Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (145)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = river plumes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 8644 KiB  
Article
Enhanced Transport Induced by Tropical Cyclone and River Discharge in Hangzhou Bay
by Hongquan Zhou and Xiaohui Liu
Water 2025, 17(2), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17020164 - 9 Jan 2025
Viewed by 458
Abstract
Sediment transport in Hangzhou Bay and the adjacent Changjiang Estuary is extremely complex due to the bathymetry and hydrodynamic conditions in this region. Using the particle tracing method based on the ROMS model, three-dimensional (3D) passive particle transport in Hangzhou Bay and the [...] Read more.
Sediment transport in Hangzhou Bay and the adjacent Changjiang Estuary is extremely complex due to the bathymetry and hydrodynamic conditions in this region. Using the particle tracing method based on the ROMS model, three-dimensional (3D) passive particle transport in Hangzhou Bay and the Changjiang Estuary was simulated. Ocean temperature, salinity, and circulation patterns before and during Severe Tropical Storm Ampil (2018) were reproduced by the model. The circulation in Hangzhou Bay is significantly influenced by the passing of the storm with an enhanced southeastward surface current. The along-front current offshore of the Changjiang Estuary, accompanied by the Changjiang River plume, is weakened by strong mixing under the storm. The transport of passive particles before and during the storm was also simulated based on the current fields of the model. The results show that the passing of the tropical storm enhances mass exchange in Hangzhou Bay by the storm-induced southeast circulation, while particle transport near the Changjiang Estuary decreases as the estuarine plume is weakened by the intense mixing of strong winds of the storm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport in Ocean Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Bathymetry (m) of the Yellow Sea and East China Sea (<b>a</b>) and Hangzhou Bay and its adjacent seas (<b>b</b>). The bathymetry data are from the ETOPO Global 1-min dataset. The red circles in (<b>b</b>) represent the tide gauges used to validate the model results in <a href="#water-17-00164-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sea surface elevation (m) of the model simulation (blue curves) and the observational data from tidal gauges (black dots) in Hangzhou Bay. The stations S1 to S4 are marked in <a href="#water-17-00164-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wind speed at 10 m above sea surface (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>), precipitation rate (<b>f</b>–<b>j</b>), and air temperature at 2 m above sea surface (<b>k</b>–<b>o</b>) during the Severe Tropical Storm Ampil passing Hangzhou Bay. All the data are from the CFSR hourly dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temperature (colors, °C) and velocity (vectors) in Hangzhou Bay and the Changjiang Estuary before the Tropical Storm Ampil (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and during the storm (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). The red triangle is the center of the storm on day 0, and the black line represents the track of the storm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Locations of the particles simulated by the model released in the surface layer before the Tropical Storm Ampil (noTC, (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>)) and during the storm (TC, (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>)) in the CONTROL case. The panels from left to right show the particles released after 5 days, 10 days, 20 days, and 30 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Locations of the particles simulated by the model released in the bottom layer before the Tropical Storm Ampil (noTC, (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>)) and during the storm (TC, (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>)) in the CONTROL case. The panels from left to right show the particles released after 5 days, 10 days, 20 days, and 30 days.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Accumulated number of particles in the surface layer from the releasing time to after 5 days (<b>a</b>), 10 days (<b>b</b>), 20 days (<b>c</b>), and 30 days (<b>d</b>) in Hangzhou Bay in the noTC experiment of the CONTROL case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Accumulated number of particles in the surface layer from the releasing time to after 5 days (<b>a</b>), 10 days (<b>b</b>), 20 days (<b>c</b>), and 30 days (<b>d</b>) in Hangzhou Bay in the TC experiment of the CONTROL case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Accumulated number of particles in the bottom layer from the releasing time to after 5 days (<b>a</b>), 10 days (<b>b</b>), 20 days (<b>c</b>), and 30 days (<b>d</b>) in Hangzhou Bay in the noTC experiment of the CONTROL case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Accumulated number of particles in the bottom layer from the releasing time to after 5 days (<b>a</b>), 10 days (<b>b</b>), 20 days (<b>c</b>), and 30 days (<b>d</b>) in Hangzhou Bay in the TC experiment of the CONTROL case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Number of particles inside Hangzhou Bay after release.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Accumulated number of particles in the surface layer from the releasing time to after 5 days (<b>a</b>), 10 days (<b>b</b>), 20 days (<b>c</b>), and 30 days (<b>d</b>) in Hangzhou Bay in the TC experiment of the NO-RIVER case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Accumulated number of particles in the bottom layer from the releasing time to after 5 days (<b>a</b>), 10 days (<b>b</b>), 20 days (<b>c</b>), and 30 days (<b>d</b>) in Hangzhou Bay in the TC experiment of the NO-RIVER case.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 11003 KiB  
Article
A Numerical Study on Impact of Coal Mining Activity and Mine Water Drainage on Flow and Transport Behavior in Groundwater
by Kaisar Ahmat, Hao Lu and Huiquan Liu
Water 2024, 16(24), 3596; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243596 - 13 Dec 2024
Viewed by 722
Abstract
Under the dual carbon mission, more and more coal mines will face shutting down in the future and stop treating mine water drainage, which, if it escapes, may cause severe secondary damage to the local groundwater quality. Wudong Coal Mine is a currently [...] Read more.
Under the dual carbon mission, more and more coal mines will face shutting down in the future and stop treating mine water drainage, which, if it escapes, may cause severe secondary damage to the local groundwater quality. Wudong Coal Mine is a currently active subsurface coal mine in Xinjiang, China, that shows high-salinity characteristics. To forecast and discuss future possible groundwater quality damages and potential solutions, we here introduce a model prediction study on the effects of water pollution by coal mine drainage. The study protocol first involves creating a calibrated 2D groundwater flow model by use of FEFLOW software, then designing several flow and solute transport prediction analyses under changing mine water drainage conditions, different pollution source areas and water treatment pumping wells to discuss future prominent flow and transport behavior, as well as water treatment-affecting factors. It has been shown that mine water drainage plays a critical role in maintaining the mine water solute distribution, as without mine draining, local flow and solute distribution change dramatically, altering the groundwater capture zone, and may change the plume-migrating direction from upstream to downstream. A larger pollution source could produce a higher concentration of pollutants and a larger pollution-coverage area. To reduce pollutant concentrations, mine water treatment pumping wells with higher pumping rates can be applied as a useful remedial measure to effectively prevent the pollutant plume front from reaching the important drinking and irrigation water source of the region, Urumqi River. The results of this study can give important suggestions and decision-making support for authorities focused on water treatment and environmental protection decision-making in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrogeology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study area’s geological location.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Model boundary condition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Model mesh design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Initial flow distribution (<b>a</b>) and model flow chart (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Initial calibrated head distribution (<b>a</b>) and hydrogeological parameter zoning map (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Model validation by measured and modeled hydraulic head.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Flow distribution change at different times.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Solute distribution at different times without stopping drainage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>Solute distribution at different times without stopping drainage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Base case flow distribution change after stopping mine water drainage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Base case solute distribution change with stopping mine water draining in the 5th year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Larger pollution source with flow distribution change (<b>a</b>) and solute distribution with stopping drainage (<b>b</b>−<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Observation point pollutant concentration history under different pollution source.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>A treatment rate of 200 m<sup>3</sup>/d of well pumping caused a flow distribution change (<b>a</b>) and solute distribution when stopping mine water drainage (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Impact of treatment rate of 1000 m<sup>3</sup>/d of well pumping, which caused flow distribution change (<b>a</b>) and solute distribution when stopping mine water drainage (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Observation point pollutant concentration history at different pumping rates.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5541 KiB  
Article
Resilience or Collapse? Reconstructing the Water Quality Time Series of a Tropical River Impacted by a Mine Tailings Dam Failure
by Anelise Rodrigues Machado Garcia, Diego Guimarães Florencio Pujoni and José Fernandes Bezerra-Neto
Limnol. Rev. 2024, 24(4), 637-652; https://doi.org/10.3390/limnolrev24040037 - 6 Dec 2024
Viewed by 654
Abstract
The 2015 Fundão tailings dam collapse in Mariana, Brazil, was a major environmental catastrophe. Assessing its long-term effects on water quality is critical for environmental restoration and policy development. In this study, we reconstructed a 15-year time series of five water quality parameters [...] Read more.
The 2015 Fundão tailings dam collapse in Mariana, Brazil, was a major environmental catastrophe. Assessing its long-term effects on water quality is critical for environmental restoration and policy development. In this study, we reconstructed a 15-year time series of five water quality parameters to assess whether the collapse caused permanent changes. Using public data from the Minas Gerais Water Institute (IGAM), we fitted generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape to model long-term trends in turbidity, total solids, conductivity, pH, and dissolved oxygen. Predictor variables included daily precipitation and smooth functions for time and longitudinal distance along the river. As expected, turbidity and total solids increased sharply after the collapse; however, the mean values returned to pre-collapse levels within four years. Conductivity, which was already elevated pre-collapse, remained high following the passage of the tailings plume. Although we observed a tendency toward pre-collapse values, the long-term conductivity mean did not fully stabilize to previous levels. No clear patterns were observed for pH or dissolved oxygen. This study highlights the acute impact of the dam collapse on five water quality parameters in the Doce River and illustrates the river’s subsequent stabilization process, although other important and chronic impacts are still persistent. Long-term studies such as this provide valuable insights into the dynamics of fluvial systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the Doce River Basin with IGAM and INMET sampling stations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatter plots of the accumulated rainfall over different accumulated intervals with principal component 1 scores (PC1). Pearson correlation, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values and the line representing the regression slope are indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Time series of the 30-day accumulated rainfall (average of the four INMET stations); the points represent the measured values. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line represents the average, and the shaded area represents the standard error. The red vertical line represents the collapse date, and the horizontal line represents the average for the period. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods. The solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Time series of the flow from Governador Valadares station, the points represent the measured values. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line represents the average and the shaded area represents the standard error. The red vertical line represents the date of the collapse, and the horizontal line represents the average for the period. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods, the solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Reconstructed time series of total solids. For clarity, the plot shows the data observed only from a single sampling station (RD035). The black dots represent the observed values, and the grey lines represent the fitted values from the 50 bootstrap samples. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line and the shaded area represent the mean and the standard error, respectively. The red vertical line marks the collapse date, and the horizontal line represents the average for Period 1. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods. The solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Reconstructed time series of turbidity. For clarity, the plot shows the data observed only from a single sampling station (RD035). The black dots represent the observed values, and the grey lines represent the fitted values from the 50 bootstrap samples. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line and the shaded area represent the mean and the standard error, respectively. The red vertical line marks the collapse date, and the horizontal line represents the average for Period 1. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods. The solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Reconstructed time series of conductivity. For clarity, the plot shows the data observed only from a single sampling station (RD035). The black dots represent the observed values, and the grey lines represent the fitted values from the 50 bootstrap samples. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line and the shaded area represent the mean and the standard error, respectively. The red vertical line marks the collapse date, and the horizontal line represents the average for Period 1. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods. The solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Reconstructed time series of pH. For clarity, the plot shows the data observed only from a single sampling station (RD035). The black dots represent the observed values, and the grey lines represent the fitted values from the 50 bootstrap samples. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line and the shaded area represent the mean and the standard error, respectively. The red vertical line marks the collapse date, and the horizontal line represents the average for Period 1. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods. The solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>A</b>)—Reconstructed time series of dissolved oxygen. For clarity, the plot shows the data observed only from a single sampling station (RD035). The black dots represent the observed values, and the grey lines represent the fitted values from the 50 bootstrap samples. (<b>B</b>)—Long-term trend estimated by the GAMLSS model. The solid line and the shaded area represent the mean and the standard error, respectively. The red vertical line marks the collapse date, and the horizontal line represents the average for Period 1. (<b>C</b>)—Seasonality across the four periods. The solid black line indicates the monthly median for that period.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 15651 KiB  
Article
Numerical Analysis of the Influence of Runoff Input on Salinity Distribution and Its Mechanisms in Laizhou Bay
by Kaixuan Ju, Lehang Xiong, Tao Liu, Zilong Li and Minxia Zhang
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(10), 1858; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101858 - 17 Oct 2024
Viewed by 729
Abstract
This study employs the MIKE 3 Flow Model, incorporating forcing conditions such as inflow from 18 major rivers along the Bohai coast, wind, precipitation, evaporation, and solar radiation, to develop a hydrodynamic and temperature-salinity model for the Bohai Sea, using a finer mesh [...] Read more.
This study employs the MIKE 3 Flow Model, incorporating forcing conditions such as inflow from 18 major rivers along the Bohai coast, wind, precipitation, evaporation, and solar radiation, to develop a hydrodynamic and temperature-salinity model for the Bohai Sea, using a finer mesh for more detailed simulation in Laizhou Bay. The residual current in the surface layer primarily flowed eastward, exhibiting coastal transport characteristics in the southern region, leading to the formation of a large low-salinity region. The bottom salinity distribution closely mirrored that of the surface, with the isohaline shifting shoreward due to the high-salinity Bohai Sea water transported by the residual current. By grouping major runoff sources according to river outlet locations and residual current patterns, the study analyzed the impact of freshwater plumes formed by runoff from different directions on the salinity distribution in Laizhou Bay. The results indicate that the influence of freshwater inputs on both the mean salinity and the area of low-salinity zones in Laizhou Bay, ranked from greatest to least, is as follows: the Yellow River, the southwest, and the southeast. The variation in the area of low-salinity regions is closely related to factors such as runoff volume, residual currents, and the selection of boundaries for the low-salinity regions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Environmental Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Computational grid and Bathymetric map. (<b>a</b>) The computational grid for the Bohai Sea region, along with the locations of river discharge outlets and hydrodynamic observation stations. (<b>b</b>) The bathymetric distribution of the Bohai Sea, along with the locations of salinity observation stations and vertical salinity profile AA’ and BB’ sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Curves of water surface elevation validation: (<b>a</b>) Validation of Station A1 over 1 month; (<b>b</b>) Validation of Station T1 over half a month; (<b>c</b>) Validation of tidal Station B1 over 24 h; (<b>d</b>) Validation of tidal Station B2 over 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Curves of water surface elevation validation: (<b>a</b>) Validation of Station A1 over 1 month; (<b>b</b>) Validation of Station T1 over half a month; (<b>c</b>) Validation of tidal Station B1 over 24 h; (<b>d</b>) Validation of tidal Station B2 over 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Validation curves of 24 h tidal currents at selected stations. (<b>a</b>) Surface current speed at station A1; (<b>b</b>) Middle current speed at station A1; (<b>c</b>) Bottom current speed at station A1; (<b>d</b>) At station A1; (<b>e</b>) Middle current direction at station A1; (<b>f</b>) Bottom current direction at station A1; (<b>g</b>) Surface current speed at station B1; (<b>h</b>) Middle current speed at station B1; (<b>i</b>) Bottom current speed at station B1; (<b>j</b>) Surface current direction at station B1; (<b>k</b>) Middle current direction at station B1; and (<b>l</b>) Bottom current direction at station B1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Validation of simulated and observed salinity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Surface current and bathymetric contour-distribution map in Laizhou Bay in 2022: (<b>a</b>) Maximum flood (9 September 2022 19:00); (<b>b</b>) Flood slack (9 September 2022 22:00); (<b>c</b>) Maximum ebb (9 September 2022 02:00); (<b>d</b>) Ebb slack (9 September 2022 06:00).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The distribution of surface and bottom salinity in dry season and wet season: (<b>a</b>) Surface salinity distribution during the dry season; (<b>b</b>) Surface salinity distribution during the wet season; (<b>c</b>) Bottom salinity distribution during the dry season; (<b>d</b>) Bottom salinity distribution during the wet season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Salinity profile: (<b>a</b>) Profile A during the dry season; (<b>b</b>) Profile B during the dry season; (<b>c</b>) Profile A during the wet season; (<b>d</b>) Profile B during the dry season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Surface salinity distribution and residual current patterns in Experimental Scenario 1: (<b>a</b>) Dry season; (<b>b</b>) Wet season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Surface salinity distribution and residual current patterns in Experimental Scenario 2: (<b>a</b>) Dry season; (<b>b</b>) Wet season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Surface salinity distribution and residual current patterns in Experimental Scenario 3: (<b>a</b>) Dry season; (<b>b</b>) Wet season.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Rate of change in the area of low-salinity regions compared to the control group: (<b>a</b>) Rate of area change in the surface layer during the dry season; (<b>b</b>) Rate of area change in the surface layer during the wet season.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1554 KiB  
Article
Multi-Modal Machine Learning to Predict the Energy Discharge Levels from a Multi-Cell Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower
by Christopher Sobecki, Larry Deschaine and Brian d’Entremont
Energies 2024, 17(17), 4385; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174385 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 925
Abstract
An artificial neural network was developed to augment the accuracy of a physically based computer model in relating heat discharge to visible plume volume of a 12-cell mechanical draft cooling tower. In a previous study, Savannah River National Laboratory developed a 1D model [...] Read more.
An artificial neural network was developed to augment the accuracy of a physically based computer model in relating heat discharge to visible plume volume of a 12-cell mechanical draft cooling tower. In a previous study, Savannah River National Laboratory developed a 1D model to capture the average power plant discharge levels via analysis of a series of visual images but was unable to accurately predict individual cases, resulting in an overall average error of about 5%, but individual comparisons resulted in an R2 of 0.36. Three optimization algorithms were applied to better fit the entrainment coefficients, and the artificial neural network model was applied to 289 cases of a 12-cell mechanical draft cooling tower power generation facility. Two artificial neural networks configurations consisted of 10 and 47 nodes that used as input readily available plant data, observed cooling tower plume conditions, observed operational conditions, local and regional weather, and the predicted plume volume from the physical model; the individual predictions’ accuracy improved to R2>0.95. This article concludes the sensitivities for the 1D model and additional actions to progress this field of study as well as applications for cooling tower monitoring. This strategy demonstrated an encouraging first step towards using multi-modal artificial neural network machine learning technology for information fusion to estimate power levels from external observations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A twelve-cell MDCT with plume exhaust and mergers in the southeastern U.S.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Best fit line with a scatter plot comparing 289 cases from both simulated and actual power outputs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of computed power output for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ϕ</mi> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>β</mi> </semantics></math> values for the DDS algorithm and the SME versus the actual power output. The RGA and GML lines are not present because the computational power values were either very close to or overlapped the computational power calculated by DDS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Base analysis configuration consists of a fully connected single layer ANN. Shown here is the 10-node version.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Trainingand validation plot of the ANN method using 10 nodes and a 5 cross-fold validation.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 46868 KiB  
Article
Thermal Profile Dynamics of a Central European River Based on Landsat Images: Natural and Anthropogenic Influencing Factors
by Ahmed Mohsen, Tímea Kiss, Sándor Baranya, Alexia Balla and Ferenc Kovács
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3196; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173196 - 29 Aug 2024
Viewed by 830
Abstract
River temperature is a critical parameter influencing aquatic ecosystems and water quality. However, it can be changed by natural (e.g., flow and depth conditions) and human factors (e.g., waste and industrial water drainage). Satellite-based monitoring offers a valuable tool for assessing river temperature [...] Read more.
River temperature is a critical parameter influencing aquatic ecosystems and water quality. However, it can be changed by natural (e.g., flow and depth conditions) and human factors (e.g., waste and industrial water drainage). Satellite-based monitoring offers a valuable tool for assessing river temperature on a large scale, elucidating the impacts of various factors. This study aims to analyze the spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water temperature (SWT) in the medium-sized Tisza River in response to natural and anthropogenic influences, employing Landsat satellites and in situ water temperature data. The validity of the Landsat-based SWT estimates was assessed across different channel sections with varying sizes. The longitudinal thermal profile of the Tisza was analyzed by mosaicking, monthly, four Landsat 9 images, covering the entire 962 km length of the Tisza in 2023. The impact of climate change was evaluated by analyzing SWT trends at a specific site from 1984 to 2024, utilizing 483 Landsat 4–9 images. The findings indicated elevated accuracy for Landsat-based SWT estimation (R2 = 0.94; RMSE = 3.66 °C), particularly for channel sizes covering ≥ 3 pixels. Discharge, microclimatic conditions, and channel morphology significantly influence SWT, demonstrating a general increasing trend downstream with occasional decreases during the summer months. Dams were observed to lower the SWT downstream due to cooler bottom reservoir water discharge, with more pronounced differences during the summer months (1–3 °C). Tributaries predominantly (75%) elevated the SWT in the Tisza River, albeit with varying magnitudes across different months. Over the 40-year study period, an increasing trend in SWT was discerned, with an annual rise rate of 0.0684 °C. While the thermal band of Landsat satellites proved valuable for investigating the Tisza River’s thermal profile at a broad scale, finer spatial resolution bands are necessary for detecting small-scale phenomena such as thermal plumes and localized temperature variations in rivers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Satellite-Based Climate Change and Sustainability Studies)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The Tisza River and its catchment span five European countries.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Evaluation of the Landsat 8 and 9 surface water temperature (SWT) estimates in the Tisza River (<b>A</b>), and at specific sites in the upper (at Tiszabecs) (<b>B</b>), middle (at Szonlok) (<b>C</b>), and lower (at Szeged) (<b>D</b>) reaches of the river.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The monthly mean hourly water temperature in the Tisza River (at Szeged) in 2023.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Monthly longitudinal thermal profile of the Tisza River at the section scale (S1–S5) in 2023. The monthly SWT data are based on satellite estimates on a specific date each month (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03196-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>). The gray dotted box refers to sections with narrow and shallow channels, resulting in low SWT estimation accuracy (interpret with caution).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Monthly longitudinal thermal profile of the Tisza River at a 2 km scale in 2023, including the locations of the main tributaries, dams, and cities. The monthly SWT data are based on satellite estimates on a specific date each month (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03196-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>). The gray dotted box refers to sections with narrow and shallow channels, resulting in low SWT estimation accuracy (interpret with caution).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Examples of overestimated surface water temperatures (SWT) at meandering and narrow channel sections in the Upper (<b>A</b>), Middle (<b>B</b>), and Lower (<b>C</b>) Tisza. The influence of selected cities located along the Tisza River in Hungary on SWT in adjacent channel sections (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>). A decline in SWT was observed in some channel sections in the Middle (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) and Lower (<b>I</b>) Tisza.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Monthly surface water temperature (SWT) at channel sections adjacent to eight towns in Hungary located along the Tisza River in 2023. The missing data refer to cloudy images. The monthly SWT data are based on satellite estimates at a specific date each month (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03196-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>). The interpretation of SWT in the channel section next to Khust should be conducted with caution, owing to its narrow width and low estimation accuracy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Monthly influence of the main tributaries on the thermal profile of the Tisza River in 2023. The monthly SWT data are based on satellite estimates on a specific date each month (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03196-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Monthly thermal profile of 2 km river channel sections upstream and downstream of the Tiszalök (<b>A</b>), Kisköre (<b>B</b>), and Novi Bečej (<b>C</b>) dams in the Tisza River, based on SWT data obtained by the Landsat TIR sensor every 30 m in 2023. Examples of Landsat-based SWT upstream and downstream of the three dams of the Tisza in August 2023 (<b>D</b>). The monthly SWT data are based on satellite estimates on a specific date each month (<a href="#remotesensing-16-03196-t0A1" class="html-table">Table A1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Time series of surface water temperature (SWT) in the Tisza River at Mindszent between 13 June 1984 and 27 January 2024 based on 438 Landsat satellite images (<b>A</b>). Mean annual SWT during the studied period (1984 to 2024) (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Surface water temperature (SWT) differences between channels located upstream of ten major cities along the Tisza River and those located adjacent to the cities.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Surface water temperature (SWT) differences between channels upstream of Tisza Lake and adjacent to the lake (<b>A</b>) and between upstream and adjacent shaded channel sections (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>).</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 8689 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Atmospheric Correction Algorithms for Sentinel-3 OLCI in the Amazon River Continuum
by Aline M. Valerio, Milton Kampel, Vincent Vantrepotte, Victoria Ballester and Jeffrey Richey
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(14), 2663; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16142663 - 20 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1443
Abstract
Water colour remote sensing is a valuable tool for assessing bio-optical and biogeochemical parameters across the vast extent of the Amazon River Continuum (ARC). However, accurate retrieval depends on selecting the best atmospheric correction (AC). Four AC processors (Acolite, Polymer, C2RCC, OC-SMART) were [...] Read more.
Water colour remote sensing is a valuable tool for assessing bio-optical and biogeochemical parameters across the vast extent of the Amazon River Continuum (ARC). However, accurate retrieval depends on selecting the best atmospheric correction (AC). Four AC processors (Acolite, Polymer, C2RCC, OC-SMART) were evaluated against in situ remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) measurements. K-means classification identified four optical water types (OWTs) that are affected by the ARC. Two OWTs showed seasonal differences in the Lower Amazon River, influenced by the increase in suspended sediment concentration with river discharge. The other OWTs in the Amazon River Plume are dominated by phytoplankton or by a mixture of optically significant constituents. The Quality Water Index Polynomial method used to assess the quality of in situ and orbital Rrs had a high failure rate when the Apparent Visible Wavelength was >580 nm for in situ Rrs. OC-SMART Rrs products showed better spectral quality compared to Rrs derived from other AC processors evaluated in this study. These results improve our understanding of remotely sensing very turbid waters, such as those in the Amazon River Continuum. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for the Study of the Changes in Wetlands)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Sampling stations along the Amazon River Continuum used in this study. Each campaign has a different colour (see <a href="#remotesensing-16-02663-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the present study illustrating the overall methodology. The orange, blue and green lines represent the statistical comparisons made between the in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and the satellite-derived <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> values after atmospheric correction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Match-ups of simulated in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for S3-OLCI bands and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> derived from different atmospheric correction processors for the same day: (<b>A</b>) Acolite; (<b>B</b>) Polymer; (<b>C</b>) C2RCC; (<b>D</b>) OC-SMART. The data were measured at the Amazon River Continuum, and the in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> were derived following the methodology proposed by [<a href="#B37-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">37</a>] with the elimination of sun and sky glint as recommended by [<a href="#B38-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. Scatter plots are presented in a log–log scale. Circles represent match-ups within a 3 h satellite pass window, while triangles represent match-ups outside the 3 h satellite pass window.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spectral variation in the statistical parameters between 400 and 779 nm: (<b>A</b>) Coefficient of determination (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>), (<b>B</b>) Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), (<b>C</b>) slope, (<b>D</b>) Mean Relative Absolute Difference (MRAD), (<b>E</b>) Mean Bias (MB) and (<b>F</b>) Valid Pixel (VP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Radar plot illustrating the statistical metrics used to evaluate the accuracy of the remote sensing reflectance for each atmospheric correction processor, using different approaches to estimate in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The green line represents the in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> processed according to [<a href="#B37-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">37</a>] with sun and sky glint corrected according to the method proposed in [<a href="#B38-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">38</a>] (M99 + R06). The blue line shows the same approach, not only considering the day of the in situ measurement but also one day before or after to increase the number of match-ups. The red line corresponds to the in situ<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> processed with the 3C model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Optical Water Types (OWT) identified in the Amazon River Continuum and (<b>B</b>) their location for the different campaigns carried out (see <a href="#remotesensing-16-02663-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> and <a href="#remotesensing-16-02663-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a> for more information on the field campaigns).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) The QWIP relationship between Apparent Visible Wavelength (AVW) and the Normalised Difference Index (NDI) at blue-green and red bands, as described in [<a href="#B31-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">31</a>], with the Amazon River Continuum (ARC) in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> dataset showing the different levels of QWIP values (±0.2 dashed grey line and ±0.3 dash-dotted grey line). Each optical water type found at the ARC is represented by a different colour. (<b>B</b>) Histogram of the AVW for our in situ ARC dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mapped S3-OLCI image as an example (8 November 2019), where Apparent Visible Wavelength has been applied after using different atmospheric corrections: (<b>A</b>) Acolite; (<b>B</b>) Polymer; (<b>C</b>) C2RCC and (<b>D</b>) OC-SMART. The white line in the C2RCC image represents the transect used to extract pixels for evaluation. The same transect was applied to all four images processed with different atmospheric corrections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Apparent Visible Wavelength (AVW) values for the same pixel according to different atmospheric correction approaches, with longitudinal variability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mapped S3-OLCI image as an example (8 November 2019), where Quality Water Index Polynomial score was calculated after applying different atmospheric corrections: (<b>A</b>) Acolite; (<b>B</b>) Polymer; (<b>C</b>) C2RCC and (<b>D</b>) OC-SMART. Black pixels are those outside the range of −0.2 to 0.2, as recommended by [<a href="#B31-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. Pixels outside this range are considered as not passing the spectral quality.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Match-ups of simulated in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for S3-OLCI bands and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> derived from different atmospheric correction processors for the same day: (<b>A</b>) Acolite; (<b>B</b>) Polymer; (<b>C</b>) C2RCC; (<b>D</b>) OC-SMART. The in situ and satellite data used for the match-up passed the QWIP score with an interval of ±0.3. The data were measured at the Amazon River Continuum, and the in situ <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> were derived following the methodology proposed by [<a href="#B37-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">37</a>] and the elimination of sun and sky glint as recommended by [<a href="#B38-remotesensing-16-02663" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. Scatter plots are presented on a log–log scale. Circles represent match-ups within a 3 h satellite pass window, while triangles represent match-ups outside the 3 h satellite pass window.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Spectral variation in the statistical parameters between 400 and 779 nm for the in situ and satellite data that passed the QWIP score with an interval of ±0.3: (<b>A</b>) Coefficient of determination (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>), (<b>B</b>) Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), (<b>C</b>) Slope, (<b>D</b>) Mean Relative Absolute Difference (MRAD), (<b>E</b>) Mean Bias (MB) and (<b>F</b>) Valid Pixel (VP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Performance evaluation according to the statistical metrics (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, RMSD, MRAD, MB, VP). Light colours (white or yellow, closer to 0) are likely to have accurate <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>s</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for a given optical water type (OWT: K1, K2, K3 and K4) and S3-OLCI band.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 15374 KiB  
Project Report
Mesophotic Hardground Revealed by Multidisciplinary Cruise on the Brazilian Equatorial Margin
by Luigi Jovane, Allana Q. Azevedo, Eduardo H. Marcon, Fernando Collo Correa e Castro, Halesio Milton C. de Barros Neto, Guarani de Hollanda Cavalcanti, Fabíola A. Lima, Linda G. Waters, Camila F. da Silva, André C. Souza, Lucy Gomes Sant’Anna, Thayse Sant’Ana Fonseca, Luis Silva, Marco A. de C. Merschmann, Gilberto P. Dias, Prabodha Das, Celio Roberto Jonck, Rebeca G. M. Lizárraga, Diana C. de Freitas, Maria R. dos Santos, Kerly A. Jardim, Izabela C. Laurentino, Kyssia K. C. Sousa, Marilia C. Pereira, Yasmim da S. Alencar, Nathalia M. L. Costa, Tobias Rafael M. Coelho, Kevin L. C. Ferrer do Carmo, Rebeca C. Melo, Iara Gadioli Santos, Lucas G. Martins, Sabrina P. Ramos, Márcio R. S. dos Santos, Matheus M. de Almeida, Vivian Helena Pellizari and Paulo Y. G. Sumidaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 702; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070702 - 10 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1394
Abstract
The Amapá margin, part of the Brazilian Equatorial Margin (BEM), is a key region that plays a strategic role in the global climate balance between the North and South Atlantic Ocean as it is strictly tied to equatorial heat conveyance and the fresh/salt [...] Read more.
The Amapá margin, part of the Brazilian Equatorial Margin (BEM), is a key region that plays a strategic role in the global climate balance between the North and South Atlantic Ocean as it is strictly tied to equatorial heat conveyance and the fresh/salt water equilibrium with the Amazon River. We performed a new scientific expedition on the Amapá continental shelf (ACS, northern part of the Amazon continental platform) collecting sediment and using instrumental observation at an unstudied site. We show here the preliminary outcomes following the applied methodologies for investigation. Geophysical, geological, and biological surveys were carried out within the ACS to (1) perform bathymetric and sonographic mapping, high-resolution sub-surface geophysical characterization of the deep environment of the margin of the continental platform, (2) characterize the habitats and benthic communities through underwater images and biological sampling, (3) collect benthic organisms for ecological and taxonomic studies, (4) define the mineralogical and (5) elemental components of sediments from the study region, and (6) identify their provenance. The geophysical data collection included the use of bathymetry, a sub-bottom profiler, side scan sonar, bathythermograph acquisition, moving vessel profiler, and a thermosalinograph. The geological data were obtained through mineralogical, elemental, and grain size analysis. The biological investigation involved epifauna/infauna characterization, microbial analysis, and eDNA analysis. The preliminary results of the geophysical mapping, shallow seismic, and ultrasonographic surveys endorsed the identification of a hard substrate in a mesophotic environment. The preliminary geological data allowed the identification of amphibole, feldspar, biotite, as well as other minerals (e.g., calcite, quartz, goethite, ilmenite) present in the substrata of the Amapá continental shelf. Silicon, iron, calcium, and aluminum composes ~85% of sediments from the ACS. Sand and clay are the main fraction from these sediments. Within the sediments, Polychaeta (Annelida) dominated, followed by Crustacea (Arthropoda), and Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata). Through TowCam videos, 35 taxons with diverse epifauna were recorded, including polychaetes, hydroids, algae, gastropods, anemones, cephalopods, crustaceans, fishes, and sea stars. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Mineralogy and Biogeochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location map of study sites 1–7 (purple circles) within Amazon continental shelf, which are near the limit between Brazil and French Guiana. Black, purple, and red rectangles represent the areas 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Black arrow indicates the North Brazil Current (NBC) and light brown represents the Amazon River plume along the Brazilian coastal region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart with all the methodologies associated with geophysics, geology, and biology (light green squares) used in this study to perform the characterization of the ACS. Those results allowed recognition of the morphological, geological, and biological features of the edge of the continental platform through geophysical mapping, hydrodynamic reconstruction, provenance of sediments, elementary geochemistry, mineralogy, ecology, and taxonomy (light blue squares).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) KC Denmark Box Corer (40 L, sampling box dimensions 40 × 37 × 56 cm), (<b>B</b>) subsamples carried out from an entire box corer. In each box we collected four small cores to perform different analysis, (<b>C</b>) diminished sediment recovery due the presence of hard ground, and (<b>D</b>) ferruginous crusts that prevented retention of intact sediment cores at points 3 and 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sampling of macrofauna with a box corer during the research campaign. (<b>A</b>) Total sediment sample from the box core for faunal sampling; (<b>B</b>) selection of the bioturbated upper portion of the sediment for sieving; (<b>C</b>) cutting and removing the sediment layer of interest; (<b>D</b>) sediment elutriation; (<b>E</b>) capture of living organisms identified in the sediment; (<b>F</b>,<b>G</b>) screening of the sediment in the set of 1.0 and 0.5 mm sieves; (<b>H</b>) registration of collection information; and (<b>I</b>) screening and identification in the Vital de Oliveira wet laboratory of live taxa before preservation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>TowCam system in operation.: (<b>A</b>) TowCam system near people for scale (<b>B</b>) TowCam deployment (<b>C</b>) winch with 1300 m of optical fiber umbilical; (<b>D</b>) TowCam retrieval (<b>E</b>) Dry lab TowCam Operations control and live annotation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Bathymetric map of the whole three study areas showing the seven (7) study sites in which we collected sediment samples through the box corer. The right panel indicates the three dimensional hardground structure commonly present in the study area 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Backscatter map of the region, where the rocky bed exhibits higher contrast than the rest of the area with a very strong reflection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Seismic data from the study area 1 illustrating lines of interest from the acquisition: (<b>A</b>) L418, (<b>B</b>) L420, (<b>C</b>) L442, and (<b>D</b>) L444, showing high acoustic reflectivities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Side scan sonar raw data from the study region illustrating line 11, highlighting a reflective target in a lighter color, which is indicative of the presence of hard ground. Light green lines indicate the grid spacing of 25 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Relative abundance of macrofauna by phyla, collected with a box corer in areas 1, 2, and 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Examples of macrofauna collected with the box corer in areas 1, 2, and 3. Phyla Annelida: (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Eunice</span> sp.; (<b>B</b>) Priapulidae; (<b>C</b>) polychaete tube. Phylum Cnidaria: (<b>D</b>) Scleractinia, prov. Deltocyathus. Phylum Echinodermata: (<b>E</b>) Ophiuroidea. Phylum Arthropoda, Class Crustacea: (<b>F</b>) Piscidae crab; (<b>G</b>) Cirripedia; (<b>H</b>) Decapoda Thalassinidea; (<b>I</b>) Isopoda. Phylum Mollusca: (<b>J</b>) Bivalvia; (<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>) Gastropoda.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Total abundance graph of organisms sampled by box corer, separated into areas 1, 2, and 3. “Polychaeta” refers to polychaetes that have not yet been identified to the family (or genus) level.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>XRD result from top depth sample from core MEQ 5B-3 with major mineralogy and its associated d-spacing value. Light green line represents the background of the sample. The red line indicates the intensity peaks of minerals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>XRD results from top sample MEQ 6A-1 displaying the major groups of minerals found (feldspar, chlorite) as well as goethite, calcite, and quartz with their respective d-spacing values. Light green line represents the background of the sample. The red line indicates the intensity peaks of minerals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>XRF results from top sample MEQ 5B-3 in which Si, Fe, Ca, Al, Cl, and K are the main elements present and display the highest intensities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Grain size results from top depth samples from sites 5 and 6, showing minor differences between both samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The TowCam video sampling transect, shown in red at three different scales, extended approximately 2.6 km, with an average depth of 280 m. The transect is illustrated with respect to the South American coastline (upper left map),the overall sampling area (right map) and with respect to the 300 m isobath (lower left map). Box corer samples (green triangles) were collected at 7 locations (right map), three of which occurring along the transect line (lower left map), identified by their box core sample IDs. The red dots along the transect mark the distribution of organisms recorded in the images. The two gaps within the transect are indicative of regions where visibility was too poor to identify the presence of organisms rather than an absence of fauna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Abundance of the benthic macro- and megafauna recorded using the BMPTech TowCam in area 2, graphed on a logarithmic scale.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 9411 KiB  
Article
A Probabilistic Study of CO2 Plume Geothermal and Hydrothermal Systems: A Sensitivity Study of Different Reservoir Conditions in Williston Basin, North Dakota
by Emmanuel Gyimah, Olusegun Tomomewo, Luc Yvan Nkok, Shree Om Bade, Ebenezer Asare Ofosu and Maxwell Collins Bawuah
Eng 2024, 5(3), 1407-1421; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5030074 - 10 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 902
Abstract
The exploration of alternative energy sources has gained significant traction in recent years, driven by the urgent need to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and transition towards sustainable energy. Among these alternatives, CO2 plume geothermal and hydrothermal systems have emerged as promising [...] Read more.
The exploration of alternative energy sources has gained significant traction in recent years, driven by the urgent need to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and transition towards sustainable energy. Among these alternatives, CO2 plume geothermal and hydrothermal systems have emerged as promising options due to their potential for providing clean, renewable energy. This study presents a probabilistic investigation into the sensitivity of CO2 plume geothermal and hydrothermal systems under various reservoir conditions in the Williston Basin, North Dakota. In addition to elucidating the impact of reservoir conditions on system performance, the study utilizes probabilistic methods to assess energy output of CO2 plume geothermal and hydrothermal systems. Insights derived from this probabilistic investigation offer valuable guidance for the working fluid selection, systems design and optimization in the Williston Basin and beyond. Results from the sensitivity analysis reveal the profound influence of reservoir conditions on the behavior and efficiency of CO2 plume geothermal and hydrothermal systems. Our case study on Red River Formation and Deadwood Formations shows a potential of 34% increase and 32% decrease in heat extraction based on varying reservoir conditions. Our investigations in the Beaver Lodge field within the Red River Formation yielded arithmetic mean values for CO2 best case resources, hydrothermal resources and the CO2 worst case as 6.36 × 1018 J, 4.75 × 1018 J and 3.24 × 1018 J, respectively. Overall, this research contributes to advancing the knowledge and understanding of CO2 plume geothermal and hydrothermal systems as viable pathways towards sustainable energy production and carbon sequestration. By highlighting the sensitivity of these systems to reservoir conditions, the study provides valuable insights that can inform decision-making processes and future research endeavours aimed at fostering the transition to a low-carbon energy landscape. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GeoEnergy Science and Engineering 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Modified North Dakota Stratigraphic column showing era, system, rock units, litho-column, and thickness [<a href="#B24-eng-05-00074" class="html-bibr">24</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>NDIC Map highlighting location of Beaver Lodge field (Depicted in black square) [<a href="#B25-eng-05-00074" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart for Probabilistic Parametric Approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Probabilistic Expectation curve for Beaver Lodge field.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 6389 KiB  
Article
Continuity and Enhancements in Sea Surface Salinity Estimation in the East China Sea Using GOCI and GOCI-II: Challenges and Further Developments
by Eunna Jang, Jong-Kuk Choi and Jae-Hyun Ahn
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(12), 2111; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122111 - 11 Jun 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 970
Abstract
During the summer, substantial freshwater discharge from the Changjiang River into the East China Sea (ECS) results in extensive low-salinity water (LSW) plumes that significantly affect regions along the southern Korean Peninsula and near Jeju Island. Previous research developed an empirical equation to [...] Read more.
During the summer, substantial freshwater discharge from the Changjiang River into the East China Sea (ECS) results in extensive low-salinity water (LSW) plumes that significantly affect regions along the southern Korean Peninsula and near Jeju Island. Previous research developed an empirical equation to estimate sea surface salinity (SSS) in the ECS during the summer season using remote-sensing reflectance (Rrs) data from bands 3–6 (490, 555, 660, and 680 nm) of the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI). With the conclusion of the GOCI mission in March 2021, this study aims to ensure the continuity of SSS estimation in the ECS by transitioning to its successor, the GOCI-II. This transition was facilitated through two approaches: applying the existing GOCI-based equation and introducing a new machine learning method using a random forest model. Our analysis demonstrated a high correlation between SSS estimates derived from the GOCI and GOCI-II when applying the equation developed for the GOCI to both satellites, as indicated by a robust R2 value of 0.984 and a low RMSD of 0.8465 psu. This study successfully addressed the challenge of maintaining continuous SSS estimation in the ECS post-GOCI mission and evaluated the accuracy and limitations of the GOCI-II-derived SSS, proposing future strategies to enhance its effectiveness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ocean Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The East China Sea (ECS) study area and the in situ data collection sites used in this study. The green circle represents the Ieodo Ocean Research Station’s location (32.12°N and 125.18°S), and the blue circles depict the distribution of serial oceanographic observation data collected in August 2020 and 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart for the procedural steps for estimating the SSS from GOCI-II data. Choi’s equation is represented as a multilinear regression equation used to estimate the SSS in the ECS using GOCI data, as explained in <a href="#sec3dot2-remotesensing-16-02111" class="html-sec">Section 3.2</a>. ‘GII-C SSS’ is the SSS derived from GOCI-II using Choi’s equation, whereas ‘GII-RF SSS’ indicates the SSS derived from GOCI-II using the machine learning model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatterplots of the adjusted GOCI-II R<sub>rs</sub> versus GOCI R<sub>rs</sub> for bands at (<b>a</b>) 443 nm, (<b>b</b>) 555 nm, (<b>c</b>) 660 nm, and (<b>d</b>) 680 nm. The color bar depicts data density on a logarithmic scale, visually depicting the alignment of the GOCI-II R<sub>rs</sub> with the GOCI R<sub>rs</sub> across the examined spectral bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatterplots comparing the GOCI-derived SSS with GII-C SSS, distinguishing between SSS estimates derived from adjusted GOCI-II R<sub>rs</sub> data (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and those using original GOCI-II R<sub>rs</sub> data (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>). The results for all August 2020 pixels are shown in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), while (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) exclude GOCI-II pixels that were flagged as turbid pixels. The color bar depicts data density on a logarithmic scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Modeling results from the random forest (RF) model, using in situ data for calibration (<b>a</b>) and validation (<b>b</b>), demonstrating the model’s performance in estimating SSS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatterplots comparing in situ data with the GII-C SSS (<b>a</b>), GII-RF SSS (<b>b</b>), GOCI-derived SSS (<b>c</b>), SMAP L2B SSS (<b>d</b>), and SMAP L3 SSS (<b>e</b>), distinguishing between I-ORS data (green circles) and NIFS data (blue circles).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The daily SSS comparison between the in situ I-ORS data and various satellite-derived SSS products for August 2020 and 2021, with the X-axis marking the days of August.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Scatterplots comparing the GOCI-II-derived SSS with the SMAP L2B SSS (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and SMAP L3 SSS (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>), covering all pixels from August 2020 to 2021. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) include the entire dataset, whereas (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) focus specifically on pixels from GOCI-II data not classified as turbid. The color bar depicts data density on a logarithmic scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Spatial distribution maps of SSS as derived from GII-C SSS (<b>a</b>), GOCI-derived SSS (<b>b</b>), SMAP L2B SSS (<b>c</b>), and SMAP L3 SSS (<b>d</b>) data at UTC03 on 30 August 2020, with the I-ORS highlighted by a black circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of GOCI-II R<sub>rs</sub> (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and the resultant GII-C SSS (<b>e</b>) for UTC03 on 30 August 2020, illustrating the close alignment between R<sub>rs</sub> and SSS estimations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spatial distribution of the GOCI-II R<sub>rs</sub> at 555 nm (<b>a</b>), 660 nm (<b>b</b>), and GOCI-II-derived SSS (<b>c</b>) at UTC03 on 15 August 2020. (<b>b</b>) Delineates each GOCI-II slot with matching boundaries and slot numbers, highlighting the spatial variability across the slots.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 3254 KiB  
Article
Genetic Population Structure of Lane Snapper Lutjanus synagris (Linnaeus, 1758) in Western Atlantic: Implications for Conservation
by Mayra Núñez-Vallecillo, Iván Vera-Escalona, Antonella Rivera, Konrad Górski and Antonio Brante
Diversity 2024, 16(6), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060336 - 7 Jun 2024
Viewed by 2622
Abstract
Genetic structure and connectivity information can be used to identify biological corridors and prioritize the conservation of areas that help maintain ecosystem integrity. Some marine fish, especially those of commercial interest, have been proposed as suitable indicators to identify potential marine biological corridors [...] Read more.
Genetic structure and connectivity information can be used to identify biological corridors and prioritize the conservation of areas that help maintain ecosystem integrity. Some marine fish, especially those of commercial interest, have been proposed as suitable indicators to identify potential marine biological corridors due to their high mobility among habitats and socioeconomic importance. In this study, we assessed the genetic structure of lane snapper populations in the Honduran Caribbean to evaluate connectivity and identify potential environmental barriers. Furthermore, we evaluated the genetic characteristics of the lane snapper on a larger spatial scale, including populations across the rest of its distribution range in the western Atlantic, using mtDNA and nuDNA markers. Our results demonstrate a significant genetic diversity of lane snappers in the Honduran Caribbean. Furthermore, despite their high dispersal potential, we observed genetic structuring in lane snapper populations on a larger spatial scale, resulting in the formation of two distinct groups throughout their distribution range: group 1 from Florida, the Gulf of Mexico, Honduras, and Colombia and group 2 from Puerto Rico and Brazil. This genetic differentiation can be attributed to oceanographic barriers such as river plumes and marine currents. These findings have the potential to significantly impact marine conservation and management efforts in the region, both at local and regional scales. It is anticipated that they will not only inform but also elicit a response, driving further action towards effective conservation measures. At a local scale, we recommend that conservation efforts focus on protecting critical habitats. At a regional scale, lane snappers should be included in the management plans of existing marine protected areas necessary to ensure the long-term sustainability of the species and the marine ecosystems in which it resides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity in 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of study localities to assess genetic population diversity and connectivity of lane snapper (<span class="html-italic">Lutjanus synagris</span>). Abbreviations represent sampling localities. Green samples from Honduras: TE (Tela), CU (Cuero y Salado), CA (Cayos Cochinos), TR (Trujillo). Red GenBank sequence: Gulf of Mexico: Pl (Port Isabel), AR (Aransas), Pl (Port Lavaca), GA (Galveston), LO (Louisiana), AL (Alabama) [<a href="#B35-diversity-16-00336" class="html-bibr">35</a>]; Florida: FW (Florida West), FK (Florida Keys), FE (Florida West) [<a href="#B38-diversity-16-00336" class="html-bibr">38</a>], and CO (Colombia) [<a href="#B37-diversity-16-00336" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; Puerto Rico: PW (Puerto Rico West), PE (Puerto Rico East), ST (Saint Thomas), SC (Saint Croix) [<a href="#B38-diversity-16-00336" class="html-bibr">38</a>]; Brazil: AM (Amapá), PA (Pará), MA (Maranhão), CE (Ceará), RG (Rio Grande do Norte), BA (Bahia), and ES (Espírito Santo) [<a href="#B37-diversity-16-00336" class="html-bibr">37</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>). Mitochondrial DNA (ND4 marker). Genetic differentiation was based on <span class="html-italic">FST</span> values obtained from sampled localities along the distribution of lane snappers (<span class="html-italic">Lutjanus synagris</span>). The values in red indicate a greater level of structure compared to the values in green (* Denotes significant values). (<b>B</b>) A two-dimensional non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) plot was used to summarize <span class="html-italic">FST</span> genetic distances. Group 1 represents sites from the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, Honduras, and Colombia, while Group 2 represents sites from Puerto Rico and Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A haplotype network, based on maximum likelihood, was used to indicate the relationship between lane snapper (<span class="html-italic">Lutjanus synagris</span>) haplotypes throughout the western Atlantic, based on mtDNA ND4. Each circle in the plot corresponds to a haplotype, and its size is proportional to the frequency of that haplotype. The small black circles represent undetected haplotypes. The colors in the plot correspond to the localities indicated in the legend: cream for Honduras, green for Colombia, blue scale for Brazil, purple scale for the Gulf of Mexico, yellow scale for Florida, and red scale for Puerto Rico.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Graphs of pairwise mismatch of lane snappers (<span class="html-italic">Lutjanus synagris</span>) for ND4. (<b>A</b>) Total, including Group 1 and Group 2; (<b>B</b>) Group 1, including Florida Keys, Gulf of Mexico, Honduras, Colombia; (<b>C</b>) Group 2, including Puerto Rico and Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bayesian skyline plot for lane snappers (<span class="html-italic">Lutjanus synagris</span>) based on the mitochondrial marker ND4 sequences. The thick solid line represents the median, while the blue regions represent the 95% confidence intervals.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4957 KiB  
Article
Amazon River Plume in the Western Tropical North Atlantic
by Eugene G. Morozov, Dmitry I. Frey, Pavel A. Salyuk and Maxim V. Budyansky
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(6), 851; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060851 - 21 May 2024
Viewed by 1490
Abstract
Measurements of temperature, salinity, and currents in the Amazon River plume over a section in the open ocean of the western tropical North Atlantic (38°48′ W) are considered. The measurements were carried out using an AML Base X CTD probe in the upper [...] Read more.
Measurements of temperature, salinity, and currents in the Amazon River plume over a section in the open ocean of the western tropical North Atlantic (38°48′ W) are considered. The measurements were carried out using an AML Base X CTD probe in the upper layer and a flow-through system that measures salinity, turbidity, and chlorophyll-a content in seawater while a vessel is on the way. The measurements were supplemented by velocity profiling using shipborne SADCP. Additionally, archived oceanographic data from the World Ocean Database (WOD18), data on satellite altimetry measurements (AVISO), and satellite salinity data from Aquarius and SMOS were used. It is shown that the width of the Amazon River plume is about 170–400 km and the depth of desalination is from 50 to 100 m. Surface salinity decreases compared to the background (36.1) by 0.25 in February and by more than 3.0 in September during the period of maximum development of the plume, which was determined from satellite measurements of surface salinity. Lagrangian modeling of the back-in-time advection of passive markers simulating freshwater particles was carried out. It was shown that the source of freshwater in the measurement area is discharge from the Amazon River. Amazon River freshwater covered a distance of 3300 km in 60–80 days. The estimate of freshwater transport in the plume was 0.02 Sv, which is one order of magnitude smaller than the mean river discharge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrodynamic Circulation Modelling in the Marine Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of monthly surface salinity based on SMAP satellite data in October 2023. (Color scale of salinity is given on the right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scheme of currents in the tropical West Atlantic that transport Amazon River waters in the ocean based on [<a href="#B5-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B6-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B20-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B26-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B29-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. Red arrows show plumes of the Orinoco and Amazon rivers. NBC is North Brazil Current; NECC is North Equatorial Countercurrent; GC is Guiana Current; and NEC is North Equatorial Current. (Color scale of depth is given on the right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Absolute dynamic topography (ADT) of the tropical West Atlantic on 1 February 2024 (<b>top panel</b>). Geostrophic currents calculated from the ADT data (<b>bottom panel</b>). The black line shows the location of our section from 3° to 12° N. Arrows show velocity vectors. The scale of velocity vectors is shown in the inset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Zonal component of the Northern Equatorial Current and other currents over the section from 3°00′ N to 12°00′ N at 30°48′ W (<b>top panel</b>). Surface salinity (green line) from flow system data (<b>bottom panel</b>). The horizontal scale is the same for both panels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Salinity section at the intersection with the plume of desalinated waters at 38°48.0′ W on 1–2 February 2024 (<b>left panel</b>). Salinity profile at the station at latitude 5°20′ N (<b>right panel</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Graphs of variations in salinity, turbidity, and chlorophyll-a as recorded by the vessel’s flow-through system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Composition of daily traces of trajectories of passive markers simulating Amazon River waters, selected in the segments with the minimum measured salinities (5°12.0′–5°15.6′ N, 38°48′ W, 2 February 2024 and 8°27′–8°33′ N, 38°48′ W, 4 February 2024) over the section. The marker trajectories were calculated back in time over 180 days based on the AVISO velocity field. The initial location of the tracers is indicated with the black dots. The line after which trajectories were not calculated is shown with a white color. Color scale of time is given on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Salinity section when crossing a plume of desalinated waters at 35°00′ W on 27–29 April 1996.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Salinity section when crossing a plume of desalinated waters at 35°00′ W on 4–5 February 1993.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Variations in the surface salinity of the Amazon River plume based on the SMAP satellite data in February and September 2021–2023 [<a href="#B18-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">18</a>], which is similar to [<a href="#B14-jmse-12-00851" class="html-bibr">14</a>] but updated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Salinity section when crossing a plume of desalinated waters at 34°00′ W on 3–5 September 1986.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Vertical distributions of salinity in September during the period of minimum salinity on the surface in different years in comparison with our data in February 2024.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 2883 KiB  
Article
Genetic Variability and Genetic Differentiation of Populations in the Grooved Carpet Shell Clam (Ruditapes decussatus) Based on Intron Polymorphisms
by Carlos Saavedra and David Cordero
Oceans 2024, 5(2), 257-275; https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans5020016 - 6 May 2024
Viewed by 1428
Abstract
The grooved carpet-shell clam is one of the most economically relevant shellfish species living in the Mediterranean and nearby Atlantic coasts. Previous studies using different types of genetic markers showed a remarkable genetic divergence of the eastern Mediterranean, western Mediterranean, and Atlantic populations, [...] Read more.
The grooved carpet-shell clam is one of the most economically relevant shellfish species living in the Mediterranean and nearby Atlantic coasts. Previous studies using different types of genetic markers showed a remarkable genetic divergence of the eastern Mediterranean, western Mediterranean, and Atlantic populations, but important details remained unclear. Here, data from six nuclear introns scored for restriction fragment size polymorphisms in eight populations that have not been studied before have been pooled for the analysis with data scattered through three previous studies, totaling 32 samples from 29 locations. The results show lower levels of heterozygosity, higher mean number of alleles, and alleles with restricted distribution in the Mediterranean populations, suggesting the existence of a large, isolated population in the eastern Mediterranean at the middle Pleistocene. The data also confirm the similarity of populations from Tunisia to Western Mediterranean populations. Finally, a genetic mosaic is apparent in the Atlantic coasts of the Iberian Peninsula, with a divergence of Rias Baixas populations from more northern populations and Central Portugal populations. The effects of oceanic fronts, seasonal upwellings, river plumes, and/or fishery management operations could explain this and other features of the Atlantic populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Maps showing the locations considered in this study and the main geographic and oceanographic features cited in the text. Red dots show the new locations sampled for this study. Black dots show locations sampled in previous studies. (<b>a</b>) Locations outside of the Atlantic coasts of the Iberian Peninsula. BF: Balearic Front. AOOF: Almeria–Oran oceanographic front; S-TS: Siculo–Tunisian Strait. (<b>b</b>) Locations on the Atlantic coasts of the Iberian Peninsula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Plot of the mean number of alleles per locus (Na) and the mean heterozygosity per locus (H) in the clam populations from the Atlantic (AT), West Mediterranean (WM), and East Mediterranean (EM) regions. Dot sizes are proportional to sample sizes (N).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Neighbor-joining tree of the clam populations based on F<sub>ST</sub> distances. Colored lines group populations according to the geographic regions cited in the text. Note the lack of correspondence between genetic distance and geographic position of some populations, marked in squares.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Plot of the posterior probabilities for each K value from the Bayesian analysis of genetic structure. (<b>b</b>) Plot of Evanno et al.’s ∆K for each K value from the Bayesian analysis of genetic structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plots of cluster frequencies from the Bayesian analysis of genetic structure for K = 2 (<b>above</b>) and K = 6 (<b>below</b>), for all individuals and populations. Clusters are defined by colors. The table below the plots gives the average proportions of each cluster in each population for K = 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flow of water masses (thick arrows), upwelling, and front (thin arrows) near the NW coasts of the Iberian Peninsula in summer. See Discussion for explanations.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 13719 KiB  
Article
Numerical Study on the Formation Mechanism of Plume Bulge in the Pearl River Estuary under the Influence of River Discharge
by Chenyu Zhao, Nan Wang, Yang Ding, Dehai Song, Junmin Li, Mengqi Li, Lingling Zhou, Hang Yu, Yanyu Chen and Xianwen Bao
Water 2024, 16(9), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091296 - 2 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1371
Abstract
Previous studies have investigated the characteristics and influencing factors of plume bulge in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) using observations and numerical simulations. However, the understanding of how river discharge affects plume bulge is not consistent, and the response mechanism of plume bulge [...] Read more.
Previous studies have investigated the characteristics and influencing factors of plume bulge in the Pearl River Estuary (PRE) using observations and numerical simulations. However, the understanding of how river discharge affects plume bulge is not consistent, and the response mechanism of plume bulge to changes in river discharge has not been revealed in detail. In this study, a three-dimensional hydrodynamic Finite-Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FVCOM) is constructed, and five experiments were set to characterize the horizontal and vertical distribution of the plume bulge outside the PRE under different river discharge conditions during spring tide. The physical mechanisms of plume bulge generation and its response mechanisms to river discharge were discussed through standardized analysis and momentum diagnostic analysis. The results indicate that the plume bulge is sensitive to changes in river discharge. When the river discharge is relatively low (e.g., less than 11,720 m3/s observed in the dry season), the bulge cannot be formed. Conversely, when the river discharge is relatively high (e.g., exceeding 23,440 m3/s observed in flood season), the bulge is more significant. The plume bulge is formed by the anticyclonic flow resulting from the action of the Coriolis force on the strongly mixed river plume. The bulge remains stable under the combined effects of barotropic force, baroclinic gradient force, and Coriolis force. The reduction of river discharge weakens the mixing of freshwater and seawater, resulting in the reduction of both the volume and momentum of the river plume, and the balance between advective diffusion and Coriolis forces are altered, resulting in the plume, which is originally flushed out from the Lantau Channel, not being able to maintain the anticyclonic structure and instead floating out along the coast of the western side of the PRE, with the disappearance of the plume bulge. Due to the significant influence of plume bulges on the physical and biogeochemical interactions between estuaries and terrestrial environments, studying the physical mechanisms behind the formation of plume bulges is crucial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coastal Management and Nearshore Hydrodynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Map of South China Sea (SCS). (<b>b</b>) Depth and the locations of stations of the Pearl River Estuary (PRE). The blue dots represent the locations of current stations. The red stars represent the tidal stations. The cross-plume sections in <a href="#sec4dot4dot2-water-16-01296" class="html-sec">Section 4.4.2</a> are denoted by red segments. (<b>c</b>) River discharge of PRE in April 2019. The red points represent 2 and 23 April 2019.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Domain area and computational mesh of the model. The distances of the study area from the eastern, southern, and western open boundaries are 109, 102, and 154 km, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison between observation data and model data. Blue lines are model data and red dots are observations. (<b>A</b>) Tidal stations; (<b>B</b>) Current stations Y1–Y3; (<b>C</b>) Current Stations C1–C6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Large-scale verification of salinity in the surface layer. The (<b>a1</b>) is observation data and (<b>a2</b>) is model data. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b3</b>) are scatterplots of observation salinity and model salinity in each layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagram of research structure and expected results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The top panel (<b>a</b>) shows the sea surface elevation of 22–23 April 2019 at T2 Station (the red star in <a href="#water-16-01296-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>). Moments I–IV are represented by red points. (<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) Salinity-current distribution for the surface layer, middle layer, and bottom layer, respectively; the color and white arrows represent the salinity field and current field, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Salinity-current distributions of the surface layer of all experiments, (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>,<b>e1</b>–<b>e4</b>) represent Exp1–Exp5, respectively; colors represent the salinity distribution and white arrows represent the current vectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Vertical salinity distribution in Section A shown in <a href="#water-16-01296-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>. Colors and contours represent the salinity, and vertical and horizontal coordinates indicate the water depth and longitude, respectively. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>,<b>e1</b>–<b>e4</b>) represent Exp1–Exp5, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Vertical salinity distribution in Section B, shown in <a href="#water-16-01296-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>, (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>,<b>e1</b>–<b>e4</b>) represent Exp1–Exp5, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Distribution of <span class="html-italic">Sr</span> at Moments I–IV in PRE. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) represent Exp1–4, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Distribution of <span class="html-italic">S<sub>A</sub></span> in PRE. Each column from left to right represents the surface, middle, and bottom layers, respectively. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a3</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b3</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c3</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d3</b>) represent Exp1–4, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Distribution of the momentum balance terms for the surface layer in (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>) Exp1, (<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) Exp2. (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>), and (<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) represent U-direction and V-direction, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Distribution of the momentum balance terms for the surface layer in (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>) Exp3, (<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) Exp4., (<b>a1</b>–<b>a4</b>,<b>c1</b>–<b>c4</b>), and (<b>b1</b>–<b>b4</b>,<b>d1</b>–<b>d4</b>) represent U-direction and V-direction, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 17222 KiB  
Article
Salinity Fronts in the South Atlantic
by Igor M. Belkin and Xin-Tang Shen
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(9), 1578; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091578 - 29 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1399
Abstract
Monthly climatology data for salinity fronts in the South Atlantic have been created from satellite SMOS sea surface salinity (SSS) measurements taken from 2011–2019, processed at the Barcelona Expert Center of Remote Sensing (BEC), and provided as high-resolution (1/20°) daily SSS data. The [...] Read more.
Monthly climatology data for salinity fronts in the South Atlantic have been created from satellite SMOS sea surface salinity (SSS) measurements taken from 2011–2019, processed at the Barcelona Expert Center of Remote Sensing (BEC), and provided as high-resolution (1/20°) daily SSS data. The SSS fronts have been identified with narrow zones of enhanced horizontal gradient magnitude (GM) of SSS, computed using the Belkin–O’Reilly algorithm (BOA). The SSS gradient fields generated by the BOA have been log-transformed to facilitate feature recognition. The log-transformation of SSS gradients markedly improved the visual contrast of gradient maps, which in turn allowed new features to be revealed and previously known features to be documented with a monthly temporal resolution and a mesoscale (~100 km) spatial resolution. Monthly climatologies were generated and analyzed for large-scale open-ocean SSS fronts and for low-salinity regions maintained by the Rio de la Plata discharge, Magellan Strait outflow, Congo River discharge, and Benguela Upwelling. A 2000 km-long triangular area between Africa and Brazil was found to be filled with regular quasi-meridional mesoscale striations that form a giant ripple field with a 100 km wave length. South of the Tropical Front, within the subtropical high-salinity pool, a trans-ocean quasi-zonal narrow linear belt of meridional SSS maximum (Smax) was documented. The meridional Smax belt shifts north–south seasonally while retaining its well-defined linear morphology, which is suggestive of a yet unidentified mechanism that maintains this feature. The Subtropical Frontal Zone (STFZ) consists of two tenuously connected fronts, western and eastern. The Brazil Current Front (BCF) extends SE between 40 and 45°S to join the subantarctic front (SAF). The STFZ trends NW–SE across the South Atlantic, seemingly merging with the SAF/BCF south of Africa to form a single front between 40 and 45°S. In the SW Atlantic, the Rio de la Plata plume migrates seasonally, expanding northward in winter (June–July) from 39°S into the South Brazilian Bight, up to Cabo Frio (23°S) and beyond. The inner Plata front moves in and out seasonally. Farther south, the Magellan Strait outflow expands northward in winter (June–July) from 53°S up to 39–40°S to nearly join the Plata outflow. In the SE Atlantic, the Congo River plume spreads radially from the river mouth, with the spreading direction varying seasonally. The plume is often bordered from the south by a quasi-zonal front along 6°S. The diluted Congo River water spreads southward seasonally down to the Angola–Benguela Front at 16°S. The Benguela Upwelling is delineated by a meridional front, which extends north alongshore up to 20°S, where the low-salinity Benguela Upwelling water forms a salinity front, which is separate from the thermal Angola–Benguela Front at 16°S. The high-salinity tropical water (“Angola water”) forms a wedge between the low-salinity waters of the Congo River outflow and Benguela Upwelling. This high-salinity wedge is bordered by salinity fronts that migrate north–south seasonally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Remote Sensing of Ocean Salinity)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS, January–June. (<b>b</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS, July–December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS, January–June. (<b>b</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS, July–December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of sea surface salinity SSS, January–June. (<b>b</b>) Log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of sea surface salinity SSS, July–December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of sea surface salinity SSS, January–June. (<b>b</b>) Log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of sea surface salinity SSS, July–December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly distributions of SSS along 7 meridians between 40°W and 20°E from the equator to 50°S. Monthly curves are numbered as in the legend (1 January, … 12 December).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly SSS in the Rio de la Plata outflow region, January–June. (<b>b</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly SSS in the Rio de la Plata outflow region, July–December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly SSS in the Rio de la Plata outflow region, January–June. (<b>b</b>) Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly SSS in the Rio de la Plata outflow region, July–December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly log-transformed gradient of SSS in the Rio de la Plata outflow region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS in the Plata Estuary region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS gradient magnitude in the Plata Estuary region. Red fingers along the northern flank of the estuary are likely artifacts since their scale is smaller than the resolution of the original SSS data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS and log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of SSS in mid-summer (February) and mid-winter (August) in the Magellan Strait outflow region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS in the Congo River outflow region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of gradient magnitude GM of SSS in the Congo River outflow region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS and log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of SSS in mid-summer (February) and mid-winter (August) in the Congo-Angola-Benguela region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Long-term (2011–2019) mean monthly maps of SSS and log-transformed gradient magnitude GM of SSS in mid-summer (February) and mid-winter (August) in the Benguela Upwelling region.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop