Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (142)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = memantine

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
33 pages, 2610 KiB  
Review
A Narrative Review on the Neuroprotective Potential of Brown Macroalgae in Alzheimer’s Disease
by Melis Cokdinleyen, Luana Cristina dos Santos, Cristiano José de Andrade, Huseyin Kara, Nieves R. Colás-Ruiz, Elena Ibañez and Alejandro Cifuentes
Nutrients 2024, 16(24), 4394; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244394 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 528
Abstract
Systematic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease increasingly prevalent in the aging population. AD is characterized by pathological features such as β-amyloid (Aβ) plaque accumulation, tau neurofibrillary tangles formation, oxidative stress, an impaired cholinergic system, and neuroinflammation. Many therapeutic [...] Read more.
Systematic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease increasingly prevalent in the aging population. AD is characterized by pathological features such as β-amyloid (Aβ) plaque accumulation, tau neurofibrillary tangles formation, oxidative stress, an impaired cholinergic system, and neuroinflammation. Many therapeutic drugs have been developed to slow the progression of AD by targeting these pathological mechanisms. However, synthetic drugs, such as donepezil and memantine, can often lead to side effects. In this context, seaweeds have been drawing attention as a nutrient source and a potential source of health-improving metabolites. Studies have shown that extracts from brown macroalgae can potentially reduce the inflammation associated with neurodegenerative diseases by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine expression. Furthermore, their bioactive compounds exhibit antioxidant properties vital in combating oxidative stress. Antioxidants, mainly carotenoids and phenolic compounds, have been linked to improved cognitive function and a reduced risk of neurodegenerative disorders by protecting neuronal cells through their ability to scavenge free radicals. In addition, omega-3 fatty acids found in certain macroalgae have the potential to support brain health and cognitive function, further enhancing their neuroprotective effects. In conclusion, this review has comprehensively evaluated the research conducted on brown macroalgae in the last five years, covering their potential bioactive compounds, methods of obtaining these compounds, and their neuroprotective properties against AD. The limited number of clinical studies in the literature highlights the need for further research. This narrative review provides a basic framework for new approaches to neuroprotective strategies, such as those associated with brown macroalgae natural resources. Furthermore, they may play an increasingly important role in developing functional foods and nutraceuticals that can support human health in preventing and managing neurodegenerative diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Phytochemicals and Human Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Chemical structure of some neuroprotective compounds from brown macroalgae. (<b>A</b>) Omega-3 fatty acids: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA). (<b>B</b>) Polysaccharides: Laminarin and fucoidan. (<b>C</b>) Carotenoids: Fucoxanthin and astaxanthin. (<b>D</b>) Polyphenols and their derivatives: Dieckol, phloroglucinol, zonarol, dioxynodehydroeckol, eleganolone, fluorofucofuroeccol-A, fucodifluoroetol G and 8,8′-bieckol.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Fundamental mechanisms that cause neurodegeneration (created by <a href="http://BioRender.com" target="_blank">BioRender.com</a>).</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 4992 KiB  
Article
Deep Brain Stimulation Combined with NMDA Antagonist Therapy in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: In Silico Trials
by Dariusz Świetlik
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7759; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247759 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 285
Abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is employed to adjust the activity of impaired brain circuits. The variability in clinical trial outcomes for treating Alzheimer’s disease with memantine is not yet fully understood. We conducted a randomized in silico study comparing virtual DBS [...] Read more.
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is employed to adjust the activity of impaired brain circuits. The variability in clinical trial outcomes for treating Alzheimer’s disease with memantine is not yet fully understood. We conducted a randomized in silico study comparing virtual DBS therapies with treatment involving an NMDA antagonist combined with DBS in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Methods: Neural network models representing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients were randomly assigned to four groups: AD, memantine treatment, DBS, and DBS and memantine. Out of 100 unique neural networks created to model moderate and severe AD with varying hippocampal synaptic loss, 20 were randomly selected to represent AD patients. Virtual treatments—memantine, DBS, and DBS and memantine—were applied, resulting in a total of 80 simulations. Results: The normalized mean number of spikes in the CA1 region among the virtual AD hippocampi treated with memantine, DBS therapy, and DBS and memantine differed significantly (p < 0.0001). The normalized mean number of spikes in the virtual AD hippocampi was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.29–0.36) and was significantly lower compared to the number of spikes in the virtual AD hippocampi treated with memantine, which was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.48–0.59) (p = 0.0162), and in the DBS and memantine group, which was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57–0.78) (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Our simulation results indicate the effectiveness of virtual memantine and DBS therapy compared to memantine monotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The DG-CA3-CA1 microcircuit of the hippocampal formation, involving the dentate gyrus (DG) region (<b>A</b>), CA3 (<b>B</b>), CA1 (<b>C</b>), and schematic of hippocampal structures including DG, CA3, and CA1: the modeling DBS therapy involved simulating oscillations in the perforant pathway from EC2 to the dentate gyrus and CA3 region, at a frequency of 40 Hz (<b>D</b>). Major cell types and their connections include the following: granule cells (G1–G8), Flow of information in the hippocampus from DG through CA3 to CA1, pyramidal cells (CA3 of P1–P16) and (CA1 of P1–P8), basket cells (B1–B6), O-LM1 and O-LM2 cells, mossy cells (MCs), and GABAergic cells (T1–T9) located in the medial septum-diagonal band (MS-DB). These GABAergic cells deliver disinhibitory inputs to hippocampal interneurons operating at theta rhythm. The dentate gyrus and CA3 region receive layer II (EC2) inputs from both the medial and lateral entorhinal cortex, which are radially organized. Meanwhile, principal neurons in the entorhinal cortex layer 3 (EC3) send direct projections to the CA1 field, synapsing with pyramidal neurons in the CA1 region. (<b>E</b>) Connections from EC2 to granule cells are shown at Ex1-Ex9, and for Ex1-Ex7, there are bursts of five action potentials (100 Hz) with inter-burst theta frequency at 8 Hz, shifted in phase between particular lines. On lines E × 8 and 9, there were no spikes or silent synapses. For experiments, DBS was added at 40 Hz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram illustrating the simulation of the hippocampal network. The AD group was randomized to one of three subgroups, where one received virtual memantine therapy, DBS therapy, and memantine and DBS therapy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Analysis of simulations of normalized spikes CA1 (<b>A</b>), CA3 (<b>B</b>), and DG (<b>C</b>) (* <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01). In the box-and-whisker plot, the top and bottom sides of the box are ±1.96 times the variable standard error. The horizontal line that splits the box in two is the mean. The box covers the mean ± 1.96 times the variable standard error.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 4630 KiB  
Review
Glutamate: Molecular Mechanisms and Signaling Pathway in Alzheimer’s Disease, a Potential Therapeutic Target
by Nidhi Puranik and Minseok Song
Molecules 2024, 29(23), 5744; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29235744 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1068
Abstract
Gamma-glutamate is an important excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS), which plays an important role in transmitting synapses, plasticity, and other brain activities. Nevertheless, alterations in the glutamatergic signaling pathway are now accepted as a central element in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [...] Read more.
