses, though the cash value could still
decrease due to fees and charges.
The main attraction of indexed universal life insurance is that it offers addi-
tional gains in the cash value when the market is strong, with relatively little risk.
The guaranteed minimum interest-crediting rate on the fixed account and the
growth floor on the index account both protect the policy from losses when the
market is weak. Thus, indexed universal life insurance has a fairly conservative
risk-reward structure; those interested in comparably higher risks and higher
potential rewards may look into variable life insurance, as we’ll see below.
Example:
Rachid Othmani is considering purchasing one of several life insurance
policies. Rachid is a seasoned investor who enjoys following financial
markets. He is interested in accepting additional risk in exchange for the
possibility of increased rewards, but he also wants to have the flexibility to
use extra income to increase his policy’s cash value in pay periods when
his finances are particularly strong.
Analysis:
Rachid picks a variable universal life policy to suit his needs. A universal life
policy would not give him the potential investment return he’s interested
in, and a variable life policy would have fixed premiums, which would not
give him the flexibility he requires.
Figure 6.6 compares different types of universal and variable life insurance.
Endowment Insurance
You may recall from Chapter 1 that endowment insurance provides a policy ben-
efit payable either when the insured dies or on a stated date if the insured is still
alive on that date. Each endowment policy specifies a maturity date, which is the
date on which the insurer will pay the policy’s face amount to the policyowner if
the insured is still living. The maturity date is reached either (1) at the end of a
stated term, such as 20 years, or (2) when the insured reaches a specified age. If
the insured dies before the maturity date, then the insurer pays the policy’s face
amount to the designated beneficiary. Thus, an endowment insurance policy pays
a fixed benefit whether the insured survives to the policy’s maturity date or dies
before that maturity date.
Figure 6.6 Universal and Variable Life Insurance Policy Features By Product
Indexed Variable
Universal Variable
universal universal
life life
life life
Endowment policies share many of the features of cash value life insurance
policies. For example, premiums usually are level throughout the term of an
endowment policy, although a policyowner can purchase an endowment policy
with a single premium or with a series of premiums over a limited period of time.
Like cash value life insurance policies, endowment policies steadily build cash
values. Recall that the reserve and the cash value of a whole life policy eventually
equal the policy’s face amount—but not until the insured reaches the age at the
end of the mortality table used to calculate premiums for that policy. By contrast,
the reserve and cash value of an endowment policy usually equal the policy’s face
amount on the policy’s maturity date, which typically is much sooner than when
the insured reaches the last age found in the mortality table. As a result, an endow-
ment policy’s cash value builds much more rapidly than does the cash value of a
comparable whole life insurance policy.
Because endowment policies build cash values rapidly and the cash value of an
endowment policy is quite large in relationship to the face amount of the policy,
these policies generally do not satisfy the requirements to receive the same favor-
able federal income tax treatment in the United States as do most other life insur-
ance policies. Given this increased tax liability, very few insurers in the United
States still offer endowment insurance. Endowment insurance remains a popular
product in insurance markets in many other countries, however.
Key Terms
policy loan mortality charge
cash surrender value guaranteed minimum interest-crediting
whole life insurance rate
continuous-premium current interest-crediting rate
whole life insurance policy Option A plan
limited-payment Option B plan
whole life insurance policy flexible-premium universal life
paid-up policy insurance policy
single-premium fixed-premium universal life insurance
whole life insurance policy policy
modified-premium indexed universal life (IUL) insurance
whole life insurance policy general account
modified coverage index account
whole life insurance policy variable life (VL) insurance
joint whole life insurance subaccount
last survivor life insurance separate account
family policy variable universal life (VUL) insurance
universal life (UL) insurance maturity date
Endnotes
1. Ashley V. Durham and Benjamin Baldwin, U.S. Individual Life Insurance Sales Trends, 1975–2014
(Windsor, CT: LL Global, Inc., © 2015). Used with permission; all rights reserved.
2. In Canada, tax is paid on accrual income from an insurance policy. With some exceptions, the taxpayer
must report accrued investment income on a life insurance policy or annuity on an annual basis.
3. Some insurers also offer joint term life insurance and last survivor term life insurance.
4. The primary risk the insurer assumes is the risk of the insured’s dying while the policy is in force,
which is referred to as the mortality risk. However, as we shall see in Chapter 7, many life insurance
policies offer supplemental benefits in addition to the death benefit. The mortality charge covers the
cost of providing all benefits that may be payable under a particular policy.
Chapter 7
Supplemental Benefits
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
7A Identify and describe three types of supplemental disability benefits
that life insurance policies may provide
7B Explain the coverage that an accidental death benefit rider provides and
give examples of common exclusions
7C Identify three types of accelerated death benefit riders and describe the
differences between these riders
7D Describe three types of insurance riders that expand a life insurance
policy’s coverage to insure more than one individual
7E Identify two types of insurability benefit riders and explain how they
allow a life insurance policyowner to purchase additional insurance
coverage
Outline
Supplemental Disability Benefits Accelerated Death Benefits
Waiver of Premium for Terminal Illness Benefit
Disability Benefit Dread Disease Benefit
Waiver of Premium for Long-Term Care Insurance Benefit
Payor Benefit
Benefits for Additional Insureds
Disability Income Benefit
Spouse Insurance Rider
Accident Benefits Children’s Insurance Rider
Accidental Death Benefit Second Insured Rider
Accidental Death and
Insurability Benefits
Dismemberment Benefit
Guaranteed Insurability Benefit
Paid-Up Additions Option Benefit
A
lthough their features may vary, all life insurance policies provide a ben-
efit if the insured dies while the policy is in force. Life insurance policies
may also offer other benefits, which we refer to as supplemental benefits.
The insurer usually charges an additional premium amount for each supplemental
benefit that is added to a policy; the additional premium charge typically ends
when the supplemental benefit expires or is cancelled.
In some situations, insurers offer life insurance policies that include supple-
mental benefits as standard features, but these benefits are usually added as rid-
ers to a life insurance policy. Policy riders benefit both the policyowner and the
insurer because they give both parties flexibility. When an insurance company
issues a policy, it can include riders to customize a basic plan of insurance for the
policyowner. If the policyowner later wants to adapt the policy to better meet her
needs, the insurer can drop or add riders. Thus, the policyowner and the insurer
don’t have to enter into a new contract when the policyowner desires customized
or additional coverage.
The most common supplemental life insurance benefits are supplemental dis-
ability benefits, accident benefits, accelerated death benefits, benefits for additional
insureds, and insurability benefits.
Example:
Edward Stern purchased a whole life insurance policy from the Reliable
Insurance Company. Edward’s policy included a waiver of premium for
disability (WP) benefit rider with a six-month waiting period. One month
before his first semiannual renewal premium was due, Edward became
totally disabled.
Analysis:
To qualify for the WP benefit, Edward must notify Reliable and provide
proof of his disability. Because the renewal premium was due during the
waiting period, Edward must pay that premium. Once the waiting period
ends, Reliable will waive all future premiums as long as Edward remains
totally disabled, during which time his policy will continue to build a cash
value.
Because universal life insurance policies and variable universal life insur-
ance policies typically have variable premiums, the standard WP benefit usu-
ally is not offered. Instead, these types of policies may have a waiver of cost of
Waiver of Premium for Disability Benefit Waiver of Premium for Payor Benefit
Premiums are waived if the insured becomes Premiums are waived if the payor,
totally disabled. who is typically the policyowner, dies or
becomes totally disabled.
Designed for policies where: Designed for third-party policies where:
Policyowner = Insured Policyowner ≠ Insured
Total disability defined as the insured’s During the first two years of d
isability,
inability to perform the essential duties the payor is considered totally d isabled
of her own occupation or any other if she is unable to perform the essential
occupation for which she is reasonably duties of her own occupation. A fter the
suited by education, training, or two-year period, the payor is considered
experience. totally disabled if she is unable to
perform the essential duties of any
occupation for which she is reasonably
suited by education, training, or
experience.
Example:
Paxton Haynes was the policyowner-insured of a $200,000 life insurance
policy that included a disability income benefit rider. According to the
terms of this rider, if Paxton became totally disabled, the insurer would
pay him a monthly income benefit of 1% of his policy’s face amount
during the period of disability; the rider also stipulated a three-month
waiting period. While the policy was in force, Paxton became disabled as
defined in the disability income benefit rider. Two years later, he died as a
result of his disability.
Analysis:
Three months after he became disabled, Paxton became eligible to receive
a disability income benefit of $2,000 a month, found as $200,000 × 0.01.
This monthly income benefit was payable as long as Paxton remained
disabled. Upon Paxton’s death, the policy’s death benefit became payable
to the beneficiary.
Life insurance policies that are issued with a disability income benefit gener-
ally include a WP benefit as well. In this case, the renewal premiums charged for
the life insurance policy and the additional premiums charged for the disability
income benefit are both waived during the total disability of the insured.
Accident Benefits
Accident benefits may be added to any type of life insurance policy. The two most
commonly offered accident benefits are (1) accidental death benefits and (2) acci-
dental death and dismemberment (AD&D) benefits.
Example:
An insured with a history of heart disease died in an automobile accident.
Her policy provides a $250,000 death benefit and includes an accidental
death benefit rider that provides an accidental death benefit of $250,000.
Analysis:
If the accident itself caused the insured’s death, then the insurer would pay
the $250,000 accidental death benefit in addition to the policy’s basic death
benefit of $250,000. On the other hand, if the insured died from a heart
attack while driving, causing her to lose control of the automobile, then her
death did not result from an accident. In this case, the insurer would pay
only the policy’s basic death benefit of $250,000 to the beneficiary.
Accidental death benefit riders usually contain several exclusions and limita-
tions. For example, these riders typically exclude payment of the accidental death
benefit if the insured’s death results from certain stated causes, including
Self-inflicted injuries (suicide)
War-related accidents
In addition, some riders require that the insured’s death occur within a specified
time period after the accident, such as within 90 days of the date of the accident,
in order for the benefit to be payable.
Keep in mind that these exclusions and limitations relate only to the accidental
death benefit. With a few exceptions, which we describe later in the text, the basic
death benefit provided by the life insurance policy is payable regardless of the
cause of the insured’s death.
•• Medical expenses
•• Outstanding debts and living expenses
•• Home health care costs
•• Travel expenses (or those of the insured’s
family)
discount factor to the death benefit accelerated. For example, if the discount factor
is 60 percent for every $10,000 of death benefit accelerated, then a $100,000 policy
would yield a benefit of $40,000.
An insured becomes eligible for DD benefits when she has a certain disease or
event or undergoes certain medical procedures specified in the rider. These speci-
fied diseases, events, or medical procedures are known as insurable events and
usually include
Life-threatening cancer
Stroke
The above four insurable events are the most common. Other less common
insurable events include end-stage renal (kidney) failure, vital organ transplants,
and Alzheimer’s disease.
In many countries, considerably more diseases and medical procedures—some-
times more than 30 in total—are included as insurable events. In these countries,
insurers offer a number of DD benefit options, such as a less expensive basic rider,
which covers a limited number of diseases and procedures, and a more expensive
comprehensive rider, which covers a greater number of diseases and procedures.
Policyowners can purchase another form of dread disease coverage as supple-
mental medical expense coverage. We discuss medical expense coverage in a later
chapter.
may be the spouse of the insured, another relative, or an unrelated person, such as
a business partner of the insured. The amount of coverage a second insured rider
provides typically is greater than what is available under a spouse’s insurance
rider, although some insurers limit the maximum coverage to the face amount of
the primary insurance policy. The premium rate charged for the second insured
rider is based on the risk characteristics of the second insured, and not on the risk
characteristics of the person insured under the basic policy.
Some advantages of the second insured rider are its convenience—as more
than one life can be insured under a single policy—and the fact that it typically
provides coverage on the second person at a lower cost than would a separate
policy on that person.
Insurability Benefits
A policyowner may anticipate that she will need additional coverage in the future
but will become uninsurable as she ages. Insurers offer two types of supplemen-
tal benefits that allow policyowners to purchase additional insurance without the
insured having to provide evidence of insurability at the time of purchase: the
guaranteed insurability benefit and the paid-up additions option benefit.
Key Terms
waiver of premium for disability (WP) benefit
waiver of premium for payor benefit
juvenile insurance policy
disability income benefit
accidental death benefit
accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) benefit
accelerated death benefit
terminal illness (TI) benefit
dread disease (DD) benefit
long-term care (LTC) insurance benefit
spouse insurance rider
children’s insurance rider
spouse and children’s insurance rider
second insured rider
guaranteed insurability (GI) benefit
paid-up additions option benefit
Chapter 8
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
8A Describe the free-look provision of an insurance policy
8B Identify the documents that make up the entire contract between the
owner of a life insurance policy and the insurer
8C Explain the purpose and operation of the incontestability provision
8D Apply the terms of the standard grace period provision in a given
situation to determine whether a life insurance policy has lapsed for
nonpayment of premium
8E Identify situations in which a life insurance policy can be reinstated and
the conditions the policyowner must meet to reinstate the policy
8F Determine the action an insurer likely will take if it discovers a
misstatement of the age or sex of the person insured by a life insurance
policy
8G Describe the rights provided by a policy loan provision and a policy
withdrawal provision, and explain the differences between a policy loan
and a commercial loan
8H Identify and describe the nonforfeiture options typically included in
cash value life insurance policies
8I Identify the exclusions that insurers sometimes include in individual
life insurance policies
Outline
Standard Policy Provisions Provisions Unique to Cash Value
Free-Look Provision Policies
Entire Contract Provision Policy Loans and Policy Withdrawals
Incontestability Provision Nonforfeiture Provision
Grace Period Provision
Life Insurance Policy Exclusions
Reinstatement Provision
Misstatement of Age or Sex
Provision
A
s we saw in Chapter 3, an individual insurance policy is a contract between
the insurance company and the policyowner. Every contract must antici-
pate the needs of both parties involved, and therefore like other contracts,
an insurance policy relies heavily on its provisions to address possible circum-
stances that might arise. The provisions included in the written policy (1) set forth
the terms of the agreement between the two parties, (2) describe the operation and
effect of the contract, and (3) define the rights and obligations of the parties to the
insurance contract.
Free-Look Provision
An individual life insurance policy typically includes a free-look provision, some-
times referred to as a free-examination provision or a cooling-off provision, which
gives the policyowner a stated period of time—usually at least 10 days—after the
policy is delivered within which to cancel the policy and receive a refund. In most
jurisdictions, this period of time ranges from 10 to 30 days. The free-look period
begins on the date the policy is delivered to the policyowner, not on the date of
issue. Insurance coverage is in effect throughout the free-look period or until the
policyowner rejects the policy, whichever occurs first.
Example:
Claude Juneau applied for an individual insurance policy on his life and
paid the initial premium. The insurer issued the policy, which contained
a 10-day free-look period, and delivered it to Claude on October 6. On
October 8, Claude changed his mind about purchasing the policy. Before
he could contact the insurer to cancel the policy, Claude died in an
accident.
Analysis:
During the free-look period, Claude had the right to cancel the policy
and receive a refund. However, because the policy was in force when
Claude died, the insurer is obligated to pay the death benefit to Claude’s
beneficiary.
In addition to defining the documents that make up the contract, the entire con-
tract provision usually states that (1) only specified individuals—such as certain
officers of the insurer—can change the contract, (2) no change is effective unless
made in writing, and (3) no change will be made unless the policyowner agrees to
it in writing.
Incontestability Provision
Applications for life insurance policies contain questions designed to provide the
insurance company with relevant information so that it can decide whether the
LEARNING AID
proposed insured is an insurable risk. Under the general rules of contract law, an
insurance company has the right to rescind—or cancel—an otherwise enforceable
insurance contract if the applicant misrepresented certain facts in the application
for insurance.
Insurance laws in many jurisdictions, however, impose two important limits on
an insurer’s right to rescind an insurance contract on the basis of misrepresenta-
tion. First, only material misrepresentations give the insurer the right to rescind
an insurance contract. Second, the insurer has only a limited amount of time in
which to rescind an insurance contract. As a result, life insurance policies contain
an incontestability provision, which denies the insurer the right to rescind the
contract on the grounds of a material misrepresentation in the application after
the contract has been in force for a specified period of time. This provision is
designed to give the insurer sufficient time in which to evaluate the information
in an application.
Material Misrepresentation
A false or misleading statement in an application for insurance is known as a
misrepresentation. A statement made in an application for insurance that is not
true and that caused the insurer to enter into a contract it would not have agreed to
if it had known the truth is called a material misrepresentation. A misrepresen-
tation is considered material if, had the truth been known, the insurer would not
have issued the policy or would have issued the policy on a different basis, such as
with a higher premium or a lower face amount. A misrepresentation in an applica-
tion for life insurance gives the insurer grounds to rescind the contract only if it
was a material misrepresentation.
Example:
Ivana Gradenko’s application for life insurance contained the statement
that she had recently visited a doctor for a fractured wrist, when the injury
had actually been a badly sprained wrist.
Analysis:
The insurer’s decision as to whether Ivana is an insurable risk would not
have changed as a result of the misstatement of Ivana’s injury. Ivana’s
misstatement is not a material misrepresentation, and the insurer could
not use it to rescind the contract.
Example:
Edward Honda’s application for life insurance contained the statement
that he had visited a doctor on November 12 for a routine physical
examination, when in fact the reason for the visit was that he was being
treated for kidney disease.
Analysis:
To evaluate Edward’s application properly, the insurance company
needed to know that he suffered from kidney disease. Therefore,
the misrepresentation regarding this doctor visit is a material
misrepresentation, and the insurer could rescind the contract. Alternately,
the insurer could revise the terms of the policy—such as by changing
the required premiums or the face amount—based on the corrected
application.
We will not contest this policy after it has been in force during the lifetime
of the insured for two years from the date of issue.
As a general rule, after a policy’s contestable period has ended, the insurer can-
not rescind the contract. Laws in many jurisdictions, however, contain an excep-
tion: an insurer may contest a policy at any time if the application for insurance
contained a fraudulent misrepresentation. A fraudulent misrepresentation is a
misrepresentation that was made with the intent to induce another party to enter
into a contract that results in the giving up of something of value or a legal right
and that did induce the innocent party to enter into the contract. When an applica-
tion contains a fraudulent misrepresentation, the contract is not made for a law-
ful purpose—and recall that a contract not made for a lawful purpose is void at
inception. In reality, insurers seldom exercise their right to contest a policy in this
situation because they are unable to prove that a misrepresentation was fraudulent.
The phrase during the lifetime of the insured is an important part of the incon-
testability provision. This phrase, in effect, makes the policy contestable forever if
the insured dies during the contestable period. As a result, the insurance company
will have the opportunity to investigate for material misrepresentation whenever a
claim arises within the contestable period of a life insurance policy. If the phrase
during the lifetime of the insured were not included in the incontestability provision
and the insured died during the contestable period, the beneficiary could possibly
delay making a claim until after the contestable period expired. The insurer might
then be prevented from contesting the policy and, thus, would be required to pay
the death benefit even if the application contained a material misrepresentation.
The purpose of the incontestability provision is to assure policyowners and
beneficiaries that, after the contestable period has ended, the insurer cannot
rescind the policy on the basis of a material misrepresentation in the application
for insurance.
Example:
In the previous example, Edward Honda did not disclose the true reason
for his visit to the doctor. Edward died four years after the policy was
issued. In evaluating the claim, the insurer discovered the material
misrepresentation.
Analysis:
Because the policy’s two-year contestable period had expired by the time
the insurer discovered the misstatement, the insurer does not have the
right to contest the validity of the contract. As a result, the insurer must
pay the death benefit to the beneficiary.
Example:
Joanna Hark was the policyowner-insured of a $150,000 term life insurance
policy. The policy’s annual renewal premium of $600 was due on July 6 of
each year. Her policy contained a typical 31-day grace period provision.
Joanna died on August 3, 2015, without having paid the renewal premium
then due.
Analysis:
Because Joanna died during her policy’s grace period, the insurer was
liable to pay the death benefit to the beneficiary. The insurer deducted the
unpaid premium from the death benefit and paid the policy beneficiary
$149,400 ($150,000 - $600). If Joanna had died a week later on August 10,
without having paid the renewal premium then due, the policy’s grace
period would have expired, and the insurer would not be obligated to pay
the death benefit.
Some types of life insurance policies, such as universal life insurance policies,
do not require scheduled premium payments. If the cash value of the policy is
sufficient, the insurer uses it to pay the policy’s monthly mortality and expense
charges. If the cash value is not sufficient, the insurer applies the grace period
provision. The date on which the grace period begins can vary by policy, and the
grace period’s length varies based on this date. For example, some universal life
insurance policies state that the grace period begins on the date on which the poli-
cy’s cash value is insufficient to cover the policy’s monthly mortality and expense
charges. For those policies, the grace period will continue for 61 or 62 days after
that date. Other universal life policies provide that the grace period begins on the
date that the cash value is zero and continues for 30 or 31 days after that date. The
grace period provision in these policies also requires the insurer to notify the poli-
cyowner that if the policyowner does not make a premium payment large enough
to cover the policy charges, then coverage will terminate. This notification must
be issued at least 30 or 31 days before the coverage expires. If the insured dies dur-
ing the policy’s grace period, then the insurer will pay the death benefit less the
amount required to pay the overdue mortality and expense charges.
Example:
Hideo Tanaka is the policyowner-insured of a universal life insurance
policy. Hideo has not made a premium payment in several years, during
which time the insurer has used the policy’s cash value to pay the monthly
mortality and expense charges. Currently, the policy’s remaining cash
value is insufficient to cover the mortality and expense charges.
Analysis:
The insurer will send Hideo a notice that his policy will continue under
the grace period provision for 61 days, during which time he must make a
premium payment sufficient to cover the overdue mortality and expense
charges to keep the policy from lapsing. If Hideo should die during the 61-
day grace period, the insurer would pay the beneficiary the death benefit,
less the amount of any overdue mortality and expense charges.
Reinstatement Provision
Individual life insurance policies typically include a reinstatement provision, which
describes the conditions that the policyowner must meet for the insurer to reinstate
a policy. Reinstatement is the process by which an insurer puts back into force an
insurance policy that either has been terminated because of nonpayment of renewal
premiums or has been continued under the extended term or reduced paid-up insur-
ance nonforfeiture option. (We discuss these nonforfeiture options later in this chap-
ter.) Most insurers do not permit reinstatement if the policyowner has surrendered
the policy for its cash surrender value. When an insurer reinstates a policy, the origi-
nal policy is again in effect; the insurer does not issue a new policy.
To reinstate a life insurance policy, the policyowner must fulfill the conditions
stated in the policy’s reinstatement provision. The following conditions typically
must be met to reinstate a policy:
The policyowner must complete a reinstatement application within the time
frame stated in the reinstatement provision (usually two to five years).
The policyowner must provide the insurance company with satisfactory evi-
dence of the insured’s continued insurability.
The policyowner must pay a specified amount of money; the amount required
depends on the type of policy being reinstated. We describe this amount later
in this section of the chapter.
The policyowner may be required to either pay any outstanding policy loan
or have the policy loan, including any additional accrued interest, reinstated
with the policy.
Perhaps the most significant of these conditions concerns the required evidence
of insurability. This condition is necessary to help prevent antiselection. If no evi-
dence of insurability were required, those people who were unable to obtain insur-
ance elsewhere because of poor health would be more likely to apply for reinstate-
ment than would those who were in good health.
The specific amount of money required to reinstate a policy depends on the type
of policy. For a fixed-premium policy, such as a whole life policy, the policyowner
must pay all back premiums plus interest on those premiums. The insurer charges
interest at the rate specified in the reinstatement provision. Payment of back pre-
miums with interest is needed to bring the policy reserve to the same level as the
reserve for a similar policy that has been kept in force without a lapse in premium
payments.
For a flexible-premium policy, such as a universal life policy, the policyowner
usually must pay an amount sufficient to cover the policy’s mortality and expense
charges for at least two months. In addition, some universal life policies require
that the policyowner pay mortality and expense charges for the period between the
date of lapse and the date of reinstatement.
Because reinstating a life insurance policy may require the policyowner to
pay a sizable sum of money, each policyowner must decide whether reinstating
the original policy or purchasing a new policy is more advantageous. One advan-
tage to reinstating a fixed-premium policy is that the premium rate for the origi-
nal policy is based on the insured’s issue age, or age at the time the policy was
purchased. A comparable new policy usually calls for a higher premium rate,
Example:
Marisol Velasquez took out a life insurance policy on her father Jorge;
the policy was issued on February 16, 2012. When she was laid off in
2013, she let the policy lapse. Marisol got a new job not long afterward
and submitted an application to reinstate the lapsed policy. The insurer
reinstated the policy on May 4, 2014. On September 9, 2015, the insurer
discovered that Jorge had been admitted to the hospital for a heart attack
in 2011, and that Marisol had not stated this incident on either her initial
application for insurance or her application for reinstatement.
Analysis:
The contestable period on the original policy expired on February 16,
2014, so the insurer could not rescind the policy based on the original
application. However, a new contestable period began on May 4, 2014,
when the policy was reinstated. The insurer could choose to rescind the
policy based on the material misrepresentation submitted on Marisol’s
application for reinstatement.
Example:
On Inga Henriksson’s 35th birthday, her brother Michael purchased an
insurance policy on her life from Presidency Life Insurance. Inga died
seven years later, after the policy’s contestable period had expired. While
Presidency was processing the claim, they discovered that Michael had
mistakenly listed her as both 33 years old and male.
Analysis:
Presidency will adjust the policy’s death benefit to the amount that the
premiums paid would have purchased for Inga as a 35-year-old woman.
The amount will adjust upward for the misstatement of sex, but downward
for the misstatement of age; Presidency will apply the difference between
the two adjustments to the death benefit and pay the modified amount
to the beneficiary.
Example:
At the time of his death, Marco Grimaldi was insured under a $350,000
whole life insurance policy. The policy had an unpaid policy loan in the
amount of $15,000.
Analysis:
The insurance company will deduct the amount of the unpaid policy loan
from the death benefit. As a result, the beneficiary will receive $335,000
($350,000 - $15,000).
A policy loan also differs from a commercial loan in that the insurance com-
pany does not perform a credit check on a policyowner who requests a policy loan.
The policyowner’s request is evaluated only in terms of the amount of the net cash
value available.
Insurers charge interest on each policy loan, usually on an annual basis.
Although the policyowner may pay policy loan interest at any time, she is not
required to pay the interest. Any unpaid interest charges become part of the policy
loan. Therefore, when we speak of the amount of the policy loan outstanding,
that amount includes the unpaid amount of the loan plus any unpaid interest. If
this amount increases to the point at which the total indebtedness exceeds the
policy’s cash value, then the policy terminates without further value. Typically, the
insurer must notify the policyowner at least 30 days in advance of such a policy
termination.
Universal life insurance policies typically include a policy loan provision and a
policy withdrawal provision. A policy withdrawal provision, which is often called
a partial surrender provision, permits the policyowner to reduce the amount of
the policy’s cash value by withdrawing up to the amount of the cash value in cash.
Insurers do not charge interest or expect repayment on policy withdrawals; the
amount of the cash value is simply reduced by the amount of the withdrawal. How-
ever, many policies impose an administrative fee for each withdrawal and limit the
number of withdrawals allowed within a one-year period. Withdrawals may also
reduce the amount of the policy’s death benefit.
Nonforfeiture Provision
The nonforfeiture provision sets forth the options available to the owner of a cash
value policy if the policy lapses or if the policyowner decides to surrender—or ter-
minate—the policy. Most nonforfeiture provisions give the policyowner the right LEARNING AID
to select from among several nonforfeiture options if a renewal premium is unpaid
when the grace period expires. These nonforfeiture options include the cash pay-
ment nonforfeiture option, two continued insurance coverage options—reduced
paid-up insurance and extended term insurance—and the automatic premium loan
option. Most policies include an automatic nonforfeiture benefit, which is a spe-
cific nonforfeiture benefit that becomes effective automatically when a renewal
premium for a cash value life insurance policy is not paid by the end of the grace
period and the policyowner has not elected another nonforfeiture option. The most
typical automatic nonforfeiture benefit is the extended term insurance benefit.
The coverage issued under this option continues to have and to build a cash
value, and the policyowner retains the rights available to the owner of any life
insurance policy. Thus, the policyowner has the right to surrender the policy for its
cash value. Any supplemental benefits that were available on the original policy,
such as accidental death benefits, are usually not available when the policy is con-
tinued as reduced paid-up insurance.
defined by the policy within a specified period following the date of policy issue.
Laws in many jurisdictions specify the maximum allowable length of a suicide
exclusion period, which is usually one or two years. A typical suicide exclusion
provision follows.
Suicide Exclusion. Suicide of the insured, while sane or insane, within two
years of the date of issue, is not covered by the policy. In that event, this
policy will end, and the only amount payable will be the premiums paid
to us, less any loan.
In some policies, the suicide exclusion provision states that, if the insured com-
mits suicide during the suicide exclusion period, the insurer will pay the larger of
(1) the cash surrender value or (2) the premiums paid for the policy.
Insurance companies include the suicide exclusion provision in policies to pro-
tect themselves against the possibility of antiselection. Otherwise, a person who
is planning to commit suicide would be more likely to apply for life insurance
than would other people. For the same reason, when a policy is reinstated, a new
suicide exclusion period generally begins to run from the date of reinstatement.
Death benefits are not payable if the insured dies as the result of suicide within the
suicide exclusion period following the date of policy reinstatement.
Insurers may also include other exclusions in life insurance policies. These
exclusions, which vary from insurer to insurer and from country to country,
include
A war exclusion clause, which states that the insurer will not pay the death
benefit if the insured’s death results from war or an act of war. The policy
defines the terms “war” and “act of war.” Similarly, some policies include a
military service exclusion clause, which states that the insurer will not pay the
death benefit if the insured’s death results from his military service during a
time of war. Policies containing these clauses typically are issued only during
periods of war or threats of war.
A hazardous activities exclusion provision, which states that the insurer will
not pay the death benefit if the insured’s death results from specified danger-
ous activities such as mountain climbing, sky diving, or scuba diving. This
exclusion is usually included only when the application indicates that the
insured engages in such hazardous activities.
An aviation exclusion provision, which states that the insurer will not pay
the death benefit if the insured’s death results from aviation-related activities.
Some aviation exclusions apply only to activities connected with military or
experimental aircraft. Other aviation exclusion provisions apply to pilots and
crew members of privately owned aircraft. A few aviation exclusion provi-
sions apply to any aviation-related death unless the insured was a passenger
on a regularly scheduled commercial airline.
Some insurers offer policyowners the option of (1) excluding certain hazardous
or aviation-related activities from coverage or (2) paying an additional premium
for such coverage.
Key Terms
free-look provision policy withdrawal provision
entire contract provision nonforfeiture provision
closed contract automatic nonforfeiture benefit
open contract cash payment nonforfeiture option
incontestability provision surrender charge
misrepresentation net cash surrender value
material misrepresentation reduced paid-up insurance nonforfeiture
fraudulent misrepresentation option
grace period provision extended term insurance nonforfeiture
grace period option
reinstatement provision automatic premium loan (APL) option
reinstatement exclusion
misstatement of age or sex provision suicide exclusion provision
policy loan provision
Endnote
1. A one-year contestable period is the maximum allowed by law in some states and countries. Most other
countries allow a maximum two-year contestable period, but some extend the maximum allowable
period to three years or even more.
Chapter 9
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
9A Distinguish between primary and contingent beneficiaries and between
revocable and irrevocable beneficiaries
9B Describe the premium payment modes that insurers typically offer on
individual life insurance policies
9C Identify the policy dividend options that most commonly are included
in participating life insurance policies and describe the characteristics
of each option
9D Identify the methods by which ownership of a life insurance policy can
be transferred
9E Identify the person in a given situation who is entitled to receive the
proceeds of a life insurance policy following the insured’s death
9F Describe the general rule stated in a simultaneous death act and explain
how that rule is affected if a policy contains a survivorship clause
9G Calculate the proceeds payable under a given life insurance policy
following the death of the insured
9H Identify the settlement options that typically are included in life
insurance policies and describe the features of each option
Outline
Naming the Beneficiary Transfer of Policy Ownership
Primary and Contingent Transfer of Ownership by
Beneficiaries Assignment
Changing the Beneficiary Transfer of Ownership by
Endorsement
Mode of Premium Payment
Death of the Policyowner
Policy Dividends
Cash Dividend Option Right to Receive Policy Proceeds
Premium Reduction Dividend
Identifying Who Is Entitled to Policy
Option Proceeds
Policy Loan Repayment Dividend
Calculating the Amount of the
Option Policy Proceeds
Accumulation at Interest Dividend
Paying Policy Proceeds under a
Option Settlement Option
Paid-Up Additional Insurance
Dividend Option
Additional Term Insurance Dividend
Option
W
e’ve already seen in Chapter 3 that an insurance policy is a contract
and therefore is personal, intangible property. When a life insurance
policy is issued, the policy’s ownership rights vest in the policyowner.
If a policy has no living owners, including contingent owners or joint owners, then
ownership typically passes to the estate of the policyowner.
Ownership rights are spelled out in the policy, and some vary depending on
the type of policy. One of the most important ownership rights in a life insurance
policy is the right to name the beneficiary who will receive the policy proceeds,
which is the total monetary amount paid by an insurer if the insured dies while
the policy is in force. Other important rights concern premium payments, policy
dividends, and settlement options. The owner of a policy can also transfer her
ownership rights to another party.
p olicy proceeds, the primary beneficiary must survive the insured; the benefi-
ciary’s estate has no claim to the policy proceeds if the beneficiary dies before
the insured does. If more than one party is named as primary beneficiary, the
policyowner may indicate how the proceeds are to be divided among the parties.
If the policyowner does not make such an indication, then the insurer divides the
proceeds evenly among the primary beneficiaries who survived the insured.
Example:
At the time of his death, Jason Kilpatrick owned an insurance policy on his
life. Jason named his three children—Amos, Kiley, and Rebecca—as the
policy beneficiaries. All three children survived Jason.
Analysis:
Unless Jason indicated otherwise, the policy proceeds would be divided
evenly among Amos, Kiley, and Rebecca.
Example:
Sophie Katsaros took out an insurance policy on her life and named her
children, Mia and Zoe, as equal primary beneficiaries. She also named
her husband, Basil, as contingent beneficiary. When Sophie died, she was
survived only by Mia and Basil, as Zoe had died in an accident two years
earlier.
Analysis:
The policy proceeds are payable to the sole surviving primary beneficiary,
Mia.
Example:
Juliet Chau owned an insurance policy on her life and named her husband,
Stephen, as primary beneficiary and her children, Sam and May, as equal
contingent beneficiaries. Both Stephen and May predeceased Juliet.
Analysis:
Because the primary beneficiary (Stephen) is deceased, the policy
proceeds go to any surviving contingent beneficiaries—Sam, in this case.
Insurers usually prefer that policyowners name at least a primary and a contin-
gent beneficiary. Naming additional levels of contingent beneficiaries ensures that
the proceeds are paid to the desired party.
Example:
Javad Kashani owned an insurance policy on his life. He named his
wife, Maria, primary beneficiary; their daughter, Azra, first contingent
beneficiary; and his brother, Mahmud, second contingent beneficiary.
Javad and Maria died in an accident.
Analysis:
Azra is entitled to receive the policy proceeds. Mahmud would be
entitled to receive the policy proceeds only if Maria and Azra had both
predeceased Javad.
Revocable Beneficiary
The vast majority of life insurance policy beneficiaries are revocable beneficiaries.
A revocable beneficiary is a life insurance beneficiary whose designation as ben-
eficiary can be changed by the policyowner at any time before the insured’s death.
During the insured’s lifetime, the revocable beneficiary has no legal interest in the
policy proceeds and cannot prohibit the policyowner from exercising any policy
ownership rights, including the right to change the beneficiary. A revocable ben-
eficiary’s interest in a life insurance policy during the insured’s lifetime is referred
to as a “mere expectancy” of receiving the policy proceeds.
Note that a beneficiary change can be made only during the insured’s life-
time. After the insured dies, the beneficiary has a vested interest in the policy
proceeds, and the policyowner cannot deprive the beneficiary of that interest.
A vested interest is a property right that has taken effect and cannot be altered or
changed without the consent of the person who owns the right.
Irrevocable Beneficiary
An irrevocable beneficiary is a life insurance policy beneficiary whose desig-
nation as beneficiary cannot be changed by the policyowner unless the benefi-
ciary gives written consent. An irrevocable beneficiary has a vested interest in
the proceeds of the life insurance policy even during the lifetime of the insured.
A policyowner usually designates an irrevocable beneficiary as a contractual
promise to meet obligations, such as in some divorce cases.
Most insurers do not permit a policyowner who has designated an irrevoca-
ble beneficiary to exercise all of his ownership rights in the contract without the
irrevocable beneficiary’s consent. For example, the policyowner cannot obtain a
policy loan, surrender the policy for cash, or assign ownership of the policy to
another party without the written consent of the irrevocable beneficiary. (We dis-
cuss assignments later in this chapter.)
Most life insurance policies also contain a provision stating that the rights of
any beneficiary, including an irrevocable beneficiary, will terminate if the benefi-
ciary should die before the insured dies. This provision prevents the payment of the
proceeds to the estate of the irrevocable beneficiary and permits the policyowner
to designate a new beneficiary following the death of an irrevocable beneficiary.
Example:
Aimie Brodeur purchased an insurance policy on her own life and named
her mother, Yvette, as irrevocable beneficiary. Several years later, while
the policy was still in effect, Yvette died.
Analysis:
Upon Yvette’s death, Aimie is permitted to designate a new beneficiary—
revocable or irrevocable—without having to obtain anyone’s consent.
Policy Dividends
Insurance policies may be issued on either a participating or nonparticipating basis.
A participating policy, sometimes referred to as a par policy, is a type of policy
under which the policyowner shares in the insurance company’s divisible surplus.
A nonparticipating policy, also known as a nonpar policy, is a type of policy in
which the policyowner does not share in the insurer’s divisible surplus. Recall that
a company’s surplus is the amount by which its assets exceed its liabilities plus its
capital. Divisible surplus is the portion of surplus that insurance companies set
aside specifically for distribution to owners of participating policies. An amount of
money that an insurer pays to the owner of a participating policy from the insurer’s
divisible surplus is called a policy dividend.
Stock insurance companies as well as many mutuals offer both participating
and nonparticipating policies. In 2014, approximately 73 percent of the individual
life insurance policies issued in the United States were nonparticipating policies.1
Although policy dividends are not guaranteed, most insurers periodically pay
dividends on participating life insurance policies that are expected to remain in
force over a long time period. The insurance company’s board of directors annu-
ally determines the amount payable as dividends. Any policy dividend declared
for a policy is payable on the policy’s anniversary date, and the terms of some life
insurance policies state that the policy must be in force for two years before any
policy dividends are payable. Generally, dividend amounts increase substantially
with the age of the policy, as they are based on the cash surrender value, which
grows over time.
The owner of a participating life insurance policy may receive policy dividends
by a number of specified methods, called dividend options. Common dividend
options for participating life insurance policies include
The cash dividend option
some changes are subject to certain restrictions. Each participating life insurance
policy also specifies an automatic dividend option, which is the dividend option
that the insurer will apply if the policyowner does not choose an option. Most cash
value policies specify the paid-up additional insurance option as the automatic
dividend option. Most term insurance policies specify the accumulation at interest
option as the automatic dividend option.
Total
Paid-Up
Paid-Up
Dividend Dividend Total Death
Insured’s Age Dividend
Declared Additions Benefit
Additions to
Current Year
Date
40 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,000
42 5 16 16 100,016
43 21 65 81 100,081
–– –– –– –– ––
50 229 598 1,905 101,905
–– –– –– –– ––
60 1,664 3,342 22,280 122,280
–– –– –– –– ––
65 2,771 5,042 49,357 149,357
As you can see, after the policy had been in force for two years, the insurer declared a dividend
of $5. The insurer automatically applied the $5 dividend to purchase a paid-up whole life addition
of $16, the amount of paid-up whole life insurance that the $5 premium would purchase at the
insured’s attained age of 42. As a result, the total death benefit payable under the policy increased
to $100,016.
The next year, the insurer used the $21 policy dividend to purchase another paid-up whole life
addition—this time for $65—and the total death benefit payable under the policy increased to
$100,081.
By the time the insured reached age 65, the total amount of paid-up additions purchased with
policy dividends totaled $49,357, thus increasing the total death benefit payable under the policy to
$149,357. Although the dividends were relatively modest at first, the policy death benefit increased
to almost 150% of its original value over time.
The assignment of a life insurance policy may not infringe on the vested rights
of an irrevocable beneficiary. An assignment made without such a beneficia-
ry’s consent is invalid. Note that when the beneficiary is a revocable ben-
eficiary, the policyowner has an unlimited right to assign the policy without
obtaining the beneficiary’s consent.
An assignment that is made for illegal purposes, such as speculating on a life,
is invalid.
Types of Assignment
An assignment may take one of two forms: an absolute assignment or a collateral
assignment. Whether an assignment is absolute or collateral depends on whether
the assignee has received complete ownership of the policy or only certain speci-
fied ownership rights in the policy.
Absolute Assignment
An absolute assignment of a life insurance policy is an irrevocable assignment
under which a policyowner transfers all of his policy ownership rights to the
assignee. The policyowner-assignor has no further rights under the contract, and
the assignee becomes the policyowner. In general, a policyowner can absolutely
assign a policy to anyone, regardless of whether the assignee has an insurable
interest in the life of the insured.
A policyowner can make a gift of a life insurance policy by absolutely assign-
ing the policy to the assignee without receiving any payment in exchange. For
example, parents who purchase insurance on their child’s life often transfer own-
ership of the policy—as a gift—to the child when she reaches the age of majority.
A policyowner also can sell a life insurance policy by absolutely assigning the
policy to the assignee in exchange for financial compensation. For example, a busi-
ness that owns an insurance policy on the life of a key person may sell the policy
to the key person in exchange for the policy’s accumulated cash value when that
key person leaves employment.
Collateral Assignment
A collateral assignment of a life insurance policy is a temporary assignment of
the monetary value of a life insurance policy as collateral—or security—for a
loan. For example, if a person takes out a personal loan from a bank, that per-
son may collaterally assign a life insurance policy to the bank as security for the
loan. A collateral assignment differs from an absolute assignment in three general
respects.
1. The collateral assignee’s rights are limited to those ownership rights that
directly concern the monetary value of the policy. The policyowner retains
all ownership rights that do not affect the policy’s value. For example, the
right to name the policy beneficiary and the right to select a settlement option
remain with the policyowner. The policyowner-assignor, however, is not per-
mitted to take out a policy loan or surrender the policy for its cash surrender
value while a collateral assignment is in effect unless the assignee consents.
This limitation protects the assignee’s right to the policy’s value because a
policy loan and a policy surrender both diminish that value.
2. The collateral assignee has a vested right to the policy’s monetary val-
ues, but that right is limited. The assignee’s rights to the policy’s values are
limited to the amount of the assignor’s debt to the assignee. Consequently, if
the policy proceeds become payable, the assignee is entitled to receive only
the amount of the indebtedness; any remaining amount must be paid to the
policy’s beneficiary. The assignee can receive this amount only in a lump sum
and cannot select a settlement option.
Example:
Mark Tetley was the policyowner-insured of a $100,000 life insurance
policy. Mark collaterally assigned the policy to Enlightened Bank as
security for a loan he received from Enlightened. When Mark died, he
owed Enlightened $30,000.
Analysis:
The insurer paid Enlightened $30,000. The policy beneficiary received the
remaining $70,000 of the policy proceeds.
3. The collateral assignee’s rights to the policy values are temporary. If the
policyowner repays the amount owed to the collateral assignee during the
insured’s lifetime, the assignment terminates, and all of the policy’s owner-
ship rights revert to the policyowner. Once the loan is repaid, the policyowner
usually secures from the assignee a release of the assignee’s claim to the policy
proceeds.
Assignment Provision
Most life insurance policies include an assignment provision, which describes the
roles of the insurer and the policyowner when the policy is assigned. An example
of a life insurance policy’s assignment provision follows.
Assignment. While the insured is living, you can assign this policy or any
interest in it. As owner, you still have the rights of ownership that have not
been assigned. We must have a copy of any assignment. We will not be
responsible for the validity of an assignment. An assignment will be subject
to any payment we make or other action we take before we record it.
The insurance company is not obligated to act in accordance with the terms of
an assignment unless it has received written notice of the assignment. The follow-
ing example illustrates what can happen if an insurer is not notified of a collateral
assignment.
Example:
Eileen Shelton collaterally assigned the insurance policy she owned on
her life to Enlightened Bank as security for a loan. When Eileen died, the
insurance company had not been notified of the assignment, and, thus, it
paid the policy proceeds to the beneficiary. Enlightened later claimed its
share of the policy proceeds.
Analysis:
Because the insurer was not notified of the assignment before it paid
the death benefit, it has no liability to pay any part of the proceeds to
Enlightened.
Because the assignee wants to protect its own interests, the assignee typically
assumes responsibility for notifying the insurance company, in writing, of the
assignment. Similarly, when the policyowner repays the debt, the policyowner usu-
ally assumes responsibility for notifying the insurance company that the assign-
ment is no longer in effect.
such a policy, a policyowner might die while the insured is still alive, raising the
question of who owns the policy. For example, a person might take out an insur-
ance policy on his father, while retaining ownership of the policy, only to die in an
accident before his father does.
To cover these situations, an insurance policy may name a contingent owner.
This person becomes the new owner of the policy if the original policyowner dies
while the insured is still living. Rather than name a contingent owner, some poli-
cies name multiple people as the joint owners of the policy.
If a policy has no living owners, including contingent owners or joint owners,
then ownership typically passes to the estate of the policyowner.
No Surviving Beneficiary
If no beneficiary has been named or none of the beneficiaries are living when the
insured dies, then the policy proceeds typically are paid to the policyowner, if the
policyowner is living. If the policyowner is deceased, then the proceeds are paid
to the policyowner’s estate.
Example:
Mark Palakiko was the policyowner-insured of a life insurance policy
that named his wife as the primary beneficiary and their two children as
contingent beneficiaries. Mark’s wife and children all predeceased him.
Analysis:
If Mark did not name a new beneficiary prior to his death, the policy
proceeds are payable to the policyowner’s—in this case, Mark’s—estate.
insured. The preference beneficiary clause is found more often in group life insur-
ance policies than in individual life insurance policies.
If the insured and the beneficiary die at the same time or under
circumstances that make it impossible to determine which of them died
first, the insured is deemed to have survived the beneficiary, and policy
proceeds are payable as if the insured outlived the beneficiary, unless the
policy provides otherwise.
The following example illustrates how this rule of law affects the payment of
life insurance policy proceeds.
Example:
Amy Leong and her husband, James, died in an automobile crash, and the
evidence did not clearly indicate which of them died first. Amy owned a
policy on her life that named James as the primary beneficiary and Amy’s
sister, Gemma, as the contingent beneficiary. Gemma was still living at the
time of the accident.
Analysis:
If the insurer is located in a jurisdiction that has a typical simultaneous
death act, the insurer will assume that Amy survived the primary
beneficiary, James. Therefore, the policy proceeds are payable to the
contingent beneficiary, Gemma.
A simultaneous death act generally does not affect how policy proceeds are
paid in cases in which the beneficiary survives the insured.2 If the beneficiary
survives the insured by any length of time—even if only for a few minutes—then
the beneficiary usually is entitled to receive the policy proceeds. Therefore, if the
beneficiary survives the insured but dies before receiving the policy proceeds,
then the proceeds are payable to the beneficiary’s estate.
The policyowner, however, may prefer that the proceeds be paid to someone
other than the beneficiary’s estate if the beneficiary survives the insured by only
a short time. Some life insurance policies include a survivorship clause to address
this potential problem. A survivorship clause states that the beneficiary must
Example:
Lars Klunder was insured under a life insurance policy that included a
survivorship clause requiring the beneficiary to survive the insured by
30 days. His son, Nils, was the policy’s primary beneficiary, and his wife,
Hanna, was the contingent beneficiary. Lars and Nils were involved in a
boating accident; Lars died immediately, and Nils died five days later.
Analysis:
Because Nils died only 5 days after Lars died, he did not survive his father
by the required 30 days. Therefore, the proceeds are payable to the
contingent beneficiary, Hanna.
The amount of any premium due and unpaid at the time of the insured’s
death. This situation occurs when the insured dies during the policy’s grace
period before the premium due has been paid.
The result of this calculation is the total policy proceeds payable.
Example:
When Teemu Pulkkenin died in an accident, he was insured under a
$200,000 life insurance policy with a $100,000 accidental death benefit.
At the time of his death, $350 in accumulated policy dividends were on
deposit with the insurer, and Teemu had paid $450 in advance premiums.
Teemu also had an outstanding policy loan of $6,200.
Analysis:
The insurer was liable to pay the beneficiary a total benefit of $294,600.
That amount was calculated as follows:
$200,000 Death benefit of policy
+100,000 Accidental death benefit
+350 Accumulated policy dividends
+450 Premium paid in advance
–6,200 Outstanding policy loan
$294,600 Total benefit amount payable
who selects a settlement option for the beneficiary may choose to make the settle-
ment mode irrevocable, in which case the beneficiary will not be able to change
to another option when the policy proceeds become payable. For example, the
policyowner might not feel that the beneficiary would handle a single lump sum
responsibly, and would prefer that the death benefit take the form of a series of
payments. In contrast, the settlement mode is considered to be revocable when
the beneficiary has the right to select another settlement option when the proceeds
become payable. Further, if the policyowner has not chosen a settlement option
when the policy proceeds become payable, then the beneficiary has the right to
choose a settlement option.
The person or party who is to receive the policy proceeds under a settlement
option is referred to as the payee. The party who elects an optional mode of settle-
ment—either the policyowner or the beneficiary—also has the right to designate a
contingent payee, or successor payee, who will receive any proceeds still payable
at the time of the payee’s death.
Insurers commonly offer four optional modes of settlement in their individual
life insurance policies. These settlement options are the interest option, the fixed
period option, the fixed amount option, and the life income option.
Interest Option
The interest option is a settlement option under which the insurance company
invests the policy proceeds and periodically pays interest on those proceeds to
the payee. The policy usually guarantees that the insurer will pay at least a stated
minimum interest rate, but the insurer may pay a higher rate if its investment earn-
ings are better than expected.
The payee generally has the right to withdraw all or part of the policy proceeds
at any time or to place all of the proceeds—including any interest that the insurer
is holding—under another settlement option. However, a policyowner who selects
the interest option may place restrictions on the payee’s right to withdraw the
policy proceeds. For example, the policyowner might specify that the payee is not
permitted to withdraw more than 10 percent of the policy proceeds per year for the
first 10 years after proceeds are payable.
If the policyowner has not designated the fixed period option as irrevocable,
many policies permit the payee to cancel the option at any time and to collect all
of the remaining policy proceeds and unpaid interest in a lump sum. The payee,
however, usually does not have the right to withdraw only a part of the funds dur-
ing the payment period. Such a partial withdrawal would reduce the amount of the
remaining funds and would require the insurer to recalculate the entire schedule
of benefit payments.
The settlement options provision also guarantees that each annuity payment
will be at least as large as a stated amount. Policies typically contain charts that
list the amount of the guaranteed minimum annuity payments that will be avail-
able under each of the life income options. If the insurer’s payout factors in effect
at the time of settlement would result in larger payment amounts, then the insurer
typically provides the larger amounts, rather than the guaranteed amounts. We’ll
go into greater detail about annuities in the next two chapters.
Key Terms
policy proceeds paid-up additional insurance
class designation dividend option
primary beneficiary additional term insurance dividend
contingent beneficiary option
right of revocation assignment
revocable beneficiary assignor
vested interest assignee
irrevocable beneficiary absolute assignment
premium payment mode collateral assignment
participating policy assignment provision
nonparticipating policy preference beneficiary clause
divisible surplus simultaneous death act
policy dividend survivorship clause
dividend options settlement options
automatic dividend option settlement options provision
cash dividend option payee
premium reduction contingent payee
dividend option interest option
policy loan repayment fixed period option
dividend option fixed amount option
accumulation at interest life income option
dividend option life annuity
Endnotes
1. ACLI Life Insurers Fact Book 2015 (Washington, DC: American Council of Life Insurers, 2015), 68,
https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Pages/RP15-010.
aspx (30 August 2016).
2. In some jurisdictions, the simultaneous death act applies if the insured and beneficiary die within
a stated amount of time—often 120 hours—of each other. Under such a law, if the beneficiary dies
within 120 hours of the insured, then the insured is deemed to have survived the beneficiary, unless the
policy provides otherwise.
3. In many jurisdictions, the beneficiary’s unintentional wrongful killing of the insured also disqualifies
her from receiving the policy proceeds. For example, the beneficiary might have driven a car while
intoxicated and unintentionally caused an accident that resulted in the death of the insured, who was a
passenger in the car.
Chapter 10
Introduction to Annuities
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
10A Define longevity risk and important annuity terms, such as annuity,
annuity payment, contract owner, individual annuity, group annuity,
annuitant, payee, beneficiary, annuity start date, payout period, and
annuity period
10B Distinguish between immediate and deferred annuity contracts,
single-premium and flexible-premium annuity contracts, and fixed
and variable annuity contracts
10C Describe the features of the deferred income annuity (DIA), the
longevity annuity, and the fixed indexed annuity (FIA)
10D Explain standard contract provisions included in individual annuity
contracts
Outline
Important Annuity Terms Annuity Contract Provisions
Types of Annuity Contracts
Standard Annuity Contract
Provisions
Immediate and Deferred Annuities
Standard Deferred Annuity Contract
Single-Premium and Flexible- Provisions
Premium Annuities
Fixed and Variable Annuities
Other Types of Fixed Annuities
A
ccording to a recent study, most Americans rank death as their second-
greatest fear. What could be scarier than dying? Coming in at first place:
running out of money before you die.1
The life insurance products we have discussed so far in this text can provide
protection against the financial consequences of premature death. However, living
too long is also a risk. As a result of increasing life expectancies, many people now
live for a number of years or even decades longer than they planned. These people
face longevity risk, which is the risk that a person will live longer than expected
and will exhaust her assets.
In the United States, life insurers offer annuities as a means of protection
against longevity risk. As Figure 10.1 demonstrates, policy reserves for annuities
significantly exceed those for life and health insurance in the United States.
In some countries, such as Argentina, companies that issue life insurance poli-
cies and annuity contracts must be different legal entities. In the United States,
annuities are considered to be life insurance products, and only life insurance
companies are permitted to issue annuities. Thus, annuities must comply with
state insurance laws and regulations. Although only insurers may issue annuities,
many types of financial institutions, including depository institutions and broker-
dealers, may market and distribute annuities.
Supplementary
Contracts
Life 0.4%
Insurance
29% Annuities
66%
Health
Insurance
5%
Source: Adapted from ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015, Copyright © 2015 American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, DC,
(November 2015, 19,) 28 https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Documents/FB15_All.pdf
(15 February 2016). Used with permission.
In most cases, the contract owner, annuitant, and payee are the same person.
Important dates and time periods for annuities include the
Annuity start date, also known as the annuity commencement date, income
date, or maturity date, which is the date when the insurer is required to begin
making annuity payments under the contract.
Payout period, also known as the liquidation period or the distribution period,
which is the period during which the insurer makes annuity payments.
Annuity period, which is the time span between each of the annuity payments.
The annuity period is typically either one month or one year, although quar-
terly or semiannual payments are also available.
Example:
Jocelyn Picard used a lump sum of money to purchase an annuity from
the Reliable Insurance Company. According to the terms of this annuity,
Reliable will begin making annuity payments to Jocelyn beginning next
month on March 1, and it will continue making monthly annuity payments
to her for a 10-year period. If Jocelyn should die during this 10-year period,
Reliable will make the remaining annuity payments to her son, Grant.
Analysis:
Jocelyn is the contract owner and annuitant of this annuity. Her son, Grant,
is the beneficiary. The annuity start date is March 1, and the 10-year period
during which Reliable makes the annuity payments is the payout period.
The annuity period is one month, making her annuity a monthly annuity.
Example:
Abigail Choate purchased an immediate annuity on September 1, 2016.
She selected an annuity start date of February 1, 2017, and annual annuity
payments.
Analysis:
Abigail will begin receiving annual annuity payments on her annuity’s
start date of February 1, 2017.
People often purchase deferred annuities during their working years to accu-
mulate savings for retirement. At retirement, deferred annuity contract owners
may then convert the contract to payout status and begin receiving annuity pay-
ments. A deferred annuity contract that has been converted to payout status—
whether over the course of the annuitant’s life or a specific time period—is said to
be annuitized.
Figure 10.2 illustrates the difference between an immediate annuity and a
deferred annuity.
Immediate Annuity
Annuity start date
{
2010
Payout Period
Insurance company makes payments
$
Contract owner
pays a single premium
Deferred Annuity
2010 2015 2020
Accumulation Period
Payout Period
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Contract owner Insurance company makes payments
pays 10 annual premiums
Typically, the minimum amount required for the initial premium of an FPDA is
larger than the minimum amount allowed for subsequent premiums. For example,
an FPDA might require the contract owner to pay an initial premium of at least
$2,000 and then allow the contract owner to pay subsequent premiums of at least
$100 each year. The contract owner can also choose not to pay any premium in a
given year; the only requirement is that any premium amount paid each year must
fall within the stated minimum and maximum amounts
Figure 10.3 illustrates some of the different ways that people can use annuities.
Fixed Annuities
A fixed annuity is an annuity contract under which the insurer guarantees
(1) the minimum interest rate that it will apply to any accumulated value and
(2) the minimum amount of the annuity payments that it will pay. Most fixed
annuities state that after the insurer begins making annuity payments, the amount
of each payment will not change.
If the fixed annuity is an immediate annuity, then it has no accumulated value
and the amount of each annuity payment is known when the insurer issues the
contract.
If the fixed annuity is a deferred annuity, then the accumulated value earns
interest throughout the accumulation period. Fixed deferred annuities (FDAs)
typically specify two types of interest rates that apply to the accumulated value:
The guaranteed minimum interest-crediting rate is the minimum interest
rate an insurer must pay on an FDA’s accumulated value. Guaranteed mini-
mum interest rates ensure that the value of an FDA will increase over time and
that the contract owner will not lose any of the premiums—or principal—paid
into the annuity, unless he terminates the contract within a specified time
period.
The current interest-crediting rate is the rate of interest that an insurer
declares and pays on an FDA’s accumulated value for a specified period of
time. Insurers typically offer FDAs with current interest-crediting rates that
are good for one, three, and even five years. After this initial period, the insurer
will set a new interest rate that is good for one year at a time.
Example:
The Reliable Insurance Company offers a guaranteed minimum interest-
crediting rate of 1% on its FDAs. Reliable also offers the following current
interest rates:
1 year 3 years 5 years
1.10% 1.20% 1.25%
The new current interest-crediting rate can be higher or lower than the previ-
ous current rate, but it can’t drop below the guaranteed minimum interest-
crediting rate stated in the contract.
When an insurer provides interest-rate guarantees in a fixed deferred annuity
contract, the insurer agrees to assume the investment risk of the contract. The
insurer places the funds in relatively secure investments as part of its general
account. If the insurer’s general account performs well, the insurer can pay inter-
est rates that are higher than the minimum rates guaranteed in its contracts while
still achieving profits from the general account. The insurer, however, faces the
risk that its investments will perform poorly. If investment returns are less than the
minimum guaranteed in its contracts, the insurer will lose money.
Variable Annuities
A variable annuity is an annuity under which the amount of any accumulated
value and the amount of the annuity payments fluctuate in accordance with the
performance of one or more specified investment funds. In general, insurers make
no guarantees regarding the principal or the interest rate. The contract owner ben-
efits from any gains that result from profitable investments and bears most or all
of the risk of any losses from unprofitable investments. Because the investment
risk is assumed by the contract owner, variable annuities in the United States are
considered securities and must comply with federal securities laws.
Example:
On January 15, Trisha Hart paid a $100,000 single premium for a variable
deferred annuity from the Reliable Insurance Company. She chose to
invest her premium payments in two subaccounts, as follows:
25% of $100,000 in Subaccount A, or $25,000
75% of $100,000 in Subaccount B, or $75,000
At the time of purchase, accumulation units in
Subaccount A were valued at $20 per unit
Subaccount B were valued at $15 per unit
Therefore, Trisha purchased
1,250 accumulation units in Subaccount A ($25,000 ÷ $20)
5,000 accumulation units in Subaccount B ($75,000 ÷ $15)
By August 1, the value of the accumulation units in
Subaccount A had increased to $25 per unit
Subaccount B had decreased to $12 per unit
Analysis:
As of August 1, the value of Trisha’s investment in
•• Subaccount A was equal to $31,250, found as $25 × 1,250. Thus, Subac-
count A increased in value by $6,250, found as $31,250 − $25,000.
•• Subaccount B was equal to $60,000, found as $12 × 5,000. Thus, Sub-
account B decreased in value by $15,000, found as $75,000 − $60,000.
The accumulated value of her account was equal to $91,250 ($31,250 +
$60,000), so overall her subaccount investments declined in value during
the period.
Immediate Deferred
Annuity Annuity
Single-premium
Fixed
Single-premium OR
Annuity
Flexible-premium
Single-premium
Variable
Single-premium OR
Annuity
Flexible-premium
Percentage
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Change
2014/2013
Variable
Deferred $127.9 $140.5 $157.9 $147.4 $145.4 $140.0 -4%
Immediate 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.13 151%
Total Variable $128.0 $140.5 $157.9 $147.4 $145.4 $140.1 -4%
Fixed
Book Value1 $53.2 $30.3 $29.7 $20.2 $22.2 $20.9 -6%
Market-Value Adjusted 14.4 6.1 5.2 4.5 7.1 9.9 39%
Indexed 29.9 32.1 32.2 33.9 39.3 48.2 23%
Total Deferred $97.5 $68.5 $67.1 $58.6 $68.6 $70.0 15%
Immediate 7.5 7.6 8.1 7.7 8.3 9.7 17%
Deferred Income (DIA) * * 0.20 1.0 2.2 2.7 22%
Structured Settlements 5.6 5.8 5.1 5.0 5.3 5.4 3%
Total Fixed $110.6 $81.9 $80.5 $72.3 $84.4 $96.8 15%
TOTAL $238.6 $222.4 $238.4 $219.7 $229.8 $236.9 3%
•1Book Value = Traditional Fixed Deferred *Less than $50 Million
Source: Adapted from Todd Giesing, U.S. Individual Annuity Yearbook—2014 (Windsor, CT: LL Global, Inc., ©2015), 14.
Used with permission; all rights reserved.
Example:
Imran Kahn owns a fixed deferred annuity from the Reliable Insurance
Company. Imran’s annuity allows him to withdraw up to 10% of the
accumulated value each year without incurring a surrender charge. Last
year, Imran chose to have $400 per month deducted from his annuity’s
accumulated value and deposited into his bank account. Therefore, his
scheduled withdrawals for the year totaled $4,800 ($400 per month × 12
months). The accumulated value of Imran’s annuity on the most recent
contract anniversary date was $40,000.
Analysis:
Reliable determined that Imran’s free withdrawal amount for the contract
year was $4,000, found as $40,000 × 0.10. Because Imran withdrew
$800 more than this amount ($4,800 – $4,000), he was required to pay a
surrender charge on the $800.
Insurers also impose a surrender charge if the contract owner fully surren-
ders the contract within a stated number of years after it was purchased (the sur-
render period). In this case, the contract owner receives the annuity’s surrender
value—the accumulated value less any surrender charges included in the policy.
The amount of any surrender charge that is imposed usually declines over time.
An insurer typically imposes a surrender charge during the early years of a
deferred annuity contract to recover the costs it incurred in issuing the contract.
Example:
Cynthia Quincy purchased a single-premium fixed deferred annuity
contract from the Reliable Insurance Company. Her annuity contract
contained the following surrender charge schedule:
Analysis:
The insurer imposed a surrender charge of 6% of $100,000, or $6,000, and
paid Cynthia the surrender value of $94,000, found as $100,000 – $6,000.
Key Terms
longevity risk single-premium deferred annuity
annuity (SPDA)
annuity payments flexible-premium annuity
contract owner fixed annuity
individual annuity guaranteed minimum interest-crediting
group annuity rate
annuitant current interest-crediting rate
payee variable annuity
beneficiary fixed account
annuity start date accumulation unit
payout period deferred income annuity (DIA)
annuity period longevity annuity
immediate annuity fixed indexed annuity (FIA)
deferred annuity withdrawal provision
accumulation period surrender charge
accumulated value surrender value
single-premium annuity market-value-adjusted (MVA) annuity
single-premium immediate death benefit
annuity (SPIA)
Endnote
1. Allianz Life Insurance Company, Reclaiming the Future, http://www.thepg.com/resources/allianz_
brochure.pdf (9 October 2015).
Chapter 11
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
11A Identify and distinguish among the types of annuity options available
under annuity contracts
11B Describe the guaranteed benefits offered as riders on certain annuity
contracts
11C Explain how insurers determine the amount of each annuity payment
for a fixed single premium immediate annuity (SPIA) and describe the
effect of various factors on the amount of each annuity payment
11D Explain how insurers determine the amount of each annuity payment
for a fixed deferred annuity (FDA) and for a variable annuity
11E Explain the fees and charges typically paid by annuity contract
owners
11F Differentiate between qualified and nonqualified annuities and
describe the income tax treatment of annuities
11G Differentiate between an individual retirement account and an
individual retirement annuity and between a traditional and a Roth
individual retirement arrangement
Outline
Annuity Features Taxation of Annuities
Annuity Options
Individual Retirement Arrangements
Annuity Guarantee Riders
Financial Aspects of Annuities
Determining Annuity Payment
Amounts
Fees and Charges for Annuities
I
n this chapter, we continue our discussion of annuities by describing impor-
tant annuity features, such as annuity options and guarantee riders. We then
examine some of the financial aspects of annuities by explaining how insurers
determine annuity payment amounts and describing the kinds of fees and charges
they assess for annuities.
We then present another product in the United States that can offer protection
against longevity risk: the individual retirement arrangement. U.S. life insurers
offer one type of individual retirement arrangement—the individual retirement
annuity. Individual retirement arrangements (IRAs) have become the largest com-
ponent of private-sector retirement assets in the United States. According to the
Federal Reserve, as of the end of 2014, IRAs contained $7.4 trillion in assets,
accounting for 30 percent of all retirement assets.1
Annuity Features
Important annuity features include the options for distributing the annuity’s funds
and riders that give contract owners certain guaranteed benefits.
Annuity Options
Every annuity contract includes a list of annuity options, also known as payout
options, which are the choices a contract owner has as to how the insurer will dis-
LEARNING AID
tribute the annuity payments. In the case of an immediate annuity, the applicant
chooses an annuity option when she applies for the annuity. For a deferred annuity,
the contract owner must choose an annuity option if she decides to annuitize the
contract.
All but one of the options described below apply to immediate annuities and
to deferred annuities that have been annuitized. The exception is the lump-sum
distribution, which applies only to deferred annuities.
For all of the examples of annuity options in this chapter, we are assuming that
the contract owner and annuitant are the same person.
Lump-Sum Distribution
A deferred annuity contract owner may choose to have the accumulated value of
the annuity distributed in a single payment, known as a lump-sum distribution.
Once the insurer makes a lump-sum distribution, the annuity contract terminates,
and the insurer has no further obligation to the contract owner.
Example:
Miko Yamata plans to retire at age 60. However, she will not receive
benefits from her employer-sponsored retirement plan until she reaches
age 65. Miko purchased a five-year fixed period deferred annuity with an
annuity start date of when she reaches age 60.
Analysis:
When Miko reaches age 60, she will begin receiving annuity payments
from her annuity for five years. At the end of the five-year period, the
payments will cease, but at this time Miko will begin receiving benefits
from her employer-sponsored retirement plan.
Example:
Isabel Loyola, age 60, purchased a fixed amount annuity of $1,000 a
month with her husband, Clyde, as the beneficiary. She paid the insurer a
premium of $55,000.
Analysis:
The insurer will inform Isabel of how long she will receive monthly annuity
payments of $1,000, as well as the amount of the last payment, which will
be less than $1,000. If Isabel dies before the annuity payments have all
been made, Clyde will receive the remaining annuity payments.
Life Annuities
As noted in Chapter 9, a life annuity is an annuity that provides annuity payments
for at least the lifetime of the annuitant. Insurers offer various forms of life annui-
ties as annuity options.
The most basic form of life annuity is the life only annuity, also known as a
single life annuity or a straight life annuity, which provides annuity payments for
only as long as the annuitant lives. Upon the death of the annuitant, the insurer has
no further liability under the contract.
With a life only annuity, if the annuitant lives a very long time, he might receive
more in annuity payments than he paid in premiums. (Remember that we’re assum-
ing the contract owner and annuitant are the same person.) On the other hand, if
the annuitant dies shortly after annuity payments begin, he could end up paying a
great deal more in premiums than he receives in annuity payments. The possibility
of experiencing this second scenario makes many people unwilling to purchase
life only annuities. Instead, they purchase other forms of life annuities that contain
more guarantees than a life only annuity.
Example:
When Gabriel Long retired at age 65, he used a lump sum of $500,000 to
purchase a life only annuity. The annuity began making monthly payments
of $2,955 to Gabriel one month later.
Analysis:
Assume that Gabriel beats the odds by living to the age of 97. Gabriel
would receive a total of $1,134,720 in annuity payments from his life only
annuity—more than double what he paid for the annuity.
Now assume instead that Gabriel dies five years after purchasing his
annuity. At that time, he would have received $177,300 in total payments
from his annuity, an amount considerably less than his premium payment
of $500,000.
Example:
When Lawrence and Natasha Raymond retired at age 66, they purchased
a joint and survivor annuity that specified a monthly payment of $2,000,
beginning in one month and continuing until one of them died. In this
event, the insurer would reduce the monthly payments by 50% for the rest
of the survivor’s life.
Analysis:
When Lawrence died 15 years later, the annuity continued to make
payments in the amount of $1,000 a month. The annuity payments
continued until Natasha died at age 88.
A life income with period certain annuity guarantees that the insurer will
make annuity payments throughout the annuitant’s life and for at least a speci-
fied period, even if the annuitant dies before the end of that period. The contract
owner selects the guaranteed period, which is often 5 or 10 years. If the annuitant
dies before the period certain has expired, then the beneficiary becomes entitled
to receive the annuity payments for the rest of the period certain. If the annuitant
dies after the period certain has expired, annuity payments cease.
Example:
Blanche Bessett purchased a life income annuity with a 10-year period
certain. She named herself as the annuitant. She named her daughter,
Elaine, as the beneficiary. Blanche died 7 years after annuity payments
began.
Analysis:
Elaine received annuity payments for the rest of the 10-year period
certain—which was 3 more years. After the 10-year period expired, no
more payments were made. If Blanche had lived 15 years after annuity
payments began, she would have received the payments until she died,
and Elaine would have received no payments after her death.
The life income with refund annuity, also known as a refund annuity, provides
annuity payments throughout the annuitant’s lifetime and guarantees that at least
the purchase price of the annuity will be paid out. Therefore, if the annuitant dies
before the purchase price of the annuity has been paid out, the insurer will pay the
beneficiary an amount equal to the difference between the purchase price and the
amount that has already been paid out.
Example:
Harry Benedict paid a single premium of $150,000 for a life income with
refund annuity that provided an annuity payment of $10,000 per year.
He named his wife, Dorothy, as the beneficiary. Harry died 6 years after
annuity payments began; at the time of his death, he had received annuity
payments totaling $60,000.
Analysis:
Dorothy was entitled to a refund of $90,000, which was the difference
between the $150,000 purchase price and the $60,000 in annuity payments
made during Harry’s lifetime. If Harry had died 20 years after annuity
payments began, he would have received more in annuity payments than
he paid for the annuity (20 years × $10,000 = $200,000). In that case,
Dorothy would not have received a refund following Harry’s death.
Example:
Kishan Halwai purchased a variable deferred annuity with a single premium
payment of $500,000. Kishan’s variable annuity has a GMDB that specifies
a death benefit equal to the greater of (1) all premiums paid, adjusted
for withdrawals, or (2) the accumulated value at the time of his death.
When Kishan died, he had taken no withdrawals from his annuity, and its
accumulated value had fallen to $300,000.
Analysis:
The death benefit of Kishan’s variable annuity was $500,000 (the total
premiums paid), because this value was greater than the accumulated
value of $300,000.
Example:
Trey Lee, age 65, is interested in purchasing a fixed single-premium
immediate annuity (SPIA). The monthly payout factors per $1,000 of
premium for a male age 65 are
Analysis:
If Trey pays $100,000 for a life only fixed SPIA, he will receive $591 per
month for life (100,000 ÷ 1,000 = 100; $5.91 × 100 = $591).
Payout factors differ among products and among insurers. Payout factors take
into account the insurer’s costs, the rate of return the insurer is estimating it will
earn on the premiums over the life of the annuity, the annuitant’s average life expec-
tancy (mortality) based on age and gender, the annuity option selected, and the fre-
quency of the annuity payments. All other factors being equal, for a fixed SPIA,
The higher the estimated rate of return, the larger the amount of each annuity
payment.
The older a person is, the larger the amount of each annuity payment because
his average life expectancy is shorter than a younger person’s. Note, though,
that the payout factors for fixed period annuities and fixed amount annuities
do not take into account mortality.
A man’s annuity payment amount will be larger than a payment to a woman of
the same age because a man’s average life expectancy is less than a woman’s.
The longer the annuity option guarantees payments, the smaller each annuity
payment amount will be.
The less frequently annuity payments are made during the year, the larger
each annuity payment amount will be.
Example:
Emma Maier, age 65, owns an FDA that has an accumulated value of
$300,000. Emma wants to annuitize her contract and begin receiving
annuity payments for life only.
Analysis:
According to Figure 11.1, the appropriate payout factor is $4.27. With an
accumulated value of $300,000, Emma will receive $1,281 per month for
life (300,000 ÷ 1,000 = 300; $4.27 × 300 = $1,281).
Example:
Willow Tannenbaum owns a variable deferred annuity from the Reliable
Insurance Company. Willow decides to annuitize her contract, and she
selects a life only annuity option with fixed payments. Reliable will transfer
the contract’s accumulated value to the general account.
Analysis:
Willow will receive payments for life based on the following formula:
(Accumulated value ÷ 1,000) × Payout factor
An insurer uses this same formula to determine the amount of the fixed annuity
payments for a variable immediate annuity, except that the lump-sum premium pay-
ment is substituted for the funds from the accumulation units and fixed accounts.
If the contract owner annuitizes his variable deferred contract and elects vari-
able annuity payments, the amount of each annuity payment will vary. In this
situation, the accumulation units are used to purchase annuity units. An annuity
unit is a share in an insurer’s subaccount that is used in the calculation of variable
annuity payments; it is obtained by converting a variable deferred annuity’s accu-
mulation units upon annuitization or by making a premium payment for a variable
immediate annuity. Although the number of annuity units is set when the contract
is annuitized, the value of each annuity unit fluctuates daily. The insurer calculates
the value of an annuity unit based on the investment experience of the subaccount.
The insurer then calculates the amount of the annuity payment by multiplying the
total number of annuity units by the current value of an annuity unit.
Example:
Todd Lovett is the contract owner of a variable deferred annuity from
the Reliable Insurance Company. Todd recently decided to annuitize his
contract. At this time, Reliable used the accumulation units in Todd’s
annuity to purchase annuity units. Todd then had
300 annuity units in Subaccount A
150 annuity units in Subaccount B
200 annuity units in Subaccount C
On the date when Reliable made its first monthly annuity payment to
Todd, the value of an annuity unit in
Subaccount A was $5.00
Subaccount B was $4.00
Subaccount C was $2.50
Example (continued):
Therefore, Todd’s first monthly annuity payment was $2,600, found as
(300 × $5.00) + (150 × $4.00) + (200 × $2.50).
On the date when Reliable made its second monthly annuity payment, the
value of an annuity unit in
Subaccount A was $4.00
Subaccount B was $3.50
Subaccount C was $2.00
In this case, Todd’s second monthly annuity payment was $2,125, found as
(300 × $4.00) + (150 × $3.50) + (200 × $2.00). This amount was less than
the previous month’s annuity payment.
Each month Reliable will perform a similar calculation to determine the
amount of Todd’s annuity payment.
Taxation of Annuities
In the United States, annuities are classified for tax purposes as either qualified or
nonqualified:
A qualified annuity is an annuity that is purchased to fund or distribute funds
from a tax-advantaged retirement plan or IRA.
A nonqualified annuity is an annuity that is purchased outside of a tax-advan-
taged retirement plan or IRA. All of the examples of annuities in the previous
chapter and this chapter have been nonqualified annuities.
Figure 11.2 illustrates qualified and nonqualified deferred annuity sales in the
United States in 2014.
Under current U.S. federal tax laws, qualified annuities are taxed in accor-
dance with the tax laws that apply to the plan or IRA that the annuities fund or
distribute funds from. In contrast, all nonqualified annuities are treated the same
for purposes of U.S. federal income taxes: premiums are not tax deductible, but
investment earnings are tax deferred until payments are received from the annuity.
Thus, each annuity payment received under a nonqualified annuity is considered
to consist of the following two parts:
1. One portion of each annuity payment is considered a return of premiums,
which is not taxable because the purchaser has already paid income taxes on
that amount.
In the pie chart below, the segments “IRA” and “Employer Plan” represent qualified annuities.
Amounts in Billions
Employer Plan
$24.8
IRA
$109.80
Nonqualified
$84.5
Source: Adapted from Todd Giesing, U.S. Individual Annuity Yearbook—2014 (Windsor, CT: LL Global, Inc., © 2015), 37.
Used with permission; all rights reserved.
Figure 11.3 compares the features of traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs.
Withdrawals taxable? Yes, unless the owner made No, provided certain
nondeductible contributions requirements are met
Contributions deductible from Yes, up to certain limits, No
taxable income? unless the owner made
nondeductible contributions
Penalties for early withdrawals Yes, with certain Yes, with certain
(before age 59½)? exceptions exceptions
Key Terms
annuity options payout factor
lump-sum distribution annuity unit
fixed period annuity contract fee
period certain contract maintenance fee
fixed amount annuity front-end load
life only annuity service fee
joint and survivor annuity mortality and expense risks (M&E)
life income with period charge
certain annuity fund operating expense charge
life income with refund annuity qualified annuity
guaranteed minimum death nonqualified annuity
benefit rider (GMDB) individual retirement arrangement
guaranteed living benefit riders (GLBs) (IRA)
guaranteed lifetime withdrawal individual retirement account
benefit (GLWB) individual retirement annuity
guaranteed minimum income traditional individual retirement
benefit (GMIB) arrangement (IRA)
guaranteed minimum withdrawal Roth individual retirement arrangement
benefit (GMWB) (IRA)
guaranteed minimum accumulation
benefit (GMAB)
Endnote
1. Investment Company Institute. 2015 Investment Company Fact Book: A Review of Trends and
Activities in the U.S. Investment Company Industry, 55th ed., (Washington, D.C.: ICI, 2015), 151,
https://www.ici.org/pdf/2015_factbook.pdf (24 September 2015).
Chapter 12
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
12A Identify some common types of basic medical expense coverage and
describe the benefits that each provides
12B Identify the purpose of expense participation features in major
medical expense policies and give examples of commonly used
expense participation methods
12C Identify and describe common types of medical expense coverage
other than basic and major medical expense coverage
12D Describe the techniques that managed care plans use to manage
access to health care services and the costs of health care services
12E Describe the major characteristics of a consumer-driven health plan
(CDHP), and differentiate between a health savings account (HSA), a
health reimbursement arrangement (HRA), and a health care flexible
spending account (HCFSA)
12F Explain the effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(ACA) on insurers that offer medical expense insurance coverage
12G Identify the criteria used to classify disability income coverage as
either short-term coverage or long-term coverage
12H Identify the various definitions of total disability that are commonly
used in disability income insurance policies and distinguish among
these definitions
12I Explain the purpose of including an elimination period in a disability
income insurance policy and identify the length of the typical
elimination period
12J Identify and describe some supplemental benefits that may be
included in a disability income insurance policy
12K Identify the causes of disability that a disability income insurance
policy may exclude from coverage
12L Identify two types of specialized disability coverage that are designed
to meet the needs of closely held businesses for disability coverage of
owners, partners, and key people
12M Describe the important features of long-term care insurance (LTCI)
policies, such as benefit triggers, benefits, and elimination periods
Outline
Medical Expense Coverage Disability Income Coverage
Traditional Medical Expense Types of Disability Income Insurance
Insurance Definitions of Total Disability
Government-Sponsored Medical Elimination Period
Expense Coverage Benefit Amounts
Managed Care Plans Supplemental Disability Benefits
Consumer-Driven Health Plans Exclusions
The Patient Protection and Specialized Types of Disability
Affordable Care Act Coverage
Long-Term Care Coverage
Important Features of LTCI Policies
Benefits of LTCI Policies
M
ost people cannot afford to pay the full costs of their medical treatment
should they become seriously ill or require long-term care. Nor can most
people afford a loss of income when they are unable to work because of
an extended illness or injury. Life and health insurance companies market a vari-
ety of individual and group health insurance products designed to protect against
the financial losses that insureds are likely to experience as the result of an illness
or injury. In this chapter, we describe three important types of health insurance
products: medical expense coverage, disability income coverage, and long-term
care coverage.
Covered Expenses
The benefits that major medical expense coverage provides include payment for
many different types of medical treatments, supplies, and services. Major medical
expense policies usually cover a wider range of medical expenses than do basic
medical expense policies. The covered services and treatments typically include
all or some of the following medical expenses:
Hospital charges for room and board in a semiprivate room
Miscellaneous inpatient hospital charges, such as laboratory fees, X-rays,
medications, and the use of an operating room
Surgical supplies and services
Anesthesia and oxygen
Physical, occupational, and speech therapy
Surgeons’ and physicians’ services
Registered nurses’ services
Specified outpatient expenses, such as laboratory fees, X-rays, and prescrip-
tion drugs
Preventive services, such as childhood immunizations and periodic screening
and diagnostic tests
Major medical policies allow the insured to seek medically necessary treatment
from any licensed provider of recognized medical services.
Benefit Amounts
Major medical expense policies, like all health insurance policies, pay benefits
only for allowable expenses—that is, those expenses that the insured incurs that
are covered under the policy. Most policies specify a maximum benefit amount
that the insurer will reimburse for any allowable expense. In most cases, the maxi-
mum benefit amount payable for a particular service is based on the usual, custom-
ary, and reasonable fee for that service. The usual, customary, and reasonable
(UCR) fee is the amount that medical care providers within a particular geo-
graphic region commonly charge for a particular medical service. For example,
an insurer might set its maximum benefit amount for an appendectomy in a given
state at 90 percent of the UCR fee for the procedure in that state. If an insured
files a claim for an amount that is equal to or less than the maximum benefit for
the treatment received, then the insurer will allow the entire amount of the claim.
If the amount of the claim is greater than the maximum benefit, then the insurer
will allow expenses up to the maximum, and the insured is responsible for paying
expenses that exceed the maximum benefit amount.
A deductible is usually a flat dollar amount, such as $200 or $500, that the
insured must pay for eligible medical expenses before the insurer begins making
any benefit payments under a medical expense insurance policy. Most major medi-
cal expense policies contain a calendar-year deductible, which is a deductible that
applies to the total of all allowable expenses an insured incurs during a given cal-
endar year. In other words, an insured is required to pay the deductible specified
in the policy each calendar year in which she submits claims.
Example:
Kara Garner is covered by a major medical expense policy that specifies
a $500 calendar-year deductible. Last year, she incurred a total of $400
in allowable expenses. This year, she incurred a total of $800 in allowable
expenses.
Analysis:
Because Kara’s allowable expenses for last year were less than the $500
calendar-year deductible specified in her policy, she was required to pay
the entire $400 in expenses she incurred. For this year, she was required
to pay $500 of the $800 in allowable expenses she incurred to satisfy the
policy deductible, but she was eligible to receive at least a portion of the
remaining $300 from the insurer.
Example:
Duncan Wu is covered by a major medical expense policy that specifies a
$400 calendar-year deductible and a 20% coinsurance requirement. Last
year, Duncan incurred $1,000 in allowable expenses in March and $500 in
allowable expenses in September.
Analysis:
When Duncan incurred the $1,000 in allowable expenses in March, he first
had to pay the $400 calendar-year deductible. He was responsible for
paying coinsurance of 20% of the remaining $600, or 0.20 × $600 = $120.
So his total expenses in March were $520, found as $400 + $120, and the
insurer paid the remaining $480, found as $1,000 – $520.
In September, Duncan had already satisfied the calendar-year deductible,
so he paid only coinsurance of 20% on the $500 in allowable expenses: 0.20
× $500 = $100. The insurer paid the remaining $400, found as $500 – $100.
Most major medical expense policies limit the amount of money the insured
must pay under the coinsurance provision by including a maximum out-of-pocket
provision. The maximum out-of-pocket provision, also known as the stop-loss
provision, specifies that the policy will cover 100 percent of allowable medical
expenses after the insured has paid a specified amount out of pocket to satisfy the
deductible and coinsurance requirements.
Example:
Marisol Lopez is covered by a major medical expense policy that specifies
a $500 calendar-year deductible, a 20% coinsurance requirement, and
a $5,000 annual out-of-pocket maximum. Last year, Marisol incurred
allowable expenses of $2,500 in January and $30,000 in May.
Analysis:
Of the $2,500 in allowable expenses that Marisol incurred in January of
last year, she was required to pay $500 to meet the policy’s calendar-year
deductible and an additional $400, or 0.20 × $2,000, in coinsurance. The
insurer paid the remaining $1,600. Because she satisfied the deductible
in January, Marisol was required to pay only the 20% coinsurance on the
allowable expenses she incurred in May. The amount of this coinsurance
was $6,000, found as 0.20 × $30,000. However, the maximum annual
out-of-pocket provision in her policy requires Marisol to pay only $5,000
of her expenses per calendar year. Because she had already paid $900
in deductible and coinsurance amounts in January, Marisol paid only
$4,100 of her May expenses, found as $5,000 - $900. The insurer paid the
remaining $25,900.
Exclusions
Although major medical expense policies cover most medical expenses, they com-
monly exclude from coverage any medical expenses that result from the following
health care services:
Cosmetic surgery other than corrective surgery required as a result of an acci-
dental injury or for other medical reasons
Treatment of an illness or injury that occurs while the insured is in military
service or that results from an act of war
Treatment of intentionally self-inflicted injuries
Dental expense coverage, which provides benefits for routine dental exami-
nations, preventive dental work, and dental procedures needed to treat tooth
decay and diseases of the tooth and jaw. Dental expense coverage typically is
provided under a stand-alone dental expense policy.
Prescription drug coverage, which provides benefits for the purchase of drugs
and medicines that are prescribed by a physician and are not available over the
counter. Prescription drug coverage usually requires the insured to pay part
of the cost of the prescription out of pocket at the time of purchase. Benefit
levels and expense participation requirements for prescription drug coverage
usually vary according to the type of drug. For example, some policies require
insureds to pay one out-of-pocket amount for generic drugs and a higher
amount for brand-name drugs. Prescription drug costs are a covered expense
under many major medical expense policies, but prescription drug coverage
can also be provided under a stand-alone policy.
Vision care coverage, which provides the insured with benefits for expenses
incurred in obtaining eye examinations and corrective lenses. Vision care cov-
erage generally provides benefits to cover one routine eye examination per
year for each insured. Policies also specify the maximum benefit amount the
insurer will pay for eyeglass lenses and frames or contact lenses.
Medicaid is a joint U.S. federal and state program that provides basic medi-
cal expense and nursing home coverage to low-income individuals and to certain
elderly and disabled individuals.
Example:
Melvin Smith is a member of a managed care plan that requires a $30
copayment for physician office visits and a $20 copayment for prescription
drugs. On February 1, Melvin visited his PCP for treatment of a sprained
ankle. During the office visit, X-rays were taken of Melvin’s ankle. The PCP
also wrote Melvin a prescription for pain medication.
Analysis:
Before leaving the PCP’s office, Melvin paid a $30 copayment to cover
the office visit. The remaining charges for the office visit, including the
X-rays, were covered by the managed care plan. When Melvin took his
prescription to the pharmacy, he paid a $20 prescription drug copayment.
The pharmacy billed the managed care plan for the remaining cost of the
prescription drug.
Example:
Katrina Whitley is a member of a CDHP sponsored by her employer,
the Quark Corporation. This CDHP is accompanied by an HDHP with a
deductible of $1,300. Last year, Quark contributed $2,500 to an account
for Katrina to use for medical expenses. During the year, Katrina incurred
$4,800 in medical expenses.
Analysis:
Katrina used the $2,500 in her account to help pay for the $4,800 in
medical expenses. After the account was depleted, she then paid $1,300
out of pocket to satisfy the HDHP’s deductible. After the deductible was
satisfied, the HDHP paid the remaining $1,000 in medical expenses.
HSA distributions used to pay for qualified medical expenses are tax free.
Although distributions can be taken to pay for nonmedical expenses, these
distributions are subject to income tax and may also be subject to an additional
20 percent penalty tax. Exceptions to the penalty tax are for distributions that
occur after the accountholder dies, becomes disabled, or becomes eligible for
Medicare.
Other important characteristics of HSAs are that funds can be carried over
from one year to the next, and HSAs are portable, meaning that an employee who
terminates her employment can take her HSA with her.
Figure 12.2 illustrates the growth in HSAs in the United States from 2009 until
the end of 2014.
$24.2 billion
$25 billion
$19.4 billion
$20 billion
$15.4 billion
$15 billion
$12.2 billion
$9.9 billion
$10 billion
$7.2 billion
$5 billion
$0 billion
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Source: LIMRA analysis of the 2014 Year-End HSA Market Statistics & Trends Executive Summary, Devenir Research, February 2015.
The Retirement Income Reference Book (Windsor, CT: LL Global, Inc., © 2015), 186.
The employer may provide that any unused amounts in an HRA are carried
over from one year to the next. HRAs are not portable, however.
What is the tax Subject to income HRA will lose tax- HCFSA will lose
treatment of tax and may be favored status if a tax-favored status if
distributions to pay subject to distribution is taken a distribution is taken
for nonmedical additional 20% under these under these
expenses? penalty tax circumstances circumstances
Is it portable? Yes No No
Any Occupation
At one time, disability income policies defined total disability as a disability that pre-
vented the insured from performing the duties of any occupation. Because a strict
interpretation of this definition would prevent most people from ever qualifying for
disability income benefits, most insurers now define total disability more liberally.
Example:
Enzo Scanno, a surgeon, is insured under a disability income policy that
contains the “current usual” definition of total disability; the policy’s
definition of total disability changes after the insured has been disabled
for two years. Enzo was involved in an accident and lost his left arm.
Although he is unable to perform surgery, he has been hired to teach at
a medical college.
Analysis:
Because Enzo’s injury prevents him from working as a surgeon, he meets
the policy’s initial definition of total disability and therefore will be eligible
to receive disability income benefits for up to two years. At the end of that
time, Enzo will no longer be considered disabled because his disability
does not prevent him from teaching, an occupation for which he is
reasonably fitted by his education and training.
inability to perform the essential duties of the insured’s own previous o ccupation.
In fact, policies using this “own previous occupation” definition specify that ben-
efits will be paid even while the insured is gainfully employed in another occu-
pation, as long as she is prevented by disability from engaging in the essential
duties of the occupation specified in the policy. Policies containing this definition
of total disability often are sold to people who are employed in certain professional
occupations.
Example:
Suppose that Enzo Scanno from the last example is insured under a
disability income policy that contains this “own previous occupation”
definition of total disability. Because of his accident, Enzo is unable to
perform surgery and has begun teaching at a medical school.
Analysis:
Enzo is unable to perform surgery and therefore will never be able to work
in his own previous occupation. Therefore, even though Enzo is working
as a teacher, the insurance company will pay Enzo the full disability income
benefit until the end of the policy’s benefit period.
Presumptive Disabilities
Some disability income policies classify certain conditions as presumptive disabil-
ities. A presumptive disability is a stated condition that, if present, automatically
causes the insured to be considered totally disabled and thus eligible to receive
disability income benefits. An insured with a presumptive disability receives the
full income benefit amount provided under the policy, even if he resumes full-
time employment in a former occupation. Presumptive disabilities include total
and permanent blindness, loss of the use of any two limbs, and loss of speech or
hearing.
Elimination Period
Although some forms of disability income coverage are designed to provide ben-
efits beginning on the first day of an insured’s disability, most policies specify an
elimination period. An elimination period, often referred to as a waiting period
or a benefit waiting period, is the specific amount of time that the insured must be
disabled before becoming eligible to receive policy benefits.
Like the deductible amount found in medical expense policies, the purpose of
the elimination period is to reduce the cost of coverage. By specifying an elimi-
nation period, the insurer can substantially reduce the expenses involved in pro-
cessing and paying claims for disabilities that last for only a very short time. This
expense savings is reflected in the cost of the coverage; the longer the elimination
period, the lower the cost for otherwise equivalent disability income coverage.
The length of the elimination period included in both short-term and long-term
individual disability income policies is typically 30 days to 6 months. The elimi-
nation period in a group policy is typically related to the length of the maximum
benefit period:
Benefit Amounts
As a general rule, the benefit amount provided by disability income coverage is not
intended to fully replace an individual’s pre-disability earnings. Instead, disability
income benefits are limited to an amount that is lower than the individual’s regular
earnings when not disabled. Without such restrictions, a disabled insured could
receive as much income as he received while working and would have no financial
incentive to return to work.
Disability income benefit amounts, however, should not be so low that a dis-
abled insured suffers a drastic reduction in income and lifestyle; the purpose of
disability insurance, after all, is to provide protection against the economic con-
sequences of income loss. Therefore, the benefit amount should be related to the
amount of the individual’s income before disability and should be available for a
premium that the insured can afford.
Disability income providers use two methods to establish the amount of disabil-
ity income benefits that will be paid to a disabled person: (1) an income benefit for-
mula or (2) a flat benefit amount. The method used generally depends on whether
the coverage is provided by a group or an individual policy and on whether the
coverage is short term or long term.
Cost-of-Living-Adjustment Benefit
A cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA) benefit provides for periodic increases in
the disability income benefit amount that the insurer will pay to a disabled insured.
These increases usually correspond to increases in the cost of living. When a
policy or rider provides a COLA benefit, it usually defines an increase in the cost
of living in terms of a standard index, such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI),
that measures changes in the prices of goods and services.
Exclusions
Disability income policies often specify that income benefits will not be paid to a
disabled insured if the insured’s disability results from certain causes, including
Injuries or sicknesses that result from an act of war
Benefit Triggers
A benefit trigger in an LTCI policy specifies the conditions that establish an
insured’s eligibility to receive long-term care benefits. For LTCI policies, the fol-
lowing two occurrences serve as benefit triggers:
The inability of the insured to perform at least two ADLs without assistance
for a period of time expected to last at least 90 days
The need for supervision to protect a person from threats to health and safety
due to a severe cognitive impairment
A licensed health care practitioner, such as a physician, registered nurse, or
licensed social worker, must certify that the insured meets at least one of these
two criteria. Although the inability to perform IADLs is not a benefit trigger,
most LTCI policies provide help with IADLs when an insured becomes eligible
for benefits.
Elimination Period
The elimination period refers to the number of days that a person insured under
an LTCI policy must receive care before benefit payments under the policy can
begin. For individual LTCI policies, the insured generally chooses the elimination
period. Common elimination periods are 30 days, 60 days, and 90 days. Some
individual LTCI policies also offer a 0-day elimination period. In this case, ben-
efits will begin on the first day that the insured receives care. In general, the longer
the elimination period is for a policy, the lower the policy’s premium. Group LTCI
policies typically have a set elimination period of 90 days.
Example:
Sharon Baumer, age 55, an applicant for an LTCI policy, is trying to
determine the proper daily benefit amount for her policy. Sharon does
not plan to relocate when she retires.
Analysis:
After conducting some research, Sharon chose $250 a day because that
amount represented the average daily cost of nursing home care in her
area.
After choosing a daily or monthly benefit amount, the applicant must select a
benefit period, such as three, four, or five years. In general, longer benefit periods
increase the cost of a policy. In fact, lifetime benefit periods are rarely offered
anymore because of their prohibitive cost.
LTCI policies typically have maximum lifetime benefits, which take one of two
forms: (1) a maximum time period over which benefits will be paid or (2) a maxi-
mum dollar amount of benefits that will be paid. A policy that uses a maximum
time period stipulates that benefits will be paid for the benefit period chosen by the
applicant. A policy that uses a maximum dollar amount of benefits—sometimes
called the “pool of money” method—multiplies the benefit period by the daily or
monthly dollar amount for the policy. The resulting amount becomes the maxi-
mum lifetime benefit under the policy.
Example:
Sharon from the previous example chose a four-year benefit period for
her policy, which provides a $250 daily amount.
Analysis:
If Sharon’s policy uses the maximum time period to determine maximum
lifetime benefits, the policy will pay benefits for four years. If it uses the
maximum dollar amount of benefits, the maximum lifetime benefit will be
$365,000, calculated as $250 × (4 years × 365 days).
Example:
Riley Nugent owns an LTCI policy that pays a monthly benefit amount of up
to $3,000. The benefit payment option for his policy is the reimbursement
method. Riley incurs charges in a skilled nursing facility of $2,800 a month.
Analysis:
Because Riley’s policy uses the reimbursement method, Riley will pay the
skilled nursing facility $2,800 a month, and the insurer will then reimburse
Riley for $2,800 a month. The remaining $200 a month will remain in the
policy to be used at a later time if needed.
The indemnity benefit method, also known as the per diem method, pays a
stated benefit amount to the insured, regardless of the amount of expenses incurred.
Example:
Assume that Riley from our previous example had an LTCI policy that uses
the indemnity benefit method of paying benefits.
Analysis:
The insurer will pay benefits of $3,000 a month, even though Riley’s actual
expenses are only $2,800 a month.
The premium for an LTCI policy varies based on the benefit payment option
that the policyowner chooses. For example, all other factors being equal, an insured
who owns an LTCI policy that uses the indemnity benefit method will generally
pay a higher premium than he would with the reimbursement method.
Key Terms
indemnity benefits Patient Protection and
basic medical expense coverage Affordable Care Act (ACA)
hospital expenses health insurance exchange
surgical expenses benefit period
physicians’ expenses short-term individual disability
first-dollar coverage income coverage
major medical expense coverage long-term individual disability
usual, customary, and income coverage
reasonable (UCR) fee short-term group disability
deductible income coverage
calendar-year deductible long-term group disability
coinsurance income coverage
maximum out-of-pocket provision total disability
dental expense coverage presumptive disability
prescription drug coverage elimination period
vision care coverage partial disability
Medicare future purchase option benefit
Medicaid cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA)
managed care plan benefit
network key person disability coverage
primary care provider (PCP) disability buyout coverage
copayment cognitive impairment
health maintenance physical impairment
organization (HMO) activities of daily living (ADLs)
preferred provider organization (PPO) instrumental activities of daily living
point-of-service (POS) plan (IADLs)
consumer-driven health plan (CDHP) benefit trigger
high-deductible health plan (HDHP) elimination period
health savings account (HSA) reimbursement method
health reimbursement indemnity benefit method
arrangement (HRA)
health care flexible
spending account (HCFSA)
Chapter 13
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
13A Identify the parties to a group insurance contract and distinguish
between contributory and noncontributory group insurance plans
13B Describe the operation of the probationary period and the actively-at-
work requirement
13C Compare group underwriting with individual underwriting and
identify the risk characteristics that group underwriters consider
13D Identify the common types of insurable groups
13E Describe the purpose and operation of benefit schedules in group life
insurance policies
13F Explain the method insurers use to calculate group insurance
premiums
13G Define self-administered group plans and insurer-administered group
plans
Outline
Group Insurance Contracts Group Insurance Premiums
Certificates of Insurance Premium Amounts
Eligibility Provisions Premium Refunds
Group Insurance Underwriting Group Plan Administration
Reason for the Group’s Existence
Size of the Group
Flow of New Members into the
Group
Stability of the Group
Participation Levels
Determination of Benefit Levels
Nature of the Business
I
n previous chapters, we discussed mostly individual life and health insurance
products. In this chapter, we turn our attention to group insurance. Group
insurance is a method of providing life or health insurance coverage for a
group of people under one insurance contract. In many parts of the world, group
insurance represents a substantial portion of the overall life insurance market.
Figure 13.1 illustrates the growth of group life insurance coverage in the United
States from 1950 to 2014.
23,000
21,000
15,000
13,000
11,000
9,000
7,000
5,000
3,000
1,000
0
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2014
Year
Source: Adapted from ACLI, Life Insurers Fact Book 2015, Copyright © 2015 American Council of Life Insurers, Washington, DC,
(November 2015, 19,) 72 https://www.acli.com/Tools/Industry%20Facts/Life%20Insurers%20Fact%20Book/Documents/FB15_All.pdf
(15 February 2016). Used with permission.
Businesses purchase group life and health insurance for their employees as an
employee benefit. Although insurers issue group insurance policies covering other
types of groups, which we will discuss, most group insurance policies insure a
group of employees. For that reason, this text concentrates on employer-employee
group insurance policies. We sometimes refer to the group policyholder as the
employer and to the group insureds as the employees.
The group policyholder usually is responsible for handling some of the admin-
istrative aspects of the group insurance plan. For example, the group policyholder
typically handles the enrollment of new group members into the plan. The group
policyholder also is responsible for making all premium payments to the insurer, LEARNING AID
although the insured group members may be required to contribute some or all of
the premium amount. If the insured group members are not required to pay any
part of the group insurance premium, the group plan is a noncontributory plan.
If insured group members must pay part or all of the premium for their cover-
age, the group insurance plan is a contributory plan. A contributory plan usually
requires covered employees to pay their portion of the premium through payroll
deductions.
Certificates of Insurance
The group insureds are not parties to a master group insurance contract, do not
participate in the formation of the contract, and do not receive individual copies
of the contract. However, as we discussed, insured group members have certain
rights under the contract. Insurance laws typically require the insurer to provide
the group policyholder with written descriptions of the group insurance plan; the
group policyholder then delivers a written description to each group insured. This
document, known as the certificate of insurance, describes (1) the coverage that
the master group insurance contract provides and (2) the group insured’s rights
under the contract. As a result, an insured group member often is referred to as a
certificate holder. Many policyholders describe the group insurance coverage in a
special benefit booklet. In such cases, the benefit booklet contains the information
that would be included in a certificate, and the benefit booklet serves as the group
insurance certificate.
Example:
Sudoku Manufacturing Company purchased from Origami Life Insurance
Company a group life insurance policy covering its employees.
Analysis:
Sudoku and Origami are the parties to the master group insurance contract.
Sudoku is the group policyholder. Sudoku’s employees who are covered
under the policy are the group insureds. Each group insured receives a
certificate of insurance describing the coverage provided under the group
insurance contract and his rights under the contract.
Eligibility Provisions
An important term found in every group insurance policy is a description of the
individuals who are covered by the policy. A group policy often defines the indi-
LEARNING AID
viduals who are eligible for coverage as those employees in a specified class or
classes. These classes typically are defined by requirements that are related to
conditions of employment, such as salary, occupation, specific division within the
company, or length of employment.
Example:
Many group insurance policies state that all full-time employees are
eligible for coverage; therefore, at these companies, part-time workers
are excluded from the class of eligible employees.
Group insurance policies also impose requirements that new group members
must meet to be eligible for coverage. The most common of these eligibility provi-
sions are the actively-at-work provision and the probationary period.
An actively-at-work provision states that, to be eligible for coverage, an
employee must be actively at work—rather than ill or on leave—on the day the
insurance coverage is to take effect. If the employee is not actively at work on the
day the coverage is to take effect, then the employee is not covered by the group
insurance policy until he returns to work. For example, according to this provi-
sion, if an employee who would otherwise become eligible for coverage on March
1 is absent due to illness on that date, coverage would not begin until the day the
employee returns to work.
A probationary period is the length of time—typically, from one to six
months—that a new group member must wait before becoming eligible to enroll in
the group insurance plan. A probationary period requirement can reduce a plan’s
administrative costs by avoiding the cost of enrolling new employees who work
for the company for only a short period. Under a noncontributory group insurance
plan, a new employee who has met all other eligibility requirements is automati-
cally covered at the end of the probationary period. In contrast, if the plan is con-
tributory, then an eligibility period typically follows the probationary period.
An eligibility period, also called an enrollment period, is a specified period
of time, usually 31 days, during which a new group member may first enroll for
contributory group insurance coverage without providing evidence of insurability.
As part of the enrollment process, the employee must sign a written authoriza-
tion allowing the employer to make payroll deductions from her salary to cover
the amount of her premium contributions. Coverage under a contributory group
insurance plan will not become effective until the employee completes such an
authorization.
Example:
John Talbot and Enrique Ramirez both began work on September 1.
John and Enrique are both eligible for coverage under group life
insurance policies that their employers provide. Both policies have a
30-day probationary period. John’s employer has a noncontributory
plan, whereas Enrique’s employer has a contributory plan.
Analysis:
Both John and Enrique became eligible for life insurance coverage
on October 1, the first day following the end of their probationary
periods. John’s coverage under his employer’s noncontributory plan
was automatically effective on that date. Because Enrique’s plan was
contributory, his group coverage will become effective when he enrolls
and signs the payroll deduction authorization form during the eligibility
period.
Sometimes when an employee first becomes eligible for group insurance cover-
age under a contributory plan, she declines the coverage. In such cases, she must
usually submit satisfactory evidence of insurability before she is allowed to join
the plan at a later date. However, some contributory group insurance plans for
larger groups feature an open enrollment period, which is a period of time—typi-
cally a specified 30 or 31 days per year—during which eligible people who did not
join the group insurance plan at the first opportunity may join the plan without
providing evidence of insurability.
Example:
Paige Higgins works for a company that offers a contributory group life
insurance plan to its eligible employees. When Paige first became eligible
to enroll in the plan, she declined the coverage. A year later, however,
she decided she wanted to join the plan. Her company offers an open
enrollment period in December of each year.
Analysis:
As long as Paige enrolls during December, she will be allowed to join the
group life insurance plan without providing evidence of insurability.
Some group insurance policies provide coverage both for eligible group mem-
bers and the dependents of covered group members. Group insureds who are cov-
ered as dependents typically do not have the same rights as do members of the
insured group, such as the employees who are covered by an employer-employee
group policy. For example, a covered dependent typically does not have the right
to name the beneficiary of his group life insurance coverage. Instead, the benefi-
ciary of any dependent group life coverage usually is either (1) the insured group
member himself or (2) a beneficiary selected by the insured group member. Fur-
ther, if dependent coverage is optional, then the insured group members—not their
dependents—have the right to elect or reject that coverage.
Example:
David Hewitt works for Tallulah Enterprises, which purchased a group life
insurance policy to insure its employees and their dependents. The group
policy provides $100,000 of life insurance coverage on David and $25,000
of life insurance coverage on both David’s wife and his son.
Analysis:
According to the requirements of most insurance companies, David has
the right to name the beneficiary who is entitled to receive any group life
insurance benefits following his own death. In addition, depending on the
terms of the group policy, either David is the beneficiary of the coverage
on his wife and his son, or David has the right to name someone else as
the beneficiary of this coverage.
To prevent antiselection
To determine the appropriate premium rates to charge for the group insurance
Group underwriters consider a number of specific characteristics of a group
when evaluating whether that group is an acceptable risk. These risk characteris-
tics include the reason for the group’s existence, the size of the group, the flow of
new members into the group, the stability of the group, the required percentage of
eligible group members who must participate in the plan, the way in which benefit
levels will be determined, and the activities of the group. The group underwriter
may also consider additional characteristics of the group.
Underwriting guidelines vary for each of the preceding types of groups. For
example, group underwriting guidelines typically require the employer in an
employer-employee group insurance plan to pay at least a portion of the group
insurance premium. This requirement, which is imposed by law in many juris-
dictions, gives the employer a financial interest in the operation of the plan. In
contrast, other group policyholders usually are not required to pay a portion of the
group insurance premium.
Some underwriting guidelines are more stringent for some types of groups
than others. For example, antiselection by individual group members is much
more likely to occur in association groups in which group membership is volun-
tary than in an employer-employee group. As a result, insurance companies often
impose more stringent underwriting requirements on association groups than on
employer-employee groups. An insurer might be willing to issue an employer-
employee group insurance policy to a group with as few as 10 members, but it
might refuse to issue an association group insurance policy covering fewer than
50 association members.
The underwriting process varies depending on the size of the group. For very
small groups, such as groups with fewer than 15 members, group underwriting
guidelines may require each individual member of the group to submit evidence of
insurability.2 When calculating the anticipated loss rate of a slightly larger group,
such as a group with between 15 and 50 members, the underwriter often pools
several groups that are of the same approximate size and are in the same business
sector. In this case, the underwriter is expecting the experience of those small
groups taken as a whole to approximate the experience of a single large group.
Most insurers establish minimum size requirements for groups they are willing
to insure. Minimum group sizes typically range from 3 to 50, depending on the
insurer.
Example:
A group of seasonal or temporary workers generally would not be
considered an insurable group.
Participation Levels
Group insurance underwriting requirements impose limits on the minimum per-
centage of eligible group members that a group insurance plan must cover. Note
that these requirements relate to participation by eligible group members. Mini-
mum participation requirements minimize antiselection. Employees who believe
themselves to be in good health are less likely than other employees to choose
to participate in group insurance plans. Without minimum participation require-
ments, an insurance company could not rely on the group underwriting process
because an unusually large percentage of group members might be individuals
who were uninsurable on an individual basis.
Example:
Many insurers would decline to issue group disability income coverage to
a team of professional hockey players.
Premium Amounts
Group insurance premiums typically are payable monthly. The insurer establishes
the premium rate for a group insurance policy at the beginning of each policy year.
LEARNING AID
That premium rate usually is calculated on the basis of a stated benefit unit.
Example:
The premium rate for group life insurance usually is stated as a rate per
$1,000 of death benefit provided by the policy.
Although the premium rate for a group insurance policy generally is guaran-
teed for one year, the premium amount payable each month varies, depending on
the amount of insurance in force that month. A group life insurance policy, for
example, requires a monthly premium amount that is equal to the premium rate
per $1,000 of coverage multiplied by the number of benefit units ($1,000 of cover-
age) in force that month. If additional employees become eligible for coverage dur-
ing the policy year, the number of benefit units in force increases, and the premium
amount the employer pays to the insurer each month increases. The premium rate
per $1,000 of coverage, though, does not change during the year.
Example:
The Polyhedron Company provides $50,000 of noncontributory group
life insurance coverage for each of its full-time employees. The current
monthly premium rate for this coverage is $0.40 per $1,000 of coverage.
In January, Polyhedron had 10 full-time employees. In March, Polyhedron
hired 2 new full-time employees, who became eligible for group life
insurance coverage in April.
Analysis:
In January, February, and March, Polyhedron provided $50,000 of group
life insurance coverage to 10 employees, resulting in a monthly premium
of $200 for each of those three months, calculated as
Example (continued):
Premium Refunds
Depending on the size of the group and the insurance arrangement, at the end of
each policy year, a portion of the group insurance premiums paid during the year
may be refunded to the group policyholder. Group insurance premium refunds
are similar to the policy dividends paid on individual participating life insurance
policies. These refunds are usually called dividends by those companies that also
issue individual participating policies. Companies that do not issue participating
policies generally call premium refunds for group insurance experience refunds.
The insurer determines the amount of a premium refund by evaluating the
group’s claims experience and expense experience during the policy year. If
the group incurred fewer claims or if the insurer incurred lower administrative
expenses than anticipated when the prior year’s premium rate was established,
then the insurer may refund a portion of the premium paid for the coverage.
All premium refunds are payable to the group policyholder, even if the plan
is contributory. If the amount of the refund to the policyholder of a contributory
plan is greater than the portion of the group premium that was paid out of the
policyholder’s funds, then the excess amount must be used for the benefit of the
individual participants in the plan.
Example:
The Marzipan Company has a contributory group life insurance plan for
its employees. Last year, the premiums that Marzipan paid were higher
than the claims and expenses incurred by the plan. Therefore, Marzipan
received a premium refund for last year’s coverage under the plan.
Analysis:
Marzipan must use this excess refund to benefit the employees who
participate in the group life insurance plan. For example, Marzipan could
use the excess refund to pay a portion of the employees’ contributions for
this year, or it could use the excess refund to pay for additional benefits
for its covered employees.
Key Terms
group insurance
master group insurance contract
group insured
noncontributory plan
contributory plan
certificate of insurance
certificate holder
actively-at-work provision
probationary period
eligibility period
open enrollment period
benefit schedule
manual rating
experience rating
blended rating
self-administered group plan
insurer-administered group plan
Endnotes
1. The same rules and restrictions that apply to individual life insurance beneficiary designations also
apply to group life insurance beneficiary designations. In addition, a group insured may not name the
group policyholder as beneficiary unless the group insurance plan is a group creditor life plan, which
we discuss later.
2. Group life insurance underwriting requirements may vary according to the amount of coverage on
an individual. For example, some insurers may require evidence of insurability from group insureds
with coverage in excess of a certain amount. In addition, in the United States, various state and fed-
eral laws limit the ability of insurers to require evidence of insurability for health insurance under
certain circumstances.
3. In determining minimum participation percentages, insurers typically do not consider employees
who decline coverage because they have other coverage available to them, such as through another
employer or a spouse’s employer.
Chapter 14
Objectives
After studying this chapter, you should be able to
14A Identify and describe typical provisions contained in a group life
insurance policy and compare these provisions with similar provisions
contained in individual life insurance policies
14B Describe the features of group term life insurance plans, group
accidental death and dismemberment plans, group cash value
insurance plans, and group creditor life insurance plans
14C Explain the tax benefits generally provided to qualified retirement
plans in the United States
14D Identify the components of a qualified retirement plan and describe
the types of provisions that a plan document contains
14E Identify and describe four common types of qualified retirement plans
and four types of tax-advantaged retirement plans in the United States
14F Describe examples of government-sponsored retirement plans in the
United States and Canada
Outline
Group Life Insurance Group Retirement Plans
Group Life Insurance Policy Components of a Retirement Plan
Provisions Types of Qualified Retirement Plans
Group Life Insurance Plans Other Types of Retirement Plans
Government-Sponsored Retirement
Plans
N
ow that you are familiar with the basic principles of group insurance, we
turn to a more specific discussion of group life insurance and group retire-
ment plans.
Example:
The Moonbeam Corporation provides a group life insurance plan for its
eligible employees. The plan specifies a 31-day grace period. Moonbeam
failed to pay the premium that was due on January 1. On February 1,
Moonbeam had still made no premium payments.
Analysis:
Although Moonbeam’s group life insurance plan terminated for
nonpayment of premium on February 1, Moonbeam is obligated to pay
the insurer the premium for the coverage in January.
Incontestability Provision
Group life insurance policies include an incontestability provision, which limits
the period during which the insurance company may use statements in the group
insurance application to contest the validity of the master group insurance con-
tract. Generally, the incontestability provision in a group life insurance policy
limits the period during which the insurer may contest the contract to two years
from the date of issue. Material misrepresentation occurs much less frequently in
group life insurance applications than in individual life insurance applications. As
a result, insurance companies rarely contest the validity of group life insurance
contracts.
Individuals insured under a group life insurance policy usually are not required
to provide evidence of insurability to be eligible for group coverage. Sometimes,
however, group insureds are required to provide such evidence. If a group insured
makes material misrepresentations about his insurability in a written application,
then the insurance company can contest the individual group member’s coverage
on the grounds of material misrepresentation without contesting the validity of the
master group contract itself. The incontestability provision of a group life insur-
ance policy typically states that the insurer cannot contest the insurance coverage
of any group insured after the coverage has been in effect during the lifetime of the
insured for a period of one or two years from the date on which the group insured’s
coverage became effective.
Example:
Jocelyn Picard was required to fill out a medical questionnaire to be eligible
for group life insurance coverage. In completing the questionnaire, Jocelyn
made material misrepresentations about her health. Jocelyn died six
months after her coverage became effective. While investigating the claim,
the insurance company discovered Jocelyn’s material misrepresentations.
The group policy contained a two-year contestable period.
Analysis:
Jocelyn died while her group insurance coverage was contestable.
Therefore, the insurer had the right to contest the validity of Jocelyn’s
coverage on the basis of the material misrepresentations in her medical
questionnaire. Jocelyn’s material misrepresentations did not affect the
validity of the master group contract.
Beneficiary Designation
Under the terms of a group life insurance policy—unless it is a group creditor life
policy—each insured group member has the right to name a beneficiary who will
receive the insurance benefit that is payable when that group insured dies. (We
describe group creditor life policies later in the chapter.) The insured group mem-
ber also has the right to change the beneficiary designation.
The beneficiary designation rules and restrictions that apply to individual life
insurance beneficiary designations also apply to group life insurance beneficiary
designations. The only other restriction on the insured group member’s right to
name the beneficiary is that he may not name the group policyholder as beneficiary
unless the plan is a group creditor life plan.
We discussed beneficiary designations for dependent coverage in the previous
chapter.
Portability Provision
Many group life insurance policies contain a portability provision, which allows
a group insured whose coverage terminates for certain reasons to continue her
coverage under the group plan. Group insurance coverage that can be continued if
an insured employee leaves the group is known as portable coverage. Continued
coverage usually is term insurance coverage.
To continue coverage under the portability provision, a group insured generally
must complete an application and pay the initial premium within a stated time—
usually 31 days or less—after her group coverage terminates. Depending on the
amount of coverage requested and the age of the applicant, the insurer may also
require the group insured to answer some medical questions or submit evidence of
her insurability. The maximum amount of continued coverage available under the
portability provision may be less than the amount of coverage the group insured
had under the group plan. The premium rate is based on the insured’s attained age
when the continued coverage begins.
Some group life insurance policies include a conversion privilege, which
allows a group insured whose coverage terminates for certain reasons to convert
her group life insurance coverage to an individual life insurance policy, usually
without presenting evidence of insurability. The group insured usually can pur-
chase any type of individual life insurance policy that the insurer is then issu-
ing, but the amount of coverage the group insured can purchase is limited. The
premium rate for converted coverage typically is higher than for an equivalent
amount of continued coverage. Some group life insurance policies contain both a
portability provision and a conversion privilege, but the eligibility requirements
and amounts of coverage available may vary depending on the type of coverage.
Misstatement of Age
The misstatement of age or sex provision included in individual life insurance
policies specifies that the insurer will adjust the amount of the death benefit pay-
able to reflect a misstatement of the insured’s age or sex. In contrast, the amount
of the benefit payable following a group insured’s death is specified in the group
life insurance policy’s benefit schedule. As a result, the misstatement of age pro-
vision in most group life insurance policies specifies that, if the amount of the
premium required for the coverage is incorrect as the result of a misstatement
of a group member’s age, then the insurer will retroactively adjust the amount of
the premium required for the coverage to reflect the group insured’s correct age.
Note that the misstatement of age provision comes up most often with voluntary
group life insurance plans, in which employees are given the option of purchasing
life insurance coverage and, if they choose to receive the coverage, they pay 100
percent of the premiums.
Example:
The Einkorn Corporation provides a voluntary group life insurance plan
for its eligible employees. One of Einkorn’s employees, Patricia McElroy,
applied for $100,000 of life insurance coverage under the plan. Patricia
was 35 years old, but her age was mistakenly reported to the insurer as
45 years old. The insurer discovered the mistake one year later when it
received a claim for the policy proceeds.
Analysis:
In this situation, the insurer will retroactively adjust the amount of the
premium for Patricia’s coverage. Because Patricia’s age was younger than
reported to the insurer, the insurer will refund the difference to Patricia’s
beneficiary.
The amount of the death benefit payable remains unaffected. Because group life
insurance premium rates typically do not vary according to the sex of the insured,
such policies typically do not include a misstatement of sex provision.
Settlement Options
When a person insured under a group life insurance policy dies, the beneficiary
of the group insured’s coverage usually receives the death benefit in a lump sum.
Sometimes settlement options also are available. If so, the group life insurance pol-
icy gives the group insured or the beneficiary the right to choose a settlement option.
All of the usual settlement options described in Chapter 9 are generally made avail-
able. However, for a group insured or beneficiary to select the life income option, the
death benefit payable usually must be at least a stated minimum amount.
When employers pay the premiums to provide their employees with group term
life insurance, the employees receive a financial benefit. The income tax treatment
of such group term life insurance coverage varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
In some countries, such as the United States and Canada, some or all of the premi-
ums paid by the employer for group term life insurance coverage for employees are
considered taxable income to the employee. In other countries, such as the United
Kingdom, such premiums are not considered taxable income to the employee.
Example:
Karl Bernhard is covered under the group life insurance plan his employer
provides. The group insurance policy provides $100,000 of group term
life insurance, $100,000 of group accidental death and dismemberment
insurance, and $50,000 of business travel accident insurance.
Analysis:
If Karl dies in an accident while he is traveling on business for his employer,
his beneficiary would be entitled to receive $250,000 in benefits, calculated
as $100,000 + $100,000 + $50,000. If Karl dies in an accident while he is on
a vacation trip, then his beneficiary would be entitled to receive $200,000
in benefits, calculated as $100,000 + $100,000.
The specific characteristics of group cash value life insurance coverage vary
from plan to plan. Three commonly offered group cash value life insurance plans
are level premium whole life plans, group universal life plans, and group variable
universal life plans.
The Plan
The plan sponsor determines the type of plan to establish and the terms of that
plan, which are described in a plan document. A plan document is a detailed
legal agreement that establishes the existence of a retirement plan and specifies
the rights and obligations of various parties to the plan. Among other matters, the
plan document describes the individuals whom the plan covers, the benefits that
the plan provides, and the method for funding the plan. Plan participants typically
receive a summary plan description that informs them of their rights under the
plan.
Example:
The Peaberry Company offers a qualified retirement plan to its employees
who are 21 years of age or older and who have at least one year of
employment.
The plan document also specifies the plan’s vesting requirements, which define
when a plan participant is entitled to receive partial or full benefits under the plan
even if he terminates employment prior to retirement. Vesting requirements differ
for contributions made by plan participants and for those made by the employer:
A plan participant’s right to receive benefits funded by his own contributions
vests immediately because those contributions belong to the participant.
Qualified plans must also include minimum vesting standards, which state
when a plan participant has the right to receive benefits funded by employer
contributions. For example, a participant might become 20 percent vested in
benefits funded by employer contributions each year, until 100 percent vesting
is reached after the fifth year.
Benefit Formulas
A retirement plan’s benefit formula describes the calculation of the plan spon-
sor’s financial obligations to plan participants. Two types of benefit formulas are
LEARNING AID
common:
A defined benefit formula specifies the amount of the retirement benefit a
plan sponsor agrees to provide to each plan participant. A retirement plan
structured according to a defined benefit formula is referred to as a defined
benefit plan.
A defined contribution formula specifies the contributions that the plan spon-
sor agrees to make to the plan. The benefit that a participant will receive is
not determined in advance of the participant’s retirement but depends on the
investment performance of the funds in the plan. A retirement plan struc-
tured according to a defined contribution formula is referred to as a defined
contribution plan.
In recent years, defined contribution plans have become increasingly popular
among plan sponsors establishing retirement plans. The reason for this rise in pop-
ularity is that when an employer establishes a defined contribution plan, it knows
in advance what it will cost to fund the plan each year. In contrast, an employer
that establishes a defined benefit plan must rely on actuarial estimates of what it
will cost each year to fund the plan. The employer also has no guarantee that its
costs will remain at or below the estimated amount.
Figure 14.1 illustrates the differences between defined benefit plans and defined
contribution plans.
Plan Administration
The plan sponsor usually names a plan administrator, who is the party respon-
sible for handling the administrative aspects of a retirement plan. The plan admin-
istrator oversees the plan’s operation and ensures that the plan is administered in
accordance with the plan document. The administrator may be the sponsoring
employer or it may be a board or committee that the employer establishes. The
plan administrator also may need to obtain the services of other professionals,
such as accountants, actuaries, and attorneys.
Amount of
Amount of Sponsor’s
Plan Participant’s
Contributions
Retirement Benefits
Funding Vehicles
The sponsor of a retirement plan must choose a funding vehicle for the plan.
A funding vehicle, also known as an investment vehicle or a funding instrument,
is an arrangement for investing a retirement plan’s assets as the assets are accumu-
lated. Life insurers offer a variety of products that are designed to serve as retire-
ment plan funding vehicles, including group annuities.
Pension Plans
The most common type of defined benefit plan is the defined benefit pension
plan, which is a type of qualified retirement plan that provides plan participants
with a lifetime monthly income benefit—known as a pension—at retirement.
The employer usually makes all plan contributions, and those contributions are
mandatory. To adequately fund the plan, the employer must know how much
money it needs to contribute each year to pay the promised benefits. Actuaries
typically make the required calculations using actuarial methods and assumptions
about the expected investment returns and the make-up of the employee group that
will be entitled to benefits.
401(k) Plans
In the United States, the 401(k) plan has become the most popular type of retire-
ment plan. A 401(k) plan is a type of qualified retirement plan that employers
establish for the benefit of employees and that allows both employers and employ-
ees to make specified contributions to the plan that reduce current taxable income.
Therefore, when an employee contributes to a 401(k) plan, the amount of his con-
tribution is typically not included in his current taxable income.
Example:
The Stardust Corporation provides a 401(k) plan for its employees.
Jonathan Rydal, a Stardust employee, earned $70,000 last year and
contributed $7,000 of that amount to his 401(k) account.
Analysis:
Jonathan’s taxable income for last year was $63,000, found as $70,000 –
$7,000. When Jonathan retires and begins to take distributions from his
401(k) account, he will then pay taxes on the money he contributed to the
plan over the years.
Note that very few stand-alone profit sharing plans exist in the United States
these days. The vast majority of 401(k) plans allow for profit sharing contributions,
thus eliminating the need to establish a separate profit sharing plan.
Social Security provides a monthly income benefit to people who have contrib-
uted to the program during their income-earning years. These retirement benefits
are available to covered individuals who are age 62 and older, although people who
claim their retirement benefits prior to a specified retirement age—known as their
full retirement age—receive a lower benefit amount than they would if they claim
benefits at or after the specified retirement age. The federal government admin-
isters the Social Security program and makes frequent changes in the program’s
funding and benefits.
Many other countries have government-sponsored retirement plans; however,
the exact provisions vary widely from country to country. Figure 14.2 describes
government-sponsored retirement plans in Canada.
In Canada, three separate government plans provide pensions to retirees: (1) the Old Age
Security Act, which is in effect throughout Canada; (2) the Canada Pension Plan, which operates
in all Canadian provinces except Quebec; and (3) the Quebec Pension Plan.
Key Terms
portability provision
portable coverage
conversion privilege
group creditor life insurance
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
plan sponsor
plan participant
plan document
vesting requirements
benefit formula
defined benefit formula
defined benefit plan
defined contribution formula
defined contribution plan
plan administrator
funding vehicle
defined benefit pension plan
pension
401(k) plan
profit sharing plan
employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)
simplified employee pension (SEP)
savings incentive match plan for employees (SIMPLE) IRA
403(b) plan
457(b) plan
Social Security
Glossary
401(k) plan. A type of qualified retirement plan that employers establish for the
benefit of employees and that allows both employers and employees to make
specified contributions to the plan that reduce current taxable income. [14]
403(b) plan. A tax-advantaged retirement plan available only to tax-exempt orga-
nizations established for religious, charitable, and educational purposes and
public schools. [14]
457(b) plan. A deferred compensation plan established by a state or local govern-
ment or a tax-exempt organization. [14]
absolute assignment. An irrevocable assignment of a life insurance policy under
which a policyowner transfers all of his policy ownership rights to the assignee.
Contrast with collateral assignment. [9]
ACA. See Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
accelerated death benefit. A supplemental life insurance policy benefit that
typically provides that a policyowner may elect to receive all or part of the
policy’s death benefit before the insured’s death, if certain conditions are met.
Also known as a living benefit. [7]
acceptance. The offeree’s unqualified agreement to be bound to the terms of the
offer. [3]
accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) benefit. A supplemental life
insurance policy benefit that provides an accidental death benefit and also pro-
vides a dismemberment benefit payable if an accident causes the insured to lose
any two limbs or sight in both eyes. [7]
accidental death benefit. A supplemental life insurance policy benefit that requires
the insurer to pay a specified amount of money in addition to the policy’s basic
death benefit if the insured dies as a result of an accident. [7]
account value. See accumulated value.
accumulated value. For a deferred annuity, the amount paid for the annuity, plus
the interest earned, minus the amount of any withdrawals and fees. Also known
as the accumulation value, contract value, or account value. [10]
accumulation at interest dividend option. A policy dividend option under which
the policy dividends are left on deposit with the insurer to accumulate at inter-
est. Sometimes called dividends on deposit option. [9]
accumulation period. The period between the contract owner’s purchase of a
deferred annuity and either the date when the annuity’s payout period begins or
the date when the annuity is terminated. [10]
annuity options. The choices a contract owner has as to how the insurer will dis-
tribute the annuity payments. Also known as payout options. [11]
annuity payments. The monthly, quarterly, semiannual, or yearly payments that
the insurer promises to make under an annuity contract. Also known as annuity
benefit payments, annuity income payments, and periodic income payments.
[10]
annuity period. For an annuity, the time span between each of the annuity
payments. [10]
annuity start date. The date when the insurer is required to begin making annu-
ity payments under the contract. Also known as the annuity commencement
date, income date, or maturity date. [10]
annuity unit. A share in an insurer’s subaccount that is used in the calculation of
variable annuity payments. [11]
antiselection. The tendency of individuals who believe they have a greater-than-
average likelihood of loss to seek insurance protection to a greater extent than
do other individuals. Also known as adverse selection or selection against the
insurer. [1]
APL option. See automatic premium loan option.
applicant. The person or business that applies for an insurance policy. [1]
assets. Items of value, such as cash, buildings, and investments, that a company
owns. [2]
assignee. The party to whom life insurance property rights are transferred. [9]
assignment. An agreement under which the policyowner transfers some or all of
his ownership rights in a life insurance policy to another party. [9]
assignment provision. A life insurance policy provision that describes the roles of
the insurer and the policyowner when the policy is assigned. [9]
assignor. The policyowner who makes an assignment of a life insurance policy. [9]
assuming company. See reinsurer.
attained age. The age the insured has reached (attained) on a specified date. [5]
attained age conversion. A conversion of a term life insurance policy to a cash
value insurance policy in which the premium rate for the cash value policy is
based on the insured’s age at the time the policy is converted. [5]
automatic dividend option. A specified policy dividend option that the insurer
will apply if the owner of a participating policy does not choose an option. [9]
automatic nonforfeiture benefit. A specific nonforfeiture benefit that becomes
effective automatically when a renewal premium for a cash value life insurance
policy is not paid by the end of the grace period and the policyowner has not
elected another nonforfeiture option. [8]
automatic premium loan (APL) option. A cash value life insurance policy non-
forfeiture option under which the insurer will automatically pay an overdue
premium for the policyowner by making a loan against the policy’s cash value
as long as the cash value equals or exceeds the amount of the premium due. [8]
bargaining contract. A contract in which both parties, as equals, set the terms
and conditions of the contract. Contrast with contract of adhesion. [3]
basic medical expense coverage. Medical expense insurance coverage that pro-
vides separate benefits for each type of covered medical care cost: hospital
expenses, surgical expenses, and physicians’ expenses. [12]
beneficiary. (1) For a life insurance policy, the person or party the policyowner
names to receive the policy benefit. [1] (2) For an annuity, the person or legal
entity who may receive benefits accrued or values remaining in an annuity con-
tract upon the death of the contract owner or annuitant. [10]
benefit formula. A formula that describes the calculation of a plan’s financial
obligation to participants in a retirement plan. [14]
benefit period. In a disability income insurance policy, the time period during
which the insurer agrees to pay income benefits to the insured. [12]
benefit schedule. A schedule included in group life insurance policies to define
the amount of life insurance the policy provides for each group insured. [13]
benefit trigger. A long-term care insurance policy feature specifying the condi-
tions that establish an insured’s eligibility to receive long-term care benefits.
[12]
benefit waiting period. See elimination period.
bilateral contract. A contract in which both parties make legally enforceable
promises when they enter into the contract. Contrast with unilateral contract.
[3]
blended rating. A method of setting group insurance premium rates in which the
insurer uses a combination of manual rating and experience rating. Contrast
with manual rating and experience rating. [13]
block of policies. A group of policies issued to insureds who are all the same age,
the same sex, and in the same risk classification. [4]
business continuation insurance plan. An insurance plan designed to ensure the
continued financial viability of a business when faced with the death or disabil-
ity of the business owner or other key person. [5]
buy-sell agreement. An agreement in which (1) one party agrees to purchase the
financial interest that a second party has in a business following the second
party’s death, and (2) the second party agrees to direct his estate to sell his inter-
est in the business to the purchasing party. [5]
calendar-year deductible. In medical expense insurance, a deductible that applies
to the total of all allowable expenses an insured incurs during a given calendar
year. [12]
capital. The amount of money that a company’s owners have invested in the com-
pany, usually through the purchase of company stock. [2]
cash dividend option. A policy dividend option under which the insurance com-
pany sends the policyowner a check in the amount of the policy dividend that
was declared. [9]
cash payment nonforfeiture option. A cash value life insurance policy nonfor-
feiture option under which the policyowner discontinues premium payments,
surrenders the policy, and receives the policy’s cash surrender value in a lump-
sum payment. [8]
cash surrender value. The amount that a policyowner is entitled to receive upon
surrendering a cash value life insurance policy, before adjustments for factors
such as policy loans and applicable charges. Also known as the surrender value
or the surrender benefit. [6]
cash value. The savings element of a cash value life insurance policy. [1]
cash value life insurance. Life insurance that provides coverage throughout the
insured’s lifetime and also provides a savings element, known as the cash value.
Also known as permanent life insurance. Contrast with term life insurance. [1]
CDHP. See consumer-driven health plan.
ceding company. See direct writer.
certificate holder. An individual who is insured under a group insurance plan and
who has received a certificate of insurance. [13]
certificate of authority. A document that grants an insurer the right to conduct an
insurance business and sell insurance products in the jurisdiction that grants the
certificate. Also known as a license. [2]
certificate of insurance. A document that is provided to each person insured by
a group insurance plan that describes (1) the coverage that the master group
insurance contract provides and (2) the group insured’s rights under the
contract. [13]
children’s insurance rider. A supplemental life insurance policy benefit that pro-
vides term life insurance coverage on the insured’s children. [7]
claim. A request for payment under the terms of an insurance policy. [1]
class designation. A life insurance beneficiary designation that identifies a certain
group of people rather than naming each person individually. [9]
closed contract. A contract for which only those terms and conditions that are
printed in—or attached to—the contract are considered to be part of the con-
tract. Contrast with open contract. [8]
cognitive impairment. A reduction in a person’s ability to think, reason, or
remember. Contrast with physical impairment. [12]
coinsurance. In medical expense insurance, an expense participation requirement
in which the insured must pay a specified percentage of all allowable expenses
that remain after he has paid the deductible. [12]
COLA benefit. See cost-of-living-adjustment benefit.
collateral assignment. A temporary assignment of the monetary value of a life
insurance policy as collateral—or security—for a loan. Contrast with absolute
assignment. [9]
contract owner. The person or other entity who owns and exercises all the rights
and privileges of an annuity contract. [10]
contract value. See accumulated value.
contractual capacity. The legal capacity to make a contract. [3]
contractual reserves. See policy reserves.
contributory plan. A group insurance plan in which group members are
required to pay part or all of the premium for their coverage. Contrast with
noncontributory plan. [13]
convergence. A movement toward a single financial institution being able to serve
a customer’s banking, insurance, and securities needs. [2]
conversion privilege. (1) For individual life insurance, a term life insurance pro-
vision that gives the policyowner the option to change—or convert—the term
insurance policy to a cash value policy without providing evidence of insurabil-
ity. [5] (2) In group life insurance, a policy provision that allows a group insured
whose coverage terminates for certain reasons to convert her group life insur-
ance coverage to an individual life insurance policy, usually without presenting
evidence of insurability. [14]
convertible term insurance policy. A term insurance policy that gives the poli-
cyowner the option to convert the term policy to a cash value life insurance
policy without providing evidence of insurability. [5]
cooling-off provision. See free-look provision.
copayment. In managed care plans, a specified, fixed amount that a plan member
must pay to a network provider for certain medical services at the time the ser-
vices are received. [12]
corporation. A legal entity that is created by the authority of a governmental unit,
through a process known as incorporation, and that is separate and distinct
from its owners. [2]
cost of benefits. The value of all the contractually required benefits a product
promises to pay. Sometimes known as the cost of insurance. [4]
cost of insurance. See cost of benefits.
cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA) benefit. In disability income insurance poli-
cies, a benefit that provides for periodic increases in the disability income ben-
efit amount that the insurer will pay to a disabled insured. [12]
credit life insurance. A type of term life insurance designed to pay the balance
due on a loan other than a mortgage if the borrower dies before the loan is
repaid. [5]
critical illness benefit. See dread disease (DD) benefit.
current interest-crediting rate. (1) For universal life (UL) insurance policies, the
rate of interest that an insurer declares and pays on the policy’s cash value for
a specified period of time. [6] (2) For fixed deferred annuities, the rate of inter-
est that an insurer declares and pays on the annuity’s accumulated value for a
specified period of time. [10]
fixed period annuity. An annuity option in which the insurer provides annuity
payments for a specified period of time. Also known as a period certain annuity
or annuity certain. Contrast with fixed amount annuity. [11]
fixed period option. A life insurance policy settlement option under which the
insurance company agrees to pay policy proceeds in equal installments to the
payee for a specified period of time. [9]
fixed-premium universal life insurance policy. A universal life insurance policy
that requires a series of scheduled premium payments of a specified amount for
a specified length of time (typically 8 to 10 years) or until the insured’s death,
whichever comes first. [6]
flexible-premium annuity. An annuity that allows the contract owner to make
additional premium payments after the contract is purchased. Contrast with
single-premium annuity. [10]
flexible-premium variable life insurance. See variable universal life (VUL)
insurance.
flexible-premium universal life insurance policy. A universal life insurance pol-
icy that allows the policyowner to alter the amount and frequency of premium
payments, within specified limits. [6]
formal contract. A written contract that is enforceable because the parties
met certain formalities concerning the form of the agreement. Contrast with
informal contract. [3]
fraternal benefit society. A nonprofit organization that is operated solely for the
benefit of its members and that provides social, as well as insurance, benefits to
its members. Also known as a fraternal insurer. [2]
fraternal insurer. See fraternal benefit society.
fraudulent misrepresentation. A misrepresentation that was made with the
intent to induce another party to enter into a contract that results in the giving
up of something of value or a legal right and that did induce the innocent party
to enter the contract. [8]
free-examination provision. See free-look provision.
free-look provision. An insurance policy or annuity contract provision that gives
the policyowner or contract owner a stated period of time—usually at least 10
days—after the policy is delivered within which to cancel the policy. For an
insurance policy, the policyowner receives a refund, and for an annuity con-
tract, the contract owner receives a refund of the premiums paid or the con-
tract’s accumulated value. Also called a free-examination provision or cooling-
off provision. [8, 10]
front-end load. For deferred annuities, a charge that an insurer imposes when a
contract owner pays an initial premium and any additional premiums to help
cover the costs of selling the annuity. [11]
FSOC. See Financial Stability Oversight Council.
fund operating expense charge. For variable deferred annuities, an annual charge
that each investment fund underlying a subaccount assesses to cover the advi-
sory and administrative expenses of the fund. [11]
funding instrument. See funding vehicle.
funding vehicle. An arrangement for investing a retirement plan’s assets as the
assets are accumulated. Also known as an investment vehicle or a funding
instrument. [14]
future purchase option benefit. In certain disability income policies that specify
a flat benefit amount, an option that grants the insured the right to increase the
benefit amount in accordance with increases in the insured’s earnings. [12]
general account. An asset account in which an insurer maintains funds that sup-
port its contractual obligations to pay benefits under its guaranteed insurance
products, such as whole life insurance, fixed annuities, and other nonvariable
products. [6]
GI benefit. See guaranteed insurability benefit.
GLBs. See guaranteed living benefit riders.
GLWB. See guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit.
GMAB. See guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit.
GMDB. See guaranteed minimum death benefit rider.
GMIB. See guaranteed minimum income benefit.
GMWB. See guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit.
grace period. A specified time (often 31 days) following each premium due date
during which the contract remains in effect regardless of whether the premium
is paid. [8]
grace period provision. An insurance policy provision that specifies a length of
time following each renewal premium due date within which the premium may
be paid without loss of coverage. [8]
group annuity. In a retirement plan, an annuity that is purchased by a plan spon-
sor to provide annuity payments to plan participants at retirement. Contrast
with individual annuity. [10]
group creditor life insurance. Group life insurance issued to a creditor, such as a
bank, to insure the lives of the creditor’s current and future debtors. [14]
group insurance. A method of providing life or health insurance coverage for a
group of people under one contract. [13]
group insurance policy. A policy that insures the lives or health of a specific
group of people, such as a group of employees. [1]
group insured. In most jurisdictions, an individual covered by a group insurance
policy. Also known simply as the insured. [13]
group policyholder. The person or organization that decides what types of group
insurance coverage to purchase for a specific group, negotiates the terms of the
group insurance contract, and purchases the group insurance coverage. [3]
insured. (1) The person whose life, health, or property is insured under an insur-
ance policy. [1] (2) In group insurance plans, an alternate term for a group
insured. [13]
insurer. A company that accepts risk and makes a promise to pay a policy benefit
if a covered loss occurs. Also known as an insurance company. [1]
insurer-administered group plan. A group insurance plan in which the insurer
is responsible for handling the administrative and recordkeeping aspects of the
plan. Contrast with self-administered group plan. [13]
interest. A payment for the use of money. [4]
interest option. A life insurance policy settlement option under which the insur-
ance company invests the policy proceeds and periodically pays interest on
those proceeds to the payee. [9]
investment earnings. The money an insurer earns from investing the funds it
receives from customers. [4]
investment vehicle. See funding vehicle.
IRA. See individual retirement arrangement.
IUL insurance. See indexed universal life insurance.
irrevocable beneficiary. A life insurance policy beneficiary whose designation as
beneficiary cannot be changed by the policyowner unless the beneficiary gives
written consent. Contrast with revocable beneficiary. [9]
joint and survivor annuity. An annuity option in which the insurer provides a
series of annuity payments based on the life expectancies of two or more annui-
tants, with payments continuing until the last annuitant dies. [11]
joint mortgage life insurance. A variation of mortgage life insurance that pro-
vides the same benefit as a mortgage life insurance policy except the joint pol-
icy insures the lives of two people. [5]
joint whole life insurance. A plan of whole life insurance that has the same fea-
tures and benefits as individual whole life insurance, except that it insures two
people under the same policy. Often referred to as first-to-die life insurance. [6]
juvenile insurance policy. An insurance policy that is issued on the life of a
child but is owned and paid for by an adult, usually the child’s parent or legal
guardian. [7]
key employee life insurance. See key person life insurance.
key person. For insurance purposes, any person or employee whose continued par-
ticipation in a business is vital to the success of the business and whose death or
disability would cause the business to incur a significant financial loss. [5]
key person disability coverage. A type of disability income insurance coverage
that provides benefit payments to the business if an insured key person becomes
disabled. [12]
key person life insurance. Individual life insurance that a business purchases on
the life of a key person. Also known as key employee life insurance. [5]
market conduct law. A law designed to make sure that insurance companies con-
duct their businesses fairly and ethically. [2]
market-value-adjusted (MVA) annuity. A type of fixed deferred annuity that
adjusts withdrawal and surrender values based on changes in market interest
rates. [10]
master group insurance contract. A contract that describes the relationship
between an insurer and a group policyholder and specifies the benefits provided
by the contract to the insured group members. [13]
material misrepresentation. A statement made in an application for insurance
that is not true and that caused the insurer to enter into a contract it would not
have agreed to if it had known the truth. [8]
maturity date. (1) The date on which the insurer will pay an endowment policy’s
face amount to the policyowner if the insured is still living. [6] (2) For annuities,
an alternate term for annuity start date. [10]
maximum out-of-pocket provision. A major medical expense insurance policy
provision that states that the policy will cover 100 percent of allowable medi-
cal expenses after the insured has paid a specified amount out of pocket to
satisfy the deductible and coinsurance requirements. Also known as a stop-loss
provision. [12]
McCarran-Ferguson Act. A U.S. federal law under which Congress left insur-
ance regulation to the state governments, as long as Congress considers this
regulation to be adequate. [2]
Medicaid. In the United States, a joint federal and state program that provides
basic medical expense and nursing home coverage to low-income individuals
and to certain elderly and disabled individuals. [12]
medical expense insurance. A type of health insurance coverage that provides
benefits to pay for the treatment of an insured’s illnesses and injuries and some
preventive care. [1]
Medicare. In the United States, a federal government program that provides
medical expense benefits to people age 65 and older and those with certain
disabilities. [12]
minor. A person who has not attained the age of majority. [3]
misrepresentation. A false or misleading statement in an application for
insurance. [8]
misstatement of age or sex provision. An insurance policy or annuity contract
provision that describes the action the insurer will take in the event that the age
or sex of the insured or annuitant is incorrectly stated. [8, 10]
modified coverage whole life insurance policy. A whole life insurance policy
under which the amount of insurance provided decreases by specific percent-
ages or amounts either when the insured reaches certain stated ages or at the
end of stated time periods. [6]
owners’ equity. The owners’ financial interest in a company, which is the differ-
ence between the amount of the company’s assets (what it owns) and the amount
of its liabilities (what it owes). [2]
ownership of property. The sum of all the legal rights that exist in a piece of
property. [3]
P&C insurance company. See property/casualty insurance company.
paid-up additional insurance dividend option. A policy dividend option under
which the insurer uses any declared policy dividend to purchase paid-up addi-
tional insurance on the insured’s life. [9]
paid-up additions option benefit. A supplemental life insurance policy benefit
offered in connection with a whole life insurance policy that allows the poli-
cyowner to purchase single-premium paid-up additions to the policy on stated
dates in the future without providing evidence of the insured’s insurability. [7]
paid-up policy. A life insurance policy that requires no further premium pay-
ments but continues to provide coverage. [6]
par policy. See participating policy.
partial disability. A disability that prevents the insured either from performing
some of the duties of his usual occupation or from engaging in that occupation
on a full-time basis. [12]
partial surrender provision. See policy withdrawal provision.
participating policy. A type of insurance policy under which the policyowner
shares in the insurance company’s divisible surplus. Also called a par policy. [9]
partnership. A business that is owned by two or more people, who are known as
the partners. [2]
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Enacted by the U.S. Congress in
2010, legislation intended to make health insurance more affordable for and
accessible to Americans. Also known as the Affordable Care Act or the ACA. [12]
payee. (1) For a life insurance policy, the person or party who is to receive the
policy proceeds under a settlement option. [9] (2) For an annuity, the person or
entity designated by an annuity contract owner to receive the annuity payments.
[10]
payout factor. The amount of each annuity payment per thousand dollars of pre-
mium (for an immediate annuity) or accumulated value (for a deferred annuity).
[11]
payout options. See annuity options.
payout period. For an annuity, the period during which the insurer makes annuity
payments. Also known as the liquidation period or the distribution period. [10]
PCP. See primary care provider.
pension. A lifetime monthly income benefit paid to a person upon her retirement.
[14]
per diem method. See indemnity benefit method.
period certain. For a fixed period annuity, the stated period over which the insurer
will make the annuity payments. See fixed period annuity. [11]
period certain annuity. See fixed period annuity.
periodic income payments. See annuity payments.
permanent life insurance. See cash value life insurance.
personal property. All property other than real property. Contrast with real
property. [3]
personal risk. The risk of economic loss associated with death, poor health,
injury, and outliving one’s economic resources. [1]
physical hazard. A physical characteristic that may increase the likelihood of
loss. Contrast with moral hazard. [1]
physical impairment. A treatable, but generally incurable, chronic condition such
as arthritis, emphysema, heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension. Contrast
with cognitive impairment. [12]
physicians’ expenses. Medical expenses that include charges associated with phy-
sicians’ visits both in and out of the hospital. [12]
plan administrator. The party responsible for handling the administrative aspects
of a retirement plan. [14]
plan document. A detailed legal agreement that establishes the existence of a
retirement plan and specifies the rights and obligations of the various parties to
the plan. [14]
plan participant. A member of a covered group who is eligible to participate in
a retirement plan and who actually chooses to take part in the plan or whose
participation is automatic. [14]
plan sponsor. A business, government entity, educational institution, nonprofit
organization, or other group that establishes a retirement plan for the benefit of
its members. [14]
point-of-service (POS) plan. A managed care plan that offers incentives for plan
members to use providers who belong to the plan’s network of providers, but
allows plan members to choose, at the point of service, whether to seek medical
care from inside or outside the network. [12]
policy. See insurance policy.
policy anniversary. The anniversary of the date on which coverage under an
insurance policy became effective. [5]
policy benefit. A specific amount of money an insurer agrees to pay under an
insurance policy when a covered loss occurs. [1]
policy dividend. An amount of money that an insurer pays to the owner of a par-
ticipating policy from the insurer’s divisible surplus. [9]
policy loan. A loan a policyowner receives from an insurer using the cash value of
a life insurance policy as security. [6]
policy loan provision. A cash value life insurance policy provision that specifies
the terms under which the policyowner of a cash value insurance policy can
obtain a loan from the insurer against the policy’s cash value. [8]
policy loan repayment dividend option. A policy dividend option under which
the insurer applies policy dividends toward the repayment of an outstanding
policy loan. [9]
policyowner. The person or business that owns an insurance policy. [1]
policy proceeds. The total monetary amount paid by an insurer if the insured dies
while the policy is in force. [9]
policy reserves. Liabilities that represent the amount an insurer estimates it needs
to pay future benefits. Sometimes referred to as contractual reserves, legal
reserves, or statutory reserves. [4]
policy rider. An amendment to an insurance policy that becomes part of the insur-
ance contract and changes its terms. Also known as an endorsement. [5]
policy term. The specified period of time during which a term life insurance
policy provides coverage. [5]
policy withdrawal provision. A universal life insurance policy provision that
permits the policyowner to reduce the amount of the policy’s cash value by
withdrawing up to the amount of the cash value in cash. Also called a partial
surrender provision. [8]
portability provision. A provision in a group insurance policy that allows a group
insured whose coverage terminates for certain reasons to continue her coverage
under the group plan. [14]
portable coverage. Group insurance coverage that can be continued if an insured
employee leaves the group. [14]
POS plan. See point-of-service plan.
PPO. See preferred provider organization.
preference beneficiary clause. A provision included in some life insurance poli-
cies that states that if the policyowner does not name a beneficiary, then the
insurer will pay the policy proceeds in a stated order of preference. Also called
a succession beneficiary clause. [9]
preferred premium rate. A lower-than-standard premium rate charged to
insureds who are classified as preferred risks. [1]
preferred provider organization (PPO). A managed health care plan that
arranges with providers for the delivery of health care at a discounted cost and
that provides incentives for PPO members to use the providers who have con-
tracted with the PPO, but also provides some coverage for services rendered by
providers who are not part of the PPO network. [12]
preferred risk. A proposed insured who presents a significantly lower-than-aver-
age likelihood of loss. [1]
premium. A specified amount of money an insurer charges in exchange for agree-
ing to pay a policy benefit when a covered loss occurs. [1]
real property. Land and whatever is growing on or attached to the land. Contrast
with personal property. [3]
reduced paid-up insurance nonforfeiture option. A cash value life insurance
policy nonforfeiture option under which the policyowner discontinues paying
premiums and uses the policy’s net cash surrender value as a net single premium
to purchase paid-up life insurance of the same plan as the original policy. [8]
refund annuity. See life income with refund annuity.
regular individual retirement arrangement. See traditional individual
retirement arrangement.
reimbursement benefits. See indemnity benefits.
reimbursement method. In long-term care insurance policies, a benefit payment
method in which the insurer reimburses eligible expenses that are incurred by
the insured, up to the policy’s daily or monthly benefit amount. [12]
reinstatement. The process by which an insurer puts back into force an insur-
ance policy that either has been terminated because of nonpayment of renewal
premiums or has been continued under the extended term or reduced paid-up
insurance nonforfeiture option. [8]
reinstatement provision. An individual life insurance policy provision that
describes the conditions that the policyowner must meet for the insurer to rein-
state a policy. [8]
reinsurance. Insurance that one insurance company, known as the direct writer
or ceding company, purchases from another insurance company, known as the
reinsurer or assuming company, to transfer all or part of the risk on insurance
policies that the direct writer issued. [1]
reinsurer. An insurance company that accepts risks transferred from another
insurer in a reinsurance transaction. Also known as an assuming company.
Contrast with direct writer. [1]
renewable term insurance policy. A term life insurance policy that gives the
policyowner the option to continue the coverage at the end of the specified term
without presenting evidence of insurability, although typically at a higher pre-
mium because the premium amount is based on the insured’s attained age. [5]
renewal premium. An insurance policy premium payable after the initial
premium. [3]
renewal provision. A term life insurance policy provision that gives the
policyowner the option to continue the coverage for an additional policy term
without providing evidence of insurability. [5]
return of premium (ROP) term insurance. A form of term life insurance that
provides a death benefit if the insured dies during the policy term and promises
a return of all or a portion of the premiums paid for the policy if the insured
does not die during the policy term. [5]
revocable beneficiary. A life insurance policy beneficiary whose designation as
beneficiary can be changed by the policyowner at any time before the insured’s
death. Contrast with irrevocable beneficiary. [9]
Social Security. A U.S. federal insurance program that provides specified ben-
efits—such as monthly retirement income benefits—to eligible individuals. [14]
sole proprietorship. A business that is owned and operated by one person. [2]
solvent. A term used to describe an insurance company that is able to meet its
debts and pay policy benefits when they come due. [2]
SPDA. See single-premium deferred annuity.
special class rate. See substandard premium rate.
special class risk. See substandard risk.
speculative risk. A risk that involves three possible outcomes: loss, gain, or no
change. [1]
SPIA. See single-premium immediate annuity.
spouse and children’s insurance rider. A supplemental life insurance policy
benefit offered by some insurers that provides term life insurance coverage on
the insured’s spouse and children. Also known as a family insurance rider. [7]
spouse insurance rider. A supplemental life insurance policy benefit that pro-
vides term life insurance coverage on the insured’s spouse. [7]
standard premium rate. A premium rate charged to insureds who are classified
as standard risks. [1]
standard risk. A proposed insured who has a likelihood of loss that is not signifi-
cantly greater than average. [1]
state insurance code. A set of laws in each state that regulates insurance in that
state. [2]
state insurance department. An administrative agency in each state that is
responsible for making sure that companies operating in the state comply with
applicable regulatory requirements. [2]
statutory reserves. See policy reserves.
stock corporation. A corporation whose ownership is divided into units known as
shares or shares of stock. [2]
stockholder. A person or organization that owns shares of stock in a corporation.
Also known as a shareholder. [2]
stockholder dividend. A portion of a corporation’s earnings paid to the owners of
its stock. Contrast with policy dividend. [2]
stock insurance company. An insurance company that is owned by the people and
organizations that own shares of the company’s stock. Contrast with mutual
insurance company. [2]
stop-loss provision. See maximum out-of-pocket provision.
straight life annuity. See life only annuity.
straight life insurance policy. See continuous-premium whole life insurance
policy.
subaccount. (1) One of several investment funds to which a variable life insurance
policyowner allocates the premiums she has paid and the cash values that have
accumulated under her policy. [6] (2) An investment fund within an insurance
company’s separate account; used with variable life insurance policies and vari-
able annuities. [6, 10]
substandard premium rate. A higher-than-standard premium rate charged to
insureds who are classified as substandard risks. Also known as a special class
rate. [1]
substandard risk. A proposed insured who has a significantly greater-than-aver-
age likelihood of loss but is still found to be insurable. Also known as a special
class risk. [1]
succession beneficiary clause. See preference beneficiary clause.
successor beneficiary. See contingent beneficiary.
successor payee. See contingent payee.
suicide exclusion provision. A life insurance policy provision that states that the
insurance company does not have to pay the death benefit if the insured dies as
the result of suicide as defined by the policy within a specified period following
the date of policy issue. [8]
superintendent of insurance. See insurance commissioner.
surgical expenses. Medical expenses that include charges for inpatient and outpa-
tient surgical procedures. [12]
surplus. The amount by which a company’s assets exceed its liabilities and capital.
[2]
surrender benefit. See cash surrender value.
surrender charge. (1) For a cash value life insurance policy, a specific charge
imposed if the owner surrenders the policy for its cash surrender value. [8] (2)
For a deferred annuity, a fee an insurer imposes if the contract owner makes
excess withdrawals as defined in the contract or fully surrenders the contract
before the surrender period is over. Also known as a contingent deferred sales
charge. [10]
surrender value. (1) For cash value life insurance, an alternate term for cash
surrender value. [6] (2) For deferred annuities, the amount of the annuity’s
accumulated value, less any surrender charges, that the contract owner is enti-
tled to receive if the contract is surrendered during its accumulation period. [10]
survivor benefit. For annuities, an alternate term for death benefit. [10]
survivorship clause. A provision included in some life insurance policies that
states that the beneficiary must survive the insured by a specified period, usu-
ally 30 or 60 days, to be entitled to receive the policy proceeds. [9]
survivorship life insurance. See last survivor life insurance.
valid contract. A contract that is enforceable at law. Contrast with void contract
and voidable contract. [3]
valued contract. An insurance policy that specifies the amount of the policy ben-
efit that will be payable when a covered loss occurs, regardless of the actual
amount of the loss that was incurred. [1]
variable annuity. An annuity under which the amount of any accumulated value
and the amount of the annuity payments fluctuate in accordance with the perfor-
mance of one or more specified investment funds. Contrast with fixed annuity.
[10]
variable life (VL) insurance. A form of cash value life insurance in which pre-
miums are fixed, but the death benefit and other values may vary, reflecting the
performance of the investment subaccounts that the policyowner selects. [6]
variable universal life (VUL) insurance. Cash value life insurance that com-
bines the premium and death benefit flexibility of universal life insurance
with the investment flexibility and risk of variable life insurance. Also called
flexible-premium variable life insurance. [6]
vested interest. A property right that has taken effect and cannot be altered or
changed without the consent of the person who owns the right. [9]
vesting requirements. For a retirement plan, requirements that define when a plan
participant is entitled to receive partial or full benefits under the plan even if he
terminates employment prior to retirement. [14]
vision care coverage. A type of medical expense coverage that provides the
insured with benefits for expenses incurred in obtaining eye examinations and
corrective lenses. [12]
VL insurance. See variable life insurance.
voidable contract. A contract under which one party has the right to avoid his obli-
gations under the contract. Contrast with valid contract and void contract. [3]
void contract. A contract that does not meet one or more of the legal requirements
to create a valid contract and, thus, is never enforceable. Contrast with valid
contract and voidable contract. [3]
VUL insurance. See variable universal life insurance.
waiting period. See elimination period.
waiver of premium for disability (WP) benefit. A supplemental life insurance
policy benefit under which the insurer promises to give up—to waive—its
right to collect premiums that become due when the insured is totally disabled
according to the policy or rider’s definition of disability. [7]
waiver of premium for payor benefit. A supplemental life insurance policy
benefit that provides that the insurer will waive its right to collect a renewal
premium if the payor—the person who pays the policy premiums—dies or
becomes totally disabled. [7]
whole life insurance. A type of cash value life insurance that provides lifetime
insurance coverage, usually at a level premium rate that does not increase as
the insured ages. [6]
Index
A 5.15
Annual Statement, 2.12
absolute assignment, 9.10 annuitant, 10.3–10.4
ACA. See Patient Protection and Affordable annuities, 9.18, 10.2
Care Act classifications of, 10.10
accelerated death benefits, 7.2, 7.7–7.9 deferred, 10.4, 10.5–10.6, 10.8, 10.10,
acceptance, 3.7 10.11, 10.13–10.14
accidental death benefit, 7.6–7.7, 8.13, fees and charges for, 11.11–11.12
9.15–9.16, 14.6 financial aspects of, 11.7–11.12
accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) fixed, 10.7–10.8, 10.10, 10.11, 11.7
benefit, 7.7 immediate, 10.4–10.5, 10.6, 10.8, 10.10,
accidental death and dismemberment 10.11
insurance, 14.6 incontestabililty provision for, 10.13
accident benefits, 7.2, 7.6–7.7 individual, 10.12–10.13
account value. See accumulated value issuance of, 10.2
accumulated policy dividends, 9.15–9.16 as life insurance products, 10.2
accumulated value, 10.5, 10.8, 10.9 marketing and distribution of, 10.2
accumulation at interest dividend option, payment amounts for, determining,
9.6, 9.7 11.7–11.11
accumulation period, 10.5, 10.9 regulation of, 2.10
accumulation units, 10.9, 11.10 sales of, 10.12, 11.13
accumulation value. See accumulated value taxation of, 11.12–11.13
acquisition, 2.7 types of, 10.3
actively-at-work provision, 13.4–13.5 use of, 10.7
activities, risk and, 1.12, 1.13, 8.15 variable, 10.7, 10.9–10.10
activities of daily living (ADLs), 12.21 annuity benefit payments. See annuity
actuaries, 4.2, 4.4, 4.11, 14.12 payments
AD&D benefit. See accidental death and annuity certain. See fixed period annuity
dismemberment benefit annuity commencement date. See annuity
additional insured rider. See second start date
insured rider annuity contracts, 1.6, 10.2
additional term insurance dividend option, provisions for, 10.12–10.14
9.6, 9.8 types of, 10.4–10.11
ADLs. See activities of daily living annuity guarantee riders, 11.6–11.7
administrator, 5.4 annuity income payments. See annuity
advanced life deferred annuity. payments
See longevity annuity annuity options, 11.2–11.6
adverse selection. See antiselection annuity payments, 10.2, 11.7–11.13
advertisements, 2.13 annuity period, 10.4
affiliates, 2.6, 2.7 annuity start date, 10.4
affinity group. See common interest annuity unit, 11.10–11.11
association antiselection, 1.11
Affordable Care Act. See Patient Protection conversion and, 5.17
and Affordable Care Act group underwriting and, 13.7, 13.8,
age, misstatement of. See misstatement of age 13.9, 13.10
provision; misstatement of age or sex reinstatement and, 8.8
provision renewability and, 5.14, 5.15
age of majority (age of maturity), 3.8 suicide exclusion and, 8.15
agents, 2.13 any occupation, 7.4, 12.16
alcohol abuse, 1.12 APL option. See automatic premium
loan option
cash value life insurance, 1.6, 4.12, 5.15, 5.16, contracts, 3.2
6.2. See also variable life insurance; consideration for, 3.9, 3.10
whole life insurance group insurance, 13.2
paid-up additions with, 9.8, 9.9 indemnity, 3.2–3.3
provisions unique to, 8.10–8.13 lawful purpose for, 3.9–3.10
surrender of, 6.2 legal status of, 3.7
taxation and, 6.2 provisions of, 8.2, 10.12–10.14
CDHP. See consumer-driven health plan requirements for, 3.6–3.11
CDSC. See contingent deferred sales charge types of, 3.2–3.6
ceding company. See direct writer valid, 9.15
certificate of authority, 2.9 valued, 3.3
certificate holder, 13.4 void, 9.15
certificate of insurance, 13.4 written, 3.3
chance, loss and, 1.8 contractual capacity, 3.6, 3.7–3.9, 3.11, 9.9
change of ownership provision, 9.12 contractual reserves. See policy reserves
children’s insurance rider, 7.10 contract value. See accumulated value
claim, 1.5, 1.7 contributory plan, 13.3, 13.10, 14.7
class designation, 9.2 convergence, 2.6
CLHIA. See Canadian Life and Health conversion privilege, 5.15, 7.10, 14.4
Insurance Association convertibility, value of, to insurers, 5.18
closed contract, 8.3 convertible term insurance policy, 5.15–5.17
cognitive impairment, 12.20–12.21 cooling-off provision. See free-look provision
coinsurance, 12.4, 12.5 copayment, 12.8–12.9
COLA benefit. See cost-of-living-adjustment corporations, 2.3, 3.7, 3.9, 5.6
benefit cost of benefits (cost of insurance), 4.4
collateral assignment, 9.10–9.11 cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA) benefit,
commercial loans, 8.10, 8.11 12.19
common disaster, 9.14 cost sharing, limitations on, 12.15
common interest association, 13.8 cost-sharing requirements. See expense
commutative contract, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6 participation requirements
composite mortality table, 4.5 coverage units, 4.3, 7.10
compounding, 4.8–4.9, 4.10 CPI. See Consumer Price Index
compound interest, 4.8–4.9, 4.10 CPP. See Canada Pension Plan
conditional promise, 3.5 crediting rate, 6.15
consideration, 3.6, 3.9, 3.10, 3.11 credit life insurance, 5.10, 5.12
consolidation, 2.7 creditor life insurance, 14.7
Consumer Price Index (CPI), 5.13, 5.19n4 credit union group, 13.7
consumer-driven health plan (CDHP), 12.2, credit unions, 13.7
12.9, 12.11–12.13, 12.14 critical illness benefit. See dread disease
contestable periods, 8.9, 8.16n1 benefit
contingent beneficiary, 9.3–9.4 current interest-crediting rate, 6.10, 10.8
contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), customer service, costs of, 4.6
10.13, 11.12
contingent owner, 9.13
contingent payee, 9.17
D
continued insurance coverage nonforfeiture DD benefit. See dread disease benefit
options, 8.12, 8.13 death
continuous-premium whole life insurance cause of, 7.6
policy, 6.4, 6.6, 6.8 fear of, 10.2
contract of adhesion, 3.3, 3.5, 3.6 death benefit, 4.4, 9.15
contract fee, 11.11 accidental death and, 7.6–7.7
contract of indemnity, 1.8 for annuities, 10.14
contract law, fundamentals of, 3.2–3.10, 3.11 joint whole life insurance and, 6.8
contract maintenance fee, 11.11 policy loans and, 8.11
contract owner, 10.2, 10.4 term insurance and, 5.7
universal life insurance and, 6.12–6.13,
6.14, 6.15
variable life insurance and, 6.17
variable universal life insurance and, 6.18
whole life insurance and, 6.4
instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), insurers, 1.4, 1.5, 1.7. See also insurance
12.21 companies
insurability, evidence of, 1.14, 5.14, 6.8 intangible property, 3.11
and additional term insurance dividend interest, 4.8–4.9
option, 9.8 policy loans and, 8.11
and annuity benefit riders, 10.13 policy withdrawals and, 8.11
and group insurance, 13.5–13.6, 13.9, 14.3, universal life insurance and, 6.10
14.4 interest option, 9.17
reinstatement provisions and, 8.8 interest rates, 4.11
universal life insurance and, 6.13 Internal Revenue Code, Section 7702, 6.13, 6.15
and waiver of premium for payor benefit, Internal Revenue Service, 11.14
7.4 investment earnings, 4.8–4.11, 4.12
insurability benefits, 7.2, 7.11–7.12 investment expenses, 4.7
insurable events, for dread disease benefit, 7.9 investment-linked insurance products, 2.10.
insurable interest, 1.13–1.15, 3.10, 9.10 See also variable annuities; variable life
insurable risks, 1.7–1.10, 1.11 insurance
insurance, 1.3, 1.4–1.7 investments, 4.8–4.11, 6.10, 10.8
government’s role in, 2.8–2.13. See also investment vehicle. See funding vehicle
taxation IRAs. See individual retirement arrangements
selling of, 2.13 IRDA. See Insurance Regulatory and
supply and demand for, 2.8 Development Authority
wagering and, 1.13 irrevocable beneficiary, 9.4, 9.5, 9.10
insurance agents, 2.13 issue age, 8.8
insurance commissioner, 2.10 IUL insurance. See indexed universal life
insurance companies, 1.7. See also insurers insurance
contractual capacity for, 3.7–3.9
expenses for, 4.6
financial condition of, 2.12
J
as financial institutions, 2.4–2.8 joint mortgage life insurance, 5.11
financial models for, 4.11 joint and survivor annuity, 11.4–11.5
investment earnings for, 4.8, 4.11, 4.12, joint whole life insurance, 6.8–6.9
6.10, 10.8 juvenile insurance policy, 7.4
nonfinancial operations of, 2.13
operating expenses for, 4.6, 4.8, 4.11 K
organization types for, 2.3–2.4 key person, 5.5–5.6
regulation of, 2.9–2.13 key person disability coverage, 12.20
taxes paid by, 4.7 key person insurance, 5.4
insurance contract. See also insurance policy key person life insurance (key employee life
acceptance of, 3.7 insurance), 5.5, 9.10
insurance marketplace. See health insurance
exchange
insurance policies, 1.4–1.5, 3.2 L
as contracts, 9.2 labor union, 13.7
policy riders and, 5.13 labor union group, 13.7
as property, 3.11–3.12 lapse, 4.7, 4.11, 6.11
provisions of, 8.2–8.14 lapse rate, 4.7
requirements for, 6.15 last survivor life insurance, 6.8, 6.9
termination of, 4.7, 8.11, 8.12 lawful purpose, 3.11
insurance producers, 2.13 law of large numbers, 1.9
insurance products, taxation and, 2.13 legal reserves. See policy reserves
insurance regulation, goals of, 2.10 legal reserve system, 4.2–4.3
Insurance Regulatory and Development lenders mortgage insurance (LMI), 5.19n2
Authority (IRDA; India), 2.9 level premiums, 5.9
insurance riders, 7.10 level premium system, 4.12, 4.13, 6.3
insureds, 1.5, 1.7, 7.10–7.11. See also group level premium whole life insurance, 14.7
insureds level term life insurance, 5.9
insurer-administered group plan, 13.15 liabilities, 2.11, 2.12, 4.2
minors, 3.8
as beneficiaries, 9.4
O
contracts and, 3.8, 3.12n1 occupation, 1.12
misrepresentation, 8.4–8.6 offer, 3.7
misstatement of age provision, 14.4–14.5 offeree, 3.7
misstatement of age or sex provision, 8.2, offeror, 3.7
8.9–8.10, 10.13, 14.4 Old Age Security Act (Canada), 14.14
model laws and regulation, 2.10 one-year term insurance, policy dividends and,
modified coverage whole life insurance 9.8
policy, 6.7 open contract, 8.3
modified-premium whole life insurance policy, open enrollment period, 13.5–13.6
6.7, 6.8 operating expenses, 4.6, 4.7, 4.11
modified whole life insurance, 6.6–6.7, 6.8 operating units, 2.6
monthly deduction waiver benefit. See waiver optional insured rider. See second insured rider
of cost of insurance benefit optional modes of settlement. See settlement
moral hazard, 1.12, 1.16n1 options
morbidity rates, 1.10 Option A (Option 1) plan, 6.13, 6.14
morbidity tables, 1.10 Option B (Option 2) plan, 6.13, 6.14
mortality charges, 6.10, 6.11, 8.7, 8.13 Option C plan, 6.13
mortality expense, 4.12 oral statements, 3.3, 8.3
mortality and expense risks (M&E) ordinary life insurance policy. See continuous-
charge, 11.12 premium whole life insurance policy
mortality rates, 1.9, 4.4–4.5, 4.11 original age conversion, 5.16–5.17
mortality tables, 1.9, 1.10, 4.4–4.5, 6.4 other insured rider. See second insured rider
mortgage insurance, 5.19n2 owners’ equity, 2.11, 2.12
mortgage life insurance (mortgage redemption ownership of property, 3.11–3.12
insurance), 5.10–5.11 ownership rights
multiple-employer group, 13.7 for annuities, 10.2
mutual assent, 3.6, 3.7, 3.11 beneficiary designation and, 9.2–9.5
mutual fund, 2.4 and irrevocable beneficiary designations,
mutual fund companies, 2.4 9.5
mutual insurance companies, 2.3–2.4, 2.5, 2.11, for life insurance policies, 9.2–9.19
2.12, 9.6 policy dividends and, 9.6–9.8
MVA annuity. See market-value-adjusted policy transfer and, 9.8–9.12
annuity premium payment mode and, 9.5–9.6
transfer of, 9.2
N own previous occupation, 12.16–12.17
Q
longevity, 10.2
personal, 1.5
QHPs. See qualified health plans preferred, 1.13
QPP. See Quebec Pension Plan spread of, 1.10
qualified annuity, 11.12, 11.13 standard, 1.12
qualified health plans, 12.13 substandard, 1.13
qualified medical expenses, 12.11 transfer of, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4
qualified retirement plan, 14.8–14.13 risk class, 1.12–1.13
Quebec Pension Plan (QPP), 14.14 risk management, 1.2–1.4, 1.7–1.15
U W
UCR fee. See usual, customary, and wagering, insurance and, 1.13, 3.9–3.10
reasonable fee waiting period, 7.3. See also elimination period
UL insurance. See universal life insurance for annuities, 11.7
underwriters, 1.10 long-term care insurance benefit and, 7.9
underwriting, 1.10–1.13, 13.6–13.11 waiver of cost of insurance benefit, 7.3–7.4
underwriting guidelines, 1.12 waiver of premium for disability (WP) benefit,
unearned premiums paid in advance, 9.16 7.2–7.4, 7.5
Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), 9.4 waiver of premium for disability benefit rider,
unilateral contract, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6 10.13
unisex mortality tables, 4.5
Y
yearly renewable term (YRT) insurance, 14.5,
5.15, 5.16