Cheris Kramarae Essay
Cheris Kramarae Essay
Cheris Kramarae Essay
Have you ever wondered why in Charles Shultz’s cartoon, Peanuts, you can never
understand what Charley Brown’s teacher is saying? It is always the sound of someone trying to
talk through a drive through speaker box, followed by a reply of “Yes ma’am” from Charley.
Perhaps Mr. Shultz wanted to cutback on the budge and not pay an extra woman actor for such a
minor role, or it could be determined that women in society have trouble communicating and are
The Muted Group Theory was originally thought of by Edwin Aredner, a social
anthropologist from Oxford University (Meyer, 2001, ¶ 3). Language works in a kind of
hierarchal system controlled by men. This creates an uncomfortable world for females. It makes
women seem silenced (Littlejohn, 1999). In a book written by Stephan Littlejohn, it said,
“Ardener concluded that our language favors men. Since men created the meanings of the words,
women are said to be muted” (1999). That is how we get the term “muted group”. Since the
original creation of the Muted Group Theory, a lot of scholars have expanded on it, but the
“Cheris Kramarae is one of the most prolific scholars in the communication field”
(Littlejohn, 1999). In 1972, she enrolled at the University of Illinois, Urbana. Here is where she
started her research in speech communications on feminist studies with a focus on gender and
language (Kalin, 2003 ¶ 1). Kramarae is very interested in language and gender. She writes on a
wide range of gender issues such as: technology, education, and women’s studies. She is also
interested in the hierarchical order of language, how language favors men, and the crippling
effect it has on the ways women communicate (Kalin, 2003, ¶ 2). Kramamarae has written in
Haines 3
several magazines and scholarly journals, but she has written more books than anything else, and
In an article written by Scott Chadwick called Muted Group Theory: Summary he says.
Muted Group Theory begins with the premise that language is culture
bound, and because men have more power than women, men have more
influence over the language, resulting in language with a male-bias. Men
create the words and meaning for the culture, allowing expression of their
ideas. Women, on the other hand, are left out of this meaning creation and
left without a means to express that which is unique to them. That leaves
women as a muted group (2003, ¶ 2).
Because women are the muted group, they have to find other ways to communicate. They
communicate though diaries, journals, letters, folklore, gossip, art, graffiti, poems, songs,
and many other ways (Meyer, 2001, ¶ 7). Another effect of women being muted is that
women have to take what they are going to say and convert it to male terms (Littlejohn,
1999). When male and female meaning of words conflict, the masculine meaning usually
wins, because it is more dominate in society, and again, the woman is muted (Littlejohn,
1999). The Muted Group Theory also explains some of the problems that husbands and
wives have when they try to talk to one another. Women are accustomed to using back
channels when they communicate, but men, because they developed our language, are
more straightforward with what they say, and have a hard time comprehending what the
wife is trying to say (Kramarae, 1981). The Muted Group Theory also states that these
problems are cultural based, not biologically, and can be fixed if men forfeit the power
Cheris Kramarae Muted Group Theory is based on 3 assumptions. First, men and
women look at the world differently, and because they look at the world differently, they
do different jobs in society. Second, men are politically dominate and suppress women’s
ideas and meaning though public support. Finally, women must translate their meanings,
Haines 4
their thoughts, and their feelings into man’s terms in order to communicate (Chadwick,
2003, ¶ 3).
Cheris also has several hypotheses about women’s communication. First, women have a
harder time expressing themselves compared to men. Second, women can understand men better
than men can understand women because women have to learn the male system of
communication. Third, women use other channels not accepted by men to communicate. Fourth,
women are not as content with communication. Women do not coin new words, although women
do create words just so they can express the feelings and situations special to them (Chadwick,
2003 ¶ 4). Also, women have to use more nonverbal expressions than men, in order to express
feelings not defined in male language (Littlejohn, 1999). Finally, women have a different sense
The Muted Group Theory is important in society because it brings into focus the issue of
women in society being suppressed in their attempt to communicate. It also is important because
it deals with power and how it is used against women (Chadwick, 2003 ¶ 1). Muted Group
Theory also says that we need to study the different ways that females and males use nonverbal
language when they speak to help us understand the language difference between them
(Kramarae, 1981). It also states that women have had to toil through a communication systems
created by men so they are more apt to have a better understanding of a man’s worldviews
(Kramarae, 1981). Again, it explains why men have a harder time understanding women than
Cheris Kramarae has worked to bridge the gap between men and women’s
communication “She wants to see a world that makes connections rather than separation, and a
world that respects rather than rejects differences” (Littlejohn, 1999). To achieve this goal,
Haines 5
Cheris says first women must better understand faint signs of “linguistic domination”. We must
also study women’s communication, and find another form to communicate, and use it
(Littlejohn, 1999). Cheris, along with Paula Treichler and Ann Russo, have written a dictionary
just for women called Feminist Dictionary. It has entries in it such as foremother, meaning
ancestor and birth name, instead of maiden name (Littlejohn 1999). This dictionary helps in
There are a few weak points in the Muted Group Theory. It states that women would
have a harder time expressing themselves than men however research says the opposite
(Kramarae, 1981). In addition men are sometimes classified as the “muted group” as well.
Kramarae wrote in her book Women and Men Speaking that “Men are less likely to talk about
their feelings, troubles, and pain. This makes them the muted group” (1981). Also, as children,
males are likely to meet aggression with violence, while women will more often talk it out
(Kramarae, 1981). “Kramarae's balanced look at the tenets of Muted Group Theory indicates
areas of potential weakness. Evidence advanced by Ardener in his support of the theory, seems
Allot has changed since Cheris Kramarae expanded on the Muted Group Theory, and
even more has changed since Edwin Aredner first introduced it. In today’s society, women are
doing more, and are equal to men. Women are also speaking more, even if it is in a system of
communication created by males, or in the case of Charley Brown’s teacher though a drive
Reference
Chadwick, S. (2003, June). “Muted Group Theory: Summary”. Retrieved September 24, 2003,
From Iowa State University Communication Department site
http://chadwick.jlmc.iastate.edu/theory/mutedgrp.html.
Kalin, R. (2000, November) Biography: Cheris Kramarae. Retrieved September 12, 2003, from
From California State UniversityCommunication Department.site: http://hyper.vcsun.org
/HyperNews/battias/get /cs600/bio/12.html?nogifs.
Meyer, C. (2001, November). Muted Group Theory. Retrieved September 24, 2003, From Dana
College Communication Department site: http://www.dana.edu/lschreib/students/
Theory%20Papers/meyer.doc.
Wall ,C. and Gannon-Leary, P. (1999). A Sentence Made by Men: Muted Group Theory
Revisited. The European Journal of Women’s Studies. Vol. 6,. Retrieved September
24, 2003, From: http://www.academicarmageddon.co.uk/library/EJWS.htm.