Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (23)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = on-orbit wavelength calibration

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 7144 KiB  
Article
A Study of NOAA-20 VIIRS Band M1 (0.41 µm) Striping over Clear-Sky Ocean
by Wenhui Wang, Changyong Cao, Slawomir Blonski and Xi Shao
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17010074 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 427
Abstract
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) satellite was launched on 18 November 2017. The on-orbit calibration of the NOAA-20 VIIRS visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) bands has been very stable over time. However, NOAA-20 operational [...] Read more.
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) satellite was launched on 18 November 2017. The on-orbit calibration of the NOAA-20 VIIRS visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) bands has been very stable over time. However, NOAA-20 operational M1 (a dual gain band with a center wavelength of 0.41 µm) sensor data records (SDR) have exhibited persistent scene-dependent striping over clear-sky ocean (high gain, low radiance) since the beginning of the mission, different from other VisNIR bands. This paper studies the root causes of the striping in the operational NOAA-20 M1 SDRs. Two potential factors were analyzed: (1) polarization effect-induced striping over clear-sky ocean and (2) imperfect on-orbit radiometric calibration-induced striping. NOAA-20 M1 is more sensitive to the polarized lights compared to other NOAA-20 short-wavelength bands and the similar bands on the Suomi NPP and NOAA-21 VIIRS, with detector and scan angle-dependent polarization sensitivity up to ~6.4%. The VIIRS M1 top of atmosphere radiance is dominated by Rayleigh scattering over clear-sky ocean and can be up to ~70% polarized. In this study, the impact of the polarization effect on M1 striping was investigated using radiative transfer simulation and a polarization correction method similar to that developed by the NOAA ocean color team. Our results indicate that the prelaunch-measured polarization sensitivity and the polarization correction method work well and can effectively reduce striping over clear-sky ocean scenes by up to ~2% at near nadir zones. Moreover, no significant change in NOAA-20 M1 polarization sensitivity was observed based on the data analyzed in this study. After the correction of the polarization effect, residual M1 striping over clear-sky ocean suggests that there exists half-angle mirror (HAM)-side and detector-dependent striping, which may be caused by on-orbit radiometric calibration errors. HAM-side and detector-dependent striping correction factors were analyzed using deep convective cloud (DCC) observations (low gain, high radiances) and verified over the homogeneous Libya-4 desert site (low gain, mid-level radiance); neither are significantly affected by the polarization effect. The imperfect on-orbit radiometric calibration-induced striping in the NOAA operational M1 SDR has been relatively stable over time. After the correction of the polarization effect, the DCC-based striping correction factors can further reduce striping over clear-sky ocean scenes by ~0.5%. The polarization correction method used in this study is only effective over clear-sky ocean scenes that are dominated by the Rayleigh scattering radiance. The DCC-based striping correction factors work well at all radiance levels; therefore, they can be deployed operationally to improve the quality of NOAA-20 M1 SDRs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection The VIIRS Collection: Calibration, Validation, and Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Monthly DCC reflectance (mode) time series for NOAA-20 VIIRS bands M1–M4 from May 2018 to June 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>NOAA-20 M1 (<b>a</b>) detector level relative response (RSR, represented by different colors) functions and (<b>b</b>) operational F-factors on 31 December 2023 (right).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example of 6SV simulated Stokes vectors (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">I</span>, (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Q</span>, (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">U</span>, and (<b>d</b>) DoLP for a NOAA-20 VIIRS M1 granule on 9 January 2024 20:36–20:38 UTC (Pacific Coast, latitude: 29.27°, longitude: −116.95°).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>6SV simulated degree of linear polarization (DoLP, unitless) over clear-sky ocean at surface pressure of 1013.5 hPa and wind speed of 5 m/s: (<b>a</b>) DoLP as functions of view zenith angle (VZA) and relative azimuth angle (RAA) at solar zenith angle (SZA) of 22.5°; (<b>b</b>) DoLP as functions of SZA and RAA at VZA of 22.5°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>6SV simulated DoLP (black dots) for NOAA-20 M1 over clear-sky ocean as a function of scattering angle, at a surface pressure of 1013.5 hPa and a wind speed of 5 m/s. The blue vertical dash line marks the 90° scattering angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Polar plots of NOAA-20 VIIRS M1 prelaunch polarization sensitivity and phase angle at different scan angles for (<b>a</b>) HAM-A and (<b>b</b>) HAM-B. Polarization sensitivity (unit: percent) is represented by the length of a vector on the polar plot, while polarization phase angle is represented by the direction of the vector. Scan angle is represented by different colors; detector is represented by different symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>NOAA-20 VIIRS M1 detector- and HAM-side-dependent <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (left panel) and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>13</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (right panel) terms as a function of the scan angle, derived using prelaunch characterized polarization amplitude and phase angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>NOAA-20 M1 striping over a clear-sky ocean scene on 9 January 2024 20:36 UTC: (<b>a</b>) operational SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence in the operational SDR; (<b>c</b>) operational reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are similar to (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but after applying the polarization correction. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00074-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>, but for a NOAA-20 M1 clear-sky ocean scene on 23 September 2018 06:12 UTC (Indian Ocean, West Coast of Australia): (<b>a</b>) operational SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence in the operational SDR; (<b>c</b>) operational reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are similar to (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but after applying the polarization correction. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of NOAA-20 M1 DCC-based striping correction factors for (<b>a</b>) considering detector-dependent striping only and (<b>b</b>) considering both HAM-side- and detector-dependent striping.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Impacts of DCC-based striping correction factors for NOAA-20 M1 over the Libyan-4 desert site (30 March 2024, 11:32 UTC): (<b>a</b>) operational SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence in the operational SDR; (<b>c</b>) operational reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) are similar to (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), but after applying the DCC-based striping correction. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00074-f008" class="html-fig">Figure 8</a>, but after applying both DCC-based striping correction and polarization correction: (<b>a</b>) SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence; (<b>c</b>) reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-17-00074-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, but after applying both DCC-based striping correction and polarization correction: (<b>a</b>) SDR image; (<b>b</b>) HAM-side and detector-level reflectance divergence; (<b>c</b>) reflectance ratios between individual detectors and band-averaged value. The gray horizontal dash lines in (<b>c</b>) mark reflectance ratio values of 0.99, 1.00, and 1.01, to assist understanding only.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7294 KiB  
Article
Prelaunch Reflective Solar Band Radiometric Performance of JPSS-3 and -4 VIIRS
by Amit Angal, David Moyer, Xiaoxiong Xiong, Qiang Ji and Daniel Link
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(24), 4799; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244799 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 366
Abstract
The Joint Polar Satellite System 3 (JPSS-3) and -4 (JPSS-4) Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instruments are the last in the series (S-NPP VIIRS launched in October 2011, JPSS-1 VIIRS launched in November 2017, and JPSS-2 VIIRS launched in November 2022) of [...] Read more.
The Joint Polar Satellite System 3 (JPSS-3) and -4 (JPSS-4) Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) instruments are the last in the series (S-NPP VIIRS launched in October 2011, JPSS-1 VIIRS launched in November 2017, and JPSS-2 VIIRS launched in November 2022) of highly advanced polar-orbiting environmental satellites. Both instruments underwent a comprehensive sensor-level thermal vacuum (TVAC) testing at the Raytheon Technologies El Segundo facility to characterize the spatial, spectral, and radiometric aspects of the VIIRS sensor performance. This paper focuses on the radiometric performance of the 14 reflective solar bands (RSBs) that cover the wavelength range from 0.41 to 2.3 µm. Key instrument calibration parameters such as instrument gain, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), dynamic range, and radiometric calibration uncertainty were derived from the TVAC measurements for both the primary and redundant electronics at three instrument temperature plateaus: cold, nominal, and hot. This paper shows that all the JPSS-3 and -4 VIIRS RSB detectors have been well characterized, with key performance metrics comparable to the previous VIIRS instruments on-orbit. The radiometric calibration uncertainty of the RSBs is within the 2% requirement, except in the case of band M1 of JPSS-4. Comparison of the radiometric performance to sensor requirements, as well as a summary of key instrument testing and performance issues, is also presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection The VIIRS Collection: Calibration, Validation, and Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of the optical paths into the VIIRS rotating telescope assembly (RTA) and SDSM during solar observations. The angles and positions are not drawn to scale and are for illustrative purposes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of the on-orbit solar spectral irradiance profile and the SIS-100 radiance profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cartoon of the TVAC test chamber setup. The Blackbody calibration source (BCS), SVS, TMC-SIS, and SIS-100 sources are shown with respect to the instrument location within the chamber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) dn vs. L with the fits, fractional residuals, tau vs. radiance for band M4H from J3 TVAC. The blue dotted lines represent Lmin and Lmax and the pink dotted line represents Ltyp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) dn vs. L with the fits, fractional residuals, tau vs. radiance for band M4H from J4 TVAC. The blue dotted lines represent Lmin and Lmax and the pink dotted line represents Ltyp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) dn vs. radiance with the fits, fractional residuals, tau vs. radiance for band M4L from J3 TVAC. The blue dotted lines represent Lmin and Lmax and the pink dotted line represents Ltyp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) dn vs. radiance with the fits, fractional residuals, tau vs. radiance for band M4L from J4 TVAC. The blue dotted lines represent Lmin and Lmax and the pink dotted line represents Ltyp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) tau, c0/c1, and c2/c1 coefficients with 2-sigma error bars for band M4H from J3 TVAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) tau, c0/c1, and c2/c1 coefficients with 2-sigma error bars for band M4L from J3 TVAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) tau, c0/c1, and c2/c1 coefficients with 2-sigma error bars for band M4H from J4 TVAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) tau, c0/c1, and c2/c1 coefficients with 2-sigma error bars for band M4L from J4 TVAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SNR vs. L for M4H and M4L from J3 TVAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SNR vs. L for M4H and M4L from J4 TVAC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Normalized gain (band-averaged) versus the VNIR FPA and ASP temperatures for JPSS-3 VIIRS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Normalized gain (band-averaged) versus the VNIR FPA and ASP temperatures for JPSS-4 VIIRS.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 8626 KiB  
Article
Calibration and Validation of NOAA-21 Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) Nadir Mapper Sensor Data Record Data
by Banghua Yan, Trevor Beck, Junye Chen, Steven Buckner, Xin Jin, Ding Liang, Sirish Uprety, Jingfeng Huang, Lawrence E. Flynn, Likun Wang, Quanhua Liu and Warren D. Porter
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4488; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234488 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 511
Abstract
The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suites (OMPS) Nadir Mapper (NM) is a grating spectrometer within the OMPS nadir instruments onboard the SNPP, NOAA-20, and NOAA-21 satellites. It is designed to measure Earth radiance and solar irradiance spectra in wavelengths from 300 nm to [...] Read more.
The Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suites (OMPS) Nadir Mapper (NM) is a grating spectrometer within the OMPS nadir instruments onboard the SNPP, NOAA-20, and NOAA-21 satellites. It is designed to measure Earth radiance and solar irradiance spectra in wavelengths from 300 nm to 380 nm for operational retrievals of the nadir total column ozone. This study presents calibration and validation analysis results for the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SDR data to meet the JPSS scientific requirements. The NOAA-21 OMPS SDR calibration derives updates of several previous OMPS algorithms, including the dark current correction algorithm, one-time wavelength registration from ground to on-orbit, daily intra-orbit wavelength shift correction, and stray light correction. Additionally, this study derives an empirical scale factor to remove 2.2% of systematic biases in solar flux data, which were caused by pre-launch solar calibration errors of the OMPS nadir instruments. The validation of the NOAA-21 OMPS SDR data is conducted using various methods. For example, the 32-day average method and radiative transfer model are employed to estimate inter-sensor radiometric calibration differences from either the SNPP or NOAA-20 data. The quality of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SDR data is largely consistent with that of the SNPP and NOAA-20 OMPS data, with differences generally within ±2%. This meets the scientific requirements, except for some deviations mainly in the dichroic range between 300 nm and 303 nm. The deep convective cloud target approach is used to monitor the stability of NOAA-21 OMPS reflectance above 330 nm, showing a variation of 0.5% over the observed period. Data from the NOAA-21 VIIRS M1 band are used to estimate OMPS NM data geolocation errors, revealing that along-track errors can reach up to 3 km, while cross-track errors are generally within ±1 km. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Satellites Calibration and Validation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Deviation of the on-board-measured (day-1) solar spectrum from the pre-launch instrument-based (synthetic) solar spectrum for both the SNPP and NOAA-21 OMPS NM, respectively, i.e., <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and their double differences with/without the solar calibration corrections, i.e., <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> In (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), the red dash line represents the average values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, respectively. Additionally, the results of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> after applying the 2.2% correction is included in (<b>b</b>), with the light blue dash line indicating their average value. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>Deviation of the on-board-measured (day-1) solar spectrum from the pre-launch instrument-based (synthetic) solar spectrum for both the SNPP and NOAA-21 OMPS NM, respectively, i.e., <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and their double differences with/without the solar calibration corrections, i.e., <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> In (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), the red dash line represents the average values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>, respectively. Additionally, the results of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> after applying the 2.2% correction is included in (<b>b</b>), with the light blue dash line indicating their average value. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mn>21</mn> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>N</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mi>P</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time series of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM-averaged dark rate and hot pixel percent when the dark door is open and closed, separately. The data cover the period from 19 November 2022 to 27 May 2024. (<b>a</b>) Dark rate. (<b>b</b>) Hot pixel percent. The gaps in time series from 16 December 2022 to 2 February 2023 were caused by the KaTx-2 problem.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparisons of three solar spectra for the NOAA-21 OMPS NM: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) Derived ground-to-orbit wavelength shifts as a function of the macropixel position. In (<b>b</b>), the thick line is the averaged wavelength shift at a given macropixel for all CCD micropixels within it, while the thin line is the standard deviation from the mean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparisons of three solar spectra for the NOAA-21 OMPS NM: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>a</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>y</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) Derived ground-to-orbit wavelength shifts as a function of the macropixel position. In (<b>b</b>), the thick line is the averaged wavelength shift at a given macropixel for all CCD micropixels within it, while the thin line is the standard deviation from the mean.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time series of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM and nadir housing temperature differences and derived intra-orbit relative wavelength shift by using five orbits of data on 20 July 2024. (<b>a</b>) Instrument temperature difference. (<b>b</b>) Intra-orbit relative wavelength shift.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>OMPS NM intra-orbit wavelength scale as a function of latitude by using the data on 14 April 2024 for the SNPP, NOAA-20, and NOAA-21. (<b>a</b>) SNPP; (<b>b</b>) NOAA-20; (<b>c</b>) NOAA-21.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>NOAA-21 OMPS NM stray light contributions as a function of the wavelength by using the newly derived stray light calibration coefficients. The computation was performed on the global data for solar zenith angles of less than 75°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mean and standard deviation of a series 32-day running-average of radiance differences between the NOAA-21 and SNPP OMPS NM SDR datasets since 1 June 2023 through 12 December 2023. (<b>b</b>) Same as (<b>a</b>) but for reflectance. (<b>c</b>) The 32-day average of normalized radiance difference between the NOAA-21 and SNPP NM by using the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SDR dataset spanning from 15 May 2024 to 15 June 2024, where a correction of 2.2% has been applied. (<b>d</b>) Same as (<b>c</b>) but for the NOAA-21 and NOAA-20 OMPS NM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mean and standard deviation of a series 32-day running-average of radiance differences between the NOAA-21 and SNPP OMPS NM SDR datasets since 1 June 2023 through 12 December 2023. (<b>b</b>) Same as (<b>a</b>) but for reflectance. (<b>c</b>) The 32-day average of normalized radiance difference between the NOAA-21 and SNPP NM by using the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SDR dataset spanning from 15 May 2024 to 15 June 2024, where a correction of 2.2% has been applied. (<b>d</b>) Same as (<b>c</b>) but for the NOAA-21 and NOAA-20 OMPS NM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Averaged double differences in the normalized radiance under clear skies between the NOAA-21 and SNPP by using the data on 2 February 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Time series of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM reflectance within the DCC targets from 7 July 2023, to 7 June 2024 at wavelengths of 331.21, 345.39, 359.99, 372.93, 378.37, and 380.46 nm. Only the first week of the data per month is used to produce an average to reduce the impact of different solar angles with time on the stability of the reflectance. Large drops in reflectance after April 2024 are caused by the updated solar flux table by 2.2% in the SDR data that was implemented into the IDPS operational system on 11 April 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Geolocation accuracy of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SDR data against the NOAA-21 VIIRS M1 band data geolocation position. (<b>a</b>) LOS vector angle error vs. spatial index in the along-track direction on 18 June 2023. (<b>b</b>) Same as (<b>a</b>) but in the cross-track direction. (<b>c</b>) Time series of the angle error at the leftmost pixel position in the spatial direction since 10 February 2023 through 20 June 2024. (<b>d</b>) Same as (<b>c</b>) but at the nadir pixel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Estimated NOAA-21 OMPS NM data SNR using a root mean square residual (RMSR) analysis method. (<b>a</b>) Daily mean OMPS NM radiance SNR over tropical regions within [30°S, 30°N] on 10 February 2023, where the mean radiance and noise are added in the figure for a comparison. (<b>b</b>) Time series of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SNR data from 1 April 2023 through 19 March 2024, using one day of data per week.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Estimated NOAA-21 OMPS NM data SNR using a root mean square residual (RMSR) analysis method. (<b>a</b>) Daily mean OMPS NM radiance SNR over tropical regions within [30°S, 30°N] on 10 February 2023, where the mean radiance and noise are added in the figure for a comparison. (<b>b</b>) Time series of the NOAA-21 OMPS NM SNR data from 1 April 2023 through 19 March 2024, using one day of data per week.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 4554 KiB  
Article
Early Mission Calibration Performance of NOAA-21 VIIRS Reflective Solar Bands
by Ning Lei, Xiaoxiong Xiong, Kevin Twedt, Sherry Li, Tiejun Chang, Qiaozhen Mu and Amit Angal
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3557; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193557 - 24 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 787
Abstract
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) is one of the key instruments on the recently launched NOAA-21 (previously known as JPSS-2) satellite. The VIIRS, like its predecessors on the SNPP and NOAA-20 satellites, provides daily global coverage in 22 spectral bands from [...] Read more.
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) is one of the key instruments on the recently launched NOAA-21 (previously known as JPSS-2) satellite. The VIIRS, like its predecessors on the SNPP and NOAA-20 satellites, provides daily global coverage in 22 spectral bands from 412 nm to 12 μm. The geometrically and radiometrically calibrated observations are the basis for many operational applications and scientific research studies. A total of 14 of the 22 bands are reflective solar bands (RSBs), covering photon wavelengths from 412 nm to 2.25 μm. The RSBs were radiometrically calibrated prelaunch and have been regularly calibrated on orbit through the onboard solar diffuser (SD) and scheduled lunar observations. The on-orbit SD’s reflectance change is determined by the onboard solar diffuser stability monitor (SDSM). We review the calibration algorithms and present the early mission performance of the NASA N21 VIIRS RSBs. Using the calibration data collected at both the yaw maneuver and regular times, we derive the screen transmittance functions. The visible and near-infrared bands’ radiometric gains have been stable, nearly independent of time, and so were the radiometric gains of the shortwave-infrared bands after the second mid-mission outgassing. Further, we assess the Earth-view striping observed in the immediate prior collection (Collection 2.0) and apply a previously developed algorithm to mitigate the striping. The N21 VIIRS RSB detector signal-to-noise ratios are all above the design values with large margins. Finally, the uncertainties of the retrieved Earth-view top-of-the-atmosphere spectral reflectance factors at the respective typical spectral radiance levels are estimated to be less than 1.5% for all the RSBs, except band M11 whose reflectance factor uncertainty is 2.2%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection The VIIRS Collection: Calibration, Validation, and Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Major physical components and their relative positions of the VIIRS instrument, including the on-orbit calibrators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A schematic of the VIIRS RSB on-orbit radiometric calibration. RTA refers to the telescope (rotating telescope assembly), SD refers to the solar diffuser, and SDSM refers to the solar diffuser stability monitor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The N21 VIIRS SDSM detector 8 Sun-view background’s subtracted digital count (circles) and the bulkhead temperature (pluses) vs. time. The solid line is the model regression (see Equation (11)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The N21 VIIRS SDSM screen’s relative effective transmittance for detector 8, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">f</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math> vs. the solar azimuth angle in the SDSM screen’s coordinate system at the solar declination angle <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">V</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>: prelaunch values (blue solid line), values derived from the Sun-view data on the yaw maneuver orbits (black circles), and values derived from the Sun-view data on both the yaw maneuver and regular orbits (other symbols and red solid line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The N21 VIIRS SD screen’s relative effective transmittance times the SD BRDF for the SDSM SD view at the start of the mission for the SDSM detector 1, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">e</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">f</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">B</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">M</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, vs. the solar azimuth angle in the VIIRS coordinate system (see <a href="#app1-remotesensing-16-03557" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>) at the solar declination angle <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">V</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">V</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 17°: prelaunch values (black solid line) and values derived from the calibration data collected on the yaw maneuver orbits (green solid line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The N21 VIIRS SD screen transmittance times the SD BRDF for the telescope SD view at the start of the mission for the VIIRS band M1, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> </mrow> </msub> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">B</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">R</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">T</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">A</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, vs. the solar declination angle in the VIIRS coordinate system at five solar azimuth angles, 16<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 19<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 22<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, 25<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and 28<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>°</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>: prelaunch values (circles) and values derived from the calibration data collected on the yaw maneuver orbits (solid lines).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The SDSM detector’s radiometric gains vs. the respective days since the satellite launch, normalized to the satellite launch time, for the SNPP (<b>left</b>), N20 (<b>center</b>), and N21 (<b>right</b>) VIIRS instruments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The measured N21 VIIRS SDSM SD BRDF on-orbit change factors, the H-factors, normalized to the satellite launch time, with the prelaunch screen transmittance functions (<b>left</b>), the screen functions derived from the yaw maneuver calibration data (<b>center</b>), and the screen functions derived from the yaw maneuver and the regular on-orbit calibration data (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The measured SDSM SD BRDF on-orbit change factors, the H-factors vs. the respective days since the satellite launch, normalized to the respective launch times, for the SNPP (<b>left</b>), N20 (<b>center</b>), and N21 (<b>right</b>) VIIRS instruments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The wavelength power law exponents, for the SD BRDF on-orbit change factors at the SWIR wavelengths vs. the respective days since the satellite launch for the SNPP (black), N20 (green), and N21 (blue) VIIRS instruments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The N21 VIIRS VisNIR band F-factors, the correction factor to the scene spectral radiance retrieved by the quadratic detector digital number polynomial, averaged across the detectors in each band vs. days since the satellite launch. The large data gap roughly between days 37 to 85 is due to a Ka-band data transmitter malfunction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>left</b>) The N21 VIIRS SWIR band F-factors, the correction factor to the scene spectral radiance retrieved by the quadratic detector digital number polynomial, averaged across the detectors in each band vs. days since the satellite launch. (<b>right</b>) The N21 VIIRS band M9 F-factors for detectors 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 vs. days since the satellite launch.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The N21 VIIRS RSB gains (1/F-factors) determined from the SD (solid lines) and lunar observations (circles) vs. days since the satellite launch, normalized to the respective values at orbit 180 for the SD F-factors and on 2 March 2023 (day 112) for the lunar F-factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>The N21 VIIRS RSB gains (1/F-factors) determined from the SD (solid lines) and lunar observations (circles) vs. days since the satellite launch, normalized to the respective values at orbit 180 for the SD F-factors and on 2 March 2023 (day 112) for the lunar F-factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The N21 VIIRS F-factor trend comparison for Collections 1.0, 2.0, and 2.1 for bands M1, M3, and M5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14 Cont.
<p>The N21 VIIRS F-factor trend comparison for Collections 1.0, 2.0, and 2.1 for bands M1, M3, and M5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The N21 VIIRS F-factor difference between using the TSIS-1 and the Thuillier solar spectral powers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The DCC Collection 2.1 Level 1B spectral reflectance (circles) retrieved by using the N21 VIIRS RSB moderate-resolution bands from the eastern Indian and western Pacific Oceans (20°S–20°N and 95°E–175°E), except band M6 because of saturation. Each data point is from mode reflectance averaged across the detectors in each of the bands over 30 days, over a large telescope scanning angular range around nadir. Collection 2.1 reflectance is obtained from Collection 2.0, by multiplying the F-factor ratio of C2.1 to C2.0. The spectral reflectance for Collection 2.0 is represented by the plus symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The Libya 4 Collection 2.1 Level 1B spectral reflectance retrieved from the N21 VIIRS RSB moderate-resolution bands, except bands M6 and M9 because of saturation and atmospheric water vapor photon absorption, respectively, averaged across the 16 detectors in each of the bands, from nadir view. Collection 2.1 reflectance is obtained from Collection 2.0, by multiplying the F-factor ratio of C2.1 to C2.0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Retrieved N21 VIIRS Collection 2.0 Earth-view Level 1B spectral reflectance (circles) striping for bands M1–M3 (top to bottom) between the end detectors obtained from a linear fit to the reflectance from the 16 detectors in each of the bands, without applying the solar diffuser BRDF on-orbit change factor SD positional dependence. The solid lines are the modeled reflectance for the respective bands (see Equation (23)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 18 Cont.
<p>Retrieved N21 VIIRS Collection 2.0 Earth-view Level 1B spectral reflectance (circles) striping for bands M1–M3 (top to bottom) between the end detectors obtained from a linear fit to the reflectance from the 16 detectors in each of the bands, without applying the solar diffuser BRDF on-orbit change factor SD positional dependence. The solid lines are the modeled reflectance for the respective bands (see Equation (23)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>The Libya 4 Level 1B reflectance retrieved from the N21 VIIRS Collection 2.0 L1B band M1’s 16 detectors on 30 May 2024, before (<b>left</b>) and after (<b>right</b>) applying the solar diffuser BRDF on-orbit change factor SD positional dependence (see Equation (22)).</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>The N21 VIIRS RSB signal-to-noise ratios at the respective specified typical spectral radiances for a single frame from the Earth view divided by the respective required signal-to-noise ratios, on 2 March 2023 (black), 1 January 2024 (red), and 15 May 2024 (green).</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>The estimated relative standard deviations for the N21 VIIRS RSBs at the respective specified spectral radiances on 15 May 2024. The dots indicate the 2% requirement.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>A schematic diagram showing the definition of the VIIRS SDSM screen coordinate system. The plate with dots indicates the SDSM screen, and the dots indicate the through holes on the screen. The <span class="html-italic">x</span> axis is along the SDSM screen normal vector, and the <span class="html-italic">y</span> axis is along the long dimension of the screen. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> <mo>→</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">U</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the solar vector.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 11255 KiB  
Article
On-Orbit Wavelength Calibration Error Analysis of the Spaceborne Hyperspectral Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Instrument Using the Solar Fraunhofer Lines
by Yulong Guo, Cailan Gong, Yong Hu, Fuqiang Zheng and Yunmeng Liu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(18), 3367; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16183367 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 896
Abstract
Accurate on-orbit wavelength calibration of the spaceborne hyperspectral payload is the key to the quantitative analysis and application of observational data. Due to the high spectral resolution of general spaceborne hyperspectral greenhouse gas (GHG) detection instruments, the common Fraunhofer lines in the solar [...] Read more.
Accurate on-orbit wavelength calibration of the spaceborne hyperspectral payload is the key to the quantitative analysis and application of observational data. Due to the high spectral resolution of general spaceborne hyperspectral greenhouse gas (GHG) detection instruments, the common Fraunhofer lines in the solar atmosphere can be used as a reference for on-orbit wavelength calibration. Based on the performances of a GHG detection instrument under development, this study simulated the instrument’s solar-viewing measurement spectra and analyzed the main sources of errors in the on-orbit wavelength calibration method of the instrument using the solar Fraunhofer lines, including the Doppler shift correction error, the instrumental measurement error, and the peak-seek algorithm error. The calibration accuracy was independently calculated for 65 Fraunhofer lines within the spectral range of the instrument. The results show that the wavelength calibration accuracy is mainly affected by the asymmetry of the Fraunhofer lines and the random error associated with instrument measurement, and it can cause calibration errors of more than 1/10 of the spectral resolution at maximum. A total of 49 Fraunhofer lines that meet the requirements for calibration accuracy were screened based on the design parameters of the instrument. Due to the uncertainty of simulation, the results in this study have inherent limitations, but provide valuable insights for quantitatively analyzing the errors of the on-orbit wavelength calibration method using the Fraunhofer lines, evaluating the influence of instrumental parameters on the calibration accuracy, and enhancing the accuracy of on-orbit wavelength calibration for similar GHG detection payloads. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Super-Gaussian functions of different orders <span class="html-italic">n</span> and the other parameters of the function are as follows: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2060.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> <mi>W</mi> <mi>H</mi> <mi>M</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. When <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, the function is identical to a general Gaussian function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Positions of 21 typical Fraunhofer lines in solar reference irradiance spectra of the three bands, where the positions of Fraunhofer lines are marked by a red “x”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulations of the ideal instrumental solar observation values in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band, where the ILS was simulated using a general Gaussian function with FWHM = 0.08 nm: (<b>a</b>) the high-resolution Kurucz solar irradiance spectrum in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band; (<b>b</b>) simulated instrumental solar measurement DN values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flow chart of the simulation to calculate instrumental solar measurement spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simulation spectrum of the instrumental solar observation in the SCO<sub>2</sub> band before (red line) and after (blue line) adding measurement uncertainty, where SNR = 750:1@8.3 × 10<sup>19</sup> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">p</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">h</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">r</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>0.2%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Peak-seek using the Gaussian fitting algorithm to the inverted normalized simulated measurement Fraunhofer lines at 1596.446 nm in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band: the blue dots represent the inverted normalized simulated measurement values; the black line is the fitted Gaussian function curve; the red “+” is the peak position of fitted Gaussian function curve; and the blue dashed line marks the actual position of the Fraunhofer absorption peaks in the reference spectrum. The peak-seek position of the measured Fraunhofer line at 1596.446 nm is 1596.4427 nm, and the offset of peak-seek is 0.0033 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The flow of the on-orbit wavelength calibration method based on the solar Fraunhofer lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The wavelength shifts at the central wavelength of different spectral channels in the three bands caused by the Doppler effect. The Doppler shifts of the starting and ending wavelengths of the three bands are 0.000327 nm, 0.000677 nm, and 0.000910 nm, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The average Doppler shift correction error of the three bands caused by ±5% relative velocity calculation when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>V</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo> </mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi> <mo>·</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> (red “x”).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Peak-seek algorithm applied to the simulated measurement of Fraunhofer lines at 1612.039 nm and 1613.034 nm in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band: (<b>a</b>) the high-resolution Kurucz solar spectrum at 1612.039 nm and 1613.034 nm; (<b>b</b>) the simulated measurement spectra at the ILS with a general Gaussian function and FWHM = 0.08 nm; (<b>c</b>) peak-seek algorithm using Gaussian fitting to the normalized simulated measurement of Fraunhofer lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The peak-seek errors (blue squares) of Fraunhofer lines at 1612.039 nm and 1613.034 nm fluctuate around the mean value (red dashed line) affected by the shift in the central wavelength position of each sampling point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The peak-seek errors at 1612.039 nm when (<b>a</b>) FWHM = 0.10 nm and (<b>b</b>) FWHM = 0.06 nm. The systematic error caused by the asymmetry of the Fraunhofer line decreases from 0.0138 nm to 0.0093 nm as the spectral resolution changes from 0.10 nm to 0.06 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Variation in the peak-seek error of the 7 Fraunhofer lines in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band with spectral resolution, which changes from 0.06 nm to 0.12 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Variation in the peak-seek error of the 7 Fraunhofer lines in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band with the super-Gaussian function order of ILS, which changes from 1.5 to 3.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of the maximum peak-seek errors (“x”) of the 21 Fraunhofer lines (<b>a</b>) before and (<b>b</b>) after removing the average systematic error in three bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>Comparison of the maximum peak-seek errors (“x”) of the 21 Fraunhofer lines (<b>a</b>) before and (<b>b</b>) after removing the average systematic error in three bands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The peak-seek obtained by Gaussian fitting (<b>a</b>) before and (<b>b</b>) after adding noise at the 2045.000 nm Fraunhofer line. The peak-seek error increases from 0.0008 nm to 0.0027 nm due to the influence of the noise signal (SNR = 750), and thus the random error due to noise is 0.0019 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Peak-seek errors of the Fraunhofer lines at (<b>a</b>) 2056.96 nm and (<b>b</b>) 2063.533 nm before (left figure) and after (right figure) removing the systematic error. The blue data points denote the peak-seek position error values of 400 experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Peak-seek errors of the Fraunhofer lines at (<b>a</b>) 2045.0 nm, (<b>b</b>) 2054.431 nm, and (<b>c</b>) 2074.254 nm when the SNR is 800, 650, and 500, where the red line is the boundary of FWHM/10.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Variation in the peak-seek error of the 7 Fraunhofer lines in the SCO<sub>2</sub> band with SNR changing from 500 to 850.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Variation in the peak-seek error of the Fraunhofer lines in the SCO<sub>2</sub> band with the inter-channel relative radiometric calibration uncertainty changing from 0.05% to 0.3%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Peak-seek obtained using the (<b>a</b>) center-of-mass algorithm and (<b>b</b>) cubic spline fitting algorithm to the normalized simulated measurement Fraunhofer lines at 1596.446 nm in the WCO<sub>2</sub> band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>The peak-seek errors of the Fraunhofer lines (<b>a</b>) before and (<b>b</b>) after removing the systematic error in three bands using the Gaussian fitting (red “x”), center-of-mass (blue “x”), and cubic spline fitting (green “x”) algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>The peak-seek errors of Fraunhofer lines at 1612.039 nm and 1613.034 nm affected by the shift in the center wavelength position of each sampling point using the cubic spline fitting algorithm. The red dashed line is the reference line of the average value of peak-seek errors (blue squares).</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>The peak-seek errors of the Fraunhofer lines in three bands using the super-Gaussian function fitting algorithm with the corresponding order of ILS: (<b>a</b>) the order of the super-Gaussian function is 2.5; (<b>b</b>) the order of the super-Gaussian function is 3.0. The peak-seek errors are after removing the systematic error.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Selection of Fraunhofer lines in the three bands according to the systematic error: the black “x” marks indicate that the peak-seek systematic error of the Fraunhofer line is &gt;FWHM/10; the blue triangle marks indicate that the systematic error is &lt;FWHM/10 and &gt;FWHM/20; the red five-pointed star marks indicate that the systematic error is &lt;FWHM/20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>The random errors of peak-seek positions of 19 Fraunhofer lines in the SCO<sub>2</sub> band (SNR = 700, uncertainty = 0.2%): the blue dashed line is the reference line of FWHM/10, and the position of Fraunhofer line is marked by a green “x” if the random error is less than FWHM/10, while it is marked by a red “x” if the random error is greater than FWHM/10.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 6987 KiB  
Technical Note
Pre-Launch Assessment of PACE OCI’s Polarization Sensitivity
by Jeff McIntire, Eugene Waluschka, Gerhard Meister, Joseph Knuble and William B. Cook
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(11), 1851; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16111851 - 22 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 815
Abstract
To provide ongoing continuity for the ocean, cloud, and aerosol science data records, NASA will launch the Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) mission on 8 February 2024. The Ocean Color Instrument (OCI) is the primary sensor onboard PACE and will provide ocean [...] Read more.
To provide ongoing continuity for the ocean, cloud, and aerosol science data records, NASA will launch the Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) mission on 8 February 2024. The Ocean Color Instrument (OCI) is the primary sensor onboard PACE and will provide ocean color science data to continue the data sets collected by heritage sensors MODIS, SeaWiFS, and VIIRS, but with increased spectral coverage and improved accuracy. The OCI is a grating spectrometer with hyperspectral coverage from the ultraviolet (about 315 nm) to near-infrared (about 900 nm), with additional filtered channels in the short-wave infrared (940 nm–2260 nm). A rigorous ground test program was conducted to calibrate the instrument and ensure that the calibration can be transferred to on-orbit operations in order to achieve the high levels of accuracy demanded by the science community. Some calibration parameters, such as polarization sensitivity, can only be measured during pre-launch testing. Tests were performed to measure the Mueller matrix components necessary to correct polarized scenes encountered on orbit. Measurements covered all spectral bands and a series of telescope scan angles encompassing the expected on-orbit scan range. The sensitivity (linear diattenuation) was measured above 340 nm to be below 0.6%, except at wavelengths, and was characterized as better than 0.1%. Below 340 nm, the sensitivity can be much higher, but this is not expected to affect the science data significantly. These results indicate that any polarized scenes encountered on orbit can be corrected with a high degree of confidence. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of polarization test setup under ambient conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Upper plot: the OCI response for band 557.8125 nm as the telescope scanned past the source as a function of pixel for scan angle of 0 degrees and polarizer angle of 0 degrees. Lower plot: the OCI response for the polarizer angles listed in the legend when the OCI footprint is fully within the source aperture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Polarizer efficiency measured by OCI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Amplitudes of the Fourier analysis as a function of pixel along the response curve plateau for band 672.8125 nm: 1-cycle (<b>upper plot</b>), 2-cycle (<b>middle plot</b>), and 4-cycle (<b>lower plot</b>). Measurements at different scan angles are defined by the color code in the legend. The symbols indicate the pixel for each scan angle with the lowest 1-cycle variation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Measured response (normalized to the average) plotted as a function of polarizer angle (symbols) along with the corresponding fourth-order Fourier series (solid lines). Measurements at different scan angles are defined by the color code in the legend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Measured response (normalized to the average) plotted as a function of polarizer angle (symbols) along with the corresponding second-order Fourier series (solid lines) for 0 degree scan angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Linear diattenuation for all OCI bands at a 0 degree scan angle: UV-VIS in the lower plot, VIS-NIR in the middle plot, and SWIR in the lower plot. The OCI design requirement is shown by the black line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Linear diattenuation for all OCI bands at various scan angles: UV-VIS in the lower plot, VIS-NIR in the middle plot, and SWIR in the lower plot. The OCI design requirement is shown by the black line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Measured uncertainty for all OCI bands: UV-VIS in the lower plot, VIS-NIR in the middle plot, and SWIR in the lower plot. The OCI design requirement is shown by the black line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Measured uncertainty for all OCI bands (total and largest contributors): UV-VIS in the lower plot, VIS-NIR in the middle plot, and SWIR in the lower plot.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 10855 KiB  
Article
Retrieval of an On-Orbit Bidirectional Reflectivity Reference in the Mid-Infrared Bands of FY-3D/MERSI-2 Channels 20
by Bo Peng, Wei Chen, Hengyang Wang, Xiuqing Hu, Hongzhao Tang, Guangchao Li and Fengjiao Zhang
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(21), 5117; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215117 - 26 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1170
Abstract
The acquisition of high-accuracy reflectance in mid-infrared channels is of great significance for the on-orbit cross-calibration of other bands using the mid-infrared band. However, due to the phenomenon that some sensors have a wide range of wavelengths covered by adjacent channels in the [...] Read more.
The acquisition of high-accuracy reflectance in mid-infrared channels is of great significance for the on-orbit cross-calibration of other bands using the mid-infrared band. However, due to the phenomenon that some sensors have a wide range of wavelengths covered by adjacent channels in the mid-infrared band, the traditional method of estimating the mid-infrared reflectivity assumes that the sea surface reflectivity in different mid-infrared bands is equal, which will lead to a large error during calculation. To solve this problem, this study proposes a nonlinear split-window algorithm involving ocean sun glint data to retrieve reflectivity of FY-3D/MERSI-2 channels 20. The results show that the variation range of sea surface reflectivity of channel 20 in the glint area is 10~25%, the mean value of the reflectivity difference obtained by the nonlinear split-window algorithm is 0.27%, and the RMSE is 0.0066. Among the main influencing factors, the atmospheric conditions have the greatest impact, and the effects of the uncertainties in the water vapor content and aerosol optical thickness on the calculation results are 1.16% and 0.34%, respectively. The initial value limits of the mid-infrared sea surface reflectivity also contribute approximately 0.84%, and their contribution to the uncertainty represents one of the main components. This work shows that the nonlinear split-window algorithm can calculate the infrared sea surface reflectivity with high accuracy and can be used as a reference for in-orbit cross-calibration between different bands. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Location of study area; (<b>b</b>) true color composite image of sun glint over the deep ocean; (<b>c</b>) map of brightness temperatures at the top of the atmosphere of the channel 20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Transit time of the samples; (<b>b</b>) blackbody brightness temperature of the samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Technical framework of the study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Radiance received by the satellite sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The sea surface bidirectional reflectivity fitting relationship of mid-infrared channels 20 and 21.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Polynomial fitting Equation (14) coefficient a1. (<b>b</b>) Polynomial fitting Equation (14) coefficient a2. (<b>c</b>) Polynomial fitting Equation(14) coefficient a3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Bidirectional reflectivity of the channel 20 in the sun glint over the sea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) Difference between the reflectance calculated using the emissivity library and the sea surface temperature product and the reflectance calculated using the model in December 2018. (<b>B</b>) Difference between the reflectance calculated using the emissivity library and the sea surface temperature product and the reflectance calculated using the model in December 2019. (<b>C</b>) Difference between the reflectance calculated using the emissivity library and the sea surface temperature product and the reflectance calculated using the model in December 2020. (<b>D</b>) The absolute value of the difference of 176 samples (<b>E</b>) the mean value of the difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Mid-infrared channel transmittance; (<b>b</b>) spectral response function of FY-3D/MERSI-2 channels 20 and 21.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of water vapor, VIS, and VZA on transmittance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Effect of water vapor and horizontal visibility changes on reflectance calculation results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Effect of the first hypothesis on the calculation of reflectivity; (<b>b</b>) effect of the second hypothesis on the calculation of reflectivity.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2091 KiB  
Article
Design of a Compact Transfer Radiometer for a Radiometric Benchmark Transfer Chain
by Kaichao Lei, Xin Ye, Zhiwei Xia, Nan Xu, Shuqi Li, Yachao Zhang, Yuwei Wang, Zhiwei Liu and Zhigang Li
Sensors 2022, 22(18), 6795; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22186795 - 8 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1610
Abstract
In order to meet the high-accuracy calibration requirements of satellite remote sensing instruments, a transfer radiometer for an on-orbit radiometric benchmark transfer chain has been developed, which provides vital technical support for realizing the radiometric calibration uncertainty of the order of 10−3 [...] Read more.
In order to meet the high-accuracy calibration requirements of satellite remote sensing instruments, a transfer radiometer for an on-orbit radiometric benchmark transfer chain has been developed, which provides vital technical support for realizing the radiometric calibration uncertainty of the order of 10−3 for remote sensing instruments. The primary role of the transfer radiometer is to convert from the spectral power responsivity traceable to a cryogenic radiometer to the spectral radiance responsivity and transfer it to the imaging spectrometer. At a wavelength of 852.1 nm, the combined uncertainty of the radiance measurement comparison experiment between the transfer radiometer and a radiance meter is 0.43% (k = 1), and the relative deviation of the measurements between the transfer radiometer and the radiance meter is better than 0.36%, which is better than the combined uncertainty of the radiance measurement comparison experiment. This demonstrates that the transfer radiometer can achieve radiance measurements with a measurement uncertainty better than 0.3% (k = 1). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic of radiance measurement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of FOV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sectional view of the transfer radiometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Picture of the transfer radiometer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for the power responsivity calibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for the radiance measurement comparison.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 5994 KiB  
Article
On-Orbit Characterization of TanSat Instrument Line Shape Using Observed Solar Spectra
by Zhaonan Cai, Kang Sun, Dongxu Yang, Yi Liu, Lu Yao, Chao Lin and Xiong Liu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(14), 3334; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143334 - 11 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1620
Abstract
The Chinese carbon dioxide measurement satellite (TanSat) has collected a large number of measurements in the solar calibration mode. To improve the accuracy of XCO2 retrieval, the Instrument Line Shape (ILS, also known as the slit function) must be accurately determined. In this [...] Read more.
The Chinese carbon dioxide measurement satellite (TanSat) has collected a large number of measurements in the solar calibration mode. To improve the accuracy of XCO2 retrieval, the Instrument Line Shape (ILS, also known as the slit function) must be accurately determined. In this study, we characterized the on-orbit ILS of TanSat by fitting measured solar irradiance from 2017 to 2018 with a well-calibrated high-spectral-resolution solar reference spectrum. We used various advanced analytical functions and the stretch/sharpen of the tabulated preflight ILS to represent the ILS for each wavelength window, footprint, and band. Using super Gaussian+P7 and the stretch/sharpen functions substantially reduced the fitting residual in O2 A-band and weak CO2 band compared with using the preflight ILS. We found that the difference between the derived ILS width and on-ground preflight ILS was up to −3.5% in the weak CO2 band, depending on footprint and wavelength. The large amplitude of the ILS wings, depending on the wavelength, footprint, and bands, indicated possible uncorrected stray light. Broadening ILS wings will cause additive offset (filling-in) on the deep absorption lines of the spectra, which we confirmed using offline bias correction of the solar-induced fluorescence retrieval. We estimated errors due to the imperfect ILS using simulated TanSat spectra. The results of the simulations showed that XCO2 retrieval is sensitive to errors in the ILS, and 4% uncertainty in the full width of half maximum (FWHM) or 20% uncertainty in the ILS wings can induce an error of up to 1 ppm in the XCO2 retrieval. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue China's First Dedicated Carbon Satellite Mission (TanSat))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>TanSat mean solar spectrum at (<b>a</b>) O2A, (<b>b</b>) WCO2, and (<b>c</b>) SCO2 bands, and comparison with the reference solar spectra convolved with TanSat ILS. TanSat solar measurements were from footprint 4 on 1 March 2017.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Examples of tabulated preflight ILS of TanSat for the O2A band (pixel 620 in spectral direction, ∼768.6 nm), WCO2 band (pixel 240, ∼1608.8 nm), and SCO2 band (pixel 240, ∼2060.3 nm) (upper panel). The lower panel depicts the same but in log y scale. Nine footprints are shown in different colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Preflight ILS, retrieved ILS using stretch/sharpen, super Gaussian+P7, and asymmetric super Gaussian function at 758 nm for footprint 1; (<b>b</b>) the same as for (<b>a</b>) but at 1596 nm and (<b>c</b>) at 2066 nm. FWHM (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ω</mi> </semantics></math>) for each type of ILS function is shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) FWHM of retrieved ILS as a function of wavelength for three TanSat bands at footprint 1 on 1 March 2017. The black line denotes preflight ILS FWHM. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) Average fitting residual of each fitting window using four different ILS functions. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) Similar to (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) but for the fitting residual at each wavelength.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) FWHM and (<b>b</b>) average fitting residual of retrieved ILS using four ILS functions for the O2A band at footprint 1 and fitting window 1 over time. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Similar to (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) but for fitting window 6, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) FWHM and (<b>b</b>) average fitting residual of retrieved ILS using four ILS functions for the WCO2 band at footprint 1 and fitting window 1 over time. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Similar to (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) but for fitting window 6, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variation in relative difference between FWHM derived using stretch/sharpen function and preflight FWHM in fitting windows at the O2A band for all footprints. Dotted line represents 0%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Similar to <a href="#remotesensing-14-03334-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a> but for 6 fitting windows at the WCO2 band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Sharpen term over time for window 6 in the O2A band and window 5 in the WCO2 band.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Time series of (<b>a</b>) SIF offset correction derived at 145 W m<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> </semantics></math>sr<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow/> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>m<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </semantics></math>. Filling-in offset derived using (<b>b</b>) preflight ILS and (<b>c</b>) stretch/sharpen ILS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Estimation of XCO2 retrieval error due to FWHM and sharpen term uncertainties using synthetic TanSat measurements. Reflectance was modeled with: surface albedo = 0.05, solar zenith angle = 30, and viewing zenith angle = 0.1.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 7738 KiB  
Article
SNPP VIIRS Day Night Band: Ten Years of On-Orbit Calibration and Performance
by Hongda Chen, Chengbo Sun, Xiaoxiong Xiong, Gal Sarid and Junqiang Sun
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(20), 4179; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204179 - 19 Oct 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2841
Abstract
Aboard the polar-orbiting SNPP satellite, the VIIRS instrument has been in operation since launch in October 2011. It is a visible and infrared radiometer with a unique panchromatic channel capability designated as a day-night band (DNB). This channel covers wavelengths from 0.5 to [...] Read more.
Aboard the polar-orbiting SNPP satellite, the VIIRS instrument has been in operation since launch in October 2011. It is a visible and infrared radiometer with a unique panchromatic channel capability designated as a day-night band (DNB). This channel covers wavelengths from 0.5 to 0.9 µm and is designed with a near-constant spatial resolution for Earth observations 24 h a day. The DNB operates at 3 gain stages (low, middle, and high) to cover a large dynamic range. An onboard solar diffuser (SD) is used for calibration in the low gain stage, and to enable the derivation of gain ratios between the different stages. In this paper, we present the SNPP VIIRS DNB calibration performed by the NASA VIIRS characterization support team (VCST). The DNB calibration algorithms are described to generate the calibration coefficient look up tables (LUTs) for the latest NASA Level 1B Collection 2 products. We provide an evaluation of DNB on-orbit calibration performance. This activity supports the NASA Earth science community by delivering consistent VIIRS sensor data products via the Land Science Investigator-led Processing Systems, including the SD degradation applied for DNB calibrations in detector gain and gain ratio trending. The DNB stray light contamination and its correction are highlighted. Performance validations are presented using comparisons to the calibration methods employed by NOAA’s operational Interface Data Processing Segment. Further work on stray light corrections is also discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Pre-launch and on-orbit modulated DNB RSR. 3 February 2012, 1 March 2015, and 20 June 2021 present the first, the fifth and the tenth year in operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>VIIRS SD degradation at five times during the mission as marked by the orbit numbers. Different colors denote different orbits. The DNB wavelength coverage is shaded in green.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>DNB daily averaged LGS F-factor trending at two aggregation modes (mode-1 and mode-15). Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Ratio trend of DNB middle-to-low using SD <span class="html-italic">dn</span> signals at two aggregation modes (mode-1 and mode-15). Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Ratio trend of DNB high-to-middle using SD <span class="html-italic">dn</span> signals at two aggregation modes (mode-1 and mode-15). Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>DNB dark signals of Mode-1 in LGS and MGS. Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>DNB dark signals of HGS-A and HGS-B in mode-1 and mode-15. Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>DNB SNR trend for HGS-B in two aggregation modes (mode-1 and mode-15). Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Recent 3-month averaged SNR versus Modes in HGS-B for HAM-1. Different colors are used to plot the DNB 16 detectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>An illustration of stray light correction in bin-6: three detectors are presented in different colors. For each detector, the top noisy curve represents its raw signal. The smooth curve underneath the raw signal is its stray light estimate. After stray light correction, the signal is shown at the bottom.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SNPP DNB images from 11 April 2021, 1:40 GMT. Images before/after stray light correction are located middle and right, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>SNPP and NOAA-20 VIIRS DNB F-factor comparisons in the case of LGS mode-1 at HAM-1. DNB 16 detectors are plotted in different colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>VCST and IDPS SNPP DNB F-factor comparisons in the case of LGS mode-1 at HAM-1. DNB 16 detectors are plotted in different symbols/colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>SNPP VIIRS DNB stray light patterns in 10 years. Left charts are examples from the northern hemisphere, and right charts are examples from the southern hemisphere.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5271 KiB  
Article
S-NPP VIIRS Thermal Emissive Bands 10-Year On-Orbit Calibration and Performance
by Carlos L. Pérez Díaz, Xiaoxiong Xiong, Yonghong Li and Kwofu Chiang
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(19), 3917; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193917 - 30 Sep 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2623
Abstract
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership Program (S-NPP) satellite, launched in late 2011, has reached the decade landmark under successful operations. VIIRS has 22 spectral bands, 7 of which are thermal emissive bands (TEB) that cover [...] Read more.
The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) onboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership Program (S-NPP) satellite, launched in late 2011, has reached the decade landmark under successful operations. VIIRS has 22 spectral bands, 7 of which are thermal emissive bands (TEB) that cover the 3.70 to 11.84 μm wavelength range. Over the years, VIIRS TEB observations have been used to generate several data products (e.g., surface/cloud/atmospheric temperatures, cloud top altitude, and water vapor properties). The VIIRS TEB calibration uses a quadratic algorithm and is referenced to an on-board blackbody with temperature measurements traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology standard. This manuscript provides an overview of the VIIRS instrument operations and TEB calibration activities and algorithms used in the level 1B data and describes the TEB on-orbit performance for S-NPP VIIRS. The 10-year on-orbit performance of the S-NPP VIIRS TEB has generally been stable, and the degradations in the S-NPP TEB detector responses are minor after a decade in orbit. The noise characterization performance repeatedly meets the design requirements for all TEB detectors as well. On-orbit changes in the TEB response-versus-scan-angle, based on pitch maneuver observations, have been demonstrated to be extremely small. Moreover, multiple time series over select ground targets have shown that the sensor’s on-orbit performance is quite stable. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>VIIRS FPAs: VIS/NIR, S/ MWIR, and LWIR. The VIIRS band layout is in the scan direction. The M- and I-bands have 16 and 32 detectors in the track direction, respectively. Values at the top of the figure represent each band’s position in M-band sampling interval units relative to the focal plane reference axis. These values also define the relative number of samples removed at the EV beginning-of-scan for alignment. The Day-Night Band illustrates four detector arrays in three gain stages and is not to scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>S-NPP VIIRS BB (<b>a</b>) temperature and (<b>b</b>) uniformity with requirement (red line) throughout an entire WUCD operation from 15 March to 17 March 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>S-NPP VIIRS (<b>a</b>) average BB temperature and (<b>b</b>) BB uniformity for three orbits on 1 February 2021. Horizontal red line represents the BB uniformity requirement of 30 mK. Values are on a per scan basis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>S-NPP VIIRS (<b>a</b>) BB temperature; (<b>b</b>) inputs to the thermal model: HAM, RTA, scan cavity (CAV), and BB shield (SH) temperatures; (<b>c</b>) electronics (ASP) and instrument opto-mech module (OMM) temperatures; and (<b>d</b>) cold FPAs temperatures over the entire mission. Values are daily-averaged.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Schematic simplification of the RTA as it rotates and views the sectors (with their respective scan angles) used for the VIIRS TEB calibration. Not to scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>S-NPP VIIRS TEB band-averaged gains (1/F-factor) during nominal operations over the entire mission. Values are normalized to 20 January 2012. Only HAM-side A is illustrated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>S-NPP VIIRS bands (<b>a</b>) I4 (detector 16, Product Order) and (<b>b</b>) M14 (detector 8, Product Order) normalized F-factors during nominal operations on 1 February 2021. Values are shown on a granule-averaged and scan-by-scan basis and are normalized to the first data point of the day. Only HAM-side A is illustrated. Note: Throughout this paper, the detectors are listed/numbered in Product Order. This means that the highest numbered detector (e.g., detector 16 for the M-bands and detector 32 for the I-bands) of a given scan is adjacent to detector 1 in the next scan. This is opposite to the prelaunch numbering convention (also known as Santa Barbara Remote Sensing (SBRS) Order), which is reversed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>S-NPP VIIRS bands I4 (detector 16, Product Order) and M14 (detector 8, Product Order) F-factors and BB temperature during WUCD event performed from 15 March to 17 March 2021. Values shown are granule-averaged. Only the F-factors for HAM-side A are illustrated. The M14 F-factors were shifted upward by 2.75% so that these can be in the same range as the I4 F-factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>S-NPP VIIRS TEB band-averaged NEdT/Spec. during nominal operations (BB temperature at ~ 292.7 K) over the entire mission. Only HAM-side A is illustrated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>S-NPP VIIRS TEB band-averaged on-orbit-derived (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <msub> <mrow/> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <msub> <mrow/> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <msub> <mrow/> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>o</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) calibration coefficients for (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) I4, (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) I5, (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) M12, (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) M13, (<b>m</b>–<b>o</b>) M14, (<b>p</b>–<b>r</b>) M15, and (<b>s</b>–<b>u</b>) M16 over the entire mission. Results are separated into WU and CD processes. Prelaunch coefficients are also included and defined by horizontal black lines. Only HAM-side A is illustrated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>S-NPP VIIRS pitch-to-prelaunch RVS ratios for all TEB. Results are averaged for HAM-side A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>S-NPP VIIRS bands M13 and M15 BT and in situ SST over ocean scene near Hawaii Islands. Results between VIIRS and SST are collocated in space and coincident in time. The brightness temperatures for the VIIRS bands are monthly-averaged. The in situ SST are nighttime observations only. Time series start on 20 January 2012. Data gaps in SST observations are due to outages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>S-NPP VIIRS-IASI BT difference (ΔBT) time series for bands M13 and M15 at IASI-simulated M15 BT centered at 220 K, 240 K, and 260 K (described by different colors) with bin sizes of ±5 K. Empty symbols define IASI-A, while filled symbols represent IASI-C. Brightness temperature units are in Kelvin.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 9432 KiB  
Article
Pre-Launch Radiometric Characterization of EMI-2 on the GaoFen-5 Series of Satellites
by Minjie Zhao, Fuqi Si, Haijin Zhou, Yu Jiang, Chunyan Ji, Shimei Wang, Kai Zhan and Wenqing Liu
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(14), 2843; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142843 - 20 Jul 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3050
Abstract
The environmental trace gas monitoring instrument (EMI) is a space-borne imaging spectrometer onboard GaoFen-5, which was launched in May 2018, covering wavelengths in the range of 240–710 nm to measure NO2, O3, HCHO, and SO2. An advanced [...] Read more.
The environmental trace gas monitoring instrument (EMI) is a space-borne imaging spectrometer onboard GaoFen-5, which was launched in May 2018, covering wavelengths in the range of 240–710 nm to measure NO2, O3, HCHO, and SO2. An advanced EMI-2 instrument with a higher spatial resolution and sufficient signal-to-noise is currently planned for launch on the GaoFen-5(02) satellite in 2021. The EMI-2 instrument bidirectional scattering distribution function (BSDF) is obtained from the absolute irradiance and radiance calibration on-ground. Based on EMI-2 earth and sun optical paths, the key factors of BSDF parameters are introduced. An NIST-calibrated 1000 W FEL quartz tungsten halogen lamp and a 2D turntable are adopted for the absolute irradiance calibration. A large aperture integrating sphere system is used for the absolute radiance calibration. Based on absolute irradiance and radiance calibration functions, the BSDF parameters are obtained, with accuracy of 4.9% for UV1, 4.3% for UV2, 4.1% for VIS1, and 4.2% for VIS2. The on-ground measurement results show that the reflectance spectrum can be calculated from BSDF parameters. On-orbit application of the EMI-2 instrument BSDF are also discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Atmospheric Remote Sensing)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Optical layout of EMI-2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Absolute irradiance calibration system of EMI-2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Absolute radiance calibration system of EMI-2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic of EMI-2 experimental setup. The observation target includes walls, fences, weeds, and tree trunks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Onboard diffuser BRDF at 355 nm: (<b>a</b>) F4 and (<b>b</b>) QVD with the zenith angle and azimuth angle of incident light varying from 22°–44° and 118°–150°, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optical transmission ratio of sun and earth paths.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Wavelength maps for UV1, UV2, VIS1, and VIS2 channels, where horizontal and vertical directions are spectral and spatial dimensions, respectively. The spectral smile (the wavelengths at the center pixels of imaging spectrometer detector array are different from the marginal pixels) is visible in wavelength maps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Calculated distance offsets. (<b>a</b>) at lamp incident angle 20° with distance from lamp to diffuser center 30, 40, and 50 cm; (<b>b</b>) at distance 30 cm with lamp incident angles 30°, 20°, and 15°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Lamp images via F4 (<b>a</b>) and QVD (<b>b</b>) diffuser in VIS1 channel, where horizontal and vertical directions are spectral and spatial dimensions, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Absolute irradiance calibration function results for the nominal azimuth (22°) and elevation (0°) angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Absolute irradiance calibration function results for the nominal azimuth (22°) and elevation (0°) angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Absolute irradiance calibration function results for the nominal azimuth (22°) and elevation (0°) angles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>EMI-2 instrument BSDF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>EMI-2 instrument BSDF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Linear fitting results of EMI-2 response.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>Linear fitting results of EMI-2 response.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Radiance (<b>a</b>) and irradiance (<b>b</b>) measured by EMI-2. Note that quartz window transmittance and plane mirror reflectivity are involved in the measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>): Output digital number of Earth and Sun ports, (<b>b</b>): observation target reflectance spectrum after smoothing. Note that quartz window transmittance and plane mirror reflectivity are involved in the measurements.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 4659 KiB  
Article
S-NPP VIIRS Day Night Band On-Board Solar Diffuser Calibration Validation Using the Scheduled Lunar Collections
by Taeyoung Choi and Changyong Cao
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(6), 1093; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061093 - 13 Mar 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2915
Abstract
Similar to the Reflective Solar Band (RSB) calibration, Suomi-National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on-board calibration of Day Night Band (DNB) is based on the Solar Diffuser (SD) observations in the Low Gain State (LGS). DNB has a broad [...] Read more.
Similar to the Reflective Solar Band (RSB) calibration, Suomi-National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) on-board calibration of Day Night Band (DNB) is based on the Solar Diffuser (SD) observations in the Low Gain State (LGS). DNB has a broad spectral response covering a wavelength range roughly from 500 nm to 900 nm with a large dynamic range from three different gain states called High Gain State (HGS), Mid Gain State (MGS), and LGS. The calibration of MGS and HGS is also dependent on the LGS gain estimation with the gain ratios for each gain state. Over the lifetime of S-NPP VIIRS operations, the LGS gains have been derived from the on-board SD observations since its launch in October 2011. In this study, the lifetime LGS gains are validated by the lunar calibration coefficients (defined as F-factors) using a lunar irradiance model called Global Space-based Inter-Calibration System (GSICS) Implementation of RObotic Lunar Observatory (ROLO) (GIRO). Using the moon as an independent on-orbit calibration source, the S-NPP VIIRS DNB on-board SD based radiometric calibration is validated by the lunar F-factors within two percent of the lunar F-factors in terms of the standard deviation in the long-term trends over nine years of the S-NPP VIIRS operation. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>S-NPP VIIRS DNB and visible (VIS)/near-infrared (NIR) Focal Plane Assembly (FPA) sub-detector and detector layout [<a href="#B3-remotesensing-13-01093" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A simplified schematic of S-NPP VIIRS and on-board calibrators [<a href="#B3-remotesensing-13-01093" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A simplified Rotating Telescope Assembly (RTA) scan angle at each view [<a href="#B3-remotesensing-13-01093" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A scheduled lunar collection on 4 April 2020. (<b>a</b>) shows the raw Digital Number (DN) image and (<b>b</b>) shows the pixel gain states selected by the on-board DNB processor. The black, gray, and white areas represent HGS, MGS, and LGS, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Radiance image of the scheduled lunar collection on 4 April 2020.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The GIRO compulsory option diagram described in the GSICS Lunar Calibration website at (<a href="http://gsics.atmos.umd.edu/bin/view/Development/LunarWorkArea" target="_blank">http://gsics.atmos.umd.edu/bin/view/Development/LunarWorkArea</a>) (accessed on 11 March 2021).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Time-dependent RTA darkening due to Tungsten oxides on the mirror surface (<b>a</b>) and corresponding modulated Relative Spectral Response (RSR) (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>DNB LGS gain from the SD observations (<b>a</b>) and The DNB RSR FWHM change over time (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The VIIRS observed mean lunar radiance. Independent linear fits are performed before and after the 1500 Days Since Launch (DSL).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Lunar phase angles (<b>a</b>) and the distance between moon and satellite (<b>b</b>) for the scheduled lunar collections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Lunar observed and GIRO irradiances (<b>a</b>) and the corresponding lunar F-factors (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2679 KiB  
Technical Note
First Evaluation of PRISMA Level 1 Data for Water Applications
by Claudia Giardino, Mariano Bresciani, Federica Braga, Alice Fabbretto, Nicola Ghirardi, Monica Pepe, Marco Gianinetto, Roberto Colombo, Sergio Cogliati, Semhar Ghebrehiwot, Marnix Laanen, Steef Peters, Thomas Schroeder, Javier A. Concha and Vittorio E. Brando
Sensors 2020, 20(16), 4553; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164553 - 14 Aug 2020
Cited by 55 | Viewed by 8585
Abstract
This study presents a first assessment of the Top-Of-Atmosphere (TOA) radiances measured in the visible and near-infrared (VNIR) wavelengths from PRISMA (PRecursore IperSpettrale della Missione Applicativa), the new hyperspectral satellite sensor of the Italian Space Agency in orbit since March 2019. In particular, [...] Read more.
This study presents a first assessment of the Top-Of-Atmosphere (TOA) radiances measured in the visible and near-infrared (VNIR) wavelengths from PRISMA (PRecursore IperSpettrale della Missione Applicativa), the new hyperspectral satellite sensor of the Italian Space Agency in orbit since March 2019. In particular, the radiometrically calibrated PRISMA Level 1 TOA radiances were compared to the TOA radiances simulated with a radiative transfer code, starting from in situ measurements of water reflectance. In situ data were obtained from a set of fixed position autonomous radiometers covering a wide range of water types, encompassing coastal and inland waters. A total of nine match-ups between PRISMA and in situ measurements distributed from July 2019 to June 2020 were analysed. Recognising the role of Sentinel-2 for inland and coastal waters applications, the TOA radiances measured from concurrent Sentinel-2 observations were added to the comparison. The results overall demonstrated that PRISMA VNIR sensor is providing TOA radiances with the same magnitude and shape of those in situ simulated (spectral angle difference, SA, between 0.80 and 3.39; root mean square difference, RMSD, between 0.98 and 4.76 [mW m−2 sr−1 nm−1]), with slightly larger differences at shorter wavelengths. The PRISMA TOA radiances were also found very similar to Sentinel-2 data (RMSD < 3.78 [mW m−2 sr−1 nm−1]), and encourage a synergic use of both sensors for aquatic applications. Further analyses with a higher number of match-ups between PRISMA, in situ and Sentinel-2 data are however recommended to fully characterize the on-orbit calibration of PRISMA for its exploitation in aquatic ecosystem mapping. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of the Earth)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Distribution of in situ dataset: red dots are for AERONET-OC sites, blue dot is for PANTHYR site (colocated with the AERONET-OC AAOT Venice), and yellow diamond is for the WISPStation site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>TOA radiances measured by PRISMA and Sentinel-2/MSI (S2), and simulated with 6SV (labelled as in situ). Symbol * means that Sentinel-2 and PRISMA overpasses occurred on the same day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Scatterplots of TOA radiances from PRISMA (x-axis) vs. 6SV simulations (y-axis) for common bands. Blue dots are indicating the comparison for AERONET-OC sites, green for WISPStation and yellow for PANTHYR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scatterplots of TOA radiances from PRISMA (x-axis) vs. 6SV simulations from in situ data (y-axis) and PRISMA (x-axis) for the nine test sites. The plots are generated for wavelengths (in nm) of the six bands which are common to all in situ data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatterplots of TOA radiances from PRISMA (x-axis) vs. Sentinel-2/MSI (y-axis) for the eight match-ups (corresponding to five sites, i.e., all save Lucinda). Diamonds in blue highlight when PRISMA and Sentinel-2/MSI were acquired on the same day, diamonds in red stand for +/− 1 day mismatch.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4417 KiB  
Article
The Moon as a Climate-Quality Radiometric Calibration Reference
by Thomas C. Stone, Hugh Kieffer, Constantine Lukashin and Kevin Turpie
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(11), 1837; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111837 - 5 Jun 2020
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 4243
Abstract
On-orbit calibration requirements for a space-based climate observing system include long-term sensor response stability and reliable inter-calibration of multiple sensors, both contemporaneous and in succession. The difficulties with achieving these for reflected solar wavelength instruments are well known. The Moon can be considered [...] Read more.
On-orbit calibration requirements for a space-based climate observing system include long-term sensor response stability and reliable inter-calibration of multiple sensors, both contemporaneous and in succession. The difficulties with achieving these for reflected solar wavelength instruments are well known. The Moon can be considered a diffuse reflector of sunlight, and its exceptional photometric stability has enabled development of a lunar radiometric reference, manifest as a model that is queried for the specific conditions of Moon observations. The lunar irradiance model developed by the Robotic Lunar Observatory (ROLO) project has adequate precision for sensor response temporal trending, but a climate-quality lunar reference will require at least an order of magnitude improvement in absolute accuracy. To redevelop the lunar calibration reference with sub-percent uncertainty and SI traceability requires collecting new, high-accuracy Moon characterization measurements. This paper describes specifications for such measurements, along with a conceptual framework for reconstructing the lunar reference using them. Three currently active NASA-sponsored projects have objectives to acquire measurements that can support a climate-quality lunar reference: air-LUSI, dedicated lunar spectral irradiance measurements from the NASA ER-2 high altitude aircraft; ARCSTONE, dedicated lunar spectral reflectance measurements from a small satellite; and Moon viewing opportunities by CLARREO Pathfinder from the International Space Station. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometric observation parameter coverages for the ROLO data that were used to construct the USGS lunar irradiance model. The dot symbols represent sequences of images acquired in all 32 ROLO bands; ∼1200 such sequences are represented here. (<b>a</b>) Lunar disk reflectance phase curve for the ROLO 555 nm band, showing phase angle coverage and the bimodal waxing/waning distribution. (<b>b</b>) Lunar libration coverage, plotted as selenographic sub-observer longitude and latitude coordinates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of fitting the representative lunar reflectance spectrum (blue line) to the model-generated disk reflectance outputs of Equation (<a href="#FD4-remotesensing-12-01837" class="html-disp-formula">4</a>) (square symbols).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of air-LUSI instrument components and their placement in the ER-2 wing pod.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Layout of the ARCSTONE sensor components (<b>a</b>) and the instrument packaging into a 6U CubeSat bus (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Concept diagram of the CLARREO Pathfinder instrument and its installation location on the International Space Station at Express Logistics Carrier 1, Site 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results of a simulation of Moon viewing opportunities by CLARREO Pathfinder from the ISS ELC-1 Site 3. Potential observations of 4 min or longer duration are represented as colored dots.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop