Nanodrop spectrophotometry can measure very concentrated samples without dilution, up to 50 times more concentrated than standard cuvette-based methods, since it uses surface tension instead of cuvettes to hold samples. Extracting genomic DNA from cheek cells is easier than extracting plasmid DNA since it only requires breaking open cells through lysis to release the whole genome, while extracting plasmids requires separating them from genomic DNA. Culturing bacteria for 16 hours is optimal for extracting plasmid DNA since it is when the culture transitions from logarithmic to stationary phase, resulting in a higher ratio of plasmid DNA to RNA compared to logarithmic phase, but before DNA degradation occurs in later stationary phase.
Nanodrop spectrophotometry can measure very concentrated samples without dilution, up to 50 times more concentrated than standard cuvette-based methods, since it uses surface tension instead of cuvettes to hold samples. Extracting genomic DNA from cheek cells is easier than extracting plasmid DNA since it only requires breaking open cells through lysis to release the whole genome, while extracting plasmids requires separating them from genomic DNA. Culturing bacteria for 16 hours is optimal for extracting plasmid DNA since it is when the culture transitions from logarithmic to stationary phase, resulting in a higher ratio of plasmid DNA to RNA compared to logarithmic phase, but before DNA degradation occurs in later stationary phase.
Nanodrop spectrophotometry can measure very concentrated samples without dilution, up to 50 times more concentrated than standard cuvette-based methods, since it uses surface tension instead of cuvettes to hold samples. Extracting genomic DNA from cheek cells is easier than extracting plasmid DNA since it only requires breaking open cells through lysis to release the whole genome, while extracting plasmids requires separating them from genomic DNA. Culturing bacteria for 16 hours is optimal for extracting plasmid DNA since it is when the culture transitions from logarithmic to stationary phase, resulting in a higher ratio of plasmid DNA to RNA compared to logarithmic phase, but before DNA degradation occurs in later stationary phase.
Nanodrop spectrophotometry can measure very concentrated samples without dilution, up to 50 times more concentrated than standard cuvette-based methods, since it uses surface tension instead of cuvettes to hold samples. Extracting genomic DNA from cheek cells is easier than extracting plasmid DNA since it only requires breaking open cells through lysis to release the whole genome, while extracting plasmids requires separating them from genomic DNA. Culturing bacteria for 16 hours is optimal for extracting plasmid DNA since it is when the culture transitions from logarithmic to stationary phase, resulting in a higher ratio of plasmid DNA to RNA compared to logarithmic phase, but before DNA degradation occurs in later stationary phase.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Discussion
Advantages of Nanodrop over cuvette based spectrophotometry is that
it is capable of measuring very concentrated samples without dilution it is 50 times higher than measurements by standard cuvette based spectrophotometry. Also it has a sample retention technology that uses only surface tension to hold the sample thus there is no need in cuvettes. Cheek cell DNA extraction is the extraction of the genomic DNA; therefore, it is easier to isolate the whole genomic DNA because it is just needed a good lysis step to release genomic DNA. Whereas, extracting plasmid DNA is a bit more complicatd because it requires separating plasmid from the genomic DNA. In addition, in isolating genomic DNA, chewing the cheeks was the primary method of cell lysis (physical) whereas in plasmid extraction SDS-alkaline method was applied for the lysis. Culturing bacteria for 16 hours is optimal as it is the transition from logarithmic into stationary growth phase. At this time, the ratio of plasmid DNA to RNA is higher than during the logarithmic phase. If culturing last longer, DNA might be degraded due to over aging of the culture in the later stationary phase.
(New Concepts in Latino American Cultures) Vanessa Pérez Rosario (Eds.) - Hispanic Caribbean Literature of Migration - Narratives of Displacement-Palgrave Macmillan US (2010)