Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

STRICKLAND v. FULLER Et Al - Document No. 6

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

STRICKLAND v. FULLER et al Doc.

6
Case 4:07-cv-00242-SPM-WCS Document 6 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE


NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DANIEL RYAN STRICKLAND,

Plaintiff,

vs. 4:07cv242-SPM/WCS

DETECTIVE LEE FULLER, et al.,

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order filed May 31, 2007, Plaintiff was directed to file a motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis by July 1, 2007. Doc. 4. On June 8, 2007, Plaintiff's copy of

that order was returned to the Clerk's office marked "Not at this Address." Doc. 5.

A telephone call from Chambers to Montgomery City Jail in Montgomery, Alabama,

revealed that the Plaintiff was released and did not leave a forwarding address. To

date, Plaintiff has not notified the court of a new address.

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 4:07-cv-00242-SPM-WCS Document 6 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff's only submission to the court was his original complaint on May 29,

2007. Doc. 1. It is Plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute his own lawsuit and to keep this

court apprised of his current address. Since Plaintiff has not furnished the court with a

new address, it is doubtful that he will even receive a copy of this report and

recommendation. In the event the Plaintiff does receive a copy of this report and

recommendation, the court will allow him an opportunity to show cause why this report

and recommendation should be vacated, failing which, the Clerk shall be directed to

forward the report and recommendation to the assigned district judge.

It is therefore RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

IN CHAMBERS in Tallahassee, Florida, on June 14, 2007.

S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr.


WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a
party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and
recommendations. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after
being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review
of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:07cv241-SPM/WCS Page 2 of 2

You might also like