Philippines CocoTech FINAL
Philippines CocoTech FINAL
Philippines CocoTech FINAL
Reflecting on these facts, Bo made it his personal mission during his tenure in the University
to find out why, in spite of the abundance of coconuts, the coconut farmers are mired in
poverty and to find out what the agricultural academic community has done to address this
problem. He learned that the Government’s research and development activities were focused
mainly on rice and corn, which is why the country’s agricultural colleges and universities– the
majority of which are state-owned– pattern their curriculum to cater to this focus; as a result,
very little attention was given to other agricultural products, particularly coconuts.
The lack of coconut farming technological know-how was exacerbated by serious flooding
and landslides during the typhoon season (from June to November), which destroys farmland
1
All figures quoted are in US dollars
2
The Philippine Department of Trade and Industry defines small- and medium-size enterprise (SME) as
those with a capitalization of not more than US$2 million and a workforce of 100 or less.
3
Bicol is one of the poorest regions in the Philippines and one of the country’s major coconut-producing
regions, situated approximately 449 kilometers southeast of Manila.
4
Source: Nation Master Statistics. www.nationmaster.com
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 2
and crops. Because of the mountainous topography in the Philippines, soil erosion is a major
problem. Half of the land area is considered upland or slopes of more than 18 degrees, with
weather patterns characterized by strong tropical typhoons. Illegal and rampant logging
operations also contribute to increasing land degradation and denudation of forests.
As an agriculturist, Bo knew that farming and the environment go hand in hand in addressing
the farmers’ economic problems. Thus, the stage was set for his quest to find solutions.
The Philippines produces six billion kilos of coconut husks per year (about 732,750 metric
tons of cocofibre per year), constituting the largest single source of country’s agricultural
waste and a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. 5 The husks are normally thrown away
or burned– in the process, harmful particulates and noxious gases are released into the
atmosphere. Out of this waste, Bo saw a huge potential; he just needed to find a way to add
value to waste coconut husks.
Bo proposed to conduct a study on the productive uses of the coconut husks to Bicol
University. Unfortunately, the University did not have the funds to support such a study, so he
took it to the International Research and Development Center (IRDC), the principal research
and development arm of the Government, who after several months finally agreed.
The study involved a series of experimentation conducted by his students. The first task was
to design a machine called a decorticator, which grinds waste coconut husks, producing fibre
and peat- in the process discovering that a coconut husk is 35 percent fibre and 65 percent
dust or peat. Then, by using a 100-year-old weaving process, they learned that cocofiber
could be made into twines or ropes and woven into nets. They also discovered unique
characteristics of coconut fibre:
Coconut fibre is completely biodegradable
It degrades naturally at a rate that allows vegetation to settle firmly in the soil; in contrast,
Decorticator processing
other geotextiles degrade faster than plants can grow
The fibre has excellent water-absorption and water-holding capability, which helps to
prevent water from going directly into the soil– a major cause of soil erosion
5
Source: Philippine Coconut Authority
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 3
It has natural rooting hormones
Finally, they successfully tested the effectiveness of the nets for soil erosion control.
Consultations with local public works officials confirmed that the cocofiber nets were much
cheaper than imported synthetic materials that were commonly used in public works and
construction. Experimentation at local farms using coconut peat as soil enhancer also proved
highly successful. Bo encouraged local groups of farmers and cooperatives to go into
cocofiber-making by offering training courses, emphasizing the potential for an alternative
income stream. He introduced the cocofiber nets to the Philippine government units as an
effective technology to solve serious erosion problems, particularly in government
infrastructure projects, such as roads and bridges. He pointed out the potential for savings–
especially to the country’s foreign exchange reserve– by eliminating the need to import
pricier synthetic materials. Finally, he stressed that the government’s adoption of cocofiber
nets for erosion control would create a stable domestic market, and therefore help rejuvenate
the coconut industry.
Denuded hillside… … covered by nets … grass seeds begin … after 3 months … after one year,
embedded with to sprout grass begins to grow fully covered with
seeds grass
This failure to enlist support was a reality check for Bo. He decided to leave the University to
start a business– CocoTech– with the objective of helping poor coconut farmers and the
environment through the production and application of cocofiber nets.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 4
net business, but every bank he approached turned him down. Bo was relentless. In the end he
had to use his family’s life savings to fund the project. “My wife was so scared to put all we
had into the project as she herself wasn’t sure if the project would work, but I guess she
trusted me enough,” Bo confessed. His wife Julie added, “Actually, a part of it came from my
retirement, but deep inside, I knew that sharing what we have is my way of supporting Bo’s
dream to help the poor. Looking back, it was all worth it.” With the help of some relatives,
Bo was able to pool about $7,000 to start what was then called Juboken 6 Enterprise.
The production of coconets as well as other cocofiber products involves five major processes.
The steps and income generated for workers in each step is as follows (see Appendix A for an
illustration of the cocofiber process):
1. Purchase husks from coconut farmers for US$0.03 per husk.
2. Process husks into fibre and peat using the decorticator (decorticator operators earn US$3
to $5 per day).
3. Pack and distribute fibre to the community (workers [packing and loading] and drivers
earn an average of US$3 per day, and the company provides a transport vehicle).
4. Twine fibre: twining is often done collectively by families (they earn US$5 per day or
about $100 per month 7 , a significant increase for coconut farmers who typically earn up
to $30 per month).
5. Weave twine into nets (there are two weavers per loom; each receives US$2 per day).
6
Juboken is the former name of Coco Technologies Corporation. Juboken is the combination of the
names of Bo, his wife Julie and their son Ken. Even today, Juboken is still the most recognizable name
of the company. In fact, CocoTech’s main production facility in Bicol still carries the name of Juboken.
7
This is on the assumption that a family works only 20 days a month. But in reality most families work
every day except Sundays.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 5
CocoTech’s product processing is typically carried out by the under-employed members of
the coconut farming communities such as women and out-of-school young men. Generally,
an entire family gets involved in twining, usually led by women and a handful of otherwise
unemployable males (for example, the physically handicapped). If a family employs four
members, their income is four times greater. Families pay for the fabrication of the twining
equipment, which cost about US$30 to $40 per “twiner.” This is considered to be their
contribution to the project.
Weaving is done exclusively by women– in part out of tradition and in part because of the
stigma attached to weaving as female only activity– and men are primarily involved in plant
operations. This involves heavier and more intense work such as operating and maintaining
the decorticating equipment, and sorting fibre for distribution to various households. The
operations workers put in 5am to 5pm days each week. Women who work from home are
more flexible with their time.
Over the past thirteen years, CocoTech has validated a novel supply chain that includes the
direct involvement of the coconut farmers, eliminating the middlemen.
The figure below illustrates the critical sphere of CocoTech’s business partners, which are the
key elements of its business model.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 6
Sharing Operational Accountability with the
Community
CocoTech organized the community partners with the help of local government units.
Together they provided training in business affairs, such as ensuring the quality of the
products, timely delivery of cocofibre for twining and transporting the twine from one
community or household to another for weaving. In essence, the community partners
represent the assembly line of the CocoTech’s operations. Sharing the accountability of the
company’s operations with the local farmer organizations has helped create a sense of
ownership on the part of the community and efficiency on the part of the company.
The company’s partners are autonomous and self-reliant enterprises. CocoTech encourages
each one of them to develop its own markets, wherever possible. CocoTech does, however,
provide technical assistance in designing and fabricating machinery and equipment. In some
cases, CocoTech loans or donates machinery and equipment, and provides hands-on training
in bioengineering. Today, there are at least nine “CocoTech-like” enterprises around the
country (see Appendix B for partner locations). They serve as consolidators of coconet
production activities in their respective provinces and sell the coconets to CocoTech.
“Kung hindi lang sa project na ito, siguro ngayon ay lima na ang anak ko!” (“If it were not for this project,
I am sure that by now I would already have five children!”), Flora Navaresa, one of the women workers
who produce cocofiber nets at the cocofibre processing facility of Sustainable Rural Enterprise (SRE),
told a visiting journalist.
In 2001, SRE, a community based organization based in Aklan Province, visited CocoTech’s facility in
Albay. Having learned about CocoTech’s operations, SRE figured that acquiring the coconut fibre
processing technology of CocoTech was an ideal method of disposing thousands of waste coconut
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 7
husks that SRE’s partner, the Ibajay Small Coconut Farmers Development Cooperative (ISCFDC), had
accumulated at its mini-oil mill facility in Ibajay, Aklan.
Two staff members of SRE made a follow-up visit to learn about the processes, including the design of
equipment such as the decorticator, sieving drum, twiner and loom. A series of training sessions
followed, covering skills in twining, weaving, operating and maintaining machinery and equipment and
quality control. It was also during this period of training that the SRE women discovered that they could
double production by modifying and improving the original twiner and loom that had been brought in
from CocoTech– improvements that were, in turn, replicated by CocoTech.
In 2003 SRE delivered its first batch of nets to CocoTech, produced by 75 families. A grant in 2004 from
the World Bank Development Marketplace allowed SRE to expand its operations by purchasing a larger-
capacity decorticator and training more families in other communities (including families of former
Nationalist People’s Army communist insurgents). With guidance from CocoTech, SRE staff members
acquired skills in cocofiber processing and were able to carry out its own demonstration installations at
local mangroves and fishponds. In addition, SRE expanded its product line by processing coconut dust
into cocopeat, with help from CocoTech, Sagana 100 (the country’s leading producer of organic
fertilizer) and the Philippine Coconut Authority. In 2005, SRE’s “Aklan Model” was successfully
replicated in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao in Indanan, Sulu– in collaboration with the
Philippine Business for Social Progress/Center for Corporate Citizenship and the German Development
Service. The first phase of the Sulu project is expected to benefit more than 250 families of poor coconut
farmers and former Muslim rebels by the end of 2006. SRE is also a leading advocate for the increased
use of cocofiber products in the Philippines.
Currently SRE sells all of its production to CocoTech. SRE has a workforce of more than 400 families,
and the majority of workers are women. This newfound “women power” has allowed its partner, the
ISCFDC, to increase its membership by three-fold and to elect its first-ever woman chairperson. Women
workers are now eligible to take out small loans from lending institutions and local shops and stores.
SRE is gaining a reputation as Western Visayas Region’s leading producer of quality cocofiber products.
Installations of the coconets in nearby Antique Province have become tourist attractions. This particular
project was credited with minimizing the effects of the typhoon Milenyo, which caused flooding and
landslides in other unprotected areas of the province. The Governor of Antique expressed her gratitude
and hoped that many more vulnerable areas will have similar coconet installations.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 8
Expanding the Market to Provide More Work for
the Communities
Bo’s first few clients were local government units and domestic companies involved in land
development and landscaping activities. Aside from the production of cocofiber net
geotextiles, CocoTech also provided the following technical services to customers: project
feasibility study, bioengineering system design, installation services and supply of
bioengineering materials (cocofiber nets). This was moderately successful, but CocoTech
aimed to stimulate employment for the families of coconut farmers, and the only way to do
this was to expand the market.
An opportunity arose when Bo was invited by the German Development Service to participate
in a conference in Munich, Germany where he met the officers of Bestmann Bioengineering
Company. The company was looking for a natural alternative for jute and plastic fibres which
Bestmann was using at the time to make mattresses and upholstery for car seats for clients
such as Mercedes Benz. Bo convinced the company to try cocofiber.
Bo came back to the Philippines with a job order from Bestmann, the latter having discovered
that cocofiber was indeed superior, particularly for its water-absorption capacity and natural
biodegradability. The company asked CocoTech to help carry out a larger-scale experiment
on the use of cocofiber for erosion control in Europe. They were particularly interested in
using a natural fibre. This partnership introduced CocoTech to the international market. It
opened new opportunities for the company not only in providing cocofiber nets but also in
providing bioengineering services for foreign projects (a list of the company’s international
bioengineering projects is included in Appendix C).
To increase domestic use of cocofibre products, Bo wrote and advocated the passage of
Presidential Memorandum 25 (see Appendix D). The Memorandum was signed on September
2002 by President Arroyo, mandating the use of cocofiber products in all government
infrastructure projects.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 9
The Memorandum was significant for the
Figure 3: CocoTech Company Performance
industry because it helped ensure
(1996-2006, in Php)
increased domestic demand. Most
important, as cited above, the domestic
80,000,000 market commands a higher price than the
Project Value
While the presidential mandate has increased domestic demand, another obstacle remains:
CocoTech’s biggest client, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), takes an
inordinately long time to pay for its purchase orders. This adversely affects the company’s
income stream and ability to pay its workers on time– a tremendous blow to worker morale
especially because most of them depend on their earnings from CocoTech for their day-to-day
needs. These challenges forced the company to diversify its product line (see Appendix F)
and focus on bioengineering and consulting services, particularly on its expertise in designing
large-scale soil erosion control projects abroad, which translate to increased orders for
cocofiber nets. This allowed the company to grow despite the challenges. Earnings in 2005
totalled US$320,000, with earnings for 2006 expected to reach $500,000.
CocoTech saw the competitive advantage of the Philippines not just in exporting cocofiber
but also in processing cocofiber into other coco-based products aside from coconets to
stimulate the local economy (see Appendix G). “We need to add value to cocofiber to provide
more jobs for our communities,” Bo emphasized.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 10
In 2005, CocoTech partnered with Guangzhou Kekai Technology Development Co. Ltd., a
Chinese company, to carry out an experiment using cocofiber nets (instead of plastic nets) to
cover the surface of a Chinese landfill. The project was worth about US$100,000 in cocofiber
nets and proved to be a huge success. Within eighteen months, the landfill was transformed
into a beautiful, green park.
CocoTech has been invited by the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture to carry out experiments
using cocofiber nets in anti-desertification of the Gobi Desert and in restoring riverbanks
throughout the country (see Figure 4). An industry observer predicts that if just one of these
two experiments succeeds, “Our cocofiber processing workers would have jobs for the next
30 years.” However, funding has not been secured to support the research studies on anti-
desertification.
In the Philippines, after a devastating landslide in Leyte, CocoTech was hired by a private
European organization to install coconets on the hillsides and mountains whose collapse
wiped out entire villages. In addition, Cocotech’s coco-peat products were used to help
restore the farmlands that had all but disappeared. Today, the mountains and hillsides are
sprouting vegetations, and farmlands are once again retuning to productive uses, albeit not as
yet fully restored to their original conditions (see Figure 5). The most important thing is that
land and soil have been rejuvenated and will be in better condition than before the disaster.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 11
CocoTech is proud of its pool of talented Filipino engineers working on the company’s
various experimental projects abroad. However, investment is needed to train more engineers
in the emerging technology of bioengineering.
The local government units also play a critical facilitating role in the entire operations. For
example, community leaders are often the arbiters to settle complaints and conflicts between
the working families, the company, and the community. They also help facilitate training
programmes, workshops and demo installations, leading to increased local use of coconut
fibre products.
The advent of cocofiber products has not only invigorated the depressed coconut farming
industry, but has also created an entirely new industry that has, in turn, spawned new local
enterprises.
EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN
Women play a critical role in the supply chain as they represent 85 percent of CocoTech’s
workforce. The cocofiber processing allows them to work out of their homes, keeping them
accessible to their children. Their newfound financial independence has helped them to gain
access to credit, join cooperatives and become less dependent on their husbands. The most
dramatic and significant aspects are the intangible impacts on women: acquiring a sense of
self-importance and increased self-esteem, because they bring in additional resources for the
family.
The company’s activities have also contributed to the reduction of juvenile delinquency
through employment of out-of-school youth (ages 18 and up). Further, in many communities
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 12
where CocoTech and partners have operations, there has been a significant reduction in
smoking among men and women because they have been made to understand that cocofiber is
a highly flammable material.
Continued collaboration with academic institutions, especially the engineering and agriculture
departments of major universities in the country, have led to improved equipment and
processes, new technology discoveries and a pool of qualified engineering graduates, 12 of
whom have joined CocoTech so far.
8
Data from the Cooperative Development Authority, Aklan.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 13
The cost of domestic shipping is often unaffordable for local entrepreneurs.
The domestic market pays a higher price, but payment and collection, particularly from
the public sector, can be a lengthy and expensive process.
The export market pays up-front, but international competition makes the price too low
and requires production volumes beyond the capability of CocoTech.
Funding is needed to support research studies in anti-desertification, to complement the
pilot project in the Gobi Desert in Mongolia; if the pilot project is proven feasible,
demand for cocofiber nets would outstrip global supply.
Funding is needed to train engineers and others in bioengineering.
Funding is needed to support skills training workshops on twining and weaving as a
means to expand the current worker base.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 14
Conclusion: The Important Adventure
Bo Arboleda named his original company Juboken, representing his name and those of his
wife and son. He then realized that in the Japanese language– in which he is fluent- Ju means
important and boken means adventure. Indeed, for this visionary who was once a political
activist and a detainee during the Marcos martial law period– which forced him to study
abroad– Juboken was but a continuation of his life’s dream to help the poor. This became the
perfect name for a company that symbolizes his hope and the hopes of thousands of coconut
farmers.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 15
References
BBC. Official website. Available at www.bbc.co.uk.
Project monitoring report of Indanan, Sulu, in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao
(ARMM). Project replication and interview notes with workers and their families and with
Governor. March 2006.
Radio programme in early September 2006 featuring the Governor of the Province of
Antique, shortly after Typhoon Milenyo caused flash floods and landslides, giving
special mention to coconet-covered hillsides that were left unscathed.
Interviews
Arboleda, Julie. 2 October 2006.
Workers and their families, chairwoman of coconut farmers’ cooperative, school principal,
and town Mayor, SRE facility in Aklan. 27 to 30 September 2006.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 16
Appendix A: Coco Fiber Processing
s
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 17
Appendix B: Map of the Philippines Islands and CocoTech’s Areas of
Operation and Partners
COCO TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION
Bioengineering and
Marketing Office –
Quezon City, Metro
Manila
BALER PLANT
Baler, Aurora, Quezon
LABO PLANT
Labo, Camarines Norte
LUPI PLANT
Lupi, Camarines Sur
JUBOKEN/CocoTech
ENTERPRISES INC.
Gapo, Camalig, Albay
SUSTAINABLE RURAL
ENTERPRISES
Kalibo, Aklan
PAMMPCO-
PIFARMCO-PUSCO
Panaon, Southern Leyte
PAMMPCO-
PIFARMCO-PUSCO
Panaon, Southern Leyte
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 18
Appendix C: List of CocoTech international service projects
Implementing Company/
Country Name of Projects
Partner
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 19
Appendix D: Presidential Memorandum No. 25
DIECTING ALL NATIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, BUREAUS, AND OTHER
INSTRUMENTALITIES INCLUDING AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTIONS AND COUNCILS TO USE
COCO PEAT OR COIR DUST AND COCONUT FIBER MATERIALS FOR SOIL CONDITIONING AND
EROSION CONTROL.
In line with the program to promote better farm practices and environment conservation to mitigate the
effect of drought during El Niño years, all heads of National and Local Government agencies, bureaus,
and instrumentalities including Government institutions and councils involved in the implementation of
farming programs are hereby directed to prescribe the use of coco peat and other coconut husk
materials in farming and horticulture as effective soil conditioner and water moisture conservator.
Likewise, the use of geo-textiles and bio-logs or fascines made from coir or coconut fiber is hereby
prescribed for use in infrastructure and public work projects for soil erosion control, more particularly of
the Department of Public Works and Highways. These coir products, proven for their high tensile
strength, are abundant, available, and biodegradable.
The use of coir will further provide additional income to coconut farmers and generate more jobs in the
countryside.
The Department of Agriculture, the Department of Public Works and Highways and the Philippine
Coconut Authority shall issue the corresponding Implementing Guidelines within thirty (30) days from the
date of issuance of this Memorandum Circular.
By the President:
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 20
Appendix E: CocoTech’s Project Performance
Value of Projects
Year of Operation No of Projects
(in Php)
1996 1 750,000.00
1997 3 8,246,000.00
1998 2 8,265,000.00
1999 4 2,073,000.00
2000 4 6,361,000.00
2001 6 7,503,866.00
2002 6 66,740,000.00
2003 9 25,000,000.00
2004 8 15,200,000.00
2005 7 13,600,000.00
2006 18 16,499,983.34
TOTAL 170,238,849.34
US$ 3,404,776.99
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 21
Appendix F: List of products and services
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 22
Appendix G: Coconut husks products
Plant liner
Car seat
Brush rope
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 23
September 2007
The information presented in this case study has been reviewed and signed-off by the company to
ensure its accuracy. The views expressed in the case study are the ones of the author and do not
necessarily reflect those of the UN, UNDP or their Member States.
Copyright @ 2007
United Nations Development Programme
All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without
prior permission of UNDP.
Case Study • CocoTech: Providing Livelihood Opportunities for Poor Coconut Farmers 24