Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

NPC v. The Provincial Treasurer of Benguet

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION v. THE PROVINCIAL TREASURER OF BENGUET, et al.

G. R. NO. 209303, 14 November 2016, THIRD DIVISION (Peralta, J.)

DOCTRINE OF THE CASE

“If the property being taxed has not been dropped from the assessment roll, taxes must be paid
under protest if the exemption from taxation is insisted upon.”

FACTS:
National Power Corporation (NPC) is a government-owned and controlled corporation created
to undertake the development of power generation and production from hydroelectric or other
sources, and may undertake the construction, operation and maintenance of power plants,
dams, reservoirs, and other works. It operates and maintains the Binga Hydro-Electric Power
Plant. Respondents Provincial Treasurer, Provincial Assessor, Municipal Treasurer and
Municipal Assessor of Itogon are representatives of the province of Benguet, a local
government unit. Respondent issued the subject assessment in their official capacities.

Municipal Assessor of Benguet assessed the NPC the amount of ₱62,645,668.80 real property
tax. NPC challenged before the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) the legality of the
assessment and the authority of the respondents to assess and collect real property taxes from
it when its properties are exempt pursuant to Section 234 (b) and (c) of Local Government
Code. Respondents alleged that NPC’s properties were not exempt from tax since the
properties were classified in their tax declarations as “industrial,” “for industrial use,” or
“machineries” and “equipment.” There was no evidence that the properties were being used
for generation and transmission of electric power. LBAA deferred the proceedings upon NPC’s
payment under protest of the assessed amount, or upon filing of a surety bond to cover the
disputed amount of tax. NPC filed a petition for review before the Central Board of Assessment
Appeals (CBAA) claiming that payment under protest was not required before it could challenge
the authority of respondents to assess tax on tax exempt properties before the LBAA. CBAA
dismissed the appeal for being filed out of time. The CBAA, in an Order denied the NPC’s
motion for reconsideration. It ruled that it is incumbent upon the NPC to pay under protest
before the LBAA could entertain its appeal as provided under LGC. NPC appealed to CTA En
Banc by filing a Petition for Review. The CTA En Banc denied the same for lack of merit.

ISSUE:
WON NPC need to pay the assessed amount under protest in claiming for an exception from
the payment of real property tax.

RULING
Yes. Settled is the rule that should the taxpayer/real property owner question the excessiveness
or reasonableness of the assessment, LGC directs that the taxpayer should first pay the tax due
before his protest can be entertained. A claim for exemption from the payment of real property
taxes does not actually question the assessor’s authority to assess and collect such taxes, but
pertains to the reasonableness or correctness of the assessment by the local assessor. Every
person who shall claim exemption from payment of real property taxes imposed upon said
property shall file with the provincial, city or municipal assessor sufficient documentary
evidence in support for such claim. The burden of proving is upon whom the subject real
property is declared. If the property being taxed has not been dropped from the assessment
roll, taxes must be paid under protest if the exemption from taxation is insisted upon. NPC’s
failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of payment under protest in accordance
with Section 252 of the LGC was fatal to its appeal.

You might also like