Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (56)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = single-event upsets (SEUs)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 6184 KiB  
Article
Radiation-Hardened 16T SRAM Cell with Improved Read and Write Stability for Space Applications
by Jong-Yeob Oh and Sung-Hun Jo
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(24), 11940; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411940 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 257
Abstract
The critical charge of sensitive nodes decreases as transistors scale down with the advancement of CMOS technology, making SRAM cells more susceptible to soft errors in the space industry. When a radiation particle strikes a sensitive node of a conventional 6T SRAM cell, [...] Read more.
The critical charge of sensitive nodes decreases as transistors scale down with the advancement of CMOS technology, making SRAM cells more susceptible to soft errors in the space industry. When a radiation particle strikes a sensitive node of a conventional 6T SRAM cell, a single event upset (SEU) can occur, flipping in the stored data in the cell. Additionally, charge sharing between transistors can cause single-event multi-node upsets (SEMNUs), where data in multiple nodes are flipped simultaneously due to a single particle strike. Therefore, this paper proposes a radiation-hardened high stability 16T (RHHS16T) cell for space applications. The characteristics of RHHS16T are evaluated and compared with previously proposed radiation-hardened SRAM cells such as QUCCE12T, WEQUATRO, RHBD10T, RHD12T, RSP14T, RHPD14T, and RHBD14T. Simulation results for RHHS16T indicated that the proposed cell demonstrates improved performance in read stability, write access time, and write stability compared to all comparison cells. These improvements in the proposed cell are achieved with higher power consumption and a minor area penalty. Notably, isolating the storage node from the bit line during read operations and the feedback loop between nodes during write operations enables the proposed RHHS16T to achieve enhanced read stability and write stability, respectively. The proposed integrated circuit was implemented using a 90 nm CMOS process and operates at a supply voltage of 1V. Furthermore, RHHS16T provides high immunity against SEUs and SEMNUs. Through its enhanced read and write stability, it ensures reliable data retention for space applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the proposed RHHS16T cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The cell layout of the proposed RHHS16T cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulation results of the basic operation of the proposed RHHS16T cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Read access time (<b>a</b>) measuring method (<b>b</b>) simulation result for different comparison cells with supply voltage variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>RSNM (<b>a</b>) simulation circuit diagram for conventional SRAM cell; (<b>b</b>) butterfly curves for various cells at VDD = 1 V.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>RSNM for different comparison cells with supply voltage variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Write access time (<b>a</b>) measuring method and (<b>b</b>) simulation result for different comparison cells with supply voltage variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>WWTV (<b>a</b>) measuring method and (<b>b</b>) simulation result for different comparison cells with supply voltage variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>H</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>W</mi> <mi>R</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> for different comparison cells with supply voltage variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Equivalent circuit for generating (<b>a</b>) negative and (<b>b</b>) positive transient pulses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Waveforms presenting the soft error recovery when SEU affects (<b>a</b>) node Q, (<b>b</b>) node QB, and (<b>c</b>) node S0; (<b>d</b>) the storage node pair Q-QB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relative EQM for various comparison cells on log scale.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 5128 KiB  
Article
Low-Power Radiation-Hardened Static Random Access Memory with Enhanced Read Stability for Space Applications
by Hong-Geun Park and Sung-Hun Jo
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 10961; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310961 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 347
Abstract
In space environments, radiation particles affect the stored values of SRAM cells, and these effects, such as single-event upsets (SEUs) and single-event multiple-node upsets (SEMNUs), pose a threat to the reliability of systems used in the space industry. To mitigate the impacts of [...] Read more.
In space environments, radiation particles affect the stored values of SRAM cells, and these effects, such as single-event upsets (SEUs) and single-event multiple-node upsets (SEMNUs), pose a threat to the reliability of systems used in the space industry. To mitigate the impacts of SEUs and SEMNUs, this paper proposes the Read Stability Improved and Low Power (RSLP16T) SRAM cell. It was confirmed that in SEU-induced simulations, all nodes of the RSLP16T could be restored with a charge amount of less than 100 fC. Additionally, it was verified that a similar level of restoration was possible for SEMNUs occurring in pair of storage nodes. The proposed cell achieves a high level of read stability due to a high pull-down cell ratio (current ratio, CR) at the storage nodes and the fact that only a pair of nodes is in contact with the bit lines during read operations. Because all node paths use a stacking structure for internal transistor configuration and a relatively higher number of cells are composed of PMOS, it consumes the least hold power. While these improvements come at the cost of slightly increased delay time and area, performance evaluation revealed that the equivalent quality metric (EQM) was the highest, indicating that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. The proposed integrated circuit is implemented in the 90 nm CMOS process and operated on 1 V supply voltage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the proposed RSLP16T cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Layout of the proposed RSLP16T cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>HPWR among comparison cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Butterfly curves of the proposed cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>RSNMs among comparison cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Read delay among comparison cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>TWA among comparison cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>WWTV among comparison cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Simulation results of the proposed RSLP16T cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Soft-error recovery when an SEU affects (<b>a</b>) node Q, (<b>b</b>) node QB, (<b>c</b>) node S0 individually, and (<b>d</b>) node pair (Q–QB) simultaneously.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 533 KiB  
Article
Statistical Analysis of LEO and GEO Satellite Anomalies and Space Radiation
by Jeimmy Nataly Buitrago-Leiva, Mohamed El Khayati Ramouz, Adriano Camps and Joan A. Ruiz-de-Azua
Aerospace 2024, 11(11), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11110924 - 8 Nov 2024
Viewed by 696
Abstract
Exposure to space radiation substantially degrades satellite systems, provoking severe partial or, in some extreme cases, total failures. Electrostatic discharges (ESD), single event latch-up (SEL), and single event upsets (SEU) are among the most frequent causes of those reported satellite anomalies. The impact [...] Read more.
Exposure to space radiation substantially degrades satellite systems, provoking severe partial or, in some extreme cases, total failures. Electrostatic discharges (ESD), single event latch-up (SEL), and single event upsets (SEU) are among the most frequent causes of those reported satellite anomalies. The impact of space radiation dose on satellite equipment has been studied in-depth. This study conducts a statistical analysis to explore the relationships between low-Earth orbit (LEO) and geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite anomalies and particle concentrations, solar and geomagnetic activity in the period 2010–2022. Through a monthly and daily timescale analysis, the present work explores the temporal response of space disturbances on satellite systems and the periods when satellites are vulnerable to those disturbances. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Astronautics & Space Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Radiation particles and their effects on satellite systems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Anomaly selection criteria and their categorization per subsystem. F1, F2, F3 F4, and F5 corresponds to the filters described in <a href="#sec3dot1-aerospace-11-00924" class="html-sec">Section 3.1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LEO/GEO satellites’ anomalies and solar and geomagnetic activity correlation (2010–2022). Sunspot number and CME speed index are used to quantify solar activity, whereas Kp and Dst indices are used to quantify geomagnetic activity. Despite using a monthly timescale for analysis, this figure is plotted by grouping four months for visual simplicity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Relationship between LEO anomalies and the average SSN, Kp, CME speed, and Dst indices of the month the anomaly occurred and the previous three months, respectively (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). Relationship between GEO anomalies and the average SSN, Kp, CME speed, and Dst indices of the month the anomaly occurred and the previous three months, respectively (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). Note: M-1,2,3 indicate the months before the anomalous event, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between LEO (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and GEO (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) anomalies and number of days per month with Kp-index ≥ 5 and Dst index ≤−16 of the month the anomaly occurred and the prior three months, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Monthly LEO/GEO anomaly rate correlation with the average SSN, Kp, CME speed, and Dst indices, computed for every month by averaging the 13 samples throughout the study period (2010–2022).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Assessment of solar and geomagnetic indicators during seven days (anomaly day + 6 prior days), for those days (anomaly day, D) with LEO and GEO anomalies ≥ 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Proton, electron, and X-ray flux time series comparison between days with no reported anomalies (see <a href="#aerospace-11-00924-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>) and those selected days with <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>A</mi> <mi>D</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> ≥ 3 during a seven-day window (see <a href="#aerospace-11-00924-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>). Given that one or a few days can have significantly higher particle concentrations than others, logarithmic charts are employed to respond to the large value ranges. Before the log() application, proton (P), electron (E), and X-ray flux (X) were in protons/(cm·day·sr), electrons/(cm·day·sr), and W/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Orbital inclination classification for LEO and GEO satellites whose anomalies were selected for the analysis. The satellites failures percentage in each orbit inclination range is normalized by dividing the total number of satellites failed by active satellites in that range from 2010 to 2022 according to Seradata [<a href="#B38-aerospace-11-00924" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1210 KiB  
Article
Synergistic Effects of Total Ionizing Dose and Single-Event Upset in 130 nm 7T Silicon-on-Insulator Static Random Access Memory
by Zheng Zhang, Gang Guo, Linfei Wang, Shuyan Xiao, Qiming Chen, Linchun Gao, Chunlin Wang, Futang Li, Fuqiang Zhang, Shuyong Zhao and Jiancheng Liu
Electronics 2024, 13(15), 2997; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13152997 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 624
Abstract
The exposure of spaceborne devices to high-energy charged particles in space results in the occurrence of both a total ionizing dose (TID) and the single-event effect (SEE). These phenomena present significant challenges for the reliable operation of spacecraft and satellites. The rapid advancement [...] Read more.
The exposure of spaceborne devices to high-energy charged particles in space results in the occurrence of both a total ionizing dose (TID) and the single-event effect (SEE). These phenomena present significant challenges for the reliable operation of spacecraft and satellites. The rapid advancement of semiconductor fabrication processes and the continuous reduction in device feature size have led to an increase in the significance of the synergistic effects of TID and SEE in static random access memory (SRAM). In order to elucidate the involved physical mechanisms, the synergistic effects of TID and single-event upset (SEU) in a new kind of 130 nm 7T silicon-on-insulator (SOI) SRAM were investigated by means of cobalt-60 gamma-ray and heavy ion irradiation experiments. The findings demonstrate that 7T SOI SRAM is capable of maintaining normal reading and writing functionality when subjected to TID irradiation at a total dose of up to 750 krad(Si). In general, the TID was observed to reduce the SEU cross-section of the 7T SOI SRAM. However, the extent of this reduction was influenced by the heavy ion LET value and the specific writing data pattern employed. Based on the available evidence, it can be proposed that TID preirradiation represents a promising avenue for enhancing the resilience of 7T SOI SRAMs to SEU. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Microelectronics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of memory cell structure in of 7T SOI SRAM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of transistors N1, N2, N3, N4, P1, P2 (<b>a</b>) and delay transistor N5 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The irradiation platform (<b>a</b>) and the 7T SOI SRAMs under test (<b>b</b>) of the TID experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The irradiation platform (<b>a</b>) and the 7T SOI SRAMs under test (<b>b</b>) of the SEU experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The IDD of the 7T SOI SRAMs after TID irradiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SEU cross-section of the 7T SOI SRAMs before and after the TID irradiation versus the heavy ion LET value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>SEU cross-section of the 7T SOI SRAM with data patterns “55” (<b>a</b>) and “AA” (<b>b</b>) versus the heavy ion LET value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SEU cross-section of the 7T SOI SRAM with data patterns “55” (<b>a</b>) and “AA” (<b>b</b>) versus the total dose.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEU cross-section of the 7T SOI SRAMs with data pattern “55” (<b>a</b>) and “AA” (<b>b</b>), and one of the SOI SRAMs in each test group was written with data pattern “55” before the TID irradiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>SEU cross-section of the upset models “0→1” and “1→0” in the 7T SOI SRAMs with data pattern “55” under heavy ion irradiation with LET of 5.0 (<b>a</b>), 13.9 (<b>b</b>), 21.8 (<b>c</b>), and 37.4 (<b>d</b>) MeV·cm<sup>2</sup>/mg after TID irradiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SEU cross-section of the upset models “0→1” and “1→0” in the 7T SOI SRAMs with data pattern “AA” under heavy ion irradiation with LET of 13.9 (<b>a</b>), 21.8 (<b>b</b>), and 37.4 (<b>c</b>) MeV·cm<sup>2</sup>/mg after TID irradiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The equivalent circuits of SET pulse propagation corresponding to “0→1” upset (<b>a</b>) and “1→0” upset (<b>b</b>) in 7T SOI SRAMs.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 5464 KiB  
Article
Experimental Study of the Impact of Temperature on Atmospheric Neutron-Induced Single Event Upsets in 28 nm Embedded SRAM of SiP
by Shunshun Zheng, Zhangang Zhang, Jiefeng Ye, Xiaojie Lu, Zhifeng Lei, Zhili Liu, Gaoying Geng, Qi Zhang, Hong Zhang and Hui Li
Electronics 2024, 13(11), 2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13112012 - 22 May 2024
Viewed by 1048
Abstract
In this paper, the temperature dependence of single event upset (SEU) cross-section in 28 nm embedded Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) of System in Package (SiP) was investigated. An atmospheric neutron beam with an energy range of MeV~GeV was utilized. The SEU cross-section [...] Read more.
In this paper, the temperature dependence of single event upset (SEU) cross-section in 28 nm embedded Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) of System in Package (SiP) was investigated. An atmospheric neutron beam with an energy range of MeV~GeV was utilized. The SEU cross-section increased by 39.8% when the temperature increased from 296 K to 382 K. Further Technology Computer Aided Design (TCAD) simulation results show that the temperature has a weak impact on the peak pulse current, which is mainly caused by the change of bipolar amplification effect with temperature. As the temperature increases, the critical charge of the device decreases by about 4.8%. The impact of temperature on the SEU cross-section is determined competitively by the peak pulse current and the critical charge. The impact of temperature on critical charge is expected to become more severe as the feature size is further advanced. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The differential neutron spectrum compared with the JEDEC standard [<a href="#B19-electronics-13-02012" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Laboratory layout diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Experimental field diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Thermal chamber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Temperature dependence of SEU cross-section.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>3D physical model of the device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Temperature dependence of peak pulse current.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Contribution of drift and bipolar amplification to pulse current peak (T = 296 K, Red: drift diffusion current, Black: bipolar amplification current).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Temperature dependence of drift pulse current.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Temperature dependence of electron mobility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Temperature dependence of pulse current duration.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4294 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of a Simplified Modeling Approach for SEE Cross-Section Prediction: A Case Study of SEU on 6T SRAM Cells
by Cleiton M. Marques, Frédéric Wrobel, Ygor Q. Aguiar, Alain Michez, Frédéric Saigné, Jérôme Boch, Luigi Dilillo and Rubén García Alía
Electronics 2024, 13(10), 1954; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13101954 - 16 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 808
Abstract
Electrical models play a crucial role in assessing the radiation sensitivity of devices. However, since they are usually not provided for end users, it is essential to have alternative modeling approaches to optimize circuit design before irradiation tests, and to support the understanding [...] Read more.
Electrical models play a crucial role in assessing the radiation sensitivity of devices. However, since they are usually not provided for end users, it is essential to have alternative modeling approaches to optimize circuit design before irradiation tests, and to support the understanding of post-irradiation data. This work proposes a novel simplified methodology to evaluate the single-event effects (SEEs) cross-section. To validate the proposed approach, we consider the 6T SRAM cell a case study in four technological nodes. The modeling considers layout features and the doping profile, presenting ways to estimate unknown parameters. The accuracy and limitations are determined by comparing our simulations with actual experimental data. The results demonstrated a strong correlation with irradiation data, without requiring any fitting of the simulation results or access to process design kit (PDK) data. This proves that our approach is a reliable method for calculating the single-event upset (SEU) cross-section for heavy-ion irradiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The diffusion–collection model: (<b>a</b>) the carriers arriving to the OFF-state drain at a given time, <span class="html-italic">t</span>, and a given distance, <span class="html-italic">r</span>, of the ion generation point; (<b>b</b>) segmentation of the ion track and the drain surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of the IDS vs. VDS curves for different VGS values of the simplified NMOS transistor with W/L = 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Standard 6T SRAM electrical diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simplified flowchart of PredicSEE code.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three different layout designs that can be applied to the 6T SRAM cell: (<b>a</b>) “tall” design [<a href="#B27-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">27</a>]; (<b>b</b>) “thin” design [<a href="#B25-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">25</a>]; (<b>c</b>) “ultra-thin” design [<a href="#B28-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>PredicSEE view of the simplified 3D structure used in the simulations. The BEOL is modeled with SiO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Heavy-ion SEU cross-section for 90 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B32-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Heavy-ion SEU cross-section for 65 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B27-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Heavy-ion SEU cross-section for 45 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B33-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Heavy-ion SEU cross-section for 32 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B34-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Heavy-ion SEU cross-section for 65nm SRAM considering the voltage scaling situation. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B27-electronics-13-01954" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Heavy-ion SEU cross-section for 65 nm SRAM with variations in different input parameters. The standard plot is the golden result obtained using the following input parameters: CR = 1.5; layout = “Tall”; BEOL = 8 μm; and doping = 10<sup>18</sup> atoms/cm<sup>3</sup>. For the other curves, we only show one of the parameters and indicate the simulation response. The cell ratio curve applies CR = 2.0. The layout curve uses the “Thin” layout approach. The no-layout curve does not follow a layout structure, only spacing the transistors apart from each other. The BEOL curve applies a BEOL thickness of 3 μm. The doping curve uses N-P WELL = 10<sup>17</sup> atoms/cm<sup>3</sup>.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 4738 KiB  
Article
Evaluation and Mitigation of Weight-Related Single Event Upsets in a Convolutional Neural Network
by Yulong Cai, Ming Cai, Yanlai Wu, Jian Lu, Zeyu Bian, Bingkai Liu and Shuai Cui
Electronics 2024, 13(7), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071296 - 30 Mar 2024
Viewed by 884
Abstract
Single Event Upsets (SEUs) are most likely to cause bit flips within the trained parameters of a convolutional neural network (CNN). Therefore, it is crucial to analyze and implement hardening techniques to enhance their reliability under radiation. In this paper, random fault injections [...] Read more.
Single Event Upsets (SEUs) are most likely to cause bit flips within the trained parameters of a convolutional neural network (CNN). Therefore, it is crucial to analyze and implement hardening techniques to enhance their reliability under radiation. In this paper, random fault injections into the weights of LeNet-5 were carried out in order to evaluate and propose strategies to improve the reliability of a CNN. According to the results of an SEU fault injection, the accuracy of the CNN can be classified into the following three categories: benign conditions, poor conditions, and critical conditions. Two efficient methods for mitigating weight-related SEUs are proposed, as follows: weight limiting and Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) for the critical bit of the critical layer. The hardening results show that when the number of SEU faults is small, the weight limiting almost completely eliminates the critical and poor conditions of LeNet-5’s accuracy. Additionally, even when the number of SEU faults is large enough, combining the weight limiting and TMR methods for the critical bit of the critical layer can retain the occurrence rate of benign conditions at 98%, saving 99.3% of the hardware resources compared to the Full-TMR hardening method. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The structure of LeNet-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Framework for quantifying CNN degradations caused by injecting fault to weights randomly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>LeNet-5’s accuracy varies with the number of SEUs injected.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The proportion of the three LeNet-5 accuracy conditions caused by weight-related SEUs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The weight distributions of the third layer of the LeNet-5 network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The weight distributions of the sixth layer of the LeNet-5 network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Example of an SEU causing an extreme weight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The probabilities of critical condition change with the number of SEUs under different hardening methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The probabilities of benign condition change with the number of SEUs under different hardening methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The probability of benign conditions after hardening for individual layers in LeNet-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The probability of benign conditions after hardening for the combination of multiple layers in LeNet-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of the effectiveness of five different selective TMR methods.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4802 KiB  
Article
Implementation of Highly Reliable Convolutional Neural Network with Low Overhead on Field-Programmable Gate Array
by Xin Chen, Yudong Xie, Liangzhou Huo, Kai Chen, Changhao Gao, Zhiqiang Xiang, Hanying Yang, Xiaofeng Wang, Yifan Ge and Ying Zhang
Electronics 2024, 13(5), 879; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13050879 - 25 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1404
Abstract
Due to the advantages of parallel architecture and low power consumption, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) is typically utilized as the hardware for convolutional neural network (CNN) accelerators. However, SRAM-based FPGA devices are extremely susceptible to single-event upsets (SEUs) induced by space radiation. [...] Read more.
Due to the advantages of parallel architecture and low power consumption, a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) is typically utilized as the hardware for convolutional neural network (CNN) accelerators. However, SRAM-based FPGA devices are extremely susceptible to single-event upsets (SEUs) induced by space radiation. In this paper, a fault tolerance analysis and fault injection experiments are applied to a CNN accelerator, and the overall results show that SEUs occurring in a control unit (CTRL) lead to the highest system error rate, which is over 70%. After that, a hybrid hardening strategy consisting of a finite state machine error-correcting circuit (FSM-ECC) and a triple modular redundancy automatic hardening technique (TMR-AHT) is proposed in this paper to achieve a tradeoff between radiation reliability and design overhead. Moreover, the proposed methodology has very small workload and good migration ability. Finally, by full exploiting the fault tolerance property of CNNs, a highly reliable CNN accelerator with the proposed hybrid hardening strategy is implemented with Xilinx Zynq-7035. When BER is 2 × 10−6, the proposed hybrid hardening strategy reduces the whole system error rate by 78.95% with the overhead of an extra 20.7% of look-up tables (LUTs) and 20.9% of flip-flops (FFs). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Model, architecture, and implementation platform of CNN: (<b>a</b>) Lenet-5 model; (<b>b</b>) architecture, (<b>c</b>) hardware platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Model, architecture, and implementation platform of CNN: (<b>a</b>) Lenet-5 model; (<b>b</b>) architecture, (<b>c</b>) hardware platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Convolution calculations with SEUs in CNN accelerator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Operation of SEU evaluation platform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Two-dimensional max-pooling operation: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>×</mo> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> kernel size; (<b>b</b>) 2 × 2 kernel size.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three common activation functions in CNNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cumulative time of CNN operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Examples of SEU effects on CTRL: (<b>a</b>) Status code error; (<b>b</b>) critical bit error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fault type statistics at BER = 10<sup>−6</sup>: (<b>a</b>) CNN model view; (<b>b</b>) architecture view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Schematic of FSM-ECC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Waveforms of FSM-ECC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The flowchart of TMR-AHT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>A hardening example with TMR-AHT.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Fault type statistics for hardened and unhardened CNN with different BERs in the CTRL.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 7071 KiB  
Article
A Methodology to Estimate Single-Event Effects Induced by Low-Energy Protons
by Cleiton Marques, Frédéric Wrobel, Ygor Aguiar, Alain Michez, Jérôme Boch, Frédéric Saigné and Rubén García Alía
Eng 2024, 5(1), 319-332; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5010017 - 19 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1084
Abstract
This work explains that the Coulomb elastic process on the nucleus is a major source of single-event effects (SEE) for protons within the energy range of 1–10 MeV. The infinite range of Coulomb interactions implies an exceptionally high recoil probability. This research seeks [...] Read more.
This work explains that the Coulomb elastic process on the nucleus is a major source of single-event effects (SEE) for protons within the energy range of 1–10 MeV. The infinite range of Coulomb interactions implies an exceptionally high recoil probability. This research seeks to extend the investigations under which the elastic process becomes significant in the energy deposition process by providing a simplified methodology to evaluate the elastic contribution impact on the reliability of electronics. The goal is to derive a method to provide a simple way to calculate and predict the SEE cross-section. At very low energy, we observe a significant increase in the proton differential cross-section. The use of a direct Monte Carlo approach would mainly trigger low energy recoiling ions, and a very long calculation time would be necessary to observe the tail of the spectrum. In this sense, this work provides a simple methodology to calculate the SEE cross-section. The single-event upset (SEU) cross-section results demonstrate a good agreement with the experimental data in terms of shape and order of magnitude for different technological nodes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Electrical and Electronic Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Elastic reaction leading to the deflection of the incident nucleon and the recoil of the target nucleus [<a href="#B18-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">18</a>]. The recoil ion may be responsible for an SEE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Nonelastic reaction leading to the production of secondary particles [<a href="#B18-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">18</a>]. The secondaries may ionize the matter and trigger SEE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Nuclear cross-sections for p + <sup>28</sup>Si interaction. Data from IAEA database [<a href="#B23-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Differential cross-section for incident neutrons and protons at 5 MeV and as a function of recoiling energy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Differential cross-section for incident neutrons and protons at 10 MeV and as a function of recoiling energy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Elastic cross-section as a function of proton energy for different threshold recoil energies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of an elastic collision in the BEOL. The recoiling silicon loses energy along its track and can reach the sensitive region with different LET.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cumulative probability to obtain a silicon recoil with a LET &gt; LET<span class="html-italic"><sub>th</sub></span> for different proton energies. In this example, the BEOL thickness is 10 μm. The sensitive region layer is 1 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Heavy-ion cross-section for 90 nm SRAM fitted with a power law. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B29-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Heavy-ion cross-section for 65 nm SRAM fitted with a power law. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B28-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Heavy-ion cross-section for 40 nm SRAM fitted with a power law. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B29-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>SEU cross-section calculation for 90 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B29-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>SEU cross-section calculation for 65 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B28-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SEU cross-section calculation for 40 nm SRAM. Experimental data taken from [<a href="#B29-eng-05-00017" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 3528 KiB  
Article
Proton- and Neutron-Induced SEU Cross-Section Modeling and Simulation: A Unified Analytical Approach
by Gennady I. Zebrev, Nikolay N. Samotaev, Rustem G. Useinov, Artur M. Galimov, Vladimir V. Emeliyanov, Artyom A. Sharapov, Dmitri A. Kazyakin and Alexander S. Rodin
Radiation 2024, 4(1), 37-49; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation4010004 - 14 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1838
Abstract
A new physics-based compact model, which makes it possible to simulate in a unified way the neutrons and protons of cosmic ray-induced SEU cross-sections, including the effects from nuclear reaction products and from direct ionization by low-energy protons, has been proposed and validated. [...] Read more.
A new physics-based compact model, which makes it possible to simulate in a unified way the neutrons and protons of cosmic ray-induced SEU cross-sections, including the effects from nuclear reaction products and from direct ionization by low-energy protons, has been proposed and validated. The proposed approach is analytical and based on explicit analytical relationships and approximations with physics-based fitting parameters. GEANT4 or SRIM numerical calculations can be used as an aid to adjust or refine the phenomenological parameters or functions included in the model, taking into account real geometrical configurations and chemical compositions of the devices. In particular, explicit energy dependencies of the soft error cross-sections for protons and neutrons over a wide range of nucleon energies were obtained and validated. The main application areas of the developed model include space physics, accelerator studies high energy physics and nuclear experiments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Conceptual view of influencing and sensitive volumes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>GEANT4 simulations of the LET spectra of secondary particles at different proton energies [<a href="#B14-radiation-04-00004" class="html-bibr">14</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Typical SEU cross-section vs. LET dependence in a linear scale [<a href="#B13-radiation-04-00004" class="html-bibr">13</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Approximate dependencies of the effective LET on neutron energy <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mo>Λ</mo> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> simulated with (13) at Λ<sub>max</sub> = 15 MeV-cm<sup>2</sup>/mg for three ion ranges: L<sub>R</sub> = 1, 3 and 5 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Energy dependencies of neutron-induced SEU cross-sections per bit simulated for three values of critical LET (for Λ<sub>C</sub> = 0.2 (red), 0.3 (blue), 0.4 (green) MeV-cm<sup>2</sup>/mg). Parameters: <span class="html-italic">a<sub>C</sub></span> = 0.5 µm<sup>2</sup>, Λ<sub>max</sub> = 15 MeV-cm<sup>2</sup>/mg, <span class="html-italic">ε<sub>n0</sub></span> = 2 MeV, δ<span class="html-italic">ε<sub>n</sub></span><sub>0</sub> = 0.4 MeV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Neutron-induced SEU cross-sections per bit simulated as functions of critical LETs for three values of neutron energy (for <span class="html-italic">ε<sub>n</sub></span> = 1 (green), 2 (blue), 14 (red) MeV) with the same parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of experimental (points) and simulated (lines) data for proton-induced SEU cross-sections (Lambert et al., 2009 [<a href="#B29-radiation-04-00004" class="html-bibr">29</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The efficacy of secondary particle generation <span class="html-italic">α(ε<sub>p</sub>)</span> simulated with GEANT4 as a function of proton energies <span class="html-italic">ε<sub>p</sub></span> for overlayer thicknesses of 2.5 µm (solid line) and 22 µm (dashed line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SRIM-calculated dependence of LET as a function of proton energy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Non-monotonic view of direct ionization SEU cross-sections for low-energy protons simulated with Equation (16) for different Λ<sub>C</sub>; <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mo>Λ</mo> <mi>p</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ε</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> was simulated using SRIM as in <a href="#radiation-04-00004-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Typical proton-induced SEU cross-sections as a function of energy, simulated with Equation (16) for critical LETs: Λ<sub>C</sub> = 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 MeV-cm<sup>2</sup>/mg (top down).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>A comparison of experimental total proton cross-sections vs. energy (different points) and simulation with (16) (red solid line).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 12132 KiB  
Article
A Lightweight Method for Detecting and Correcting Errors in Low-Frequency Measurements for In-Orbit Demonstrators
by María-Ángeles Cifredo-Chacón, José-María Guerrero-Rodríguez and Ignacio Mateos
Sensors 2024, 24(4), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041065 - 6 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1026
Abstract
In the pursuit of enhancing the technological maturity of innovative magnetic sensing techniques, opportunities presented by in-orbit platforms (IOD/IOV experiments) provide a means to evaluate their in-flight capabilities. The Magnetic Experiments for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (MELISA) represent a set of in-flight [...] Read more.
In the pursuit of enhancing the technological maturity of innovative magnetic sensing techniques, opportunities presented by in-orbit platforms (IOD/IOV experiments) provide a means to evaluate their in-flight capabilities. The Magnetic Experiments for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (MELISA) represent a set of in-flight demonstrators designed to characterize the low-frequency noise performance of a magnetic measurement system within a challenging space environment. In Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, electronic circuits are exposed to high levels of radiation coming from energetic particles trapped by the Earth’s magnetic field, solar flares, and galactic cosmic rays. A significant effect is the accidental bit-flipping in memory registers. This work presents an analysis of memory data redundancy resources using auxiliary second flash memory and exposes recovery options to retain critical data utilizing a duplicated data structure. A new and lightweight technique, CCM (Cross-Checking and Mirroring), is proposed to verify the proper performance of these techniques. Four alternative algorithms included in the original version of the MELISA software (Version v0.0) are presented. All the versions have been validated and evaluated according to various merit indicators. The evaluations showed similar performances for the proposed techniques, and they are valid for situations in which the flash memory suffers from more than one bit-flip. The overhead due to the introduction of additional instructions to the main code is negligible, even in the target experiment based on an 8-bit microcontroller. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Space Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Graphical representation of the CCM technique.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 2637 KiB  
Communication
A Radiation-Hardened Triple Modular Redundancy Design Based on Spin-Transfer Torque Magnetic Tunnel Junction Devices
by Shubin Zhang, Peifang Dai, Ning Li and Yanbo Chen
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 1229; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031229 - 1 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1179
Abstract
Integrated circuits suffer severe deterioration due to single-event upsets (SEUs) in irradiated environments. Spin-transfer torque magnetic random-access memory (STT-MRAM) appears to be a promising candidate for next-generation memory as it shows promising properties, such as non-volatility, speed, and unlimited endurance. One of the [...] Read more.
Integrated circuits suffer severe deterioration due to single-event upsets (SEUs) in irradiated environments. Spin-transfer torque magnetic random-access memory (STT-MRAM) appears to be a promising candidate for next-generation memory as it shows promising properties, such as non-volatility, speed, and unlimited endurance. One of the important merits of STT-MRAM is its radiation hardness, thanks to its core component, a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ), being capable of good function in an irradiated environment. This property makes MRAM attractive for space and nuclear technology applications. In this paper, a novel radiation-hardened triple modular redundancy (TMR) design for anti-radiation reinforcement is proposed based on the utilization of STT-MTJ devices. Simulation results demonstrate the radiation-hardened performance of the design. This shows improvements in the design’s robustness against ionizing radiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Circuit Design in Post-Moore Era)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Traditional TMR system with four majority voters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of an STT-MTJ device corresponding to two states, namely the P and AP states.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic of an equivalent circuit of the MTJ device used in simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The transient responses of the double exponential current pulses with various values of <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>inj</sub></span>, including 2 pC, 1.6 pC, 1.2 pC, 0.8 pC, and 0.4 pC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic of (<b>a</b>) the designed TMR circuit based on STT-MTJ devices and (<b>b</b>) the PCSA circuit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Transient simulation results of the majority voter circuit based on STT-MTJ devices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Transient simulation waveforms of corrected output from the proposed TMR circuit when SEU occurs with <span class="html-italic">Q<sub>inj</sub></span> = 0.2 pC (<b>a</b>) read “1” and (<b>b</b>) read “0”.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 5039 KiB  
Article
Simulation Study on the Charge Collection Mechanism of FinFET Devices in Single-Event Upset
by Hongwei Zhang, Yang Guo, Shida Wang, Yi Sun, Bo Mei, Min Tang and Jingyi Liu
Micromachines 2024, 15(2), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15020201 - 29 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1457
Abstract
Planar devices and FinFET devices exhibit significant differences in single-event upset (SEU) response and charge collection. However, the charge collection process during SEU in FinFET devices has not been thoroughly investigated. This article addresses this gap by establishing a FinFET SRAM simulation structure [...] Read more.
Planar devices and FinFET devices exhibit significant differences in single-event upset (SEU) response and charge collection. However, the charge collection process during SEU in FinFET devices has not been thoroughly investigated. This article addresses this gap by establishing a FinFET SRAM simulation structure and employing simulation software to delve into the charge collection process of FinFET devices during single-event upset. The results reveal substantial differences in charge collection between NMOS and PMOS, and that direct incidence of PMOS leads to the phenomenon of multiple-node charge collection causing SRAM unit upset followed by recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue High-Reliability Semiconductor Devices and Integrated Circuits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Physical distribution of MCU in SRAM arrays horizontally corresponds to the bitline direction and vertically corresponds to the wordline direction [<a href="#B17-micromachines-15-00201" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SRAM Simulation Models Based on FinFET Technology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calibration Curves of TCAD Model and SPICE Model: (<b>a</b>) PMOS; (<b>b</b>) NMOS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Top View of the SRAM Model (the STI is hidden) and Circuit Interconnect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The source current of the N1 transistor and the variation in drain voltage over time at 0.009 pC/μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Variation in N1 drain current over time for LET values of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 pC/μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The Variation in Drain Current in N1 Transistor over Time for LET values ranging from 0.003 to 0.0011 pC/μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation in source and drain currents over time in the P2 transistor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Time-dependent curve of Q-point voltage under high LET conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Total current situation of P2 drain and source at LET = 0.7 pC/μm. Positive current values represent current flowing into the device; negative values represent current flowing out of the device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Potential variation of P2 drain, source, and channel at LET = 0.7 pC/μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Time-dependent curve of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">Q</mi> </mrow> <mo>¯</mo> </mover> </mrow> </semantics></math>-point voltage under high LET conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>3D TCAD process simulation before ion incident and after 0.01 ns, 10 ps, and 20 ps (the STI is hidden).</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 2686 KiB  
Article
A Scalable Formal Framework for the Verification and Vulnerability Analysis of Redundancy-Based Error-Resilient Null Convention Logic Asynchronous Circuits
by Dipayan Mazumder, Mithun Datta, Alexander C. Bodoh and Ashiq A. Sakib
J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2024, 14(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/jlpea14010005 - 14 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2315
Abstract
The increasing demand for high-speed, energy-efficient, and miniaturized electronics has led to significant challenges and compromises in the domain of conventional clock-based digital designs, most notably reduced circuit reliability, particularly in mission-critical hardware. At scaled technology nodes, devices are vulnerable to transient or [...] Read more.
The increasing demand for high-speed, energy-efficient, and miniaturized electronics has led to significant challenges and compromises in the domain of conventional clock-based digital designs, most notably reduced circuit reliability, particularly in mission-critical hardware. At scaled technology nodes, devices are vulnerable to transient or soft errors, such as Single Event Upset (SEU) and Single Event Latch-up (SEL). External radiation, internal electromagnetic interference (EMI), or noise are the primary sources of these errors, which can compromise the circuit functionality. In response to these challenges, the Quasi-Delay-Insensitive (QDI) Null Convention Logic (NCL) asynchronous design paradigm has emerged as a promising alternative, offering advantages such as ultra-low power performance, reduced noise and EMI, and resilience to process, voltage, and temperature variations. Moreover, its unique architecture and insensitivity to timing variations offers a degree of resistance against transient errors; however, it is not entirely resilient. Several resiliency schemes are available to detect and mitigate soft errors in QDI circuits, with approaches based on redundancy proving to be the most effective in ensuring complete resilience across all major QDI implementation paradigms, including NCL, Pre-charge/Weak-charge Half Buffers (PCHB/WCHB), and Sleep Convention Logic (SCL). This research focuses on one such redundancy-based resiliency scheme for QDI NCL circuits, known as the dual-modular redundancy-based NCL (DMR-NCL) architecture, and addresses the absence of formal methods for the verification and analysis of such circuits. A novel methodology has been proposed for formally verifying the correctness of DMR-NCL circuits synthesized from their synchronous counterparts, covering both safety (functional correctness) and liveness (the absence of deadlock). In addition, this research introduces a formal framework for the vulnerability analysis of DMR-NCL circuits against SEU/SEL. To demonstrate the framework’s efficacy and scalability, a prototype computer-aided support tool has been developed, which verifies and analyzes multiple DMR-NCL benchmark circuits of varying sizes and complexities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>NCL framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) TH13 gate, and (<b>b</b>) TH24w22 gate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>DMR-NCL architecture with an illustration of data flow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Unsigned two-stage 3 × 3 DMR-NCL multiplier.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial 3 × 3 multiplier DMR-NCL netlist, and (<b>b</b>) converted Boolean equivalent netlist.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Initial 3 × 3 multiplier DMR-NCL netlist, and (<b>b</b>) converted Boolean equivalent netlist.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Extracted submodule to test the group components enclosed within the purple box.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4775 KiB  
Article
Study of Single-Event Effects Influenced by Displacement Damage Effects under Proton Irradiation in Static Random-Access Memory
by Yan Liu, Rongxing Cao, Jiayu Tian, Yulong Cai, Bo Mei, Lin Zhao, Shuai Cui, He Lv, Xianghua Zeng and Yuxiong Xue
Electronics 2023, 12(24), 5028; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12245028 - 16 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1338
Abstract
Static random-access memory (SRAM), a pivotal component in integrated circuits, finds extensive applications and remains a focal point in the global research on single-event effects (SEEs). Prolonged exposure to irradiation, particularly the displacement damage effect (DD) induced by high-energy protons, poses a substantial [...] Read more.
Static random-access memory (SRAM), a pivotal component in integrated circuits, finds extensive applications and remains a focal point in the global research on single-event effects (SEEs). Prolonged exposure to irradiation, particularly the displacement damage effect (DD) induced by high-energy protons, poses a substantial threat to the performance of electronic devices. Additionally, the impact of proton displacement damage effects on the performance of a six-transistor SRAM with an asymmetric structure is not well understood. In this paper, we conducted an analysis of the impact and regularities of DD on the upset cross-sections of SRAM and simulated the single-event upset (SEU) characteristics of SRAM using the Monte Carlo method. The research findings reveal an overall increasing trend in upset cross-sections with the augmentation of proton energy. Notably, the effect of proton irradiation on the SEU cross-section is related to the storage state of SRAM. Due to the asymmetry in the distribution of sensitive regions during the storage of “0” and “1”, the impact of DD in the two initial states is not uniform. These findings can be used to identify the causes of SEU in memory devices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Microelectronics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the SEU experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structure of the 6T SRAM storage cell.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Proton-induced SEU cross-sections: (<b>a</b>) SRAM #1, (<b>b</b>) SRAM #2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of SRAM structure including sensitive volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Statistical diagram of secondary particles: (<b>a</b>) 20 MeV, (<b>b</b>) 40 MeV, (<b>c</b>) 60 MeV, (<b>d</b>) 80 MeV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution of secondary heavy ion LET under proton irradiation with different energy levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Characteristic curves of the devices. Transfer characteristic curve for NMOS (<b>a</b>) and PMOS (<b>b</b>), subthreshold current for NMOS (<b>c</b>) and PMOS (<b>d</b>), gate current for NMOS (<b>e</b>) and PMOS (<b>f</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of transient drain current values with and without displacement damage: (<b>a</b>) NMOS, (<b>b</b>) PMOS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Cross-sections for SRAM: (<b>a</b>) SRAM #1, (<b>b</b>) SRAM #2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Distribution of the carrier recombination rate: (<b>a</b>) pristine NMOS, (<b>b</b>) NMOS with DD, (<b>c</b>) pristine PMOS, and (<b>d</b>) PMOS with DD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Subthreshold current curve for devices with different width–length ratios: (<b>a</b>) NMOS and (<b>b</b>) PMOS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Transient drain current values in devices with different width–length ratios.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop