Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (40)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = levodopa/carbidopa

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 6142 KiB  
Article
Targeting the Sirtuin–1/PPAR–Gamma Axis, RAGE/HMGB1/NF-κB Signaling, and the Mitochondrial Functions by Canagliflozin Augments the Protective Effects of Levodopa/Carbidopa in Rotenone-Induced Parkinson’s Disease
by Mennatallah A. Elkady, Ahmed M. Kabel, Lamees M. Dawood, Azza I. Helal, Hany M. Borg, Hanan Abdelmawgoud Atia, Nesreen M. Sabry, Nouran M. Moustafa, El-Shaimaa A. Arafa, Shuruq E. Alsufyani and Hany H. Arab
Medicina 2024, 60(10), 1682; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101682 - 14 Oct 2024
Viewed by 982
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a pathological state characterized by a combined set of abnormal movements including slow motion, resting tremors, profound stiffness of skeletal muscles, or obvious abnormalities in posture and gait, together with significant behavioral changes. Until now, no [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a pathological state characterized by a combined set of abnormal movements including slow motion, resting tremors, profound stiffness of skeletal muscles, or obvious abnormalities in posture and gait, together with significant behavioral changes. Until now, no single therapeutic modality was able to provide a complete cure for PD. This work was a trial to assess the immunomodulatory effects of canagliflozin with or without levodopa/carbidopa on rotenone-induced parkinsonism in Balb/c mice. Materials and Methods: In a mouse model of PD, the effect of canagliflozin with or without levodopa/carbidopa was assessed at the behavioral, biochemical, and histopathological levels. Results: The combination of levodopa/carbidopa and canagliflozin significantly mitigated the changes induced by rotenone administration regarding the behavioral tests, striatal dopamine, antioxidant status, Nrf2 content, SIRT–1/PPAR–gamma axis, RAGE/HMGB1/NF-κB signaling, and mitochondrial dysfunction; abrogated the neuroinflammatory responses, and alleviated the histomorphologic changes induced by rotenone administration relative to the groups that received either levodopa/carbidopa or canagliflozin alone. Conclusions: Canagliflozin may represent a new adjuvant therapeutic agent that may add value to the combatting effects of levodopa/carbidopa against the pathological effects of PD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An illustrative representation of the experimental protocol of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The open field test apparatus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the pole test (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the open field test (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the rotarod test (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the striatal dopamine levels (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the levels of Nrf2 and the redox state of the striatal tissues (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the levels of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) p65 in the striatal tissues (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the striatal tissue levels of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the striatal tissue levels of HMGB1 and receptors of advanced glycation end products (RAGE) (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the mitochondrial functions (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the striatal tissue levels of AMPK and mTOR (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Effect of levodopa/carbidopa with or without canagliflozin on rotenone-induced changes in the autophagy markers in the striatal tissues (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections from the hippocampus of: (<b>A</b>) the control group demonstrating multiple compact layers of pyramidal cells with polygonal cell bodies and vesicular nuclei (thin arrows); (<b>B</b>) rotenone-injected group showing significant diminution of the thickness of the pyramidal cell layer, with many cells showing apoptotic changes (thin arrows), diffuse inflammatory cellular infiltration (thick arrow), and marked vascular congestion (arrow head); (<b>C</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with levodopa/carbidopa and (<b>D</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with canagliflozin exhibiting moderate decline in the number of cells that showed apoptotic changes (thick arrows) with a significantly increased number of normal cells with vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli (thin arrows); (<b>E</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with levodopa/carbidopa concomitantly with canagliflozin exhibiting marked increase in the number of normal neurons with vesicular nuclei (thin arrows), with scanty dystrophic apoptotic neurons in between (thick arrow); (<b>F</b>) the average thickness of the different areas of the hippocampus (Mean ± SD). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin); DG (dentate gyrus).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sections from the substantia nigra of (<b>A</b>) the control group demonstrating the dopaminergic neurons with vesicular nuclei and basophilic cytoplasm (thin arrows); (<b>B</b>) rotenone-injected group showing massive neurodegeneration. The neurons appear small and shrunken (thick arrows) with many neurons showing irregular outlines, cytoplasmic shrinkage, and pyknotic darkly stained nuclei (arrow heads) with perineuronal vacuolations (thin arrows); (<b>C</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with levodopa/carbidopa; and (<b>D</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with canagliflozin exhibiting a moderate decline in the number of the degenerated shrunken cells (thick arrows) and the nuclei showing pyknotic changes (arrow head) with significantly increased number of the normal dopaminergic neurons with vesicular nuclei (thin arrows); (<b>E</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with levodopa/carbidopa concomitantly with canagliflozin exhibiting significant increase in the number of the normal dopaminergic neurons with vesicular nuclei (thin arrows) associated with scanty small shrunken neurons in-between (thick arrow).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The immunohistochemical staining of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (×40) in the tissue sections of the substantia nigra of: (<b>A</b>) the control group exhibiting strong positive TH immunostaining; (<b>B</b>) rotenone-injected group showing minimal positive TH immunostaining; (<b>C</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with levodopa/carbidopa; and (<b>D</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with canagliflozin demonstrating moderately positive TH immunostaining; (<b>E</b>) rotenone-injected group treated with levodopa/carbidopa concomitantly with canagliflozin revealing strong positive TH immunostaining; (<b>F</b>) the percentage of positive immunostaining of TH in the substantia nigra (Mean ± SD). <sup>a</sup> Significant compared to the control group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>b</sup> significant relative to rotenone group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>c</sup> significant relative to rotenone + levodopa/carbidopa group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05); <sup>d</sup> significant relative to rotenone + canagliflozin group (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value less than 0.05). ROT (rotenone); CNG (canagliflozin).</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 610 KiB  
Case Report
Dropped Head Syndrome: The Importance of Neurophysiology in Distinguishing Myasthenia Gravis from Parkinson’s Disease
by Marilena Mangiardi, Alessandro Magliozzi, Carlo Colosimo and Luca Marsili
Biomedicines 2024, 12(8), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081833 - 12 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1175
Abstract
Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is characterized by severe forward flexion of the cervical spine due to an imbalance in neck muscle tone. This condition can be linked to various neuromuscular diseases, including myasthenia gravis (MG). On the other hand, Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients [...] Read more.
Dropped head syndrome (DHS) is characterized by severe forward flexion of the cervical spine due to an imbalance in neck muscle tone. This condition can be linked to various neuromuscular diseases, including myasthenia gravis (MG). On the other hand, Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients may show a clinically indistinguishable picture named antecollis, which is caused by increased axial tone, but without muscle weakness. Differentiating between DHS and antecollis is crucial due to their distinct treatment requirements. We present the case of a 71-year-old White male with a one-month history of severe neck flexion, mild dysphagia, and dysphonia. His medical history included diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, and mild cervical spondylosis. Neurological examination revealed features of Parkinsonism, including hypomimia, asymmetric rigidity, and reduced arm swing. There was significant weakness in his neck extensor muscles, with no signs of ptosis or diplopia. Brain/spine MRI scans were unremarkable, but electromyography showed a reduced compound muscle action potentials amplitude in repetitive nerve stimulation, consistent with MG. High-titer acetylcholine receptor antibodies confirmed the diagnosis. Treatment with pyridostigmine (60 to 120 mg/day) and plasma exchange (daily, for five consecutive days) improved the patient’s general condition and neck posture. Concurrently, the patient was diagnosed with PD based on established clinical criteria and improved with carbidopa/levodopa therapy (up to 150/600 mg/daily). This case highlights the rare co-occurrence of MG and PD, emphasizing the need for thorough clinical, neurophysiological, and laboratory evaluations in complex DHS presentations. Managing MG’s life-threatening aspects and addressing PD symptoms requires a tailored approach, showcasing the critical role of neurophysiology in accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Repetitive nerve stimulation traces. The top set represents a normal condition, while the bottom set depicts a patient with myasthenia gravis. The normal repetitive nerve stimulation traces show consistent, overlapping waveforms with each subsequent stimulus. The compound muscle action potential amplitudes remain stable across all stimuli, indicating efficient neuromuscular transmission. The myasthenia gravis (MG) repetitive nerve stimulation traces (bottom set) show a decremental response, with a noticeable reduction in the amplitude of successive compound muscle action potential. There is a progressive decline in compound muscle action potential amplitude with each subsequent stimulus, characteristic of impaired neuromuscular transmission due to the reduced number of functional acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction (see progressively reduced amplitude from I° to IV°).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Altered repetitive nerve stimulation results in our patient. The graph shows the results of the repetitive nerve stimulation of the patient’s right spinal accessory nerve recorded from the trapezius muscle. A valuable decrease in the amplitude and area of the compound muscle action potential between the first and fourth stimuli (19% decrease in amplitude; 22% decrease in area) was observed both at rest and after 2 min of muscle activation.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 1049 KiB  
Review
A Comprehensive Approach to Parkinson’s Disease: Addressing Its Molecular, Clinical, and Therapeutic Aspects
by Mauricio Muleiro Alvarez, Gabriela Cano-Herrera, María Fernanda Osorio Martínez, Joaquin Vega Gonzales-Portillo, Germán Rivera Monroy, Renata Murguiondo Pérez, Jorge Alejandro Torres-Ríos, Ximena A. van Tienhoven, Ernesto Marcelo Garibaldi Bernot, Felipe Esparza Salazar and Antonio Ibarra
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(13), 7183; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25137183 - 29 Jun 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3094
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a gradually worsening neurodegenerative disorder affecting the nervous system, marked by a slow progression and varied symptoms. It is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting over six million people in the world. Its multifactorial etiology includes environmental, genomic, [...] Read more.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a gradually worsening neurodegenerative disorder affecting the nervous system, marked by a slow progression and varied symptoms. It is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, affecting over six million people in the world. Its multifactorial etiology includes environmental, genomic, and epigenetic factors. Clinical symptoms consist of non-motor and motor symptoms, with motor symptoms being the classic presentation. Therapeutic approaches encompass pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and surgical interventions. Traditional pharmacological treatment consists of administering drugs (MAOIs, DA, and levodopa), while emerging evidence explores the potential of antidiabetic agents for neuroprotection and gene therapy for attenuating parkinsonian symptoms. Non-pharmacological treatments, such as exercise, a calcium-rich diet, and adequate vitamin D supplementation, aim to slow disease progression and prevent complications. For those patients who have medically induced side effects and/or refractory symptoms, surgery is a therapeutic option. Deep brain stimulation is the primary surgical option, associated with motor symptom improvement. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion through percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy and a portable infusion pump succeeded in reducing “off” time, where non-motor and motor symptoms occur, and increasing “on” time. This article aims to address the general aspects of PD and to provide a comparative comprehensive review of the conventional and the latest therapeutic advancements and emerging treatments for PD. Nevertheless, further studies are required to optimize treatment and provide suitable alternatives. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Advances in Parkinson’s disease genetic treatment strategies. (<b>A</b>) Genetic mutations identified as participants in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease, leading to degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, accumulation of α-synuclein, and neuroinflammation. (<b>B</b>) Use of viral vectors for the expression of AADC, improving symptomatology and reducing pharmacological requirements. (<b>C</b>) Use of viral vectors for the expression of AAV2-NRTN, producing an anti-inflammatory and neurodegenerative environment, decreasing disease progression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Continuous infusion treatment. Continuous LC infusion can be achieved through two mechanisms: LCIG and subcutaneous continuous infusion. Both promote more stable concentrations of these drugs. However, among their main complications are problems with both procedures, pump malfunctions, insomnia, falls, headache, depression, and orthostatic hypotension.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 983 KiB  
Article
An Artificial Neural Network Predicts Gender Differences of Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Patients with Advanced Parkinson’s Disease under Levodopa–Carbidopa Intestinal Gel
by Anastasia Bougea, Tajedin Derikvand and Efthymia Efthimiopoulou
Medicina 2024, 60(6), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060873 - 26 May 2024
Viewed by 1354
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Currently, no tool exists to predict clinical outcomes in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) under levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a novel deep neural network model to predict the clinical [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Currently, no tool exists to predict clinical outcomes in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) under levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a novel deep neural network model to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced PD after two years of LCIG therapy. Materials and Methods: This was a longitudinal, 24-month observational study of 59 patients with advanced PD in a multicenter registry under LCIG treatment from September 2019 to September 2021, including 43 movement disorder centers. The data set includes 649 measurements of patients, which make an irregular time series, and they are turned into regular time series during the preprocessing phase. Motor status was assessed with the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts III (off) and IV. The NMS was assessed by the NMS Questionnaire (NMSQ) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the quality of life by PDQ-39, and severity by Hoehn and Yahr (HY). Multivariate linear regression, ARIMA, SARIMA, and Long Short-Term Memory–Recurrent NeuralNetwork (LSTM-RNN) models were used. Results: LCIG significantly improved dyskinesia duration and quality of life, with men experiencing a 19% and women a 10% greater improvement, respectively. Multivariate linear regression models showed that UPDRS-III decreased by 1.5 and 4.39 units per one-unit increase in the PDQ-39 and UPDRS-IV indexes, respectively. Although the ARIMA-(2,0,2) model is the best one with AIC criterion 101.8 and validation criteria MAE = 0.25, RMSE = 0.59, and RS = 0.49, it failed to predict PD patients’ features over a long period of time. Among all the time series models, the LSTM-RNN model predicts these clinical characteristics with the highest accuracy (MAE = 0.057, RMSE = 0.079, RS = 0.0053, mean square error = 0.0069). Conclusions: The LSTM-RNN model predicts, with the highest accuracy, gender-dependent clinical outcomes in patients with advanced PD after two years of LCIG therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Clinical outcomes after LCIG implementation in women at 2-years followup. LCIG: levodopa–carbidopa infusion gel, QoL: quality of life, UPDRSIII:Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Clinical outcomes after LCIG initiation in men at 2-years followup. LCIG: levodopa–carbidopa infusion gel, QoL: quality of life, UPDRSIII: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Effects of LCIG treatment on dyskinesia duration in men and women (before and 2 years after the initiation of LCIG treatment). LCIG: levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Regular and irregular time series of dyskinesia duration for men and women two years after the initiation of LCIG treatmentusing cubic spline. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Are plots ofthe irregular time series with a frequency of 1 dyskinesia duration for men and women, respectively. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Are plots of their corresponding irregular time series without any outlier data. To omit possible outlier data, the lower and upper bounds are considered as 1.5 times the IQR (interquartile range), less than the first quartile, and 1.5 times the IQR, greater than the second quartile, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the LSTM and ARIMA models to predictdyskinesia duration for patients under LCIG. LCIG: levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 3372 KiB  
Article
Poly(acrylic acid)/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Microarray Patches for Continuous Transdermal Delivery of Levodopa and Carbidopa: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
by Yaocun Li, Lalitkumar K. Vora, Jiawen Wang, Akmal Hidayat Bin Sabri, Andrew Graham, Helen O. McCarthy and Ryan F. Donnelly
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(5), 676; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050676 - 17 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3626
Abstract
Levodopa (LD) has been the most efficacious medication and the gold standard therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) for decades. However, its long-term administration is usually associated with motor complications, which are believed to be the result of the fluctuating pharmacokinetics of LD following [...] Read more.
Levodopa (LD) has been the most efficacious medication and the gold standard therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD) for decades. However, its long-term administration is usually associated with motor complications, which are believed to be the result of the fluctuating pharmacokinetics of LD following oral administration. Duodopa® is the current option to offer a continuous delivery of LD and its decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa (CD); however, its administration involves invasive surgical procedures, which could potentially lead to lifelong complications, such as infection. Recently, dissolving microarray patches (MAPs) have come to the fore as an alternative that can bypass the oral administration route in a minimally invasive way. This work explored the potential of using dissolving MAPs to deliver LD and CD across the skin. An acidic polymer poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) was used in the MAP fabrication to prevent the potential oxidation of LD at neutral pH. The drug contents of LD and CD in the formulated dissolving MAPs were 1.82 ± 0.24 and 0.47 ± 0.04 mg/patch, respectively. The in vivo pharmacokinetic study using female Sprague–Dawley® rats (Envigo RMS Holding Corp, Bicester, UK) demonstrated a simultaneous delivery of LD and CD and comparable AUC values between the dissolving MAPs and the oral LD/CD suspension. The relative bioavailability for the dissolving MAPs was calculated to be approximately 37.22%. Accordingly, this work highlights the use of dissolving MAPs as a minimally invasive approach which could potentially bypass the gastrointestinal pathway and deliver both drugs continuously without surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A schematic illustration of ring insert preparation for ‘two-layer’ dissolving MAP casting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A schematic illustration of ‘two-layer’ dissolving MAP casting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A schematic illustration of MAP application to rats in in vivo pharmacokinetic studies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) LD content and (<b>b</b>) CD content in the LD/CD MAP ‘drug-containing layer’ formulation (means + S.D., <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). (<b>c</b>) Percentage height reduction in MAP needles upon 32 N/cm<sup>2</sup> pressure for 30 s (means + S.D., <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5). (<b>d</b>) Insertion profiles of dissolving MAPs (means ± S.D., <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3). (<b>e</b>) Representative digital microscopic images of the LD/CD dissolving MAPs. (<b>f</b>) Drug distribution of the LD/CD dissolving MAPs. Representative microscopic images of the (<b>g</b>) first layer, (<b>h</b>) second layer, (<b>i</b>) third layer, and (<b>j</b>) fourth layer of Parafilm M<sup>®</sup> in the insertion studies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Digital microscopic images of LD/CD dissolving MAP dissolution upon insertion into PBS-soaked excised full-thickness neonatal porcine skin after (<b>a</b>) 0 min, (<b>b</b>) 15 min, (<b>c</b>) 30 min, and (<b>d</b>) 60 min. (<b>e</b>) TGA thermogram of the LD/CD dissolving MAPs. (<b>f</b>) Ex vivo permeation profiles of the LD/CD dissolving MAPs (mean ± S.D., <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Representative images of the backs of rats upon LD/CD MAP removal. In vivo pharmacokinetic profiles of (<b>b</b>) LD and (<b>c</b>) CD (means ± S.D., <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3 for 1, 2, 4, and 6 h, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 6 for the other sampling points). The dotted lines show the therapeutic window of LD [<a href="#B49-pharmaceutics-16-00676" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 478 KiB  
Article
Levodopa–Entacapone–Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: A Single Center Real-World Experience
by Szabolcs Szatmári, József Attila Szász, Károly Orbán-Kis, Beáta Baróti, Simona Bataga, Marius Ciorba, Előd Ernő Nagy, Radu Mircea Neagoe, István Mihály, Péter Zsombor Szász, Krisztina Kelemen, Attila Frigy, Mónika Szilveszter and Viorelia Adelina Constantin
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(4), 453; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16040453 - 25 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1509
Abstract
Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel infusion is a relatively new treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease. We aimed to describe and analyze the characteristics of de novo levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel therapy in 20 consecutive patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. We assessed the profile of motor [...] Read more.
Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel infusion is a relatively new treatment option for advanced Parkinson’s disease. We aimed to describe and analyze the characteristics of de novo levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel therapy in 20 consecutive patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. We assessed the profile of motor complications by evaluating the following: motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and the freezing phenomenon at baseline (before the testing period) and before discharge. The treatment significantly reduced the duration of daily hours spent in off time compared with baseline pre-treatment values from a mean of 4.8 ± 0.9 h/day to a mean of 1.4 ± 0.5 h per day (p < 0.001). The duration and severity of peak-dose dyskinesia were also significantly reduced compared with baseline values. Out of the 10 patients who reported freezing, 8 did not present this complication at the pre-discharge assessment. Significant improvements were observed in Hoehn and Yahr scale scores in both the on and off states. The levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel therapy was well tolerated during the follow-up period immediately after initiation. Despite a relatively severe stage of the disease, all patients experienced a significant improvement in motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and the freezing phenomenon. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The differences between the theoretically calculated and real levodopa/entacapone/carbidopa intestinal gel doses. Negative values show lower actual LECIG doses compared to the theoretically calculated, whereas positive values present cases where the actual LECIG dose was higher.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 456 KiB  
Article
Endoscopic Complications Are More Frequent in Levodopa–Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Treatment via JET-PEG in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Compared to Nutritional PEG in Non-Parkinson’s Disease Patients
by Laura Gombošová, Jana Deptová, Ivana Jochmanová, Tatiana Svoreňová, Eduard Veseliny, Mária Zakuciová, Vladimír Haň, Alexandra Lacková, Kristína Kulcsárová, Miriama Ostrožovičová, Joaquim Ribeiro Ventosa, Lenka Trcková, Ivica Lazúrová and Matej Škorvánek
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(3), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030703 - 25 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1227
Abstract
Background: To date, no studies comparing complication rates between patients with nutritional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (N-PEG) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastro-jejunostomy (JET-PEG) for treatment administration have been published. Our study aimed to compare complication rates and the number [...] Read more.
Background: To date, no studies comparing complication rates between patients with nutritional percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (N-PEG) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastro-jejunostomy (JET-PEG) for treatment administration have been published. Our study aimed to compare complication rates and the number of re-endoscopies between N-PEG and JET-PEG patients. Methods: Individuals requiring N-PEG or JET-PEG insertion between 2014 and 2021 were included in this single-center retrospective observational study. Complications were divided into time-related medical and technical complications. Reasons for post-insertion re-endoscopies and their number were also analyzed. Results: Eighty-seven subjects, 47 (54.02%) in JET-PEG group and 40 (45.98%) in the N-PEG group, were included. Early and technical complications were more frequent in JET-PEG vs. N-PEG subjects (70% vs. 10% [p < 0.001], and 54.5% vs. 5.1% [p < 0.001], respectively). The presence of psychiatric disease was associated with a higher number of early complications (p < 0.002). All three types of complications were significantly more frequent in subjects where a healthcare professional did not handle PEG (p < 0.001). Subjects with JET-PEG required a higher number of re-endoscopies compared to the N-PEG group (57.1% vs. 35%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Complications are significantly more common in individuals with JET-PEG than those with N-PEG, which can be attributed to higher mobility in PD patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The study flow diagram. Abbreviations: ATB—antibiotics; F—females; JET-PEG—percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy JET-jejunal extension tube; M—males; <span class="html-italic">n</span>—number; N-PEG—nutritional PEG; PEG—percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, PPI—proton pump inhibitors.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 2941 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Colorimetric Sensing of Carbidopa in Anti-Parkinson Drugs Based on Selective Reaction with Indole-3-Carbaldehyde
by Pasquale Palladino, Alberto Rainetti, Mariagrazia Lettieri, Giuseppe Pieraccini, Simona Scarano and Maria Minunni
Sensors 2023, 23(22), 9142; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229142 - 13 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1710
Abstract
The quality of life of patients affected by Parkinson’s disease is improved by medications containing levodopa and carbidopa, restoring the dopamine concentration in the brain. Accordingly, the affordable quality control of such pharmaceuticals is very important. Here is reported the simple and inexpensive [...] Read more.
The quality of life of patients affected by Parkinson’s disease is improved by medications containing levodopa and carbidopa, restoring the dopamine concentration in the brain. Accordingly, the affordable quality control of such pharmaceuticals is very important. Here is reported the simple and inexpensive colorimetric quantification of carbidopa in anti-Parkinson drugs by the selective condensation reaction between the hydrazine group from carbidopa and the formyl functional group of selected aldehydes in acidified hydroalcoholic solution. An optical assay was developed by using indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3A) giving a yellow aldazine in EtOH:H2O 1:1 (λmax~415 nm) at 70 °C for 4 h, as confirmed by LC-MS analysis. A filter-based plate reader was used for colorimetric data acquisition, providing superior results in terms of analytical performances for I3A, with a sensitivity ~50 L g−1 and LOD ~0.1 mg L−1 in comparison to a previous study based on vanillin, giving, for the same figures of merit values, about 13 L g−1 and 0.2–0.3 mg L−1, respectively. The calibration curves for the standard solution and drugs were almost superimposable, therefore excluding interference from the excipients and additives, with very good reproducibility (avRSD% 2–4%) within the linear dynamic range (10 mg L−1–50 mg L−1). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) impairing dopamine crossing from blood (light red) to the brain (gray), and the mechanism of action of the drugs used in Parkinson’s disease containing carbidopa and levodopa (L-DOPA). Carbidopa limits the premature transformation of L-DOPA to dopamine in blood by the enzyme dopa-decarboxylase (DDC), allowing a larger dopamine generation in the brain and the subsequent signaling activity restoration of this neurotransmitter [<a href="#B5-sensors-23-09142" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B16-sensors-23-09142" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-sensors-23-09142" class="html-bibr">17</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Vanillin; (<b>b</b>) p-Anisaldehyde; (<b>c</b>) Catechaldehyde; (<b>d</b>) Terephthalaldehyde; (<b>e</b>) Amylcinnamaldehyde; (<b>f</b>) Anthracene-9-carbaldehyde; (<b>g</b>) Indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3A).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pictures of 10 mM aldehyde solutions alone (left tube) or in presence of 1 mM carbidopa after 15 min of reaction in ethanol at 20 °C (middle tube) and 70 °C (right tube) for (<b>a</b>) Vanillin, (<b>b</b>) p-Anisaldehyde, (<b>c</b>) Catechaldehyde, (<b>d</b>) Terephthalaldehyde, (<b>e</b>) Amylcinnamaldehyde, (<b>f</b>) Anthracene-9-carbaldehyde, and (<b>g</b>) Indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3A).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic mechanism of hydrazone formation by a reaction between an aldehyde and carbidopa. (<b>b</b>) Vanillin (R = CH<sub>3</sub>), catechaldehyde (R = H), and (<b>c</b>) indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3A) schematic mechanisms of azine and 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid formation by reaction between the protonated forms of these aldehydes and the corresponding carbidopa-derived hydrazone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Absorbance spectrum of 10 mM catechaldehyde (blue line) and indole-3-carbaldehyde (red line) alone or in the presence of 0.88 mM carbidopa after 4 h at 70 °C in EtOH (<b>a</b>) and EtOH:H<sub>2</sub>O 1:1 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chromatographic profile of carbidopa/I3A reaction products after 4 h at 70 °C in EtOH:H<sub>2</sub>O (1:1) with 40 mM HCl. Absorbance (a.u.) at 280 nm (<b>lower</b> panel), 304 nm (<b>middle</b> panel), and 413 nm (<b>upper</b> panel) was recorded by using the Diode Array Detector (DAD). The peak corresponding to I3A (C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>7</sub>NO) is highlighted by a red dashed line, and its absorbance is limited to the UV region (280 nm and 304 nm). Peaks corresponding to a I3A azine molecule (C<sub>18</sub>H<sub>14</sub>N<sub>4</sub>) are highlighted by blue dashed lines, and their absorbance covers UV and visible regions (280 nm, 304 nm, and 413 nm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Electrospray mass spectrometry analysis in positive ion mode (Scan ESI<sup>+</sup>) of carbidopa/I3A reaction products after 4 h at 70 °C in EtOH:H<sub>2</sub>O (1:1) with 40 mM HCl. The highest intensity signals (base peak intensity, BPI) are reported in the lower panel. The [M + H]<sup>+</sup> ion corresponding to I3A (C<sub>9</sub>H<sub>7</sub>NO, 145.9 <span class="html-italic">m</span>/<span class="html-italic">z</span>) is highlighted by a red dashed line. The [M + H]<sup>+</sup> ions corresponding to I3A azine molecule isomers (C1<sub>8</sub>H<sub>14</sub>N<sub>4</sub>, 287.1 <span class="html-italic">m</span>/<span class="html-italic">z</span>) are highlighted by blue dashed lines. The [M + H]<sup>+</sup> ion corresponding to I3A-carbidopa hydrazone (C<sub>19</sub>H<sub>19</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, 354.2 <span class="html-italic">m</span>/<span class="html-italic">z</span>) is highlighted by a black dashed line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Colorimetric calibration curves of carbidopa (CD) in drug formulation L-DOPA:CD (4:1 <span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">w</span>, black circles), Sinemet (blue circles), and Hexal (red circles), followed by the means of aldazine formation (λ<sub>max</sub> 415 nm) upon reaction with 10 mM I3A for 4 h at 70 °C in EtOH:H<sub>2</sub>O 1:1 and 40 mM HCl. The carbidopa content increased from 10 mg L<sup>−1</sup> to 50 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, whereas L-DOPA increased from 40 to 200 mg L<sup>−1</sup>, also without carbidopa (white circles). Each point represents the mean ± SD of 8 replicates on a 96-well microplate. Data were fitted according to linear Equation (1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scheme of the condensation reaction between the formyl functional group of indole-3-carbaldehyde (I3A) in acidified alcoholic solution and (<b>a</b>) the hydrazine group from carbidopa, giving the yellow indole-3-carbaldehyde azine (I3AZ), or (<b>b</b>) the amine group from L-DOPA, giving the uncolored imine.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 608 KiB  
Article
Compatibility of Commonly Used Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients in a Ready-to-Use Oral Suspending Vehicle
by Mercedeh Mansourian, Eli Dijkers, Carolina C. V. Silva and Hudson C. Polonini
Pharmaceutics 2023, 15(10), 2388; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15102388 - 26 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2040
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from different pharmacological classes in a compounded oral suspending vehicle. Oral suspensions of amoxicillin trihydrate (50 mg/mL), clozapine (25 mg/mL), indomethacin (5.0 mg/mL), levodopa/carbidopa (10.0/2.5 mg/mL), levothyroxine sodium (T4, 25 [...] Read more.
The present study aimed to evaluate the stability of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) from different pharmacological classes in a compounded oral suspending vehicle. Oral suspensions of amoxicillin trihydrate (50 mg/mL), clozapine (25 mg/mL), indomethacin (5.0 mg/mL), levodopa/carbidopa (10.0/2.5 mg/mL), levothyroxine sodium (T4, 25 µg/mL), lomustine (4.0 and 10.0 mg/mL), methyldopa (25 mg/mL) and procarbazine (10.0 mg/mL) were formulated in SyrSpend® SF PH4 and the stability was monitored for up to 90 days, except for amoxicillin trihydrate, which was evaluated for 30 days only. The APIs’ stability was determined by measuring percent recovery using stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC or UHPLC) or titration (amoxicillin trihydrate only). The stability of amoxicillin trihydrate, clozapine, indomethacin and levodopa/carbidopa were studied at both refrigerated (2–8 °C) and room temperature (20–25 °C). Lomustine, procarbazine, and methyldopa were studied at refrigerated temperature only. Our data demonstrated promising stability for the compounded suspensions containing various APIs, investigated in SyrSpend® SF PH4, as all APIs exhibited stability throughout the study duration and met content uniformity criteria. These findings lead to the conclusion that the tested compounded oral suspensions present a viable approach for creating personalized, age-appropriate formulations. The capacity to ensure dose consistency and stability using APIs from diverse pharmacological classes renders them suitable choices for both pediatric and geriatric patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Stability of the selected APIs in SyrSpend<sup>®</sup> SF PH4 throughout the study.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2848 KiB  
Article
Literature-Based Discovery Predicts Antihistamines Are a Promising Repurposed Adjuvant Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease
by Gabriella Tandra, Amy Yoone, Rhea Mathew, Minzhi Wang, Chadwick M. Hales and Cassie S. Mitchell
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12339; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512339 - 2 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4684
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a movement disorder caused by a dopamine deficit in the brain. Current therapies primarily focus on dopamine modulators or replacements, such as levodopa. Although dopamine replacement can help alleviate PD symptoms, therapies targeting the underlying neurodegenerative process are limited. [...] Read more.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a movement disorder caused by a dopamine deficit in the brain. Current therapies primarily focus on dopamine modulators or replacements, such as levodopa. Although dopamine replacement can help alleviate PD symptoms, therapies targeting the underlying neurodegenerative process are limited. The study objective was to use artificial intelligence to rank the most promising repurposed drug candidates for PD. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques were used to extract text relationships from 33+ million biomedical journal articles from PubMed and map relationships between genes, proteins, drugs, diseases, etc., into a knowledge graph. Cross-domain text mining, hub network analysis, and unsupervised learning rank aggregation were performed in SemNet 2.0 to predict the most relevant drug candidates to levodopa and PD using relevance-based HeteSim scores. The top predicted adjuvant PD therapies included ebastine, an antihistamine for perennial allergic rhinitis; levocetirizine, another antihistamine; vancomycin, a powerful antibiotic; captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; and neramexane, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor agonist. Cross-domain text mining predicted that antihistamines exhibit the capacity to synergistically alleviate Parkinsonian symptoms when used with dopamine modulators like levodopa or levodopa–carbidopa. The relationship patterns among the identified adjuvant candidates suggest that the likely therapeutic mechanism(s) of action of antihistamines for combatting the multi-factorial PD pathology include counteracting oxidative stress, amending the balance of neurotransmitters, and decreasing the proliferation of inflammatory mediators. Finally, cross-domain text mining interestingly predicted a strong relationship between PD and liver disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sequence of simulation searches in SemNet. For each simulation layer, specific “hub nodes” were identified. Hub nodes have a predicted strong relationship (e.g., HeteSim score) with the target node or query. The identified hub nodes were subsequently used as targets for the next layer of searches. The synthesis of information from all the SemNet 2.0 simulation layers contributed to the identification of antihistamines as a promising group of repurposed PD drugs. a = piroxicam; b = leflunomide; c = loratadine; d = ebastine; e = levocetirizine; f = ebastine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative source node results from SemNet 2.0 simulations with the target node “Levodopa”. The source node type used was “Clinical Drug” (CLND). HeteSim scores were normalized to enable comparison of nodes across multiple simulations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative source node results from SemNet 2.0 simulations with target nodes of “Antihistamine” and “Dopamine”. The source node types were “Clinical Drug” (CLND), “Pharmacologic Substance” (PHSU), and “Therapeutic or Preventative Procedure” (TOPP). HeteSim scores were normalized to enable comparison of nodes across multiple simulations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative source node results from SemNet 2.0 simulation with target nodes of “Antihistamine” and “Levodopa.” The source node type was “Clinical Drug” (CLND). HeteSim scores were normalized to enable comparison of nodes across multiple simulations. Notice that ebastine reoccurs as a source node.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Normalized HeteSim scores of returned source nodes selected as hubs using “Parkinson’s Disease” as a SemNet 2.0 simulation target node. HeteSim scores were normalized to enable comparison of nodes across multiple simulations. Color code represents source node type: GNGM (gene or genome), DSYN (disease or syndrome), or PHSU (pharmacologic substance). Descriptions of shown source nodes: “Hypomyelination” is hypomyelination within brainstem and spinal cord; “WH” is Werdnig Hoffmann paralysis; “Granuloma” is granuloma of intestine; “Langer” is Langer mesomelic dysplasia syndrome; “Infection” is infection in the elderly; “Renal” is high renal threshold for glucose; “Liver injury” is drug-induced liver injury.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Overview of the cross-domain text-mining method. Over 33+ million journal articles from PubMed are text mined. Relationships are extracted according to the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) ontology to construct a large-scale knowledge graph in a recently developed cross-domain text-mining software called SemNet 2.0 [<a href="#B8-ijms-24-12339" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. Artificial intelligence methods mine relationship patterns to identify promising candidates using “levodopa” and “Parkinson’s Disease” as the primary target nodes for the initial series of searches. Specifically, unsupervised learning rank aggregation assigned a ranking to filter the most promising repurposed drugs for PD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>An example subgraph (&gt;99.99% pruned) obtained by querying the large SemMedDB knowledge graph using cross-domain text mining in SemNet 2.0. UMLS node types included are “Pharmacologic Substance” (PHSU), “Amino Acid, Peptide, or Protein” (AAPP), and “Disease or Syndrome” (DSYN). Note the full, unpruned graph is too large to visualize and would be intractable to the human eye.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1439 KiB  
Article
Development and Validation of a New LC-MS/MS Bioanalytical Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Levodopa, Levodopa Methyl Ester, and Carbidopa in Human Plasma Samples
by Linda Molteni, Bruno Charlier, Viviana Izzo, Albino Coglianese, Valeria Conti, Roberto Eleopra, Roberto Cilia, Chiara Capelli, Annachiara D’Urso and Ugo de Grazia
Molecules 2023, 28(11), 4264; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114264 - 23 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3175
Abstract
Levodopa (L-DOPA) treatment, combined with the administration of dopa-decarboxylase inhibitors (DDCIs), is still the most effective symptomatic treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although its efficacy in the early stage of the disease has been confirmed, its complex pharmacokinetics (PK) increases the variability of [...] Read more.
Levodopa (L-DOPA) treatment, combined with the administration of dopa-decarboxylase inhibitors (DDCIs), is still the most effective symptomatic treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although its efficacy in the early stage of the disease has been confirmed, its complex pharmacokinetics (PK) increases the variability of the intra-individual motor response, thus amplifying the risk of motor/non-motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that L-DOPA PK is strongly influenced by several clinical, therapeutic, and lifestyle variables (e.g., dietary proteins). L-DOPA therapeutic monitoring is therefore crucial to provide personalized therapy, hence improving drug efficacy and safety. To this aim, we have developed and validated an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method to quantify L-DOPA, levodopa methyl ester (LDME), and the DDCI carbidopa in human plasma. The compounds were extracted by protein precipitation and samples were analyzed with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The method showed good selectivity and specificity for all compounds. No carryover was observed, and dilution integrity was demonstrated. No matrix effect could be retrieved; intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy values met the acceptance criteria. Reinjection reproducibility was assessed. The described method was successfully applied to a 45-year-old male patient to compare the pharmacokinetic behavior of an L-DOPA-based medical treatment involving commercially available Mucuna pruriens extracts and an LDME/carbidopa (100/25 mg) formulation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spectral data and fragment analysis of L-DOPA (panel (<b>a</b>)), LDME (panel (<b>b</b>)), and carbidopa (panel (<b>c</b>)). Panel (<b>d</b>) shows L-DOPA metabolism and enzymes involved in sequential transformation (catechol-O-methyltransferase COMT; monoamine oxidases (MAO).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative chromatograms of blank plasma (<b>1</b>) compared to spiked plasma (<b>2</b>). In panel (<b>A</b>), L-DOPA (quan 198.09 → 152.13 <span class="html-italic">m/z</span>, RT: 0.89 min); in panel (<b>B</b>), LDME (quan 212.50 → 152.13 <span class="html-italic">m/z</span>, RT: 1.53 min); in panel (<b>C</b>), carbidopa (quan 227.07 → 181.11 <span class="html-italic">m/z</span>, RT: 1.44 min); in panel (<b>D</b>), internal standard L-DOPA-D3 (201.05 → 154.39 <span class="html-italic">m/z</span>, RT: 0.85 min). Qualifier ions are described in <a href="#molecules-28-04264-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>L-DOPA plasma concentrations (µg/L) and PK parameters at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after administration of two tablets of an LDME/carbidopa (100/25 mg) formulation (L-DOPA concentrations curve in green and carbidopa in red) (<b>A</b>) compared to plasma concentrations after the administration of 500 mg of L-DOPA from commercially available <span class="html-italic">Mucuna pruriens</span> extracts (<span class="html-italic">Mucuna pruriens</span>-derived L-DOPA concentrations curve in blue) (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 2188 KiB  
Article
Dopamine D1 Agonists: First Potential Treatment for Late-Stage Parkinson’s Disease
by Mechelle M. Lewis, Lauren J. Van Scoy, Sol De Jesus, Jonathan G. Hakun, Paul J. Eslinger, Julio Fernandez-Mendoza, Lan Kong, Yang Yang, Bethany L. Snyder, Natalia Loktionova, Sridhar Duvvuri, David L. Gray, Xuemei Huang and Richard B. Mailman
Biomolecules 2023, 13(5), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050829 - 12 May 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3260
Abstract
Current pharmacotherapy has limited efficacy and/or intolerable side effects in late-stage Parkinson’s disease (LsPD) patients whose daily life depends primarily on caregivers and palliative care. Clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD patients. We explored if a D1/5 dopamine agonist would have [...] Read more.
Current pharmacotherapy has limited efficacy and/or intolerable side effects in late-stage Parkinson’s disease (LsPD) patients whose daily life depends primarily on caregivers and palliative care. Clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD patients. We explored if a D1/5 dopamine agonist would have efficacy in LsPD using a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover phase Ia/b study comparing the D1/5 agonist PF-06412562 to levodopa/carbidopa in six LsPD patients. Caregiver assessment was the primary efficacy measure because caregivers were with patients throughout the study, and standard clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD. Assessments included standard quantitative scales of motor function (MDS-UPDRS-III), alertness (Glasgow Coma and Stanford Sleepiness Scales), and cognition (Severe Impairment and Frontal Assessment Batteries) at baseline (Day 1) and thrice daily during drug testing (Days 2–3). Clinicians and caregivers completed the clinical impression of change questionnaires, and caregivers participated in a qualitative exit interview. Blinded triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data was used to integrate findings. Neither traditional scales nor clinician impression of change detected consistent differences between treatments in the five participants who completed the study. Conversely, the overall caregiver data strongly favored PF-06412562 over levodopa in four of five patients. The most meaningful improvements converged on motor, alertness, and functional engagement. These data suggest for the first time that there can be useful pharmacological intervention in LsPD patients using D1/5 agonists and also that caregiver perspectives with mixed method analyses may overcome limitations using methods common in early-stage patients. The results encourage future clinical studies and understanding of the most efficacious signaling properties of a D1 agonist for this population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>Evaluation of quantitative GCI data for four of five subjects:</b> (<b>A</b>) Clinician (left) and caregiver (right) quantitative global clinical impression (GCI) of change scores on Day 3 of the levodopa (light gray) or PF-2562 (dark gray) week. The horizontal line indicates no change, with scores above the line reflecting better scores. Clinician scores were more variable than those from caregivers for both levodopa and PF-2562, but both favored PF-2562. (<b>B</b>) Quantitative GCI scores from the caregivers representing the four classic LsPD patients rated PF-2562 consistently better than levodopa (<span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.007).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Synaptic mechanisms explaining the loss of levodopa effectiveness with PD progression.</b> Levodopa is an indirect dopamine agonist that must be converted to dopamine in residual nerve terminals. It is estimated that 40–60% of the terminals are lost at first diagnosis (Early-stage PD). By late-stage illness, &gt;&gt;90% of terminals have degenerated, preventing production of dopamine in critical areas of the basal ganglia (also see <a href="#biomolecules-13-00829-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Schematic of basal ganglia chemoarchitecture in healthy and PD brains.</b> Levodopa, an indirect dopamine agonist, must be converted to dopamine in nerve terminals. In normal brain, the circuitry of the basal ganglia balances activation of the direct and indirect pathways to stimulate the motor cortex (<b>left</b> panel). In EsPD, 40–60% of terminals are lost. By LsPD, &gt;90% of terminals have degenerated, preventing production of dopamine in critical areas of basal ganglia. The result is a dramatic increase in inhibitory signaling to the thalamus that then decreases the stimulation of the motor cortex needed to initiate and maintain motor function (<b>right</b> panel).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p><span class="html-italic">Study Schematic</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p><span class="html-italic">Consort Flow Diagram</span>.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 887 KiB  
Article
Association between Parkinson’s Disease Medication and the Risk of Lower Urinary Tract Infection (LUTI): A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Niklas Gremke, Sebastian Griewing, Marcel Printz, Karel Kostev, Uwe Wagner and Matthias Kalder
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(23), 7077; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237077 - 29 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2195
Abstract
Background: The occurrence of autonomic dysfunctions (e.g., urological dysfunctions) is a common phenomenon during the course of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and resulting complications such as lower urinary tract infections (LUTI) are one of the leading causes of hospitalizations and mortality in patients with [...] Read more.
Background: The occurrence of autonomic dysfunctions (e.g., urological dysfunctions) is a common phenomenon during the course of Parkinson’s disease (PD) and resulting complications such as lower urinary tract infections (LUTI) are one of the leading causes of hospitalizations and mortality in patients with the condition. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the most common levodopa-based treatment regimens (DOPA decarboxylase inhibitor (DCI) + carbidopa or benserazide) and to analyze the incidence of LUTI and antibiotic prescriptions in patients receiving the respective treatments. Methods: This study was based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA) and included adult patients (≥18 years) with an initial prescription of levodopa therapy including fixed-dose levodopa/DCI combinations in 1284 general practices in Germany between January 2010 and December 2020. Conditional Cox regression models were used to analyze the association between levodopa/DCI combinations and LUTI incidence and antibiotic prescriptions. Results: Compared to levodopa + carbidopa, levodopa + benserazide therapy was significantly and negatively associated with LUTI (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71–0.95). This association was stronger in women (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65–0.92) than in men (HR: 0.93, not significant). Conclusions: Especially in women, receiving levodopa + benserazide prescriptions was associated with a lower LUTI incidence. It is important for clinicians to keep this in mind, since LUTI is a leading cause of hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality in patients with PD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Selection of study patients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cumulative incidence of LUTI diagnosis (<b>a</b>) and antibiotic therapy (<b>b</b>) within 12 months after start of therapy in patients treated with levodopa (100 mg) + benserazide and levodopa (100 mg) + carbidopa.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 2161 KiB  
Review
Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson’s Disease: Pathogenesis and Emerging Treatment Strategies
by Destany K. Kwon, Mohit Kwatra, Jing Wang and Han Seok Ko
Cells 2022, 11(23), 3736; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11233736 - 23 Nov 2022
Cited by 51 | Viewed by 13100
Abstract
The most commonly used treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is levodopa, prescribed in conjunction with carbidopa. Virtually all patients with PD undergo dopamine replacement therapy using levodopa during the course of the disease’s progression. However, despite the fact that levodopa is the “gold [...] Read more.
The most commonly used treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD) is levodopa, prescribed in conjunction with carbidopa. Virtually all patients with PD undergo dopamine replacement therapy using levodopa during the course of the disease’s progression. However, despite the fact that levodopa is the “gold standard” in PD treatments and has the ability to significantly alleviate PD symptoms, it comes with side effects in advanced PD. Levodopa replacement therapy remains the current clinical treatment of choice for Parkinson’s patients, but approximately 80% of the treated PD patients develop levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in the advanced stages of the disease. A better understanding of the pathological mechanisms of LID and possible means of improvement would significantly improve the outcome of PD patients, reduce the complexity of medication use, and lower adverse effects, thus, improving the quality of life of patients and prolonging their life cycle. This review assesses the recent advancements in understanding the underlying mechanisms of LID and the therapeutic management options available after the emergence of LID in patients. We summarized the pathogenesis and the new treatments for LID-related PD and concluded that targeting pathways other than the dopaminergic pathway to treat LID has become a new possibility, and, currently, amantadine, drugs targeting 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors, and surgery for PD can target the Parkinson’s symptoms caused by LID. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Flow Chart for articles selection and literature search.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of Normal dopamine storage Vs improper dopamine storage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Basal ganglia circuitry regulating the direct and indirect pathways.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Different physical reactions as a result of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LID developmental changes as a result of levodopa concentration and progression of PD.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4101 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Neurotoxicity of a Sub-Optimal Dose of Rotenone in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and the Possible Neuroactive Potential of Valproic Acid, Combination of Levodopa and Carbidopa, and Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains
by Ovidiu-Dumitru Ilie, Raluca Duta, Ioana-Miruna Balmus, Alexandra Savuca, Adriana Petrovici, Ilinca-Bianca Nita, Lucian-Mihai Antoci, Roxana Jijie, Cosmin-Teodor Mihai, Alin Ciobica, Mircea Nicoara, Roxana Popescu, Romeo Dobrin, Carmen Solcan, Anca Trifan, Carol Stanciu and Bogdan Doroftei
Antioxidants 2022, 11(10), 2040; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11102040 - 17 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5747
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an enigmatic neurodegenerative disorder that is currently the subject of extensive research approaches aiming at deepening the understanding of its etiopathophysiology. Recent data suggest that distinct compounds used either as anticonvulsants or agents usually used as dopaminergic agonists or [...] Read more.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is an enigmatic neurodegenerative disorder that is currently the subject of extensive research approaches aiming at deepening the understanding of its etiopathophysiology. Recent data suggest that distinct compounds used either as anticonvulsants or agents usually used as dopaminergic agonists or supplements consisting of live active lactic acid bacteria strains might alleviate and improve PD-related phenotypes. This is why we aimed to elucidate how the administration of rotenone (ROT) disrupts homeostasis and the possible neuroactive potential of valproic acid (VPA), antiparkinsonian agents (levodopa and carbidopa – LEV+CARB), and a mixture of six Lactobacillus and three Bifidobacterium species (PROBIO) might re-establish the optimal internal parameters. ROT causes significant changes in the central nervous system (CNS), notably reduced neurogenesis and angiogenesis, by triggering apoptosis, reflected by the increased expression of PARKIN and PINK1 gene(s), low brain dopamine (DA) levels, and as opposed to LRRK2 and SNCA compared with healthy zebrafish. VPA, LEV/CARB, and PROBIO sustain neurogenesis and angiogenesis, manifesting a neuroprotective role in diminishing the effect of ROT in zebrafish. Interestingly, none of the tested compounds influenced oxidative stress (OS), as reflected by the level of malondialdehyde (MDA) level and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymatic activity revealed in non-ROT-exposed zebrafish. Overall, the selected concentrations were enough to trigger particular behavioral patterns as reflected by our parameters of interest (swimming distance (mm), velocity (mm/s), and freezing episodes (s)), but sequential testing is mandatory to decipher whether they exert an inhibitory role following ROT exposure. In this way, we further offer data into how ROT may trigger a PD-related phenotype and the possible beneficial role of VPA, LEV+CARB, and PROBIO in re-establishing homeostasis in Danio rerio. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The 3D swim trace results for <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) in (<b>a</b>) CONTROL and the groups treated with (<b>b</b>) VPA—0.5 mg/mL, (<b>c</b>) LEV/CARB—250 mg + 25 mg, (<b>d</b>) PROBIO—3 g, (<b>e</b>) ROT—2.5 µg/L, (<b>f</b>) ROT+VPA—2.5 µg/L + 0.5 mg/mL, (<b>g</b>) ROT+LEV/CARB—2.5 µg/L + 250 mg LEV + 25 mg CARB, and (<b>h</b>) ROT + PROBIO—2.5 µg/L + 3 g. An automated integration of traces using Track3D software results in 3D swim tracks reflected by the red color, the right panel indicating the top (X, Y) and side (Y, Z) views of <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> in the 240 s test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Swimming distance (mm) patterns in studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; ***—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005; ****—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001; values expressed as mean with SEM followed by Tukey test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Velocity (mm/s) patterns in studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; ***—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005; values expressed as mean with SEM followed by Tukey test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Episodes of inactivity (s) patterns in studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; ***—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005; values expressed as mean with SEM followed by Tukey test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The reactivity of the nervous system in studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) groups of HE, p53, PCNA, S100b, GFAP, and cox4i1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The enzymatic activity of SOD and the level of MDA in the studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; values expressed as mean with SEM followed Tukey HSD test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">LRRK2</span>, <span class="html-italic">SNCA</span>, <span class="html-italic">PARKIN,</span> and <span class="html-italic">PINK1</span> relative expression levels in the brain of studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; ***—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005; values expressed as mean with SEM followed by Tukey HSD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p><span class="html-italic">LRRK2</span>, <span class="html-italic">SNCA</span>, <span class="html-italic">PARKIN,</span> and <span class="html-italic">PINK1</span> relative expression levels in the brain of studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; ***—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005; values expressed as mean with SEM followed by Tukey HSD).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Brain DA level in the studied <span class="html-italic">Danio rerio</span> (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5) groups (*—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; **—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005; ***—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0005; ****—<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001; values expressed as mean with SEM followed by Tukey HSD).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop