Capstone Final Draft
Capstone Final Draft
Capstone Final Draft
Bracing for Brexit: The Detrimental Economic Impacts of Great Britain Leaving the
European Union
Allison Courtney
Introduction/Background Information
On June 23rd, 2016, a referendum was held in Great Britain to decide whether or not the
country would remain a member of the European Union. The final results of the vote were 51.9%
(17,410,742) of people choosing to leave the European Union, while only 48.1% (16,141,241) of
people voted to remain a member (“EU Referendum Results,” 2016). The referendum, also
known as a British Exit or “Brexit,” is defined as “the residents decision that the benefits of
belonging to the unified monetary body no longer outweigh the costs of free movement of
immigration” (Amadeo, 2019). On the 29th of May, 2017, the United Kingdom Prime Minister,
Theresa May, submitted the Article 50 withdrawal notification to the European Union. Article 50
of the Treaty of Lisbon gives any European Union member the right to quit unilaterally, and
outlines the procedure for doing so. It gives the leaving country two years to negotiate an exit
deal, and once it is set in motion, it cannot be stopped except by unanimous consent of all
The exit deal between the United Kingdom and the European Union includes: The UK
does not want to continue allowing unlimited EU immigration, and the two sides must guarantee
the status of European Union members living in the United Kingdom, and vice versa. The same
principle applies to work visas, which are not currently required. Additionally, the United
Kingdom wants to withdraw from the European Court of Judgement. In regards to trade, the
United Kingdom wants a “customs union” with the European Union (which means they will not
imposed tariffs on each others’ imports and impose common tariffs on imports from other
countries), and both sides want to continue trade. Financially, the European Union will require a
cash settlement from the United Kingdom to meet existing financial commitments. The
BRACING FOR BREXIT 3
withdrawal plan must be approved by the European Council, the 20 European Union countries
with approval from 65% of the population, and the European Parliament in order to go into effect
(“Key points from Article 50 letter,” 2017). As it currently stands, Prime Minister Theresa May
and the EU Council have been granted an extension until October 31st, 2019, in order to ensure
that there is not a possibility of Great Britain leaving the EU with no deal.
Many people who decided to leave the European Union chose to vote this way because
they believed it would be the best action in order to regain control of Great Britain's borders and
policies on immigration. In addition, many thought that leaving the European Union would save
taxpayers billions and free Great Britain from an economic burden, as well as give Great Britain
more freedom in regards to trade. However, the vote caused many consequences for Great
Britain and its government. The vote was proposed because people were concerned about
controlling their own borders, government, and economy, something that was limited due to their
membership to the European Union (Allen, Oltermann, Borger, Nelsen, 2015). In spite of this,
the vote caused a major drop in Great Britain’s economy. Immediately after the vote was
finalized, the exchange rate between the pound and other European currencies drastically
dropped. These immediate repercussions of the referendum further indicate that Brexit will have
catastrophic impacts on the stability of Great Britain’s economy for years to come. Although
riddled with delays, uncertainty, and unpredictability, ongoing Brexit negotiations pose a severe
detriment to the economic stability of not only the United Kingdom's short and long term trade
relations, employment rates, and economic prosperity, but also all global relations, particularly
The severity of the economic consequences of Brexit is vastly dependent on what terms
the United Kingdom leaves the European Union. The two main options currently being debated
are soft Brexit versus hard Brexit. A soft Brexit means a relatively slow negotiation designed to
“retain as close as possible a relationship with the rest of the EU.” This entails access to the EU’s
market, with as few tariffs as possible (Wintour, 2016). The objective of a soft Brexit is to
“minimize the disruption to trade, to supply chains and to business in general that would be
created by diverging from the EU’s regulations and standards” (J.P., 2018). In theory, a soft
Brexit means staying within both the EU’s single market and its customs union. This would
allow for a longer transitional period between Great Britain and the EU once an agreement has
been made, and ultimately lower the chances of economic turmoil. Therefore, it would allow for
a slow disassociation from the European Union, allowing Great Britain to adjust gradually to the
drastic economic and trade changes associated with Brexit. Those who support a soft Brexit are
typically “willing to be bound by EU rules and tariffs even though Britain will lose any say in
making them.” Additionally, they also accept “the inevitable consequence that it will be hard,
even impossible, for Britain to do any trade with outside countries” (J.P., 2018).
Contrarily, a hard Brexit would likely “see the UK give up full access to the single
market and full access of the customs union along with the EU” (Sims, 2016). The lack of
access to the trade market would mean Britain would both be in control of their own trade, but
also have to make new trade allies. Additionally, this exit strategy would “prioritize giving
Britain full control over its borders, making new trade deals and applying laws within its own
territory.” Due to this, in the initial stages of Brexit, it means the UK would “likely fall back on
BRACING FOR BREXIT 5
World Trade Organization rules for trade with its former EU partners” (Sims, 2016). This would
eliminate the possibility of a lenient transition period, making the economic consequences of
Brexit more immediate, something Great Britain is not yet equipped to handle. If a negotiation
deal is passed based on the premises of a “hard Brexit,” the economic stability of Great Britain
will be in greater danger, leading to both more short and long-term impacts. A hard Brexit is
predominantly supported by those who voted to leave the European Union in the initial
referendum, and the opposite is true for those who support a soft Brexit.
Soft versus hard Brexit is a point of contention amongst British citizens, but also amongst
Members of Parliament (MPs). The main reason the exit deal has not yet been negotiated, nor
passed, is because MPs cannot agree on which is the better way to leave. Although many citizens
feel as though there should be a moderate plan, one that combines elements of a hard and soft
brexit, many politicians and high ranking officials disagree with that sentiment. In an interview,
Markus Kerber of the German Bundesverband der Deutschen (BDI) group told BBC Radio 4’s
Today programme that it is better to have either a hard or soft Brexit “that works than to have a
fudge in the middle that has to be renegotiated or doesn’t politically work and you have
uncertainty lingering on” (Sims, 2016). This lack of consensus and compromise has further
complicated the options at hand, whilst also further delaying an already backstopped process of
negotiating an exit deal. Additionally, it has also increased the chance of Great Britain leaving
with an exit deal that nobody is satisfied with, and leads to the most detrimental economic
consequences.
BRACING FOR BREXIT 6
Irish Backstop
A key part of the Brexit negotiations over the past two years revolves around the border
that separates Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Northern Ireland is a part of the
United Kingdom and is a member of the EU; however, the Republic of Ireland is its own
separate country, has no formal bond to the U.K., and is not a member of the EU. This debate is
commonly referred to as the Irish Backstop. The backstop is “a position of last resort, to maintain
an open border on the island of Ireland in the event that the UK leaves the EU without securing
an all-encompassing deal” (Campbell, 2019). In creating the backstop, it would allow for a less
restrictive route of trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland in the event of a
no deal or “hard Brexit” negotiation agreement. Presently, goods and services are traded between
the two jurisdictions on the island of Ireland with few restrictions. The United Kingdom and
Ireland are currently “part of the EU single market and customs union, so products do not need to
be inspected for customs and standards” (“What is the Irish backstop?,” 2019). However, Brexit
would drastically change this process, as the two parts of Ireland would be in different customs
and regulatory regimes, which could lead to products being checked at the border.
These checkpoints could drastically delay deliveries, exports, imports, and trade deals,
which would inevitably decrease the economic stability and prosperity of Great Britain. Up to
30,000 workers work and live on different sides of the border, and “31% of the exports from the
north have their destination in the south” (Rios, 2019). This makes Republic of Ireland the
largest international market for Northern Ireland exports. As a result, Northern Ireland will
become “particularly vulnerable due to the loss of EU funding and the potential impact of tariff
and non-tariff barriers for trade between both side of the island” (Rios, 2019). If Northern Ireland
BRACING FOR BREXIT 7
sustains a loss of trade of this proportion, a tidal wave of economic issues across Great Britain
The UK government does not want this occurring, and neither does the EU; however, the
UK’s “current red lines, which include leaving the customs union and the single market, make
that very difficult” (Campbell, 2019). In order to guarantee the aspiration of a frictionless border,
a safety net would need to be put in place. The backstop is a safety net - “an arrangement that
will apply to the Irish border after Brexit, if a wider deal or technological solution cannot keep it
won’t agree to a transitional period, or substantive trade talks, until it is place. However, drafting
the backstop is proving difficult, as there has yet to be a proposal passed through Parliament
during the past three years of negotiations. This delay is posing severe economic ramifications to
Great Britain, which would only be heightened if they were not able to secure a deal on the
Britain’s departure from the European Union could “send shock waves across the global
economy and threaten more than a trillion dollars in investments and trade with the United
States” (Mui, 2016). The decision to leave the European Union carries detrimental consequences
for American businesses, as they employ “more than a million people in Britain” (Mui, 2016). If
Brexit officially happens, regardless of whether or not a deal is settled on, these people are at a
severe risk of losing their jobs and stable sources of income. The notion of an isolationist
viewpoint in regards to foreign affairs, and the commonly accepted idea that Brexit does not
impact the United States is entirely false. If Great Britain, one of the United States’ closest
BRACING FOR BREXIT 8
trading allies, leaves the European Union, the economic impacts will reach far greater than the
surrounding countries.
Additionally, the United States is the largest single investor in Britain, and many
American firms consider it the “gateway to free trade with the 28 nations that make up the
European Union” (Mui, 2016). Corporate America has been one of the biggest supporters of the
campaign to keep the union together, even several of Wall Street’s biggest names donated
substantial sums of money to the effort. According to Angel Gurria, head of the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development, Brexit would be “bad for the U.K., it would be bad for
Europe, it would be bad for the world, including the United States. You already have enough
uncertainty in the world today. We don’t need more” (Mui, 2016). The sheer uncertainty and
unpredictability of Brexit’s outcome poses a severe threat to the relationship between the U.K
and United States. Emanuel Adam, head of policy and trade for BritishAmerican Business,
which represents companies in New York and London, expressed “nobody knows at this point
how the world would look like with the UK out of the EU. This alone creates an uncertainty that
businesses don’t wish to see” (Kierzenkowski, Pain, Ruticelli, Zwart, 2016). If Great Britain
officially leaves the EU, they will suffer the blow of a lost ally, detrimentally impacting their
foster global monetary cooperation and secure financial stability, issued a forecast calling the
impact of Britain’s departure from the European Union “negative and substantial.” The fund
predicted that Brexit could reduce growth by up to 5.6 percent over the next three years in its
BRACING FOR BREXIT 9
worst-case scenario (Mui, 2016). These challenges are coming at an already weak moment for
Europe’s economy, as “Europe is still recovering from the series of financial crises that have
been roiling countries such as Greece and Italy along with others across the continent” (Mui,
2016). The economic repercussions of Brexit, in addition to an already wavering economy, will
prove detrimental to the stability of their trade, employment, and economic productivity, and will
be felt for years to come. Additionally, there are also worries about the strength of the economies
of Europe’s major trading partners, most notably the United States and China. Without the
support of these countries, and especially if Great Britain leaves the customs union in a hard
Brexit, Britain’s economy will begin to feel the severe, impending consequences.
anticipate that Brexit will eventually reduce sales and increase costs” (Bloom, Bunn, Chen,
Mizen, Smietanka, Thwaites, 2019). Over the past two years since the referendum was held, the
UK has reduced productivity by roughly one percent, the equivalent of going backwards a year.
If this trend continues, by the time the current extension to reach an exit deal is expired, Great
Britain will have reduced productivity by 0.5%, the equivalent of moving backwards for half of a
year. Additionally, the expected impacts of Brexit on UK business are: -3.6% impact on sales,
-2.8% impact on exports, 5.2% impact on unit costs, 3.3% impact on labor costs, 0.3% impact on
financing costs (Bloom, Bunn, Chen, Mizen, Smietanka, Thwaites, 2019). These predictions are
moderate based on several compilations of data; however, the worst case scenario, entailing a
hard Brexit without a link to the customs union, could produce a much more dire situation than
One of the biggest indicators of economic success and growth is a country’s trade, both in
relation to imports and exports. However, Brexit poses an impending threat to most of the
strongest trade alliances to Great Britain, further contributing to the instability of their economy
post-Brexit. The EU is the main trading partner for the British economy, as it is the destination
for roughly 45 percent of all British exports and goods, and around 38 percent of total exported
UK services. Dependent on the institutional arrangement decided between the UK and the EU, “a
Brexit would imply higher EU trade barriers” (Busch, Berthold; Matthes, Jurgen, 2016). Trade
barriers and their corresponding trade transaction costs would rise customs clearance
requirements that would lead to delays for British firms exporting to the EU. Moreover, “the UK
would partially lose access to the EU Internal Market which would particularly affect the
freedom to provide services and the right of establishment in the EU” (Busch, Berthold; Matthes,
Jurgen, 2016).
In regards to trade alliances with other countries, those remaining in the European Union
and otherwise, the Centre for European Reform warns that trade costs would “rise after a Brexit
and the United Kingdom would have less bargaining power for trade agreements than it does as a
part of a bigger entity, the European Union” (Allen, Oltermann, Borger, Nelsen, 2014). A
smaller voice in the world of trade will prove detrimental to the economy of Great Britain, as a
majority of their wealth and success is in part due to their strong trade relations. According to the
Business for New Europe, a coalition of business leaders pushing for the United Kingdom to stay
in a reformed European Union, “there are a number of free trade agreements currently being
negotiated by the European Union, including with the United States and Japan” (Amadeo, 2019).
BRACING FOR BREXIT 11
They went on further to explain that, “The United Kingdom with 65 million consumers would
not have anywhere near the negotiating power that the European Union, with its 500 million
consumers, would have” (Amadeo, 2019). The United Kingdom, currently considered to be a
strong world power, specifically in the area of trade, will experience a drastic shift in negotiation
abilities, access, and trade allies, all proving to be a detriment to their economic stability.
In addition to a decline of pre-existing strong trade allies, Great Britain will struggle to
find new allies to the scale and caliber of the European Union and its trade benefits. The
Confederation of British Industry (CBI) foresees tricky negotiations if the UK wants to keep its
current trading conditions after an EU exit. The business group’s deputy direction general, Katja
Hall, explained: “while we could navigate trade deals with the rest of the world, we would have
to agree deals with over 50 countries from scratch just to get back to where we are now, and to
do so with the clout of a market of 60 million, not 500 million” (Allen, Oltermann, Borger,
Nelsen, 2015). This size difference is astounding, and will greatly limit Great Britain’s outreach
and accessibility to other countries with successful and thriving trade agreements. The limitation
of trade, both with countries in and outside of the European Union, is at a great detriment to the
economic stability of Great Britain, as their access and bargaining power will be greatly
diminished.
Conclusion
On the 23rd of June, 2016, Great Britain held a vote that will continue to implement
consequences on the United Kingdom for years to come. The decision to leave the European
Union sent shockwaves throughout both the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe. Coinciding
with Great Britain’s decision to remove its membership from the European Union, the United
BRACING FOR BREXIT 12
Kingdom’s status as an economic power will rapidly become unstable. Tariff-free trade and
negotiations between Great Britain and other European Union members will greatly diminish,
with other world powers is now extremely uncertain. The referendum has often been referred to
as, “the largest immediate risk facing United Kingdom financial markets, and possibly also
global financial markets” (Mui, 2016). Despite citizen’s justification for Brexit outweighing a
connection and relationship with the European Union, the catastrophic implications of leaving
the EU will leave graver consequences than imaginable, in not only Great Britain, but around the
world.
BRACING FOR BREXIT 13
References
Allen, K., Oltermann, P., Borger, J., & Nelsen, A. Brexit - what could happen if Britain left the
s/2015/may/14/brexit-what-would-happen-if-britain-left-eu-european-union-referendum-
uk.
Amadeo, K. (2019, March 4). Brexit consequences for the U.K., the EU, and the United States.
Begg, I., & Mushovel, F. (n.d.). The economic impact of Brexit: Jobs, growth, and the public
se.ac.uk/europeanInstitute/LSE-Commission/Hearing-11---The-impact-of-Brexit-on-j
obs-and-economic-growth-sumary.pdf/
Bloom, N., Bunn, P., Chen, S., Mizen, P., Smietanka, P., & Thwaites, G. (2019, March 13).
ady-affecting-uk-businesses-heres-how.
Busch, Berthold; Matthes, Jurgen (2016): Brexit - the economic impact: A meta-analysis, IW
Campbell, J. (2019, April 5). Brexit: What is the Irish border backstop? BBC. Retrieved from
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-politics-44615404.
cs/eu_referendum/results?ocid=socialflow_twitter///////.
J.P. (2018, June 25). How a soft Brexit differs from a hard one. The Economist. Retrieved from
BRACING FOR BREXIT 14
https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2018/06/25/how-a-soft-brexit-differs
-from-a-hard-one
Key points from the Article 50 letter. (2017, March 29). BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.
com/news/uk-politics-uk-leaves-the-eu-39433403.
Kierzenkowski, R., Pain, N., Rusticelli, E., & Zwart, S. (April 2016). The economic
rary.org/docserver/5jm0lsvdkf6k-en.pdf?expires=1553732060&id=id&accname=guest&
checksum=E0E953BA8EC9F0421327CE207B9CE80F
Mueller, B. (2019, March 13). What is Brexit? A simple guide to why it matters and what
2019/world/europe/what-is-brexit.html
Mui, Y. (2016, June 18). ‘Brexit’ could send shock waves across U.S. and global economy. The
16/06/18/how-brexit-could-hurt-america/?utm_term=.fe0f8bb50499.
Pettifor, A. (2019, January 2). The economic consequences of Brexit? Prime. Retrieved from
http://www.primeeconomics.org/articles/the-economic-consequences-of-brexit
Rios, Beatriz. (2019, February 26). Northern Ireland - A cross-border economy at stake.
-ireland-a-cross-border-economy-at-stake/
Sims, A. (2016, October 3). What is the difference between hard and soft Brexit? Everything you
\/uk/politics/brexit-hard-soft-what-is-the-difference-uk-eu-single-market-freedom-movem
ent-theresa-may-a7342591.html
Tetlow, G. & Stojanovic, A. (October 2018). Understanding the economic impact of Brexit.
k/sites/default/files/publications/2018%20IfG%20%20Brexit%20impact%20%5Bfi
nal%20for%20web%5D.pdf
Van Reenen, J. (September 2016). Brexit's long-run effects on the U.K. economy. Massachusetts
017/02/brexits-long-run-effects-john-van-reenen.pdf
What is the Irish backstop? (2019, March 15). Full Fact. Retrieved from https://fullfact.org/
europe/irish-backstop/
Wintour, P. (2016, July 14). What’s the best Brexit Theresa May could get for Britain? The
best-brexit-theresa-may-could-get-for-britain