Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Biomaterials and Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Interests: biomedical materials; tissue engineering; materials and systems for the controlled release of drugs/biomolecules/genes; surface engineering; nanotechnologies; electrospinning; additive manufacturing ("3D printing"); biomanufacturing
School of Mechanical Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
Interests: 3D/4D printing; biofabrication; tissue regeneration; biomaterials; organoid
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Shenzhen, China
Interests: biointerfaces; stimuli-responsive biomaterials; tissue engineering; biomanufacturing; electrospinning; electrospraying

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Tissue engineering emerged more than three decades ago. It has attracted great attention because it holds great promise for solving many difficult medical problems that current treatments cannot deal with or cannot achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for. Worldwide efforts over the past few decades have led to remarkable progresses in regenerating human body tissues such as skin, blood vessels, and bone. However, there are still great challenges in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent advances in materials science and engineering, nanoscience and nanotechnology, manufacturing technologies, biological science, clinical sciences, etc., can significantly move the field forward and greatly assist us to tackle the challenges and regenerate complex body tissues/organs such as the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and uterus.

There are different strategies for human body tissue regeneration. Many researchers have successfully used scaffold-, growth factor (GF)-, or cell-based tissue engineering for regenerating human skin, bone, articular cartilage, etc. In scaffold-based tissue engineering, scaffolds provide conducive microenvironments for cells and play vital roles for cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and new tissue formation. Many biocompatible materials, including polymers, metals, ceramics, and composites/hybrids, have been used/developed as tissue engineering materials and have achieved their successes. However, different materials have their advantages and shortcomings. For example, hydrogels have seen their increasing use in the tissue engineering field because of their particular attractiveness, but they are weak materials. Strong and highly resilient hydrogels are now being investigated/developed for targeted applications by research groups in different continents. For the regeneration of a specific body tissue, the material/materials should be carefully selected and evaluated. There are also many scaffold fabrication technologies, including electrospinning and additive manufacturing (i.e., “3D printing”). Electrospinning is attractive because it can produce nanofibrous structures that mimic the extracellular matrix structure. However, there are limitations in electrospinning, so significant improvements for electrospun products are also required. 3D-printing technologies have significantly raised our ability to create complex scaffolds or cell-scaffold constructs for regenerating complex body tissues. Bioprinting has shown great promise in a number of areas, including tissue engineering. However, there many scientific and technological issues that need to be addressed for 3D printing in tissue engineering and for bioprinting. Additionally, stem cells are increasingly used in tissue engineering investigations. Again, there are fundamental and technical questions that need to be answered for their wide use in the field. Designing scaffolds and scaffold simulation (mechanical, fluidic, etc.) are gaining increasing attention with the aim to achieve the best clinical performance for scaffolds. Biomimicking scaffolds are becoming popular for tissue regeneration. Guidelines on scaffold design, which are tissue specific, should therefore be established. Even though there are already numerous investigations on cell‒scaffold interactions, scaffold‒tissue interactions, and biochemical and/or biomechanical cues on cell behaviour and tissue formation, great efforts are still needed to gain further understanding and new insights in these areas. Furthermore, developing multifunctional scaffolds that can also perform other functions (anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, etc.) provides much wider scope for our R&D activities.

This Special Issue provides a forum for sharing new research findings and new insights in different areas mentioned above from people, both experienced workers and newcomers, involved in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. These people include biomaterials scientists and engineers, tissue engineers, biological scientists, clinicians, and industrialists. Submissions presenting new ideas/approaches, new materials, new scaffold designs, new fabrication technologies, novel scaffolds, new testing techniques, and new assessment methods are very welcome. The materials and porous scaffolds that are presented in these submissions are/will be used for regenerating different body tissues/organs, including skin, blood vessels, bone, tendon/ligament, articular cartilage, osteochondral tissue, gastrointestinal tract, liver, uterus, etc. Articles of excellent quality in this Special Issue will be selected as Feature Papers of the Journal of Functional Biomaterials.

Prof. Dr. Min Wang
Dr. Chong Wang
Dr. Qilong Zhao
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Functional Biomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • tissue engineering
  • regenerative medicine
  • natural polymer
  • synthetic polymer
  • hydrogel
  • metal
  • ceramic
  • composite
  • hybrid
  • porous scaffold
  • scaffold design
  • biomimicking
  • graded scaffold
  • multifunctional scaffold
  • cell‒scaffold construct
  • scaffold fabrication
  • electrospinning
  • 3D printing
  • bioprinting
  • structure
  • performance
  • biodegradation
  • scaffold simulation
  • biochemical cue
  • biomechanical cue
  • bioreactor
  • mature cell
  • stem cell
  • cell‒scaffold interaction
  • scaffold‒tissue interaction
  • in vitro evaluation
  • in vivo evaluation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 4201 KiB  
Article
Impact of Particle Size and Sintering Temperature on Calcium Phosphate Gyroid Structure Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
by Romina Haydeé Aspera-Werz, Guanqiao Chen, Lea Schilonka, Islam Bouakaz, Catherine Bronne, Elisabeth Cobraiville, Grégory Nolens and Andreas Nussler
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(12), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15120355 - 21 Nov 2024
Abstract
Due to the chemical composition and structure of the target tissue, autologous bone grafting remains the gold standard for orthopedic applications worldwide. However, ongoing advancements in alternative grafting materials show that 3D-printed synthetic biomaterials offer many advantages. For instance, they provide high availability, [...] Read more.
Due to the chemical composition and structure of the target tissue, autologous bone grafting remains the gold standard for orthopedic applications worldwide. However, ongoing advancements in alternative grafting materials show that 3D-printed synthetic biomaterials offer many advantages. For instance, they provide high availability, have low clinical limitations, and can be designed with a chemical composition and structure comparable to the target tissue. This study aimed to compare the influences of particle size and sintering temperature on the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of calcium phosphate (CaP) gyroid scaffolds. CaP gyroid scaffolds were fabricated by 3D printing using powders with the same chemical composition but different particle sizes and sintering temperatures. The physicochemical characterization of the scaffolds was performed using X-ray diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy, and microtomography analyses. The immortalized human mesenchymal stem cell line SCP-1 (osteoblast-like cells) and osteoclast-like cells (THP-1 cells) were seeded on the scaffolds as mono- or co-cultures. Bone cell attachment, number of live cells, and functionality were assessed at different time points over a period of 21 days. Improvements in mechanical properties were observed for scaffolds fabricated with narrow-particle-size-distribution powder. The physicochemical analysis showed that the microstructure varied with sintering temperature and that narrow particle size distribution resulted in smaller micropores and a smoother surface. Viable osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cells were observed for all scaffolds tested, but scaffolds produced with a smaller particle size distribution showed less attachment of osteoblast-like cells. Interestingly, low attachment of osteoclast-like cells was observed for all scaffolds regardless of surface roughness. Although bone cell adhesion was lower in scaffolds made with powder containing smaller particle sizes, the long-term function of osteoblast-like and osteoclast-like cells was superior in scaffolds with improved mechanical properties. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scaffold with cylindrical shape and gyroid structure. (<b>a</b>) Top view. (<b>b</b>) Side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Powder composition determined by X-ray diffractometry (XRD). Representative XRD curve for (<b>a</b>) powder A and (<b>b</b>) powder B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mechanical characterization of the three scaffolds tested. (<b>a</b>) Maximum force, (<b>b</b>) maximum stress, (<b>c</b>) displacements at maximum load, and (<b>d</b>) flexural strength were analyzed on scaffolds generated with powder A sintering at 1230 °C [Scaffold A] or powder B sintering at 1250 °C and 1210 °C [scaffolds B<sub>I</sub> and B<sub>II</sub>, respectively]. The data are presented as the mean, standard error of the mean, and all data points. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are classified as * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; and **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison between scaffold B and scaffold A and as # <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 for comparison within scaffold B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Surface topographies of the three scaffolds analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (<b>a</b>) Scaffold generated with powder A and sintering at 1230 °C. (<b>b</b>) Scaffold generated with powder B and sintering at 1250 °C. (<b>c</b>) Scaffold generated with powder B and sintering at 1210 °C (scale bar 10 µm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SCP-1 cell attachment, number of live cells, and proliferation on three scaffolds tested. SCP-1 cells were seeded and cultured on scaffolds A, B<sub>I</sub>, and B<sub>II</sub> for 21 days. (<b>a</b>) Attached SCP-1 cells on scaffolds compared to cultured polystyrene. Number of live SCP-1 cells were analyzed after 24 h, 48 h, 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days by total DNA levels (<b>b</b>) and visualized by esterase activity (<b>c</b>) using calcein-AM (green) and nuclear staining using Hoechst 33342 (blue) (scale bar 2000 µm). Each measure was conducted at least three independent times in triplicate. The data are presented as the mean, standard error of the mean, and all data points. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons (<b>a</b>) or a two-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons (<b>b</b>). <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are classified as ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; and **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison between scaffold B and scaffold A and as ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; and #### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison within scaffold B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SCP-1 osteogenic differentiation potential on three scaffolds tested. SCP-1 cells were seeded and cultured under osteogenic condition on scaffolds A, BI, and BII for 21 days. (<b>a</b>) Metabolic activity of SCP-1 cells were analyzed after 24 h, 48 h, 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days by mitochondrial activity as relative fluorescence units (RFU). (<b>b</b>) Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity normalized to DNA of SCP-1 cells were analyzed after 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days as relative absorbance units (RAU). (<b>c</b>) Procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP) supernatant levels were determined after 21-day osteogenic culture. Each measure was conducted at least three independent times in duplicate. The data are presented as the mean, standard error of the mean, and all data points. Data were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are classified as * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; and **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison between scaffold B and scaffold A and as # <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05; ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01; ### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001; and #### <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison within scaffold B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>THP-1 cell attachment and number of live cells on three scaffolds tested. THP-1 cells were seeded and cultured on scaffolds A, BI, and BII for 24 h. (<b>a</b>) Attached SCP-1 cells on scaffolds compared to cultured polystyrene. Number of live THP-1 cells were visualized after 24 h by esterase activity (<b>b</b>) using calcein-AM (green) and nuclear staining using Hoechst 33342 (blue) (scale bar 2000 µm). Each measure was conducted at least three independent times in triplicate. The data are presented as the mean, standard error of the mean, and all data points. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are classified as **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison between scaffold B and scaffold A.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Bone cell viability and proliferation in co-cultures on the three scaffolds tested. THP-1 and SCP-1 were seeded and co-cultured on scaffolds A, BI, and BII for 21 days. Quantification of total DNA (<b>a</b>) and mitochondrial activity by resazurin conversion (<b>b</b>) in bone co-cultures after 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. Number of live bone co-cultures were visualized by esterase activity (<b>c</b>) using calcein-AM (green) and nuclear staining with Hoechst 33342 (blue) (scale bar 2000 µm). Each measure was conducted at least three independent times in triplicate. The data are presented as the mean, standard error of the mean, and all data points. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are classified as **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001 for comparison between scaffold B and scaffold A and as # <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 for comparison within scaffold B.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Osteoblast- and osteoclast-like cell function in co-cultures on the three scaffolds tested. THP-1 and SCP-1 were seeded and co-cultured on scaffolds A, BI, and BII for 21 days. (<b>a</b>) Alkaline phosphatase (AP), (<b>b</b>) carbonic anhydrase II (CAII), and (<b>c</b>) tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity normalized to DNA of bone co-cultures were analyzed after 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days as relative absorbance units (RAU). (<b>d</b>) Procollagen type I N-propeptide (PINP) and collagen type I N-telopeptide (NTX) supernatant levels were determined after a 21-day culture. Each measure was conducted at least three independent times in duplicate. The data are presented as the mean or standard error of the mean. Data were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance test followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons. <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are classified as **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.0001, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, and * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 for comparison between scaffold B and scaffold A and as ## <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 for comparison within scaffold B.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1007 KiB  
Article
Core–Shell Microspheres with Encapsulated Gold Nanoparticle Carriers for Controlled Release of Anti-Cancer Drugs
by Lin Guo, Qilong Zhao and Min Wang
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(10), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15100277 - 24 Sep 2024
Viewed by 796
Abstract
Cancer is one of the major threats to human health and lives. However, effective cancer treatments remain a great challenge in clinical medicine. As a common approach for cancer treatment, chemotherapy has saved the life of millions of people; however, patients who have [...] Read more.
Cancer is one of the major threats to human health and lives. However, effective cancer treatments remain a great challenge in clinical medicine. As a common approach for cancer treatment, chemotherapy has saved the life of millions of people; however, patients who have gone through chemotherapy often suffer from severe side effects owing to the inherent cytotoxicity of anti-cancer drugs. Stabilizing the blood concentration of an anti-cancer drug will reduce the occurrence or severity of side effects, and relies on using an appropriate drug delivery system (DDS) for achieving sustained or even on-demand drug delivery. However, this is still an unmet clinical challenge since the mainstay of anti-cancer drugs is small molecules, which tend to be diffused rapidly in the body, and conventional DDSs exhibit the burst release phenomenon. Here, we establish a class of DDSs based on biodegradable core–shell microspheres with encapsulated doxorubicin hydrochloride-loaded gold nanoparticles (DOX@Au@MSs), with the core–shell microspheres being made of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) in the current study. By harnessing the physical barrier of the biodegradable shell of core–shell microspheres, DOX@Au@MSs can provide a sustained release of the anti-cancer drug in the test duration (which is 21 days in the current study). Thanks to the photothermal properties of the encapsulated gold nanoparticle carriers, the core–shell biodegradable microspheres can be ruptured through remotely controlled near-infrared (NIR) light, thereby achieving an NIR-controlled triggered release of the anti-cancer drug. Furthermore, the route of the DOX-Au@MS-enabled controlled release of the anti-cancer drug can provide durable cancer cell ablation for the long period of 72 h. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic illustration showing the design and formation of DOX-Au@MSs for the controlled release of anti-cancer drugs and durable killing of cancer cells. Upon exposure to an NIR light, the DOX@Au@MSs would be ruptured, caused by photothermal effects of the AuNPs, subsequently releasing the DOX@Au and then the DOX in a spatiotemporally controllable manner.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Different release behaviors of DOX from different types of delivery vehicles. (<b>a</b>) Schematically illustrating the differential release behaviors of DOX from diverse delivery vehicles. (<b>b</b>) A representative TEM image of DOX@Au. Scale bar: 50 nm. (<b>c</b>) A representative SEM image of DOX-Au@MSs, with an inset showing a representative TEM image of DOX-Au@MSs. Scale bar: 100 nm and 2 μm (inset). (<b>d</b>) A representative SEM image of DOX@Au@MSs, with an inset showing a representative TEM image of DOX@Au@MSs. Scale bar: 100 nm and 2 μm (inset). (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) Cumulative release behaviors of DOX from DOX@Au (<b>e</b>), DOX-Au@MSs (<b>f</b>) or DOX@Au@MSs (<b>g</b>), with the right curves showing the release within the initial 48 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>NIR-controlled microsphere rupture and DOX release. (<b>a</b>) Schematically illustrating the NIR-controlled release of DOX from the DOX@Au@MSs. (<b>b</b>) A representative SEM image showing the ruptured structure of the DOX@Au@MSs after NIR irradiation. Scale bar: 5 μm. (<b>c</b>) A representative TEM image showing the released DOX@Au from the DOX@Au@MSs after NIR irradiation. Scale bar: 100 nm. (<b>d</b>) Cumulative release behaviors of DOX from the DOX@Au@MSs with or without NIR irradiation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>In vitro anti-cancer performance of DOX@Au@MSs. (<b>a</b>) Representative fluorescence images showing the HeLa cells treated with the DOX@Au@MSs for different amounts of time. Scale bar: 5 μm. (<b>b</b>) Statistics of the percentages of dead cells for the HeLa cells treated with the DOX@Au@MSs or the DOX-free control over different amounts of time.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3519 KiB  
Article
Cell Proliferation, Chondrogenic Differentiation, and Cartilaginous Tissue Formation in Recombinant Silk Fibroin with Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Binding Peptide
by Manabu Yamada, Arata Nakajima, Kayo Sakurai, Yasushi Tamada and Koichi Nakagawa
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(8), 230; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15080230 - 17 Aug 2024
Viewed by 936
Abstract
Regeneration of articular cartilage remains a challenge for patients who have undergone cartilage injury, osteochondritis dissecans and osteoarthritis. Here, we describe a new recombinant silk fibroin with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) binding peptide, which has a genetically introduced sequence PLLQATLGGGS, named P7. [...] Read more.
Regeneration of articular cartilage remains a challenge for patients who have undergone cartilage injury, osteochondritis dissecans and osteoarthritis. Here, we describe a new recombinant silk fibroin with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) binding peptide, which has a genetically introduced sequence PLLQATLGGGS, named P7. In this study, we cultured a human mesenchymal cell line derived from bone marrow, UE6E7-16, in wild-type fibroin sponge (FS) and recombinant silk fibroin sponge with P7 peptide (P7 FS). We compared cell proliferation, chondrogenic differentiation and cartilaginous tissue formation between the two types of sponge. After stimulation with bFGF at 3 ng/mL, P7 FS showed significantly higher cell growth (1.2-fold) and higher cellular DNA content (5.6-fold) than did wild-type FS. To promote chondrogenic differentiation, cells were cultured in the presence of TGF-β at 10 ng/mL for 28 days. Immunostaining of P7 FS showed SOX9-positive cells comparable to wild-type FS. Alcian-Blue staining of P7 FS also showed cartilaginous tissue formation equivalent to wild-type FS. A significant increase in cell proliferation in P7 FS implies future clinical application of this transgenic fibroin for regeneration of articular cartilage. To produce cartilaginous tissue efficiently, transgenic fibroin sponges and culture conditions must be improved. Such changes should include the selection of growth factors involved in chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage formation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic drawing of recombinant silk fibroin fused to P7 peptide.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scanning electron microscopic images of wild-type (WT) and P7 fibroin sponge. P7 fibroin sponge (P7) is a recombinant silk fibroin with bFGF-binding peptide, named P7. Scale bars = 50 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cell culture in fibroin sponge using a cell culture insert. Cells were cultured in the presence of bFGF for 3 days and subjected to a cell proliferation assay. Following stimulation with bFGF, cells were also cultured in the presence of TGF-β3 for 28 days to evaluate chondrogenic differentiation and cartilaginous tissue formation in the sponge. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; TGF, transforming growth factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cell proliferation of UE6E7-16 cells cultured in FS for 3 days. (<b>A</b>) Wild-type FS. Stimulation with bFGF increased cell growth in a dose-dependent manner. (<b>B</b>) P7 FS. Stimulation with bFGF increased cell growth but not in a dose-dependent manner. (<b>C</b>) Comparison between wild-type and P7 FS without stimulation of bFGF. (<b>D</b>) Comparison between wild-type and P7 FS after stimulation with bFGF. Error bars show standard deviation. Significant difference, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.005, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001. WT, wild-type; FS, fibroin sponge; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>DNA quantification of UE6E7-16 cells cultured in FS for 3 days. (<b>A</b>) Wild-type FS. (<b>B</b>) P7 FS. (<b>C</b>) Comparison between wild-type and P7 FS without stimulation of bFGF. (<b>D</b>) Comparison between wild-type and P7 FS after stimulation with bFGF. Error bars show standard deviation. Significant difference, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, **** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001. N.S., not significant; WT, wild-type; FS, fibroin sponge; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chondrogenic differentiation of UE6E7-16 cells cultured in FS for 28 days. (<b>A</b>) Immunostaining of SOX9 for WT and P7 FS. Scale bars = 50 µm. (<b>B</b>) A median ratio (%) of SOX9-positive cells to total cells. Thick horizontal lines, boxes, and whiskers show median, interquartile range (IQR), and most extreme points from the limits of the box, respectively. N.S., not significant; WT, wild-type; FS, fibroin sponge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cartilaginous tissue formation by UE6E7-16 cells cultured in FS for 28 days. Cartilaginous tissue is rendered light blue with Alcian-Blue staining. P7 FS shows an equivalent amount of cartilaginous tissue to that seen in wild-type FS. Scale bars = 50 µm. WT, wild-type; FS, fibroin sponge.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6821 KiB  
Article
Design of Laser Activated Antimicrobial Porous Tricalcium Phosphate-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Orthopedic Applications
by Emil Filipov, Ridvan Yildiz, Anna Dikovska, Lamborghini Sotelo, Tharun Soma, Georgi Avdeev, Penka Terziyska, Silke Christiansen, Anne Leriche, Maria Helena Fernandes and Albena Daskalova
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(2), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15020036 - 30 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2099
Abstract
The field of bone tissue engineering is steadily being improved by novel experimental approaches. Nevertheless, microbial adhesion after scaffold implantation remains a limitation that could lead to the impairment of the regeneration process, or scaffold rejection. The present study introduces a methodology that [...] Read more.
The field of bone tissue engineering is steadily being improved by novel experimental approaches. Nevertheless, microbial adhesion after scaffold implantation remains a limitation that could lead to the impairment of the regeneration process, or scaffold rejection. The present study introduces a methodology that employs laser-based strategies for the development of antimicrobial interfaces on tricalcium phosphate–hydroxyapatite (TCP-HA) scaffolds. The outer surfaces of the ceramic scaffolds with inner porosity were structured using a femtosecond laser (λ = 800 nm; τ = 70 fs) for developing micropatterns and altering local surface roughness. The pulsed laser deposition of ZnO was used for the subsequent functionalization of both laser-structured and unmodified surfaces. The impact of the fs irradiation was investigated by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. The effects of the ZnO-layered ceramic surfaces on initial bacterial adherence were assessed by culturing Staphylococcus aureus on both functionalized and non-functionalized scaffolds. Bacterial metabolic activity and morphology were monitored via the Resazurin assay and microscopic approaches. The presence of ZnO evidently decreased the metabolic activity of bacteria and led to impaired cell morphology. The results from this study have led to the conclusion that the combination of fs laser-structured surface topography and ZnO could yield a potential antimicrobial interface for implants in bone tissue engineering. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dense outer surface of the TCP-HA scaffolds prior to laser ablation. (<b>a</b>) image at 2000× magnification; (<b>b</b>) image at 5000× magnification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Internal porosity of the scaffolds as a result of PMMA beads’ thermal removal. (<b>a</b>) image at 100× magnification; (<b>b</b>) image at 250× magnification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Femtosecond laser-patterned outer surfaces of TCP-HA. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) F = 50.9 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; v = 5.16 mm/s; dx = 60 μm; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) F = 30.6 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; v = 5.16 mm/s; dx = 60 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Femtosecond laser-patterned outer surfaces of TCP-HA. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) F = 24.4 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; v = 7.6 mm/s; d<sub>x</sub> = 60 μm; (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) F = 20.3 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; v = 3.44 mm/s; d<sub>x</sub> = 35 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The 3D profiles of TCP-HA scaffolds. (<b>a</b>) An untreated surface; (<b>b</b>) an fs laser-treated area (F = 24.4 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; v = 7.6 mm/s; d<sub>x</sub> = 60 μm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>An XRD analysis indicating the presence of a β-phase of tricalcium phosphate before and after femtosecond laser treatment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Raman spectra of TCP-HA scaffolds before and after femtosecond laser treatment with varying laser fluences applied at different scanning velocities.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>XPS survey spectra of ZnO-functionalized TCP-HA scaffolds. (<b>upper</b> panel) Control area; (<b>lower</b> panel) laser-treated area (F = 24.4 J/cm<sup>2</sup>; v = 7.6 mm/s).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>XPS spectra of ZnO nanolayer deposited on control and fs laser-treated surfaces of TCP-HA scaffolds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Representative SEM and HIM images of <span class="html-italic">S. aureus</span> adhered on unprocessed TCP-HA scaffolds at the 3 h time-point. Control samples: SEM (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and HIM (<b>d</b>). Control ZnO sample: SEM (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) and HIM (<b>h</b>). (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>) Bacterial cell coloring for a better visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Representative SEM and HIM images of <span class="html-italic">S. aureus</span> adhered on laser-processed TCP-HA scaffolds at the 3 h time-point. Laser ZnO samples: SEM (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and HIM (<b>d</b>). Laser no ZnO samples: SEM (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) and HIM (<b>h</b>). (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>) Bacterial cell coloring for a better visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Representative SEM and HIM images of <span class="html-italic">S. aureus</span> adhered on TCP-HA scaffolds at the 6 h time-point. Unprocessed control: SEM (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) and HIM (<b>d</b>). Laser ZnO sample: SEM (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) and HIM (<b>h</b>). Laser no ZnO sample: SEM (<b>i</b>–<b>k</b>) and HIM (<b>l</b>). (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>j</b>) Bacterial cell coloring for visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Metabolic activity of <span class="html-italic">S. aureus</span> sessile population 3 and 6 h after cultivation on laser-treated TCP-HA scaffolds with or without ZnO deposition. * Statistical significance (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05) compared to ZnO samples. ** Statistical significance between 3 h and 6 h time points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Metabolic activity of planktonic <span class="html-italic">S. aureus</span> (Resazurin assay) after 3 and 6 h of culture on TCP-HA scaffolds. * Statistical significance (<span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05) compared to laser ZnO group.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 8907 KiB  
Article
Fibronectin Conformations after Electrodeposition onto 316L Stainless Steel Substrates Enhanced Early-Stage Osteoblasts’ Adhesion but Affected Their Behavior
by Séverine Alfonsi, Pithursan Karunathasan, Ayann Mamodaly-Samdjee, Keerthana Balathandayutham, Sarah Lefevre, Anamar Miranda, Olivier Gallet, Damien Seyer and Mathilde Hindié
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15010005 - 21 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1991
Abstract
The implantation of metallic orthopedic prostheses is increasingly common due to an aging population and accidents. There is a real societal need to implement new metal implants that combine durability, good mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, as well as affordable costs. Since the functionalization [...] Read more.
The implantation of metallic orthopedic prostheses is increasingly common due to an aging population and accidents. There is a real societal need to implement new metal implants that combine durability, good mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, as well as affordable costs. Since the functionalization of low-cost 316L stainless steel substrates through the successive electrodeposition of a polypyrrole film (PPy) and a calcium phosphate deposit doped with silicon was previously carried out by our labs, we have also developed a bio-functional coating by electrodepositing or oxidating of fibronectin (Fn) coating. Fn is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion and differentiation. Impacts of either electrodeposition or oxidation on the structure and functionality of Fn were first studied. Thus, electrodeposition is the technique that permits the highest deposition of fibronectin, compared to adsorption or oxidation. Furthermore, electrodeposition seems to strongly modify Fn conformation by the formation of intermingled long fibers, resulting in changes to the accessibility of the molecular probes tested (antibodies directed against Fn whole molecule and Fn cell-binding domain). Then, the effects of either electrodeposited Fn or oxidized Fn were validated by the resulting pre-osteoblast behavior. Electrodeposition reduced pre-osteoblasts’ ability to remodel Fn coating on supports because of a partial modification of Fn conformation, which reduced accessibility to the cell-binding domain. Electrodeposited Fn also diminished α5 integrin secretion and clustering along the plasma membrane. However, the N-terminal extremity of Fn was not modified by electrodeposition as demonstrated by Staphylococcus aureus attachment after 3 h of culture on a specific domain localized in this region. Moreover, the number of pre-osteoblasts remains stable after 3 h culture on either adsorbed, oxidized, or electrodeposited Fn deposits. In contrast, mitochondrial activity and cell proliferation were significantly higher on adsorbed Fn compared with electrodeposited Fn after 48 h culture. Hence, electro-deposited Fn seems more favorable to pre-osteoblast early-stage behavior than during a longer culture of 24 h and 48 h. The electrodeposition of matrix proteins could be improved to maintain their bio-activity and to develop this promising, fast technique to bio-functionalize metallic implants. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Surface protein quantities after 1% SDS rinses for the Fn initially adsorbed (AD), oxidized (OX), or electrodeposited (ED) on PPy-coated 316L SS supports. Values are means ± standard error means. Data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate; significant differences were determined using a one-way ANOVA analysis, and the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value of the test is 0.0004 (** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Images of Fn adsorbed (AD), oxidized (OX), or electrodeposited (ED) on PPy-coated 316L SS supports. Fn was immunostained to be observed by CSLM. Scale bar: 50 μm. Data are representative of two different experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic representation of fibronectin monomer. Binding sites for <span class="html-italic">Staphylococcus aureus</span> bacteria and the integrin α5β1/cell-binding domain are reported. The extra domain A (EDA), which is involved in matrix remodeling, and the extra domain B (EDB), which has an important role during embryogenesis, are also indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>ELISA test of Fn adsorbed (AD), oxidized (OX), or electrodeposited (ED) on PPy-coated 316L SS substrates using monoclonal antibodies specific to the assessment of cell-binding domain accessibility. Values are means ± standard error means (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 3, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Images of STRO-1<sup>+</sup> A cells cultured on Fn adsorbed in (<b>a</b>) AD, oxidized in (<b>b</b>) OX, or electrodeposited in (<b>c</b>) ED on supports for 3 h. Fn, nucleus, and actin cytoskeleton are stained in green, blue, and red respectively. Scale bar: 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Cytoskeletal structure and cellular α5 integrin expression of STRO-1<sup>+</sup> A pre-osteoblasts cultured for 3 h on supports functionalized by Fn adsorbed (AD) in (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>) images, oxidized (OX) in images (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>) or electrodeposited (ED) in images (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>). Fn, actin cytoskeleton, α5 integrin, and nuclei are stained in green, cyan, magenta, and blue respectively. Scale bar: 20 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cytoskeletal structure and Fn extra domain A (EDA) synthesis of STRO-1<sup>+</sup> A pre-osteoblasts cultured for 3h on supports functionalized by Fn adsorbed (AD) shown in (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>) images, oxidized (OX) in images (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>), or electrodeposited (ED) presented in images (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>). Fn, actin cytoskeleton, EDA Fn, and nuclei are stained in green, cyan, red, and blue respectively. Scale bar: 20 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Bacterial attachment on bio-functionalized supports. Number of <span class="html-italic">Staphylococcus aureus</span> CIP4.83 bacteria adhering on Fn adsorbed (AD), oxidized (OX), electrodeposited (ED), polypyrrole (PPy) coating, or stainless steel (SS) substrate. The incubation time was 3 h. Values are means ± standard error means (<span class="html-italic">n</span> = 2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Images of STRO-1<sup>+</sup> A cells cultured on Fn adsorbed (AD) or electrodeposited (ED) on supports for 24 h and 48 h. Fn, nucleus, and actin cytoskeleton are stained in green, blue, and red respectively. Scale bar: 50 μm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mitochondrial activity of STRO-1<sup>+</sup> A pre-osteoblasts cultured on Fn adsorbed (AD), or electrodeposited (ED) on supports for 24 h and 48 h. Activity measured for cells cultured on AD are represented by blue dots. Red dots are results obtained for cells cultured on ED substrates The box represents the data, with the horizontal line indicating the median value. (ANOVA test was performed, <span class="html-italic">n =</span> 3, *** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.001).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Proliferation of STRO-1<sup>+</sup> A pre-osteoblasts cultured on Fn, adsorbed (AD), or electrodeposited (ED) on supports for 24 h and 48 h. Blue dots represent nuclei counted on AD supports and the red ones are the nuclei counted on ED ones. For each plot, the line within the box represents the median. (ANOVA test was done, <span class="html-italic">n =</span> 3, * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.).</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Observation of PPy coating on support with an optical microscope.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>ELISA test of Fn adsorbed (AD), oxidized (OX), or electrodeposited (ED) on PPy-coated 316L SS substrates after desorption using a polyclonal antibody targeting Fn. Positive control was performed with Fn adsorbed (AD) without desorption, and negative control was performed with substrate without Fn coating.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7377 KiB  
Article
Nanostructured Porous Silicon for Bone Tissue Engineering: Kinetics of Particle Degradation and Si-Controlled Release
by Naveen Fatima, Hamideh Salehi, Eduardo J. Cueto-Díaz, Alban Desoutter, Frédéric Cuisinier, Frédérique Cunin and Pierre-Yves Collart-Dutilleul
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(10), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100493 - 30 Sep 2023
Viewed by 2221
Abstract
Nanostructured porous silicon (pSi) is a synthetic silicon-based material. Its biocompatibility and bioresorbability in body fluids make pSi an appealing biomaterial for tissue engineering, with surfaces characteristics facilitating human cell adhesion and differentiation. The resorption kinetics of such porous biomaterials is crucial for [...] Read more.
Nanostructured porous silicon (pSi) is a synthetic silicon-based material. Its biocompatibility and bioresorbability in body fluids make pSi an appealing biomaterial for tissue engineering, with surfaces characteristics facilitating human cell adhesion and differentiation. The resorption kinetics of such porous biomaterials is crucial for in vivo bone regeneration, in order to adapt biomaterial resorption to tissue formation, and to control the release of loaded bioactive molecules. We investigated pSi as a bioactive scaffold for bone tissue engineering, with an emphasis on kinetics of pSi resorption and silicon release. PSi particles and chips were fabricated from crystalline silicon, and functionalized by oxidation and chemical grafting of amine groups to mimic biological structures. Materials resorption over time was investigated with Raman spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Silicon release was followed by mass spectrometry. Particle degradation and inclusion in newly formed bone were studied in vivo. The in vitro experiments revealed that non-oxidized pSi had an accelerated initial dissolution in ddH2O and an inhibition of initial Si release in SBF. This high reactivity also led to transformation towards amorphous non-resorbable silica when incubated in SBF. PSi resorption started immediately with a maximal dissolution in the first 24 h. Later, the dissolution rate decreased over time. In comparison, the resorption process of oxidized pSi seemed delayed, but more continuous. This delayed dissolution increased the bioactivity and stability, leading to enhanced bone formation in vivo. Delayed pSi degradation provided a constant surge of silicic acid over time and promoted bone regeneration, demonstrating the high potential of pSi for bone tissue engineering: Oxidized pSi were almost completely resorbed after 2 months of healing, with remaining partially dissolved particles surrounded by newly formed bone. On the contrary, non-oxidized particles were still obviously present after 2 months with limited bone regeneration. This delayed resorption is consistent with the in vitro observations in SBF, and particles’ transformation towards silica. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of the electrochemical set-up used to make porous silicon. (<b>A</b>) Schematic side view of the custom-made set-up, with chamber containing hydrofluoric acid solution (HF solution); (<b>B</b>) schematic side view of the silicon wafer after etching, with a superficial porous part (porous silicon) and an unetched part (bulk silicon). (<b>C</b>) Top view photograph of a freshly etched silicon wafer. The black area is the porous part while the mirror area is the unetched part. Scale bar = 1 cm. (<b>D</b>) SEM image of pSi surface. Scale bar = 500 nm. (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) SEM images of pSi: cross section of the wafer. (<b>E</b>) Scale bar = 10 μm. (<b>F</b>) Scale bar = 300 nm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Optical microscopy and particle photoluminescence, elucidating modification over time. Scale bar = 100 µm. The histogram represents the intensity of photoluminescence of each sample initially, after 1 week, and after 3 weeks. The dash line between plots is to guide the eye, and to highlight the evolution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Silicic Acid release: measurements of Si in supernatant by ICP-MS. At each time point, the amount of Si corresponds to the amount released since the last measurement. (**) and (*) indicate a significant difference between non-ox pSi in ddH<sub>2</sub>O and non-ox pSi in SBF (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively). (††) and (†) indicate a significant difference between non-x pSi in ddH<sub>2</sub>O and ox pSi in ddH<sub>2</sub>O (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01 and <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Evolution over time of the ratio cSi/aSi, from Raman peaks intensity. After 1 week, the very high ratios observed for non-Oxidized samples correspond to the disappearing of pSi layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Raman shifts of the crystalline Si–Si peaks, with peak evolution over time. The main shift was obtained after 72 h for non-oxidized pSi, while it took up to 1 week for oxidized samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Raman spectra of non-oxidized pSi particles in ddH<sub>2</sub>O and in SBF. The cSi–Si peak disappeared after 1 week in SBF and after 4 weeks in ddH<sub>2</sub>O.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Si–O peak evolution over time, as measured via ATR-FTIR. Si–O peak increased during the first hours, before decreasing, except for non-ox pSi in ddH<sub>2</sub>O.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Oxidized pSi functionalized with APTES: NH<sub>2</sub> peak evolution over time, as measured via ATR-FTIR. NH<sub>2</sub> peak remains visible for up to 7 h in both SBF and ddH<sub>2</sub>O.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>SEM of pSi chips enlightening porous layer degradation after 2 weeks. (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) Initial pSi layers (non-oxidized and oxidized, respectively). (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) pSi in SBF (non-oxidized and oxidized, respectively). (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) pSi in ddH<sub>2</sub>O (non-oxidized and oxidized, respectively). Higher magnification images in (<b>C</b>–<b>F</b>) correspond to the white square in the corresponding lower magnification images.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>In vivo experiments conducted on rat vertebrae. Optical microscopy images of representative undecalcified sections, stained with Masson trichrome: (<b>A</b>) Oxidized pSi particles. (<b>B</b>) Non-oxidized pSi particles. (<b>C</b>) Non porous Si particles. Scale bar = 5 mm. The bottom graph represents bone mineral density, as measured from the triplicate experiments. * indicates a significant difference (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). NS indicates no significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Representation of pSi dissolution, with involvement of crystalline silicon (cSi), amorphous silicon (aSi), silicon oxide (SiO<sub>2</sub>), and silici acid Si(OH)<sub>4</sub>. (<b>A</b>) Schematic representation of pSi side view, with silicon oxide and amorphous silicon layers surrounding crystalline silicon. (<b>B</b>) SEM images of pSi particles, revealing the porous part. (<b>C</b>) Psi dissolution process, from crystalline silicon to released silicic acid; blue, red, and white balls represent Silicon, Oxygen, and Hydrogen, respectively.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 10647 KiB  
Article
Cryo-Electrospinning Generates Highly Porous Fiber Scaffolds Which Improves Trabecular Meshwork Cell Infiltration
by Devon J. Crouch, Carl M. Sheridan, Julia G. Behnsen, Raechelle A. D’Sa and Lucy A. Bosworth
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(10), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100490 - 22 Sep 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2322
Abstract
Human trabecular meshwork is a sieve-like tissue with large pores, which plays a vital role in aqueous humor outflow. Dysfunction of this tissue can occur, which leads to glaucoma and permanent vision loss. Replacement of trabecular meshwork with a tissue-engineered device is the [...] Read more.
Human trabecular meshwork is a sieve-like tissue with large pores, which plays a vital role in aqueous humor outflow. Dysfunction of this tissue can occur, which leads to glaucoma and permanent vision loss. Replacement of trabecular meshwork with a tissue-engineered device is the ultimate objective. This study aimed to create a biomimetic structure of trabecular meshwork using electrospinning. Conventional electrospinning was compared to cryogenic electrospinning, the latter being an adaptation of conventional electrospinning whereby dry ice is incorporated in the fiber collector system. The dry ice causes ice crystals to form in-between the fibers, increasing the inter-fiber spacing, which is retained following sublimation. Structural characterization demonstrated cryo-scaffolds to have closer recapitulation of the trabecular meshwork, in terms of pore size, porosity, and thickness. The attachment of a healthy, human trabecular meshwork cell line (NTM5) to the scaffold was not influenced by the fabrication method. The main objective was to assess cell infiltration. Cryo-scaffolds supported cell penetration deep within their structure after seven days, whereas cells remained on the outer surface for conventional scaffolds. This study demonstrates the suitability of cryogenic electrospinning for the close recapitulation of trabecular meshwork and its potential as a 3D in vitro model and, in time, a tissue-engineered device. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p><b>Electrospinning and cryogenic electrospinning processes.</b> Schematic illustrating (<b>A</b>) conventional electrospinning and (<b>B</b>) cryogenic electrospinning set-ups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Cryogenic electrospinning increased spacing between fibers without affecting morphology or diameter.</b> (<b>A</b>) Scanning electron micrographs of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and cryogenic electrospun PCL (cryo-PCL) (magnification ×10,000, scale bar = 5 µm). (<b>B</b>) Fiber diameters displayed as a violin plot demonstrating fiber diameter distribution, median, and interquartile range for PCL and cryo-PCL (n = 100). Two-tailed Mann–Whitney statistical test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), with non-significance represented as ns. (<b>C</b>) Confocal singular slice images (thickness 1.46 µm) of PCL and cryo-PCL (orange = rhodamine-stained fibers) (objective 20×, scale bar = 10 µm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><b>Cryogenic electrospinning increases pore size and thickness of electrospun PCL scaffolds.</b> X-ray computed tomography images of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and cryo-electrospun PCL (cryo-PCL) presented in (<b>A</b>) front-on and (<b>B</b>) cross-sectional orientations (scale bars = 100 µm).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>Cryo-spinning significantly reduces the tensile properties of the fiber scaffold.</b> (<b>A</b>) Typical stress–strain curve, (<b>B</b>) Young’s modulus, and (<b>C</b>) yield stress of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and cryo-electrospun PCL (cryo-PCL). Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 12). Two-tailed unpaired <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test statistical test. Statistical differences presented by <span class="html-italic">p</span> values with <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 considered significant.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p><b>Cryogenic electrospinning did not affect initial cell attachment.</b> Percentage of normal trabecular meshwork (NTM<sub>5</sub>) cell attachment to electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), cryo-electrospun PCL (cryo-PCL), tissue culture-treated well plates (TCP; positive control), and low-binding TCP well plates (negative control) (n = 6). Cell location split across three different fractions: adherent to the scaffold or the well, or circulating in the media. Note: no scaffold was present in either control group. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><b>Cryogenic electrospinning facilitated increased cell infiltration within the scaffold.</b> (<b>A</b>) Representative confocal z-stacked images of NTM<sub>5</sub> cells after 7 days in culture on electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds and cryo-electrospun PCL (cryo-PCL). Immunocytochemistry staining of cell nucleus (DAPI, blue), cell cytoskeleton (phalloidin-488, green), and fibers (rhodamine, orange). Images shown: XY z-stack (20× objective, scale bar = 50 µm), XZ, and YZ side view. White dashed line on XY z-stack represent position of XZ (horizontal) and YZ (vertical) images. (<b>B</b>) Quantification of NTM<sub>5</sub> cell infiltration into both PCL and cryo-PCL scaffolds after 7 days in culture. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation, where each data point represents the mean from 10 measurements of an individual sample. Two-way ANOVA statistical test. Statistical differences presented by <span class="html-italic">p</span> values (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop