Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (334)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = hydrodynamic imaging

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 6687 KiB  
Article
Pea Protein—ĸ-Carrageenan Nanoparticles for Edible Pickering Emulsions
by Galia Hendel, Noy Hen, Shulamit Levenberg and Havazelet Bianco-Peled
Polysaccharides 2025, 6(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/polysaccharides6010014 - 17 Feb 2025
Viewed by 71
Abstract
Pickering emulsions (PEs) can be utilized as inks for 3D food printing owing to their extensive stability and appropriate viscoelastic properties. This research explores food-grade PEs stabilized with nanoparticles (NPs) based on modified pea protein (PP) isolate and k-carrageenan (KC). NPs are fabricated [...] Read more.
Pickering emulsions (PEs) can be utilized as inks for 3D food printing owing to their extensive stability and appropriate viscoelastic properties. This research explores food-grade PEs stabilized with nanoparticles (NPs) based on modified pea protein (PP) isolate and k-carrageenan (KC). NPs are fabricated from solutions with different concentrations of protein and polysaccharide and characterized in terms of size, zeta potential, and wetting properties. The composition of the emulsion is 60% sunflower oil and 40% aqueous phase. Nine emulsion formulations with varying PP and KC concentrations are investigated. The formation of hollow NPs with a hydrodynamic diameter of 120–250 nm is observed. Microscope imaging shows oil droplets surrounded by a continuous aqueous phase, forming homogenous PEs in all formulations that are stable for over 30 days. Further, the oil droplet size decreases with increasing NP concentration while the viscosity increases. Rheologic experiments portray elastic emulsion gels with thixotropic qualities ascribed to the presence of the polysaccharide. The emulsions are subjected to centrifugation in order to compare the original emulsions to concentrated PEs that possess improved capabilities. These emulsions may serve as sustainable and printable saturated fat alternatives due to their composition, texture, stability, and rheological properties. Lastly, PEs are printed smoothly and precisely while maintaining a self-supported structure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Mean hydrodynamic diameter and (<b>B</b>) zeta potential. Different letters within the same graph indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Cryo-TEM images: (<b>A</b>,<b>C</b>) P1K0.25, and (<b>B</b>) P2K0.25. Scale bar 100 [nm].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Three-phase contact angle measurements of NPs with different compositions. (<b>B</b>) Surface tension. Different letters within the same graph indicate a significant difference (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05) in surface tension.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FTIR spectra of NPs formed from solutions with 3% (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>) PP with 0.25–0.5% KC (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>), compared to the spectra of PP and KC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Oil concentration series: (<b>A</b>) Emulsions after preparation, (<b>B</b>) after one week, (<b>C</b>) after two weeks, and (<b>D</b>) after one month. NPs concentration P2K0.25, oil volume fraction φ = 20–70% (<span class="html-italic">v</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>). Stored at 4 °C. Emulsions circled in red exhibit phase separation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Series of the concentration of solids: (<b>A</b>) Emulsions after preparation, (<b>B</b>) after one week, (<b>C</b>) after two weeks, and (<b>D</b>) after one month. Oil volume fraction φ = 60% (<span class="html-italic">v</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>), PP = 1%, 2%, and 3% (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>), KC = 0.0, 0.25, and 0.5% (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>). Stored at 4 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CLSM images of emulsions of different concentrations (<b>A</b>) as-prepared and (<b>B</b>) after undergoing centrifugation. The scale bar represents 20 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Size analysis of oil droplets at a KC concentration of (<b>A</b>) 0.0% (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>), (<b>B</b>) 0.25% (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>), and (<b>C</b>) 0.5% (<span class="html-italic">w</span>/<span class="html-italic">v</span>), as prepared (light blue) and after centrifugation (dark blue). Different letters within the same graph indicate significant differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Amplitude sweeps of PEs as-prepared and after applying centrifugation: G′ (full symbols) and G″ (open symbols) as a function of strain. (<b>A</b>) PEs stabilized P3K0 NPs: as-prepared (light blue) and after centrifugation (dark blue). (<b>B</b>) As-prepared PEs stabilized with P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (gray) NPs, (<b>C</b>) As-prepared PEs stabilized with P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (gray) NPs (<b>D</b>) PEs stabilized with P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (gray) NPs after centrifugation. (<b>E</b>) PEs stabilized with P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (gray) NPs after centrifugation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Frequency sweep of PEs as-prepared and after applying centrifugation. G′ (full symbols) and G″ (open symbols) as a function of angular frequency. (<b>A</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0 NPs, as-prepared (light blue) and after centrifugation (dark blue). (<b>B</b>) As-prepared PEs stabilized by P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (gray) NPs. (<b>C</b>) As-prepared PEs stabilized by P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (gray) NPs. (<b>D</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (gray) NPs after centrifugation. (<b>E</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (gray) NPs after centrifugation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Viscosity of as-prepared emulsions compared to the same formulations after centrifugation (AC). (<b>A</b>) PEs P3K0 (blue), P2K0 (green), or P1K0 (grey) NPs. (<b>B</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (grey) NPs. (<b>C</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (grey) NPs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Shear recovery of PEs as-prepared and after applying centrifugation: G′ (full symbols) and G″ (open symbols) as a function of time. (<b>A</b>) PEs stabilized with P3K0 NPs: as-prepared (light blue) and after centrifugation (dark blue). (<b>B</b>) As-prepared PEs stabilized P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (gray) NPs. (<b>C</b>) As-prepared PEs stabilized by P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (gray) NPs. (<b>D</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0.25 (blue), P2K0.25 (green), or P1K0.25 (gray) NPs after centrifugation. (<b>E</b>) PEs stabilized by P3K0.5 (blue), P2K0.5 (green), or P1K0.5 (gray) NPs after centrifugation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>A</b>) Representation of continuous filament extrusion using PE bioink. (<b>B</b>) 3D printing of rectilinear grids: 10·10 mm (left) and 20·20 mm (right). (<b>C</b>) computer-aided design (CAD) of the printed structures; scale bar 5 mm. (<b>D</b>) The obtained printed structures of as-prepared PE and (<b>E</b>) 3D printed PE after centrifugation. PEs are stabilized with P3K0.5 NPs, scale bar: 10 mm. (<b>F</b>) Calculation of the Pr index and fidelity parameters of as-prepared PEs compared to emulsions after centrifugation (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 5), * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 3412 KiB  
Article
New Cyclam-Based Fe(III) Complexes Coatings Targeting Cobetia marina Biofilms
by Fábio M. Carvalho, Luciana C. Gomes, Rita Teixeira-Santos, Ana P. Carapeto, Filipe J. Mergulhão, Stephanie Almada, Elisabete R. Silva and Luis G. Alves
Molecules 2025, 30(4), 917; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040917 - 16 Feb 2025
Viewed by 204
Abstract
Recent research efforts to mitigate the burden of biofouling in marine environments have focused on the development of environmentally friendly coatings that can provide long-lasting protective effects. In this study, the antifouling performance of novel polyurethane (PU)-based coatings containing cyclam-based Fe(III) complexes against [...] Read more.
Recent research efforts to mitigate the burden of biofouling in marine environments have focused on the development of environmentally friendly coatings that can provide long-lasting protective effects. In this study, the antifouling performance of novel polyurethane (PU)-based coatings containing cyclam-based Fe(III) complexes against Cobetia marina biofilm formation was investigated. Biofilm assays were performed over 42 days under controlled hydrodynamic conditions that mimicked marine environments. Colony-forming units (CFU) determination and flow cytometric (FC) analysis showed that PU-coated surfaces incorporating 1 wt.% of complexes with formula [{R2(4-CF3PhCH2)2Cyclam}FeCl2]Cl (R = H, HOCH2CH2CH2) significantly reduced both culturable and total cells of C. marina biofilms up to 50% (R = H) and 38% (R = HOCH2CH2CH2) compared to PU-coated surface without complexes (control surface). The biofilm architecture was further analyzed using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), which showed that biofilms formed on the PU-coated surfaces containing cyclam-based Fe(III) complexes exhibited a significantly reduced thickness (58–61% reduction), biovolume (50–60% reduction), porosity (95–97% reduction), and contour coefficient (77% reduction) compared to the control surface, demonstrating a more uniform and compact structure. These findings were also supported by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) images, which showed a decrease in biofilm surface coverage on PU-coated surfaces containing cyclam-based Fe(III) complexes. Moreover, FC analysis revealed that exposure to PU-coated surfaces increases bacterial metabolic activity and induces ROS production. These results underscore the potential of these complexes to incorporate PU-coated surfaces as bioactive additives in coatings to effectively deter long-term bacterial colonization in marine environments, thereby addressing biofouling-related challenges. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Chemical structure of [{H<sub>2</sub>(<sup>4-CF3</sup>PhCH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cyclam}FeCl<sub>2</sub>]Cl (<b>FeCy-1</b>) and [{(HOCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(<sup>4-CF3</sup>PhCH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Cyclam}FeCl<sub>2</sub>]Cl (<b>FeCy-2</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Culturable and (<b>b</b>) total cells of <span class="html-italic">C. marina</span> biofilms formed on <b>PU</b> (control), <b>PU/FeCy-1</b>, and <b>PU/FeCy-2</b> surfaces after 42 days. The asterisks represent statistical differences between PU and the PU/FeCy surfaces (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-values &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Representative images of water contact angle measurements and (<b>b</b>) visual depictions (captured by the Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) camera; scale bar = 1 mm) of <b>PU</b> (control), <b>PU/FeCy-1</b>, and <b>PU/FeCy-2</b> surfaces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Two-dimensional and (<b>b</b>) three-dimensional AFM images of <b>PU</b> (control), <b>PU/FeCy-1</b>, and <b>PU/FeCy-2</b> surfaces, including absolute average (R<sub>a</sub>) and root mean square (R<sub>q</sub>) values. All images correspond to a 5 × 5 µm<sup>2</sup> surface area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative 3D OCT images of C. marina biofilms formed on <b>PU</b> (control), <b>PU/FeCy-1</b>, and <b>PU/FeCy-2</b> surfaces after 42 days. The color scale shows the range of biofilm thickness. All images were obtained in a scan range of 2490 µm × 1512 µm × 600 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Thickness, (<b>b</b>) porosity, (<b>c</b>) contour coefficient, and (<b>d</b>) biovolume of <span class="html-italic">C. marina</span> biofilms formed on <b>PU</b> (control), <b>PU/FeCy-1</b>, and <b>PU/FeCy-2</b> surfaces after 42 days. The asterisks represent statistical differences between <b>PU</b> and PU/FeCy surfaces (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-values &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CLSM images of C. marina biofilms on <b>PU</b> (control), <b>PU/FeCy-1</b>, and <b>PU/FeCy-2</b> surfaces after 42 days. These representative images were obtained from confocal <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>z</mi> </semantics></math>-stacks using the IMARIS 9.3.1 software and present an aerial, 3D view of the biofilms, with the shadow projection on the right. The white scale bars represent 40 μm.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 8896 KiB  
Article
A Prediction of Estuary Wetland Vegetation with Satellite Images
by Min Yang, Bin Guo, Ning Gao, Yang Yu, Xiaoli Song and Yanfeng Gu
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(2), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13020287 - 4 Feb 2025
Viewed by 461
Abstract
Estuarine wetlands are the transition zone between marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems and are more ecologically fragile. In recent years, the spread of exotic vegetation, specifically Spartina alterniflora, in the Yellow River estuary wetlands has significantly encroached upon the habitats of native [...] Read more.
Estuarine wetlands are the transition zone between marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems and are more ecologically fragile. In recent years, the spread of exotic vegetation, specifically Spartina alterniflora, in the Yellow River estuary wetlands has significantly encroached upon the habitats of native species such as Phragmites australis, Suaeda glauca Bunge, and Tamarix chinensis Lour. With advances in land prediction modeling, predicting wetland vegetation distribution can aid management and decision-making for ecological restoration. We selected the core area as the study object and coupled the hydrological model MIKE 21 with the PLUS model to predict the potential future distribution of invasive and dominant species in the region. (1) Based on the fine classification results from satellite images of GF1/G2/G5, we gained an understanding of the changes in wetland vegetation types in the core area of the reserve in 2018 and 2020. (2) Using public data such as ERA5 and GEO as input for basic environmental data, using MIKE 21 to provide high-spatial-resolution hydrodynamic parameters for the PLUS model as an environmental driver, we modeled the spatial distribution of various wetland vegetation in the Yellow River estuary wetland in Dongying under different artificial restoration measures. (3) We predicted the 2022 distribution of typical vegetation in the region, used the classification results of GF6 as the actual distribution, compared the spatial distribution with the actual distribution, and obtained a kappa coefficient of 0.78; the predicted values of the model are highly consistent with the true values. This study combines the fine classification results of vegetation based on hyperspectral remote sensing, the construction of a coupled model, and the prediction effect of typical species, providing a reference for constructing and optimizing the vegetation prediction model of estuarine wetlands. It also allows scientific and effective decision-making for the management of ecological restoration of delta wetlands. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Research area-the Yellow River estuary wetlands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of the coupling models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Grid range of MIKE 21.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic diagram of the ecological restoration area of the Yellow River estuary delta.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The processing flow of MIKE 21-PLUS coupling model in artificial ecological restoration measures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Hydrodynamic simulation of MIKE21 model. (<b>a</b>) Hydrodynamic simulation within the restoration area; (<b>b</b>) current velocity without tidal creek; and (<b>c</b>) flow velocity under tidal ditch conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes in the distribution of features in the Yellow River estuary, 2018–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Model realization process for mowing and replanting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of observed and modeled salinity in Laizhou Bay. (Salinity data from the environmental survey of Laizhou Bay in August 2020 by Beihai Bureau of the Ministry of Natural Resources).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of simulation results based on MIKE 21-PLUS with actual results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of simulation results between natural and artificial restoration scenarios in the restoration area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Environmental drivers of the evolution of the distribution of <span class="html-italic">Spartina alterniflora</span>, <span class="html-italic">Suaeda glauca Bunge</span>, and <span class="html-italic">Reed</span> (<span class="html-italic">Phragmites australis</span>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of <span class="html-italic">F</span><sub>1</sub>-<span class="html-italic">score</span> for simulating vegetation distribution in the Yellow River estuary wetland in 2022 using MIKE21-PLUS and PLUS.</p>
Full article ">
57 pages, 13137 KiB  
Article
Compositional and Numerical Geomorphology Along a Basement–Foreland Transition, SE Germany, with Special Reference to Landscape-Forming Indices and Parameters in Genetic and Applied Terrain Analyses
by Harald G. Dill, Andrei Buzatu, Sorin-Ionut Balaban and Christopher Kleyer
Geosciences 2025, 15(2), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15020037 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 504
Abstract
The Münchberg Gneiss Complex (Central European Variscides, Germany) is separated by a deep-seated lineamentary fault zone, the Franconian Lineamentary Fault Zone, from its Mesozoic foreland. The study area offers insight into a great variety of landforms created by fluvial and mass wasting processes [...] Read more.
The Münchberg Gneiss Complex (Central European Variscides, Germany) is separated by a deep-seated lineamentary fault zone, the Franconian Lineamentary Fault Zone, from its Mesozoic foreland. The study area offers insight into a great variety of landforms created by fluvial and mass wasting processes together with their bedrocks, covering the full range from unmetamorphosed sediments to high-grade regionally metamorphic rocks. It renders the region an ideal place to conduct a study of compositional and numerical geomorphology and their landscape-forming indices and parameters. The landforms under consideration are sculpted out of the bedrocks (erosional landforms) and overlain by depositional landforms which are discussed by means of numerical landform indices (LFIs), all of which are coined for the first time in the current paper. They are designed to be suitable for applied geosciences such as extractive/economic geology as well as environmental geology. The erosional landform series are subdivided into three categories: (1) The landscape roughness indices, e.g., VeSival (vertical sinuosity—valley of landform series) and the VaSlAnalti (variation in slope angle altitude), which are used for a first order classification of landscapes into relief generations. The second order classification LFIs are devoted to the material properties of the landforms’ bedrocks, such as the rock strength (VeSilith) and the bedrock anisotropy (VaSlAnnorm). The third order scheme describes the hydrography as to its vertical changes by the inclination of the talweg and the different types of knickpoints (IncTallith/grad) and horizontal sinuosity (HoSilith/grad). The study area is subjected to a tripartite zonation into the headwater zone, synonymous with the paleoplain which undergoes some dissection at its edge, the step-fault plain representative of the track zone which undergoes widespread fluvial piracy, and the foreland plains which act as an intermediate sedimentary trap named the deposition zone. The area can be described in space and time with these landform indices reflecting fluvial and mass wasting processes operative in four different stages (around 17 Ma, 6 to 4 Ma, <1.7 Ma, and <0.4 Ma). The various groups of LFIs are a function of landscape maturity (pre-mature, mature, and super-mature). The depositional landforms are numerically defined in the same way and only differ from each other by their subscripts. Their set of LFIs is a mirror image of the composition of depositional landforms in relation to their grain size. The leading part of the acronym, such as QuantSanheav and QuantGravlith, refers to the process of quantification, the second part to the grain size, such as sand and gravel, and the subscript to the material, such as heavy minerals or lithological fragments. The three numerical indices applicable to depositional landforms are a direct measurement of the hydrodynamic and gravity-driven conditions of the fluvial and mass wasting processes using granulometry, grain morphology, and situmetry (clast orientation). Together with the previous compositional indices, the latter directly translate into the provenance analysis which can be used for environmental analyses and as a tool for mineral exploration. It creates a network between numerical geomorphology, geomorphometry, and the E&E issue disciplines (economic/extractive geology vs. environmental geology). The linguistics of the LFIs adopted in this publication are designed so as to be open for individual amendments by the reader. An easy adaptation to different landform suites worldwide, irrespective of their climatic conditions, geodynamic setting, and age of formation, is feasible due to the use of a software and a database available on a global basis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geodynamic overview of the NE Bavarian basement and the study area at the western edge of the Münchberg Gneiss Complex, SE Germany. (<b>a</b>) The position of the study area in Germany. (<b>b</b>) The geological setting of the study area in SE Germany and its neighboring geodynamic units of the Frankenwald and Fichtelgebirge Mts. (modified from Emmert et al. [<a href="#B26-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">26</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Legend for the map in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>b. The area with the dashed line denotes the close-up view of the geological setting in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological overview and the bedrock lithologies of the landform series under consideration. (<b>a</b>) The geological map of the study area with the Cenozoic overburden and the fluvial drainage network and sampling sites. The geological basis is the geological maps published by Emmert and Weinelt [<a href="#B36-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Emmert et al. [<a href="#B35-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">35</a>], Stettner [<a href="#B39-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">39</a>] and Stettner [<a href="#B40-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">40</a>] which, in places, have been updated during the current investigation. (<b>b</b>) Lithological units shown in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a and symbols used in the cross-sections through the landforms (see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2 Cont.
<p>Geological overview and the bedrock lithologies of the landform series under consideration. (<b>a</b>) The geological map of the study area with the Cenozoic overburden and the fluvial drainage network and sampling sites. The geological basis is the geological maps published by Emmert and Weinelt [<a href="#B36-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">36</a>], Emmert et al. [<a href="#B35-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">35</a>], Stettner [<a href="#B39-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">39</a>] and Stettner [<a href="#B40-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">40</a>] which, in places, have been updated during the current investigation. (<b>b</b>) Lithological units shown in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a and symbols used in the cross-sections through the landforms (see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geomorphological overview of the washboard landscape and the study areas defined by the two paleosurfaces, I and II. (<b>a</b>) Cartoon showing two paleosurfaces. Paleosurface I is gently dipping off the FLFZ (Franconian Line Fault Zone) as a presumed architectural planar element covering the Franconian Scarpland. Paleosurface II is a presumed surface covering the basement and the immediate foreland affected by the FLFZ. It is a tripartite curved surface covering three plains [<a href="#B29-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">29</a>] (<b>b</b>) Cartoon providing an idealized cross-section of the tripartite paleosurface II. For geology, see key of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a. Dotted line marks the modern-day surface and longitudinal profile of the talweg with its knickpoints. (<b>c</b>) Digital terrain model of the study area showing the controlling linear tectonic elements of the main anticline of the MGC. (<b>d</b>) Topographic map showing the altitude of the study area in meters a.m.s.l. (<b>e</b>) Thematic map showing the slope angle values of the various land forms under consideration in degrees. (<b>f</b>) Geomorphological index map showing the morphotectonic units currently on display: 1 = paleoplain undissected, 2 = paleoplain dissected, 3 = step-fault plain inclined, 4 = foreland plain inclined off the basement, and 5 = foreland plain towards the basement (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b). The position of the reference cross-sections (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) and the maximum aerial extension of relief generations R1 to R4 (Rre = R2 landforms are patchily preserved as relics on R3) determined based upon the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index are displayed by red full, stippled, and dashed-stippled lines. (<b>g</b>) Geological index map (for legend, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a). The position of the reference cross-sections (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>g) and the maximum aerial extension of relief generations R1 to R4 (Rre = R2 landforms are patchily preserved as relics on R3) determined based upon the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index are displayed by red full, stippled, and dashed-stippled line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Geomorphological overview of the washboard landscape and the study areas defined by the two paleosurfaces, I and II. (<b>a</b>) Cartoon showing two paleosurfaces. Paleosurface I is gently dipping off the FLFZ (Franconian Line Fault Zone) as a presumed architectural planar element covering the Franconian Scarpland. Paleosurface II is a presumed surface covering the basement and the immediate foreland affected by the FLFZ. It is a tripartite curved surface covering three plains [<a href="#B29-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">29</a>] (<b>b</b>) Cartoon providing an idealized cross-section of the tripartite paleosurface II. For geology, see key of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a. Dotted line marks the modern-day surface and longitudinal profile of the talweg with its knickpoints. (<b>c</b>) Digital terrain model of the study area showing the controlling linear tectonic elements of the main anticline of the MGC. (<b>d</b>) Topographic map showing the altitude of the study area in meters a.m.s.l. (<b>e</b>) Thematic map showing the slope angle values of the various land forms under consideration in degrees. (<b>f</b>) Geomorphological index map showing the morphotectonic units currently on display: 1 = paleoplain undissected, 2 = paleoplain dissected, 3 = step-fault plain inclined, 4 = foreland plain inclined off the basement, and 5 = foreland plain towards the basement (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b). The position of the reference cross-sections (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) and the maximum aerial extension of relief generations R1 to R4 (Rre = R2 landforms are patchily preserved as relics on R3) determined based upon the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index are displayed by red full, stippled, and dashed-stippled lines. (<b>g</b>) Geological index map (for legend, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a). The position of the reference cross-sections (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>g) and the maximum aerial extension of relief generations R1 to R4 (Rre = R2 landforms are patchily preserved as relics on R3) determined based upon the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index are displayed by red full, stippled, and dashed-stippled line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Geomorphological overview of the washboard landscape and the study areas defined by the two paleosurfaces, I and II. (<b>a</b>) Cartoon showing two paleosurfaces. Paleosurface I is gently dipping off the FLFZ (Franconian Line Fault Zone) as a presumed architectural planar element covering the Franconian Scarpland. Paleosurface II is a presumed surface covering the basement and the immediate foreland affected by the FLFZ. It is a tripartite curved surface covering three plains [<a href="#B29-geosciences-15-00037" class="html-bibr">29</a>] (<b>b</b>) Cartoon providing an idealized cross-section of the tripartite paleosurface II. For geology, see key of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a. Dotted line marks the modern-day surface and longitudinal profile of the talweg with its knickpoints. (<b>c</b>) Digital terrain model of the study area showing the controlling linear tectonic elements of the main anticline of the MGC. (<b>d</b>) Topographic map showing the altitude of the study area in meters a.m.s.l. (<b>e</b>) Thematic map showing the slope angle values of the various land forms under consideration in degrees. (<b>f</b>) Geomorphological index map showing the morphotectonic units currently on display: 1 = paleoplain undissected, 2 = paleoplain dissected, 3 = step-fault plain inclined, 4 = foreland plain inclined off the basement, and 5 = foreland plain towards the basement (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b). The position of the reference cross-sections (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>) and the maximum aerial extension of relief generations R1 to R4 (Rre = R2 landforms are patchily preserved as relics on R3) determined based upon the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index are displayed by red full, stippled, and dashed-stippled lines. (<b>g</b>) Geological index map (for legend, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a). The position of the reference cross-sections (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>g) and the maximum aerial extension of relief generations R1 to R4 (Rre = R2 landforms are patchily preserved as relics on R3) determined based upon the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index are displayed by red full, stippled, and dashed-stippled line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The reference cross-sections provide the link between the landscape and the lithological composition. For lithology, see key of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b, and for their position, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>d. In the rectangles, the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index of the landform series portrayed by the reference cross-section is given. It is the landscape roughness index of regional scale (for more information see text). (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>The reference cross-sections provide the link between the landscape and the lithological composition. For lithology, see key of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b, and for their position, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>d. In the rectangles, the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index of the landform series portrayed by the reference cross-section is given. It is the landscape roughness index of regional scale (for more information see text). (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>The reference cross-sections provide the link between the landscape and the lithological composition. For lithology, see key of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b, and for their position, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>d. In the rectangles, the vertical sinuosity—valley (VeSi<sub>val</sub>) index of the landform series portrayed by the reference cross-section is given. It is the landscape roughness index of regional scale (for more information see text). (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>X–Y diagrams of the variation in slope angle altitude (VaSlAn<sub>alti</sub>) index with the X-axis giving the mean slope angle in degrees and the Y-axis giving the altitude in meters above mean sea level. R2 = correlation coefficient. (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>X–Y diagrams of the variation in slope angle altitude (VaSlAn<sub>alti</sub>) index with the X-axis giving the mean slope angle in degrees and the Y-axis giving the altitude in meters above mean sea level. R2 = correlation coefficient. (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>X–Y diagrams of the variation in slope angle altitude (VaSlAn<sub>alti</sub>) index with the X-axis giving the mean slope angle in degrees and the Y-axis giving the altitude in meters above mean sea level. R2 = correlation coefficient. (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>X–Y diagrams of the variation in slope angle altitude (VaSlAn<sub>alti</sub>) index with the X-axis giving the mean slope angle in degrees and the Y-axis giving the altitude in meters above mean sea level. R2 = correlation coefficient. (<b>a</b>) M1-M2, (<b>b</b>) L1-L2, (<b>c</b>) Pe1-Pe2, (<b>d</b>) K1-K2, (<b>e</b>) Ku1-Ku2, (<b>f</b>) We1-We, (<b>g</b>) J3-J4, (<b>h</b>) H1-I2, (<b>i</b>) H1-H2, (<b>j</b>) G1-G2, (<b>k</b>) F1-E2, (<b>l</b>) E1-E2, (<b>m</b>) D1-D2, (<b>n</b>) C1-C2, (<b>o</b>) B1-B2, (<b>p</b>) A1-A2, (<b>q</b>) Lu1-Lu2, (<b>r</b>) Wü1-Wü2, (<b>s</b>) A3-A4, (<b>t</b>) A3-A4 FW, (<b>u</b>) A1-A2 FW, (<b>v</b>) J1-J2, and (<b>w</b>) J5-J6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Overview of the variation in slope angle altitude (VaSlAn<sub>alti</sub>) index as facies marker.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Overview of the petrophysical–geomorphological parameters vertical sinuosity—lithology (VeSi<sub>lith</sub>) of the landform and variation in normalized slope angle (VaSlAn<sub>norm</sub>) of the landform.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Meta-sedimentary, meta-intrusive, and meta-volcanic magmatic rocks and their landforms featuring different values of VaSlAn<sub>norm</sub> and VeSi<sub>lith</sub>. For numerical, compositional, topographic, and more detailed geomorphological data, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-t002" class="html-table">Table 2</a>. (<b>a</b>) Mica gneiss with subhorizontal jointing on top of a hillock of a large and shallow valley. The top slope is strewn with boulders undergoing creep and solifluction. (<b>b</b>) Close-up view of one of the boulders which displays a lens-shaped and strong foliation. (<b>c</b>) A well-rounded paragneiss-hornfels boulder similar in outward appearance and internal texture but of rock strength twice as much as the mica gneiss. (<b>d</b>) Layered phyllite exposed on the mid-slope of a V-shaped valley. (<b>e</b>) Tightly foliated and folded phyllite as an allochthonous block. See ignition key for scale. Dashed line highlights wrinkled folding. (<b>f</b>) Alternating beds of chert, forming ledges and slates with the beginning of disintegration into debris of flakes at the footslope of a V-shaped valley. (<b>g</b>) Plates of (roof)slate in the D horizon of the pedosphere. The argillaceous rocks are transformed into individual slaps of slate preserving the original siting of the rocks with the slaty cleavage. (<b>h</b>) Completely disintegrated pencil slates randomly scattered along the footslope of a V-shaped valley while forming a talus apron of flakey gravel. See hammer for scale. (<b>i</b>) Augengneiss ledges protruding out of the top slope of a V-shaped valley. The inset displays the tight arrangement of layers composed of quartz, K feldspar, and plagioclase with dark micaceous layers. (<b>j</b>) Meta-granite-to granodiorite showing a massive texture devoid of any strong foliation. (<b>k</b>) Steeply-dipping layers of tightly foliated epidote amphibolite (prasinite). (<b>l</b>) Layers of meta-basalt with narrowly-spaced joints near the escarpment of the inclined step-and-fault plain which is identical to the highland-boundary fault FLFZ (see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>b,c). The inset shows the disintegration of the meta-basalt (diabase) as a consequence of weathering. (<b>m</b>) Amphibolite with a vaguely expressed layering which is intruded by an alkaline feldspar pegmatoid rimmed by a stippled line. It constitutes the edge of a V-shaped valley (wide angle) passing into a large and shallow valley. See geologists for scale. (<b>n</b>) Monadnock with subrounded exposures of bronzite-serpentinite displaying typical rillen features of “silica karst”. (<b>o</b>) Disharmonic tight folding of alkaline feldspar—quartz mobilisates in massive layered amphibolite gneiss. (<b>p</b>) A monadnock made of massive eclogite and eclogite amphibolite surrounded by a blockmeer of the same lithology. Inset shows a slightly weathered massive eclogite with red Fe-Al-Mn garnet and green omphacitic pyroxene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Longitudinal sections along the talweg of drainage systems. The X-axis denotes the station points, and the Y-axis denotes the dip angle of the talweg in degree. The station points are characterized by Arabic numerals. The third variable is the wall rock or bedrock lithology of the host rocks exposed in the river banks and the river bed which, when different from each other on the left- and right-hand bank, are given by more than one numeral which refers to the notation in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b, e.g., profile X7-X9 13 + 12 + 14 = phyllite &gt; epidote amphibolite &gt; talc schist (for lithology, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b). The correlation coefficient R2 between the two data sets is given in the upper right-hand corner of the diagram. (<b>a</b>) X–Y plot showing the inclination of the talweg (IncTal<sub>lith/grad</sub> index) in degrees. <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis versus the station point downstream of longitudinal profile X15-X16 FW. The knickpoints intensity can be directly assessed by the length of the various intervals of the graph and the type of knickpoint (see text) by its upward and downward directions. At station point 11, the longitudinal section is intersected by the cross-section A3-A4 FW (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>t). The red rectangle marks the IncTal<sub>lith/grad</sub> index fluvial facies in the close-up view of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>b. (<b>b</b>) Incision of an acute-angle single-channel non-alluvial V-shaped valley into the Devonian chert unit (slope angle 30° ⇒ 35°, talweg angle 2.7° ⇒ 0.7°). See reference profile with steps and pools in (stippled white line = strike of bedding). (<b>c</b>) Geological index map (for more detail and key, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a) with horizontal sinuosity—lithology plus gradient index (HoSi<sub>lith/grad</sub>) given in the white boxes; the knickpoint types 1 and 2 and the start and end points of longitudinal sections are displayed in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>d–i by X–Y diagrams plotting the station points and inclinations data. The red dots mark mines of talc—(purple), pegmatoid—(dark blue), and Cu-(Au) deposits (yellow). (<b>d</b>) X1-X2, (<b>e</b>) X2-X3, (<b>f</b>) X5-X6, (<b>g</b>) X7-X8, (<b>h</b>) X9-X10, and (<b>i</b>) X11-X12 (for color symbols, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>c).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Longitudinal sections along the talweg of drainage systems. The X-axis denotes the station points, and the Y-axis denotes the dip angle of the talweg in degree. The station points are characterized by Arabic numerals. The third variable is the wall rock or bedrock lithology of the host rocks exposed in the river banks and the river bed which, when different from each other on the left- and right-hand bank, are given by more than one numeral which refers to the notation in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b, e.g., profile X7-X9 13 + 12 + 14 = phyllite &gt; epidote amphibolite &gt; talc schist (for lithology, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>b). The correlation coefficient R2 between the two data sets is given in the upper right-hand corner of the diagram. (<b>a</b>) X–Y plot showing the inclination of the talweg (IncTal<sub>lith/grad</sub> index) in degrees. <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis versus the station point downstream of longitudinal profile X15-X16 FW. The knickpoints intensity can be directly assessed by the length of the various intervals of the graph and the type of knickpoint (see text) by its upward and downward directions. At station point 11, the longitudinal section is intersected by the cross-section A3-A4 FW (<a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>t). The red rectangle marks the IncTal<sub>lith/grad</sub> index fluvial facies in the close-up view of <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>b. (<b>b</b>) Incision of an acute-angle single-channel non-alluvial V-shaped valley into the Devonian chert unit (slope angle 30° ⇒ 35°, talweg angle 2.7° ⇒ 0.7°). See reference profile with steps and pools in (stippled white line = strike of bedding). (<b>c</b>) Geological index map (for more detail and key, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a) with horizontal sinuosity—lithology plus gradient index (HoSi<sub>lith/grad</sub>) given in the white boxes; the knickpoint types 1 and 2 and the start and end points of longitudinal sections are displayed in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>d–i by X–Y diagrams plotting the station points and inclinations data. The red dots mark mines of talc—(purple), pegmatoid—(dark blue), and Cu-(Au) deposits (yellow). (<b>d</b>) X1-X2, (<b>e</b>) X2-X3, (<b>f</b>) X5-X6, (<b>g</b>) X7-X8, (<b>h</b>) X9-X10, and (<b>i</b>) X11-X12 (for color symbols, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>c).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Quantification of fluvial and mass wasting deposits as well as their ratios (quantification of fluvial–mass wasting index (Quant<sub>flu/mas</sub>). For geomorphological background, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>f. 1 + 2: Mass wasting deposits: 2.302 to 0.768 per km<sup>2</sup>, fluvial deposits: 0.888 to 0.135 per km<sup>2</sup>. 3: Mass wasting deposits: 0.457 to 0.061 per km<sup>2</sup>, fluvial deposits: 0.335 to 0.017 per km<sup>2</sup>. 4: Mixed type (mass wasting and fluvial): 3.443 to 0.393 per km<sup>2</sup>, mass wasting deposits 3.132 to 0.393 per km<sup>2</sup>, fluvial deposits: 2.798 to 0.028 per km<sup>2</sup>. 5: Mass wasting deposits 0.019 per km<sup>2</sup>, fluvial deposits: 0.076 per km<sup>2</sup>. In the case of very small quantities of the landform-related mass wasting and fluvial deposits, only the ratio of the deposits is presented as a sector diagram. In the case of very high quantities of these unconsolidated deposits, columnar diagram are used instead.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Composition of siliciclastic deposits of the study area. For geology of the sampling sites, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a. The mineralogical and petrological composition is given by sector diagrams (100%). (<b>a</b>) Abundance of sand-sized light minerals (Quant<sub>san/ligh</sub>). (<b>b</b>) Abundance of sand-sized heavy minerals (Quant<sub>san/heav</sub>). (<b>c</b>) Abundance of gravel-sized debris (Quant<sub>grav/lith</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Composition of siliciclastic deposits of the study area. For geology of the sampling sites, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a. The mineralogical and petrological composition is given by sector diagrams (100%). (<b>a</b>) Abundance of sand-sized light minerals (Quant<sub>san/ligh</sub>). (<b>b</b>) Abundance of sand-sized heavy minerals (Quant<sub>san/heav</sub>). (<b>c</b>) Abundance of gravel-sized debris (Quant<sub>grav/lith</sub>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Landforms hosting gravel-sized debris accumulations subjected to GMS analyses (granulometry–morphometry–situmetry). For sampling sites, see the geological setting presented in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a> and the legend on display in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a,b. (<b>a</b>) A V-shaped valley (acute angle 22 to 25°) with a small floodplain narrowing upstream towards a gorge (alluvial to non-alluvial). The inset situgram shows a bimodal clast orientation. Sampling site 7. (<b>b</b>) Non-alluvial V-shaped valley (acute angle 25 to 30°) chocked with gravel-sized clast and concentrated in side- and mid-channel longitudinal bars. Sampling site 15. (<b>c</b>) V-shaped valley with a small raised side bar on the slip bank (wide angle 5 to 11°) Sampling site 2. (<b>d</b>) Wide valley (angle 5 to 15°) showing a floodplain with gallery forests lined up along the meander belts, S = 1.407. Sampling site 12. (<b>e</b>) Two valleys telescoped into each other. The large and shallow valley (angle &lt;&lt; 10°) is cut by an acute V-shaped valley near the FLFZ. Sampling site 13 photography facing towards the W with the scarpland on the horizon. (<b>f</b>) A polymodal clast orientation representative of different landscape-forming processes superimposed on each other. Situgram of sampling site 15. (<b>g</b>) Unimodal clast orientation preserved on the raised sidebar of a slip bank. Situgram of sampling site 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Landforms hosting gravel-sized debris accumulations subjected to GMS analyses (granulometry–morphometry–situmetry). For sampling sites, see the geological setting presented in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f011" class="html-fig">Figure 11</a> and the legend on display in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>a,b. (<b>a</b>) A V-shaped valley (acute angle 22 to 25°) with a small floodplain narrowing upstream towards a gorge (alluvial to non-alluvial). The inset situgram shows a bimodal clast orientation. Sampling site 7. (<b>b</b>) Non-alluvial V-shaped valley (acute angle 25 to 30°) chocked with gravel-sized clast and concentrated in side- and mid-channel longitudinal bars. Sampling site 15. (<b>c</b>) V-shaped valley with a small raised side bar on the slip bank (wide angle 5 to 11°) Sampling site 2. (<b>d</b>) Wide valley (angle 5 to 15°) showing a floodplain with gallery forests lined up along the meander belts, S = 1.407. Sampling site 12. (<b>e</b>) Two valleys telescoped into each other. The large and shallow valley (angle &lt;&lt; 10°) is cut by an acute V-shaped valley near the FLFZ. Sampling site 13 photography facing towards the W with the scarpland on the horizon. (<b>f</b>) A polymodal clast orientation representative of different landscape-forming processes superimposed on each other. Situgram of sampling site 15. (<b>g</b>) Unimodal clast orientation preserved on the raised sidebar of a slip bank. Situgram of sampling site 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>GMS indices (granulometry–morphology–situmetry) and their fluvial networks of the X1-X2 drainage system and its tributaries X3-X4 and X7-X8. For more details on the numerical parameters of the drainage systems, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, and for geology, <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. (<b>a</b>) Granulometry of gravel-sized debris illustrated by the numerical index QuantSed<sub>gran/sort</sub> with a cumulative frequency grain-size distribution of all samples from the study area above represented by the blue shaded area. (<b>b</b>) The regional variation in the minimum values of the QuantSed<sub>morp/roun</sub> of gravel-sized debris (map above) and a reference site showing the QuantSed<sub>morp/roun</sub> compared with the QuantSed<sub>morp/cycl</sub> numerically and visually for the most widespread lithology of the study area, the muscovite-biotite gneisses. (<b>c</b>) Situmetry of gravel-sized debris illustrated by 360° circle diagrams showing the true orientation of the river course and of various maxima of the longest axis of gravel clasts (<b>above</b>). The reference samples show a topographically non-oriented semi-circle rose diagram with a trimodal arrangement of gravel clasts with a sharpness of maximum as follows: first maximum 60.0, second maximum 19.4, and third maximum 19.0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>GMS indices (granulometry–morphology–situmetry) and their fluvial networks of the X1-X2 drainage system and its tributaries X3-X4 and X7-X8. For more details on the numerical parameters of the drainage systems, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>, and for geology, <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. (<b>a</b>) Granulometry of gravel-sized debris illustrated by the numerical index QuantSed<sub>gran/sort</sub> with a cumulative frequency grain-size distribution of all samples from the study area above represented by the blue shaded area. (<b>b</b>) The regional variation in the minimum values of the QuantSed<sub>morp/roun</sub> of gravel-sized debris (map above) and a reference site showing the QuantSed<sub>morp/roun</sub> compared with the QuantSed<sub>morp/cycl</sub> numerically and visually for the most widespread lithology of the study area, the muscovite-biotite gneisses. (<b>c</b>) Situmetry of gravel-sized debris illustrated by 360° circle diagrams showing the true orientation of the river course and of various maxima of the longest axis of gravel clasts (<b>above</b>). The reference samples show a topographically non-oriented semi-circle rose diagram with a trimodal arrangement of gravel clasts with a sharpness of maximum as follows: first maximum 60.0, second maximum 19.4, and third maximum 19.0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The manual from fieldwork (geological, geomorphological, and lithological mapping) to numerical geomorphology &gt; geomorphometry (genetic geosciences) and economic and environmental geology (applied geosciences). The landform indices are the missing links. See also <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The evolution of landscape and re-orientation of the drainage system from the ancient Donau River to the modern Rhein River systems on display as a series of landscape contours true to scale as a function of altitude and distance based upon the VeSi<sub>val</sub>, VaSlAn<sub>alti</sub>, IncTal<sub>lith/grad</sub>, and geochronological data (for reference, see text). Periods correspond to the relief generations shown in plan view in <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>f,g. For the geology and landforms of each cross-section, see <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a> and <a href="#geosciences-15-00037-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a>. (<b>a</b>) Stage of peneplanation at full swing (Ro). (<b>b</b>) Stage of peneplanation (R1) transitioning into pediplanation (R2) (fossiliferous badlands). (<b>c</b>) Stage of the re-orientation of the paleogradientaccompanied by river piracy (R2e) and linear erosion (R3). (<b>d</b>) Stage of the re-direction of the fluvial regime from dip to strike stream and perched pedimentation (R4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Clay minerals (QuantClaSil), sand-sized light minerals (QuantSan<sub>/ligh</sub>), heavy minerals (QuantSan<sub>heav</sub>), and gravel (QuantGrav<sub>lith</sub>) of different lithologies represented by the range of dispersal off their source rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The “graphical conclusions” to underscore what the compositional terrain analysis is all about. The tripartite subdivision of the geoscientific disciplines involved: (<b>a</b>) A digital terrain model showing the interrelationship between morphotectonic linear architectural elements (fold axis), and hydrography (strike stream vs. dip stream). (<b>b</b>) The sedimentological GMS technology encompassing <b>g</b>ranulometry, morphometry, and <b>s</b>itumetry. (<b>c</b>) The pie-chart diagram commonly used in sediment petrography to quantify the lithological changes during transport.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 621 KiB  
Article
Image Analysis of the Influence of the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) on the Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer at Extremely Low Reynolds Number
by Ángel Antonio Rodríguez-Sevillano, María Jesús Casati-Calzada, Rafael Bardera-Mora, Juan Carlos Matías-García, Estela Barroso-Barderas and Emilio Fernández-Rivero
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(1), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010220 - 30 Dec 2024
Viewed by 505
Abstract
This study analyzes the influence of the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) on the Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer (MEDA) station located on board the Perseverance rover (Mars 2020). A novel visualization methodology was developed using a hydrodynamic towing tank and 3D-printed models created [...] Read more.
This study analyzes the influence of the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) on the Mars Environmental Dynamics Analyzer (MEDA) station located on board the Perseverance rover (Mars 2020). A novel visualization methodology was developed using a hydrodynamic towing tank and 3D-printed models created through additive manufacturing. This experimental approach, not previously applied in this context, proved to be a cost-effective alternative for studying thermal interactions while providing accurate preliminary insights into the behavior of thermal plumes under Martian-like conditions. Key factors such as the extremely low Reynolds number, an increasing temperature of the model, and atmospheric properties similar to those in Mars were incorporated. The findings suggest that the MMRTG’s thermal plume may significantly influence MEDA’s performance due to the plume’s height and its interaction with the surrounding environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Image Analysis and Processing Technologies and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>left</b> (Mast)) Modular mast design with mounting of the booms, TIRS, and rover head. (<b>right</b> (MMRTG)) Modular design of the MMRTG with shell and main module assembly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>MMRTG cavity (<b>left</b>) in addition to the resistor housing and the presence of the ink holes. MMRTG’s shell (<b>right</b>) with 30° angled brackets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>MMRTG and mast on the experimental floor: the 200 mm spacing between the mast and the MMRTG can be seen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of laminar length fluxes (marked in a green line) for active and non-active resistor: (<b>a</b>) non-active resistor (289 K); (<b>b</b>) active resistor (301 K).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Side view flow rate 0.7 [mL/s]—dynamic mast/MMRTG—non-active resistor; in green and blue lines, the thermal plume near the mast and downstream is marked.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Side view flow rate 0.7 [mL/s]—dynamic mast/MMRTG active resistor; in green and blue lines, the thermal plume near the mast and downstream is marked.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Zenithal view exit angle flow rate 0.7 [mL/s]—dynamic mast/MMRTG-non-active resistor. Upper images (from 1 to 4) show the ink emission flow evolution; lower image details (green lines) the measurement of the exit angle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Zenithal view exit angle flow rate 0.7 [mL/s]—dynamic mast/MMRTG active resistor. Upper images (from 1 to 4) show the ink emission flow evolution; lower image details (green lines) the measurement of the exit angle.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2318 KiB  
Review
A Brief Review of Hydrodynamic Circulation in the Mediterranean Gulfs
by Alexandra G. Aspioti and Nikolaos Th. Fourniotis
Dynamics 2024, 4(4), 873-888; https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics4040045 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 616
Abstract
In this paper, a brief review regarding the hydrodynamic circulation of the Mediterranean gulfs is presented. Studies concerning the hydrodynamics of the Mediterranean gulfs with significant environmental and commercial importance were gathered as an initial insight of studies in the Mediterranean microtidal environment. [...] Read more.
In this paper, a brief review regarding the hydrodynamic circulation of the Mediterranean gulfs is presented. Studies concerning the hydrodynamics of the Mediterranean gulfs with significant environmental and commercial importance were gathered as an initial insight of studies in the Mediterranean microtidal environment. Numerical models, field measurements, and satellite images are the methods used by the investigators for the description and prediction of the circulation in the gulfs. The basic hydrodynamic characteristics of the gulfs are mainly defined by the wind action and less by tide and baroclinicity. Most of the gulfs are characterized by a cyclonic wind-driven circulation, since the tidal effect remains weak in the Mediterranean basin. However, tidal resonance and strong currents are evident in the shallow coastal areas as well as in the wider area of straits. Basic gulfs’ characteristics are summarized in a table that gives an overview of the main Mediterranean gulfs, which can be especially useful for young researchers or new hydroenvironmental studies in the Mediterranean marine and coastal environment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General view of the Mediterranean basin where significant gulfs are marked with yellow dots [<a href="#B5-dynamics-04-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Significant gulfs northwesterly of the Mediterranean Sea. The Mediterranean Sea is given at the upper left corner, where the area of interest is marked with yellow window [<a href="#B5-dynamics-04-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Significant gulfs in the center of the Mediterranean Sea. The Mediterranean Sea is given at the upper right corner, where the area of interest is marked with yellow window [<a href="#B5-dynamics-04-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Significant gulfs easterly of the Mediterranean Sea. The Mediterranean Sea is given at the upper left corner, where the area of interest is marked with yellow window [<a href="#B5-dynamics-04-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Significant gulfs in Greece. The Mediterranean Sea is given at the upper right corner, where the area of interest is marked with yellow window [<a href="#B5-dynamics-04-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Significant gulfs southerly of the Mediterranean Sea. The Mediterranean Sea is given at the upper right corner, where the area of interest is marked with yellow window [<a href="#B5-dynamics-04-00045" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3347 KiB  
Article
Study of Interactions Between Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents and Collagen by Taylor Dispersion Analysis and Frontal Analysis Continuous Capillary Electrophoresis
by Chutintorn Somnin, Joseph Chamieh, Laurent Leclercq, Christelle Medina, Olivier Rousseaux and Hervé Cottet
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(12), 1633; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17121633 - 5 Dec 2024
Viewed by 750
Abstract
Background: Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are widely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance image contrast by interacting with water molecules, thus improving diagnostic capabilities. However, understanding the residual accumulation of GBCA in tissues after administration remains an area of active research. [...] Read more.
Background: Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) are widely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to enhance image contrast by interacting with water molecules, thus improving diagnostic capabilities. However, understanding the residual accumulation of GBCA in tissues after administration remains an area of active research. This highlights the need for advanced analytical techniques capable of investigating interactions between GBCAs and biopolymers, such as type I collagen, which are abundant in the body. Objective: This study explores the interactions of neutral and charged GBCAs with type I collagen under physiological pH conditions (pH 7.4) using Taylor dispersion analysis (TDA) and frontal analysis continuous capillary electrophoresis (FACCE). Methods: Collagen from bovine achilles tendon was ground using a vibratory ball mill to achieve a more uniform particle size and increased surface area. Laser granulometry was employed to characterize the size distributions of both raw and ground collagen suspensions in water. TDA was used to assess the hydrodynamic radius (Rh) of the soluble collagen fraction present in the supernatant. Results: From the TDA and FACCE results, it was shown that there were no significant interactions between the tested GBCAs and either the ground collagen or its soluble fraction at pH 7.4. Interestingly, we also observed that collagen interacts with filtration membranes, indicating that careful selection of membrane material, or the absence of filtration in the experimental protocol, is essential in interaction studies involving collagen. Conclusion: These findings bring valuable insights into the behavior of GBCAs in biological systems with potential implications for clinical applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmaceutical Technology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Presentation of the workflow analysis for the study of GBCA/collagen interactions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Laser diffraction granulometry of raw collagen and ground collagen 5 g/L suspended in water. The span number is a parameter that indicates the width of particle size distribution. For raw collagen, a significant fraction of the material flocculated before the laser analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Frontal Taylorgrams (black) and its 1st derivative (blue) of 3.65 g/L supernatant collagen in 10 mM tris pH 7.4 with UV detection at 200 nm (<b>A</b>). Deconvolution of 1st derivative Taylorgram by Gaussian fitting with two Gaussian curves (<b>B</b>). Fit is plotted as a red dotted line. Experimental conditions: fused silica capillary of 65 cm total length (56.5 cm to UV detector) × 50 µm i.d. eluent: 10 mM tris buffer (pH 7.4). Mobilization pressure: 100 mbar. Experiments were performed at 37 °C. Supernatant collagen was prepared following the procedure described in <a href="#sec2dot3-pharmaceuticals-17-01633" class="html-sec">Section 2.3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Frontal Taylorgrams of Gd-PCTA D2 (0.5–7.0 mM) in the presence of ground collagen (75 g/L) and after centrifugation (<b>A</b>). Linear calibration curves of Gd-PCTA D2 obtained by frontal TDA in the absence (dotted line) and in the presence of ground collagen after centrifugation (solid line) at 270 nm (<b>B</b>). Experimental conditions: fused silica capillary of 65 cm total length (56.5 cm to UV detector) × 50 µm i.d. eluent: 10 mM tris buffer (pH 7.4). Mobilization pressure: 100 mbar. UV detection at 270 nm. Incubation of mixture: 37 °C 1000 rpm for 4 h. TDA experiments were performed at 37 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Frontal Taylorgrams showing the potential retention of supernatant collagen (3.65 g/L, in blue) and Gd-PCTA D2 (2.5 mM, in orange) before and after filtration using Amicon<sup>®</sup> and Pall<sup>®</sup> devices with MWCO of 10 kDa. Experimental conditions: fused silica capillary of 65 cm total length (56.5 cm to UV detector) × 50 µm i.d. eluent: 10 mM tris buffer (pH 7.4). Mobilization pressure: 100 mbar. UV detection at 200 nm. Incubation of mixture: 37 °C 1000 rpm for 4 h. Sample volume: 60 µL. TDA experiments were performed at 37 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The first derivative of the experimental mixture (black trace) and the sum of the individual (yellow) of 1.22 g/L supernatant collagen (blue) and 2.5 mM Gd-PCTA D2 (orange). Experimental conditions: fused silica capillary of 65 cm total length (56.5 cm to UV detector) × 50 µm i.d. eluent: 10 mM tris buffer, pH 7.4. Mobilization pressure: 100 mbar. UV detection at 200 nm. Incubation of mixture: 37 °C 1000 rpm for 4 h. Sample volume: 60 µL. TDA experiments were performed at 37 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Frontal electropherograms showing the electrophoretic mobility of individual Gd-PCTA D2, Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DOTA, and supernatant collagen in the effective mobility scale (<b>A</b>). Timescale frontal electropherograms of 2.5 mM Gd-PCTA D2, Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DOTA standards (plain lines) and their mixtures in the presence of 1.825 g/L supernatant collagen (dotted lines) (<b>B</b>). Experimental conditions: PDADMAC coated capillary of 65 cm total length (56.5 cm to UV detector) × 50 µm i.d. eluent: 150 mM tris with 36 mM NaCl buffer (pH 7.4). UV detection at 200 and 270 nm. Incubation of mixture: 37 °C 1000 rpm for 4 h. Applied voltage: −15 kV (from inlet) for standard GBCA and applied co-pressure +50 mbar (from inlet) for supernatant collagen and the mixture. Sample volume: 120 µL. FACCE experiments were performed at 37 °C.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 11941 KiB  
Article
Investigation of the Effects of Hydrogen Addition on Explosion Characteristics and Pressure Fluctuations of Ethyl Acetate
by Ce Liang, Xiaolu Li, Cangsu Xu, Francis Oppong, Yangan Bao, Yuan Chen, Yuntang Li, Bingqing Wang and Jiangqin Ge
Energies 2024, 17(23), 5970; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235970 - 27 Nov 2024
Viewed by 579
Abstract
This study systematically explored the characteristics of explosion and pressure fluctuations of ethyl acetate (EA)/hydrogen (H2)/air mixtures under different initial pressures (1–3 bar), H2 fractions (4%, 8%, 12%), and equivalence ratios of EA (0.5–1.4). The flame images indicated that a [...] Read more.
This study systematically explored the characteristics of explosion and pressure fluctuations of ethyl acetate (EA)/hydrogen (H2)/air mixtures under different initial pressures (1–3 bar), H2 fractions (4%, 8%, 12%), and equivalence ratios of EA (0.5–1.4). The flame images indicated that a higher pressure, a higher H2 fraction, and a higher equivalence ratio could cause flame instability. An analysis of the dimensionless growth rate indicated that the flame instability was impacted by both thermal diffusion and hydrodynamic effects. The results also indicated that a higher initial pressure or H2 fraction could accelerate the combustion reaction and increase the explosion pressure and deflagration index. The maximum values were observed at 21.841 bar and 184.153 bar·m/s. However, their effects on explosion duration and heat release characteristics differed between lean and rich mixtures. Additionally, this study examined pressure fluctuations in both the time and frequency domains. The findings indicated a strong correlation between pressure fluctuation and flame instability. Modifying the H2 fraction and equivalence ratio to enhance flame stability proved effective in reducing pressure fluctuation amplitude. This study offers guidance for evaluating explosion risks associated with EA/H2/air mixtures and for designing related combustion devices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Energy Combustion and Flame)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Testing unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Images of flames at varying pressures and equivalence ratios for specific durations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Images of flames at varying hydrogen fractions and equivalence ratios for specific durations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Images of flames at varying hydrogen fractions and equivalence ratios for a specific radius.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Dimensionless growth rate variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Explosion pressure and rise rate of pressure curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Explosion pressure and rate of pressure rise under various conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Pressure fluctuation curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Pressure fluctuations under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spectrum analysis of pressure fluctuation curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Short time energy under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relationship between maximum short time energy and absolute maximum value of pressure fluctuation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Extreme ratio under different H<sub>2</sub> fractions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Deflagration index under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Adiabatic deflagration/severity index under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Duration of explosion under different H<sub>2</sub> fractions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Heat release rate under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Relationship between maximum rate of pressure rise and maximum heat released.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Heat or energy loss under different conditions.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 25812 KiB  
Article
Forecasting Flood Inundation in U.S. Flood-Prone Regions Through a Data-Driven Approach (FIER): Using VIIRS Water Fractions and the National Water Model
by Amirhossein Rostami, Chi-Hung Chang, Hyongki Lee, Hung-Hsien Wan, Tien Le Thuy Du, Kel N. Markert, Gustavious P. Williams, E. James Nelson, Sanmei Li, William Straka III, Sean Helfrich and Angelica L. Gutierrez
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(23), 4357; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234357 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 984
Abstract
Floods, one of the costliest, and most frequent hazards, are expected to worsen in the U.S. due to climate change. The real-time forecasting of flood inundations is extremely important for proactive decision-making to reduce damage. However, traditional forecasting methods face challenges in terms [...] Read more.
Floods, one of the costliest, and most frequent hazards, are expected to worsen in the U.S. due to climate change. The real-time forecasting of flood inundations is extremely important for proactive decision-making to reduce damage. However, traditional forecasting methods face challenges in terms of implementation and scalability due to computational burdens and data availability issues. Current forecasting services in the U.S. largely rely on hydrodynamic modeling, limited to river reaches near in situ gauges and requiring extensive data for model setup and calibration. Here, we have successfully adapted the Forecasting Inundation Extents using REOF (FIER) analysis framework to produce forecasted water fraction maps in two U.S. flood-prone regions, specifically the Red River of the North Basin and the Upper Mississippi Alluvial Plain, utilizing Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) optical imagery and the National Water Model. Comparing against historical VIIRS imagery for the same dates, FIER 1- to 8-day medium-range pseudo-forecasts show that about 70–80% of pixels exhibit absolute errors of less than 30%. Although originally developed utilizing Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images, this study demonstrated FIER’s versatility and effectiveness in flood forecasting by demonstrating its successful adaptation with optical VIIRS imagery which provides daily water fraction product, offering more historical observations to be used as inputs for FIER during peak flood times, particularly in regions where flooding commonly happens in a short period rather than following a broad seasonal pattern. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>top</b>) The USGS in situ streamflow data (blue line, cumecs: m<sup>3</sup>/second) from 2017 to 2020 at gauges located in (<b>a</b>) Drayton, North Dakota, along the Red River of the North mainstem, and (<b>b</b>) New Madrid, Missouri, along the Mississippi River mainstem. The green triangles mark all the epochs when Sentinel-1 images were acquired, while the orange dots mark the epochs of the VIIRS images used in this study. (<b>bottom</b>) The corresponding amount of data with less than 5% cloud coverage within each of the 10% USGS in situ streamflow percentile groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>Left column</b>) JRC historical maximum inundation extents and permanent water from 1984 to 2022 [<a href="#B42-remotesensing-16-04357" class="html-bibr">42</a>], and (<b>right column</b>) the USGS NLCD 2021 cultivated croplands [<a href="#B44-remotesensing-16-04357" class="html-bibr">44</a>] in (<b>a</b>) RRNB and (<b>b</b>) UMAP. The white dots show the locations of the USGS in situ gauges used in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pie charts of the top five classes in the USDA CDL for 2021 and 2022 in the (<b>a</b>) RRNB and (<b>b</b>) UMAP, showing the most dominant crops are spring wheat and soybeans, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of the FIER process largely consists of framework construction and forecasting. Dashed line arrow indicates the synthesis of RSMs and forecasted RTPCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flowchart (<b>left</b>) and schematic view (<b>right</b>) of the quantile mapping process employed to correct the biases in FIER water fraction forecasts. The blue boxes in the flowchart represent historical water fraction data (FIER-synthesized and VIIRS-observed) and their respective CDFs. The red boxes in the flowchart represent forecasted water fraction data and the corresponding extracted quantiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The extracted streamflow-related (<b>a</b>) RSMs, (<b>b</b>) RTPCs along with USGS in situ streamflow data, and (<b>c</b>) neural network regression models for FIER water fraction forecasting in the RRNB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The extracted streamflow-related (<b>a</b>) RSMs, (<b>b</b>) RTPCs along with USGS in situ streamflow data, and (<b>c</b>) neural network regression models for FIER water fraction forecasting in the UMAP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The extracted streamflow-related (<b>a</b>) RSMs, (<b>b</b>) RTPCs along with USGS in situ streamflow data, and (<b>c</b>) neural network regression models for FIER Sentinel-1 inundation extent forecasting in the RRNB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The extracted streamflow-related (<b>a</b>) RSMs, (<b>b</b>) RTPCs along with USGS in situ streamflow data, and (<b>c</b>) neural network regression models for FIER Sentinel-1 inundation extent forecasting in the UMAP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cumulative percentages of pixels in different ranges of AEs in the RRNB and UMAP over (<b>a</b>) all pixels and (<b>b</b>) pixels with high water fractions (&gt;80%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Water fractions on the peak-flood dates in 2022 and 2023 in the RRNB: (<b>a</b>) historical observation where white pixels are clouds, (<b>b</b>) FIER pseudo-nowcast, and (<b>c</b>) 8-day FIER medium-range pseudo-forecast.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Water fractions on the peak flood dates in 2021, 2022, and 2023 in the UMAP: (<b>a</b>) historical observation where white pixels are clouds, (<b>b</b>) FIER pseudo-nowcast, and (<b>c</b>) 8-day FIER medium-range pseudo-forecast.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Examples of averaged FIER medium-range water fraction pseudo-forecasts over the next 1 to 8 days in the 2022 spring wheat fields in the RRNB, which could have been generated on (<b>a</b>) 2022-05-02, (<b>b</b>) 2022-05-03, or (<b>c</b>) 2022-05-04, before the peak flood on 2022-05-05 in the planting period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Examples of averaged FIER medium-range water fraction pseudo-forecasts over the next 1 to 8 days in the 2022 soybean fields in the UMAP, which could have been generated on (<b>a</b>) 2022-05-11, (<b>b</b>) 2022-05-12, or (<b>c</b>) 2022-05-13, before the peak flood on 2022-05-14 in the planting period.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 9156 KiB  
Article
3D Modelling and Measuring Dam System of a Pellucid Tufa Lake Using UAV Digital Photogrammetry
by Xianwei Zhang, Guiyun Zhou, Jinchen He and Jiayuan Lin
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(20), 3839; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203839 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 865
Abstract
The acquisition of the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the complete tufa dam system is of great significance for analyzing the formation and development of a pellucid tufa lake in a fluvial tufa valley. The dam system is usually composed of the dams partially [...] Read more.
The acquisition of the three-dimensional (3D) morphology of the complete tufa dam system is of great significance for analyzing the formation and development of a pellucid tufa lake in a fluvial tufa valley. The dam system is usually composed of the dams partially exposed above-water and the ones totally submerged underwater. This situation makes it difficult to directly obtain the real 3D scene of the dam system solely using an existing measurement technique. In recent years, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) digital photogrammetry has been increasingly used to acquire high-precision 3D models of various earth surface scenes. In this study, taking Wolong Lake and its neighborhood in Jiuzhaigou Valley, China as the study site, we employed a fixed-wing UAV equipped with a consumer-level digital camera to capture the overlapping images, and produced the initial Digital Surface Model (DSM) of the dam system. The refraction correction was applied to retrieving the underwater Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the submerged dam or dam part, and the ground interpolation was adopted to eliminate vegetation obstruction to obtain the DEM of the dam parts above-water. Based on the complete 3D model of the dam system, the elevation profiles along the centerlines of Wolong Lake were derived, and the dimension data of those tufa dams on the section lines were accurately measured. In combination of local hydrodynamics, the implication of the morphological characteristics for analyzing the formation and development of the tufa dam system was also explored. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The study site is located in Sichuan Province, China; (<b>b</b>) Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve; (<b>c</b>) the tufa dam system of Wolong Lake.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The workflow for modelling and analyzing dam system of a tufa lake using UAV digital photogrammetry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Deviated underwater terrain caused by refraction of light at the interface of water and air.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The resulting DEM of above-water tufa dam using ground interpolation based on the initial DSM from SfM-MVS processing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The centerline of a water channel is obtained using Voronoi-based median axis extraction algorithm. (<b>a</b>) The discrete points sampled on both sides of the water channel; (<b>b</b>) the generated Thiessen polygons; (<b>c</b>) the resulting centerline of the water channel.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Delineated boundaries of above-water and underwater parts of study site; (<b>b</b>) the initial DSM of study site were divided into above-water and underwater parts; (<b>c</b>) the spatial scopes of UD, SD, and DD delineated out on the complete DEM of study site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The complete DEM of the study site by stitching the resulting DEMs after refraction correction and ground interpolation. (<b>a</b>) The initial underwater DSM; (<b>b</b>) the resulting DEM via refraction correction; (<b>c</b>) the initial above-water DSM; (<b>d</b>) the resulting DEM removed of vegetation; (<b>e</b>) the complete DEM of the study site.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Thiessen polygons of the fluvial channel of Wolong Lake; (<b>b</b>) extracted centerline of the fluvial channel of Wolong Lake; (<b>c</b>) extracted three centerlines for deriving elevation profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Longitudinal elevation profiles of the tufa dam system belonging to Wolong Lake. (<b>a</b>) Elevation profile along the left centerline; (<b>b</b>) elevation profile along the middle centerline; (<b>c</b>) elevation profile along the right centerline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic diagram of downstream-dipping ramp; (<b>b</b>) schematic diagram of downstream-overhanging crest with tufa stalactites; (<b>c</b>) the real scenery of the downstream tufa dam of Wolong Lake; (<b>d</b>) the stepped terrain where the downstream tufa dams formed. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) adapted from Carthew et al. [<a href="#B43-remotesensing-16-03839" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 14919 KiB  
Article
Marine Microplastic Classification by Hyperspectral Imaging: Case Studies from the Mediterranean Sea, the Strait of Gibraltar, the Western Atlantic Ocean and the Bay of Biscay
by Roberta Palmieri, Silvia Serranti, Giuseppe Capobianco, Andres Cózar, Elisa Martí and Giuseppe Bonifazi
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(20), 9310; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209310 - 12 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1319
Abstract
In this work, a comprehensive characterization of microplastic samples collected from unique geographical locations, including the Mediterranean Sea, Strait of Gibraltar, Western Atlantic Ocean and Bay of Biscay utilizing advanced hyperspectral imaging (HSI) techniques working in the short-wave infrared range (1000–2500 nm) is [...] Read more.
In this work, a comprehensive characterization of microplastic samples collected from unique geographical locations, including the Mediterranean Sea, Strait of Gibraltar, Western Atlantic Ocean and Bay of Biscay utilizing advanced hyperspectral imaging (HSI) techniques working in the short-wave infrared range (1000–2500 nm) is presented. More in detail, an ad hoc hierarchical classification approach was developed and applied to optimize the identification of polymers. Morphological and morphometrical attributes of microplastic particles were simultaneously measured by digital image processing. Results showed that the collected microplastics are mainly composed, in decreasing order of abundance, by polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and expanded polystyrene (EPS), in agreement with the literature data related to marine microplastics. The investigated microplastics belong to the fragments (86.8%), lines (9.2%) and films (4.0%) categories. Rigid (thick-walled) fragments were found at all sampling sites, while film-type microplastics and lines were absent in some samples from the Mediterranean Sea and the Western Atlantic Ocean. Rigid fragments and lines are mainly made of PE, whereas PP is the most common polymer for the film category. Average Feret diameter of microplastic fragments decreases from EPS (3–4 mm) to PE (2–3 mm) and PP (1–2 mm). The setup strategies illustrate that the HSI-based approach enables the classification of the polymers constituting microplastic particles and, at the same time, to measure and classify them by shape. Such multiple characterization of microplastic samples at the individual level is proposed as a useful tool to explore the environmental selection of microplastic features (i.e., composition, category, size, shape) and to advance the understanding of the role of weathering, hydrodynamic and other phenomena in their transport and fragmentation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sampling sites in the Western Atlantic Ocean, Bay of Biscay, Strait of Gibraltar and Mediterranean Sea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Dendrogram showing the hierarchical PLS-DA model built to classify the four different polymers constituting microplastic particles: PE, PP, EPS, PS and not identified (NI).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Composition of the training dataset of microplastics. Polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and expanded polystyrene (EPS).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average raw reflectance spectra in the SWIR range (1000–2500 nm) of the reference microplastic particles acquired by HSI device and used as training set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Average pre-processed reflectance spectra of the different polymers (<b>a</b>) and PCA score plot (PC1–PC2–PC5) (<b>b</b>) related to Rule 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Average pre-processed reflectance spectra of the different polymers (<b>a</b>) and PCA score plot (PC1–PC2–PC5) (<b>b</b>) related to Rule 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Source digital images and corresponding false color prediction maps obtained from the HSI-hierarchical model of some of the examined microplastic samples from the Mediterranean Sea and the Strait of Gibraltar obtained by the application of the hierarchical PLS-DA model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Source digital images and corresponding false color prediction maps obtained from the HSI-hierarchical model of some of the examined microplastic samples from the Western Atlantic Ocean (E4 Sermiento) and the Bay of Biscay (ETO 16 and NST 41) were obtained following the application of the hierarchical PLS-DA model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Percentages of different identified polymers in the investigated marine microplastic samples collected in different areas. NI: not identified.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Abundance of microplastic categories in each analyzed sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Percentage of polymer types in each analyzed marine microplastic category such as fragments, films and lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Percentage abundance of polymer types at each sampling site, categorized by fragments, films and lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>Percentage abundance of polymer types at each sampling site, categorized by fragments, films and lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Maximum Feret diameter frequency distribution (in number) for PE, PP, EPS, PS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Area frequency distribution (in number) for PE, PP, EPS and PS fragments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Perimeter frequency distribution (in number) for PE, PP, EPS and PS fragments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Circularity frequency distribution (in number) for PE, PP, EPS and PS fragments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Example of microplastic items, made of different polymers (i.e., PP, PE and EPS), showing different circularity values.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from the Strait of Gibraltar and Mediterranean Sea: (<b>a</b>) A02DS, (<b>b</b>) A06NS, (<b>c</b>) A27NS and (<b>d</b>) A34NS.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from the Strait of Gibraltar and Mediterranean Sea: (<b>a</b>) A02DS, (<b>b</b>) A06NS, (<b>c</b>) A27NS and (<b>d</b>) A34NS.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from the Strait of Gibraltar and Mediterranean Sea: (<b>a</b>) A02DS, (<b>b</b>) A06NS, (<b>c</b>) A27NS and (<b>d</b>) A34NS.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from the Western Atlantic Ocean: E4-Sarmiento.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2 Cont.
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from the Western Atlantic Ocean: E4-Sarmiento.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from Bay of Biscay: ETO 16.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Digital images and corresponding predicted images obtained after the application of hierarchical PLS-DA model of the microplastic samples coming from Bay of Biscay: NST41.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1818 KiB  
Article
An Experimental Methodology for Automated Detection of Surface Turbulence Features in Tidal Stream Environments
by James Slingsby, Beth E. Scott, Louise Kregting, Jason McIlvenny, Jared Wilson, Fanny Helleux and Benjamin J. Williamson
Sensors 2024, 24(19), 6170; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24196170 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 790
Abstract
Tidal stream environments are important areas of marine habitat for the development of marine renewable energy (MRE) sources and as foraging hotspots for megafaunal species (seabirds and marine mammals). Hydrodynamic features can promote prey availability and foraging efficiency that influences megafaunal foraging success [...] Read more.
Tidal stream environments are important areas of marine habitat for the development of marine renewable energy (MRE) sources and as foraging hotspots for megafaunal species (seabirds and marine mammals). Hydrodynamic features can promote prey availability and foraging efficiency that influences megafaunal foraging success and behaviour, with the potential for animal interactions with MRE devices. Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) offer a novel tool for the fine-scale data collection of surface turbulence features and animals, which is not possible through other techniques, to provide information on the potential environmental impacts of anthropogenic developments. However, large imagery datasets are time-consuming to manually review and analyse. This study demonstrates an experimental methodology for the automated detection of turbulence features within UAV imagery. A deep learning architecture, specifically a Faster R-CNN model, was used to autonomously detect kolk-boils within UAV imagery of a tidal stream environment. The model was trained on pre-existing, labelled images of kolk-boils that were pre-treated using a suite of image enhancement techniques based on the environmental conditions present within each image. A 75-epoch model variant provided the highest average recall and precision values; however, it appeared to be limited by sub-optimal detections of false positive values. Although further development is required, including the creation of standardised image data pools, increased model benchmarking and the advancement of tailored pre-processing techniques, this work demonstrates the viability of utilising deep learning to automate the detection of surface turbulence features within a tidal stream environment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Airborne Unmanned Sensor System for UAVs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The United Kingdom and the Inner Sound of the Pentland Firth with UAV coverage of training and test datasets displayed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of (<b>left</b>) untreated and (<b>right</b>) CLAHE and linear transformed images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The workflow of Faster R-CNN architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Examples of calm, glare, and wind category images detected by the 75-epoch model.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 11864 KiB  
Article
Comparison Study of Hydrodynamic Characteristics in Different Swimming Modes of Carassius auratus
by Ying Zhang, Di Jing, Xiaoshuang Huang, Xinjun Chen, Bilin Liu and Xianghong Kong
Fishes 2024, 9(9), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9090365 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 709
Abstract
This study utilized particle image velocimetry (PIV) to analyze the kinematic and hydrodynamic characteristics of juvenile goldfish across three swimming modes: forward swimming, burst and coast, and turning. The results demonstrated that C-shaped turning exhibited the highest speed, enabling rapid and agile maneuvers [...] Read more.
This study utilized particle image velocimetry (PIV) to analyze the kinematic and hydrodynamic characteristics of juvenile goldfish across three swimming modes: forward swimming, burst and coast, and turning. The results demonstrated that C-shaped turning exhibited the highest speed, enabling rapid and agile maneuvers for predator evasion. Meanwhile, forward swimming was optimal for sustained locomotion, and burst-and-coast swimming was suited for predatory behaviors. A vorticity analysis revealed that vorticity around the tail fin was the primary source of propulsive force, corroborating the correlation between vorticity magnitude and propulsion found in previous research. The findings emphasize the crucial role of the tail fin in swimming efficiency and performance. Future research should integrate ethology, biomechanics, and physiology to deepen the understanding of fish locomotion, potentially informing the design of efficient biomimetic underwater robots and contributing to fish conservation efforts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fish body part division.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow-field test PIV system. The green area in the image indicates the laser plane light source.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Grid division on the swimming plane of goldfish.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Fish body stress diagram. (The red dashed line represents the midline of the fish body).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Fish turning angle and curvature. (<b>A</b>) Fish turning angle; (<b>B</b>) fish curvature coefficient.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Sequence diagram of the forward movement state of a goldfish over one cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Sequence diagram of a goldfish’s turning movement over one cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Sequence diagram of a goldfish’s burst-and-coast over one cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Vorticity field of juvenile goldfish swimming in a straight line. The arrow in the picture represents the velocity vector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Vorticity field during turning swimming in juvenile goldfish. The arrow in the picture represents the velocity vector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Vorticity field of juvenile goldfish swimming with burst and coast (annotated at t = 180 ms to indicate the schematic of the jet stream.). The arrow in the picture represents the velocity vector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Time sequence diagram of the magnitude of forces acting on juvenile goldfish swimming in a straight line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Time sequence diagram of the magnitude of forces acting on juvenile goldfish swimming in a turning state.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Time sequence diagram of the magnitude of forces acting on juvenile goldfish in the burst-and-coast state.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 8636 KiB  
Article
Karst Hydrological Connections of Lakes and Neoproterozoic Hydrogeological System between the Years 1985–2020, Lagoa Santa—Minas Gerais, Brazil
by Wallace Pacheco Neto, Rodrigo de Paula and Paulo Galvão
Water 2024, 16(18), 2591; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182591 - 12 Sep 2024
Viewed by 883
Abstract
This study focuses on a complex Brazilian Neoproterozoic karst (hydro)geological and geomorphological area, consisting of metapelitic–carbonate sedimentary rocks of ~740–590 Ma, forming the largest carbonate sequence in the country. At the center of the area lies the Lagoa Santa Karst Environmental Protection Area [...] Read more.
This study focuses on a complex Brazilian Neoproterozoic karst (hydro)geological and geomorphological area, consisting of metapelitic–carbonate sedimentary rocks of ~740–590 Ma, forming the largest carbonate sequence in the country. At the center of the area lies the Lagoa Santa Karst Environmental Protection Area (LSKEPA), located near the Minas Gerais’ state capital, Belo Horizonte, and presents a series of lakes associated with the large fluvial system of the Velhas river under the influence, locally, of carbonate rocks. The hydrodynamics of carbonate lakes remain enigmatic, and various factors can influence the behavior of these water bodies. This work analyzed the hydrological behavior of 129 lakes within the LSKEPA to understand potential connections with the main karst aquifer, karst-fissure aquifer, and porous aquifer, as well as their evolution patterns in the physical environment. Pluviometric surveys and satellite image analysis were conducted from 1984 to 2020 to observe how the lakes’ shorelines behaved in response to meteorological variations. The temporal assessment for understanding landscape evolution proves to be an effective tool and provides important information about the interaction between groundwater and surface water. The 129 lakes were grouped into eight classes representing the hydrological connection patterns with the aquifers in the region, with classes defined for perennial lakes: (1) constantly connected, (2) seasonally disconnected, and (3) disconnected; for intermittent lakes: (4) disconnected during the analyzed time interval, (5) seasonally connected, (6) disconnected, (7) extremely disconnected, and (8) intermittent lakes that connected and stopped drying up. The patterns observed in the variation of lakes’ shorelines under the influence of different pluviometric moments showed a positive correlation, especially in dry periods, where these water bodies may be functioning as recharge or discharge zones of the karst aquifer. These inputs and outputs are conditioned to the well-developed karst tertiary porosity, where water flow in the epikarst moves according to the direction of enlarged karstified fractures, rock foliation planes, and lithological contacts. Other factors may condition the hydrological behavior of the lakes, such as rates of evapotranspiration, intensity of rainfall during rainy periods, and excessive exploitation of water. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Karstic Hydrogeology, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological and location map of the study area highlighting the Lagoa Santa Karst Environmental Protection Area, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and the lakes analyzed in this work. Geology modified from “Projeto Vida” [<a href="#B21-water-16-02591" class="html-bibr">21</a>] and profile modified from [<a href="#B22-water-16-02591" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of Landsat satellite images used in this study, representing the rainy season of 1999 and the dry season of the same year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Graphical representation of perimeter variation over the years for the studied lakes (example Lake 28).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart summarizing the steps taken to identify the expansion or contraction behavior of each lake over the analyzed years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bar chart representing the annual average precipitation between the hydrological years 1984–1985 and 2019–2020. The orange bars indicate precipitation during the dry months (April to September), while the blue bars show precipitation during the wet months (October to March). The red line marks the average precipitation for the 36 years analyzed in this study, with confidence intervals represented by the dashed blue line (positive confidence interval) and the dashed yellow line (negative confidence interval).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Bar chart representing rainfall and drought cycles. Values above the historical average (black dashed line) during dry precipitation cycles were defined as atypical dry hydrological years, while values below the historical average (black dashed line) during wet cycles were defined as atypical wet hydrological years.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Graph of the precipitation cycles, showing their averages, and trend lines representing the precipitation variation within each cycle. Below is a table summarizing the averages and equations of the trend lines for each cycle, with angular coefficients in blue (positive) and red (negative).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Identification and distribution of perennial lakes (in blue) and intermittent lakes (in orange) in the study area. (<b>A</b>) and (<b>B</b>): Highlights of some lakes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Graphical representation of the perimeter variation of perennial lake 23 over the time interval used. The precipitation cycles and the trend lines of perimeter variation in each cycle can be observed. The table below provides the trend line equations within each cycle, along with their positive and negative angular coefficients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Graphical representation with examples of the behavior of perennial lakes that are constantly connected (<b>a</b>), seasonally disconnected perennial lakes (<b>b</b>), and disconnected perennial lakes (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Illustration of the proposed classes of hydrological connection for the analyzed perennial lakes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Graphical representation, with examples of the behavior of intermittent lakes that disconnected from the aquifer at some point (<b>a</b>), intermittently connected lakes (<b>b</b>), disconnected intermittent lakes (<b>c</b>), extremely disconnected intermittent lakes (<b>d</b>), and fully connected intermittent lakes (<b>e</b>).</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 4853 KiB  
Article
Enhancements of Wave Power Absorption with Arrays and a Vertical Breakwater
by Fuat Kara
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(9), 1523; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091523 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 813
Abstract
The capability of the in-house transient wave-multibody computational tool, ITU-WAVE, is extended to predict the wave power absorption with Wave Energy Converters (WECs) arrays placed in front of a vertical breakwater. The hydrodynamic forces are approximated by solving boundary integral equation at each [...] Read more.
The capability of the in-house transient wave-multibody computational tool, ITU-WAVE, is extended to predict the wave power absorption with Wave Energy Converters (WECs) arrays placed in front of a vertical breakwater. The hydrodynamic forces are approximated by solving boundary integral equation at each time interval. The reflection of incoming waves due to a vertical wall is predicted with method of images. The constructive or destructive performance of WECs arrays with different array configurations is measured with mean interaction factor. The behaviour of the hydrodynamic forces of each WEC due to a vertical wall effect shows considerable differences than those of WECs arrays without a vertical wall. When the wave power absorption with WECs arrays with and without a vertical wall effect are compared, the numerical results show that WECs placed in front of a vertical wall have much greater effects on wave power absorption. This can be attributed to the hydrodynamic interaction, standing waves, and nearly trapped waves in the gap between a vertical wall and WECs arrays. The analytical and other numerical results are used for the validation of present ITU-WAVE computational results for exciting and radiation forces, and mean interaction factor of WECs arrays which show satisfactory agreements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Positions of WECs in 2 × 5 arrays with a vertical wall (breakwater) and a coordinate system in xy-plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Nondimensional interaction sway radiation force coefficients between WEC1 and WEC4 [<a href="#B10-jmse-12-01523" class="html-bibr">10</a>]; (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>A</mi> <mrow> <mn>22</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>14</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>B</mi> <mrow> <mn>22</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>14</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Nondimensional interaction sway radiation force coefficients between WEC1 and WEC5 [<a href="#B10-jmse-12-01523" class="html-bibr">10</a>]; (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>A</mi> <mrow> <mn>22</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>B</mi> <mrow> <mn>22</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Nondimensional amplitudes of exciting forces in surge mode [<a href="#B3-jmse-12-01523" class="html-bibr">3</a>]; (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Mean interaction factor <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="normal">q</mi> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>mean</mi> </mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> of rectangle 2 × 5 arrays [<a href="#B28-jmse-12-01523" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Nondimensional heave IRF of exciting force for 5th row of 5 × 5 arrays with and without a vertical wall effect.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Nondimensional IRFs of exciting force in heave mode at the centre of each row of 3 × 5 arrays; (<b>a</b>) without a vertical breakwater; (<b>b</b>) with a vertical breakwater.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Nondimensional heave radiation interaction IRFs of 3 × 5 arrays; (<b>a</b>) without a vertical wall; (<b>b</b>) with a vertical wall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Effects of a vertical wall on each WEC’s RAO for 1 × 3 arrays of sphere; (<b>a</b>) sway; (<b>b</b>) heave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effects of a vertical wall on each WEC’s RAO for 2 × 3 arrays of sphere; (<b>a</b>) 1st row sway; (<b>b</b>) 2nd row sway; (<b>c</b>) 1st row heave; (<b>d</b>) 2nd row heave.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Heave and sway modes of isolated sphere; (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>; (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mo> </mo> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Effects of a vertical wall with 2 × 3 arrays on wave power absorption; (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Heave mean interaction factors of each row without a vertical wall effect; (<b>a</b>) 2 × 3; (<b>b</b>) 3 × 3 arrays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Effects of a vertical wall on heave mean interaction factors of each row; (<b>a</b>) 2 × 3 arrays; (<b>b</b>) 3 × 3 arrays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Heave mean interaction factors in a range of row numbers; (<b>a</b>) without a vertical wall; (<b>b</b>) with a vertical wall.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop