Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (316)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = photosystem II (PSII)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 3417 KiB  
Article
Divergent Photosynthetic Strategies of Lupinus polyphyllus and Helleborus viridis During Cold Acclimation and Freezing–Thaw Recovery
by Pengyuan Xie, Yining Zhao, Xin Zhao, Linbo Xu, Kai Wang, Ruidong Jia, Yaping Kou, Hong Ge, Wenjun Wang and Shuhua Yang
Plants 2025, 14(4), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14040607 - 17 Feb 2025
Abstract
Low temperatures can significantly affect the growth of ornamental plants, emphasizing the importance of improving their cold tolerance. However, comparative studies on the photosynthetic responses of sun and shade plants to low temperatures remain limited. In this study, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence in [...] Read more.
Low temperatures can significantly affect the growth of ornamental plants, emphasizing the importance of improving their cold tolerance. However, comparative studies on the photosynthetic responses of sun and shade plants to low temperatures remain limited. In this study, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence in Photosystem II (PSII) and Photosystem I (PSI), the antioxidant system, the osmoregulator substance, and lipid peroxidation were investigated in the shade plant Helleborus viridis (Hv) and the sun plant Lupinus polyphyllus (Lp) during cold acclimation (CA) and the freezing–thaw recovery (FTR). The CA treatment significantly declined the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) in Hv and Lp, indicating the photoinhibition occurred in both species. However, Hv exhibited a much better photosynthetic stability to maintain Pn, Fv/Fm, and carboxylation efficiency (CE) than Lp during CA, suggesting that Hv had a greater photosynthetic resilience compared to Lp. Furthermore, Hv preferred to maintain Pn, Fv/Fm, the actual photosynthetic efficiency of PSII (Y(II)), and the actual photosynthetic efficiency of PSI (Y(I)) to consistently provide the necessary energy for the carbon assimilation process, while Lp tended to divert and dissipate excess energy by thermal dissipation and cyclic electron flow during CA. Moreover, there were higher soluble sugar contents in Hv in comparison to Lp. These traits allowed Hv to recover photosynthetic efficiency and maintain cellular integrity better than Lp after the freezing stress. In conclusion, CA significantly reduced the photosynthetic capacity and led to the divergent photosynthetic strategies of both species, which finally resulted in a different freezing tolerance after the freezing–thaw recovery. These findings provide insights into the divergent photoprotective strategies of sun and shade plants in response to cold temperatures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Changes in the leaf (<b>A</b>) net photosynthetic rate (Pn), (<b>B</b>) stomatal conductance (Gs), (<b>C</b>) intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (Ci), (<b>D</b>) transpiration rate (Tr), (<b>E</b>) stomatal limitation (Ls) and (<b>F</b>) water use efficiency (WUE) in the seedlings of <span class="html-italic">Lupinus polyphyllus</span> and <span class="html-italic">Helleborus viridis</span> during cold acclimation (CA) and the following freezing–thaw recovery (FTR). Values are the means of five biological replicates ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Means followed by the different letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Changes in the (<b>A</b>) minimum fluorescence (Fo) and (<b>B</b>) maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) in the seedlings of <span class="html-italic">Lupinus polyphyllus</span> and <span class="html-italic">Helleborus viridis</span> during cold acclimation and the following freezing–thaw recovery. Values are the means of five biological replicates ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Means followed by the different letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Changes in the (<b>A</b>) actual photosynthetic efficiency of PSII (Y(II)), (<b>B</b>) the efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PSII reaction centers (Fv′/Fm′), (<b>C</b>) PSII photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR(PSII)), (<b>D</b>) PSII excitation pressure(1-qP), (<b>E</b>) the effective quantum yield of PSII (Y(NO)), and the (<b>F</b>) quantum yield of regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PSII (Y(NPQ)) in the seedlings of <span class="html-italic">Lupinus polyphyllus</span> and <span class="html-italic">Helleborus viridis</span> during cold acclimation and the following freezing–thaw recovery. Values are the means of five biological replicates ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Means followed by the different letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Changes in the (<b>A</b>) actual photosynthetic efficiency of PSI Y(I), (<b>B</b>) PSI photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR(PSI)), (<b>C</b>) PSI non-photochemical energy dissipation due to the donor-side limitation (Y(ND)), and the (<b>D</b>) PSI non-photochemical energy dissipation due to the acceptor-side limitation (Y(NA)) in the seedlings of <span class="html-italic">Lupinus polyphyllus</span> and <span class="html-italic">Helleborus viridis</span> during cold acclimation and the following freezing–thaw recovery. Values are the means of five biological replicates ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Means followed by the different letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in the (<b>A</b>) Hydrogen peroxide content (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), the antioxidant enzyme activities of (<b>B</b>) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (<b>C</b>) peroxidase (POD), (<b>D</b>) catalase (CAT), (<b>E</b>) ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and (<b>F</b>) glutathione reductase (GR) in the seedlings of <span class="html-italic">Lupinus polyphyllus</span> and <span class="html-italic">Helleborus viridis</span> during cold acclimation and the following freezing–thaw recovery. Values are the means of five biological replicates ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Means followed by the different letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Changes in (<b>A</b>) proline, (<b>B</b>) soluble sugars, (<b>C</b>) relative electrical conductivity (REC), and (<b>D</b>) thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) in the seedlings of <span class="html-italic">Lupinus polyphyllus</span> and <span class="html-italic">Helleborus viridis</span> during cold acclimation and the following freezing–thaw recovery. Values are the means of five biological replicates ± SE (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Means followed by the different letters indicate the significant differences among the treatments at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 9508 KiB  
Article
Responses of Tomato Photosystem II Photochemistry to Pegylated Zinc-Doped Ferrite Nanoparticles
by Ilektra Sperdouli, Kleoniki Giannousi, Julietta Moustaka, Orestis Antonoglou, Catherine Dendrinou-Samara and Michael Moustakas
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(4), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15040288 - 13 Feb 2025
Abstract
Various metal-based nanomaterials have been the focus of research regarding their use in controlling pests and diseases and in improving crop yield and quality. In this study, we synthesized via a solvothermal procedure pegylated zinc-doped ferrite (ZnFer) NPs and characterized their physicochemical properties [...] Read more.
Various metal-based nanomaterials have been the focus of research regarding their use in controlling pests and diseases and in improving crop yield and quality. In this study, we synthesized via a solvothermal procedure pegylated zinc-doped ferrite (ZnFer) NPs and characterized their physicochemical properties by X-ray diffraction (XRD), vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), FT-IR and UV–Vis spectroscopies, as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Subsequently, their impact on tomato photosynthetic efficiency was evaluated by using chlorophyll a fluorescence imaging analysis to estimate the light energy use efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), 30, 60, and 180 min after foliar spray of tomato plants with distilled water (control plants) or 15 mg L−1 and 30 mg L−1 ZnFer NPs. The PSII responses of tomato leaves to foliar spray with ZnFer NPs showed time- and dose-dependent biphasic hormetic responses, characterized by a short-time inhibitory effect by the low dose and stimulatory effect by the high dose, while at a longer exposure period, the reverse phenomenon was recorded by the low and high doses. An inhibitory effect on PSII function was observed after more than ~120 min exposure to both ZnFer NPs concentrations, implying a negative effect on PSII photochemistry. We may conclude that the synthesized ZnFer NPs, despite their ability to induce hormesis of PSII photochemistry, have a negative impact on photosynthetic function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Organisms (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (<b>a</b>), TEM image with inset of a size distribution histogram and Gaussian fitting curve (<b>b</b>), FT-IR spectrum (<b>c</b>), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve (<b>d</b>), and hysteresis loop by vibrating sample measurement (VSM) (<b>e</b>) of ZnFer NPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (<b>a</b>), TEM image with inset of a size distribution histogram and Gaussian fitting curve (<b>b</b>), FT-IR spectrum (<b>c</b>), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve (<b>d</b>), and hysteresis loop by vibrating sample measurement (VSM) (<b>e</b>) of ZnFer NPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>/F<span class="html-italic">m</span>) (<b>a</b>) and the efficiency of the oxygen-evolving complex (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>/F<span class="html-italic">o</span>) (<b>b</b>) in dark-adapted tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Light energy distribution at PSII. The effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) measured at the growth light intensity (GLI) (<b>a</b>) and the effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) measured at the high light intensity (HLI) (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves, 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Light energy distribution at PSII. The quantum yield of regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PSII (Φ<sub>NPQ</sub>) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>), the quantum yield of regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PSII (Φ<sub>NPQ</sub>) measured at the HLI (<b>b</b>), the quantum yield of non-regulated energy loss in PSII (Φ<sub>NO</sub>) measured at the GLI (<b>c</b>), and the quantum yield of non-regulated energy loss in PSII (Φ<sub>NO</sub>) measured at the HLI (<b>d</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The fraction of open PSII rection centers (RCs) (q<span class="html-italic">p</span>) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The electron transport rate (ETR) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The efficiency of the open PSII RCs (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>′/F<span class="html-italic">m</span>′) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The excitation pressure at PSII (1−qL) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The excess excitation energy at PSII (EXC) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> ZnFer NPs, compared to control plants (CK). Bars represent standard deviations (SD). Different lower-case letters denote significant differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The time-dependent biphasic response curves of the quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>), in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (blue line) and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (red line) ZnFer NPs, compared to the control level. Bars represent standard deviations (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The time-dependent response curves of the excitation pressure at PSII (1−qL) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (blue line) and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (red line) ZnFer NPs, compared to the control level. Bars represent standard deviations (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The time-dependent biphasic response curve of the excess excitation energy at PSII (EXC) measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) in tomato leaves 30 min, 60 min, and 180 min after exposure to 15 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (blue line) and 30 mg L<sup>−1</sup> (red line) ZnFer NPs, compared to the control level. Bars represent standard deviations (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 9918 KiB  
Article
Aspirin Foliar Spray-Induced Changes in Light Energy Use Efficiency, Chloroplast Ultrastructure, and ROS Generation in Tomato
by Julietta Moustaka, Ilektra Sperdouli, Emmanuel Panteris, Ioannis-Dimosthenis S. Adamakis and Michael Moustakas
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(3), 1368; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031368 - 6 Feb 2025
Abstract
Aspirin (Asp) is extensively used in human health as an anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and anti-thrombotic drug. In this study, we investigated if the foliar application of Asp on tomato plants has comparable beneficial effects on photosynthetic function to that of salicylic acid (SA), with [...] Read more.
Aspirin (Asp) is extensively used in human health as an anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and anti-thrombotic drug. In this study, we investigated if the foliar application of Asp on tomato plants has comparable beneficial effects on photosynthetic function to that of salicylic acid (SA), with which it shares similar physiological characteristics. We assessed the consequences of foliar Asp-spray on the photosystem II (PSII) efficiency of tomato plants, and we estimated the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and the chloroplast ultrastructural changes. Asp acted as an osmoregulator by increasing tomato leaf water content and offering antioxidant protection. This protection kept the redox state of plastoquinone (PQ) pull (qp) more oxidized, increasing the fraction of open PSII reaction centers and enhancing PSII photochemistry (ΦPSII). In addition, Asp foliar spray decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, decreasing the excess excitation energy on PSII. This resulted in a lower singlet oxygen (1O2) generation and a lower quantum yield for heat dissipation (ΦNPQ), indicating the photoprotective effect provided by Asp, especially under excess light illumination. Simultaneously, we observed a decrease in stomatal opening by Asp, which reduced the transpiration. Chloroplast ultrastructural data revealed that Asp, by offering a photoprotective effect, decreased the need for the photorespiration process, which reduces photosynthetic performance. It is concluded that Asp shares similar physiological characteristics with SA, having an equivalent beneficial impact to SA by acting as a biostimulant of the photosynthetic function for an enhanced crop yield. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The chlorophyll content of water (WA)-sprayed and Aspirin (Asp)-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray, expressed in relative units (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 10 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>PSII</sub></span>) at the growth light intensity (GLI) (<b>a</b>) and at the high light intensity (HLI) (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The quantum yield of regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PSII (Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>NPQ</sub></span>) at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The quantum yield of non-regulated energy loss in PSII (Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>NO</sub></span>) at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The fraction of open PSII reaction centers (RCs) (q<span class="html-italic">p</span>), at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The efficiency of the open PSII RCs (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>’/F<span class="html-italic">m</span>’) at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The electron transport rate (ETR) at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The excitation pressure at PSII (1 − q<span class="html-italic">L</span>), measured at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA-sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The excess excitation energy at PSII (EXC), at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA- sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 ± SD). Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The relationship between the excess excitation energy (EXC) and the excitation pressure at PSII (1 − q<span class="html-italic">L</span>) at the GLI (<b>a</b>) and at the HLI (<b>b</b>) of WA- sprayed and Asp-sprayed leaves 24- and 96-h after the spray (based on the data of <a href="#ijms-26-01368-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>a,b and <a href="#ijms-26-01368-f010" class="html-fig">Figure 10</a>a,b). Each blue dot represents the paired measurement of the variables, while the red line is the regression line that shows the relationship between the two variables.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>ROS production in tomato leaflets of WA-sprayed (<b>a</b>) and Asp-sprayed <b>(b</b>) leaves 24-h after the spray. The light green color indicates ROS generation. Scale bar, 200 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Transmission electron micrographs of mesophyll cells of tomato leaves sprayed with water (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) or with Asp (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>). Note the peroxisomes (arrows in (<b>a</b>)), which include electron-dense crystals (asterisk in (<b>b</b>)) in cells of WA-sprayed leaves. Starch grains (sg) can be observed in chloroplasts of Asp-sprayed leaves (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) but not in those of WA-sprayed leaves. m: mitochondrion. Scale bars as indicated on the micrographs.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2400 KiB  
Article
Synergistic Role of Streptomyces Composite Inoculants in Mitigating Wheat Drought Stress Under Field Conditions
by Hao Shan, Hongwei Wen, Jinhui Zhang, Yuzhi Wang, Lahu Lu, Yutao Liu, Bin Yang and Wei Ji
Plants 2025, 14(3), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14030366 - 25 Jan 2025
Viewed by 186
Abstract
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a globally important staple crop; however, its growth and yield are severely limited by drought stress. This study evaluated the effects of a combined microbial inoculant, Streptomyces pactum Act12 and Streptomyces rochei D74, on wheat photosynthesis, physiological [...] Read more.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a globally important staple crop; however, its growth and yield are severely limited by drought stress. This study evaluated the effects of a combined microbial inoculant, Streptomyces pactum Act12 and Streptomyces rochei D74, on wheat photosynthesis, physiological traits, and yield under drought conditions. Key physiological and yield parameters were measured during the jointing, heading, and grain-filling stages. Drought stress significantly reduced chlorophyll content, maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm), and antioxidant enzyme activities, while increasing malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, leading to a notable yield decline. In contrast, inoculation with Streptomyces strains alleviated these adverse effects, with the combined inoculant (Act12+D74) group demonstrating the most significant improvement. Chlorophyll content increased by up to 32.60%, Fv/Fm improved by 43.07%, and antioxidant enzyme activities were enhanced, with superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity increasing by 19.32% and peroxidase (POD) activity by 75.44%. Meanwhile, MDA levels were reduced by 61.61%. The proline content in the combined inoculant group increased by 90.44% at the jointing stage and the soluble protein content increased by 60.17% at the heading stage. Furthermore, it improved the yield by 26.19% by increasing both effective spikes and grains per spike. For the first time, this study revealed the synergistic effects of Act12 and D74 in enhancing photosynthesis, strengthening antioxidant defenses, and optimizing osmotic regulation under drought conditions. These findings provide a theoretical basis for developing environmentally friendly drought management strategies and highlight the potential applications of this inoculant in sustainable agriculture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Physiology and Crop Production)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Variation in monthly rainfall and average temperature during the entire growth period of wheat.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Streptomyces</span> inoculation (Act12, D74, and their combination) under normal irrigation and drought stress on plant height (<b>A</b>), leaf length (<b>B</b>), leaf width (<b>C</b>), leaf area (<b>D</b>), and fresh (<b>E</b>,<b>G</b>,<b>I</b>), and dry weights (<b>F</b>,<b>H</b>,<b>J</b>) of leaves, stems, and spikes of wheat at heading (HS) and grain-filling (MS) stages. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Streptomyces</span> inoculation (Act12, D74, and their combination) under normal irrigation and drought stress on chlorophyll content (SPAD, (<b>A</b>)) and maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm, (<b>B</b>)) in wheat leaves at the jointing (JS), heading (HS), and grain-filling (MS) stages. Data are presented as mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Streptomyces</span> inoculation (Act12, D74, and their combination) under normal irrigation and drought stress on antioxidant enzyme activities, including superoxide dismutase (SOD, (<b>A</b>)) and peroxidase (POD, (<b>B</b>)) in wheat leaves at the jointing (JS), heading (HS), and grain-filling (MS) stages. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Streptomyces</span> inoculation (Act12, D74, and their combination) under normal irrigation and drought stress on malondialdehyde (MDA) (<b>A</b>), proline (<b>B</b>), and soluble protein (<b>C</b>) content in wheat leaves at the jointing (JS), heading (HS), and grain-filling (MS) stages. Data are presented as mean ± SD (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Streptomyces</span> inoculation (Act12, D74, and their combination) under normal irrigation and drought stress on spike length (<b>A</b>), effective spike number (<b>B</b>), grain number per spike (<b>C</b>), thousand-grain weight (<b>D</b>), and grain yield (<b>E</b>) of wheat. Data are presented as mean ± SD; spike length, effective spike number, grain number per spike, and thousand-grain weight, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5; grain yield, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 11099 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Abiotic Environmental Stressors on Fluorescence and Chlorophyll Content in Glycine max (L.) Merrill
by Judita Tomaškinová, Ján Tomaškin, Marek Drimal and Jesus Bellido
Agronomy 2025, 15(2), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15020263 - 22 Jan 2025
Viewed by 284
Abstract
In this study, we present the results of the impact of abiotic environmental (chemical) stressors in the soil environment (salinity, acidification, inorganic elements from industry—red mud waste containing Al) on the content and fluorescence of chlorophyll in the assimilating tissues of Glycine max [...] Read more.
In this study, we present the results of the impact of abiotic environmental (chemical) stressors in the soil environment (salinity, acidification, inorganic elements from industry—red mud waste containing Al) on the content and fluorescence of chlorophyll in the assimilating tissues of Glycine max (L.) Merrill, cv. ES Mentor. Under controlled conditions of a pot experiment during the 2023 growing season, we applied graded doses of these stressors (salinity—doses of 20, 30, and 60 g NaCl per 2 dm3 of water used for plant irrigation; acidity—pH 6, pH 5, and pH 4; red mud—200 g, 400 g, and 600 g per pot) and assessed their impact on the effective and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII), yield Y(II), or the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence—the Fv/Fm test. These tests are used to detect plant stress. The Y(II) test yielded values in the range of 0.627–0.800. Significant differences (variance analysis, 95% Least Significant Difference—LSD, post hoc test of analysis of variance—ANOVA) in reducing PSII chlorophyll fluorescence (Y(II)) were found between the medium and high doses of all three stressors compared to the control, indicating plant stress response. The Fv/Fm test yielded values between 0.668 and 0.805 and similarly detected stress responses in plants to all medium and high doses of stressors. The evaluated cultivar showed tolerance to moderately increased salt (NaCl) content and red mud levels. This was also confirmed by the chlorophyll content expressed as the Chlorophyll Content Index (CCI). The highest (significantly confirmed) chlorophyll content was found in the control variant and the variants with lower salt content and a soil pH of 6, with values of 35.633–37.467 CCI, compared to variants with higher red mud content (15.533–18.133 CCI) and higher soil acidity with pH 4 (22.833 CCI). Based on the results obtained, we conclude that the ES Mentor cultivar is tolerant to lower doses of the assessed stressors and can be cultivated in agricultural practice. However, medium to high doses of stressors trigger a strong stress response in plants and, therefore, we do not recommend cultivating this variety in contaminated environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agroecology Innovation: Achieving System Resilience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effective quantum yield of the PSII Y(II) test in <span class="html-italic">Glycine max</span> (L.) Merrill, cv. ES Mentor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Maximum quantum yield of the PSII Fv/Fm test in <span class="html-italic">Glycine max</span> (L.) Merrill, cv. ES Mentor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chlorophyll content (CCI) in <span class="html-italic">Glycine max</span> (L.) Merrill, cv. ES Mentor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effect of salinity (including the control treatment) on soybean plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effect of acidity (including the control treatment) on soybean plants.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The effect of red mud (including the control treatment) on soybean plants.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 6542 KiB  
Article
Exogenous SNP Alleviates Drought Stress in Wheat During the Grain-Filling Stage by Modulating TaP5CS Gene Transcription
by Xinyu Xue, Ruqing Li, Menghan Zhang, Sixu Jin, Haifang Jiang, Chongju Wang, Yifei Pang, Ruili Xue and Yuexia Wang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(2), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26020618 - 13 Jan 2025
Viewed by 361
Abstract
Drought stress severely damages wheat growth and photosynthesis, and plants at the grain-filling stage are the most sensitive to drought throughout the entire period of development. Exogenous spraying of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) can alleviate the damage to wheat caused by drought stress, but [...] Read more.
Drought stress severely damages wheat growth and photosynthesis, and plants at the grain-filling stage are the most sensitive to drought throughout the entire period of development. Exogenous spraying of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) can alleviate the damage to wheat caused by drought stress, but the mechanism regulating the proline pathway remains unknown. Two wheat cultivars, drought-sensitive Zhoumai 18 and drought-tolerant Zhengmai 1860, were used as materials when the plants were cultivated to the grain-filling stage. The results show that under drought stress, SNP pretreatment effectively improved the physiological basis of photosynthesis and water use efficiency of the two cultivars, increased their tolerance to photosystem II (PSII) damage, and maintained a normal photosynthetic rate and yield. Drought stress induced an increase in pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (TaP5CS) gene transcription, and a comparatively greater increase was detected in Zhengmai 1860. When SNP treatment was applied before drought exposure, TaP5CS transcription was further enhanced. Induction of TaP5CS transcription promoted proline accumulation in response to drought stress, increased osmotic ability, and maintained the net photosynthetic rate, thereby increasing the accumulation of dry matter and yield traits. In this study, exogenous SNP regulates the transcription of genes related to the proline metabolism pathway and provides a theoretical basis for the establishment of wheat cultivation technology using SNP to resist drought stress. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phenotypes (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), SPAD (<b>C</b>), MDA content (<b>D</b>), APX activity (<b>E</b>), and Pro content (<b>F</b>) of Zhengmai 1860 and Zhoumai 18 under drought stress and SNP pretreatment at the grain-filling stage. The wheat plants were cultivated to the grain-filling stage and then subjected to drought stress. The SNP and S+D groups were sprayed with 100 mg/L SNP for 7 days. The watering of the plants in the drought and S+D groups was subsequently stopped to simulate drought stress, whereas those in the CK and SNP groups were watered normally. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between all treatments at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Scale bars (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), 5 cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><span class="html-italic">F<sub>v</sub></span>/<span class="html-italic">F<sub>m</sub></span> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">ETR</span> (<b>B</b>), <span class="html-italic">qP</span> (<b>C</b>) and <span class="html-italic">NPQ</span> (<b>D</b>) of Zhengmai 1860 and Zhoumai 18 under drought stress and SNP pretreatment at the grain-filling stage. The wheat plants were cultivated to the grain-filling stage and then subjected to drought stress. The SNP and S+D groups were sprayed with 100 mg/L SNP for 7 days. The watering of the plants in the drought and S+D groups was subsequently stopped to simulate drought stress, whereas those in the CK and SNP groups were watered normally. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between all treatments at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">P</span><sub>n</sub> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">G</span><sub>s</sub> (<b>B</b>), <span class="html-italic">T</span><sub>r</sub> (<b>C</b>), and <span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub> (<b>D</b>) of Zhengmai 1860 and Zhoumai 18 under drought stress and SNP pretreatment at the grain-filling stage. The wheat plants were cultivated to the grain-filling stage and then subjected to drought stress. The SNP and S+D groups were sprayed with 100 mg/L SNP for 7 days. The watering of the plants in the drought and S+D groups was subsequently stopped to simulate drought stress, whereas those in the CK and SNP groups were watered normally. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between all treatments at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spike (<b>A</b>) and grain (<b>B</b>) phenotypes, and yield traits (<b>C</b>) of Zhengmai 1860 and Zhoumai 18 under drought stress and SNP pretreatment at the grain-filling stage. The wheat plants were cultivated to the grain-filling stage and then subjected to drought stress. The SNP and S+D groups were sprayed with 100 mg/L SNP for 7 days. The watering of the plants in the drought and S+D groups was subsequently stopped to simulate drought stress, whereas those in the CK and SNP groups were watered normally. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between all treatments at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. Scale bars (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), 5 cm for spikes, and 1 cm for grains.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The relative expression levels of <span class="html-italic">TaP5CS</span> (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">TaP5CR</span> (<b>B</b>), <span class="html-italic">TaProDH</span> (<b>C</b>), and <span class="html-italic">TaSAMDC</span> (<b>D</b>) in different wheat cultivars under drought stress and SNP pretreatment at the grain-filling stage. The wheat plants were cultivated to the grain-filling stage and then subjected to drought stress. The SNP and S+D groups were sprayed with 100 mg/L SNP for 7 days. The watering of the plants in the drought and S+D groups was subsequently stopped to simulate drought stress, whereas those in the CK and SNP groups were watered normally. The data are presented as the means ± standard deviations of three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences between all treatments at the level of <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Role of the wheat proline synthesis pathway in response to drought stress and exogenous SNP pretreatment. Red arrows indicate an increase in the expression of related gene transcripts, and purple arrows indicate a decrease in the expression of related gene transcripts.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5030 KiB  
Article
Beneficial Roles of 1-MCP on Regulation of Photosynthetic Electron Transport and Energy Dissipation in Chrysanthemum Under Heat Stress
by Runtian Miao, Xiaoman Liu, Yilin Zhao, Yanli Zhao, Han Dong, Gan Huang and Yonghua Li
Horticulturae 2025, 11(1), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010068 - 10 Jan 2025
Viewed by 341
Abstract
1-Methyl cyclopropene (1-MCP) is known as an ethylene antagonist, yet its mechanisms in regulating photosynthetic electron transport and energy dissipation in chrysanthemum under heat stress are not well understood. Here, the chlorophyll a fluorescence and modulated 820 nm reflection transients were analyzed in [...] Read more.
1-Methyl cyclopropene (1-MCP) is known as an ethylene antagonist, yet its mechanisms in regulating photosynthetic electron transport and energy dissipation in chrysanthemum under heat stress are not well understood. Here, the chlorophyll a fluorescence and modulated 820 nm reflection transients were analyzed in heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive chrysanthemum plants. This study demonstrates that 1-MCP pre-treatment helps maintain the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and the reaction center activity of photosystems I and II (PSI and PSII) during heat stress. Specifically, 1-MCP treatment significantly increases the fraction of active oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) centers and reduces relative variable fluorescence intensity at the J step (VJ) as well as the efficiency of electron transfer at the PSI acceptor side (δRo). These effects mitigate damage to the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Additionally, 1-MCP-treated plants exhibit decreased quantum yield of energy dissipation (φDo) and reduced energy flux per reaction center (DIo/RC). Overall, 1-MCP enhances light utilization efficiency and excitation energy dissipation in the PSII antennae, alleviating heat stress-induced damage to PSI and PSII structures and functions. This study not only advances our understanding of 1-MCP’s regulatory role in photosynthetic processes under heat stress but also provides a basis for using exogenous substances to improve chrysanthemum heat resistance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The effects of heat stress and 1-MCP on the OJIP transient curves of the heat-tolerant (<b>a</b>) and heat-sensitive (<b>b</b>) chrysanthemum accessions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The effects of heat stress and 1-MCP on the L-band of the heat-tolerant (<b>a</b>) and heat-sensitive (<b>b</b>) chrysanthemum accessions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The effects of heat stress and 1-MCP on the K-band of the heat-tolerant (<b>a</b>) and heat-sensitive (<b>b</b>) chrysanthemum accessions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effects of heat stress and 1-MCP on the MR<sub>820 nm</sub> of the heat-tolerant (<b>a</b>) and heat-sensitive (<b>b</b>) chrysanthemum accessions. The MR<sub>820 nm</sub> signals are presented by MR<sub>t</sub>/MR<sub>o</sub> ratio. ΔI/I<sub>o</sub> is the relative signal dropped at 820 nm during red light irradiation and indicates PSI activity, which is presented in (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>). Different letters on error bars indicate significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effects of heat stress and 1-MCP on the photosynthetic parameters deduced by the JIP test analysis of fluorescence transients of the heat-tolerant (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and heat-sensitive (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) chrysanthemum accessions. Different letters on error bars indicate significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The effects of heat stress and 1-MCP on the Chl a content (<b>A</b>), Chl b content (<b>B</b>), Chl a + b content (<b>C</b>), and carotenoid content (<b>D</b>) of the heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive chrysanthemum accessions. Different letters on error bars indicate significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 5403 KiB  
Article
Exogenous 2,4-Epibrassinolide Alleviates Alkaline Stress in Cucumber by Modulating Photosynthetic Performance
by Wenjing Nie, Qinghai He, Jinzhao Ma, Hongen Guo and Qinghua Shi
Plants 2025, 14(1), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010054 - 27 Dec 2024
Viewed by 547
Abstract
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are recognized for their ability to enhance plant salt tolerance. While considerable research has focused on their effects under neutral salt conditions, the mechanisms through which BRs regulate photosynthesis under alkaline salt stress are less well understood. This study investigates these [...] Read more.
Brassinosteroids (BRs) are recognized for their ability to enhance plant salt tolerance. While considerable research has focused on their effects under neutral salt conditions, the mechanisms through which BRs regulate photosynthesis under alkaline salt stress are less well understood. This study investigates these mechanisms, examining plant growth, photosynthetic electron transport, gas exchange parameters, Calvin cycle dynamics, and the expression of key antioxidant and Calvin cycle genes under alkaline stress conditions induced by NaHCO3. The findings indicate that NaHCO3 stress substantially impairs cucumber growth and photosynthesis, significantly reducing chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (E), maximum photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), actual photochemical efficiency (ΦPSII), antenna conversion efficiency (Fv′/Fm′), and photochemical quenching coefficient (qP). This disruption suggests a severe dysregulation of the photosynthetic electron transport system, impairing electron transfer from photosystem II (PSII) to photosystem I (PSI) and subsequently the Calvin cycle. Application of exogenous 24-epibrassinolide (EBR) alleviated these effects, reducing leaf chlorosis and growth inhibition and significantly enhancing the expression of key genes within the antioxidant system (AsA-GSH cycle) and the Calvin cycle. This intervention also led to a reduction in reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and improved photosynthetic performance, as evidenced by enhancements in Pn, Gs, E, Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, Fv′/Fm′, and qP. Moreover, NaHCO3 stress hindered chlorophyll synthesis, primarily by blocking the conversion from porphobilinogen (PBG) to uroporphyrinogen III (UroIII) and by increasing chlorophyllase (Chlase) and decreasing porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD) activity. Exogenous EBR countered these effects by enhancing PBGD activity and reducing Chlase activity, thereby increasing chlorophyll content under stress conditions. In summary, EBR markedly mitigated the adverse effects of alkaline stress on cucumber leaf photosynthesis by stabilizing the photosynthetic electron transport system, accelerating photosynthetic electron transport, and promoting the Calvin cycle. This study provides valuable insights into the regulatory roles of BRs in enhancing plant resilience to alkaline stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Biostimulant Use on Horticultural Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of EBR on plant phenotypes under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. (CK denotes plants grown under normal Hoagland nutrient solution; CK + EBR denotes the addition of EBR under normal growth conditions; S denotes NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR denotes the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of EBR on superoxide anion (O<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>) and hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) staining in cucumber leaves under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. (CK represents control plants grown in normal Hoagland nutrient solution; EBR denotes normal growth conditions with the addition of EBR; S indicates NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR indicates the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress). Histochemical observations utilized Nitroblue Tetrazolium (NBT) for staining superoxide anion and Diaminobenzidine (DAB) for hydrogen peroxide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Influence of exogenous EBR on the transcript levels of key genes involved in the antioxidant and ascorbate–glutathione (ASA-GSH) cycles under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress in cucumber leaves. Panels represent transcript levels of (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">CsCu-ZnSOD</span>, (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">CsFeSOD</span>, (<b>C</b>) <span class="html-italic">CsAPX</span>, (<b>D</b>) <span class="html-italic">CsDHAR</span>, (<b>E</b>) <span class="html-italic">CsMDHAR</span>, (<b>F</b>) <span class="html-italic">CsGR</span>overall, (<b>G</b>) EBR modulation of the ASA-GSH cycle. Red symbols denote upregulated genes under stress conditions. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments at the 0.05 level (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, n = 3). Key abbreviations: SOD, superoxide dismutase; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; MDHAR, monodehydroascorbate reductase; DHAR, dehydroascorbate reductase; GR, glutathione reductase; AsA, ascorbic acid; MDHA, monodehydroascorbate; DHA, dehydroascorbic acid; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione. (CK represents control plants grown in normal Hoagland nutrient solution; CK + EBR denotes normal growth conditions with the addition of EBR; S indicates NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR indicates the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of EBR on net photosynthetic rate, Pn (<b>A</b>), transpiration rate, Tr (<b>B</b>), stomatal conductance, Cs (<b>C</b>), chlorophyll a content (<b>D</b>), chlorophyll b content (<b>E</b>), and chlorophyll a + b content (<b>F</b>) of cucumber seedlings under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. (CK represents normal Hoagland nutrient solution culture; EBR represents the addition of EBR under normal growth conditions; S represents NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR represents the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of EBR on the contents of ALA (<b>A</b>), PBG (<b>B</b>), UroIII (<b>C</b>), ProtoIX (<b>D</b>), Mg-ProtoIX (<b>E</b>), and Pchl (<b>F</b>) in cucumber leaves under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. (CK represents normal Hoagland nutrient solution culture; EBR represents the addition of EBR under normal growth conditions; S represents NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR represents the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of EBR on the activities of Chlase (<b>A</b>) and PBGD (<b>B</b>) in cucumber leaves under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments at the 0.05 level (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, n = 3). (CK represents normal Hoagland nutrient solution culture; EBR represents the addition of EBR under normal growth conditions; S represents NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR represents the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of EBR on maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII, Fv/Fm (<b>A</b>); photochemical efficiency of PSII in the light, Fv′/Fm′ (<b>B</b>); photochemical quenching, qP (<b>C</b>); actual photochemical efficiency of PSII in the light, ΦPSII (<b>D</b>) in cucumber seedlings under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. (CK represents normal Hoagland nutrient solution culture; EBR represents the addition of EBR under normal growth conditions; S represents NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress treatment; S + EBR represents the addition of EBR under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effects of EBR on the expression of genes related to photosynthesis in cucumber leaves under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. The relative expression levels of <span class="html-italic">psbA</span> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">psbB</span> (<b>B</b>), <span class="html-italic">psaA</span> (<b>C</b>), <span class="html-italic">psaB</span> (<b>D</b>), <span class="html-italic">rbcL</span> (<b>E</b>), <span class="html-italic">rbcS</span> (<b>F</b>), <span class="html-italic">Rca</span> (<b>G</b>), <span class="html-italic">TPI</span> (<b>H</b>), <span class="html-italic">FBPase</span> (<b>I</b>), <span class="html-italic">SBPase</span> (<b>J</b>), <span class="html-italic">PRK</span> (<b>K</b>), and <span class="html-italic">Rupe</span> (<b>L</b>) were measured. Abbreviations: <span class="html-italic">rbcL</span>, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit; <span class="html-italic">rbcS</span>, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase small subunit; <span class="html-italic">Rca</span>, Rubisco activase; <span class="html-italic">TPI</span>, triose phosphate isomerase; <span class="html-italic">FBPase</span>, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase; <span class="html-italic">SBPase</span>, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase; <span class="html-italic">Rupe</span>, ribulose-5-phosphate epimerase; <span class="html-italic">PRK</span>, phosphoribulokinase. Different letters indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; n = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Impact of EBR on photosynthetic electron transport and Calvin cycle in cucumber leaves under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. Compared to the NaHCO<sub>3</sub> treatment, the application of exogenous EBR upregulated the expression of crucial photosynthesis-related genes. These include <span class="html-italic">psbA</span> and <span class="html-italic">psbB</span> associated with PSII; <span class="html-italic">psaA</span> and <span class="html-italic">psaB</span> integral to photosystem I (PSI); and key genes involved in the Calvin cycle such as <span class="html-italic">rbcL</span> and <span class="html-italic">rbcS</span>, which encode the large and small subunits of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), respectively. Additionally, genes like <span class="html-italic">Rca</span> (Rubisco activase), <span class="html-italic">TPI</span> (triose phosphate isomerase), <span class="html-italic">FBPase</span> (fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase), <span class="html-italic">SBPase</span> (sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase), <span class="html-italic">Rupe</span> (ribulose-5-phosphate isomerase), and <span class="html-italic">PRK</span> (phosphoribulokinase) also showed significant upregulation. The red highlights in the figure indicate areas where the expression levels of these genes were significantly enhanced due to EBR treatment under NaHCO<sub>3</sub> stress. Key abbreviations: PSII (photosystem II); P680 (primary electron donor of PSII); PSI (photosystem I); P700 (primary electron donor of PSI); rbcL, <span class="html-italic">rbcS</span> (genes encoding the large and small subunits of Rubisco, respectively); 3-PGA (3-phosphoglyceric acid); Fru-1,6-P (fructose-1,6-bisphosphate); Fru-6-P (fructose-6-phosphate); Sed-7-P (sedoheptulose-7-phosphate); Ru-5-P (ribulose-5-phosphate); RuBP (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate); <span class="html-italic">Rubisco</span> (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2272 KiB  
Article
Physiological, Photosynthetic Characteristic and Transcriptome Analysis of PsnWRKY70 Transgenic Populus simonii × Populus nigra Under Salt Stress
by Hui Zhao, Wenhu Wang, Yujie Fan, Guifeng Liu, Shaokang Guo and Guoqiang Fan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(1), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010081 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 434
Abstract
The PsnWRKY70 transcription factor (TF) was reported to play an important role in the salt stress response mechanism of Populus simonii × Populus nigra in our previous research, and we also produced several PsnWRKY70 overexpression (OEXs) and RNAi suppression (REXs) P. simonii [...] Read more.
The PsnWRKY70 transcription factor (TF) was reported to play an important role in the salt stress response mechanism of Populus simonii × Populus nigra in our previous research, and we also produced several PsnWRKY70 overexpression (OEXs) and RNAi suppression (REXs) P. simonii × P. nigra lines. In order to further compare the photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of NT (non-transgenic line) and transgenic lines under salt stress, the dynamic phenotypic change, Na+ and K+ content in leaf and root tissues, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, chlorophyll content (Chl), photosynthesis parameters (net photosynthetic rate, Pn; stomatal conductance, Gs; intercellular CO2 concentration, Ci; transpiration rate, Tr), chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (electron transport rate, ETR; maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII), Fv/Fm; actual efficiency of PSII, ΦPSII; photochemical quenching coefficient, qP; non-photochemical quenching, NPQ; the photosynthetic light-response curves of ΦPSII and ETR) and RNA-seq of NT, OEX and REX lines were detected and analyzed. The phenotypic observation, MDA content and Chl detection results indicate that the stress damage of REXs was less severe than that of NT and OEX lines under salt stress. Photosynthesis parameter (Pn, Gs, Tr and Ci) and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter (ETR, Fv/Fm, ΦPSII qP and NPQ) detection results indicate that the REX lines exhibited much better photosynthetic adaptability than NT and OEX lines during salt stress. The photosynthetic light-response curves of ΦPSII and ETR of NT, OEX and REX lines indicate that REXs exhibited better ability to activate the photosynthetic protection mechanism and adapt to a certain degree of strong light than NT and OEX lines under salt stress. RNA-seq analysis indicates that the DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT and REX1 vs. NT in different tissues (apical bud and fifth functional leaf) were all different in category and change trend. The expression of PsnWRKY70 was significantly up-regulated in both the apical bud and fifth functional leaf of OEX1, and showed no significant change (namely maintained low expression level) in both the apical bud and fifth functional leaf of REX1, thus indicating the negative regulation role of PsnWRKY70 in P. simonii × P. nigra under salt stress. Additionally, there were a lot of stress response-related TF genes (such as bHLH, WRKY, MYB, NAM and AP2/EREBP) and photosynthesis-related genes among all the DEGs. In REX1, the expression of three Photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1 genes (Potri.003G065200, Potri.013G141800 and Potri.019G028100) and a Photosystem II protein D1 gene (Potri.013G138300) were significantly up-regulated after 6 days of salt stress. In OEX1, the Heterodimeric geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase small subunit gene (Potri.015G043400) and Phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase 1 gene (Potri.007G095700) were significantly down-regulated after 6 days of salt stress. These photosynthesis-related genes are probably regulated by PsnWRKY70 TF in response to salt stress. In conclusion, the REX lines suffered less severe salt damage and exhibited better photosynthetic adaptability than NT and OEXs under salt stress. The differences among the DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT and REX1 vs. NT in apical bud and fifth functional leaf, and the significantly differentially expressed photosynthesis-related genes are probably the key clues for discovering the photosynthesis adaptability mechanism of PsnWRKY70 transgenic P. simonii × P. nigra under salt stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Phenotypic dynamic changes in NT, OEX1 and REX1 plants during salt stress treatment. (<b>A</b>) NT-0d, OEX1-0d and REX1-0d indicate NT, OEX1 and REX1 plants under normal growth conditions. (<b>B</b>) NT-3d, OEX1-3d and REX1-3d indicate NT, OEX1 and REX1 plants on the third day after salt stress treatment. (<b>C</b>) NT-21d, OEX1-21d and REX1-21d indicate NT, OEX1 and REX1 plants suffered 15 days of salt stress treatment and 6 days of rewatering. (<b>D</b>) The relative expression of <span class="html-italic">PsnWRKY70</span> in NT, OEX1, OEX2 and OEX3 lines. (<b>E</b>) The relative expression of <span class="html-italic">PsnWRKY70</span> in NT, REX1, REX2 and REX3 lines. Different letters on the columns indicate the significance of the difference (n = 3, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, multiple-comparison method: Duncan).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup> content, SOD, POD activity and MDA content of NT, REX and OEX lines under salt stress. (<b>A</b>) Na<sup>+</sup> content in the leaf and root tissues of NT, OEX1 and REX1 under salt stress. (<b>B</b>) K<sup>+</sup> content in the leaf and root tissues of NT, OEX1 and REX1 under salt stress. (<b>C</b>) Na<sup>+</sup>/K<sup>+</sup> in the leaf and root tissues of NT, OEX1 and REX1 under salt stress. (<b>D</b>) SOD activity of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 under salt stress. (<b>E</b>) POD activity of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 under salt stress. (<b>F</b>) MDA content of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 under salt stress. Different letters on the columns indicate the significance of the difference (n = 5, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, multiple-comparison method: Duncan), and “n.s.” means no significant difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chlorophyll content and chlorophyll content index (CCI) of NT, OEX and REX lines under salt stress. (<b>A</b>) The chlorophyll content dynamic change trends of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 during salt stress treatment. (<b>B</b>) The CCI dynamic change trends of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 during salt stress treatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photosynthesis parameters of NT, OEX and REX lines during salt stress. (<b>A</b>) The net photosynthetic rate (P<sub>n</sub>) dynamic change trends of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 during salt stress treatment. (<b>B</b>) The intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>) dynamic change trends of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 during salt stress treatment. (<b>C</b>) The stomatal conductance (G<sub>s</sub>) dynamic change trends of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 during salt stress treatment. (<b>D</b>) The transpiration rate (T<sub>r</sub>) dynamic change trends of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 during salt stress treatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of NT, REXs and NEXs lines before and after salt stress. (<b>A</b>) The photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 plants before and 9 days after salt stress treatment. (<b>B</b>) The maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 plants before and 9 days after salt stress treatment. (<b>C</b>) The actual efficiency of PSII (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 plants before and 9 days after salt stress treatment. (<b>D</b>) The photochemical quenching coefficient (q<sub>P</sub>) of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 plants before and 9 days after salt stress treatment. (<b>E</b>) The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of NT, OEX1, OEX2, OEX3, REX1, REX2 and REX3 plants before and 9 days after salt stress treatment. Different letters on the columns indicate the significance of the difference (n = 5, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, multiple-comparison method: Duncan), and “n.s.” means no significant difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Photosynthetic light-response curves of Φ<sub>PSII</sub> and ETR of NT, OEX and REX lines under salt stress. (<b>A</b>) Photosynthetic light-response curves of ETR of NT, OEX and REX lines under salt stress. (<b>B</b>) Photosynthetic light-response curves of Φ<sub>PSII</sub> of NT, OEX and REX lines under salt stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Venn diagram of the DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT and REX1 vs. NT 6 days after salt stress. (<b>A</b>) The DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT and REX1 vs. NT in their apical buds. NT-1, OEX1-1 and REX1-1 indicate the apical buds of NT, OEX1 and REX1 after 6 days of salt stress. (<b>B</b>) The DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT and REX1 vs. NT in their fifth functional leaves. NT-5, OEX1-5 and REX1-5 indicate the fifth functional leaves of NT, OEX1 and REX1 after 6 days of salt stress.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>KEGG enrichment on the DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT and REX1 vs. NT 6 days after salt stress. (<b>A</b>) KEGG enrichment on the DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT apical buds. (<b>B</b>) KEGG enrichment on the DEGs between REX1 vs. NT apical buds. (<b>C</b>) KEGG enrichment on the DEGs between OEX1 vs. NT fifth functional leaves. (<b>D</b>) KEGG enrichment on the DEGs between REX1 vs. NT fifth functional leaves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>QRT-PCR verification on the expression change trends in several DEGs. (<b>A</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">PsnWRKY70</span> (Potri.016G137900) in the apical buds of NT and OEX1 plants after 6 days of salt stress treatment. (<b>B</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">AAE6</span> (Probable acyl-activating enzyme 6, Potri.019G067900) in the apical buds of NT and REX1 plants after 6 days of salt stress treatment. (<b>C</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">CCD4</span> (Probable carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4, Potri.019G093400) in the apical buds of NT and REX1 plants after 6 days of salt stress treatment. (<b>D</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">PRPA</span> (Pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein At2g29760, Potri.009G044700) in the fifth functional leaves of NT and REX1 plants after 6 days of salt stress treatment. (<b>E</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">CPD11</span> (Chaperone protein dnaJ 11, Potri.004G172300) in the fifth functional leaves of NT and REX1 plants after 6 days of salt stress treatment. (<b>F</b>) The expression level of <span class="html-italic">GPSSS</span> (Heterodimeric geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase small subunit, Potri.015G043400) in the fifth functional leaves of NT and OEX1 plants after 6 days of salt stress treatment.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2327 KiB  
Article
Assessment of 3-Cyanobenzoic Acid as a Possible Herbicide Candidate: Effects on Maize Growth and Photosynthesis
by Luiz Henryque Escher Grizza, Isabela de Carvalho Contesoto, Ana Paula da Silva Mendonça, Amanda Castro Comar, Ana Paula Boromelo, Ana Paula Ferro, Rodrigo Polimeni Constantin, Wanderley Dantas dos Santos, Rogério Marchiosi and Osvaldo Ferrarese-Filho
Plants 2025, 14(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14010001 - 24 Dec 2024
Viewed by 546
Abstract
Chemical weed control is a significant agricultural concern, and reliance on a limited range of herbicide action modes has increased resistant weed species, many of which use C4 metabolism. As a result, the identification of novel herbicidal agents with low toxicity targeting C4 [...] Read more.
Chemical weed control is a significant agricultural concern, and reliance on a limited range of herbicide action modes has increased resistant weed species, many of which use C4 metabolism. As a result, the identification of novel herbicidal agents with low toxicity targeting C4 plants becomes imperative. An assessment was conducted on the impact of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on the growth and photosynthetic processes of maize (Zea mays), a representative C4 plant, cultivated hydroponically over 14 days. The results showed a significant reduction in plant growth and notable disruptions in gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence due to the application of 3-cyanobenzoic acid, indicating compromised photosynthetic activity. Parameters such as the chlorophyll index, net assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), maximum effective photochemical efficiency (Fv′/Fm′), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry (ϕPSII), and electron transport rate through PSII (ETR) all decreased. The A/PAR curve revealed reductions in the maximum net assimilation rate (Amax) and apparent quantum yield (ϕ), alongside an increased light compensation point (LCP). Moreover, 3-cyanobenzoic acid significantly decreased the carboxylation rates of RuBisCo (Vcmax) and PEPCase (Vpmax), electron transport rate (J), and mesophilic conductance (gm). Overall, 3-cyanobenzoic acid induced substantial changes in plant growth, carboxylative processes, and photochemical activities. The treated plants also exhibited heightened susceptibility to intense light conditions, indicating a significant and potentially adverse impact on their physiological functions. These findings suggest that 3-cyanobenzoic acid or its analogs could be promising for future research targeting photosynthesis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Chemical Ecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Hydroponically grown maize plants treated with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days: 0 mM (<b>A</b>), 0.5 mM (<b>B</b>), and 1.0 mM (<b>C</b>). Scale bars represent 10 cm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on hydroponically grown maize plants for 14 days. Parameters measured include (<b>A</b>) chlorophyll content (SPAD index), (<b>B</b>) maximum quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>), (<b>C</b>) net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span>), (<b>D</b>) stomatal conductance (<span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>s</sub>), (<b>E</b>) intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub>), (<b>F</b>) maximum efficiency of PSII (F<sub>v′</sub>/F<sub>m′</sub>), (<b>G</b>) non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), and (<b>H</b>) photochemical quenching (q<sub>P</sub>). Means values (n = 16–22 ± SEM) significantly different from the control are marked with * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on hydroponically grown maize plants for 14 days on quantum yield of photosystem II photochemistry (ϕ<sub>PSII</sub>) (<b>A</b>) and electron transport rate through PSII (ETR) (<b>B</b>). Means (n = 22 ± SEM) marked with * or ** are statistically different from the control according to Dunnett’s test at 5% and 1% significance levels, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span>) curves in response to varying photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for maize plants grown hydroponically with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days. The initial linear region of the graph is magnified for clarity. Data are presented as mean values (n = 4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on hydroponically grown maize plants after 14 days, focusing on parameters derived from the <span class="html-italic">A</span>/PAR curve: (<b>A</b>) net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span><sub>max</sub>), (<b>B</b>) apparent quantum yield (ϕ), (<b>C</b>) light compensation point (LCP), and (<b>D</b>) dark respiration rate (<span class="html-italic">R</span><sub>D)</sub>. Means values (n = 3–4 ± SEM) significantly different from the control are marked with, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average net assimilation (<span class="html-italic">A</span>) curves in response to varying intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub>) forma maize plants grown hydroponically with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days. Data are presented as mean values (n = 4–6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on maize plants grown hydroponically for 14 days, focusing on parameters derived from the <span class="html-italic">A</span>/<span class="html-italic">C</span><sub>i</sub> curve: (<b>A</b>) maximum carboxylation rate of RuBisCo (V<sub>cmax</sub>), (<b>B</b>) maximum carboxylation rate of PEPCase (V<sub>pmax</sub>), (<b>C</b>) rate of photosynthetic electron transport (<span class="html-italic">J</span>), and (<b>D</b>) mesophyll conductance (<span class="html-italic">g</span><sub>m</sub>). Means values (n = 4–6 ± SEM) significantly different from the control are marked with * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chlorophyll <span class="html-italic">a</span> fluorescence OJIP transient curves in maize plants grown hydroponically with 3-cyanobenzoic acid for 14 days. The OJIP curve represents key fluorescence intensities: the minimal fluorescence when all PSII reaction centers are open (O step), the intensity at 0.002 s (J step), the intensity at 0.03 s (I step), and the maximal fluorescence when all PSII reaction centers are closed (P step, at 0.3 s). Data are presented as means (n = 18 ± SEM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effects of 3-cyanobenzoic acid on specific energy flux parameters in hydroponically grown maize plants after 14 days of treatment. Parameters include: absorption flux per reaction center (ABS/RC), energy trapping per reaction center (TR<sub>0</sub>/RC), electron transport per reaction center (ET<sub>0</sub>/RC), energy dissipation per reaction center (DI<sub>0</sub>/RC), reaction center density per cross-sectional area (RC/CS), quantum yield of primary PSII photochemistry (TR<sub>0</sub>/ABS), efficiency with which a trapped electron is transferred from Q<sub>A</sub> to Q<sub>B</sub> (ET<sub>0</sub>/TR<sub>0</sub>), quantum yield of electron transport from Q<sub>A</sub> to Q<sub>B</sub> (ET<sub>0</sub>/ABS), and performance indices (PI<sub>ABS</sub> and PI<sub>Total</sub>). Data are presented as means (n = 18 ± SEM). Mean value significantly different from the control is marked with * <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, according to Dunnett’s test.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10097 KiB  
Article
Effects of Foliar Application of a Lambda-Cyhalothrin Insecticide on Photosynthetic Characteristics of a Fodder Plant Malva moschata
by Jaroslav Lang, Miloš Barták, Josef Hájek, Eliška Staňková and Kateřina Trnková
Agronomy 2024, 14(12), 2818; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122818 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 545
Abstract
Recently, a large number of pesticides with different chemical structures and modes of action (MOAs) have become regularly used in agriculture. They are used to control the insect populations in various crops. Foliar application of pesticides may negatively affect crop physiology, especially photosynthesis. [...] Read more.
Recently, a large number of pesticides with different chemical structures and modes of action (MOAs) have become regularly used in agriculture. They are used to control the insect populations in various crops. Foliar application of pesticides may negatively affect crop physiology, especially photosynthesis. However, the sensitivity of particular crops, especially their primary and secondary photosynthetic processes, to insecticide application is generally unknown. Our study aimed to evaluate the negative effects of lambda-cyhalothrin (λ-CY) on photosystem II (PSII) in Malva moschata (Musk mallow). We used fast chlorophyll fluorescence transients (i.e., OJIPs) and OJIP-derived parameters, the effective quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII), induction curves of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) and spectral reflectance curves and indices. The recommended concentration (0.05 μM) and a 10 times higher concentration (0.5 μM) of λ-CY did not cause any negative effect on photosynthetic parameters. An overdosed foliar application (100 times higher than recommended, i.e., 50 μM) led to changes in OJIP shape; a decrease in performance index (PIABS), maximum photosynthetic yield (FV/FM) and photosynthetic electron transport (ET0/RC); and an increase in protective mechanisms (unregulated quenching, DI0/RC). These changes lasted only tens of minutes after application, after which the parameters returned to pre-application values. An overdosed λ-CY application caused more rapid activation of NPQ, indicating the early response to stress in PSII. The application of 50 μM λ-CY caused an increase in spectral reflectance above 720 nm and changes in the indices that indicated λ-CY-induced stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pest and Disease Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Course of mean daily air temperature (blue line) at the field plot during the cultivation time of <span class="html-italic">M. moschata</span> plants. The orange symbols and line represent the daily maxima of air temperature. The grey symbols and line denote daily minima of air temperature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Typical NPQ induction curve with the definition of the parameters used.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chlorophyll fluorescence transients (OJIPs) were recorded for 60 min (<b>upper panels</b>) and 240 min (<b>lower panel</b>) after applying different concentrations of λ-CY to <span class="html-italic">M. moschata</span> plants. Blue symbols represent the lowest concentration (0.5 µM), yellow symbols represent the medium concentration (5.0 µM) and red symbols represent the high concentration (50.0 µM). OJIPs for the untreated control are indicated by green symbols. The subpanels in the right column present OJIPs in absolute values, while those in the left represent the OJIPs normalised to their maximum values. The curves represent the means of 10 replicates. On the left (left columns), two important phenomena are noted: (1) the shift in time at which the maximum chlorophyll fluorescence (point P) is reached in control plants (*) compared with λ-CY-treated plants (**); and (2) the decrease in chlorophyll fluorescence values, indicated by an arrow. On the right, the chlorophyll fluorescence values in the J to I segment of the normalised OJIP show a decrease at 0.5 and 5.0 μM concentrations, while an increase in J is observed (lower right panel) when using a 100× concentration (50 mM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The time courses of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters derived from OJIPs (normalised to the initial value) were recorded from the start (time 0, representing the control value taken before λ-CY treatments) to the end of the measurements (24 h after application). Data points represent the means of 10 replicates, and the error bars indicate ± standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The time courses of the maximum yield of photochemical processes during photosynthesis in PS II (F<sub>V</sub>/F<sub>M</sub>) and the photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR) in <span class="html-italic">M. moschata</span> were influenced by the application of λ-CY (50 µM). The parameters for the control group, representing plants before λ-CY treatment, are shown in the 0-time columns. The error bars indicate + standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><b>Left</b>: Induction curves of NPQ (normalised to the maximum NPQ value, NPQ<sub>max</sub>) recorded for <span class="html-italic">M. moschata</span> leaves treated with 50 μM λ-CY. NPQ data were recorded for the untreated control (green symbols and lines) and then at 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min and 24 h after treatment. Data points are the means of three replicates. A more rapid increase in NPQ values is apparent at the initial part of the curve (compare untreated control green symbols and lines with values recorded 90 min after λ-CY application, shown in red). <b>Right</b>: Visualisation of the initial slope of NPQ increase (alpha parameter, α) in control (green line) and λ-CY-treated plants (30, 60 and 90 min after λ-CY exposition).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spectral reflectance curves (averages of 10 replicates) were recorded in <span class="html-italic">M. moschata</span> following a 50 µM λ-CY foliar application. The reflectance for the control group, representing the plants before λ-CY treatment, is shown as the 0-time spectrum (green symbols). Notably, there is a λ-CY-induced increase in spectral reflectance at wavelengths above the red edge (indicated by an arrow). This increase begins at 720 nm (refer to the inset graph for the differences from the control). In the inset graph, the differences in reflectance values (∆R) recorded after (1) 30 min (soft green), (2) 60 min (orange) and (3) 24 h (blue) of application are presented alongside the control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spectral reflectance curves (averages of 10 replicates) recorded in the near-infrared wavelengths were obtained for <span class="html-italic">M. moschata</span> exposed to a 50 μM λ-CY foliar application. The reflectance data for the control—representing plants before the λ-CY treatment—is displayed as the 0-time spectrum (green symbols). It is important to note that the λ-CY-induced increase in spectral reflectance (∆R) is evident in the wavelength range of 720–1060 nm (indicated by an arrow) for the following times after λ-CY application: 30 min (soft green symbol), 60 min (orange symbol), and 24 h (blue symbol).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The time course of the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) was recorded in the control group (green) before the application of 50 µM λ-CY foliar treatment (0 min) and then at 30 min (soft green), 60 min (orange), 24 h (blue) and 48 h (brown) post-application. Please note the statistically significant increase in PRI values resulting from the λ-CY application. The letters above the error bars indicate statistically-significant differences.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4649 KiB  
Article
Altered Photoprotective Mechanisms and Pigment Synthesis in Torreya grandis with Leaf Color Mutations: An Integrated Transcriptome and Photosynthesis Analysis
by Yujia Chen, Lei Wang, Jing Zhang, Yilu Chen and Songheng Jin
Horticulturae 2024, 10(11), 1211; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111211 - 17 Nov 2024
Viewed by 681
Abstract
Torreya grandis is a widely cultivated fruit species in China that is valued for its significant economic and agricultural importance. The molecular mechanisms underlying pigment formation and photosynthetic performance in Torreya leaf color mutants remain to be fully elucidated. In this study, we [...] Read more.
Torreya grandis is a widely cultivated fruit species in China that is valued for its significant economic and agricultural importance. The molecular mechanisms underlying pigment formation and photosynthetic performance in Torreya leaf color mutants remain to be fully elucidated. In this study, we performed transcriptome sequencing and measured photosynthetic performance indicators to compare mutant and normal green leaves. The research results indicate that the identified Torreya mutant differs from previously reported mutants, exhibiting a weakened photoprotection mechanism and a significant reduction in carotenoid content of approximately 33%. Photosynthetic indicators, including the potential maximum photosynthetic capacity (Fv/Fm) and electron transport efficiency (Ψo, φEo), decreased significantly by 32%, 52%, and 49%, respectively. While the quantum yield for energy dissipation (φDo) increased by 31%, this increase was not statistically significant, which may further reduce PSII activity. A transcriptome analysis revealed that the up-regulation of chlorophyll degradation-related genes—HCAR and NOL—accelerates chlorophyll breakdown in the Torreya mutant. The down-regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis genes, such as LCY1 and ZEP, is strongly associated with compromised photoprotective mechanisms and the reduced stability of Photosystem II. Additionally, the reduced expression of the photoprotective gene psbS weakened the mutant’s tolerance to photoinhibition, increasing its susceptibility to photodamage. These changes in gene expression accelerate chlorophyll degradation and reduce carotenoid synthesis, which may be the primary cause of the yellowing in Torreya. Meanwhile, the weakening of photoprotective mechanisms further impairs photosynthetic efficiency, limiting the growth and adaptability of the mutants. This study emphasizes the crucial roles of photosynthetic pigments and photosystem structures in regulating the yellowing phenotype and the environmental adaptability of Torreya. It also provides important insights into the genetic regulation of leaf color in relation to photosynthesis and breeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Developmental Biology in Tree Fruit and Nut Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Leaf appearance of wild type and mutant <span class="html-italic">Torreya</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Prompt chlorophyll a fluorescence (PF). (<b>B</b>) Normalized curve; V<sub>t</sub> = [(F<sub>t</sub> − F<sub>O</sub>)/(F<sub>M</sub> − F<sub>o</sub>)], J reflects early electron transport blockage; I reflects the size of the PQ pool and the efficiency of electron flow; P represents the maximum PSII photochemical efficiency. (<b>C</b>) Delayed chlorophyll a fluorescence (DF). I<sub>1</sub> represents the redox state of Q<sub>A</sub> and PSII functionality; I<sub>2</sub> represents the reduction of the PQ pool and the efficiency of electron transfer; D<sub>2</sub> represents the charge separation stability and recombination dynamics. (<b>D</b>) The decay kinetics of DF at the characteristic maxima I<sub>1</sub> (7 ms). Each curve represents the mean value derived from three replicate measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Radar plot of energy fluxes in mutant and wild type <span class="html-italic">Torreya</span>. The radar plot reflected specific activity values at individual PSII reaction centers (RCs) and cross-sections (CSs). Each data point represents the mean value derived from three replicate measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in different leaves of <span class="html-italic">Torreya</span>. (<b>A</b>) DEGs were displayed in the form of a volcano plot. The red dots denote up-regulated genes, while the blue dots denote down-regulated genes. (<b>B</b>) Hierarchical cluster analysis of DEGs. Each row represents a gene, with red indicating a more pronounced up-regulation and green indicating a more pronounced down-regulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Functional annotation of DEGs. (<b>A</b>) GO classification of differentially expressed genes—the top 30 enriched GO terms. (<b>B</b>) KEGG enrichment of differentially expressed genes; the larger the bubble, the more DEGs that are enriched.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Regulation of gene expression and metabolic pathways associated with leaf color at the transcriptional level. (<b>A</b>) Analysis of differentially expressed genes related to chlorophyll biosynthesis and degradation pathways. (<b>B</b>) Differential expressions of genes related to carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation pathways. (<b>C</b>) Transcriptome data (FPKM) were used for heat mapping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The expression levels of DEGs in wild-type and mutant <span class="html-italic">Torreya</span>. (<b>A</b>) Gene ID: TG8G02048 (CHL2). (<b>B</b>) Gene ID: TG5G03735 (LCY1). (<b>C</b>) Gene ID: TG3G00961 (CCD4). (<b>D</b>) Gene ID: TG9G00978 (NOL). (<b>E</b>) Gene ID: TG7G03643 (chlN). (<b>F</b>) Gene ID: TG3G0175 (ZEP). (<b>G</b>) Gene ID: TG8G003353 (psaA). (<b>H</b>) Gene ID: TG4G00167 (psbS). (<b>I</b>) Gene ID: TG11G01233 (HCAR). (<b>J</b>) Gene ID: TG3G00946 (NECD1). Each error bar represents the SD calculated from three biological replicates, each of which includes three technical replicates.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 3588 KiB  
Article
Cyanobacterial Cultures, Cell Extracts, and Individual Toxins Decrease Photosynthesis in the Terrestrial Plants Lactuca sativa and Zea mays
by Scott A. Heckathorn, Clare T. Muller, Michael D. Thomas, Emily P. Vining, Samantha Bigioni, Clair Elsie, J. Thomas Franklin, Emily R. New and Jennifer K. Boldt
Plants 2024, 13(22), 3190; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13223190 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 810
Abstract
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cHABs) are increasing due to eutrophication and climate change, as is irrigation of crops with freshwater contaminated with cHAB toxins. A few studies, mostly in aquatic protists and plants, have investigated the effects of cHAB toxins or cell extracts [...] Read more.
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cHABs) are increasing due to eutrophication and climate change, as is irrigation of crops with freshwater contaminated with cHAB toxins. A few studies, mostly in aquatic protists and plants, have investigated the effects of cHAB toxins or cell extracts on various aspects of photosynthesis, with variable effects reported (negative to neutral to positive). We examined the effects of cyanobacterial live cultures and cell extracts (Microcystis aeruginosa or Anabaena flos-aquae) and individual cHAB toxins (anatoxin-a, ANA; beta-methyl-amino-L-alanine, BMAA; lipopolysaccharide, LPS; microcystin-LR, MC-LR) on photosynthesis in intact plants and leaf pieces in corn (Zea mays) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa). In intact plants grown in soil or hydroponically, overall net photosynthesis (Pn), but not Photosystem-II (PSII) electron-transport yield (ΦPSII), decreased when roots were exposed to cyanobacterial culture (whether with intact cells, cells removed, or cells lysed and removed) or individual toxins in solution (especially ANA, which also decreased rubisco activity); cyanobacterial culture also decreased leaf chlorophyll concentration. In contrast, ΦPSII decreased in leaf tissue vacuum-infiltrated with cyanobacterial culture or the individual toxins, LPS and MC-LR, though only in illuminated (vs. dark-adapted) leaves, and none of the toxins caused significant decreases in in vitro photosynthesis in thylakoids. Principal component analysis indicated unique overall effects of cyanobacterial culture and each toxin on photosynthesis. Hence, while cHAB toxins consistently impacted plant photosynthesis at ecologically relevant concentrations, the effects varied depending on the toxins and the mode of exposure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Plant Photobiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Microcystis aeruginosa</span> culture (intact cells) on soil-grown corn (<span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span>) after 14 days. Roots of potted plants grown in the greenhouse were watered every third day with nutrient solution only (control) or nutrient solution containing live cyanobacteria. Just prior to harvest to obtain plant fresh weight (FW) and shoot-to-root FW ratio, yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) and relative chlorophyll concentration ([chlorophyll] (SPAD)) were measured on recently expanded leaves of intact plants. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5–6, and significant treatment differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">t</span>-test) are indicated with an asterisk.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Microcystis aeruginosa</span> culture (with or without intact cells) on soil-grown corn (<span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span>) plants after 14 days. Plants were grown and watered as in <a href="#plants-13-03190-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> with nutrient solution only (control) or nutrient solution containing cell-free (filtered) or intact-cell (unfiltered) cyanobacterial culture. Yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) and relative chlorophyll concentration ([chlorophyll] (SPAD)) were measured on recently expanded leaves of intact plants. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5, and significant treatment differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (ANOVA followed by LSD test) are indicated with different letters above bars. Insert photo shows leaves (ca. 3 cm wide) from each treatment after 14 d in the same order as the <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Anabaena flos-aquae</span> culture (cells lysed and removed) on soil-grown corn (<span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span>) plants after 10 days. Plants were grown and watered as above with nutrient solution only (control) or nutrient solution containing cell-free (cells lysed and then filtered) cyanobacterial culture. Net photosynthesis (P<sub>n</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub> uptake), stomatal conductance (G<sub>s</sub>), internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>), yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>), and relative chlorophyll concentration ([chlorophyll] (SPAD)) were measured on recently expanded leaves of intact plants. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4, and significant treatment differences between treatments within each day at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (<span class="html-italic">t</span>-test) are indicated with an asterisk. Insert photo shows plants from each treatment, with the control on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Anabaena flos-aquae</span> or <span class="html-italic">Microcystis aeruginosa</span> culture (cells lysed and removed) on hydroponic corn (<span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span>) plants after 24 h. Plants were grown in soil and transferred to glass containers with roots submerged in nutrient solution only (control) or nutrient solution containing cell-free (cells lysed and then filtered) cyanobacterial culture. Net photosynthesis (P<sub>n</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub> uptake), stomatal conductance (G<sub>s</sub>), internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>), yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>), and relative chlorophyll concentration ([chlorophyll] (SPAD)) were measured on recently expanded leaves of intact plants. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4–6, and significant treatment differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (ANOVA followed by LSD test) are indicated with different letters above the bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Anabaena flos-aquae</span> or <span class="html-italic">Microcystis aeruginosa</span> culture (cells lysed and removed) on leaf pieces of corn (<span class="html-italic">Zea mays</span>) or lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span>) after 1 or 3 h. Leaf pieces were vacuum-infiltrated with nutrient solution only (control, C) or nutrient solution containing cyanobacterial culture (<span class="html-italic">Anabaena</span>, A; <span class="html-italic">Microcystis</span>, M). For lettuce, two independent cultures of each species were tested (A1, A2; M1, M2). The yields of light-adapted Photosystem-II (PSII) electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) and dark-adapted maximum PSII efficiency (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) were measured on leaf tissue from recently expanded leaves (for Φ<sub>PSII</sub>, 750 ± 25 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> PAR). Results are means + 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5, and significant treatment differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (ANOVA followed by LSD test) are indicated with different letters above bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effects of <span class="html-italic">Anabaena flos-aquae</span> culture or pure cyanobacterial toxins on hydroponic lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span>) plants after 10 days. Plants were grown in soil and transferred to glass containers with roots submerged in nutrient solution only (control), cyanobacterial culture (cells lysed and removed from nutrient solution), or individual toxins in nutrient solution (0.5 μM: anatoxin-a, ANA, beta-methyl-amino-alanine, BMAA, microcystin-LR; 25 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>: lipopolysaccharide, LPS). Just prior to harvest to obtain the increase in plant fresh weight during treatment (ΔFW), net photosynthesis (P<sub>n</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub> uptake), stomatal conductance (G<sub>s</sub>), internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>), yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>), and relative chlorophyll concentration ([chlorophyll] (SPAD)) were measured on recently expanded leaves of intact plants. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4. Significant treatment differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (ANOVA followed by LSD test) are indicated with different letters above bars, except for P<sub>n</sub>, where significant differences (Welch’s ANOVA and <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test) from the control are indicated with asterisks (see <a href="#sec2-plants-13-03190" class="html-sec">Section 2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Principal components analysis (PCA) visualizing overall differences in the responses of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span>) to <span class="html-italic">Anabaena flos-aquae</span> culture and individual toxins from <a href="#plants-13-03190-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Vectors represent relative chlorophyll concentration (Chl), net photosynthesis (P<sub>n</sub>), increase in fresh weight (FW), stomatal conductance (G<sub>s</sub>), and internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>). Points represent eigen-values of individual replicate plants. Differences in replicates are visualized based on their position on two orthogonal principal component axes. The direction and magnitude of response-variable vectors indicate their direction and degree of effect on the replicate position. Treatments are indicated by color: nutrient solution only (control); cyanobacterial culture, cells lysed and removed from nutrient solution (Cyanobacteria); or individual toxins in nutrient solution (0.5 μM: anatoxin-a, ANA, beta-methyl-amino-alanine, BMAA, microcystin-LR, MC-LR; 25 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>: lipopolysaccharide, LPS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effects of pure cyanobacterial toxins on in vivo rubisco activity in hydroponic lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span>) plants after 10 days. Plants were grown and treated as in <a href="#plants-13-03190-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>, with roots submerged in nutrient solution only (control) or individual toxins in nutrient solution (0.5 μM: anatoxin-a, ANA, beta-methyl-amino-alanine, BMAA, microcystin-LR, MC-LR; 25 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>: lipopolysaccharide, LPS). Rubisco activity was determined from the initial slope of the photosynthesis–CO<sub>2</sub> response curve, measured in recently expanded attached leaves at 1000 μmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> PAR and 25 °C. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 4. There were no significant treatment differences with ANOVA (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.12), as indicated by the same letters above the bars, but ANA differed from the control with one-tailed <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.03).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effects of individual cyanobacterial toxins on detached leaves of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span>) after 2 h. Leaf pieces were vacuum-infiltrated with deionized water only (control) or individual toxins in deionized water (1 μM: anatoxin-a, ANA, beta-methyl-amino-alanine, BMAA, microcystin-LR, MC-LR; 50 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>: lipopolysaccharide, LPS). Leaves were then incubated for 2 h under 450 ± 25 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> PAR or in the dark, after which the yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II (PSII) electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) or dark-adapted maximum PSII efficiency (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) was measured. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5. There were no significant effects of toxins on Φ<sub>PSII</sub> or F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> (ANOVA, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05), as indicated by the same letters above the bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effects of low vs. high concentrations of the cyanobacterial toxins, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and microcystin-LR (MC-LR) on detached leaves of lettuce (<span class="html-italic">Lactuca sativa</span>) after 3 hours. Leaf pieces were vacuum-infiltrated with deionized water only (control) or 1 µM MC-LR (MC-LR Low), 10 µM MC-LR (MC-LR High), 50 µg mL<sup>−1</sup> LPS (LPS Low), or 250 µg mL<sup>−1</sup> LPS (LPS High). Leaves were then incubated for 3 h under 750 ± 25 µmol m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> PAR or in the dark, after which the yield of light-adapted Photosystem-II (PSII) electron transport (Φ<sub>PSII</sub>) or dark-adapted maximum PSII efficiency (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) was measured. Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5, and significant treatment differences at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 (ANOVA followed by LSD test) are indicated with different letters above bars.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The effects of cyanobacterial toxins on in vitro O<sub>2</sub> evolution of thylakoid membranes. Chloroplasts were isolated from tomato (<span class="html-italic">Solanum lycopersicum</span>) leaves and lysed to obtain thylakoids. Thylakoids were treated with either deionized water or individual toxins (1 µM: anatoxin-a, ANA, beta-methyl-amino-alanine, BMAA, microcystin-LR, MC-LR; 50 µg mL<sup>−1</sup>: lipopolysaccharide, LPS). Results are means ± 1 SE, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5. There were no significant effects of toxins on O<sub>2</sub> evolution (ANOVA, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &gt; 0.05), as indicated by the same letters above the bars.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4125 KiB  
Article
Light Energy Use Efficiency in Photosystem II of Tomato Is Related to Leaf Age and Light Intensity
by Julietta Moustaka, Ilektra Sperdouli and Michael Moustakas
Crops 2024, 4(4), 623-635; https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4040043 - 11 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 741
Abstract
The fundamental key to increase photosynthetic efficiency of crop plants lies in optimizing the light energy use efficiency. In our study, we used tomato to evaluate the allocation of absorbed light energy in young and mature leaves, and to estimate if the extent [...] Read more.
The fundamental key to increase photosynthetic efficiency of crop plants lies in optimizing the light energy use efficiency. In our study, we used tomato to evaluate the allocation of absorbed light energy in young and mature leaves, and to estimate if the extent of photoinhibition and photoprotection can be affected by the leaf age. A reduced efficiency of the oxygen-evolving complex, in young leaves compared to mature ones, resulted in a donor-side photoinhibition, as judged from the significantly lower Fv/Fm ratio, in young leaves. The detected increased 1O2 production in young leaves was probably due to a donor-side photoinhibition. The effective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry (ΦPSII), at low light intensity (LLI, 426 μmol photons m−2 s−1), was significantly lower in young compared to mature leaves. Moreover, the non-significant increase in non-photochemical energy loss in PSII (ΦNPQ) could not counteract the decreased ΦPSII, and as a result the non-regulated energy loss in PSII (ΦNO) increased in young leaves, compared to mature ones. The significantly lower ΦPSII in young leaves can be attributed to the increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) creation that diminished the efficiency of the open PSII reaction centers (Fv’/Fm’), but without having any impact on the fraction of the open reaction centers. The reduced excess excitation energy, in mature leaves compared to young ones, at LLI, also revealed an enhanced PSII efficiency of mature leaves. However, there was almost no difference in the light energy use efficiency between young and mature leaves at the high light intensity (HLI, 1000 μmol photons m−2 s−1). The ability of mature tomato leaves to constrain photoinhibition is possible related to an enhanced photosynthetic function and a better growth rate. We concluded that the light energy use efficiency in tomato leaves is influenced by both the leaf age and the light intensity. Furthermore, the degrees of photoinhibition and photoprotection are related to the leaf developmental stage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The efficiency of the oxygen-evolving complex (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>/F<span class="html-italic">o</span>) (<b>a</b>), and the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>/F<span class="html-italic">m</span>) (<b>b</b>), in young and mature tomato leaves after 30 min of dark adaptation. Standard deviations (SDs) are shown by bars. Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Eight to ten plants were measured from each treatment (n = 8–10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The light energy partitioning at PSII. The effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry (Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>PSII</sub></span>) (<b>a</b>); the quantum yield of regulated non-photochemical energy loss in PSII (Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>NPQ</sub></span>) (<b>b</b>); and the quantum yield of non-regulated energy loss in PSII (Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>NO</sub></span>) (<b>c</b>), in young and mature tomato leaves, evaluated at 426 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (low light intensity, LLI), and at 1000 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (high light intensity, HLI). Standard deviations (SDs) are shown by bars. Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Eight to ten plants were measured from each treatment (n = 8–10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The fraction of open PSII reaction centers (RCs) (q<span class="html-italic">p</span>) (<b>a</b>), and the efficiency of the open PSII RCs (F<span class="html-italic">v</span>’/F<span class="html-italic">m</span>’) (<b>b</b>), in young and mature tomato leaves, evaluated at 426 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (low light intensity, LLI) and at 1000 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (high light intensity, HLI). Standard deviations (SDs) are shown by bars. Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Eight to ten plants were measured from each treatment (n = 8–10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The electron transport rate (ETR) (<b>a</b>), and the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (<b>b</b>), in young and mature tomato leaves, evaluated at 426 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (low light intensity, LLI) and at 1000 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (high light intensity, HLI). Standard deviations (SDs) are shown by bars. Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Eight to ten plants were measured from each treatment (n = 8–10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The excess excitation energy at PSII (EXC) (<b>a</b>) and the excitation pressure at PSII (1 − <span class="html-italic">qL</span>) (<b>b</b>) in young and mature tomato leaves, evaluated at 426 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (low light intensity, LLI) and at 1000 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> (high light intensity, HLI). Standard deviations (SDs) are shown by bars. Significant differences are shown by different lower-case letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). Eight to ten plants were measured from each treatment (n = 8–10).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Representative whole-leaf pseudocolor-coded pictures of the parameters F<span class="html-italic">v</span>/F<span class="html-italic">m</span> captured in young and mature dark-adapted tomato leaves, and of Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>PSII</sub></span>, Φ<span class="html-italic"><sub>NPQ,</sub></span> and q<span class="html-italic">p</span>, captured at 426 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> and at 1000 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>, in young and mature tomato leaves. The average whole-leaf value for each parameter is shown for each leaf. An asterisk indicates a significant difference at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05. At the bottom of the figure, the color code indicates the corresponding color values.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 6363 KiB  
Article
Biological Acclimatization of Micropropagated Al-Taif Rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) Plants Using Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Rhizophagus fasciculatus
by Yaser Hassan Dewir, Ali Mohsen Al-Ali, Rashid Sultan Al-Obeed, Muhammad M. Habib, Jahangir A. Malik, Thobayet S. Alshahrani, Abdulaziz A. Al-Qarawi and Hosakatte Niranjana Murthy
Horticulturae 2024, 10(10), 1120; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10101120 - 21 Oct 2024
Viewed by 827
Abstract
Tissue culture is used to multiply Al-Taif rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) plants in order to meet the demands of the fragrance, cosmetic, and floriculture industries. The use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) could potentially improve plant growth and [...] Read more.
Tissue culture is used to multiply Al-Taif rose (Rosa damascena f. trigintipetala (Dieck) R. Keller) plants in order to meet the demands of the fragrance, cosmetic, and floriculture industries. The use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) could potentially improve plant growth and acclimatization performance to ex vitro conditions. Thus, in the current study, we investigated how AMF Rhizophagus fasciculatus influences the growth, establishment, and physiological performance of micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants during the acclimatization stage. The growth and physiological parameters of the AMF-treated plants were evaluated after a 12 week growth period in the growth chambers. The plants treated with AMF exhibited greater height (25.53 cm) and biomass growth values for both shoot fresh weight (0.93 g/plant) and dry weight (0.030 g/plant), more leaves (11.3/plant), more leaf area (66.15 cm2), longer main roots (15.05 cm/plant), total root length (172.16 cm/plant), total root area (64.36 cm2/plant), and biomass from both fresh weight (383 mg/plant) and dry weight (80.00 mg/plant) of the plants. The plants treated with AMF also exhibited increased rates of net CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration compared to the control plants. The proline content in the leaves and roots was significantly lower in the AMF-treated plants than untreated plants. The Fv/Fm ratio, which serves as an indicator of the intrinsic or maximal efficacy of Photosystem II (PSII) demonstrated a notable decline in the untreated Al-Taif rose plants. These results elucidate the advantageous impact of AMF colonization on micropropagated Al-Taif rose plants, thereby enhancing their resilience against adverse ex vitro conditions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Photograph showing Al-Taif rose plant material used for the AMF experiments. (<b>a</b>) shoots regenerated in vitro on MS medium containing 0.5 mg/L of BAP + 30 g/L sucrose; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) in vitro rooting on MS medium containing 80 g/L sucrose, 0.5 g/L activated charcoal, and 0.2 mg/L NAA; (<b>d</b>) micropropagated plantlets with plastic cover during the acclimatization using AMF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photomicrographs (400× magnification) showing blue stained Al-Taif rose roots inoculated with <span class="html-italic">R. fasciculatus</span> (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>). The typical AMF colonization structures were observed as vesicles (V), intraradical hyphae (IH), intraradical spore (IS), coiled hyphae (CH), and arbuscules (Ar).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spore and mycelial count in the roots of Al-Taif rose colonized by <span class="html-italic">R. fasciculatus</span> after 12 weeks acclimatization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photograph showing vegetative growth (<b>a</b>) and root growth (<b>b</b>) in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plantlets after 12 weeks acclimatization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Root growth characteristics in non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants after 12 weeks acclimatization. (<b>a</b>) length of the main root, (<b>b</b>) total root length, (<b>c</b>) number of root tips, (<b>d</b>) root diameter, (<b>e</b>) total root surface area, (<b>f</b>) total root volume, (<b>g</b>) root fresh weight, and (<b>h</b>) root dry weight. NS and * = non-significant and significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, respectively, according to Student’s unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Microscopic images of stomata (Arrow; 40× magnification) in non-AMF (<b>a</b>) and AMF-treated (<b>b</b>) Al-Taif rose plantlets and stomatal density, aperture length and width (<b>c</b>) after 12 weeks acclimatization. NS and * = non-significant and significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, respectively, according to Student’s unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Net photosynthetic rate (<b>a</b>), stomatal conductance (<b>b</b>), transpiration rate (<b>c</b>), Fv/Fm (<b>d</b>), and proline content in leaf (<b>e</b>) and root (<b>f</b>) of non-AMF and AMF-treated Al-Taif rose plants after 12 weeks acclimatization. * = significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05 according to Student’s unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop