Assignment - A Strategic Analysis of Apple Corporation
Assignment - A Strategic Analysis of Apple Corporation
Assignment - A Strategic Analysis of Apple Corporation
PREFACE
The primary objective of this report is to provide the readers the insight into the success of apple
industry.
I hope that the report has made the text interesting and lucid. In writing this report, I have
benefited immensely by referring to many publications and articles. I express my gratitude to all
such authors and publishers.
Any suggestions to improve this report in contents or in style are always welcome and will be
appreciated and acknowledged.
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO.
Executive Summary
Apple Computer’s 30-year history is full of highs and lows, which is what we would expect in a
highly innovative company. They evolved throughout the years into an organization that is very
much a representation of its leader, Steven Jobs. Apple made several hugely successful product
introductions over the years. They have also completely fallen on their face on several occasions.
They struggled mightily while Jobs was not a part of the organization. Apple reached a point
where many thought they would not survive. When asked in late 1997what Jobs should do as
head of Apple, Dell Inc.'s (DELL) then-CEO Michael S. Dell said at an investor conference:"I'd
shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders.” (Burrows, Grover, and Green)
Well, times changed. Less than 10 years later, Business Week ranked Apple as the top performer
in its 2006 Business Week 50.Apple attributes their recent success to robust sales of iPod music
players (32 million in 2005).They are optimistic about the economies of scope with media giants,
such as Disney and Pixar. (Business Week)
Apple rarely introduces a new type of product. Thus, instead of being the pioneer, they are an
expert “second mover” by refining existing products. Portable music players and notebook
computers are examples. Apple increases the appeal of these products by making them stylish
and more functional. They now appear poised to make significant strides in the home computer
market and to creating a total digital lifestyle whereby the home is a multimedia hub.
I am very much passionate to be an executive of the coming days. So, I have to gather more
experience beside my study. I do not want to concentrate my lessons only in classroom but to
implement it in my practical life that will help my in professional life. The purposes of preparing
of this report are-
To relate our theoretical report writing knowledge with the practical working experience.
To know about the leadership and change management of Apple Inc. and also try to get
idea about the relationship among them and their productivity.
I choose Apple Inc. to relate the implementation of the Strategic Business Planning.
To provide suggestions for the probable identified problems.
To illustrate the overview and the feature of the organization.
I have mainly tried to cover all the information needed to know their overall communication
process both inside and outside the organization. Their worldwide business, activities their
strategy, goals etc., I have also identified some basic problems of them.
Shortage of Time
To make a longer version of report needs too much time. But I had to prepare this report within a
very short span of time. Because of their time constraint I didn’t collect enough information to
prepare my report. To get touch with them was very difficult for me. In this case I had to collect
data from their Wikipedia and tried my best to prepare my report perfectly.
Introduction
Company Background:
Without Wayne, Apple was incorporated in 3rd January 1977, who sold his share of the company
back to Jobs and Wozniak for $800. Multi-millionaire Mike Marcela provided essential business
expertise and funding of $250,000 during the incorporation of Apple. By the end of the 1970s,
Apple had a staff of computer designers and a production line. The company introduced the ill-
fated Apple III in May 1980 in an attempt to compete with IBM and Microsoft in the business
and corporate computing market. Steve Jobs began working on the Apple Lisa in 1978 but due to
infighting, and took over Jeff Ruskin’s low-cost-computer project, the Macintosh; in 1982 he
was pushed from the Lisa team. A turf war broke out between Lisa's "corporate shirts" and Jobs'
"pirates" over which product would ship first and save Apple. Lisa won the race in 1983 and
became the first personal computer sold to the public with a GUI. But due to its high price tag
and limited software titles there was a commercial failure.
And then from 1986-1993 it went through rise and fall continuously. After 1993 they gave a lot
of emphasize on its reinvention practice. From 1994-1997 they developing their alternative
plans, reinvention practices. From 1998-2005 they return to its profitability.
VISION
The four pillars of their vision set out the long term direction for the company – where they want
to go and how they are going to get there:
We work to create a better future every day
We help people feel good, look good, and get more out of life with brands and services
that are good for them and good for others.
We will inspire people to take small everyday actions that can add up to a big difference
for the world.
We will develop new ways of doing business with the aim of doubling the size of our
company while reducing our environmental impact.
They've always believed in the power of their brands to improve the quality of people’s lives and
in doing the right thing. As its business grows, so do its responsibilities. They recognize that
global challenges such as climate change concern. Considering the wider impact of its actions is
embedded in its values and is a fundamental part of who they are.
MISSION
"Apple is committed to bringing the best personal computing experience to students, educators,
creative professionals, and consumers around the world through its innovative hardware,
software, and internet offerings."
The total industry threat for the industry space that Apple occupies (computer equipment and
distribution of entertainment) is a high threat industry. Apple must continue to pursue product
differentiation (i.e. the style and ease-of-use of an iPod) and economies of scope (i.e. offering
ABC television shows on iTunes) to maintain their sustained competitive advantage in this
industry.
• Computer Hardware and Software: Open Source software such as the Linux Operating
System and Open Office applications threaten both Apple and Microsoft. The low (often,
free) cost of the software may allow it to overtake Apple and Microsoft, especially in
developing markets such as China.
• Music Products: Major online retailers such as Amazon are considering entry into the
online music market. With a wide internet presence and a household name, Amazon
could present a formidable challenge to Apple. If the major record labels (Universal,
Sony BMG, EMI, and Warner) negotiate better terms with new competitors to iTunes,
Apple may be unable to provide some of the music content that they currently offer. The
major music labels dislike Apple’s dollar per song pricing. They would prefer to earn
higher profits with “variable pricing.” (Winfield) With variable pricing, the most popular
songs would be greater than $1, and less popular songs would be less than $1.Although
the labels recently renewed their contracts with Apple, there may be provisions that allow
future changes in the pricing model. (Winfield and Smith)
• Suppliers: The recent shift to Intel processors could present a significant threat to Apple.
With only two companies (Intel and AMD) producing Intel-compatible processors, there
is a strong potential for tacit collusion and oligopoly power between these suppliers.
Apple purchasing must now directly compete with HP, Lenovo, and Dell. If shortages or
exclusive agreements materialize; Apple could face problems with obtaining
rawmaterials. Apple should consider additional sources such as Advanced Micro Devices
(AMD).
Sony is an example of a competitor with a unique position against Apple. Sony Music supplies
Apple with many of the songs for iTunes. Sony also creates a version of the Walkman portable
music player that is a direct competitor to the iPod. (Hall)
Sony is attempting to vertically integrate forward directly to the music buyer. Sonyintegrated
their music system (Mora) into the Sony Walkman. Sony is exclusively distributing certain songs
on Mora. (Hall) Mora currently targets Japanese consumers. If Sony can gain additional
momentum (such as collaborating with other record labels), their service could present
formidable challenge to iTunes in additional markets.
SWOT Analysis
Although participation in such activities may add value, they may not be a source of competitive
advantage. Ultimately, the value, rarity, inimitability, and/or organization (VRIO) of an activity
or resource determine its sustainability as a source of competitive advantage. Within this context,
we can identify a firm’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT).
Strengths
Technical savvy – Product lines are easy to use and stable. Recent integration with
Microsoft products lines and Intel processors demonstrate ability and willingness to adapt to a
diverse customer base. (Mossberg) Such innovation, however, would not be sustainable without
a learning environment tolerant of mistakes. While the pure technical expertise alone is not a
valuable or rare resource, it becomes very costly to imitate when it exists within the socially
complex, entrepreneurial culture of Apple.
Financial vitality – Cash reserves remained robust and stable despite stagnant market
share growth in the computer hardware and software arenas. Apple exploited this by resisting
market pressures to reduce costs, tightly integrating product packages, and forming strategic
alliances (i.e. securing the backing of all major music distributors in the support of iTunes).
Brand loyalty – The only way that Apple could maintain the financial vitality described
above is via a fanatical, almost cult-like, affair with its customer base. Such brand loyalty is
extremely costly and time-consuming to imitate.
Steve Jobs – As discussed earlier, Jobs proved to be a vital component to Apple’s
success. During his absence (1985-1996), Apple experienced the most turbulent (financial and
innovative) timeline in its history. Immediately upon his return, he replaced most of the Board of
Directors, pruned and focused the new product ideas, and delivered seven
consecutive quarters of positive earnings to shareholders. (Linzmayer, 289-99) As such,
Jobs are certainly a valuable, rare, and hard to imitate resource that Apple fully exploits.
Weaknesses
Market share – Apple has historically been strongest in the US geographical and
educational vertical markets. With the educational market facing tightening budget constraints
and the US approaching a PC saturation point, Apple may need to burn cash more quickly and
succumb to market cost pressures on its products without a strategic innovation, integration, or
divesture.
Steve Jobs – For virtually the same reasons Jobs are strength, he is simultaneously a
weakness. The aggressive drive to bring innovative visions to life was noticeably absent and
painfully felt (especially by shareholders) during his departure. The apparent absence of
succession planning coupled with a lust for the limelight positioned Jobs as Apple’s single
consciousness in the eyes of consumers and shareholders.
Opportunities
Consumer electronics – With the startling success of the iPod and iTunes, Apple entered
the consumer electronics market. By expanding the iTunes concept to downloadable mobile
phone features and movies (podcasts), the door is now open to develop new and potentially
profitable strategic alliances with peripheral component manufacturers(speaker, home stereo,
etc.) and media transmission giants (Disney, TBS, Verizon, etc.).
PC hardware and software market growth – With cross-licensing of operating system
platforms in place, Apple entered the high-volume business environment traditionally dominated
by Windows-based PCs. The introduction of Intel-based processors prompted
businesses to replace PCs with iMacs. They did this to gain a level of stability and reliability in
their business applications that PCs failed to provide. An example is Japan’s Aozora Bank Ltd.,
who is replacing 2,300 PCs with iMacs. (Wingfield) Apple must establish themselves as a
credible player in business desktop applications to overcome the “desktop publishing”
stereotype.
Threats
Legal risks – In a market that literally changes at the speed of thought, patent, and
copyright infringement risks remain high. As long as operating systems and support software
packages continue to converge and remain relatively easy to imitate, present and future lawsuits
are inevitable. The Apple records claim against iTunes remains unresolved.
Competition – This threat occurs primarily on two fronts: PC hardware/software and
consumer electronics. For the same reasons discussed in the opportunities section, the threat of
limitability (cloning, pirating, etc.) increases. As relative newcomers to the consumer electronics
arena, will Apple retain a competitive advantage as they diversify their offerings (speakers, home
entertainment systems, etc.)?
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR COMPANY:
Lowering the cost of products and maintaining the same quality standards
Can form joint – ventures
Knowledge Management
More number of retail stores for easy access
Continuous innovation to expand
FOR OTHERS:
CONCLUSION
I feel that Apple must focus on several key aspects to continue to grow and succeed. They must
continue a stable commitment to licensing, push for economies of scope between media and
computers, and become a learning organization.
Apple apparently made a commitment to licensing. Although it should continue, Apple may
want to consider other forms of strategic alliances. An equity strategic alliance may offer Apple
the opportunity to obtain additional competencies. An effective way for a company like Apple to
accomplish this would be in the form of a joint venture.
Apple should continue pushing the new line of media-centric products. Meanwhile, Apple should
not lose focus on its computers. Macintosh computers were 39% of Apple’s sales in 2005.
(Burrows) This very innovative company exploits its second-mover position. In the future, they
will need to continue innovating to expand the boundaries of both media and computers.
One persistent element of both competitive advantage and risk is Steve Jobs. He is both
synonymous with Apple’s success and has a large equity interest in Apple and Disney. If he were
to divest his leadership position, the reaction of both the market and consumers would be
uncertain. Given his position within the organization as well as the history of the company when
he was gone, Apple must find a way to learn as an organization. This will allow the company to
withstand a departure by Jobs.
Based on the actions of the organization, we feel that the mid-term performance of Apple will be
strong. This period allows Apple time to overcome their challenges if they move swiftly. For this
reason, we feel that they will continue to succeed and will continue to outperform their peers.
BIBLOGRAPHY
http://www.apple.com/
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2004/jan/08hp.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc.
http://obamafellows.org/mf/948-External%20Ananlysis%20-%20Apple%20Corporation.html