RPMS Template For Teacher I-III Msword File Teachers
RPMS Template For Teacher I-III Msword File Teachers
RPMS Template For Teacher I-III Msword File Teachers
Revision Code: 00
Department of
Education
Position Title
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit
Reports to
Position
Supervised
Teacher I
Salary Grade
Principal/School Heads
Effectivity Date
Page/s
10
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary/Secondary/Early Childhood Education or Bachelors degree plus 18 professional unit in edcation
Experience None required
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with education units (18-21), MA units 18 units
Experience
Eligibility PBET/LET Passers
Trainings In-service training
Revision Code: 00
Department of
Education
Position Title
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit
Reports to
Position
Supervised
Teacher II
Salary Grade
Principal/School Heads
Effectivity Date
Page/s
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
11
Revision Code: 00
Department of
Education
Position Title
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit
Reports to
Position
Supervised
Teacher III
Salary Grade
Principal/School Heads
Effectivity Date
Page/s
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
12
2. Facilitates learning in the elementary/secondary schools through functional lesson plans (for new teachers up to 3 years) Daily Log (for teachers
teaching 4 years and above) of activities and appropriate, adequate and updated instructional materials
3. Monitors and evaluates pupils/students progress
4. Undertakes activities to improve performance indicators
5. Maintains updated pupils/students progress regularly
6. Supervises curricular and co-curricular projects and activities
7. Maintains updated pupil/student school records
8. Counsels and guides pupils/students
9. Supports activities of governmental and non-governmental organizations
10. Conducts Action Plan
11. Maintains Daily Routine (classroom cleanliness, classroom management, overall physical classroom atmosphere
12. Maintains harmonious relationship with fellow teachers and other school personnel as well as with parents and other stakeholders
13. Does related work
Teaching-Learning Process
Objectives
Outputs
Objectives
Pupils/Students Outcomes
Community Involvement
Outputs
Positive/productive/safe
learning environment
Updated pupils/students
school records
Students mastery of the
required learning
ompetencies per grade level
PTA meetings/conferences
organized
Academic monitoring/followup
Projects/events/activities
initiated/undertaken
Action research
Professional membership
and/or community linkages
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Objectives
Outputs
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
Published work
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
learning competencies
1130% and above
based on the budget
of work
Very Satisfactory
(4)
approved budget of work
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
Has
provided Has provided individual Has provided individual Has
provided Has provided individual
activities for 50%
individual activities for
activities for a115-129%
activities for a100-114% of
individual activities for
and below of the
a 130% and above of
of the classes handled for
the classes handled for
a 51-99% of the
classes handled for the
the classes handled
the rating period
the rating period
classes handled for the
rating period
for the rating period
rating period
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
Teaching
methods Teaching methods and Teaching methods and Teaching methods and Teaching methods and
strategies elicited
and strategies elicited
strategies elicited 115strategies elicited 100strategies elicited 5150% and below
130% and above
129% interaction from
114% interaction from a
99% interaction from
interaction from a
interaction from a
a class
class
a class
class
class
Inductive
Inductive
Inductive
Inductive
Inductive
method/deductive
method/deductive
method/deductive
method/deductive method
method/deductive
method was not used
method was 130%
method was 115-129%
was 100-114% used in
method was 51-99%
in teaching a lesson
and above used in
used in teaching a lesson
teaching a lesson
used in teaching a
teaching a lesson
lesson
Cooperative learning Cooperative
learning Cooperative
learning Cooperative learning Cooperative learning
strategy was never
strategies was 130%
strategies was 115-129%
strategies was 100-114%
strategies was 51-99%
used
and above effective
effective when used
effective when used
effective when used
when used
ICT
integration ICT integration is 115- ICT integration is 100- ICT integration is 51- ICT integration is not
evident
is130% and above
129% evident
114% evident
99% evident
evident
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
Results
of Results of student
Results
of
student Results of student Results of student
student
observation/
appraisal
observation/ appraisal
observation/ appraisal are
observation/ appraisal
observation/
are 115-129% used as
are not used as basis
100-114% used as basis
are 51-99% used as
basis for follow-up
appraisal
are
for follow-up
for follow-up
basis for follow-up
130%
and
above used as
basis for follow-up
Objectives
daily
Outstanding
(5)
out
Very Satisfactory
(4)
carried out
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
carried out
Unsatisfactory
(2)
out
Poor
(1)
out
Monitored
and Evidences
showed The teacher explained There is evidence of more The teacher planned No evidence of student
monitoring or
evaluated
and
that the teacher
the various uses and
than one measure of
instructions
without
evaluation of student
maintained
pupils/
purposely
plans
limitations of the different
student performance but
analyzing
student
progress.
students
progress
assessments
and
kinds
of
there is difficulty in
learning data.
within the rating
varies
assessment
assessments/tests.
analyzing data to inform
period
choices to match the
Evidences showed that
intructional planning and
different
student
student
needs
and
delivery.
needs, abilities, and
avenues for growth were
learning styles.
clearly identified.
Class record reflected Class record reflected the Class record reflected the Class record reflected Class record reflected the
bases of 50% and
the bases of 130%
bases of 115-129% of
bases of100-114% of
the bases of 51-99% of
below of pupils ratings
and above of pupils
pupils ratings in all
pupils ratings in all
pupils ratings in all
in all classes/subject
ratings
in
all
classes/subject
areas
classes/subject
areas
classes/subject areas
areas handled
classes/subject areas
handled
handled
handled
handled
Students
portfolio Students
portfolio Students
portfolio Students
portfolio Students portfolio
contained 50% and
contained 130% and
contained 115-129% of
contained 100-114% of his
contained 51-99% of
below of his
above
of
his
his accomplishment
accomplishment
his accomplishments
accomplishments
accomplishment
Objectives
Outstanding
(5)
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
Table of Specifications Table of Specifications is Table of Specifications is Table of Specifications Table of Specifications is
is not prepared
is 130% and above
115-129% prepared for
100-114% prepared for
is 51-99% prepared for
prepared for tests that
tests that require it
tests that require it
tests that require it
require it
Table of Specifications Table of Specifications Table of Specifications Table of Specifications Table of Specifications did
not show congruence
showed130%
and
showed
115-129%
showed
100-114%
slightly showed 51between content and
above
congruence
congruence
between
congruence
between
99%
congruence
skills tested
between content and
content and skills tested
content and skills tested
between content and
skills tested
skills tested
Test
questions Test questions were 115- Test questions were 100- Test questions were Test questions were not
logically sequenced
were130% and above
129%
logically
114% sequenced
51-99%
logically
logically sequenced
sequenced
sequenced
Pretest
and Pretest and Post-test Pretest and Post-test Pretest and Post-test Pretest and Post-test were
Post-test were
were
115-129%
were
100-114%
were
51-99%
never administered
administered
in
all
administered
in
all
administered in all
130%
and
classes/subject
area
classes/subject
area
classes/subject area
above
(supported
by
(supported
by
(supported
by
administered in
analysis report on
analysis report on
analysis report
all
subject area per
subject area per
on subject area
classes/subject
class/grade level)
class/grade level)
per class/grade
area
level)
(supported
by
analysis report
on subject area
per class/grade
level)
Conducted
Remediation/
Remediation/ Enrichment
Objectives
remediation/
enrichment programs
to
improve
performance indicators
Outstanding
(5)
Enrichment Program
is offered to 130% and
above of students who
need it and
Very Satisfactory
(4)
Program is offered to
115-129% who need it
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
Program is offered to 100114% who need it
100-114% MPS/GSA
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Enrichment Program is
offered to51-99% who
need it
51-99% MPS/GSA
Poor
(1)
Program is offered to
50% and below who
need it
100-114%
51-99%
accomplishment of visits
accomplishment
of
with suggested planned
visits with planned
interventions
interventions
No project/event/activity
initiated
3 Action Research 2
Action
Research 1
Action
Research Identified
conducted with full
conducted
with
conducted
with
classroom/learning
documentation
on
documentation
on
documentation
on
problems
with
completion
of
completion
of
completion
of
research proposals
interventions
interventions
interventions
Initiated/Participated in Initiated at least 2 co- initiated and participated participated in most of co- Participation
only
co-curricular/school
curricular/
school
in
co-curricular/school
curricular/ school activities
without documented
No participation in school
activities
Objectives
activities within
rating period
Outstanding
(5)
the
activities
with
documented results
Very Satisfactory
(4)
activities
with
documented results
Performance Indicators
Satisfactory
(3)
with documented results
Unsatisfactory
(2)
Poor
(1)
results
Unpublished work
produced