Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (372)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = demand response (DR)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 2746 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Microgrid Performance: Integrating Unscented Transformation and Enhanced Cheetah Optimization for Renewable Energy Management
by Ali S. Alghamdi
Electronics 2024, 13(22), 4563; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13224563 - 20 Nov 2024
Viewed by 281
Abstract
The increased integration of renewable energy sources (RESs), such as photovoltaic and wind turbine systems, in microgrids poses significant challenges due to fluctuating weather conditions and load demands. To address these challenges, this study introduces an innovative approach that combines Unscented Transformation (UT) [...] Read more.
The increased integration of renewable energy sources (RESs), such as photovoltaic and wind turbine systems, in microgrids poses significant challenges due to fluctuating weather conditions and load demands. To address these challenges, this study introduces an innovative approach that combines Unscented Transformation (UT) with the Enhanced Cheetah Optimization Algorithm (ECOA) for optimal microgrid management. UT, a robust statistical technique, models nonlinear uncertainties effectively by leveraging sigma points, facilitating accurate decision-making despite variable renewable generation and load conditions. The ECOA, inspired by the adaptive hunting behaviors of cheetahs, is enhanced with stochastic leaps, adaptive chase mechanisms, and cooperative strategies to prevent premature convergence, enabling improved exploration and optimization for unbalanced three-phase distribution networks. This integrated UT-ECOA approach enables simultaneous optimization of continuous and discrete decision variables in the microgrid, efficiently handling uncertainty within RESs and load demands. Results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly improves microgrid performance, achieving a 10% reduction in voltage deviation, a 10.63% decrease in power losses, and an 83.32% reduction in operational costs, especially when demand response (DR) is implemented. These findings validate the model’s efficacy in enhancing microgrid reliability and efficiency, positioning it as a viable solution for optimized performance under uncertain renewable inputs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the proposed UT-based ECOA for optimal solving of EM problems.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The mean values of (<b>a</b>) wind speed, (<b>b</b>) solar irradiance, and (<b>c</b>) load demand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microgrid’s Optimal generation scheduling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>DR’s effect on the hourly load curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Optimal results of the PV’s power generation, bus, and phase locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Optimal results of the grid’s power generation, bus, and phase locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Optimal results of the WT’s power generation, bus, and phase locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Optimal results of the DG’s power generation, bus, and phase locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Optimal results of the MT’s power generation, bus, and phase locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Optimal results of the BESS’s power generation, bus, and phase locations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Voltage deviations before and after the proposed optimization EM model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Microgrid losses before and after the proposed optimization EM model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Convergence curves of the comparative algorithms in solving the problem.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 14659 KiB  
Article
Effect of Relative Density on the Lateral Response of Piled Raft Foundation: An Experimental Study
by Mohammad Ilyas Siddiqi, Hamza Ahmad Qureshi, Irfan Jamil and Fahad Alshawmar
Buildings 2024, 14(11), 3687; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113687 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 379
Abstract
The population surge has led to a corresponding increase in the demand for high-rise buildings, bridges, and other heavy structures. In addition to gravity loads, these structures must withstand lateral loads from earthquakes, wind, ships, vehicles, etc. A piled raft foundation (PRF) has [...] Read more.
The population surge has led to a corresponding increase in the demand for high-rise buildings, bridges, and other heavy structures. In addition to gravity loads, these structures must withstand lateral loads from earthquakes, wind, ships, vehicles, etc. A piled raft foundation (PRF) has emerged as the most favored system for high-rise buildings due to its ability to resist lateral loads. An experimental study was conducted on three different piled raft model configurations with three different relative densities (Dr) to determine the effect of Dr on the lateral response of a PRF. A model raft was constructed using a 25 mm thick aluminum plate with dimensions of 304.8 mm × 304.8 mm, and galvanized iron (GI) pipes, each 457.2 mm in length, were used to represent the piles. The lateral and vertical load cells were connected to measure the applied loads. It was found that an increase in Dr increased the soil stiffness and led to a decrease in the lateral displacement for all three PRF models. Additionally, the contribution of the piles in resisting the lateral load decreased, whereas the contribution of the raft portion in resisting the lateral load increased. With an increase in Dr from 30% to 90%, the percentage contribution of the raft increased from 42% to 66% for 2PRF, 38% to 61% for 4PRF, and 46% to 70% for 6PRF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Foundation Engineering for Building Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Particle size distribution of the soil used in this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Direct shear test results for D<sub>r</sub> 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Direct shear test results for Dr 60%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Direct shear test results for Dr 90%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Model soil box; (<b>b</b>) horizontal and diagonal stiffeners; (<b>c</b>) 3D view of the box.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Model raft; (<b>b</b>) raft with hook.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Model piles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Top view schematic diagram of: (<b>a</b>) 2PRF; (<b>b</b>) 4PRF; (<b>c</b>) 6PRF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Real PRF models: (<b>a</b>) 2PRF; (<b>b</b>) 4PRF; (<b>c</b>) 6PRF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Strain gauge installation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Strain gauge calibration process. (<b>a</b>) Digital balance. (<b>b</b>) Load arrangement for calibration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Variation in relative density with free fall height.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Verification of D<sub>r</sub> with DCP; (<b>b</b>) positions for performing DCP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison curve for DCP results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Schematic diagram of test setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) Vertical load cell; (<b>b</b>) lateral load cell; (<b>c</b>) LVDTs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Vertical load setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Lateral load setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Analysis of 2PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Analysis of 2PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 60%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Analysis of 2PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 90%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Analysis of 4PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Analysis of 4PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 60%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Analysis of 4PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 90%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>Analysis of 6PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 30%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 26
<p>Analysis of 6PRF at D<sub>r</sub> 60%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 27
<p>Analysis of 6PRF at Dr 90%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 28
<p>Percentage contribution of 2PRF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 29
<p>Percentage contribution of 4PRF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 30
<p>Percentage contribution of 6PRF.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2611 KiB  
Article
A Coordinated Bidding Strategy of Wind Power Producers and DR Aggregators Using a Cooperative Game Approach
by Xuemei Dai, Shiyuan Zheng, Haoran Chen and Wenjun Bi
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10699; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210699 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 323
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the profitability of wind energy and demand response (DR) resources participating in the energy and frequency regulation markets. Since wind power producers (WPPs) must reduce their output to provide up-regulation and DR aggregators (DRAs) have [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the profitability of wind energy and demand response (DR) resources participating in the energy and frequency regulation markets. Since wind power producers (WPPs) must reduce their output to provide up-regulation and DR aggregators (DRAs) have to purchase additional power to facilitate down-regulation, this may result in revenue loss. If WPPs coordinate with DRAs, these two costs could be reduced. Thus, it would be profitable for WPPs and DRAs to form a coalition to participate in the regulation market. To better utilize the frequency response characteristics of wind and DR resources, this paper proposes a cooperation scheme to optimize the bidding strategy of the coalition. Furthermore, cooperative game theory methods, including Nucleolus- and Shapley-value-based models, are employed to fairly allocate additional benefits among WPPs and DRAs. The uncertainties associated with wind power and the behavior of DR customers are modeled through stochastic programming. In the optimization process, the decision-maker’s attitude toward risks is considered using conditional value at risk (CVaR). Case studies demonstrate that the proposed bidding strategy can improve the performance of the coalition and lead to higher benefits for both WPPs and DRAs. Specifically, the expected revenue of the coordinated strategies increased by 12.1% compared to that of uncoordinated strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art of Power Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Wind and DR resource cooperation scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flowchart for the proposed bidding strategies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wind power data for a sample day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Expected hourly prices in energy and regulation markets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Total expected profit in each case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The expected profits from each market.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of individual and integrated bidding strategies for WPP and DRA, (<b>a</b>) results of Case S2, (<b>b</b>) results of Case S4, (<b>c</b>) results of Case S6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Daily profit over 1 week.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Expected profit and CVaR for different β, (<b>a</b>) expected profit versus CVaR for Case 1, (<b>b</b>) expected profit versus CVaR for Case 2, (<b>c</b>) expected profit versus CVaR for Case 3.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2164 KiB  
Article
An Optimization Strategy for Unit Commitment in High Wind Power Penetration Power Systems Considering Demand Response and Frequency Stability Constraints
by Minhui Qian, Jiachen Wang, Dejian Yang, Hongqiao Yin and Jiansheng Zhang
Energies 2024, 17(22), 5725; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225725 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 389
Abstract
To address the issue of accommodating large-scale wind power integration into the grid, a unit commitment model for power systems based on an improved binary particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed, considering frequency constraints and demand response (DR). First, incentive-based DR and price-based [...] Read more.
To address the issue of accommodating large-scale wind power integration into the grid, a unit commitment model for power systems based on an improved binary particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed, considering frequency constraints and demand response (DR). First, incentive-based DR and price-based DR are introduced to enhance the flexibility of the demand side. To ensure the system can provide frequency support, the unit commitment model incorporates constraints such as the rate of change of frequency, frequency nadir, steady-state frequency deviation, and fast frequency response. Next, for the unit commitment planning problem, the binary particle swarm optimization algorithm is employed to solve the mixed nonlinear programming model of unit commitment, thus obtaining the minimum operating cost. The results show that after considering DR, the load becomes smoother compared to the scenario without DR participation, the overall level of load power is lower, and the frequency meets the safety constraint requirements. The results indicate that a comparative analysis of unit commitment in power systems under different scenarios verifies that DR can promote rational allocation of electricity load by users, thereby improving the operational flexibility and economic efficiency of the power system. In addition, the frequency variation considering frequency safety constraints has also been significantly improved. The improved binary particle swarm optimization algorithm has promising application prospects in solving the accommodation problem brought by large-scale wind power integration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section F1: Electrical Power System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Optimization strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Economic load distribution process diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Algorithm iteration steps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Wind and load forecasting power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Load curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time-of-use electricity price in each period of a day.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Shiftable load power curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Curtailable load power curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of iterative effects of different algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Scenario 1 unit combination output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Scenario 2 unit combination output.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2866 KiB  
Article
Incentive Determination for Demand Response Considering Internal Rate of Return
by Gyuhyeon Bae, Ahyun Yoon and Sungsoo Kim
Energies 2024, 17(22), 5660; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225660 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 343
Abstract
The rapid expansion of renewable energy sources has led to increased instability in the power grid of Jeju Island, leading to the implementation of the plus demand response (DR) system, which aims to boost electricity consumption during curtailment periods. However, the frequency of [...] Read more.
The rapid expansion of renewable energy sources has led to increased instability in the power grid of Jeju Island, leading to the implementation of the plus demand response (DR) system, which aims to boost electricity consumption during curtailment periods. However, the frequency of curtailment owing to the increased utilization of renewable energy is outpacing the implementation of plus DR, highlighting the need for additional resources, such as energy storage systems (ESS). High initial investment costs have been the primary hindrance to the adoption of ESS by DR-participating companies but have not been fully considered in earlier studies on DR incentive determination. Therefore, this study proposes an algorithm for calculating appropriate incentives for plus DR participation considering the investment costs required for ESS. Based on actual load data, incentives are determined using an iterative mixed-integer programming (MIP) optimization method that progressively adjusts the incentive level to address the overall nonlinearity arising from both the multiplication of variables and the nonlinear characteristics of the internal rate of return (IRR), ensuring that the target IRR is achieved. A case study on the impact of factors such as IRR, ESS costs, and fluctuations in electricity rates on incentive calculations demonstrated that plus DR incentives required to achieve IRR targets of 5%, 10%, and 15% have increased linearly from 142.2 KRW/kWh to 363.0 KRW/kWh, confirming that the appropriate incentive level can be effectively determined based on ESS investment costs and target IRR. This result could help promote ESS adoption among DR companies and plus DR participation, thereby enhancing power grid stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling, Optimization, and Control in Smart Grids: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Situation at the instance of DR execution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of the iterative optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) TOU pattern; (<b>b</b>) Load pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Incentive variations when IRR = 5%, 10%, and 15%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Peak load in a day in spring. (<b>b</b>) Peak load in a day in summer. (<b>c</b>) Peak load in a day in the fall. (<b>d</b>) Peak load in a day in winter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Incentive variations with decreasing ESS investment costs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Incentive variations based on TOU rates.</p>
Full article ">
31 pages, 11682 KiB  
Article
Comparative Study of Time Series Analysis Algorithms Suitable for Short-Term Forecasting in Implementing Demand Response Based on AMI
by Myung-Joo Park and Hyo-Sik Yang
Sensors 2024, 24(22), 7205; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227205 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 296
Abstract
This paper compares four time series forecasting algorithms—ARIMA, SARIMA, LSTM, and SVM—suitable for short-term load forecasting using Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) data. The primary focus is on evaluating the applicability and performance of these forecasting models in predicting electricity consumption patterns, which is [...] Read more.
This paper compares four time series forecasting algorithms—ARIMA, SARIMA, LSTM, and SVM—suitable for short-term load forecasting using Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) data. The primary focus is on evaluating the applicability and performance of these forecasting models in predicting electricity consumption patterns, which is a critical component for implementing effective demand response (DR) strategies. The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability of each algorithm using a dataset of real-time electricity consumption collected from AMI systems over a designated period. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that each algorithm has distinct strengths and weaknesses depending on the characteristics of the dataset. Specifically, SVM exhibited superior performance in handling nonlinear patterns and high volatility, while SARIMA effectively captured seasonal trends. LSTM showed potential in modeling complex temporal dependencies but was sensitive to hyperparameter settings and required a substantial amount of training data. This research offers practical guidelines for selecting the optimal forecasting model based on data characteristics and application needs, contributing to the development of more efficient and dynamic energy management strategies. The findings highlight the importance of integrating advanced forecasting techniques into smart grid systems to enhance the reliability and responsiveness of DR programs. This study lays a solid foundation for future research on integrating these forecasting models into real-world AMI applications to support effective demand response and grid stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IoT and Big Data Analytics for Smart Cities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Possibility of overfitting due to amount of learning data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Neural network without dropout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Neural network with dropout.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution and trend line graphs of sampled data by consumer number (CNSMR_NO).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in DJ0200309001501.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in DJ0800133001204.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in DJ1200215000404.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CB0100106000505.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0100107001801.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0200311001801.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN1100106000103.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN1600102001004.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0500311000403.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data in CN0700109000102.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Differences in SGPowerUsage values between predictions and actual data.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 15476 KiB  
Article
Explainable AI-Based Ensemble Clustering for Load Profiling and Demand Response
by Elissaios Sarmas, Afroditi Fragkiadaki and Vangelis Marinakis
Energies 2024, 17(22), 5559; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225559 - 7 Nov 2024
Viewed by 419
Abstract
Smart meter data provide an in-depth perspective on household energy usage. This research leverages on such data to enhance demand response (DR) programs through a novel application of ensemble clustering. Despite its promising capabilities, our literature review identified a notable under-utilization of ensemble [...] Read more.
Smart meter data provide an in-depth perspective on household energy usage. This research leverages on such data to enhance demand response (DR) programs through a novel application of ensemble clustering. Despite its promising capabilities, our literature review identified a notable under-utilization of ensemble clustering in this domain. To address this shortcoming, we applied an advanced ensemble clustering method and compared its performance with traditional algorithms, namely, K-Means++, fuzzy K-Means, Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering, Spectral Clustering, Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), BIRCH, and Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs), across a dataset of 5567 households for a range of cluster counts from three to nine. The performance of these algorithms was assessed using an extensive set of evaluation metrics, including the Silhouette Score, the Davies–Bouldin Score, the Calinski–Harabasz Score, and the Dunn Index. Notably, while ensemble clustering often ranked among the top performers, it did not consistently surpass all individual algorithms, indicating its potential for further optimization. Unlike approaches that seek the algorithmically optimal number of clusters, our method proposes a practical six-cluster solution designed to meet the operational needs of utility providers. For this case, the best performing algorithm according to the evaluation metrics was ensemble clustering. This study is further enhanced by integrating Explainable AI (xAI) techniques, which improve the interpretability and transparency of our clustering results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Energy Market and Distributed Generation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Detailed overview of methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Snapshot of the dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Silhouette scores for cluster ranges from 3 to 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Davies–Bouldin scores for cluster ranges from 3 to 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calinski–Harabasz scores for cluster ranges from 3 to 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Dunn index for cluster ranges from 3 to 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Non-normalized load profiles of all households in each cluster.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Normalized load profiles of all households in each cluster.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Weekend vs. weekday mean cluster profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>SHAP values analysis for cluster 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>SHAP values analysis for cluster 2.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 544 KiB  
Article
Optimal Configuration of Electricity-Heat Integrated Energy Storage Supplier and Multi-Microgrid System Scheduling Strategy Considering Demand Response
by Yuchen Liu, Zhenhai Dou, Zheng Wang, Jiaming Guo, Jingwei Zhao and Wenliang Yin
Energies 2024, 17(21), 5436; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215436 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 398
Abstract
Shared energy storage system provides an attractive solution to the high configuration cost and low utilization rate of multi-microgrid energy storage system. In this paper, an electricity-heat integrated energy storage supplier (EHIESS) containing electricity and heat storage devices is proposed to provide shared [...] Read more.
Shared energy storage system provides an attractive solution to the high configuration cost and low utilization rate of multi-microgrid energy storage system. In this paper, an electricity-heat integrated energy storage supplier (EHIESS) containing electricity and heat storage devices is proposed to provide shared energy storage services for multi-microgrid system in order to realize mutual profits for different subjects. To this end, electric boiler (EB) is introduced into EHIESS to realize the electricity-heat coupling of EHIESS and improve the energy utilization rate of electricity and heat storage equipment. Secondly, due to the problem of the uncertainty in user-side operation of multi-microgrid system, a price-based demand response (DR) mechanism is proposed to further optimize the resource allocation of shared electricity and heat energy storage devices. On this basis, a bi-level optimization model considering the capacity configuration of EHIESS and the optimal scheduling of multi-microgrid system is proposed, with the objectives of maximizing the profits of energy storage suppliers in upper-level and minimizing the operation costs of the multi-microgrid system in lower-level, and solved based on the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition and Big-M method. The simulation results show that in case of demand response, the total operation cost of multi-microgrid system and the total operation profit of EHIESS are 51,687.73 and 11,983.88 CNY, respectively; and the corresponding electricity storage unit capacity is 9730.80 kWh. The proposed model realizes the mutual profits of EHIESS and multi-microgrid system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renewable Energy Power Generation and Power Demand Side Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Topology of electricity-heat-gas coupled microgrid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Multi-microgrid system shared EHIESS model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of the solution process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Loads demands and predicted power generation of PV and WT in multi-microgrid system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Charging and discharging energy EHIESS for Case 1 to Case 3 in summer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Power balance and upstream network electricity price considering DR in Case 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Operation costs and customer satisfaction of microgrids with different load shares after considering DR under Case3.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 6716 KiB  
Article
Demand Response Potential of an Educational Building Heated by a Hybrid Ground Source Heat Pump System
by Tianchen Xue, Juha Jokisalo and Risto Kosonen
Energies 2024, 17(21), 5428; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215428 - 30 Oct 2024
Viewed by 464
Abstract
Demand response (DR) enhances building energy flexibility, but its application in hybrid heating systems with dynamic pricings remains underexplored. This study applied DR via heating setpoint adjustments based on dynamic electricity and district heating (DH) prices to a building heated by a hybrid [...] Read more.
Demand response (DR) enhances building energy flexibility, but its application in hybrid heating systems with dynamic pricings remains underexplored. This study applied DR via heating setpoint adjustments based on dynamic electricity and district heating (DH) prices to a building heated by a hybrid ground source heat pump (GSHP) system coupled to a DH network. A cost-effective control was implemented to optimize the usage of GSHP and DH with power limitations. Additionally, four DR control algorithms, including two single-price algorithms based on electricity and DH prices and two dual-price algorithms using minimum heating price and price signal summation methods, were tested for space heating under different marginal values. The impact of DR on ventilation heating was also evaluated. The results showed that applying the proposed DR algorithms to space heating improved electricity and DH flexibilities without compromising indoor comfort. A higher marginal value reduced the energy flexibility but increased cost savings. The dual price DR control algorithm using the price signal summation method achieved the highest cost savings. When combined with a cost-effective control strategy and power limitations, it reduced annual energy costs by up to 10.8%. However, applying the same DR to both space and ventilation heating reduced cost savings and significantly increased discomfort time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Energy Management and Control for Smart Buildings)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of simulation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of the simplified building model [<a href="#B33-energies-17-05428" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simplified schematic diagram of the hybrid GSHP system model [<a href="#B33-energies-17-05428" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Borehole field layouts: (<b>a</b>) original layout; (<b>b</b>) simplified layout [<a href="#B38-energies-17-05428" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flowchart of DR control of space heating.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flowchart of DR control of ventilation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Hourly electricity price (including all taxes) in the simulation year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Hourly DH price (including all taxes) in the simulation year.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Differences in monthly consumed energy costs (excluding power costs) between DR cases with a marginal value of 15 €/MWh and the reference case CE-PL-Ref21.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) Specific heating prices of DH (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>H</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <msub> <mi>η</mi> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> <mi>H</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>) and GSHP (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>c</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>/</mo> <mi>C</mi> <mi>O</mi> <msub> <mi>P</mi> <mrow> <mi>c</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>l</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>), and specific heating price difference, (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) price trend signals, and consumed energy cost differences between DR cases with a marginal value of 15 €/MWh and the reference case CE-PL-Ref21 during the week with the highest electricity price in December.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Differences in monthly consumed energy costs (excluding power costs) between DR cases with a marginal value of 75 €/MWh and the reference case CE-PL-Ref21.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flexibility factors of total heating energy during the heating season (October–April).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Flexibility factors of DH consumption during the heating season (October–April).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Flexibility factors of electricity consumption during the heating season (October–April).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Duration curves of indoor air temperature of reference cases and DR cases (marginal value of 15 €/MWh) during the occupied time in the heating season (October–April).</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Duration curves of indoor air temperature of reference cases and DR cases (marginal value of 75 €/MWh) during the occupied time in the heating season (October–April).</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Duration curves of supply air temperature in cases with and without DR in ventilation during the occupied time in the heating season (October–April).</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 9855 KiB  
Article
Cost-Effective Power Management for Smart Homes: Innovative Scheduling Techniques and Integrating Battery Optimization in 6G Networks
by Rana Riad Al-Taie and Xavier Hesselbach
Electronics 2024, 13(21), 4231; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13214231 - 29 Oct 2024
Viewed by 568
Abstract
This paper presents an Optimal Power Management System (OPMS) for smart homes in 6G environments, which are designed to enhance the sustainability of Green Internet of Everything (GIoT) applications. The system employs a brute-force search using an exact solution to identify the optimal [...] Read more.
This paper presents an Optimal Power Management System (OPMS) for smart homes in 6G environments, which are designed to enhance the sustainability of Green Internet of Everything (GIoT) applications. The system employs a brute-force search using an exact solution to identify the optimal decision for adapting power consumption to renewable power availability. Key techniques, including priority-based allocation, time-shifting, quality degradation, battery utilization and service rejection, will be adopted. Given the NP-hard nature of this problem, the brute-force approach is feasible for smaller scenarios but sets the stage for future heuristic methods in large-scale applications like smart cities. The OPMS, deployed on Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC) nodes, integrates a novel demand response (DR) strategy to manage real-time power use effectively. Synthetic data tests achieved a 100% acceptance rate with zero reliance on non-renewable power, while real-world tests reduced non-renewable power consumption by over 90%, demonstrating the system’s flexibility. These results provide a foundation for further AI-based heuristics optimization techniques to improve scalability and power efficiency in broader smart city deployments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Storage, Analysis and Battery Usage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Proposed scenario: offloading computing tasks to the nearest MEC agent.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Operational workflow of the advanced OPMS for IoE-enabled smart home.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Adaptive power consumption management model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Participants of the proposed OSPM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>An overview of the proposed M2M protocol negotiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Power demand distribution across time slots for different start time-shifting combinations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily power consumption of household appliances without power optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Daily power consumption of household appliances after power optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Dynamic renewable power supply for testing in synthetic data over 24 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Renewable power supply vs. baseline demand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Priority mechanism performance for synthetic data test. (<b>a</b>) Priority 1: renewable power vs. demand and shortages. (<b>b</b>) Priority 2: renewable power vs. demand and shortages. (<b>c</b>) Priority 3: renewable power vs. demand and shortages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of performance across various management mechanisms for with synthetic data testing. (<b>a</b>) Renewable power supply and proposed demand after rejection. (<b>b</b>) Renewable power supply and proposed demand after time shifting. (<b>c</b>) Renewable power supply and proposed demand after quality degradation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of renewable power supply versus demand with and without battery storage. (<b>a</b>) Renewable power supply and baseline demand, with shortages highlighted when demand exceeds available renewable power. (<b>b</b>) Renewable power supply with battery storage and proposed demand, showing the impact of battery storage in partially mitigating shortages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of power utilization rate, acceptance ratio, and minimum residual power across various management mechanisms for synthetic data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Typical power ratings for common household appliances [<a href="#B28-electronics-13-04231" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Predictive power supply from PV Panels and Wind Turbines (WT) [<a href="#B41-electronics-13-04231" class="html-bibr">41</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Optimization effect on power with battery utilization management mechanism for real data. (<b>a</b>) Shows the initial power and total power consumption before optimizing. (<b>b</b>) Displays available power (including supply and battery) and the consumption after optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p><span class="html-italic">Comparison of power management strategies in real data testing.</span> (<b>a</b>) Average non-renewable power before and after optimization. (<b>b</b>) Average residual power for time-shifting, quality degradation, and battery utilization, showing battery utilization as the most effective strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Simulation profiles for power supply and demand consumption [<a href="#B15-electronics-13-04231" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2631 KiB  
Article
A Method for Evaluating Demand Response Potential of Industrial Loads Based on Fuzzy Control
by Yan Li, Zhiwen Liu, Chong Shao, Bingjun Lin, Jiayu Rong, Nan Dong, Buyun Su and Yuejia Hong
Energies 2024, 17(20), 5146; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205146 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 498
Abstract
Demand response (DR) can ensure electricity supply security by shifting or shedding loads, which plays an important role in a power system with a high proportion of renewable energy sources. Industrial loads are vital participants in DR, but it is difficult to assess [...] Read more.
Demand response (DR) can ensure electricity supply security by shifting or shedding loads, which plays an important role in a power system with a high proportion of renewable energy sources. Industrial loads are vital participants in DR, but it is difficult to assess DR potential because of many complex factors. In this paper, a new method based on fuzzy control is given to assess the DR potential of industrial loads. A complete assessment framework including four steps is presented. Firstly, the industrial load data are preprocessed to mitigate the influence of noisy and transmission losses, and then the K-means algorithm considering the optimal cluster number is used to calculate baseline load of industrial load. Subsequently, an open-loop fuzzy controller is designed to predict the response factor of different industrial loads. Three strongly correlated indicators, namely peak load rate, electricity intensity, and load flexibility, are selected as the input of fuzzy control, which represents response willingness. Finally, the baseline load of diverse clustering scenarios and the response factor are used to calculate the DR potential of different industrial loads. The proposed method takes into account both economic and technical factors comprehensively, and thus, the results better represent the available DR potential in real-world situations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, the case of a medium-sized city in China is studied. The simulation focuses on the top eight industrial types, and the results show they can contribute about 189 MW available DR potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section K: State-of-the-Art Energy Related Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Available DR potential evaluation framework based on fuzzy control.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart of selection of optimal cluster number.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The electricity intensity of typical industry types in China.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evaluation process of load flexibility.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The processes of predicting response factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of load before and after KF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Graphs of <span class="html-italic">SSE</span> and <span class="html-italic">SC</span> for each industry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Clustering result of glass.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of industrial load with and without DR.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 3842 KiB  
Article
Multi-Objective Optimization Operation of Multi-Agent Active Distribution Network Based on Analytical Target Cascading Method
by Yiran Zhao, Yong Xue, Ruixin Zhang, Jiahao Yin, Yang Yang and Yanbo Chen
Energies 2024, 17(20), 5022; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17205022 - 10 Oct 2024
Viewed by 448
Abstract
In the context of the green energy transition, the rapid expansion of flexible resources such as distributed renewable energy, electric vehicles (EVs), and energy storage has significantly impacted the operation of distribution networks. This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization approach for active distribution [...] Read more.
In the context of the green energy transition, the rapid expansion of flexible resources such as distributed renewable energy, electric vehicles (EVs), and energy storage has significantly impacted the operation of distribution networks. This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization approach for active distribution networks (ADNs) based on analytical target cascading (ATC). Firstly, a dynamic optimal power flow (DOPF) calculation method is developed using second-order conic relaxation (SOCR) to address power flow and voltage issues in the distribution network, incorporating active management (AM) elements. Secondly, this study focuses on aggregating the power of flexible resources within station areas connected to distribution network nodes and incorporating these resources into demand response (DR) programs. Finally, a two-layer model for collaborative multi-objective scheduling between station areas and the active distribution network is implemented using the ATC method. Case studies demonstrate the model’s effectiveness and validity, showing its potential for enhancing the operation of distribution networks amidst the increasing integration of flexible resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Planning, Operation, and Control of New Power Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of hierarchical regulation and control of “distribution network-station area-flexible resources”.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Two-layer model of distribution network-station area cooperative dispatching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Topology diagram of station area, AM element, and distribution network connection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>OLTC scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>CB scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SVC scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ESS scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Node voltage in the distribution network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Proportion of distributed PV consumption in the distribution network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Station scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Station ESS scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Station EV scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Station air conditioning scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Station interruptible load scheduling results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Convergence error values.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>PV and load power prediction curves.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Capacity of the substation.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Netoad power and time-of-use electricity price in the station area.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4186 KiB  
Article
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch and Demand Response in Electricity Market Using Multi-Objective Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm
by Punam Das, Subhojit Dawn, Sadhan Gope, Diptanu Das and Ferdinando Salata
Processes 2024, 12(9), 2049; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12092049 - 23 Sep 2024
Viewed by 759
Abstract
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch (ORPD) is a power system optimization tool that modifies system control variables such as bus voltage and transformer tap settings, and it compensates devices’ Volt Ampere Reactive (VAR) output. It is used to decrease real power loss, enhance the [...] Read more.
Optimal Reactive Power Dispatch (ORPD) is a power system optimization tool that modifies system control variables such as bus voltage and transformer tap settings, and it compensates devices’ Volt Ampere Reactive (VAR) output. It is used to decrease real power loss, enhance the voltage profile, and promote stability. Furthermore, several issues have been faced in electricity markets, such as price volatility, transmission line congestion, and an increase in the cost of electricity during peak hours. Programs such as demand response (DR) provide system operators with more control over how small customers participate in lowering peak-hour energy prices and demand. This paper presents an extensive study on ORPD methodologies and DR programs for lowering voltage deviation, limiting cost, and minimizing power losses to create effective and economical operations systems. The main objectives of this work are to minimize costs and losses in the system and reduce voltage variation. The Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) and Dragonfly Algorithm (DA) have been implemented successfully to solve this problem. The proposed technique has been evaluated by using the IEEE-30 bus system. The results obtained by the implementation of demand response systems show a considerable reduction in costs and load demands that benefit consumers through DR considerations. The results obtained from the GOA and DA are compared with those generated by other researchers and published in the literature to ascertain the algorithm’s efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Renewable Energy Systems (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of GOA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>IEEE 30 bus system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison results of TVD for IEEE 30 bus system [<a href="#B1-processes-12-02049" class="html-bibr">1</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Load voltage profile of IEEE 30 bus system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparative convergence characteristics.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Response bus load reduction with DR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Load bus voltage profile with and without DR program.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of cost before and after DR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Incentives paid at different load buses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Convergence curve comparison of DR for IEEE-30 bus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Load bus voltage profile with and without DR program using MOGOA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pareto optimal curve comparison for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 3051 KiB  
Review
Reviewing Demand Response for Energy Management with Consideration of Renewable Energy Sources and Electric Vehicles
by Benjamin Chatuanramtharnghaka, Subhasish Deb, Ksh Robert Singh, Taha Selim Ustun and Akhtar Kalam
World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 15(9), 412; https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15090412 - 8 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1641
Abstract
This review paper critically examines the role of demand response (DR) in energy management, considering the increasing integration of renewable energy sources (RESs) and the rise in electric vehicle (EV) adoption. As the energy landscape shifts toward sustainability, recognizing the synergies and challenges [...] Read more.
This review paper critically examines the role of demand response (DR) in energy management, considering the increasing integration of renewable energy sources (RESs) and the rise in electric vehicle (EV) adoption. As the energy landscape shifts toward sustainability, recognizing the synergies and challenges offered by RESs and EVs becomes critical. The study begins by explaining the notion of demand response, emphasizing its importance in optimizing energy usage and grid stability. It then investigates the specific characteristics and possible benefits of incorporating RESs and EVs into DR schemes. This assessment evaluates the effectiveness of DR techniques in leveraging the variability of renewable energy generation and managing the charging patterns of electric vehicles. Furthermore, it outlines important technological, regulatory, and behavioral impediments to DR’s mainstream adoption alongside RESs and EVs. By synthesizing current research findings, this paper provides insights into opportunities for enhancing energy efficiency, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and advancing sustainable energy systems through the coordinated implementation of demand response, renewable energy sources, and electric vehicles. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Different types of demand-response programs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Demand Response Process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>EV charging scheme.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simple representation of VPP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Conceptual flowchart of an energy hub.</p>
Full article ">
42 pages, 6747 KiB  
Article
Integrated Home Energy Management with Hybrid Backup Storage and Vehicle-to-Home Systems for Enhanced Resilience, Efficiency, and Energy Independence in Green Buildings
by Liu Pai, Tomonobu Senjyu and M. H. Elkholy
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(17), 7747; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177747 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1139
Abstract
This study presents an innovative home energy management system (HEMS) that incorporates PV, WTs, and hybrid backup storage systems, including a hydrogen storage system (HSS), a battery energy storage system (BESS), and electric vehicles (EVs) with vehicle-to-home (V2H) technology. The research, conducted in [...] Read more.
This study presents an innovative home energy management system (HEMS) that incorporates PV, WTs, and hybrid backup storage systems, including a hydrogen storage system (HSS), a battery energy storage system (BESS), and electric vehicles (EVs) with vehicle-to-home (V2H) technology. The research, conducted in Liaoning Province, China, evaluates the performance of the HEMS under various demand response (DR) scenarios, aiming to enhance resilience, efficiency, and energy independence in green buildings. Four DR scenarios were analyzed: No DR, 20% DR, 30% DR, and 40% DR. The findings indicate that implementing DR programs significantly reduces peak load and operating costs. The 40% DR scenario achieved the lowest cumulative operating cost of $749.09, reflecting a 2.34% reduction compared with the $767.07 cost in the No DR scenario. The integration of backup systems, particularly batteries and fuel cells (FCs), effectively managed energy supply, ensuring continuous power availability. The system maintained a low loss of power supply probability (LPSP), indicating high reliability. Advanced optimization techniques, particularly the reptile search algorithm (RSA), are crucial in enhancing system performance and efficiency. These results underscore the potential of hybrid backup storage systems with V2H technology to enhance energy independence and sustainability in residential energy management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IoT in Smart Cities and Homes, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Proposed Framework of the HEMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comprehensive Diagram Illustrating the Framework of the Proposed Integrated Intelligent HEMS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the HEMS’ Operational Strategy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart illustrating a clear and comprehensive overview of the RSA process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Location of the residential home in Liaoning Province, China, examined in this case study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Daily load demand pattern of the chosen area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Daily solar irradiation profile of the selected region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Daily temperature profile of the selected region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Daily wind speed profile of the selected region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The degree of participation from both primary and backup system in satisfying the load demand in Scenario 1 without utilizing DR programs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The LPSP values in Scenario 1 without employing DR programs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The degree of participation from both primary and backup system in satisfying the load demand in Scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The LPSP values in Scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The degree of participation from both primary and backup system in satisfying the load demand in Scenario 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The LPSP values in Scenario 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The degree of participation from both primary and backup system in satisfying the load demand in scenario 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The LPSP values in scenario 4.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Daily Electrical Load Profiles with Varying Degrees of DR Participation.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop