280 The Holy New Martyrs of Eastern Russia
280 The Holy New Martyrs of Eastern Russia
280 The Holy New Martyrs of Eastern Russia
RUSSIA
Vladimir Moss
CONTENTS
2
3
INTRODUCTION
In 2007 the first volume of the series, The Russian Golgotha: The Holy New
Martyrs and Confessors of Russia, was published by Monastery Press,
Wildwood, Alberta, Canada. That volume was devoted to the All-Russian
Martyrs – that is, the Royal Martyrs and Patriarch Tikhon – and to the
Martyrs and Confessors of North-West Russia. This is the fourth volume in
the series, and is devoted to the Martyrs and Confessors of Southern Russia
the Ukraine, Moldavia and the Caucasus
3
4
The question is: what is the status of those who did not separate from
Sergius, but who suffered at the hands of Soviet power in this period?
On the basis of Metropolitan Cyril’s words, we have taken the end of the
year 1934 as a provisional cut-off point. Those who suffered unjustly at the
hands of Soviet power before that point, whether they belonged to the
sergianist or to the True Orthodox Church, are counted as having suffered for
the true faith and as being martyrs or confessors of the True Church – with
the exception of the sergianist hierarchs, who, as being responsible for
“rightly dividing the word of truth”, must be considered as having failed in
their duty to confess the truth against sergianism, and other leading priests or
laymen who quite clearly did know what sergianism was but still remained
members of the sergianist church. However, from 1935 – by which time
almost all the True Orthodox had in any case been killed, incarcerated or
driven underground – those sergianists who suffered at the hands of Soviet
power are not counted as martyrs and confessors, including the vast numbers
killed in the purges of 1937-38, unless there are clear indications in their
biography that they struggled against Soviet power and in this way liberated
themselves from the sin of sergianism.
Through the prayers of our Holy Fathers, Lord Jesus Christ our God, have
mercy on us!
4
5
East House, Beech Hill, Mayford, Working, Surrey, England. GU22 0SB.
5
6
1. HIEROMARTYR JOACHIM,
ARCHBISHOP OF NIZHNI-
NOVGOROD
6
7
founded in the vast region from Orenburg to the Caspian Sea. Hundreds and
thousands of Cossacks and non-Cossacks living in the Cossack villages were
converted to yedinoveriye Orthodoxy, and every year tens of new parishes
were added to the diocese.
From June, 1906 to the beginning of 1907, Bishop Joachim sent two
diocesan missionary priests to Turgai. They established that the whole region
was in captivity to the sectarians. This missionary trip had a reviving effect on
the waverers: people brought tens of babies for baptism; young newly
married couples came asking that they "receive the law", that is, be married
according to the Orthodox rite; and many believers asked for pannikhidas to
be performed for those who had died without a church rite.
On the return of the missionaries, Bishop Joachim sent a report to the Holy
Synod, which then assigned 50,000 roubles above the normal annual budget
for the construction of churches and schools in the Turgai region. Special
missionary courses were organized in Orenburg and Kustanai, at which
candidates for the priesthood were trained for four months. These were
mainly teachers, readers and experienced deacons. Churches, schools and
hospitals were built, and every central point received a priest-teacher. A new
life began in the Turgai region. Many zealous pastors from other regions
7
8
asked to do missionary work in the Turgai, and in this way the whole region
was soon covered with well-organized parishes led by principled pastors. An
end was put to sectarian propaganda. Those who had been lured into the
sects were converted without difficulty to Orthodoxy. Everywhere evening
services with talks with the priests were organized. Religious-educational and
missionary brotherhoods began to be opened. Thus Orthodoxy was saved in
the region.
Vladyka saved countless people from despair and falls into mortal sin.
Once he dissuaded Deacon Gir-ko from killing himself as a result of a family
drama. He went to him by night, put him drunk into his carriage, drove him
to his hierarchical house and kept him for a whole week, forcing him to serve
every day. The deacon came to himself, persuaded by the love of Vladyka.
Later Vladyka ordained him to the priesthood and appointed him to a
militant workers' parish in P-y factory. Gir-ko literally regenerated the
rebellious parish, and presented the image of an ideal priest.
Vladyka protected education, and during his episcopate the church schools
multiplied and flourished. He clothed the poor seminarists from head to foot
from his own resources, ordained them to the priesthood and provided them
with means to live.
He was a true benefactor, doing good deeds both openly and secretly.
8
9
In the autumn he went to visit his son and his family in the Crimea. He
was often invited from there to serve in the churches of Sebastopol. Once,
when all the inhabitants of the house had gone out and he was alone, some
unknown people who were supposedly robbers, but were in fact sent by the
local Bolsheviks, appeared. According to the witness of a Crimean priest, he
was martyred by being hanged with his head down on the royal doors of the
Sebastopol cathedral.
9
10
"Now I must become spiritual, now the Church is in need, and I must serve
her."
His three last sermons ended with the words: “Beloved brothers and
sisters, we are living through a quite special time, before us all there stands
the feat of confession, and for some – martyrdom.”
10
11
Joachim, and, not finding him, asked: “Where is the hierarch?” They replied:
“In the Caves.” They went there and arrested Bishop Laurence.
Vladyka was two months in prison, first in the new palisade, and then in
the old. At that time there were still house churches in the prisons. There they
brought hierarchical vestments for Vladyka, and he served there on feastdays.
There were many people in the cells, but no cots, everyone slept on the floor,
but Vladyka had a bed, and the prisoners believed that whoever lay on
Vladyka’s bed would be released to go home – which was what happened.
Many people asked to rest on his cot. Every day matushka and her relatives
brought him parcels. Vladyka sent back notes, linen and empty bowls. Once
he sent back a worn out prayer rope, requesting that it be exchanged for a
new one. This prayer rope was given to Fr. Barnabas (the future bishop), who
took them and said: “A working prayer rope.”
Until then there had been no interrogations. But now they accused him of
writing an appeal to the people at a conference of the clergy in the summer, in
which the following words of the Apostle Paul were quoted: “Put on the
whole armour of God”. His signature was under the appeal as being the
president of the conference. Protopriest Alexis Alexandrovich Porfiriev, the
superior of the cathedral, had also signed as deputy president. They were
summoned together.
Fr. Alexis was born in 1856 in Simbirsk province. He came from a large
peasant family, and was the son of a reader. A great man of prayer, he
especially venerated the icon of the Mother of God, “The Joy of All Who
Sorrow”. He went to Simbirsk theological seminarcy and St. Petersburg
Theological Academy, graduating in 1882. Then he went to serve as a teacher
in the Nizhni-Novgorod theological seminary. He was an active member of a
missionary anti-schismatic brotherhood in the name of the Holy Prince
George Vsevolodovich. In 1886 he was ordained to the priesthood, and went
to serve in the Verkhneposadskaya church of St. Nicholas in Nizhni-
Novgorod province. In 1888 he had very successful talks with Old Ritualists
in the church of the theological seminary. On July 15, 1893 he was appointed
rector of the cathedral of the Holy Archangel Michael in Nizhni-Novgorod,
with promotion to the rank of protopriest. In 1901 he was head of the second
diocesan missionary congress, and in 1902 was appointed a member of the
Consistory for the affairs of the Old Ritualist schism. On April 12, 1905 he was
11
12
On the day of his summons to the authorities (after Vladyka Laurence), Fr.
Alexis was in a particularly joyful mood, and he said goodbye to everyone in
the cell in the firm conviction that he was going to be released. However, after
they had been condemned, they were sentenced to be shot. But they were
offered clemency on condition that they renounced their priesthood. They
refused. Then the final sentence was read out.
Vladyka had the Holy Gifts with him. He communed himself and then
communed Fr. Alexis. Vladyka was calm and joyful, Fr. Alexis wept. Vladyka
said: “Why are you weeping, we must rejoice. I’m ready!” Fr. Alexis replied
that he was sorry for his family. Afterwards Fr. Alexis’ daughter told her
mother that she had never seen her father weep. She also said that her father
never served the Liturgy without reading the akathist to the Heavenly Queen,
“the Joy of all who Sorrow”. He died on that day, October 24 / November 6,
1918.
They were led into the garden and placed on the edge of a freshly dug
grave. Vladyka raised his arms and prayed a fiery prayer, while Fr. Alexis
stood with his head lowered, with his hands folded on his breast, repeating
the prayer of the publican: “O God, be merciful to me, a sinner.” The Russian
soldiers refused to shoot because they said that they had heard the chanting
of the Cherubikon. So they summoned some Latvians (according to another
source, Chinese), who carried out the sentence.
At about eleven o’clock, the mother of the woman who gave this account
was standing not far off with some other people when they heard shots in the
garden. Then the lights went out in the house and the drunken Latvians came
out. But the investigator who had conducted the affair, came that night at the
request of Vladyka to the people who were close to him, bringing his things.
He told them everything, threw the things down and went off to his
homeland in Latvia, saying that there had been no substance to the crime.
Vladyka Laurence was tall with blonde hair and light blue eyes, and was a
little hunched. His voice was quiet, and his movements were measured. He
cared little for his outer appearance. He was forty-two years old when he
died. Of his relatives, only his widowed mother survived him.
12
13
Some time later, a woman who had known Vladyka well was on her way
to the early Liturgy when she passed the Cheka and saw two bodies being
taken out of the gates. She boldly asked who they were. They replied that
they were the bodies of a bishop and a priest. “Where are you taking them?”
“To Mochalny island. From there they will be thrown into the Volga.”
"On June 24, 1918 there began the affair of Archimandrite Augustine
which was to be so unfortunate for the Oransk monastery. Both at the
beginning of this sad affair and after the arrest of Augustine [which took place
on July 7], the monastery led an extremely anxious life, for it could not be
unaware that the surrounding population had been incited against it and
could inflict any unpleasantness it wanted on it, the more so in that the man at
the head of its administration, the treasurer and hieromonk Demetrius
(Arkhangelsky), had no authority even among the brotherhood, not to speak
of the surrounding inhabitants. He did not possess those characteristics which
are necessary for a man upon whom the lot has fallen of being at the head of a
well-known organization. Everybody recognized that they were living
through a critical time, so order was maintained as if by itself, for everybody
considered it his duty to fulfil the duties laid upon him in a conscientious
manner, and not out of fear. In the course of this life everybody was conscious
of the need to see a man at the head of the monastery's administration who
would have had experience of life and possess in abundance the qualities
necessary for a monastic community. Such a man had been promised to the
monastery since July 9 by Bishop Laurence. Archimandrite Arcadius had been
his deputy for 15 years, and at the given time was governing the Oransk
Gulyaevsky desert. And Bishop Laurence had issued a corresponding
resolution granting Fr. Arcadius the rights of the deputy of the monastery.
13
14
"On the night of August 17-18 he appeared before the bench of the
military-revolutionary tribunal.
"With this reply Archimandrite Augustine signed his own death sentence.
By the decision of the military-revolutionary tribunal, he, Protopriest
Nicholas Orlovsky and 15 other people whom I do not know were sentenced
to shooting, and the so-called "Mochalny island", which was downstream
along the Volga a little below the Caves monastery, was assigned as the place
of execution.
"At dawn all those doomed to die were seated in a ferry which sailed to the
fateful spot. All the unfortunates were in an state of exaltation, animatedly
14
15
talking to each other and expressing the hope that they would die for the
truth. They even served a pannikhida over themselves while still alive.
"On arriving at the island, all those doomed to die were placed in the
required positions. Archimandrite Augustine stood firmly with his eyes
fearlessly fixed on the red army men who were preparing to fire a volley. But
when it rang out, the archimandrite continued standing. A second volley rang
out, and a third, but to the amazement of all he continued standing, and only
after the fourth volley did he fall down dead, and was buried by the red army
men, or, to be more exact, he and his companions in death were covered with
a bit of earth so carelessly that the inhabitants of the Caves settlement were
later obliged to dig a common grave for the slaughtered ones.
"And many, many victims were offered to the terrible spirit of the times in
those evil days. My cousin, Priest Alexander Alexeyevich Voskresensky of
the village of Panov in Arzamas district, and his son Peter were killed in the
same way at that time. Unfortunately, even now, as I write these lines, the
details of the deaths of these relatives of mine are completely unknown to me,
and I know no more about the death of Archimandrite Augustine.
"In spite of the fact that the time was terrible for everybody, the usual life
of the monastery did not die, nor did the agricultural work which the
brotherhood occupied itself as usual come to an end. They greeted the death
of Archimandrite Augustine in silence, and it must be said that they had
neither enough courage, nor love, nor brotherly Christian forgiveness to raise
their prayers for the slaughtered man, who appeared to many in sleep,
usually in the form of one preparing to perform a priestly service. I did not
fear to raise his name in the common prayers. But his Reverence Laurence
went still further: on the very day of the death of Archimandrite Augustine,
August 18, he served a common pannikhida for the repose of the souls of the
slaughtered Archimandrite Augustine and Protopriest Nicholas in his Caves
monastery, not in the least suspecting, of course, that the same fate awaited
him in the near future.
15
16
to the same fate. Among them was the former regional Marshal of the
Nizhegorod nobility Alexis Borisovich Neidgart.”
“On his arrival at the prison, the bishop was offered a special room, but he
preferred to stay in a common cell, spending his first night on the bare floor.
The next day his fervent admirer Catherine Ivanovna Mesina appeared at the
prison bringing him a bed. They accepted the bed and passed it on as was
intended, but arrested the woman who brought it, although she was released
a few days later. His Reverence spent the rest of his days in prison, leaving his
room only when he was required either for an interrogation or to carry out
forced public labour, which consisted either in cleaning the prison courtyard
or in flinging hay, or, finally, in trips to fetch water in barrels, etc. In his free
time in the room, without paying any attention to the remarks and mockeries
of the prisoners that were cast at him from the first day, the bishop was
almost entirely occupied in praying. And he prayed with such fervour that
the mockery stopped of itself, and those who were there, softened in heart by
the hierarch's exploit of prayer, unwillingly began to imitate his praiseworthy
example. Vladyka had no small consolation in being allowed to serve in the
prison church, and he let no feast or Sunday pass without offering the
bloodless sacrifice for himself and the people. His cell-attendant was allowed
to meet his Reverence not less than twice a week, and sometimes (for
example, on feastdays, when he carried out the duty of book-bearer while the
hierarch served) more often. Through him Vladyka was provided with more
nourishing food.
"Days and weeks passed as the archpastor, together with Protopriest Alexis
Porfiriev and the other people, languished in prison, and no end to it was in
sight. His Reverence at first entertained the hope of being released, but as
time passed his hopes diminished. They say that the bishop twice sent his
cell-attendant to a protopriest of the town of Balakhna with a request to
inspire the citizens of Balakhna with the thought of petitioning the authorities
for his release as the bishop of Balakhna. It seems that this embassy was not
without effect, for the citizens of Balakhna collected up to 16,000 roubles
which they were intending to offer as a deposit. And at the same time they
16
17
gathered signatures for a petition for the release of his Reverence. This
thought also occurred to the citizens of Nizhni-Novgorod, and signatures for
a similar petition were collected in the parish churches.
"Of course, this movement could not go unnoticed by the authorities, who
were in no way inclined to grant the request. The anniversary of the October
revolution (October 24) and the triumph of Soviet power was approaching.
On the night of that day his Reverence Laurence, Protopriest Alexis
Porfirievich and Alexis Borisovich Neidgart appeared before a military-
revolutionary tribunal in the house of "the struggle against counter-
revolution, speculation and sabotage" on Malo-Pokrovsky street. It seems that
after giving a negative reply to the question: 'Do you recognise Soviet power?'
they were taken out into the garden of the house, where they were shot.
Rumours circulated in Nizhni-Novgorod that after his Reverence had been
shot he fell, but did not die, and by an instinct of self-preservation crawled
towards the gates, covered in blood. He was on the point of reaching them
when one of the sentries noticed him. He struck him with his gun-stock so
powerfully that the hierarch's head split and his brains came out. After
receiving a first volley, Protopriest Alexis Porfiriev moved around the garden,
but then he was shot for a second time - this time, for good.
"On the next day, which was the anniversary of the triumph of Soviet
power, all those in prison, including his Reverence Laurence and Protopriest
Alexis Porfiriev and the others, should have been released on amnesty. But
the evil spite of men had carried them all away from the stage of life some
hours earlier..."
Bishop Laurence and those with him were shot on October 24 / November
6, 1918.
Before his death he called on the soldier to repent, and declared that Russia
would be saved.
17
18
Bishop Ambrose, in the world Basil Gudko, was born on December 28,
1867 in Lyublin province. In 1889 he entered the St. Petersburg Theological
Academy, graduating in 1893. In 1891 he was tonsured into the mantia. On
May 30, 1893 he was ordained to the priesthood. On October 14, 1893 he was
appointed head of the catechetical missionary school in the Altai. In 1897 he
became head of the Korean Spiritual Mission, and on December 7 was raised
to the rank of archimandrite. On June 30, 1899 he was made inspector of the
Moscow Donskoy spiritual school. On July 27, 1901 he was appointed rector
of the Volhynia theological seminary. On April 30, 1904 he was consecrated
bishop of Kremenets, a vicariate of the Volhynia diocese by Metropolitan
Flavian of Kiev, Bishop Anthony (Khrapovitsky) and others. On February 17
(according to other sources, 24 or 27), 1909, he was appointed bishop of
Baltsk, a vicariate of the Kamenets-Podolsk diocese. On February 14/27, 1914,
he was appointed Bishop of Sarapul, a vicariate of Vyatka diocese, and on
October 5, 1916 – Bishop of Sarapul and Elabuga, with special privileges.
Vladyka did much to strengthen the faith and love of the believers through
his inspiring sermons and services. He also waged a successful campaign
against drunkenness, which was a major problem in such centres as Sarapul,
Izhevsk and Votkinsk. Abstinence brotherhoods were founded in Sarapul and
Elabuga.
At the end of 1916 a conflict took place between Bishop Ambrose and two
Sarapul liberals, Mikhel and Polyakov, as a result of which Vladyka forbade
them to receive Communion. Such a measure was unusual in those times, and
Mikhel complained to the Holy Synod. Soon a slanderous campaign was
unleashed against Vladyka, who was distinguished for his direct, ardent and
fearless character. Delegations of laymen went in defence of Vladyka to St.
Petersburg and Bishop Nicander (Fenomenov) of Vyatka. For a while the
campaign against Bishop Ambrose quietened down, and the Holy Synod was
even thinking of making Sarapul into an independent diocese. However, the
February revolution brought to the fore a new procurator, Prince V.N. Lvov,
who removed many of the monarchist bishops, including Vladyka Ambrose.
And so on March 18/31, 1917 Vladyka was retired, and became the
superior of the Sviyazhsk Dormition monastery. Here he found the monastery
in a run-down state, with several of the monks living an unworthy life. This
was not improved by the interventions of the Sviyazhsk head of police, the
atheist Komarov, who took possession of some of the monastery buildings,
thereby depriving the pilgrims of a shelter for the night.
18
19
The next day Vladyka served the Liturgy in his monastery. During a
moleben to the Mother of God he prayed on his knees, weeping. Everyone
wept...
On March 29, the Financial Committee of the Peasants' and Workers' Soviet
of the Sviyazhsk uyezd, in its very first order decided to levy a tax of 5000
roubles on all the men's and women's monasteries of the uyezd, and
threatened Bishop Ambrose that if he did not carry out the order he would be
put on trial and the monastery's possessions would be confiscated. Vladyka
Ambrose categorically refused to comply, first because he would not take part
in the looting of the monastery of St. Herman, secondly because he couldn't
pay the required sum even if he wanted to, and thirdly because the Church
was separate from the State and these requisitions constituted interference in
the internal affairs of the Church and were therefore counter to the decree on
19
20
On June 6/19, Vladyka was again arrested, this time for refusing to allow
the authorities to have offices in the monastery. At about the same time seven
marauding Bolsheviks had been killed in Raithu monastery, and Vladyka was
accused of having incited this act. Vladyka was placed in the same cell from
which two White Guardists had just been taken out to be shot. He stayed
there for five days. However, through the intercession of Bishop Anatolius
(Grisyuk) and Fr. Nicholas Troitsky, and after the workers of the Alafuzovsky
and Porokhovoy factories had threatened to go on strike, Vladyka was
released from prison on June 11, the Day of the Holy Spirit.
20
21
On May 18, 1919 the newspaper Ural’skaya Zhizn’ wrote: “20 corpses have
thawed out at the Kama by the city Sarapul. There was Deacon Anisimov and
one unrecognized priest.” According to the older inhabitants of the region,
this unrecognized priest was none other than Bishop Ambrose…
21
22
22
23
5. HIEROMARTYR
METROPHANES, ARCHBISHOP
OF ASTRAKHAN
23
24
polemicizing with the Catholics. From the beginning of the war Bishop
Metrophanes served molebens for the soldiers, blessed field hospitals, serving
molebens in them, and visited the wounded. The monks of the diocese helped
him in this.
24
25
belonged to the ruling bishop, and parish life could be regulated with his
cooperation and help. In the autumn the authorities demanded that the
archbishop abandon the hierarchical house and cathedral in the Kremlin.
Vladyka Metrophanes refused, but when the fronts of the civil war drew near
to Astrakhan, he was forced to leave the hierarchical house. On January 19,
1919 S.M. Kirov arrived in Astrakhan, which was followed by shootings of
clergy and church wardens. In spite of the threat, on April 7, the feast of the
Annunciation, the archbishop celebrated the festal liturgy in the Annunciation
monastery, and in his sermon commemorated “those who have died as a
result of unnecessary and useless actions of the civil authorities”. And after
the liturgy he served a pannikhida for those killed. In Holy Week the pastors
and laity began to ask their archpastor to leave Astrakhan. However, he
categorically refused: “On my breast is the Cross of the Saviour, and it will
reproach me for my faintheartedness. I would like to ask you: why do you not
run? Does that mean that you value your honour more than I must value my
apostolic rank? Know that I am completely pure and in no way guilty before
my homeland and people… To flee at the very time when they are killing our
innocent brothers before our eyes! No, I am going nowhere away from my
flock…”
On June 6, 1919 he was arrested and cast into the Cheka prison in
Astrakhan. Bishop Leontius was arrested with him. They were accused of a
White Guard plot; but the arrest of tens of people accused of being
participants in this plot was carried out a month later. The pastors and
parishioners of several parishes petitioned for their release, knowing their
complete innocence. Laymen brought the imprisoned archpastor food every
day.
The communist authorities wanted to toss the bodies out on the steppe, but
gravedigger-cabmen ransomed their remains from the authorities for a large
sum and buried them in a fitting manner not far from the Pokrovo-Bodlinsky
monastery. The archbishop’s mother, a simple laundress, mourned at his
funeral. In 1930 a brick memorial over their grave was destroyed to prevent
pilgrimages.
25
26
26
27
27
28
7. HIEROCONFESSOR
PHILARET, ARCHBISHOP OF
SAMARA
28
29
In the world Bishop Sergius was called Michael. He was a handsome, tall
and well-built young man, with a fine tenor voice. He had a fiancée, and was
about to get married. All the preparations for the wedding had been
completed. But this event was averted in the following way. Being an officer
in the army, he had to take part in battles. Once he almost lost his life. But
God heard his prayer and saved him from death. The young man made a vow
to become a monk and consecrate his whole life to God. And he received the
monastic tonsure.
"The episcopate is a great honour, but great sufferings are also bound up
with it. Through sufferings to heavenly glory!"
Bishop Sergius always expressed great love for Patriarch Tikhon, and
composed some verses in his honour which have been preserved to this day.
K.S. writes: "I was 12 years old when Bishop Sergius (Nikolsky) appeared
in our town of Ephremov. He was close to my parents and often came to our
house. From my parents I learned about certain moments in his biography,
but basically my recollections are bound up with my personal impressions of
church life in our little town...
"At that time there were seven churches in Ephremov (they were all later
destroyed). On Saturdays and Sundays Bishop Sergius served in the main
cathedral, while on the remaining days he read akathists in turns in the other
churches of the town.
"He was a fine, eloquent preacher. He spoke for a long time, with warmth
and animation. His sermons could last half an hour - that was a common
occurrence. Through his sermons he tried to instil in the people love for God.
29
30
He loved his flock, and his flock loved him. He presented the image of an
apostle, and that is how he was remembered.
"Some of his sermons were given specially for children. He would say:
"And when they came closer to him, he taught them the word of God.
These sermons remained forever in the memory.
"After the all-night vigil Vladyka blessed everyone separately and did not
leave until he had blessed the last one.
"I remember that among the parishioners was a fool for Christ -
Yegorushka of Zadonsk (he came to Ephremov from Zadonsk). Blue-eyed,
dressed in a canvas shirt, he always, winter and summer, travelled barefoot.
Once after the all-night vigil all the parishioners went up to Vladyka for his
blessing and only Yegorushka remained all the time in front of the icons. The
bishop watched him and did not leave. Out of curiosity the others, especially
the children, also watched him - what would happen?
"'Yegorushka, were you testing me?' asked the bishop, blessing him.
"The face of the bishop, as always, was kindly and joyful. Yegorushka
nodded his head, admitting that he had indeed been testing the patience of
Vladyka.
"They used to say that this Yegorushka, at his own request, had allegedly
been crucified on some gates by his brothers, and that they had pierced him
with nails. It is possible that this was not so, but on his hands and feet there
really were wounds from nails.
"I remember another incident, also linked with this Yegorushka. Once at
the request of Vladyka the abbess of a Tula monastery, Matushka
Metrophania, brought to Ephremov a cross with holy particles of the wood of
the Life-creating Cross of the Lord. The cross was of wood, not very large,
perhaps about 30 centimetres high. During the night they took it to the homes
of pious families, and it also stayed in the family of K.S. Some pious people
were gathered there, and Yegorushka also came. Everybody went to bed, but
Yegorushka spent the whole night standing in prayer. I remember that the
floor in the house was very beautiful and covered with varnish. When
everyone woke up in the morning, Yegorushka prepared to leave. When he
had left his place, everyone saw on the floor two white footprints - the varnish
had vanished there. Throughout the night Yegorushka had not moved, he had
30
31
not shifted from foot to foot, so that the floor under him had lost its shine.
Later, remembers K.S., her father brought her some varnish and covered up
the marks of the feet.
"The house in which K.S.'s parents lived was good and spacious, but
Yegorushka prophesied:
"Soon this prophecy was fulfilled, the family was evacuated and some time
later took shelter in a shed.
"In Vladyka's house the tree was lit up already on the eve, after the all-
night vigil. This was recounted by his aunt, Anna Antonovna Tiptsova.
"The Paschal Mattins service was wonderful. After the procession with the
cross Vladyka struck the door with the cross and cried out: 'Christ is risen!'
And in reply the chant of the myrrh-bearing women was borne out of the
church three times: 'He is risen indeed!'
"How well the choir sounded in those days! It was directed by a precentor
from Moscow, Vissonov. And how the service was beautified by the
magnificent voice of Protodeacon Michael!
"Once after the Liturgy on the feast of the myrrh-bearing women, Vladyka
together with 12 priests and Protodeacon Michael were in the house of the
parents of K.S. for dinner. After dinner, when Vladyka was about to leave, a
nun called Maria who was present in the house wanted to give him a rasa,
while K.S. by agreement was to give him a staff. The priests were against this,
and wanted to vest Vladyka themselves, but he stopped them with the words:
'Today is the feast of the myrrh-bearing women, let them do the serving.'
"The time came when they began to summon Vladyka to the police,
frequently. They had talks with him, they noticed his innate gifts, and
suggested he go to work... in the theatre. But the local authorities did not
succeed in exerting influence over him. And then they called him to Moscow,
to imprison him in Butyrki. But after some time they released him from
prison, and he returned to Ephremov. Bishop Sergius told the story as follows:
'The rusty lock clanked, everyone pricked up his ears. And the jailor's voice
rang out:
31
32
"Vladyka's return elicited such indescribable joy among the people! They
wept for joy, especially the children!
"Soon after his return, Vladyka collected the children together and treated
them to tea from the samovar, himself pouring the tea into the cups. And he
gave them all a book entitled The Young Christian...
"The people [of Ephremov] did not abandon their Vladyka, and many
travelled to Zadonsk to see him, to receive his hierarchical blessing and to
pray with him in the church. K.S. also travelled to Zadonsk with her parents,
and there she was present at a service in the women's monastery of the Joy of
all who sorrow…
"Bishop Sergius was not long in Zadonsk, they soon summoned him back
to Moscow [in 1927]. The bishop asked for permission to pass by Ephremov
so as to say farewell to his flock. In the church they did not even allow him to
serve a moleben, he could only say farewell to the people. But the bishop did
not manage to enter even one of the houses of the close circle of believers.
After tea Vladyka gave everyone his last blessing. For everybody he found a
good, kind, exhortatory word. He found one also for K.S.:
32
33
"On the second or third day after his arrival in Ephremov he left for
Moscow. On the platform thousands of people gathered to say farewell to
their Vladyka. And he stood at the window in the carriage also saying
farewell to the people. Suddenly the light in the carriage was turned off so
that those who had gathered should not be able to see Vladyka. Soon the train
moved, the people surged forward following him, but what could they do
now? The irreparable was quickly accomplished. The people were not
destined to meet the man who had given them all the warmth of his pastor's
heart again.
"At this time K.S., who was a fifteen-year-old girl, went to Voronezh to
continue her education. On learning about this, Vladyka sent her his
photograph from Buzuluk - he was standing near the little house where he
lived, and from a window there looked out that same aunt of his - Anna
Antonovna Tiptsova. On the back Vladyka had written in his own hand:
'Look where you've flown to, my swallow!'
On March 25, 1930 he was arrested again in Ufa and cast into the Domzak
in Orenburg. There, at the request of his sister, he was visited by Nun Irina
(Gladysheva), who was martyred a year later. On April 27 he was condemned
to be shot for “participation in a church-sectarian organization, on whose
orders he carried out counter-revolutionary activity”. On May 16, 1930, Holy
Thursday, he was shot on Mayak hill in Orenburg together with Priest
Erastus Kurdyukov, Hierodeacon Lev and Schema-Monk Martyrius.
33
34
"Much later, there was a rumour about the circumstances of his death. My
childhood friend, remembers K.S., once confidentially recounted the
following story.
"In the thirties she was giving private music lessons to children. One child
was always brought by his grandfather. It turned out that he had been a
former worker in the police. In a moment of frank conversation he said to the
teacher:
"'You knew Bishop Sergius and you would probably be interested to hear
the details of his death?'
"According to this man, they brought Bishop Sergius into some sort of
cave, where the waters of a turbulent river rushed across some rapids. They
ordered the bishop to go forward, deep into the cave, into the darkness. There,
somewhere in the rapids, he probably fell and was carried away by the flood."
34
35
"But the confessors of Christ understood that here there awaited them
inevitable death, and they turned to God with flaming, tearful prayer. About
one thing only: that they might be strengthened to receive the longed-for
death for Christ... While they stood the beasts of prey were not able to
overpower them. But, tormented by hunger and thirst, they grew weaker and
lay dawn. And then the whole mass of rats around the water hurled
themselves upon them. The supervisor saw all this and waited for them to
begin to entreat him to save them, but in vain. The holy martyrs preferred
death, 'the sweet death for Christ', rather than betray Him and recognize
Metropolitan Sergius' treachery to be 'a good deed'. They did not ask for
mercy from the torturers, and, strengthened by the grace of God, they were
eaten alive by the beasts of prey..."
All accounts agree that Bishop Sergius and his companion(s) received the
crown of martyrdom on May 3/16, 1930.
35
36
But suddenly his career was cut short when, on March 5, 1890, he
unexpectedly retired. The reason was the sudden death of his wife. Overcome
by sorrow, on March 30, on the advice of St. John of Kronstadt, he entered the
Optina Hermitage as novice together with Prince Turkestanov, the future
Metropolitan Tryphon. From his early years he had been a spiritual son of St.
John of Kronstadt, having got to know him in the first year of his service in
the navy. “Visiting his services daily in the Andreyevsky cathedral,” recalled
Bishop Micah, “I was counted worthy to commune the Holy Mysteries very
often, at least once a week, sometimes more often. At that time Fr. John was
still serving the Divine Liturgy alone, without co-servers, and I was serving
with him in the altar, taking the place of the altar-servers, who often upset
batyushka by their crudity.” Explaining his decision to go to Optina, he said:
“I wanted to serve as he did. I went to the monastery of the strictest life –
Optina. I became stronger here, and abandoned earthly vanity: thinking about
my deeds, I corrected my faults. I thought of staying there forever.”
Once Elder Ambrose blessed Novice Michael to give the emperor a gift on
his namesday. Two days later he blessed him to give St. John of Kronstadt a
gift on his namesday. On seeing him in church, St. John was worried that the
novice had abandoned the monastery, and was relieved to learn the truth. On
the death of Elder Ambrose in 1891, St. John blessed him to take up the path
of learned monasticism.
Bishop John of Pechersk recounts the following story from Michael’s short
stay in Optina: “Being people of upper-class origin, they [he and Prince
Turkestanov] continued to love comforts and certain worldly diversions even
while at Optina Hermitage, such as taking a samovar into the forest and
holding tea parties there.
36
37
"Once the Superior summoned these novices and told them that since they
were educated people, it would be better for them to enter the Ecclesiastical
Academy and follow an academic career.
"Father John blessed Alexeyev to enter the Ecclesiastical Academy and said
to him these prophetic words:
"'You will finish the academy and will attain to the rank of a hierarch, and
you will be a bishop in my homeland, in Arkhangelsk.'
37
38
On April 17, 1912 Vladyka was transferred to the see of Ufa and
Menzelinsk. His health was by now shaky. Nevertheless, he went round the
diocese, looking into the needs of the clergy, the flock and the parishes. He
opened many missionary courses for the conversion of non-Russians to
Orthodoxy, and created a translators’ subcommission “for translations and
original compositions in the languages of the non-Russians inhabiting the
diocese”. He organized temperance societies and devoted special attention to
children – he invited them to his house, organized Christmas parties, and sent
sick children to Eupatoria. “He gave much money for clothes, because most of
them were in dire poverty.” Soon after his arrival, on July 20, 1912, he opened
the Berezovsko-Bogoroditsky missionary monastery for women on the Kama.
Vladyka constantly instructed his flock to remain faithful to the Orthodox
Church.
38
39
Vladyka Michah died on February 16, 1931, and was buried in the
Pyatnitskoye cemetery.
(Sources: I.K. Sursky, Otyets Ioann Kronshtadtsky, Belgrade, 1941, chapter 50,
translated in The True Vine, N 33, vol. 6, no. 3, 1994, pp. 53-54; M.E. Gubonin,
Akty Svyatejshego Patriarkha Tikhona, Moscow: St. Tikhon's Theological
Institute, 1994, p. 981; Monk Ambrose (von Sivers), "Istoki i svyazi
Katakombnoj Tserkvi v Leningrade i obl. (1922-1992)", report read at the
conference "The Historical Path of Orthodoxy in Russia after 1917", Saint
Petersburg, 1-3 June, 1993; Tsvetochki Oprinoj Pustyni, Moscow: Palomnik,
1995, p. 168;
http://www.pstbi.ru/bin/code.exe/frames/m/ind_oem.html?/ans)
39
40
Bishop Stephen (in the world, Valerian Stepanovich Bekh) was born on
September 13, 1872 in Zhitomir (according to another source, in the 1870s in
Vologda province, and according to a third – in St. Petersburg) in a noble
family. He graduated from the juridical faculty of St. Petersburg Imperial
University in 1897. On November 8, 1897 he entered Moscow Theological
Academy. A year later, when he was to be transferred to the second course,
he was released from the Academy at his own request. On July 1, 1899 he was
appointed zemstvo leader of the second district of the Yarensk uyezd,
Vologda province. On August 15, 1900 he retired from the service, and on
January 16, 1901 he was appointed teacher of the Law of God in church-parish
schools. In September, 1903 he was again received into the number of the
students of the second course at the Moscow Theological Academy.
"This is how Vladyka Stefan became a monk. The future Vladyka Stefan,
then a young student, was walking along the street. He saw a big crowd in
one entrance and asked:
"A carriage came up. The crowd rushed up to it and pushed the young
future bishop so powerfully that he felt towards Fr. John, who was just
getting out. He looked at him attentively and went into the house. The crowd
remained outside the house. The future bishop also remained, although he
didn't know why. Suddenly an unknown person came out of the house and
asked:
"His amazement increased. He followed the man who had been sent for
him. Fr. John got up to meet him, calling him 'Vladyka'..."
40
41
41
42
Protopriest Fr. Basil Bondyrev, who had been with Vladyka Stephen
during his first exile and was later shot, told the following story: "A huge bear
lumbered up to us while we were preparing timber. He filled all of us with
terror. At that time Vladykya Stephen and I and the other exiles were going to
cut timber. Once we were working when we suddenly heard someone
crashing through the grove. A bear! We all ran off in different directions. I,
too, hid. Then I looked out and saw Vladyka Stephen standing where he was
and the bear stretched out at his feet. Vladyka was feeding him with some
bread and stroking him. And from that time the bear became completely
tame; he would come up and lie down beside Vladyka, who would feed him."
"'The doctor discovered that I have cancer and has ordered me to have an
operation immediately,' she said, dropping exhausted onto the bed.
"I spoke confidently in this vein. Mama was calm. I managed to get her into
the hospital without any particular difficulty. In the evening I was visited by
my neighbour, a very believing and intelligent old woman, Vera
Alexandrovna Arbuzova, who lived with her daughter, Musya, a nurse.
"At this time I had no idea of true spiritual life, and only recently, 'to spite
the Bolsheviks', I had begun to go to church. My soul had been searching for
42
43
something for a long time, life seemed pointless. At the age of 18 I had
suddenly been attacked by a terrible thought which deprived me of the
strength to live. What was the point of working, of studying, of seeking, of
hoping for anything, if everything ended in death? At this point my path
crossed with that of the theosophists, and their teaching seemed to me, who
did not know the truth, to be a revelation. I must add that from the age of 9 I
had grown up without the beneficial influence of my deeply and sincerely
believing parents. When the persecutions against the Church began, I, out of a
confused feeling of protest, began to go to church. There I found rest to my
soul, although I had no idea about the true life of the spirit. But the church
was the only place where I felt in Russia, where the present disappeared
without a trace.
"And now Vera Alexandrovna tried to direct me along the right path. But I
didn't give in to her, relying self-confidently on my experience alone.
"'You know, Nata,' she turned to me. 'I want to suggest that you ask
Vladyka Stephen. Remember, I told you about him, that he could pray for
your mama. Let's go to Pesochnaya tomorrow, to the church where he is.'
"I put no particular hope on the prayers of an unknown bishop, but you
clutch onto anything when grief comes.
"The next morning the three of us set off for the Liturgy. During the service
I noticed, not far away, among the worshippers, an old, thin monk in a
tattered old ryasa. His pale face looked ascetic, and there were straggly
strands of grey hair sticking out from under his old skufya. Something drew
me to look in his direction.
"After the service Vera Alexandrovna said to me, pointing at the elder:
"'That's Vladyka.'
"The people began to crowd up to him, asking for his blessing. A long
queue was formed. We got up. Never before had I kissed the hands of a
priest, and I immediately noticed that most people not only kissed Vladyka's
hand, but also bowed to the ground before him. I was upset. All this seemed
strange and barbarian to me. I was perplexed. How could this be?
43
44
fell at his feet and couldn't regain my calm. And to his sympathetic question I
could only mutter:
"I told him. He knitted his brow and shook his head.
"I returned home somewhat calmer. The operation was appointed for the
morning, just at the time of the Liturgy. I rushed straight from the church to
the hospital. Would she be alive? In fear and anxiety I went into the ward.
From a cot in the distance mama nodded to me, smiling. She was weak, but in
full consciousness and kind as always. Musya Abramova told me that the
doctor had warned her, since she was a nurse, that he feared that the sick
woman would die under the knife... The last words that mama heard were the
word of the professor:
"But the operation not only went well, there was not even any of the
festering from which so many sick people die, and her temperature did not
even go up. Mama was released from hospital two weeks later. The stitches
healed as if after a shallow cut in a young and healthy person.
"'I don't understand a thing,' said the professor, spreading his hands. It
couldn't end like that. The sick said that they were struck how calmly and
happily mama went to the serious operation, as if she were going on a walk.
"Mama's first outing was to the church on Pesochnaya. After the service
Vladyka had a long, tender conversation with us. He joked, and tried to
encourage us. We both wept. We quietly left the church. Vladyka caught up
with us; he greeted us, smiling radiantly. His tall figure could be seen for a
long time at the end of the alley.
"We didn't see him again. Shortly after this they arrested and exiled him.
The accusation was: 'Opium for the people'. And - evidently through the
prayers of Vladyka Stephen - mama was given two more years so as to
receive a crown to her life so full of harsh suffering - an angelic, monastic
crown [with the name Eugenia]....
44
45
"Vera Alexandrovna told me how Margarita Jul. Mei had seen mama in a
dream on the very day of her death lying in the grave. Beside her stood an
unknown elder-monk who was praying fervently. Vera Alexandrovna had
had the thought of showing her the photograph of Vladyka Stephen.
"'That's him! That's him!' shouted Margarita Jul., although she had never
once seen Vladyka Stephen in the flesh.
"They say that during the fast Vladyka ate nothing except one prosphora a
day with holy water.
"'Receive Communion while there is the Chalice,' were his constant words.
"1. Once we were standing in the church. Vladyka Stephen was at the other
end blessing the people. I also went up. But Musya said:
'I've finished blessing all the women, now I can bless you, too.'
"Vladyka could not possibly have heard the words that were said in a
whisper at the other end of the church. Musya was ready to fall through the
earth out of shame! What clairvoyance from the Lord!
"2. There was a lady staying with us, not a church person. Once she said:
"'You keep saying about your bishop that whatever he prays for he
receives. I shall go to him. Let him pray that so-and-so gives up his wife and
marries me.'
"She went. She went ahead of us to receive his blessing. She had hardly
opened her mouth when the tenderly smiling face of Vladyka suddenly
darkened, he frowned and, without saying a word, turned away from her,
and turned to the next person. The lady was very upset both with us and with
Vladyka.”
45
46
Natalya Kieter continued her reminiscences: "A year passed. I had a dream.
A door opened quickly and Vladyka Stephen entered in a fur coat. I had
never seen him dressed like that, and he said:
"That was all. I woke up. Immediately the news came of his death in
exile..."
46
47
Nun Ierusalima, in the world Catherine Nikitichna Kasif, was born in 1880
in the village of Verknyaya Belozerka, Melitopol province, Ukraine. She went
to a church-parish school, and then entered the St. Joseph monastery, serving
as treasurer. In 1930 she was arrested and sentenced to three years’ exile in
the north in accordance with article 54-10. She was sent to the village of Bad-
Yel, Ust-Kulom region, Komi, where, on September 15, 1932, she was arrested
again and cast into prison in Syktyvkar. On April 27, 1933 she was convicted
and sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, but was released in
view of the time she had already spent in prison. Nothing more is known
about her.
47
48
48
49
11. HIEROCONFESSOR
VICTOR, BISHOP OF IZHEVSK
AND VOTSK
and those with him
In August, 1903 Fr. Victor was sent to serve in his native Saratov diocese,
and in September was appointed by Bishop Germogen as superior of the Holy
Trinity podvorye of the Saratov Spaso-Preobrazhensky monastery in
Khvalynsk. This podvorye was founded in order to struggle with the Old
Ritualists in Khvalynsk uyezd, and Fr. Victor was soon displaying exceptional
talents as a missionary. However, he was transferred – to the great sorrow of
the people – from the podvorye to Saratov, where in March, 1904 he was
appointed diocesan missionary for the non-Russians – that is, the Chuvash.
Before that, in February, Fr. Victor also delivered three lectures on the works
of Maxim Gorky.
On January 25, 1905 Fr. Victor was appointed senior hieromonk of the
Jerusalem Spiritual Mission. However, Fr. Victor was not happy in this post,
and asked Bishop Anthony (Khrapovitsky) whether he could be transferred
back to Khvalinsk; but his requests were refused. He explained his reasons at
the Fourth Missionary Congress in Kiev in July, 1908, at which Archbishop
Anthony, the organizer of the Congress, had asked him to speak. The Mission,
thought Fr. Victor, was in an ambiguous situation canonically and had no
clear functions. He was also unhappy at the degree of cooperation with the
other Orthodox Churches in the region.
49
50
On December 26 (15), 1919 Fr. Victor was consecrated first bishop of the
newly created see of Urzhuma, a vicariate of the Vyatka diocese, in Petrograd.
He arrived in January, 1920, but in May was arrested and imprisoned by the
Vyatka revolutionary tribunal for anti-Soviet agitation – or, as Vladyka put it
later, for “agitation against medicine”! What had happened in fact was that
during an epidemic of typhus Vladyka had called on the people to repent and
advised them to sprinkle their homes with holy water. He was sentenced to
imprisonment until the end of the war in Poland.
This made for difficult relations between Bishops Victor and Eusebius.
According to one source, Bishop Victor was appointed temporary
administrator of the Tomsk diocese in April, 1921. But the disturbances ended
when Bishop Paul (Borisovsky) was appointed ruling Bishop of Vyatka on
May 13, 1921.
50
51
the Vyatkians anywhere,” he said. “There are no such people as the Vyatkians
anywhere in Russia!”
In March, 1922 the Bolsheviks started their campaign for the requisitioning
of church valuables. It went smoothly in Vyatka – it turned out that the
people did not know about the Patriarch’s epistle on the subject, because it
had been concealed by the president of the Diocesan Council, Protopriest
A.A. Popov. And when there was a meeting of the clergy in Vyatka on March
3 under the presidency of Bishop Paul, all its participants unanimously voted
to support the government campaign. It began on March 7 without excesses
or any active opposition.
However, in April, 1922 Bishop Paul was arrested for “not handing over
enough from the list of church valuables”. At that point Protopriest Popov
showed Bishop Victor “in secret” the epistle of the Patriarch, explaining that
he had concealed the epistle because “it was late and was similar in character
to his previous epistles with their sorrowful consequences for the clergy”. On
April 25 Bishop Victor wrote to Patriarch Tikhon asking forgiveness for
himself and the other clergy and laity for their sin of ignorance. He said in the
city of Vyatka the clergy had been prepared to give away everything, even the
holy chrism, considering them to be “trifles”. The only exception, he said, had
been Fr. Basil Perebaskin, and he asked that only Fr. Basil should be awarded
with promotion so as to warn the others not to act so lightmindedly in matters
of the faith and the Church.
On August 25, 1922 Bishop Paul, having been released from exile, ordered
that all the Vyatka uyezd sees should be raised to the rank of independent
sees while remaining in canonical communion with the Vyatka
Autocephalous Orthodox Church. Thus Bishop Victor was made Bishop of
Orlov, a vicariate of the Vyatka diocese, while continuing to live in Vyatka,
with the rights of an independent bishop for the administration of the affairs
of the Orlov uyezd. He was also entrusted with the legal and marital affairs of
the Vyatka uyezd. Until the see of Glazov was filled, he also administered its
affairs. Bishop Paul remained in charge of Church affairs in the cities of
51
52
Vyatka, Sloboda, Kotelnich and Nolinsk with their uyezds. And the Urzhuma
diocese was in the administration of Bishop Sergius of Yaransk. Bishop Paul’s
epistle was probably written by Bishop Victor.
On the next day, August 26 Bishops Paul and Victor were arrested together
with Protopriests A. Popov, V. Perebaskin, N. Tikhvinsky and Tikhonitsky.
On August 28 the arrested were interrogated, as a result of which Protopriests
Tikhvinsky and Tikhonitsky were released. On September 5 Protopriest
Popov was also released. On the same day the two bishops were accused of
violating the resolution of August 24, 1918 on the carrying out of the decree
“On the Separation of the Church from the State and the School from the
Church”, which was expressed by their “interfering in secular matters,
assuming to themselves judicial functions, re-resolving marital-divorce cases,
carrying out investigations into these matters, and having a special apparatus
for this”. Besides, they were accused of “links with underground monarchist
groupings” and for “distributing the illegal appeals of Patriarch Tikhon,
Metropolitan Agathangelus and the Brotherhood of the Zealots of
Orthodoxy”. Then they were cast into the Butyrki prison in Moscow together
with Alexander Bonifatyevich Yechugin, the secretary of the Vyatka
governing council of people’s judges. On February 23, 1923 they were
sentenced by the OGPU to three years in exile in the Narymsk region in
Siberia. This was “The Case of Bishops Paul (Borisovsky) and Victor
(Ostrovidov), Vyatka, 1923”.
On February 23, 1926 Vladyka Victor’s exile came to an end and on March
29 he returned to Vyatka. The next day he and Archbishop Paul, who had also
just returned from exile, were forced to sign that “until the organization of a
Vyatka diocesan administration and its registration in the Vyatka
52
53
On May 20 both hierarchs were cast into the Butyrki prison in Moscow. On
August 20 Bishop Victor was convicted of “resisting the renovationists” and
“creating an illegal diocesan chancellery”. In accordance with article 69 he
was forbidden from living in six major cities in the USSR and also in Vyatka.
Metropolitan Sergius had been coming to the decision to make Izhevsk into
an independent diocese already at the beginning of the year. However, at that
time Bishop Alexis (Kuznetsov) of Sarapul had objected to Metropolitan
Sergius’ decision to re-open the Izhevsk diocese and succeeded in making him
reverse his decision. So when Bishop Stefan (Bekh) of Glazov returned from
exile in Solovki to take back the administration of the diocese, he encountered
opposition from Bishop Alexis. Although a part of the clergy and laity in
Izhevsk did not want to submit to Bishop Alexis, suspecting him because of
his temporary fall into renovationism, Bishop Stefan found it
53
54
difficult to serve in the circumstances and early in the autumn of 1926 went
into retirement in Petrograd.
At first Bishop Victor could not obtain permission to leave Glazov to take
Bishop Stefan’s place in Izhevsk. But, on receiving a telegram from the
president of the parish council of the cathedral Shishkin that all formalities
had been settled, he arrived in Izhevsk on October 10. However, it turned out
that Shishkin had not completed the formalities correctly, and so Bishop
Victor, much to his annoyance, was forced to leave the city on October 13.
When Metropolitan Sergius tried to find out what had happened, he was told
by Protopriest N. Tonkov of the Mikhailov church in Izhevsk that Bishop
Victor had shown no desire to take over the diocese. Misled by this false
information, Sergius then suggested to Bishop Simeon (Mikhailov), who had
been petitioning for the post, that he take over the Izhevsk diocese. However,
the parishioners of the Alexander Nevsky church in Izhevsk did not accept
Bishop Simeon, who immediately left. Finally, with Metropolitan Sergius’
blessing, Bishop Victor took over the administration of the Izhevsk diocese.
On January 20, 1927 Bishop Victor accepted the village of Starie Zyatsy
from the Sarapul into the Izhevsk diocese. This annoyed Bishop Alexis of
Sarapul, who then accused Bishop Victor of violating the canons and also of
unlawfully occupying the Izhevsk diocese, which should belong to Bishop
Simeon. Bishop Victor replied that the purpose of the creation of the Izhevsk
was to make its boundaries coincide with the Votsk autonomous diocese,
which would aid the conversion of the Votsk (Udmurt) people. Moreover, he
said that Metropolitan Sergius had permitted him to administer the diocese in
November, and that it was also with Sergius’ permission that the Starie
Zyatsy and other parishes in the Votsk autonomous region were allowed to
join the Izhevsk diocese. The quarrel could not be resolved by Metropolitan
Sergius since he had been in prison since December. Bishop Victor advised the
dean of Izhevsk to write a protest to Archbishop Seraphim of Uglich, who was
now the deputy of the Patriarchal Locum Tenens. However, Archbishop
Seraphim was not able to help because he was forbidden to occupy himself
with administration of the Church.
54
55
In about July, 1927 Bishop Victor was appointed Archbishop of Omsk and
Pavlodar, but was not allowed to leave for the Urals. On August 31, at a
session of his temporary synod that reviewed the administrative chaos in the
Vyatka and Votkinsk dioceses, Metropolitan Sergius decreed that Archbishop
Victor had acted hastily, and that petitions for parishes to join the Izhevsk
diocese could not be decided by one bishop only. Archbishop Victor should
have consulted more with the bishops of the neighbouring dioceses, and the
final decision rested with the Higher Church Authority. So until a final
decision of the question of the three parishes of the Votkinsk diocese and the
Seltinsk deanery, they were to remain in their former administration.
These administrative difficulties were not entirely the fault of any one or
more bishops, and were complicated by the fact that the authorities continued
to forbid the bishops from carrying out any administrative activity until the
registration of the Churches. It is understandable, therefore, that Bishop
Victor should have expressed the hope, in a letter to Bishop Alexis dated May
30, that the registration of a temporary synod under Metropolitan Sergius
would bring the beginnings of church peace. “The possibility is opened also
of our diocesan registration. Then the [renovationist] heretics will have no
way of enticing and deceiving the weak in spirit…”
55
56
emphasis is made on the political speeches of the clergy abroad against Soviet
power. Secondly, it is to declare not only his own loyalty and non-
participation from now on in any speeches against Soviet power, but also his
inner union with it against its foreign and internal enemies, as being his own
enemies, that is, the enemies of the Orthodox Church.”
To the question: what should be our attitude to this epistle, Bishop Victor
replied: “What is written in the epistle does not correspond to the truth and
reality: the True Orthodox Church always had to be apolitical and spiritual,
and for that reason it was not and cannot be in any active external struggle
with Soviet power. But clergy can be subject to punishments either as private
citizens for their political crimes outside their relationship to the Church, or as
confessors of the Orthodox Church. As regards the union of the Church and
Soviet power on the basis of spiritual interests and needs, sympathies and
shared joys, etc., there never can be anything of the sort, since the views on
life of the Church and Soviet power are diametrically opposed to each other.
The aims of the activity of Soviet power are exclusively material-economic
and are foreign to faith in God, while the aims of the activity of the Church are
exclusively spiritual-moral, and through faith in God they raise man beyond
the bounds of earthly life to attain the eternal heavenly good things. Therefore
in defining the mutual relations of the True Church and every state, we can
talk only about a relationship in the plane of civil duty and obligation, and
this not out of fear but for conscience’s sake.
“… The epistle, by covering itself with the words of Holy Scripture and
reasonings from the sphere of the spiritual interests of man, masks the
drawing of the Church into the sphere of earthly tasks, thereby diminishing
the Holy Orthodox Church, humiliating it and inexorably pushing it onto the
path of new earthquakes and divisions. Therefore it demands not only careful
attention, but outright rejection.”
“Dear Vladyko! You know, it is not so long ago that you were our brilliant
helmsman, and for all of us our most longed-for first pastor, and the mere
mention of your most holy name poured strength and joy into our hearts.
And suddenly – such a sad change for us. Our minds are wavering, our hearts
have lost their support, and we feel that we are again without a leader and
defender from those who attack us, and this is from the time that your
counsellors surrounded you. Our souls are exhausted, we are horrified at the
sight of what is now happening around us in the Church, it’s oppressing us
like a nightmare, and everyone is overwhelmed by a terrible fear for the
56
57
future of the Church. There distant Tashkent has for some time been thinking
of separating, here Petrograd is seething and grumbling. There Votlandia is
groaning and crying out to heaven, and Izhevsk is again rebelling, while
Vyatka, Perm and many other cities have collapsed in sorrow and perplexity.
And over and above all these Moscow is just now preparing to utter its
deciding voice. After all, everywhere the Church is just being destroyed, and
this is ‘by administrative means’. What is this? Why? Has the Holy Church
suffered only a little from ‘outsiders’? What can be the use of these
destructive measures which are ruining our peace? Take our Votkinsk diocese
which has hardly seen the light. How glad the people were, and how great
were the possibilities of the development of church life in her. Then suddenly,
to please ‘an evil genius’, for the sake of his avaricious and malicious aims
and intrigues (I have in mind a bishop), and also for the sake of the personal
desires of Ar., this diocese which had scarcely begun to live through you is
being destroyed. Would it not be more just before God and men to confirm its
existence by your decree alone within the territorial bounds of the Votkinsk
region, for which Heaven and earth would bless you. After all, the Truth itself
speaks in favour of this: a people united in the civil sense should necessarily
be united in the ecclesiastical sense, and should not be given to dividing up
into five parts out of mercantile considerations.
57
58
On January 11, 1928 Bishop Victor gave some more details about these
“pitiful justifications”: “I wrote to you that Archbishop Paul came to ‘punish’,
but he was met with the suggestion that he repent and renounce ‘the appeal of
July 16’. He refused, and his justification was very pitiful – in that case, he
said, I can expect prison and all kinds of privations. One of the priests
guaranteed him complete security, but he did not agree. From the questions
put to him it became clear that they are acting without the blessing of
Metropolitan Peter and are conscious that if he were to arrive, he would
remove them, ‘and we will go’, he said. But he didn’t bat an eyelid at the fact
that in that time they would impose so much evil and destroy thousands of
souls. He admitted that they had done this at the insistence of the civil
authorities, and to the question what had they achieved, he replied that now
he felt himself to be a hierarch. O what blindness! He does not feel that he has
been erased from the book of life…”
58
59
consider it my service duty briefly to acquaint you with the content and
direction of the activity of the Temporary Patriarchal Synod headed by the
Deputy of the Patriarchal Locum Tenens, his Eminence Sergius, Metropolitan
of Nizhegorod.” Being not only a member of Metropolitan Sergius’ synod, but
also one of the active defenders of his politics, Archbishop Paul hastened to
calm his flock and “rejoice in a certain success achieved in the past six months
for the good of the Church of Christ”: “The appeal of July 16/29 of this year,
in which Metropolitan Sergius and the members of the Synod definitively
declared their complete loyalty and sincere submission to the Soviet
Government, has created for Metropolitan Sergius and the Sacred Patriarchal
Synod a condition of completely peaceful work for the good of the Church
that is hindered by nothing and nobody under the protection of Soviet
legislation which envisages the self-definition of cult associations in their
religious life in their inner church discipline.”
In any case, the epistle did not succeed. As Bishop Victor noted,
Archbishop Paul’s attacks on the True Orthodox and on himself, “and his
unsuccessful attempts to prove that he is not a renovationist, have finally torn
his flock away from him, and the movement against the ‘appeal’ has
encompassed the whole diocese”.
59
60
“The Holy Church, which the Lord acquired for Himself from this world
through His own Blood (Acts 20.28), and which is His Body (Colossians 1.24),
but which is for all of us the house of eternal, Grace-filled salvation from this
destroying life – now this holy Church of Christ god is being adapted to serve
interests that are not only foreign to her, but even completely incompatible
with her Divinity and spiritual freedom…
“The Church of Christ in its essence can never be any kind of political
organization, otherwise it ceases to be the Church of Christ, the Church of
God, the Church of eternal salvation. And if now, through this ‘appeal’, the
Church is united with the civil authorities, this is not simply an external
manoeuvre, but at the same time a terrible defilement and destruction of the
Orthodox Church, Here there has also been committed the great sin of the
renunciation of the truth of the Church, which no attainment of earthly goods
for the Church can justify…
“Don’t tell me that in this way a Central Administration has been formed
for us, together with local administrations, and that an appearance of external
calm has been acquired for the Church, or, as the appeal says, ‘the lawful
existence of the Church’ – this and similar things all those love to say who
have already been caught by the enemy-devil in falling away from the
Orthodox Church. What good is it if we, having become and being called the
Temple of God (II Corinthians 4.16), have become useless and disgusting in
the eyes of God, while acquiring an external administration for ourselves?
“This lie, alas, is for us sinners much bitterer than the three preceding ones:
the livingchurchmen, the renovationists and the Gregorians, whose madness
was evident to all without difficulty, while the destructiveness of the last lie
cannot be discerned by everybody, and it is especially difficult for those
whose mind and heart are turned to earthly things, for the sake of which
people are accustomed to renounce the Lord.”
Sergius’ Synod wrote to Bishop Victor asking him why he was not leaving
Glazov, and on what basis he was looking after the affairs of Vyatka.
60
61
sorrow with regard to the ruinous destruction of the Orthodox Church that
was beginning ‘by administrative means’.
"This sin, as the Word of God witnesses, is not less than any heresy or
schism, but is rather incomparably greater, for it plunges a man immediately
into the abyss of destruction, according to the unlying word: 'Whosoever shall
deny Me before men...' (Matthew 10.33), etc.
“Insofar as we have been able we have protected ourselves and our flock
so as not to become partakers of this sin, and for this reason we have sent the
appeal itself back. Acceptance of the appeal would be a witness before God
that we are indifferent in relation to the Most Holy Church of God, the Bride
of Christ.
“In accordance with the fear of God I also cannot accept your order for my
transfer: ‘I fear,’ as one hierarch writes to me, ‘that the expression of
obedience on our part will be considered by “them” (the Synod) as an
approval of what “they” have done. And for that reason, if I were given full
freedom of movement, which I do not have as being in administrative exile, I
would ask myself: will I not have to answer before God for this obedience, for
it in essence unites me with people who have been alienated from God. But I
have expressed my thoughts that the appeal is truly worthy of many tears,
and that it alienates a man from God in the form of a letter to those close to
me, which is here attached.
“What of the future? In the future I would beseech God, and not only I, but
the whole of the Orthodox Church, that he not harden your heart as He once
hardened the heart of Pharaoh, but that He give you the grace to understand
the sin you have committed and repent for the rest of your life. Then all the
believers would thank God in joy and tears, and would again come to you as
to a father and pastor – as to the first pastor, and the whole of the Russian
Church as to her sacred head. The enemy has lured and deceived you for a
second time with the idea of an organization of the Church. But if this
organization is bought for the price of the Church of Christ Herself no longer
remaining the house of Grace-giving salvation for men, and he who received
61
62
the organization ceases to be what he was - for it is written, 'Let his habitation
be made desolate, and his bishopric let another take' (Acts 1.20) - then it were
better for us never to have any kind of organization.
“What is the benefit if we, having become by God's Grace temples of the
Holy Spirit, become ourselves suddenly worthless, while at the same time
receiving an organization for ourselves? No. Let the whole visible material
world perish; let there be more important in our eyes the certain perdition of
the soul to which he who presents such external pretexts for sin will be
subjected.
“But if the hardening of your heart has gone so far, and there remains no
hope of repentance, then in this case we have a word to enlighten us: ‘Come
out from among them and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and do not touch
their impurity, and I will receive you, and I will be to you and a Father and
you will be to as sons and daughters’ (II Corinthians 6.17-18)."
And he concluded that Sergius’ pact with the atheists was “not less than
any heresy or schism, but is rather incomparably greater, for it plunges a man
immediately into the abyss of destruction, according to the unlying word:
‘Whosoever shall deny Me before men…’ (Matthew 10.33).”
62
63
To refrain from communion with him and the bishops with him; (2) To
recognize Bishop Victor as our spiritual leader, chosen by the whole of the
Glazov diocese in 1924; and (3) To call him Bishop Victor of Glazov and
Votkinsk. Bishop Victor, Metropolitan Sergius and Bishop Onesimus of
Votkinsk, together with the deans of the Glazov diocese, are to be informed of
this.”
On the same day Bishop Victor wrote on this protocol: “I rejoice in the
Grace of God, which has enlightened the hearts of the members of the
Spiritual Administration in this difficult and great work of choosing the way
of truth. May its decision be blessed by the Lord, and may it be to the joy and
consolation of the Holy Orthodox Church. With regard to the third resolution
on the renaming of my title, [I have decided that it should] remain as before,
‘of Izhevsk and Votkinsk’ until a resolution of this question by a general
Diocesan Congress.”
“So as to protect themselves from all the mad bans, the parishes together
with their pastors separating themselves beforehand from him through
decisions of parish councils and choosing or asking me to accept them under
my spiritual archpastoral leadership before God and men. Our Spiritual
Administration has done something similar in relation to Metropolitan
Sergius in the name of the whole of the Votsk Diocese, placing it out of
communion with Metropolitan Sergius until his repentance and renunciation
of the ‘appeal’, of which they have informed him. The decree is attached…
“It is necessary that Moscow should begin to act, and not merely passively
endure their insults to the Orthodox Church. Then other dioceses will be
encouraged. Our Votsk diocese is not authoritative for those who are
accustomed to establish themselves, not on the truth, but on authority.”
63
64
would like to pray in every place that the name of God is praised. But don’t
you know, if you go on further, you will fall not only in with all kinds of
heretics, but also with Mohammedans, Buddhists, etc., for the name of God is
praised among them, but you yourself see that such thoughts of complete
indifference destroy not only the meaning and significance of the Orthodox
Church, but also Christianity itself. And what use then is our confession for
the truth of the Orthodox Church? For what do we suffer deprivations,
sufferings, and perhaps we shall have to endure death itself!...
“This from your first letter, and now from your second you mention
schism, the Catharoi, etc., as if, between the lines, you are ascribing this to us.
Against this destroys all your praises of us for the true word of ours which, in
your opinion, we should have said.
“No, sacred head, we are not renegades from the Church of God and we
are not schismatics that have cut ourselves off from her: may this never
happen with us. We reject neither Metropolitan Peter, nor Metropolitan Cyril,
nor the most holy Patriarchs, and it goes without saying that we with blessing
preserve all the teaching on the faith and structure of the Church that has
been passed down to us by the Father, and in general we are not crazy and do
not blaspheme the Church of God.
“Look, in 1923 we confessed the truth of the Church in exactly the same
way, and we attained by our sufferings that the impious should be expelled
from the Church of God and form their ‘renovationist’ meeting separately
from us. So, in your opinion, we were schismatics at that time in our
confession? I don’t think that you thought that, for you yourself blessed us
and kissed our wounds. It was the traitors of the Church who taught that
about us, saying that we were schismatics deceived by the devil. In this way
they wanted to defend their own abdication and fall. The people who accuse
of schism now are doing exactly the same thing. But we are not creating a
schism in the Church, but are only demanding that the traitors of the Church
of God should leave their places and hand over the administration into other
hands or repent with tears for the evil they have done. Or do you think that
Sergius is better than [the renovationist] Antonin? His errors with regard to
the Church and the salvation of man in her were clear to me already in 1911,
and I wrote about him [under the pseudonym ‘Wanderer’] in an Old Ritualist
journal [The Church], that there would come a time when he would shake the
Church. That is what happened. And we have to take all measures to protect
and preserve the sheep of the Orthodox Church from the new deception. And
it is not only we who are striving for this: the council of the Solovki bishops
(26) is with us, the great majority of the servants of God is with us. The horror
at the evil that these wolves are producing within the fold of Christ has
suppressed fear of them of the masters of the House of God, although they are
not the masters. Metropolitan Peter blessed neither the ‘Synod’ nor the
‘appeal’ not the acts whereby Metropolitan Sergius has increased his
64
65
“With childlike simplicity we believe that the strength of the Church is not
in organization, but in the Grace of God, which cannot exist where there is
betrayal and renunciation of the Orthodox Church, even if it is under the
guise of the attainment of the external good of the Church. After all, here we
do not have simply a [personal] sin of M. Sergius and his advisors. If it were
only that! No! Here we have the systematic destruction of the Orthodox
Russian Church according to a definitely thought-through plan, the striving
spiritually to mix up, defile and degrade everything. Here is laid the
destruction of the whole of the Orthodox Church, and precisely her conscious
adaptation – of the Heavenly Bride of Christ – to the service of evil, for the
world lies in evil.
“Truly, these evil intentions against the Church are not from man, but from
him who from the beginning was the murderer of man and who thirsts for
our eternal destruction. The new traitors have become his servants,
subverting the very essence of the Orthodox Church of Christ; they have
changed her from being heavenly to being earthly, and turned her from being
a Grace-filled union into a political organization.
“’Be not yoked together with unbelievers’, etc., commands the holy apostle
(II Corinthians 1.14-18). But these teach the opposite. And all this has to
spread through the Orthodox Russian Church, for everybody must approve
of the new impiety, otherwise – bans, for, they say, ‘we are the bosses’. O,
what blindness of mind! O, what horror we are living through!
“During the trial of 1923 and later it was clearly revealed that the support
of the Orthodox Church was the confessors of the Truth – the Bishops who
were bound by indissoluble grace-filled bonds and love with their flocks. But
what are the new enemies of Orthodoxy doing? They are moving these
Bishops from their sees and their places are being taken by their appointees.
And there are not just one or two cases of this; it is being accomplished in
accordance with a definite system throughout the Russian Church. You can
imagine what groans and crying and horror has covered the Orthodox
Church, when this cutting asunder of the indivisible has begun.
“The Petrograd clergy and laity have asked Metropolitan Sergius how he
can explain this evil act, and he naively replies that it is not the Church that is
65
66
suffering here, but the bishops and the flock. – But is this not the Little
Church? Is it not a cell of the Universal Church? But this is necessary, in the
words of Metropolitan Sergius, for the supposed revealing of loyalty in
relation to the civil authorities. – What madness! Revealing the loyalty of the
Church by killing her!
“In conclusion, I beseech you, as a friend whom I venerate for your piety,
to flee from the poisonous seductive speeches (letters) that are tempting you
like snake, and wish to separate you from the live-giving tree of the Truth.
“Let us remain firm and unbending in out confession for the Truth of God
that we undertook in 1922, so that the Lord may not refer to us the voice of
the prophet: ‘My priests have rejected My law and defiled My holy things.
They do not distinguish between the holy and the defiled. They are all the
same for them’ (Ezekiel 22.26).
“No, this will be, not a blinding of the heart, but the opposite – the defence
of the Truth of God, and not a schism. Remember also the words of another
confessor, St. Maximus, who said: ‘Even if the whole inhabited earth were to
commune with the apostate Patriarch, I alone will not commune with him to
the end of the age.’ By the Grace of God we shall imitate this confessor…”
On January 18, Bishop Victor was summoned to the Vyatka OGPU, but
was released after answering a series of questions. On returning home, he
wrote “The Replies of his Grace Victor to 15 questions put to him by the
OGPU”. He gave this document to his acquaintances, “for information on the
new synodal movement”. The first two questions and replies were as follows:
66
67
“How would you interpret, from the civil and ecclesiastical points of view,
the appearance of the new church tendency – the platform of the Declaration
of July 29, 1927?”
From the ecclesiastical point of view: as an incorrect teaching on the Church and
on the matter of our salvation in Jesus Christ – an error of principle by Metropolitan
Sergius…
From the Church point of view it is an incorrect teaching on the Church and on
the matter of our salvation in Jesus Christ (Metropolitan Sergius’ error in principle),
while from the civil point of view it is the desire to be freed from this oppressive and
disturbing situation in which the hierarchs of the Orthodox Church find themselves.
The personal composition of the Synod has no great significance as regards its
acceptability. It is the very platform [of this Synod] that is unacceptable, for it sees in
the Church an external political organization which is united with the civil
organization of the authorities of the USSR, and in accordance with this aims for a
corresponding external political activity for the Orthodox Church, and thereby pushes
the Church onto the path of new upheavals and surprises, at the same time distorting
THE VERY ESSENCE OF THE CHURCH.
Only the salvation of my own soul, since I believe that they (the synodals) are
destroying Orthodoxy, making it worldly and earthly, and completely distorting the
essence of the Orthodox Church… I will never refuse to carry out any tasks given by
the government that do not bind my conscience, if only in order to show that they are
not thinking up any evil against it. A purely political civil organization of believers is
possible only as a subsidiary weapon of the civil authorities, as it was before the
67
68
revolution. The State itself alone administers the whole of the external life of man,
while the Church knows only the exclusively spiritual needs of believers, and
everything that pertains to prayer. We greatly rejoice at the decree on the separation
of the Church from the State, but unfortunately the Government does not believe in
the sincerity of our joy.
I recognize its justice, but only on condition that this strengthening does not
restrict and repress our Orthodox faith.
Bishop Victor was loyal to the civil authorities. But he understood this
loyalty in a quite different way from Metropolitan Sergius, as he made clear
in the epistle he wrote to his flock on February 28 / March 12, 1928 (new
calendar): "Judge for yourselves: what significance, for example, can the bans
of Catholics, Protestants, livingchurchmen and others have for an Orthodox
priest if they were to think of applying them to us? None at all. It’s exactly the
same here. The only difference is that the Catholics, Protestants and others fell
away earlier from the Church of God, while the apostates (antichurchmen)
have only now, in our time, been deceived by the devil, ‘who has taken them
captive at his will’ (II Timothy 2.26). And this fall of theirs is not little and not
secret, but very great and evident to all those who have sense (I Corinthians
11.16). It was revealed in the well-known 'appeal' of July 16/29 and the bold
destruction of the Orthodox Church which followed it. The 'appeal' is a
disgusting sale of that which cannot be sold and is priceless - that is, our
spiritual freedom in Christ (John 8.36); it is their attempt, contrary to the word
of God, to unite that which cannot be united - the portion of the sinner with
the work of God, God and Mammon (Matthew 6.24), light and darkness (II
Corinthians 6.14-18).
68
69
Sergius now there can no longer be any exploit of confession of the Church,
and for that reason, in his conversation with regard to the 'appeal', he declares
that every cleric who dares to say anything in defence of THE TRUTH OF
GOD against the civil power is an enemy of the Orthodox Church. Is this not
madness, madness that has overtaken a man in spiritual deception? You
know, if we think like that, then we shall have to consider as an enemy of God
- the hierarch Philip, for example, who once rebuked Ivan the Terrible and
was strangled for that. Moreover, we shall have to count among the enemies
of God the great Forerunner himself, who rebuked Herod and was beheaded
for that.
“To such a sorry state have the apostates been brought that they have
preferred an external earthly freedom - for the sake of a specious earthly
prosperity joined to it - to our spiritual freedom in Christ. And if Archbishop
Paul shouts and swears that he, in signing the ‘appeal’, was thinking that he
was not violating the dogmas and canons of the Orthodox Church and that he
had not renounced her, then may [God] forgive him – Pilate, too, by his
words claimed that he was innocent in the killing of Christ, while with his
quill (pen) he confirmed His death. For the antichurchmen, the apostates from
the Church, their preservation of the dogmas and canons is a comparatively
small matter. He who has cut off someone’s head is not justified by the fact
that he did not harm any of the hairs on the head: to think otherwise is risible.
But they all affirm: ‘Everything with us is in the old style’. True, their
appearance has remained Orthodox, and this disturbs many; but they do not
have THE SPIRIT OF LIFE, THE GRACE OF GOD, and consequently the
eternal salvation of man. That is why this deception is bitterer than the first
ones.
“Christ did not bow down to Beliar when he was tempting Him in the
desert and offered him all the power of this world – provided, he said, you
bow down before me (Matthew 4.8). But they have bowed down. And, being
a spiritual authority, they have forcibly drawn all the rest into their sin, their
destruction. But only lack of faith in the grace of God and a lack of
understanding of our salvation in it and through it can force a man to set out
of the path of union with apostates. For all their proofs in defence of the
‘appeal’ are words ‘sounding from the earth’ (Isaiah 29.4), from foreign laws
and the crowd stirred up by human fear to say everything. But their
threatening with canonical sanctions is only a trap for the ignorant and
fainthearted. After all, the canons of God were not given by the Holy Fathers
so that by their means, as with a whip, to drive to their destruction those who
declare that they, out of fear of God, cannot follow someone caught by the
enemy-devil.
“Moreover, the very content of the canons to which the apostates refer
cannot according to their meaning be applied to us in any way. For example,
what do Canons 13, 14 and 15 of the First-and-Second Council [of
69
70
Constantinople in 869], and other similar ones they refer to, talk about? – The
Canons says that if a PERSONAL misunderstanding arises between one of the
clergy and his bishop, or between a bishop and the metropolitan of the
province, or between a metropolitan and a patriarch, or if a local bishop
expresses a PERSONAL opinion on questions of faith and piety that is
doubtful, then in all such cases, first, it is necessary to pass this matter on to
the review of a higher authority, and secondly, nobody on account of these
PERSONAL matters of his or BECAUSE OF DOUBTFUL OPINIONS must
break canonical communion with his president.
“How can these canons now apply to the matter of our confession… [a gap
in the text] [when] neither do you have any personal misunderstandings with
your bishop, nor me with Metropolitan Sergius? Our case is not personal and
does not touch on local interests, or any dubious unproven opinions, but it
concerns the immediate practical destruction of our common eternal salvation
by the ecclesiastical authorities themselves through their substitution of the
false church, the great harlot (Revelation 17,1) for the true Church, the woman
clothed with the Sun (Revelation 12.1). In other circumstances of church life
Metropolitan Sergius and all his accomplices would be subject to immediate
trial by the Orthodox Church in the form of a local council. But not that
council which is being prepared by the apostates from the True Church
themselves, and which will be an offshoot of the ‘robber council’ of 1923. It is
necessary that the council should be perfect, that is, with the participation of
all the Orthodox Bishops, and most of all the confessors of the Church. But
such a council can never take place in the present conditions. And in reality in
the conditions that have been created we do not even have the possibility of
complaining to anyone against the apostates from the true Church.
“True, we, as men, are subject to spiritual authority. But at the same time
each one of us is directed in his life by the commandments of God, in
accordance with which we shall be judged, and if we turn out to be
accomplices in the impiety of our spiritual authorities, even that should be in
the person of the Patriarch himself, then in no way can we be justified before
God. For the commandment of God declares: ‘He who renounces Me before
men, I will renounce before My Heavenly Father’ (Matthew 10.33).
"That is why, when they tried to persuade St. Maximus the Confessor by
means of terrible tortures to enter into communion of prayer with a wrong-
thinking patriarch, he cried out: 'even if the whole universe begins to have
70
71
communion with the patriarch, I alone will not communicate with him'. Why
was that? Because he feared to destroy his soul through communion with a
patriarch who had been drawn into impiety, although at that time he had not
yet been condemned by a council and was, on the contrary, supported by the
majority of the bishops. You know, the ecclesiastical administrative authority,
even in the person of councils, did not always defend the truth in former
times, to which clear witness is borne by the story of the hierarch Athanasius
the Great, John Chrysostom, Basil the Great, Theodore the Studite and others.
How, then, can I remain unreasonable and indifferent? That cannot be. That is
why we have set out on the only possible way out in our present situation -
the way of the confession of THE TRUTH OF SALVATION. This way is
difficult, it is the way of exploit [podvig]; but we do not trust on our own
strength, but look to the Author and Finisher of our faith, Jesus Christ
(Hebrews 12.2). And our action is not a separation for the Church, but the
defence of the truth and justification of the Divine commandments, or - still
better – THE PRESERVATION OF THE WHOLE ECONOMY OF OUR
SALVATION. That is why a whole pleiad of archpastors have rebuked
Metropolitan Sergius: Metropolitans Joseph, Agathangel and Arsenius,
Archbishops, Bishops and a multitude of individual pastors, who have told
Metropolitan Sergius that they can no longer recognize him to be the leader of
the Orthodox Church, and will rule independently for the time being..."
On April 4, 1928 Bishop Victor was arrested in Glazov and cast into
Butyrki prison. He was accused of “systematically distributing anti-Soviet
documents composed by him and printed on a typewriter. The most anti-
Soviet of them in content was the document, ‘Epistle to Believers’ with and
appeal to them not to fear and not to submit to Soviet power as being the
power of the devil, but to suffer martyrdom from it, just as Metropolitan
Philip or John, the so-called ‘baptist’ suffered martyrdom for the faith in their
struggle with the power of the state”.
A week later the sergianist synod decreed: “To keep in force our resolution
concerning the former vicars of the Leningrad diocese, Bishops Demetrius of
Gdov and Sergius of Kopor, the former Bishop Victor of Shadrinsk and the
former Bishop Alexis of Urazov, the more so in that the mentioned bishops
not only have not repented of the sin of creating a schism, but by their
activities, speeches and epistles continue to sow disturbance, undermining the
faith of the Church of Christ. They send a prepared text renouncing
Metropolitan Sergius and the Patriarchal Synod for signature, calling of them
to unite with them, while Bishop Victor, although banned from serving,
ordains clergy for dioceses not subject to him.”
71
72
decisive anti-sergianists here, and they, I hope, will leaven the local Christians
with a good leaven.”
At some time in 1928 Bishop Victor wrote: “In his scattering of the Church
together with his treachery, Metropolitan Sergius has also committed a
terrible blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, which according to the unlying
word of Christ will never be forgiven him, neither in this life, nor in the life to
come.
"'He who does not gather with Me,' says the Lord, 'scatters.' 'Either
recognize the tree (the Church) as good and its fruit as good, or recognize the
tree as bad and its fruit as bad' (Matthew 12.33). 'Therefore I say unto you,
every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto me, but the blasphemy
against the Spirit shall not be forgiven unto me' (Matthew 12.31). 'Fulfilling
the measure of his sin,' Metropolitan Sergius together with his Synod, by his
ukaz of October 8/21, 1927, is introducing a new formula of commemoration.
"Mixing together into one, despite the word of God, the 'faithful with the
unfaithful' (II Corinthians 6.14-18), the Holy Church and those fighting to the
death against her, in the great and most holy sacrament of the Eucharist, the
metropolitan by this blasphemy of his destroys the prayerful meaning of the
great sacrament and its grace-filled significance for the eternal salvation of the
souls of Orthodox believers. Hence the service becomes not only graceless
because of the gracelessness of the celebrant, but an abomination in the eyes
of God, and for that reason both the celebrant and he who participates in it
subject themselves to severe condemnation.
"Without a formal external trial by the Church (which cannot be carried out
on him), he 'is self-condemned' (Titus 3.10-11); he has ceased to be what he
was - a 'server of the truth', according to the word: 'Let his habitation be
desolate, and let no one live in it; and his office let another take' (Acts 1.20).
72
73
"For that reason, we, by the grace given us by our Lord Jesus Christ, 'by the
power of our Lord Jesus Christ' (I Corinthians 5.4), declare the former
Metropolitan Sergius deprived of prayerful communion with us and all those
faithful to Christ and His Holy Orthodox Church, and give him up to the
judgement of God: 'Vengeance is Mine, I will repay, saith the Lord' (Hebrews
19.30).
"This present act, in addition to our earlier declarations made in 1927 and
1928, we carry out in strict consciousness of our archpastoral duty before our
flock, all the faithful children of the Orthodox Church, in obedience to the
Church of Christ, in dutiful submission to the canons of the Ecumenical
Councils and the Council of the Russian Church of 1917-1918, which is
headed today by the patriarchal locum tenens, Metropolitan Peter of Krutitsa
and his deputy, Archbishop Seraphim of Uglich.
"'Fear not, little flock! For your Father has determined to give you the
Kingdom!' (Luke 12.32).”
From 1928 to 1930 Archbishop Victor was on the main island of Solovki.
He worked as an accountant in the Solovki rope factory. Academician
Demetrius Sergeyevich Likhachev, who knew Vladyka Victor on Solovki, said
that he was a highly educated man with several theological publications to his
credit, but he looked like a village priest. He had a sparse beard, rosy cheeks
and dark blue eyes. He met everyone with a broad smile, and radiated
kindness and joy. He tried to help everyone, and was truly able to help them,
because everyone thought highly of him and trusted him.
When, writes Likhachev, "during the winter of 1929 I returned from the
typhus 'brigade of convalescents', he sent me some green onion and cream
through Fedya Rozenberg. How tasty that onion and cream was! Once I met
Vladyka (among ourselves we used to call him 'Vladychka') in a particularly
radiant and joyful state. It was on the square in front of the Transfiguration
cathedral. An order had been issued that all the prisoners should have their
73
74
hair cut and were not to wear long clothes. Vladyka Victor refused to carry
out this order, so they took him into the lock-up, forcibly shaved him, in the
process seriously wounding his face, and cut his clothes crookedly from
below. He walked towards us with a towel wrapped round his face and
smiling. He said that they had dragged him into the lock-up in order to shave
him, and had bound him, but that he had demanded that they first cut the
long 'chekist' greatcoat (in the style of that in which Dzerzhinsky is depicted
on the Lubyanka) of the escort who had dragged him into the lock-up. I think
that Vladyka had resisted without spite and that he considered his suffering
to be the mercy of God."
"... Both Vladykas (Victor and Maximus) loved each other; unhurriedly,
without ever quarrelling or getting irritated, but attentively they studied a
single complicated phenomenon from different points of view. Vladyka
Maximus was a pessimist and was getting ready for the heavy trials of the last
times, not believing in the possibility of a regeneration of Russia. But Vladyka
Victor was an optimist and believed in the possibility of a short, but radiant
period, as a final gift from heaven for the tormented Russian people. At the
end of 1930 Vladyka Victor completed his three-year term, but instead of
being released was sent to Mai-Guba."
Bishop Victor’s sentence ended in the spring of 1931, but he was not
released. On April 10, 1931 his case was reviewed, and according to one
source he was sentenced to three years’ exile in Onega, Archangelsk district.
From Solovki he was taken to the mainland, to Mai-Guba (according to I.M.
Andreyevsky, this was already in the autumn of 1930). Vladyka worked as an
accountant at Mai-Guba, and then, in November, 1931, or perhaps earlier, was
sent to the north. According to one source, he was sent to Novaya Birzha on
the White Sea – Baltic canal. According to another source, in the summer or
early autumn of 1931 he was sent to Ust-Tsilma, Komi province via
Arkhangelsk, the White and Barents Seas and the Rivers Pechora and Tsilma.
There he found the “Victorites” Protopriest John Fokin and Nuns Angelina
(Tomilova) and Alexandra (Lopatina).
74
75
He was arrested again on the night of December 12-13, 1932, and the next
day was sent with ten others (four priests and six laymen) to prison in
Syktyvkar.
“The main information for the investigation’s version of events was given
at the interrogations of the accused priests. Thus A.D. Nechaev detailed by
name, in his own words, ‘the undoubted participants in our counter-
revolutionary grouping’ – ten people in Ust-Tsilma, including Victor
Alexandrovich Ostrovidov, and five people in Arkhangelsk. I.A. Nikolsky
told in detail, point by point, about ‘the practical counter-revolutionary
75
76
activity of the participants in our grouping’, and these points were transferred
in the same words into the ‘Concluding Indictment’. Apparently, such
testimonies were demanded of Bishop Victor, but Vlayka did not recognize
his guilt in the writing of the ‘novel’ thought up by the investigation.”
On March 23 Bishop Victor and six others were formally accused that: “(a)
they were active participants in a counter-revolutionary grouping of
administratively exiled clergy and churchmen in the village of Ust-Tsilma; (b)
they took part in group meetings conducted by the leadership of the grouping
in which general methods and tactics of counter-revolutionary work were
worked out; (c) in the mass of the peasantry they conducted daily anti-soviet
agitation directed at the undermining of the enterprises of Soviet power; and
(d) they spread provocative rumours about the inevitability of a war and the
destruction of Soviet power with the aim of strengthening defeatist
sentiments.”
On May 10, 1933 he was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10 and
58-11 to another three years in exile. First he spent at least another three
months in an isolator in Syktyvkar, where he miraculously found an icon of
Christ lying on the ground – it was a copy of the wonder-working icon from
the Holy Trinity – St. Stephen monastery in Ust-Sysolsk uyezd. Vladyka
brought it into his cell and prayed: “Lord, Thou has appeared to me. So
intercede for me!” Soon he was freed.
After prison Vladyka served several liturgies with other exiled priests in
the flat of the exiled Fr. Nicholas in Arkhangelsk. “What a joy it was for us!”
said Vladyka. “And then the icon was with us.”
Then he was sent to the village of Neritsa, some thirty kilometres from Ust-
Tsilma. Here he was surrounded by atheists, who followed his every
movement. Vladyka arrived in a sad mood. But the believers in Ust-Tsilma,
who were now free, promised not to abandon him. Although no parcels could
be sent directly to him in Neritsa, the Vyatka and Glazov parishioners
constantly sent him things, which he immediately distributed to the needy
villagers (there was a famine in the winter of 1933-1934). He prayed for the
sick twelve-year-old daughter of the man in whose house he lived, and she
recovered. Vladyka’s neighbour, a communist, was constantly playing
something on the gramophone very loudly. Vladyka went up to the wall,
made the sign of the cross on it – and the gramophone fell down. There was
no more noise…
A little more than two months before his death, on February 23, 1934,
Vladyka wrote a letter to Ekaterina Pavlovna Peshkova of the Political Red
Cross asking for help, since he was in a difficult situation. Peshkova’s reply
was dated May 8. In August it was returned again to Moscow with the note:
“Returned to the sender because of the death of the addressee”.
76
77
At the beginning of spring, Vladyka would go out into the woods to pray.
He helped in the cutting of wood and the carrying of water. According to one
source, Vladyka talked about the faith with some Old Ritualists living in the
region.
Vladyka often went into the taiga to pray. At the end of April, 1934 he
caught a cold and pneumonia – according to another source, meningitis. He
could not be sent to the regional centre because the river had overflowed its
banks. Two days before his death Nun Angelina came to visit him. On May 2,
1934 he reposed in the Lord. On that same day a woman called Nastya went
into his former room in Ust-Tsilma and smelt incense…
Mother Angelina carried the body away on a sledge, pretending he was ill.
But, being unable to cross the river on which the ice was beginning to melt,
she had to send back to Neritsa for help. Eventually some men came, brought
the body back to Neritsa and buried him there. No priest could go to the
village, so Fr. Nicholas carried out the funeral service for him in Arkhangelsk.
On the fortieth day after Vladyka’s death the nuns asked one of the men in
whose house he had lived to catch fish for his commemorative meal. He was
at first unwilling, but then Vladyka Victor appeared to him in a vision and
asked him to do this. He set off, and he caught a huge of fish. “It was not a
simple man who lived with us,” he said in amazement to his wife.
The fragrant relics of the saint were taken to Moscow, and then, on
December 2, 1997, to the St. Alexander Nevsky church of the Holy Trinity-
Macarius monastery in Vyatka. All his life St. Victor had served in churches
dedicated either to the Holy Trinity or to St. Alexander Nevsky…
Many miracles of healing have been recorded at the shrine of St. Victor.
77
78
78
79
the renovationist clergy. Popyvanov recruited the former abbess of the Pokrov
monastery Febronia (Yufereva) to his side together with a group of monastics
who had remained with her after the liquidation of the monastery. She was
taken ‘as a saint’ by the fanatically believing population. Having on their side
the church archive, the clergy of the cathedral with the help of Abbess
Febronia conducted agitation ‘On the strengthening of the Foundations of
Orthodoxy’ among the peasant population. After Priest Perebaskin and
Missionary Ivanov had been arrested in Vyatka, the Resurrection cathedral
acquired the authority of ‘a true bastion of the so-called Old Orthodoxy’
among the reactionary clergy, and in a short space of time the majority of the
churches of Vyatka who had been standing on the so-called renovationist
platform had been drawn to the Tikhonite platform. When, in 1926,
Archbishop Paul Borisovsky and Bishop Victor Ostrovidov returned to
Vyatka from exile, the cathedral was turned into the governing centre of the
reactionary Tikhonite churchmen of Vyatka diocese. In 1926 a so-called
‘penitential commission’ was created in the cathedral. Its aim was to struggle
with the renovationist clergy by forcing the renovationists to repent and deny
the canonical resolutions of the renovationist council of 1923. After Bishops
Paul and Victor and others had again been arrested and exiled, Popyvalov
invited Priest Michael Valentinovich Glushkov to serve in the cathedral, and
also accepted the former nuns of the Pokrov monastery to the services.” The
main accusation against those arrested was their non-acceptance of the
Declaration of Metropolitan Sergius and their support of the position of
Bishop Victor. Moreover, the nuns were accused of “organizing groups of a
sisterhood, the followers of Bishop Victor, mainly from women who carried
out the functions of church-parish councils. They took seized churches into
their hands and spread the leaflets of Bishop Victor. The cathedral clergy
organized monetary assistance for exiled clergy and Bishop Victor… After the
district executive committee had declared the closure of the Resurrection
cathedral the grouping in question organized resistance to the closure. After
the arrest of the cathedral clergy the parishioner of the Resurrection cathedral
A.L. Petrova and other believers collected signatures in defence of the
arrested, demanding the immediate release of the imprisoned.” Abbess
Febronia was interrogated once; she pleaded not guilty. On February 3, 1930
she was convicted of “anti-Soviet activity, being a member of an illegal
church-parish council” and “helping the activity of a church-monarchist
group”. In accordance with article 58-11 she was sentenced to three years’
exile in the north, but was not sent into exile because of her illness. On
December 16, 1930 she died in prison in Vyatka.
79
80
80
81
school and then, from 1912 to 1915, took two courses in the Kharkov
technological institute. In 1915 he was called into the army, but was released
from army service in 1917 because of illness. In 1918 he decided to join the
Novy Afon monastery, but on the way there was arrested by the Whites, who
persuaded him to join their army. However, Michael refused to fight and
decided to devote himself to God. After many adventures, he arrived at the
monastery and became a novice. In 1921, however, on hearing that the Reds
were going to close the monastery, he returned to his homeland, where he
helped to feed his family. From 1923 to 1935 he worked in haberdashery.
After the death of his father he sold his house and went to serve as a deacon
in the cathedral in Kotelnich. Then he went to the Resurrection cathedral in
Vyatka as a priest. On September 13, 1929 he was arrested and cast into
Vyatka isolator. On February 3, 1930 he was condemned as “a member of an
illegal church-parish council, [who] helped the activity of a church-
monarchist grouping”. In accordance with article 58-11 he was sentenced to
five years in the camps. In 1935 he was again arrested and sentenced to five
years in prison. Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Ivan Vasilyevich Alpov. He was born on August 16, 1878 in the
village of Vladimirskoye, Darovsky region, Vyatka province into the family of
a priest. He went to a city school. Before the revolution he was an official
working in the Vyatka control palace in the rank of college registrar. Until
1922 he was senior inspector of a consumer society. In February, 1922 he was
ordained to the diaconate and sent to serve in the Vladimir church in the
village of Makarye, Vyatka province. In 1927 he was ordained to the
priesthood and sent to the All Saints church in Vyatka, but in 1928 returned to
Makarye. In September, 1929 he was arrested in Makarye and cast into the
Vyatka isolator. On February 3, 1930 he was convicted of “being a member of
an illegal church-monarchist council and helping in the activity of a church-
monarchist grouping”. He was sentenced to five years in the camps. In 1935
he was arrested again and detained for three weeks “in the case of Priest
Nikulin”. On July 2, 1936 he began serving in the village of Ilyinskoye,
Makarye region, but on October 27, 1936 he was sentenced to five years in the
camps in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11. Nothing more is known
about him.
81
82
and went to serve in the village of Kumeny. In October, 1929 he was arrested
in the affair of Abbess Febronia, and was sentenced to five years in the camps.
On his release he served in secret. On September 7, 1938 he was arrested
together with Nun Maria (Tomilova) as a “wandering churchman” and a
participant in the anti-Soviet organization “The Vyatka Diocese of the True
Orthodox Victorite Church”. The investigation lasted for five months, but the
case was closed and the arrested were released. Nothing more is known about
him.
Nun Anna (Tarasovna Nekrasova). She was born in 1893 in the village of
Koshelevo, Nikolsky uyezd, North Dvina province into a peasant family. In
1918 she entered the Pokrov monastery in Vyatka. From 1923 to 1926 she was
a servant. In 1926 she became a watchman in the Resurrection cathedral in
Vyatka. In September, 1929 she was arrested, and on February 3 she was
convicted in accordance with article 58-11 and sentenced to three years’ exile
in the north. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Felitsata, in the world Thecla Andreyevna Lagunova. She was born in
1871 in the village of Ardashi, Vyatka province into a peasant family, and at
the age of eight entered the Transfiguration women’s monastery in Vyatka,
remaining there until its liquidation in 1923, when she and all the nuns settled
in the village of Fileiki. In 1926 she went to the Resurrection cathedral. In
September 1929 she was arrested and cast into Vyatka isolator. On February 3
she was convicted in accordance with article 58-11 and sentenced to three
years’ exile in the north. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Eudocia (Vasilyevna Akatyeva). She was born in 1883 in the village of
Sutyagi, Vyatka province, and entered the Vyatka Arbazhsky monastery in
1905. After the closure of the monastery in 1919 she lived in various villages,
and then in Vyatka, going to the Resurrection cathedral. In September, 1929
she was arrested and cast into Vyatka isolator. On February 3, 1930 she was
convicted in accordance with article 58-11 and was sentenced to three years’
exile in the north. Nothing more is known about her.
82
83
Nun Theodosia (Danilovna Shatova). She was born in 1899 in the village of
Zadovtsy (Zotovtsy), Kotelnichi uyezd, Vyatka province into a peasant
family. She entered the Pokrov monastery in Vyatka in 1918. After its closure
in 1923 she worked as a servant, then as a cleaner or watchman in the
Resurrection cathedral. In September, 1929 she was arrested and cast into
Vyatka isolator. On February 3, 1930 she was convicted in accordance with
article 58-11 and was sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. Nothing
more is known about her.
Nun Olga (Trofimovna Dudina). She was born in 1901 in the village of
Yekaterinskaya, Kotelnich uyezd, Vyatka province. She lived in the Pokrov
monastery until its closure in 1923, when she became a singer and reader in
the Resurrection cathedral. In September, 1929 she was arrested and cast into
the Vyatka Isolator. On February 3, 1930 she was convicted in accordance
with article 58-11 and sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. Nothing
more is known about her.
83
84
84
85
85
86
86
87
after the arrest of her husband, she lived next to the church in the village of
Khlebnikov, Mari-Tureksky region. On February 3, 1931 she was arrested for
being “a participant in a counter-revolutionary organization of churchmen,
‘the True Orthodox Church’”, and on December 14 was sentenced to ten
months and eleven days incarceration. On her release she went round the
villages taking part in secret services. On August 7, 1937 she was arrested “for
counter-revolutionary agitation among the population”. On August 19 she
was sentenced to death, and on September 6 was shot.
87
88
88
89
1954 (or 1956) Fr. Lucian was released because of illness, and he returned to
Kazan. His flock became very large. He had spiritual children in Kazan,
Yoshkar-Ola, Borovoj, Matyushino, Paratsk, Volzhsk, in the villages of Komi
republic, in Kosmodemyansk and other places. People even travelled to see
him from the Ukraine. He was a humble, loving man, and many people
sought his advice. If they followed what he told them, everything turned out
well for them. During the fasts Fr. Lucian visited flock, but he had to act in
secret, because opposite there lived a family who had been told by the
authorities to spy on the priest. They recorded all those who came and went,
and read Fr. Lucian’s mail before putting it into his box. In spite of that, many
people came to the house, where Fr. Lucian served at night, covering the
windows with blankets to stop the light showing in the street. Once a
neighbour, Eugenia Mikhailovna, saw a very bright light coming out of the
chimney during the night. She thought the house was on fire. The light came
from the stove in which Fr. Lucian baked his prosphoras… Once a spiritual
child of batyushka’s called Ivan, who worked as a lorry driver in Kazan, was
warned by him not to work on Sunday. He ignored this advice, and very
nearly had a serious accident… Fr. Lucian loved children. He would buy
sweets for them and stroke them on the head. Now these children have
grown up, and remember him to this day… Fr. Lucian died of anaemia in
Kazan on November 19, 1963. He was buried in Ars cemetery next to his
father and brother. After his death the police often visited his family. But
they did not find his church books and utensils, which were handed over to
another catacomb priest…
Nun Anna (Demyanovna Kopylova) was born in the village of Lom, Mari-
Turetsky uyezd, Nizhegorod province. In 1898 she joined the Kuzhnersky
monastery and was tonsured. In 1924, after the closure of the monastery, she
sent to live in the village of Mari-Sola, working as a watchman and
prosphora-baker in the local church. On December 12, 1929 she was arrested
for being “a participant in a counter-revolutionary group of clergy and
believers attached to the ‘Victorites’”, and on January 13, 1930 she was
sentenced to three years in the camps with confiscation of property and sent
to a camp. On June 25, 1932 she was released early and returned to Senchur
region. In the summer of 1937 she was arrested again, and on August 19 was
sentenced to death and shot.
89
90
90
91
91
92
92
93
released early because of illness, and went to live in the village of Kuznetsovo.
Then he became a wandering priest, secretly serving believers in their houses,
most often in the cell fitted out for him in the village of Selivanov in the house
of Anna Plotnikova. From 1940 he was serving in the village of Fedosikha,
Tuzhin region. On June 22, 1941 (according to another source, November,
1941) he was arrested, and on February 18, 1942 he was sentenced to two
years in the camps and sent to a camp. On September 17 he was investigated
for being “a leader of the counter-revolutionary church-monarchist
organization, the True Orthodox Church”, and on August 18, 1943 he was
sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to Yaransk prison. There he died
on March 22, 1944.
93
94
94
95
Once, when Alexander's mother was bringing him and his younger brother
home for the holidays, they met St. John of Kronstadt on a Volga steamer. The
conversation with St. John made such an impression on the brothers that they
both decided, in spite of the attempts of their mother to dissuade them, to
enter the Moscow Theological Academy. In later life, Alexander often met St.
John, corresponded with him, and often mentioned him in his sermons and
articles.
95
96
"For two whole years I found no peace, performing the Holy Mysteries in
fear and trembling on account of my unworthiness, ready to forsake that
terrible and awesome calling. But a meeting with the great Father John of
Kronstadt saved my soul from further bitterness, torment and the
prolongation of the almost sickening duel in my soul. When I asked him for
counsel on this matter, Father John said, 'Yes, we are all guilty before the Holy
Mysteries, but we must be true to our priestly calling, for we are in obedience
to the Holy Church. Weeping over our own sins, we must, however, do the
will of Christ's Church and follow the instructions of the Church which are
made known to us through our Archpastors.'
96
97
It was at about this time that Fr. Andrew had a deep premonition of the
coming of new persecutions against the Orthodox. It became clear that the
only way to preserve the faith and the Church in such conditions would be
service in secret in the manner of the Catacomb Christians of Roman times.
And so, when he was ruling the Sukhumi diocese in 1911-1912, Vladyka
Andrew founded a number of secret sketes in the Caucasus mountains which
later became strongholds of True Orthodoxy.
Vladyka's spiritual daughter, Nun Tabitha, writes that when he left Kazan,
"a crowd of thousands accompanied him. His carriage headed for the steamer
quayside. The workers and soldiers unharnessed the horses from his carriage
and transported him themselves. Everyone wept... Non-Russians wept like
children as they accompanied their beloved 'batka', and they strewed their
clothes in his path..."
97
98
"What can save us, preserve our Orthodox fatherland, and return to Holy
Rus' her former glory?
"I believe and am firmly convinced that, just as Holy Rus' grew around the
Orthodox Church, so only her native Orthodoxy can regenerate her. That is
why I await that great day in Rus' when a Council of the Russian Church will
be convened in the presence of our most meek and Christian Tsar, Nicholas
Alexandrovich... It is not a faithless gathering of self-appointed arrogant
people, not crowds of people united by nothing and hating each other, that
will point out for us new paths of public and state life, but a Council of
Church hierarchs... who come together in complete concord and love and
speak the truth to the most truth-loving of tsars with Christian firmness."
On April 14/27, 1917, after the Provisional Government had dissolved the
old Holy Synod, Archbishop Andrew became a member of the new Synod.
However, he did not believe that the Provisional Government had changed
the situation for the better. "The Provisional Government," he wrote,
"appointed a revolutionary Over-Procurator, but the problem of having the
Church ruled by a government official was not resolved." At the same time he
did not believe in a complete separation of Church and State. Thus in August,
1917, he sent Kerensky a long letter, in which he declared that "the separation
of the Church from the State is not frightening for the Church, but for the
State its own separation from the Church is frightening."
98
99
However, it is clear from the bishop's articles that when, during the first
months of the revolution, the socialist movement was dominated by fairly
moderate elements, he tried to establish contacts with the movement and
even wrote about its positive sides:
"Is it possible for the parish councils to form a block with the social
revolutionaries?… This party is the closest for me of all the parties. The
Church-parish councils and the party of the social revolutionaries must form
one whole..."
But as the violence of the socialists grew, the bishop sharply changed his
attitude towards the movement. Thus in one of his sermons in the cathedral,
he said: "The socialists have taken from our original Apostolic Church her
holy teaching on the community, brotherhood and equality... and have
departed from us with this teaching."
"The socialists," wrote the bishop, "do not have enough love, and so at the
base of their theory and practice they have placed the idol of class struggle,
which on Russian soil has given 'freedom to hooliganism'."
And again: "Our homeland and the whole of our Russian people is
confused, and is now living the last weeks of its existence. One page of
Russian history has come to an end, and another, terrible one is beginning..."
In his speech before the opening of the state conference of members of the
Constitutional Assembly, which took place in Ufa in April, 1918, Archbishop
Andrew gave a clear basis to his judgements on the events that were taking
place. He referred to Biblical history, when the judges of Israel led the people
along the path of spiritual regeneration and national renewal:
99
100
"And now," he said, "for the salvation of the fatherland we need one
particular fine, patriotic name, and an inspired leader who is powerful in
word and deed, and who could incarnate our unfortunate Homeland and
incarnate it in himself."
Vladyka Andrew welcomed the Whites; he called the White Czech soldiers
“the best representatives of the Slavic family”, and hoped for a republic on
the lines described in the Book of Judges.
"And so this major Russian activist and patriot failed until almost the very
end to find an application for his abilities."
100
101
Although Vladyka had been on the side of the Whites, and although, in
1918, the Ufa newspaper Zavolzhskij Letopisets (№ 1, p. 8) described
Bolshevism as “an illness of the spirit, socialism of the belly, the service of
Mammon”, he renounced counter-revolution after the collapse of the White
armies. Thus in August, 1920 he promised A.G. Goikhdart of the Siberian
Revolutionary Committee that he would not undertake any open or secret
agitation against Soviet power, and that he would be completely loyal to it.
At the end of the year Patriarch Tikhon appointed him bishop of Tomsk.
From this time until his death, Vladyka was only rarely out of prison or
exile. Nevertheless, the people did not forget him, and many managed to see
him in prison or deliver food parcels to him; and every time he was released
and returned to his flock, it would cause a whole 'event' among the people.
The Secret Police sought to use his popularity as bait to fish out the more
fervent church people, but Bishop Andrew was so cautious and prudent in his
behaviour that these attempts always failed.
In 1922 he fell ill in prison with tuberculosis of the lungs, and on February
22 was treated in one of the private Moscow clinics before being returned to
Butyrki. On August 8, 1922 he was acquitted by the Moscow revolutionary
tribunal "because of insufficient evidence". In the same month, according to
one source, Archbishop Andrew met Patriarch Tikhon and received from him
101
102
the blessing to elect candidates for the episcopate and arrange their
consecration in secret – if necessary, moreover, by one bishop only.
By this time there was only one Orthodox church in Ufa; all the rest were
renovationist. So serious was the situation that Archbishop Andrew once said
to the married priest Fr. Victor (Poyarkov): “You and matushka must accept
monasticism so as to save the Church!” Fr. Victor and matushka obeyed the
call, and on November 29 / December 12, 1922 Fr. John (as he was now called
in monasticism) was consecrated Bishop of Davlekanovsk, a little town near
Ufa.
Just after the February revolution, Archbishop Andrew presided over the
All-Russian Congress of Yedinovertsy (that is, converts to Orthodoxy from
the Old Ritualists who were allowed to retain the Old Rite) in Nizhni-
Novgorod. In May, 1917, together with the future hieromartyr-bishop Joseph
(Petrovykh) and the yedinoverets Protopriest (later bishop and hieromartyr)
Simon (Sheev), he visited the Rogozhskoye monastery in Moscow, the
102
103
spiritual centre of the Byelokrinitsky Old Ritualist hierarchy, and handed over
a letter from the Congress expressing a desire for union. However, the reply
of the Old Ritualist bishops was negative.
But Vladyka’s sympathy for the Old Ritualists went further than these
early actions would suggest, and further than the opinion, which was
generally accepted in his time, that the anathemas on the Old Rite were unjust
and should be removed. Influenced by one of his teachers at the Academy,
Professor N. Kapterev, he adopted a still more “liberal” attitude towards the
Old Ritualists which has been a subject of controversy to this day. While
continuing to recognize the pre-revolutionary Church, he considered that it
had fallen into caesaropapism, or the “Niconian heresy” as he called it, and
that it was “Niconianism” that had led to the Russian revolution and to the
renovationist and sergianist submission of the Church to Soviet power. He
often referred to the Orthodox as “Niconians”, while calling the Old Ritualists
“Ancient Orthodox”, whose schism was not a schism, but precisely a protest
against this unlawful encroachment on the freedom of the Church. Therefore
Vladyka Andrew's attempted rapprochement with the Old Ritualists must be
seen in the context of the main struggle of the times - the struggle of the
Church against Soviet power and renovationist and sergianist caesaropapism.
Let us turn to Archbishop Andrew’s own account of his dealings with the
Old Ritualists: “In September, 1917 the so-called beglopopovtsi [i.e. those Old
Ritualists who accepted runaway priests from the official Russian Church, but
had no hierarchy of their own] approached me with the request that I become
their bishop. At this time I was in Moscow at the 1917 Council. I agreed in
principle, but on condition that my flock in Ufa should remain in my
jurisdiction. It was Lev Alexeyevich Molekhonov who was conducting
negotiations with me on the side of the beglopopovtsi. He assembled in
Moscow a small convention of representatives of other communities of theirs.
At this convention, after long discussions, they agreed that my union with
this group of Old Ritualists should take place in the following manner: I
would come without vestments to the church of the beglopopovtsi in Moscow
(on M. Andronievskaia street). They would meet me with the question: ‘Who
are you?’ I would reply at first that I was a bishop of the Orthodox, One,
Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and them I would read the Symbol of
Faith and a lengthy confession of faith, which everyone ordained to the
episcopate would read. Then I, at the request of the beglopopovtsi, would
anoint myself with the same chrism which they in 1917 called and considered
to be patriarchal, which remained [to them] from Patriarch Joseph [(1642-
1652), the last Moscow Patriarch recognized by both the Orthodox and the
Old Ritualists]. With this my ‘rite of reception’ would come to an end.
103
104
“Thus from both sides everything was measured, calculated, thought out
and humanly speaking worked out in a manner completely acceptable for all.
After this I went to Ufa.
“But then the events of 1918 and 1919 took place. The beglopopovtsi lost
me for a long time. I was in Siberia and then in a difficult incarceration… But
in 1925, when I was in exile in Askhabad, the beglopopovets Archimandrite
Clement came to me and began to ask me again that I should become bishop
for the beglopopovtsi…
“Clement accepted all my conditions and on August 28, 1925 we for the
first time prayed together with him to God in a truly Orthodox, that is, not
caesaro-papist church [!!!]; I on my side had fulfilled everything that I had
been blessed to do by Patriarch Tikhon. On September 3, 1925 I (together with
Bishop Rufinus) consecrated Clement to the episcopate, giving him the
authority to be my deputy, as it were, as long as I did not enjoy freedom of
movement…
“But soon I received news from Bishop Clement that the beglopopovtsi
recognised neither me nor him as their bishops and that he, Clement, had
been received in his existing rank into the number of the bishops of the
Belokrinnitsky hierarchy.”
104
105
"After this, Archbishop Andrew anointed himself with the Old Ritualist
chrism [more exactly: the chrism consecrated by the Orthodox Patriarch
Joseph] and read out the following confession of faith: 'I, Bishop Andrew, of
the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, who was consecrated to the
rank of bishop on October 4, 1907 in front of the holy relics of the Kazan
hierarchs Gurias and Barsanuphius and on the day of their commemoration,
and who am now suffering persecution from the ruling hierarchy for the
freedom of the Church of Christ, confess before the Holy Church that
Patriarch Nicon in his wisdom disrupted the life and love of the Catholic
Church, thereby laying the beginnings of the schism in the Russian Church.
On the basis of Patriarch Nicon's mistake was established that caesaropapism
which has, since the time of Patriarch Nicon, undermined all the roots of
Russian Church life and was finally expressed in the formation of the so-
called 'Living Church', which is at present the ruling hierarchy and which has
transgressed all the church canons... But I, although I am a sinful and
unworthy bishop, by the mercy of God ascribe myself to no ruling hierarchy
and have always remembered the command of the holy Apostle Peter:
'Pasture the flock of God without lording it over God's inheritance'."
105
106
106
107
“You can imagine his surprise when in the spring of 1927 he became
convinced that there were absolutely no documents about me in the Synodal
archives, neither about my ‘departure into schism’, nor about my ‘ban’, etc.
He asked in the Synod what this meant, and received the exceptionally
characteristic reply: ‘Metropolitan Peter was probably only wanting to
frighten Bishop Andrew’!…
“’But this is only my advice, and it will be clearer how to act on the spot,”
said Metropolitan Agathangel to Bishop Pitirim.
“Bishop Pitirim, on returning to Ufa, told me about all this, and Bishop
Habbakuk of Old Ufa decided immediately to carry out the advice of
Metropolitan Agathangel and on February 3, 1927 he invited Bishop Pitirim
and Anthony to a convention in Ufa, while he asked me for all the materials
that would explain my ecclesiastical behaviour.
“On February 3, 1927 these three bishops issued under their signatures an
‘Act with regard to the Affair of Archbishop Andrew’, in which they laid out
the circumstances of the affair and came to the conclusion that I had not
‘departed’ anywhere, and that Metropolitan Sergius’ slander was in essence a
light-minded and shameful intrusion into a holy affair.”
107
108
Archbishop Andrew returned from exile to Ufa at the end of 1926, and
according to eyewitnesses, the people visited their Vladyka in unending
streams. However, the Ufa clergy led by the newly appointed Bishop John
met him with hostility and coldness. As one of his parishioners wrote in her
diary: "The people search him out and revere him, and all the parishioners of
various churches invite him to them, while the clergy does not accept him.
There are many rumours, and no one knows what to believe...” Bishop
Andrew took up his residence in the workers' quarter on Samara street not far
from the Simeonov church. He served in the Simeonov church, and in such a
way, according to another eyewitness, that "we ascended to heaven and did
not want to come down."
Meanwhile, from October 3-6, 1927 a large diocesan Congress took place in
the Simeonov church in Ufa with the participation of Bishops Clement
(Longinov), Habbakuk (Borovkov), Rufinus (Brekhov) and other
“Andrewites”, at which the “Act” was approved, Archbishop Andrew
vindicated “as their true Ufa archpastor" and Metropolitan Sergius accused of
lying. After interrogating Bishop Clement and Nun Theva, the Congress
declared that: (1) there had been no transfer of an Orthodox community and
church to Old Ritualism, (2) there had been no re-sanctification of the church,
(3) Archbishop Andrew had not confessed with the beglopopovets Clement,
but had confessed with Abbot Matthew, (4) Clement had also confessed with
Abbot Matthew, and (5) Vladyka Andrew had not been received by the
beglopopovtsi by any rite, and Clement had not chrismated him. The reunion
had taken place, not according to a beglopopovtsi rite, but according to a rite
specially composed by Vladyka Andrew and approved already in 1917 by
Patriarch Tikhon. The Congress confirmed Vladyka Andrew as their ruling
archpastor, and Bishop Habbakuk as his deputy in his absence.
At the same Congress a decision was made about reunion with the Old
Ritualists of the Belokrinitsky hierarchy. Representatives of these Old
Ritualists were present at the Congress and suggested reunion. A special
commission was formed to work out the bases for the reunion, a project of
reconciliation was drawn up, which was to be confirmed at a future Council
of both sides.
However, Archbishop Andrew’s relations with the Old Ritualists did not
end there. From 1928 to 1931 he was in prison, and on his release in October,
1931, he began to visit the Rogozhskoye cemetery again. He concluded “that I
am for them not a stranger, but their own, and I am for them not a hostile and
harmful ‘Niconian’, but a true bishop of the One, Holy, Catholic and
Apostolic Church”. It seems that he then entered into communion with
108
109
In striving, like the Apostle Paul, to be "all things to all men", Archbishop
Andrew sometimes expressed extreme statements concerning Patriarch Nicon
and the pre-revolutionary Church which have not been generally accepted by
the Russian Orthodox Church (or even, paradoxically, by his spiritual father,
Metropolitan Anthony, who considered Patriarch Nicon to be an uncanonized
saint). This gave the opportunity to lesser, evil-intentioned men, such as
Metropolitan Sergius, to cast doubt on Archbishop Andrew's Orthodoxy. But
in fact Vladyka maintained his good confession, as we shall see, was later
accepted into communion by Metropolitan Joseph, the leader of the Catacomb
Church, and finally gave his life in martyrdom for Christ...
Sergianism
109
110
According to one source, Vladyka Andrew signed the acts of the so-called
“Nomadic Council” of the Catacomb Church through his vicar, Bishop Job.
This Council anathematised the sergianists. And during the time of this
Council, on June 18, 1928, he wrote the following "Epistle to the brethren":
"Yes, we are all living through a fearful, terrible time, when lies and deceit
rule and celebrate their triumph on the earth. The breath of the Antichrist can
be felt in every corner of our life. Even Metropolitan Peter did not escape this
breath of the Antichrist. But later he repented and now he is in a distant exile.
As for the renovationists and Metropolitan Sergius, they have completely
bowed down to that beast of which the holy book of the Revelation of John
the Theologian speaks. Read the thirteenth chapter. Both the renovationists
and Metropolitan Sergius are carrying out only the will of the atheists. And
they do not hide this from anyone, but even write about it in their
'Declarations'. That is why every true son of the Church must flee from these
betrayers of Christ without looking back; and all true children of the Church
must give their parish communities foundations that are free and
independent of the hierarch betrayers of Christ. There is no doubt that the
hierarchs who have submitted to Metropolitan Sergius have all renounced the
people of the Church and are serving the atheists and are only corrupting the
believing people. That is why it is necessary to carry out the command from
the Revelation of John the Theologian: 'Come out from her, My people, so that
you may not participate in her sins and not be subjected to her plagues' (Rev.
18.4). It is necessary that all parish priests should be elected and not
appointed. It is necessary that all priests should give their signatures to the
parish councils that they will do nothing without the knowledge of the parish
council. It is necessary that bishops, too, should be elected by the people for
their pious life, and not drunkards or betrayers of Christ whom the
renovationists have appointed."
110
111
Then, after citing the question and answer at the interview, Vladyka wrote:
"Such is the opinion of the false head of the false patriarchal church
Metropolitan Sergius. Who, after all this, can recognize him as their head? For
whom will this false head remain as such, in spite of his betrayal of Christ?
Imagine, readers - they recognize him, many recognize him!… They curse
him, but recognize him as their 'canonical' head. As if it were better to sit in
hell with such a canonical head than without any head at all... But tell me,
reader, is it possible to consider this company of hierarchs, these universal
deceivers, as followers of Christ? - It goes without saying: no and no! All the
followers of the lying Metropolitan Sergius are themselves filled to
overflowing with lies and cunning and have fallen away from the truth of
Christ - they have fallen away from the Church of Christ. The Holy Catholic
and Apostolic Church is in some other place, but not with Metropolitan
Sergius and not with his 'Synod'. Let the reader himself search where she is...
It is not so difficult to find her. But one can firmly say that Metropolitan
Sergius has convincingly demonstrated that the Synodal government of the
Church did not give, and could not give her anything but harm. Sergius has
dug a deep grave for this kind of Church government. The Holy Church will
recall the sins of Sergius and his co-strugglers with horror, placing his name
next to the names of the ecumenical false-patriarchs - Nestorius, Dioscurus
and the other terrible traitors against Orthodoxy. When the hierarch
Athanasius of Alexandria was expelled from his see by an heretical emperor,
then, of course, hierarchs were found who readily carried out all the unlawful
commands of the tsar. These hierarchs were called by St. Athanasius, not
episkopoi [bishops], but kataskopoi (i.e. the emperor’s spies) deprived of all
the gifts of grace. Such are our contemporary kataskopoi; they are destroyers
of the churches of God and of Church life in general. Such is Metropolitan
Sergius."
111
112
On April 14, 1932 Archbishop Andrew was again arrested for being “a
participant in the Moscow branch of the True Orthodox Church” and cast into
Butyrki prison.
112
113
On July 7, 1932 Archbishop Andrew was exiled for three years to Alma-
Ata, from where he conducted an extensive correspondence with his co-
workers and admirers both in Ufa and throughout Russia. There, according to
one source, he met Metropolitan Joseph, and they consecrated a bishop,
Nicetas, together. According to the memoirs of the priest Alexander
Bogoslovsky, which are preserved in the archive of Protopriest Valery
Mokhov of the church of the Kazan Mother of God in Ufa, in Alma-Ata
"Archbishop Andrew received endless parcels, which he distributed. There
were some criminals there, and they also received of his largesse - they adored
him. He was put in charge of the warehouses, but in a childlike manner he
attached no importance to material values and so he was given another job as
a sweeper." Another witness records that "Vladyka Andrew reacted in a lively
and open fashion to all the injustices that took place in prison, for which the
bosses did not love him, but feared him. He prayed a great deal. He entered
into arguments with the atheists and always left them in a derisory position,
for which he was often deprived of parcels."
113
114
of the teaching of the Apostle Paul (II Corinthians 5.4). But I consider that the
holy Church is constituted by all the Ritualists, all the sons of God through
faith in Jesus Christ (Galatians 3.26), the whole people of God, the living
stones from which the spiritual house is being built (I Peter 2.5), the Body of
Christ (I Corinthians 12.27; Hebrews 1.23).”
Nun Valentina (Petrovna Chalkina) was born on January 28, 1902 in Ufa.
She finished three courses at a pedagogical institute and two courses at an
institute in Petrograd. Then she worked as a physics teacher. She was arrested
for the first time in Ufa in August, 1923 for “counter-revolutionary church
activity”, but was released in December of the same year. She was again
arrested for a short time in 1925. In 1926 she got to know Archbishop Andrew,
who appointed her as a catechist in the Simeonovsky church. She also
distributed his appeals. In October, 1927 she was a participant in the Ufa
Congress of Oldchurchmen. On November 11 she was arrested together with
Bishop Habbakuk (Borovkov), his sister and two parishioners (and three
others, according to another source). They were all condemned for anti-Soviet
activity according to article 58-11, part 1. Mother Valentina was given three
years corrective labour in the camps in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-
11 part 1. On August 1, 1937 she was again arrested. The certificate for her
arrest stated that, “being an active participant in the counter-revolutionary
fascist-monarchist organization of Andrewite Churchmen, she moved from
the sect of the Baptists to the followers of Bishop Andrew and carried out the
duties of his personal secretary. After the exile of Bishop Andrew she carried
out the functions of a communications centre through whom links with
Bishop Andrew were maintained, his counter-revolutionary instructions were
114
115
Olga Petrovna Romodanovskaya (Yakina) was born in 1911 in Ufa into the
family of a doctor. After the activities of the sisterhood were cut off by the
authorities in 1928, she was not arrested because she was still a minor.
However, in May, 1930 she was arrested after the chance finding in her flat of
the archive of Bishop Habbakuk of Old Ufa. During interrogations she refused
to name any of the people to whom the manuscripts belonged. She admitted
that after the arrest of members of the sisterhood she had continued her
“counter-revolutionary activity” for eighteen months. When asked whether
she was intending to continue it now, if she were put on trial, she replied that
she would never give up this activity, on the contrary she would strive to
develop it still more intensely. She was condemned for preparing and
distributing anti-Soviet literature, and sentenced in accordance with
115
116
article 58-10 to three years’ exile in Tashkent. During her exile, she went
illegally from Tashkent to Alma-Ata, where Archbishop Andrew was in exile.
It is amazing that, in spite of the repressions that had begun and the ever-
increasing pressure of the authorities, Church life in the Simeonovsky parish
not only did not cease, but even became still more lively. The protocols of the
general meeting of the parish on 26 May, 1929, which expressed complete
trust in Bishop Benjamin, indicate that 238 people were present at the
meeting. The list of parishioners on March 29, 1931 numbered 663 people.
Moreover, this list contained detailed information, addresses, etc.
116
117
In May, 1930 the parish asked to be registered in accordance with the new
laws, and the NKVD of Bashkiria found it difficult to refuse them. On
September 3, 1931, the authorities decreed the closure of the church, and
Bishop Benjamin had already been arrested together with the warden of the
church, Olga Vonifatievna Vinokurova, and many nuns and active
members of the parish. But the protests were so strong that it was only in
1932 that the authorities managed to close the church on the basis of a decree
of June 10, 1932. After this, the remaining “Andrewites” entered the
catacombs, although a large open parish existed in Sterlitamak under Bishop
Rufinus until 1935.
Martyrdom
A prison report dated August 22, 1937 says that “during walks on feasts
like Christmas and Pascha, he congratulated everyone and called on all the
prisoners to celebrate the great feasts”. And then one of his fellow-prisoners is
named as “Novoselov” – that is, the Catacomb Hieromartyr Bishop Mark
(Novoselov).
117
118
In 1984 the elderly Nun Tabitha wrote in her memoirs: "Five years ago,
Bishop Andrew appeared to me in my sleep and said: 'I've been assigned
again to Ufa, I'm going to live with you.' What joy! The God-saved city of Ufa
is under his supervision! Glory and thanks to the Lord God for this His care
for Ufa and her people!"
118
119
13. HIEROMARTYR
NECTARIUS, ARCHBISHOP
OF YARANSK
and those with him
119
120
from him a promise not to leave Petrograd, so he could not visit his see. In
December, 1924 he was appointed bishop of Yaransk, a vicariate of the Vyatka
diocese, arriving there on January 15, 1925. At that time Yaransk was in the
hands of the renovationist heretics. However, the faithful children of the
Orthodox Church sent a member of the parish council of the Dormition
church, James Chernyshev, to Patriarch Tikhon to ask him to give them their
own bishop, and he sent them Bishop Nectarius.
Yaransk already had its new martyrs. In the early years of the revolution a
group of clergy had been shot and buried in Yaransk cemetery. In the same
grave they buried two brothers, one of whom was called Vasya, from Kiknur
who had been caught for refusing to join the reds and had joined the whites.
Not content with this triumph in the city, Vladyka Nectarius went out into
the neighbouring villages and submitted the renovationist churches to his
authority. "Now the clergy is persecuted," he preached, "and the time of the
Antichrist has arrived. Soviet power must offer repentance, stop the
repressions and radically change its politics towards the Church."
120
121
From January, 1925 Vladyka Nectarius was looking after more than 40
parishes of the True Orthodox Christians. In May he went to seek the advice
of the elder, Hieromonk Matthew, who was living in the settlement of
Yershovo some 35 versts from the city.
Vladyka Nectarius went up to Fr. Matthew’s little house and said: "Lord
Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on us" at the door. "Amen" came the
reply, as if he had been long expected. The door opened, and there was Fr.
Matthew dressed in the full monastic garb. After blessing him, Vladyka went
up to the icons, and made the sign of the cross, while Fr. Matthew chanted
softly: "Thy martyrs, O Lord, have acquired unfading crowns in their
sufferings..." Vladyka shuddered at hearing the troparion to the martyrs. He
did not think that he would receive the answer to his question so quickly
from the elder.
On May 25, 1925 the GPU arrested Vladyka "for conducting anti-Soviet
agitation", and cast him into Vyatka isolator. On November 13 he was
sentenced to three years on Solovki. There he worked as a fisherman and
janitor, and took part in the secret meeting of imprisoned hierarchs that took
place in the food warehouse of the monastery Kremlin on May 25 / June 7,
1926, at which the epistle of the Solovki bishops was composed.
(According to one source, Vladyka was arrested in 1923, and between 1923
and 1926 was on Solovki. He was arrested again in 1926 or 1927. From 1927 to
1928, according to another source, he ruled the Kursk diocese while being
temporarily in charge of the Kirov diocese.)
121
122
122
123
sledge. And behind us this ‘Father Hierodeacon’ was lifting up the snow with
a spade. And the watchman-batyushka whom I knew bowed to him and said:
‘Hello, Vladyka.’ But I said: ‘Who’s the Vladyka here?’ ‘The one with the
spade,’ he said. ‘But he’s a hierodeacon,’ I said. ‘What are you saying!’ ‘That’s
how I know him!’ ‘But I,’ he said, ‘sleep next to him.’ I was so embarrassed…
On the way back, when we were returning with the sledge, this batyushka
said: ‘Vladyka, why do you lead innocent people into error?’ But he smiled…
He really was a hierarch… And I began to run away from him… Immediately
I saw that Vladyka Nectarius was coming… ‘Vladyka, forgive me… for
calling you a hierodeacon… You know, you led me into error.’ And he said:
‘Why did you decide that I really was a hierodeacon and had no doubts?’ ‘But
you work a lot, not like a hierarch… Hierarchs don’t work like that…’ ‘Yes,
they’re all idlers,’ he said.”
In the course of 1928, according to one (dubious) source, he signed the acts
of the so-called “Nomadic Council” of the Catacomb Church. Towards the
end of 1928 he was placed under ban by Metropolitan Sergius, but refused to
accept its validity. In October, 1930 he was mentioned as being under ban.
On November 20, 1928 he was released (the resolution was dated May 18,
1928), but not allowed to live in the major cities and Vyatka for three years.
Following the advice of Bishop Victor, he went to Kazan. On settling in
Kazan, Vladyka Nectarius was given the names of the anti-sergianists Fr.
Nicholas Troitsky and Professor Victor Ivanovich Nesmelov. However, both
these confessors were under surveillance, so Vladyka stayed in the Kozya
Sloboda suburb of Kazan, at 22 Oktyabrskaya street. Here he became close to
a group of exiles who were close to Archbishop Andrew of Ufa: the priest Fr.
Arcadius Volokitin; the laywoman Eugenia Antipina and her daughter
Olga Antipina, who had been condemned in 1925 for spreading the epistles
of Archbishop Andrew and helping the imprisoned clergy with food and
other articles; and Angelina Solovyeva, who had been condemned for the
same "crime" in 1925. Also close to him were some nuns of the closed Raithu
monastery and the nuns of the closed monastery of the Kazan icon: Maria
(Preobrazhenskaya), Stepanida (Makarova), Anna (Baranova), Agatha
(Lipina), Maria (Veryasova), Maria (Yegorova); and also Anna (Bulanova),
Euphrosyne (Vikurova), Eudocia (Sergina), Praskovya (Stepanova),
Theodosia (Romanova), Anna (Yegorova), Zinaida (Lykova) and E. Lagutina.
123
124
124
125
Vladyka did not conceal his contacts with the Josephites, but he was
careful to mention the names only of people who had already been shot or
were in prison or exile. On September 1, 1930 he said during interrogation: "I
do not know why I have been arrested, but I think that I have been arrested as
a counter-revolutionary. Prayer takes place in my flat-cell on Sundays and the
twelve major feasts; among the worshippers with me are people from the
Yaransk diocese, parishes which do not recognise Metropolitan Sergius and
his Synod. I am a true supporter of Patriarch Tikhon and strive to be such,
and am ready to die for that... Among the regular worshippers there are also
inhabitants of Kazan, but I cannot say who they are or give their names, since
I consider that to be betrayal..."
Further interrogations took place on June 5, June 12 and July 20, 1931. At
one of these, when asked about his helpers, he said: “I cannot give an
enlightening reply on the essence of the matter because of my loss of memory,
and also because of my extreme weakness of mind since birth.” Nevertheless,
at another interrogation he did give the name of his Helper – albeit in the
fashion of a fool for Christ: “I was regularly visited by Maria Yakimovna
Davydova, but she does go to people like you, while you have no access to
her. She lives in the Kingdom of Heaven.” He meant the Mother of God…
Once the Catacomb Christian Elisha Ilyich visited Vladyka on Solovki. The
policeman replied that that it was impossible that day – but the next day he could
see him. And he asked: “Who is he to you?” “A distant relative.” “And
125
126
what kind of person is he?” “Like all the rest – an ordinary person.” “No –
he’s not like everyone else.” “In what way he is not like the others?” “Well:
when Trezvinsky [Vladyka Nectarius’ surname] goes to catch fish they bring
back a huge catch. And when Trezvinsky doesn’t go, they come back with
empty boats.” The fishing artel used to ask Vladyka: “We don’t force you to
catch fish, Vladyka, just come out to sea with us…”
The next day they were able to meet. Vladyka Nectarius asked about all the
priests: who had joined the sergianists, who had not, who had remained firm in
Orthodoxy. He gave Elisha Ilyich many crosses to distribute to everyone, as if to
remind his children about the meaning of the Christian life…
Vladyka told Elisha Ilyich that when he had been imprisoned they had
begun to force him to sign the sergianist declaration, but he had refused.
“Well then,” they said, “that’s ten years for refusing.” “Let me die here, but I
won’t go to Sergius,” replied the hierarch. “And we won’t let you out until
you rot in prison.” A little later, Matushka S. remembers that they received
the following letter written on one side of a piece of paper: “Vladyka
Nectarius is writing to you. I am sending you God’s blessing and am praying
for you. Every morning and every evening I bless my diocese. A rare guest,
Elisha Ilyich from the village of Votchina, has told me about everything that is
happening in my diocese, who has fallen away into Sergianism, and who has
remained firm in Orthodoxy. I beseech you not to go to the sergianist church.
Pray at home in front of the icons. Receive communion if only twice a year
only from a true pastor…”
He wrote the following letter to his flock from exile in about 1933:
"Beloved! I want to write a few lines to you for your general edification and
confirmation in Orthodoxy.
126
127
“Our new tragedy consists in the fact that the bishops who have warred
against Metropolitan Sergius have found themselves under the heel of the
GPU. Thus Metropolitans Peter of Krutitsa and Cyril of Kazan have been
banished to the distant tundra. Joseph of Petrograd has been imprisoned
amidst the sands of [Central] Asia. Archbishop Demetrius is in the very strict
Yaroslavl isolator. Vladyka Victor is somewhere in the northern regions. Your
humble servant was confined for ten years in the concentration camps, while
Bishops Hierotheus, Alexis and Maximus were shot. A similar fate, that is, a
lengthy term of imprisonment in concentration camps and exile, awaited
many of the clergy and laity who decided to speak out against Metropolitan
Sergius and his like-minded minions.
127
128
released, I shall most likely perish in the camps; and I comfort myself with the
promise of Christ: 'Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness'
sake, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.' It is not easy to suffer, but there is
no way out, there can be no other choice. Don't you waver either, beloved! For
you, too, 'to live is Christ, and to die is gain'. 'What are we to do? How are we
to live?' the zealots of Orthodoxy ask me, those who have been deprived of
their pastors and whose sensitive conscience will not allow them to pray in
sergianist churches. Their souls' suffering is completely comprehensible. To
live without church prayer is a great woe for Orthodox believers. But, you
know, today there are many towns and villages where there are no churches,
and where there are some, they are renovationist or sergianist. Unite into
small groups and pray at home. Sing church songs. Read the Word of God,
give alms, bury the dead, as far as possible without sergianist priests. Receive
the Holy Mysteries from true pastors; with the help of God, you will find
them. Now, in the words of the holy Apocalypse-Revelation of John the
Theologian, the Church has departed into the wilderness, that is, she has
hidden in secret places; the situation is such that believers are compelled to
gather together for church prayer in hidden, secret places. Thus was it in the
times of martyrdom, of iconoclasm and of all the heresies that have disturbed
the Church in Greece, in the East, when there was a persecution against the
supporters of Divine Truth, while our time is that of the preparation for the
Antichrist and his kingdom. Satan, the enemy of God had armed himself
against the Church of Christ, her children, her members, who have remained
faithful to the testament of Christ and the Holy Fathers.
"'Simon, Simon! Satan has sought to winnow you like wheat,' said Jesus
Christ to His disciples. Go after Me along the path of sufferings! I have prayed
for you, Peter, that your faith may not fail.' In the same way, you, too,
brethren, pray for yourselves and for me, that our faith may not cool, and that
the feeling of burning religious inspiration may not be quenched. If it does,
then woe to us! The holy Apocalypse of John the Theologian declares that the
Church [sic. correction: the Lord?] will then vomit us up as useless spittle
from His Divine lips, that is, from the saving depths of His Church, the society
of salvation. And what could be worse than that?!
"Watch and pray that you do not fall into the abyss, into temptation!
Amen."
“I hope and believe,” he said, “that this ecclesiastical Nizhny fair under the
neo-renovationist flag will suffer complete defeat and the Orthodox believers
will all leave this sad church adventure invented in order to destroy and
mock the Church of Christ, which is the pillar and ground of the Truth.”
128
129
of the West Kazakhstan region. The sentence was carried out in the Caspian
town of Guriev (according to one source, on the same day).
In February, 1917 Fr. Arcadius was appointed superior of the church in the
village of Novo-Belokataj, Zlatoustovsky uyezd. In August, 1917 he was
awarded a nabedrennik for his zealous service to the Church of God. In
October, 1917 he was appointed in the place of the priest of the Georgievsky
women’s monastery in Ufa uyezd. Fr. Arcadius was a man of strong
character, a natural leader. His parishioners trusted him implicitly. He chose
his words carefully, and did not like empty phrases.
Fr. Arcadius had six children. The elder daughter, Maria Arkadievna,
became a Catacomb nun. The younger, Zoya Arkadievna, was told the details
of her father’s death in 1994. His son, Ivan Arkadievich, who was only two
when his father was shot, has left us his memoirs of his father. Three of his
children died when young, the third, Fedya, from cholera.
In the 1920s he served in the village of Suneyevo, and then, fro 1927, in the
city of Birsk, where he had a prayer house in which the services were
conducted without haste and in strict accordance with the typicon, with no
abbreviations. Next to the prayer house a kind of work house for the poor and
the sick was built. He actively opposed the renovationist schismatics, and in
1927 joined the Andrewite “non-commemorators”.
Fr. Arcadius’ younger brother Fr. Demetrius was also a catacomb priest.
They were both highly venerated by their flocks, and the names of both figure
in the minutes of the Congress that took place in Ufa in 1927. Although Fr.
Arcadius was not present at the Congress, his report on Archbishop Andrew
and the Old Believers was read out at the last session, after which “many
years” was sung to Archbishop Andrew and Fr. Arcadius. Fr. Demetrius was
a member of the presidium at the Congress and read a report entitled
129
130
In the 1920s Fr. Arcadius was condemned four times for “counter-
revolutionary activity”. In 1927 he was arrested in Birsk for conducting
religious propaganda among juveniles. To the amazement of the court, the
juveniles defended their pastor, and so, on January 28, 1928 he was sentenced
to the comparatively light sentence of 11 months’ hard labour in Bashkiria in
accordance with article 122. However, on February 2 he was again arrested
and cast into prison in Kazan. On March 30, 1928 he was condemned to three
years’ exile in Kazan in accordance with article 58-10 (anti-Soviet propaganda
and agitation) (or article 59-7, according to another source). From the summer
of 1930 he lived in Kazan. In Kazan Fr. Arcadius and other exiled clergy from
Ufa entered into communion with Bishop Nectarius. Like him, Fr. Arcadius
constructed a secret church in the house in which he lived and conducted
regular services there. Many Chuvash who did not recognize the declaration
of Metropolitan Sergius came to him, and he gave them the address of
Archbishop Andrew in Central Asia, who in turn blessed Bishop Benjamin to
ordain a priest for the Chuvash – the future Bishop Gurias (Pavlov).
On August 30 or 31, 1930 Fr. Arcadius was arrested and cast into prison in
Kazan. He was accused, together with Bishop Nectarius and Nuns E.A.
Antipina, O.M. Antipina and A.F. Solovieva, of being “a participant in a
counter-revolutionary organization, a branch of ‘The True Orthodox Church’
in Kazan”, of “convening in his flat meetings of an anti-Soviet nature”. The
accused “gathering around themselves counter-revolutionary church people
and forming a filial of the ‘All-Union Centre of the Church-monarchist
organization “The True Orthodox Church”, and acting in accordance with its
principles on the territory of the Tatar republic, the Mari region, the Votkinsk
region and the former Vyatka province, with the aim of overthrowing Soviet
power”. On the same day an interrogation took place at which Fr. Arcadius
conducted himself very calmly and independently. He said that he had had
prayer services in his house without the permission of the OGPU,
emphasising that he had never intended to ask permission since he did not
consider it necessary. In conclusion he declared that “he refuses to name the
surnames of the believers who visited his house, since he is not intending to
betray anyone”. In his interrogation on September 2 he declared: "In my home
I arrange prayer services, the worshippers are citizens of Kazan. I refuse to
say who they are and how many they are, I do not want to give them away...
In general, I have no intention of telling the authorities about the worshippers
who visit me. I do not have permission to perform Divine services and do not
consider it necessary to let the NKVD know and seek permission from them.
Only about three to four worshippers come to me." Fr. Arcadius said that
130
131
Her daughter, Nun Olga (Mikhailovna Antipina), was born in 1910 in Ufa
into a merchant’s family, and received a secondary education. In 1925 she was
arrested and exiled with her mother “for distributing the counter-
revolutionary appeals of Archbishop Andrew Ukhtomsky”, but in 1930, after
returning from exile, and being forbidden to live in six places, she settled in
Kazan. On August 30, 1930 she was arrested in connection with a group case
of churchmen, and was accused that: “together with her mother she took an
active part in anti-Soviet activity in a group of ‘Grigorians’ and joined the
Kazan branch of the All-Union church-monarchist organization, the True
Orthodox Church”. On October 15, 1930 she wrote the following in her own
hand in the office of the investigator: “To the question who is my spiritual
father and whether I confessed with Bishop Andrew I cannot answer since I
consider that the sphere of my personal life does not belong to the jurisdiction
of the OGPU. Consequently my attitude to the existing order, “the socialist
construction”, has not yet been established, since I am now interested in
questions of religion, and not politics. I have been at the Volokitins, and was
present at the kind of services that are standard in the Orthodox Church.
Moreover, I categorically declare that I personally know of no meetings in the
indicated house except prayer meetings. I consider the preaching of the
Christian teaching, as well as everything decreed in the Gospel as obligatory
for myself, except in the case envisaged by the words: ‘Cast not your pearls
before swine’.” At the next interrogation she said: “The OGPU has itself
violated the acting laws of Soviet power on freedom of conscience and
131
132
Nun Angelina (Fyodorovna Solovyeva) was born in 1901 in Ufa into the
family of a merchant. She received an intermediate education and studied for
one year in the faculty of social sciences in Ufa University (1920-21). She was a
religious activist, a member of the Simeonov church in Ufa, and in February,
1925 was arrested and exiled for three years “for distributing the counter-
revolutionary appeals of Bishop Andrew Ukhtomsky”, her spiritual father. In
1929 she was sentenced in accordance with article 58-10 to three years in exile.
In February, 1930 she was released from exile, but forbidden to live in six
places. She settled in Kazan. On August 30 (or 31) she was arrested and cast
into Kazan transit prison.
The accused in general said very little. False witnesses and traitors
affirmed that in 1928 there had appeared two representatives of the anti-
sergianist tendency in Kazan: the exiled bishop N.K. Trezvinsky and the
priest of the “Andrewite” fraction A.I. Volokitin, who had created their own
church communities, which had then united into an anti-Soviet and anti-
sergianist bloc. They accused the two confessors of reading appeals after
services and distributing them in neighbouring republics, and much else. Nun
Angelina was accused of “actively participating in the ‘Gregorian’ group
headed by Priest [Arcadius] Volokitin”, for “conducting anti-Soviet agitation”
and for “taking part in the distribution of a counter-revolutionary appeal
among the peasants”. In accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, she was
sentenced to three years in the camps.
The accused languished in prison for a year and a half. On January 5, 1932
Fr. Arcadius and Nun Angelina were sentenced to three years in the camps in
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11. This was “The Case of the Members
of the Kazan Branch of the ‘True Orthodox Church’, Kazan, 1932”.
On May 19, 1933 Nun Angelina was released from camp without
restrictions. Nothing more is known about her.
After his release Fr. Arcadius lived in Bashkiria. He never talked about his
sufferings in prison and the camps. When his daughter Olga asked him
whether the investigators beat him, he said, quietly and with conviction: “It is
not necessary to ask about that.” However, one of his fellow-prisoners
witnessed that when they were together in the Bear Mountain camp, he saw
how Fr. Arcadius cried out during a particularly severe frost: “O Lord, warm
me or take my soul!”
On July 23, 1937 Fr. Arcadius was arrested in Birsk for anti-Soviet
propaganda and agitation. On October 15, 1937 he was condemned to be shot
with confiscation of his property by a troika of the NKVD of the Bashkirian
132
133
republic. On November 15, 1937 the sentence was carried out in Ufa. He was
buried in the Sergievsky cemetery in Ufa.
Fr. Alexander was also visited by two girls, to whom he said: “Next time
bring me clothes for burial.” The next time they came he was dead…
133
134
The people also preserved the memory of Fr. Theodore from the village of
Shcherbash. He was arrested together with a nun. When he had been shot and
his body was just lying there, the prison guard said: “I don’t know who he is,
but every night a man in white comes down and censes him…”
After the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius, Fr. Arsenius went round the
churches which remained faithful to Orthodoxy, such as Chernushka and
Lom. He died from a disease of the throat. He left Matushka S.’s mother a
basket of prosphoras: “Look, Maria, keep the holy things. There will be many
churches, but the Truth is one.” That is, it was forbidden to receive
communion in those churches…
134
135
Fr. Sergius’ church warden was Isaiah Yakovlevich. Once, at the end of the
1920s, he was summoned to the village soviet, where they tried to force him,
as church warden, to sign the declaration. He refused outright: “We are not
servants of the atheist power, we submit only to Christ…” While the
president was drawing up an act for him to sign, Isaiah recited Psalm 90, “he
that dwelleth in the help of the Most High”. He refused to sign it, and the
president, exasperated, at length shouted: “Are you a magician, or what? Go
home!”
People used to come to Isaiah for advice, and he always filled them with
courage. His face shone like a priest’s. Once on December 18/31, 1930 there
was a meeting of the parishioners at Lom to decide what to do. They included
Fr. Sergius, Isaiah Yakovlevich, another trustee Alexander, who later hid for
ten years, James Stepanovich Oshaev, who had been a trustee of the
destroyed church at Kiknur and who later received a martyr’s crown. This
was Fr. Sergius’ last supper with his parishioners. James’ Stepanovich’s
daughter, Matushka S., remembers some words of his relayed to her by her
mother: “Preserve the Church by going up to Soviet power? But what will
135
136
that Church be? Christ’s?” Next Sunday she was taken to confession and
communion with Fr. Sergius since her parents feared that it would be the last.
And they were right. She never went to a church again for 62 years – until the
Free Russian Orthodox Church appeared in Suzdal. Within a week after
Christmas two policemen came to take Fr. Sergius away. The parishioners
hastily brought him a sarafan and shawl, and dressed in these, Fr. Sergius left
the church, avoiding the policemen. The parishioners took him to another
village 10 kilometres away. This took place at the beginning of 1931.
But the self-sacrificing parishioners could not protect their priest for long.
In the summer of 1932 he was arrested in Lom and accused of “joining the
staff of the church-monarchist organization, the True Orthodox Church”, of
“organizing the church counter-revolutionary underground” and of
“directing it and conducting active counter-revolutionary work in the
population”. On August 14, 1932 he was sentenced to three years in the
camps and sent to a camp. After his release he lived in the village of Staraya
Rudka, Sharanga region. On December 4, 1937 he was arrested, and on
November 3, 1938 he was sentenced to five years in the camps and sent to a
camp. On April 20, 1942 he died in the Talazhsk section of the camp.
After the arrest of Fr. Sergius there were no longer any truly Orthodox
churches in the Vyatka region. Vladyka Nectarius blessed the priests to take
the antimensia from the churches and serve in the catacombs. Fr. Simeon,
who took the place of the martyred Fr. Sergius, served in a store-room; at the
end of the 1930s he went into the woods. Fr. Nicephorus, a former medical
assistant, also hid in the woods. He had been ordained, it seems, by Vladyka
Nectarius and later became Hieromonk Peter. He was found and arrested in
the woods after Fr. Simeon.
136
137
Fr. Simeon was a young man. There exists a unique photograph of his
catacomb church in the woods. Later he built a more permanent church in an
izba where he had a stove for heating and for the baking of prosphoras. This
work was carried out by Matushka Euphrosyne. Not far away was a dug-out
in which some men who did not want to fight in the Red Army lived. Fr.
Simeon did not bless fighting in the army: “A believing Christian must not
defend the communists.” They wove bast shoes; people came to them and
took away their handiwork. They went to services in the secret church.
The church was betrayed, according to some sources, by one of those who
helped to build it and with whom people stayed the night who wanted to
pray in the church. According to other sources, the police were brought to the
church by his son after the boy had been interrogated. They parted the
branches and twigs that were disguising the church and came inside.
Matushka Euphrosyne rushed deeper into the church: “Batyushka, it’s the
police!” “That means, that it is God’s will,” replied Fr. Simeon. He was
dragged to prison by his hair…
The photograph shows two boys. One of them was the boy who led the
persecutors to the church. The other, nearer batyushka, was the son of Paul
Vasilyevich, who was very close to Fr. Simeon, his right hand. In the winter
he accompanied batyushka on skis when he had to visit a person. He was
arrested together with Fr. Simeon, was seated on a stool and beaten with a
chain on the legs until they were torn to bloody shreds. Several of the men in
the dug-out were also arrested. Paul Vasilyevich and these men were
sentenced to be shot. On hearing the news they sang in the cell from joy that
their torments were coming to an end and they would receive a martyr’s
crown. But their joy was turned to tears when their sentence was commuted
to ten years in prison. But Fr. Simeon and two people with him were shot on
the eve of the Entrance of the Mother of God into the Temple.
Another underground church was dug out from under the roots of a tree.
It was unwittingly betrayed by a girl who brought red eggs to the church on
Holy Thursday for Pascha. They followed her to the tree, which had fallen
across a neighbouring road…
Another catacomb priest was Hieromonk John Protasov. Before the war he
visited his parishioners only by night. One night he went to baptize a small
girl. He managed to baptize her, and then there was a loud knock. When the
police came in, batyushka was clutching a chalice to his chest. They tore it
from his hands and then led him away. However, this was not Fr. John’s last
arrest. They only searched him, took his money and let him go, ordering him
to come to them the next day. Perhaps they did not want him to return,
otherwise they would have had to part with the money they took from him.
137
138
The parishioners also did not want Fr. John to return. For some years he went
into hiding while they searched for him. During the war it was not advisable
for men to show themselves in any case. People would write their confessions
to him, and he would read the prayer of absolution. He would also distribute
the Holy Gifts through two Annas: “small Anna”, who was a tall, beautiful
18-year-old, and “big Anna”, who was already elderly, and Mother
Euphrosyne, who was also a beauty. The young Anna was arrested first. They
tortured her so fiercely that she wanted to throw herself off the boat on which
they were taking her somewhere. Big Anna was arrested already after Fr.
John. But both Annas returned, and the younger one later went to live in the
south.
Fr. John was very strict. He did not allow parents to bless their children to
join collective farms. Once he did not allow a couple to give their daughter in
marriage to a collective farm-worker. They said to her: “you will have no
blessing from us, or feast.” But the daughter married against her parents’ will.
They completely cut her off from themselves: “You are ours no longer,” they
said; “we would be excommunicated from the Church because of you.”
Once, on the Nativity of St. John the Baptist, the patronal feast of the village
church, the daughter went out to feed a pig. It thundered – and the daughter
was struck by lightning and killed. The mother went to bury her: the father
did not…
Once the police came to the house of the woman where Fr. John was living.
He was standing in prayer. The policemen waited until he had finished.
“Well, Protasov, the time has come,” they said. “I see that it has come,” said
Fr. John.
Some people managed to visit him in prison and bring him some food.
They said that he had been greatly tortured at his interrogation. Within a year
he died in prison.
Fr. John was of medium height and with reddish hair. Fr. Simeon was
young, good-looking, with black hair.
138
139
139
140
"Enough."
Only then did he, astonished by the words of the warden, finish his sermon
in the empty church.
140
141
"From now on don't go into the open churches. They are snares. There is no
Orthodoxy there. Only the form without the content... There it is as the Lord
said: 'Your house is left to you empty!' (Luke 13.35). The Lord has punished
us for our sins. The Church of Christ is not there - only a sham appearance
remains. The true pastors have been annihilated, imprisoned, exiled, put to
flight. While the 'priests' that have remained are, as a rule, party members,
atheists. And these priests are creating there what the Holy Gospel calls 'the
abomination of desolation'. And we are told to 'flee into the mountains' from
this 'desolation'. And this is the same as that which Revelation refers to as
'fleeing into the wilderness'... Flee by praying to God! He is the Most High, He
will not leave us who hope on Him as orphans. He is powerful to defend us,
to preserve us from all evil, from enemies visible and invisible... Save us!"
The Lord gave him the gift of clairvoyance, but he hid it by playing the
fool. Because of his foolishness for Christ's sake, there were some who did not
understand this feat and laughed at him.
His prophecies were sometimes realized many years later. Once he gave a
nun some children's swaddling clothes. She was indignant:
"What's this?"
And ten years later she was put in camp... And her swaddling clothes
"came in handy"!
On May 24, 1931 he was arrested for being “the leader of the Udmurtia
branch of the counter-revolutionary church-monarchist organization, the True
Orthodox Church”, and on January 26, 1932 was sentenced to ten years in the
camps. He was sent to the camps on the Baltic-White Sea canal, arriving there
141
142
Priest Paul Vasilyevich Merzin was born in 1881 in Izhevsk into a peasant
family, and received a home education. He served in the Dormition cemetery
church. In the 1920s he was disenfranchised. On May 24, 1931 he was arrested
for being “a participant in the Udmurtia ‘branch’ of the counter-revolutionary
church-monarchist organization, the True Orthodox Church”, and on January
26, 1932 was sentenced to three years in the camps and in February was sent
to Visherlag. Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Paul Ivanovich Popov was born in 1875 in Izhevsk into the family of
a church reader. He went to a theological seminary, and served in Izhevsk. In
the 1920s he was disenfranchised. On May 24, 1931 he was arrested for being
142
143
Priest Ivan Ivanovich Tareyev was born in 1879 in Izhevsk into a peasant
family, and received a home education. He served in a church in Izhevsk. In
the 1920s he was disenfranchised. On May 27, 1931 he was arrested for being
“a participant in the Udmurtia ‘branch’ of the counter-revolutionary church-
monarchist organization, the True Orthodox Church”, and on January 19,
1932 was sentenced to three years in the camps and in February was sent to
Visherlag. Nothing more is known about him.
143
144
organization, the True Orthodox Church”, and on January 19, 1932 was
sentenced to three years in the camps, and in February was sent to Visherlag.
Nothing more is known about her.
144
145
145
146
Tragediya Russkoj Tserkvi, 1917-45, Paris: YMCA Press, 1977, pp. 605-606;
Russkiye Pravoslavniye Ierarkhi, Paris: YMCA Press, 1986; Metropolitan
Manuil, Die Russischen Orthodoxen Bischofe von 1893-1965, volume 6,
Erlangen, 1989, p. 224; M.E. Gubonin, Akty Svyateishago Patriarkha Tikhona,
St. Tikhon's Theological Institute, 1994, p. 993; Bishop Ambrose (von Sievers),
"Istoki i svyazi Katakombnoj Tserkvi v Leningrade i obl. (1922-1992 gg.)"
(MS); “Katakombnaya Tserkov’: Kochuyushchij Sobor 1928 g.”, Russkoye
Pravoslaviye, N 3 (7), 1997, p. 20; “Episkopat Istinno-Pravoslavnoj
Katakombnoj Tserkvi 1922-1997gg.”, Russkoye Pravoslaviye, N 4(8), 1997, p.
5; I.I. Osipova, “Skvoz’ Ogn’ Muchenij i Vody Slyoz”, Moscow: Serebryanniye
Niti, 1998, pp. 260-261; M.V. Shkarovsky, Iosiflyanstvo, St. Petersburg, 1999,
p. 298; http://www.histor-ipt-kt.org/KNIGA/nnov.html#n.018a;
http://www.histor-ipt-kt.org/KNIGA/vyatka.html)
146
147
On December 27 (or 30), 1922 he was arrested, and on May 16, 1923 was
condemned for “combining Church serving with teaching in school, the
teaching of the Word of God in school, anti-Soviet activity among the young
and the organization in Ufa of religious circles of youth”. In accordance with
article 121 (58-10), he was sentenced to three years’ exile in Ust-Sysolsk,
Zyransk region, Komi SSR. In July, 1926 he returned to Ufa. He fought against
renovationism and also rejected the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius in
1927. From July to December, 1927, in the absence of Archbishop Andrew, he
was temporarily administering the Ufa diocese, a decision that was confirmed
by the Congress of clergy and laity (of “Orthodox Oldchurchmen”) that he
organized in Ufa between October (or September) 16 and 19. Bishop
Habbakuk was also Archbishop Andrew’s choice, but Metropolitan Sergius
appointed Bishop John (Poyarkov) of Davlekanovsk.
On the third day after the conference (or on December 10, according to
another source) Bishop Habbakuk was arrested and condemned in
accordance with article 58-10 to five years in the camps. However, on March
16, 1928 the OGPU released him under guard, depriving him of the right to
live in Moscow and six other cities and confining him to one domicile for
three years. He was exiled first to Chelyabinsk, and then to Ulyanovsk.
147
148
The initiative for the creation of the Union came from the reader of the
village of Noviye Shimkusy, Malo-Yalchikovsky region, Alexander
Grigoryevich Grigoryev. He was supported by the dean of the district and
rector of the church in the village of Bayglychevo, Fr. Orlov, and his deputy,
the priest of the village of Ap-Temyahsi, Fr. Andrew Khrisanfov. In March,
1929 they created a deanery district consisting of 13 parishes. At a meeting it
was decided to break communion with Metropolitan Sergius, to create the
“Union of the Orthodox Church” and come into union with Bishop
Habbakuk. Then Grigoryev, and the priests Orlov and Khrisanfov composed
the programme of the Union. Alexander Grigoryev was elected president of
the Union, and he, the priests Orlov and Khrisanfov and the laymen Nicholas
Krasnov and Timothy Shilov. Its main aims were to strengthen church
discipline among the believers and especially the clergy, to unite the laity and
the clergy around the Union, and to struggle with all ecclesiastical schisms.
th
“3. Strictly to observe the 59 canon of St. Basil the Great. Not to give those
living without a marriage crown the Body and Blood of Christ. Also not to
allow children to communion who are brought by relatives living without a
marriage crown (in a Soviet marriage). The children of these parents are to be
admitted to communion only by their godfather or godmother.
148
149
The Union created church groups in several villages. Soon their influence
extended throughout the Malo-Yalchiksky region and the neighbouring
villages. The “Habbakukites” hindered the closure of churches and the
removal of bells, and called on the peasants not to enter the collective farms
which, in their opinion, were atheist organizations. A series of collective
forms came close to collapse as a result of the activity of the “Habbakukites”.
In July, 1929 Fr. Andrew Khrisanfov and Reader Grigoriev went to Bishop
Habbakuk in Ulyanovsk. He confirmed the programme of the Union and took
upon himself its archpastoral direction, saying: “Stand firmly for the purity of
Orthodoxy and unite around you the clergy and believers.” In 1930 he
ordained several priests on the recommendation and at the request of the
Union. After the arrest of Priest Orlov in January, 1930, Fr. Andrew
Khrisanfov became the dean and leader of the groups in the Union. After the
arrest of Bishop Habbakuk, the Union continued to commemorate his name in
services since they did not know any other bishop.
There were secret meetings throughout the region, and the authorities
became worried by the Union’s influence. In January, 1930 an icon of the
Mother of God was found in a hole in the ice in the river Bula, in the village of
N. Yanashevo. At the same time the inscription appeared in Chuvash: “He
who goes to the collective farm goes to hell.” Many peasants did not go into
the collective farms, and many who had already entered petitioned to come
out.
In January, 1930, the district dean, Fr. Orlov was arrested. Then the local
party members took the decision to remove the bells from the church of the
village of Bayglychevo, which was without a priest, by January 26. However,
on January 25 the warden Demetrius Susmetov brought Priest Cosmas, who
from 6 in the morning on January 26 began a service in the church. The
service lasted a long time. The church was filled to overflowing. During the
service the signatures of believers were gathered to keep the bells untouched.
Then the blind Monk Theophanes (Davydov) spoke out, saying that the
atheists were intending to close the church and remove the bells, and called
on the believers not to allow this, and not to shrink before the shedding of
blood. In his conclusion he suggested that the people not leave the church,
and if the atheists or “antichrists” mobilised, to sound the alarm, gather the
believers and defend the church to the last drop of blood.
And so the people did not disperse at the end of the service, but crowded
round the church. The authorities summoned the monk with the aim of
arresting him. But at that moment the alarm was sounded and a crowd of
about 300 believers gathered round the office of the village executive
committee demanding the release of those detained. In view of the threat of
violence, the authorities released all three of the detained and ran away.
149
150
However, on June 12-13, 1930 there took place in the village of Maliye
Yalchiki the trial of the warden of the church, Demetrius Susmetov, 34 years
old. He was sentenced to five years in a corrective labour camp, while
Timothy Shilov, the secretary of the Union, was sentenced to ten years. The
blind Monk Theophanes was sentenced to one year’s exile in a remote part of
Russia.
But the work of the Union continued. In place of Priest Orlov Fr. Andrew
Khrisanfovich Khrisanfov was elected. He had been ordained to the
priesthood by Bishop Abraham of Syzran at the request of the believers in
October, 1926. On the day of the October revolution, 1926 he organized a
cross procession which disrupted a demonstration which the communists
were planning to hold on their feast day.
In the record of the interrogation, it was said that Fr. Andrew “forced”
people to be crowned, and slowed down dekulakisation and collectivization.
On October 7, 1931 he was sentenced to one year’s imprisonment for not
paying taxes. In 1932 he was formally charged with being one of “the
initiators and leaders of the counter-revolutionary organisation of the
Habbakukites, ’the Union of the Orthodox Church’”, with “systematically and
over a period of years acting to disrupt undertakings initiated by Soviet
power”, with “hindering collectivisation”, with “re-establishing the old
monarchist order” and that “in 1930 when the bells were being removed he
roused the religious masses to mass speeches.”
At that time other active Habbakukite priests and laity were arrested.
Alexander Grigoryev was also accused of being an initiator of the Union. He
was ordained by Bishop Habbakuk at the beginning of 1930 and served in the
church of the village of Noviye Shimkusy, the former rector of which,
Hieromonk Philemon, also a Habbakukite, had already been arrested. Fr.
Alexander served every day according to the monastic typicon, from early in
the morning to four in the afternoon. After the service he gave long sermons
and conducted discussions. He talked about Soviet power, about the
international situation, and said that soon there would be a war and the end
of Soviet power. He did not allow collective farm workers to his services. He
150
151
called on them to leave the collective farms, and put “guards” at the doors of
the church so as not to let them in.
Between 1500 and 1700 people visited his church. Many women came
distances of 30 to 40 versts to the church. Under Fr. Alexander’s influence
many women spoke out against the collective farms in their villages. Thus in
the village of Poleviye Burtasy there were nineteen petitions to leave. In the
village of Sabanchino, the collective farm was made almost completely
inoperative. More than 100 households petitioned to leave in 1930 under the
influence of Anton Alexandrov, Eudocia Alexandrova and Andrew Antonov,
who day and night went round the households preaching. On January 11,
1932 Eudocia Alexandrova organised a meeting of women and agitated for
withdrawal from the collective farm, and all the women signed a declaration
on their withdrawal.
After Fr. Gerasimus Fr. Nicholas Kondratyevich Krasnov served for about
a year in the church. When a tax of 720 roubles was imposed on him, Eudocia
Alexandrova turned to the believers after a service and collected 500 roubles
from them.
151
152
farms one has to take part in dividing the property of others, as it was during
dekulakisation. And when working for an artel one has to have contact with
anti-religious people and enter into all the sinful affairs of the artel.”
All the accused were found guilty according to articles 58-10 and 58-11 of
the criminal code. On October 28, 1932 the OGPU collegium sentenced the
five priests Fr. Andrew Khrianfov, Fr. Gerasimus Chernov, Fr. Maximus
Askhipov, Fr. Nicholas Krasnov and Hieromonk Gurias Pavlov (who was
consecrated Bishop of Kazan in the U.S.A. in 1991) to three years in the
camps. Fr. Ignatius Kononov was sent to Kazakhstan for three years. The
laypeople Terence Makarov, Ivan Skobelev, Basil Pavlov, Ivan Baskhirov,
Alexander Fyodorov, Metrophanes Nikitin and Vladimir Saphronov were
sentenced to three years exile in the north, and Egor Novikov was sentenced
to living in one fixed place for three years.
152
153
On August 10, 1931 Bishop Habbakuk was arrested and cast into Samara
Domzak. On September 8 the OGPU convicted him of “leading a church-
sectarian organization on whose orders he conducted anti-Soviet agitation
and recruitment, created counter-revolutionary religious cells among the
national minorities and undermined the undertakings of Soviet power in the
village”. In accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-2, he was sentenced to
ten years in the camps. This was “The Case of the Church-sectarian
organization under the leadership of Bishop Habbakuk (Borovkov), Orenburg
province, 1931”. He refused to admit that he was guilty.
The following were convicted in the same trial and on the same charges as
Bishop Habbakuk:
153
154
Mordvinian. He had a wife, three sons and two daughters. Until 1927 he
worked in the fields. In 1928 he was ordained to the priesthood and served in
his native village. On April 8, 1931 he was arrested, and on September 8 was
convicted of “participation in a counter-revolutionary religious cell of a
church-sectarian organization among the national minorities” and of
“undermining Soviet power in the village”. In accordance with articles 58-10,
58-11 and 59-2, he was sentenced to ten years in the camps. He refused to
recognize his guilt. Nothing more is known about him.
Priest James Makarovich Troshkov. He was born in July, 1880 in the village
of Aspayevo (Altayevo?), Buguruslan uyezd, Samara province (Boklinsky region,
Orenburg province) into a Mordvinian peasant family. Until 1917 he went on
pilgrimages to the holy paces, and was in Harbin. From 1917 to 1930 he worked
in the fields. He lived with his wife, his two daughters and his brother. In 1930 he
was ordained to the priesthood by Bishop Habbakuk, and went to serve in his
native village. On May 3, 1931 he was arrested and cast into Samara Domzak. On
September 8 he was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-2 to
five years in the camps. He refused to plead guilty. He returned to serving in his
village. In 1937 he was arrested again, and on August 31 was sentenced to death.
He was then shot.
154
155
Nun Agatha (Efimovna Bashitova). She was born in April, 1876 in the
village of Boriskino, Buguruslan uyezd, Samara province into a Mordovian
peasant family. She was a nun in the women’s monastery of the Kazan icon of
the Mother of God in Bugulma from 1901 until its closure in 1928, when she
went to live in the village of Saleleika, Boklinsky region, Buruguslan district.
On May 2, 1931 she was arrested there and cast into the Domzak in Samara.
On September 8 she was convicted of being “a member of a counter-
revolutionary cell in the national minorities” and of “undermining the
undertakings of Soviet power in the village”. In accordance with articles 58-
10, 58-11 and 59-2, she was sentenced to five years in the camps. She refused
to recognize her guilt. Nothing more is known about her.
155
156
156
157
It is known that on November 20, 1935 Bishop Habbakuk was in the camps
on the White Sea-Baltic canal, Karelia.
157
158
in Belebejsk uyezd, Ufa province, not far from the village of Nikolayevka,
Karyavdinskaya volost. This was a Chuvash community, which was given the
status of a monastery by the Holy Synod in 1901. Here Michael was tonsured
with the name Metrophanes. In 1915 Bishop Andrew of Ufa ordained him to
the diaconate, and in 1918 – to the priesthood. After the closure of his
monastery in 1929, Fr. Metrophanes served in parish churches in the Ufa and
Kazan dioceses. At the beginning of the 1930s he was serving in the village of
Toisi, Tsivilsky region, and in the village of Pervoye Churyashevo, October
region, in Ufa province. At one stage he came under the omophorion of
Bishop Habbakuk.
In the summer of 1950 Fr. Metrophanes sent the Chuvash MGB a letter
containing a brochure called “My Life in Christ”, with a very strong anti-
soviet content. He was summoned to the MGB, and promised not to publish
the text. After signing this promise he repented of it, considering it a sin
before God.
Fr. Gurias relates that at the end of March, 1951 he met Fr. Metrophanes in
a Chuvash village on the other side of the Volga not far from the settlement of
Zvenigovo in Mari ASSR. They gave each other Holy Unction, confessed and
received Communion. Then Fr. Metrophanes said that he had to cross the
Volga. Fr. Gurias tried to dissuade him – it was the time of the spring thaw,
and Fr. Metrophanes only had bast shoes. But Fr. Metrophanes was
unbending. He gave his bronze icon of the Kazan Mother of God together
with other holy things to Fr. Gurias and left. Towards the end of March Fr.
Metrophanes arrived in Zvenigovo, where he stayed for a few days with the
parishioner Gregory Ivanov. It was then that he told Gregory that he would
soon die, and he wanted to die as a martyr. So he would soon go to the square
and denounce the antichristian authorities. Gregory tried to dissuade him, but
on March 26 Fr. Metrophanes gave a speech before the people against the
atheist authorities and tore down a slogan with the name of Stalin from the
wall of a shop, tearing it to pieces. He was arrested and sent to the Zvenigovo
regional department of the MGB, where he continued to preach and tried to
158
159
tear the portraits of communist leaders from the walls. Later Gregory Ivanov
told Fr. Gurias about all this.
159
160
Bishop Cyril was a close friend of the great luminary of the Orthodox
Church, St. John of Kronstadt. In his will St. John asked that he be buried by
Bishop Cyril, and Cyril fulfilled this request. In 1908, he was the chief
celebrant in the funeral services and placed the body in the coffin.
160
161
them preserve the name of this loyal servant of God and archpastor, for the
strengthening of faith and piety in my overburdened brethren. The name of
this bishop is Cyril of Gdov. May his name be blessed from generation to
generation." Defying the warnings of the police, and in the presence of the
Royal Family, Bishop Cyril had blessed the water of the Neva at the St.
Alexander Nevsky Lavra through a hole in the ice. The local police, however,
took measures to ensure that no one was allowed to take water from the
"Jordan".
Archbishop Cyril spent a large part of his time going round his large
diocese. He always appeared suddenly, when he was not expected. In his
sermons he showed a good knowledge of the life of the people: common
themes of his were their drunkenness, foul language and prejudice against
literacy and schooling. The fundamental aim of his life was the enlightenment
of the people in the spirit of the Orthodox Church.
He was very exacting towards the clergy. It was enough for him to notice
two deacons talking during a service for their names to appear in the local
diocesan newspaper. But at the same time he was very merciful to the poor.
Archbishop Cyril took a leading part in the Local Church Council of 1917-
18, being president of the section on the teaching of the Law of God. In this
capacity he made a report which unmasked the antichristian plans of the
Provisional Government for the education of children. He was the leader of
the Council delegation which went to Kerensky with the demand for the re-
establishment of the patriarchate, was elected to the Sacred Synod and was
one of the 25 candidates for the patriarchate.
161
162
Abbess Juliana, whose particular duty was to supply food and help to
imprisoned bishops, wrote: "In about 1919 Bishop Gurias was arrested; he
was protector [of the Academy] in Kazan when Metropolitan Cyril was rector.
Therefore the Metropolitan [who was in Moscow] called me in connection
with sending some things to Vladyka Gurias. As it turned out, he had agreed
with him beforehand as to how the Holy Gifts were to be sent to him in
prison. For this he gave me a little box with what seemed to be small white
pieces of bread, and he said that these should be registered among the other
supplies which were to be given. I was upset at taking the Holy Gifts with me,
and in general at the idea of carrying them at all, and I told this to Vladyka.
To this he answered me:
"But having thought a little, he offered that I take the Holy Gifts from him
early in the morning on the same day when I would be going with the
packages for Vladyka Gury in the Butyrki prison. This was done. Soon I was
going with packages for Vladyka Cyril himself, but not for long. In 1920
Metropolitan Cyril was in the Taganka prison; in the same prison at that time,
perhaps even in the same cell, were Vladykas Theodore [Pozdeyevsky] and
Gurias. In the Taganka prison the old rules were still in effect: for good
behaviour prisoners were called or went over to the category of the
'reformed', and they enjoyed certain privileges. In the Taganka prison there
were five prisoners in this category: Metropolitan Cyril, Archbishop
Theodore, Bishop Gurias, Alexander Dmitrovich Samarin and Vladimir
Fyodorovich Dyunkovsky. Besides the usual general visits, they were allowed
once a week on a certain day to have visitors with the grating lifted. Usually,
at the general visits, when many people were speaking with the prisoners
through a double grating, it was almost impossible to converse because of the
noise and shouting. Besides that, these meetings lasted only five minutes. On
162
163
the other hand, visits to the 'reformed' lasted for fifteen minutes, and one
could even give things right into the hands of the prisoners. Under these
circumstances I had to speak with and give things to Metropolitan Cyril many
times. When the Metropolitan was in exile we were able to help him not only
with parcels but also by furnishing church service books."
On December 24, 1921 Metropolitan Cyril was released, and on January 18,
1922 he arrived in Kazan. He was met at the station by Bishops Joasaph and
Athanasius and a crowd of joyful Christians. In April the Bolsheviks carried
out their requisitioning of the valuables of the Kazan churches supposedly
"for the benefit of the starving". However, on August 15 (or 1 or 21) Vladyka
Cyril was arrested (he had already been arrested in April) for his involvement
with the American Relief Organization which supplied food to the starving.
After a spell in prison in Moscow, in January, 1923 he was exiled first to the
province of Krasnoyarsk in Siberia, then to Ust-Sysolsk (Syktyvkar), then to
Ust-Kul (Komi SSR) and finally to Kotelnich (Vyatka province).
During this period Patriarch Tikhon, too, was imprisoned, which gave the
renovationist heretics the opportunity to seize control of the central
administration of the Church. Even after the Patriarch was released from
prison in 1923, the GPU tried to persuade the Patriarch to enter into
negotiations with the renovationists, promising that if he did many hierarchs
languishing in prison and exile would be freed. So in May, 1924, the
renovationist leader Krasnitsky was admitted briefly into the Patriarch's
Higher Ecclesiastical Council.
Vladyka then went to the Patriarch, who asked him his opinion about
admitting Krasnitsky into the Council. He replied:
"Your Holiness, don't think about us hierarchs. There's no need to take pity
on them, they are strengthening the Church. But you must not compromise
with Krasnitsky."
163
164
only after two weeks of travelling in a boat on a river. He was not given
anything to eat, he was left to sleep in the cold outside the forest cabins in
which the agents themselves lodged, he was dragged by the beard and
mocked in such a way that he began to ask for death for himself. He spent a
year under the rule of a communist in a forest where there were only two
hunting cabins."
During this period, Vladyka governed his diocese through his vicars,
Bishops Joasaph, Athanasius and Andronicus.
On March 25 / April 7, 1925, Patriarch Tikhon died. In his will, which was
read out in the presence of 60 hierarchs in the Donskoy monastery, it was
revealed that he had appointed Metropolitan Cyril as the first of three
hierarchs who were empowered to become locum tenens of the patriarchal
throne and take over the leadership of the Russian Church until a new
patriarch could be elected. Since Metropolitan Cyril was not allowed to return
to Moscow take up the locum tenancy, and since the second candidate,
Metropolitan Agathangel of Yaroslavl, was also in exile, the post fell to the
third candidate, Metropolitan Peter of Krutitsa.
"If we have to remove some hierarch," asked Tuchkov, "will you help us in
this?"
"No!" replied Tuchkov. "You must try to find an appropriate reason and
remove him as if on your own initiative."
To this the hierarch replied: "Eugene Nikolayevich, you are not the cannon,
and I am not the bomb, with which you want to blow up our Church from
within!"
164
165
hope that the latter, tormented by prisons and exiles, would make a
compromise. He even succeeded in persuading the metropolitan to take up
his post of locum tenens (he was the first candidate according to Patriarch
Tikhon's will). Metropolitan Cyril left his place of exile, but, on arriving in
Rybinsk, he stopped and sent his cell-attendant to an ascetic nun [Blessed
Xenia] living in Rybinsk, and asked her what he should do. She replied that if
he went to Moscow and accepted Tuchkov's offer, he would lose everything
(spiritual) that he had gathered throughout his life. And the metropolitan
went back into exile."
165
166
166
167
A third point made by Metropolitan Cyril was that even when such a break in
communion occurs between two parties, both sides remain in the Church so long
as dogmatic unanimity is preserved. But this immediately raised the question:
had Sergius only sinned “administratively”, by transgressing against the canons,
as Metropolitan Cyril claimed (until 1934, at any rate), or had he sinned also
“dogmatically”, by transgressing against the dogma of the One Church, as
Archbishop Demetrius of Gdov, among others, claimed?
On August 19, 1933 Metropolitan Cyril was released and went to live in the
town of Gzhatsk, from where he continued secretly to lead the opposition to
Metropolitan Sergius. During this period, while refraining from saying that
the sacraments of the sergianists were graceless, Metropolitan Cyril
nevertheless considered that those who partook of them knowing the
unrighteousness of Sergius’ position partook of them to their condemnation.
167
168
These letters make clear that while Metropolitan Cyril was quite prepared
to say of certain hierarchs (the renovationists, Bishop Zacharius) that they
were deprived of the grace of sacraments, he was not prepared to say this –
yet – of Metropolitan Sergius, “until a lawful Council by its sentence shall
utter the judgement of the Holy Spirit concerning him”. He gave as one
reason for his hesitation – or “excessive caution”, as his correspondent put it –
“an incomplete clarification of the conditions which surround me and all of
us”. Another reason was his ignorance of the position of Metropolitan Peter –
an ignorance engineered, of course, by the Bolsheviks. Thus “for me
personally,” he wrote, “it is impossible at the present time to step forth, since I
am entirely unsure of the character of the attitudes of Metropolitan Peter, in
order to be convinced of his actual views and to decide how to act…”
168
169
169
170
stocky Metropolitan Cyril was short. As they walked in a circle, they were
always engaged in concentrated conversation. Evidently there, in the open air,
no one could overhear them. And these two figures, as if fitting into each
other, gave a touching demonstration of the 'two-in-one' nature of these
hierarchs. And this walk of the metropolitans was watched by some catacomb
nuns from a hill. This was not without danger. It was necessary to disguise it,
so that the authorities should not notice this secret signalling. And it came to
the point where the metropolitans gave them their blessing at the beginning
and at the end of their walk. I heard this detail from inhabitants of Chimkent
both in captivity and in freedom. So there can be no doubt about this sojourn
of Metropolitan Cyril with Metropolitan Joseph in the autumn of 1937. Both
'Moscow' and 'Chimkent' witness to it. Now there are no traces left of the little
house in which the hierarch-confessors were kept. They demolished it when
they noticed that the place enjoyed special veneration from the believers..."
When the KGB archives were opened in January, 1992, it was discovered
that after his arrest Metropolitan Cyril had been accused of leading “all the
counter-revolutionary clergy”, but that he had conducted himself with great
courage and had taken all the responsibility upon himself. On September 23
he was joined in prison by Metropolitan Joseph of Petrograd. The two
outstanding hierarchs were condemned by a troika of the South Kazakhstan
region on November 6/19, and were shot together on November 7/20, 1937 in
Lisiy ovrag, near Chimkent. They were buried in Lisiy ovrag.
Nun Maria (Sergeyevna Rykova) was born in 1892 in Moscow. She was
arrested in Chimkent on June 23, 1937, and in August was convicted of
170
171
171
172
172
173
Bolsheviks. Besides, almost all the members of the diocesan council were out
of the city at that moment. So Archimandrite Joasaph was forced to take on
the administration of the Kazan diocese alone.
Finally, with the help of the nuns of the Monastery of the Mother of God,
the relics of Saints Gurias and Barsanuphius, the icon of St. Barbara with part
of her relics, the icons of the All-Merciful Saviour and other holy objects were
transferred in a silent procession to the Kazan monastery.
The Bolsheviks then began looting the churches in the Kremlin and
shooting several priests in the Kazan region. News of these shootings reached
the diocesan council headed by Archimandrite Joasaph, and he inscribed the
martyrs' names into the martyrologies and diptychs. These acts were
confirmed by Bishop Anatolius, who returned to Kazan on September 26 and
took over the leadership of the diocese.
With the approach of Kolchak's armies, the Kremlin was again opened to
the public. Archimandrite Joasaph took a leading part in the restoration work
which then began. And it was he who served the first service in the cathedral
church on March 25, 1920 (old style).
In April, 1920, Patriarch Tikhon learned that Metropolitan James was not
intending to return to Kazan, so he appointed Metropolitan Cyril (Smirnov) to
take his place. Metropolitan Cyril was met with great joy by the citizens of the
city.
173
174
In the spring of 1921 the Cheka learned that the Theological Academy was
still in existence under the guise of theological courses. So they arrested
Bishop Anatolius, the rector of the Academy, and all the professors on the
charge of organizing an unlawful academic organization. The professors were
soon freed, but Bishop Anatolius was detained in prison in Moscow.
This left Bishop Joasaph once again in charge of the Kazan diocese. With
the agreement of Metropolitan Cyril, with whom he maintained contact in the
Taganka prison, he and Bishop Athanasius proceeded to consecrate
Archimandrite Andronicus of the Seven Lakes Hermitage to the episcopate,
transferring him to the monastery of St. John the Forerunner in Kazan.
Moreover, in November he obtained the authorities' permission in effect to
reopen the Kazan Theological Academy under the rectorship of Professor
Protopriest Nicholas Petrov, the superior of the church of St. Barbara. The
institute continued in existence for another two years until Bishop Joasaph's
exile from Kazan in 1924.
Early in 1922 Metropolitan Cyril was released from prison and was met in
Kazan by Bishops Joasaph and Athanasius and a large crowd of Orthodox, for
whom Metropolitan Cyril already had the aura of a confessor of the faith.
174
175
washing of feet on that day, entered the church at "Glory...", vested and went
into the altar during the little entrance. Here for the first time he saw
Archbishop Alexis. He continued to serve the Liturgy, censing Alexis at the
appropriate times as a hierarch. During the singing of the communion verse,
Alexis went up to Bishop Joasaph, called himself Archbishop of Kazan and
Svyazhsk and asked whether he would serve with him. Vladyka categorically
refused, justly pointing out that such an appointment of a new hierarch in the
place of the still-living Metropolitan Cyril contradicted the church canons.
That was why he, as an Orthodox bishop and vicar of the Kazan diocese,
being in obedience to Patriarch Tikhon and Metropolitan Cyril, considered
such a decision of the renovationist authorities to be uncanonical. The
firmness of Vladyka Joasaph made a strong impression on Alexis, who had
expected nothing of the sort.
175
176
On the night of May 25 to 26, on the eve of Alexis' first visit to the church of
the Descent of the Holy Spirit, the whole city was filled with notices stuck to
houses and telegraph posts declaring that Alexis was a wolf in sheep's
clothing and appealing to the citizens of Kazan not to accept him. Alexis then
wrote to the renovationist "Metropolitan" Eudocimus: "I am personally
beginning to regret that I came to Kazan. Since the council negative reactions
to me, as to the usurper of Cyril's see, have increased... As long as Bishops
Joasaph and Athanasius live here, I supposed that we shall not be able to
create a single vicariate..."
Alexis also complained that the Soviet authorities were not helping him
enough against his opponents. However, when, on May 24, the renovationist
diocesan council petitioned the authorities for the removal of Igumen Pitirim,
Hieromonk John, Hierodeacon Seraphim and Hieromonk Theophanes, the
authorities responded by arresting them on June 14 for writing and spreading
anti-renovationist proclamations and for maintaining links with Metropolitan
Cyril in Ust-Sysolsk. A report to the GPU put the real reasons for the arrests
as follows: "The whole of this Black Hundreds company headed by
Archbishop Joasaph is the headquarters of every possible kind of counter-
revolutionary intrigues. After them trudge all of the reactionary clergy and
the believing masses, which is to the highest degree dangerous from a
political point of view." It is interesting that Bishop Joasaph is named
"archbishop" in this document; this showed how great was his authority
among the believers.
Bishop Joasaph was for a long time Metropolitan Cyril's deputy in the
Kazan region, and in the opinion of the Kazan renovationists he was "the
undeclared administrator of the whole of the Kazan, Mari and Chuvash
regions". The victory of the Orthodox over the renovationists in the Kazan
region was in large part owing to him. Thus it was through Vladyka Joasaph's
exhortations and his own sermons that Protopriest Theophanes converted
almost the whole of the city of Yelabuga (his native town, where his father
was protopriest in the Pokrov church) from renovationism to Orthodoxy.
Again, when Bishop Andronicus was summoned to the renovationist
diocesan council to explain his refusal to accept them, he said: "I don't want to
separate from Bishop Joasaph." From 1923, according to one source, Bishop
Joasaph was a member of the strictly anti-renovationist (and later, anti-
sergianist) "Danilovtsy" and "Andrewite" groups, led by Archbishops
Theodore (Pozdeyevsky) and Andrew (Ukhtomsky) respectively.
On June 30, the arrested monks were released; all of them had conducted
themselves bravely under interrogation, and none of them said a word
against Bishop Joasaph. The position of the renovationists was further
weakened when Patriarch Tikhon was released from prison and issued his
anathema against them in July. On July 17 an assembly of all the believers of
176
177
the parish churches of Kazan was held in the main cathedral. It was organized
by the circle of the zealots of Orthodoxy, led by the Academy Professor Plato
Ivanovich Ivanov and the 28-year-old lawyer Alexander Sergeyevich
Kozhevnikov, who were trusted followers of Bishop Joasaph. At the meeting
it was resolved: "The community considers that the only lawful, canonical
authority in the Kazan diocese is the deputy of Metropolitan Cyril, Bishop
Joasaph of Chistopol..."
During the next two or three days almost all the renovationist clergy
offered repentance for their sin and were received back into the Church by
Bishop Joasaph. At the insistence of the laity, Bishop Joasaph served a lesser
blessing of the waters in those churches which had been defiled by the
services of "Archbishop" Alexis. When the main cathedral was blessed, the
people rejoiced and wept. Alexis immediately ran to complain to the GPU.
The last of all to repent were the priests of the monastery of the Mother of
God, who were particularly compromised before the citizens of Kazan. The
four of them came to Vladyka and were accepted benevolently, with the
promise not to humiliate them in front of the diocese; and on July 21 Vladyka
was already serving in their monastery.
The local GPU, annoyed at the defeat of the renovationists but not having
clear instructions about what to do from the Moscow authorities, arrested
Plato Ivanov and Alexander Kozhevnikov on the basis of denunciations by
secret GPU agents who had been present at the parochial assembly.
177
178
for the practical realization of the [apolitical] direction of church activity that I
have mentioned above".
This was considered enough by the GPU, and within a month Ivanov and
Kovezhnikov were released.
178
179
On being asked why a bishop should work in the diocesan council and
then leave it, Vladyka replied: "My agreement to work in the diocesan
administration as a ruling bishop was dictated by my succession from
Metropolitan Cyril and the promise of the diocesan administration not to
introduce any church reforms before the Council and not to infringe my
hierarchical rights in matters of church ritual... My departure from the
diocesan administration took place not for political reasons, but because a
new hierarch was appointed in Kazan and in connection with this I was
retired. At the given time in political and ecclesiastical matters I share
Tikhon's point of view as expressed in his appeals published up to this time..."
With regard to his services, Vladyka said: "I started to serve after the
release of Patriarch Tikhon, since in this release I saw Moscow's permission
for the existence of the Orthodox, but not of the renovationist hierarchy..."
Vladyka denied that his struggle against renovationism in Kazan was
political, for "every interference of the Church in the civil political struggle is
undoubtedly incompatible with the mission of the Church. In this struggle she
will be turned into an ordinary institution and will cease to be the highest
impartial criterion of the life of man..." Confirming his conviction that the only
canonical head of the Russian Orthodox Church was Patriarch Tikhon,
Vladyka remarked: "I would like now, as in the past, to see in the person of
my Patriarch an exclusively spiritual leader, directing the believers in their
spiritual life..." As a man, Vladyka Joasaph could not agree with certain of the
decisions of the Patriarch, but as an Orthodox hierarch and a monk he always
recognized his Holiness' rights and followed the decrees of his ecclesiastical
authority, which remained for him incontestable.
179
180
On April 12, 1925 Bishop Joasaph signed the act which transferred the
leadership of the Church to Metropolitan Peter.
On the way back from his three-year exile, in the summer of 1929, he
stopped for two months in Yeniseisk. There he was ordered to live in one
fixed domicile. He chose the town of Kozmodemyansk in the Mari republic,
where he settled towards the end of 1929.
"But it's not I, it's the deacon who prays for it..."
While living in Kozmodemyansk, Bishop Joasaph did not break his ties
with Kazan, and especially with the nuns there: Vitalia, Kaleria, Agrippina,
Veronica (Busygina) and others went at various times to Metropolitan Cyril
with assignments from him. They all brought food, letters and other things to
Metropolitan Cyril, Archimandrite Alexander (the last superior of the Seven-
Lakes desert) and many other exiled pastors and archpastors. And they
organized meals for the arrested clergy languishing in the prisons of Kazan.
Most of these nuns perished towards the end of the 1930s.
180
181
In August, 1930, there began the first arrests of people for belonging to the
True Orthodox Church. These included the following teachers at the Kazan
Theological Academy: Protopriest Nicholas V. Petrov, V.I. Nesmelov, M.N.
Vasilevsky, E.Y. Polyansky, I.M. Pokrovsky; Bishop Nectarius (Trezvinsky),
the priests Fathers Nicholas Troitsky, James Galakhov, Andrew Bogolyubov,
Nicholas Dyagilev, Sergius Vorontsov and Eulampius Edemsky-
Sovyezemtsev; the nuns of the closed Kazan monasteries, and laymen - 33
people in all.
181
182
The following were convicted with Bishop Joasaph in this, “The Case of
Members of the Kazan Branch of the ‘True Orthodox Church’, Kazan, 1932”:
182
183
183
184
August 31, 1930 he was arrested again and cast into the Kazan Transit
Domzak. He was accused that “he inspired and led the organization, ‘The
Union of Christian Youth’. He was an active member of the Kazan counter-
revolutionary organization of churchmen., presenting his flat as a rendezvous
for exiled clergy. He actively took part in the transformation of the
organization into a branch of the All-Union Centre of the church-monarchist
organization, the True Orthodox Church On January 5, 1932 he was convicted
of being “the director of the counter-revolutionary youth organization,”, and
of belonging to a counter-revolutionary organization that he was trying “to
transform into a branch of the True Orthodox Church, and in the practical
activity of the branch that followed”. On January 5, `1932, in accordance with
articles 58-10 and 58-11, he was sentenced to three years’ exile in Kazakhstan.
In 1937 he was arrested again in Kazan, and on November 29 was sentenced
to ten years without right of correspondence. On December 2, 1937 he was
shot.
184
185
185
186
Abbess Angelina, in the world Anna Stepanova Alexeyeva. She was born
in 1884, the daughter of a Kazan merchant, and received higher education. In
1902 (1901) she became a ryasophor nun in the Fyodorovsky monastery. In
October, 1918, she was appointed the treasurer, and in February, 1923 (1922),
after the death of Abbess Margarita, Mother Angelina was appointed superior
of the Fyodorovsky monastery by Bishop Joasaph, who was at that time
temporarily ruling the Kazan diocese. Energetic and clever, Abbess Angelina
was among those few who unambiguously expressed their opposition to the
renovationists when almost all the parish clergy had gone over to them. In
July, 1924, during the re-registration of the monastery, the renovationists
managed, by deception and with the help of the monastery priest, to take
control of the monastery. But the nuns under the leadership of Abbess
186
187
Angelina did not leave the monastery and called on all the parishioners not to
visit the renovationist priest. After a time, being forced to serve in a deserted
church, the priest repented and the monastery became Orthodox again.
Mother Angelina stayed in the monastery until its closure in 1928 (1927), after
which she did handiwork at home. On August 27, 1930 she was arrested in a
church case and was accused of “taking part in the organization of the
provision of food and money for exile clergy. She carried out tasks of a
counter-revolutionary organization linked with Bishop Joasaph. She took part
in meetings of a counter-revolutionary organization of churchmen, being a
participant in the anti-Soviet activity of the counter-revolutionary
organization of churchmen.” She was arrested again on June 27, 1931, and
again on January 5, 1932, when she was sentenced to three years' exile, first in
Archangelsk and then in the Komi and Zyryansk regions. On being freed she
settled in Kazan, where she acted as a courier for correspondence with
Metropolitan Cyril. On December 8, 1937 she was arrested, interrogated on
December 15 and on December 21 (28) - shot.
Nun Margarita (Petrovna Surina). She was born in 1866 or 1865 or 1867 in
Kazan in the family of a policeman. She went to a parish school and then
entered a monastery in Kazan, where she was tonsure in 1902, living there for
thirty-five years. After its closure in 1928 she existed on money from day
work – cleaning, darning, etc. She corresponded with Metropolitan Cyril of
Kazan. “The last letter I sent was in January, 1931. I asked him to pray for me
and comfort me, since I felt that I was becoming depressed.” On June 27, 1931
she was arrested and cast into Kazan transit prison. She was accused that:
“being a participant in the Kazan branch of the All-Union Centre of the
church-monarchist organization, ‘the Trues’, she took an active part in
discussion of methods of combatting Soviet power and in anti-Soviet agitation
among believers. She established links between the organization and
Metropolitan Cyril”. On January 5, 1932 she was sentenced to three years’
exile in the north in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11. Nothing more is
known about her.
187
188
Nun Vitalia (Dmitrievna Tersinskaya). She was born in 1877 in Kazan into
the family of a merchant. She entered a women’s monastery in Kazan in 1890
and served there for almost forty years, until the death of her father. In 1922
she was for eight months the cell-attendant, or servant, of Metropolitan Cyril
before he went into exile. Then she several times visited him in exile - to Ust-
Sysolsk, Ust-Kulom, Podyelsk, Perevoloki in Krasnoyarsk (there she did not
catch Metropolitan Cyril, since he had been taken to Yeniseisk). After the
closure of her monastery she earned money by sewing, together with her
sister, Nun Kaleria. On August 21 (31), 1930 she was arrested and cast into
Kazan transit prison. She was accused of being “a member of the Kazan
counter-revolutionary organization of churchmen, and then of the branch of
the All-Union Centre of the church-monarchist organization, ‘the Trues’. She
established links with Metropolitan Cyril, and personally went to him in
Turukhansk province for instruction. She distributed his counter-
revolutionary appeals, and took part in the organization of meals for clergy
repressed by Soviet power.” On January 5, 1932, in accordance with articles
58-10 and 58-11, she was sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. She was
shot in 1937.
Nun Kaleria (Dmitrievna Tersinskaya). She was born in 1867 or 1866 or 1870
in Kazan in the family of a merchant. She struggled in a monastery in Kazan for
about fifty years. On August 21, 1930 she was arrested and cast into Kazan transit
prison. She was accused that: “being a link between the counter-revolutionary
organization of churchmen and the branch of the All-Union
188
189
Centre, ‘the Trues’, with Metropolitan Cyril, she took part in the distribution
of the appeals of Metropolitan Cyril and in the organization of the obtaining
of food and money for the exiled and imprisoned clergy.” On January 5, 1932,
in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, she was sentenced to three years’
exile in the north. She was shot in 1937.
189
190
190
191
11 he was exiled for three years to Kazakhstan. Nothing more is known about
him.
191
192
Maria Alexeyevna Mironova. She was born in 1890 in the village of Kokuj,
Tetyushsky uyezd, Kazan province into a peasant family. In August, 1929, as
she herself witnessed, she took part in the work of the community of the
Kazan women’s monastery and became a member of a church “troika”.
However, in October she left the troika, but continued to go to church. On
August 31, 1930 she was arrested. Nothing more is known about her.
192
193
Bishop Nectarius and in general about clergy. I also will not speak of
cooperation with Bishop Nectarius on my part.” She was sentenced to three
years’ exile in the north. Nothing more is known about her.
In May, 1933 Bishop Joasaph was arrested for being “a participant in the
church-monarchist counter-revolutionary group, the True Orthodox Church”.
On January 28, 1934, two years were added to Bishop Joasaph’s sentence in
accordance with article 58-11 of the criminal code for supposedly
participating in a "church-monarchical group" in the camp, recruiting new
members, spreading "provocative rumours about the position of the Church
in the USSR" and conducting work among the prisoners "to disrupt the camp
and blow up the camp's work". He was transferred to a punishment isolator.
In 1936 (1935) Vladyka Joasaph was released and returned from the camps
to Kazan. He lived in the outskirts of the city with his sick mother, and served
fourteen people, including one protopriest and three nuns, in the cemetery
church dedicated to SS. Theodore and his sons David and Constantine. His
sufferings in the prisons and camps had not broken his faith. He had not
renounced Christ or separated from Metropolitan Cyril, with whom,
according to one report, he had been for a time in the same prison or camp.
In the city, two diocesan councils, one renovationist and the other
sergianist, were in control of the churches. Vladyka continued not to
recognize the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius and remained a bishop in
retirement. He served only rarely in the church of the Yaroslavl
wonderworkers in Arsky cemetery, and then only pannikhidas. Those close to
him consisted mainly of clergy who were exiled or in sympathy with him.
193
194
Also, the peasants of the Tatar and Chuvash republics, and the Mari region,
came to the confessor bishop for advice and archpastoral instruction.
However, the majority of the parish clergy were afraid to visit him, and if
they visited him, it was in secret.
In April, 1936, when they began to destroy the ancient memorials and
crosses, Vladyka angrily noted: "The people that does not care for its
antiquities is good for nothing." And, after a short silence, he added:
"However, Joseph Vissarionovich [Stalin] has nothing more to destroy, so the
cemetery is his last support."
Once, when asked what he thought of Soviet power, he said: "One has to
have been in the concentration camps to judge about Soviet power..."
Vladyka had very little to live on. But his spiritual children, monks and
nuns from the destroyed monasteries of the region, continued to give him and
his mother food and clothing, as they had helped his mother during his
period in the camps. Vladyka kept very few of these gifts for himself, sending
a significant part through trusted people to Metropolitan Cyril (from whom a
letter to Vladyka dated September, 1936 has been preserved), to the exiled
clergy and to the priests who were languishing in Kazan prison. Moreover, he
often gave refuge in his house at 31 Tikhomirova street, flat 2, to people who
were persecuted for their confession of the Orthodox Faith.
In August, 1937, an agent of the NKVD reported that Bishop Joasaph was
persuading people not to go to Metropolitan Sergius' churches, and was
serving pannikhidas in the cemetery church of SS. Theodore, Constantine and
David. On November 30 (29) he was arrested at the bedside of his dying
mother for “organizing a counter-revolutionary church underground”.
Together with Protopriest Nicholas Troitsky, Nuns Eudocia (Dvinskikh) and
Stepanida (Makarova) of the destroyed monastery of the Mother of God and
several people among those closest to him, he was thrown into the inner
prison of the NKVD in Kazan.
194
195
the monastery of the Mother of God in 1900, and became a ryasophor nun in
August, 1908, carrying out obediences on the cliros and in the weaving of
gold thread. In the winter of 1935-36 she went to Metropolitan Cyril with a
parcel and letter from Bishop Joasaph, and took back a letter from
Metropolitan Cyril to Bishop Joasaph. She was arrested on November 29,
1937. Nothing more is known about her.
195
196
18. HIEROMARTYR
RAPHAEL, BISHOP OF
ALEXANDROVSK
196
197
Bishop Job, in the world James Ivanovich Afanasyev, was born in 1882
(1888) in the village of Grechishkino, Starobelsky uyezd, Kharkov province
into a peasant family. From his youth he lived in various monasteries of the
Sukhumi diocese, was tonsured and ordained to the priesthood. In 1923 he
was arrested in Ufa and sentenced to three years’ exile and sent to Central
Asia. On January 20, 1928 (or 1924) he was secretly ordained to the episcopate
by Bishops Pitirim (Ladygin) of Nizhegorod and Rufinus (Brekhov) of
Satkinsk, with the blessing of Archbishop Andrew of Ufa, in the village of
Chetverto-Petrovskoye. It appears that at that same time he tonsured Bishop
Pitirim into the schema and received from him the administration of the
Nizhegorod diocese with the blessing of Archbishop Andrew. However, he
served in the church of the Exaltation in Ufa, and figures in documents as
Bishop of Ufa. On September 10, 1930 he was arrested in Ufa in a group case
of churchmen, and on September 27 was sentenced in accordance with articles
58-10 and 58-11 to eight years’ imprisonment. He was sent to the White Sea
canal (Segezha station in Karelia), where he arrived in October. At the
beginning of September, 1937 he was arrested again in camp, on September 9
he was sentenced to death, and on September 15 he was shot.
(Sources: http://www.pstbi.ru/cgi-
htm/db.exe/no_dbpath/docum/cnt/ans/; http://www.histor-ipt-
kt.org/KNIGA/bashkir.html)
197
198
He was tonsured as a monk in 1922 or 1923 in the St. Nilus desert, and was
the subdeacon of Bishop Theophilus (Bogoyavlensky), who ordained him to
the priesthood. He then entered the Novotorzhsk Borisoglebsk monastery in
Tver diocese.
198
199
199
200
the care of his relatives and the surveillance of the MVD of Bashkiria. Nothing
more is known about him.
200
201
Nun Natalya (Vasilyevna Demidova). She was born in 1893 in Ufa into a
trader’s family. In 1917 she joined a women’s monastery in Ufa. After the
closure of the monastery she continued to live in Ufa. On July 22, 1930 she
was arrested, and on December 3 was convicted. In accordance with articles
58-10 part 2 and 58-13, she was sentenced to five years in the camps with
confiscation of property. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Xenia (Dmitrievna Kobyzeva). She was born in 1893 in the village of
Bulgakovo, Ufa uyezd into a peasant family. In 1921 she entered a women’s
monastery in Ufa province. After its closure she lived in Ufa, where, on July
22, 1930 she was arrested, and on December 3 – convicted. In accordance with
articles 58-10 part 2 and 58-13, she was sentenced to five years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about her.
James Davydovich Schmidt. He was born in 1869 in Latvia, and was elder
of the church in Baltijsky stanitsa, Bashkiria. On September 15, 1930 he was
arrested, and on December 3 was convicted. In accordance with articles 58-10
part 2 and 58-13, was sentenced to death, and was shot on December 3, 1930.
201
202
Priest Timothy Porfiryevich Strelkov was born on January 15, 1880 in the
village of Atyazhkino, Pomayevskaya volost, Buinsky uyezd, Simbirsk
province, in a Mordovian peasant family. He went to a village and a city
school, and then to Simbirsk pedagogical seminary. Then he was sent as a
teacher to the village of Mikhailovka, twelve kilometres from the regional
centre of Duvan, Bashkiria. He married Nadezhda Ionovna, and became a
priest in the village. He had four sons and one daughter.
Fr. Timothy was the younger brother of another priest, Father Theodore
Strelkov, who had been president of the local section of “The Union of the
Russian People” before the revolution and then left with the armies of
Admiral Kolchak to the East, to Harbin, where he died. In 1919 Fr. Timothy
also left with the White armies, and went to Omsk.
“In the summer of 1918, as living witnesses of this very great wonder
relate, this outstanding priest, Fr. Timothy, was arrested by the reds on the
eve of the day of the Holy Trinity. On the same day they sentenced him to
death as a fearless confessor of Christ. In the night of Trinity they led him on
foot out of the village of Mikhailovka, under mounted guard, in the direction
of Duvan. A large crowd of people accompanied their beloved pastor. In this
crowd there were also representatives of the "new authorities". Some
mourned and wept, but others rejoiced and celebrated... In spite of the late
202
203
hour, the crowd of people did not disperse. They came to the village of
Mitrofanovka. And here all those who were accompanying him were ordered
to return. All returned, including even the mounted guard. Only one of them
was left. They allowed the priest's wife to go on.
“The poor woman was weeping all the time and sometimes asked for the
release of Fr. Timothy. The convoy was silent, while Batyushka Timothy,
addressing her said:
“’Why do you ask this? Do you think that it's his will? Do you think he
sentenced me to death? Others took the decision to deprive me of life. But the
Will of God also ordered him. May His holy Will be done... Glory to God for
all things! Glory to the Lord for His great mercy, that He should send me such
a death... But did I teach the people evil? But do not beseech Him... Beseech
the Lord only for one thing, for the repose of my soul... for the forgiveness of
my sins! For there is no man living, nor will there be, who does not sin... And I
have sinned! That's the important thing you must pray about... Lord, have
mercy, have mercy! Forgive me the accursed one!...’
“And the priest wept. And his matushka also sobbed violently.
“When they were still three kilometres from the regional centre of Duvan,
they turned off into an area overgrown with little bushes and climbed a little
hill. It had already begun to get light. The day of the Holy Trinity had
dawned.
“The convoy rode on his horse, in front of him walked the priests
condemned to death. Beside them walked the weeping matushka... Fr.
Timothy was praying warmly and with tears, beseeching the Lord to
strengthen him for the feat of martyrdom which lay ahead of him. He humbly
thanked the Lord for such a death...
203
204
“But matushka arrived at Mikhailovka and related how Fr. Timothy had
been beheaded before her every eyes... They got ready a cart and came to
collect the corpse. But imagine their astonishment and joyful trembling when
they found him alive, covered in blood but with a scar all round his neck
witnessing to the fact that he had been beheaded and healed by an ineffable
miracle... When the clotted blood had been wiped away, there appeared a
fully healed fresh scar around the whole neck in the form, as it were, of a
bright thread. There was no sign of inflammation. Fr. Timothy showed this
scar to everyone close to him, as a witness of the miracle.
It may be for this reason that, according to the other source for his story, Fr.
Timothy went to Omsk. According to this version, between 1923 and 1928 he
did not serve in church, but in 1924 he moved to Bulayevskaya station on the
Trans-Siberian railway, where he worked as an accountant. In 1929 he
returned to Omsk and again began to serve as a priest.
"’How many monks do you have in this community?’ the chairman asked
the abbot.
"’Thirty-two,’ he replied.
“Fr. Timothy was there, absorbed in prayer like all the other monks. He
stood beside a table, leaning against the stove. They checked them all.
“It was as if they had not seen Fr. Timothy standing beside the stove. When
the chekists had gone, the abbot gathered the brotherhood and told them the
wonderful miracle of God's mercy and served a thanksgiving prayer-service
204
205
not only for the priest, but at the same time for the miraculous deliverance of
the whole community from inevitable death...”
“After this incident Fr. Timothy left that area and went secretly to Sim
factory, near Ufa. Here he served in a house church until his last arrest and
death in 1930…”
Our other source agrees that Fr. Timothy was sent to Sim factory, but says
that he was sent there in 1929 by the Catacomb Bishop Alexis (Buj), who had
arrived in Omsk, and then, in 1930 moved to the village of Novo-Troitskoye,
Iglinskaya volost, Ufkanton, Bashkiria. However, there is no record of Bishop
Alexis being in Omsk at that time, and it seems more likely that Fr. Timothy
decided of his own accord to return to his homeland and made contact there
with Bishop Benjamin (Troitsky).
In any case, on July 14, 1930 he was arrested and cast into the Domzak in
Zlatoust, Bashkiria. Then, on December 3, he was condemned by the GPU for
“being a member of a counter-revolutionary organization, entering into the
group of churchmen headed by the accused [Bishop Benjamin] Troitsky”, for
“recruiting people, working on them and preparing them for a rebellion”. In
accordance with articles 58-10 part 2 and 58-11, he was sentenced to be shot.
On December 3 he was shot.
In 1932 (or 1933), after a serious operation, Bishop Benjamin was exiled for
the rest of his sentence to the town of Melekess in Ulyanovsk region
(Dimitrovgrad). He was visited there by his brother, Protopriest Michael and
his family (his other brother, Archimandrite Paul (in the world Peter
Vasilyevich), also belonged to the Catacomb Church). He was also visited in
exile by Natalya Pavlovna Nikolskaya, who had formerly been the
headmistress of a gymnasium in Ufa. She sold her house in Ufa and bought
herself a house in Melkess, where she lived with some nuns. She also gave
Vladyka some money to buy a house.
205
206
logging and was buried in the camp. According to a third source, he died on
September 6, 1940 in Magadan district, North-East Siberia (Magadan).
206
207
207
208
Nun Tatyana (Mikhailovich Ryzhkova). She was born on January 12, 1881
in the village of Travniki (Drovniki?), Orenburg province into a peasant
family. On July 1, 1930 she was arrested in Ufa, and on September 27 was
208
209
Ivan Efimovich Loginov. He was born on July 12, 1878 in the village of
Sabakayevo, Stavropol uyezd (now Ulyanovsk province, Melekessky region),
Samara province. He was the son of a peasant wood merchant, and served for
seven months in the Russian army during the First World War. He was
married to Anna Trophimovna (born 1884), and had five children: Alexander
(born 1921), Nicholas (born 1923), Alexis (born 1929), Claudia (born 1933) and
Ivan (born 1912). He worked as a watchman in the collective farm “Forward
to Socialism”. However, in 1937 the church of which he was the president of
the church-parish council was closed, and Ivan Efimovich began gathering
signatures among the parishioners for its reopening. On December 14 he was
arrested in Sabakayevo, and cast into prison in the city of Melekess. On
December 22 he was condemned to death in accordance with articles 58-10
and 58-11. On May 8, 1938 the sentence was carried out in Saratov
(Kuibyshev), where he was buried.
209
210
Some other people close to Bishop Benjamin were arrested and kept in
winter in cold cells with broken windows and with no hot food for eleven
days. Then they were all taken for interrogation in one night. Bishop
Benjamin's brother, Fr. Michael, was cruelly beaten until it was impossible to
recognize him - his face was like a baked apple and one could not see his eyes.
He was condemned by a troika. Fr. Michael was sent together with a 62-year-
old Nun Philareta to Archangelsk. There were rumours that he died there.
Natalya Pavlovna Nikolskaya died in a transit prison.
210
211
211
212
Vladimir’s mother was a deeply religious woman, and played a large role
in the education of the five children in the Orthodox faith. Often in the
evenings Vladimir would gather together all the children, ask for a stool from
the nurse, lock the room so that none of the adults could enter, and ask them
to pray. He himself, having made a censer out of the lampada, would walk
with them around the stool, representing a Divine service.
After the death of his father in 1885, Vladimir at first studied with teachers
at home, but then went to primary school.
After some time Bishop Hermogen, being the superior of the Saratov
Saviour-Transfiguration monastery, tonsured his spiritual son into the mantia
and called him Nicholas in honour of St. Nicholas of Myra, the
wonderworker. Later, when he was already a hieromonk, the elder Nicholas
recalled: “During my tonsure a dove separated from the cross which was
being handed to me and flew into my mouth. For a whole year after this I felt
a great sweetness in my heart.” Under the spiritual direction of Bishop
Hermogen and Elder Adrian, the humble skete-dweller perfected himself in
the study of the Church services and the Holy Scriptures, and also immersed
212
213
himself in the reading of the patristic literature and the practice of writing
verses.
Sorrowing over his beloved city and the people who lived in it, he no
longer had the right to be silent as before, hiding in the depths of his heart the
gift of wonderworking that he had received, and he took upon himself the
exploit of eldership, so that the people of the Saratov land, of all ranks and
conditions, should live together as one big loving family…
In the autumn of 1914 he foretold to his spiritual son, N.P. Rufimsky, that
the roof of the panorama “The torments of the Christians in the circus of
Nero”, which was situated in the centre of Saratov, would collapse, which it
did on January 15, 1915. He also said: “Soon the whole of Russia will be like
this circus.”
213
214
Fr. Nicholas not only knew the past and the future of every person whom
he saw for the first time, but also saw what he was thinking about and what
he was dreaming about in the innermost depths of his heart. But if someone
came to him with evil thoughts, thinking to mock the grace of the Holy Spirit
that rested on him, he would play the fool and make up proverbs of his own
creation wrapped up in strange words. Moreover, he asked all his
parishioners without exception to call him “little batyushka”.
From the Volga region, Kiev, Moscow and other cities people would come
to him for advice. There are many witnesses of his clairvoyance, the power of
his prayer and profound discernment. When people would come to him from
various places, and among them were some newcomers, he would usually
put the visitors on one side of a table, while on the other side he put toys –
cocks, chicken, parrots, cats, dogs and other birds and animals. And he would
talk with the birds and animals. And in all these conversations the visitors
received answers to their unexpressed and hidden questions and thoughts.
In 1917 Fr. Nicholas and Alexander Makheev made a pilgrimage round the
holy places of Russia. They visited the Kremlin cathedrals of Moscow, the
Donskoj, Novodevichi, Strastnoj, Simonov and Danilov monasteries, the
Trinity-St. Sergius Lavra, New Jerusalem, Optina Desert, the Alexander
Nevsky Lavra and Valaam.
214
215
Fr. Nicholas, his humble servant, who carried out the sacraments in
accordance with the needs of the spiritual children of the clairvoyant elder.
In 1920 Fr. Nicholas met the future Bishop of Saratov Benjamin (Milov) and
amazed him by his clairvoyance. He foretold the name he would receive in
monasticism and told him to go to the Danilov monastery, the future
stronghold of the Catacomb Church, giving him the following prayer rule:
“As a monk, apply yourself to the Jesus prayer: 300 Jesus prayers and 300
Mother of Gods. My elder was Fr. Adrian, a man of lofty spiritual life. He so
loved the Jesus prayer that he heard nothing worldly and did not enter into
vain conversations. If someone would start talking about something vain in
his presence, he would incline his head and go to sleep. But immediately
someone started talking about something important, he would wake up from
his supposed sleep and display the most profound wisdom. The Lord
consoles monks in many ways. I will tell a story about myself. When I was
being tonsured, a dove separated from the hand of the person who was
handing me the cross and flew into my mouth. For a whole year after this I
felt great sweetness in my heart.”
As a faithful son of the Mother Church, Vladyka Nicholas did not accept
renovationism. In all probability he was the only bishop in Saratov in this
period (September, 1922), and fulfilled the duties of temporary administrator
of the Saratov diocese. The news of his consecration was brought with great
difficulty to Patriarch Tikhon when he was under house arrest. On March 17,
1923 he appointed Vladyka Nicholas bishop of Atkar, a vicariate of the
Saratov diocese, specially creating this new vicar-see in the centre of the city
of Atkar.
Vladyka Nicholas served in this see until 1925, when he retired because of
ill health. Bishop Nicholas lived in a monastic skete in Saratov, and was for
two years in reclusion. During this time he not only prayed but also worked,
215
216
James Ivanovich wanted to see Bishop Nicholas, about whom he had heard
many good things. Once he hired a cabby and went to look at him. He was
sitting under an umbrella and getting ready to look at him, when Bishop
Nicholas came out onto the porch of his little house, turned towards him and
said unexpectedly:
"James Ivanovich, I've been waiting for you for a long time."
This event was a fresh shock for James Ivanovich. After all, he had never
seen the bishop before, and the bishop could not have known anything about
him. After thinking about it for a long time, he was tonsured into monasticism
with the name Pitirim and then became a hieromonk and Bishop Nicholas'
cell-attendant.
Between March and June 15, 1928 Bishop Nicholas carried out secret
monastic tonsures together with Bishop Thaddeus (Uspensky) of Saratov.
216
217
Bishop Nicholas lived in this house for six years. During this time his
admirers in Saratov did not forget him, and some of them came to see him in
Kiev. The above-mentioned Protopriest Constantine was one of them. On
meeting Bishop Nicholas he fell to his knees and asked for his hierarchical
blessing. He told several Kievans of the holy life and spiritual exploits of
Bishop Nicholas in Saratov.
"'Let Batiushka Fr. Adrian pray to the Lord that He incline his heart toward
some Orthodox bishop and ask him about everything: now it is necessary to
search for bishops.'"
"I began to fuss about the housework, wishing to give better hospitality to
our guest. And then, I remember, there was the following incident. I had a
good bun, but a little pig's fat had been put in it. Should I put it on the table or
not - after all, Vladyka was a monk. I thought and thought, and in the end I
put it in with all the rest. And what then? Vladyka tasted everything, but
didn't touch the bun!
"Then, I remember, Vladyka started to say that there are certain matushkas
who hinder their batyushkas from advancing in the spiritual life. Looking at
me, he asked:
217
218
“In general, I didn't like Vladyka. I thought: 'Why did he suddenly begin to
attack me?' Vladyka stayed with us and then returned to Kiev.
"I quickly went across the yard and into Vladyka's quarters. My first
impression was of cleanliness, cosiness and a certain peace and quiet. One felt
that everyone was living under obedience, that it was a kind of small
monastery.
"Vladyka himself played the fool a little; he spoke quite sharply and
sometimes joked. For example, he threw me into complete confusion by
saying:
"'Do you want to stay and have lunch with us? If you want to - stay, if not -
leave.'
"Some months passed. During this time Fr. Adrian went to Vladyka, but I
did not. Christmas came. The whole of our family went to congratulate
Vladyka on the feasts. I remember that I had no special desire to go; I was still
somewhat critically disposed towards Vladyka.
"Then, without my noticing it, I went to him more and more often, and
came to like him so much that I couldn't decide or begin anything for myself
without asking his blessing and prayers.
"For, you know, that was a very difficult time, especially for the family of a
priest. Fr. Adrian did not have a parish in Kiev, he served together with [the
218
219
catacomb priest] Fr. Michael [Yedlinsky, the future hieromartyr] in the church
of Saints Boris and Gleb in Podol.
"We lived mainly on chance parcels from former parishioners from Romny.
The whole time there were various unpleasantnesses. For example, a message
would come from the police: the next day Fr. Adrian was to go there to clean
the snow; I had to run, bustle around and get a medical certificate to say that
Fr. Adrian was ill and lying in bed. Moreover, the certificate could not be from
a private doctor, but had to be from the Red Cross.
"In 1929 Fr. Adrian was arrested. How Vladyka supported me, encouraged
me, prayed for me at that time! By some kind of miracle Fr. Adrian was
released.
“In 1931 the story with the flat began. At that time we were not living in
the basement but occupied two rooms in the house of people whom we knew.
But the house in which we were living had changed into a “communal living
area”, so we had to find a flat from a private house-owner. But when we with
great difficulty found it, it was almost taken away from us by a man who
came into our flat, put a bed in one of the rooms and said that the flat was his!
“How much I went through then! Alone with two small children, and with
constantly drunken people on the other side of the wall who shouted: ‘She’s
hiding her pope somewhere or other’. I knew that the wife of this man was
about to come from hospital with her just-born child. I understood our
hopeless situation, our complete lack of rights in a juridical sense. Our
landlady, of course, want to evict this man who had settled in without her
knowledge and have us in her house. With her we decided that Poly (the
nanny of our children, who at that time worked in a factory) could take him to
court since she had the rights of a working person. I ran to Vladyka in
complete despair, told him everything and said that we had to take a lawyer.
But Vladyka said to me: ‘What lawyer, your lawyer is Nicholas the
Wonderworker.’ I left Vladyka encouraged, with a certain hope. We served a
moleben to the holy Hierarch Nicholas, and the next day Polya returned from
the court and said that the case had been decided in her favour and that if, in
the course of the next two weeks, the man did not appeal, he would have to
vacate the flat. In two weeks the flat was freed.
"Was this not the mercy of God, Who defended our rightless family
according to the laws of that time through the prayers of Vladyka! How
necessary in those difficult times were such people as Vladyka Nicholas. By
their deep faith and authoritative word they were able to support us who
were fainthearted and wavering in faith. Vladyka always supported me in
this way. We also had to suffer material hardships at that time. Vladyka
somehow understood them and knew when they came. He would come to us,
219
220
and after his visit you would find two roubles on the table; you would look at
them as at a blessing to escape your material difficulties..
“And then, I remember, I went to Vladyka straight from work with the
feeling that I should forget everything and calm down. But Vladyka suddenly
said: “You know, we’ve salted the guerkins and packed the cabbage.” And I
thought: “Well, that’s very interesting to me, I’ve had enough of everyday
household cares”. But Vladyka suddenly said to me: “Yes, there you are
wanting to talk about spiritual things, while Batyushka Nicholas is talking to
you about everyday matters. So here you are: read,” and he gave me one of
the works of the holy Hierarch Tikhon of Zadonsk, where he writes that first
of all it is necessary to be kind to everyone, give him food and drink. And I
involuntarily remembered all our visitors and arrivals, who bothered me so
much. Yes, Vladyka was often able somehow to catch my thoughts. With
great difficulty I succeeded in getting Vladyka to confess me, and I remember
this with great tender feeling and gratitude.
“Vladyka was able to say to each person that which was useful for him. I
remember several people once gathered in our house who wanted to get to
know Vladyka. They sat and drank tea. By chance, a young married woman
arrived. Vladyka went on talking and talking as if he were conducting a
general conversation; but when he left it turned out that everything that he
had been saying was for this person: she received replies to all the questions
that were disturbing her at that time in connection with her difficulties with
her husband and mother-in-law.
"I remember one incident with a deacon. This deacon, besides having a
difficult general church situation, had difficulties in his family, too: his wife
was against his service as a deacon. She was well-off, but she gave nothing to
220
221
her husband. He was in great need and was going to pieces. At that time there
was a fool-for-Christ in Kiev by the name of Seraphima. Some recognized her
as such, some did not, but Vladyka Nicholas nevertheless received her when
she came to him. And one day this Seraphima sent the deacon Nikola to
Vladyka. He arrived in a dirty old cassock and in a very depressed mood.
Vladyka comforted him, but really went for him for coming to him dressed in
such a way:
"'What kind of deacon are you? You're so dirty and you're going to church
and to the altar dressed like that! You have to buy a new cassock.'
"Fr. Nikola replied that he had no money. And, you know, it was very
difficult to buy material at that time. But Vladyka insisted:
"The deacon trusted him, said 'Give the blessing', took the 20 kopecks and
left. He got on a tram and went in the direction of his church, where he had to
be for the all-night vigil. But just at that moment work was coming to an end
in the factories, the workers filled up the trams and the poor deacon was
knocked about: he couldn't squeeze his way to the exit when he had to leave
and went several stops past. Finally, he managed to get out. The poor man
began to run because he was already late for the service. Suddenly two
women met him:
"And they asked him to take them to the Florovsky monastery. The deacon
took pity on them and said:
"And then they literally ran, and on the way the women told him their
woes. Their brother had died and they wanted to go to the Florovsky
monastery to order a pannikhida for the fortieth day. They ran up to the
church in which the deacon was serving, went into it and suddenly said:
"They went up to the priest, gave him money and asked him to
commemorate the deceased man. And then it turned out that they gave so
much money that immediately after the all-night vigil the deacon, on
receiving his share, saw that he could sew himself a new cassock. And two
weeks later he went to Vladyka Nicholas in his new cassock.
221
222
"And how much I heard about Vladyka when I visited him once in
Moscow, where he sometimes went for a certain time! The son of some
relatives recovered through the prayers of Vladyka, in another family the
husband stopped drinking and became a good family man. One woman said
that she came to Vladyka and suddenly noticed that she had lost her wedding
ring. She was terribly upset, and Vladyka sent her to look for the ring on the
street. She set off with complete faith that she would find it, and she found it.
In the spring of 1933 or 1934, Bishop Nicholas was arrested by the Kiev
OGPU in accordance with article 58-10 of the Ukrainian code, and was in
prison for four months. According to one source, he was in prison with
Schema-Archbishop Anthony (Abashidze). His fellow prisoners remembered
his exceptional kindness and unacquisitiveness. He would literally share his
last piece of bread with them.
222
223
"[In October] Vladyka left Kiev [via the Butyrki prison in Moscow] for
Kirzhach, a little town beyond the Holy Trinity - St. Sergius monastery, more
than one hundred versts from Moscow. This was the distance away he as an
exile had to live."
“Vladyka was interested in, and always asked in detail about our life, and
went through everything with us. After the closure of the church on Askold’s
grave Fr. Adrian was struck off the register of the department of cults “for
going away”, in the future this meant the removal of his passport by the
police and his exile from Kiev for a three-week period. With the blessing of
Vladyka Fr. Adrian went to Nezhen, where, thanks to the fact that he had a
passport in his hands, he was able to get registered and live. Of course, he
could no longer return to Kiev since he was exiled and deregistered from
there.
On December 29, 1936 Vladyka Nicholas was arrested for the second time,
together with Fr. Pitirim and about twenty other people, and brought to
Ivanovo prison. They were accused of being “active participants in a counter-
revolutionary organization of churchmen in the city of Kirzhach, the so-called
‘desert church’, created on the basis of the anti-Soviet platform of ‘the True
Orthodox Church’, which was active in planting counter-revolutionary
groups of churchmen, uniting them in so-called ‘secret churches’.” It was said
that Archbishop Theodore (Pozdeyevsky) and Archmandrite Simeon
(Kholmogorov) were the leaders of this Church, and that “on the direct
instructions of the leader of the organization Pozdeyevsky, in 1935 three
counter-revolutionary groups, cells of the organization, were created. They
were united into so-called ‘illegal house churches’ (‘sketes’, ‘communities’,
etc.) under the leadership of Archbishop Kholmogorov, Bishop [Nicholas]
Parfenov and Archimandrite Klimkov…”
223
224
On June 15, 1937 Bishop Nicholas was convicted of being “an active
participant in a counter-revolutionary group of churchmen, ‘The All-Russian
Monastic Brotherhood’, and in illegal meetings of members of the
organization at which anti-Soviet agitation was conducted”. Bishop Nicholas
refused to plead guilty, and in accordance with articles 58-10 part 1 and 58-11,
he was given a five-year prison sentence. Hieromonk Pitirim was exiled to
Kazakhstan for five years. Protopriest Igor Maltsev, who was also from
Saratov, and whose family were spiritual children of Vladyka witnessed: “In
1937 they (Bishop Nicholas and Fr. Pitirim)… were sent to Vladimir prison.
Bishop Nicholas died in prison in Vladimir on January 7/20, 1939, according
to the information centre of the UVD of Vladimir province, from heart
disease.
Nun Maura, in the world Maria Dmitrievna Bogatova. She was born in
1894 in the village of Knyazevka, Atkar uyezd, Saratov province. On
December 28, 1936 she was arrested and cast into the inner NKVD prison in
Ivanovo. On June 15, 1937 she was condemned for being “an active
participant in the counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The All-Russian
Monastic Brotherhood’, and in anti-Soviet meetings that persecuted the
Komsomol member Guryanova”. She was also accused of participating in “an
underground group organized by Bishop [Nicholas] Parfenov” in Kirzhach.
She did not admit her guilt and was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-
10 and 58-11 to five years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Catherine (Andreyevna Dolotova). she was born in 1897 in the village
of Sredneye Pogranichye, Sredne-Akhtubinsky region, Stalingrad province.
On December 29, 1936 she was working as a cleaner in a pharmacy in
Kirzhach when she was arrested. On June 15, 1937 she was convicted of being
“an active participant in the counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The All-
Russian Monastic Brotherhood’”, of “participation in anti-Soviet meetings”
224
225
After the beginning of the war with Germany, in 1942, Saratov was
buzzing with rumours about the return of “the little batyushka”, Bishop
Nicholas. It appears that people met him in the church and near the church.
One of those who witnessed to this is the still-living Protopriest Vsevolod
Kuleshov. Bishop Nicholas would talk with his spiritual children for a short
period about their spiritual life, past or future. Others who did not know him
he would “burn” with his glance, and would then disappear into the crowd,
forever sealing his image in their memory…
225
226
Bishop Paul, in the world Peter Dimitrievich Flerinsky (or Florinsky), was
born on June 29, 1871 in Samara province, in the family of a church reader. He
conducted missionary work against Baptists and struggled against
drunkenness. On March 18, 1924 he was consecrated Bishop of Pugachev, a
vicariate of the Urals diocese. According to one source, from December 30 /
January 12, 1927/28 to March 27 / April 9, 1928, he was Bishop of Kotelnichi.
From January 8, 1931 he no longer ruled his diocese, although he was counted
as Bishop of Pugachev until September 3. On September 3/16 he was counted
as Bishop of Pokrovsk, but never entered into administration of this diocese.
He rejected the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius. He lived in Ust-Kuloma
in Pechora. In the spring of 1936 he moved to Kazan. On October 14/27, 1940
he died from a stroke.
226
227
Bishop Zenobius, in the world Nicholas Drozdov, was born on July 14,
1875 in Kostroma province. In 1897 he finished his studies at the Kostroma
theological seminary and was ordained to the priesthood. He was later
widowed. In 1900 he entered the St. Petersburg Theological Academy, and in
1903 he was tonsured into the mantia. In 1904 he graduated from the
Academy with the degree of candidate of theology. On August 14, 1904 the
Holy Synod sent him as a priest for the hospital ship "Orel". On September 23,
1905 he was appointed a teacher in the Vyatka theological seminary. On
September 28, 1906 he was appointed supervisor at the Kutaissi theological
school. From July 14, 1907 he was in charge of the chancellery of the exarch of
Georgia. On September 12, 1907 he was raised to the rank of archimandrite.
From July 13, 1908 he was supervisor at the Ekaterinburg theological school.
From January 22, 1909 he was rector of the Kishinev theological seminary.
"Dearer than the receiving of fresh rewards is the ability to preserve one's
dignity, not to lose that which one has."
227
228
"Well, come what may, for ethical reasons we can do nothing else. We are
united with Metropolitan Peter."
Metropolitan Sergius did not reply. But his presence made a painful
impression on the bishops. It seemed to them that he had more power than a
metropolitan...
228
229
Early Years
"In 1875, when I was ten, they brought us the icon of the Mother of God
'the Consolation of the Sorrowing', which came from Mount Athos. The first
miracle [from this icon] was worked on Vladimir Nevolen. He was deaf and
dumb. Immediately he kissed the icon of the Mother of God he began to
speak and hear. The miracle took place on November 19, 1866, and after this
all kinds of miracles came from this icon of the Mother of God, and everyone
was healed. During prayer services [in front of this icon] I would always
weep. I couldn't help myself, something unusual worked on me.
"During my youth I never went for walks or played games, but in my free
time I went fishing. I caught a lot of fish, everyone was amazed.
"My mama died when I was 18. Papa and my younger brothers John and
Simeon remained. And at that point they took it into their heads to marry me.
My father had never put a finger on me, but when I didn't want to marry, he
twice beat me on the back with a belt and took me weeping to my bride.
There I said to my bride Catherine:
"'Don't marry me, I don't want to. We have a very bad older sister-in-law,
it'll be bad for you. Don't marry me.'
"But she didn't believe me. Our matchmaker was my aunt, my mama's
sister. They married me, but while I was being crowned I couldn't believe it.
But then I was reconciled with life and a year passed.
"I became seriously ill. I had pneumonia during Great Lent. They lost all
hope that I would live. In May I went fishing and I got a cold in my legs,
229
230
completely losing the use of them. In June and July I lay in hospital. The
doctors said that my legs would not work - I had severe rheumatism. I was in
terrible pain. My wife Catherine looked after me. Every night she would put
nettles on my legs. Katya was always crying, and I always reminded her:
"After the Dormition of the Mother of God an old wanderer came to us. In
the evening they began to bind my legs with nettles.
"'What,' said the man, 'have you been ill like this for a long time?'
"'If you pray to God and beseech the Mother of God, I will heal you.'
"I gave him my promise, and while I was still ill I promised that I would
join the army. We got up in the morning. The old man asked:
"'They are.'
"He asked for a tub, and put a prop for my legs against the tub. And when
the bread was baked, he took one loaf, broke it and put it on the bottom of the
tub, and my legs on the bread... And the pain in my legs became less sharp.
He left asking me not to forget the Mother of God or to pray. And he also
ordered that this should be done two more times. And when it had been done
three times I recovered completely and began to walk.
"She went away and Katya fell ill. She contracted a high fever, and on
September 19 she died. My daughter remained alive for nine more days. She
was looked after by my in-laws. On November 19, the day of the feast of the
Mother of God "the Consolation of the Sorrowing", she died without pain.
The Mother of God took her to herself.
"And on the evening of the same day I went to enrol in the army. I was
accepted into service on November 22. The doctors who had treated me did
not want to accept me because I was ill - my legs were no good. But I had
given a promise when I was ill that when I recovered, even if I would have to
230
231
go far away, I would still join the army. The doctors still did not want to
accept me. I demanded that they accept me. But I was left on one side. They
accepted three people. I began to ask insistently for the commanding officer,
and he ordered me to be accepted, saying:
"And they accepted me. I made the sign of the cross and left. But my papa
began to cry and said:
"'You've destroyed yourself. You'll die, and we'll never see you again.'
"I said: 'I won't die. The Mother of God will preserve me...'"
Mount Athos
The young Patapius fulfilled his military service in Kiev, serving as a non-
commissioned officer. He learned engineering with the sappers. In his free
time he would go to the Kiev Caves Lavra, where he venerated the relics of
the saints and read the Kiev Caves Patericon. He became a spiritual son of
Elder Jonah (in schema Peter), who was himself a spiritual son and novice of
St. Seraphim of Sarov. Patapius asked Elder Jonah to bless him to enter the
Kiev Caves Lavra after his military service, but instead the elder directed him
to go to Jerusalem and Mount Athos:
"When you've gone there and seen everything, and visited the holy places,
then you'll be able to come here and join. Monasticism will not run away from
you. Look, I've been a monk for more than 40 years and the enemy
continually disturbs me with the thought that I haven't been to Jerusalem or
Athos. But it's difficult to leave here, they don't let you out of the monastery."
Patapius followed the elder's advice, and in September, 1892, at the end of
his military service, he went home to receive his father's blessing and earn
some money for the fare to Jerusalem. Then, on June 12, 1893, the feast of
Saints Peter and Onuphrius of Mount Athos, he set off. The steamer from
Constantinople stopped at Mount Athos, where the monks of St. Andrew's
skete invited Patapius to stay until Christmas. But Patapius said:
"What are you saying?! You don't let people sleep! During the day you
sleep it off, while the pilgrims go round the monasteries. But at night you
don't let us sleep!"
231
232
"I can't live on Mount Athos. The monks there don't let one sleep. I
quarrelled with them and only just made it to the steamer two weeks later."
"Child, these thoughts are from the enemy. Think how many ascetics are
there and what a holy mountain it is. The Mother of God feeds and consoles
and saves all those who live there."
"How fortunate are those who live on Athos, in the lot of the Mother of
God."
Then the abbess suggested that they cast lots in the name of the Trinity: the
first for going to Athos and staying there, the second for staying there, in
Jerusalem, and the third for going to Russia. They went to the Holy Sepulchre,
laid the lots on the Tomb of the Lord and prayed for a long time. The lot
which they chose was for Athos. Patapius was terrified. But the abbess
calmed him:
And on the third day of Christmas, after again praying all night at the Holy
Sepulchre, the lot fell on Athos. Then Patapius felt calmer and said:
But the abbess said that they should cast lots a third time. So on the fourth
day of Christmas, after again praying at the Holy Sepulchre, they cast lots.
The lot fell on Russia. The abbess said:
"This is your destiny with the Lord and the Mother of God. Go to Athos,
the lot of the Mother of God. She has blessed this path for you with two lots.
But with the third lot the Lord has shown you that you will be sent from
Athos on obedience to Russia, and there you may end your life."
And so, after visiting the holy places again, Patapius went to Jaffa and on
January 16, 1894 set sail for Athos. That night there was an all-night vigil in
232
233
honour of St. Anthony. Patapius prayed to him, as the leader of all monks, to
indicate which community on Athos he should go to. After casting lots, the lot
fell on the St. Andrew skete.
Patapius arrived at St. Andrew's skete on January 20. Igumen Joseph gave
him obediences in the chancellery and the candle-shop, gave him a cassock, a
jacket and a prayer-rope, and blessed him to pray three prayer-ropes: two to
the Saviour and one to the Mother of God. And he warned him:
"When you pray, take care not to be frightened - the enemy will try to
frighten you. Don't move from your place, stand and pray. He won't do
anything to you."
Patapius was living in the guest-house with six pilgrims. When they had
gone to sleep, he began to pray his three prayer-ropes.
"'Brother Patapius, how did it go? Did you pray the prayer-ropes?'
"'I did.'
"'They did.'
Patapius was then given a cell with Novice Matthew. They prayed
together, and the devil did not trouble them. Later the igumen said to
Patapius:
233
234
"So, Brother Patapius, the Mother of God, the Apostle Andrew and St.
Anthony the Great have sent you here to us. Remember that you will answer
in fear before the Lord for every word or deed that you have done out of
laziness or not in accordance with righteousness. Know that it is not I that
have given you such a great obedience, but the Mother of God, the Apostle
Andrew and Anthony the Great. They will help you in everything if you carry
out your holy obedience with humility and a pure heart."
And then the igumen gave him the very responsible obedience of
calculating the money to be given to all the workers and the desert-dwellers.
All the monks were amazed that a newly arrived novice should be given such
a difficult and responsible obedience. Besides this, he was given the
obediences of waking up the brethren for services and serving in the altar as
an ecclesiarch.
"On March 25, 1895," continues Bishop Peter in his biography, "on the feast
of the Annunciation, I the sinful and unworthy one was found worthy to hear
the chanting of angels. There was a vigil in the church of the Mother of God
'The Consolation of the Sorrowing'. The vigil began at 7 o'clock and finished at
6 in the morning. During the vigil they read the akathist to the Annunciation
of the Mother of God. The vigil came to an end, and the young monastic
clergy were going to serve the late Liturgy. I had to come early into the church
in order to prepare the censer, the warm water and do various chores. After
the vigil I went to my cell to rest for one-and-a-half to two hours. My cell was
under the altar of this church. My window was open. At seven o'clock in the
morning I heard chanting in the church. They were chanting and reading the
akathist to the Mother of God and chanting: 'Rejoice, O Bride Unwedded'.
When I heard it I jumped up and thought that I had overslept. I was
frightened and ran to the church. I ran up, but the doors of the church were
locked, and in the church everyone was continuing to chant. I ran back down
the corridor to the altar. I ran up to the altar door and again the chanting was
continuing. I was filled with fear - I had never heard such chanting before. I
went back to my cell and fell on my knees. I wept and listened to the chanting.
And suddenly they began to chant the verse "The Pre-Eternal Counsel" in my
cell. They chanted the whole verse. I don't remember whether I was in heaven
or on earth.
"At 7.45 I gave the signal for the beginning of the church service.
Everybody came and I went into the church. I told my spiritual father and the
igumen about it. They said:
"'Thank God and don't forget it. Always chant this verse...'
"At Pascha my father came to see me at the feast. He stayed for three weeks
and wept a great deal, calling me to return home.
234
235
"'No,' he said, 'I can't stand it. One has to pray for a long time.'
"I accompanied him and he wept a great deal. When he returned home, a
year later, on the second day of Pascha, he died."
"I left the monastery and went towards Athos, to the Kalyagrou jetty. A
desert-dweller by the name of Macarius was with me.
"We had not gone very far when suddenly we saw a huge snake lying
across the path. Macarius saw it and said:
"But I decided to carry out my obedience, crossed myself and jumped over
it. I went on alone.
"After a while I came across another huge snake which was lying in the
form of a ring across the path. It was impossible to pass it by. On the left was
a cliff and the sea, and on the right - a huge rock. I stood by the snake for a
long time, praying to the Mother of God and the Apostle Andrew. I did not
want to return home, but I feared to go on because of this snake. I crossed
myself and jumped into the ring and then out of the ring and further.
"I went on for a while and came to the Kolyagrou jetty. There was a big
level area by the sea. The whole of the area was filled with various snakes.
Some had died, others were still alive after a fashion. I passed through there
without fear. It began to get dark. It was night, I couldn't see the path.
"I saw a small light and a little hut. I prayed and the answer came: 'Amen.'
I showed the man the address on the package and asked him how to get
there. He said:
235
236
"I saw that there was a great number of snakes in his cell, and I thought
that he had collected them... But he said:
"I didn't take them or bring them here. They come here of themselves in
order to tempt me during prayer, and I don't believe them. I pray, and they
immediately die.'
"'Go straight ahead, don't turn to the left and also not to the right. Go
straight on.'
"After a time I suddenly saw some houses. A man came out and I asked
him where the house on the address was. He showed me the house and I
went in.
"There were many cobblers there sewing boots. I gave them my package.
They tore it up and immediately all stood up. And from men they turned into
demons.
"'So you've been tonsured!' they said and began to tear my cassock into
shreds.
"I ran away from them, but they got hold of my cassock and tore it to
pieces. I got hold of one piece, stuck it on, and it became one whole cassock. I
kept running and suddenly I saw a church. The doors were shut, and there
was an open space under the church. I ran into it. It was dark, and the
demons were still tearing at me. I fell on my knees and shouted:
"And suddenly a light appeared in the corner and all the demons
disappeared, and it turned out that there was an icon in the corner, the Kazan
Mother of God. It was all shining, and diamonds were glittering on it. And
above the icon of the Mother of God was an icon of the Saviour wearing a
crown of thorns. And above the Saviour - the Crucifixion. And from the icon
of the Mother of God a voice spoke to me:
"The bell was ringing, and I went into the church. When I went up to ask
the igumen's blessing, he said to me:
236
237
"'And tell him what size the Saviour and Mother of God and Crucifixion
were, and let him paint them. And you always keep them in your cell. And
pray to them, and the demons will do nothing to you. And carry out the holy
obedience which the Lord has blessed you to carry out with fear and
trembling.'
"The icons were painted, and the igumen himself blessed them and said:
"'You will have many sorrows, but don't be depressed. The Mother of God
has told you that she will not leave you, and has shown you how the Lord
Jesus Christ suffered and was crucified for us sinners.'
"I always took these icons with me and kept them, but in 1930, when I was
arrested for the third time, they took them away from me. Maria, Olga and
Cleopatra saw these icons and prayed to them. I prayed to them for 34 years."
In 1898 he was tonsured into the mantia with the name Pitirim.
On May 14, 1900 he was ordained to the diaconate, and in 1901 he was sent
on obedience to Constantinople to serve as a hierodeacon in the metochion
(podvorye) and to do the accounts of the income and expenditure of the
community. In May while he was in the podvorye, he had the following
vision:
"'Where?' I asked.
"'The Heavenly Queen has appointed you to command a ship, you have to
go to sea.'
237
238
"'I've never been a sailor,' I said, 'and I don't know how to command. I'll
sink the ship and drown myself.'
"They said: 'We can't leave you, for the Queen has sent you, you must go.'
"I went. We came to the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg. At the quayside
of the river Neva there stood a beautiful sailing ship. We went onto it, and
suddenly the Queen, the Mother of God, came out and said:
"'So you must take this ship to the other side of the ocean, together with all
these people whom I'm entrusting to you.'
"I wept, and fell at the feet of the Mother of God and said:
"'I can't.'
"'Have no fear,' she said, 'I myself will be with you. Command the ship to
go out to sea.'
"We went out to sea, and a terrible storm rose up. Our ship was going fast
and the storm had no influence on it. On the sea we met two huge ships full
of people. The waves were hurling them off the ships from all sides, and you
think they're going to send them to the bottom of the sea now. We quickly
passed by them. They remained in the midst of the sea, but we quickly
arrived at the shore. It is impossible to describe how beautiful it was on the
shore; there were various trees and fruits. We all got out onto the shore and
the Mother of God said to me:
"'Write all this down, and for the time being tell nobody anything. The
Mother of God will entrust you to rule a flock.'
"And then we went into the church of the wonderworking icon 'The
Consolation of the Sorrowing' and served a prayer service to her and thanked
her for caring for us."
In 1902 Fr. Pitirim returned to Athos, and on September 25, 1904 he was
ordained to the priesthood. He continued to serve his obedience as a steward,
which involved feeding the vast numbers of pilgrims who came to the skete
for feasts. And with his engineering skills he was much in demand for
building projects both in the St. Andrew skete and the Thebaida skete.
238
239
Once, in the second week of the Great Fast, 1907, he went to his cell after
the all-night vigil to rest for an hour or so before celebrating the late Liturgy at
8 o'clock. He read his rule, and there were still 20 minutes remaining before
he had to go to the church at 7.15. He was sitting beside a lamp reading a
book, and began to nod off.
"While I was dozing I saw that our brothers had condemned myself and
two youths to death by crucifixion. I asked the brothers, not for myself, but
for the youths, saying that they were guilty of nothing. But the brothers said:
"They brought a cross made out of bits of rails and began to crucify me.
They pierced my hands with clamps and bolted them down. What a terrible
pain I suffered! They dug a hole and put the cross in it. I was hanging with a
terrible pain in my hands. They said:
"'He'll be hanging there for a long time, we'll have to break his shins.'
"And they began to beat my shins, and it was terribly painful, unbearable.
When they had broken my shins, I immediately died and remained the same,
only in the air. I saw my body hanging and heard everything they were
saying:
"'Now he's dead, let's take him away and unscrew the bolts.'
"They took me down and laid me on a stretcher, the kind on which they
put dead people, and placed my body in the church. My friend Florentius the
sacristan said:
"He brought out the Gospel, laid it on the analoy and began to read. They
came into the church to celebrate the Liturgy and saw me lying there, so they
did not begin the Liturgy but began to chant the funeral service. I heard and
saw everything, but couldn't speak. When they had buried me and begun to
chant: 'Come, brethren, let us give the last kiss', the brothers all began to say
farewell to my body, but so joyfully, while five of the monks who had
crucified me did not want to say farewell. They stood by the left kliros, and
the others began to force them, but they didn't want to. Then the brothers
dragged them up and forced to say farewell. When they had come up to my
body and kissed it, two angels immediately appeared and said to me:
239
240
"'Well, we've shown you earthly things, now we'll show you heavenly
things.'
"'O Mother of God, Apostle Andrew and Anthony the Great, save me from
falling!'
"At this point the second angel appeared before me, and I was joyful and
we continued to go upwards, stopping five times. When we stopped the sixth
time, the ecclesiarch came out of the church and knocked on the door so as to
call me in the church. I then absentmindedly put on my ryasa and went into
the church without locking my cell.
"I went into the church but was unable to do the proskomedia.
Archimandrite Joseph and others had already arrived in order to celebrate the
late Liturgy. They went into the altar and saw that my face had completely
changed and I was all trembling.
"I told him everything. They made another monk continue the Liturgy and
sent me away to calm down and rest. When the late Liturgy was over, the
igumen invited all the clergy and told me to tell the whole vision.
"I was given two days to calm down and rest. Another hieromonk served
me. And the igumen told me:
"'You will have to suffer much, but believe that the Mother of God and the
Lord will not leave you. The angels which you saw will always help you in
your sorrows...'"
240
241
The year 1912 passed successfully; "but in 1913 my cross began, which I
had seen on Athos, when they crucified me. In January, 1913, a division took
place among the brothers on Athos, and the worship of the name of God
began. In the Caucasus a certain schema-monk Hilarion had published a book
in which he wrote that God Himself is included in the name 'Jesus'. But this
was an incorrect opinion. The monks on Athos began to divide over this book,
some being for it and some against.
"The book was also given to the Russian Synod, which condemned it. In
our skete of St. Andrew on Athos, Hieromonk Anthony Bulatovich was a
partisan of the book, and gathered other partisan monks, especially the young
ones, and beat up the igumen and elders, and threw them out of the
monastery and took over the monastery. They sent me a telegram telling me
that Igumen Jerome and all our elders had been removed from the monastery
and telling me to submit to them.
"They threw out Igumen Jerome and elected a new archimandrite, David.
Igumen Jerome also sent me a telegram in Odessa. He wrote what had
happened and asked me not to carry out the commands of David and his
supporters. I took these telegrams and went to Archbishop Demetrius of
Odessa and the Chersonese. I asked him what to do. And he blessed me not to
carry out the commands for the time being, but to wait for a resolution of the
matter.
"I did that, but within two weeks Archbishop Demetrius had died. In his
place they appointed Archbishop Sergius, who told me that he would not
interfere in the matter. And I had to take everything on myself. When I did
not carry out the orders of either side, the Athonites sent a declaration to the
bank and post office in Odessa, saying that I was not their attorney. Then they
sent two monks to remove me from the podvorye and take it over themselves.
They took 2000 roubles from there, but the customs removed this money, put
it into the treasury and asked me:
"I told them: 'Until the clarification of the matter, you mustn't.'
241
242
"And with regard to the monks I sent a telegram to the Most Holy Synod,
since Bishop Sergius refused to interfere. The Synod replied:
"'Return the monks to Athos and give them the 2000 roubles.'
"I sent them back to Athos, but kept the money in Odessa since they could
go by rail from Constantinople to Russia.
"On their return to Athos, they began to say that it was necessary to calm
down and return the former igumen. Then Anthony Bulatovich himself
decided to go to Russia, and in 1913, on the day of the 300th anniversary of
the House of the Romanovs, he forcibly obtained the signatures of 330 monks
to his election. He wanted to be presented to his Majesty, so that his Majesty
could confirm the monastery's rule by Archimandrite David and his
supporters.
"They searched him, and set off to search his monk, while Monk Michael
was placed outside his room so as not to let him out. He asked to go to the
lavatory, and Anthony Bulatovich was let out without his hat. He went
straight to the station just as the train with Patriarch Gregory was moving out.
"They told me that Bulatovich had escaped and had got on the train. So in
the evening I sent a telegram to the Procurator of the Most Holy Synod in
Petersburg, Sabler, and a second to Archbishop Anthony [Khrapovitsky] of
Volhynia, who was a member of the Holy Synod. They immediately gave
orders that he should be arrested as they were leaving the train. But in Zlobin
he got off the train, got on a train for Moscow and in Moscow went to Grand-
Princess Elizabeth Feodorovna. From her he obtained a letter allowing him
free access to his Majesty Tsar Nicholas.
"The train with Patriarch Gregory arrived in Petersburg, and he was not on
it. Then the Procurator Sabler told the superior of our podvorye in Petersburg,
Hieromonk Antonin, that immediately he appeared at the podvorye he
should inform the Procurator. He appeared two days later, and the superior
Antonin told him that they were looking for him to arrest him. He
immediately went into hiding and hid in Petersburg for six months.
242
243
"I explained everything to them in detail and said that it was essential for
them to send a commission to Athos. I had to find and explain it to all the
members of the Synod individually, and I went to the flat of each of them. On
May 20 the Synod decided to send a commission to Athos. They appointed
Archbishop Nicon of Vologda and Professor Sergius Victorovich Troitsky as
members of the commission. They said that they would set off in four days'
time. And they said to me:
"'You must obtain permission for the commission to go abroad, and see
that the Greek authorities cooperate.'
"I had to obtain this from the Minister of Foreign Affairs. At that time he
was Sazonov. He was in Moscow for the coronation of his Majesty Tsar
Nicholas II. His first deputy was Neratov, and second deputy - the landowner
Prince Trubetskoy. I couldn't see Neratov, and all the foreign ambassadors
directed me to Trubetskoy. But I did not agree because he was friendly with
Bulatovich.
"I went to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with this visiting card and
handed it over. I was given an appointment for 8 o'clock in the evening...
Neratov received me very kindly and in response to my petition ordered that
the Constantinople embassy take the most energetic measures on behalf of the
commission so that everything necessary should be given it.
243
244
"I thanked Neratov. I had still had business with Sevastianov, the director
of posts and communications for the whole of Russia. I went to him and
presented my petition asking that I be allowed to receive the post, the money,
the parcels and the transfers. He shouted at me:
"He shouted and shouted at me. I simply stood and waited until he had
finished. Then I began to say:
"'You are the Minister and Director of the post of the whole of Russia, and
you occupy this post in a lawful manner. If your junior officials came to you,
beat you up and expelled you from this building, would you begin to make a
fuss or not?'
"'And that's just what I'm doing. Although I was not there, and they didn't
beat me up, but have been in Odessa now since 1911 and entrusted with the
capital and property. In Odessa I publish a journal entitled The Confirmation
of the Faith.
"'I print this journal, but I need money for paper and materials, and for
printing. They send money for me to the post office, and besides,
correspondence comes for the brothers and the pilgrims, and all that is lying
in the post-office in Odessa, and by law in three months' time it all has to be
sent back. For that reason I beseech you to allow me to be given all the
correspondence which has been held up. You can decide not to give me the
correspondence which is addressed to Igumen Jerome and David... until the
affair is resolved.'
In the end the Minister gave in, and Fr. Pitirim returned to Odessa,
received his mail, and began to prepare for the arrival of the commission.
Two days later the commission arrived. On May 28, 1913, the commission
departed for Constantinople together with Fr. Pitirim's monk Bessarion.
Having arrived in Constantinople and received the blessing of the Patriarch to
go ahead, the commission together with the Russian ambassador and 200
soldiers set off for Athos.
244
245
the refectory. There he was surrounded by groups of ten to fifteen monks who
shouted at him and did not allow him to speak a word. Finally, the embassy
official Shcherbin took the archbishop and Troitsky back to the ship. As they
were leaving the shore, the name-worshipping monks began to hurl stones at
the ship.
The next day the commission appealed to the Greek authorities. The local
Athonite authorities then took it upon themselves to write to each monk
individually and ask whether he recognized the authority of the Ecumenical
Patriarch and the Russian Synod or whether he recognized the heretical
brochure. The census lasted two weeks, after which it was revealed that 487
monks were on the side of the name-worshippers.
Then the Greeks decreed that they should be removed from Athos and
demanded that the Russians send a steamer. The Russians sent the steamer
"Kherson", which docked at the St. Panteleimon monastery on June 17. The
heretical monks locked themselves into one block and refused to go out to the
steamer. Then Russian soldiers and sailors decided to open the roof of the
block and pour cold water through a hose onto the monks. They couldn't
stand this, so they opened the door and were led out under convoy.
This left the monks of the St. Andrew skete, who had locked themselves up
for six months. Bulatovich's assistant, Protodeacon Thaddeus, was caught by
the Greeks and Shcherbin, and he agreed to persuade the monks of the St.
Andrew skete to open their doors on condition that he himself would not be
taken. Then Thaddeus went to the skete and told the monks that the Tsar had
sent the steamer, that at the intercession of Bulatovich and the Tsar they
would be given either the Kiev-Caves Lavra or New Athos, whichever they
wanted, and that each monk would be given 100 roubles per year. And he
showed them a supposed gramota which confirmed this.
This delighted the monks, and they agreed to meet the commission at 10
o'clock the next day. So when the commission arrived, they were
triumphantly with the ringing of bells. But then, while a "Many Years" to the
Tsar and Bulatovich was being chanted in the church, 100 sailors were let into
the skete. They took up positions preventing any escape and promptly began
to ask each monk whether he recognized the Patriarch of Constantinople and
the Russian Synod, or the heretical brochure. It turned out that 183 were
name-worshippers, while 345 recognized the authority of the Patriarch and
Synod. They were then led quietly out to the steamer.
When they had been put onto the steamer, the commission introduced the
exiled Igumen Jerome and the elders into the skete.
The steamer with the 736 name-worshipping monks arrived in Odessa, and
each monk was then given money for his ticket back to his homeland and the
245
246
Bulatovich was not condemned at this trial because his godfather was close
to the Tsar. And the Tsar and Tsaritsa were inclined to take pity on the exiled
monks. So an appointment was made for Fr. Pitirim to see the Tsar and
explain the matter to him. He explained the matter so well to the Tsar and
Tsaritsa that the Tsar was persuaded of the rightness of the decision.
But Bulatovich then petitioned that his case be brought up in the State
Duma. Since he was himself a left socialist revolutionary, the revolutionaries
took his side. So Fr. Pitirim was again summoned to Petersburg to explain the
matter before the Duma. Finally, the revolutionaries were persuaded to drop
the matter. That was the end of the Bulatovich affair.
In 1914 the war with Germany began, and all communications between
Russia and Athos were cut off.
In Odessa Fr. Pitirim was the first to open a hospital for the war wounded,
and was given awards for his work by the Red Cross, the Holy Synod and the
War Ministry.
While in Petersburg, Fr. Pitirim was invited to attend the critical session of
the Duma on February 23, at which Kerensky said: "Down with the Tsar and
the ministers, they've been tormenting the people enough. The workers are
starving and they cannot give them bread. We, the workers, shall do
everything, we'll take the bread from the peasants who produce corn, give
them a firm price of one rouble per pound and force them to take the corn to
the railway stations. And if they don't bring it, then we'll go with arms. The
workers will do everything."
On February 27, the first full day of the revolution, Fr. Pitirim left
Petersburg for Odessa. In November, he was again in Petersburg and on 30
November he went to congratulate the newly-enthroned Patriarch Tikhon on
246
247
the great and heavy obedience he had undertaken. The Patriarch received him
kindly, and while they were talking the newly-appointed Metropolitans
Agathangelus and Cyril arrived. From that time Fr. Pitirim always continued
to correspond with these great leaders and future hieromartyrs of the Russian
Church.
At the end of December, 1917, Fr. Pitirim was summoned by the Holy
Synod to Petersburg in connection with the Bessarabian monasteries, and in
June, 1918 the Patriarch summoned him to Moscow and entrusted him with a
gramota to the Patriarch in Constantinople, from whom he had received no
communications since November of the previous year.
Having arrived at the residence of the Patriarch, Fr. Pitirim was told that
the Ecumenical Patriarch had received Patriarch Tikhon's gramota already in
November, 1917, and welcomed the restoration of the patriarchate in Russia.
He then petitioned for, and obtained, the transfer to himself of the seven
Russian metochia (podvorya) in Constantinople, and proceeded to transfer
3700 Russian prisoners of war into them in preparation for their repatriation
to Russia.
He continues the story in his biography: "On November 1st, 1918, the
English, French, Italian and Greek fleets arrived in Constantinople and
occupied it, making it neutral from that day on. It was ruled by four powers:
England, France, Italy and Turkey. On November 3rd, our prisoners were
clothed by the English, who gave each man three pairs of underwear, shoes,
soldiers' blouses, greatcoats, service caps, waterproof raincoats and provisions
in the form of tinned food. The prisoners began to sell everything in the
market and get drunk. Then the command went out from all the powers that
no one was to buy English military clothes from prisoners of war. Typhus
appeared among the prisoners and they began to die. I myself had to clothe
the dead and go to the cemetery to sing the burial service. The whole of
November passed in this way. I was tormented together with them. They
began to pull up the floors, cut them up and burn them, and then boil
themselves tea. There was any amount [of wood] in the courtyard, but they
didn't take that, but burned the floors in the house. Then I began to ask the
powers to allow me to bring twenty-four people from Athos, three for each
podvorye. They gave me leave to go to Athos.
247
248
"Of the 700 prisoners who had arrived in Odessa, the majority turned out
to be Russians, not Ukrainians. The Hetman's authority refused to receive
them and began to return them to Constantinople.
"At three in the afternoon the ship came up to the quay of Daphni. The
captain asked me about my return journey. I said that I would return in two
weeks. He said that on January 7/20 he would drop by for me on his return
journey. After this they let down the small boats and let us out on the
quayside. Then I sent the Panteleimon monk to the Panteleimon monastery to
tell them about my arrival, and after two hours they came for me on horses
and at six o'clock in the evening, on the eve of the Nativity of Christ, I arrived
at the Panteleimon monastery. They met me so triumphantly and with such
joy: none of them knew whether I was alive or dead. They took me straight to
the abbot of the monastery. He, like all the monastics, was amazed. I told
them how I had arrived there, and they all listened with amazement. They
gave me something to eat, but there was no time to eat - I was talking to them
the whole time. After one-and-a-half hours I said:
"But under no circumstances would they let anyone out at night. They said
they would take me the next day. I promised that afterwards I would come
and tell them everything, but they said:
248
249
"I said that I would go alone, only would they give me a mule or a horse.
They gave me a mule which went each day to Karyes to bring provisions for
the members of the Athonite Synod. So the mule knew the road. It was dark
and foggy. I left the Panteleimon monastery. Along the whole route I met
only three desert-dwellers in various places. The mule brought me to Karyes,
where it used to bring provisions, but wouldn't go a step further. Then I got
off the mule and went in front of it, leading it. We arrived at our community, I
tied the mule to the pavilion, went up to the gates and knocked. A monk
opened the gate. He didn't know me. He asked who was there. I replied: 'One
of ours.' He opened up and I went in. But since he didn't know me, he said:
Fr. Archippus was not to be found, he had left on some business. I asked
the monk at the gate to tell him that such-and-such a monk had arrived, and
then myself went out of the gates and began to untie the mule and my
baggage. When Fr. Archippus arrived, his assistant told him that some
stranger had arrived. Fr. Archippus came out and began to ask me:
"When I said: 'Well, I'm me,' he recognized my voice, fell at my feet and
said:
249
250
"Then we went to the guest-house. We went to the buffet, where the guest-
master Protodeacon Stratonicus was reading his rule. When I opened the door
and went in, his book fell out of his hands. He only stood there and looked at
me.
"'What are you looking at me like that for?' I said. 'It's Fr. Pitirim.'
"I assured him that it was me and we greeted each other. Then I said:
"'Give me a room with a window onto the courtyard so that I can see how
the monks go to church.'
"But I said: 'First you go to Vladimir and Joasaphat, and quietly tell them
that I have arrived, but tell noone else that I'm here.'
"First he went to Vladimir. He asked in what room I was and himself ran
up to me. The guest-master then went to Joasaphat. Vladimir ran with such
joy that he dropped a shoe off his foot, hurled himself at me, and we kissed
each other and wept copiously. Meanwhile, Joasaphat arrived. We greeted
each other and began to talk. I began to tell them my story in short.
Meanwhile they gave me tea. While we were talking and drinking tea, the bell
began to ring for the all-night vigil. Vladimir had to go and serve the sick
abbot. They agreed not to tell anyone anything, but when the service began I
would go into the church. Already the younger desert-dwellers were kissing
the icons. I went up to kiss the icon of the feast of the Nativity, and one of the
monks said to me:
"'Where are you going? Our own monks have not arrived yet, and you're
going to kiss the icons?'
"I kissed the icon of the Mother of God and in accordance with Athonite
custom in the middle of the church opposite the royal doors I made three
bows, and them bowed first to the right kliros and then to the left and then to
the brothers behind. When I was bowing to the right kliros, the chanter on the
right kliros Maurice recognized me and said to the others:
"'It's Pitirim.'
250
251
"They replied that he had gone out of his mind: from where would Pitirim
turn up there? I went straight into the sanctuary. Everyone was already
reading the rule. I went up to the altar-table and bowed. All the clerics were
standing and looking, none of them said a word. The sacrist, Hieromonk
Florentius, decided to go up to me and asked:
"I said that it was me, and then everyone began to greet me and we kissed
each other. Then we began to pray. At the magnification I went out, and all
the monks saw me. After the magnification I began to anoint all the monks.
Then they were all convinced that it was me. After the all-night vigil had
finished, I wanted to serve the early Liturgy, and six hieromonks and three
hierodeacons served with me. Almost all the monks came for the early
Liturgy. After the service they all invited me to have tea. I didn't go, but went
into the guest-house together with all the clergy, chanters and all the other
monks. There they poured out tea and while we were drinking I spoke. They
all wanted to know what we had gone through during this period and how I
had come to Athos.
"On the second day of the Nativity I went to the St. Elijah skete and stayed
there for a day. I told them about their podvorye in Odessa and how the
monks were living there. Then I returned to my community. The heads of the
monasteries began to come to me and agreed that when we went they would
each give me three people. I needed twenty-four people. I told them that a
steamboat was coming for me, and we would go on January 7/20, 1919.
Around the New Year people were sent to me from the Panteleimon
monastery, and I went there and stayed there for two days. They took me on
the cutter to the skete at Thebadia, where there was a church, so that I could
see how they had finished the church, which my workmen had finished
without me. On January 3rd I returned to my community again and remained
there until the feast of the Baptism of the Lord. On the feast I celebrated the
Liturgy and began to get ready to go to the Pantaleimon monastery, where
the steamboat would arrive. It was very hard for me to leave my community.
I didn't want to go, but I was compelled by the fact that in Constantinople I
had accepted the responsibility for some communities and I had to hand them
over to those to whom they belonged. From Constantinople I would be able to
return again to Athos, but the main thing was to fulfil the charge given me by
his Holiness Patriarch Tikhon and bring the gramota from the Ecumenical
Patriarch to our Patriarch. And so I, for the sake of holy obedience, had to
return to Russia and give this gramota to his Holiness Patriarch Tikhon.
"On January 7th the French steamboat put in at Athos. I boarded it with
tears. While it was passing for two hours by Athos, I could not restrain myself
and wept all the time. On January 8th I returned to Thessalonica, and on the
9th - to Constantinople. On January 16th there arrived the monks who had
251
252
been appointed for the podvoryes. I handed over to them the acts whereby
the podvoryes were received from the Turkish government, after which I
could go to Russia.
"While I had been on Athos, the Bolsheviks had taken Odessa. There was
no longer any Hetman. They began to send all the Russian and Ukrainian
prisoners to Odessa. I left on the next steamboat. On January 29th I arrived in
Odessa. There Soviet power was in control.
"In 1919 a certain Petlyura appeared and drove the Bolsheviks out of
Odessa. They fought for more than a year. In 1920 armies began to come to
Odessa from Crimea under the command of a certain General Imeling, and in
February the Bolsheviks again took Odessa. This was already the last battle,
and all the armies, and the intelligentsia, too, left Russia for Constantinople. In
1920 the war came to an end, only in Siberia there was Kolchak, who was also
gradually retreating towards Manchuria and Vladivostok.
"We had nothing to live on in Odessa. I began to ask for some land to be
given to us. We were sixty people at the podvorye. They gave us some land
near the Yeremievka station, fifty versts from Odessa, in the village of
Kuzmenko. We had nothing: neither horses, nor ploughs, nor harrows. We
began as follows. First six monks would go there. Tailors and cobblers in the
villages began privately to sew boots, jackets and coats, and in exchange for
this work each would plough as much land as he could, so that we could sow
something. I also arrived on a pair of horses, as did the president of the
village. They stopped near me. The president, Manuel Sidorenko, came up to
me and said:
"I said: 'We won't go - the government has given us this land.'
"He struck me twice. A boy from Kotalovka was with me. I said to him:
"He hit me again, pushed me away with his feet and left. I finished
ploughing as much as was necessary, sowed some oats and barley, and then
started harrowing. The boy had gone home with the horses, so I got on a train
and went to Odessa. I described everything in detail and went to the court. A
252
253
week later, Sidorenko was arrested and driven on foot to Odessa. A trial was
arranged, the boy and I were summoned to appear before it. When they
interrogated the boy, he described everything that had happened in great
detail. The judge said:
"'If Archimandrite Pitirim forgives you, then fine. Otherwise you will be
sentenced to three years, one year for every blow.'
"I forgave him, but the judge still gave him one year's forced labour. After
this no one touched us. We began to work the land and live on it."
"In 1921-22 they began to remove the silver and golden things from the
churches. Patriarch Tikhon wrote that church vessels in which the services
were carried out should not be given up, in accordance with the church
typicon established by Anastasius and the Ecumenical Councils. When the
Patriarch did not allow this, three bishops, Eudocimus, Antonin and Leonid,
were found, together with the Protopriests Vvedensky, Krasnitsky, Boyarsky,
Stadnik and others. They declared that they did not agree with the Patriarch,
that his ban was unlawful, and that they allowed it. Then, on May 2nd, 1922,
the Patriarch was arrested. He handed over his administration to
Metropolitan Agathangelus, the first candidate [for the post of patriarchal
locum tenens] who had been appointed by the Council [of 1917-18].
Agathangelus issued an epistle stating that he was accepting the patriarchal
locum tenancy. 'Every ruling bishop must lead his flock in accordance with
his hierarchical conscience, with which he gave his oath on being established
as a bishop. But if he is in perplexity about anything, let him address my
humility.'
253
254
"'I was elected to this see by the people. Without the people I cannot
decide. Tomorrow is Sunday, the people will be free. We shall ask the people
to assemble at the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. Then you explain to them what
renovationism and the Living Church is.'
"They all agreed to this. That same evening Metropolitan Benjamin phoned
the deans of Leningrad that they should immediately announce in all the
churches that some metropolitans had arrived from Moscow who had
suggested that he accept renovationism
"'Tomorrow, May 28th, I shall serve in the Alexander Nevsky Lavra. At the
end of the Liturgy the representatives of the Living Church will explain what
renovationism and the Living Church is. And I shall ask the whole people and
all the believers who are interested in Church matters to come at ten o'clock to
the Lavra.'
"On May 28th, 1922, the people began to come together from the whole of
Leningrad, and in front of the entrance they placed notebooks in which
everyone's name could be recorded. From these notebooks it is calculated that
12,000 people gathered, as well as the clergy from every church. Three people:
Archimandrite Macarius [the future bishop-confessor of the Catacomb
Church], Hieromonk Seraphim and Hierodeacon German wrote down
everything that happened and sent it to me in Odessa.
"At the end of the Liturgy Metropolitan Benjamin addressed the people,
saying:
"Vvedensky came out onto the ambon. He began to explain his programme
as follows:
254
255
"'Brothers and sister, up to now,' he said, 'we have been subject to the Tsar
and the metropolitans. But now we are free, and we ourselves must rule the
people and the Church. More than 1900 years have already passed since it
was written for us that the Lord Jesus Christ was born from the Virgin Mary
and is the Son of God. But that is not true We recognize the existence of the
God of Sabaoth, about whom our whole Bible and all the prophets have
written. And we recognize them. But Jesus Christ is not God. He was simply a
very clever man. And it is impossible to call Mary, who was born of a Jewish
tribe and herself gave birth to Jesus - the Mother of God and Virgin. And so
now we have all recognized the existence of God, that is, the God of Sabaoth,
and we must all be united: both Jews and Catholics must be a living people's
church.'
"'We believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Son of God and God, and we
recognize the Mother of God to be a Virgin!'
"'Brothers and sisters, the baptism of small children has been accepted by
us. But when the child is just born he does not know or understand anything.
They baptize him, put a little cross on him, and he grows up with the
obligation of wearing this cross and not taking it off. But when he has grown
up, he will learn and know everything - the cross will be quite unnecessary for
him. So we do not recognize the baptism of young children, and when he
comes of age let him be baptized and wear a cross. In the same way we do not
recognize marriage: it is unnecessary and wrong. Why bind people? It should
be like this: they should get together, register a civil marriage, and if one
doesn't like the other, then let them go off in search of another and let him
take another woman. We have freedom now. So we do not recognize any
saints or relics. Nor do we recognize monasticism. We don't need any
monasticism. Before, bishops had to come from the monks. This is wrong,
because a man cannot live without a woman, nor the woman without a man.
Bishops must be married, and priests also. It used to be that if a priest's wife
died he had to remain a widower until his death. That is wrong. Now there is
freedom. We can take a second and a third wife.'
"'Although Vvedensky said that Jesus Christ is not God but a clever man,
and the Mother of God is not a Virgin, I do not agree with this. I recognize
that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and the Mother of God a Virgin... But
baptism, marriage, holy relics, monasticism - I do not recognize!'
255
256
"'We do not need your explanations. We do not want your new Living
Church'
"'You have all heard all the explanations of the representatives of the
Living Church. Perhaps there is someone who will agree to join them. But I
cannot, because this is the same blasphemy which was previously preached
by Arius and his followers. And so I, in accordance with the rules of the
Apostles and the Ecumenical Councils am obliged to anathematize all the
leaders of this living and new church and their followers.'
"'In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and of the All-pure,
immaculate and Ever-Virgin His Mother, the Birth-giver of God, I
anathematize...'
"And there and then the protodeacon pronounced anathema on all the
teachers and followers of the 'Living Church'. But while they were chanting
anathema, Vvedensky, fled out of the sanctuary through a side-door into the
courtyard of the Alexander-Nevsky Lavra, and informed the GPU by
telephone of what had happened. But Metropolitan Benjamin began to preach
and give further explanations to the people. While he was speaking, there
appeared representatives of the Soviet authorities and arrested Metropolitan
Benjamin and the four bishops and three laymen who had been appointed
members of the presidium.
"Immediately, they took them out into Gorochovaya street, where the
GPU was situated. All the people who had been in the Lavra went there and
demanded that the authorities release the metropolitan and those who had
been taken with him. The whole people gathered and towards the evening of
May 28th about 30,000 people had gathered on the square of the GPU. No one
left, they continued demanding their release, but the authorities did not
release them. It was already late in the evening when the people were
dispersed by a cavalry army.
256
257
"I in Odessa was very upset and unhappy, but I did not commemorate the
HCA for one day, although I did not know in detail what was happening in
Moscow and Leningrad. On the same day, August 17th, I received letters
from my brothers Archimandrite Macarius and Metropolitan Agathangelus.
In Metropolitan Agathangelus' letter was an epistle in which it was said that
he had taken [the administration of the Church] upon himself in accordance
with the will and blessing of his Holiness Patriarch Tikhon, who had been
arrested, and that 'I, as the first candidate chosen by the Council in accordance
with the will of God, take upon myself this great work of the administration
of the Church of the whole of Russia, and I give my full blessing to every
bishop, archimandrite and priest to lead his flock along the true path which
has been given to us by the Holy Apostles and the Ecumenical Councils.
Everybody must firmly take stock of the church situation. Now the so-called
Living Church, in which the HCA [is involved?], has been founded and
confirmed by the authorities in our land. But I remain by the apostolic
conciliar decrees, and if you are perplexed about anything, address my
humility.' There was nothing more from Metropolitan Agathangelus. But
Archimandrite Macarius wrote from Leningrad everything that I have
indicated above, about how Metropolitan Benjamin anathematized the HCA.
Immediately I received the epistle from Metropolitan Agathangelus and
Macarius, I went to the ruling bishop of Odessa and Kherson, Alexis. I gave
him to read the epistle I had received, and the detailed explanation from
Leningrad of what had been happening there in the month of May. When he
had read it all, Vladyka ordered the secretary of the Odessa-Kherson diocese,
Nicholas Vladimirovich Chishchakov, to be invited there, and gave him, too,
to read it. Then immediately, on August 19th (it was a Friday, at two o'clock
in the afternoon), they decided to instruct all the Odessa clerics and the
spiritual presidents, i.e. of the church councils, to come to the Dormition
church. They all assembled and the epistle from Leningrad was read out to
257
258
all. It was decreed that the epistle of Metropolitan Agathangelus should be re-
printed on typewriters. On Saturday the 20th it was announced throughout
the city of Odessa that [the epistle] would be read out on the Sunday, so that
all the people should know what was being done in the Church and in the
diocese. On the evening of the Saturday Bishop Alexis telephoned all the
deans, telling them to come to him on the Sunday, but that they should not
read the epistle for the time being. And I was told by phone that I should not
explain anything to the people for the time being. But I did not obey the
bishop - I proclaimed it at the early and later Liturgies. The people dispersed,
and the news spread throughout the city about what Metropolitan
Agathangelus had written and the fact that in Leningrad the HCA had been
excommunciated from the Church and anathematized by Metropolitan
Benjamin.
"'You were told on the telephone that you should not for the time being
proclaim it to the people, but you did proclaim it. Does that mean that you do
not submit to your diocesan bishop?'
"I replied that in the Dormition church it had been decreed that the news
should be proclaimed to the people on Sunday, and should be sent separately
to each church in the diocese, so that the people should know what was being
done in our Church.
"'I find it unnecessary to proclaim it for the time being,' replied Vladyka.
"'That means that you agree to join the HCA and commemorate them,' I
said, 'but I have not commemorated them and will not commemorate them in
the future.'
"I replied: 'I do not recognize your ban - it means that you, too, are a
renovationist.'
"I objected: 'If you were not a renovationist, you would not have rescinded
the decree of Metropolitan Agathangelus. And from today I do not recognize
you and will not commemorate you at the litanies'… And I left Alexis.
"I went home to the podvorye, gathered together the five monks and three
hierodeacons, and declared to them that from that day I would not be
commemorating the bishop of Odessa and Kherson. I told them everything in
258
259
detail, that he had forbidden me to serve and that I did not recognize him and
that he was a renovationist. Out of all the eight people present, only one
hierodeacon did not agree with me.
"'If you want to commemorate Alexis,' I replied, 'go to him and serve there,
but I will not allow you to serve with me in the podvorye.'
"I did not allow him to serve, and he went to the bishop's house, where he
served. From August 23rd Alexis was not commemorated with us in the
podvorye. Nor was the HCA. The whole city knew about that in the St.
Andrew podvorye Archimandrite Pitirim had forbidden his monks from
commemorating Alexis of Odessa and Kherson.
"On October 25th, I was arrested and taken to the GPU. I went with joy for
the purity of the faith. They kept me there for seventeen days for
interrogations: why did I not recognize or commemorate Alexis? I explained
that I was from old Athos, there I was tonsured into monasticism and
ordained as a church-server by a Greek bishop and I was in obedience to the
Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople. According to our Church law, one
must commemorate the person one is in obedience to. After interrogation I
was freed.
"During this period, on January 2nd, 1923, I saw a vision: it was as if I was
in my community on Athos and the reposed Archimandrite Joseph was
blessing me for a new obedience. He was making me a bishop, vesting me in a
hierarchical mantia and omophorion, and putting a staff in my hand, while by
the other column on the left stood the Apostle Andrew, who was also blessing
me. And they put me on the left kliros of the church. I looked at them with
such joy - at my elder Joseph and the Apostle Andrew. The service continued
for some time until suddenly two people came up to me and said:
"'Let's go. You have been appointed our bishop. Everybody's waiting for
you there!'
"They took me by the hands and led me out of the church, and suddenly a
simple peasant cart drawn by a pair of horses appeared. I kept on thinking
how I was going to sit in this carriage in my mantia and omophorion and
staff. Then suddenly I was in the carriage, while behind me there was a carpet
and railings. The driver set off, and we left my community and Athos. We
259
260
went over the sea on the horses. It was as if we were crossing dry land.
Suddenly the inhabitants brought me up to a large church. They were ringing
the bells as one does when meeting a bishop. We went up to the church and
again the same two people who had taken me out on Athos appeared. They
took me and led me into the church. When we entered, there was a lot of dirt
and dust in the vestibule. I said to them:
"They replied that there was a clean, good place with them. We went up
the left-hand side-chapel and came to the iconostasis. There were no icons -
they had been broken up. And suddenly a priest came out from the central
altar with a cross, in the way priests always meet bishops. I took the cross and
kissed it. Suddenly there appeared in front of me a boy of extraordinary
beauty, who said to me:
"'So you've come to us - good. We are all alive and we shall live, and you
will be with us.'
"He was not tall. I said to those who had brought me:
"The third of January was indeed the commemoration of the holy Prophet
Malachi. Then they led me into the central chapel, where on the left side the
steps of the ambon were broken. They lifted me up and I found myself on the
ambon of the central chapel. The priest went into the altar, and I turned to the
people. I wanted to pronounce some words of welcome, and I saw that the
middle of this church was covered with Persian carpets, and there were no
people. But the right-hand side-chapel was full of people, and they all wanted
to hear what I would say. I began to speak as follows:
"'Dear brothers and sisters, I have been appointed as your pastor here. I
don't know any of you, and you don't know me. I have to say to you that our
260
261
Church administration here in Russia is not canonical and they do not want to
stand for the purity of the Apostolic Church.'
"Two weeks later, on January 17th, 1923, on the feast of St. Anthony the
Great, I had served the all-night vigil, gone into my cell and had only lain
down to sleep a little when I had the following vision: I was going into the
cathedral church of Odessa to the right-hand doors of the right-hand chapel. I
went - and saw no one. On the right-hand iconostasis there were no icons -
they had all been broken. I went into the sanctuary and kissed the altar-table.
The altar-table was in its usual place. I made three prostrations and began to
kiss the altar-table. At that moment the Prophet Malachi appeared between
the altar and the high place and said to me:
"I went into the central chapel to kiss the altar-table, went up to the altar
and saw that the whole sanctuary was full of men and women crowding
round the altar-table. When I was moving across to the central chapel where
the people were, a Jew was reading on the altar - I don't know what he was
reading. I asked him:
"At that moment I saw a vested protodeacon standing on the ambon, while
in the middle of the church on the cathedra stood a bishop and many people.
At that moment the protodeacon intoned: "Blessed be the Kingdom of the
Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." The chanters chanted: "Amen."
All those who were in the sanctuary, men and women, were praying. Then
they lay down and in the lying position sang with a laugh: "Lord, have
mercy." Then I woke up, shaking all over.
261
262
"I replied: 'Your Eminence, I cannot commemorate the HCA because all of
them have been excommunicated from the Church and anathematized by
Metropolitan Benjamin, who also excommunicated and anathematized all
those who confess the new Living Church, in whose programme it is said that
Jesus Christ is not the Son of God, and the Mother of God is not a Virgin. This
confession has been condemned by the Ecumenical Councils and
anathematized. Moreover, on May 28th in the Alexander Nevsky Lavra in
Leningrad your brothers Vvedensky, Krasnitsky and Boyarsky, in the
presence of 12,000 people, confessed and explained what the Living Church
was. And you are subject to expulsion. Benjamin excommunicated you
lawfully. You shot Benjamin, four bishops and three laymen!'
"And I began to tell them that I knew everything and had read everything.
And since Vladyka Alexis had forbidden the epistle of Metropolitan
Agathangelus to be proclaimed to the people, I had stopped commemorating
him.
"Eudocimus said to me: 'Since you cannot commemorate the HCA and
Alexis, remain with your convictions, but tell your hieromonks that they
should commemorate the HCA and Bishop Alexis in the litanies, so as not to
disturb the people.'
"'For this they will put you in prison,' he said, 'close your podvorye and
expel all your monks from Odessa. How will you answer before your
Athonites, who have entrusted you with both the podvorye and the monks?'
"'You understand that you are already excommunicated. If I did not know
that, I could still do as you wish,' I replied.
"I replied: 'The fact that the Panteleimon monks have made a compromise
with you is their business, but I will not do and cannot do it. In our Church
there can be no compromises.' And then I left them.
262
263
"Three days later they sent Bishop Gerasimus of Boltovsk to me. He was
with me for more than an hour, constantly trying to persuade me. I did not
agree and he left.
"Two days later they sent Archbishop Pimen of Podolsk to me. He came
and tried to persuade me. He said:
"'Vladyko! Shall we really take beds with us into the Kingdom of Heaven?'
"Then he got up and said: 'Forgive me, I shall not speak with you any
longer,' and left.
"After this Eudocimus appointed another bishop for Odessa and took
Alexis Bazhanov away with him to Moscow, where he made him
Metropolitan of Kazan.
"A week after their departure, on Palm Sunday, we were serving the all-
night vigil. At three o'clock the GPU arrived and sealed our churches. In the
morning the people arrived, but the churches were closed, so the people stood
in the street until 12 o'clock. All the streets were full of people. The police
asked them:
"But the people did not move. At 12 o'clock the cavalry were summoned.
They dispersed the people and emptied the streets. Up to Holy Thursday we
were still in the podvorye, but on Holy Thursday they moved all of us out of
the St. Andrew podvorye to Ilinskoye, where they had appointed their own
priests in the church. Since none of the monks would go into the church, the
order was given to all the monks to leave Odessa and go wherever they
wanted. All the monks chose me to go to Moscow and intercede for all the
Athonite monks to be allowed to go to Old Athos, and if permission was not
given, to be given a monastery somewhere in Russia. I wrote down the names
of all of them - there were 180 people. I wrote down the Christian names and
surnames of each of them, how long they had lived on Athos and in which
community. I arrived in Moscow and went to Kalinin. Kalinin said that he
could not do this, but that everything depended on his colleagues' opinions of
the matter. And he sent me to Sakhorov, who, having looked into the matter,
sent me to Krasin. Krasin did not receive me for two weeks. Every day I went
to him. His secretary proposed that I go to Chicherin and get a note from him
to Krasin. And he told me that I should come to him at eight o'clock in the
263
264
evening. Krasin was due to arrive a nine o'clock. I arrived and sat in the
reception room. At 9 Krasin came in with a comrade, with whom he talked
until 10.30. After that they told him about me and Krasin received me. Having
read my petition and the list [of names], he said:
"And he told his secretary to make a note and give me the number of my
case. Krasin told me to go to Odessa, and after the session the decision would
be sent to me there. They could cope with things only one at a time. I left
Moscow with nothing. On arriving in Odessa in May, I told everything to the
monks. They began to disperse - some to their homeland, wherever they
wanted. In June, papers came from Moscow allowing the monks to go to
Athos and dividing them into three groups of sixty monks each. All those sent
away were specified by name exactly as on the list of Archimandrite Pitirim.
He himself was allowed to leave with the last group. When the papers arrived
in Odessa, there were thirty monks there. The Odessa GPU said that in view
of the fact that we were so few they could not allow us to leave. So we stayed.
"'I forgive you since you repent, but you will have to be judged by a
Council of the Orthodox Church.'
"In 1923 I [together with all the brothers] was exiled from Odessa to a farm
fifty versts from the city [in the village of Yeremevka], where we had
previously worked the land. In 1924, thirty-seven protopriests recognized
their mistake. The people were not going to church. They then began to write
that they were again returning to Patriarch Tikhon. But in Odessa there was
no Orthodox bishop. [The nearest] was in Kharkov, by the name of
Onuphrius, but in Odessa itself there was only a renovationist bishop.
Patriarch Tikhon blessed Archimandrite Pitirim, who was living near Odessa,
to go to Odessa and receive these thirty-seven protopriests. He said that they
264
265
should give an oath and ask forgiveness of the whole people in the church. I
went to Odessa with the blessing of Patriarch Tikhon with the letter he had
sent me... I united them [to the Church] on four Sundays, dividing them into
groups of nine. They repented. I read the prayer of absolution over them and
united them again to our Church. I asked the people to accept them and go
with them to church without doubting. A month after this, the Soviet
authorities ordered me to leave even the farm and told me that I should not
dare to live anywhere in Ukraine. And they took from me a written
undertaking concerning my future place of residence. I indicated the town of
Glazov, in Vyatka province. I went to Patriarch Tikhon in Moscow to tell him
of my position. The Patriarch only smiled and said:
"'It's good that you have come. I am now going to make you a bishop [of
Yaransk]. We need many people here, but I don't have anyone.'
"He said: 'You can't refuse - this is holy obedience. We need bishops, and
we can't get them anywhere.'
"'After that, let the will of God be done, I shall carry out the obedience. In
1917 I came to bring you a gramota from the Ecumenical Patriarch, which was
considered impossible. But by your holy prayers and blessing I succeeded in
everything and now I ask you only to let me go to my homeland and see my
relatives.'"
"I was two nights in the Donskoy monastery, where he [Patriarch Tikhon]
was accomodated in the small church. There were three rooms attached to it.
He served his confinement in this church with the double eastern doors, and
when he was released he did not want to live in the patriarchal apartment. So
he stayed in the place where he had been confined. On two evenings he
invited me to his room, and there we discussed everything. It was then that I
asked him:
"He said to me: 'I received him as a penitent novice, he cannot rule the
Church until a Council. And he must bear whatever punishment the Council
gives him. Sergius agreed to this.'
265
266
"As for me, [the Patriarch] blessed me to go and rest in my homeland, after
which I was to return to him in Moscow. I was with his Holiness the Patriarch
in October, 1924, and on December 7, the Patriarch wrote an epistle to all the
clergy of the Church. There it was written:
"'Do not serve, your Holiness, have a rest. You are very tired and weak.'
"The Patriarch felt well and was getting ready to serve the next day. But
suddenly there was a ring at the door. When they opened the door, a doctor
entered. The doctor said:
"'Your Holiness! You rang us and asked us to come since you were weak.
Here I am to examine you and prescribe you some medicines.'
"'Okay,' said the doctor, 'but just allow me to examine you. Your pulse is
weak. You must drink some medicine.'
"The Patriarch asked: 'Why have you come and not my doctor, who always
looks after me?'
"'He's not at home now, he's on call, but I was at home - so here I am,'
replied the doctor. 'In an hour's time I shall send you a mixture.'
266
267
"An hour after the doctor had left, at ten o'clock in the evening, Mark
brought the Patriarch a mixture and said that the doctor had ordered him to
drink a spoonful.
"Mark poured out a spoonful of the mixture and the Patriarch drank it.
Immediately he began to vomit (be sick). The cell-attendants Straton and
Mark rang the doctor. After a few minutes the doctor appeared. The Patriarch
was lying down.
"The doctor demanded to see the mixture immediately. They gave it him.
On seeing it, the doctor threw up his hands and immediately sent the
Patriarch to hospital. Mark and Stratonicus took him out and put him in the
carriage. They got in themselves and accompanied him to the hospital. There
they gave him some milk, and prepared some baths, but nothing helped.
Within an hour and a half Patriarch Tikhon had died. The cell-attendants took
him back. At three o'clock the Patriarch was laid out as a corpse at home. I
write this from the words of the cell-attendants Mark and Stratonicus, who
were with the Patriarch in the place of the murdered Yakov.
[This version of events by Schema-Bishop Peter does not agree with the
usually accepted account of the death of the Patriarch and for that reason it
may give rise to doubts, first of all because it is well-known that before his
death the Patriarch lived in a clinic and died in a room he had taken. -
Comment of the editors of Tserkovnaya Zhizn'.]
"In 1925 I was again in Moscow, where I met the cell-attendants [of the
Patriarch] and asked how the Patriarch had died. In 1924, when I had been
with the Patriarch, he had commanded me to leave my address for
Metropolitan Peter. I arrived in my homeland of Glazov, where all my
relatives were very glad to see me. I remained there for four months. On
learning in Ufa province that I was in Glazov, my cousins and nephews came
to visit me. Nun Eustalia came to Glazov and asked me to go and see them.
That was in 1925. I arrived in Ufa, went to the church and asked:
"They replied that they were old-churchmen. [But] in the church they did
not commemorate Patriarch Tikhon. I asked the priest:
267
268
"He replied: 'We are doing what Vladyka John of Ufa ordered us to do.'
"'That cannot be,' I said. 'It is never permissible not to commemorate the
Patriarch. Now we can find out: where they commemorate Patriarch Tikhon
they are old-churchmen, and where they do not they are renovationist.'
"'Why do you allow the archimandrite to serve? Now he will take your
place and we will be left without a crust of bread.'
"She wrote a letter to Bishop John, and sent it with her mother-in-law to
Ufa. In it she pointed out that the archimandrite was commemorating
Patriarch Tikhon and that the people were coming to him from all the
villages. The bishop forbade me to serve, saying:
268
269
"'Why are you taking the last crust of bread from a poor priest? Come to
me and I will give you a place. John's card was given to me at Mid-Pentecost
and after this I stopped serving. I decided to go to Vyatka and stay there for a
while.
"'Bring me one of the monks and I will make him a bishop. Bishop John is a
real renovationist. You are doing well in not recognizing him.'
"They said that about 3000 people were not going to the church where the
priests of Bishop John who did not commemorate Patriarch Tikhon were
serving.
"'Up to this time we have been in darkness, but now Soviet power has
given us light. In the past we bowed down to the golden calf, but now we
have complete freedom. Priests do not have to give sermons in the churches,
they can speak openly on the squares.'
"This was signed by Bishop John. When I read this declaration, then it
really dawned on me that the poor people knew nothing about what was
happening in our church and what kind of church-servers we had. I said that I
could not agree to this exploit without the lot and the will of God. They said
to me:
"'If you do not agree, then you will answer for all of us before the Lord. We
shall not go to these churches.'
"I said: 'Then choose three candidates. Tomorrow is Trinity Sunday, the
descent of the Holy Spirit upon the Apostles. Whoever the Lord indicates to
you will be your bishop.'
269
270
"They were very glad and agreed. Then they appointed me as the first
candidate, Theophanes, who served in the French factory, as the second, and
since no third monastic could be found they also appointed Michael
Panchenko, who was married. They said: if the lot falls to him, they will both
be tonsured, and have already agreed about this. I also agreed and wrote
down the three lots. On the day of the feast of the Holy Trinity we asked the
Lord to indicate a Bishop for us. At the end of the service, the Liturgy and the
Vespers, I took the three lots from the altar, put them in the tabernacle, and
then shook them. They decided that the lot should be drawn by the leader of
the group of missionaries Chemetov. The lot fell on me. Everybody was
joyful, but I wept bitterly, knowing that I was going to sufferings. But I
submitted to the will of God. On the second day of Trinity I again celebrated
the Liturgy, and immediately after they accompanied me with the missionary
Chemetov to Archbishop Andrew, who was in Ten-Zhen in Asia
[Tadzhikstan]. On the train travelling with us were Archimandrite Anthony
Milovidov and Hieromonk Rufinus Brekhov, who were also due to be
consecrated to the episcopate.
"From Ten-Zhen I went straight to Odessa to pick up the things I had left
there. From Odessa I went to Sophinevskoye, where I stayed with relatives. I
arrived at Uteryak station, and from Sophronov I had to go four kilometres
out of my way on horseback. They found for me a Bashkiri driver and he
arrived at the station on exactly the same carriage which I had seen in a dream
in 1923 on the 2nd of January, in which I had been consecrated to the
episcopate. I had been consecrated to the episcopate and a Bashkir drove me
to the village of Sophronovka.
270
271
"In 1925 Metropolitan Peter took upon himself the administration of the
Church. Then, in September, Metropolitan Sergius convened a Council, at
which they decreed that all should unite into one: the renovationists, the
[Ukrainian] self-consecrators and the Church of Metropolitan Peter.
Metropolitan Peter did not agree to this, nor could he according to the
apostolic and conciliar decrees. The renovationists had already been
excommunicated and anathematized, while the self-consecrators had also
uncanonically consecrated themselves, which has never been known in our
Orthodox Church. But Metropolitan Peter was immediately arrested for his
disagreement with the impious council. He spent two days in prison and
handed over the administration of the Church to some unknown person. A
group of eight bishops was with Metropolitan Peter, forming a Synod. The
head of this group, and the oldest, was Archbishop Gregory of Sverdlovsk.
They were waiting for Metropolitan Peter to announce to whom he was
handing over the administration. But at this point Metropolitan Peter was
visited by Tuchkov, who been put in charge of Church affairs by the
authorities. Tuchkov was with some bishop or other, I don't know who.
Tuchkov ordered Metropolitan Peter to hand over the administration to
Metropolitan Sergius. Peter said that he could not do that since Metropolitan
Sergius had been in a member of the [renovationist] Higher Church
Administration, and because in December, 1924 there had been published an
epistle of Patriarch Tikhon to the whole Russian flock in which it was said that
whoever had been in the HCA could not be part of the administration of the
Orthodox Church. Then Tuchkov said that Metropolitan Peter should hand
over the administration to this group of eight bishops. Sergius would join this
group, but would not do any administration. Metropolitan Peter agreed to
Tuchkov's demand to write this and hand over the administration to the
group of bishops. But it was not handed over to the bishops, but to Sergius.
Sergius was at that time in Gorky [Nizhni-Novgorod], and he did not join this
group of hierarchs, but collected several bishops of his own there. Two weeks
passed. Gregory in Moscow knew nothing, and he sent a second time to
Metropolitan Peter. The latter replied that already two weeks before he
handed the administration over to thim, and that 'the group must rule, and
Metropolitan Sergius must join this group'.
"Sergius replied: 'I don't recognize any of you and will not come to
Moscow.'
"The two bishops returned from Sergius and explained to Sergius' reply to
Gregory and his group. Then Gregory and his group informed Metropolitan
271
272
Peter that Sergius would not come to Moscow and declared that he
recognized none of them and had already registered his council [with the
authorities]. Then Metropolitan Peter handed over the whole administration
to Archbishop Gregory of Sverdlovsk and his group. When Archbishop
Gregory received this communication from Metropolitan Peter, he registered
his group. That was how three Synods came to be formed with us in Russia:
the Renovationist, the Sergianist and the Gregorian. But no one in the whole
of Russia knows this. Then they began to divide the Church into Gregorians,
Sergianists, Renovationist and self-consecrators... When Metropolitan Sergius
head that Gregory and his group had been registered, he excommunicated his
Synod and forbade them all to serve. Gregory, of course, did not recognize
these bans. I learned these details and was terrified by all that had happened.
I decided to go into retirement, take the schema and not be responsible for my
flock before the Lord."
On April 21, 1927, Bishop Pitirim took the schema with the name of Peter.
According to another source, he was tonsured on January 20, 1928 in the
village of Chetverto-Petrovskoye by Bishop Job (Afanasyev), who took over
his Nizhegorod diocese with the blessing of Archbishop Andrew of Ufa.
"After my tonsure," he writes, "I resigned from the administration of the
Church and in Voznesensk, near Chetveropetrovsk, they made me a cell in
which I prayed, without leaving or going anywhere. On feasts and Sundays I
would go to Chetveropetrovsk and sometimes I served. Many people came,
and they also brought the sick. Bishop John, seeing this, began to complain
and petition that I be arrested or removed.
"In 1926 Metropolitan Agathangelus finished his term of exile and returned
to Yaroslavl since he was considered the metropolitan of Yaroslavl. Everyone
began to come to him. Then Tuchkov with some archimandrite came to
Agathangelus and began to demand from him that he hand over his
administration to [Metropolitan] Sergius. Metropolitan Agathangelus did not
agree to this. Then Tuchkov told him that he would now go back into exile.
Then Agathangelus, because of his health and since he had already been three
years in exile, resigned from the administration [the post of patriarchal locum
tenens] and left it to Peter of Krutitsa as the lawful [locum tenens] until the
second candidate, Metropolitan Cyril, should return from exile. I heard about
this when I personally went to him in Yaroslavl and he himself explained his
situation to me. And he said that the canonical administration was now really
in the hands of Cyril, and temporarily, until the return of Cyril, with
Metropolitan Peter. He did not recognize Sergius or Gregory.
"'How should we act in the future,' I asked him, 'if neither Cyril nor Peter
are around? Who must we commemorate?'
272
273
"Joseph was sent by the Patriarch to Leningrad, but when Sergius took
over the administration, he sent Alexis there, the one who is now
metropolitan in Leningrad. But Joseph was imprisoned and sent into exile,
while Alexis ruled in Leningrad until he was appointed Patriarch. A year after
Agathangel, Cyril also completed his term in exile and arrived in Kazan. Then
Tuchkov arrived in Kazan from Metropolitan Sergius and asked Cyril to
withdraw his candidature. He did not agree and was immediately sent for
another ten years in exile."
According to one (dubious) source, Vladyka Peter took part in the so-called
“Nomadic Council” of the Catacomb Church, which took place in various
places between March and August, 1928. He signed the decisions of the
Council through the priest John (Lysenko?). However, he did not accept its
eleventh canon, which decreed that the “worshippers of the Name of God”
had been unjustly excluded from the Church and should be received “with
honour, as confessors of the Faith”.
In December, 1928, Bishop Peter fell ill with an unknown disease, and in
the same month, as he writes, "I was arrested [in connection with the Ufa
branch of the True Orthodox Church] and taken to the GPU in Ufa.”
According to Nina Ivanovna Pashko, he was accused of reading prayers over
sick people in church, and they demanded money from him. “I could not go
up the stairs, and the GPU carried me on their arms. 7 people were arrested
with me: Priest John Lysenko, who served in Chetveropetrovsk, Cosmas
Panchenko, who served in Kuznetsovskaya, Michael Panchenko, who served
in Ryazanovskaya; four nuns: Maria Smolnikova, Aleutina Mikhailovna,
Vera Salnikova and Christine Pashko. We were in prison from December,
1928. In April, 1929, a show trial was carried out on us; it began on the
Monday of Holy Week and continued every day for the whole week. On Holy
Saturday at 6 p.m. they read out the sentence: for Maria Smolnikova and
myself - two [three] years imprisonment followed by five years free exile
outside Bashkiria; for John Lysenko - one year; for Cosmas and Michael
Panchenko - one year and five months; for Aleutina Mikhailovna and
Christine Panko - six months. The priest John Lysenko and the Panchenkos
completed their tems and were freed, while Maria and I were freed after one
year and nine months in prison.
"270 of us were put into one barracks. They read out a list of the sentences
and declared:
"'Go to whatever town you want and feed yourselves at your own expense.
And look for flats yourselves.'
273
274
"The village soviet had five bishops and 450 priests and deacons living in
exile in flats. We all came together to pray in one church. At this time they
published in a Russian newspaper Metropolitan Sergius' declaration to the
effect that Orthodoxy was triumphing in our country, that no one was exiled
or arrested for church activity, and that those who had been exiled were
enemies of Soviet power. When we read this newspaper, there was great
weeping in the church. Everyone wept, and when we began to sing "O fervent
protectress", the whole church was sobbing.
"On July 10, 1930, I was released from exile because we had made a
petition to Moscow to the chief administration of the GPU that we had been
wrongly sent to exile in Archangelsk. I wrote that the court had condemned
me to two years in prison and five years of free exile, but they had sent us into
exile. A paper arrived from Moscow saying that we should be freed, and on
July 11 they let us out. We were allowed to go anywhere except to five cities.
We chose the city of Asha, and moved there on July 20. Since we had no flat,
we settled in citizen Kholodilina's apiary in the wood. There we lived for five
months. When they arrested us, they took us to Chelyabinsk. There they
interrogated me several times:
"They gave her a paper and pencil and told her to sign. She signed, and
they immediately arrested her and took her to Chelyabinsk prison, where
Olga Kryshkova, Maria Smolnikov and Christine Pashkova already were.
They were all amazed and both rejoiced and wept. They were all in
Chelyabinsk prison about a year and then were all given three years in the
camps, while I was kept in a cellar in Sverdlovsk for six months before being
transferred to a general block. At the end of 1931 I was taken to Moscow,
274
275
where I was kept in Butyrki prison for one and a half months. From Moscow I
was sent to Yaroslavl, where I remained for two years. When I had completed
my term, I was freed."
Priest John Proklovich Lisenko was born in 1880. On July 20, 1931 he was
arrested in a group case with Bishop Peter. He was sentenced to three years in
the camps. On November 28, 1937 he was arrested and sentenced to death. On
December 17 he was shot.
Last Years
In 1933 Bishop Peter was given a passport in Ufa, and went to his
homeland of Glazov, where he remained in hiding for two and a half years.
According to one source, Bishop Peter recovered from his illness in January,
1934, and lived in retirement in his see, serving the early Liturgy on feastdays.
Neither the ruling bishop, Rufinus, nor the people recognized Metropolitan
Sergius; they formed an autocephalous church. We have a letter from Bishop
Peter and Bishop Rufinus to Bishop Gabriel [Chepura?] of Akkerman asking
for a litre or half a litre of holy chrism because they had neither pure oil nor
anything to boil the chrism in.
After two-and-a-half years, writes Bishop Peter, "I was again summoned to
Ufa, where Bishop Rufinus wanted to arrest me. In May, 1936 I left Ufa for my
homeland, while all the above-mentioned citizens carried out their sentences
in the camps. While they were in the camps they were forbidden to wear
crosses. Maria Smolnikova and Olga and Alexandra Kryshkova did not
agree, and were given three more years free exile and were sent to Vologda.
My relatives and I went to visit them twice. I remained in my homeland until
1937, in which year I went to Kaluga and remained there until 1940. In July
we were moved to Beloretsk [in Bashkiria], where we lived until 1945. We
lived quietly, cultivating the soil and praying in the house. This was
displeasing to the enemy, and he found some people who betrayed us to new
sufferings. So let the believers know how the pastors suffer for the purity of
the Church..."
Nun Eudocia, in the world Olga Vasilyevna Kryshkova, was born in 1903
in Ufa province. She was a nanny in a kindergarten. She was a reader for
Bishop Peter. On December 5, 1945 she was arrested and sentenced to ten
years in the camps, and sent to Dubravlag. After being released she returned
to her homeland. Nothingr more is known about her.
275
276
During the war, according to Nina Ivanovna Pashko, Vladyka Peter lived
with an agronomist and was their cook during the Fast.
In 1945 Bishop Peter was arrested in Ufa and sentenced to five years’ exile
in Central Asia for belonging to the True Orthodox Church. At the time of his
arrest, he appears to have been serving in Saratov (his predecessors Bishop
Job and Bishop Dositheus had already been sent to the camps). At the railway
station a large number of people appeared and tried to abduct him, and the
soldier who was accompanying him and the station guard had to shoot. The
local newspaper reported: "Wretched and hysterical women tried to free their
'idol' and shamefully disturbed public order..."
When in exile, Bishop Peter hid there in the mountains. In 1948, according
to one source, he took part in the Catacomb Council of Chirchuk, near
Tashkent. From 1949 to 1951 he went into hiding in Belorussia and the Kuban.
He was a tall man with an erect stance and long, white hair.
Vladyka Peter was blind for five years before his death. He reposed in
complete isolation on February 6/19 (or June 2), 1957, at 3 o'clock in the
morning, in the town of Glazov. He died sitting in a chair with his arms raised
and his fingers in a blessing position. He decreed in his will that he should be
buried without a coffin, according to Athonite custom. He was buried in the
city cemetery. On the grave is a short inscription: “Here lies the servant of
God Peter”. Catacomb believers who look after his grave witness that there
have been cases of healing from illness after prayers at his grave.
276
277
province into a poor peasant family. He was baptised and communed on the
morning of his birth because they feared that he would not survive. When he
was three years old, it turned out that his legs were severely crippled and he
could not walk. His parents took him from the village to an exiled professor,
Alexander Afanasyevich Barabin. Barabin, a deeply believing person,
examined him and said: “This child does not have a physical illness. Go to
Schema-Monk Zosimia.” This great clairvoyant eldress healed the child and
foretold that he would be a monk. Immediately Misha began to walk and
read, he began to pray a great deal, and he did this with love.
At the age of five, Misha began to read in church. They made a little
sticharion for him. Once, at the Small Entrance, he went through the Royal
Doors ahead of the priest. “Minushnya will be a priest,” said Fr. Gregory.
From the age of six the child was chanting in the choir. And standing on a
little stool, he would read the Apostle and the Hours. Fr. John loved him very
much, and often, on a cold and snowy winter’s day, he would wrap him in a
sheepskin coat and carry him into the church. His father did not allow him to
pray at home, and so he prayed at nights until the morning in front of a cross
on the common grave of those who had died during the famine of 1921. And
there he went to sleep. During the winter he would pray in the basement on
the potatoes until he fell asleep. He was at school for only one complete year.
Then they began to exclude him because of his faith. But the Lord preserved
the youth. When the regional inspector tore the crosses off all the pupils, they
did not touch Misha’s cross, but only threw him out of the class.
On the feast of the Annunciation, 1934, since almost all the churches in the
district were closed, the believers from twenty villages came together in the
church in Barakovo. The church could not accommodate all the people. They
began to ring the bells at four in the morning, and the service continued until
one in the afternoon. As Misha was entering the church in his sticharion, he
saw two NKVD officers dragging Fr. John out of the altar. They also arrested
the warden, two nuns and the ten-year-old Misha. All the arrestees were
locked into a hut for three days. Misha’s hat was in the altar, but he had put
on a little fur coat under his sticharion. Fr. John put his own skufya on Misha,
while he himself froze without anything on his head. Three days later Fr.
John was shot, while the others were sentenced to three years in prison.
Misha was released because of his youth. That night, he walked home for
seven kilometres through the frost. Then his father took a whip and thrashed
him so hard that his sticharion was cut to pieces. For three months Misha lay
without moving on the stove…
In 1937 all the churches began to be closed, and the priests arrested.
Michael’s father expelled him from his house. The youth built a cell for
himself in the courtyard, earning his living by repairing pails and tables,
building stoves and working as a smith. Then he decided secretly to dig out a
cave for himself. At night he would carry the earth in a sack to the river.
277
278
Finally, the cave was ready. Only his father’s mother knew about it. She came
there to pray with her grandson. More than once she said to Michael: “Dear
one, he [your father] is going to kill you!...” “Let him kill me. I will be a
martyr,” Michael replied. In the cave Michael put a cross, made a coffin and
began to sleep in it after the manner of Eldress Zosimia. The cave was in a
kitchen-garden, and potatoes grew on top of it. More than once the Chekists
came from Sharlyk, broke the windows in the cell and took Michael to the
regional centre. But they had to release him because he was still so young.
However, when he was fourteen, they imposed income tax on him as though
he were an adult.
Michael’s father was not accepted into the communist party because of the
faith of his son. Once, on May 1, which coincided that year with the second
day of Holy Pascha, his father came home late at night and heard Michael and
his grandmother chanting: “Christ is risen!” The father said: “Are you going
to live the monastic life for long?” Unable to restrain himself, Michael replied:
“Forever, dad!” His father kicked him as hard as he could in the pit of the
stomach. Michael fell, and turned black. Then his father rushed out of the
house to drown himself in the river, but at the bank he saw a beautiful old
man in white garments walking towards him in the air and saying:
“Constantine, go back. Pull yourself together!” He turned back, and never
again beat Michael. Michael’s father told about this vision much later, when
he went to the front and thought he was not going to come back alive.
At the beginning of the war, in 1941, Michael was called up to the military
commissariat in Sharlyk. Michael, being a ryasophor monk, came in his ryasa,
skufya and bast shoes. In his satchel were some service books. The commissar
cursed and said: “Where did you come from looking like that?” Immediately
he was sent to a prison cell. The next day they tried to take from him his ryasa
and skufya, but he said that he would go to the front in his ryasa. At that time
Michael’s hair grew below his waist, but his beard had not yet grown. He was
sent on foot to Orenburg with a letter sealed with sealing-wax. For three days
Michael walked across the steppe chanting psalms, weeping and praying. The
regional authorities were also amazed seeing him in a ryasa. Michael handed
over the packet from Commissar Zaitsev to the Military Commissar. On
reading it, he said: “What, is he mad? He’s written about you: ‘Line him up
against the wall and shoot him!’ For what? We have a military code: if a priest
or monk does not wear his uniform, but remains in his ryasa, and with a
beard, then we have the right to send him to the front as a sapper, a medical
orderly, a cook or a carpenter. After all, you’re a carpenter and stove-mender,
arent’ you?” “Yes.” “We shall send you to Buzuluk, to the building section.”
And so Michael spent the first year of the war in the building battalion. The
frosts reached 40 degrees, and he walked around in his summer skufya. From
the wind and the frost his right eye went red. He was sent to the military
hospital in Orenburg, but the doctors there decided that they could not save
278
279
his eye. After an operation he remained with one eye. He was classified as an
invalid, second class, and decommissioned.
In 1942 Michael became the spiritual son of Bishop Peter (Ladygin), who
was in hiding. The spiritual children of Vladyka Peter, about twenty-five
people in all, decided to set off with him to Central Asia. They dressed
Vladyka as an “Uzbek” and put him on a train to Tashkent. However, they
were not able to obtain permission to live in any of the cities of Central Asia.
And so they decided to go into the mountains of Tyan-Shan. They stayed in
Zhelal-Abad with a spiritual son of Matushka Zosimia, Ivan Elyanovich
Yeremenko from Orenburg, a participant in the Local Council of Moscow in
1917-18, who had miraculously escaped from the Bolsheviks. Here they
prepared themselves to flee into the mountains: they bought seeds, and
collected icons and service books. At night they set out for the Chinese border,
and for eight days travelled through deserted places. They struck camp on a
high plateau in the Tyan-Shan mountains of Kirgizia and built a skete with
twelve cells and a church. They lived according to the strictest rule of the
skete of St. Andrew on Mount Athos (Vladyka was an Athonite monk), and
slept only three hours in the twenty-four, praying without ceasing. There, in
1944, Schema-Bishop Peter tonsured Michael into monasticism and then
ordained him to the diaconate and priesthood with the name Misael. Fr.
Misael was responsible for the economy of the skete.
Seven years passed, during which nobody disturbed their isolation. But
then Fr. Misael suggested to Vladyka that they should go further into the
mountains. Vladyka replied: “No, I have to finish my life, but you must pass
through the school of suffering.” The monks were expecting arrest every day.
On November 22, 1951, the feast of the Mother of God “The Quick-
Hearer”, the liturgy was served and all the monks received Holy
Communion. Then they all saw an airplane in the sky. It spotted them.
Vladyka Peter was the first to be taken away. He was sent under house arrest
to Vyatka province, where he died in 1957. The rest, including Fr. Misael,
were arrested. Soon the brothers were given an amnesty and passports.
However, Fr. Misael was given a “wolf’s ticket” – he was allowed to live in
any populated place for no more than three weeks in a row. He wandered
throughout Central Asia. Then, exhausted from his endless moves, he decided
to run away. An All-Union search warrant was issued.
Secretly he went to Orenburg, to the flat of his sister. His appearance in the
church caused much joy. The next day, half the city knew of his arrival. A
search was begun. Sitting in the flat of his sister, he saw that police had
surrounded the whole block. He left his sister’s flat, having put a woman’s
coat and fluffy dress over his ryasa, and went into hiding with his uncle.
Then, in spite of a snow-storm, he left the city. Getting lost on the way, he
came to a village and knocked on the door of the last house. Under an icon of
279
280
St. Nicholas, an old man, the father of the mistress of the house was lying on
the point of death. He turned to Fr. Misael and implored him: “Give me
Communion!” Fr. Misael had nothing with him. The old man made his
confession to Fr. Misael and then died. It turned out that these people had
lived a strict Orthodox life at home, and had not entered the collective farm.
Fr. Michael set off for Nemetskaya Sloboda, where he lived with German
sectarians. They knew that he was an Orthodox priest. Once Fr. Michael
blessed some water and began to drink it. They also wanted to drink it, but he
did not allow them, saying: “You mustn’t, you are of a different faith.” Soon
the masters of the house were baptized by Fr. Michael. Then he hid for nine
months in the only house in the sloboda where Russians were living. More
than once NKVD officers came out to interrogate the owners. When an officer
came in, he would usually sit on a cot while Fr. Michael was under the cot.
“That accursed one-eyed priest!” complained the NKVD officer. “An All-
Union search warrant has been issued for him, but we can‘t catch him!” Once
he had to sit in a well, and another time – in a ravine.
In 1955 Fr. Michael returned to Central Asia. There he was arrested and
sent into exile in Przhevalsk, Kirgizia. Nothing more is known about him
except that he became a schema-archimandrite in Orenburg.
280
281
Priest Sergius. He lived in Yurga, and was also in Bashkiria, not far from
the city of Asha. He was shot in the 1930s.
281
282
Fathers Michael and Cosmas. They were brothers-in-law. When they were
released, Fr. Michael immediately went to Vladyka in Asha, and did not even
go home to his family.
Nun Cleopatra, in the world Xenia Kochetova. After the arrest of Vladyka
Peter she collected food from well-wishers and gave them to Vladyka and
other prisoners. She helped the clergy throughout the persecutions. She was a
very bold and ingenious woman. She died in Ufa.
282
283
http://www.pstbi.ru/cgi-htm/db.exe/no_dbpath/docum/cnt/ans/;
http://catacomb.org.ua/modules.php?name=Pages&go=page&pid=1048;
http://catacomb.org.ua/modules.php?name=Pages&go=print_page&pid=12
66; http://www.histor-ipt-kt.org/KNIGA/bashkir.html)
283
284
284
285
285
286
Nicholas was the only child of his parents, and they reared him in faith and
piety. As he wrote in his biography: "the atmosphere created by the prayerful
disposition of my mother had a good, sweet, grace-filled influence on my
soul." She died on the feast of the Annunciation, 1903 or 1904. The young
Nicholas acquired strong religious feelings from his mother. Once he went to
venerate an icon of the Mother of God which was 12 versts away. After the
all-night vigil, he decided not to stay the night, although it was about to rain,
but to go home, thinking: "I must suffer something for the sake of my love for
the Mother of God. Knights freeze in front of the windows of their beauties in
spite of the bad weather. All the more should I do this for the 'Bride
Unwedded'!" On the way back it poured, and he was soaked to the skin. In
the morning he went to the Liturgy. But suddenly an inner voice said to him:
After some hesitation he went home. Hardly had he arrived when he felt
so weak that he could move neither hands nor legs. He had a terrible
rheumatism of the joints. But although he was suffering greatly, he did not
allow the doctor to be called, but relied rather on prayer to the Mother of God.
His prayer was immediately answered. His pain went, he got up and went
down to his relatives, completely healthy.
286
287
Once when he was between ten and twelve years old, his mother and his
aunt went in fulfilment of a promise to the relics of St. Sergius in Sergiev
Posad, taking Nicholas and his cousin with them. When they came up to the
shrine, a monk standing at the feet of the saint turned to Nicholas. Taking
some coins that were lying on the broad shelf of the coffin as if from the hand
of the saint himself, he gave them to Nicholas and told him to buy two books
with them - one for himself, and the other for his cousin; for himself - the
famous Indication of the Way into the Kingdom of Heaven by St. Innocent,
metropolitan of Moscow, and for his cousin - the well-known speech of
Professor Klyuchevsky on the occasion of the 600th anniversary of the day of
the repose of St. Sergius.
The monk's action seemed strange and significant. The way in which he
specially turned to him and insisted on his buying the book, his mother's
acquiescence and the blessing as if from the saint itself - all this struck
Nicholas. He bought the book and forgot about it.
"Not because I was disobedient," he recalled later, "but simply because the
time had not yet come for God's will to be fulfilled and for my soul to respond
to the voice of God Who was calling me. Later the monk's action seemed to
me to be prophetic."
The grace of God did its work, and immediately after the examination, in
the summer of 1909, he made his way first to Sarov and then to Optina desert.
In Optina he met the great elder Barsanuphius. Two Nicholas Belyaevs came
to the elder at about this time. The one, the future elder and hieromartyr
Nicon had already been taken on as the elder's secretary. To the other's
request the elder thought a little and then said:
287
288
"Well, where shall we take you? You can't do the general obediences, your
health is too weak, while the post of secretary is already taken."
In 1910, Nicholas left high school with a gold medal. That summer he met
Elder Alexis (Sobolev) of the Zosima Hermitage and became his spiritual son
and novice in the hermitage. Having already some idea of eldership, he began
immediately to write down the elder's replies, knowing that they were to be
carried out.
"All the replies that I have given you so far," said the elder to him later, "are
in force and true, and if you do not carry them out, then you are guilty and
not I. You must ask forgiveness and repent... As regards your soul - I take
everything onto myself..."
288
289
Before his tonsure Elder Alexis gave him the following advice: "Let your
motto and prayer for the whole of your life be these words: Receive me, O
Lord, into Thy paternal embrace and do not release me whatever happens to
me throughout my life. May I always be Thine."
Two or three years after this tonsure, Bishop Theodore was visited by the
famous Elder Schema-Archimandrite Gabriel. Vladyka called all those whom
he had tonsured, about 15 to 20 people, into his room. When they were all
sitting at the table and Vladyka began to recommend several of those who
were newly tonsured, the elder at the name of Barnabas said, without talking
to anyone in particular:
"When they tonsured him and I heard about it, I thought: a new Fr.
Barnabas has been born."
This was the beginning of Fr. Barnabas' acquaintance with the great elder
Fr. Gabriel (Zyryanov). "Batyushka would talk," Vladyka Barnabas
remembered later, "and I listened attentively, not lowering my eyes from him.
It's hard to believe that it really was all like that. Batyushka was sitting all
white, like the moon, peaceful, joyful, while through the window it was a
quiet evening and a strong, sickly sweet smell of jasmine came up from the
garden...
"It was good to sit with the elder Fr. Gabriel those quiet warm summer
evenings... I was going through a particularly difficult period in my life: the
transition from the noetic Egypt through "the Red Sea deep"... And to meet
such a Moses on the way was exceptionally sweet and, as I see now,
absolutely necessary."
In 1911 Fr. Barnabas entered the Moscow Theological Academy, and in the
summer he was ordained to the diaconate, and in 1913 – to the priesthood.
While he was studying in the Academy, Fr. Barnabas got to know the very
strict life of the monasteries and sketes which were around the Trinity - St.
Sergius Lavra, which made a great impression on him.
In 1913 Fr. Barnabas was ordained to the priesthood, and during the last
year of his course, he went on a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, and returned in
the summer of 1914 because of the beginning of the world war. In 1915 he
graduated from the Moscow Theological Academy and on September 11 was
sent as a teacher to the Nizhegorod theological seminary, where he taught
289
290
homiletics until the summer of 1918. At one point he was the abbot of the
Staro-Golutvinsky monastery in the Moscow diocese. In 1919 he became the
secretary of Archbishop Eudocimus (Meshcherksy) of Nizhni-Novgorod.
"This is the second day on which you have heard the canon of St. Andrew
of Crete, in which sins are called by their own names, as they are in life,
without any kind of concealment. You know from yourselves that it is hardest
of all to repent of sexual sins, saying everything in detail, as it was in reality.
The whole difficulty lies in the fact that few people call things by their names
in confession. It is necessary to say everything to the smallest details,
describing its whole essence. There are plenty of good examples for us in the
Bible, where sins are named directly by their own names, where the falls into
sin are described in every detail..."
For this he was besieged by demons. Sometimes they would take him by
the throat, physically preventing him from serving. Sometimes he came from
the church to his cell exhausted and tormented. They visited him also at
home, sometimes even in broad daylight in their own form. Once they took
hold of his right hand so that he could not cross himself or move his hand,
and felt a very strong pain. He called on the name of God: at first it did not
help, and the bishop was puzzled. Perhaps he had sinned in some way that he
could not remember and so had angered God. Then he turned for help to the
Mother of God and immediately received it.
290
291
After his return from Zosima Hermitage, Bishop Barnabas was appointed
to the consistory to deal with divorce matters.
"Now he must be patient," said Blessed Maria Ivanovna. "He must hold
onto the old, nothing new, everything in the old style. He must spit on the
ukazes, let him not go anywhere, there is nowhere for him to go. He mustn't
listen, they won't drive him anywhere. That would be the same as taking off
one's cross and becoming a Jew, wouldn't it?… He must be a bishop and reject
sin. The people need him, he cannot be an ordinary person."
It became impossible for Bishop Barnabas to rule his diocese while the
ruling hierarch, Eudocimus, was a renovationist. (Already for a long time
Maria Ivanovna had called him a red candle, a red hierarch.) So he left
Nizhni-Novgorod in order to offer his repentance to Archbishop Theodore at
the Danilov monastery. But Archbishop Theodore refused to accept him. So
he went to Zosima Hermitage, where Elder Alexis laid his epitrachelion on
him and gave him a penance.
291
292
On the evening of September 29, 1922 all his problems received a fitting
resolution. "The elders," wrote Vladyka, "easily and freely blessed me to take
on the feat of foolishness for Christ's sake as the only way out of my present
situation, which threatened grave dangers for the whole of my spiritual life."
Fr. Alexis said: "Well, we [that is, he and Fr. Metrophanes] are locking you
up [that is, away from people, although not completely, not as a recluse]."
When Vladyka asked whether he could serve at home, Fr. Alexis said:
Later, on October 22, the feast of the Kazan icon, he was released at the
petition of believers and settled in the private house of his spiritual children
Raphael Andreyevich Karelin and Elizabeth Germanovna Karelina. Raphael
Alexandrovich was a former satanist with great power in the demonic world,
who had been saved from destruction by Vladyka Barnabas, for which
Vladyka had to pay by suffering many attacks from the dark powers. After
Karelin's conversion, the demons appeared to the bishop and personally
confirmed the great authority he had had among them.
It was in this house that, with the blessing of Elder Alexis, he began writing
"The Foundations of the Art of Holiness". He wrote it in such a way that
anyone, and especially young people, could understand and profit from it.
During this period of his life he had no communications with anyone. Here he
was visited by Fr. Metrophanes, who had been sent by Elder Alexis; and after
a long conversation Fr. Metrophanes emerged to say that by the command of
Vladyka his spiritual children were to refer for the time being for spiritual
nourishment to Fr. Peter Topolev.
Vladyka Barnabas was several times arrested by the authorities and put in
prison. But he was soon freed because they could not prove that he was
healthy. They told his novice Valentina to take him way.
Once Vladyka was sitting and writing. There was a knock on the front
door. Realizing that this was the GPU, he got up, put the pages he had written
into a book and placed it on the shelf. The chekist came in and, without a
292
293
moment's hesitation, as if he were a real magician, stretched out his hand and
took precisely that book from the shelf.
The authorities tried to elicit a confession from his novices that he was
healthy, offering them freedom in exchange. But they stood firm and refused
to sign any testimonies. They were convicted of “creating a secret monastery”,
and were sentenced to three years' exile in the north in accordance with article
58-11. Faina was killed in exile in 1936, while Valentina died at some time
after 1985.
Bishop Barnabas and Fr. Cyprian were sentenced to three years in the
camps. Vladyka was convicted of “creating a secret monastery” and
sentenced in accordance with article 58-10. He served the beginning of his
imprisonment in the Biisk camps in the Altai. On the road to the camp, the
Lord revealed to him everything that was to happen to him in the first year
and even the detailed structure of the camp. And on the eve of every transfer
the Lord would reveal to him what was in store for him.
293
294
The camp was occupied with the building of the Chuisk highway, which
stretched 626 kilometres from the city of Biisk to the border with Manchuria.
The bishop refused to work and received punishment rations. He was put in
the worst barracks, amidst the most inveterate villains. So as not to hear their
foul language, the bishop left the barracks and walked the whole day in his
long, yellow satin shirt along the outer wall. He spoke with nobody, and if he
said anything it was incomprehensible.
So the camp doctors certified him insane and he was sent to the prison
psychiatric hospital in the town of Tomsk, where he was visited by his cell-
attendant Vera Vasilyevna Lobzanskaya. Two months later, in the savage
winter of 1936, he was transferred to the Mariinsk camps. In March the “mad”
bishop was freed. On leaving the camp he changed his patronymic from
Nikanorovich to Nikolayevich, and his date of birth to 1883, and lived secretly
in a tiny room in Tomsk with Vera Vasilyevna. There they stayed in hunger
and cold, supporting themselves mainly from a kitchen garden, until the
beginning of the war in 1941. He was known as "Uncle Kolya".
Zinaida was a doctor who had been imprisoned for helping a bishop who
later betrayed her. She became Vladyka's spiritual daughter, and after leaving
prison he kept up correspondence with the people close to him through her.
Vladyka's major works were completed by the time of his arrest in 1933
and were kept in the earth until 1948, when it was revealed to him that there
294
295
"I will not touch this book, and you must not only not read it, but if you
give it to others, you will answer for it at the Terrible Judgement."
Once a secret nun whom he had known in the Altai came to him. She
exhibited certain signs of spiritual deception - feelings of great exaltation
during services, seeing the faces of some people for whom she was praying as
brighter than others, hearing sweet music, etc. She told the bishop that at the
command of an elder she prayed one thousand Jesus prayers at a time, and
asked whether she should add some more. But he told her to pray only ten -
but in such a way that her concentration was not interrupted while she
prayed. She thought this was trivial, but soon came back confessing with
contrition that she had been quite unable to pray ten Jesus prayers without
distraction. Then the bishop explained that God gives spiritual gifts not for
mechanical effort as such, but for humility - and humility comes only as a
result of pure prayer, while pure prayer is received only through humility.
295
296
sorrow for the Church', and did not even allow a lampada to be lit in front of
an icon, considered it to be a spiritual consolation which should not exist at
times of great sorrow."
Among the sayings of Vladyka are the following: "The communists fight
against religion. Stalin himself has declared this for all to hear. For decades
they have preached this by pen and sword, and the fact that several churches
have now been repaired for the carrying out of Divine services by hirelings
who have broken their vows is simply a political trick and a temporary
'campaign'."
"One must force and constrict oneself at all times. One must not love the
conditions of salvation, even if they are paradise for prayer and piety."
"One must always consider oneself guilty, even if a clear lie has been made
against you. One must know that this has happened because of some sin
which was perhaps committed several years ago. Always reproach yourself,
humble yourself in such a way as to say to all that they say against you:
'Forgive me.' This is the quickest path to receiving grace, while others are very
long. On this path one does not need direction, while direction is necessary on
other paths."
"It is impossible to live on earth without a cross. God sends sufferings for
some sin you have committed."
"I demand nothing from you," Vladyka said to his spiritual children,
"neither non-eating, nor sleeping on bare boards, nor long prayers. Only
reproach yourselves for everything, at all times, in every place. This is my
advice to you and my most sincere desire."
For the sake of the publication of his works in the West, he got to know a
series of people who were far from the Church and Orthodoxy, about whom
it was revealed to him that they would in time leave for the West. Afterwards,
in 1972, this happened, but already after the death of Vladyka. He said: "I
must live by faith, write by faith, hide by faith, and preserve what is written
by faith, preparing for the publication of my works by faith..."
296
297
Towards the end of 1961 he began to feel weaker. Forty days before his
repose, on March 25, 1963, he blessed the sewing for him of some hierarchical
vestments. Then, on April 17, he summoned his spiritual daughters and said:
"It's time to go home, home, I hear a voice... I don't want to. I'm held back
by my affairs. There is much I have to complete... There will be no better time
to do it... It is terrible to die, one must prepare oneself for it..."
In the forty days before his death he often repeated to his cell-attendant:
"I ask you only one thing: do not place your hope on men, hope only in
God."
Just before his death, on May 6, the feast of St. George, two tears rolled
down his cheeks. Then he quietly reposed. After his repose, his face lost its
shadow of sadness and looked younger and lighter.
At the request of Zina Petrunevich, Fr. Alexis Glagolev vested him in his
hierarchical vestments and celebrated his funeral service. He was buried in
the Baykov cemetery by the western wall of the church of the Protecting Veil
of the Mother of God.
297
298
was arrested in Moscow and cast into Butyrki isolator. On May 5, in “The
Case of Bishop Barnabas, 1933”, he was indicted of “creating a secret
monastery” and of “conducting anti-Soviet agitation and counter-
revolutionary activity”, and was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10
and 58-11 to three years in the Siblag camps in the Altai, where he joined
Bishop Barnabas. In the camps he was given work on the soil, but was then
made a storeman. For his honesty he was slandered and sent on a punishment
battalion to inveterate criminals, who constantly abused him. But he was
always patient, calm and radiant. Fr. Cyprian died of tuberculosis in the camp
hospital on June 16, 1934, “in the flower of his strength”, as Bishop Barnabas
had prophesied. He was buried in Korkuchi cleft, where Nun Catherine later
laid a cross made out of stones.
298
299
299
300
Priest Alexander Almazov was born in 1873, and served in the city of
Arzamas, Nizhni-Novgorod province. In 1917 he was arrested, and nothing
more is known about him.
Priest Stefan Nemkov was serving in the church of the Holy Trinity in the
village of Deyanovo, Nizhni-Novgorod province. In 1918 he was arrested in
Deyanovo, and on September 8 he was shot together by the Bolsheviks
together with 18 parishioners.
300
301
Priest Michael Voskresensky was born in 1883 in the village of Teply Stan,
Nizhegorod province. In 1910 he began serving in the village of Bortsurmany.
He was arrested for ringing the church bell as if awaiting the arrival of
Kolchak. On September 9, 1918 he, Reader Eulampius Nikolayev, Nicholas
Migunov, Nicholas Nebasov and other laymen were shot. Not one of the
sixteen bullets that hit Fr. Michael killed him, so the executioners then had to
bayonet him.
The revolution came to the Transvolga. The straightforward and honest Fr.
Constantine remained the same man under the new authorities, and when the
terrible news of the death of the Royal Family reached him, he, “without
respect of persons”, began to serve Pannikhidas (memorial services) for them.
The “comrades” quickly took notice of him: such a man obviously hindered
those who wanted to “level the churches and prisons to the ground” (though,
as we know, things turned out quite the opposite as far as prisons were
concerned). The last drop that overflowed the cup of patience of the new
authority’s representatives was the Liturgy served by Fr. Constantine on
October 25 / November 7, 1918. This was the day on which the
301
302
For the most part, the people did not go to the meeting, but went to church
and celebrated the feast of Great-Martyr Demetrius of Thessalonica. Also on
that day in the village according to a customary old pious tradition, the
people shared grain with those who had had a poor harvest. They shared
voluntarily: “He that had gathered much had nothing over; and he that had
gathered little had no lack” (II Corinthians 8.15).
The next day the militant proletariat burst into the church during services
and, tearing the priestly vestments from Fr. Constantine, dragged him out
into the street in his underwear and began to beat him cruelly. They beat him
for several hours, as the old residents of Kirzhemany later told their children
and grandchildren. Fr. Constantine, who was fairly strong, could perhaps
have put up some resistance – if not to save his life then at least to save
himself from terrible sufferings – but he resolved to endure everything to the
end… Later, after the beating, they harnessed the priest to a light carriage and
drove him through the whole village. The villagers, stricken with fear, locked
themselves in their homes and did not dare show themselves on the street.
When the sufferer had no more strength to pull the carriage, they put a horse-
collar on his neck and led him throughout the village, not ceasing to beat him
with a whip and with whatever else came to hand. (Fr. Constantine’s body
showed signs of the beating; a fractured skull, a broken-off finger, and the
marks of the whipping.) At the end, they dragged the now weakened priest
by the hair to the high church porch and crucified him on the church doors…
The next morning the church warden and the guard took Fr. Constantine’s
body down and, dressing him in priestly vestments, laid him in a pine coffin
into which they placed, along with the Gospel, the nails with which Fr.
Constantine had been affixed. The “delegates” did not permit them to bury
the priest in the cemetery, and Fr. Constantine was buried in wasteland
outside the village. God’s punishment did not wait long: on the return trip to
the city both “delegates” died when they fell through the ice along with the
cart on which they were travelling… All the families of the poverty committee
ceased to exist – neither children nor grandchildren remained. In 1931 they
removed the cross from the church. None of the villagers wanted to do it, so
they forced an adolescent to do it. He went to Kazan and soon died there.
302
303
With time this horrible story was almost erased from the people’s memory.
The majority of witnesses were afraid even to hint at what had happened. But
all the same, some passed on the truth about the crucified sufferer to their
children and grandchildren, and showed them his burial site where, as local
inhabitants affirmed, several healings had taken place during the Soviet years.
At the place of his burial people had placed Orthodox crosses, but each time
the authorities removed them, and in the end the spot was forgotten.
After the body had been placed in the ground it continued to emit the
fragrance and, despite all apprehensions, was not subject to any corruption
whatever for a significant length of time; it only quickly began to darken and
303
304
soon became a dark brown colour, which is often the case with holy relics.
Soon afterwards, Fr. Constantine’s body was re-buried in the altar of the
Archangel Michael Church in Bolshoye Ignatovo. (There had been a large
wooden church in Kirezhemany, but it had been totally destroyed in the
1970s, and the remains had been carried off for firewood. However, to this
day pious residents have preserved pieces of the doors on which the martyr
had been crucified.) The broken-off finger, which became separated when Fr.
Constantine’s body was exhumed, was permitted to be preserved separately.
It was placed in a special small shrine which is carefully kept in the altar of
the Archangel Michael Church in Ignatovo. According to Fr. Alexander,
neither the strength nor the nature of the fragrance coming from the holy
relics has changed since the day they were exhumed. Even the icons in the
church of St. Michael began to stream myrrh.
After the uncovering of the relics healings began to take place, and from
such illnesses before which medicine is powerless: childhood cerebral palsy,
epilepsy and cancer… Fr. Alexander related something that took place before
everyone’s eyes: a child suffering from cerebral palsy was brought to the
coffin so he could kiss the relics. After this the wheelchair was rolled back, but
the child got on his feet and went over to the coffin himself to kiss the relics a
second time… And two singers whose voices sounded so beautiful in the
church turned out also to have been healed after both of them had been told
they needed surgery.
The body of the Hieromartyr is hidden beneath the earth, but people come
and ask from Pannikhidas to be served. They leave, and then send letters of
gratitude to Fr. Alexander - letters in which they inform him of their healing.
So far he has received 1,024…
304
305
In 1918 a military communist delegation came from Moscow and asked the
monks:
"Will you serve on our side or not? You have twenty-four hours to
answer!"
"It is too long until tomorrow! We'll give you the answer in ten minutes."
And then the bishop turned to the monks and asked them: "Brothers, now
you have the great opportunity to become martyrs for Christ! Do you want to
unite with the communists or to give your life for Christ and be numbered
with the martyrs? Don't be afraid! Christ is with us! He calls us to Him!" And
all replied with a single voice: "We want to die for Christ!"
And so all were shot in the head with a machine gun. They executed more
than 300 a day for a month, dumping their bodies in a ravine in the yard of
the monastery. Some were digging the pit, then they in turn were shot and
others replaced them until all were shot. The bishop was the last to be shot
and was buried sitting on a small chair among the other monks.
In the camp were 14,000 POWs from Stalingrad, Romanian, German and
others.
"Dig further with care and see what you can find."
"Father Bejan, we found an old priest incorrupt, sitting on a stool. You can
see that he was shot in the head. He has around the neck a chain with a cross
and an icon of metal with the image of the Mother of God."
305
306
"Brothers," I said to them, - "go to the commander and report to him. This
is a miracle. They are all saints, martyrs killed by the communists in 1918-20.
We cannot make toilets here!"
I recognized that the old priest was a bishop because he was wearing the
engolpion [panagia]. Unfortunately, the cross was stolen by the soldiers
digging the trench, who cut it and distributed the parts among themselves. I
saved the engolpion, but it was taken afterwards by the commander. I called
him to the site. All he said was, "Why is this sitting on a stool? Take him out
and bury him somewhere else like all people!" And he put me in charge.
I went to the camp shop and we made a solid oak chair. I seated him on the
chair and attached him firmly to the back. I sprinkled him and the other
bodies with holy water. Then we buried him like a bishop next to a well in the
monastery yard.
In that well the water bursts from time to time, according to the worthiness
of those who come to take water. In the summer, on the 6th of August, a
number of old priests, all former prisoners in the labour camps of Siberia,
gathered to perform the Holy Liturgy. We took part in the Liturgy.
The commander ordered that a solid oak box be made to protect the body.
I witnessed a miracle. When I took him out from among the other bodies, his
body stretched out as if he had just died then.
I had the opportunity to tell this story to two young Russian intellectuals.
One was of Romanian origin. These two men went to Oranki to search for the
bodies. But they could not approach the camp, which in the meantime had
been transformed into a prison for women. They strove to obtain official
approval to disinter them. But that is a difficult thing. Remember that 11,000
bodies constitute an army! This is the army of the Heavenly Emperor! Christ's
saints!
We just covered them back with earth. We made the toilets in other
locations. And so they remained known only by God's knowledge and mercy.
The two students managed to dig in the place indicated by me and from my
sketches. The found the skeletons, but they could not find the bishop, because
they were not permitted to dig deeper than two meters. They departed fully
convinced. They came to me and confirmed my words. In Russian there is not
the same religious freedom as here. The communist spirit is still very strong,
so they put off the matter indefinitely.
306
307
"I found them in the fall of 1942. But they had been executed in 1918. The
priests and the monks had been asked them: `Do you come with us or not?'
And all answered: `No! We remain with Christ!' Then they were shot on the
spot, as I already told you."
"Sure they are! True martyrs, like in the time of the Roman persecutions.
11,000 martyrs! Only monks and priests led by that saintly bishop. '1'here was
nobody around from the villages. Nobody since Roman times has killed so
many martyrs as the communists!"
"Did the authorities permit the two youths to take some of the bones?"
"No, nothing! They gave them permission only to ascertain the findings.
They pretended to know nothing. Why would they care?"
“One severe winter we were taken to cut wood from a forest north of the
camp. We were guarded by the chasovoy, i.e. the armed civilian guard. As I
was straying alone through the forest, I came to a small house on the bank of
a small river. I knocked on the door. An old bearded man opened the door
and asked me who I was and what was I doing there.
"I told him that I was a prisoner from Oranki and that I was a Romanian
Orthodox priest. For more than thirty years he had not seen a priest. He
trusted me and I found out that he was a simple monk. He knew the entire
typicon. He was in possession of a book which he followed for his canon, in
the evenings after work.
"He was very pious. I don't think that he is still alive. He was always
kneeling every time I went there, urging me to kneel with him. He was saying
everything he knew; I helped him. We managed to get a Book of Hours
(chasoslov) from a Russian. "
“'Yes,' I confirmed.
307
308
“'Then I will tell you a great secret: I am a monk from the Oranki
monastery. My name is Theodot and in 1918, when I was young, I fled one
night to escape the killings. I built then this house and the mill. I never saw a
priest since I escaped from Oranki!'
"I then told him how we discovered the bodies of the monks shot and I
asked him:
“'What happened there, with all these monks?' "He told me, crying:
"'I managed to escape. And they put them to dig a big trench hundreds of
meters long and shot them all in a month, the bishop being the last. They alone
dug the trench, they alone were covering it. But they were full of faith in Christ
and were living in fasting and prayer until the atheists killed them all'."
Sergius became a soldier in the Russian army, and at the end of the First
World War, in April, 1918, he returned home from the front. The first thing he
did was go to the monastery to than God. It was Lazarus Saturday, April
14/27, and the nuns and pilgrims were cleaning the church in preparation for
Palm Sunday. At that moment an armed gang of Latvians entered the
monastery with a view to making an inventory of the monastery property and
stealing it. Abbess Maria expressed her disagreement. The people locked
themselves in the church and the bell-tower. The Latvians demanded the key.
The alarm was sounded from the bell-tower. The Latvians opened fire and
seriously wounded an old man who was coming out of the church to stop the
atheists from entering.
"Why are you firing at them? They are innocent people, why are you
firing?"
308
309
They served the All-Night Vigil and Liturgy. Many pilgrims remained to
spend the night in the monastery, so as to prevent its possible looting.
Sergius and the old man, who died from his wounds, were given a
triumphant funeral and then buried opposite the church, on the right side.
In the same village there lived Dunya's uncle and aunt. Dunya learned
piety from them and lived with them during her adolescent years. Uncle was
the churchwarden; prayer in church was not enough for them, and they
prayed a lot at home. When Dunya was nine, she and her friend Maria went
to Sarov, and there an elder knocked their heads together, from which
moment they lived side by side for three years. Maria would reap while
Dunya sat on the sheaves and sang. They always went to church together
hand in hand. Dunya would always walk in a warm scarf and homespun
coat, and never showed her face. In their youth they went to Sarov, Diveyevo
and Ponetayevka. Dunya recounted how they once sent to see Pelagia
Ivanovna in Diveyevo. She was feeding the doves at the fence. Dunya went
up to the fence.
"Go away, you scamp, don't scare the doves," said the cell-attendants.
Dunya cried and would not go away. She had a morsel in her hands, and
she threw that, too, to the pigeons. Pelagia Ivanovna said:
309
310
"Why are you driving her away from me, bring her here and feed her."
Some said that the love between Dunya and Maria was from the devil,
others - from God. If Maria was in trouble, Dunyushka would not be
separated from her. Maria was beaten by her parents, and Dunya by her
relatives. They kept driving them away from each other, but they held hands
and walked along singing. They also went to church as a couple. When Maria
died, Dunya went every day to the church, and although when Maria had
been alive they had begun to throw stones at them, when she was on her own
they did it even more. They would not let her into the church on feastdays,
and she could only go to liturgies she had ordered.
In her seventeenth year she fell seriously ill. She could only walk with a
stick, but she was able to put wood in the stove herself (her aunt had died by
this time). Later, however, when she was twenty, she became even worse. It
was Christmas, and she cried out:
The two girls who used to come to her took her out into the courtyard and
poured two buckets of cold water onto her. Then she said:
Then they laid her on a bench, and she never got up again. She never
received treatment from doctors, and no one knows what her illness was, but
everyone says that Dunyushka was a great sufferer. She was completely
chained to her bed for about 35 years and had to be carried to her execution.
Several families in the village took constant care of Dunya, providing her with
everything she needed. She was always surrounded by "nurses" - girls from
various places who were voluntarily called to serve her. She lived in great
poverty, in the same few clothes till she died. She never cut her hair or her
nails.
The Orthodox Russian people does not simply feel compassion for such
sufferers. They are surrounded by a special veneration, which is rooted in a
special faith in the divine election and gifts of grace of all those who
innocently undergo great suffering. Such was Dunyushka's reputation. She
was often visited by people from afar who were seeking spiritual edification
and consolation. And there are still living people who witness from their
personal experience that Dunyushka had the gift of clairvoyance.
When Daria Timagina joined Dunya there were three of them: Dunya,
Daria and Dunya's uncle. In her time Dasha Timagina had been on the point
of marrying, but the Sarov Elder Anatolius (in schema Basil) had blessed her
310
311
to go in obedience to the sick Dunya. (The elder died in 1919, and in 1927 his
relics were discovered to be incorrupt.) Then other pious girls came to join
them, and they created a rule. They would sing verses, kontakia and akathists.
Dunya could be consoled only by prolonged singing and reading. She read
well, but was unable to write. She read lives of saints most of all, bringing
them from the church, although she had some of her own. Dasha, like Dunya,
had a good voice. She could not read, but she could recite the Psalter and
chant verses and hymns by heart.
Dunya complained that she needed a novice who could read, so Fr.
Anatolius blessed Annushka to join her. She loved singing and reading, and
knew the church typicon. She was then twenty-three and lived with Dunya
for eighteen years. She came to her from a worldly life. Dunya forced her to
clean the floor, and she would say:
And Dunya allowed it, she let her do anything. Thus she read novels
secretly, without letting Dunya know. Dasha saw it and told Dunya. Then
Annushka began to cry:
"But what can I do, Dunya, I'm bored. I'll run away..."
And she wanted to run away. It was still the evening, otherwise she would
have run away. But in the night she saw herself in the church in Ponetayevka,
and she saw what looked like St. Seraphim feeding a bear. She went up to
him, bowed at his feet. He blessed her, gave her a dried crust and said:
"Oh you idler! Look, I'm giving you something to do - go and nurse my
children."
And he took her by the hand and led her into a cell. And there stood two
cradles with two small girls lying in them.
She began to nurse them, but they began to cry. She wanted to run away.
She ran up to the door, but it was like a wall: it was impossible to get out.
Anna woke up. And she told Dunya her dream. And Dunya said that these
girls were her and Dasha. She persuaded Anna to stay and told her to pray to
the Heavenly Queen.
I.N. records that once his father brought her some bread. She always
accepted his offerings, but this time for some reason she refused to take it:
311
312
On his way home, he met a woman who complained that she had nothing
to feed her son who had arrived, she had no bread. He understood that the
bread which Dunya had refused to accept was destined for this family.
Once Dunya was visited by a woman from Moscow who was endowed
with a good voice. Dunya listened to her singing and then suddenly said:
"I'm not blessed or a fool-for-Christ, I'm a sick maiden," said Dunya, "but
you're not wearing a cross. Fear the Heavenly Queen," she concluded,
pointing to the Iveron icon of the Mother of God.
And the woman admitted that her cross was in her purse.
Not long before the events in August, Fr. Sophronius sent Dunya a gift - an
icon of the Saviour wearing a crown of thorns. On seeing the icon, Dunya
wept:
And Dunyushka more than once prophesied her own death. There was a
custom in the village that when someone died they rang the bell six times. But
Dunya said:
"They won't ring either the big or the small bell for me."
312
313
In 1919 Darya Timagina was about 35 years old, having spent 18 of those
years without parting from Dunya. But about two weeks before the fateful
events - witnesses her god-daughter, Ryasofor-nun E. - Dasha felt a terrible
anguish and went for a few days to Ponetayevsky monastery, not far from
Sarov. On her return she said that on the way back from Ponatayevsky four
birds had pecked at her head.
Nothing is known about the nature of the "crime" of Dunya's "nurses", but
everyone unanimously witnesses that right until the evening of August 4/17
there was a real possibility of their escaping execution. There were no
constant guards around the house, and some of the girls were able to leave.
313
314
Daria Timagina, the other Daria and the Mordovian Maria voluntarily
decided to share blessed Dunya's lot.
At dawn on August 5/18, some women who had gone out to milk their
flocks saw four columns of light rising from earth to heaven above the
cemetery.
At about 10 in the morning the priest Basil Radugin came to the arrested
women, informed them about the death sentence and offered that they receive
Communion. Dunyushka asked:
The priest replied that he couldn't help them, and that the same threat
hung over him, too. After this all four partook of the Holy Mysteries of Christ.
At about 11 a cart came up to the house. The whole village already knew
about the impending execution, and a large crowd of people had gathered,
but those who came too close were driven away by the soldiers with lashes.
The two Darias and Maria carried Dunya out on their arms, laid her into the
cart and themselves mounted upon it.
Ryasofor-nun E. was 22 at that time, and well remembers the scene: "The
people all around were weeping, but the condemned women were smiling
happily, crossing themselves and saying farewell to everybody. My
godmother was tall, good-looking, with a beaming face - a strong one, she
was. She was bowing in all directions and saying:
"My mother went up to the cart, but the soldiers drove her away. But my
godmother continued saying farewell:
314
315
"And they all said farewell and smiled happily - you know, they had just
had Communion..."
The cart, surrounded by soldiers, moved off towards the cemetery. The
soldiers were beating Dunya with lashes all along the way. The nurses joined
hands over Dunya, protecting her from the blows. The lashes fell on them, but
they smiled all the while, as if they felt nothing. John Anisimov, who died in
about 1924 of typhus, used to say that when they were beating the girls with
lashes on the way to the place of execution, he suddenly saw a White Dove
with outstretched wings above their arms as they defended Dunya. And the
blows rained down on the wings, and the soldiers said that the lashes
bounced backed from those those being beaten as if from something elastic.
At the moment of the vision Anisimov felt an especially sharp pang of
compassion for the sufferers which freed him from any fear for his own life.
They were shot on the territory of the cemetery of the village of Suvorovo,
fifteen kilometres from Diveyevo.
Dasha Timagina was holding Dunyushka in her arms. The first time they
fired blanks for some reason. Dasha shuddered and dropped Dunya to the
earth. At that moment one of the soldiers refused point-blank to shoot.
"I can't. I can see something white, with white wings, near them."
The commander of the unit swore terribly and pushed him aside. He also
seemed to be experiencing some kind of terror, and was trying to suppress it
with constant swearing. After the second shot it seemed that Masha the
Mordovian was still alive. Ryasofor-nun E. says that she was still "quivering",
so they thrust a bayonet through her throat.
Then they called some people who were standing at a distance to dig a
grave. Basil Ivanovich Seednov was one of those called. He relates that when
a big hole had been dug, the soldiers wanted to push the bodies of the shot
women straight into the grave with their boots. But he hastily jumped into the
grave and asked them to give him the bodies. He covered the faces of the
dead with their kerchiefs. There is a rumour that later, at night, some people
secretly brought some coffins and transferred the bodies into them, singing
the burial service according to the full Orthodox rite.
After the shooting, the commander of the unit who had been in charge of
the shooting read the sentence.
"They were real witches, no wild animal would have tolerated what they
did."
315
316
More than once the soldiers expressed their terror by calling the dead
"witches". The imperturbable calm and joy of those doomed to death always
terrifies murderers. But there was something special here - the extreme degree
of defencelessness and orphanhood. The fact that they were women, and
virgins, and one of them was chained to her bed with an incurable illness - all
this tore at the heart and appealed to their compassion.
Some years after the execution, a fire destroyed half the village, and many
said that this was their punishment for not defending Dunyushka. Her
memory was linked in the minds of the villagers with a recognition of their
guilt.
Twice a year every year, on August 5/18 and the day of St. Eudocia, March
1/14, many venerators of Dunyushka from new generations gather in
Suvorovo, Nizhni-Novgorod and other parts of the region. At memorial feasts
they sing a song about Dunyushka composed in Suvorovo: "O our mother
Eudocia..." Before the funeral they carry out Dunya's great prayer rule, which
contains the troparia to the Iveron Mother of God and St. Seraphim.
Dunyushka had a special veneration for the Good Gatekeeper and promised
to hear everyone who sang this troparion at her grave: "Before thy holy icon..."
Priest Boris Yedsky was a former regimental priest in the White Army. In
1920 he was arrested, and in March was convicted of “helping the Whites”.
316
317
Priest Michael Alexeyevich Kritsky was born in 1879, and in 1900 finished
his studies at the Nizhegorod theological seminary. In September, 1900 he
was ordained to the diaconate, and in October – to the priesthood. He taught
the Law of God in schools in the villages of Avtodeyeva and Teryaeva, and
served in the Trinity church in Avtodeyeva, Ardatov uyezd, Nizhni
Novgorod province. In October, 1914 he was appointed assistant to the dean
of the second Ardatov district.
Fr. Michael was a priest of lofty spiritual life. After the revolution he took
upon himself the exploit of being a fool-for-Christ, collected money for the
Diveyevo sisters, and by his unusual words and actions prophesied the
future. He tore up anti-religious placards and portraits of revolutionary
leaders.
In 1919 he was arrested and cast into prison. On December 19, 1920 he was
arrested in church immediately after a service and cast into prison in Ardatov.
On March 30, 1921, as he was being transferred to a village in the town of
Kulibaki, he was shot in a wood without trial or investigation. On April 7 he
was buried next to the church of the Life-Giving Trinity to the right of the
altar. Many people came to his funeral, and his memory is preserved in his
local church.
Priest Vladimir Karpinsky began to serve in the church of the Holy Trinity
in the village of Deyanovo, Nizhegorod province after the murder of the local
priest, Fr. Stefan Nemkov. He was killed in 1923 by local communists during
the Paschal liturgy.
317
318
318
319
Euthymia was from Chuvashia. She graduated from an institute, but for
the sake of Christ left everything and took on the life of a wanderer. In the
1930s she was arrested and cast into prison in Arzamas, where she died.
319
320
Ivan Osipovich Korolev was born in 1888 in the village of Chistoye Polye,
Vozdvizhensky uyezd into a peasant family, and went to a village school. He
was a free peasant. On April 26, 1931 he was arrested for being “a participant
in an illegal monastery of ‘Victorite orientation’ called ‘the True Orthodox
Church’”, and on October 2 was sentenced to three years’ exile and sent to the
north. Nothing more is known about him.
320
321
321
322
322
323
323
324
Together with him was arrested the warden of the church, Ioann Lezhin.
The atheists’ aim was to close the church. The warden was accused of the
324
325
illegal manufacture of crosses and was cast into Yaransk prison. However, the
torturers did not succeed in forcing him to accuse himself, and he was
sentenced to three years in prison. He died in prison in Vyatka.
Together with Priest Nicephorus and several peasants Fr. Simeon fled
deep into the woods. There they dug out some caves and built a monastery.
They were there for more than one year. Once, however, at the beginning of
the 1940s, a hunting dog began to chase their cat, and after him came the
hunters. They told the authorities about the monastery. They were all arrested
and shot.
Priest Vyacheslav Leontiev was born in 1900, and his father died when he
was still young. His mother, Lydia, brought up her children in the spirit of
Orthodox piety; two of her sons, Vyacheslav and Leontius, became priests.
Vyacheslav prepared to become a priest from his youth. The first place where
he served was Vershinino, where his father-in-law, Fr. Raphael, served until
his death.
325
326
The peasants helped him buy a house and set up a home of his own. In the
same year the authorities came to take away the house. Without a trace of
dissatisfaction, Fr. Vyacheslav joyfully helped them put his things on the cart.
"What are you doing, batyushka, helping these thieves?" asked the
peasants, who were sorrowful over the injustice of it. "How will you bear it,
batyushka?"
Deprived of their haven, Fr. Vyacheslav and his matushka Zoya wandered
from house to house. After six months they found refuge in a warden's hut.
They lived in one room, and the warden in the other. It was here that he
performed baptisms.
The priest refused nobody who requested him to pray or serve a moleben;
he visited the houses of parishioners, and preached in each of them.
Then the authorities ordered him to give some flax seed. The peasants
brought it; they all understood: if the priest did not produce the contribution,
326
327
Towards the end of the 1920s they decided to get rid of Fr. Vyacheslav. The
authorities' plan was not hidden from the Orthodox. When the murderers
drew near, the peasants surrounded Fr. Vyacheslav in a solid ring, while the
women hung on their arms, not allowing them to use their arms.
The authorities did not give up their plan, waiting for the moment when he
would be alone. But now he never emerged on his own. Later Fr. Vyacheslav's
persecutor, Alexander Pyatnitsyn, died in terrible torment, while another
persecutor, Grishivin, was run over by a car.
In 1933, seeing that they were managing neither to kill nor to frighten the
confessor, the authorities arrested him and condemned him to three years'
imprisonment.
During these three years, the aged Fr. Gregory served in the church. He
was summoned to the village council:
"Did you summon me? You summoned me. Did I arrive? I arrived. But I
will not follow your path."
The priest was old and infirm, and it was this that saved him from being
arrested. As he came out of the village soviet, he told the parishioners that the
atheists were determined to close the church, come what may.
Soon after his death they built a club in the place of the cemetery.
After three years Fr. Vyacheslav returned home. He served for one year. In
the autumn of 1937 he was again arrested.
Matushka Zoya lay ill with severe pain in the heart, and Anastasia
Babanova, who was living with them, called the medical orderly.
327
328
"It's me."
Anastasia opened the door, and the chekists entered with the orderly. Fr.
Vyacheslav met them with love:
"My dear sons, I'm not going to escape from your hands, but let me see
how this illness ends, come in the morning, otherwise if you take me now, she
will die."
On hearing this, the parishioners gathered at the village soviet for the last
time to ask their pastor how to live and to receive his blessing.
"Live according to God," replied the priest. "Now that's all. They're going
to close the churches. And you will sit behind the chimney and pray. I am
leaving you forever, and I bless you all."
Fr. Vyacheslav was taken to the city of Sergach, where the arrested
Orthodox were taken at that time. The authorities demanded that he renounce
God. “If you renounce God, you can go home.” But not many renounced God.
Once Fr. Vyacheslav was sawing wood in the prison courtyard, and his
parishioner Elizabeth Oparina saw him through a chink in the fence.
"Batyushka, we're all praying that they release you," she said.
"Don't pray for me," the confessor said in a serious tone. "Pray that the
Lord give me patience. Yesterday one person was released because he
renounced God. There is no other way to get out of here."
328
329
After Fr. Vyacheslav's arrest the church was closed, the bells were thrown
down and destroyed, and the church itself desecrated. But the icon of the
Tikhvin Mother of God did not remain in the hands of the atheists.
At that time there lived in the village the pious youth Peter Varakin. He
was born in 1913, was deprived of his father at an early age, and was brought
up by his uncle Michael Kovalov. He was a pious person: having been
widowed when young, he gave a vow to devote the rest of his life to the
service of God. He taught Peter to read and chant in Slavonic. Since because
of his youth he could not reach the analoy, Peter was placed on a little stool
and read the hours and the Psalter in the church, first with Fr. Gregory, and
then with Fr. Vyacheslav.
The boy's childhood and youth were spent in front of the wonderworking
icon of the Mother of God, and he spent all his free time in the church.
When they closed the church, Peter went there secretly every day and lit
the lampada in front of the wonderworking icon. The atheists soon noticed
that someone was penetrating into the church. They began to investigate and
caught Peter. Fearing that the holy thing would be subjected to profanation,
Peter took it away to the village of Saranka and left it in the safe keeping of
some pious people.
Once a girl, Barbara Shulayeva, when she was spending the night in this
house while hiding from persecution, heard a voice:
Barbara understood that the wonderworking icon was in the house and
that the All-Holy one herself did not want them to keep her hidden. It was
decided to move the icon to one of the functioning churches. The icon was
wrapped up and put on a cart, and the Orthodox quietly took it out of the
village. At that time the police had put up blocks on all the roads and were
searching for bread and meat in the carts. The cart was stopped, the
policemen removed the cloth and discovered the icon. There was no limit to
the atheists' fury. They rushed to remove the icon, but the Orthodox refused
to give it up. And it was split in two. The image of the God-Child remained
with the Orthodox, and that of the Mother of God - with the atheists.
329
330
Triumphantly they brought their part of the icon into the court of the
police-station in the village of Pilny. The Mother of God was subjected to
profanation, cut up into small pieces and burned.
Peter kept the remaining part of the icon as a most valuable treasure. He
hid it from strangers, and himself hardly left the house. Beyond the window
was the abomination of desolation, destroyed churches, and the groans and
tears of the peasants, to whom the destroyers of Holy Russia did violence. The
prayerful chanting in the church, and the peace and calm in the peasants'
hearts was remembered now like paradise lost.
Peter went up to the window and looked out. He was noticed by a woman
who denounced him to the authorities. He was arrested. It was the summer of
1942.
They allowed him. And he began to sing the irmoses of the canon of Great
Saturday. The wonderful chanting poured out of the prison cell onto the
street. The passers-by involuntarily slowed their pace, and some of those who
were Orthodox recognised Peter's voice. The policemen also listened,
enchanted by the beauty of his chanting.
Peter was not there long. Soon he was sent off to the front in a punishment
battalion, and was immediately killed.
The icon which he so treasured and kept remains to this day in the village
of Maidany.
Abbess Alexia, in the world Anna Andreyevna Sotova, was born in 1882 in
St. Petersburg. From 1897 (?) she was a novice in the Pitsk Skorbyaschensky
monastery in Nizhegorod province, and became director of the monastery
choir. In 1918 she was tonsured and raised to the rank of abbess, which she
remained until May, 1928. She was disenfranchised. After the closure of the
monastery, she settled in Nizhni Novgorod and earned her living by sewing
quilts at home. In May, 1939 she was arrested in a group case about “a
counter-revolutionary church-monarchist organization”, and in 1940 was
sentenced to five years’ exile and sent to Krasnoyarsk district, where she died
from cancer on August 14, 1940.
330
331
Abbess Agnia (in the world Anna Filippovna Mytikova) was born in the
60s of the nineteenth century in the village of Malye Chetai, Nizhni-Novgorod
province, in a Chuvash family. Her father was widowed and remained with
six children. The eldest son Gregory married, the daughter Maria married,
and the second son, Basil, began to help his father bring up the children. Later
all three - Anna, Simeon and Catherine - became monastics, after which Basil
also became a monk - as it is thought, on Athos.
When Basil brought Anna to the monastery near Kanash she was twenty-
three years old. She spent twenty years in this monastery and was tonsured
with the name Agnia.
Later she became the builder and abbess of a new monastery. In the
monastery the abbess worked in all the obediences. However, when she was
cutting down a tree for the construction of the church, a huge bough hit her
and broke her rib. She lay on a plank for a year or two.
331
332
In 1918 the Bolsheviks destroyed the monastery and expelled the abbess,
robbing her of everything. The peasants of the surrounding villages received
her and gave her all the necessities of life. After the thieves had left, the
inhabitants returned to the monastery and called the abbess. Christian life
again began to be set in order. But the nuns did not have long to rejoice in the
gifts of grace-filled labour and prayer. The atheists destroyed the monastery
to the foundations, and the abbess settled in a wood not far from Vasilsursk.
She lived in poverty, praying a great deal, especially at night. All those
seeking spiritual consolation went to her. She belonged to the Catacomb
Church.
In the winter of 1953 she fell ill, lay in bed for nine weeks, and died on the
third day after the Meeting of the Lord - February 5/18. Abbess Agnia was
buried in the cemetery in Vasilsursk. Her grave is greatly venerated,
especially by the Mari.
But once, when she was thirteen years old, she saw in her sleep a church
and a Woman in monastic vesture, and many people around her. The eyes of
all were directed upon her; they went up to her reverently and received her
blessing. And Varenka very much wanted to receive her blessing. She got up
after the others - there were nuns there, as well as priests - and went closer
and closer to her. Finally she came up to her and asked:
And such sorrow gripped the heart of the girl, she so wanted to receive her
blessing, that from that day she began to go to church every day. And so that
people should not laugh at her for going to church every day like a nun,
Varenka wrapped her face in a scarf and went to the church through the
kitchen gardens.
Some time later, she for the first time fell asleep in a special way and slept
for several days. In her sleep she saw the habitations of Paradise and hell and
what awaits a man after his death.
332
333
"Do you remember," she said to her mother on awakening, "when I threw
up my hands? That was when I saw a woman who was being flayed with iron
combs. Then she was thrown into a boiling cauldron, and I was frightened."
Sometimes she told people what the Lord had been pleased to show her.
Matthew Leontiev died in Maidany, and since it was a time of famine his
relatives did not want to have a funeral repast on the fortieth day. When
Varenka fell asleep she saw him standing up to the knees in a fiery river.
Varenka told this to his relatives, and they had a funeral repast. After this
she saw him again in her sleep, but he was now standing on the bank.
The news of her unusual gift spread among the Orthodox, and they began
to come to her so as to learn the lot of their dead relatives. An old woman
called Olga lived in the village. She was extremely poor and weak. She had a
wattle fence which was rickety; she cut wood with a mattock, and her
courtyard was always covered with snow - she didn't have the strength or
time to clear it because she still had a horse and cow, without which not one
peasant household could survive. She had worked all her life and her life had
been hard. And when she died Varenka saw her soul in Paradise.
Sometimes when they asked her about something, she did not reply
immediately, but only the next time she woke up.
A few days before she would go to sleep, an Angel would appear to her
and warn her not to leave the house in case she fell down somewhere with
nobody to look after her.
When she fell asleep she became as if dead, so that the limbs of her body
grew numb and became immobile.
Once in the church after the end of the Liturgy, Varenka said to Anastasia
Astafyeva, with whom she was friendly:
And indeed they hadn't reached the square before Varenka began to fall
asleep. They had to go for a sledge to bring her to her house.
333
334
Sometimes while she was asleep she would describe in detail what she was
seeing at that moment. These stories were written down and filled a thick
notebook. But during the persecutions, for fear of the atheists, those close to
her threw the notebook into the stove.
These revelations took place regularly in the course of almost ten years.
She said that she had seen the Mother of God, that she had been led by St.
Nicholas, that there is a fiery river which every soul must pass over after
death, and she showed a place on her hand which had been burned to the
bone when a drop from the river fell on her.
But, whatever they did, the atheists were unable to break her sleep. Then
they decided to take her to a hospital so as to continue their experiments
there. Once they had already come to the girl and were trying to lift her, but
they found her so heavy that they couldn't tear her away from the bed.
"It doesn't matter," they said. "Tomorrow we'll come with the car and take
her together with her bed."
After their departure Varenka woke up, and her mother, bitterly
complaining that she could do nothing, told her what the doctors were
intending to do. On the same day Varenka got her things together and left the
house. And for the next several years she wandered round the holy places of
the Volga region, sometimes alone, sometimes with some friends.
"I've already corrected myself" (that is received communion, for she did
not receive communion in the sergianist churches).
When he died she wept very much, because she knew what happened to
him after his death. Once the Lord showed her all the renovationists and
Metropolitan Sergius. They were in a dark place and their hands were bound.
334
335
Once the priest Peter sent her the Holy Gifts. He put them in a specially
adapted icon. When they came to arrest Fr. Peter in the house where he was
hiding he suddenly had a heart attack and died.
In 1936, when she was only just twenty-two, she went with some friends to
the elder Ioann Ardatovsky, who was famed throughout the region for his
righteous life and gift of clairvoyance. He said to her:
But her friends did not want to accompany her; they were in a hurry to go
home. And so she, fearing that her mother would worry about her, did not go
to Sarov.
She left the house to go to Pilna, where she lived, fleeing persecution, with
the Opariny sisters. She left them with the girl Damasha, and went to the
station to go to Sarov. Six policemen were lying in wait for them in a remote
place. One of them had been her persecutor for a long time; his name was
Gavrilov.
Varenka understood that they wouldn't let her go. And she prayed to the
Mother of God.
The policemen beat her mercilessly, kicking her and hitting her with iron
rods; they beat her in such a way that her face was turned into a purple mask,
and blood poured from her ears and mouth. When they were preparing to
dishonour her, the Mother of God defended her - an invisible force stopped
them from approaching her.
They retreated, and took the girls to the police-station, but they did not
abandon the thought of punishing her. When Varenka asked for a drink, they
gave her instead, in the guise of medicine, some arsenic powder in the water.
But Domasha, who was being kept in the police-station together with
Varenka, stealthily poured away the arsenic, and gave her water. The
policemen were waiting for the poison to work, but when they saw no signs
of her being poisoned, they said:
From that time Varenka was deprived of the use of her legs, and spent the
next 40 years until her death lying down. She had control only over the upper
half of her body.
335
336
Her falling asleep also stopped. But now she was persecuted by the
authorities, so she couldn't stay long in one place, and had to go from place to
place, whatever the weather. In the winter they transported her in a basket
attached to the sledge.
One night when the weather was bad Varenka fell out of the basket into a
snowdrift, and they didn't discover it immediately. They returned, but
wandered round the whole night, having lost the way.
Varenka had to suffer not only from the atheists, but also from those close
to her. At first she was looked after by Annushka, who was nicknamed
Handless, and by Nyura. When Annushka didn't like something she beat the
sick Varenka cruelly, while Nyura soon married, taking all Varenka's things
except her icons and the bed on which she lay. Soon the house in which she
lived with her husband burned down. Then they built another one - and it
also burned down. Only then did the mother of Nyura understand that the
Lord was punishing her because of the sick Varenka, and she came to ask
forgiveness for her daughter.
Once Darya Zaikina came to Varenka, sat with her for a while and then got
ready to leave. But Varenka asked her:
336
337
"None of us are there now, we're all here, on earth. Whoever has no straps
we do whatever we like with." Then he said, turning to Varenka: "Drop it,
take it off."
And Varenka replied: "I won't drop it, I won't take it off"
Twice the demon repeated this, and twice Varenka replied. Suddenly he
said with hatred:
"Ach, what a hunk of bread you are! You've hung up an internal lock,
otherwise I'd wear you out completely!"
At that time many demons came to the house, trying to frighten her. And
they retreated only when the Queen of Heaven herself appeared and placed
an epitrachelion on her head. At the appearance of the All-Holy one the
demons disappeared in a puff of smoke.
All of Varenka's spiritual fathers died in prison. All the nearby churches
were closed, and she began to beseech God to send her a spiritual father.
"A priest will come to you on the day of the Vladimir icon of the Mother of
God in the guise of a stove-repairer. His name is Philip - don't let him go until
the end of your days."
She came to. What was that? she thought. Probably a demonic illusion -
and she made the sign of the cross all around her.
Again she lost consciousness, and again she heard the same voice,
repeating the same words. On coming to, she again made the sign of the cross
all around her. And she lost consciousness a third time, and the same thing
happened again.
It was the 21st - the day of the Vladimir icon. A peasant workman knocked,
called himself a stove-repairer and asked:
337
338
It was the priest Fr. Philip Anikin. He was born in 1878 (or 1880) in
Chuvashia, and served in the Chuvash village of Kulatka (Ulyanovsk region).
In 1915 he was ordained to the priesthood by Bishop Palladius (Dobronravov,
+1922) of Saratov and Tsaritsyn. Fr. Philip was arrested in 1929 or 1930. The
parishioners did not allow their church to be closed, and Fr. Philip was
accused of inciting them. He was given ten years on Solovki. Fr. Philip
rejected the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius and joined the Catacomb
Church. He recounted how, on the first day of Pascha, they were being
escorted from work. They stopped in the middle of a wood and immediately
began the Paschal all-night vigil service. There were many bishops, priests
and deacons. At first, when the priests stopped, the guards shouted at them,
but them they fell silent and the service went off without incident. At the end
they began to exchange the paschal kiss. And even the guards, who usually
abused the prisoners, began to exchange kisses with everyone. Fr. Philip
served his term with the Shamordino nuns who did not want to work for the
atheists in prison, and took no camp food. Fr. Philip and other priests brought
them food from their own meagre rations. The nuns lived on Solovki during
the summer, and were then taken somewhere and were reported killed.
Before being released, in 1940, Fr. Philip asked one of the Solovki bishops
to bless him. And to his question: what should he do now? the bishop replied:
338
339
Fr. Philip's son, Ivan, was imprisoned for eight years in Archangelsk. He
wrote: "Papa, there are people like you here, and they give us what you give
us (i.e. communion)." Soon he died from hunger.
In his last years Fr. Philip used to sit most of the time on his bed - he could
no longer use his legs. He died on April 17, 1974. His flock was looked after
by Fr. Andrew from Chuvashia, and later Fr. Nicetas Lekhan from Kharkov.
Protopriest Philip Sychev was born on July 16, 1892 in Perm. After the
army he joined the monastery in Solovki. His obedience was at the mill, then
he built roads. With the blessing of his elder he returned to Perm, where he
was appointed reader. Soon he married, and later Bishop Pavlin ordained him
to the priesthood. He did not recognize Metropolitan Sergius, and
commemorated Bishop Nectarius (Trezvinsky) and Bishop Barlaam
(Lazarenko). For belonging to the True Orthodox Church he was arrested and
sent to a camp in the north, where he was forced to clean lavatories. He was
imprisoned for ten years, and was on the Volga-Don canal. Towards the end
of his term he became blind and deaf and developed an illness of the legs. The
medical commission threw him out of the gates without a certificate. He
managed to reach a friendly woodman, and lived with him for a year while
he healed. Some novices bought him a little house in Izhevsk. He served
secretly, early in the morning. People came to him for services from Perm. He
died on March 16, 1978, and was buried by Fr. Michael Rozhdestvensky.
After his death his flock was looked after by Hieromonk Paul from
Kazakhstan, and later on his advice people went to Fr. Nicetas Lekhan from
Kharkov.
In Sergach the church had been destroyed, and many believers from the
town and nearby went for church services to Varenka. On great feasts and at
Pascha up to 70 people came to her. When there was no priest there would be
services at Varenka's according to a "catacomb typicon" which took place
quite openly. The authorities knew about them but did not touch her.
Varenka was too well-known, and knew too much, not only earthly things
but also heavenly (in all she had spent 101 days in heaven at various times).
In spite of her weak health, she was a great faster. During Holy Week she
ate nothing. Once at the beginning of the Great Fast her novices brought her
some soft white bread and began to persuade her to eat it. She obeyed and ate
a little piece, after which her ulcer became worse and she ate nothing during
the whole of the Great Fast. Her head was constantly aching, and her liver
was also painful. So as to relieve her sufferings somehow, she artificially
made herself vomit, but she never complained, and was always joyful.
She knew the day of her death in advance. A week before her death the
Mari Protopriest Gurias gave her communion, and it was he who buried her.
339
340
The day before her death she ordered the bath to be stoked up, and when they
took her across the courtyard she asked them to stop so that she could look at
the starry sky and the snowy earth for the last time. She died on December
1/14, 1980, and was buried in the cemetery at Sergach. When they took her
past the church, everyone sensed that the space around became many-
coloured. Obvious miracles took place during the burial.
pp. 211, 213, 214, 216- 217, part 2, p. 230; Vladimir Rusak, Pir Satany, London,
Canada: "Zarya", 1991, p. 104; Pravoslavnaya Zhizn', N 1 (1574), January 1/14,
1997, pp. 9, 21-22; Vladimir Semibratov, “Nye primknuvshij k sinodalym”,
Pravoslavnaya Rus’, N 11 (1584), June 1/14, 1997, pp. 3-4, 15;
http://catacomb.org.ua/modules.php?name=Pages&go=print_page&pid=12
66; http://www.histor-ipt-kt.org/KNIGA/moskva.html; http://www.histor-
ipt-kt.org/KNIGA/nnov.html)
340
341
On the night of April 8/21 (or 7/20), 1918 the humble and hospitable priest
of the St. Macarius church in Admiralteiskaya sloboda, Kazan, Fr. John
Petrovich Bogoyavlensky, was murdered. 26 wounds were administered to
his face and his whole body. At the same time, they cut off the eyelids and
burned out the eyes of his brother, a colonel, with methylated spirits.
Relatives besought the Bolsheviks to allow the sons to see their murdered
father. When the sons heard that their father had been killed, one of them
could not stand it and called the soldier "soul-destroyers". This was enough
for them all to be taken out of the town and shot by the quayside.
341
342
On June 22, 1918 Fr. Alexander was arrested again, and during the night,
on June 23, was shot at Kaslinsky factory together with Priests Peter
Smorodintsev and Peter Belyaev and 27 others. The priests were buried in
the Dormition church near the main altar. Before shooting Fr. Alexander, the
Bolsheviks beat him about the face, cut his body with cutlasses, broke his leg,
pierced his heel, bound his hands and hurled him into a pit. The Tatars were
amazed by this behaviour: “What did the Reds kill him for? He gave good
books and taught what is good.”
Later that month the Reds were expelled, and the Whites under Admiral
Kolchak unearthed the bodies of the thirty martyrs. They had been severely
disfigured and were scarcely recognizable. Some had been beheaded. On July
7 the funeral service took place. There were about 10,000 mourners. Many
wept. The rector of the church, Fr. Constantine, who had miraculously
survived, said in his parting word: “Why were they killed? For what did they
suffer such torments? Because they were servants of the Church, because they
bore the name of Christ…”
342
343
Priest Basil Lvovich Agatitsky was born in 1880 and went to a theological
seminary. He was ordained to the priesthood in 1902 and sent to serve in the
Trinity cathedral in the city of Tetyush, Kazan province, where he was also a
teacher of the Law of God in a church-parish school. Between June 21 and
July 5, 1918 there was a Diocesan Assembly of the clergy of Kazan diocese at
which he, as deputy from Tetyush uyezd, was elected president of the
administrative commission. On October 4 he was killed in Tetyush.
The clergyman Arcadius Skardanitsky was shot by the Chekists in the city
of Izhevsk, Udmurtia on November 13, 1918.
343
344
Priest Andrew Petrovich Bragin was born in 1872 and went to a teachers’
school. In 1902 he was ordained to the priesthood and was sent to serve in the
village of Levyashevo, Spassk uyezd, Kazan province. In May, 1918 he was
arrested and convicted of being a “counter-revolutionary” and of “not
recognizing and not obeying Soviet power”. On May 23, 1918 he wrote to
Metropolitan James of Kazan: "I consider it my duty to inform your Right
Reverence that I have been judged by the court of the Spassky revolutionary
tribunal as a counter-revolutionary for not recognising and not obeying Soviet
power. On May 10 of this year I was sentenced to six months in prison, and
from the day of that decision I have been in prison. In my parishes the needs
have been served by my neighbouring brothers Fr. Lepeshkin from the village
of Maslovki and Fr. Nesterov from the village of Lebedin. I am always
suffering in soul for the good of the people and in particular for the good of
the flock entrusted to me. During these days, the days of the great trials and
woes of our hapless and tormented Homeland, I have always stood and will
always stand on guard for the true interests of the people in accordance with
the commandments of Christ, not fearing to suffer even to the shedding of my
blood. Through my unceasing preaching of the word of God amidst my flock,
I have in a short period won for myself their love and now they have spoken
out in my defence, petitioning for my release. But - by the will of destiny - I
am still in prison. Copies of this petition are with the Spassk soviet and the
Commissar of Justice in Kazan, but I do not yet know the results. If it is
pleasing to your Right Reverence to help expedite my release from prison,
then I beseech you to send someone from the Diocesan Council with a
petition for my release." On June 7 (new style), this document was sent by the
head of the Spassk uyezd prison to Metropolitan James, who entrusted the
petition for the release of Fr. Andrew to M.N. Vasilevsky, the president of the
commission for the defence of the interests of the Orthodox Church and
clergy. Apparently, the efforts of the Diocesan Council were crowned with
success, for Fr. Andrew was released and transferred, to avoid further
persecutions from the local authorities, to the village of Chirki-Bebkeyevy in
Tetyush uyezd. There he was killed in unclear circumstances sometime
between August and December, 1918. In a letter to Metropolitan James he
wrote: “I am always suffer in soul for the good of the people, and in particular
for the good of the flock entrusted to me. In these days of great trials and
woes for our hapless and tormented Homeland, I have always stood and will
stand on guard for the true interests of the people in accordance with the
commands of Christ, not fearing to suffer even to the shedding of blood…”
Archimandrite Sergius, in the world John Zaitsev, was born in 1863 in the
city of Gatchina, in the family of an official of the 10th class. Having finished
his studies in the sciences in the Gatchina Emperor Nicholas Institute, he
became a novice in the St. Nilus Desert in Tver diocese in September, 1891,
344
345
having as obedience to assist the teacher of the St. Nilus parish school. On
September 25, 1893 he was tonsured into monasticism with the name Sergius.
In June, 1894 he was ordained to the diaconate, and on May 24, 1896 - the
priesthood. On March 14, 1900 he was transferred to the post of treasurer of
the Novotorzhsk Borisoglebsk monastery, and on July 1 - to the post of
steward of the Hierarchical House. From August 13, 1904 he was temporary
dean of the monasteries of the first district. At his request, Hieromonk Sergius
was received into the brotherhood of the Hierarchical House in Kazan on
April 2, 1905, and on May 11 of that year he was raised to the rank of igumen.
On September 1, 1906 Igumen Sergius was appointed superior of the
Sviyazhsk St. Macarius Desert, and from April 13 - dean of the monasteries of
the third district. On January 17, 1908, by a decree of the Kazan Spiritual
Consistory, Igumen Sergius was appointed dean of the second district of
monasteries of the Kazan diocese (which duty he carried out until his martyric
death), and on May 28, 1908 he was raised to the rank of archimandrite. On
January 7, 1909 Archimandrite Sergius was appointed superior of the Kazan
Zilantov monastery of the Dormition, where he acquired a good reputation
for his ascetic life and his ability as a peacemaker.
Fr. Sergius found the monastery in a dilapidated state, and he spent a lot of
time restoring the building and churches. He also introduced monks from
other monasteries. Thus from the St. Macarius Desert came Monk Leontius, in
the world Laurence Karyagin. He was born in 1870 into a peasant family in
Kazan province. From 1901 to February, 1907 he was a novice in the Raithu
Desert. He was tonsured into monasticism on December 20, 1909, six months
after his transfer to the Zilantov monastery.
The spiritual father of the monastery was Hieromonk Joseph, in the world
John Tyurin. He was born into a peasant family in Kazan uyezd, and entered
the Sviyazhsk Dormition monastery in 1892 at the age of 39. In March, 1893 he
was tonsured into monasticism, and on March 30, 1894 he was ordained to the
diaconate. In November, 1894 Fr. Joseph was transferred to the Kazan
345
346
By 1918 there was only one hierodeacon in the monastery - Fr. Theodosius,
in the world Theodore Alexandrov. He was born in 1864 in a peasant family
of Kazan province and entered the Zilantov monastery in 1904, where he was
tonsured into monasticism in August, 1910 by Archimandrite Sergius. He was
ordained to the diaconate on December 24, 1910.
The revolution did not leave the Zilantov monastery untouched: lands and
economic resources were confiscated, and many of the novices were called up
into the army. However, in July, 1918, Archimandrite Sergius secured the
transfer to the monastery of Hieromonk Seraphim, in the world Semyon
Kuzin or Kuzmin, who was born in 1870 into a Chuvash peasant family from
Kozmodemyansk uyezd, Kazan province. On March 25, 1903 Fr. Seraphim,
who was a widower, entered the St. Michael monastery, on December 20, 1904
was made a rassophor monk, and on April 7, 1907 was tonsured into
monasticism. He was ordained to the diaconate on July 20, 1910, and to the
priesthood - in 1913. In 1914 he was called up into the army and fulfilled the
functions of pastor in a mobile field hospital. On returning from the front,
where he suffered much on seeing the sufferings of the soldiers, Fr. Seraphim
was appointed sacristan of the monastery in 1916. In July, 1918, Fr. Seraphim
asked to be transferred from the St. Michael monastery because of the racial
tensions between Cheremiss and Chuvash monks.
Thus in the middle of 1918 there were 11 people in the Zilantov monastery:
Archimandrite Sergius, Hieromonks Laurence, Joseph and Seraphim,
Hierodeacon Theodosius, Monks Leontius and Stephen, and novices
George Timofeyev (38 years old, a Chuvash, in the monastery since October
9, 1909), Reader John Sretensky, Novices Sergius Galin, and Hilarion
Pravdin.
346
347
from Kazan on September 10 (new style), all the monks had returned to the
monastery.
Then they went into the monastery, where Archimandrite Sergius and his
ten monks were in the trapeza after the Liturgy, listening to the life of St.
Moses the Ethiopian, who had been killed by invading barbarians. The new
barbarians lined the monks up against the wall, and shot them. When the
Bolsheviks had left, the 65-year-old superior of the monastery, Hieromonk
Joseph, crawled out from under the blood and brains of his martyred
children, went into the city and took refuge with Igumen Ephraim in the
monastery of St. John the Forerunner. He told the story to Archimandrite
Joasaph, who himself served the burial service for the martyred
Archimandrite Sergius and his brotherhood.
Fr. Joseph died in the monastery of St. John a year after the tragedy, which
had left him deaf. He used to say:
"It seems to me that a part of the brains of the brother who fell with his
shattered skull onto me has remained in my ears. I washed his blood and
brains from my face before leaving the deserted community."
The doddery old man often served the Liturgy in the monastery that gave
him shelter, teaching the flock to commemorate "the slaughtered
Archimandrite Sergius with the brotherhood of the Zilantov monastery".
Those who knew the meek and humble Joseph continue to do this.
347
348
After the revolution Fr. Constantine spoke boldly from the ambon against
the excesses of the atheist authorities, who planted atheism in the souls of
children in schools and poisoned their consciousness with propaganda of
unrealisable promises of peace and land, and who had plunged a vast and
prosperous country into a terrible age of medieval terror and civil war.
On July 31, 1918 a Red Army soldier came secretly to Fr. Orestes and
warned him to flee, since he had heard that he would be arrested the next
day. However, Fr. Orestes decided that he could not forsake his flock. The
next day he was arrested together with two other citizens (one a merchant)
and taken to the commanding officer's residence. The Latvian soldiers took Fr.
Orestes into a separate room, sat him on a chair and mocked him. Then they
danced around him, spat at him, pulled out his hair and threw him to the
ground, where they trampled on him. When Fr. Orestes' matushka Lydia
could not find him near the commanding officer's residence a boatman came
up to her and told her that the Latvians had taken the three prisoners down
river. Together with the boatmen, matushka found the bodies, which were
barely covered with branches. All three had been tortured and then shot in
the back of the head. Batyushka was buried in the city cemetery, which has
now been drowned.
348
349
Sometime between 1918 and 1921 Priest Nicholas Nartsev was taken from
his house in Kazan and shot without investigation or trial.
Priest Arcadius Otarsky was born in 1878 and finished his studies at the
Kazan theological seminary. He was ordained to the priesthood in 1894 and in
the same year appointed to the church of the village of Ismentsy, Cheboksary
uyezd, Kazan province, where he was also teacher of the Law of God. He was
appointed dean of the third district of the churches of Cheboksary uyezd. By
1918 Fr. Arcadius and his matushka had three young children. Towards the
end of September, 1918, Fr. Arcadius was arrested on the basis of a peasant's
denunciation, and taken under convoy to the Kazan provincial prison. 168 of
his parishioners (all of the Cheremyss nationality) petitioned for his release,
saying that he had never spoken to them about politics. However, on October
2 Fr. Arcadius was condemned to be executed for agitating against Soviet
power, and on October 8 (new style) he was shot.
"Do you agree, beloved children, that our enemies should take the valuable
rizas from the holy icons?"
349
350
Church, which was why Orthodox people should not join the antireligious
activists of the new authorities.
The investigation into the case of Fr. Leonid lasted 24 hours, and on
October 7 he was condemned for stirring up the people against the
authorities, for serving a moleben for the White soldiers on the square and for
being in the White Army. In the morning of October 8 he and four other
inhabitants of Laishev and the village of Oshnyaki were shot for "clearly
counter-revolutionary activity".
Fr. Demetrius was a humble man who had nothing to do with politics. He
was a good pastor who was beloved both by the workers and by the
prisoners, and did not leave the city with the Whites. On September 26, 1918
he was arrested on the basis of a denunciation by a young policeman, whom
he had supposedly called to repentance for being a communist. He was
arrested and thrown into prison in the Kazan Kremlin. 17 members of the
staff of the Kazan provincial prison and 19 superiors of the Kazan correctional
department, as well as the parishioners of the church of St. Paraskeva, which
was near the priest's house, interceded for him
Only one letter reached his wife from prison. This was delivered by a
person who risked his life in so doing. It was written in pencil and read: "Dear
Anechka! I have made my choice, any day now everything will be decided. I
cannot meet their conditions... I ask you not to come to me, or ask or petition
350
351
on my behalf. It's useless, you'll only bring woe upon yourself and the
children. All petitions on my behalf are useless, I feel this and know it,
nobody and nothing can save me now. I cannot be different. I am consoled by
the thought that such is the Will of God, and you will all survive through His
mercy. Don't inquire about me, don't try and clarify anything, they won't tell
you and it's dangerous. When they take me out of Kazan for my sentence,
look for a chemical pencil along the wall. Demetrius."
Nothing more was learned about him for many years. Some bystanders
said that a group of priests had been drowned on a steamboat and taken
along the Volga in an unknown direction. In 1991 a tourist-guide from Kazan
said in Sviyazhsk that in 1918 the Bolsheviks had shot a number of political
prisoners in a slaughter-house in Sviyazhsk, which is situated on an island in
the Volga some way from Kazan. A large group of priests from Kazan prison
had been brought there. During the first years of Soviet power there had been
a monastery and some functioning churches in Sviyazhsk. At first monastics
from the surrounding monasteries had buried the shot priests by the
monastery wall, but soon the monastery was closed and sacked, the monks
were driven out, the churches were ruined and everything was desolate for
many years. Sviyazshk was turned into a trans-shipment point for political
prisoners, and almost no one returned from there alive.
We now know that Fr. Demetrius was shot on October 10, 1918 in
Sviyazhsk, following the unfounded denunciation of a policeman. This took
place in spite of the intercession of Orthodox communities, the prison
administration and even the supervisors of the prison.
On October 22, the steward of the Kazan Theological Academy and priest
of the Academy church of the Archangel Michael, Fr. Philaret Velikanov, was
shot together with the priest of the village of Verkhny Uslon, Fr. Daniel
Stefanovich Dymov.
351
352
Priest Philaret Ioannovich Velikanov was born on May 14, 1873 in the
family of a deacon of the town of Verkny Lomov. Having finished his studies
at the Penza theological seminary, on October 7, 1891 he was appointed
reader at the church of Nizhny Lomov. From October 18, 1895 he was a
teacher of the Nizhny Lomov resurrection school. On May 25, 1896 he was
ordained to the diaconate, and on September 10 he was appointed to the
teacher-deacon post at the church of the Exaltation of the Cross in the village
of Surkino, Narovchatovsky uyezd. On June 11, 1897 he was transferred to the
village of Bolshoj Azyas, Krasnoslobodsky uyezd, and on August 23, 1901 he
was appointed steward of the Krasnoslobodsky spiritual school. On March 2,
1904 he was appointed deacon of the village of Oborochny, Karsnoslobodsky
uyezd, in March, 1904 - steward of the Tikhonovsky spiritual school in Penza,
and on June 10, 1909 - steward of the Penza theological seminary. On October
30, 1916 he was ordained to the priesthood. He was by this time a widower.
When most of the clergy of Kazan left the city together with the Whites, the
workers of the Krestovnikov brothers asked the Academy to let Fr. Philaret
serve them in the Borisoglebsk church. This was granted for one month from
September 11.
On October 11 Fr. Philaret was arrested on the false charge made by two
members of the cheka that he had walked armed through the Academy
slobodka and threatened the communists in hiding with execution. He was
taken to the building of the Kazan cheka, where he was condemned by a
military tribunal for “participation in the counter-revolutionary adventure of
the Czechoslovaks”, and was sentenced to be shot. He managed to smuggle a
letter out of prison to Bishop Anatolius (Grisyuk) which showed that he had
suffered much from the authorities, but that he was ready for death: "The
whole of my life has been passed in sin. I do not know that I have done any
good works... God is punishing me for my sins." The sentence of execution
was confirmed on October 22, and S. Talyzin wrote to his father from the
same prison that Fr. Philaret had "with fitting courage accepted his martyric
death".
Priest Daniel Stefanovich Dymov was born in Kazan in 1884 into a poor
tradesman's family. From 1901 to 1904 he was a teacher in the people's school
in the village of Verkhny Uslon. Then he was enrolled in the army. He served
in Petrograd from 1905 to 1907, where, caught up in the general revolutionary
fervour, he was among 120 people sentenced to exile in the Caucasus for two
352
353
353
354
During the war years Fr. Theodore did much to comfort and strengthen the
suffering populace. He also went very often to the hospitals to see the
wounded. Once Private Nicephorus Rudin was about to have a very serious
operation, and was not expected to live. Fr. Theodore served an all-night vigil
in the hospital in front of the Kazan icon of the Mother of God. During the
night his temperature miraculously disappeared, his pain was removed, and
everything was resolved so well that he did not even have to have an
operation.
After the revolution of February, 1917 Fr. Theodore joined the Union of
Pastors of Kazan and Kazan diocese. On July 27, as the icon of the Mother of
God of the Seven Lakes was being escorted from Kazan back to the Seven
Lakes monastery after a service (an annual celebration), Fr. Theodore was
distributing leaflets published by the Union of Pastors in the Kremlin near the
cathedral, among them one entitled "What does the Separation of Church and
State mean?" A Red Army soldier came up to him and told him to stop this
activity. When Fr. Theodore refused he was arrested and escorted, still
wearing his epitrachelion, to the Kazan Soviet of Workers' and Peasants'
Deputies, where his leaflets were taken from him. On the same day agents of
the Soviet went to the printing house which printed the leaflets and forced
them not to issue the remaining 9000 leaflets on the Separation of Church and
State. On July 29 the local papers published articles accusing the Union of
Pastors and Fr. Theodore for "Black Hundreds pogrom-rousing activity". The
Union of Pastors met and rejected these accusations, declaring that it was
their duty to inform the flock of Russia of the woes caused by atheism.
354
355
Early in 1918 Fr. Theodore read Patriarch Tikhon's anathema against the
Bolsheviks to his parishioners, and himself preached against socialism. Once
he spoke about the Biblical image of giving a stone instead of bread. Later,
when he was in prison, he was accused of saying that the Bolsheviks were
forcing the people to eat stones! He also said that those who rejected Christ
were "antichrists" and that the God-fighting army of such people was "an
antichristian army", whose aim was the destruction of Orthodox Russia and
the construction of "the Kingdom of God on earth" - in other words, the
Tower of Babel. Later, in prison, batyushka was accused of calling the Red
Army "an antichristian army", and the White army - "God's [army]".
When, in July-August, 1918, the red armies occupied Kazan, Fr. Theodore
daily went around his poor parish in Nagornaya street sloping down to the
river Kazanka with a cross procession. On September 3, the White soldiers
who had retaken the city asked him to bless their weapons in defence of the
city, and Fr. Theodore did not refuse. His two sons joined the White army.
On the eve of the Bolsheviks' retaking of the city, Fr. Theodore took his
family to Samara, where the mother of his wife lived. On October 22, having
said goodbye to his family, he returned to Kazan to fulfil his duty as a pastor.
On October 31 he was arrested and accused of counter-revolution. In spite of
the appeals of his parishioners, the Diocesan Council and Bishop Anatolius
(Grisyuk), he was executed on November 12.
In 1937-38, many Christians passed their last days before being shot in this
church, and passed into the next world some twenty years after the execution
of its superior.
Priest Paul Mikhailovich Mikhailov was born in 1866, finished his studies
at a teacher training seminary, and became a teacher of the Law of God and
treasurer of the Diocesan School Council. In 1890 he was ordained to the
priesthood, and from 1898 was the priest of the Mamadysh Trinity cathedral.
On March 13, 1919, after being tortured, he was drowned by the atheists into
an unfrozen patch of water in the river Vyatka.
355
356
Hieromonk Dionysius was serving in the monastery of St. John the Baptist
in Kazan. There he was killed in 1923.
Priest Basil Gavrilovich Panteleyev was born in 1884, and served in the
village of Koschakovo, Tataria. On October 2, 1929 he was shot.
356
357
357
358
358
359
Monk Basil (Maliev) was born in 1883 and served in Mamadysh, Tataria.
He was sentenced to death and was shot in about 1930.
Boris Antonovich Kiryukhin was born in 1891 and suffered for the faith
in Tataria, being shot on March 5, 1930.
359
360
Ivan Yegorovich Kuritsyn was born in 1887, and suffered for the faith in
Tataria, being shot on March 5, 1930.
Priest Paul Sergeyevich Ilyin, a Kryashen, was born in 1889 in the village
of Yantsevary, Pestrechinsky region, Tataria, and lived in the village of Lyaki,
Sarmanovsky region. On March 8, 1930 he was arrested, and on May 16 was
convicted of “anti-collective farm religious agitation”. In accordance with
article 58-10, he was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing more is
known about him.
360
361
Priest Basil was serving in the village of Sololoiki, Tataria. In 1930 he was
condemned for “counter-revolutionary activity” and exiled. Nothing more is
known about him.
361
362
In 1917 the monastery dedicated to the memory of the Martyrs of Sinai and
Raithu, near Kazan, numbered 81 people - the igumen, 11 hieromonks, 1
priest, 7 hierodeacons, 44 novices and 6 workers. In 1918 a band led by two
chekists, Kopko and Lavrinovich, together with five Red Army men,
descended upon it. Their blasphemies aroused the peasants, who sounded the
alarm. People ran together from the neighbouring villages and killed the
seven blasphemers. The brotherhood hid in the surrounding woods and the
monastery was deserted. The monastery's main holy object, the
wonderworking Georgian icon of the Mother of God, was not in the church
when it was desecrated and so was saved. However, Hieromonk Peter was
killed on the threshold of the church. A part of the brotherhood, led by
Igumen Barsanuphius, then decided to leave the monastery, fearing reprisals
from the Cheka. Thus by the end of 1918 only 48 members of the original
brotherhood remained.
A few days later, however, the monastery was again closed, and the local
uyezd executive committee and militia settled in it. But the church was not
closed and services and tonsures continued in it. Thus in 1920 Metropolitan
Cyril found a superior for the monastery - the former superior of the St.
Macarius Desert, Igumen Theodosius.
362
363
363
364
This situation did not suit the authorities, and in May, 1929 the first arrests
began under the pretext that many of the monks were hiding church vessels
from requisitioning by the government. However, the real reason was
probably the fact that the church was not registered and not within the
jurisdiction of Metropolitan Sergius of Nizhni-Novgorod. Fingers were
pointed at Hieromonk Sergius (Guskov), his sister the Nun Barbara, the
novice Ivan Larionov and others. Searches were carried out, and the GPU
removed some church vestments from Hieromonk Sergius, a gilded cross and
epitrachelion from the peasant woman Nadezhda Porphirievna (Fr. Sergius
had given them to her for safe keeping), and various vessels used in the
Liturgy from the peasant woman Pelagia Alexeyevna. When they came to
take away a chalice, Fr. Sergius said:
"I have not given the chalice to you because for religious reasons I
personally cannot give it up."
Having ascertained that the Raithu monks were continuing to influence the
peasants, who rejected all anti-religious propaganda and were not in a hurry
to enter the collective farms, the authorities decided to accuse the monks of
three things: of agitation against the decisions of Soviet power, of killing
seven Red Army soldiers in 1918 (although none of the monks took part in
this), and of hiding monastery property. And so on January 10/23, 1930, in
the village of Belo-Bezvodnaya, all the monks living in the village and several
churchmen were arrested - 19 people in all.
364
365
of January 14/27, 25 monastics from the closed monasteries of the Kazan area
assembled as usual at the Raithu Desert. This used to happen every year on
that day. Some of the monks were working as workers, while others were too
old to work and lived with those close to them. The nuns were laundresses
and workers in the factories and workshops, and in the kitchen gardens. On
the morning of January 14/27 they all arrived at the Vasilyevo station, from
where it was ten kilometres on foot to the monastery. They were allowed to
open the church and celebrate the Liturgy. Monastics of both sexes and
several laymen communed in the Holy Mysteries. It seemed as if a
community of Christians of the first centuries had gathered in the snow-
covered monastery among the elegant pines.
After the Liturgy and a touching moleben during which many of those
present wept, the GPU detachment that had surrounded the church pushed
their way into the altar, and dragged out the deacons who were consuming
the Holy Gifts. All present were arrested and accused of unlawful assembly.
The monks and nuns were interned into one room, and the laypeople into
another. Then, after each person had been interrogated individually, all the
monks and nuns and several of the laypeople were taken to Kazan, where
they were put in prison.
The investigation lasted 23 days, and on February 20, 1930 a troika of the
GPU of the Tatar autonomous republic sentenced the following to be shot in
“The Case of the Raithu Monks, Kazan, 1930”: Hieromonks Joseph
(Gavrilov), Sergius (Guskov), Barlaam (Pokhilyuk), Job (Protopopov) and
Anthony (Chirkov), Novice Peter (Tupitsin) and the laymen Basil Gavrilov
and Abram Stepanov. The sentence was carried out on Hieromonks Joseph,
Job, Barlaam and Anthony, and on Novice Peter, on the feast of the
Annunication, April 7, 1930.
365
366
"I have never, and do not now, belong to any political parties. I consider
Soviet power to be given from God, but a power that is from God must fulfil
the will of God, and Soviet power does not fulfil the will of God. Therefore it
is not from God, but from Satan. It closes churches, mocks the holy icons,
teaches children atheism, etc. That is, it fulfills the will of Satan... It is better to
die with faith than without faith. I am a real believer, faith has saved me in
battles, and I hope that in the future faith will save me from death. I firmly
believe in the Resurrection of Christ and His Second Coming. I have not gone
against the taxes, since it says in Scripture: 'To Caesar what is Caesar's, and to
God what is God's.' I cannot recognise myself to be guilty. I have never
conducted any anti-Soviet agitation and do not do so now."
366
367
367
368
Many other Raithu monks and novices were arrested and interrogated.
They all behaved with courage and refused to renounce the faith. Among
them were Hierodeacons Jerome (Sorokin) and Porphyrius (Sovetnikov),
Monks Gelasius, Nestor (Nikitin), who was from Athos, Sabbatius
(Agafonov), the novices Alexander Sebeldin, Peter Rantsev, John Balyakin,
and John Khorkov. Also interrogated and punished were 19 nuns from the
three women's monasteries in the region that had been closed towards the
end of the 1920s. Mother Sophia, the last superior of the St. Theodore
women's monastery, which had been razed to the ground in 1930, was
executed.
368
369
369
370
Nun Darya (Mironovna Ivanova) was born in 1870 in Kazan uyezd into a
peasant family, and was tonsured in Sviyazhsk monastery. She was
disenfranchised. On January 27, 1930 she was arrested in a group church case,
and on February 20 was sentenced to five years’ exile in the north. Nothing
more is known about her.
370
371
and on February 20 she was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing
more is known about her.
Nun Euphemia (Petrovna Petrova) was born in 1900 in the village of Staro-
Odelyakovo, Chistopol canton into a peasant family. She was tonsured in the
Fyodorovsky monastery. She was disenfranchised. On January 27, 1930 she
was arrested in a group church case, and on February 20 was sentenced to
five years’ exile in the north. Nothing more is known about her.
371
372
case, and on February 20 was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing
more is known about her.
Ivan Matveyevich Khorkov was born in 1908 in the village of Khodyaschevo, Sviyazhsk
uyezd into a peasant family. He was a free peasant and a sexton. On January 27, 1930 he was
arrested in connection with a group case of churchmen, and on February 20 was sentenced to
five years in the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
372
373
373
374
374
375
375
376
Priest Basil Trofimovich Yevgenyev was born in 1877 in Kazan, and lived
in Laishevo settlement, Tataria. On February 22, 1930 he was arrested, and on
May 14 he was convicted of “anti-collective farm religious agitation”. In
accordance with article 58-10, he was sentenced to three years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Basil Alexeyevich Kiatrov was born in 1879 and served in the
village of Dubyazy, Tataria. On August 10, 1930 he was shot.
376
377
377
378
378
379
379
380
Abbess Christina (Olga Georgievna Yermolova) was born in 1876 (or 1882)
in Kazan, or the village of Muras, Bilyarskoye uyezd, into a noble family. In
1901 she finished her studies at the Kazan Institute for Noble Ladies, and
began to serve as a teacher. In 1903 she entered a monastery in Moscow, was
tonsured, and in 1906 became superior of the Romanovsky monastery, before
being transferred to the podvorye of the Pokrov community in the village of
Romodan, Chistopol uyezd. In the 1920s she was disenfranchised. According
to other sources, she was superior of the St. George monastery in Ufa province
and of the Anesinskaya desert in Kazan province. On October 30 1924 she was
arrested in Chistopol for “counter-revolutionary activity” and on June 19,
1925 she was accused of “religious agitation and spreading provocative
rumours” and was sentenced in accordance with article 58-10 to two years in
exile in Zyryansk region, Komi. In December, 1926 she returned to the
Romodan community. In 1928 she went to Chistopol and went to secret
services in the cemetery church. On March 10, 1931, she was arrested and
accused of being “a participant in the counter-revolutionary religio-
monarchist organization, the True Orthodox Church”, and on July 9 was
sentenced to death and confiscation of her property in accordance with article
58-11. She was shot on July 10 in Kazan.
380
381
381
382
Nun Catherine (Suslova) was born in 1865. She was a nun, and entered the
Trinity women’s monastery in Laishevo, Kazan province. In 1922 she went to
serve in the church of the Life-Giving Source in Bilyarskoye. In 1931 she was
sentenced to death, and in July, 1931 she was shot.
382
383
organization”, and on July 9 was sentenced to ten years in the camps. Nothing
more is known about her.
Nun Barbara (Nikolayevna Serova) was born in 1865 or 1862 in the village
of Bilyarskoye, Tataria into a peasant family. She became a nun in the
Dormition monastery, and from 1909 - a hermitess, living in a cell next to the
holy source in Bilyarskoye region. She was disenfranchised. On April 8, 1931
she was arrested for being “a member of a counter-revolutionary monarchist
organization”, and accused, “with other members of the group”, of
“spreading provocative rumours” and “distributing leaflets of a counter-
revolutionary content”, and of “taking part in disturbances because of the
closure of the church”. On July 9, 1931 she was sentenced to death. On July 11
she was shot.
383
384
Nun Maria (Nikitichna Makarova) was born in 1887 in the village of Mysy,
Lanshevo uyezd into a peasant family. In 1913 she joined the Lanshevo
monastery, but within a year was transferred to the Chistopol monastery,
where she was tonsured. From 1924 she was serving as stoker in a church in
Chistopol. On April 8, 1931 she was arrested for being “a member of a
counter-revolutionary monarchist organization”, and on July 9 was sentenced
to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
384
385
385
386
Basil Sergeyevich Irisov was born in 1886 in the village of Ostolopovo into
a peasant family. He was a free peasant. In 1929 he served a six-month
sentence for not fulfilling bread requisitioning norms. In 1931 he was
sentenced to exile for two years, but was released. On March 8, 1931 he was
arrested for being “a member of a counter-revolutionary monarchist
organization”, and on July 9 was sentenced to ten years in the camps. Nothing
more is known about him.
386
387
and on July 9 was sentenced to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is
known about him.
387
388
Hermolaus Pavlovich Mikulin was born in 1869 in St. Petersburg into the
family of a landowner, and went to a gymnasium. He served in the tsarist
army as an under-officer. He lived in Chistopol and worked as an official. On
March 8, 1931 he was arrested for being “a member of a counter-
revolutionary monarchist organization”, and on July 9 was sentenced to
death. He was shot, and his property confiscated.
388
389
389
390
390
391
391
392
Priest Sergius Ilyich Ilyin, a Kryashen, was born in 1862 in the village of
Ureyevo-Chelny, Rybno-Slobodsky region, Tataria, and lived in the village of
Bassar, Zainsky region. On April 4, 1931 he was arrested, and on July 22 he
was sentenced to death in accordance with article 58-10. The sentence was
commuted to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
392
393
Nun Agatha (Frolovna Yezhova) was born in Tambov province, and lived
in Bugulma, Tataria. On June 9, 1931 she was arrested for “religious agitation”
and imprisoned in accordance with article 58-11. On August 14, 1931 she died
in prison.
393
394
Priest Peter Mikhailovich Kostin was born in 1896 in the village of Krym-
Saray, Bugulma uyezd into a peasant family. A free peasant, in 1919 he served
in the White army. On returning to his homeland he was arrested, but was
later released. In 1928 he was ordained to the priesthood by Bishop Benjamin
of Ufa and served in the village of Sololeiki, living in the village of
Balakhonovka, Boklino region. In the spring of 1930 he was arrested, but not
condemned. On May 4, 1931 he was arrested in a group church case and sent
to Bugulma prison. On September 12 he was sentenced to ten years in the
camps. Nothing more is known about him.
Monk Ilya (Gavrilovich Lesin) was born in 1870 in the village of Zykovo,
Bugulma uyezd into a peasant family. He was a monk of the Salsk monastery.
From 1914 he was a reader. He was a free peasant. In March, 1931 he was
arrested in a group church case and sent to Bugulma prison. On September 12
he was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing more is known about
him.
394
395
She was disenfranchised. She was a prosphora-baker. In March, 1931 she was
arrested in a group church case and sent to Bugulma prison. On September 12
she was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing more is known about
her.
395
396
396
397
397
398
1944 she was arrested in a group case, and on December 21 was sentenced to
ten years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about her.
Ivan Mikhailovich Pokrovsky was born on January 17, 1865 (or 1866) in
the village of Koldarovo (or Koldary), Morshansk uyezd, Tambov province
into the family of a village priest. In 1886 he finished his studies at Tambov
theological seminary and went to serve as a reader in Lipetsk. He was then
appointed overseer in the Tambov theological school. In 1891 he entered the
Kazan Theological Academy, graduating in 1895, in which year he became a
lecturer in the faculty of the history of the Russian Church in the Academy. In
1908 he became extraordinary professor, and from 1909 to 1918 – ordinary
professor of Russian history. Moreover, from 1905 to 1907 he was editor of the
journal News from Kazan Diocese. He was the author of more than forty
scientific works. He had a wife and four children. In 1917 he was made a
member of the Preconciliar Council in Petrograd, and then a member of the
Local Council of the Russian Church from Kazan diocese. During the Council
he took part in working out a constitution for the Russian theological
academies. After the revolution Ivan Mikhailovich continued his academic
work in the faculty of the history of Russian Church history, working also in
the fields of archaeology and ethnography. At the end of 1918 he was part of a
group of university and academic professors who tried to preserve Raithu
monastery from the Bolsheviks, petitioning for the transfer of the Raithu lands
to Kazan University. On October 6, 1921 he was convicted by the Cheka of
“unlawful teaching in the Academy”, and was given one year’s imprisonment
conditionally. This was part of the group case, “The Case of the Teachers of
Kazan Theological Academy, Kazan, 1921”. On August 31, 1930 he was
arrested in a group church case and cast into a prison in Kazan. He
398
399
399
400
Buruguslam region, Middle Volga district, and from 1924 – in Bugulma. Then
he returned to Naumovka. He organized five underground churches on the
territory of Tataria and personally organized and distributed a series of
leaflets, including one by the name of “Russian has perished”. On May 7, 1929
he was arrested, but soon released. In January, 1930, fearing arrested, he left
the village and went underground, hiding in the village of Zabugorovka,
Bugulma region. On May 11, 1932 he was arrested for being “the leader of a
counter-revolutionary religio-monarchist organization, the True Orthodox
Church”, and on February 7, 1933 was sentenced to ten years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about him.
400
401
401
402
402
403
403
404
404
405
to three years’ exile in the north. On July 22, 1935 she was released from exile.
Nothing more is known about her.
Priest John Lukich Lukin was born in 1890 in the village of Kazyn, Rybno-
Slobodsky uyezd into a peasant family. He went to a zemstvo school and a
theological seminary. From 1913 he was a reader. In 1915 he joined the army.
From January, 1917 he was a reader again. In 1918 he was ordained to the
diaconate, and in 1919 – to the priesthood in the village of Kuzaikino. In 1920
405
406
he was condemned to one year’s forced labour for not handing over bread
reserves. In 1921 he was sentenced to three years in the camps. This sentence
was reduced to eighteen months on amnesty on June 22, 1921. After his
release he returned to Kuzaikino, and after the church’s closure worked as a
tailor. In 1929 he was fined for fifty rubles for not handing over bread
reserves. On October 18, 1929 he was arrested in a group church case and
accused that: “he grouped around himself the clergy of surrounding villages,
and for three years systematically conducted agitation against the soviets and
their enterprises”. On December 23 he was sentenced to three years in the
camps and sent to Solovki. In July, 1932 he was released and returned to his
homeland. In 1933 he was arrested for being “the leader of a religio-
monarchist group of True Orthodox Churchmen”. On June 16 he was
sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp (Nizhnyaya
Tunguska). Nothing more is known about him.
His wife, Euphrosyne Ivanovna Pokarova, was born in 1884 in the village
of Maly Tolkish, Chistopol uyezd, and was a member of the brotherhood of
St. Gurias. On March 26, 1933 she was arrested for being “a participant in a
religio-monarchist counter-revolutionary group of True Orthodox
Churchmen”, and on June 16 was sentenced to five years in the camps and
sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about her.
406
407
Nun Euthalia, in the world Anna Ivanovna Volkova, was born in 1871 in
the village of Ploskoye, Novotorzhsk uyezd, Moscow province. She lived in
Torzhsk. On June 9, 1931 she was arrested, and on June 18 – sentenced to five
years in the camps, commuted to exile to Kazakhstan for the same period. On
March 26, 1933 she was arrested for being “a participant in a religio-
monarchist counter-revolutionary group of True Orthodox Christians”, and
on June 16 was sentenced to five years in the camps and sent to a camp.
Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Xenia (Ilyinichna Kildyusheva) was born in 1873 in the village of But,
Almetyevsk uyezd, where she lived. She was a member of the brotherhood of
St. Gurias. On March 26, 1933 she was arrested for being “a participant in a
religio-monarchist counter-revolutionary group of True Orthodox
Christians”, and on June 16 was sentenced to five years’ exile and sent to the
north. Nothing more is known about her.
407
408
Priest Theodore Alexeyevich Petrov was born in 1875, and lived in the
village of Stariye Chelny, Kazan province. On March 27, 1933 he was arrested
for being “a participant in a religio-monarchist organization”, and on
408
409
November 28 was sentenced to three years in the camps and sent to a camp.
Nothing more is known about him.
409
410
410
411
Novice Tatyana Ivanovna Kirilova was born in 1886, and in the 1900s
became a novice in the Dormition monastery. In the 1920s she was living in
the village of Nizhnyaya Rus’, Kukmor region. In 1931 she was arrested, and
on July 5 was sentenced to three years’ exile and sent to Chelyabinsk
province. In 1934 she was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a
camp. Nothing more is known about her.
411
412
21, 1935 she was arrested in a group church case, and on February 14, 1936
was sentenced to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
412
413
413
414
414
415
415
416
Priest Gregory Ivanovich Repin was born in 1907 in the village of Sloboda
Volchya, Novosheshminsk uyezd, Tataria into a peasant family, and received
an elementary education. A free peasant, on November 19, 1932 he was
arrested for being “a participant in the sect of the True Orthodox Church”, but
in 1933 he was released from prison and his case shelved. He was then
secretly ordained to the priesthood. On August 20, 1936 he was arrested and
accused that: “being a participant in a counter-revolutionary church-
monarchist group, he took part in illegal meetings and services. He is openly
counter-revolutionary and monarchist, and categorically refuses to sign
documents.” On December 9 he was sentenced to five years in the camps and
sent to Karlag. Later he was transferred to Sevvostlag (Kolyma), where he
refused to work for religious reasons. In the summer of 1941 he was arrested,
and on August 16 was sentenced to death. On August 30 he was shot.
416
417
417
418
418
419
left the collective farm. From 1946 she offered her flat for illegal prayer
meetings, and concealed the illegal Stepanova in it. She was a messenger
between the Kazan group and the illegal priest Alexis Kornilov in Chuvashia.
On May 1, 1947 she was arrested and accused of “taking an active part in the
anti-Soviet organization of churchmen, the True Orthodox Church. She went
to illegal meetings at which she spoke out with anti-Soviet ideas.” On August
1 she was sentenced to seven years in the camps. Nothing more is known
about her.
419
420
420
421
many years she hid her husband, Timothy Bobrov, under her house. On June
23, 1949 she was arrested in a group case of “the anti-Soviet underground of
churchpeople”, and was sent for further investigation to the inner prison. She
was accused that: “being hostile to the political system existing in the USSR,
for many years she has been an active participant in the anti-Soviet
underground of churchpeople”. On February 13, 1950 she was sentenced to
eight years in the camps, and was sent to Osoblag no. 4 (Dzhezkazgan camp).
421
422
Church’”. In accordance with articles 58-10 part 2 and 58-11, he was sentenced
to ten years in prison with confiscation of property. On July 17, 1954 this
sentence was commuted to five years’ imprisonment. Nothing more is known
about him.
422
423
423
424
424
425
activity she took part, drawing young people into it”. On September 11-13,
1948 she was sentenced to six years in the camps with disenfranchisement for
three years, and was sent to Temlag (Yavas, Zubovo-Polyansky region). On
April 11, 1949 she was sentenced to twenty-five years in the camps with
disenfranchisement for five years. On November 24, 1954 she was released
from camp. Nothing more is known about her.
425
426
December 15 was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp. On
September 16, 1952 a camp court sentenced her to a further ten years. On
October 15, 1954 her sentence was reduced to five years and she was released.
Nothing more is known about her.
426
427
was sentenced to twenty-five years in the camps. On January 13, 1955 he was
released from camp and his case was shelved. Nothing more is known about
him.
427
428
428
429
part in illegal meetings and carried out collections of food for people
condemned for anti-Soviet activity”. She was sentenced to eight years in the
camps. On January 13, 1955 she was released from camp and her case
quashed. Nothing more is known about her.
429
430
430
431
Paul Kirillovich Lazarev was born in 1921 in the village of Bolshiye Aty,
Sheremetyevo uyezd into a peasant family. He finished four classes at a
village school, and was a free peasant. In August, 1942 he was called, and in
October he was wounded. Until February, 1943 he was in hospital in Tambov,
then was again sent to the front, where he fell into captivity in August. In
May, 1945 he was freed by the Americans, and in June was sent to work in the
mines in Krivoy Rog. In August, 1946 he was made redundant and returned
to his homeland. On September 5, 1948 he and his sisters were exiled for eight
years to Prishkovaya, near Krasnovishera, Molotov province. He fled from
exile, but on April 8, 1949 was arrested and sentenced to eight years in the
431
432
Paul Mikhailovich Umnov was born in 1927 in the village of Bolshiye Aty,
Sheremetyevo uyezd into a peasant family, and went to four classes of the
village school. He was a carpenter. In 1943 he was sentenced to one year in
the camps. After his release he returned to his native village, but on March 7,
1960 he was arrested for being “a participant in the anti-Soviet underground
of churchmen, supporters of the True Orthodox Church”. On May 25-26 he
was sentenced to six years in the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
432
433
in the anti-Soviet underground of the True Orthodox Church” and was sent to
Kazan prison. She was accused that: “being a supporter of the anti-Soviet
underground of the True Orthodox Church, she took part in illegal meetings
at which she expressed anti-Soviet slanderous inventions and occupied
herself in active propaganda of the idea of the True Orthodox Church of
Tikhonite orientation, calling for active disobedience to the laws of Soviet
power”. On January 30, 1959 she was sentenced to ten years in the camps with
the first three years in prison and confiscation of property. On February 19 the
sentence was reduced to five years. Nothing more is known about her.
Monk Basil (Ivanovich Zhukov) was born in 1904 in the village of Staroye
Mokshino, Aksubayevo region, Tataria. On July 21, 1951 he was arrested, and
on October 24 was convicted of being “a participant in the grouping, ‘The
True Orthodox Church’”. In accordance with articles 58-10 part 2 and 58-11,
he was sentenced to twenty-five years in the camps with confiscation of his
property. On July 17, 1954 his sentence was commuted to ten years. On June
1, 1956 he was released because he was an invalid. On November 6, 1958 he
was arrested again in Tataria, and on January 30, 1959 was convicted of
“religious agitation”. In accordance with articles 58-10 part 2 and 58-11, he
was sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. On February 19, 1959 his
sentence was commuted to ten years. He was released on January 6, 1968.
Nothing more is known about him.
433
434
434
435
His first son, Anatoly, was born on October 24, 1900. Three more sons were
born: Alexis, Alexander and Theodore. In 1917 Anatoly and Alexis were
studying in Tambov theological seminary, and Alexander was continuing his
education in the church school.
435
436
gathered together, expressed dismay that the horses were being confiscated
when they were so necessary for bringing in the harvest. Fr. Peter stood up
before the peasants and spoke about the injustice of Soviet power. The
meeting was broken up with the aid of arms by communists and village
activists. An investigation was conducted. Fr. Peter was captured and,
according to a Cheka document dated November 25, 1918, after the uprising
had been suppressed, was sentenced to be shot together with another priest
called Panov for inciting the people to counter-revolutionary insurrection.
According to one version, his execution was also linked with his refusal to
hand over the metrical books of the parish, which contained the main
information about the parishioners and was kept in the church.
After being cruelly beaten, Fr. Peter was put on a cart and taken beyond
the bounds of the village. Throughout the night the semi-conscious priest
read prayers, while his tormentors were tormented by fears and visions. At
dawn the next day Fr. Peter was cast into Sosulinsky pond. There, not long
before Pentecost, a shepherd noticed something like light and singing by the
water (several kilometres from the village). Then they found the body of Fr.
Peter, which had a waxen colour and was completely incorrupt. Matushka
Lydia Feodorovna was frightened to take the body of her husband without
permission. Only when the village soviet gave permission did she and her
elder son Anatoly bury Fr. Peter beside the altar of the church on May 31,
1919, the Day of the Holy Spirit. A cross now stands on the grave.
In 1918 Priests Alexander and Alexis, Deacon Basil, the church warden
Gregory and the laymen Antipas and John were killed in the village of
Bondari, Tambov province. They were buried in the village cemetery in a
common grave of 24 people killed by the persecutors of the faith.
In 1918 the priest of the village of Olshanki, Tambov diocese, Fr. Nicholas
Kasatkin, was murdered. The criminals stole all the money that was in his
436
437
hands and escaped. The priest's widow and his five young children were left
as orphans.
Priest Ivan Ivanovich Pokhvalensky was born in 1859, and went to the
Tambov theological seminary. In 1879 he was appointed reader and teacher at
the church-parish school in the village of Uspenskoye, Kozlov uyezd, Tambov
province. In 1903 he was ordained to the priesthood and was appointed to the
Iverskaya church in the village of Naschekino, Kirsanov uyezd. He was
married to Ekaterina Petrovna (born 1882), and had no children. On
November 5, 1918 he was shot by the Bolsheviks.
437
438
The yedinverchesky Priest Yerokhin was put on trial together with S.A.
Nikitov, the warden of the church in the village of Lakhmytovka,
Kirsanovsky uyezd, Tambov province for “hiding church valuables”. As it
turned out, there was nothing to hide because the church was of the poorest.
So they were acquitted. Nothing more is known about him.
In Penza region there is a station which bears the name of Zametchina. Not
far away there used to be a monastery, of which only the foundations and
some stones remain. After the revolution forty monks were buried alive next
to the river. After a time forty small springs began to flow at the place of their
martyrdom. Their water is considered holy. At the end of June, on the day of
the commemoration of these forty martyrs, many people come to this spot to
venerate their memory. They say that on this day all forty springs burn with a
wonderful fire...
438
439
439
440
The clergyman Alexis Ivanovich Yezhikov was born in 1890 in the village
of Russkiye Naimany, Mordovia, and served in the village of Parakino,
Bolsheberezinkovsky region. On November 21, 1929 he was sentenced to five
years’ imprisonment in accordance with article 58-10. Nothing more is known
about him.
440
441
he was convicted in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, and sentenced
to ten years in prison. Nothing more is known about him.
The clergyman Nicholas Yegorovich Kutin was born in 1874 in the village
of Slaim, Torbeyevsky region, Mordovia, where he also served. On December
29, 1929 he was arrested and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11. Nothing more is known about him.
441
442
The clergyman Ivan Dmitrievich Kamnev was born in 1870 in the village
of Staraya Pichmorga (now in Nosakino), Torbeyevsky region, Mordovia.
There he was arrested, and on March 26, 1930 was sentenced in accordance
with articles 58-8, 58-10 and 58-11 to ten years’ imprisonment. Nothing more
is known about him.
442
443
443
444
444
445
The clergyman Eugene Pavlovich Insarsky was born in 1870 in the village
of Narovchat, Penza province, where he lived. On April 4, 1930 he was
sentenced in accordance with articles 58-8, 58-10 and 58-11 to ten years’
imprisonment. Nothing more is known about him.
Fifteen people were sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11
as part of “The Case of Bishop Gabriel (Abalymov) and others, 1931”. They
445
446
446
447
On January 10, 1931 he was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10 and
58-11 to five years’ imprisonment. Nothing more is known about him.
447
448
"One day, as I was examining patients, the nurse who worked with me -
also a camp prisoner - said to me:
"'Doctor, I have heard that a denunciation has been brought against you;
you are being accused of excessive lenience in regard to prisoners and you are
threatened with an extension of your term up to fifteen years.'
"The nurse was a sober woman, I had good reason to feel horrified at her
words. I had been sentenced to three years which were soon to be completed.
Already I was counting the months and weeks which separated me from my
long-awaited freedom. And suddenly - fifteen years!
"All night I couldn't sleep, and when I went to work the next morning, the
nurse shook her head in distress upon seeing the drawn expression on my
face. After we had finished the examinations she said hesitantly:
"'I would like, doctor, to give you some advice, but I'm afraid you'll only
laugh at me.'
"'Tell me.'
"'In Penza, my home town, there lives a woman called Matronushka. The
Lord has granted her a special power of prayer. When once she begins to pray
for someone, her prayer is always answered. Many people turn to her for help
and she never refuses anyone. Why don't you ask her to help you?'
"I laughed sorrowfully. 'By the time my letter reaches her, they'll have
sentenced me to fifteen years.'
"'But it's not necessary to write to her, just call out to her,' said the nurse, a
little abashed.
"'Shout? From here?' I asked. 'She lives over a hundred kilometres away.'
"'I knew you'd laugh at me for saying that, but she can hear you from
anywhere. Do this: when you go out for your evening walk, fall behind the
448
449
rest for a bit and shout out three times in a loud voice: "Matronushka, help
me. I'm in trouble." She'll hear you and will answer.'
"Although all this seemed very strange, rather like magic as it were,
nevertheless, when I went out on my evening walk, I did as my friend had
instructed. A day passed, a week, a month... No one summoned me. In the
meantime, changes were made in the camp administration: someone was
removed, another was appointed. Another half year passed and there came
the day of my release from the camp. When I was issued my documents in the
commandant's office, I asked to be sent in the direction of the town where
Matrona lived, since I had promised before calling out to her that if she
helped me I would remember her in my daily prayers and that upon my
release from camp I would straightway go and thank her.
"Having received my papers, I heard that two fellows, who were also being
released, were travelling to the same town where I was headed. I joined them
and we set off together. As we journeyed, I asked them if perchance they
knew Matronushka.
"'We know her very well; everyone knows her - both in the town and for
miles around. We'd take you to her if you like, but we live in the country, not
in town, and we're anxious to get home. But just do this: when you arrive, ask
the first person you meet where Matronushka lives and they'll show you.'
"On my arrival I did just as my fellow travellers had told me. I asked the
first boy I met.
"'Follow this street,' he said, 'then turn by the post office into the alley.
Matrona lives in the third house.'
449
450
"'Why shouldn't I know it?' came her weak but clear voice. 'You called out
to me and I prayed to God for you. This is how I know. Sit down, be my
guest.'
"For a long time I sat at Matronushka's. She told me that as a young child
she had fallen ill with some disease which had stunted her growth and caused
her to become immobile. At the age of two she had lost her sight from
smallpox. Her family was poor, and on her way to work her mother would
lay her in a box and take her to church. Putting the box with the girl on a
bench, she would leave her there until evening. Lying in the box, the young
girl would listen to all the church services and sermons. The priest took pity
on the little girl and looked after her. The parishioners also felt sorry for the
child and would bring her a little something to eat or something to wear;
someone else would caress her or help her to lie more comfortably. In this
way she grew up surrounded by an atmosphere of deep spirituality and
prayer.
"Then we spoke about the purpose of life, about faith, about God. Listening
to her, I was struck by the wisdom of her judgements and her spiritual
insight. In parting she said:
"'When you stand before the Throne of God, remember the slave of God
Matrona.'
"At that time I had no thought of becoming a bishop and was not even a
priest. Concerning herself, she said that she would die in prison.
"Sitting beside her, I understood that before me lay not an ordinary sick
woman but someone great in the eyes of God. It was such a comfort and a joy
to be with her that I hated to leave, and I promised myself to visit her again as
soon as I could. But this never came to pass. Soon Matronushka was dragged
off to prison, to Moscow, and there she died."
450
451
The following were convicted in the group case, “The Case of Hieromonk
Pachomius (Ionov) and others, Mari (or Mordovia) ASSR, 1935”:
451
452
452
453
Other Catacomb Christians of Lipetsk province who suffered for the faith,
being accused of “participation in the anti-Soviet church group, ‘The True
Orthodox Christians’”, included:
453
454
Maria Petrovna Nosova. She was born in 1901 in the village of Romanovo,
Lebedyan uyezd, Lipetsk province, and was sentenced in accordance with
article 58-10 to eight years in prison. Nothing more is known about her.
454
455
58-10 part 2 and 58-11 to exile in Krasnoyarsk region. Nothing more is known
about her.
Anna Petrovna Knutova. She was born in 1908 in the village of Romanovo,
Lebedyan uyezd. She was arrested in her native village and was sentenced in
accordance with articles 58-10 part 2 and 58-11 to eight years’ imprisonment.
Nothing more is known about her.
455
456
in her native village and was sentenced to three years in exile in the north.
Nothing more is known about her.
"'See that when you are exiled, you take the door with you. Take it off its
hinges and put your things on it. Carry them in that way. Don't fear the
456
457
difficulties. Endure everything. They'll take you a long way away. But God is
everywhere: He sees everything, hears everything, knows everything...
'Blessed are they that are persecuted for righteousness' sake... Blessed are ye
when men shall revile you and persecute you and say all manner of evil
against you for My name's sake' (Matt. 5.10-11)... Take the door from its
hinges and put all kinds of food on it. Don't forget to take an axe and a spade.
Oh how handy they'll be!'
"We didn't understand what exile she was talking about. Everything was
calm with us. They didn't harm anybody. A few years later [in the time of
collectivization in the 1930s], the exiles began. Our turn came. We were
warned only a day before:
"'You can take as many things as you can carry with you!'
"They loaded us onto cattle trucks. They spread out a panel which read:
'Volunteers are going to Siberia to live. Greetings to them from the working
population.'
"But if the people had known what kind of 'volunteers' were travelling in
that special train! How many tears were shed in every carriage! You know,
we had abandoned everything - homes, property, gardens. Our only
consolation was that Matushka Abbess had warned us about everything long
before and had given her blessing.
We travelled for a long time. Finally, we came to the place: bare steppe!
There was not even a bush. And no people at all: it was just desert... They
took us out:
"'Well now, kulaks, let's see how you're going to live here!'
"Everyone wept. The women sobbed aloud. But the authorities just got into
their cars and drove off. It was already frosty, winter was approaching in that
area. And we had nothing. Under our feet was bare, cold earth, and above us
the blue sky. That was all!
"Oh, how we thanked God that we had taken an axe and spade! And how
useful the doors came in! We bowed to the earth in front of Matushka. But she
herself was blind. In both eyes. But the Lord gives wisdom to the blind, He
gave her other, spiritual eyes. She saw what others did not see, what the Lord
revealed to her. She was already old, now she's over ninety...Save, O Lord,
and have mercy on Thy servant schema-abbess Seraphima. You know, we all
457
458
lived in obedience to her, we did everything with her blessing. She, the
servant of God, kept the whole region free from heresy. She stood like an
unbending pillar!
"'You're a wolf, a wolf!... You are apostates. You have denied Christ-God.
How can you read such a paper in the church of God!...'
"The priest was embarrassed. She knocked the declaration out of his hands.
She was pushed aside. But she continued:
"'Shameful! Shameful!'
"The priest cut off the reading and went into the altar. But the people said:
"I will tell you a story which proves that Matushka Schema-Abbess had the
gift of clairvoyance.
"It was completely understandable that the authorities should look for her,
but they did not succeed in finding her. First one group of believers, and then
another, took her into their home. She was transferred from one province to
another. So the KGB resorted to a diabolical trick.
458
459
came to the house of a woman who believed that she was a real nun, and not
an artist. And so they later called her 'artist'...
"'Oh, forgive me, dear sister, I said that out of habit. You know, I'm always
among nuns, and I took you for a matushka... But perhaps you will be a nun!'
"Of course, such a device might appear to be the best proof that she was a
true nun. The more so since she always acted and spoke in a monastic way.
On sitting down to eat lunch or supper, she read the prayers in a monastic
way. After the meal and prayers she thanked the mistress of the house with a
deep bow and prayed for the repose of her parents' souls. She particularly
won over the mistress with her rapid prostrations, which showed that the
'nun' did many prostrations secretly.
"'Oh, ma... - forgive me, sister, what kind of life are we living now! I don't
want to live any longer. These are the last times! Faith has diminished in
people. You can no longer find a monk to ask his advice on how to live. But
the Lord has led me to you, may Christ save you. You don't know where else
to go. You might land up with some OGPU agents!'
"'But, by the mercy of God, there are still some lamps of God left!'
"'What are you saying?! I have gone round almost half Russia, and there's
no-one!'
"And so in this cunning way the agent found out the address. The
laywoman told her everything, only she couldn't remember the number of the
house:
"'It doesn't matter, I'll explain it to you... It's the third, or maybe the fourth
house from the corner. There's a high gate covered with tin-plate. . As you go
in, you'll see a narrow path to the corner of the house. Turn left past the
corner. Knock three times on the first window past the turn. And ask...'
459
460
"With these words she immediately went into the town... Perhaps about
two hours later she came back:
"'Ach, I went the wrong way. I arrived, but it seems that it wasn't the right
place... I came to the window and knocked three times. A woman jumped out,
it seems she had been washing some clothes.
"'"What matushka are you talking about? I'll wake up my husband now,
he's drunk, and he’ll show you both a matushka and a batyushka!" I was
frightened and left...'
"'That was probably Dasha... Most likely you didn't understand each
other... It doesn't matter. I'll find out. Don't be sad. Sit down and drink some
tea. I'll put the samovar on... And meanwhile write down some addresses you
can go to.'
"The nun took out a piece of paper and wrote down the addresses. The
samovar was already on the table...
"While the so-called 'nun' had been knocking on the window, matushka
said to the novice:
"'It's an enemy! It's an enemy! Drive her away, drive her away!'
"And when the agent had left in perplexity, the blind woman said:
"'Now run quickly to Pasha and tell her that a spy is drinking tea in her
house.'
"Dasha ran off. By road it was about 11 kilometres, but much shorter
through the kitchen-gardens. Dasha ran up, panting. She knocked on the
door. Pasha came out. Dasha passed her the message:
"'Matushka told me: run quickly to Pasha, a spy is drinking tea in her
house!'
"And Dasha disappeared... It was as if she had been covered with boiling
water. But she went in calmly and asked:
460
461
"'Let's have a look... What's this, I'm so mixed up. No, that's wrong...'
"And she threw the whole piece of paper into the samovar spout. It went
up in smoke.
"They transferred matushka to another place. And the OGPU agent went
away in a sulk... But she couldn't say that she was working for the OGPU...
"I'll tell you about a miracle which took place, as all of us firmly believe, by
the holy prayers of Matushka Schema-Abbess Seraphima.
"I was fixed up, again by her prayers, in a good job at a railway crossing,
opening and closing the barrier. This place was near a mine. Trucks passed
along the road carrying explosive destined for the mine. My work consisted
in sitting in a glass cabin and looking out for trains. When a train came up to
cross the road, I closed the barrier, and when it passed, I opened it. On
blessing me for this work, matushka had said:
"'When you go to work in the morning, your first duty will be to make the
sign of the cross over all the levers and cables and everything that has to do
with your work. Then sit down and say the Jesus prayer without ceasing.
Don't allow any sinful thought in, fight it by prayer!'
"And I did everything that matushka told me to do... Many years passed,
and nothing special happened at that place... There was another person, a
trackman, working on the crossing. His duties included sweeping the road
and watching the track. I used to say hello to him, and then sit down to work
and prayer.
“One day I came to work. It was already autumn, and it was frosty. I
secretly made the sign of the cross over the whole place. I went into the cabin,
sat down and occupied myself with the Jesus prayer. I lost consciousness of
461
462
my surroundings. When I lifted my head I saw a big and heavy goods train
already close. And when I looked behind, I saw a car going along the road
with red flags, which meant that it was carrying explosive. There was no time
to let down the barrier. Apparently the driver had decided to get ahead of the
train. I froze... The car crossed the rails, but the locomotive was there too. The
sound of glass was heard. The car was hanging on the locomotive. The guards
who were sitting with their rifles on chests flew out onto the asphalt together
with the explosive. The explosive scattered over a wide area. The train
stopped. I heard a voice:
"A short time later the police and the bosses arrived. Many of them. But for
some reason everyone was very quiet. There was no sound of conversation.
They were walking carefully, there was explosive everywhere... But the
guards who had fallen at great speed off the car were unharmed, safe and
sound. They took the car down from the locomotive. In the cabin were the
driver and senior guard - the door was jammed. But they also were
completely unharmed. It was simply amazing. Such a catastrophe and no
consequences. The car was going at such a speed and yet nobody suffered.
They came out, said something... Finally, the commission came up to the
barrier and said to me:
"I told them that I had tried to close the barrier, but the cable had snapped.
The commission and I went up to the transmission. There was ice there. I was
so amazed at that and fervently thanked the Lord in my soul. Although it was
frosty, it was impossible to explain the presence of ice in the transmission. It
was the first time I had seen ice there in so many years. Yes and in general
was it not a clear miracle of God! Why were the guards alive and unharmed?
After all, they had fallen out of the car and flown several metres. Why did the
explosive not explode at the impact? They later said that if the explosive had
gone off the whole town would have been destroyed!
"I was not responsible at all. Formally speaking, I did everything I could.
Only the technology did not work. It could not work because ice had formed
in the box. Only the car suffered damage. While all the people who had been
involved in the catastrophe had been miraculously preserved completely
unharmed.
"Several years passed... Circumstances were such that I was given the right
to retire. And I asked matushka for permission to retire. 'Blind' matushka, as
462
463
everyone called her, gave her blessing... And so I, having gone with my list of
signatures through all the sections, went to the director for the final signature.
He signed, and then, looking attentively at me, asked me to close the doors. I
closed them. And he said to me:
"He spread his hands as if he wanted to say something special, but just
said:
As she told the story of this miracle wrought through the prayers of
Schema-Abbess Seraphima, tears were in her eyes. And we all, as we listened
to her, could not refrain from weeping.
463
464
Postradavshiye, Moscow: St. Tikhon’s Theological Institute, 1997, pp. 51, 63,
92, 226, 340, 511, 613; Vladimir Rusak, Pir Satany, London, Canada: "Zarya",
1991, p. 29; Protopresbyter Michael Polsky, Noviye Mucheniki Rossijskiye,
Jordanville, 1949-57, part 1, pp. 213-214; Michael Khlebnikov, “O tserkovnoj
situatsii v Kostrome v 20-30ye gody”, Pravoslavnaya Zhizn’, 49, N 5 (569),
May, 1997, p. 2; Priest Basil Redechkin, from the witness of T.V. Nikolayeva
and the servant of God Juliana; Nadezhda, no. 5; Orthodox America, vol. 4,
no. 1, July, 1983, p. 5; Schema-Monk Epiphany (Chernov), typescript; “Krasnij
Provokator F.I. Zhurbenko, ‘Arkhiepiskop Lazar’”, Russkoye Pravoslaviye, N
2 (16), 1999, pp. 9-10; Archbishop Lazarus of Tambov, “Out of the
Catacombs”, Orthodox America, p. 6;
http://www.omolenko.com/texts/katakomb.htm; http://www.pstbi.ru/cgi-
htm/db.exe/no_dbpath/docum/cnt/ans/;
http://catacomb.org.ua/modules.php?name=Pages&go=print_page&pid=12
66)
464
465
Then another decided to do it. They summoned Fr. Peter to the window, he
came up, and the soldier immediately shot him - straight in the heart.
Fr. Peter was shot at the church. Now there is no church there - it was
destroyed. And the grave was washed away by a river.
Priest Vladimir Piksanov was serving in the Pokrov church of the village of
Pavlovka, Khvalynsky uyezd, Simbirsk province. He was a good pastor, and
many people went to batyushka for advice and consolation. Fr. Vladimir
enjoyed great authority in the village as an educated and discerning man. The
villagers went to church with joy, dressed in their best clothes. The choir was
renowned far beyond the confines of Pavlovka. In 1917 he was conducting a
service when some armed men came into the church. They did not allow him
to take off his epitrachelion, but took him away with insults. The people
followed him in a crowd. Many of the women wept. Batyushka calmly stood
opposite his persecutors. Making the sign of the cross, he said: “O Lord, accept
my soul!” And the epitrachelion was stained with his blood. In the evening it
was quiet in the village. In many families they wept and prayed for the
murdered priest.
465
466
A co-prisoner of his, who witnessed his martyric end, tells the following.
The whole tragedy took place in the town of Chorny-Yar, on the Volga, where
he had gone with his wife in the hope that, being near the Whites (the front
was quite near Chorny-Yar), he would be able to pass over to their side and
thus flee the Bolshevik horrors. But the Lord judged otherwise. The church
authorities had given him an order to read Patriarch Tikhon's epistle
anathematizing the Bolsheviks on one of the Sundays. This event was widely
announced among the local population, and on the day on which he was to
read the epistle so many people had gathered that he had to read it, not in the
church, but on the porch in front of the whole people. Of course, among the
people there were many Bolsheviks who reported the event to the centre. The
front moved to and fro in the area of Tsaritsyn. The Bolsheviks raged, and
special tribunals did their savage work everywhere. The cheka also came to
Chorny Yar. The population was forbidden to leave their houses without
special permission from the authorities. But some managed to leave the town
after having been thoroughly checked by the Bolsheviks. When Lev
Zacharovich's wife heard about this, wishing to help her husband leave
466
467
Chorny Yar, she went to the cheka for a pass. This wife was a very simple
woman, in the full sense of the phrase "not of this world". In her simplicity she
could not understand what Bolshevism was. She believed everything and
everyone, as only the purest child can believe. But having fallen into the hands
of the skilled masters of satanism, she, the poor wretch, could not understand
what was awaiting her husband. Having listened to her request and found out
from her where her husband was, the Bolsheviks rejoiced and told her that he
must now come to them and they would immediately give him a pass. In fact
the Bolsheviks had special instructions from the centre to search for and arrest
him. But since the couple lived humbly and in isolation, rarely coming out
onto the street, the Bolsheviks had not been able to find where he was. The
wife, rejoicing at this declaration by the Bolsheviks, ran to her husband to
inform him of the news. After some hesitations they went together to the
cheka, from where Lev Zacharovich never returned. This was between July 20-
30, 1918. He was about two months in prison, being subjected to mockery and
humiliation. One hour before his execution the chekists gave his wife
permission to meet him, assuring her that his time in prison was about to come
to an end. She wept for joy, but an hour after the meeting, as she was passing
through the square, she saw her husband tied to a post and being shot by the
Red Army men. On seeing this horrific scene, she went out of her mind. The
peasants of the village of Staritsky all took turns in taking her in and feeding
her. During the last days of his imprisonment, Lev Zacharovich felt that his
fate was already decided and wept bitterly, thinking all the time about the
destiny of his defenceless and unhappy wife. He besought everyone that if he
were saved he would not abandon his wife.
Fr. Michael served in Bortsurman from 1910. His parishioners loved him for
his kindness, piety and conscientious fulfilment of his pastoral duties. The
revolution came, and then, in the summer of 1918, a group of Kolchak's armies
were retreating along the banks of the river Sura. The inhabitants of the city of
Kurmysh rebelled, either in order to free themselves from the Bolshevik yoke,
or in order to unite with the retreating armies.
467
468
The rebellion was led by the director of the local bank, Sovernin. The
citizens disarmed a unit of the Red Army that was in the town and imprisoned
the soldiers, strictly ordering Nicholas Migunov and Nicholas Nebasov from
the village of Bortsurman to guard them without giving them anything to eat
or drink. However, the villagers gave them both food and drink, and hardly
restricted them at all.
The punishment squad sent to suppress the rebellion was composed almost
entirely of Latvians. It was led by a certain Garin, who was from a noble
family of Nizhegorod province. Where he arrived, there were tortures and the
killing of priests.
Bortsurman was swept by the rumour that the punishment squad was
going to kill everybody. A peasant named Elen sounded the alarm from the
church bell-tower. Fr. Michael was at that time in the neighbouring village of
Kozlovka, giving communion to an old man.
The punishment squad arrayed itself on a hill opposite the village. They
had also heard the bell, and they decided to burn the village down. And that is
probably what would have happened if a postman had not fallen into their
hands.
Finally, they decided to send two spies. At the entrance to the village they
met a peasant who was peacefully ploughing the land. Being peasants
themselves, the soldiers knew how to win over the peasant. One harnessed his
horse to the plough and began to plough, while the other asked the villagers
who was living where and how they could get in. A list was composed. That
night the soldiers entered the village and started arresting people. The arrested
men were brought to the building of the volost administration.
Fr. Michael returned home late at night. On the edge of the village his way
was barred by the soldiers.
468
469
At that very moment another group of soldiers arrived at his home to arrest
him, but, not finding him there, they left.
On entering his house, Fr. Michael understood what awaited him, but did
not run away.
They soon came to arrest him. He was accused of raising the alarm and
joyfully waiting for Kolchak's troops, and was cruelly tortured.
Also arrested with Fr. Michael was the reader, Eulampius Pavlovich
Nikolayev. A relative of Fr. Michael's, he was from Elijah's hill, and had lived
for some time as a clerk in the neighbouring village. Fr. Michael had invited
him to serve as the church reader in Bortsurman, and now he shared a
martyr's end with him.
So as not to alarm the villagers, the soldiers had declared that the arrested
men would be sent to Kurmysh to be put on trial. However, the martyrs knew
what was in store for them and prepared for death by repentance and
confession.
Fr. Michael fell on his knees and with hands raised prayed to God. He was
shot sixteen times, and yet remained alive - an obvious miracle. Then one of
the executioners went up to him and bayoneted him in the heart.
Of the thirty people killed only one, John Petrovich Kurepin, remained
alive. He recounted the story of the martyrdoms of Fr. Michael, the church
reader and the twenty-seven parishioners.
469
470
After the murder, the executioners sent one of the local inhabitants to
Bortsurman to tell the villagers to come and take the bodies or bury them there
- they all had to be buried by the evening. The peasants arrived on carts and
took them all, leaving a cross with an inscription at the site of the martyrdom.
Fr. Michael's house was sacked by the executioners. Soon after his martyric
death his matushka wrote to the authorities in Moscow, asking why they had
killed her husband. The reply was that her husband had suffered innocently...
Protopriest John Ilyinsky was born in 1846, and served in the village of
Sheremetyevo-Nikolskoye, Simbirsk province. There in 1918 he was arrested,
sentenced to death and shot for “counter-revolution”. All his property was
confiscated or trashed, In 1919 the Bolsheviks recognized that there had been
not enough evidence to accuse him of counter-revolution, so they returned the
confiscated property to his family.
Priest Peter Petrovich Lvov was a member of the Saratov Diocesan Council.
On October 6, 1918 he was condemned by the Saratov revolutionary tribunal
for “passive participation in counter-revolutionary activities” and condemned
to ten years’ conditional imprisonment. Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Simeon Ionin served in the city of Troitsk, Orenburg diocese. He was
shot in Kustanai in 1918.
470
471
All seventeen were shot. According to one source, the execution took place in
the period from August to December.
Fr. Stephen did not flinch. With a radiant face he got up from the table and
with a broad gesture pointed at the five-headed church of the Holy Trinity.
"Look, there it is, the Trinity. I shall never leave it. Our Lord Jesus Christ
did not hide and conceal himself, and neither shall I."
In the evening he was arrested together with eighteen other people. His
matushka, Anna, got together a knapsack for the road, but he took nothing.
471
472
The arrested men were brought to the school building and beaten for a
long time. Fr. Stephen was especially cruelly beaten and humiliated, and
before his execution his hair was cut off.
After midday on the Sunday Fr. Stephen and the peasants were led out of
Deyanovo in the direction of the village of Maltsev.
All the sufferers were buried in a common grave except for Fr. Stephen,
who was buried separately in the centre of the cemetery.
Later a cross was erected at the site, and pannikhidas were served.
The leader of the executioners, Garin, was later killed by his own men.
Priest Vladimir Karpinsky took the place of Fr. Stephen in Deyanovo after
his death.
The shining ribbon came to the entrance to the church and stopped: the
doors were closed.
472
473
The sound of the response was mixed with the sound of a gunshot.
"He is risen indeed!" was heard by the priest already not from his own
parishioners, not in the earthly church, but in the Heavenly Church, with the
angels chanting the Resurrection of Christ...
Priest Nicetas Tikhonovich Pazukhin was born on May 23, 1885 into a
peasant family. He was educated at home, and on May 2, 1895 he passed the
examination for becoming a teacher and church reader. On June 13, 1905 he
became a reader in the village of Alovo, Alatyr uyezd, Simbirsk province. On
April 29, 1906 he was transferred to the village of Chirkovo, Alatyr uyezd. He
was also teacher of the Law of God. He was well-known for his kindness,
intelligence, generosity and hospitality, and had a good library. On October 16,
1911 he was ordained to the diaconate, and began to serve in the village of
Nikolayevka, Alatyr uyezd. On April 15, 1915 he was ordained to the
priesthood, and began to serve in the village of Koshelevka, Karsunsky uyezd,
Simbirsk province. Fr. Nicetas was married to Maria, who came from a poor
but pious family. In 1919 she was only a little more than twenty years old.
They had three daughters.
In March, 1919 a parishioner came to the house of Fr. Nicetas and said:
“Batyushka, you have to hide – in Pogorelova they’ve arrested the whole
church council of ten people.” He replied: “I can run, but what will happen to
my wife and children?” And so he remained. He put his older daughters on a
bench, read a prayer and made the sign of the cross over them. Soon Red
Army soldiers came one by one into his hut. Fr. Nicetas’ daughter Elizabeth
remembers: “Fr. Nicetas gave them tea and milk, and cut some bread for them.
The Red Army soldiers did not refuse. They stacked up their rifles – the whole
wall was full of weapons. They ate and drank, and then they said: ‘You’re
wanted in the office, come with us.’ Batyushka’s wife Maria, on hearing shots,
jumped out onto the porch. A woman neighbour came up to her: ‘Matushka,
they’ve shot your [husband] and ten other people. They’re lying on their
backs.’ Matushka began to rush about, she took her youngest daughter out of
her cradle and wanted to run to the shooting, but the Red Army commander
got hold of her: ‘You can’t help him at all, think about your children, otherwise
you, too, will be shot.’ They buried Fr. Nicetas and eleven other villagers in a
common grave in the village cemetery. A cross without any names was
473
474
planted (they decided not to write the names of those killed). Within a week
they came for ‘the pope’s goods’. They took all the clothes, books, utensils,
tablecloths and napkins which matushka herself had sewn – she was a
needlewoman. They succeeded in keeping a jacket – they’d thrown it into the
manure. Now on the place of the burial of the twelve shot men there is a small
hillock, and some spikes from the fence have remained. There is no cross…”
Priest Nicholas Pokrovsky was born in 1864, and was killed on March 18,
1919 in Simbirsk province.
Priest Seraphim Sarychev was shot after the paschal Liturgy at Gondatyevka
station.
474
475
Priest Vladimir Perfilyevich (?) Dubrovin was the rector of the Pokrov
cathedral in the city of Kuznetsk, Saratov province. In the summer of 1919 he
was shot together with other priests in Kuznetsk.
Priest Alexis Ivanovich Razumov was born in 1871 in the family of Priest
Ivan Fyodorovich Razumov in the village of Yulovo, Karsunsky uyezd (now
Inzensky region). In 1893 he finished a complete science course at the Simbirsk
theological seminary, and on December 22, 1893 he was ordained as deacon of
the village of Kabayevo, Alatyr uyezd, by Bishop Barsonuphius. On May 9,
1895 he was ordained as priest of the church of the Archangel Michael in the
village of Vyazovka, Sengileyevsky uyezd (now Mainsky region). On March 2,
1900 he was transferred to the village of Kitovka, Karsunsky uyezd (now the
town of Inza), where he served in the church of the Nativity of the Mother of
God until his death in 1918. From 1895 Fr. Alexis was teacher of the Law of
God in a land school, and was also headmaster and teacher of the Law of God
in a church school from 1907. He was also trustee of a labourers' farmstead
which was under the main trusteeship of the Empress Alexandra Fyodorovna,
for which Her Majesty thanked him on September 9, 1899. In 1901 he was
given the blessing of the Holy Synod for his zealous aid to the population
suffering from a fire. He was married to the daughter of a priest, Elizabeth
Nikolayevna Pisareva (1877-1943) and had eight children.
Fr. Alexis perished together with his youngest son Nicholas (born 1911)
from a bomb thrown by Red Army soldiers through the window of his house.
He was buried in the Kitovo cemetery.
Priest John Ilyinsky of the village of Sh... was shot by unknown people in 1918 in
the village of Nikolsk. He had been accused of counter-revolution, but the Simbirsk
revolutionary tribunal admitted in 1919 that there was no evidence for that.
Deacon Peter Grigoryevich Petrovsky and Reader Nikolayev were shot on March
3/16, 1919 in the village of Repyevka-Ksomynka.
Fr. Peter was born in 1855 in the village of Annenkovo, Simbirsk uyezd
(now Annenkovo, Stepnoye Tsilinsky region), in the family of a junior deacon.
He completed his studies as the Simbirsk theological school, after which he
became a novice in the Hierarchical House (the former Pokrovsky monastery)
in Simbirsk. On November 29, 1872 he was appointed junior deacon for the
small town of Yushansk, Simbirsk uyezd (now the village of Yushanskoye,
Mainsky region). On May 11, 1875, for an incorrect handing out of two birth-
475
476
certificates to one person, he was removed from his post and exiled for three
years to Perm province, with no rights or freedoms. On May 6, 1881 he was
pardoned by the Emperor and returned to Simbirsk province. He and his wife
Pelagia Alexeyevna settled at first in the family of Pelagia Alexeyevna's father,
who was a reader.
On March 9, 1882 Fr. Peter was appointed acting reader in the village of
Osoka, Sengileyevsky uyezd (now Baryshsky region). On December 21, 1882
he was transferred to the village of Annenkovo. On June 12, 1887 he was
ordained deacon for the village of Siyava, Alatyr uyezd (now in Chuvashia).
On October 27, 1887 he was transferred to the village of Sutyazhnoye, Alatyr
uyezd (now in Chuvashia), on March 9, 1901 - to the village of Karlinskoye,
Simbirsk uyezd (now Ulyanovsk region), on April 28, 1901 - to the village of
Mikhailovka, on July 21, 1901 - to the village of Semyonovskoye, Alatyr uyezd
(now Poretsky region, Chuvashia), on December 8, 1901 - to the village of
Kladbishchi, Alatyr uyezd (now in Chuvashia). On November 2, 1904 he was
retired. On November 24, 1904 he was appointed reader of the church of the
Nativity of Christ in the city of Alatyr, Simbirsk province (now in Chuvashia).
On May 5, 1905 he was transferred to a retired deacon's post in the village of
Alovo, Alatyr uyezd (now Atyashevsky region, Mordovia). On July 5, 1906 he
was transferred to the village of Repyevka-Kosmynka, Simbirsk uyezd (now in
Maisky region), where he served to the end of his life. Fr. Peter had five
children.
In March, 1919, there was a rebellion by the peasants against Soviet power
in the region of the villages of Karlinsky and Repevka-Kosmynka. When the
"war" ended, a Soviet mounted detachment came to the house of Fr. Peter and
Reader Nikolayev, and, although there had been no rebellion in their village,
and they were not accused of anything, they were taken out onto the street
and shot before the eyes of their family. Fr. Peter’s wife, Pelagia Alexeyevna,
took his body into the house, washed it and vested it in deacon’s vestments.
Then she sent to inform her five children. On the next day, March 4, the
Monday of the Third Week of the Great Fast, Fr. Peter's son, Priest Sergius,
served the Liturgy and buried him with his own hands in the Repevka
cemetery together with Reader Nikolayev.
476
477
1892 (or, according to other information, October 20, 1891) he was transferred
to the village of Permis, Karsunsky uyezd (now the village of Permixi,
Bolshebereznikovsky region, Mordovia), where from February 17, 1892 to 1900
he was also teacher of the Law of God in the land school. From 1896 he was
missionary for the fourth rural deanery, Karsunsky uyezd. On April 16, 1900
he was transferred to the village of Bolshiye Berezinki, Karsunsky uyezd,
where he was also headmaster and teacher of the Law of God in the church-
parish school. On July 1, 1900 he was confirmed in the post of librarian of the
rural deanery library and a member of the auditing commission attached to
the Bolshebereznikovsky candle factory. From February 10, 1901 to February
10, 1904 he was a member of the Deanery Council. On August 4, 1904 he was
transferred to the village of Kirzhemany, Ardatov uyezd (now the village of
Kirzhemany, Bolsheignatovsky region, Mordovia), where he was also teacher
of the Law of God at the local land school. On October 28, 1910 he was
transferred to the village of Pyatina, Karsunsky uyezd (now Inzensky region).
From the time he came to this parish he was also headmaster of the
Mamyrovksy church-parish school, and from March 15, 1911 - teacher of the
Law of God at the Pyatinsky land school. On August 15, 1912 he was
confirmed in the post of deputy to the Diocesan conference from the fourth
deanery district of the Karsunsky uyezd. Fr. John was married to Alexandra
Stefanovna (born October 30, 1867). They had seven children.
Fr. John was shot during the requisitioning of church valuables from the
church of the village of Pyatina on March 17, 1919.
Fr. Lev was born in 1859 in the village of Alovo, Alatyr uyezd (now
Atyashevsky region, Mordovia) in the family of a deacon. In 1880 he finished
his studies at Simbirsk theological seminary, and on June 30, 1880 was
appointed reader in the village of Khokhlovka, Simbirsk uyezd (now
Tsilninsky region). Later he was transferred to the Pokrov church in Syzran,
Simbirsk province, where he remained until September 1, 1881, when he was
477
478
Fr. Lev and his daughter Nadezhda were condemned to be shot by a special
section attached to the Revolutionary Council of the Eastern front for “active
aid to the counter-revolution and belonging to a counter-revolutionary
organization”.
478
479
which took place on May 31, 1921, people looked for the bodies in order to
bury them, but could not find them.
Fr. James’ fate may be linked with that of Alexandra Petrovna Pronina,
who was born in Vladimir (?). She came from a family of church servers, and
her father was an iconographer. She was a deeply believing person, kind and
responsive. With her husband, who was an artist, she came to Tsaritsyn before
the revolution. During the civil war her husband was called up into the army.
Alexandra Petrovna had to look after their two children in a time of famine, so
she had to take work as a prison supervisor. At that time they had already
begun to imprison clergy, and, of course, Alexandra Petrovna began to help
the priests who were in the prison where she worked. Through her the
arrested priests received letters from their loved ones, and sent notes back.
Among them was Fr. James, whose letters to his wife were taken by Alexandra
Petrovna’s daughter, the ten-year-old Vera. In April, 1921 Alexandra Petrovna
was caught with a letter of an imprisoned priest, and was herself arrested and
cast into prison. A few days later, her demobilized husband returned home.
Just the night before he had had a portentous dream, from which it was clear
to him that he would never see his wife again. And he and the children could
not obtain any news about her. Then they were told that she was supposedly
in hospital. But when they came to find out if this was true, they discovered
that they had buried her already three days before in a mass grave with other
people who had died from illness or been killed. Probably, Alexandra
Petrovna had passed through the same case as Fr. James, and had been shot
with him and six others on May 31, 1921.
Vera recalls: “My father took my brother and me to the cemetery to look for
the common grave. He was madly digging in the earth with his hands. The
earth at one spot seemed to him to be warm – it was the month of May - and
he said: ‘Here is where your holy mama lies.’ After this he was ill for a long
time… I often remember a childhood dream which I had when mama was still
alive. My mama was standing in a crowd in a ship going down the Volga. She
was waving at me with her hand. At the helm stood Jesus Christ with a halo
over His head, and He was blessing me with a cross. In the morning I told this
to mama, and she, putting me on my knees, wept and said: ‘That means that I
will soon be no more, and you will be my little orphan…’”
479
480
480
481
481
482
The following were indicted in “The Case of Priest John Yablonsky and
others, Sutyazhnoye village, Simbirsk province, 1922”:
Basil Mazurov (born 1877) and Basil Malkov (born 1880). They were born
in the village of Sutyazhnoye, Kuvakinskaya volost, Alatyr uyezd, Simbirsk
province into peasant families. They became members of the church-parish
council. In March, 1922 they were arrested because “under the influence of
Priest Yablonsky [they] protested against the requisitioning of church
valuables not only from [their] church, but also from other churches in
Russia”. On May 24, 1922 they were convicted of “resisting the requisitioning
of church valuables” and sentenced them to six months’ conditional
imprisonment, deprivation of civil right and the right to occupy posts in Soviet
institution”.
482
483
Deacon Michael Vasilyevich Malkov was born in 1883, and completed his
studies at a theological seminary. He then went to serve in the Pokrov church
in Astrakhan. In 1927 he was arrested, and on December 19 he was convicted
for “anti-Soviet agitation” and sentenced to three years’ exile in Siberia.
Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Basil Semyonovich Lovtsov was born in 1863 or 1864, and served in
the village of Klyuchi, Samara province. In 1928 he was arrested and sent to
Solovki. Apart from one letter in the same year, nothing more was heard from
him.
Reader Peter Ivanovich Kurnykin was born in 1869 and had an elementary
education. He lived in the village of Ikryanoye, Ikryanoye region, Astrakhan
province. On November 17, 1920 he was arrested for “anti-Soviet agitation”,
but was released on amnesty. In 1929 he was arrested again, and on April 5
was sentenced to three years’ exile in Kazakhstan for “anti-Soviet agitation”.
Nothing more is known about him.
483
484
Reader Basil Akimovich Dalmatov was born in 1893 in the village of Orlov
Gaj, Dergachevsky region, Saratov province. He served in the village of
Zeleniye Khutora, Atkarsk region, Saratov province. On August 15, 1929 he
was arrested for “anti-Soviet agitation among the believers”. On December 3
he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. Nothing more is known about
him.
484
485
Priest Semyon Maximovich Bakholdin was born in 1885 and served in the
village of Kamennij Yar, Chernoyarsky region, Astrakhan province. On
November 3, 1930 he was arrested and convicted of “belonging to a counter-
revolutionary organization”. On November 10 he was shot.
Nun Praskovya Potapovna Ivanova was born in 1875, being from the
village of Makovka, Buzuluk uyezd, Samara area. She was illiterate. Before her
arrest she was living in the village of Pronkino, Sorochinsky district, Middle
Volga region. She was arrested by the OGPU on February 11, 1930, and on
April 27, 1930, on the basis of article 58-11, was sentenced to five years’
deprivation of liberty. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Nadezhda (Osipovna Borzunova) was born in 1882, and was the
director of the choir in the Smolensk women’s monastery in the village of
485
486
The following were convicted in the group case, “The Case of the ‘Holy
Counter-Revolution’ in Vavilov Dale, Samara, 1929”:
486
487
Gospel quotations, were so fiery that people sobbed. In July, 1928 Fr.
Onesimus took the place of Fr. John Zhuravlev, who had been arrested, in the
church of St. Nicholas in the cave skete in Vavilov Dale, Ivanteyevsky region.
He took to heart the words of Patriarch Tikhon calling the Bolsheviks “outcasts
of the human race” whose work was “satanic, for which the fire of gehenna
awaits you in the future life beyond the grave”. He expressed the same
thoughts in a more hidden way. But everybody understood what he was
talking about. He was arrested in 1929. “The court evaluates the actions of
Pryakhin and Zhuravlev as most serious crimes, though cleverly masked,
which have been committed in a period of intensification of the class struggle,
in accordance with which it considers it necessary to define for them measures
of social defence” – in other words, the death penalty… Fr. Onesimus did not
accept that he was guilty.
487
488
full of water with the words: “Lord, give the blessing…” – at which moment
the sick would begin to show signs of demonic possession, shouting and
cursing. He would sprinkle the demon-possessed with water, and many
through his prayers would receive healing. He preached mainly in parables,
and told people about the special holiness of Vavilov Dale, and its miracles.
The following fact witnesses to the lofty spirit of Quadratus Molodykh and
Stepan Turapin. Once they came to the settlement of Gorno-Ishikansky, where
the wells had dried up, and there was not enough water, not only for the
animals but also for men. Not far away there was a little lake with water, but it
was dirty, completely unfit for drinking. After a few days of constant intense
prayers on the part of the ascetics, the waters in the lake miraculously changed
and became pure and clear. After this Priest Alexander Agapovich Korin
(born 1868 or 1869, serving in the village of Ukrainka, Ivanteyevsky region,
Samara district) came with a deacon and served a thanksgiving moleben and
blessed the lake, for which he was given a lengthy prison sentence without the
right to live any longer in the European part of the RSFSR. Quadratus
Fyodorovich unceasingly went round the district preaching the truth of the
Holy Gospel. He fearlessly exposed the lies and hypocrisy of the slogans and
summonses of the new authorities. In 1929 he and Stepan were arrested in
Vavilov Dale. In the trial records we read: “the court considers the accused
Turapin and Molodykh to be socially dangerous, and since they give no sign
of correction, they are declassified and parasitic persons”. They refused to
recognize their guilt, and were sentenced to be shot. The sentence was carried
out.
488
489
489
490
arrested for “anti-Soviet agitation”, and on January 25, 1930 was sentenced to
three years’ exile in the north. He suffered for the faith.
490
491
Reader Paul Kuzmich Tatilin was born in 1872 and lived in the village of
Nachalovo, Narimanovsky region, Astrakhan province. On February 28, 1930
he was sentenced to five years imprisonment for “counter-revolutionary
activity”. Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Basil Ilyich Kornev was born in 1870 and went to a theological
seminary. He served in the village of Kochkovatka, Kharabalinsky region,
Astrakhan province. On April 12, 1930 he was convicted of “anti-Soviet
agitation” and sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. Nothing more is
known about him.
491
492
warm clothes. They sent a package, but six months later it was sent back.
Nothing more was heard of him…
*
Priest Thomas Konstantinovich Artemyev was born in 1883 and served in
the village of Mordovskoye Adelyakovo, Samara province. He used to give
sermons in which he said that now the Orthodox Church was being
persecuted, but it was necessary to be patient, for it would come to an end
soon. He said that the collective form was violence against the peasants and
the renunciation of Orthodoxy. After his sermon three hundred families left
the collective farm. Fr. Thomas asked his parishioners to help him pay his
taxes. “Otherwise,” he said, “the church of God will be closed.” In 1930 he was
sentenced to death in the village of Sosnovka, Stalinsky region, Samara
province. On January 1, 1931 he was shot.
492
493
Priest Alexander Vasilyevich Nosov was born in 1892, and was the priest
of the village of Izobilnoye, Sol-Iletsky region, Orenburg province. In 1930 he
was arrested together with other representatives of the clergy and asked to
renounce God in return for freedom and prosperity. He refused. He was cast
into prison. On April 21, 1930 he was sentenced to five years in the camps. In
prison he was tortured for a long time and then killed. His house and property
were all confiscated and his family was thrown out into the world.
493
494
494
495
Monk Emelian Porfiryevich Efremov was born in 1888, being from the
village of Stary Nekhratov in Kazan province. From 1913 he lived in
monasteries in Jerusalem, Athos and Kiev. Before his arrest he was living in
the khutor of Malga, Petrovsky district, Middle Volga region. He was arrested
by the GPU on January 21, 1931 and charged in accordance with article 58-11
as a participant in a counter-revolutionary organisation. On March 26, 1931 he
was condemned to be shot. The sentence was carried out on April 5, 1931 in
Orenburg.
Nun Praskovya Potapovna Ivanova was born in 1875, being from the
village of Makovka, Buzuluk uyezd, Samara area. She was illiterate. Before her
arrest she was living in the village of Pronkino, Sorochinsky district, Middle
Volga region. She was arrested by the OGPU on February 11, 1930, and on
April 27, 1930, on the basis of article 58-11, was sentenced to five years’
deprivation of liberty. Nothing more is known about her.
495
496
Soviet agitation among the believers. On June 9, 1930 she was sentenced to
three years’ exile in Siberia.
Priest Alexis Karpovich Yeltsov was born in 1882 and went to a theological
seminary. He was serving in the village of Vyazovka, Chernoyarsky region,
Astrakhan province, when, on November 3, 1930, he was arrested and
condemned for “belonging to a counter-revolutionary organization”. He was
sentenced to death and shot on November 10, 1930.
496
497
497
498
Antonina Pavlovna Azarova, who was born in 1910, recounts that from the
age of 16 she used to chant in the choir of the church in the village of
Petrovskoye. There Priest Victor worked hard and brought the church into a
flourishing condition. The deacon was Fr. Paul (perhaps Zhernikov, born 1890,
repressed in 1932), and the choir master was Philip Arsenyevich. It was a
terrible time, there was shooting day and night. Philip Arsenyevich was forced
to leave. Red army men surrounded the church, they shot over the heads of
the terrified congregation. “Whoever comes near the church,” they said, “will
get a bullet in the head!” They mocked and bound Fr. Victor and Fr. Paul, who
were dragged off somewhere and never seen again. Fr. Victor’s matushka
Natalya and her two children (one son had just died) lived for a time with the
church warden. Then someone took them away.
498
499
499
500
500
501
501
502
Nun Maria (Ivanovna Sizonenko). She was born in 1883 in the village of
Chernovka, Samara province into a peasant family, and received an
elementary education. In the 1920s she was living in Samara. On November
10, 1931 she was arrested in connection with the Samara branch of the True
Orthodox Church, and on April 13, 1932 she was sentenced to three years’
exile and sent to Central Asia. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Maria (Alexeyevna Zhmakina). She was born in 1898 in the village of
Beresta, Saratov province into a peasant family, and received an elementary
502
503
education. In the 1920s she was living in Samara. On October 8, 1931 he was
arrested for being “a participant in the Samara branch of the counter-
revolutionary monarchist church organization, the True Orthodox Church”,
and on April 13, 1932 she was sentenced to five years in the camps and was
sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about her.
The following were convicted in “The Case of a Group of Clergy and Laity
of Samara province, Syzran uyezd, 1931”:
503
504
considering his term to begin from February 21, 1931. Nothing more is known
about him.
Priest Basil Fyodorovich Pokrovsky was born in 1885 or 1886 in the village
of Beketovka, Korsun uyezd, Simbirsk province into the family of a priest. He
finished his studies at Simbirsk theological seminary in 1907, and became a
teacher. Then, in 1911 he became a priest in the village of N. Ekakli, Simbirsk
province. He was married, and had a son and daughter. In 1924 he was
transferred to the village of Dolzhnikovo, and was arrested in the same year,
but was soon released. In 1926 he was transferred to the village of Zhidovka,
and then, in December – to the women’s monastery in the village of Kostyuki.
In 1928 he was again arrested, and again soon released. In August, 1928 he was
transferred to the Transfiguration church in Syzran. In 1929 he was arrested
and cast into the Domzak in Syzran, but was soon released. On February 21,
1931 he was arrested in Syzran and again cast into the Domzak. The
indictment concluded: “He visited the flat of the leader of the counter-
revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues’, Bishop Augustine (Belyaev), and was
acquainted with Nilus’ book, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, on the basis
of whose data he with other members of the organization conducted anti-
Soviet propaganda. In services he commemorated the reposed Tsars
Alexander II and Alexander III.” He refused to admit that he was guilty of
counter-revolutionary activity or participating in a counter-revolutionary
organization. On October 28, 1931 he was convicted by the OGPU of “being an
active member of, and being in the ruling centre of, the church-mercenary-
monarchist organization, ‘The Trues [True Orthodox Christians?]”. In
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, he was sentenced to three years in
the camps, considering his term to begin from February 21, 1931. Nothing
more is known about him.
504
505
virulent enemy of Soviet power and all its enterprises”. In accordance with
articles 58-10 and 58-11, he was sentenced to three years in the camps. In 1933
he was again condemned for “anti-Soviet activity” and was exiled. On
returning from exile in 1937, he lived “without definite occupation” in Samara
(Kuibyshev). On November 30, 1937 he was arrested in Samara and cast into
the barracks of the correctional labour facility. He was accused of
“participation in an underground counter-revolutionary church-sectarian
organization”, and on December 21 was sentenced to be shot. This was part of
“The Case of Archbishop Alexander (Trapitsyn) and others, Samara, 1938”.
The sentence was carried out in Samara on January 14, 1938.
505
506
began to serve in the church of the Holy Archangel Michael on Pirogov street,
becoming a subdeacon and cell-attendant of Bishop Augustine. When
Vladyka was exiled to Central Asia, he followed him, helping the bishop
during services and working in the fruit gardens in Pedzhikent. When the
bishop moved to Syzran, Boris went too. Apart from helping in services, he
carried out various assignments, including taking letters from Vladyka to
Metropolitan Sergius. In December, 1930 Bishop Augustine ordained him to
the diaconate. On being arrested, Fr. Boris was cast into Syzran Domzak. At
the trial he witnessed: “In my conviction, Soviet power is at the present time
restricting the servants of the religious cult… The clergy are being loaded
with insupportable taxes which they cannot pay… Collectivization is
acceptable for an Orthodox Christian only if it does not damage his religious
convictions, that is, if collectivization does not pursue the aim of the
persecution of religion.” Fr. Boris was sent to a camp near Lodeinoye Polye,
Svirlag, Leningrad province. He was parted from the archbishop, who was
sent to another camp also near Lodeinoye Polye. There he died at the
beginning of the 1930s.
Nun Luceria Yefimovna Mankova. She was born in 1888. She was arrested
in September, 1931 and convicted, in accordance with articles 58-10 and 59-11,
of belonging to “the church-monarchist counter-revolutionary organization,
‘The Trues [True Orthodox Christians?]”. Nothing more is known about her.
Alexander Antonovich Medem. He was born in 1877 (or 1870) in the city of
Mitava, now Elgava in Latvia. His father was Count Otto (Anton)
Ludwigovich Medem, a Lutheran, a senator, a member of the State Council,
who had many important government posts, in particular the governorship of
Novgorod. He went to the Novgorod gymnasium, and then to the juridical
faculty of St. Petersburg university, from which he graduated in 1897.
However, he was not much interested in the law, and occupied himself rather
on his estate in Khvalynsky uyezd, Saratov province. He sold several pieces of
land that he had received from his father to his peasants at very low prices. In
1901 he married Maria Fyodorovna Cherkova, from whom he had a son and
three daughters. (After the revolution his son emigrated to Germany, while
one of his daughters was shot in 1938.) Until 1918 he administered the estate of
his father, and after the confiscation of the estate he rented as much of it as he
506
507
could in order to work it himself. When the Civil War began, Alexander
Antonovich and his two brothers agreed that they would not raise their hands
against their own people and would take no part in it. In 1918 he was arrested
by the Bolsheviks and was sentenced to death. However, on the eve of
execution he was allowed home to say goodbye to his relatives. He was
intending to return to the prison by morning, but the Bolsheviks were thrust
out of the city by the Whites, and the sentence was never carried out. In the
summer of 1919 he was arrested again. On returning from prison he said that
he “had never prayed so well as in prison, where death can knock on the door
at night, and nobody knows whose turn is next”. He was arrested for a third
time in the summer of 1923. He was released at the end of October and
returned home. His spiritual father at this time was Hieromonk Niphon
(Vyblov). Arrests and deprivations hardened his soul and strengthened his
faith. He wrote to his son: “Only the belief that everything does not end here
with our earthly existence gives us the strength not to hold on to our
insignificant life at all cost and for its sake descend to the depths of meanness,
baseness and humiliation. Only a man of deep and sincere faith can be really
free. Dependence on the Lord God is the only dependence that does not
humiliate a man does not turn him into a pitiful slave, but on the contrary
exalts him… Believe firmly, without wavering, pray always ardently and with
faith that the Lord will hear you. Fear nothing on earth except the Lord God
and your conscience that is ruled by him. Take no account of anything else.”
Because of illness Alexander Antonovich was forced to stop work. But he
never worked in any Soviet institution. In 1925 his wife, Maria Fyodorovna,
wrote to her son about his father: “In these years he has grown morally to an
unusual degree. I have never in my life seen such faith, such peace and
calmness of soul, such true freedom and strength of spirit. This is not only my
opinion, which could be biased. Everybody sees it. And by this we live –
nothing else. For the very fact we exist as a family in this way, having nothing
except hope on the Lord God, proves it.” Alexander Antonovich was an
opponent of the renovationists. From a letter to his children: “The pressure on
the Church, which at one time was weakening, has again increased.
Metropolitan Peter is in prison. In the Caucasus they are taking away the last
churches and giving them to the ‘livers’ – those servants of the Antichrist… So
far it is quiet with us… But this will probably reach us, too. In that case, of
course, I will be the first to fall. I don’t fear this in the slightest, the will of God
is over all. We are doing our work, and of course, if it is destined that we shed
our blood, it will not be shed in vain… I bless you, my boy, to live. Live
simply, honourably, in a godly manner. Never give in to depression.” On May
4, 1929 Alexander Antonovich was arrested and cast into Saratov prison. He
was sentenced by the OGPU to exile and deprivation of the right to live in six
major cities of the USSR. At the moment of his release from prison in May,
Alexander Antonovich became a widower, and he went into exile in Syzran
with his daughters. On December 11, 1930, when he was seriously ill, he was
arrested again for “participation in the counter-revolutionary church-
monarchist organization, ‘The Trues [True Orthodox Christians?]’ in Syzran”.
507
508
508
509
in the Kazan cathedral in Syzran. On February 21, 1931 he was arrested and
cast into the Syzran domzak for being “a participant in a counter-
revolutionary church-monarchist organization and preparing a rebellious
mood in the masses of believers”. On October 28, 1931 he was sentenced to
three years’ exile in the north in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11.
509
510
510
511
Ivan Alexeyevich Razin was born in 1872 in Syzran. Until 1930 he was
engaged in agricultural work and trade. On February 21, 1931 he was arrested
in Zhareny Bugor, Samara province, and cast into the Domzak in Syzran. On
October 28 he was convicted by the OGPU in accordance with articles 58-10
and 58-11 of “being a participant in a counter-revolutionary church-
monarchist organization which was preparing a rebellious mood in the mass
of believers”. He refused to recognize his guilt. He was released under guard,
and deprived of the right to live in twelve places, and confined to one place of
residence, for three years. Nothing more is known about him.
511
512
512
513
in the camps, and on April 13, by another court, to ten years in accordance
with articles 58-10 and 58-11 for being “the leader of a church-monarchist
organization in Samara”. He was accused of “creating, in the period 1927-28,
in Samara a church-monarchist organization with a platform of non-
recognition of Soviet power as being an atheist power. Thus he directed this
organization until April, 1930 when he went into hiding away from Samara.
The activists of the organization included churchmen of the Dormition church.
He took part in the creating and distributing of anti-Soviet propaganda.” He
was sent under convoy to Siblag in Novosibirsk province. Nothing more is
known about him.
Nun Barbara (Vasilyevna Tsaplina). She was born in 1889 or 1888 in Samara
into a peasant family. She became a nun in the Samara Iveron monastery until
1917. From 1914 to 1917 she worked as a cleaner in a field hospital. From 1917
to 1924 she worked in a factory manufacturing uniforms for the Red Army.
She visited the Trinity and Ascension churches until their closure, “then right
up to her arrest began to go to the Spaso-Preobrazhenskaya church”. On
November 9, 1931 she was arrested and cast into Samara isolator. On April 13,
1932 she was convicted of “being a member of a counter-revolutionary church-
monarchist organization in Samara”. “She joined an organizational group that
illegally collected aid for church exiles. She carried this out while conducting
provocative agitation to the effect that the money was being collected for
‘martyrs’ of the kingdom of the Antichrist.” In accordance with articles 58-10
and 58-11, she was sentenced to three years in the camps, and was sent under
escort to Vishlag in Perm province. Nothing more is known about her.
Novice Maria (Alexeyevna Zhmakina). She was born in July, 1898 in the
village of Perelyub, Pugachev uyezd, Lower Volga region. She was the
daughter of the priest, Fr. Alexis Alexandrovich Zhmakin. In October, 1918 she
was arrested together with her father for “participation in an uprising” and
cast into prison in Samara. After spending a month there, she was acquitted at
the trial. In the same year she entered the faculty of natural science in Samara
University, but was forced to leave after three months because of illness. From
513
514
1919 to 1920 she “was mentally ill” and was in hospital. The doctor said that
she “suffers from vividly expressed schizophrenia”. In 1924 she became a
novice in the Diveyevo monastery. In 1925 she left and in March, 1926 went to
work as a teacher in Vertyanovo, Arzamas uyezd. She was sacked from this
post because she conducted religious propaganda in the school. Then she went
round the monasteries, mainly Diveyevo. In her native village she, together
with her father, organized a circle for young people called “The Seventeenth
Party” by the authorities. The members of the circle were concerned with
keeping the church clean, spreading Christianity among the village youth and
converting unbelievers to the faith. Maria herself succeeded in converting
some inveterate unbelievers. On October 7, 1931 Maria was on a steamer
sailing down the Volga from Samara and started preached to a crowd that
gathered around her. She was arrested and cast into prison in Samara. She was
accused of “going round a whole series of towns and conducting anti-Soviet
agitation and spreading counter-revolutionary leaflets”. On April 13, 1932 she
was convicted of being “the main messenger for the counter-revolutionary
centre of ‘The Trues’”, and in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11 was
sent to the Vishera camps in Perm province. There she died sometime after
1932.
Alexandra Petrovna Zhukova. She was born in 1889 or 1888 in Samara, and
went to Samara University. Until 1917 she gave private lessons. From 1918 to
1920 she worked in Samara University and taught in a preparatory school. On
Novembe 10, 1931 she was arrested and cast into Samara isolator. On April 13,
1932 she was convicted of “joining the group of founders of a counter-
revolutionary churchpeople in Samara” and of “taking part in the spreading of
the organization’s ideology”. In accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, she
was sent to the Vishera camps for three years.
514
515
then their house. But each time they recovered. The people used to say:
“Batyushka is helped by God! Everything with him is not as it is with us!” He
was arrested several times on various excuses. In 1932 he was cast into prison
in Saransk for refusing to renounce his priesthood. In prison they forcibly cut
his hair in Holy Week, and he died on the night of Pascha. His fellow inmates
brought matushka his watch and boots and said: “Batyushka looked at his
watch, said: ‘Christ is risen!’ and died.”
Hieromonk Basil was born in about 1860 in Syzran, Samara province. After
ten years of happy married life he decided to leave the world. He revealed his
desire to his wife. She was silent for three days and prayed – after all, they had
ten children. On the third day, she got together a knapsack and firmly said to
her husband: “Go, if God needs you. Save us by your prayers.” And Basil set
off for Mount Athos, to St. Panteleimon’s monastery, where he remained for
three years. After the revolution he was sent back to his homeland to arouse
repentance in the deceived people. He began to live in an abandoned
basement on the outskirts of the village of Troitskoye, Syzran region. After a
time he was revealed to the villagers, and from that moment his service as an
elder began. He lived for six years in the cold basement, until the villagers
built him a little izba and asked him to move there. He had the gift of healing
and foreknowledge. He was arrested at the end of the 1920s, and returned
from prison in 1930 on crutches – his leg had been paralyzed in prison, which
is why they let him out early. He died in 1934 or 1935.
515
516
516
517
517
518
"'Methodius the blessed said: "When the enemy comes, the Church will be
saved in the mountains, in the dens of the earth, and in the deserts." And so
we went under the earth.'
"Nobody ever saw Fr. John again. But the parishioners were released after
about three months in detention.
"There were many wanderers in the Volga region at that time. At one time
we had two living in our house - Fr. Theodore and Fr. Alexis, that's what we
called them. They had nothing, neither passports nor personal effects. And as
a rule they lived with us one at a time, in turn. One would come and the other
would immediately get up and leave. It was evidently impossible for them to
live together. The chekists were searching for them, they hounded them. And
once they arrested Fr. Alexis. And it happened that I, who was a young
woman at that time, was entrusted with taking him on a cart into town. I
agreed. When we had left the village, I stopped the horses on the edge of a
wood and said:
"We never saw him or Fr. Theodore again. I was locked up for a few days
under guard and then released. What more will you get from me? I remember
that Fr. Alexis was very learned in the Scriptures. He read us the Apocalypse
518
519
and explained to us what he had read, especially chapters 12, 13 and 17. He
said:
"'Our Mother Russia will have to suffer much. The disorders of the
commune will not end soon. It will end in the time of the seventh [general
secretary - Gorbachev?], but don't expect anything good in the eighth.'
"In the 1920s Priest Peter Antipovich Vinokurov was serving in the village
of Sengilya in Simbirsk region. He did not sign [Metropolitan Sergius'
declaration] and was prevented from serving. He moved to the village of
Gorodishche, on the other bank of the Volga. At that moment they closed the
church. Then, after going through several villages, he came to the last -
Novodevichye, in Samara region. A renovationist priest called Rastorguyev,
who was then a young reformer with good prospects, turned up there. He
tried to persuade the people to let him serve according to the new style, and he
advised the people to sign. Fr. Peter refused outright. Rastorguyev was then
promoted and transferred to Moscow, where he served in one of the churches.
But they deprived Fr. Peter of all his rights and constantly tried to make him
speak at a meeting and renounce God. Being without work, he accepted help
from the local parishioners and for several years lived in a church lodge. In
1937 he was arrested as an enemy of the people. According to some
information, he lived for some time in Kolyma and died in the 1960s in
Kazakhstan in very difficult circumstances. It is known that there suffered
with him in the same camp Fr. Modestus and his son Herman, also natives of
Simbirsk. Perhaps people will be found who knew them and met them in their
places of imprisonment?
"Some who survived by a miracle returned from the camps and celebrated
services in secret. Thus in the 1960s in the town of Sengilya in Ulyanovsk
region there served in secret a batyushka named John (I don't remember his
surname), who had been released from the camps because of illness. Eternal
glory to these, our reposed men of prayer!"
519
520
the Gospel: ‘One cannot serve two masters.’ In camp he received another term
– ten years for sabotage in accordance with article 58-10. For his refusal to go
to work he was often beaten to the verge of death. He got yet another term – 25
years. I have been with monks from my childhood. I know this group of the
population thoroughly. But perhaps the strictest monk of all those I have seen
I met in camp. And he was, moreover, a simple, illiterate layman. That was
Theodore. He categorically refused to take a mattress and underwear from the
store-room. He slept on bare boards. He prayed all through the night every
night, on his knees, making prostrations to the ground. He was a very strict
faster. He was barely literate. But it was difficult to believe that when one
looked at his nervous face edged with a black beard, at his expressive, burning
eyes. His face was radiant with thought, inspired, gleaming with an inner
light. He did not want to work. But there was no resentment in him. It was
from a deep principle: ‘One cannot serve two masters.’ If a friend would ask
him for something, he would immediately do it. If someone was in trouble
with something and did not ask for help – he would go up and do it. When it
was necessary to clean the barracks, he was the first to run for water, clean the
floor, seep and scrub. This was not for the bosses – it was for the comrades. For
a long time he refused to write a petition for his release. But when they wrote
it, for a long time he did not take it to the bosses. But then, nevertheless, they
took it to the boss of the camp. The reply came in three weeks: exonerate him
in everything, release him… He lived in the village with his sister doing
handiwork. He was counted as an invalid.” Until 1958 he corresponded with
Anatoly Levitin-Krasnov. Nothing more is known about him.
During the Khruschev years, Fr. Innocent used to serve some catacomb
nuns in Suzdal. He himself was from Astrakhan, and had neither passport nor
documents, but only a certificate from a psychiatric hospital. But he was
completely normal, although he was able to imitate a mentally ill person very
well.
He used to describe the terrible things that Kirov had done in Astrakhan.
He himself survived because they buried him in the kitchen-garden. In
Simbirsk province they would put priests in barrels, put nails into them and
throw them down the cliffs into the Volga. In the Alatyr monastery of the
Archangel Michael the whole brotherhood was driven into the Alatyrka
stream and drowned there. Their bodies dammed the river for a while.
Fr. Innocent was old, he could no longer see well and for that reason was
detained in Suzdal. But he wanted to go to the other side of the Volga, to a
skete, to die. There they knew him well and invited him to join them.
The services with the nuns were monastic, sometimes they served the
whole night, reading in turn. During the day they cultivated vegetables,
520
521
guerkins and very tasty tomatoes. The nuns were from the Protection and
Deposition of the Sash convents and other monasteries. They commemorated
the Tsar and Patriarch Tikhon and called the Soviet patriarchs Sergius and
Alexis I “betrayers of Christ and servants of the Antichrist”.
Yury Belov writes: "In prison I met some Orthodox priests... Most of them
were True Orthodox priests, two of whom were unforgettable: Fr. John
(Krivushchev) and Fr. Michael (Kalinin). They did not recognize the satanic
authorities and did not want to hide that fact. On the contrary, they went
along the Volga from village to village preaching that salvation would come to
the world only from struggle with 'the Bolshevik devil'. They called on people
not to work for the Bolsheviks, to go into the woods, not to serve in the Soviet
army, and not to read satanic newspapers and books, since through them, and
through the cinema and radio, 'a great deception comes'. Krivushchev is now
[in 1980] serving his last 10-year sentence at the age of 80. Kalinin also is not
yet free, he is now about 63. If a chekist or just a warder appeared, he would
make the sign of the cross all around him and proclaim: 'Get out, satan! Out of
my sight, Bolshevik filth!' He absolutely refused to talk with them and said
that if everyone rejected 'these commissars' they would not remain in power
even for a year..."
521
522
522
523
Priest Simeon Ionin was serving in the city of Troitsk, Orenburg province.
In 1918 he was shot in Kustanai.
Nun Tikhona, in the world Haya Rozenblatt, was born into a Jewish family
that settled in Orenburg in the 1880s. Her father had a small lawyer’s practice.
Haya was the eldest child in the family. Her understanding of Christianity
was very confused. She thought that the holy Hierarch Nicholas was the
Christian God. Once, while swimming, she began to drown. “Nicholas the
Russian God, save me!” she cried, “I will become a Christian!” A wave came
up and hurled her onto the other bank. Haya could not immediately fulfil her
promise – she was still small, and did not know what to do. When she was
fourteen years old, she began to help her father in his affairs. Once it
happened that she lost a promissory note her father had given her for a large
sum of money from one of his clients. Her father went mad, cruelly beat her
up and told her that if she did not find the note by nine o’ clock the next
morning he would kill her. All night Haya rushed round the courtyard feeling
terrible. So upset was she that she decided to go the river Ural and hurl
herself into it. Then suddenly she remembered the holy
523
524
Hierarch Nicholas, who had saved her from drowning in her childhood. The
girl prayed to St. Nicholas for help. Nine o’ clock came, and Haya rushed to
the latch of the gate in order to run to the Ural when suddenly she saw
something snowy white in her hand. It was a promissory note… Haya
decided to become a Christian. She learned that the most important priest in
the town was called a “hierarch”; she learned where he lived, and went to the
hierarchical house. On entering, she saw a small old man with long hair and a
beard. It was Bishop Macarius, an elder of a lofty spiritual life. She turned to
him with her request. He listened attentively to the future Christian and sent
her to the Dormition women’s monastery, and its very old superior, Abbess
Taisia, a clairvoyant ascetic.
Haya was baptised at the age of sixteen. She liked it so much in the
monastery that after baptism she decided to become a nun. She was given her
first obedience in the icon-painting workshop. Here she had to suffer a bitter
insult from an older nun. The inexperienced novice was so upset that she
began to have the thought of changing monastery. The clairvoyant Abbess
Taisia understood her condition and said: “I don’t give you my blessing for
that. You will be my secretary and a good nun.” Everything happened as she
had foretold. A few years later she was tonsured as a rasofor nun and became
the abbess’ secretary.
524
525
525
526
After the revolution Fr. Demetrius retired. However, on March 28, 1921 he
was arrested by the Cheka in Chelyabinsk, and on April 23 was shot.
In 1922 many priests were killed for resisting the requisitioning of church
valuables: in Chelyabinsk province - 20; in Urals province - 49.
Priest Andrew Vasilyevich Lvov was born on October 17, 1874, and was
educated at the Ufa theological seminary. In 1901 he started serving as a
priest in the Holy Trinity church in Chelyabinsk, Orenburg diocese. He taught
the Law of God in various educational establishments of the city. In 1908 he
was appointed to serve in the cathedral of the Nativity of Christ in
Chelyabinsk. In 1914 he served for a while in the Sosnovsky settlement, but
then returned to the Nativity of Christ cathedral in 1915. After the revolution
526
527
he did not recognize the renovationists, and was banned by the renovationist
Metropolitan Peter (Blinov). He did not recognize this ban, and was elected
by the part of the cathedral parish that separated from the renovationists as
priest of the Kazan church of the Mother of God. He started serving there on
June 4, 1923, but on June 27 he was arrested and accused by the OGPU of
“participating in a meeting of clergy” that had taken place the previous day in
his flat. He was sentenced to two years’ exile as part of “the Case of the
Chelyabinsk priests at the illegal meeting, Chelyabinsk, 1923. Nothing more is
known about him.
The following Orenburg priests were arrested on July 20, 1925 and
convicted in the group case “The Case of Bishop James (Maskayev) and
others, Orenburg, 1925” for refusing to accept the “Living Church” when the
married renovationist “bishop” Andrew Sosedov and his supporters seized
some churches in Orenburg:
527
528
Priest Ivan Semyonovich Frolov was born into a peasant family. In the
1920s he served in the Red Army. He served as a reader, then deacon and then
priest in various places in Chelyabinsk province. His last place of service was
Chelyabinsk. He was married to Tatyana and had two children. Fr. John
defended his church from the renovationists, and was arrested on June 19,
1927 through their denunciation: “He conducted conversations with other
people to the effect that in Zlatoust the workers were armed with axes and
would not give away their church to the renovationists. He said that we
should not give away our old-church church. He organized an illegal meeting
of the clergy of the church for this reason.” In November, 1927 he was
convicted of “counter-revolutionary activity” and sentenced to three years’
exile in Siberia in accordance with article 58-14. He was exiled to the village of
Shaguli in Irbit district. Nothing more is known about him.
528
529
and Fr. Paul were bound and dragged away. They were never seen in the
village again. Matushka Natalya stayed for some time in the village, but was
then taken away somewhere. Nothing more is known about Fr. Victor. This
took place in the 1920s or 1930s.
The clergyman Sergius Petrovich Sharygin was born in 1885, and served
in the village of Mordovskoye-Dobrino, Severny region, Orenburg province.
In 1929 he was arrested, and on December 22 he was sentenced to ten years in
the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
The clergyman Alexis Ivanovich Zdvizhkov was born in 1881, and served
in the village of Yashkino, Sorochinsky region, Orenburg province. In 1930 he
was arrested, and on April 12 was sentenced to three years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about him.
529
530
Nicetas Pimenovich Kurlanov was born in 1875 and was warden of the
church in the village of Kirsanovka, Totsky region, Orenburg province. In
1930 he was arrested, and on October 25 was sentenced to three years in the
camps. Nothing more is known about him.
Fr. Basil served in the church of the village of Chernij Otrog. During the
famine of 1921 he organized a kitchen at the church and fed many starving
people. He fed them with maize, which came from America as humanitarian
aid. His daughter, Olga Vasilyevna, taught in the parish school. Fr. Basil was
probably a dean because priests would come from the whole of the
surrounding region and he would read them lectures and books, and talk with
them for a long time. These seminars lasted for up to seven days. Once the
hierarch arrived, and a large crowd gathered in the square. The bishop
thanked Fr. Basil and called on the people to not to give in and not to give up
their church. However, when Fr. Basil was dekulakized they took away
everything. The people wept, Fr. Basil’s matushka died on the spot. He was
arrested and taken, not to Orenburg, but to Kardeyevo (now Izyak-Nikitino),
to the hospital. They soon let him out, but he did not recover.
After these events they sent another priest. He was very old, about 70. He
served for two years and was then taken; no more was seen of him. He may
have been Fr. Theodore Vecherko, who was born in 1865 and was repressed
in 1932.
530
531
Priest Alexander Vasilyevich Nosov was born in 1892, and was the priest
of the village of Izobilnoye, Sol-Iletsky region, Orenburg province. In 1930 he
was arrested together with other representatives of the clergy and asked to
renounce God in return for freedom and prosperity. He refused. He was cast
into prison. On April 21, 1930 he was sentenced to five years in the camps. In
prison he was tortured for a long time and then killed. His house and property
were all confiscated and his family was thrown out into the world.
531
532
The clergyman Platon Grigoryevich Konnov was born in 1886 and served
in the village of Abdulino, Orenburg province. In 1931 he was arrested, and on
September 3 was sentenced to seven years in the camps. Nothing more is
known about him.
Nun Marina (Ivanovna Yemelyanova) was born in 1886 and lived in the
village of Pyanovka, Sorochinski region, Orenburg province. On April 27, 1930
she was sentenced to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about
her.
532
533
533
534
534
535
1930 he was arrested, and on April 29 he was sentenced to ten years in the
camps. Nothing more is known about him.
The clergyman Basil Olimievich Yemelyanov was born in 1877 and served
in the village of Pronysino, Sorochinski region, Orenburg province. In 1930 he
was arrested, and on April 27 was sentenced to ten years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about him.
The clergyman Basil Ignatyevich Yeremenko was born in 1886 and served
in the village of Chernorechenskoye, Orenburg province. On September 16,
1930 he was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing more is known
about him.
535
536
The clergyman Ivan Semyonovich Kireyev was born in 1878, and served
in the settlement of Verkhne-Ozerniy, Pokrovsky region, Orenburg province.
There, in 1930, he was arrested, and on May 18 was sentenced to ten years in
the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
Nun Irina (Artemyevna Kapustina) was born in 1880 and struggled in the
village of Spasskoye, Sorochinski region, Orenburg province. There she was
arrested in 1930, and on May 18 was sentenced to three years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about her.
The clergyman James Vasilyevich Korotkov was born in 1865, and served
in the village of Logachevka, Totsky region, Orenburg province. There, in
1931, he was arrested, and on June 29 was sentenced to three years’ exile.
Nothing more is known about him.
536
537
The clergyman Paul Nikolayevich Kurbatov was born in 1885, and served
in Kukma settlement, Kvarkensky region, Orenburg province. In 1930 he was
arrested, and on September 9 was sentenced to three years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about him.
In the spring of 1929 the church on the hill Mayak in Orenburg, where
Priest Basil Moiseyevich Kurdyukov was serving, was closed and turned into
an electricity station. Then Fr. Basil and Priest Ivan Nikolayevich Mironov
began to conduct services in Fr. Basil’s flat. The NKVD considered this to be a
crime and ascribed to Fr. Basil a whole anti-Soviet organization consisting of
four groups: Orenburg, Belozersk, Putyatin and Nizhne-Arkhangelsk. 29
people were arrested in connected with this affair, among them: G.E. Sviridov,
M.E. Nikulochkin, A.M. Lernikov in Putyatin; P.F. Igonin, F.P. Tuchin, A.Y.
Teplyakov, K.A. Nasekin in Nizhne-Arkhangelsk; T.A. Safronov, I.A.
Mishnev, N.M. Lomakin in Belozersk; and others.
On April 19, 1930, in Orenburg, in “the Case of Fr. Basil Kudryukov, Fr.
John Mironov and others (29 persons), Orenburg, 1930”, an OGPU troika for
the Middle Volga region sentenced Fr. Basil and Fr. Ivan to be shot; four
people received ten years in the camps; and the remaining twenty-three –
537
538
various terms of punishment. Fr. Basil refused to accept any guilt, he said that
he had formed no anti-Soviet organization, and that the community of 150
people which he had formed pursued purely religious ends.
Nun Sylvestra, in the world Darya Prokofyevna Kurdyukova. She was born
in March, 1880 in Bogorodsk, Moscow province, or the village of
Bogorodskoye, Kashirinsky uyezd into a merchant’s family. She was the wife
of Priest Moses Kudryukov and had three or four children. In 1923 she went to
live in Orenburg. In 1926 she was made a nun by her husband. Fr. Basil and
his matushka were followers of Bishop Demetrius (Lyubimov) of Gdov. She
was arrested together with her daughter Natalya by the OGPU on January 3,
1931 and was cast into Orenburg Domzak. On March 26, 1931 she was
condemned for “leadership of the Kudryukov part of the Orenburg city
counter-revolutionary church organization, ‘The Trues’”. In accordance with
articles 58-11 (counter-revolutionary organizational activity) and 59-7
(agitation of a revolutionary nature), she was sentenced to be shot. The
sentence was carried out on April 5, 1931 at 4.25 a.m.
F.P. Tuchin and K.A. Nasekin. They lived in the village of Nizhne-
Arkhangelskoye, Orenburg region. They went to services in the house of Fr.
Basil Kudryukov. They were arrested in 1929, and on April 19, 1930 were
convicted of “participation in the Nizhne-Arkhangelskoye group of the anti-
Soviet organization under the leadership of Priest Kudryukov”. They were
sentenced to a term in the camps. Nothing more is known about them.
538
539
Agatha (borhn 1899) and children: Demetrius (born 1924), Theodore (born
1927 and Stepanida (born 1929). On October 29, 1930 he was arrested and put
in the Orenburg Domzak. On March 26, 1931 he was convicted of “being a
member of the counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues [True Orthodox
Christians?]’” and of “agitating among the peasants against entry into the
party” and “spreading defeatist rumours”. He was sentenced to five years in
the camps in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7. His was part of the
group case, “The Case of the Group of Clergy and Laity of Orenburg region,
1931”. He was sent to the White Sea canal. Nothing more is known about him.
539
540
other - Fr. Macarius. Finally, the parishioners came to the decision that the
priest who had the majority of votes would remain in the parish. Since the
parish was a large one (more than 1000 people), a general meeting was
arranged in the church. The first to speak was Fr. Alexis. He rebuked Fr.
Macarius for not recognizing or commemorating Metropolitan Sergius and
thereby disobeying him as the rector of the church, and for creating a division
and a schism. Then Fr. Macarius took the floor. He explained to the believers
that through his declaration Metropolitan Sergius had betrayed church truth
and had entered into union with the atheists, the enemies of the Church. For
that reason he could not commemorate him for fear of becoming an
accomplice in the sin of betraying the Church. This was why he did not agree
with, and could not serve together with, Fr. Alexis. Finally, Fr. Alexis
suggested to everyone that those who agreed with him should go to the right
part of the church, while those agreed with Fr. Macarius should go to the left.
He was hoping for a majority, since he had been a priest for many years and
was the rector of the parish. But then something unexpected took place: the
left part of the church filled up with parishioners, more than two thirds of
those present. Thus did the parishioners express their trust in Fr. Macarius and
he became the rector of the church of St. Seraphim. Immediately a
thanksgiving moleben was served with great prayerful enthusiasm. Many of
the worshippers had tears in their eyes.
It seemed as if everything had gone according to the will of God and the
parish had been pacified. But the devil, in the person of the Soviet authorities,
was not pacified. In order to force the parishioners to close the church, they
imposed an unbearable tax burden on them, and increased it after each
payment. Usually the taxes were paid quarterly, but after a general meeting
the authorities decide to increase the tax each month. At first the parish
somehow managed to pay the tax, but then the authorities began to seize the
gold and silver rizas and frames from the icons, together with the Gospels and
other precious objects as if in payment of the tax. Then, in 1930, they closed the
church on the excuse that the tax had not been paid.
By this time Fr. Macarius had four children living with him: his daughter
Olga and Raisa, and his sons Vladimir and Nicholas. His eldest son Sergius,
who was a reader in the village of Chorny Otrog, Orenburg region, lived
separately. With this family Fr. Macarius took refuge in a small old bath-house
which had been adapted for living in.
540
541
installed a Russian stove with benches, put in a small table for meals, a bed for
the parents and a trunk with clothes. The children slept on the trunk and the
stove, and sometimes simply on the floor. They were all in one room with their
parents. This small room, which could be entered only one at a time, served as
their kitchen, dining room and bedroom. It was from this bath-house that Fr.
Macarius was evicted and taken to prison...
The family lived on alms from the parishioners. They would creep up
bringing bread and potatoes and furtively looking on either side as they
entered the courtyard in case outsiders noticed them. The Kvitkins had no
other kind of support since they were "depriveds" (deprived of civil rights, a
category to which the families of clergy belonged).
The bath-house where they lived was located four or five blocks from the
church. Every time Fr. Macarius and his children went to church in the
morning for the Liturgy, or in the morning for the all-night vigil, they were
met on the street by pioneers who threw sand and sometimes even stones at
them. Batyushka ordered his children never to reply to these pranks, but to
walk calmly on, for they could not expect support from anyone.
From the time that Fr. Macarius remained alone in the church of St.
Seraphim, they began to terrorize him and summon him to the GPU. His first
summons was supposedly in connection with his non-commemoration of
Metropolitan Sergius as patriarchal locum tenens, and also because under his
rectorship the parish did not pay the "lawful" tax. The second summons was
accompanied by a warning: if the parish did not pay the indicated sum, they
would close the church. The atheists suggested to Fr. Macarius that since they
would close the church come what may, he should renounce God and his
priestly rank in the columnns of the district newspaper. He was to admit that
he had "drugged" the people with "religious obscurantism". In return, they
promised him a place as a teacher, perhaps even as a school director. Fr.
Macarius replied with a categorical refusal. Then they began to try and
convince him that in this way he would save his own life and the life of his
children. But Fr. Macarius replied that he did not fear death, and that he
entrusted his children to the will of God, but that he would never, under any
circumstances, break the vow he had given to God. The Lord did not
disappoint the hopes of the martyr: all his children grew up to be honourable,
believing and pious people.
The chekists advised him to think well about their proposition and to give
them a final answer when they next summoned him. And so, on January 21,
1931, they came at midnight to search the bath-house. The search lasted until
four in the morning. Of course, they found nothing. Before leaving, Fr.
Macarius said goodbye to his family, blessed his matushka and children, and
was taken to prison. On March 26, 1931 he was accused of “being a member of
the counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues’ [True Orthodox
541
542
Christians]” and of “spreading rumours about the difficult times and the
persecution against religion”. He was sentenced to be shot in accordance with
articles 58-10, 58-11 and 58-7.
In the prison they accepted - rarely, but at any rate sometimes - small
parcels of provisions and clean clothing. As always, on March 31, matushka
with her elder daughter Olga brought a small parcel, but on that day they did
not accept it. On asking why, she received no reply. Then matushka, Olga and
some other people who had also brought parcels for their relatives, began to
wait for the moment when they would be able to hand over their parcels. And
then, at about three in the afternoon, all of them were driven away, the doors
of the prison were opened and they led out the arrestees - between 25 and 30
people, among whom was Fr. Macarius. On seeing his wife and elder
daughter, he waved at them from a distance. He looked completely healthy.
The group was led to the building of the GPU and taken inside, while the
relatives who ran after them were ordered to go home. They were told to come
the next day at nine o' clock, and everything would be explained to them.
But some did not obey, and surrounded the GPU building waiting. They
were given several warnings by the guards, and then some of them were
arrested. Among these was the wife of Fr. Macarius and his daughter. Having
held them in the basement until morning, they were given a certificate saying
that Fr. Macarius had died in prison. Then they were very severely forbidden,
under threat of arrest, not to tell anyone where they had been or what they
had seen.
The prison boss who issued the certificate swore and said:
"There's nothing to worry about, Soviet power will give him the burial he
deserved."
Then he ordered them to go away before it was too late. Then they learned
that this group had contained, basically, the priests of Orenburg and the
surrounding district who had been the most popular among believers, as well
as some steadfast true Christians who had got in the way of Soviet power. And
all these people, who the previous day had been healthy and fit, and who had
walked calmly and quickly from the prison to the GPU building, suddenly, the
next day, "died in prison", a fact that was confirmed by certificates given out to
the relatives. Later the rumour spread secretly that all of them had been
herded into a basement room in the GPU and gassed. That was why no body
was given to any of the relatives.
542
543
Fr. Macarius was shot on April 5, 1931, Palm Sunday, at 4.30 in the
morning. In this way he gave his life for the true faith as a steadfast martyr
and true pastor, loved by his parishioners, a true faithful server in the pastures
of Christ.
Again, in the madhouse in Orenburg there was a ten-year-old boy who was
suffering from an illness that the doctors pronounced incurable. Fr. Macarius
often used to go to this house and pray fervently for the boy's recovery. For
two months he visited him - and then the illness passed. The doctors, to their
amazement, recognized that the boy was completely healthy. He is now a
grown man, and has been in sound mind ever since. This miracle was also
accomplished by the prayers of Fr. Macarius. This incident was recounted by
Matushka Euphrosyne to her son Volodya before the Second World War,
when they took Vladimir into the army.
543
544
The third incident took place already after Fr. Macarius' martyric death.
Vladimir himself was a witness and remembered it all his life.
After the arrest of Fr. Macarius, his family continued to live in the same
converted bath-house, in hunger and cold. They were not allowed ration
cards. Matushka went to the country to exchange their remaining things for
something to eat. She brought everything they had in the house, to the last
towel. The parishioners tried to support the family in secret, but everyone was
in difficult circumstances at that time.
Batyushka's daughters were not given jobs since they were "children of an
enemy of the people". Nevertheless, in the summer of 1934 the second
daughter, Raisa, succeeded in getting some work in an agricultural commune
in the suburbs, and thanks to this, the family stocked up for the winter on dry
potato tops, which they later used as fuel for the stove. Kindling wood for the
stove was obtained by Vladimir and his younger brother Kolya, who went
with sleds into the woods and gathered branches, standing up to their knees in
the snow. Once all they had was taken away from them and they were nearly
beaten to death...
The following were convicted together with Fr. Macarius for being
members of “the counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues [True
Orthodox Christians]’” in “The Case of the Group of Clergy and Laity of
Orenburg region, 1931”:
544
545
545
546
He had a wife Anna, two sons and a daughter. On January 13, 1931 he was
arrested on the way from Ivanovskoye khutor to Novo-Petrovskoye and cast
into Orenburg Domzak. On March 26, 1931 he was convicted of “being a
member of a counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues’ and the leader of
a cell”, and of “having close links with the leader of the organization”. In
accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 5907, he was sentenced to death. He
was shot at 4.25 on Apri 5, 1931.
546
547
547
548
548
549
549
550
In accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7, he was sentenced to three
years in the camps conditionally. Nothing more is known about him.
550
551
leader Kudryukov”. In accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7, she was
sentenced to five years in the camps.
Nun Maria Petrovna Potto was born in Orenburg in 1896 into a merchant’s
family. She went to a parish school. On January 2, 1931 she was arrested and
cast into Orenburg Domzak. At her interrogation she said: “We have not
recognized Metropolitan Sergius because he has issued a declaration.
Metropolitan Sergius is also not recognized by Priest Artemius, who serves in
St. Nicholas church on Novaya Stroika… The persecutions on religion on the
part of Soviet power exist. Soviet power deals in a bestial manner with
innocent clergy, sending them to Solovki and closing the churches.” On March
26, 1931 she was convicted by the OGPU of “participation in a church-
monarchist counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues [True Orthodox
Christians?]’. She was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and
59-7 to five years in the camps conditionally.
Nun Olga Vasilyevna Pogorelova was born in 1868 in the village of Ilyinka,
Kashirinsky region, Orenburg district. She was in a monastery in Orenburg
from before the revolution until its closure. On January 10, 1931 she was
arrested and cast into the Orenburg Domzak. On March 26, 1931 she was
convicted by the OGPU of “participation in a church-monarchist counter-
revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues [True Orthodox Christians?]’”, “hiding
the leader of the organization, Ogorodnikov” and “forbidding women to enter
the collective farm as being ‘an organization of Satan’”. She was sentenced to
death in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7. She was shot at 4.25
a.m. on April 5, 1931.
Nun Irina (Fyodorovna Gladysheva). She was born in 1889 in the village of
Bredy, Orsky region into a peasant family. She lived in a monastery in
Orenburg for about five years. In February, 1931 she was arrested in Irpen
station, Kiev, where she had been hiding. As she said at her interrogation:
“During my first trip to Kiev in 1928 I stayed in Moscow with Hieromonk
Zephaniah Tkachev, who during the famine years had been in exile in
Orenburg. I often went to Buzuluk, where I was linked with Schema-Monk
Maximushka. Later I got to know Bishop Sergius (Nikolsky), who was at one
with us, of the Josephite orientation. Later I learned from a letter of his sister
551
552
that Bishop Sergius went from exile (he had been exiled to Ufa) to Orenburg
and was in prison. She asked me to visit her brother. I carried out her request
and sent parcels to the Domzak for Bishop Sergius.” On March 26 she was
convicted of “being the main messenger for the church-monarchist
organization, ‘The Trues’” and of “directing the city cell”. In accordance with
articles 58-10, 58-11 and 58-7, she was sentenced to death. She was shot at 22.20
on March 31, 1931 in Samara Domzak.
Nun Eugenia, in the world Matrona Ignayevna Kalashnikova. She was born
in 1886 in the village of Belozerki, Kashira region, Orenburg district, and
entered the Orenburg Dormition monastery as a novice in 1920. From 1920 to
1928 she lived with various people. In 1928 she was tonsured by Hieromonk
Basil (Kudryuk). On December 29, 1930 she was arrested in her native village
and cast into Orenburg Domzak. On March 26 she was convicted of
“participation in the counter-revolutionary church organization, ‘The Trues’”
and of being an active participant in the “Kudryukites’” cell. In accordance
with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7, she was sentenced to three years in the
camps. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Natalya (Vasilyevna Mishneva). She was born in 1903 in the village of
Belozerki, Kashirinsky region, Orenburg district. She was the daughter of Fr.
Basil. In 1928 she was tonsured into monasticism by her father in the church
on Mayak in Orenburg. She is recorded as saying in the protocols: “I was also
tonsured because my husband is a half-wit.” After her tonsure she continued
to live in her native village with her husband and two children – her daughters
Helena, aged five, and Maria, aged three. On December 2, 1930 she was
arrested in the village of Belozerka, and cast into the Domzak in Orenburg. In
accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7, she was sentenced to five years
in the camps.
552
553
Nun Anastasia (Ilyinichna Lomakina). She was born in 1885 in the village
of Belozerka, Kashirinsky district, Orenburg region, into a peasant family.
Before her tonsure she was the wife of Nicetas Maximovich Lomakin. On
November 29, 1930 she arrested, and was cast into the DZ in Orenburg. She
witnessed at her interrogation: “I am also a nun, I recognize the Church, but I
do not want to go to it, because I do not recognize these popes, but I don’t
know why, I pray at home and go nowhere.” On March 26, 1931 a troika of the
OGPU condemned her for “participation in the church-monarchist
organization ‘The Trues [True Orthodox Christians?]’” to five years in the
camps in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7.
Nun Praskovya (Fyodorovna Babina). She was born in 1875 in the village of
Second Nikolskoye, Pokrov region, Orenburg district. She struggled in the
Dormition monastery in Orenburg until 1926. On December 1, 1930 she was
arrested in her native village and cast into the Orenburg Domzak. She was
convicted of “participation in a church-monarchist counter-revolutionary
organization, ‘The Trues’” and sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-
11 and 59-7 to five years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
553
554
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11, she was sentenced to ten years in the
camps.
Nun Anastasia (Sergeyevna Urazova). She was born in 1890 in the village
of N. Petrovskoye, Petrovsky region into a peasant family. She lived from 1913
to 1917 in Jerusalem. She returned to her native village and lived there
working in the fields. On January 13, 1931 she was arrested and cast into
Orenburg Domzak. She was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11
and 59-7 to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Glyceria (Grigoryevna Urazova). She was born in May, 1877 in the
village of N. Petrovskoye, Petrovsky region into a peasant family. She lived
from 1913 to 1917 in Jerusalem and Egypt. She returned to her native village,
where, on January 13, 1931 she was arrested and cast into Orenburg Domzak.
She was accused of having links with the leaders of “The Trues” on Malga
khutor. She was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7 to
ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Anastasia (Ilyinichna Lomakina). She was born in 1885 in the village
of Belozerka, Kashirinsky district, Orenburg region, into a peasant family.
Before her tonsure she was the wife of Nicetas Maximovich Lomakin. On
November 29, 1930 she arrested, and was cast into the Domzak in Orenburg.
She witnessed at her interrogation: “I am also a nun, I recognize the Church,
but I do not want to go to it, because I do not recognize these popes, but I
don’t know why, I pray at home and go nowhere.” She was sentenced to five
years in the camps in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7. Nothing
more is known about her.
Nun Maria (Petrovna Potto). She was born in Orenburg in 1896 into a
merchant’s family. She went to a parish school. On January 2, 1931 she was
arrested and cast into Orenburg Domzak. At her interrogation she said: “We
have not recognized Metropolitan Sergius because he has issued a declaration.
Metropolitan Sergius is also not recognized by Priest Artemius, who serves in
St. Nicholas church on Novaya Stroika… The persecutions on religion on the
part of Soviet power exist. Soviet power deals in a bestial manner with
innocent clergy, sending them to Solovki and closing the churches.” She was
sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7 to five years in the
camps conditionally. Nothing more is known about her.
554
555
Nun Olga (Vasilyevna Pogorelova). She was born in 1868 in the village of
Ilyinka, Kashirinsky region, Orenburg district. She was in a monastery in
Orenburg from before the revolution until its closure. On January 10, 1931 she
was arrested and cast into the Orenburg Domzak. She was also accused of
“hiding the leader of the organization, Ogorodnikov” and “forbidding women
to enter the collective farm as being ‘an organization of Satan’”. She was
sentenced to death in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7. She was
shot at 4.25 a.m. on April 5, 1931.
Nun Magdalina, in the world Vera Antonovna Ramenskaya. She was born
on September 13, 1869 in the village of Cherninovo, Samara province
(Bolshaya Kirsanovka, Taganrog district, Don province?). She went to the
village school. From the age of twelve she lived in the Paraskevievsky
Toplovsky monastery, Theodosiya uyezd, Tauris province. At the beginning of
the 1920s an agricultural artel was organized in the monastery. On September
9, 1929 she was arrested and accused of being “a member of an anti-Soviet
grouping uniting the monastic element of the village-agricultural artel”. She
was sentenced in accordance with article 58-10 to three years’ administrative
exile to Samara. This was part of the group case, “The Case of the
Paraskevievsky Toplovsky monastery, Crimea, 1929”. On February 23, 1931
she was arrested again and cast into the Orenburg Domzak. She was sentenced
in accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7 to five years in the camps,
commuted to exile in the northern regions for the same period. Nothing more
is known about her.
555
556
556
557
557
558
558
559
559
560
560
561
th
he was occupied in trade. In 1916-17 he served in the army in the 105 reserve
regiment in Orenburg. In 1918 he served in the White army under Dutov. In
Guryev he was seized by the red forces of the Guryev cheka, and was forced to
serve in the Red Army from 1919 to 1921 in a unit of the Guryev cheka. Later
he went to live in the village of Podgornoye, Sharlyksky region. From 1923 he
was deprived of voting rights. And in 1929, for non-payment of taxes, he was
fined. He had a wife Anna (born 1902) and two daughters Vera. On October
29, 1930 he was arrested, detained in the Orenburg DPZ and on March 26, 1931
was accused by the OGPU of “being a member of the counter-revolutionary
organization ‘the Trues [True Orthodox Christians?]’, of stirring up the
peasants not to join the party, and of spreading defeatist rumours”. In
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11 he was sentenced to five years in the
camps. Nothing more is known about him.
561
562
562
563
563
564
564
565
typesetter in a printing press. During the Civil War he did physical labour in
the main workshops in Samara station. From September 13, 1921 to September
10, 1930 he worked at the depot in Samara. Then he worked as a typesetter in
the “Middle Volga Commune” printing press. At the beginning of 1931 he was
arrested, and on March 26 was convicted of “participation in a church-
monarchist counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues’”, and of being “an
active supporter of [Fr. Basil] Kudrukov”. In accordance with articles 58-10, 58-
11 and 58-7, he was given three years in the camps conditionally. Later, at the
end of the 1930s he was arrested in Kuibyshev on a church matter and was
shot.
565
566
cast into Orenburg Domzak. He was sentenced in accordance with articles 58-
10, 58-11 and 59-7 to ten years in the camps. Nothing more is known about
him.
Ivan Efimovich Boriskin. He was born on January 11, 1886 in the village of
Bogorodskoye, Sharlyksky region. He had a wife (born 1895), four sons and a
daughter. On November 10, 1930 he was arrested, and on January 13, 1931 was
cast into Orenburg Domzak. He was sentenced to five years in the camps in
accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7. Nothing more is known about
him.
566
567
567
568
568
569
569
570
570
571
571
572
572
573
links with the leader of the cell in the village of Putyatino, Spiridov”. In
accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7, he was sentenced to five years
in the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
573
574
Elizabeth Timofeyevna Fyodorova. She was born in 1855 or 1856, and lived
in the village of Belozerka, Kashirinsky region. She was convicted on
574
575
December 15, 1930 in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11 and cast into
Orenburg Domzak, but was released under guard. Nothing more is known
about her.
Lukerya Andreyevna Fokina. She was born in 1887 or 1886 in the village of
Novoye Spasskoye, Orenburg district, and was the wife of a priest with two
sons and three daughters. On December 8, 1930 she was arrested and cast into
Orenburg Domzak. On March 26, 1931 she was convicted of being “a member
of a church-monarchist counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues’, and
the wife of one of its leaders”. In accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 58-7,
she was sentenced to five years in the camps. “My husband Fokin,” she said,
“is a priest, they exiled him to a camp for anti-Soviet activity”. Nothing more
is known about her.
Lydia Lvovna Pershakova. She was born on January 1, 1882 in Ufa into a
noble family. She finished her studies at a gymnasium and at accountancy
courses. In 1915 she moved to Tashkent, where she worked as a librarian until
575
576
1915. From 1920 she did not work, but received a sickness pension. She was
deprived of voting rights. In 1927 she was arrested in Tashkent, and was
sentenced to three years in exile in accordance with article 58-10. In April, 1927
she was arrested again and cast into prison in Orenburg. In 1928 she was
arrested yet again in Orenburg. On January 5, 1931 she was arrested for a
fourth time and cast into the Orenburg Domzak. At her interrogation she said:
“Since April, 1930 I have broken with the [sergianist] church and do not go to
church. I have remained to this day a deeply religious person, and have
stopped going to church on the basis of the declaration of Metropolitan
Sergius. Proceeding from my convictions, I regularly give messages to
imprisoned priests and have often sent parcels to exiled clergy.” Lydia Lvovna
was in correspondence with Bishop Andrew of Ufa until October, 1929, and
with Bishop Benjamin of Ufa until his arrest in June, 1930. On March 26, 1931
she was convicted by the OGPU of “being a member of the counter-
revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues [True Orthodox Christians?], of
organizing an illegal cell and leading it”. In accordance with articles 58-10, 58-
11 and 59-7, she was sentenced to be shot. She was shot at 4.25 a.m. on April 5,
1931.
Maria Gavrilovna Pokryaeva was born in July, 1874 in the village of Novo-
Spassky, Pokrovsky region, Middle Volga area. She was illiterate. On
December 8, 1930 she was arrested in her native village and cast into the
Domzak in Orenburg. On March 26, 1931 she was convicted by the OGPU of
“being a member of the counter-revolutionary organization, ‘The Trues [True
Orthodox Christians?], of organizing an illegal cell, visiting illegal meetings
and considering the collective farm to be an organization of the Antichrist”. In
accordance with articles 58-10, 58-11 and 59-7, she was sentenced to five years
in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
576
577
Priest Sergius Fyodorovich Belyaev was born in 1869 or 1871 and served
in the village of Vasilyevka, Yekaterinovsky region, Orenburg province. On
March 8, 1930 he was convicted of being “an enemy of the people” and was
sentenced to death. He was shot in Orenburg province.
The clergyman Gabriel Petrovich Zhukov was born in 1874, and served in
the village of Grachevka, Andreyevsky region, Orenburg province. In 1931 he
was arrested, and on July 27 was sentenced to five years in the camps.
Nothing more is known about him.
577
578
The clergyman Michael Petrovich Belousov was born in 1894 in the village
of Verkhne-Ozernoye, Petrovsky region. According to his son, Fr. Michael was
a deacon; according to his daughter – a priest, a most honourable man of great
heart. On April 25, 1932 he was arrested simply because he was a clergyman
and refused to renounced his priesthood as the Bolsheviks demanded,
replying that he had been taught to serve God and the people in faith and
truth. He left eight young children. His son Boris wrote: “All the property was
registered and removed, the family was ejected from the house and took
shelter in the abandoned houses of others. In those years of 1932-33 my mother
died of hunger and deprivations, and then my sisters: Antonina, Lyudmila,
Valentina and my brother Peter. They were all buried in the cemetery in one
grave… The time was such that the people from our village dropped
everything and went off in different directions. Four of us remained: my sister
Lyubov (12), my brother Nicholas (9), I (7) and Elizabeth (5). We were fed God
only knows how. Only in the autumn of 1934 did our relatives take us to
Magnitogorsk and distributed us among their villages.” On May 23, 1932 Fr.
Michael was condemned to three years in the camps for “anti-Soviet agitation”
and sent to the White Sea-Baltic canal. He did not return from his
imprisonment. His elder daughter Lyubov recalls that there was a letter from
the camp boss who told about the death of her father, saying that he had
accepted death with prayer on his lips.
Priest Vladimir Petrovich Gorizontov was born in 1894, and served in the
village of N. Petrovskoye, Orenburg province. On January 25, 1931 he was
arrested and cast into prison in Orenburg. At first they suggested that he buy
his life at the price of his public renunciation of the faith, but he refused. On
March 26 he was sentenced to death. On April 5 he was shot. When his wife
came to see him they told her that he was dead.
The clergyman Basil Georgievich Yeremeyev was born in 1885 and served
in the village of Zhilinka, Buzuluk region, Orenburg province. He was
arrested in his native village, and on July 27, 1931 he was sentenced to five
years in the camps. Nothing more is known about him.
578
579
Fr. Basil served in the church of the village of Chernij Otrog. During the
famine of 1921 he organized a kitchen at the church and fed many starving
people. He fed them with maize, which came from America as humanitarian
aid. His daughter, Olga Vasilyevna, taught in the parish school. Fr. Basil was
probably a dean because priests would come from the whole of the
surrounding region and he would read them lectures and books, and talk with
them for a long time. These seminars lasted for up to seven days. Once the
hierarch arrived, and a large crowd gathered in the square. The bishop
thanked Fr. Basil and called on the people to not to give in and not to give up
their church. However, when Fr. Basil was dekulakized they took away
everything. The people wept, Fr. Basil’s matushka died on the spot. He was
arrested and taken, not to Orenburg, but to Kardeyevo (now Izyak-Nikitino),
to the hospital. They soon let him out, but he did not recover. After these
events they sent Fr. Theodore Vecherko, who was born in 1865. He served for
two years and was then taken in 1932. Nothing more was seen of him.
Priest John was born in about 1851, and was rector of the church in
Barakovo, Sharlyk region, Orenburg province. From the recollections of
Schema-Archimandrite Seraphim (Michael Tomin), he was “an exceptional
man of prayer. Fr. John could not pray without tears. While reading the
akathist, Fr. John always sobbed. He would begin, then begin to weep, and
only then continue to read. From the age of six I served in the church.
Batyushka very much loved me and cared for me.”
On the feast of the Annunciation, 1934, since almost all the churches in the
district were closed, the believers from twenty villages came together in the
church in Barakovo. The church could not accommodate all the people. They
579
580
began to ring the bells at four in the morning, and the service continued until
one in the afternoon. As little Michael Tomin was entering the church in his
sticharion, he saw two NKVD officers dragging Fr. John out of the altar. They
also arrested the warden, two nuns and the ten-year-old Misha. All the
arrestees were locked into a hut for three days. Misha’s hat was in the altar,
but he had put on a little fur coat under his sticharion. Fr. John put his own
skufya on Misha, while he himself froze without anything on his head. On
April 11, Fr. John was taken out and soon shot. The other prisoners were
given three-year terms.
Many poor, sick and unfortunate people from the neighbouring villages
came to see Monk Macarius to seek his advice and comfort in their sorrows.
He received them from morning to late at night. He was greatly loved for this
childlike simplicity and meekness. The Lord gave him the gifts of
clairvoyance and healing. Thus the servant of God Zoya relates: “My great-
grandmother Nastya came with her little son Ilyushka to the elder at the
monatery in Buzuluk. Ilya was still small. He was walking on a bench, fell and
began to grow a hump on his back. They brought him to the monastery, to Fr.
Macarius, and the hump immediately disappeared. Babushka Dunya went to
him several times. And the elder always read her thoughts: she would be
thinking something, and he would immediately say it. She went to
580
581
him for a blessing to build a house, but the elder said: ‘Build, but let the house
be small.’ Babushka was amazed: ‘But why should it be small?! We have
seven children.’ The elder replied: ‘Build it small – it will stand empty.’ The
prophecy was fulfilled: Uncle Vanya, a White officer, was killed in 1918,
Uncle Sasha was put in prison, Auntie Natasha was exiled, Aunt Lena died
young, etc. And the house remained empty. Babushka Marina went blind. She
would sit down and say: ‘If I can see, I will go to the monastery and serve a
moleben.’ And after that she began to see…”
In 1929 the monastery was closed, and Fr. Maximus was exiled for four
years to Alma-Ata in Kazakhstan. At the end of his sentence he went to live in
Samara (Kuibyshev). Then, in 1936, he moved to Buzuluk where a little house
was bought in which he lived with for a year with his only sister Tatyana,
until his next arrest. Not long before his arrest Fr. Maximus told his sister that
they would soon have to part, and that he would die in the cell of a nun.
One night in the spring of 1937 he was arrested. The prison into which he
was cast was situated in a former women’s monastery (next to a cemetery
church that is now functioning). There, according to the words of an eye-
witness, Fr. Maximus was strongly beaten, there was blood on his clothing.
According to one witness, Fr. Maximus was in Kultubanskaya prison, twenty-
five kilometres from Buzuluk.
In September, 1937 Fr. Maximus died in prison, and was buried in the old
cemetery (near the prison) in Buzuluk (after first being buried in Kultubank,
according to one witness). When he died, the room was filled with fragrance.
The prison boss ordered a coffin to be made for the elder, even though
prisoners were usually buried without coffins, because even in the opinion of
the prison boss this was a holy man. They put one half of torn bag which his
sister had given him into the coffin, and with the other half they covered his
body. A chanter from the church of All Saints in Buzuluk, who had been in
the same cell with Fr. Maximus, said that the elder had said before his death:
“Now my sufferings have ended. I will soon die. They will let you go. Don’t
put a cross immediately on my grave, for innocent people who come to me
may suffer because of that… One or two years later, go to the left kliros of the
church of All Saints and tell them where I am buried.” “I was indeed soon
released. And I completely forgot about the wonderful elder. But he began to
appear to me often in sleep, asking: ‘Why don’t you say where I’m buried?
Why don’t you put a cross there for me?’ After this I decided to go to the
indicated church.” They put a wooden cross on the grave. People come to his
grave with their sorrows, needs, illnesses and joys and receive what they ask
for through the prayers of the elder.
581
582
Two brothers declared: "We have not refused to serve in that army which
goes with Christ, but to serve in an army which is against God and Christ, that
we cannot and will not do - we are Christians!"
First they placed them under arrest in the town of Sharlyk, Orenburg
province. Then they took them to Alexandrovka, in the same province. This
was where their parents lived, and the God-fighting authorities hoped that
they would influence their sons, since otherwise death awaited them. But the
God-fighters were mistaken. The parents, being convinced Christians, not only
did not dissuade their sons from refusing to serve in the Red army, but also,
quite the reverse, supported them in their decision. Knowing that death
threatened their sons, the parents said, with tears in their eyes:
"Children, dear children, you are our hope. Apart from you we have no
children. You know what awaits you... But remember that you have received
Holy Baptism. And that is an oath of faithfulness to the Lord God Himself...
We are your parents, and you are our beloved children. We bless you to be
faithful Christians both in life and in death for Christ, the Lord of glory. The
blessing of God is with you, and our fervent prayers are with you and for
you... Go, dear ones, to eternity!"
582
583
Fr. Nicetas was a catacomb priest from Orenburg who was in hiding until
his death. But during this period he continued to fulfil his priestly duties. He
was constantly on the move, going from village to town, from town to village,
from house to house, celebrating services in "house churches", confessing
people and communicating them in the Holy Mysteries. He had to suffer very
much for the Church, but he showed himself to be a true, exemplary, self-
sacrificing pastor, bringing up his only son, Theodore, not so much by word
and instruction as by his own example without words, teaching him to be a
firm, self-sacrificing Christian.
The young Theodore was called up and went into the army. He knew
beforehand that there awaited him an impious oath, not to the Lord God, but
to the God-fighting Soviet authorities who had come in the spirit and the name
of the Antichrist. And Theodore decided in advance not to accept it. He
prayed to the Lord to strengthen him for the feat of martyrdom. In tears he
said goodbye to his parents, knowing that he would never see them again. He
took a blessing from his father, Fr. Nicetas, and from his mother. He besought
them to pray fervently for him, that he would not weaken...
When all the other soldiers obediently swore the oath to the Soviet
authorities, he alone refused. Boldly in front off everyone he declared that he
could not swear such an oath to the God-fighting authorities because he was a
Christian. There was a big stir. They forced all the soldiers to come out against
the confessor of Christ. And the son of the catacomb priest Fr. Nicetas, the
martyr for Christ Theodore, was shot in front of all the soldiers of the unit in
1937. He was an inhabitant of Orenburg.
"So you say that your God, Christ, came 'for the salvation of men'? But what
'salvation' can there be for you personally if we shoot you tomorrow as
criminal for breaking the law?" said the chief to Peter. "Your 'law' is not law.
There is only one law in the world which everyone must obey. That is the Law
of God. But God allows man both to break His Law and reject the Gospel Law
of love and to accept an evil law, the law of diabolic hatred. Which is what you
do... I believe in eternal life in Christ and I accept death for Christ with great
joy!.."
583
584
Because of something wrong in the lorry he was forced to lie down under it
and carry out repairs. As a result he caught a chill in his kidney and was
admitted into a therapeutic hospital with the diagnosis: nephritis. He felt very
ill and began to do what is "not allowed", even "in thought only", in the Soviet
Union - to pray out loud in front of everyone, and, according to the Christian
custom, to ask forgiveness of all those in the dormitory, saying that he was
going to die. And he was not mistaken...
The Soviet doctors were called to this "disorder in the ward", and, of course,
since he believed in God and prayed to Him, they certified "sudden insanity",
"madness" in the sick man. For the Soviet State recognizes as completely
normal only those people who do not pray and do not believe in God. And in
the given case, evidently, there was clearly seen such an "impudent
demonstration" of religious feelings and convictions. Therefore Michael
Vasilyevich was quickly transferred to the psychiatric section of the hospital
with the label: "socially dangerous patient".
The rest of the story was recounted by a boy who was in this ward. To the
question: what happened that Avdeyev so suddenly, on the first day of his
stay in the hospital, died?, he replied:
"'You're feeling ill? We shall give you an injection, and it will immediately
make you feel better!'
584
585
When he had given this injection, the sick man didn't even move. He died
immediately!"
(Sources: Holy Trinity Calendar for 1999, Jordanville; Priest N.E. Stremsky,
Mucheniki i Ispovedniki Orenburgskoj Eparkhii XX Veka, Saraktash, 1998,
pp. 113-120, 143-149, 183-5, 187, 190-194; "Novomuchenik Protoierej Makary
Kvitkin", Pravoslavnaya Zhizn', N 7 (547), July, 1995, pp. 2-9; Schemamonk
Epiphanius (Chernov), Tserkov' Katakombnaya na Zemlye Rossijskoj (MS),
Woking, 1980; http://www.pstbi.ru/cgi-
htm/db.exe/no_dbpath/docum/cnt/ans)
585
586
Priest John Boldyrev was ordained to the priesthood not later than in 1913,
and in 1917 was sent to the church of the Holy Archangel Michael in the
village of Petropavlovka, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province. In 1917 or 1918
some Bolsheviks came supposedly from the regional committee and said to
him: “Get ready”. He put on a black jacket, they put him in a sledge and took
him away. In the morning the villagers found him pierced with bayonet
wounds – the jacket was missing. They buried him opposite Krasny Yar near
the village of Ishtuganovo. A little hill can still be seen where he was buried.
His wife was so upset by his death that she soon died.
As the Reds retreated before the Whites in the summer of 1918, they took
more than 200 prominent citizens and officers of Ufa as hostages. Alexander
Fyodorovich was seized as a hostage on June 12. On the night of June 27 to 28,
the hostages were taken down the river Belaya on a barge. On July 1 the barge
with the hostages arrives in Birsk. In spite of the danger of being arrested, the
Birsk cooperatives provided the needy Ufa hostages with fresh linen and
beds, food and money. Two days later, the barge set off again down the river.
On the evening of July 7, nine of the hostages, including Alexander
586
587
Fyodorovich, were thrown into the hold, which was covered by an iron roof.
In January-February, 1919 the rest of the hostages were returned to Ufa. They
th
were convinced that on the night to the 8 of July the nine had been killed by
the soldiers and sailors on the deck of the barge and cast into the Kama. This
was later confirmed by some of the soldiers and sailors.
587
588
588
589
Topornino at which the peasants protested against mobilization into the Red
Army. They demanded the removal of the reds from the boundaries of their
volost and resisted pressure from the local Soviets. As a result, during the
upheaval one Bolshevik military commissar was shot dead. Then, on June 23-
24, a punitive detachment was sent by steamer from Ufa to Topornino.
Arriving at night, they arrested several people, including Fr. Alexis, who was
cast into the hold of the steamer. Then the village was sacked, and all reserves
of food stolen. Since there was a danger that the Whites might have taken Ufa,
the steamer headed for Sarapul. On its arrival on June 25, a half-drunken
sailor boarded the steamer. The twelve prisoners were taken on a return
journey from Sarapul, and not far from the railway bridge across the Kama
they were taken out of the hold and shot. Fr. Alexis raised his cross and said:
“God will forgive you, you do not know what you are doing!” The bodies
were thrown overboard.
Also killed by Red Army soldiers at this time in Ufa province was Reader
Chepurov from the village of Kaltovka.
On January 18, 1917 the Holy Synod appointed her superior of the
Menzelinsk women’s monastery of the Prophet Elijah in Ufa province with
elevation to the rank of abbess. This appointment took place thanks to the
efforts of Prince N.D. Zhevakov, the assistant over-procurator of the Holy
Synod. And her ordination as abbess took place in the presence of Great
Princess Elizabeth Fyodorovna, who was exceptionally fond of Matushka
Margaret.
The move to Menzelinsk was long and difficult. At the end of 1917 she
arrived in the monastery, which was one of the biggest women’s communities
589
590
In April, 1917 the revolutionary wave also hit the Prophet Elijah
monastery. By decree of the Provisional Government, the church-parish
schools had to be transferred into the administration of the Ministry of
popular enlightenment, but the abbess tried to defend the monastery’s school
from this transfer on the grounds that the property and buildings of the
school belonged to the monastery and that the pupils were its novices. She
declared that the upkeep of the school would from now on be the
responsibility of the monastery (under the Tsars the State had paid the
teachers). The unshakeable will of the abbess to keep the school’s education in
the Orthodox faith had an unexpected result: the city left the school in her
hands. Moreover, since city girls were studying in it, the city decided to pay
the teachers and provide the necessary equipment.
On April 18, 1918 Abbess Margaret was elected a member of the diocesan
council.
In May, 1918 the Czech legion rebelled, and by July the whole province
had been liberated from the Bolsheviks. However, battles still continued on
the western boundaries of the province, and Menzelinsk changed hands
between the combatants several times. In the late summer the Whites
abandoned Kazan; and according to Nun Alevtina, a previous inhabitant of
the monastery, Abbess Margaret at one time decided to leave with the Whites
and not remain under the authority of the Bolsheviks. She was at the wharf
preparing to leave when St. Nicholas appeared to her and said:
During the night of August 11–12 the Bolsheviks suddenly left Menzelinsk.
The citizens created a voluntary unit to guard the city and established links
with units of the White army. On August 21 the Bolsheviks renewed their
590
591
attack on Menzelinsk. The Whites held out for four hours, but finally the
Bolsheviks burst into the city and began to take revenge… On August 21 and
22, they shot 150-200 people in the city. Mother Margaret was one of their
victims. Another was Priest Vozdvizhensky of the Trinity church.
According to the witness of the Red Army soldier Ya.F. Ostroumov, the
excuse for killing the abbess was the fact that the nuns were trying to defend
some White officers probably wounded) in the monastery. “Several White
officers who had been left in the monastery were hidden in the cells of the
women’s monastery and were… shot in the monastery courtyard. The abbess
of the monastery was also shot… for hiding White officers in the cells of the
monastery.”
In reply to this they hurled insults and curses at her and demanded that
she open the church. The abbess refused outright, and the Bolsheviks said to
her: “Look to it: early tomorrow we will kill you…” With these words they
left.
After their departure, having locked the monastery gates, Abbess Margaret
went together with the sisters into the church, where they spent the whole
night in prayer and communed at the early liturgy. The abbess had not
succeeded in leaving the church when the Bolsheviks, seeing her coming
down from the ambon, took aim at her and fired point-blank. “Glory to Thee,
O God!” cried the abbess loudly when she saw the Bolsheviks taking aim at
her, and… fell dead to the floor.
Nun Alevtina has a slightly different account: “The following day [after the
Whites left Menzelinsk], Abbess Margaret was arrested as a supposed
‘counter-revolutionary’ during a service. She was taken out onto the porch,
and having refused her request to partake of the Holy Mysteries, shot her.”
Immediately after the burial service, the sisters of the monastery buried her
behind the altar of the Ascension church where she had been shot.
It was only the next day that the abbess's request to be buried on the very
day of her death, which had at first seemed strange to the priest, became
591
592
comprehensible. For the same chekists who had shot Abbess Margaret
brought out a Muslim mullah to be shot, wishing to bury him in one grave
with the Orthodox superior of the monastery. However, since she was already
buried, they could not do this and took the mullah somewhere else.
592
593
She was wearing light clothing, and the nuns were given sacks of stinging
nettles out of which they sewed shirts. Abbess Christina took off her clothes
and put on what everyone was wearing so as not to stand out in any way
from the other nuns.
She was killed by the Bolsheviks sometime between 1918 and 1922. On the day
of her death, according to Valentina Timofeyevna Koroleva, who received this
account from her cell-attendant, Mother Platonida, when she was on her death-
bed, the abbess “wept and prayed the whole day. Evening was already
approaching. Matushka Platonida had already prepared the evening meal. The
table stood by the window, and some icons were hanging near the table. Abbess
Christina fell on her knees and prayed ardently with tears. A shot rang out,
piercing the glass and entering the spine of Abbess Christina. She fell, but
Matushka Platonida stood petrified. She remembered only the [men in] leather
anoraks. ‘I don’t know how many there were. They had a hook. They got hold of
her by her skirt and dragged her along. But her hand was still moving, she was
only wounded. They either finished her off or buried her alive.’ She didn’t know
what happened next. While recalling all this, Matushka Platonida was covered
with tears and asked me never to forget the murdered Abbess Christina in her
prayers, calling her a holy martyr.”
593
594
594
595
Abbess Claudia came from a merchant’s family. In the 1910s she joined the
monastery of the Annunciation in Ufa, and on April 8, 1914 was ordained
abbess of the monastery by Bishop Andrew of Ufa. From 1914 to 1917 she was
a member of the Orthodox Palestine Society, and also of the Ufa diocesan
committee of the Orthodox Missionary Society. In July, 1914 she opened a
refuge for fifteen places for the education of non-Russian girls in her
monastery. During the First World War she did much patriotic charitable
work. The building of the monastery hospital was given over for sick and
wounded soldiers. In 1915 she opened a refuge for soldiers’ children with 45
places. Between January and March (or in June), 1919 she was killed by Red
Army soldiers in Ufa.
595
596
The next day the priest appeared in a dream to the deacon in shining white
vestments with a golden crown on his head and said:
"Brother! So you were afraid of your crown! It's waiting for you, in the
morning go and get it."
In the morning the deacon got up, recounted his vision and... went to the
Bolsheviks. They took hold of him and led him out to the place where they
had cast the remains of the priest. Several pious laymen were also led out
with the deacon. They killed them and threw them into the pit, which was
filled with rubbish and animal excrement.
In time a light began to appear over the place of the burial. And then a
spring appeared, which gushed out bubbles in abundance. The water
breathed, as it were; it gushed out air bubbles under great pressure, forming a
little pool about 450 square metres in area, and breathing as it were in one
place. It was very pleasant to the taste. And it remained at a constant cold
596
597
temperature, never freezing during the most severe frosts. Believers visit this
source in summer and winter.
597
598
and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment taking into account the period he
had already been in prison.
At this moment Bishop John issued his first epistle exposing the lies and
treachery of the renovationists. The epistle was distributed round the parishes
by volunteer laypeople, among whom there were some secretly ordained
priests. Great in the eyes of the Church was the feat of these messengers; they
were called in church circles "apologists" of Orthodoxy. It was they who
pushed into action the sluggish clergy and led the movement of the people.
They were the first to use the term "Soviet church", and defined their
confession as "old church". There were many of them, and their fates were
varied, but some of them received the title "ascetics" already during their
lifetime. Such, for example, was the student at the pedagogical technical
college Valentina Ch.
Valentina was a character of rare integrity, purity and energy. Many, even
in the True Church, called her a fanatic; but she was not hindered by, or
ashamed by, this title; and it was then that many understood that every
Christian is obliged to be such a "fanatic". Valentina worked mainly among
the women, and she did impossible things. Thus when she came to a parish,
the situation was reversed with lightning-like speed, the renovationist clergy
were driven out, the women created dvadtsatky (groups empowered to
accept the church from the Soviet authorities) and removed the keys from the
"livers" (as the renovationists of the "Living Church" were called) and simply
compelled the representatives of the authorities to sign agreements with them
concerning the existence of the "Tikhonite" Church. Often the dvadtsatky
were joined by wives and sisters of leading party members - so great was the
influence of Valentina, so powerful her word, so great the scope of her
activity.
Literally the whole police force, the communists and the komsomol
pursued Valentina. On the roads into the villages seized by the renovationists
they placed pickets composed of people who had seen Valentina, but she was
led along local paths and used to appear unexpectedly. An "old women's
psychosis" would erupt, as the local papers called it, a parish would become
"old church", and Valentina would disappear without a trace, so as to appear
again where she was least of all expected.
598
599
Valentina was arrested in 1923. But her work was already done.
Renovationism was finished.
Valentina was taken out from a small quay on the Belaya River under a
powerful convoy. Walking along the long gang-planks on the deck of the
steamer, Valentina looked back and saw a silent crowd of women on the river
bank. They had come out to escort her into exile. Then she waved her hand
and shouted:
At that moment her convoy behind her struck her in the back and she
stumbled and fell from the gang-planks into the river. Both the convoy and
the people rushed to save her, but it was too late: perhaps half an hour later
she was pulled dead out of the water. The river's swift current had pulled
Valentina under the steamer, where her dress had caught on some iron object
and she was unable to surface. The authorities did not hand her body over for
burial, but the people found her grave and secretly transferred her body to a
village cemetery.
Priest Peter Ivanovich Kuznetsov was born in 1872 in the village of Novo-
Semenkino, Belebedeyevsky uyezd, Ufa province. On July 19, 1929 he was
arrested. On November 6 he was condemned according to article 58-10. On
November 30 he was shot.
599
600
native village. On May 11, 1929 he was arrested, and on February 7, 1930 was
sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11 to five years in prison.
Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Clement Lukyanovich Lebedev was born in 1871, and was the
rector of the church in the village of Semetyayevka, Fyodorovsky region,
Bashkiria. On June 20, 1928 he was arrested, and on September 3, 1929 he was
sentenced to three years in exile according to article 58-10. Nothing more is
known about him.
Her father joined the schism of the renovationists in 1922. The daughter,
prostrating herself at her father's feet, said:
"Bless me, father, to leave you, so that I will not bind you in the salvation of
your soul."
The old priest knew his daughter, just as he was aware of the wrongness of
his action. He wept, and, blessing Lydia for an independent life, prophetically
said to her:
"See, daughter, when you win your crown, that you tell the Lord that
although I myself proved too weak for battle, still I did not restrain you, but
blessed you."
"I will, papa," she said, kissing his hand, thus herself also prophetically
foreseeing her future.
Lydia succeeded in entering the Forestry Department, and in 1926 she was
transferred to the Collective Lumber Industry for work with the lower-paid
labourers. Here she immediately came into contact with simple Russian
people, whom she warmly loved and who responded in the same fashion.
The lumberjacks and drivers, who had been hardened by the work they
did under difficult conditions, related with amazement that in the officer of
the Lumber department, where Lydia met them, a feeling came over them
similar to the one, now almost smothered, which they had felt when before
600
601
the revolution they had gone to meet the venerated icon of the Mother of God
from the village of Bogorodskoye near Ufa. In the office foul language, insults
and quarrels were no longer heard. Evil passions were extinguished, and
people became kinder to each other.
This was amazing and was noticed by everybody, including the party
chiefs. They kept watch over Lydia, but discovered nothing suspicious: she
did not go at all to the churches that had been legalized by the Bolsheviks,
and she attended catacomb services rarely and carefully. The GPU knew that
members of the Catacomb Church existed in the diocese, but they could find
no way of uncovering and arresting them.
With the aim of uncovering those who had not yet been arrested, the GPU
suddenly returned Bishop Andrew of Ufa from exile. He was deeply revered
by the people; but at his command he was received openly by only one
church in Ufa, although secretly the whole diocese came to him. The GPU was
mistaken: instead of being uncovered, the Catacomb Church deepened and
spread, remaining as before inaccessible to spies. Convinced of the failure of
its plan, the GPU again arrested Bishop Andrew and sent him into exile.
The GPU understood that there had fallen into their hands a clue for
uncovering the whole Catacomb Church in the region. Ten days of
uninterrupted questioning did not break the martyr; she simply refused to
say anything. On July 20 the interrogator, having lost all patience, gave Lydia
over to the "special command" for interrogation.
This "special command" worked in a corner room in the cellar of the GPU.
A permanent guard was stationed in the cellar corridor. On this day the guard
was Cyril Atayev, a 23-year-old private. He saw Lydia as she was brought
into the cellar. The preceding ten days' questioning had drained the strength
of the martyr, and she could not go down the steps. Private Atayev, at the call
of his chiefs, held her and led her down to the interrogation chamber.
said Lydia, sensing in the Red Army guard a spark of compassion for her in
the delicate gentleness of his strong arms.
601
602
And Christ saved Atayev. The words of the martyr, her eyes full of pain
and perplexity, fell into his heart. Now he could not listen with indifference to
her uninterrupted screams and cries, as he had previously listened to the
same cries from others being interrogated and tortured.
Lydia was tortured for a long time. The tortures of the GPU were usually
fashioned so as to leave no particularly noticeable marks on the body of the
tortured one, but at Lydia's interrogation no attention was paid to this. The
screams and cries of Lydia continued almost uninterruptedly for more than
an hour and a half.
"But aren't you in pain? You're screaming and crying, that means it's
awful?" asked the exhausted torturers in one of the intervals.
"Then why don't you talk? It will be more painful!" said the perplexed
torturers.
Then the torturers devised something new for the martyr: sexual assault.
There were four of them - one more was needed. They called the guard to
help.
When Atayev entered the room, he saw Lydia, understood the means of
her further torture and his own role in it - and there was worked in him a
miracle similar to the unexpected conversions of the ancient torturers.
Atayev's whole soul was repelled by the satanic abominableness, and a holy
enthusiasm seized him. Totally unaware of what he was doing, the Red Army
guard killed on the spot the two torturers who stood before him with his own
revolver. Before even the second shot had echoed the GPU man who had been
standing behind hit Cyril on the head with the handle of his gun. Atayev still
had the strength to turn and seize his attacker by the throat, but a shot from
the fourth one knocked him to the floor.
Cyril fell with his head toward Lydia, who was stretched out with thongs.
The Lord gave him the opportunity of hearing once more words of hope from
the martyr. And looking straight into Lydia's eyes, Cyril, with blood gushing
from him, gasped his union to the Lord:
602
603
One of these two GPU men became completely insane. The other soon died
of nervous shock. Before his death this second one told everything to his
friend, Sergeant Alexis Ikonikov, who turned to God and brought this
account to the Church. For his zealous propagation of it, he himself suffered a
martyr's death.
603
604
Monk Ivan (Alexeyevich Kiselev) was born in 1869 in Penza province, and
struggled in Ufa. There, on February 15, 1929, he was arrested, and on May 10
was sentenced in accordance with article 58-10. Nothing more is known about
him.
Priest Alexander Ilyich Zubarev was born in 1865 in Vyatka province, and
served in the village of Saklovo, Krasnokamsky region, Bashkiria. On October
24, 1929 he was arrested, and on December 3 he was condemned. Nothing
more is known about him.
604
605
The following suffered for their membership of the True Orthodox Church:
605
606
606
607
September 10 was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp.
Nothing more is known about him.
607
608
Nun Anna (Antonovna Anferova). She was born in 1885 in the village of
Yezhovka, Ufa province. On August 25, 1931 she was arrested in connection
with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 was
sentenced to three years’ exile in Kazakhstan. Nothing more is known about
her.
Nun Natalya (Grigoryevna Artemyeva). She was born in 1901 in the village
of Mikhailovka, Ufa province. On May 26, 1931 she was arrested in connection
with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 she
was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Agatha (Prokopyevna Bodrova). She was born in 1900 in the village of
Andreyevka, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province. On November 23, 1930 she was
arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and
on February 7 was sentenced to three years in the camps. Nothing more is
known about her.
Nun Eudocia (Leontyevna Builova). She was born in 1870 in the village of
Andreyevka, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province. On November 23, 1930 she
was arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church,
and on February 7 was sentenced to three years in the camps. Nothing more is
known about her.
Nun Anna (Fyodorovna Vaganova). She was born in 1904 in the village of
Varvarino, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province. On May 29, 1831 she was
arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and
on September 24 was sentenced to three years in the camps. Nothing more is
known about her.
Nun Anna (Gavrilovna Vasilyeva). She was born in 1899 in Ufa province.
In 1932 she was arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True
Orthodox Church, and on February 2, 1932 was sentenced to three years’
exile. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Lukerya (Mikhailovna Vasilyeva). She was born in 1890 in the village
of Novoandreyevka, Sterlitamak uyezd. On November 23, 1930 she was
arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and
on February 7, 1931 was sentenced to three years in the camps. Nothing more
is known about her.
608
609
Nun Darya (Kapitonova). On May 29, 1931 she was arrested in connection
with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 was
sentenced to three years in the camps. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Vassa (Dmitrievna Kolyaskina). She was born in 1896 in the village of
Mikhailovka, Ufa province, and went to a village school. On May 26, 1931 she
was arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church,
and on September 24 was sentenced to five years in the camps. Nothing more
is known about her.
Nun Darya (Dmitrievna Kulikova). She was born in 1891 in the village of
Nizhne-Troitskoye, Ufa province. On June 13, 1931 she was arrested in
connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on
September 22 she was sentenced to five years’ exile in the north. Nothing
more is known about her.
609
610
Nun Thecla, in the world Olga Petrovna Motovilova. She was born in 1899
in Ufa province, and was tonsured by Archbishop Andrew. On June 30, 1930
she was arrested in connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox
Church, and sentenced to three years in the camps. She was sent to a camp.
After her release she returned to her homeland. On February 26, 1946 she was
arrested again and sentenced to eight years in the camps. She was sent to
Dubravlag. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Matrona (Mikhailovna Oskina). She was born in 1905 in the village of
Nizhne-Troitskoye, Ufa province. On June 15, 1931 she was arrested in
connection with the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox church, and on
September 22 was sentenced to five years in the camps. After her release she
returned to her homeland, but later joined the True Orthodox Christians in
Lipetsk.
Nun Tatyana (Dmitrievna Popova). She was born in 1903 in the village of
Nizhnyaya Burma, Askinsk uyezd, Ufa province, and went to two classes of a
village school. On May 25, 1931 she was arrested in connection with the Ufa
branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 was sentenced to
five years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about her.
Nun Barbara (Vasilyevna Timoshina). She was born in 1870 in the village
of Varvarino, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province, and received an elementary
education. On May 29, 1931 she was arrested in connection with the Ufa
branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 was sentenced to
three years in the camps and was sent to a camp. Nothing more is known
about her.
610
611
the Ufa branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 was
sentenced to five years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is
known about her.
Nun Theodosia (Andreyevna Shitlina). She was born in 1896 in the village
of Varvarino, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province, and received an elementary
education. On May 29, 1931 she was arrested in connection with the Ufa
branch of the True Orthodox Church, and on September 24 was sentenced to
three years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about
her.
611
612
Priest (?) Ivan Andreyevich Belyaev was born in 1885 in the village of
Artakul, Birsk uyezd, Ufa province. From 1908 to 1910 and from 1914 to 1915
he served as a private in the tsarist army. He became either a priest or a
member of the parish council in the SS. Cosmas and Damian church in his
native village. In 1928 he was sentenced in accordance with article 59 to six
months in a house of correction. On May 18, 1929 he was arrested again, and
on September 3 was accused of “violating the rules on the separation of the
Church from the State – collecting alms among the parishioners for building a
church and for the upkeep of the clergy”. He was sentenced in accordance
with articles 58-10 and 124, but the case was shelved because of lack of
evidence of a crime. On October 18, 1929 he was arrested again, and on
February 10, 1930 he was sentenced to five years in the camps with
confiscation of his property and expulsion of his family in accordance with
articles 58-8, 58-10 and 58-11. Nothing more is known about him.
612
613
Priest Ivan Kuzmich Zvarygin was born in 1884 in Vyatka province, and
served in the village of Mitrofanovka, Duvan region, Bashkiria. On March 10,
1930 he was arrested, and on December 27 he was sentenced to death in
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-13. He was shot on the same day.
Priest Ivan Petrovich Zadorozhnin was born in 1863 in the village of Zar-
Usy, Muslyumovsky region, Tataria. He was a Kryashen. On October 20, 1930
he was arrested in his native village, and on December 1 was sentenced in
accordance with article 58-10 to five years’ exile in the north for “anti-
collective farm agitation”. Nothing more is known about him.
613
614
Nun Salome, in the world Alexandra Ivanovna Zelinskaya. She was born
in 1872 in Ufa province and went to a gymnasium. From 1918 she was editor
of the newspaper “Trans-Volga Chronicle”. On April 13, 1929 she was
arrested and sentenced to three years in the camps. After her release from
camp she was exiled to Central Asia. Archbishop Andrew lived in her flat.
Nothing more is known about her.
614
615
615
616
Deacon Basil Lvovich Kondratyev was born in 1888 in the village of Ud.
Duvaney, Blagoveschensk region, Bashkiria, and served in his native village.
On August 11, 1930 he was arrested, and on October 3 was sentenced in
accordance with article 58-7 to three years’ exile. Nothing more is known
about him.
616
617
Protopriest Michael Ivanovich Mironov was born between 1863 and 865.
He was rector of the Pokrov church in the village of Romanovka,
Meleuzskaya, Sterlitamak uyezd, Ufa province. From 1926 he was many times
in Meleuzskaya prison. When it was suggested that he renounce the faith, he
replied with a decisive refusal. After his sentence he said: “Christ went to be
crucified for the faith, I must accept trials”. He was cast into the prison of the
village of Priluk in Arkhangelsk province. There, in the prison hospital, he
died in 1932, having been subjected to terrible treatment from the camp
bosses and criminals.
617
618
The following suffered for their membership of the True Orthodox Church
after the war:
Nun Anna (Prokopyevna Prokofyeva). She was born in 1889 in the village
of Yandashevo, Marlosadsky uyezd, Chuvashia into a peasant family. In the
1930s she was living in Cheboksary without fixed occupation. On March 27,
1947 she was arrested for being “an active participant in the illegal anti-Soviet
church-monarchist organization called ‘the True Orthodox Christians’”, and
on August 28-30, in a closed session, was sentenced to five years in the camps
with disenfranchisement for two years. Nothing more is known about her.
618
619
619
620
620
621
and worked as a medical orderly in the Semyonovsky point near Poretsk, and
from 1945 – in the children’s home in Tsivilsk. After meeting the True
Orthodox Christians she was converted to the Faith, and offered her room for
secret services. She gave refuge to Hieromonk Gurias (Pavlov). On December
23, 1951 she was arrested in a group case, and on April 10-11, 1952 was
sentenced to ten years in the camps and was sent to Steplag. In 1955 she was
released and settled in the Caucasus, then in Bataisk. In 1962 she was arrested
as an “idler” and sentenced to exile and sent to the settlement of Yartsevo,
Krasnoyarsk district. For refusing to work in a collective farm she was sent for
four months to Mariinsk camp, and then exiled to Yeniseisk region. For again
refusing to work she was sentenced to internment in a camp. In 1970 she was
released from camp and settled in the village of Tishank, Voronezh province,
where she lives.
621
622
Priest Alexander Orlov was born in 1865 in the village of Ilgino, Orel
uyezd, Vyatka province, and was serving in his native village. On September
18, 1918 he was arrested and convicted by a military-revolutionary tribunal of
“counter-revolutionary activity”. He was sentenced to two years’
imprisonment. Nothing more is known about him.
622
623
Priest Basil Ivanovich Ilyinsky was born in 1871. He served in the church
of the village of Korkono, Nolinsk uyezd, Vyatka province. On October 18,
1918 he was arrested and accused by the cheka of “distributing religious
passions”. He was sentenced to death and shot in Nolinsk uyezd.
Priest Basil Vasilyevich Nesmelov was born on February 21, 1874 in the
city of Tsarevo-Sanchursk, Yaransk uyezd, Vyatka province. He finished his
studies at the Vyatka theological seminary in 1897. On June 25, 1904 he was
ordained to the diaconate and went to serve in the village of Sezenovo,
Slobodskaya uyezd, Vyatka province. On December 18, 1907 he was ordained
to the priesthood, and went to serve in the village of Bolshaya Sheshurga,
623
624
Protopriest Alexis Petrovich Lopatin was born in 1867 and was serving in
the Transfiguration cathedral in the city of Slobodskaya, Vyatka province. On
April 21, 1918 he gave a sermon in which he compared Soviet power to a
whore… On April 23 he was arrested for “summoning and inciting laymen to
defend the rights of the Church trampled on by Soviet power”. The “counter-
revolutionary” epistles of Patriarch Tikhon were also confiscated from him.
On hearing of the arrest of their pastor, 189 parishioners of the
Transfiguration cathedral had a meeting and decided to petition for his
release. They were joined by the Vyatka spiritual consistory, which sent a
letter with a similar request to the Vyatka commissar of justice. As a result of
these petitions, on May 2 Fr. Alexis was released under guard from prison in
Slobodskaya, but was forbidden to leave his place of residence. On July 26 he
was again arrested for “summoning and inciting laymen to defend the rights
of the Church trampled on by Soviet power”. He was transferred to the Urals
Cheka, which sentenced him to be shot. The sentence was carried out on
August 25, 1918.
624
625
Priest Kuzmin was serving in the church of the village of Ukan, Glazov
uyezd, Vyatka province. In 1919 he was arrested and imprisoned in Glazov.
Nothing more is known about him except that the believers formed a petition
for his release.
625
626
626
627
Priest Ivan Ivanovich Myshkin was born on March 16, 1874 in the village
of Kuznetsovo, Urzhuma uyezd, Vyatka province. He was educated in
Vyatka theological seminary, and on June 21, 1899 was married to Eugenia
Ivanovna Padarina, the daughter of a priest from Verkhoturye. In August,
1899 he was ordained to the priesthood, and was sent to serve in the Nativity
church in the village of Rozhdestvenskoye (Chakhlovka), Kotelnichi uyezd,
Vyatka province. At the beginning of 1919 Fr. John was forced to pay an
“extraordinary tax” of 1000 roubles. Being unable to pay this, his property in
his house was confiscated and he himself was arrested. He was sent to a
prison or camp in Vyatka province, where he was tortured in prison. On
being released, October 22, 1921, he was taken, very ill and unconscious to
Rozhdestvenskoye by his son, Nicholas. There he immediately died.
627
628
May 30, 1922 he was arrested and condemned for “anti-Soviet agitation”, and
sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. On December 28 a tribunal released
him because of mental illness.
628
629
sent to the village of Ust-Kulom, Zyryansk district. On May 31, 1931 he was
arrested again, and on October 6 was sentenced to five years’ exile and sent to
the north. Nothing more is known about him.
629
630
1927 he was condemned by the OGPU in accordance with article 58-10 and
sentenced to five years in prison.
*
Priest Basil Stepanovich Malginov was born in 1871 in the village of
Seleznevo, Zuyevo region, Vyatka province, where he served in the local
church. On October 19, 1927 he was arrested by the OGPU. Nothing more is
known about him.
630
631
631
632
632
633
633
634
Nun Maria (Mikhailovna Isupova) was born in 1880 in the village of Suna,
Sunsky region, Vyatka province. She was arrested in 1930, and on November
15 was sentenced in accordance with article 58-10 to three years’ exile in the
north. Nothing more is known about her.
634
635
Priest Paul Ivanovich Kashin was born in 1899 in the village of Ust-
Cheptsa, Kirovo-Chepetsky region, Kirov province, and served in the village
of Khmelevka, Zuyevsky region, Kirov province. On August 20, 1931 he was
sentenced, in accordance with article 58-10, to three years’ exile in the Urals.
Nothing more is known about him.
635
636
Priest Ilya Ivanovich Karavayev was born in 1879 in the village of Selty,
Kilmez region, Vyatka province. There, in 1931, he was arrested, and on
September 10 he was sentenced to three years’ exile in accordance with article
58-10. Nothing more is known about him.
636
637
Church’”, and on December 14 was sentenced to three years in the camps and
sent to a camp. In 1934 he was released and settled in Tabashino, Orshansk
region. In January, 1937 he was arrested again for being “a participant in a
counter-revolutionary group of True Orthodox Churchmen”, and on
February 7 was sentenced to death and shot.
637
638
638
639
639
640
May 27, 1942 was sentenced to eight years in the camps and sent to Karlag,
where she arrived on October 3. On August 23, 1943 she died in camp.
640
641
Nun Irina (Alexandrovna Perminova) was born in 1913 (?) in the village of
Platiner, Nolinsk uyezd into a peasant family, and received an elementary
education. In 1916 she was tonsured. In the 1920s she was disenfranchised.
From 1928 she was living at the church in the village of Khlebnikovo, Mari-
Tureksky canton, Mari province. On February 8, 1931 she was arrested for
being “a participant in a counter-revolutionary organization of churchmen,
the ‘True Orthodox Church’”, and on December 14 was sentenced to ten years
in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about her.
641
642
642
643
Priest Peter Platonovich Kirillov was born in 1899 in the village of Maly
Yedun, Sanchur uyezd, and received an intermediate education. He was
disenfranchised. In 1930 he was under investigation twice: “for counter-
revolutionary activity” and “for participation in a mass demonstration”. In
1932 he was arrested in the village of Sheshurga, Yaransk region and accused
of “joining the staff of the church-monarchist organization, the True Orthodox
Church”, of “being an activist of the organization” and of “conducting active
counter-revolutionary work in the population”. On August 14 he was
sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. After his release he went to live in
the village of Kokshaga, Kiknur region. In the spring of 1939 he was arrested,
and on July 30 was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp.
Nothing more is known about him.
643
644
and sentenced to two years in the camps and three years’ exile, but the
sentence was not confirmed. In 1932 he was arrested in the village of Russkiye
Kraya, Kiknur region, and accused of “joining the staff of the church-
monarchist organization, the True Orthodox Church”, of “being an activist of
the organization” and of “conducting active counter-revolutionary work in
the population”. On August 14 he was sentenced to three years’ exile and sent
to the north. Nothing more is known about him.
644
645
Soviet power”. On August 14, 1932 he was sentenced to three years’ exile in
the north. Nothing more is known about him.
Priest Ivan Petrovich Kurochkin was born in 1894 in the village of Yaran-
Muchazh, Yaransk uyezd, and went to Vyatka theological seminary. He was
645
646
646
647
Priest Peter Stepanovich Galitsky was born in 1865 in the village of Izh,
Pizhansk uyezd, Nizhegorod region, and went to Vyatka theological
seminary. In 1923 he was under investigation. He was disenfranchised. In
1932 he was arrested in the village of Arkhangelskoye, Shabalin region, and
accused of “joining the staff of the church-monarchist organization, the True
Orthodox church”, of “being a messenger” and of “conducting active counter-
revolutionary work in the population”. On August 14 (or 19) he was
sentenced to three years’ exile in Kazakhstan. Nothing more is known about
him.
Deacon Paul Fyodorovich Olyunin was born in 1876 in the village of Izh,
Pizhansk uyezd, Nizhegorod region, and went to three classes at theological
seminary. He was disenfranchised. In 1932 he was arrested in the village of
Ilyinskoye, Kotelnich region and accused of “joining the staff of the church-
monarchist organization, the True Orthodox church”, of “being a messenger”
and of “conducting active counter-revolutionary work in the population”. On
August 14 he was sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. Nothing more is
known about him.
647
648
Nun Xenia (Ignatyevna Lapteva) was born in 1896 in the village of Maloye,
Sharygino, Kiknur uyezd. She was disenfranchised. In 1932 she was arrested
in her native village and accused of “joining the staff of a church-monarchist
organization, the True Orthodox Church” and “on the command of the
organization, carrying out counter-revolutionary work among the
population”. On August 14, 1932 she was sentenced to three years’ exile and
sent to Kazakhstan. Nothing more is known about her.
648
649
649
650
650
651
Stepan Pavlovich Popov was born in 1864 in the village of Okrug, Yaransk
uyezd. He was disenfranchised and dekulakized. In 1932 he was arrested in
his native village and accused of “joining the staff of the church-monarchist
organization, the True Orthodox Church” and of “conducting counter-
revolutionary work in the population on the orders of the organization”. On
August 14 he was sentenced to three years’ exile in the north. Nothing more is
known about him.
Ivan Fomich Kulpin was born in 1870 in the village of Sheshurga, Yaransk
uyezd. He was disenfranchised and dekulakized and sentenced to six months’
forced labour. In 1932 he was arrested in his native village and accused of
“joining the staff of the church-monarchist organization, the True Orthodox
Church” and of “conducting counter-revolutionary work in the population on
651
652
652
653
August 19 was sentenced to three years’ exile and sent to the north. Nothing
more is known about her.
653
654
the ‘True Orthodox Church’”, and on March 27 was sentenced to five years in
the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about him.
Yegor Ilyich Stenkin was born in 1887 in the village of Vazhnager, Gorno-
Mariisk uyezd, where he lived as a free peasant. He went to four classes in the
village school. He was church warden in the village of M. Sundyr. On June 8,
1932 he was arrested for “counter-revolutionary activity and belonging to the
True Orthodox Church”, but was released after six months. In 1935 he was
fined for sabotage of political campaigns. On February 14, 1936 he was
arrested for being “the leader of a counter-revolutionary group of followers of
‘the True Orthodox Churchpeople’”, and was sentenced to ten years in the
camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about him.
Adrian Ivanovich Ivanov was born in 1869 in the village of Lenin, Novo-
Sheshminsk uyezd into a peasant family, and received an elementary
education. A carpenter, in 1931 he was twice condemned in accordance with
articles 58-10 and 61, and sentenced to two years in the camps. In 1933 he was
released. On July 23, 1935 he was arrested again in a group church case, and
654
655
on February 14, 1936 was sentenced to eight years in the camps. Nothing
more is known about him.
655
656
656
657
657
658
658
659
659
660
660
661
was sentenced to six months’ hard labour. In the summer of 1937 he was
arrested for being “a participant in the counter-revolutionary organization of
churchpeople, ‘the True Orthodox Church’”, and on September 29 was
sentenced to death. He was shot on October 14.
Priest Paul Kornilovich Bondal was born in 1879 in the village of Grigory,
Belskaya volost, Belorussia, and finished three classes in the village school
and eight months of theological course. A priest of the Victorite orientation,
he served in the village of Trekhrechye, Vyatka province. In 1931 he was
arrested, and on October 12 was sentenced to three years in the camps and
sent to a camp. In 1934, after being released from camp, he was exiled for
three years to the north. After his release he returned to Vyatka province. In
the summer of 1937 he was arrested for being “a participant in the counter-
revolutionary organization of churchpeople, ‘the True Orthodox Church’”,
and on September 29 was sentenced to death. He was shot on October 14.
Nun Maria (Petrovna Sadakova) was born in 1894 in the village of Sadaki,
Chepetsk uyezd, Vyatka province into a peasant family. She became a nun in
a Vytka monastery. Then she lived in Vyatka without fixed occupation. In the
summer of 1937 she was arrested for being “a participant in a counter-
revolutionary organization of churchmen, the ‘True Orthodox Church’”, and
on September 29 was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp.
Nothing more is known about her.
661
662
three years. In 1932 she was arrested again, and on July 29 was sentenced to
three years’ exile and sent to the north. In 1935 she was living in the village of
Barsuki, and working as a watchman in the church. In 1936 she was released
from camp and returned to Barsuki. In the summer of 1937 she was arrested
for being “a participant in the counter-revolutionary organization of
churchpeople, ‘the True Orthodox Church’”, and on September 29 was
sentenced to death. On October 14 she was shot.
662
663
663
664
1932 she was arrested, and on September 21 was sentenced to three years in
the camps and sent to a camp. In 1935 she was released from camp, and went
to live in the village of Monastyrschina, Orichevo region, working as a reader
in the church. In the summer of 1937 she was arrested for being “a participant
in the counter-revolutionary organization of churchpeople, ‘the True
Orthodox Church’”, and on September 29 was sentenced to ten years in the
camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about her.
664
665
True Orthodox Church”, and was sentenced to ten years in the camps and
sent to the Osinnikovo section of Siblag. Nothing more is known about him.
Monk Cyril, in the world Clement Vasilyevich Gritsko, was born in 1890 in
the village of Blyuvinichi, Brest-Litovsk uyezd, Grodno province into a
peasant family, and went to three classes of the village school. From 1915 he
was in the Yezhovsky monastery, and was tronsured. In 1924, after the
closure of the monastery, he lived in the village of Selivanovo, Yoshkar-Ola
region, and worked in the fields. In 1932 he was arrested for not handing over
bread, but was later released. He returned to Selivanovo, and was without
fixed occupation. On December 23, 1935 he was arrested, but on March 3,
1936 he was freed, and the case was shelved. He took part in secret services in
the village. On August 31, 1945 he was arrested for being “a participant in the
anti-Soviet underground of the True Orthodox Church”, and was sentenced
to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is known about
him.
665
666
and was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing
more is known about him.
*
The following members of the Myrrh-Bearers’ Desert suffered for the faith:
666
667
667
668
668
669
669
670
670
671
The First World War broke out. Ivan with four of his fellow villagers was
enrolled in the army. Once Ivan’s gas-mask didn’t work, and he would
undoubtedly have perished from the gas if his comrades had not succeeded in
wrapping him in a wet greatcoat.
Of course, the local communists could not look with favour on such
behaviour in a representative of the new authorities, and at the first
convenient opportunity (the excuse was Ivan’s marriage to his young wife in
church) they removed him from his post.
In about 1927 the church authorities transferred Fr. John to the village of
Yelevo in Belokholunitsky region. After his arrival the church of Saints Peter
671
672
and Paul began to fill up with people from Zuyevka, Kosa and other places.
Some were particularly attracted by Fr. John’s chanting.
“Our house,” recalls Fr. John’s son Nicholas, “was filled to overflowing
before feasts. My father directed the rehearsals. Already at that time I knew
the music of Tchaikovsky and Glinka.”
In 1930, Fr. John, who did not recognize the renovationists and sergianist
neo-renovationists, was arrested under the article about “antisoviet agitation
and propaganda”. He was sent to the White Sea - Baltic canal, while his
family was thrown onto the street. His wife and four children had to take
shelter with relatives. The youngest child, a daughter, died at the age of
eleven months. Matushka wove shawls day and night in order to earn enough
money to survive. She was also helped by kind people who did not let the
young family perish.
Fr. John was so exhausted by his work on the canal that he began to spit
blood and landed up in hospital. There they noticed his erudition and good
handwriting, and when he recovered a little he was taken into the
administration of the canal construction. There Fr. John even acquired a
patent for a new method of calculating the quantity of work done.
Once the president of the village soviet, a teacher and one other person
came to Fr. John and tried to persuade him to renounce God. They departed
defeated.
672
673
of war with Germany. By a miracle his relatives received a letter from him in
the summer of 1941 in which he said that he was digging ditches in Penza
region and had eaten only one wet potato in the last three days. Soon they
were informed that Fr. John had died.
673
674
674
675
675
676
676
677
677
678
James Yakimovich Popov was born in 1875 in the village of Lom, Yaransk
uyezd, and lived there as a free peasant. In 1927 he was arrested and
sentenced to six months in prison, but was released on amnesty. On July 24,
1941 he was arrested for being “a participant in the counter-revolutionary
organization, the True Orthodox Church”, but on August 18, 1943 the case
was shelved because of the death of the accused.
Ilya Izotovich Kasyanov was born in 1906 in the village of Valki, Kiknur
uyezd, Vyatka province into a peasant family, and received an elementary
education. A free peasant, in the 1940s he went into hiding from military
service. On September 15, 1942 he was arrested for being “a participant in the
counter-revolutionary organization, the True Orthodox Church”, and on
August 18, 1943 he was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a
camp. Nothing more is known about him.
678
679
August 18, 1943 he was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a
camp. Nothing more is known about him.
679
680
680
681
681
682
682
683
683
684
684
685
elementary education. In the 1940s she was living in her native village
without working. In the spring of 1945 she was arrested for being “a
participant in the anti-Soviet church underground”, and on October 31 was
sentenced to five years in the camps and sent to a camp. Nothing more is
known about her.
685
686
686
687
to the north. After being released he continued his secret service in the
villages, working as a cobbler. In 1937 he was arrested, and on March 27 was
sentenced to five years in the camps and sent to a camp. In the middle of the
1950s he was released, but continued to serve in secret. He died in the 1970s.
687
688
688
689
His first son, Anatoly, was born on October 24, 1900. Three more sons were
born: Alexis, Alexander and Theodore. In 1917 Anatoly and Alexis were
studying in Tambov theological seminary, and Alexander was continuing his
education in the church school.
689
690
gathered together, expressed dismay that the horses were being confiscated
when they were so necessary for bringing in the harvest. Fr. Peter stood up
before the peasants and spoke about the injustice of Soviet power. The
meeting was broken up with the aid of arms by communists and village
activists. An investigation was conducted. Fr. Peter was captured and,
according to a Cheka document dated November 25, 1918, after the uprising
had been suppressed, was sentenced to be shot together with another priest
called Panov for inciting the people to counter-revolutionary insurrection.
According to one version, his execution was also linked with his refusal to
hand over the metrical books of the parish, which contained the main
information about the parishioners and was kept in the church.
After being cruelly beaten, Fr. Peter was put on a cart and taken beyond
the bounds of the village. Throughout the night the semi-conscious priest
read prayers, while his tormentors were tormented by fears and visions. At
dawn the next day Fr. Peter was cast into Sosulinsky pond. There, not long
before Pentecost, a shepherd noticed something like light and singing by the
water (several kilometres from the village). Then they found the body of Fr.
Peter, which had a waxen colour and was completely incorrupt. Matushka
Lydia Feodorovna was frightened to take the body of her husband without
permission. Only when the village soviet gave permission did she and her
elder son Anatoly bury Fr. Peter beside the altar of the church on May 31,
1919, the Day of the Holy Spirit. A cross now stands on the grave.
In 1918 Priests Alexander and Alexis, Deacon Basil, the church warden
Gregory and the laymen Antipas and John were killed in the village of
Bondari, Tambov province. They were buried in the village cemetery in a
common grave of 24 people killed by the persecutors of the faith.
In 1918 the priest of the village of Olshanki, Tambov diocese, Fr. Nicholas
Kasatkin, was murdered. The criminals stole all the money that was in his
690
691
hands and escaped. The priest's widow and his five young children were left
as orphans.
Priest Ivan Ivanovich Pokhvalensky was born in 1859, and went to the
Tambov theological seminary. In 1879 he was appointed reader and teacher at
the church-parish school in the village of Uspenskoye, Kozlov uyezd, Tambov
province. In 1903 he was ordained to the priesthood and was appointed to the
Iverskaya church in the village of Naschekino, Kirsanov uyezd. He was
married to Ekaterina Petrovna (born 1882), and had no children. On
November 5, 1918 he was shot by the Bolsheviks.
691
692
The yedinverchesky Priest Yerokhin was put on trial together with S.A.
Nikitov, the warden of the church in the village of Lakhmytovka,
Kirsanovsky uyezd, Tambov province for “hiding church valuables”. As it
turned out, there was nothing to hide because the church was of the poorest.
So they were acquitted. Nothing more is known about him.
In Penza region there is a station which bears the name of Zametchina. Not
far away there used to be a monastery, of which only the foundations and
some stones remain. After the revolution forty monks were buried alive next
to the river. After a time forty small springs began to flow at the place of their
martyrdom. Their water is considered holy. At the end of June, on the day of
the commemoration of these forty martyrs, many people come to this spot to
venerate their memory. They say that on this day all forty springs burn with a
wonderful fire...
692
693
family. For some days they lived in the church courtyard. Then the authorities
offered him a flat. A little later the village soviet summoned him and detained
him for five hours. A crowd gather and demanded his release. They let him
go, but then arrested him again. He was condemned. Nothing more is known
about him.
The clergyman Alexis Ivanovich Yezhikov was born in 1890 in the village
of Russkiye Naimany, Mordovia, and served in the village of Parakino,
Bolsheberezinkovsky region. On November 21, 1929 he was sentenced to five
years’ imprisonment in accordance with article 58-10. Nothing more is known
about him.
693
694
The clergyman Nicholas Yegorovich Kutin was born in 1874 in the village
of Slaim, Torbeyevsky region, Mordovia, where he also served. On December
29, 1929 he was arrested and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in
accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11. Nothing more is known about him.
The clergyman Ivan Dmitrievich Kamnev was born in 1870 in the village
of Staraya Pichmorga (now in Nosakino), Torbeyevsky region, Mordovia.
There he was arrested, and on March 26, 1930 was sentenced in accordance
with articles 58-8, 58-10 and 58-11 to ten years’ imprisonment. Nothing more
is known about him.
694
695
695
696
696
697
Fifteen people were sentenced in accordance with articles 58-10 and 58-11
as part of “The Case of Bishop Gabriel (Abalymov) and others, 1931”. They
were recognized as being “participants in a branch of the counter-
revolutionary church-monarchist organization, ‘The Catacomb Church’ in
Moscow under the leadership of Bishop Gabriel (Abalymov) and
Hierodeacon Nestor (Postnikov-Myasnikov)”. These included:
The clergyman Eugene Pavlovich Insarsky was born in 1870 in the village
of Narovchat, Penza province, where he lived. On April 4, 1930 he was
sentenced in accordance with articles 58-8, 58-10 and 58-11 to ten years’
imprisonment. Nothing more is known about him.
697
698
"One day, as I was examining patients, the nurse who worked with me -
also a camp prisoner - said to me:
698
699
"'Doctor, I have heard that a denunciation has been brought against you;
you are being accused of excessive lenience in regard to prisoners and you are
threatened with an extension of your term up to fifteen years.'
"The nurse was a sober woman, I had good reason to feel horrified at her
words. I had been sentenced to three years which were soon to be completed.
Already I was counting the months and weeks which separated me from my
long-awaited freedom. And suddenly - fifteen years!
"All night I couldn't sleep, and when I went to work the next morning, the
nurse shook her head in distress upon seeing the drawn expression on my
face. After we had finished the examinations she said hesitantly:
"'I would like, doctor, to give you some advice, but I'm afraid you'll only
laugh at me.'
"'Tell me.'
"'In Penza, my home town, there lives a woman called Matronushka. The
Lord has granted her a special power of prayer. When once she begins to pray
for someone, her prayer is always answered. Many people turn to her for help
and she never refuses anyone. Why don't you ask her to help you?'
"I laughed sorrowfully. 'By the time my letter reaches her, they'll have
sentenced me to fifteen years.'
"'But it's not necessary to write to her, just call out to her,' said the nurse, a
little abashed.
"'Shout? From here?' I asked. 'She lives over a hundred kilometres away.'
"'I knew you'd laugh at me for saying that, but she can hear you from
anywhere. Do this: when you go out for your evening walk, fall behind the
rest for a bit and shout out three times in a loud voice: "Matronushka, help
me. I'm in trouble." She'll hear you and will answer.'
"Although all this seemed very strange, rather like magic as it were,
nevertheless, when I went out on my evening walk, I did as my friend had
instructed. A day passed, a week, a month... No one summoned me. In the
meantime, changes were made in the camp administration: someone was
removed, another was appointed. Another half year passed and there came
the day of my release from the camp. When I was issued my documents in the
commandant's office, I asked to be sent in the direction of the town where
Matrona lived, since I had promised before calling out to her that if she
helped me I would remember her in my daily prayers and that upon my
release from camp I would straightway go and thank her.
699
700
"Having received my papers, I heard that two fellows, who were also being
released, were travelling to the same town where I was headed. I joined them
and we set off together. As we journeyed, I asked them if perchance they
knew Matronushka.
"'We know her very well; everyone knows her - both in the town and for
miles around. We'd take you to her if you like, but we live in the country, not
in town, and we're anxious to get home. But just do this: when you arrive, ask
the first person you meet where Matronushka lives and they'll show you.'
"On my arrival I did just as my fellow travellers had told me. I asked the
first boy I met.
"'Follow this street,' he said, 'then turn by the post office into the alley.
Matrona lives in the third house.'
"'Why shouldn't I know it?' came her weak but clear voice. 'You called out
to me and I prayed to God for you. This is how I know. Sit down, be my
guest.'
"For a long time I sat at Matronushka's. She told me that as a young child
she had fallen ill with some disease which had stunted her growth and caused
her to become immobile. At the age of two she had lost her sight from
smallpox. Her family was poor, and on her way to work her mother would
lay her in a box and take her to church. Putting the box with the girl on a
bench, she would leave her there until evening. Lying in the box, the young
girl would listen to all the church services and sermons. The priest took pity
on the little girl and looked after her. The parishioners also felt sorry for the
child and would bring her a little something to eat or something to wear;
700
701
someone else would caress her or help her to lie more comfortably. In this
way she grew up surrounded by an atmosphere of deep spirituality and
prayer.
"Then we spoke about the purpose of life, about faith, about God. Listening
to her, I was struck by the wisdom of her judgements and her spiritual
insight. In parting she said:
"'When you stand before the Throne of God, remember the slave of God
Matrona.'
"At that time I had no thought of becoming a bishop and was not even a
priest. Concerning herself, she said that she would die in prison.
"Sitting beside her, I understood that before me lay not an ordinary sick
woman but someone great in the eyes of God. It was such a comfort and a joy
to be with her that I hated to leave, and I promised myself to visit her again as
soon as I could. But this never came to pass. Soon Matronushka was dragged
off to prison, to Moscow, and there she died."
The following were convicted in the group case, “The Case of Hieromonk
Pachomius (Ionov) and others, Mari (or Mordovia) ASSR, 1935”:
701
702
702
703
June 18, 1905 he was ordained to the priesthood and sent to the village of
Nikolskoye, Navorchatsky uyezd, where he was also teacher of the Law of
God in the church-parish school. On October 11, 1910 he was appointed
uyezd missionary, and had great success in converting Old Ritualists to the
Orthodox Church. On October 27, 1914 he was transferred to the village of
Nikolayevka, Insarsky uyezd. On April 30, 1920 he was retired at his own
request because of illness, and worked for a while as a clerk. In 1917 he was
elected by the clergy of the Penza diocese to be a delegate at the Local Council
of the Russian Orthodox Church. On December 8, 1924 he was appointed to
serve in the village of Sergievo-Paleologovo, Penza uyezd. On October 11,
1926 he was retired at his own request. On March 10, 1931 he was arrested in
Penza, and on January 2, 1932 was convicted of “belonging to a branch of the
All-Union Church-Monarchist Organization, ‘The True Orthodox Church’”,
and was sentenced to five years in the camps. He was sent to
Medvezhyegorsk in Arkhangelsk province. On October 19, 1933 he was
conditionally released. On February 27, 1937 he was arrested for “organizing
services in his flat” and sentenced to five years in the camps. He was sent to
Karaganda, where, on February 4, 1942, he died.
"'See that when you are exiled, you take the door with you. Take it off its
hinges and put your things on it. Carry them in that way. Don't fear the
difficulties. Endure everything. They'll take you a long way away. But God is
everywhere: He sees everything, hears everything, knows everything...
'Blessed are they that are persecuted for righteousness' sake... Blessed are ye
when men shall revile you and persecute you and say all manner of evil
against you for My name's sake' (Matt. 5.10-11)... Take the door from its
hinges and put all kinds of food on it. Don't forget to take an axe and a spade.
Oh how handy they'll be!'
"We didn't understand what exile she was talking about. Everything was
calm with us. They didn't harm anybody. A few years later [in the time of
collectivization in the 1930s], the exiles began. Our turn came. We were
warned only a day before:
"'You can take as many things as you can carry with you!'
703
704
"They loaded us onto cattle trucks. They spread out a panel which read:
'Volunteers are going to Siberia to live. Greetings to them from the working
population.'
"But if the people had known what kind of 'volunteers' were travelling in
that special train! How many tears were shed in every carriage! You know,
we had abandoned everything - homes, property, gardens. Our only
consolation was that Matushka Abbess had warned us about everything long
before and had given her blessing.
We travelled for a long time. Finally, we came to the place: bare steppe!
There was not even a bush. And no people at all: it was just desert... They
took us out:
"'Well now, kulaks, let's see how you're going to live here!'
"Everyone wept. The women sobbed aloud. But the authorities just got into
their cars and drove off. It was already frosty, winter was approaching in that
area. And we had nothing. Under our feet was bare, cold earth, and above us
the blue sky. That was all!
"Oh, how we thanked God that we had taken an axe and spade! And how
useful the doors came in! We bowed to the earth in front of Matushka. But she
herself was blind. In both eyes. But the Lord gives wisdom to the blind, He
gave her other, spiritual eyes. She saw what others did not see, what the Lord
revealed to her. She was already old, now she's over ninety...Save, O Lord,
and have mercy on Thy servant schema-abbess Seraphima. You know, we all
lived in obedience to her, we did everything with her blessing. She, the
servant of God, kept the whole region free from heresy. She stood like an
unbending pillar!
"'You're a wolf, a wolf!... You are apostates. You have denied Christ-God.
How can you read such a paper in the church of God!...'
"The priest was embarrassed. She knocked the declaration out of his hands.
She was pushed aside. But she continued:
704
705
"'Shameful! Shameful!'
"The priest cut off the reading and went into the altar. But the people said:
"I will tell you a story which proves that Matushka Schema-Abbess had the
gift of clairvoyance.
"It was completely understandable that the authorities should look for her,
but they did not succeed in finding her. First one group of believers, and then
another, took her into their home. She was transferred from one province to
another. So the KGB resorted to a diabolical trick.
"'Oh, forgive me, dear sister, I said that out of habit. You know, I'm always
among nuns, and I took you for a matushka... But perhaps you will be a nun!'
"Of course, such a device might appear to be the best proof that she was a
true nun. The more so since she always acted and spoke in a monastic way.
On sitting down to eat lunch or supper, she read the prayers in a monastic
way. After the meal and prayers she thanked the mistress of the house with a
deep bow and prayed for the repose of her parents' souls. She particularly
won over the mistress with her rapid prostrations, which showed that the
'nun' did many prostrations secretly.
705
706
"'Oh, ma... - forgive me, sister, what kind of life are we living now! I don't
want to live any longer. These are the last times! Faith has diminished in
people. You can no longer find a monk to ask his advice on how to live. But
the Lord has led me to you, may Christ save you. You don't know where else
to go. You might land up with some OGPU agents!'
"'But, by the mercy of God, there are still some lamps of God left!'
"'What are you saying?! I have gone round almost half Russia, and there's
no-one!'
"And so in this cunning way the agent found out the address. The
laywoman told her everything, only she couldn't remember the number of the
house:
"'It doesn't matter, I'll explain it to you... It's the third, or maybe the fourth
house from the corner. There's a high gate covered with tin-plate. . As you go
in, you'll see a narrow path to the corner of the house. Turn left past the
corner. Knock three times on the first window past the turn. And ask...'
"With these words she immediately went into the town... Perhaps about
two hours later she came back:
"'Ach, I went the wrong way. I arrived, but it seems that it wasn't the right
place... I came to the window and knocked three times. A woman jumped out,
it seems she had been washing some clothes.
"'"What matushka are you talking about? I'll wake up my husband now,
he's drunk, and he’ll show you both a matushka and a batyushka!" I was
frightened and left...'
706
707
"'That was probably Dasha... Most likely you didn't understand each
other... It doesn't matter. I'll find out. Don't be sad. Sit down and drink some
tea. I'll put the samovar on... And meanwhile write down some addresses you
can go to.'
"The nun took out a piece of paper and wrote down the addresses. The
samovar was already on the table...
"While the so-called 'nun' had been knocking on the window, matushka
said to the novice:
"'It's an enemy! It's an enemy! Drive her away, drive her away!'
"And when the agent had left in perplexity, the blind woman said:
"'Now run quickly to Pasha and tell her that a spy is drinking tea in her
house.'
"Dasha ran off. By road it was about 11 kilometres, but much shorter
through the kitchen-gardens. Dasha ran up, panting. She knocked on the
door. Pasha came out. Dasha passed her the message:
"'Matushka told me: run quickly to Pasha, a spy is drinking tea in her
house!'
"And Dasha disappeared... It was as if she had been covered with boiling
water. But she went in calmly and asked:
"'Let's have a look... What's this, I'm so mixed up. No, that's wrong...'
"And she threw the whole piece of paper into the samovar spout. It went
up in smoke.
707
708
"They transferred matushka to another place. And the OGPU agent went
away in a sulk... But she couldn't say that she was working for the OGPU...
"I'll tell you about a miracle which took place, as all of us firmly believe, by
the holy prayers of Matushka Schema-Abbess Seraphima.
"I was fixed up, again by her prayers, in a good job at a railway crossing,
opening and closing the barrier. This place was near a mine. Trucks passed
along the road carrying explosive destined for the mine. My work consisted
in sitting in a glass cabin and looking out for trains. When a train came up to
cross the road, I closed the barrier, and when it passed, I opened it. On
blessing me for this work, matushka had said:
"'When you go to work in the morning, your first duty will be to make the
sign of the cross over all the levers and cables and everything that has to do
with your work. Then sit down and say the Jesus prayer without ceasing.
Don't allow any sinful thought in, fight it by prayer!'
"And I did everything that matushka told me to do... Many years passed,
and nothing special happened at that place... There was another person, a
trackman, working on the crossing. His duties included sweeping the road
and watching the track. I used to say hello to him, and then sit down to work
and prayer.
“One day I came to work. It was already autumn, and it was frosty. I
secretly made the sign of the cross over the whole place. I went into the cabin,
sat down and occupied myself with the Jesus prayer. I lost consciousness of
my surroundings. When I lifted my head I saw a big and heavy goods train
already close. And when I looked behind, I saw a car going along the road
with red flags, which meant that it was carrying explosive. There was no time
to let down the barrier. Apparently the driver had decided to get ahead of the
train. I froze... The car crossed the rails, but the locomotive was there too. The
sound of glass was heard. The car was hanging on the locomotive. The guards
who were sitting with their rifles on chests flew out onto the asphalt together
with the explosive. The explosive scattered over a wide area. The train
stopped. I heard a voice:
"A short time later the police and the bosses arrived. Many of them. But for
some reason everyone was very quiet. There was no sound of conversation.
They were walking carefully, there was explosive everywhere... But the
708
709
guards who had fallen at great speed off the car were unharmed, safe and
sound. They took the car down from the locomotive. In the cabin were the
driver and senior guard - the door was jammed. But they also were
completely unharmed. It was simply amazing. Such a catastrophe and no
consequences. The car was going at such a speed and yet nobody suffered.
They came out, said something... Finally, the commission came up to the
barrier and said to me:
"I told them that I had tried to close the barrier, but the cable had snapped.
The commission and I went up to the transmission. There was ice there. I was
so amazed at that and fervently thanked the Lord in my soul. Although it was
frosty, it was impossible to explain the presence of ice in the transmission. It
was the first time I had seen ice there in so many years. Yes and in general
was it not a clear miracle of God! Why were the guards alive and unharmed?
After all, they had fallen out of the car and flown several metres. Why did the
explosive not explode at the impact? They later said that if the explosive had
gone off the whole town would have been destroyed!
"I was not responsible at all. Formally speaking, I did everything I could.
Only the technology did not work. It could not work because ice had formed
in the box. Only the car suffered damage. While all the people who had been
involved in the catastrophe had been miraculously preserved completely
unharmed.
"Several years passed... Circumstances were such that I was given the right
to retire. And I asked matushka for permission to retire. 'Blind' matushka, as
everyone called her, gave her blessing... And so I, having gone with my list of
signatures through all the sections, went to the director for the final signature.
He signed, and then, looking attentively at me, asked me to close the doors. I
closed them. And he said to me:
"He spread his hands as if he wanted to say something special, but just
said:
As she told the story of this miracle wrought through the prayers of
Schema-Abbess Seraphima, tears were in her eyes. And we all, as we listened
to her, could not refrain from weeping.
709
710
710
711
Fr. Michael (Yershov) was born on September 17 (or October 12), 1911, in
the village of Mamykovo in Kazan province, in a peasant family. According to
another source, he was born in the village of Barskoye, Yenaruskino,
Aksubayevo volost, Chistopol canon, Tataria. His father, whose name was
Basil, had taken part in the Russo-Japanese War, the First World War and the
Civil War. From 1920 he had become a cobbler and president of the committee
of poverty in the village. There were five children in the family, four
daughters and a son. Michael’s mother was called Daria.
Michael finished two classes at elementary school, and at the age of ten
began to help his father, working as a cobbler. He went to church services and
sang in the choir. When he was twelve years old, as he was receiving
communion a church in Chistopol, an elder saw him and said: "This lad will
take upon himself the sins of the whole people." From 1929 the church was
closed and his father became president of the village soviet and began to
persecute his son for reading service books and constantly praying at home.
As a result of this he went blind. Afterwards, when he repented, he recovered
his sight.
In November, 1930 Fr. Michael left his father’s home because he did not
agree with the family’s joining the collective farm. At some time during that
year. He arrived in Chistopol, where he fell seriously ill. On recovering, he
got to know Elder Plato, who told him: “You will suffer very much for the
name of God and for the people. Only don’t seek anything from anyone, rely
only on Almighty God. By the mercy of God I knew about you before.”
Together they went round the villages taking part in joint prayer-services.
Fr. Michael and Elder Plato were arrested on March 3, 1931 in Chistopol,
but he was released on May 1. A few days later, he was arrested again in
Kazan, but was released after twelve days. He then went underground,
wandering round the villages and earning his bread as a cobbler. He walked
in chains, carried out joint prayer services and healed the sick and the demon-
possessed.
711
712
In October, 1946 he got to know Basil Kalinin, healing him from an illness
of the spine which had paralyzed him completely for three years. He came up
to him, took him by the hand and said:
He also healed the withered hand of John Kokarev and the leprous face of
Gregory Rusakov (the future Hieromonk Philaret), which was already
stinking. He took the whole crust from his face.
Fr. Michael passed through almost all the prisons of the Soviet Gulag:
Kazan, Arzamas, Vorkuta, Olga, Bannino, Sakhalin, Nagayeva, Magadan,
Suman, Kolyma, Khabarovsk, Blagoveshchensk, Bratsk, Taipet...
712
713
It is said that in the 1950s Fr. Michael was secretly consecrated Bishop of
Chistopol in the camps, and in this capacity took part, according to one
source, in the Nikolsky Council of the Catacomb Church in 1961 through
Monk John. However, the real existence of this Council is doubted by many.
On April 11, he was transferred to the inner prison of the KGB in Kazan for
investigation in connection with a church case. On July 18 he was indicted for
being “the leader of the anti-Soviet underground of the True Orthodox
Church in Tataria. By means of written and personal links with those who
think like him, he gave instructions on preaching the ideas of the True
Orthodox Church, called on people to refuse to participate in political
enterprises and decline from service in the Soviet Army, in collective farms, in
state institutions and undertakings. He gave instructions on preparing new
secret priests, and on acquiring houses and equipment for an illegal church.”
713
714
However, his relatives heard that he had been transferred to the Kazan
special psychiatric hospital. It seems that the secret was let out by the
procurator of the town of Kazan when he was receiving his relatives. It is
possible that the authorities wanted to hide him from the believing people
because of his great popularity - he was known as "the Tsar of Mordovia" and
people came to catch a glimpse of him through the barbed wire from all over
the Soviet Union. Fr. Michael himself prophesied that they were going to hide
him, and he ordered them not to believe the story of his death. All his
spiritual children were convinced that he had been hidden away in a
psychiatric hospital so as to be annihilated there.
714
715
715
716
sent to a camp. He married, and in 1938 a daughter Tatyana was born to him,
and in 1940 – a son Michael. In 1940 he was called up into the army and was
sent to the northern fleet. At the beginning of the war he operated a machine-
gun. In 1943 he was preparing to go over to the Germans, but then he
received a letter from his brother and understood that “I’m doing something
very stupid. If I betray the Homeland, then because of me my whole family
will perish, and I am particularly sorry for my children.” In 1943 he was
arrested in Polyarny and was accused that, “while on military service in the
period 1942-43, he systematically made anti-Soviet statements and, besides,
recruited like-minded people from the other soldier with the aim of going
over to the Germans and organizing on their side an armed struggle against
Soviet power. At the same time he aimed to hand over spy material to the
Germans and carry out diversionary and terrorist acts at the moment of
passing over to the enemy.” On January 5, 1944 he was sentenced to death,
but in March his sentence was commuted to twenty years’ hard labour. He
was sent to a camp, where he got to know Fr. Michael Yershov. On October 6,
1956 he was pardoned and released from camp, and on the instructions of Fr.
Michael went to Yelantovo in Tataria, where he established links with the
underground True Orthodox Church. In March, 1957 he went, on the
instructions of Fr. Michael, to Krasnodar district, where, on March 25, 1958 he
was arrested. He was accused of “joining the anti-Soviet underground of the
True Orthodox Church of Tikhonite orientation and taking an active part in
carrying out counter-revolutionary agitation among the population, calling
people to boycott political state enterprises and decline from socially useful
work. Also he drew new people into the underground.” On August 11-14 he
was sentenced to twenty-five years in the camps with disenfranchisement for
five years with confiscation of property. On October 5 he arrived in
Dubravlag, and on October 20, 1960 he was transferred to Temnikov camp.
On March 30, 1961 he was recognized to be “an especially dangerous
recidivist”, and in February, 1974 he was sent for twelve days to a penal
isolator “for absence from physical exercise” (at that time he was praying in
the barracks). On August 30, 1974 the head of the camp gave him a negative
report and said that he had not started on the path of correction. On March 25,
1983 he was released and returned to Yelantovo, where, on February 18, 1995,
he died.
716
717
search was conducted in his house and religious literature and letters were
removed. Nothing more is known about him.
717
718
prison”. In October he arrived in his native village, but did not live there
permanently. On March 28, 1958 he was arrested in the village of Yamashi,
Aktash region and accused of “joining the anti-Soviet underground of the
True Orthodox Church and helping the anti-Soviet activity of Rusakov, aiding
him to hold meetings and work on believers in an anti-Soviet spirit. He drew
new people into the True Orthodox Church.” On August 11-14, 1958 he was
sentenced to the camps and sent to a camp. On April 9, 1964 he was pardoned
and released. Nothing more is known about him.
718
719
719
720
December 15 was sentenced to ten years in the camps and was sent to
Taishetlag. On September 25, 1954 her sentence was reduced to five years. On
October 27 she was released from camp and returned to Yamashi, where she
joined the community of the True Orthodox, going to illegal prayer meetings
under the leadership of Hieromonk Philaret (Rusakov). Nothing more is
known about her.
720
721
721
722
722
723
elementary education. A free peasant, she was deprived of her plot of land for
refusing to sow and carry out state obligations. She joined a group of the True
Orthodox Christians and went to secret prayer meetings in houses. On May 7,
1933 she was sentenced to five years’ exile, but ran away from exile. On July 2,
1935 she was arrested “for anti-Soviet activity”, and on February 14, 1936 was
sentenced to five years in the camps and sent to a camp. There she refused to
work since she considered that “to work for Soviet power is a sin”. In the
autumn of 1940 she was released from camp and returned to Yelantovo and
joined a group of the True Orthodox Christians. In 1943, fearing repression,
she went into an illegal position. On January 13, 1948 she was arrested in a
group case of the True Orthodox, but refused to sign the protocols of the
interrogations. On February 8, 1949, in a closed session, she was sentenced to
twenty-five years in the camps with disenfranchisement for five years. On
October 17 she was taken under convoy to Sevurallag (Sosva, Sverdlovsk
province). On October 11, 1953 she was transferred to Karlag. On November
17, 1954 her sentence was reduced to ten years. On June 7, 1955 she was
released from camp. Nothing more is known about her.
723
724
724
725
725
726
The hospitable house of his parents was always open for wanderers. Fr.
Nicetas had a brother, Demetrius, who was eight years older than he, and
their father used to explain his hospitality as follows: “I have two sons. Maybe
they will have to go wandering…” That’s how it turned out, at any rate in the
case of the younger son. Fr. Nicetas said that since his parents gave refuge to
pilgrims, he himself was later hidden by kind people.
One old wanderer lived for a long time with his parents, and they buried
him… Many years later, Fr. Nicetas would be secretly buried, at great risk, by
those who gave him his last shelter.
Fr. Nicetas had a Christian upbringing; he said that he had been close to
the Church from his young years, and declined from playing games: “The
young people would go and play, but I – to the church…” From his childhood
he read and chanted on the kliros, and learned all the services; the boy also
read the Apostle, for which he stood on a bench.
Fr. Nicetas’ parents were called Illarion and Euphrosyne. They were
tortured by the Bolsheviks – starved to death. They locked them in one of the
rooms of their house and didn’t let anyone bring them food, telling everyone
that they were ill. But the neighbours knew what kind of illness they had –
they said that if they had had something to eat, they would have recovered.
Fr. Nicetas was apparently born at the beginning of the century. Thus
when the revolution came he was 16 or 17. It is not known whether his
parents were still alive at that time. He was caught by the reds with an appeal
in his hands written by a starets called Jonah. The young man was taken to be
shot, but on the way he lost consciousness and turned up in hospital, where a
doctor he knew helped him to escape. He was exiled to Turkestan for refusing
to serve in the Red Army, and it is probably there that he met two people who
were destined to be very important in his life: Archimandrite Seraphim, who
came from a monastery near Tashkent, and Nun Catherine (Ilyinichna
Golovanova).
726
727
part in secret services. In 1925, with the beginning of the massive arrests of
believers, she went into hiding and an All-Union warrant was issued for her
arrest. At the end of the 1920s she was serving as Fr. Nicetas’ reader in the
villages of Gorodische and Tabashkino, Sanchur region, Vyatka province, and
then in Kiknur region. In September, 1936 he was arrested, but escaped when
her guards were sleeping. On February 18, 1937 she was again arrested for
“anti-Soviet agitation”. On March 7 she was released and her case shelved for
lack of evidence. In 1943 she was under investigation “for anti-Soviet
activity”, but was again released because of lack of evidence. She continued
her secret service in Vyatka. In the spring of 1945 she was arrested for being
“a leader of, and participant in, the anti-Soviet church underground”, and on
October 31 was sentenced to ten years in the camps and sent to a camp.
When Fr. Nicetas’ term of exile expired, he set off for Moscow, where his
brother Demetrius was, serving as a deacon. There also was Archimandrite
Seraphim, who had come from Tashkent.
Fr. Nicetas said that during the time of his service in Moscow he twice held
the robe of the Saviour in his hands; he raised it and showed the ark in which
it was laid to the people. The robe of the Lord was in the Dormition cathedral,
so did Fr. Nicetas serve there, or did he receive the holy object during a cross
procession?
Fr. Nicetas was not registered in Moscow. His life there became more and
more intolerable; they were searching for him, and at one point he had to save
himself by jumping out of a moving tram. His position became especially
difficult after the declaration of Metropolitan Sergius in 1927.
Fr. Nicetas’ name’s day was May 24 according to the old calendar – the
feast of St. Nicetas the Stylite.
In Moscow there was a certain matushka who was nicknamed ‘dark’, that
is, blind. Once for some reason she started to abuse Fr. Nicetas:
But Fr. Nicetas, without panicking, firmly explained that he would never
serve with Metropolitan Sergius, adding:
“He goes round Moscow in a van by day, while I walk the streets by
night…”
“What’s your name? Nicetas?” asked the clairvoyant matushka (she did
not know his name).
727
728
“Nicetas.”
“The Stylite?”
“The Stylite.”
At that point matushka as it were struck Fr. Nicetas on the head with the
palm of her hand.
It was during his time in Moscow that Fr. Nicetas got to know Bishop
Maximus (Zhizhilenko), who had been consecrated to the episcopate with the
blessing of Patriarch Tikhon specially for the Catacomb Church. They even
rented a room together. Fr. Nicetas became a cleric of the church of the
Meeting in Serpukhov. He belonged to the True Orthodox Church under
Bishop Maximus’ omophorion.
As they were returning home one evening in 1929, Bishop Maximus and
Fr. Nicetas noticed a light shining in the windows of their room. This put
them on their guard. “Something’s not right: there’s a light burning in the
house, and our room is lit up…”
Fr. Nicetas went to the back door: the landlady, recognizing him, waved
him away. It turned out that a search was taking place in their room: one
policeman was rummaging in their things, while the other was dozing at the
table. Fr. Nicetas tried to take Bishop Maximus away, but he decisively
refused: “I have to go – my mitre and vestments are there!” He didn’t want to
leave his hierarchical vestments in the hands of the police, so he went to the
room and was arrested…
We don’t know whether this was the same arrest that brought Bishop
Maximus to Solovki… But we know that on Solovki Bishop Maximus met the
other Catacomb Bishops Victor of Vyatka and Nectarius of Yaransk. It was
with the blessing of Bishop Nectarius that Fr. Nicetas was to carry out his
service in Vyatka province…
This took place as follows. After the arrest of Bishop Maximus Fr. Nicetas
moved to Moscow, where he served in the Exaltation church. However, he
was being hunted, and it became impossible for him to stay any longer in
Moscow. Archimandrite Seraphim was at that time in Yoshkar-Ola; and it
was from there that Fr. Nicetas received an invitation to go to him. According
to one version, this letter contained the advice to go to Kazan on his way, and
728
729
meet Vladyka Nectarius. According to other versions, Fr. Nicetas first went to
Fr. Seraphim in Yoshkar-Ola, and from there was sent by him to Bishop
Nectarius in Kazan. “You go to Vladyka,” he said; “he’ll decide your
course…”
Fr. Nicetas recounts: “I went to Kazan, and searched for the street, and the
number of the house… I arrived – he was doing some carpentry. He was not
tall, dressed in civil clothes and a jacket. “How can I find Vladyka Nectarius
and see him?” “Right now,” he said, “you’ll see him.” He turned quickly – he
was brisk, young, he’d only just left the Academy, He went up, put on his
cassock, ryassa and klobuk, and said: “Here’s Vladyka Nectarius for you.”
Fr. Nectarius took his blessing and confessed that he felt awkward in front
of Vladyka: “I took you for a novice…” “That’s nothing – I took you for a
metropolitan…”
Speaking about his voice: after the conversation, Vladyka Nectarius took
Fr. Nicetas out of the cell to sing near the yard. When he began to sing, the
neighbours began to run up and listen…
During their conversation, Fr. Nicetas said that he had not signed the
declaration of Metropolitan Sergius and after that was subject to persecutions
in Moscow, so that it had become impossible for him to stay there.
“Archimandrite Seraphim advised me to come to you, Vladyka…”
“So go to Vyatka province,” said Vladyka. “Go to Sanchur, live there, it’s a
bit quieter…“ And Bishop Nectarius wrote a paper with approximately the
following content: “I allow Protopriest Nicetas Ignatyev to serve in all the
Orthodox churches of Yaransk diocese…” (At that time there still existed
Orthodox churches subject to Bishop Nectarius, which he ruled from Kazan.).
“Vladyka, I just went to stay with Fr. Seraphim, just for two weeks…”
Vladyka slapped him on the shoulder: “Perhaps for twenty years…”
His prophetic words were fulfilled twice over – Protopriest Nicetas spent,
not twenty, but forty years in those regions…
Having spent the night with Vladyka, in the morning Fr. Nicetas went to
Yoshkar-Ola, where a telegram, like the finger of destiny, came for him: in the
village of Gorodishche they had seized a priest… He had to obey the Bishop
and set off for the vacant place in Gorodishche, the more so in that he had
failed to resolve his destiny in any other way: Fr. Nicetas had nowhere to
return to. They used to travel by cart in those days; they found such a
729
730
transport, and just as they arrived at Gorodishche the wheel fell off, as if it
had been waiting just for that…
The villagers were overjoyed at the arrival of Fr. Nicetas; there had been an
elder Miron in those parts who had prophesied: the hill of Gorodishche will
be covered with velvet… And truly it was covered with people as if with
velvet: parishioners came to it from all sides, both on foot and on horse, so as
to delight in the services of Fr. Nicetas. During the service, they say, no one
left the church, and at the end the people did not want to disperse, as if
waiting for something… This waiting was characteristic of people who, it
seemed, had been starved of a true pastor, who did not know how to act at
this terrible crisis in Russian life. Fr. Nicetas gave everyone the advice not to
join the collective farms…
But disagreements began with the second priest, Fr. D., apparently because
of his jealousy. The wife of this priest even went to Vladyka Nectarius with
some kind of complaints against Fr. Nicetas. She came into the Bishop’s cell
without a scarf: “So.. go away,” said Vladyka. She waited and waited, and
went in again, but again without a scarf – and the hierarch again drove her
out.
At this time in the village of Tabashino they had constructed a new church,
and the local fool-for-Christ used to say as he walked near it: “A new church,
but no batyushka. There’s only one batyushka, a long way away – Fr.
Nicetas…”
Then the brother-builders went to Vladyka Nectarius and asked that Fr.
Nicetas be sent to them. The Bishop looked favourably on their request. But
even at this new place Fr. Nicetas’s life was not without sorrow.
It was about 1929, and he began to be followed. The police attacked him;
first two, then four fell on him. They tried to force him to cut his hair, but he
didn’t give in. They struck his head on the bench, and he lost consciousness.
When he came to there were blood-covered hairs all round him – he had been
shorn… They didn’t even let him gather up his hair… But they let him go.
Fr. Nicetas continued to say: “Even if you’re down to your last shirt, don’t
go into the collective farm…”
730
731
Once a GPU chief dressed in a sheepskin coat came to him for confession,
to hear what the priest was teaching the people. Fr. Nicetas told him, too, not
to go to the collective farm – the same as he told everyone at confession. But
he felt something not good in this “confessor” and noted that he did not come
up for Communion.
Two weeks later, Fr. Nicetas and Matushka Golovanova, who was his
reader at that time, went to friends for a cup of tea. When they returned,
batyushka did not go to bed. The bed in his room remained undisturbed.
Batyushka himself told the story: “I sat down and kept on sitting, fur cap in
hand, without undressing. I felt a pain in my heart – probably something was
going to happen.” There was a knock at the window. “They’re coming to take
me,” said Fr. Nicetas with conviction.
Matushka Golovanova went with a candle in her hand to see who the
uninvited guests were. The door of the cabin opened outwards, and Fr.
Nicetas stood behind the opened door in the hall. The “guests” hurled
themselves from the street into the hall and suddenly found themselves in
impenetrable darkness. “Oh, the candle’s gone out!” cried matushka. Go into
the living-room - it’s light there.” As they went into the lit up part of the
house, Fr. Nicetas left the house: he was quite ready for the arrival of the
“guests” and he even had his outdoor clothing on.
“Where is batyushka?” asked the “guests”. “He’s been called for some
need to Serkovo.”
They looked round the house. Batyushka’s bunk was undisturbed – when
they had checked they went to Serkovo.
That was how Fr. Nicetas’ parish life came to an end. After serving a
moleben in the church for the last time, Fr. Nicetas started a life of wandering.
His heart told him that he would not serve in a church again in this life. And
perhaps he shouldn’t?
Fr. Nicetas stayed sometimes for one night, sometimes for two, sometimes
for a month. Matushka Golovanova went for some time to Kiknursky region
as a reader; she had a cell there. She chanted on the kliros, and herself drew
orphans to church chanting. This was how she educated them.
It was difficult until the war, then it became still harder. During the war
there was a kind of break in Fr. Nicetas’ Vyatka life. Before the war he again
went to Moscow, where Archimandrite Seraphim and many of their
acquaintances were gathered. They had much to talk about… But it was
impossible to stay long in Moscow, and the day came when Archimandrite
Seraphim said to Fr. Nicetas: “Return to Vyatka.” “You know, I have no
731
732
It was impossible to travel in wartime without being checked; and this time
guards were walking with torches from both ends of the carriage.
“The man checking me trained his torch on me,” said Fr. Nicetas. “I had no
documents, only an icon of the Vladimir Mother of God hidden on my
breast…”
The guard looked in silence at Fr. Nicetas for some time, while Fr. Nicetas
looked at him… Those accompanying batyushka almost died from fear.
Then the second guard came up: “Well, why aren’t you checking him?”
“All done, let’s go,” replied his comrade unexpectedly.
Everybody was amazed that they hadn’t checked them. Fr. Nicetas
especially venerated the Vladimir icon of the Mother of God, and she saved
him more than once…
Were there any days in Fr. Nicetas’ wandering life when he experienced no
feeling of alarm and which he passed in peace? We don’t know of any, his
spiritual children remembered only unceasingly anxious days. It goes without
saying that the authorities were tormented with the thought that Fr. Nicetas
was hiding somewhere in the region. Already all the other well-known
catacomb priests had been arrested, including Fr. John Razgulin, otherwise
known as Lisinsky from the village of Russkaya Lisa where he was born in
about 1906-07. He had been ordained by Vladyka Nectarius in Kazan, but,
because of his lack of knowledge and preparedness, had not been given the
right to serve. Vladyka Nectarius had ordained him as it were in advance, for
the last times, in case there was no one left who could give the Christians the
Holy Gifts. It only remained to Fr. John to acquire the wisdom of priestly
service; but, on his return journey from the Bishop, arriving in one of the
villages on a feastday, when the priests went out for the litia, he, too, without
the blessing of the Bishop, appeared next to them in priestly vestments, which
greatly amazed the local inhabitants, who whispered: “Look, Ivanushka’s a
pope!” Apparently the rumours spread quickly, and a little later the
incautious Fr. John was arrested, which was the result of his disobedience to
732
733
his Bishop. Fr. John Lisinsky was about ten years in prison and died already
at the end of the 1970s, remaining a secret priest. But since he had undertaken
to serve the Divine Liturgy without the blessing of his Bishop, he apparently
did not have a big flock.
Also arrested was the notable pastor Hieromonk John (Protasov), who was
remembered with gratitude for many years and before his death in prison
succeeded in transferring his flock to Fr. Nicetas. And Fr. Nicetas remained
the only priest in the whole region – his single combat with the atheist
authorities had begun.
The police in five regions searched and searched for Fr. Nicetas, but could
not catch him. Every day he was conscious that they were after him. Only
God, Fr. Nicetas and his spiritual children know what this cost him. But this
spiritual unity of theirs was worthy more than life. “For us he was
irreplaceable,” remembered his children. “For us he was a great elder.” But
they added: “Like every man, he wanted to live…” And he said to them: “If
our Church will manage to come out into freedom, if I will be able to come
out of the house without hiding – don’t tell me immediately, I won’t be able
to bear it.”
Fr. Nicetas found a temporary refuge with one widow in the village of
Krutoi, Lisisnky region. At that time they were conducting a search
throughout the village – they were looking for deserters. Stopping at the
house of the widow, the searchers unexpectedly decided to display some
uncharacteristic mercy: “Don’t go to her, we won’t trouble the old woman…”
But if they had found the priest in her house, they would certainly have
“troubled” her. All ages were suitable for prison, and there quite enough old
people in the Soviet prisons – apparently old women presented a special
threat for Soviet power… This was just one day out of thousands which
brought this kind of alarm.
Another day, in another place, they were also searching for deserters. But
when they failed to find them they decided to change from hunting men to
hunting thrushes. There were shots, whose cause Fr. Nicetas did not know, he
only heard them beginning to beat on their gates and shout: “Here!” How
was batyushka to know that a shot thrush had fallen into their yard, and the
hunters of me just wanted to take the bird to show what good shots they
were…
Batyushka had an attack of nerves and was too frightened to remain there.
So when a neighbour with children who lived about ten houses away came
into the house, he took hold of her like a little child and said: “Take me to
your house!” She took him to her shed, where they made a hole out of straw
and put Fr. Nicetas there. He lay there for three months without straightening
up; he just cut out a little chink with his knife to see the light, and prayed. The
733
734
mistress of the house did not always bring him food; if she didn’t bring him
bread, batyushka would remain hungry. After these three months he could
hardly stand on his feet, he continually fell and could hardly comb his hair…
It was difficult to find a refuge for batyushka. Some feared to have him in
their house, others were in a dangerous situation for one reason or another.
On the house-owners there lay a particularly heavy burden of responsibility,
and during the secret services, which took place, of course, at night, they
usually didn’t so much pray, as watched. There were false alarms – but, alas,
not always false. The secret had to be kept so strictly that, for example, if two
people came to batyushka they were not allowed to talk to each other about it.
But when they arrived in their destination, the village of Sobolyak, another
difficulty awaited them. It turned out that the woman had invited Fr. Nicetas
only in order to serve some kind of need, and not at all in order to give him a
place to stay. Those accompanying batyushka, his devoted spiritual children,
were so filled with sorrow at the prospect of leaving him that they couldn’t
restrain their tears. “What are you crying for?” said the mistress of the house.
“Take your batyushka back with you!” She was frightened of taking him.
Now it was time to weep for batyushka, whose legs were covered in blood
after the long and dangerous journey. He was too weak to return, and
besides, returning was very risky. The woman’s heart softened when Fr.
Nicetas foretold the return of her husband, from whom she had had no news
for a long time: “Write down the date and the time, and make ready a parcel
for the prison – your husband will be alive.” And indeed, after some time she
received a letter from her husband, and he himself soon appeared with a
wounded arm.
734
735
Nicetas was standing behind the door holding the hook… Alas there were
few in whose hearts were preserved the words: “I will not give the Mystery to
Thine enemy…” There were far more who would give away the mystery than
keep it; they would either make a denunciation or let the cat out of the bag.
This woman suffered because of that.
One nun of the Catacomb Church, remembering that time, says: “Can a
man living in freedom stand what a hunted man experiences…?” It is hard for
us to understand now how real and terrible that threat was. 40 people
suffered for Fr. Nicetas at one time (according to another source – 30 at first,
and 10 later). Batyushka went from place to place, they couldn’t catch him, so
they began to arrest his spiritual children. One woman was arrested just for
giving him some cream. It seems that in her simplicity she didn’t think of
hiding that from the persecutors. They tortured those whom they arrested,
beat them, demanding the addresses where batyushka was hiding.
They tortured them so much that some of them couldn’t stand it and
revealed the addresses where they could find Fr. Nicetas; but it seems that the
pursuers had so despaired of catching Fr. Nicetas that they didn’t believe
them even when they told them the truth.
735
736
At the trial one woman in her simplicity said: “If you let me go, I’ll go to Fr.
Nicetas again the same day.” Not believing her, they said: “We’ve been
looking for him for so many years without finding him, and you’ll find where
he is in one day?!”
While Fr. Nicetas’ spiritual children were going to suffer, he himself had
another thirty years of suffering and wanderings ahead of him. And he was
surrounded by the sufferings of the people; the war tormented Russia, their
own Russian people tormented the Russian people. So often they would go
up to door, enter as if they were the masters, say to the servants of God:
“Time’s up!” and take them away, together with their last possessions…
And it was amazing that what the majority of the Russian adults had
forgotten how to do – keep secret, the children in these families where Fr.
Nicetas was concealed were able to do.
Later, when they were grown up and had preserved this great secret of
love and faithfulness in their hearts, they remembered how Fr. Nicetas had
brought them up – he taught them about the life to come. He said to the
children: “If I didn’t believe in the future life, I wouldn’t be hiding, but would
go out onto the street and walk, or go by car… This temporary life passes, and
however long you live you’ll have to answer at the Terrible Judgement. These
are only temporary sufferings. Let us endure. Prepare yourselves – perhaps
you’ll have to suffer.
Fr. Nicetas loved to joke, especially with children. He loved to read verses;
the kids would come in and batyushka would meet them:
736
737
There were verses on more serious themes, about Lenin and Stalin:
And so Fr. Nicetas went from house to house in that most terrible time. He
lived in one family where he served in a hut which the neighbours passed on
their way to get water. The service was going on while behind the wall the
neighbour’s bucket was tinkling as he went towards the well. The owners just
couldn’t understand how they hadn’t been caught. Batyushka did think of
settling with an old woman from his parishioners. But the enemy was
everywhere; her sister was caught and sentenced to ten years for refusing to
vote. He had to leave again…
It is known that Fr. Nicetas did not allow people to enter the collective
farms or to vote. One could say: did he not demand too much from his
spiritual children, if they were threatened with prison for that? In our
lukewarm time we have different ideas, and it’s not done to remember the
example of St. Sophia, who blessed her three children to torments for Christ.
That was the position of Fr. Nicetas and other catacomb priests. It looks
strange when compared with the mass of Soviet clergy, who from the ambon
blessed their children to go and vote, so as to give their voices for the
communists, for “the ideal man” – Stalin, who blessed their flocks to lie and
be hypocritical without limit, and to carry out all the demands of the
antichristian authorities… They will say: Fr. Nicetas and those like him were
strict! But did they really love their flock more, did they really care for it more
when they blessed the Russian people to deliver themselves into the most
fearful slavery that has ever been seen on earth?
And one of the forms of this unheard of slavery was the collective farm.
737
738
One of Fr. Nicetas’ parishioners left the collective farm. They arrested her
and began to ask her about everything: why she didn’t go to the elections,
why she didn’t go to the church.
They gave her eight years, although she had four children. The person who
took her away from her children received half a pound of oil. But the workers
on the collective farm worked without being paid. The milk went to the milk
factory, and the oil – to the executioners and above – to their bosses and the
bosses of bosses… It was real slavery; which was why they persecuted those
who did not want to enter slavery so cruelly And in spite of the fact that those
on their own were threatened with prison, the collective farm-workers envied
them and said: you live like tsars… Although there was not much to envy:
they didn’t let the cow of the private worker into the field, he had to pay 200
working days for the right of keeping a goat. It came to the point that in one
village the president even said to one person who did not want to enter the
collective farm: your land is not yours – it belongs to the collective farm; don’t
you dare to cross the threshold! If the old house was destroyed, they didn’t
allow them to build a new one or even repair the old one. They had to lay new
foundations or replace rotten blinds secretly, at night. Once Fr. Nicetas’
parishioners nevertheless succeeded in building a new house, and they had to
roll it onto the site of the old one – as if it had always been there.
They will say: Fr. Nicetas was too strict, insisting that his spiritual children
did not enter the collective farms and kept their individual holdings. Yes, on
the background of the general mindless obedience the refusal to enter the
collective farm was a podvig which involved the bearing of sorrows,
sometimes up to prison and death. But did not those who blessed the Russian
people to obey the antichristian authorities condemn them to worse sufferings
even here on earth, not to speak of eternal life? And what if all the batyushkas
– or at any rate the majority of them – had acted as Fr. Nicetas did? It would
probably have been harder to drive the Russian people into this yoke: after
all, the people were waiting for the decisive word of the Church.
Nevertheless, there were many Russian people who put up a firm spiritual
resistance to the violence of the satanists. Of course, these spiritually strong
people were able to find for themselves true pastors, but, on the other hand,
you could equally say that it was precisely these true pastors who nurtured
and educated such a strong flock.
Only gradually did the renovationist clergy re-educate the Russian people,
training them all to think that for the sake of the preservation of life one could
surrender one’s faith – and as a result the people lost both faith and life… “He
who wishes to save his life will lose it; while he who loses his life for My sake
and the Gospel’s will save it” (Mark 8. 35).
738
739
“Don’t give the impression that you are friendly with me…”
“What happened?”
Then she said that for three days and nights they had not let her eat or
drink or sleep, and every night they interrogated her. They asked her: why
don’t you join the collective farm, why don’t you marry, why don’t you go to
church? This concern that citizens should visit the sergianist church was very
characteristic of Soviet power. And do you know such-and-such? they
continued to interrogate her. When she replied: “no” or “I don’t know” to all
the questions, they threatened her that they wouldn’t let her out until she had
signed that she would point the finger at such-and-such and such-and-such.
The young victim, who was in her nineteenth year, couldn’t hold out and
signed, and now she was frightened of speaking with her friend.
Unable to endure such a life, the girl got a passport and went to her aunt,
where she joined a sewing factory. After some time her mother went to see
her daughter. But on the first evening a policemen appeared to check her
documents.
739
740
Pity did not prevent this state criminal from being incarcerated in Perm.
During the interrogations they kept asking her:
“So you’re Orthodox… No, tell us what faith you adhere to.”
The poor woman couldn’t make out what they were wanted from her and
finally she blurted out:
They gathered from her that she belonged to the Tikhonite tendency. They
gave her ten years. Such charges as: belonging to the True Orthodox Church
of the Tikhonite orientation still produced long sentences. In 1958 a nun of the
Catacomb Church was condemned on such a charge, and there were many
like her.
At the same time that they were condemning the mother of the girl to ten
years, they also took her acquaintance. The investigator began to ask:
“But she went to your place and received communion in your place,”
suddenly said the woman.
The investigator laughed. Some time ago he had gone to a village, claiming
that he was a secret priest and, what is more, the son of the Tsar, Alexis
Nikolayevich, who had supposedly been saved and received priestly
ordination. When some trusting visitors decided to fast in preparation for
communion, the mistress of the house said:
“You sleep here, and batyushka over there in that room. Don’t disturb him,
he’ll be sleeping the whole night… The women couldn’t stand it, after a time
they looked through a crack in the half-open door – they very much wanted
to see how the holy batyushka was praying, and to be joined to his prayerful
spirit… But “batyushka” wasn’t at all thinking of praying, he was in deep
sleep, spread-eagled over the whole width of the bed.
740
741
“Let’s not receive communion from him, something’s not right here…”
decided the women.
The “batyushka’s” purpose was to find out who went to the secret Church.
For this, as we can see, he didn’t shun any means.
In the house where Fr. Nicetas was living the mistress’ son had returned
from the army; the boys and girls were walking together; the mother
suddenly saw that her son was being taken by two unknown men into the rye
field. She was frightened, her heart missed a beat. Not far away she noticed a
van. It turned out that the bosses had come and were trying to persuade her
son:
“You’ve served in the army – now you’re a Soviet person. Now they’ve
released the 58-ers, watch your mother, she’s an elderly person – see whether
a man with a knapsack comes to her…”
The young man told all this to batyushka. He advised him: when they
come the next time, ask them how much they will give you for this. When the
son did this, they replied:
The young man couldn’t stand it: “No, I won’t accept the lot of Judas!”
They left him… But it was already impossible for Fr. Nicetas to stay in the
house, which was being watched by the police.
And so once again Fr. Nicetas was living in a shack, sometimes in a store-
room. Or they would section off a small room…
Once at Pascha Fr. Nicetas was serving in a narrow little store-room, half of
which was curtained off. During the Paschal service the priest has to change
his vestments, and Fr. Nicetas couldn’t do this without an assistant. He
remembered a service in a big Moscow church where the choir alone
numbered 70 chanters, - all the circumstances of his long and much-suffering
life appeared in a flash before his mental gaze, - and Batyushka fell onto the
altar and wept – as an eye-witness remembers – like a child… But Batyushka
was immediately consoled, for the Saviour appeared to him at that moment
and strengthened him. He ordered that this incident should not be related to
others until after his death…
741
742
One night the neighbour’s house was on fire. The people gathered to look,
as in a bazaar. Batyushka’s frightened spiritual children ran up and asked the
mistress of the house where batyushka was. She didn’t know. It turned out
that batushka was in a shack, not knowing how he could get out when the
people were all around. The neighbouring shack was already on fire, the
sparks were flying; it was only 200 or 300 metres to the wood. Batyushka gave
his devoted parishioner the church utensils; they finally plucked up courage
to leave. Some thought that they were leading out an old man, others – that it
was Fr. John Lysinsky.
It was winter; they buried the suitcase in the woods in the snow; they
wanted to go on skis, but batyushka couldn’t. The parishioner’s family went
home from the fire and began to call out to them in the woods: they thought
that he had been captured. Fr. Nicetas said:
“Go to the neighbouring village, tell them that I wasn’t in the fire, I was
with auntie…”
“What do you mean: you weren’t in the fire, your whole back is burnt…”
Later there were many rumours about that fire. The women gathered
together in a huddle and put the question straight:
Yes, the 58-ers were released, in the big cities a “thaw” took place, a new
generation of Soviet people grew up, a far more carefree generation that the
previous one, and it seemed that those who were still alive from the older
generation could begin to live more freely. And only for Fr. Nicetas and his
faithful children did not consolation come. Many people began to come to
him, once nine people at once – such meetings could not remain unnoticed.
Fear for batyushka began to grow in the hearts of his children; Matushka
Golovanova, who had already been released for some years now, was also
worried. She wrote to batushka that it was time for him to change his flat, and
he began to prepare to leave. But the owners of the house were very much
against his moving, and detained him almost by force. Perhaps they liked
having such a remarkable person with them; besides, he received many
parcels.
At the feast of the Annunciation there was a service, and on the next day
(fortunately, not on the feast itself, when many people came), the president,
the accountant and the party committee arrived. They noticed a lamp and a
742
743
man’s hand pulling the curtain to in the uninhabited part of the house where
Fr. Nicetas lived. And in the inhabited part they came upon a woman they
didn’t know, one of Fr. Nicetas’ parishioners, who said she was a seamstress.
Without wasting time to work out who she was, they began to break down
the door – it was sealed from the house, and the entrance was from the
courtyard.
Fr. Nicetas was hiding in the basement, in such a shallow space that he
could only lie down in it. The accountant looked into the basement and saw a
grey-haired old man lying there. And again, as in the train, an icon of the
Vladimir Mother of God was on Fr. Nicetas’ breast…
The clerk slammed the hatch down and said: “Nobody there!”
Many years later, he explained his action thus: “I didn’t want him to..” –
and here he added a strong expression – “on my grave…”
The visitors took two or three suitcases with ryasas, some lengths of good
material, a Gospel in a golden setting, an altar cross with some precious
adornments and some crosses to be worn on the breast. Although the police
were informed, the investigation proceeded slowly. Perhaps they shared that
which they had plundered amongst themselves, for only a part – and not the
most valuable part – was displayed in the village soviet, as if in a museum.
Some foreign balsam was displayed for all to see, but the altar cross, for
example, had disappeared…
Now, of course, Fr. Nicetas’ landlords who had so insistently detained him
earlier, immediately asked him to leave. By this time batyushka was old and
sick and moved with difficulty, and he had nowhere to go – everyone feared
to take him in. He spent some days in an uninhabited house, then with an old
woman, until that same parishioner who had led him out of the fire found
him. They had to go many kilometres, but batyushka was exhausted and
could go only three houses away. After asking the old woman to shelter him
for a little longer, the parishioner went off in search of help. This time six
people came – four men and two women. They were ready to carry batyushka
and had made a stretcher. When batyushka came out to them and saw the
stretcher he said:
They explained that they were going to carry him, but he refused outright.
They set off on foot; one went in front as a scout while the others supported
batyushka on both sides. This was after the Annunciation, at the wettest and
muddiest time of the spring thaw. And they went at night because they feared
to go during the day.
743
744
Batyushka’s legs just wouldn’t carry him, and they managed to go only
about two kilometres before stopping in an uninhabited village. While
batyushka was resting on some straw in the bath-house, the others tried to
construct a raft made out of logs from another bathhouse. But batyushka also
refused this method of transport. So they had to walk…
When they finally got to the first big settlement, from where they hoped to
take batyushka out in a car, it turned out that the place was full of police –
apparently they had begun to look for batyushka. Fortunately, the wind had
broken the wires supplying electricity, and under cover of the darkness into
which the village had been plunged they were able to take batyushka down
the streets. But where to go – that was the big question. And once again Fr.
Nicetas had to take shelter in a shack. Only the mistress of the house knew
about this, the rest of the family, which included one of the bosses, suspected
nothing. They made a nest for Fr. Nicetas in the straw of the shack, where the
tormented sick man had to spend a week until his children could find a car
with a reliable driver.
Finally, Fr. Nicetas was taken to where he spent the remainder of his life
until his death in 1974. Surrounded by care and love, he could rest a bit… But
his illness became worse. He tried to hide his increasing sufferings, because
he knew that his death and burial would impose a heavy burden on those
giving him shelter. How and where were they to bury a man whom,
according to Soviet power, was not supposed to exist?
When Matushka Catherine Golovanova was put in the camps, she got to
know a woman called Daria Pavlovna, and through her she got to know
about Archbishop Anthony. Daria Pavlovna was serving an eight-year
sentence and had been arrested at the same time as Archbishop Anthony,
with whom she had prayed in the same house. Their places of imprisonment
were not far from each other, so somehow they were able to correspond,
744
745
putting little notes in holes or under logs. And Vladyka greatly consoled and
strengthened Daria Pavlovna with these notes.
When Matushka Golovanova returned from the camps, she of course told
Fr. Nicetas about the remarkable Catacomb hierarch. Her information was
confirmed by the Catacomb batyushka Fr. Athanasius, who had returned
from exile. He had served three sentences of eight years, five years and three
years. He had been ordained to the diaconate by Archbishop Nectarius before
the declaration of 1927; and since he had refused to sign the declaration he
had been immediately arrested. On being released, he went to Vladyka
Anthony in Armavir and received ordination to the priesthood from him.
Since the authorities knew about him, he did not have to hide as much as Fr.
Nicetas did, and batyushka sometimes went to Fr. Athanasius for help. Once
a sick girl had to be united to the Church. She couldn’t be taken to Fr. Nicetas,
nor could batyushka, who was also sick, go to her. So he ordered that Fr.
Athanasius be invited. Fr. Athanasius was able to go long distances around –
for example, to Kozmodemyansk. So whoever could not go to Fr. Nicetas
went to him.
Another of the priests under Archbishop Anthony was Fr. Gurias, a good-
looking, dark-haired priest who had served ten years in the camps. He had a
family and lived after the camps in Kozmodemyansk. He was ordained by
Archbishop Anthony. He lived openly, was very firm in his faith, but was
condescending to those who had fallen. He once received the secretary of the
village soviet with his wife, saying:
Once, on entering a small town, and seeing that a house was full of people,
he began the all-night vigil with a sermon:
Then he explained, citing passages from the Old and New Testaments.
According to the witness of those who knew him, at the end of his life, in
the middle of the 1980s, he was killed in a hospital, where he was given a
treatment from which he died. Matushka Golovanova greatly valued and
loved him.
745
746
leave her monastery destroyed by the Bolsheviks and went round the village
churches as a chanter – she was an excellent choir leader. Her bishop (this was
before the Church descended into the catacombs) blessed her to give sermons.
According to the witness of those who knew her, she understood even the
most complex church questions, and even, so they say, was able to reply to
questions on any church theme. She herself said of herself that she ate more
books than bread. She was Fr. Nicetas’ support during his suffering life; he
respected her and listened to her opinions. Learning about Vladyka Anthony
in the camps, she later went to him, was tonsured into the mantia by him with
the name Antonia, and thus became, not Matushka Catherine or Aunt Katya,
but Matushka Antonia. Vladyka Anthony himself said about her: “She is like
a pillar with you stretching from earth to heaven.”
When the six had to accompany Fr. Nicetas from the dangerous place
during the spring floods, one of them set off by train to Matushka Antonia to
tell her about the catastrophe. When she got on the train she was so nervous
that she shook; but tiredness took its tool and she dozed off. At this point it
seemed to her that someone was bending over her and whispering that
everything was alright with batyushka. When Matushka Antonia heard what
condition Fr. Nicetas was in she was at first very worried, but on hearing
about the incident on the train she calmed down and calmed her visitor. And
truly, although they had to undergo many labours and suffer many sorrows,
everything ended well.
Matushka Antonia died on August 17/30, 1979, already after the death of
Fr. Nicetas.
One who also received the monastic tonsure from Vladyka Anthony was
Matushka S. With the blessing of Fr. Nicetas, she was appointed to carry the
Holy Gifts. She carried out this very responsible duty for 28 years. She always
carried the Holy Gifts in a dry form.
Once someone they summoned the old woman: “She hasn’t communed for 30
years and is approaching death.” The old woman wept from joy. On the return
journey she had to run and almost missed the bus, there were absolutely no
roads. But it seemed to Matushka S. that she was travelling on a flat road because
the old woman was praying for her. On other occasions they led her to some
villages where the old women had also not communed for 30 years. And here
also after receiving communion they did not live long – it was evidently God’s
will; they received communion, and God took them. Matushka S. read a Lament
over sins (the blessing of the community of the Three Hierarchs on Mount Athos)
to them, and they sent their confession with her in envelopes. Once she was sent
by Fr. Nicetas 30 kilometres to a certain village and then some more kilometres
on foot by a big circuitous route.
746
747
Fr. V. was a spiritual son of Fr. Nicetas. He distributed the Holy Gifts while
still a reader. Once he came to Fr. Nicetas, who told him that he was now
under the omophorion of Vladyka Anthony. Later, with the blessing of Fr.
Nicetas, he was ordained to the priesthood by Vladyka Anthony. A few years
later, Fr. V. had to receive Fr. Nicetas’ flock.
The last days of Fr. Nicetas, besides his fears for his spiritual children, were
darkened by another sorrow.
The sick man, who could not leave his refuge, was also unable to see
Vladyka Anthony, and he gave his confession to Vladyka only through Fr. V.
Vladyka awarded him with the mitre and showered him with prosphoras;
and when he heard that Fr. Nicetas could not come to him he intended to visit
him himself in order to tonsure him and raise him to the rank of
archimandrite.
The date of Vladyka’s arrival was already decided on; everything had been
collected for the journey, his vestments had been packed and a telegram had
been sent to say that guests were expected. (Of course, it was impossible to
announce his arrival directly; it had to be done in an allegorical form.)
However, this telegram was interpreted incorrectly by the women who
received it. They were frightened at the prospect of the arrival of unknown
guests and, without saying a word to Fr. Nicetas, immediately sent a telegram
telling them not to come. When Fr. Nicetas heard about this it was already too
late, and a fitting moment for the journey did not present itself again. So the
two men never met.
Fr. Nicetas served his last service, a moleben and akathist to the Mother of
God, on the feast of the 40 martyrs, March 9/22. He decided to take refuge in
his sorrow to the Mother of God, who had always helped him out of all
difficult circumstances.
“Let us ask the Mother of God what path she indicates for us. I as a man
can go wrong. She has preserved me throughout my life,” said Fr. Nicetas.
747
748
They placed the lots behind an icon of the Vladimir Mother of God, one for
the priests under Vladyka Anthony’s omophorion, and the other for those
who did not recognise him. Then they took one out after prayer – it indicated
the priests of Vladyka Anthony.
The next day it became clear that Fr. Nicetas’ end was near. They
summoned Fr. Valentine, the future Archbishop Anthony of Yaransk. He was
at that time on quite a long journey confessing and communing the faithful;
but, although he had not completed all that he had to do, he suddenly felt that
he had to return home immediately. There they were waiting for him with the
news that batyushka was dying…
When Fr. Valentine arrived him, batyushka told him to accept his flock,
many of whom were present there. The priests managed to talk about the
most important thing, then Fr. Nicetas did confession and received
communion. He sat down, embracing Fr. Valentine, and leaning closer and
closer to him. They put him to bed and he seemed to doze off… After a time
they noticed that he was departing, and Fr. Valentine began to read the
prayers for the departing of the soul. He died very quietly. This took place on
March 12/25, 1974.
They had to bury Fr. Nicetas… They dismantled the floor in one of the
rooms in which Fr. Nicetas died and hastily dug out a grave for him under
the floor. His parishioners came from the backwoods to say goodbye to their
batyushka. There were so many of them that the neighbours were begin to
notice something. They had to hurry. They made a coffin for batyushka and to
the whispered chant, “With the souls of the righteous who have fallen
asleep…”, they lowered him into the grave. Of course, the mistress of the
house was especially worried, but they calmed her, saying: “Have no fear, the
Lord preserved him for 40 years, he’ll preserve him now.”
There was no reason to fear. The burial was carried out without
interruption and the house was put back in order. At night the mistress of the
house clearly heard angelic chanting in the place under the floor when Fr.
Nicetas was buried…
For nine months Fr. Nicetas remained under the floor. Then Fr. Valentine
ordered that his body be taken to the cemetery, which was done late in the
autumn.
748