Gamma-glutamate is an important excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS), which plays an important role in transmitting synapses, plasticity, and other brain activities. Nevertheless, alterations in the glutamatergic signaling pathway are now accepted as a central element in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathophysiology. One of the most prevalent types of dementia in older adults is AD, a progressive neurodegenerative illness brought on by a persistent decline in cognitive function. Since AD has been shown to be multifactorial, a variety of pharmaceutical targets may be used to treat the condition. N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR) antagonists and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are two drug classes that the Food and Drug Administration has authorized for the treatment of AD. The AChEIs approved to treat AD are galantamine, donepezil, and rivastigmine. However, memantine is the only non-competitive NMDAR antagonist that has been authorized for the treatment of AD. This review aims to outline the involvement of glutamate (GLU) at the molecular level and the signaling pathways that are associated with AD to demonstrate the drug target therapeutic potential of glutamate and its receptor. We will also consider the opinion of the leading authorities working in this area, the drawback of the existing therapeutic strategies, and the direction for the further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Discovering New Drug Targets for Neurodegenerative Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The figure depicts the main pathogenic features of Alzheimer’s disease, including Amyloid-beta plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, neuronal damage, decline, blood–brain barrier leakage, and neuroinflammation (created by Biorendor.com).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The picture focuses on Alzheimer’s disease treatment objectives. Tau and beta-amyloid proteins, which are essential for pathogenic aggregation, gamma-secretase and beta-secretase, which are enzymes involved in the synthesis of amyloid, and acetylcholine esterase, a target for improving cholinergic function. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) and cholinergic receptors, which are intended to alter neuronal signaling and lessen excitotoxicity, and oxidative stress and calcium homeostasis, are major targets for AD therapeutics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>FDA-approved drug treatment strategies for Alzheimer’s disease. (<b>A</b>) The drugs donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine inhibit acetylcholinesterase, preventing the breakdown of acetylcholine and thus enhancing cholinergic signaling. (<b>B</b>) The drug memantine blocks NMDA receptors, preventing excessive calcium influx that could lead to neuron damage (created by Biorendor.com).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagrammatic representation of glutamate synthesis and cycling in neurons. This cycle helps maintain glutamate levels in the synapse, supports neurotransmission, and prevents excitotoxicity. The roles of EAAT, SN1, and SAT2 in the cycling process are critical for transferring glutamate and glutamine between neurons and glial cells, highlighting the cooperative nature of neurons and glial cells in regulating neurotransmitter levels (created by Biorendor.com).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagram depicting the glutamate-mediated G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway. The effector protein phospholipase C (PLC) is stimulated when the neurotransmitter glutamate binds to its receptor and activates a G-protein (Gqα). Two second messengers, inositol triphosphate (IP<sub>3</sub>) and diacylglycerol (DAG), are produced by PLC. IP<sub>3</sub> causes the release of Ca<sup>2+</sup> ions from intracellular storage, whereas DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC). When combined, these mechanisms result in elevated protein phosphorylation and Ca<sup>2+</sup>-binding protein activation, which promote downstream cellular reactions involved in a number of physiological functions (created by Biorendor.com).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The diagram illustrates synaptic transmission under healthy and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) conditions. In the healthy synapse (<b>left</b> panel), glutamate (GLUT) is released from the presynapse into the synaptic cleft, where it binds to postsynaptic receptors, facilitating normal synaptic signaling. Microglia regulate extracellular glutamate levels by efficient uptake through glutamate transporters, maintaining synaptic homeostasis. In Alzheimer’s disease (<b>right</b> panel), amyloid-beta (Aβ) aggregates disrupt synaptic function by impairing glutamate uptake by microglia and promoting excitotoxicity. Aβ also interacts with synaptic receptors, contributing to postsynaptic dysfunction. These pathological changes highlight the impaired glutamate regulation and neurotoxicity characteristic of AD. The concept of the figure was adopted from [<a href="#B123-molecules-29-05744" class="html-bibr">123</a>] and has been modified and recreated on PowerPoint.</p>
Full article ">
38 pages, 2898 KiB  
Article
Therapeutic Options in Alzheimer’s Disease: From Classic Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors to Multi-Target Drugs with Pleiotropic Activity
by Ramón Cacabelos, Olaia Martínez-Iglesias, Natalia Cacabelos, Iván Carrera, Lola Corzo and Vinogran Naidoo
Life 2024, 14(12), 1555; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14121555 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 947
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex/multifactorial brain disorder involving hundreds of defective genes, epigenetic aberrations, cerebrovascular alterations, and environmental risk factors. The onset of the neurodegenerative process is triggered decades before the first symptoms appear, probably due to a combination of genomic and [...] Read more.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex/multifactorial brain disorder involving hundreds of defective genes, epigenetic aberrations, cerebrovascular alterations, and environmental risk factors. The onset of the neurodegenerative process is triggered decades before the first symptoms appear, probably due to a combination of genomic and epigenetic phenomena. Therefore, the primary objective of any effective treatment is to intercept the disease process in its presymptomatic phases. Since the approval of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (Tacrine, Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine) and Memantine, between 1993 and 2003, no new drug was approved by the FDA until the advent of immunotherapy with Aducanumab in 2021 and Lecanemab in 2023. Over the past decade, more than 10,000 new compounds with potential action on some pathogenic components of AD have been tested. The limitations of these anti-AD treatments have stimulated the search for multi-target (MT) drugs. In recent years, more than 1000 drugs with potential MT function have been studied in AD models. MT drugs aim to address the complex and multifactorial nature of the disease. This approach has the potential to offer more comprehensive benefits than single-target therapies, which may be limited in their effectiveness due to the intricate pathology of AD. A strategy still unexplored is the combination of epigenetic drugs with MT agents. Another option could be biotechnological products with pleiotropic action, among which nosustrophine-like compounds could represent an attractive, although not definitive, example. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Pharmaceutical Science: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Confluent pathogenetic cascades and risk factors contributing to the phenotypic definition of Alzheimer’s disease.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Correlation analysis between number of mutant AD genes per patient and age at diagnosis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of Nosustrophine on neuropathological hallmarks in transgenic AD mouse models. Comparative photomicrographs of 3xTg-AD mouse brain sections from 3- and 9-month-old mice, representing early and late stages of AD neuropathology, stained with anti-Aβ (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>), anti-TH, and anti-Cox2 antibodies (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>). Images of the cortical areas demonstrate how 3xTg-AD mice treated with Nosustrophine (<b>B</b>) exhibit a significant reduction in Aβ plaques compared to control (untreated) mice (<b>A</b>). Treatment with Nosustrophine (<b>D</b>) also significantly attenuates the inflammatory reaction (COX-2) present in dopaminergic neurons (TH) of the midbrain of untreated transgenic animals (<b>C</b>). Scale bar: 100 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Regulation of AD-related gene expression by Nosustrophine (NST) in the hippocampus of 3- and 9-month-old wild type (WT) and AD-3xTg mice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Nosustrophine (NST) regulation of inflammation-related gene expression in the hippocampus of 3- and 9-month-old wild type (WT) and AD-3xTg mice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Nosustrophine regulation of DNA methylation, <span class="html-italic">DNMT3a</span> expression, SIRT activity, and <span class="html-italic">SIRT1</span> expression in the hippocampus of 3- and 9-month-old wild type and AD-3xTg mice.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of Nosustrophine on HDAC activity and <span class="html-italic">HDAC3</span> expression in the hippocampus of 3- and 9-month-old wild type and AD-3xTg mice.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1348 KiB  
Review
Galantamine-Memantine Combination in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia
by Emma D. Frost, Swanny X. Shi, Vishnu V. Byroju, Jamir Pitton Rissardo, Jack Donlon, Nicholas Vigilante, Briana P. Murray, Ian M. Walker, Andrew McGarry, Thomas N. Ferraro, Khalid A. Hanafy, Valentina Echeverria, Ludmil Mitrev, Mitchel A. Kling, Balaji Krishnaiah, David B. Lovejoy, Shafiqur Rahman, Trevor W. Stone and Maju Mathew Koola
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121163 - 21 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1189
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects over 1% of population over age 60. It is defined by motor and nonmotor symptoms including a spectrum of cognitive impairments known as Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD). Currently, the only US Food and [...] Read more.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects over 1% of population over age 60. It is defined by motor and nonmotor symptoms including a spectrum of cognitive impairments known as Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD). Currently, the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for PDD is rivastigmine, which inhibits acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase increasing the level of acetylcholine in the brain. Due to its limited efficacy and side effect profile, rivastigmine is often not prescribed, leaving patients with no treatment options. PD has several derangements in neurotransmitter pathways (dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway, kynurenine pathway (KP), acetylcholine, α7 nicotinic receptor, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors) and rivastigmine is only partially effective as it only targets one pathway. Kynurenic acid (KYNA), a metabolite of tryptophan metabolism, affects the pathophysiology of PDD in multiple ways. Both galantamine (α7 nicotinic receptor) and memantine (antagonist of the NMDA subtype of the glutamate receptor) are KYNA modulators. When used in combination, they target multiple pathways. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with each drug alone for PD have failed, the combination of galantamine and memantine has demonstrated a synergistic effect on cognitive enhancement in animal models. It has therapeutic potential that has not been adequately assessed, warranting future randomized controlled trials. In this review, we summarize the KYNA-centric model for PD pathophysiology and discuss how this treatment combination is promising in improving cognitive function in patients with PDD through its action on KYNA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropharmacology and Neuropathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Kynurenine pathway. An abbreviated depiction of the kynurenine pathway showing the major steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Overview of the kynurenine pathway in the brain and its effects. Depiction of the differential expression of the KP in cells of the central nervous system. Astrocytes lack the full complement of KP enzymes, hence KP activation in astrocytes terminates in the production of neuroprotective KYNA. However, as microglia fully express KP enzymes, KP activation in microglia can result in the production of neurotoxic metabolites 3-HK and QUIN. KP = Kynurenine Pathway; TRP = Tryptophan; KYNA = Kynurenic Acid; IDO = Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; TDO = Tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase; QUIN = Quinolinic Acid; 3-HAA = 3 Hydroxyanthranilic Acid; 3-HK = 3-hydroxykynurenine; KMO = Kynurenin-3-monooxygenase; KYN = Kynurenine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Kynurenine pathway-centric pathophysiology model. Depiction of some of the receptors, pathways, and processes affected by increased levels of major kynurenine pathway metabolites KYN, KYNA, 3-HK, and QUIN after pathway activation. AhR = aryl hydrocarbon receptor; α7nAChR = Alpha7 nicotinic receptor; BCL-2 = B-cell Lymphoma 2; GABA = γ-aminobutyric acid; KYN = Kynurenine; KYNA = Kynurenic Acid; NMDA = N-methyl-D-aspartate; QUIN = Quinolinic Acid; 3-HK = 3-hydroxykynurenine. ↑, increased process; ↓, decreased process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Magic Bullet Versus Shotgun Approach. The magic bullet approach has long been thought to be the answer to treating complex medical conditions. Pharmaceutical companies hoped that they would be able to develop a single drug to treat many conditions. However, this has failed countless times. We argue that the shotgun approach is more effective. Using multiple drugs (shotgun approach) to target multiple pathways implicated in a disease is likely to a more effective treatment approach [<a href="#B225-brainsci-14-01163" class="html-bibr">225</a>].</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 10646 KiB  
Article
Neuronal TCF7L2 in Lateral Habenula Is Involved in Stress-Induced Depression
by Xincheng Li, Xiaoyu Liu, Jiaxin Liu, Fei Zhou, Yunluo Li, Ye Zhao, Xueyong Yin, Yun Shi and Haishui Shi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(22), 12404; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212404 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 681
Abstract
Depression is a complex psychiatric disorder that has substantial implications for public health. The lateral habenula (LHb), a vital brain structure involved in mood regulation, and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) within this structure are known to be associated with depressive behaviors. Recent research [...] Read more.
Depression is a complex psychiatric disorder that has substantial implications for public health. The lateral habenula (LHb), a vital brain structure involved in mood regulation, and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) within this structure are known to be associated with depressive behaviors. Recent research has identified transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) as a crucial transcription factor in the Wnt signaling pathway, influencing diverse neuropsychiatric processes. In this study, we explore the role of TCF7L2 in the LHb and its effect on depressive-like behaviors in mice. By using behavioral tests, AAV-mediated gene knockdown or overexpression, and pharmacological interventions, we investigated the effects of alterations in TCF7L2 expression in the LHb. Our results indicate that TCF7L2 expression is reduced in neurons within the LHb of male ICR mice exposed to chronic mild stress (CMS), and neuron-specific knockdown of TCF7L2 in LHb neurons leads to notable antidepressant activity, as evidenced by reduced immobility time in the tail suspension test (TST) and forced swimming test (FST). Conversely, the overexpression of TCF7L2 in LHb neurons induces depressive behaviors. Furthermore, the administration of the NMDAR agonist NMDA reversed the antidepressant activity of TCF7L2 knockdown, and the NMDAR antagonist memantine alleviated the depressive behaviors induced by TCF7L2 overexpression, indicating the involvement of NMDAR. These findings offer novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of depression, highlighting the potential of TCF7L2 as both a biomarker and a therapeutic target for depression. Exploring the relationship between TCF7L2 signaling and LHb function may lead to innovative therapeutic approaches for alleviating depressive symptoms. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>TCF7L2 in LHb neurons was downregulated in CMS mice. (<b>A</b>) Timeline of the CMS and behavioral tests, including the OFT, the TST, the EPM, the FST, and the SPT. (<b>B</b>) Time spent in the center in the OFT, mean of Naive: 30.98, mean of CMS: 18.46. (<b>C</b>) Total distance traveled during the OFT, mean of Naive: 2773, mean of CMS: 3258. (<b>D</b>) Latency to the first immobility in the TST, mean of Naive: 108.07, mean of CMS: 106.71. (<b>E</b>) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of Naive: 51.2, mean of CMS: 138.1. (<b>F</b>) Time spent in the open arms in the EPM, mean of Naive: 54.63, mean of CMS: 42.79. (<b>G</b>) Latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of Naive: 96.36, mean of CMS: 85.21. (<b>H</b>) Total floating time in the FST, mean of Naive: 93, mean of CMS: 139.9. (<b>I</b>) Sucrose preference (%) of SPT, mean of Naive: 75.69, mean of CMS: 61.18, (<b>J</b>,<b>K</b>) Immunofluorescence staining of TCF7L2 in LHb neurons, mean of Naive: 37.34, mean of CMS: 17.47, (red: TCF7L2, green: NeuN, blue: DAPI, scale bar = 50 μm; n = 4). Comparison between the Naive and CMS groups was conducted using T-tests or Mann–Whitney U-tests. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 14 per group. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, versus the Naive group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>TCF7L2 knockdown in the LHb neurons caused antidepressant activity in mice. (<b>A</b>) Schematic of the experimental design of AAV-mediated TCF7L2 knockdown in the LHb neurons of mice. (<b>B</b>) Verification of TCF7L2 knockdown efficiency using fluorescence staining, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 93, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 139.9 (red: TCF7L2, green: GFP, blue: DAPI, scale bar = 50 μm). (<b>C</b>) Sucrose preference (%) of SPT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 67.24, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 62.92. (<b>D</b>) Latency to eat in the NSF test, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 45.1, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 19.5. (<b>E</b>) Total intake of food in the NSF test, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 0.3667, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 0.3625. (<b>F</b>) Latency to the first immobility in the TST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 107.2, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 116.5. (<b>G</b>) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 66.86, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 37.53. (<b>H</b>) Latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 59, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 104.8. (<b>I</b>) Total floating time in the FST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 125.9, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 32.81. (<b>J</b>) Time spent in the center in the OFT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 17.17, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 15.25. (<b>K</b>) Total distance traveled during the OFT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 4039, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 3870. (<b>L</b>) Recognition index of NOR test, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 66.21, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 62.33. (<b>M</b>) Sniffing index in trial 1 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 75.78, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 76.87. (<b>N</b>) Total sniffing time in trial 1 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 85.82, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 77.41. (<b>O</b>) Preference index in trial 2 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 35.31, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 35.61. (<b>P</b>) Total sniffing time in trial 2 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled: 67.45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2: 64.59. (<b>Q</b>) Analysis of the correlation between the total floating time in FST and density of TCF7L2<sup>+</sup> cells in LHb/mm<sup>2</sup>. Comparison between the AAV-sh-Scrambled and AAV-sh-TCF7L2 groups was conducted using the <span class="html-italic">T</span>-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 10–23 per group. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, versus the AAV-sh-Scrambled group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>TCF7L2 overexpression in the LHb neurons led to depressive-like behavior in mice. (<b>A</b>) Schematic of the experimental design of AAV-mediated TCF7L2 overexpression in the LHb neurons of mice. (<b>B</b>) Verification of AAV injection point using fluorescence staining, mean of AAV-EGFP: 67.45, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 64.59 (red: TCF7L2, green: GFP, blue: DAPI, scale bar = 50 μm). (<b>C</b>) Sucrose preference (%) of SPT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 73.5, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 74. (<b>D</b>) Latency to eat in the NSF test, mean of AAV-EGFP: 45.33, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 124.27. (<b>E</b>) Total intake of food in the NSF test, mean of AAV-EGFP: 0.22, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 0.16. (<b>F</b>) Latency to the first immobility in the TST, mean of AAV-EGFP: 97, mean of AAV-TCF7L2:88.06. (<b>G</b>) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of AAV-EGFP: 60.39, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 98.89. (<b>H</b>) Latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of AAV-EGFP: 87.67, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 64.11. (<b>I</b>) Total floating time in the FST, mean of AAV-EGFP: 50.06, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 117.4. (<b>J</b>) Time spent in the center in the OFT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 17.61, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 17.9. (<b>K</b>) Total distance traveled during the OFT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 2235, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 2147. (<b>L</b>) Recognition index of NOR test, mean of AAV-EGFP: 59.34, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 62.5. (<b>M</b>) Sniffing index in trial 1 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 79.49, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 82.19. (<b>N</b>) Total sniffing time in trial 1 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 75.94, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 78.22. (<b>O</b>) Preference index in trial 2 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 29.86, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 25.55. (<b>P</b>) Total sniffing time in trial 2 of the three-chamber SIT, mean of AAV-EGFP: 71.94, mean of AAV-TCF7L2: 76.83. Comparison between the AAV-EGFP and AAV-TCF7L2 groups was conducted using <span class="html-italic">T</span>-test or Mann–Whitney U-test. (<b>Q</b>) Analysis of the correlation between the total floating time in FST and density of TCF7L2<sup>+</sup> cells in LHb/mm<sup>2</sup>. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 18 per group. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001, versus the AAV-sh-Scrambled group.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>NMDAR was involved in TCF7L2-mediated depressive-like behavior. (<b>A</b>) Experimental timeline for NMDAR agonist-NMDA administration and behavioral tests. (<b>B</b>) Effects of NMDA administration on latency to the first immobility in the TST with LHb neurons special TCF7L2 knockdown, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 106, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 111.9, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 111.1, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 108.8. (<b>C</b>) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 57.75, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 52.45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 8.143, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 62.63. (<b>D</b>) Effects of NMDA administration on latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 72.36, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 95.45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 110.9, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 102.6. (<b>E</b>) Total floating time in the FST, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + Saline: 106.1, mean of AAV-sh-scrambled + NMDA: 120.7, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + Saline: 45, mean of AAV-sh-TCF7L2 + NMDA: 134.7. (<b>F</b>) Experimental timeline for NMDAR antagonist-memantine administration and behavioral tests. (<b>G</b>) Effects of memantine administration on latency to the first immobility in the TST with LHb neurons special TCF7L2 overexpression, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 85.25, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 88.25, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 50.75, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 80.05. (<b>H</b>) Total immobility time in the TST, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 79.75, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 75.38, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 131.5, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 72.38. (<b>I</b>) Effects of memantine administration on latency to the first floating in the FST, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 91.5, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 100.8, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 35, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 82.5. (<b>J</b>) Total floating time in the FST, mean of AAV-EGFP + Saline: 32.25, mean of AAV-EGFP + Memantine: 44.63, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Saline: 157.5, mean of AAV-TCF7L2 + Memantine: 77.88. Comparisons between groups were conducted using one-way ANOVA. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. n = 7–11 per group. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 492 KiB  
Review
Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists in Neuropathic Pain Management
by Ciprian Pușcașu, Cornel Chiriță, Simona Negreș and Nicoleta Mirela Blebea
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(20), 11111; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011111 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1315
Abstract
Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a complex and debilitating condition that impacts millions of people globally. Although various treatment options exist, their effectiveness is often limited, and they can be accompanied by significant side effects. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in [...] Read more.
Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a complex and debilitating condition that impacts millions of people globally. Although various treatment options exist, their effectiveness is often limited, and they can be accompanied by significant side effects. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) as a potential therapeutic approach to alleviate different types of neuropathic pain. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive examination of NMDAR antagonists, specifically ketamine, memantine, methadone, amantadine, carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenytoin, dextromethorphan, riluzole, and levorphanol, in the management of NeP. By analyzing and summarizing current preclinical and clinical studies, this review seeks to evaluate the efficacy of these pharmacologic agents in providing adequate relief for NeP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Therapeutics for Diabetes and Related Complications)
13 pages, 673 KiB  
Article
Association between Polypharmacy and Adverse Events in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: An Analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database (JADER)
by Nobuhiro Otani, Kanae Kanda, Nlandu Roger Ngatu, Akitsu Murakami, Yusuke Yamadori and Tomohiro Hirao
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1633; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101633 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1311
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease is a global health concern, with a rising prevalence among the elderly. Current pharmacological treatments, including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and N-Methyl D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, are associated with adverse events (AEs), particularly in the context of polypharmacy. [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease is a global health concern, with a rising prevalence among the elderly. Current pharmacological treatments, including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) and N-Methyl D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, are associated with adverse events (AEs), particularly in the context of polypharmacy. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Alzheimer’s disease treatment combinations, the number of concomitant medications, and the occurrence of AEs. Materials and Methods: Data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database, spanning from April 2004 to June 2020, were analyzed. Patients aged 60 and older with Alzheimer’s disease treated with AChEIs (donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) or the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine were included. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between AEs and Alzheimer’s disease drug combinations, as well as the number of concomitant medications. Results: Among 2653 patients, 47.7% were prescribed five or more drugs. The frequency of AEs was 6.4% for bradycardia, 4.6% for pneumonia, 3.6% for altered state of consciousness, 3.5% for seizures, 3.5% for decreased appetite, 3.5% for vomiting, 3.4% for loss of consciousness, 3.4% for fracture, 3.2% for cardiac failure, and 3.0% for falls. The combination of memantine with AChEIs was associated with a higher risk of bradycardia, whereas donepezil alone was linked to a reduced risk of fractures and falls. Polypharmacy was significantly correlated with an increased incidence of AEs, particularly altered state of consciousness, decreased appetite, vomiting, and falls. The adjusted odds ratios for using five or more drugs compared to no drugs was 10.45 for altered state of consciousness, 7.92 for decreased appetite, 4.74 for vomiting, and 5.95 for falls. Conclusions: In the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, the occurrence of AEs is associated with the number of concurrent medications, independently of the known AEs of Alzheimer’s disease drugs and their combination patterns. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the dataset construction for the analysis. JADER, Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2756 KiB  
Article
In Vivo Evaluation of Nose-to-Brain Delivery of Liposomal Donepezil, Memantine, and BACE-1 siRNA for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy
by David Lee, Andrew M. Shen, Milin Shah, Olga B. Garbuzenko and Tamara Minko
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(19), 10357; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910357 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1351
Abstract
Our study took an innovative approach by evaluating, in vivo, the efficacy of intranasal (IN) administration of liposomal formulations of donepezil, memantine, and beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme (BACE-1) siRNA, and their combination as a “triple-drug therapy” in treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Female [...] Read more.
Our study took an innovative approach by evaluating, in vivo, the efficacy of intranasal (IN) administration of liposomal formulations of donepezil, memantine, and beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme (BACE-1) siRNA, and their combination as a “triple-drug therapy” in treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Female APP/PS1 homozygous, transgenic mice were used as an AD model. The spatial short-term memory of the APP/PS1 mice was evaluated by a Y-maze behavioral test. IN-administered formulations demonstrated better short-term memory recovery than oral administration. Triple-drug therapy induced short-term memory recovery and lowered beta-amyloid (Aβ) 40 and 42 peptide levels and BACE-1 mRNA expression. Additionally, inflammatory cytokine mRNA expression was downregulated. This innovative approach opens new possibilities for Alzheimer’s disease treatment and nose-to-brain delivery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic illustration of experimental timeline. APP/PS1 mice were treated seven times with various formulations within 15 days, three times per week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday). Free donepezil and memantine were administered orally (PO) by sprinkling them in drinking water. All liposome formulations were delivered intranasally.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Nose-to-brain delivery in mice. (<b>A</b>) Intranasal catheter device. (<b>B</b>) The anesthetized animal is placed in the supine position, and the bent tip of the catheter is inserted in the naris. Once the catheter is inserted, the catheter tube glides into the nasal cavity until it reaches the olfactory region. (<b>C</b>) A schematic diagram shows the inserted catheter and catheter tube location before dosing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Accumulation of liposomes (green) and siRNA (red) in brain tissue after intravenous (<b>A</b>) and nasal (<b>B</b>) delivery. Representative confocal fluorescence microscope images of frozen 5 µm brain tissue sections. Average fluorescence intensity (<b>C</b>); <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6, means + SD are shown. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Expression of BACE-1 (<b>A</b>), TNF-α (<b>B</b>), IL-1β (<b>C</b>), IL-6 (<b>D</b>), Iba-1 (<b>E</b>), and GFAP (<b>F</b>) mRNAs in mouse brain tissues. Means ± SD are shown. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 when compared with wild-type mice (bar 1); <sup>×</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, when compared with APP/PS1 mice, no treatment (bar 2); <sup>†</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, when compared with APP/PS1 mice, free donepezil + memantine, and oral (bar 3) (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The concentration of soluble (<b>A</b>) and insoluble (<b>B)</b> Aβ40 and soluble (<b>C</b>) and insoluble (<b>D</b>) Aβ42 peptides in brain tissues. Please note that the ordinate scale in (<b>D</b>) has been changed to ng/mL. Means ± SD are shown. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 when compared with wild-type mice (bar 1); <sup>×</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 when compared with APP/PS1 mice, no treatment (bar 2) (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spontaneous alternation (<b>A</b>) and number of arm entries (<b>B</b>) among the treatment groups in behavioral Y-maze test. Means ± SD spontaneous alterations are shown. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 when compared with wild-type mice (bar 1); <sup>×</sup> <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 when compared with APP/PS1 mice, no treatment (bar 2).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 652 KiB  
Review
Advances in Neuroprotection in Glaucoma: Pharmacological Strategies and Emerging Technologies
by Li-Hsin Wang, Chun-Hao Huang and I-Chan Lin
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(10), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101261 - 25 Sep 2024
Viewed by 2599
Abstract
Glaucoma is a major global health concern and the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, characterized by the progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons. This review focuses on the need for neuroprotective strategies in glaucoma management, addressing the limitations [...] Read more.
Glaucoma is a major global health concern and the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, characterized by the progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons. This review focuses on the need for neuroprotective strategies in glaucoma management, addressing the limitations of current treatments that primarily target intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Despite effective IOP management, many patients continue to experience RGC degeneration, leading to irreversible blindness. This review provides an overview of both pharmacological interventions and emerging technologies aimed at directly protecting RGCs and the optic nerve, independent of IOP reduction. Pharmacological agents such as brimonidine, neurotrophic factors, memantine, Ginkgo biloba extract, citicoline, nicotinamide, insulin, and resveratrol show promise in preclinical and early clinical studies for their neuroprotective properties. Emerging technologies, including stem cell therapy, gene therapy, mitochondrial-targeted therapies, and nanotechnologies, offer innovative approaches for neuroprotection and regeneration of damaged RGCs. While these interventions hold significant potential, further research and clinical trials are necessary to confirm their efficacy and establish their role in clinical practice. This review highlights the multifaceted nature of neuroprotection in glaucoma, aiming to guide future research and clinical practice toward more effective management of glaucoma-induced neurodegeneration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The mechanisms of glaucoma inducing the loss of retinal ganglion cells and the targets of each neuroprotective compound [<a href="#B5-pharmaceuticals-17-01261" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 885 KiB  
Systematic Review
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Inappropriate Drug Dosing among Older Adults with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment and Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review
by Saad Alhumaid, Woldesellassie M. Bezabhe, Mackenzie Williams and Gregory M. Peterson
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5658; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195658 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1207
Abstract
Background: Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing is prevalent and well studied in older adults. However, limited data are available on inappropriate drug dosing in those with dementia or cognitive impairment and renal impairment. Objectives: We aimed to examine the prevalence of, and factors associated [...] Read more.
Background: Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing is prevalent and well studied in older adults. However, limited data are available on inappropriate drug dosing in those with dementia or cognitive impairment and renal impairment. Objectives: We aimed to examine the prevalence of, and factors associated with, inappropriate drug dosing in older patients with dementia or cognitive impairment and renal impairment. Methods: We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PubMed for studies on inappropriate drug dosing in older patients with dementia or cognitive impairment and renal impairment, published from 1 January 2000 to 31 August 2024, with English language restriction following the PICOS search strategy. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts, extracted data from included studies, and undertook quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise and present findings. Results: In total, eight retrospective cohort studies were included. Of the total number of patients with dementia who had renal impairment (n = 5250), there were 2695 patients (51.3%; range: 0–60%) who had inappropriate drug dosing. Drugs commonly prescribed in inappropriate doses in patients with dementia who had renal impairment included memantine, baclofen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), metformin, digoxin, morphine, and allopurinol. The studies did not identify statistically significant risk factors for inappropriate drug dosing. Conclusions: Inappropriate drug dosing among older adults with dementia or cognitive impairment and renal impairment appears to occur frequently. While our findings should be interpreted with caution owing to the small number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, proactive prevention, recognition, and management of inappropriate drug dosing in this population is warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow diagram of studies included in the systematic review.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1910 KiB  
Article
Development and Validation of a Simple UV–HPLC Method to Quantify the Memantine Drug Used in Alzheimer’s Treatment
by Débora Nunes, Tânia G. Tavares, Frenacisco Xavier Malcata, Joana A. Loureiro and Maria Carmo Pereira
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(9), 1162; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17091162 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1133
Abstract
Memantine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, is used to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, loading memantine in nanoparticles (NPs) could be an essential tool to improve the treatment effectiveness while reducing drug toxicity. Even though some approaches have been described to quantify memantine, none [...] Read more.
Memantine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, is used to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, loading memantine in nanoparticles (NPs) could be an essential tool to improve the treatment effectiveness while reducing drug toxicity. Even though some approaches have been described to quantify memantine, none reported optimized methods using high-performance liquid chromatography resorting to ultraviolet detection (UV–HPLC) to determine encapsulation in NPs. The present research developed a HPLC method using pre-column derivatization for quantitatively analyzing memantine hydrochloride in NPs. Memantine was derivatized using 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC). The developed method was fully validated regarding suitability, specificity, linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, and robustness according to the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use guidelines. The retention time of memantine was 11.393 ± 0.003 min, with a mean recovery of 92.9 ± 3.7%. The new chromatographic method was validated and found to respond linearly over 5–140 μg/mL, with a high coefficient of determination. Intraday precision lay between 3.6% and 4.6%, and interday precision between 4.2% and 9.3%. The stability of memantine was also tested at 4 °C and −20 °C, and no signs of decay were found for up to 6 months. The new method was properly validated and proved simple, sensitive, specific, accurate, and precise for determining memantine encapsulation efficiency in lipid NPs. Greenness was evaluated, presenting a final score of 0.45. In the future, this methodology could also be applied to quantify memantine in different nanoformulations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Adverse Drug Reactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Chemical structure of memantine hydrochloride.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Optimization of the derivatization reaction condition in terms of (<b>A</b>) molar ratio of FMOC: memantine, (<b>B</b>) pH of borate buffer, (<b>C</b>) reaction temperature, and (<b>D</b>) reaction time. Results represent the mean ± SD, n = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chromatograms of (<b>A</b>) blank solution (FMOC in acetonitrile) and (<b>B</b>) derivatized memantine solution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calibration curve of derivatized memantine. Results represent the mean ± SD, n = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Stability analysis of memantine at 4 °C and −20 °C for 6 months. Results represent the mean ± SD, n = 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Reaction scheme of the derivatization of memantine with FMOC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pictogram of the HPLC method in Greenness study using the Analytical GREEnness calculator.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2894 KiB  
Article
Memantine and the Kynurenine Pathway in the Brain: Selective Targeting of Kynurenic Acid in the Rat Cerebral Cortex
by Renata Kloc and Ewa M. Urbanska
Cells 2024, 13(17), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13171424 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1216
Abstract
Cytoprotective and neurotoxic kynurenines formed along the kynurenine pathway (KP) were identified as possible therapeutic targets in various neuropsychiatric conditions. Memantine, an adamantane derivative modulating dopamine-, noradrenaline-, serotonin-, and glutamate-mediated neurotransmission is currently considered for therapy in dementia, psychiatric disorders, migraines, or ischemia. [...] Read more.
Cytoprotective and neurotoxic kynurenines formed along the kynurenine pathway (KP) were identified as possible therapeutic targets in various neuropsychiatric conditions. Memantine, an adamantane derivative modulating dopamine-, noradrenaline-, serotonin-, and glutamate-mediated neurotransmission is currently considered for therapy in dementia, psychiatric disorders, migraines, or ischemia. Previous studies have revealed that memantine potently stimulates the synthesis of neuroprotective kynurenic acid (KYNA) in vitro via a protein kinase A-dependent mechanism. Here, the effects of acute and prolonged administration of memantine on brain kynurenines and the functional changes in the cerebral KP were assessed in rats using chromatographic and enzymatic methods. Five-day but not single treatment with memantine selectively activated the cortical KP towards neuroprotective KYNA. KYNA increases were accompanied by a moderate decrease in cortical tryptophan (TRP) and L-kynurenine (L-KYN) concentrations without changes in 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK) levels. Enzymatic studies revealed that the activity of cortical KYNA biosynthetic enzymes ex vivo was stimulated after prolonged administration of memantine. As memantine does not directly stimulate the activity of KATs’ proteins, the higher activity of KATs most probably results from the increased expression of the respective genes. Noteworthy, the concentrations of KYNA, 3-HK, TRP, and L-KYN in the striatum, hippocampus, and cerebellum were not affected. Selective cortical increase in KYNA seems to represent one of the mechanisms underlying the clinical efficacy of memantine. It is tempting to hypothesize that a combination of memantine and drugs could strongly boost cortical KYNA and provide a more effective option for treating cortical pathologies at early stages. Further studies should evaluate this issue in experimental animal models and under clinical scenarios. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The effects of an acute (<b>A</b>) and 5-day treatment (<b>B</b>) with memantine on the levels of selected kynurenines in the cerebral cortex. TRP—tryptophan, KYNA—kynurenic acid, L-KYN—L-kynurenine, 3-HK—3-hydroxykynurenine. Data are shown as the percentage of mean control values set at 100%. Statistical significance * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 vs. control (receiving saline injection).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The effects of acute (<b>A</b>) and a 5-day treatment (<b>B</b>) with memantine on the levels of selected kynurenines in the hippocampus of rats. Data are shown as the percentage of mean control values set as 100%. TRP—tryptophan, KYNA—kynurenic acid, L-KYN—L-kynurenine, 3-HK—3-hydroxykynurenine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The effects of acute (<b>A</b>) and a 5-day treatment (<b>B</b>) with memantine on the levels of selected kynurenines in the striatum of rats. Data are shown as the percentage of mean control values set as 100%. TRP—tryptophan, KYNA—kynurenic acid, L-KYN—L-kynurenine, 3-HK—3-hydroxykynurenine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The effects of acute (<b>A</b>) and a 5-day treatment (<b>B</b>) with memantine on the levels of selected kynurenines in the cerebellum of rats. Data are shown as the percentage of mean control values set as 100%. TRP—tryptophan, KYNA—kynurenic acid, L-KYN—L-kynurenine, 3-HK—3-hydroxykynurenine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effects of acute (<b>A</b>) or a 5-day (<b>B</b>) administration of memantine on the ex vivo activity of kynurenine aminotransferases (KATs) I and II. Data are shown as the percentage of mean control values set at 100%. Statistical significance **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001 vs. control.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 190 KiB  
Case Report
Sustained Cognitive Improvement in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Following a Precision Medicine Protocol: Case Series
by Dale E. Bredesen, Mary Kay Ross and Stephen Ross
Biomedicines 2024, 12(8), 1776; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081776 - 6 Aug 2024
Viewed by 2909
Abstract
Arguably, the most important parameter in treating cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer’s disease is the length of time in which improvement, if achieved at all, is sustained. However, monotherapies such as donepezil and memantine are associated with a more rapid decline than no [...] Read more.
Arguably, the most important parameter in treating cognitive decline associated with Alzheimer’s disease is the length of time in which improvement, if achieved at all, is sustained. However, monotherapies such as donepezil and memantine are associated with a more rapid decline than no treatment in patients over multi-year follow-ups. Furthermore, anti-amyloid antibody treatment, which at best simply slows decline, is associated with accelerated cerebral atrophy, resulting in earlier dementia-associated brain volumes for those treated at the MCI stage than untreated patients. In contrast, a precision medicine approach, in which the multiple potential drivers of cognitive decline are identified for each patient and then targeted with a personalized protocol (such as ReCODE), has led to documented improvements in patients with cognitive decline, but long-term follow-up (>5 years) has not been reported previously. Therefore, here, we report sustained cognitive improvement, in some cases for over a decade, in patients treated with a precision medicine protocol—something that has not been reported in patients treated with anti-cholinesterase, glutamate receptor inhibitory, anti-amyloid, or other therapeutic methods. These case studies warrant long-term cohort studies to determine how frequently such sustained cognitive improvements occur in patients treated with precision medicine protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience)
9 pages, 252 KiB  
Review
All GLP-1 Agonists Should, Theoretically, Cure Alzheimer’s Dementia but Dulaglutide Might Be More Effective Than the Others
by Jeffrey Fessel
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(13), 3729; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13133729 - 26 Jun 2024
Viewed by 3361
Abstract
Addressing the dysfunctions of all brain cell types in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) should cure the dementia, an objective that might be achieved by GLP-1 agonist drugs, because receptors for GLP-1 are present in all of the main brain cell types, i.e., neurons, oligodendroglia, [...] Read more.
Addressing the dysfunctions of all brain cell types in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) should cure the dementia, an objective that might be achieved by GLP-1 agonist drugs, because receptors for GLP-1 are present in all of the main brain cell types, i.e., neurons, oligodendroglia, astroglia, microglia, endothelial cells and pericytes. This article describes the benefits provided to all of those brain cell types by GLP-1 agonist drugs. The article uses studies in humans, not rodents, to describe the effect of GLP-1 agonists upon cognition, because rodents’ brains differ from those of humans in so many ways that results from rodent studies may not be totally transferable to humans. Commercially available GLP-1 agonists have mostly shown either positive effects upon cognition or no effects. One important reason for no effects is a reduced rate of entering brain parenchyma. Dulaglutide has the greatest entry to brain, at 61.8%, among the available GLP-1 agonists, and seems to offer the best likelihood for cure of AD. Although there is only one study of cognition that used dulaglutide, it was randomized, placebo controlled, and very large; it involved 8828 participants and showed significant benefit to cognition. A clinical trial to test the hypothesis that dulaglutide may cure AD should have, as its primary outcome, a 30% greater cure rate of AD by dulaglutide than that achieved by an equipoise arm of, e.g., lithium plus memantine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Potential Cures of Alzheimer's Dementia)
Back to TopTop