Underground Storage Tanks
Underground Storage Tanks
Underground Storage Tanks
edu/ehs
Underground Storage Tanks
An Informational and Guidance Document for the University Community. Please contact
Yale Environmental Health and Safety for latest Regulatory Requirements.
A typical UST installation
October 2011 Page 1
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Introduction
The use of underground storage tanks (“USTs”) for fuels and other liquids has many advantages. These include space
considerations, appearance, fire safety, and protection from the elements and from vandalism. However, unless
installed and maintained properly, USTs have the potential for leakage from the tank or related piping. These leaks can
exist undetected for years and cause pollution of the surrounding soil and even groundwater.
Materials of Construction
USTs are usually made from either steel with a protective coating, or of fiberglass. Selection of UST type may depend on
use and installation location. Fiberglass tanks are typically unsuitable for storage of heated materials, and for high load
locations. However, they are lower maintenance and are not susceptible to corrosion. Steel tanks must be coated with
a corrosion resistant coating, and corrosion protection is required. Contact plates at the bottom of the tank under fill
and measurement ports should be installed. This prevents wear from measurement sticks hitting the bottom of the
tanks.
Piping
Piping is usually steel with a protective coating, or fiberglass. Other piping material may be copper or hydraulic flex
hosing. Piping can be the same material as the tank or different. Metallic piping must be coated with a corrosion
protective coating, and corrosion protection is required.
Corrosion Protection Systems
Corrosion is an electrochemical reaction, an example of which is the rusting of steel tanks (iron to iron oxide). Click here
for a demonstration of the corrosion process: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfmD1RyUWgY&feature=related
This reaction can be slowed or prevented by the application or creation of an electrical current to the tank. This method
is called cathodic protection. Steel structures are considered protected if a current with ‐0.85 volts is created from the
surrounding soil to the tank.
Smaller tank systems typically use the installation of magnesium anodes connected to the tank to create a current. This
current is created by the difference in corrosion potential of dissimilar metals, the faster corroding anode material will
protect the steel, thus the term “sacrificial anode.”
Steel UST protected by sacrificial anodes
A short video on how sacrificial anodes work: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAlC75xG4qU
October 2011 Page 2
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Because of their sacrificial nature, anodes, and the protective current, can diminish over time. This can be checked by
periodic measurements from the soil (or a reference electrode buried in the soil) to the tank. If determined necessary,
anodes can either be replaced or supplemented.
Larger steel UST systems typically use an external
applied electrical current to provide corrosion
protection. A rectifier is used to control this
power supply, with the negative terminal of the
unit connected to the tank system, and the
positive terminal to an inert (such as graphite)
anode or anodes, which are buried around the
tank. These anodes are not consumed during the
process and typically do not need to be replaced.
Impressed current cathodic protection system
The rectifier output should be checked monthly to verify adequate current is being supplied. Amps and volts meter
readings should be recorded and checked against set requirements.
It is important that metallic piping receive corrosion protection as well. This can be done though the tank’s protection
system or a separate system can be used. If a separate system is used, the piping should be electrically isolated from the
tank by the use of non‐conductive bushings. The piping must also be electrically isolated from equipment or building it
services. Cathodic protection systems are designed to protect the mass of the underground tank and/or piping, and will
provide inadequate protection if it is trying to protect additional electrically connected structures, such as the entire
steel frame of a building.
Cathodic protection surveys should be done on an annual basis. These surveys measure the voltage of the current
between the soil and the tank or piping for comparison against the ‐0.85 volt standard. The tests can be done with a
voltmeter using a test station, which provides leads to the tank and to a permanent reference cell buried in the soil near
the tank. If there is no test station, or to check at various location around the tank, a direct connection from the
voltmeter can be made to the tank or piping and to the ground surface.
October 2011 Page 3
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Leak Prevention
The most common releases from USTs are during filling, either from fill hose disconnection or from overfills. Prior to
delivery, an accurate assessment of delivery volume should be made. Verification of tank volume meters with sticking of
the tank (and conversion to volume using appropriate tank chart) should be conducted. Delivery volume should be such
as to not fill the tank above 90% of capacity. Overfill alarms (audible, strobe, or both), which operate based on floats
within the tank, are usually set at 85% to warm delivery person to cease filling, with another high level alarm at 90%.
These alarms should be adjacent to the fill connection area to ensure they are seen and heard.
Audible and strobe overfill alarm
In the absence of alarms, fill piping cut‐off valves can be used. These valves operate off floats as well, and close when
the tank reaches the pre‐set volume. These valves typically are within the fill drop‐tubes. However, if filling is done
utilizing high pressure pumps, this can keep valves forced open, resulting in overfill and possible spills onto the ground
surface.
October 2011 Page 4
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Typical drop tube float valve
Spill catchment basins, around filling connections, are used to contain small volumes of releases from hose
disconnections or overfills. It is important to keep these basins clean so they retain their full capture volume. These
may or may not have drain valves within them. If so equipped, the valve can be pulled open so the contained oil or fuel
can be drained back into the tank. However, if water or other contamination is present, it should be absorbed or
pumped out for proper disposal.
Fill catch basin cut‐out
October 2011 Page 5
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Leak Detection
The most common leak detection method, for double‐walled USTs is interstitial sensors. These normally are floats that
will rise when liquid is present, completing a circuit and sounding an alarm. Optical sensors are used as well, which
sense the presence of liquid as an interference with the path of light.
Typical Mounting point for interstitial sensor Sensor would be installed in port L to sit on bottom
Other tank leak detection methods include automatic tank gauging, manual inventory control, soil vapor sensors, and
groundwater monitoring. The advantage of a double wall tank with interstitial monitoring is that leaks will be detected
before they are released to the environment.
Leak detection for piping can use similar methods. For double‐walled piping, leak detection cables can be installed along
the entire piping run, or at sumps at the tank or point of use, depending upon the slope of the piping.
Sensor within a tank mounted piping sump
October 2011 Page 6
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
The advantage of the use of a leak detection cable is the location of the leak can be indicated on the sensor panel.
A typical leak detection cable
Regulatory Requirements
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines USTs as tanks containing a regulated substance and having at least
10% of volume below ground and not visible for inspection. Tanks in basements and accessible vaults are not
considered USTs. These federal regulations apply to gasoline and diesel USTs, but the EPA does not regulate USTs used
for storing heating oil for on‐site consumption. The federal UST regulations can be found at:
http://www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/cfr.htm
However, the state of Connecticut does regulate on‐site heating oil tanks, with the exception of residential USTs. The CT
UST regulations can be found at: http://www.ct.gov/dep/cwp/view.asp?A=2692&Q=322596, and include regulations for
EPA regulated tanks as well. Connecticut has required, by statute since 2003, that all new USTs and UST piping be
double‐wall with a leak monitoring system.
When a new UST is required to be installed, the tank must meet certain design requirements as outlined below:
Tank material must be either fiberglass‐reinforced plastic or steel with a factory applied corrosion
resistant coating. Fiberglass tanks require tank‐tightness testing 3‐6 months after installation.
Contact plates required under all fill and gage openings.
Corrosion protection (impressed current or sacrificial anode) required for all steel tanks and piping, with
permanent cathodic protection monitoring device.
Corrosion protection function test required annually.
Double wall tanks and interstitial monitoring required
Spill and overflow protection fill pipe required for federally‐regulated tanks, recommended for on‐site
heating oil tanks.
A signed installation certificate from the installer is required. Any USTs that do not meet the above design criteria
require written approval from CTDEEP prior to installation.
Federal and State regulations require UST cathodic protection systems be tested annually to meet the above‐referenced
‐0.85 volts minimum soil‐to‐structure requirement. Sacrificial systems are tested as is, impressed current system
readings are taken as “instant‐off” (immediately after the rectifier is turned off). If a system does not meet the
corrosion protection requirement, repairs or adjustments must be done, the system currents allowed to stabilize, and a
retest be conducted within 30 days.
Oil spill prevention plans also require that all UST level, leak, and alarms be tested minimum annually to ensure proper
function and accuracy.
October 2011 Page 7
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Table of Inspection Requirements
UST Type Soil‐to‐ Impressed Current Leak and Level Visual per SPCC
Structure Rectifier Readings Detectors
Cathodic Test
(Steel Tanks)
On‐site Fuel Oil Annual Monthly Annual Per SPCC Plan
(Powerplants
weekly)
Gasoline/Diesel Annual Monthly Annual Per SPCC Plan
(Federally (quarterly,
Regulated) monthly if leak
detection
required)
Removal
Most USTs have a life expectancy of 30 years, after which they must be closed by removal (preferred) or abandonment
in place. Often historical USTs may be encountered during construction excavation or on purchased property,
necessitating removal. Removal is to be conducted per the requirements of RCSAs 22a‐449(d)‐1 for on‐site heating oil
USTs, and 22a‐449(d) 101 through 107 for all other USTs, and latest edition of NFPA 30. The following are typical UST
removal contractor requirements:
(1) Notification to "Call before you Dig" program before commencement of excavation activities.
(2) Preparation of and adherence to site‐specific Health & Safety Plan, including confined space entry procedures as
applicable.
(3) Notification to Yale EHS and Office of New Haven Fire Marshall of removal schedule.
(4) Excavation of surrounding material and shoring if required of excavation area.
(5) Removal and proper disposal of all liquid from UST. Yale EHS Environmental Affairs only shall sign disposal
manifest.
(6) Removal of UST from tank grave. Yale EHS to witness UST removal.
(7) Rendering UST unfit for reuse and proper documented disposal off‐site, with copy of disposal document to be
provided to Yale.
(8) On‐site monitoring equipment to determine possible areas of contaminated soil.
(9) Removal of contaminated soil as an add‐on, price per cubic yard. All disposal sites are subject to Yale approval.
Manifests or Bill of Lading shipments must accompany each shipment, signed by Yale EHS Environmental Affairs
only as the generator.
(10) Sampling of tank grave per DEP guidance at
http://www.ct.gov/dep/cwp/view.asp?a=2692&q=322592&depNav_GID=1652
Results must meet CT Remediation Standard Regulations prior to backfill.
(11) Backfill of tank grave and pavement restoration to previous condition.
(12) Preparation of and submittal to Yale a Closure Report, documenting the UST removal activities, including on‐site
monitoring results, tank grave soil laboratory analytical data, copies of all disposal documents (including tank), and
photographs of various stages of removal.
October 2011 Page 8
Yale Environmental Health & Safety www.yale.edu/ehs
Notifications
Any change in UST status, such as installation, abandonment in place, or removal, requires that a written notification be
provided to CTDEEP. EHS will prepare, arrange for proper signature of authorized Yale official, and submit the form to
CTDEEP.
Database
EHS maintains a database of all campus USTs. Each UST is assigned a unique identification number for tracking
purposes. This database tracks status, removal due dates, annual testing, and notification.
October 2011 Page 9