DIFFERENT KINDS OF OBLIGATIONS

SECTION 1 3
Bearis, Justine Ace D. BSEE 4

Pure and Conditional Obligations

Art. 1179. Every obligation whose performance does not depend upon a future or uncertain event, or upon a past event unknown to the parties, is demandable at once. Every obligation which contains a resolutory condition shall also be demandable, without prejudice to the effects of the happening of the event.

CONCEPT
Pure obligation one without a term nor is it subject to a condition and is easily demandable. Conditional Obligation subject to a condition one which is

CONDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Concept of Condition It is an uncertain event which wields an influence on a legal relation Kinds of Conditions 1. Suspensive one which suspends the effectivity of the obligation until the condition is fulfilled. It is the fulfillment of the condition that produces the efficacy of the obligation. If the condition is not fulfilled, the obligation is not demandable.

CONDITIONAL OBLIGATIONS
2. Resolutory one which extinguishes the obligation upon hearing the happening of the condition. The condition is immediately demandable. However, if the condition is fulfilled, the obligation is extinguished and the parties required to restore or return to each other what they have received.

Art. 1180. When the debtor binds himself to pay when his means permit him to do so, the obligation shall be deemed to be one with a period, subject to the provisions of Article 1197.

When obligation is demandable

When the debtor binds himself to pay when his means permit him to do so, the obligation is one with a period. Hence, immediate performance cannot be enforced. But since the period for its performance is indeterminate, before the creditor can enforce it, an action should be filed in court to fix a period for the payment of the obligation (Art. 1197). Before a period is fixed to the court, the obligation cannot be enforced.

Art. 1181. In conditional obligations, the acquisition of rights, as well as the extinguishment or loss of those already acquired, shall depend upon the happening of the event which constitutes the condition. Art. 1182. When the fulfillment of the condition depends upon the sole will of the debtor, the conditional obligation shall be void. If it depends upon chance or upon the will of a third person, the obligation shall take effect in conformity with the provisions of this Code.

Kinds of Conditions
a) Potestative one which depends upon the sole will of the contracting parties. b) Casual one which depends exclusively upon chance. c) Mixed one which depends upon the will of one of the contracting parties and partly upon chance or the will of the third person.

Potestative Condition
1) Potestative on the part of the creditor 2) Potestative on the part of the debtor
a) When the condition is suspensive b) When the condition is resolutory

Art. 1183. Impossible conditions, those contrary to good customs or public policy and those prohibited by law shall annul the obligation which depends upon them. If the obligation is divisible, that part thereof which is not affected by the impossible or unlawful condition shall be valid. The condition not to do an impossible thing shall be considered as not having been agreed upon.

Effect of the impossibility or illegality of the condition

a) Positive impossible condition or illegal conditions An obligation is void if it is dependent on an impossible or illegal condition. However, if the obligation is divisible, that part which is not affected by the impossible or unlawful condition is valid.

Effect of the impossibility or illegality of the condition

b) Negative impossible condition If the condition of the obligation is not to do an impossible thing, the condition shall be considered as not having been agreed upon, and the obligation is immediately demandable.

Art. 1184. The condition that some event happen at a determinate time shall extinguish the obligation as soon as the time expires or if it has become indubitable that the event will not take place.

Art. 1185. The condition that some event will not happen at a determinate time shall render the obligation effective from the moment the time indicated has elapsed, or if it has become evident that the event cannot occur. If no time has been fixed, the condition shall be deemed fulfilled at such time as may have probably been contemplated, bearing in mind the nature of the obligation.

Art. 1186. The condition shall be deemed fulfilled when the obligor voluntarily prevents its fulfillment.

Constructive fulfillment of conditions

If the debtor prevents the creditor from fulfilling the condition of the obligation, the condition is deemed fulfilled and the obligation is demandable.

Art. 1187. The effects of a conditional obligation to give, once the condition has been fulfilled, shall retroact to the day of the constitution of the obligation. Nevertheless, when the obligation imposes reciprocal prestations upon the parties, the fruits and interests during the pendency of the condition shall be deemed to have been mutually compensated. If the obligation is unilateral, the debtor shall appropriate the fruits and interests received, unless from the nature and circumstances of the obligation it should be inferred that the intention of the person constituting the same was different. In obligations to do and not to do, the courts shall determine, in each case, the retroactive effect of the condition that has been complied with.

Effects of fulfillment of condition

In a conditional to give From the moment the suspensive condition is fulfilled, the obligation becomes effective and demandable. However, the effects of the obligation shall retrospect to the day of the constitution of the obligation. Hence, the creditors right on the thing shall vest in him from the date of the perfection of the obligation. But the retroactivity of conditional obligation is not absolute.

Effects of fulfillment of condition

As to fruits and interests during the pendency of the condition, there is no retroactivity in:

1. Reciprocal Obligations the fruits and interests received by the parties before the condition is fulfilled shall be deemed to have been mutually compensated. 2. Unilateral obligations the fruits and interest received by the debtor before the condition is fulfilled are kept by the debtor, unless otherwise agreed.

Art. 1188. The creditor may, before the fulfillment of the condition, bring the appropriate actions for the preservation of his right. The debtor may recover what during the same time he has paid by mistake in case of a suspensive condition.

Creditors right before the fulfillment of the condition

To demand the performance of the obligation. However, the creditor may bring appropriate actions for the preservation of his right such as the registration of the deeds evidencing the contract and set aside fraudulent sales made by the debtor.

Effects of payment before the condition is fulfilled

1. Payment by mistake 2. Payment with knowledge of the condition

Art. 1189. When the conditions have been imposed with the intention of suspending the efficacy of an obligation to give, the following rules shall be observed in case of the improvement, loss or deterioration of the thing during the pendency of the condition: (1) If the thing is lost without the fault of the debtor, the obligation shall be extinguished; (2) If the thing is lost through the fault of the debtor, he shall be obliged to pay damages; it is understood that the thing is lost when it perishes, or goes out of commerce, or disappears in such a way that its existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered;

(3) When the thing deteriorates without the fault of the debtor, the impairment is to be borne by the creditor; (4) If it deteriorates through the fault of the debtor, the creditor may choose between the rescission of the obligation and its fulfillment, with indemnity for damages in either case; (5) If the thing is improved by its nature, or by time, the improvement shall inure to the benefit of the creditor; (6) If it is improved at the expense of the debtor, he shall have no other right than that granted to the usufructuary.

Nature of the subject matter

To apply Art. 1189, the thing must be determinate.

Application of the rules

The loss, deterioration or improvement should take place after the obligation is perfected and before the condition is fulfilled.

Loss of the thing

Concept A thing is lost when it perished, or goes out of commerce, or disappears in such a way that its existence is unknown or it cannot be recovered. 1. Loss without the debtors fault The debtors obligation is extinguished if the thing is lost without his fault. 2. Loss due to debtors fault The debtor is obliged to pay damages if the thing is lost to his fault.

Deterioration of the thing

1. Without the debtors fault The debtor is not obliged to pay damages and the creditor bears the impairment. 2. Due to debtors fault The creditor may choose between: a) Rescission plus damages, or b) Fulfillment of the damages plus damages.

Improvement of the thing

1. By nature or by time 2. At the debtors expense

Art. 1190. When the conditions have for their purpose the extinguishment of an obligation to give, the parties, upon the fulfillment of said conditions, shall return to each other what they have received. In case of the loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing, the provisions which, with respect to the debtor, are laid down in the preceding article shall be applied to the party who is bound to return. As for the obligations to do and not to do, the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 1187 shall be observed as regards the effect of the extinguishment of the obligation.

Effects of fulfillment of resolutory condition

1. In a conditional obligation to give 2. In conditional obligations to do or not to do

Effects of the loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing before the fulfillment of the resolutory condition
The provisions of Art. 1189 shall be applied and the party who received the thing and obliged to make restitution being considered the debtor.

Art. 1191. The power to rescind obligations is implied in reciprocal ones, in case one of the obligors should not comply with what is incumbent upon him. The injured party may choose between the fulfillment and the rescission of the obligation, with the payment of damages in either case. He may also seek rescission, even after he has chosen fulfillment, if the latter should become impossible. The court shall decree the rescission claimed, unless there be just cause authorizing the fixing of a period. This is understood to be without prejudice to the rights of third persons who have acquired the thing, in accordance with Articles 1385 and 1388 and the Mortgage Law.

Application of article
This article applies only to reciprocal obligations, that is, to obligations arising out of the same cause and to be fulfilled at the same time.

Rights of the aggrieved party in case the other does not perform his obligation
In reciprocal obligations, from the moment one of the parties fulfills his obligation, and the other does not perform his undertaking, the delay by the latter shall begin. Hence, the aggrieved party may choose between: a) Rescission with damages b) Fulfillment of obligation with damages

Nature of remedy
The remedy given to the aggrieved party is alternative. He cannot ask for both. If he elects rescission and rescission is granted by the court, he cannot ask for fulfillment. If he elects fulfillment, and the obligation is fulfilled, he cannot later ask for rescission. However, if fulfillment is impossible, he may seek rescission.

Art. 1192. In case both parties have committed a breach of the obligation, the liability of the first infractor shall be equitably tempered by the courts. If it cannot be determined which of the parties first violated the contract, the same shall be deemed extinguished, and each shall bear his own damages.

Obligations with a Period

Art. 1193. Obligations for whose fulfillment a day certain has been fixed, shall be demandable only when that day comes. Obligations with a resolutory period take effect at once, but terminate upon arrival of the day certain. A day certain is understood to be that which must necessarily come, although it may not be known when. If the uncertainty consists in whether the day will come or not, the obligation is conditional, and it shall be regulated by the rules of the preceding Section.

Concept
Period a space of time which has an influence on obligations as a consequence of a juridical act, and either suspends their demandability or produces their extinguishment.

Day certain one which must necessarily come, although it may not be known when.

Kinds of Period
1. According to source
a) Legal period fixed by law b) Voluntary period fixed by the parties c) Judicial period fixed by the court

2. Other classifications
a) Ex die (suspensive) period which must lapse before the obligation can be demanded. b) In diem (resolutory) a period after which the obligation is extinguished.

When obligation is demandable

Obligation with a suspensive period shall be demandable only when the period comes. Obligation with a resolutory period is demandable at once, but terminate upon arrival of the period

Distinctions between period and condition

As to fulfillment A condition is an uncertain event,; while a period is an event that must necessarily com, at a date known beforehand, or at a time which cannot be determined. As to influence on the obligation A condition causes an obligation to arise or to cease; while a period merely fixes at the time of the efficaciousness of an obligation. As to time A condition may refer to the future or a past event unknown to the parties; while a period always refer to the future.

Art. 1194. In case of loss, deterioration or improvement of the thing before the arrival of the day certain, the rules in Article 1189 shall be observed. Art. 1195. Anything paid or delivered before the arrival of the period, the obligor being unaware of the period or believing that the obligation has become due and demandable, may be recovered, with the fruits and interests.

Art. 1196. Whenever in an obligation a period is designated, it is presumed to have been established for the benefit of both the creditor and the debtor, unless from the tenor of the same or other circumstances it should appear that the period has been established in favor of one or of the other.

Party benefited by a period

1. Benefit of both parties 2. Benefit of creditor 3. Benefit of debtor

Art. 1197. If the obligation does not fix a period, but from its nature and the circumstances it can be inferred that a period was intended, the courts may fix the duration thereof. The courts shall also fix the duration of the period when it depends upon the will of the debtor. In every case, the courts shall determine such period as may under the circumstances have been probably contemplated by the parties. Once fixed by the courts, the period cannot be changed by them.

When court may fix a period

a) When although there is no definite period fixed by the obligation, it can be inferred that a period was intended b) When the duration of the period is solely dependent upon the will of the debtor.

When can the creditor demand payment?

Before an obligation covered by Art. 1197 can be enforced, the creditor should ask the court to fix its period of performance. Before the court has fixed the period, and such period has expired, the debtor cannot be compelled to pay.

Effect of period fixed by court

If a period is fixed by the court, the period can no longer be changed without the consent of both parties.

Art. 1198. The debtor shall lose every right to make use of the period: (1) When after the obligation has been contracted, he becomes insolvent, unless he gives a guaranty or security for the debt; (2) When he does not furnish to the creditor the guaranties or securities which he has promised; (3) When by his own acts he has impaired said guaranties or securities after their establishment, and when through a fortuitous event they disappear, unless he immediately gives new ones equally satisfactory; (4) When the debtor violates any undertaking, in consideration of which the creditor agreed to the period; (5) When the debtor attempts to abscond.

Alternative Obligations

Art. 1199. A person alternatively bound by different prestations shall completely perform one of them. The creditor cannot be compelled to receive part of one and part of the other undertaking. Art. 1200. The right of choice belongs to the debtor, unless it has been expressly granted to the creditor. The debtor shall have no right to choose those prestations which are impossible, unlawful or which could not have been the object of the obligation. Art. 1201. The choice shall produce no effect except from the time it has been communicated.

Concept
Alternative obligation obligation wherein various things are due, but the payment of one of them is sufficient, determined by the choice which as a general rule belongs to the debtor.

Right of choice
As a general rule, the right of choice belongs to the debtor. Acceptance by the creditor of the debtors choice may, by expressed agreement, be granted by the creditor.

When choice is effective

The choice made by the debtor shall produce legal effect only from the time it is communicated to the creditor. Once the choice is communicated to the creditor, the debtor can no longer be permitted to renounce his choice and take an alternative which was first open to him.

Limitations on debtors right of choice

a) The debtor shall completely perform one of the various prestations; he cannot select part of one and part of the other. b) The debtor shall have no right to choose impossible or unlawful prestation.

Art. 1202. The debtor shall lose the right of choice when among the prestations whereby he is alternatively bound, only one is practicable.

When alternative obligation is converted into a simple obligation

a) When the choice made by the debtor is communicated to the creditor b) When the choice has been given to the creditor and the latters choice is communicated to the debtor c) When the prestations whereby the debtor is alternatively bound, only one is practicable.

Art. 1203. If through the creditor's acts the debtor cannot make a choice according to the terms of the obligation, the latter may rescind the contract with damages.

Effect of impossibility of selection due to creditors acts

The debtor may rescind the contract with damages.

Art. 1204. The creditor shall have a right to indemnity for damages when, through the fault of the debtor, all the things which are alternatively the object of the obligation have been lost, or the compliance of the obligation has become impossible. The indemnity shall be fixed taking as a basis the value of the last thing which disappeared, or that of the service which last became impossible. Damages other than the value of the last thing or service may also be awarded.

Art. 1205. When the choice has been expressly given to the creditor, the obligation shall cease to be alternative from the day when the selection has been communicated to the debtor. Until then the responsibility of the debtor shall be governed by the following rules: (1) If one of the things is lost through a fortuitous event, he shall perform the obligation by delivering that which the creditor should choose from among the remainder, or that which remains if only one subsists;

(2) If the loss of one of the things occurs through the fault of the debtor, the creditor may claim any of those subsisting, or the price of that which, through the fault of the former, has disappeared, with a right to damages; (3) If all the things are lost through the fault of the debtor, the choice by the creditor shall fall upon the price of any one of them, also with indemnity for damages. The same rules shall be applied to obligations to do or not to do in case one, some or all of the prestations should become impossible.

Art. 1206. When only one prestation has been agreed upon, but the obligor may render another in substitution, the obligation is called facultative. The loss or deterioration of the thing intended as a substitute, through the negligence of the obligor, does not render him liable. But once the substitution has been made, the obligor is liable for the loss of the substitute on account of his delay, negligence or fraud.

Concept
Facultative obligation obligation where only one prestation has been agreed upon but the debtor may render another substitution.