Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 246 views

    Walden Article

    Uploaded by

    api-240119100

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Walden Article

    Uploaded by

    api-240119100
    246 views2 pages

    Original Title

    walden article

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    246 views2 pages

    Walden Article

    Uploaded by

    api-240119100

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Neanderthals May Not Have Been as Inferior as Suggested

    May 1, 2014 | by Lisa Winter


    When Neanderthals went extinct
    about 40,000 years ago, Homo
    sapiens became the last remaining
    human species on Earth. The story
    frequently goes that they were
    inferior in a variety of ways to
    anatomically modern humans and
    just couldnt compete. A new study
    turns this notion on its head and
    highlights a series of ways that
    Neanderthals were actually
    superior. The analysis was
    conducted by Paola Villa of the
    University of Colorado Museum
    and Wil Roebroeks of Leiden
    University. The results were
    published in PLOS ONE.
    "The evidence for cognitive inferiority is simply not there," Villa said in a press release. "What we are saying is that the
    conventional view of Neanderthals is not true."
    Their analysis looked at the top hypotheses for why our species beat out Neanderthals. After all, there is evidence that
    we interacted and and even interbred with them, so how did we succeed when they did not? Most of the ideas centered
    around the inferiority of Neanderthals in terms of cognition, technology, language, and hunting.
    What they discovered, however, is that there isnt evidence to support those explanations. There is evidence, they
    explain, that Neanderthals hunted in groups, and used cliffs and other features of the landscape to hunt large animals.
    This speaks to their ability to effectively plan, communicate, and cooperate as a group. Other evidence has shown that
    they ate a wide variety of foods, dismissing the idea that a narrow diet wiped them out as food sources changed.
    The researchers note that some of these predictions of why Neanderthals went extinct was due to an error of comparing
    Neanderthals to the Homo sapiens of today, and not the Homo sapiens that would have been contemporary to them.
    "Researchers were comparing Neanderthals not to their contemporaries on other continents but to their successors,"
    Villa explained. "It would be like comparing the performance of Model T Fords, widely used in America and Europe in the
    early part of the last century, to the performance of a modern-day Ferrari and conclude that Henry Ford was cognitively
    inferior to Enzo Ferrari."
    While the researchers made a good case that general inferiority to Homo sapiens wasnt the cause for the
    disappearance of the Neanderthals, they werent able to come up with an evidence-based explanation. They state there
    were probably several reasons that went into play, such as genetic depression due to inbreeding, as many Neanderthals
    lived in small groups. The male offspring between Neanderthal/Homo sapiens pairings are also believed to have a lower
    fertility, making it difficult to sustain the species.





















    Winter, L. (2014). Neanderthals may not have been as inferior as suggested. I Fucking Love Science. Retrieved from
    http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/neanderthals-may-not-have-been-inferior-suggested

    You might also like