AIWA vs. Romulo - Case Digest
AIWA vs. Romulo - Case Digest
AIWA vs. Romulo - Case Digest
Prepared by Maurinne J
Those who have legal standing are the personnel who may find themselves subject of the
Secretary of Labors disciplinary authority and the Congress whose functions to amend, modify
and/or repeal laws the petitioners claimed to suffer of executive encroachment.
Petitioners have no legal standing in the case, therefore there is no actual controversy posed
2. WON E.O. 185 violates the constitutional doctrine of separation of powers
Judgment: We will have to await the proper party to assail its validity
Wherefore, premised considered, the instant petition dated March 27, 2003, is hereby DISMISSED
for lack of merit.