Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution

A special issue of Genes (ISSN 2073-4425). This special issue belongs to the section "Molecular Genetics and Genomics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2021) | Viewed by 72130

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Fralin Life Science Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Interests: comparative genomics; cytogenetics; chromosome evolution; population genomics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMCB SB RAS), 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
Interests: evolution of vertebrate genomes; sex determination and sex chromosomes; B chromosomes; comparative genomics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The development of next generation sequencing technologies in the last decade has led to obtaining highly-fragmented genome assemblies for numerous organisms. The quality of genome assemblies significantly varies among species, depending of the abundance of the repetitive elements and levels of genetic polymorphism. As a result, many important problems in genome biology remain unresolved, without understanding how the genome is organized at the level of the chromosomes. Recent advances in genome and chromosome technologies, including long-read sequencing, Hi-C scaffoding,  chromosome flow sorting, and physical and optical mapping, allow for obtaining genome assemblies at the level of complete chromosomes. Such assemblies provide new opportunities to study chromosome organization and evolution, structural genome variations, gene movements, sex-biased gene expression, epigenomic modifications, and long-range chromatin interactions.

In this Special Issue, we would like to invite submissions of original research and review articles, with a special focus on chromosomes in our understanding of the genome structure, function, and evolution. Any articles, from the development of the new technologies to comprehensive genome analyses, are welcome.   

Dr. Maria Sharakhova
Dr. Vladimir Trifinov
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genes is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • genome organization
  • genome evolution
  • chromosome
  • chromosome rearrangements
  • chromatin
  • karyotype evolution

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (16 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

4 pages, 192 KiB  
Editorial
Chromosome-Centric View of Genome Organization and Evolution
by Maria Sharakhova and Vladimir Trifonov
Genes 2021, 12(8), 1237; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081237 - 12 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1965
Abstract
Genetic material in all cellular organisms is packed into chromosomes, which represent essential units of inheritance, recombination, and evolution [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

12 pages, 1521 KiB  
Article
Amplified Fragments of an Autosome-Borne Gene Constitute a Significant Component of the W Sex Chromosome of Eremias velox (Reptilia, Lacertidae)
by Artem Lisachov, Daria Andreyushkova, Guzel Davletshina, Dmitry Prokopov, Svetlana Romanenko, Svetlana Galkina, Alsu Saifitdinova, Evgeniy Simonov, Pavel Borodin and Vladimir Trifonov
Genes 2021, 12(5), 779; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050779 - 20 May 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3283
Abstract
Heteromorphic W and Y sex chromosomes often experience gene loss and heterochromatinization, which is frequently viewed as their “degeneration”. However, the evolutionary trajectories of the heterochromosomes are in fact more complex since they may not only lose but also acquire new sequences. Previously, [...] Read more.
Heteromorphic W and Y sex chromosomes often experience gene loss and heterochromatinization, which is frequently viewed as their “degeneration”. However, the evolutionary trajectories of the heterochromosomes are in fact more complex since they may not only lose but also acquire new sequences. Previously, we found that the heterochromatic W chromosome of a lizard Eremias velox (Lacertidae) is decondensed and thus transcriptionally active during the lampbrush stage. To determine possible sources of this transcription, we sequenced DNA from a microdissected W chromosome sample and a total female DNA sample and analyzed the results of reference-based and de novo assembly. We found a new repetitive sequence, consisting of fragments of an autosomal protein-coding gene ATF7IP2, several SINE elements, and sequences of unknown origin. This repetitive element is distributed across the whole length of the W chromosome, except the centromeric region. Since it retained only 3 out of 10 original ATF7IP2 exons, it remains unclear whether it is able to produce a protein product. Subsequent studies are required to test the presence of this element in other species of Lacertidae and possible functionality. Our results provide further evidence for the view of W and Y chromosomes as not just “degraded” copies of Z and X chromosomes but independent genomic segments in which novel genetic elements may arise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The distribution of coverage depth for the <span class="html-italic">E. velox</span> sequencing reads along the <span class="html-italic">ATF7IP2</span> gene of <span class="html-italic">P. muralis</span>. (<b>a</b>) The reads derived from the W-specific DNA sample; (<b>b</b>) the reads derived from the total genomic DNA sample. The Y axes indicate coverage. The X axis indicates the coordinates in the chromosome 14 scaffold of the <span class="html-italic">P. muralis</span> genome assembly (GCF_004329235.1). Exons are indicated as solid bars, introns are indicated by thin lines. The image is obtained via the Integrative Genomics Viewer (<a href="https://www.igv.org" target="_blank">https://www.igv.org</a>, accessed on 7 August 2019).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The reconstructed scheme of the <span class="html-italic">ATF7IP2</span>-derived repeat in the W chromosome of <span class="html-italic">E. velox</span>. (<b>a</b>) Sequence composition of the repeat unit. Pink indicates <span class="html-italic">ATF7IP2</span>-derived sequences, green indicates the POM/Squam1-SINE mobile element, blue indicates other SINE elements, and gray indicates sequences of unknown origin. (<b>b</b>) The reference-based scheme of the <span class="html-italic">ATF7IP2</span>-derived sequences (see <a href="#genes-12-00779-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a> for description), with their relative positions within the repeat unit indicated by the red and blue lines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>FISH with the PCR-amplified probe to the fragment of the <span class="html-italic">ATF7IP2</span> gene (red fluorescence) and the W-specific microdissected probe (green fluorescence). Chromosomes are counterstained with DAPI. (<b>a</b>) Metaphase plate of female <span class="html-italic">E. velox.</span> Scale bar: 20 μm. (<b>b</b>) Lampbrush ZW bivalent of <span class="html-italic">E. velox</span>. Scale bar: 15 μm. Insert: agarose gel electrophoresis with the PCR-amplified fragment of the <span class="html-italic">ATF7IP2</span> gene.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 4141 KiB  
Article
Two Separate Cases: Complex Chromosomal Abnormality Involving Three Chromosomes and Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome in Patients with Impaired Reproductive Function
by Tatyana V. Karamysheva, Tatyana A. Gayner, Vladimir V. Muzyka, Konstantin E. Orishchenko and Nikolay B. Rubtsov
Genes 2020, 11(12), 1511; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11121511 - 17 Dec 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3373
Abstract
For medical genetic counseling, estimating the chance of a child being born with chromosome abnormality is crucially important. Cytogenetic diagnostics of parents with a balanced karyotype are a special case. Such chromosome rearrangements cannot be detected with comprehensive chromosome screening. In the current [...] Read more.
For medical genetic counseling, estimating the chance of a child being born with chromosome abnormality is crucially important. Cytogenetic diagnostics of parents with a balanced karyotype are a special case. Such chromosome rearrangements cannot be detected with comprehensive chromosome screening. In the current paper, we consider chromosome diagnostics in two cases of chromosome rearrangement in patients with balanced karyotype and provide the results of a detailed analysis of complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) involving three chromosomes and a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) in a patient with impaired reproductive function. The application of fluorescent in situ hybridization, microdissection, and multicolor banding allows for describing analyzed karyotypes in detail. In the case of a CCR, such as the one described here, the probability of gamete formation with a karyotype, showing a balance of chromosome regions, is extremely low. Recommendation for the family in genetic counseling should take into account the obtained result. In the case of an sSMC, it is critically important to identify the original chromosome from which the sSMC has been derived, even if the euchromatin material is absent. Finally, we present our view on the optimal strategy of identifying and describing sSMCs, namely the production of a microdissectional DNA probe from the sSMC combined with a consequent reverse painting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>GTG (G-bands after trypsin and Giemsa) differentially stained chromosomes of a patient with a complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR). der(3)t(3;16;5), der(5)t(3;16;5), der(16)t(3;16;5) reflect derivatives of chromosomes 3, 5, and 16 involved in the CCR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Two-color chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization with WCP3 (green)/WCP5 (red) (<b>a</b>) and WCP16 (red) (<b>b</b>) on metaphase chromosomes of a healthy donor. Whole chromosome painting probes (WCPs) intensely painted original chromosomes. The general staining of chromosomes with 4’,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) in blue. Chromosomes are marked as human chromosome 3 (HSA3), human chromosome 5 (HSA5), and human chromosome 16 (HSA16).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chromosome painting of patient’s chromosomes. Two-color CISS hybridization on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes with DNA probes WCP3 (green)/WCP5 (red) (<b>a</b>) and WCP16 (red, (<b>b</b>)). DAPI staining is in blue. Intact complete chromosomes are indicated as HSA3, HSA5, and HSA16. (<b>a</b>) →—arrow shows the absence of a signal on the short arm of the chromosome 5 derivative. ▶—arrowhead indicates the WCP3 signal (green) on the short arm of the chromosome 5 derivative. ➔—arrow indicates WCP5 (red) signal at the distal region of the long arm of chromosome 3. (<b>a</b>) Chromosome 3 material was detected on chromosomes der(5) and der(16). (<b>b</b>) Chromosome 16 material was detected on the short arm of chromosome der(5).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Quality control for microdissection DNA probes homologous for short and long arms of chromosome 16. CISS-hybridization of DNA probes PCP16p (<b>a</b>) and PCP16q (<b>b</b>) on metaphase chromosomes of a healthy donor. DAPI staining is in blue. Both 16p and 16q indicate the short and the long arm of chromosome 16, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>CISS hybridization with PCP16p (<b>a</b>) and WCP5 (green)/PCP16q(red) (<b>b</b>) on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes. (<b>a</b>) PCP16p DNA probe that is homologous to the short arm of chromosome 16 (red). Chromosomal regions where the specific signal was detected are indicated: 16p—short arms of chromosomes 16 and chromosome 16 derivative. (<b>b</b>) Chromosomal regions where the specific signal was detected are indicated: HSA5, HSA16—intact chromosomes 5, 16. der(3), der(5), der(16)—chromosomes 3, 5, and 16 respective derivatives. Chromatin DAPI staining is in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Two-color WCP3(green)/PCP16q(red) (<b>a</b>) and three-color WCP3(yellow)/WCP5(green)/WCP16(red) (<b>b</b>) CISS-hybridization on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes. (<b>a</b>) ➔—arrow indicates WCP3 (green) signal at the short arm of chromosome 5 derivative. →—arrow indicates the absence of a signal at the long arm of chromosome 3 derivative. Three-color CISS hybridization WCP3(green)/WCP5(green)/WCP16(red) (<b>b</b>) on metaphase chromosomes of the patient. Chromosomes and chromosomal regions with specific signals are indicated. (<b>b</b>) →—arrow indicates breaking points in 3q25; 16q21; 5p15.1 loci. Further, 3q?25→26 is a chromosome 3 segment detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the short arm of chromosome 5 derivative. CISS hybridization revealed a region from chromosome 3 in der(5). Chromatin DAPI staining is in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>CISS-hybridization of microdissection DNA probes prepared from single abnormal chromosomes: PCPder(5) (<b>a</b>) and PCPder(3) (<b>b</b>) DNA probes on metaphase chromosomes of a healthy donor. Chromosomes 3, 5, and 16 with a specific red signal are indicated. Chromatin DAPI staining is in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>CISS hybridization with PCP3q25→q26 (probe1) and PCP3q25→qter (probe 2) on chromosomes of a healthy individual (<b>a</b>) and the patient (<b>b</b>). Chromosomes with signals are indicated: HSA3—intact chromosome 3, der(3), der(5), and der(16)—derivatives of chromosomes 3, 5, and 16, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The analysis of 3q26.2 chromosomal segment. (<b>a</b>) FISH EVI1 Breakapart Probe on the patient’s chromosomes. (<b>b</b>) Scheme of EVI1 Breakapart Probe homology. The EVI1 3q26.2 product consists of a 158 kb probe, labeled in red, telomeric to the D3S4415 marker and including the LRRC34 gene, a green probe covering a 181 kb region, including the entire <span class="html-italic">EVI1</span> gene and flanking regions and a blue probe, which covers the 563 kb region centromeric to the <span class="html-italic">EVI1</span> gene, including the D3S3364 marker. Signal was detected at chromosomes 3 and der(16). Chromatin DAPI staining is in blue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The karyotype of the patient. (<b>a</b>) GTG-differentially stained chromosomes of the patient with small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) in the karyotype. (<b>b</b>) Metaphase plate of a patient with AgNOR-staining (case 2). →—arrow indicates nucleolus organizer region (NOR) detected on acrocentric chromosomes and sSMC on the patient’s sSMC by AgNOR-staining. mar—indicates sSMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>FISH with Tel-DNA probe (<b>a</b>) and rDNA-probe (<b>b</b>) on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes. mar and arrows indicate sSMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>CISS hybridization with WCP15 DNA probe on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes. (<b>a</b>) WCP15 DNA probe-stained chromosome 15 (red). A weak signal in nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) of acrocentric chromosomes. (<b>b</b>) Inverted DAPI banding. No. 15—indicates the homologs of chromosome 15. mar—indicates sSMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>FISH of DNA probe, obtained by microdissection from one copy of a marker chromosome on metaphase chromosomes of the patient (<b>a</b>) and a healthy individual (<b>b</b>). mar and arrows indicate sSMC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Three-color FISH with region-specific DNA-probes (PCP14a (green), PCP14b (red), PCP14c (bright blue) on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes. (<b>a</b>) Chromatin DAPI staining in blue. Inverted DAPI banding. (<b>b</b>) Patient’s chromosome 14 and (<b>c</b>) MCB of sSMCs are marked.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>FISH (<b>a</b>) Alu-DNA probe on the patient’s metaphase chromosomes (red). On the right—marker chromosome labeled with a DNA probe detecting euchromatin. Chromosome 14 and the sSMC are indicated. (<b>b</b>) Inverted DAPI-banding. Chromatin DAPI staining is in blue. mar(14) and arrows indicate sSMC. Arrowhead indicates chromosome 14.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5165 KiB  
Article
The Puzzling Fate of a Lupin Chromosome Revealed by Reciprocal Oligo-FISH and BAC-FISH Mapping
by Wojciech Bielski, Michał Książkiewicz, Denisa Šimoníková, Eva Hřibová, Karolina Susek and Barbara Naganowska
Genes 2020, 11(12), 1489; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11121489 - 10 Dec 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2914
Abstract
Old World lupins constitute an interesting model for evolutionary research due to diversity in genome size and chromosome number, indicating evolutionary genome reorganization. It has been hypothesized that the polyploidization event which occurred in the common ancestor of the Fabaceae family was followed [...] Read more.
Old World lupins constitute an interesting model for evolutionary research due to diversity in genome size and chromosome number, indicating evolutionary genome reorganization. It has been hypothesized that the polyploidization event which occurred in the common ancestor of the Fabaceae family was followed by a lineage-specific whole genome triplication (WGT) in the lupin clade, driving chromosome rearrangements. In this study, chromosome-specific markers were used as probes for heterologous fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to identify and characterize structural chromosome changes among the smooth-seeded (Lupinus angustifolius L., Lupinus cryptanthus Shuttlew., Lupinus micranthus Guss.) and rough-seeded (Lupinus cosentinii Guss. and Lupinus pilosus Murr.) lupin species. Comparative cytogenetic mapping was done using FISH with oligonucleotide probes and previously published chromosome-specific bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones. Oligonucleotide probes were designed to cover both arms of chromosome Lang06 of the L. angustifolius reference genome separately. The chromosome was chosen for the in-depth study due to observed structural variability among wild lupin species revealed by BAC-FISH and supplemented by in silico mapping of recently released lupin genome assemblies. The results highlighted changes in synteny within the Lang06 region between the lupin species, including putative translocations, inversions, and/or non-allelic homologous recombination, which would have accompanied the evolution and speciation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General scheme of oligonucleotide-based probe development.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic layout of the oligonucleotide libraries and repetitive sequences in pseudochromosome Lang06. The O1 library is marked in green, the O2 library in red, and the O3 library in yellow. Orange highlights the common region for the O2 and O3 libraries, whereas violet covers the region common to O2 and O4 libraries. Repetitive sequences are shown in black in the middle circle. Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone localization diagram is shown in blue in the inner circle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) mapping of oligonucleotide probes in mitotic chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">L. angustifolius</span>. The positions of individual probes are marked by arrows. Probe colors are as follows: green (O1, Lang06 arm (<b>A</b>), red (O2, Lang06 arm (<b>B</b>)), yellow (O3, pericentromeric region of Lang06 arm B) and purple (O4, telomere region of Lang06 arm B). Scale bar: 5 μm. Chromosome Lang06 schematic representation (<b>C</b>), showing the positions of aligned particular oligonucleotide-based or BAC-based probes, was not drawn to scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FISH mapping of oligonucleotide probes (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and oligonucleotide combined with BAC clones (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) on mitotic metaphase chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">L. cryptanthus</span>. The positions of individual probes are marked by arrows. Probe colors are as follows: green (O1, Lang06 arm A), red (O2, Lang06 arm B), yellow (O3, pericentromeric region of Lang06 arm B) and purple (O4, telomere region of Lang06 arm B). Scale bar: 5 μm. Schematic representation of probe mapping pattern in <span class="html-italic">L. cryptanthus</span> chromosomes (<b>F</b>), showing observed positions of particular oligonucleotide-based or BAC-based probes, was not drawn to scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FISH mapping of oligonucleotide probes (<b>A</b>–<b>C</b>) and oligonucleotide probes combined with BAC clones (<b>D</b>–<b>F</b>) on mitotic chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">L. micranthus</span>. The positions of individual probes are marked by arrows. Probe colors are as follows: green (O1, Lang06 arm A), red (O2, Lang06 arm B), yellow (O3, pericentromeric region of Lang06 arm B), and purple (O4, telomere region of Lang06 arm B). Scale bar: 5 μm. Schematic representation of probe mapping pattern in <span class="html-italic">L. micranthus</span> chromosomes (<b>G</b>), showing observed positions of particular oligonucleotide-based or BAC-based probes, was not drawn to scale. O3*—beside two major loci, minor signals were also noticed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FISH mapping results of oligonucleotide probes (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and oligonucleotide combined with BAC clones (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) in mitotic chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">L. cosentinii.</span> The positions of individual probes are marked by arrows. Probe colors are as follows: green (O1, Lang06 arm A), red (O2, Lang06 arm B), yellow (O3, pericentromeric region of Lang06 arm B), and purple (O4, telomere region of Lang06 arm B). Scale bar: 5 μm. Schematic representation of probe mapping pattern in <span class="html-italic">L. cosentinii</span> chromosomes (<b>F</b>), showing observed positions of particular oligonucleotide-based or BAC-based probes, was not drawn to scale. The O3 probe hybridized to multiple loci.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>FISH mapping of oligonucleotide probes (<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) and oligonucleotide probes combined with BAC clones (<b>C</b>–<b>F</b>) on mitotic chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">L. pilosus</span>. The positions of individual probes are marked by arrows. Probe colors are as follows: green (O1, Lang06 arm A), red (O2, Lang06 arm B), yellow (O3, pericentromeric region of Lang06 arm B), and purple (O4, telomere region of Lang06 arm B). Scale bar: 5 μm. Schematic representation of probe mapping pattern in <span class="html-italic">L. pilosus</span> chromosomes (<b>G</b>), showing observed positions of particular oligonucleotide-based or BAC-based probes, was not drawn to scale. O3*—besides two major loci, minor signals were also noticed. The fragment of <a href="#genes-11-01489-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>B showing the intra-chromosomal inversion was magnified (marked with orange, dashed line).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic representation of probe mapping pattern, showing observed positions of particular oligonucleotide-based or BAC-based probes in <span class="html-italic">L. angustifolius</span> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">L. cryptanthus</span> (<b>B</b>), <span class="html-italic">L. micranthus</span> (<b>C</b>), <span class="html-italic">L. cosentinii</span> (<b>D</b>), and <span class="html-italic">L. pilosus</span> (<b>E</b>) chromosomes. In the case of probe O3 in <span class="html-italic">L. micranthus</span> and <span class="html-italic">L. pilosus</span>, beside two major loci, minor signals were also noticed. In <span class="html-italic">L. cosentinii</span>, the O3 probe hybridized to multiple loci. Chromosome schemes and probes length are not drawn to scale.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 4068 KiB  
Article
Chromosome Distribution of Highly Conserved Tandemly Arranged Repetitive DNAs in the Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser baerii)
by Larisa S. Biltueva, Dmitry Yu. Prokopov, Svetlana A. Romanenko, Elena A. Interesova, Manfred Schartl and Vladimir A. Trifonov
Genes 2020, 11(11), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11111375 - 20 Nov 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2971
Abstract
Polyploid genomes present a challenge for cytogenetic and genomic studies, due to the high number of similar size chromosomes and the simultaneous presence of hardly distinguishable paralogous elements. The karyotype of the Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) contains around 250 chromosomes and [...] Read more.
Polyploid genomes present a challenge for cytogenetic and genomic studies, due to the high number of similar size chromosomes and the simultaneous presence of hardly distinguishable paralogous elements. The karyotype of the Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) contains around 250 chromosomes and is remarkable for the presence of paralogs from two rounds of whole-genome duplications (WGD). In this study, we applied the sterlet-derived acipenserid satDNA-based whole chromosome-specific probes to analyze the Siberian sturgeon karyotype. We demonstrate that the last genome duplication event in the Siberian sturgeon was accompanied by the simultaneous expansion of several repetitive DNA families. Some of the repetitive probes serve as good cytogenetic markers distinguishing paralogous chromosomes and detecting ancestral syntenic regions, which underwent fusions and fissions. The tendency of minisatellite specificity for chromosome size groups previously observed in the sterlet genome is also visible in the Siberian sturgeon. We provide an initial physical chromosome map of the Siberian sturgeon genome supported by molecular markers. The application of these data will facilitate genomic studies in other recent polyploid sturgeon species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Different types of chromosome homology relations in polyploid acipenserids, which genomes underwent either one (Ac1R), or two (Ac2R) whole-genome duplication events.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>GTG-banded karyotype of the Siberian sturgeon (<span class="html-italic">Acipenser baerii</span>) (2n = 248). The morphologies of some homologs in pairs differ in this image (for example, pair 10). Observed heteromorphism was not confirmed by analyzing other metaphases and can be explained by either chromosome spreading artifact or by a rare chromosome rearrangement.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>CBG-stained chromosomes of the Siberian sturgeon. The scale bar is 10 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>FISH of repetitive DNA probes on metaphase plates of the Siberian sturgeon (<b>a–d</b>). (<b>a</b>) Satellites (AC)<sub>n</sub> (red) and <span class="html-italic">Arut802A</span> (green) on GTG-banded metaphase plate (<b>left</b>). Arrows mark four middle-size metacentric chromosomes and NOR-bearing chromosomes with dual signals; (<b>b</b>) satellites <span class="html-italic">Arut40A</span> (red) and <span class="html-italic">Arut219A</span> (green), arrows mark chromosomes with dual signals; (<b>c</b>) satellites <span class="html-italic">Arut57A</span> (red) and <span class="html-italic">Arut802A</span> (green), arrows mark NOR-bearing chromosomes with dual signals, in the right insert the part of the plate is represented only with <span class="html-italic">Arut57A.</span> The scale bar is 10 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FISH of repetitive DNA probes on metaphase plates of the Siberian sturgeon (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>). (<b>a</b>) ArutF167A on GTG-banded metaphase plate (<b>left</b>), arrows mark big acrocentric chromosomes with signals and arrowheads strong signals on ABAE 104. (<b>b</b>) satellite ArutF167A (green) and painting probe ARUT 57 (R3, red) on the part of GTG-banded metaphase plate (<b>below</b>). Arrows mark ABAE chromosomes 86 and 100. The scale bar is 10 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>FISH of repetitive and microdissection-derived painting probes (<b>right</b>) on GTG-banded metaphase plates (<b>left</b>) of the Siberian sturgeon (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). (<b>a</b>) Arut434A (green) and microdissection-derived painting probe N5 (red) for ARUT 1p and 2p colocalized on ABAE 1–4; (<b>b</b>) Arut434A (green) and microdissection-derived painting probe R61 (red) for ARUT 4 colocalized on ABAE 7, 101, and 102, sometimes very weakly marked ABAE 5 and 6, orthologs of ARUT 3; (<b>c</b>) Arut434A (green) and microdissection-derived painting probes R69 (red) for orthologs of the ARUT 7 (ABAE 13, 23, and 108) and ARUT 14 (ABAE 103 and 104), and R58 (green) for orthologs of ARUT 7q (ABAE13 and 23)and ARUT 14. (<b>d</b>) U2 (green) localized into chromosomes 19, 20, 25, and 35. Arrows marked chromosomes with signals. The scale bar is 10 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic distribution of the repeat Arut434A (green), small nuclear RNA gene cluster U2 (blue), and chromosome-specific probes (grey) on the orthologs of 11 sterlet chromosomes in the Siberian sturgeon karyotype.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>FISH of repetitive and microdissection-derived painting probes (<b>right</b>) on GTG-banded metaphase plates (<b>left</b>) of the Siberian sturgeon (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>). (<b>a</b>) 18S/28S rDNA (green) and <span class="html-italic">Arut802A</span> (red); (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">Arut802A</span> (green) and <span class="html-italic">ArutF26A</span> (red); (<b>c</b>) 5S rDNA (green) and <span class="html-italic">Arut219A</span> (red). Chromosomes with signals are marked and numbered; double arrows indicate chromosomes with colocalized probes. The scale bar is 10 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Scheme of tandemly arranged repetitive DNA dynamics in the karyotypes of sterlet (ARUT) and Siberian sturgeon (ABAE), based on the chromosomal localizations of sterlet-specific repetitive DNAs and microdissection-derived painting probes on Siberian sturgeon chromosomes. The names of repetitive and chromosome-specific probes are given near the chromosomes of their origin.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 1280 KiB  
Article
Heterochiasmy and Sexual Dimorphism: The Case of the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica, Hirundinidae, Aves)
by Lyubov P. Malinovskaya, Katerina Tishakova, Elena P. Shnaider, Pavel M. Borodin and Anna A. Torgasheva
Genes 2020, 11(10), 1119; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11101119 - 24 Sep 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4604
Abstract
Heterochiasmy, a sex-based difference in recombination rate, has been detected in many species of animals and plants. Several hypotheses about evolutionary causes of heterochiasmy were proposed. However, there is a shortage of empirical data. In this paper, we compared recombination related traits in [...] Read more.
Heterochiasmy, a sex-based difference in recombination rate, has been detected in many species of animals and plants. Several hypotheses about evolutionary causes of heterochiasmy were proposed. However, there is a shortage of empirical data. In this paper, we compared recombination related traits in females and males of the barn swallow Hirundo rustica (Linnaeus, 1758), the species under strong sexual selection, with those in the pale martin Riparia diluta (Sharpe and Wyatt, 1893), a related and ecologically similar species with the same karyotype (2N = 78), but without obvious sexual dimorphism. Recombination traits were examined in pachytene chromosome spreads prepared from spermatocytes and oocytes. Synaptonemal complexes and mature recombination nodules were visualized with antibodies to SYCP3 and MLH1 proteins, correspondingly. Recombination rate was significantly higher (p = 0.0001) in barn swallow females (55.6 ± 6.3 recombination nodules per autosomal genome), caused by the higher number of nodules at the macrochromosomes, than in males (49.0 ± 4.5). They also showed more even distribution of recombination nodules along the macrochromosomes. At the same time, in the pale martin, sexual differences in recombination rate and distributions were rather small. We speculate that an elevated recombination rate in the female barn swallows might have evolved as a compensatory reaction to runaway sexual selection in males. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Synaptonemal complexes (SC) spreads of the oocyte (<b>a</b>) and spermatocyte (<b>b</b>) of the barn swallow after immunolocalization of the lateral elements of the SC (SYCP3—red signal), recombination nodules (MLH1—green), and centromeres (ANA-C—blue). Numbers indicate SCs of the macrochromosomes, letters—ZZ, ZW, and GRC. Bar—5 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of MLH1 foci along individual SCs in pachytene oocytes and spermatocytes of barn swallow and pale martin. On the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis: the relative position of MLH1 foci at the six largest macroSCs and ZW/ZZ bivalents in relation to the centromere (black triangle). The width of the interval is approximately 1 μm. On the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis: the proportion of MLH1 focus number in each interval. Colors indicate bivalents with 1–5 MLH1 foci per bivalent. The scale shows the color codes. The numbers to the left of the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis stand for chromosome numbers.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 16478 KiB  
Article
Genes Containing Long Introns Occupy Series of Bands and Interbands in Drosophila melanogaster Polytene Chromosomes
by Varvara A. Khoroshko, Galina V. Pokholkova, Victor G. Levitsky, Tatyana Yu. Zykova, Oksana V. Antonenko, Elena S. Belyaeva and Igor F. Zhimulev
Genes 2020, 11(4), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040417 - 11 Apr 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4406
Abstract
The Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes are the best model for studying the genome organization during interphase. Despite of the long-term studies available on genetic organization of polytene chromosome bands and interbands, little is known regarding long gene location on chromosomes. To analyze it, [...] Read more.
The Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes are the best model for studying the genome organization during interphase. Despite of the long-term studies available on genetic organization of polytene chromosome bands and interbands, little is known regarding long gene location on chromosomes. To analyze it, we used bioinformatic approaches and characterized genome-wide distribution of introns in gene bodies and in different chromatin states, and using fluorescent in situ hybridization we juxtaposed them with the chromosome structures. Short introns up to 2 kb in length are located in the bodies of housekeeping genes (grey bands or lazurite chromatin). In the group of 70 longest genes in the Drosophila genome, 95% of total gene length accrues to introns. The mapping of the 15 long genes showed that they could occupy extended sections of polytene chromosomes containing band and interband series, with promoters located in the interband fragments (aquamarine chromatin). Introns (malachite and ruby chromatin) in polytene chromosomes form independent bands, which can contain either both introns and exons or intron material only. Thus, a novel type of the gene arrangement in polytene chromosomes was discovered; peculiarities of such genetic organization are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>The distribution of introns and different chromatin states according to 4HMM model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]. (<b>A</b>) fraction of intron length according to the gene length in kb; and, (<b>B</b>) distribution of four chromatin states in genes with length &lt;2, 2–50, 50–100, and &gt;100 kb).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of the intron fractions and four chromatin states according to gene length in the <span class="html-italic">Drosophila</span> genome. <span class="html-italic">X</span>-axis represents gene length (bp); <span class="html-italic">Y</span>-axis represents the proportion of introns in the gene; black line represents introns on which 4HMM model does not provide any data. (<b>A</b>) intron fractions in gene bodies; (<b>B</b>) intron fractions in 5’UTR; and, (<b>C</b>) intron fractions in 3’UTR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Intron fraction overlapping with four-chromatin states model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>] according to intron length (the calculations were carried out using moving average on the number of introns equaling 500; black line presents genome regions for which data on chromatin states is absent). (<b>A</b>) distribution for gene bodies; (<b>B</b>) distribution for 5’UTR; and, (<b>C</b>) distribution for 3’UTR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Summed intron length (Mb) overlapping with four-chromatin states model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]. (<b>A</b>) in 5’UTR; (<b>B</b>) in gene bodies; and, (<b>C</b>) in 3’UTR.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Summed length of four-chromatin states model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>] and three chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>] in 70 and 15 studied genes. (<b>A</b>) distribution of chromatin states in 4HMM model in 70 genes (%); (<b>B</b>) distribution of chromatin condensation states in 3CM model in 70 genes (%); (<b>C</b>) distribution of chromatin states in 4HMM model in 15 genes (%); and, (<b>D</b>) distribution of chromatin condensation states in 3CM model in 15 genes (%).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">CG3777</span> gene in the 1AB region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">CG43867</span> gene in the 1CD region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">br</span> gene in the 2B region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">CG42666</span> gene in the 2B region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">trol</span> gene in the 3A1-4 region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">sgg</span> gene in the 3AB region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">kirre</span> gene in the 3C region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals on the stretched chromosome preparation for kirre-II, kirre-III, and kirre-IV probes; (<b>H</b>) combined FISH signals for kirre-I, kirre-II, kirre-III, kirre-IV, and kirre-V probes; and, (<b>I</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>]. Gene group 1 is represented by: <span class="html-italic">CG14416</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14417</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14418</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14419</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG3526</span>; gene group 2 is represented by: <span class="html-italic">CG3588</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14424</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG32793</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG3592</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG3598</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14420</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14421</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14422</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG14423</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG17959</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG3603</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">dnc</span> gene in the 3CD region (on the molecular map the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) combined FISH signals on the stretched chromosome preparation; (<b>G</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>H</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>I</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">Nrg</span> gene in the 7F region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">dlg1</span> gene in the 10B region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">EcR</span> gene in the 42A region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges and P. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B55-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">55</a>]. tRNA group 1 is represented by: <span class="html-italic">tRNA:R2:42Ad</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:K2:42Ae</span>; tRNA group 2 is represented by: <span class="html-italic">tRNA:N5:42Ah</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:N5:42Ag</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:N5:42Af</span>; tRNA group 3 is represented by: <span class="html-italic">tRNA:R2:42Ac</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:N5:42Ac</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:N5:42Ab</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:N5:42Aa</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:K2:42Ac</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:K2:42Ab</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:K2:42Aa</span>; tRNA group 4 is represented by: <span class="html-italic">tRNA:CR30316</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:I:42A</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:R2:42Ab</span>, <span class="html-italic">tRNA:K2:42Ad</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">Hr46</span> gene in the 46F region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">Eip74EF</span> gene in the 74E region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; (<b>H</b>) combined FISH signals on the stretched chromosome preparation; and, (<b>I</b>) P. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B57-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">57</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">Eip75B</span> gene in the 75B region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) P. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B57-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">57</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Localization of the <span class="html-italic">Eip78C</span> gene in the 78C region (the gene is bound by red dotted lines). (<b>A</b>) the scale (kb) and genomic coordinates (bp); (<b>B</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>C</b>) the chromatin condensation level model [<a href="#B32-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">32</a>]; (<b>D</b>) genes location (arrow lines show the gene orientation and black bars indicate the location of gene exons); (<b>E</b>) probes location; (<b>F</b>) phase-contrast micrograph of the region; (<b>G</b>) combined FISH signals; and, (<b>H</b>) C. Bridges’ chromosome map [<a href="#B25-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">25</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>The scheme of the polytene chromosome band organization. The predominant long “main” gene contains exons and intron material; grey arrows represent shorter genes located within the introns of the “main” gene. (<b>A</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>B</b>) studied genes; and, (<b>C</b>) bands and interbands (ib) of polytene chromosome structure comprising the genes studied.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>The scheme of the two bands and three interbands formation from the gene material with two introns and two alternative promoters of the predominant long “main” gene; grey arrows represent shorter genes located within the introns of the “main” gene. (<b>A</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>B</b>) exons and introns of the <span class="html-italic">dlg1</span> gene; and, (<b>C</b>) polytene chromosome bands and interbands (ib) structure comprising genes studied.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>The scheme of the four bands and four interbands formation from the gene material with alternative promoters and three introns composed of late replicated chromatin; grey arrows represent shorter genes located within the introns of the predominant long “main” gene. (<b>A</b>) the four chromatin-state model [<a href="#B39-genes-11-00417" class="html-bibr">39</a>]; (<b>B</b>) moderate level housekeeping genes <span class="html-italic">Syx4</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG32795</span>, <span class="html-italic">CG3603</span>, <span class="html-italic">N</span>; (<b>C</b>) exons and introns of the <span class="html-italic">kirre</span> gene; and, (<b>D</b>) polytene chromosome bands and interbands (ib) structure comprising “main”, short development, and housekeeping genes.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 8076 KiB  
Article
An Insight into the Chromosomal Evolution of Lebiasinidae (Teleostei, Characiformes)
by Francisco de M. C. Sassi, Terumi Hatanaka, Renata Luiza R. de Moraes, Gustavo A. Toma, Ezequiel A. de Oliveira, Thomas Liehr, Petr Rab, Luiz A. C. Bertollo, Patrik F. Viana, Eliana Feldberg, Mauro Nirchio, Manoela Maria F. Marinho, José Francisco de S. e Souza and Marcelo de B. Cioffi
Genes 2020, 11(4), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11040365 - 28 Mar 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3129
Abstract
Lebiasinidae fishes have been historically neglected by cytogenetical studies. Here we present a genomic comparison in eleven Lebiasinidae species, in addition to a review of the ribosomal DNA sequences distribution in this family. With that, we develop ten sets of experiments in order [...] Read more.
Lebiasinidae fishes have been historically neglected by cytogenetical studies. Here we present a genomic comparison in eleven Lebiasinidae species, in addition to a review of the ribosomal DNA sequences distribution in this family. With that, we develop ten sets of experiments in order to hybridize the genomic DNA of representative species from the genus Copeina, Copella, Nannostomus, and Pyrrhulina in metaphase plates of Lebiasina melanoguttata. Two major pathways on the chromosomal evolution of these species can be recognized: (i) conservation of 2n = 36 bi-armed chromosomes in Lebiasininae, as a basal condition, and (ii) high numeric and structural chromosomal rearrangements in Pyrrhulininae, with a notable tendency towards acrocentrization. The ribosomal DNA (rDNA) distribution also revealed a marked differentiation during the chromosomal evolution of Lebiasinidae, since both single and multiple sites, in addition to a wide range of chromosomal locations can be found. With some few exceptions, the terminal position of 18S rDNA appears as a common feature in Lebiasinidae-analyzed species. Altogether with Ctenoluciidae, this pattern can be considered a symplesiomorphism for both families. In addition to the specific repetitive DNA content that characterizes the genome of each particular species, Lebiasina also keeps inter-specific repetitive sequences, thus reinforcing its proposed basal condition in Lebiasinidae. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the central portion of South America showing the Brazilian sample sites of Copeina guttata, Copella nattereri, Lebiasina melanoguttata, Nannostomus eques, N. marginatus, N. trifasciatus, N. unifasciatus, Pyrrhulina australis, Pyrrhulina aff. australis, P. brevis and P. semifasciata. The map was produced using the software QGis 3.4.4 (<a href="https://qgis.org" target="_blank">https://qgis.org</a>), Inkscape 0.92 (<a href="https://inkscape.org" target="_blank">https://inkscape.org</a>), and Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (San Jose, CA, USA).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic representation of chromosomes of Lebiasinidae and Ctenoluciidae species, highlighting the position of 5S rDNA (green) and 18S rDNA (red). The small box highlights a sex chromosome system in <span class="html-italic">Pyrrhulina semifasciata</span>, while the bigger box highlights the Ctenoluciidae members. FISH data were taken from [<a href="#B3-genes-11-00365" class="html-bibr">3</a>,<a href="#B4-genes-11-00365" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B5-genes-11-00365" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B6-genes-11-00365" class="html-bibr">6</a>,<a href="#B7-genes-11-00365" class="html-bibr">7</a>,<a href="#B24-genes-11-00365" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. Letters correspond to the investigated genera: (<b>a</b>)—<span class="html-italic">Boulengerella</span>, (<b>b</b>)—<span class="html-italic">Nannostomus</span>, (<b>c</b>)—<span class="html-italic">Lebiasina</span>, (<b>d</b>)—<span class="html-italic">Copeina</span>, and (<b>e</b>)—<span class="html-italic">Pyrrhulina</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparative genomic hybridization using the gDNA of <span class="html-italic">Lebiasina melanoguttata</span>, <span class="html-italic">Copeina guttata,</span> and <span class="html-italic">Copella nattereri</span> against the chromosomal background of <span class="html-italic">Lebiasina melanoguttata</span>. Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">Copeina guttata</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">Copella nattereri</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). The first column (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>): DAPI images (blue); second column (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>): hybridization patterns using gDNA probe from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span>; third column (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>): hybridization patterns using gDNA probes from <span class="html-italic">Copeina guttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">Copella nattereri</span>, respectively; fourth column (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>) merged images of both genomic probes and DAPI staining depicting the common regions in yellow. Scale bar = 5 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparative genomic hybridization using the gDNA of <span class="html-italic">Lebiasina melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">Pyrrhulina</span> species against a chromosomal background of <span class="html-italic">Lebiasina melanoguttata</span>. Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">P. australis</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">Pyrrhulina</span> aff. <span class="html-italic">australis</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">P. brevis</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>). Genome from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">P. semifasciata</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>m</b>–<b>p</b>). The first column (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>I</b>,<b>m</b>): DAPI images (blue); second column (b, f, j, and n): hybridization patterns using gDNA probe from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span>; third column (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>k</b>,<b>o</b>): hybridization patterns using gDNA probes from <span class="html-italic">P. australis</span>, <span class="html-italic">Pyrrhulina</span> aff. <span class="html-italic">australis</span>, <span class="html-italic">P. brevis,</span> and <span class="html-italic">P. semifasciata</span>, respectively; fourth column (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>l</b>,<b>p</b>) merged images of both genomic probes and DAPI staining, depicting the shared regions in yellow. Scale bar = 5 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparative genomic hybridization among <span class="html-italic">Lebiasina melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">Nannostomus</span> species. Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">N. unifasciatus</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span>, and <span class="html-italic">N. trifasciatus</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span>, and <span class="html-italic">N. beckfordi</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">N. eques</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>m</b>–<b>p</b>). Genomic probes from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> and <span class="html-italic">N. marginatus</span> hybridized against <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span> chromosomes (<b>q</b>–<b>t</b>). The first column (<b>a</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>m</b>,<b>q</b>): DAPI images (blue); second column (<b>b</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>n</b>,<b>r</b>): hybridization patterns using gDNA probe from <span class="html-italic">L. melanoguttata</span>; third column (<b>c</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>k</b>,<b>o</b>,<b>s</b>): hybridization patterns using gDNA probes from <span class="html-italic">N. unifasciatus</span>, <span class="html-italic">N. trifasciatus</span>, <span class="html-italic">N. beckfordi</span>, <span class="html-italic">N. eques</span>, and <span class="html-italic">N. marginatus</span>, respectively; fourth column (<b>d</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>l</b>,<b>p</b>,<b>t</b>) merged images of both genomic probes and DAPI staining depicting the shared regions in yellow. Scale bar = 5 µm.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6539 KiB  
Article
Chromosome and Genome Divergence between the Cryptic Eurasian Malaria Vector-Species Anopheles messeae and Anopheles daciae
by Anastasia N. Naumenko, Dmitriy A. Karagodin, Andrey A. Yurchenko, Anton V. Moskaev, Olga I. Martin, Elina M. Baricheva, Igor V. Sharakhov, Mikhail I. Gordeev and Maria V. Sharakhova
Genes 2020, 11(2), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11020165 - 5 Feb 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4558
Abstract
Chromosomal inversions are important drivers of genome evolution. The Eurasian malaria vector Anopheles messeae has five polymorphic inversions. A cryptic species, An. daciae, has been discriminated from An. messeae based on five fixed nucleotide substitutions in the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) [...] Read more.
Chromosomal inversions are important drivers of genome evolution. The Eurasian malaria vector Anopheles messeae has five polymorphic inversions. A cryptic species, An. daciae, has been discriminated from An. messeae based on five fixed nucleotide substitutions in the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of ribosomal DNA. However, the inversion polymorphism in An. daciae and the genome divergence between these species remain unexplored. In this study, we sequenced the ITS2 region and analyzed the inversion frequencies of 289 Anopheles larvae specimens collected from three locations in the Moscow region. Five individual genomes for each of the two species were sequenced. We determined that An. messeae and An. daciae differ from each other by the frequency of polymorphic inversions. Inversion X1 was fixed in An. messeae but polymorphic in An. daciae populations. The genome sequence comparison demonstrated genome-wide divergence between the species, especially pronounced on the inversion-rich X chromosome (mean Fst = 0.331). The frequency of polymorphic autosomal inversions was higher in An. messeae than in An. daciae. We conclude that the X chromosome inversions play an important role in the genomic differentiation between the species. Our study determined that An. messeae and An. daciae are closely related species with incomplete reproductive isolation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the Moscow region in Eurasia (<b>A</b>) and collection sites of mosquito larvae (<b>B</b>). The ratios of <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span>, <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>, their hybrids, <span class="html-italic">An. maculipennis</span>, and <span class="html-italic">An. beklemishevi</span> are shown as pie charts for each population. The charts show different proportions of the species in three compared populations. The map was developed using OpenStreetMap data [<a href="#B59-genes-11-00165" class="html-bibr">59</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Examples of ITS2 sequence chromatograms for <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> (<b>A</b>), <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> (<b>B</b>), and their hybrid (<b>C</b>). Dash lines indicate positions of SNPs that distinguish the two species. Chromatograms indicate the presence of double picks in position 150 of <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and in positions 211, 215, and 217 of <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>. The specimen with double picks in position 150, 211, 215, 217, 412, and 432 was identified as a hybrid between <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Mosquito breeding sites in Novoskosino (<b>A</b>), Noginsk (<b>B</b>), and Yegoryevsk (<b>C</b>). Ponds in Novokosino and Noginsk are preferred by <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and represent typical for <span class="html-italic">Anopheles</span> sunny larval breeding sites with open water and abundant vegetation. The water reservoir in Yegorevsk, preferred by <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>, is shaded and characterized by high water saprobity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Inversions in polytene chromosomes of <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>. The specimens in the Moscow region are characterized by the presence of 4 highly polymorphic inversions X1, 2R1, 3R1, and 3L1, and 2 rare endemic inversions X4 and 2R4. A rare karyotype X44, 2R01, 3R01, and 3L00 in <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> is shown on panel <b>A</b>. Another rare inversion heterozygote, 2R04, in <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> is shown on panel <b>B</b>. Inversion heterozygotes X01 in <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> and X14 in <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> are indicated on panels <b>C</b> and <b>D</b>, respectively. CC stands for chromocenter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Inversion frequencies in <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> from the Novokosino, Noginsk, and Yegoryevsk populations. Frequencies of inversions: X0, X1, and X4 (<b>A</b>); 2R1 and 2R4 (<b>B</b>); 3R1 (<b>C</b>); and 3L1 (<b>D</b>) are shown by charts. Proportions of standard, inverted, and heterozygote arrangements are shown by different colors. Chromosome X is almost monomorphic in <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> but is highly polymorphic in <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> in the three Moscow populations. Although all autosomal inversions are present in both species, polymorphism is higher in <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> than in <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>. Rare inversions, X4 and 2R4, were found in low frequencies in <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Interpopulation PCA plot based on the frequencies of the autosomal chromosomal inversions in three populations of <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>. Species are indicated by different colors. PCA analysis separates <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> along the PC1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Level of genetic differentiation (Fst) between <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> (n = 5) and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span> (n = 5) along the chromosomal arms. Each dot represents a 5 kb window. The y-axis represents Fst values and the x-axis represents the genomic coordinates (Mbp). The X chromosome demonstrates the highest Fst values while the autosomal arms have a low overall level of differentiation, which is elevated in the centromeric regions. T and C stands for telomeres and centromeres, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Principal Component Analysis (<b>A</b>) and ADMIXTURE (<b>B</b>) plots based on the autosomal SNVs of the whole genomes of <span class="html-italic">An. messeae</span> and <span class="html-italic">An. daciae</span>. Species are shown by different colors. PCA (<b>A</b>) reliably differentiates two species by the PC1. Each bar (<b>B</b>) represents the proportion of ancestral species in a given individual. Two admixed individuals (shown in bold) were identified.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6072 KiB  
Article
Structural and Functional Dissection of the 5′ Region of the Notch Gene in Drosophila melanogaster
by Elena I. Volkova, Natalya G. Andreyenkova, Oleg V. Andreyenkov, Darya S. Sidorenko, Igor F. Zhimulev and Sergey A. Demakov
Genes 2019, 10(12), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10121037 - 12 Dec 2019
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4106
Abstract
Notch is a key factor of a signaling cascade which regulates cell differentiation in all multicellular organisms. Numerous investigations have been directed mainly at studying the mechanism of Notch protein action; however, very little is known about the regulation of activity of the [...] Read more.
Notch is a key factor of a signaling cascade which regulates cell differentiation in all multicellular organisms. Numerous investigations have been directed mainly at studying the mechanism of Notch protein action; however, very little is known about the regulation of activity of the gene itself. Here, we provide the results of targeted 5′-end editing of the Drosophila Notch gene in its native environment and genetic and cytological effects of these changes. Using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system in combination with homologous recombination, we obtained a founder fly stock in which a 4-kb fragment, including the 5′ nontranscribed region, the first exon, and a part of the first intron of Notch, was replaced by an attachment Phage (attP) site. Then, fly lines carrying a set of six deletions within the 5′untranscribed region of the gene were obtained by ΦC31-mediated integration of transgenic constructs. Part of these deletions does not affect gene activity, but their combinations with transgenic construct in the first intron of the gene cause defects in the Notch target tissues. At the polytene chromosome level we defined a DNA segment (~250 bp) in the Notch5′-nontranscribed region which when deleted leads to disappearance of the 3C6/C7 interband and elimination of CTC-Factor (CTCF) and Chromator (CHRIZ) insulator proteins in this region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>CRISPR/Cas9-induced homology-directed repair (HDR) with a pGX-attP{3′-5′ HA-N} donor vector. (<b>A</b>) Molecular and genetic map of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> locus. (<b>B</b>) Scheme of the 5′ region of <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene and HDR strategy utilized to replace the region with attachment Phage (attP) landing site of <span class="html-italic">ΦC</span>31 phage integration system. The target sites are indicated as “scissors”. Homology arms of 2.4 kb and 3.5 kb immediately flanking the cleavage sites were cloned into pGX-attP vector. The pGX-attP[3′-5′ HA-N] vector contains an attP site for subsequent access to a targeted locus and a mini-<span class="html-italic">white</span> gene under control of the <span class="html-italic">hsp70</span> promoter and GMR (gene modulating RNase II) enhancer, which drives expression in the eye, flanked by <span class="html-italic">loxP</span> recombination sites for its removal. (<b>C</b>) The pGX-attP[3′-5′ HA-N] donor and the plasmids encoding guide-RNAs (gRNAs) were injected into vasa-Cas9 embryos for generation of the w+ founder line (dN w+). Mini-white cassette was then removed by Cre and a founder line carrying only single attP site was created (dNw–). (<b>D</b>) A full-size 4-kb fragment of the 5′ region of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene was cloned into the pGE-attB-GMR [w+] vector, which was then integrated into the deletion region of the founder line through <span class="html-italic">ΦC</span>31-mediated DNA integration. (<b>E</b>) As a result of integration, the target region was restored at its original genomic locus together with w+ and vector sequences (AEs). Extra vector sequences, together with w+, were removed by Cre recombinase to produce the fly stock where in the engineered target region was flanked by attR and <span class="html-italic">loxP</span> sites (Nresc [w–]). (<b>F</b>) Schematic diagram of deletions in the 5′ region of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene (more details are given in the text).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Scanning electron micrographs of the male eyes hemizygous for the indicated genotypes. Flies carrying deletions and AE [w+] were raised at 25 °C and 18 °C. The eyes of N-resc[w+] and N-resc[w–] males display minor abnormalities of the bristle and ommatidial pattern. The phenotypes of d3[w+] and fa-swb are more extreme. For more details see the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pleiotropic effects in females trans-heterozygous for the founder deletion dN. (<b>A</b>) Defects in the facet structure. (<b>B</b>) There is an enhancement of the hair distribution on the thorax and legs of fa-swb/dN flies (“hairy” phenotype). (<b>C</b>) The wing veins are thickened, deltas are formed at the wing margins and apical notches are seen. The N-resc[w+]/dN females have gaps of the wing margin. The range of the phenotypes obtained are shown. (<b>D</b>) Curved tibia.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scanning electron micrographs of the eyes of females trans-heterozygous for the founder deletion chromosome dN, raised at 25 °C and 18 °C. For description see the text.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Truncation of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> 5′ end region changes the cytological structure of the 3C region in the polytene X chromosome. (<b>A</b>) Phase contrast images: OR (wild-type fly line, control), N-resc[w+] and d3[w+] (targeted mutations in the 5′ end region of <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene), and fa[swb] (<span class="html-italic">N<sup>fa-swb</sup></span> deficiency in the 5′ flanking region of <span class="html-italic">Notch</span>). (<b>B</b>) Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) localization of the DNA probe pGX-attP{3′-5′ HA-N} (green) in the 3C region of the N-resc[w+] line. DNA staining (black).Arrows point to hybridization signal of the probe pGX-attP[3′-5′HA-N] in the artificial (thicker) interband (in normal conditions, hs-) or in the artificial puff (after heat shock, hs+), marked with a bracket. Arrowheads indicate additional signal in the 3C1–C2 region, where the <span class="html-italic">white</span> gene is situated. Cytological map of the 3C region according to Bridges (1938) is shown on top of each panel, lines connect some of the marker bands. O-R: wild-type line; fa-[swb]:<span class="html-italic">N<sup>fa-swb</sup></span>deletion. Bar, 5 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The 3C region of the polytene X-chromosome. (<b>A</b>) Bridges’ map, (<b>B</b>) Chromosomes from the N-rescue[w–], (<b>C</b>) d1[w–], (<b>D</b>) d3[w–], and (<b>E</b>) N<sup>fa-swb</sup> flies. Bar, 1 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Indirect immunostaining of insulator proteins CHROMATOR (<b>A</b>) and dCTC-Factor (<b>B</b>) in the 3C region of the polytene X chromosome. DNA staining (black), CHROMATOR (CHRO) and CTCF signals (green). Red arrow<span class="html-italic">s</span> point to the thin band 3C7, containing the body of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene. The top in each panel features the cytological map of 3C region according to Bridges (1938), lines connect some of the marker bands. Yellow and blue arrows show an overlay of CHRO and dCTCF immunostaining signals in 3C6/C7 interband, respectively. Yellow and blue arrowheads show CHRO and dCTCF signals adjacent to the above signals and used as a reference. O-R: wild-type line; fa-[swb]:<span class="html-italic">N<sup>fa-swb</sup></span> deletion. Bar, 5 µm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Map of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> locus (<b>A</b>) and 5′-end of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene on a larger scale (<b>B</b>). (1) Genomic coordinates (kbp). (2) Gene map. (3)4HMM-derived chromatin map [<a href="#B46-genes-10-01037" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. (4) Enrichment profiles of insulator proteins in S2 cells (modENCODE project, <a href="http://intermine.modencode.org" target="_blank">http://intermine.modencode.org</a>). (5) Histone H1 dip localization in Kc cells [<a href="#B25-genes-10-01037" class="html-bibr">25</a>]. (6) DNase I hypersensitivity sites (DHS) in S2 cells [<a href="#B27-genes-10-01037" class="html-bibr">27</a>] and in salivary glands of third-instar larvae [<a href="#B22-genes-10-01037" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. (7) Borders of the bands in the region, as defined by the 4HMM. (8) DNA fragments capable (white) and not capable (black) of forming an interband in a new genetic environment [<a href="#B38-genes-10-01037" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B45-genes-10-01037" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. (9) Deletions of DNA segments from the 5′-regulatory part of the <span class="html-italic">Notch</span> gene causing (black) and not causing (white) the collapse of the endogenous interband 3C6/C7 (current investigation).</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 4268 KiB  
Article
ZZ/ZW Sex Determination with Multiple Neo-Sex Chromosomes is Common in Madagascan Chameleons of the Genus Furcifer (Reptilia: Chamaeleonidae)
by Michail Rovatsos, Marie Altmanová, Barbora Augstenová, Sofia Mazzoleni, Petr Velenský and Lukáš Kratochvíl
Genes 2019, 10(12), 1020; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10121020 - 6 Dec 2019
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 8932
Abstract
Chameleons are well-known, highly distinctive lizards characterized by unique morphological and physiological traits, but their karyotypes and sex determination system have remained poorly studied. We studied karyotypes in six species of Madagascan chameleons of the genus Furcifer by classical (conventional stain, C-banding) and [...] Read more.
Chameleons are well-known, highly distinctive lizards characterized by unique morphological and physiological traits, but their karyotypes and sex determination system have remained poorly studied. We studied karyotypes in six species of Madagascan chameleons of the genus Furcifer by classical (conventional stain, C-banding) and molecular (comparative genomic hybridization, in situ hybridization with rDNA, microsatellite, and telomeric sequences) cytogenetic approaches. In contrast to most sauropsid lineages, the chameleons of the genus Furcifer show chromosomal variability even among closely related species, with diploid chromosome numbers varying from 2n = 22 to 2n = 28. We identified female heterogamety with cytogenetically distinct Z and W sex chromosomes in all studied species. Notably, multiple neo-sex chromosomes in the form Z1Z1Z2Z2/Z1Z2W were uncovered in four species of the genus (F. bifidus, F. verrucosus, F. willsii, and previously studied F. pardalis). Phylogenetic distribution and morphology of sex chromosomes suggest that multiple sex chromosomes, which are generally very rare among vertebrates with female heterogamety, possibly evolved several times within the genus Furcifer. Although acrodontan lizards (chameleons and dragon lizards) demonstrate otherwise notable variability in sex determination, it seems that female heterogamety with differentiated sex chromosomes remained stable in the chameleons of the genus Furcifer for about 30 million years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Giemsa-stained karyograms of <span class="html-italic">Furcifer antimena</span> (<b>a</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. minor</span> (<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. bifidus</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. lateralis</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. verrucosus</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), and <span class="html-italic">F. willsii</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>). Sex chromosomes are indicated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>C-banded metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Furcifer antimena</span> (<b>a</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. minor</span> (<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. bifidus</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. lateralis</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. verrucosus</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), and <span class="html-italic">F. willsii</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>). W chromosome is marked in females.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Position of telomeric repeats in metaphases from <span class="html-italic">Furcifer antimena</span> (<b>a</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. minor</span> (<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. bifidus</span> (<b>c</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. lateralis</span> (<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. verrucosus</span> (<b>e</b>), and <span class="html-italic">F. willsii</span> (<b>f</b>). Arrowheads point to signals detected by FISH on both arms of a pair of macrochromosomes. W chromosome is marked in females.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Position of rDNA loci in metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Furcifer antimena</span> (<b>a</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. minor</span> (<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. bifidus</span> (<b>c</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. lateralis</span> (<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">F. verrucosus</span> (<b>e</b>) and <span class="html-italic">F. willsii</span> (<b>f</b>). Arrowheads point to signals detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with empty arrowheads marking signals on both arms of a pair of macrochromosomes. W chromosome is marked in females.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of the microsatellite motifs GATA (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), AG (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>), and TAC (<b>i</b>–<b>l</b>), and comparative genome hybridization (CGH) (<b>m</b>–<b>t</b>) in <span class="html-italic">Furcifer bifidus</span>, <span class="html-italic">F. lateralis</span>, <span class="html-italic">F. verrucosus,</span> and <span class="html-italic">F. willsii</span>. Sex chromosomes with signal from in situ hybridization are marked. Note that there are no visible sex-specific regions in males (<b>q</b>–<b>t</b>), in comparison to females, where a female-specific region was detected in the W chromosome (<b>m</b>–<b>p</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Phylogenetic relationships of the studied species of the genus <span class="html-italic">Furcifer</span> following Pyron and Burbrink [<a href="#B51-genes-10-01020" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. Diploid chromosome numbers and sex chromosome constitution are illustrated.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7502 KiB  
Article
Cytogenetic Analysis Did Not Reveal Differentiated Sex Chromosomes in Ten Species of Boas and Pythons (Reptilia: Serpentes)
by Barbora Augstenová, Sofia Mazzoleni, Alexander Kostmann, Marie Altmanová, Daniel Frynta, Lukáš Kratochvíl and Michail Rovatsos
Genes 2019, 10(11), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110934 - 15 Nov 2019
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5365
Abstract
Homologous and differentiated ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes (or derived multiple neo-sex chromosomes) were often described in caenophidian snakes, but sex chromosomes were unknown until recently in non-caenophidian snakes. Previous studies revealed that two species of boas (Boa imperator, B. constrictor) and [...] Read more.
Homologous and differentiated ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes (or derived multiple neo-sex chromosomes) were often described in caenophidian snakes, but sex chromosomes were unknown until recently in non-caenophidian snakes. Previous studies revealed that two species of boas (Boa imperator, B. constrictor) and one species of python (Python bivittatus) independently evolved XX/XY sex chromosomes. In addition, heteromorphic ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes were recently revealed in the Madagascar boa (Acrantophis sp. cf. dumerili) and putatively also in the blind snake Myriopholis macrorhyncha. Since the evolution of sex chromosomes in non-caenophidian snakes seems to be more complex than previously thought, we examined ten species of pythons and boas representing the families Boidae, Calabariidae, Candoiidae, Charinidae, Pythonidae, and Sanziniidae by conventional and molecular cytogenetic methods, aiming to reveal their sex chromosomes. Our results show that all examined species do not possess sex-specific differences in their genomes detectable by the applied cytogenetic methods, indicating the presence of poorly differentiated sex chromosomes or even the absence of sex chromosomes. Interestingly, fluorescence in situ hybridization with telomeric repeats revealed extensive distribution of interstitial telomeric repeats in eight species, which are likely a consequence of intra-chromosomal rearrangements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Giemsa-stained karyograms of <span class="html-italic">Calabaria reinhardtii</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">Candoia paulsoni</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">Chilabothrus angulifer</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">Lichanura trivirgata</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli × M. spilota</span> hybrid (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) and <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli</span> (<b>k</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Distribution of heterochromatic blocks uncovered by C-banding in metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Calabaria reinhardtii</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>)<span class="html-italic">, Candoia paulsoni</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>)<span class="html-italic">, Chilabothrus angulifer</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>)<span class="html-italic">, Eunectes notaeus</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>)<span class="html-italic">, Lichanura trivirgata</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia spilota</span> (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>)<span class="html-italic">, Morelia bredli</span> × <span class="html-italic">M. spilota</span> hybrid (<b>m</b>,<b>n</b>) and <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli</span> (<b>o</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Distribution of (TTAGGG)<sub>n</sub> motifs in metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Acrantophis dumerili</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">Acrantophis madagascariensis</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">Calabaria reinhardtii</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">Candoia paulsoni</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), <span class="html-italic">Chilabothrus angulifer</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>), <span class="html-italic">Eunectes notaeus</span> (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>), <span class="html-italic">Lichanura trivirgata</span> (<b>m</b>,<b>n</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia spilota</span> (<b>o</b>,<b>p</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli × M. spilota</span> hybrid (<b>q</b>,<b>r</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli</span> (<b>s</b>), and <span class="html-italic">Sanzinia madagascariensis</span> (<b>t</b>,<b>u</b>). Chromosomes with interstitial telomeric repeats are shown by arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Topology of rDNA loci in metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Acrantophis dumerili</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">Acrantophis madagascariensis</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">Calabaria reinhardtii</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">Candoia paulsoni</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), <span class="html-italic">Chilabothrus angulifer</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>), <span class="html-italic">Eunectes notaeus</span> (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>), <span class="html-italic">Lichanura trivirgata</span> (<b>m</b>,<b>n</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia spilota</span> (<b>o</b>,<b>p</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli × M. spilota</span> hybrid (<b>q</b>,<b>r</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli</span> (<b>s</b>), and <span class="html-italic">Sanzinia madagascariensis</span> (<b>t</b>,<b>u</b>). Chromosomes with detected signal are shown by arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of (GATA)<sub>8</sub> motifs in metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Acrantophis dumerili</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">Acrantophis madagascariensis</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">Calabaria reinhardtii</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">Candoia paulsoni</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), <span class="html-italic">Chilabothrus angulifer</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>), <span class="html-italic">Eunectes notaeus</span> (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>), <span class="html-italic">Lichanura trivirgata</span> (<b>m</b>,<b>n</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia spilota</span> (<b>o</b>,<b>p</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli × M. spilota</span> hybrid (<b>q</b>,<b>r</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli</span> (<b>s</b>), and <span class="html-italic">Sanzinia madagascariensis</span> (<b>t</b>,<b>u</b>). Chromosomes with detected signal are shown by arrows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparative genomic hybridization in metaphases of <span class="html-italic">Calabaria reinhardtii</span> (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>), <span class="html-italic">Candoia paulsoni</span> (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>), <span class="html-italic">Chilabothrus angulifer</span> (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), <span class="html-italic">Eunectes notaeus</span> (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>), <span class="html-italic">Lichanura trivirgata</span> (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>), <span class="html-italic">Morelia spilota</span> (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>), and <span class="html-italic">Morelia bredli × M. spilota</span> hybrid (<b>m</b>,<b>n</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Idiogram showing the comparative topology of ITRs (in red) and rDNA loci (in green) on the chromosomes of 18 species of boas and pythons. The original data were extracted from Viana et al. [<a href="#B17-genes-10-00934" class="html-bibr">17</a>] for species marked with asterisk (*). The phylogenetic relationships follow Reynolds et al. [<a href="#B39-genes-10-00934" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 3113 KiB  
Article
Germline-Specific Repetitive Elements in Programmatically Eliminated Chromosomes of the Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus)
by Vladimir A. Timoshevskiy, Nataliya Y. Timoshevskaya and Jeramiah J. Smith
Genes 2019, 10(10), 832; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10100832 - 22 Oct 2019
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4264
Abstract
The sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is one of few vertebrate species known to reproducibly eliminate large fractions of its genome during normal embryonic development. This germline-specific DNA is lost in the form of large fragments, including entire chromosomes, and available evidence [...] Read more.
The sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) is one of few vertebrate species known to reproducibly eliminate large fractions of its genome during normal embryonic development. This germline-specific DNA is lost in the form of large fragments, including entire chromosomes, and available evidence suggests that DNA elimination acts as a permanent silencing mechanism that prevents the somatic expression of a specific subset of “germline” genes. However, reconstruction of eliminated regions has proven to be challenging due to the complexity of the lamprey karyotype. We applied an integrative approach aimed at further characterization of the large-scale structure of eliminated segments, including: (1) in silico identification of germline-enriched repeats; (2) mapping the chromosomal location of specific repetitive sequences in germline metaphases; and (3) 3D DNA/DNA-hybridization to embryonic lagging anaphases, which permitted us to both verify the specificity of elements to physically eliminated chromosomes and characterize the subcellular organization of these elements during elimination. This approach resulted in the discovery of several repetitive elements that are found exclusively on the eliminated chromosomes, which subsequently permitted the identification of 12 individual chromosomes that are programmatically eliminated during early embryogenesis. The fidelity and specificity of these highly abundant sequences, their distinctive patterning in eliminated chromosomes, and subcellular localization in elimination anaphases suggest that these sequences might contribute to the specific targeting of chromosomes for elimination or possibly in molecular interactions that mediate their decelerated poleward movement in chromosome elimination anaphases, isolation into micronuclei and eventual degradation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Repetitive DNA in situ hybridization in eliminating cells of 1.5 dpf sea lamprey embryos. (<b>A</b>) An example of competitive hybridization repetitive DNA fraction from testes (red) and liver (green) in a cell containing micronuclei. (<b>B</b>) Hybridization of C<sub>0</sub>t2 DNA-probes from germline (red) and somatic (green) to a lagging anaphase and a corresponding fluorescence intensity profile (measurement plane is marked by a horizontal line). (<b>C</b>) Hybridization of C<sub>0</sub>t1 (red) and <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>1 (green) to a lagging anaphase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Estimates of the total genomic span and germline enrichment of repetitive sequences in the lamprey genome. The plot on the lower left shows enrichment values for the entire collection of reconstructed repetitive elements, including <span class="html-italic">Germ1</span>. The larger plot on the upper right focuses on repeats that span &lt;1.5 megabases. Sequences belonging to repeat classes selected for hybridization are highlighted by colors corresponding to their repeat class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Chromosomal localization of the germline-restricted repeats. (<b>A</b>) FISH of <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>1–7, repeats and telomeric/centromeric (liver C<sub>0</sub>t2) probes on spermatid spreads, with DAPI counterstaining (grey or blue). (<b>B</b>) A karyogram of germline-restricted chromosomes (including a somatically-retained bivalent that cross-hybridizes with <span class="html-italic">Germ1</span>: labeled with an asterisk). This bivalent presumably encodes somatic ribosomal RNAs, which share sequence homology with <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>1 [<a href="#B19-genes-10-00832" class="html-bibr">19</a>]. Each chromosome in the karyogram (<b>B</b>) is shown in four states: 1: grayscale DAPI counterstain; 2: hybridized with <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>1 (FITC, green), <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>2 (Cy3, red), and <span class="html-italic">Germ</span> 3 (Cy5, pseudocolored in yellow); 3: hybridized with <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>4 (FITC, green) and <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>5 (Cy3, red); 4: hybridized with <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>6 (FITC, green) and <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>7 (Cy3, red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>An idiogram of germline-specific chromosomes. Twelve germline-specific chromosomes (<b>a</b>–<b>l</b>) can be distinguished by DAPI staining and hybridization patterns of <span class="html-italic">Germ</span>1–7 repetitive elements in meiotic metaphase-I spreads (<a href="#genes-10-00832-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>). Profile plots were generated based on the fluorescence intensity of hybridized DNA-probes corresponding to each repeat.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Lagging chromosomes and germline-restricted repeats. Representative examples from FISH of seven repetitive elements to lagging anaphases from 1.5 dpf sea lamprey embryos: (<b>A</b>) <span class="html-italic">Germ1</span> (white), <span class="html-italic">Germ2</span> (green), <span class="html-italic">Germ6</span> (red); (<b>B</b>) <span class="html-italic">Germ5</span> (red), <span class="html-italic">Germ4</span> (green), <span class="html-italic">Germ3</span> (white); (<b>C</b>) <span class="html-italic">Germ7</span> (red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chromosome lagging in anaphases from 1.5. dpf embryos, illustrating progression through anaphase and the antiparallel orientation of lagging chromosomes. (<b>A</b>) Earlier stages of anaphase chromosome separation show symmetrical hybridization patterns for germline-specific repeats. The repeat Germ1 is primarily located on the poleward ends of stretched chromosomes, which is consistent with its pericentromeric location. In contrast, the repeat Germ2 is localized to the midzone of bridging anaphases. (<b>B</b>,<b>C</b>) FISH of a probe for the pericentromeric repeat Pm-rep1 (red), telomere PNA probe (green), and testes genomic DNA (Cy5, shown in blue). The Pm-rep1 probe also yields fainter signals on the distal edges of lagging chromosomes which are often colocalized with distal telomeric signals. Chromatid contacts are characterized by denser DNA staining and FISH signals marking the telomeres/subtelomeres of sister chromatids which are often visible adjacent to each other (especially on panel <b>A</b>). Later in anaphase, (<b>C</b>) germline-specific chromosomes retain a stretched morphology and generally bear FISH signals from probes marking their edges (centromeres and telomeres). (<b>D</b>) Schematic depiction of chromosome elimination in the sea lamprey referencing features of the examples provided in panels <b>B</b> and <b>C</b>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Telomeric contacts during chromosome elimination. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of telomere-specific (green) and Germ2 (red) to an anaphase from a 1.5 dpf embryo. See <a href="#app1-genes-10-00832" class="html-app">Figure S6</a> for additional examples.</p>
Full article ">

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

18 pages, 1082 KiB  
Review
Multi-Scale Organization of the Drosophila melanogaster Genome
by Samantha C. Peterson, Kaylah B. Samuelson and Stacey L. Hanlon
Genes 2021, 12(6), 817; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12060817 - 27 May 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 6541
Abstract
Interphase chromatin, despite its appearance, is a highly organized framework of loops and bends. Chromosomes are folded into topologically associating domains, or TADs, and each chromosome and its homolog occupy a distinct territory within the nucleus. In Drosophila, genome organization is exceptional [...] Read more.
Interphase chromatin, despite its appearance, is a highly organized framework of loops and bends. Chromosomes are folded into topologically associating domains, or TADs, and each chromosome and its homolog occupy a distinct territory within the nucleus. In Drosophila, genome organization is exceptional because homologous chromosome pairing is in both germline and somatic tissues, which promote interhomolog interactions such as transvection that can affect gene expression in trans. In this review, we focus on what is known about genome organization in Drosophila and discuss it from TADs to territory. We start by examining intrachromosomal organization at the sub-chromosome level into TADs, followed by a comprehensive analysis of the known proteins that play a key role in TAD formation and boundary establishment. We then zoom out to examine interhomolog interactions such as pairing and transvection that are abundant in Drosophila but rare in other model systems. Finally, we discuss chromosome territories that form within the nucleus, resulting in a complete picture of the multi-scale organization of the Drosophila genome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Genomic organization from the point of view of the chromosome.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Homologous pairing in <span class="html-italic">Drosophila melanogaster</span> somatic cells that carry B chromosomes. (<b>a</b>) Tight homologous chromosome pairing between condensed chromosomes is retained primarily in the euchromatic regions. Left, metaphase chromosomes from third-instar larval neuroblasts; right, cartoon trace of each chromosome. The B chromosomes do not appear to pair. (<b>b</b>) Homologous chromosome pairing of a balancer chromosome (Chromosome 3), cartooned in green. The other large chromosomes exhibit normal pairing. Chromosome 4 not shown. Magenta: DNA, stained with DAPI. Yellow: fluorescent FISH probe recognizing the <span class="html-italic">AAGAT</span> satellite repeat present on Chromosome 4 and the B chromosomes. Scale bar = 5 μm [<a href="#B100-genes-12-00817" class="html-bibr">100</a>].</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 560 KiB  
Review
Bridging the Gap between Vertebrate Cytogenetics and Genomics with Single-Chromosome Sequencing (ChromSeq)
by Alessio Iannucci, Alexey I. Makunin, Artem P. Lisachov, Claudio Ciofi, Roscoe Stanyon, Marta Svartman and Vladimir A. Trifonov
Genes 2021, 12(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010124 - 19 Jan 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4699
Abstract
The study of vertebrate genome evolution is currently facing a revolution, brought about by next generation sequencing technologies that allow researchers to produce nearly complete and error-free genome assemblies. Novel approaches however do not always provide a direct link with information on vertebrate [...] Read more.
The study of vertebrate genome evolution is currently facing a revolution, brought about by next generation sequencing technologies that allow researchers to produce nearly complete and error-free genome assemblies. Novel approaches however do not always provide a direct link with information on vertebrate genome evolution gained from cytogenetic approaches. It is useful to preserve and link cytogenetic data with novel genomic discoveries. Sequencing of DNA from single isolated chromosomes (ChromSeq) is an elegant approach to determine the chromosome content and assign genome assemblies to chromosomes, thus bridging the gap between cytogenetics and genomics. The aim of this paper is to describe how ChromSeq can support the study of vertebrate genome evolution and how it can help link cytogenetic and genomic data. We show key examples of ChromSeq application in the refinement of vertebrate genome assemblies and in the study of vertebrate chromosome and karyotype evolution. We also provide a general overview of the approach and a concrete example of genome refinement using this method in the species Anolis carolinensis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic representation of ChromSeq workflow. Briefly, chromosomes are isolated via either flow sorting or microdissection (only mechanical microdissection is shown). After isolation, Whole-Genome Amplification (WGA) is performed on chromosomal DNA. Eventually, chromosomal DNA can be labeled with fluorochromes and hybridized onto the target species metaphases to confirm the identity of isolated chromosomes. WGA products are then sequenced with next generation sequencing technologies. Sequencing data can be mapped on the target species reference genome or assembled <span class="html-italic">de novo</span>. The latter approach has proven successful when a combination of high throughput chromosome isolation (millions of copies) and long-read sequencing approaches are implemented.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 1088 KiB  
Review
Aneuploidy and DNA Methylation as Mirrored Features of Early Human Embryo Development
by Ekaterina N. Tolmacheva, Stanislav A. Vasilyev and Igor N. Lebedev
Genes 2020, 11(9), 1084; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091084 - 17 Sep 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5039
Abstract
Genome stability is an integral feature of all living organisms. Aneuploidy is the most common cause of fetal death in humans. The timing of bursts in increased aneuploidy frequency coincides with the waves of global epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. During gametogenesis and early [...] Read more.
Genome stability is an integral feature of all living organisms. Aneuploidy is the most common cause of fetal death in humans. The timing of bursts in increased aneuploidy frequency coincides with the waves of global epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. During gametogenesis and early embryogenesis, parental genomes undergo two waves of DNA methylation reprogramming. Failure of these processes can critically affect genome stability, including chromosome segregation during cell division. Abnormal methylation due to errors in the reprogramming process can potentially lead to aneuploidy. On the other hand, the presence of an entire additional chromosome, or chromosome loss, can affect the global genome methylation level. The associations of these two phenomena are well studied in the context of carcinogenesis, but here, we consider the relationship of DNA methylation and aneuploidy in early human and mammalian ontogenesis. In this review, we link these two phenomena and highlight the critical ontogenesis periods and genome regions that play a significant role in human reproduction and in the formation of pathological phenotypes in newborns with chromosomal aneuploidy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome-Centric View of the Genome Organization and Evolution)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Mechanisms and key players of DNA methylation and demethylation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mirrored dynamics of the levels of genome methylation and aneuploidy in human cells during ontogenesis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Potential relationships between DNA methylation and aneuploidy.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop