Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Antenna Design and Its Applications

A special issue of Electronics (ISSN 2079-9292). This special issue belongs to the section "Microwave and Wireless Communications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 March 2025 | Viewed by 17099

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
Interests: wearable antenna; implantable antenna; RFID; biomedical telemetry; flexible antenna; nonlinear system theory and application

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Interests: planar antenna and phased array; computational electromagnetics; microwave passive circuits; time reversal electromagnetics

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
School of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Interests: microwave; mm-wave and THz devices; antenna arrays
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Electronic and Information, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou 510665, China
Interests: reconfigurable antennas; implantable antennas; 5G MIMO antennas

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Antennas, working as electronic eyes and mouth in wireless communications, can receive and transmit electromagnetic waves. They are widely used everywhere: in our homes and workplaces, in supermarkets and hospitals, on vehicles and aircraft, even on/in the human body. As innovative technologies make progress, novel antennas have been developed to be applied in emerging areas, such as body-centric wireless communications, wireless real-time health monitoring, and RFID-based IoTs.

The objective of this Special Issue is to report recent designs and applications of antennas, as well as highlight more study possibilities in this fascinating field of communications technology. Contributions are sought for, but not limited to, the following areas:

  • Antenna theory;
  • Antenna feeds and matching circuits;
  • Mutual coupling in antenna arrays;
  • Dielectric resonator antennas;
  • Microstrip antennas, arrays, and circuits;
  • Slotted and guided wave antennas;
  • Phased-array antennas;
  • Reflector and reflectarray antennas;
  • Electrically small antennas;
  • Broadband/ultra-wideband antennas;
  • Multi-band antennas;
  • Adaptive, active, and smart antennas;
  • Reconfigurable antennas and arrays;
  • Biomedical applications;
  • MIMO implementations and applications;
  • Mobile and PCS antennas;
  • RFID antennas and systems;
  • Ultra-wideband systems;
  • Vehicular antennas and electromagnetics;
  • Software-defined/cognitive radio;
  • On-chip antennas;
  • Wireless power transmission and harvesting;
  • 3D printed antennas and structures;
  • Millimeter-wave and sub-mm-wave antennas;
  • Terahertz, infrared, and optical antennas.

Prof. Dr. Xiongying Liu
Prof. Dr. Shaoqiu Xiao
Prof. Dr. Kai-Da Xu
Dr. Yi Fan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Electronics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (12 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 42374 KiB  
Article
Twelve-Element MIMO Wideband Antenna Array Operating at 3.3 GHz for 5G Smartphone Applications
by Hehe Yu, Xinwen Shang, Qianzhong Xue, Haibing Ding, Jing Wang, Weiwei Lv and Yuanzhe Luo
Electronics 2024, 13(18), 3585; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183585 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 768
Abstract
This work presents a 12-element multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) wideband antenna array for mobile smartphones. The antenna element is mainly composed of two parts, greatly improving the antenna array bandwidth: one is a meandering, looped radiating element and the other is a U-shaped slot. For [...] Read more.
This work presents a 12-element multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) wideband antenna array for mobile smartphones. The antenna element is mainly composed of two parts, greatly improving the antenna array bandwidth: one is a meandering, looped radiating element and the other is a U-shaped slot. For the antenna element design, the meandering, looped radiating element measures 12.95 × 6 mm2, while the U-shaped slot has a size of 15 × 3 mm2. Meanwhile, the reflection coefficient indicates that the designed antenna array operates at 3.3 GHz with a bandwidth of 500 MHz; the transmission coefficient shows that the isolation between the antenna elements is better than 12 dB. In addition, more antenna array performances are presented, including nearly omnidirectional radiation characteristics, antenna efficiency ranging from approximately 17 to 60%, envelope correlation coefficients (ECCs) below 0.065, and diversity gain (DG) values of the MIMO antenna system close to 10 dB. The measurement results are highly consistent with the simulation results of the designed wideband antenna array, indicating its great potential for future practical engineering applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three design cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>S<sub>11</sub> coefficient simulation results for the three design cases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Current distributions for the three design cases: (<b>a</b>) Case 1. (<b>b</b>) Case 2. (<b>c</b>) Proposed cased.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Configuration of (<b>a</b>) the designed wideband antenna array. (<b>b</b>) Overall view of the antenna element, describing its structural composition. (<b>c</b>) Front view of single element on the vertical substrate. (<b>d</b>) Detailed structure of the U-shaped slot on the grounded plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photos of the fabricated 12-element antenna array: (<b>a</b>) Top view. (<b>b</b>) Back view. (<b>c</b>) Side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Parameter analysis of the resonant frequency point of the antenna element with different values: (<b>a</b>) L1y, (<b>b</b>) L2y, (<b>c</b>) U1y, and (<b>d</b>) U2y.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Current distribution of the antenna element (<b>a</b>) at 3.35 GHz and (<b>b</b>) at 3.6 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Simulation: (<b>a</b>) S-parameters and measurement and (<b>b</b>) S-parameter measurement for Ant1 to Ant7.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Current distribution. (<b>a</b>) Ant1 is excited. (<b>b</b>) Ant2 is excited. (<b>c</b>) Ant3 is excited.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Experimental equipment for testing the far-field pattern of the designed antenna array in the microwave anechoic chamber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simulated and measured 2D far-field patterns of the designed antenna array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Simulated and measured 2D far-field patterns of the designed antenna array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The 3D far-field radiation patterns of the designed antenna array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12 Cont.
<p>The 3D far-field radiation patterns of the designed antenna array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Simulated (<b>a</b>) antenna efficiency and measured (<b>b</b>) antenna efficiency for Ant1 to Ant3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>ECC values between adjacent antenna elements. (<b>a</b>) Simulation and (<b>b</b>) measurement results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>DG of the designed antenna array.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 11618 KiB  
Article
MmWave Tx-Rx Self-Interference Suppression through a High Impedance Surface Stacked EBG
by Adewale K. Oladeinde, Ehsan Aryafar and Branimir Pejcinovic
Electronics 2024, 13(15), 3067; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13153067 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 942
Abstract
This paper proposes a full-duplex (FD) antenna design with passive self-interference (SI) suppression for the 28 GHz mmWave band. The reduction in SI is achieved through the design of a novel configuration of stacked Electromagnetic Band Gap structures (EBGs), which create a high [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a full-duplex (FD) antenna design with passive self-interference (SI) suppression for the 28 GHz mmWave band. The reduction in SI is achieved through the design of a novel configuration of stacked Electromagnetic Band Gap structures (EBGs), which create a high impedance path to travelling electromagnetic waves between the transmit and receive antenna elements. The EBG is composed of stacked patches on layers 1 and 2 of a four-layer stack-up configuration. We present the design, optimization, and prototyping of unit antenna elements, stacked EBGs, and integration of stacked EBGs with antenna elements. We also evaluate the design through both HFSS (High Frequency Structure Simulator) and over-the-air measurements in an anechoic chamber. Through extensive evaluations, we show that (i) compared to an architecture that does not use EBGs, the proposed novel stacked EBG design provides an average of 25 dB of additional reduction in SI over 1 GHz of bandwidth, (ii) unit antenna element has over 1 GHz of bandwidth at −10 dB return loss, and (iii) HFSS simulations show close correlation with actual measurement results; however, measured results could still be several dB lower or higher than predicted simulation results. For example, the gap between simulated and measured antenna gains is less than 1 dB for 26–28 GHz and 28.5–30 GHz frequencies, but almost 3 dB for 28–28.5 GHz frequency band. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>In an FD radio, SI is cancelled over multiple stages, including antenna, analog, and digital cancellation. Antenna cancellation refers to a plurality of techniques, including use of RF absorbers, reflectors, EBGs, or even additional antennas to reduce SI in the antenna domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p><b>Top Left</b>: Zoomed-in 3D model of the unit antenna showing mechanical holes and connector. <b>Top Right</b>: Unit antenna in radiation box. <b>Bottom</b>: Stack-up with material property and layers. Bottom and second layers are used as GND.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Frequency bandwidth and return loss measurement setup for the AUT. <b>Left</b>: Unit antenna on Printed Circuit Board (PCB) and its connector. The connector is attached to a 2.92 mm RF adapter, which is then connected to the VNA through a blue RF cable. <b>Right</b>: Unit antenna lab measurement setup. The Anritsu 2-port VNA is connected to the AUT via a blue RF cable.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p><b>Top</b>: S-parameter plots (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>S</mi> <mn>11</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>) showing simulated (red) and measured return loss (blue). <b>Bottom</b>: VSWR Plots. The measured −10 dB bandwidth is 1.2 GHz (from 27.6 GHz to 28.8 GHz).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Far-field measurement setup in an anechoic chamber. <b>Left</b>: robotic arm holding a probe horn antenna. <b>Right</b>: Robotic arm holding the antenna under test (AUT) to determine the 3D radiation pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>): Simulated 3D radiation pattern (dBi). (<b>b</b>): Measured 3D radiation pattern (dBi). (<b>c</b>): Simulated H-Plane (Co) and (Cross) polarization plots. (<b>d</b>): E-Plane (Co) and (Cross) polarization plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Frequency vs. gain simulated (red) and measured (blue) plots showing measured peak gain of 4 dBi between 28 and 28.5 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><b>Left</b>: Multi-path interference due to patch antenna destructive interference of surface current waves and antenna radiated waves resulting from using solid GND plane as reference GND in patch antenna design. <b>Right</b>: Mushroom EBGs, as an alternative to the solid ground plane, mitigate surface current propagation and radiation, and improve the antenna performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>High Impedance Surface novel Stacked EBG (HIS-nSEBG) 3D model structure. (<b>a</b>): Four-layer stack-up showing top and second layers of the patch with a plated through-hole via. The diameter of the through hole via is 0.2 mm. Substrate thickness is 850 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>μ</mo> </semantics></math>m and the PCB material is RO435B Rogers laminate. (<b>b</b>): The 3D view of stacked HIS-nEBG connecting to the Bottom ground layer. (<b>c</b>): The dimension of top and second layer stacked EBG are specified. The dimensions were finalized after numerous HFSS simulations to provide a balance between antenna gain, isolation bandwidth, and port-to-port cancellation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Transmit and Receive antenna elements relative to HIS-nSEBG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p><b>Top Left</b>: HIS-nSEBG implementation in between Tx and Rx antennas. <b>Top Right</b>: Zoomed-in HIS-nSEBG showing top and second layer EBG patches. <b>Bottom Left</b>: HIS-nSEBG dimension of patches. <b>Bottom Right</b>: PCB stitching vias around EBG walls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p><b>Top</b>: The coupling between Tx and Rx ports/antennas without an EBG. <b>Bottom</b>: HIS-nSEBG creates a scattering path within the EBG structure, which reduces the mutual coupling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>2-Port Anrithsu VNA lab measurement setup for gathering the return loss and isolation parameters for the antennas. The picture shows the fabricated antenna with integrated HIS-nSEBG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Simulated and measured SI Suppression plots with and without HIS-nSEBG structures. Simulated and measured data compare well across all frequencies with only a few dB difference. Tx-Rx coupling without HIS-nSEBG (due to over-the-air path loss) is about −30 dB. HIS-nSEBG provides an average of 25 dB additional SI reduction across the 27.5 GHz and 28.5 GHz frequency range of interest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>A snapshot of the electric field distribution when the radio operates in FD mode with HIS-nSEBG (<b>bottom</b>) and without EBG (<b>top</b>).</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 3310 KiB  
Communication
A Low-Profile Wide-Angle Coverage Antenna
by Jingli Guo, Huanhuan Zhang, Wenhao Liao, Youhuo Huang and Lanying Qu
Electronics 2024, 13(14), 2749; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142749 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 646
Abstract
A low-profile wide-angle coverage antenna for Ad Hoc communication networks is presented in this letter, which consists primarily of a rotationally symmetrical structure with a microstrip patch antenna positioned at its center. Utilizing two orthogonal coupling feeds, the microstrip antenna produces circularly polarized [...] Read more.
A low-profile wide-angle coverage antenna for Ad Hoc communication networks is presented in this letter, which consists primarily of a rotationally symmetrical structure with a microstrip patch antenna positioned at its center. Utilizing two orthogonal coupling feeds, the microstrip antenna produces circularly polarized radiation in the broadside direction. Meanwhile, the rotationally thin structure is driven by the coupling of the microstrip patch, and a linearly polarized radiation out of the range of ±15° is generated. Due to this parasitic structure, the radiation of the whole antenna at the upper hemisphere is balanced greatly, which leads to the wide-angle coverage ability enhancement of the low-profile antenna. A prototype operating at 2.7 GHz is fabricated and tested, demonstrating an impedance bandwidth of 15% (2.4 to 2.8 GHz). Measurement results show a 6 dB difference between the maximum and minimum gain in the upper hemisphere. With an overall antenna height of just 6 mm, all gains in the upper hemisphere exceed −3.5 dB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometry of proposed antenna. (<b>a</b>) A 3D view, (<b>b</b>) top view, and (<b>c</b>) side view.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>VSWR and axial ratio (AR) of the microstrip antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The radiation of the circularly polarized microstrip antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) A four-feed antenna. (<b>b</b>) Coupling structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Radiation patterns in the φ = 0° planes. (<b>b</b>) Radiation patterns in the θ = 90° planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The maximum gain minus the minimum gain for different values of <span class="html-italic">K</span>. <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">B</mi> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="|"> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mo>⃑</mo> </mover> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>φ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> <mo>−</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">d</mi> <mi mathvariant="normal">B</mi> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="|"> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> <mo>⃑</mo> </mover> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>φ</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated VSWRs and gains of the antenna for different coupling structure diameters of d<sub>3</sub> = 53 mm, 55 mm, and 57 mm. (<b>a</b>) VSWR. (<b>b</b>) The maximum and minimum values of the gain on the upper half–space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Simulated VSWR and gain of the antenna for different coupling structure heights of h<sub>2</sub> = 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm. (<b>a</b>) VSWR. (<b>b</b>) The maximum and minimum values of the gain on the upper half–space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Prototype of the proposed antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Simulated and measured VSWR of the proposed antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Simulated and measured radiation pattern results of the proposed antenna for the XOZ–plane and XOY–plane at (<b>a</b>) 2.6 GHz, (<b>b</b>) 2.7 GHz, and (<b>c</b>) 2.8 GHz. The black solid line represents the simulated results, and the red dashed line represents the measured results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Simulated and measured radiation pattern results of the proposed antenna for the XOZ–plane and XOY–plane at (<b>a</b>) 2.6 GHz, (<b>b</b>) 2.7 GHz, and (<b>c</b>) 2.8 GHz. The black solid line represents the simulated results, and the red dashed line represents the measured results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The axial ratio of the proposed antenna. (<b>a</b>) Variation with θ. (<b>b</b>) Variation with frequency.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 722 KiB  
Article
Effects of Fractional Time Delay as a Low-Power True Time Delay Digital Beamforming Architecture
by Zachary Liebold, Bob Broughton and Corey Shemelya
Electronics 2024, 13(14), 2723; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142723 - 11 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1061
Abstract
True time delay digital beamforming enables large squint-free bandwidths and high beamcounts, ideal for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite communication links. This work proposes a true time delay architecture using Variable Fractional Delay (VFD). True time delay eliminates many analog beamforming performance constraints [...] Read more.
True time delay digital beamforming enables large squint-free bandwidths and high beamcounts, ideal for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite communication links. This work proposes a true time delay architecture using Variable Fractional Delay (VFD). True time delay eliminates many analog beamforming performance constraints including inaccurate beam steering and limited beamcounts, while managing system quantization error. This article presents a method of implementing true time delay using a VFD digital filter with sufficient time resolution to minimize quantization error and enable both gigahertz bandwidths and sampling frequencies. Simulations of antenna patterns utilizing the proposed VFD digital filters demonstrate satisfactory LEO beamforming performance with only a 29-tap filter. The VFD filter was implemented using a Xilinx Virtex Ultrascale FPGA and demonstrated a 1077% reduction in dynamic power and a minimum 498% reduction in logic resources, with only a modest increase in multipliers required when compared to Farrow-based architectures previously proposed in the literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>): Antenna patterns for two independent systems steering to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>S</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, 10 GHz <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>F</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, and 4 GHz signal. Ideal fractional delay (orange) vs. integer only delays (blue), and (<b>b</b>): FIR impulse response with 0 sample fractional delay (top) vs. 0.4 sample fractional delay (bottom).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>): Group delay response for an FIR filter of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Solid trace represents 0 fractional delay and dashed traces represent <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>±</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> sample fractional delay. Arrow denotes sign reversal of the implemented fractional delay. Black dashed line denotes desired functional bandwidth. Red dashed line denotes filter cutoff frequency. (<b>b</b>): Left: filter group delay for a +0.5 sample filter for a range of N. Right: range of fractional group delay values from −0.5 to +0.5 samples for a range of N.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Block diagram of proposed architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Implemented architecture in SIMULINK.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Antenna pattern of proposed architecture when steering to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mrow> <mi>Q</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>. Arrow denotes worst-case quantization sidelobe.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Beamsquint investigation of the proposed architecture.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3972 KiB  
Article
Folded Narrow-Band and Wide-Band Monopole Antennas with In-Plane and Vertical Grounds for Wireless Sensor Nodes in Smart Home IoT Applications
by Mohammad Mahdi Honari, Seyed Parsa Javadi and Rashid Mirzavand
Electronics 2024, 13(12), 2262; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13122262 - 8 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1148
Abstract
This article presents two monopole antennas with an endfire radiation pattern in the UHF band that can be installed on dry walls or metallic cabinets as a part of wireless sensor nodes, making them a suitable choice for smart home applications, such as [...] Read more.
This article presents two monopole antennas with an endfire radiation pattern in the UHF band that can be installed on dry walls or metallic cabinets as a part of wireless sensor nodes, making them a suitable choice for smart home applications, such as the wireless remote control of house appliances. Two different antennas are proposed to cover the RFID bands of North America (902–928 MHz) and worldwide (860–960 MHz). The antennas have wide horizontal radiation patterns that provide great reading coverage in their communication with a base station placed at a certain distance from the antennas. The structures have two ground planes, one in-plane and the other vertical. The vertical ground helps the antenna to have a directive radiation and also makes it easily installed on walls. The antenna feeding line lies over the vertical ground substrate. The maximum dimensions of the narrow-band antenna are L × W = 0.3λ × 0.14λ, and those for the wide-band antenna are L × W = 0.39λ × 0.14λ. The measured results show that the bandwidth of the proposed antennas for the North America and worldwide RFID bands are from 902 MHz to 939 MHz and 822 MHz to 961 MHz, with maximum gains of 4.2 dBi and 4.9 dBi, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>An array of sensors connected to a central hub, forming a smart home network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Monopole antennas with sensing circuits: (<b>a</b>) antenna with in-plane ground, and (<b>b</b>) antenna with vertical ground.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Proposed antenna structures, (<b>a</b>) narrowband antenna, and (<b>b</b>) wideband antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The Effect of length of ground plane on resonant frequency in designing narrow-band antenna, (<b>a</b>) different Ls while L = 100 mm, and (<b>b</b>) different L and Ls while L − Ls = 81.5 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The effect of length of the antenna trace on resonant frequency in designing wideband antenna, (<b>a</b>) different Lf while L = 130 mm, Lt1 = 122 mm, and Lt2 = 82 mm, and (<b>b</b>) different Lt2 while L = 130 mm, Lt1 = 122 mm, and Lf = 86 mm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Surface current of the wide-band monopole antenna at (<b>a</b>) first resonant frequency (873 MHz) and (<b>b</b>) second resonant frequency (938 MHz).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Radiation efficiency of both narrow-band and wide-band antennas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Fabricated narrow-band and wide-band monopole antennas and (<b>b</b>) antenna pattern measurement setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Reflection coefficient and antenna gain of the proposed antennas, (<b>a</b>) narrow-band monopole antenna, and (<b>b</b>) wide-band monopole antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Radiation patterns of the proposed antennas at 915 MHz, (<b>a</b>) narrow-band monopole antenna, and (<b>b</b>) wide-band monopole antenna.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 6827 KiB  
Article
Frequency Diversity Arc Array with Angle-Distance Two-Dimensional Broadening Null Steering for Sidelobe Suppression
by Wei Xu, Ying Tian, Pingping Huang, Weixian Tan and Yaolong Qi
Electronics 2024, 13(9), 1640; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13091640 - 24 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 774
Abstract
The frequency diversity arc array (FDAA) improves the structure of the traditional frequency diversity array (FDA) from a linear array structure to an arc array structure, so that the FDAA not only has the advantages of the FDA but also has a large [...] Read more.
The frequency diversity arc array (FDAA) improves the structure of the traditional frequency diversity array (FDA) from a linear array structure to an arc array structure, so that the FDAA not only has the advantages of the FDA but also has a large angle and omnidirectional scanning capability. However, when it is equivalent to a linear array, this arc-shaped structure will lead to the phenomenon of inverse density weighting, which leads to a higher sidelobe level of the FDAA beam pattern. In order to solve the problem of a high sidelobe level at a certain position of the FDAA, a frequency diversity arc array with angle-distance two-dimensional broadening null steering is proposed for sidelobe suppression. Using a structural model of the FDAA, the problem of the high sidelobe was analyzed. The linear constrained minimum variance (LCMV) method was used to generate a null with a certain width at the position of the fixed strong sidelobe level in the angle domain and the distance domain of the FDAA beam pattern, to reduce the FDAA sidelobe level. Then, the angle domain and distance domain fixed positions of the FDAA were simulated to generate the null beam pattern. The simulation results verified the effectiveness of this method for reducing the sidelobe level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure model of the FDAA. (<b>a</b>) The three-dimensional structure of the FDAA. (<b>b</b>) The two-dimensional plane of the FDAA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Equivalent linear array of the FDAA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow chart for our proposal of the angle-distance two-dimensional null widening design.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of FDA and FDAA array element spacing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of FDA and FDAA angle domain profiles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Beam pattern of the FDAA based on the Hamming window function frequency offset without null generation. (<b>a</b>) Hamming-FDAA. (<b>b</b>) Hamming-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>c</b>) Hamming-FDAA in the angle domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Beam pattern of the FDAA based on the Sym-Log frequency offset without null generation. (<b>a</b>) Sym Log-FDAA. (<b>b</b>) Sym Log-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>c</b>) Sym Log-FDAA in the angle domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Beam pattern of the FDAA with a 1.5° null width in the angle domain based on the Sym-Log frequency offset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of angle-domain patterns with a null width of 1.5° and without nulls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Beam pattern of the FDAA with a 3° null width in the angle domain based on the Sym-Log frequency offset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of angle-domain patterns with a null width of 3° and without nulls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Beam pattern of the FDAA based on the Sym-Log frequency offset with a 1.5 km null width in the range domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of distance-domain patterns with a null width of 1.5 km and without nulls.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Beam pattern of the FDAA based on the Sym-Log frequency offset with a 3 km null width in the range domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of distance-domain patterns with a null width of 3 km and without nulls.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 22893 KiB  
Article
Dual-Band 2 × 1 Monopole Antenna Array and Its MIMO Configuration for WiMAX, Sub-6 GHz, and Sub-7 GHz Applications
by Sanaa Iriqat, Sibel Yenikaya and Mustafa Secmen
Electronics 2024, 13(8), 1502; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13081502 - 15 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1617
Abstract
This study introduces a cost-effective monopole antenna array and its MIMO configuration. The single element consists of a rectangular patch monopole featuring five circular slots at the center, accompanied by two thin slots at the top, offering a wide bandwidth (2–7.62 GHz) and [...] Read more.
This study introduces a cost-effective monopole antenna array and its MIMO configuration. The single element consists of a rectangular patch monopole featuring five circular slots at the center, accompanied by two thin slots at the top, offering a wide bandwidth (2–7.62 GHz) and a peak gain of 3.8 dBi. For gain improvement, a 2 × 1 antenna array is demonstrated. This antenna array exhibits dual-band behavior; spans from 2 to 3.71 GHz and from 5.9 to 7.54 GHz; covers the 2.5 GHz band (2.3–2.7 GHz), a significant portion of the n78 band (3.3–3.71 GHz), and the n96 band (5.925–7.125 GHz); and is assigned to WiMAX, sub-6 GHz, and sub-7 GHz applications, respectively. The antenna array achieves a peak gain of 6.47 dBi. Lastly, a two-element MIMO configuration derived from the 2 × 1 array is designed. Implementing a defected ground structure (DGS) on the ground plane plays a crucial role in enhancing the isolation from 7 dB to 20 dB. The presented MIMO antenna covers the desired frequency bands of 2.5 GHz, n78, and n96 with a peak gain of 7.5 dBi and high radiation efficiency (<99%), which qualifies it for WiMAX, sub-6 GHz, and sub-7 GHz applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The proposed single-element design: (<b>a</b>) front; (<b>b</b>) back.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simulated and measured reflection coefficient of the single antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Evolution of the single-antenna design: (<b>a</b>) simulated reflection coefficient; (<b>b</b>) simulated realized gain; (<b>c</b>) simulated radiation efficiency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Evolution of the single-antenna design: (<b>a</b>) simulated reflection coefficient; (<b>b</b>) simulated realized gain; (<b>c</b>) simulated radiation efficiency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Reflection coefficient variations with different ground plane sizes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A 2 × 1 antenna array: (<b>a</b>) front; (<b>b</b>) back.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulated and measured reflection coefficient (S11) of the array antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of patch spacing on (<b>a</b>) reflection coefficient; (<b>b</b>) gain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Two-element MIMO antenna design: (<b>a</b>) partial common ground plane; (<b>b</b>) partial slotted common ground plane (proposed); (<b>c</b>) partial separated ground plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>S21 variations with respect to ground plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Fabricated MIMO antenna: (<b>a</b>) front; (<b>b</b>) back.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>S-parameters of the proposed MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Gain and efficiency variations in the MIMO antenna over the frequency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) The 3D radiation pattern at 2.5 GHz; (<b>b</b>) 3D radiation pattern at 6.2 GHz; (<b>c</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for XZ-plane (H-plane) at 2.5 GHz; (<b>d</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for YZ-plane (E-plane) at 2.5 GHz; (<b>e</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for XZ-plane (H-plane) at 6.2 GHz; (<b>f</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for YZ-plane (E-plane) at 6.2 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13 Cont.
<p>(<b>a</b>) The 3D radiation pattern at 2.5 GHz; (<b>b</b>) 3D radiation pattern at 6.2 GHz; (<b>c</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for XZ-plane (H-plane) at 2.5 GHz; (<b>d</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for YZ-plane (E-plane) at 2.5 GHz; (<b>e</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for XZ-plane (H-plane) at 6.2 GHz; (<b>f</b>) simulated and measured radiation patterns for YZ-plane (E-plane) at 6.2 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Simulated and measured ECC values of the proposed MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Simulated and measured diversity gain of the proposed MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Simulated and measured CCL of the proposed MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>TARC results of the proposed MIMO antenna: (<b>a</b>) simulated; (<b>b</b>) measured.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Simulated MEG results of the proposed MIMO antenna.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 12998 KiB  
Article
Multipolar Photoconductive Antennas for THz Emission Driven by a Dual-Frequency Laser Based on Transverse Modes
by Alaeddine Abbes, Annick Pénarier, Philippe Nouvel, Arnaud Garnache and Stéphane Blin
Electronics 2023, 12(22), 4679; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12224679 - 17 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1355
Abstract
Continuous-wave tunable photonics-based THz sources present limited output power due to the restricted input optical power accepted by photomixers, along with reduced radiation resulting from low paraxial field amplitude. Here, we investigate multipolar antenna designs to increase the available continuous-wave THz output power [...] Read more.
Continuous-wave tunable photonics-based THz sources present limited output power due to the restricted input optical power accepted by photomixers, along with reduced radiation resulting from low paraxial field amplitude. Here, we investigate multipolar antenna designs to increase the available continuous-wave THz output power by incorporating more photomixers. For this purpose, the spatial structures of the optical and THz E-fields are designed to enhance THz power and radiation in the far field. Simulations of 2 to 4 dipole antennas are conducted, demonstrating an improvement in antenna gain compared to standard dipole antennas. This is in addition to a potential increase in THz power and radiation for photomixing applications. Such work also paves the way for functionalizing the spatial structure of THz light for advanced applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dual-frequency transverse intensity distribution. <b>Top</b>: Experimental intensity map observed at the output of the VeCSEL laser, showing the superposition of the fundamental mode (centre red spot) with the higher-order transverse mode (surrounding spots) for each pair of Laguerre–Gauss modes. <b>Bottom</b>: Calculated intensity map of the beat spots available for THz emission for different Laguerre–Gauss mode couples; each map is normalized to the maximum intensity (see colour bar for scale).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Multipolar antenna designs. (<b>a</b>) Schematics of the antenna (not on scale) based on 2 to 4 crossed dipoles regularly distributed. For antenna simulations, the gap between arms was fixed at around 80 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </semantics></math>m, and the arm width was 40 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">μ</mi> </semantics></math>m. (<b>b</b>) Two types of polarities under study for the MP3 antenna. For the super-dipole polarity (SP), one-half of the dipole arms are excited with a given polarity while the other ones are excited with the opposite polarity. For the alternate polarity (AP), polarity alternates between neighboured pins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematics of the multipolar antenna under optical excitation and the associated simulated configuration of the multipin port excitation design for MP3 geometry. (<b>a</b>) View of the structured laser beam arriving on the antenna (the red content corresponds to the total intensity scale, which contains two transverse modes at two different frequencies); antenna arms are not fully represented since their dimensions are very large in comparison to the beam dimension; antenna arms extend over the dashed-arms. (<b>b</b>) View of the generated beat signal intensity that corresponds to the THz excitation signal for the antenna. (<b>c</b>) View of the simulated configuration in CST, where the pin colours correspond to the excitation polarity; in this example, it demonstrates alternate polarity (AP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>S<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>11</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> simulation of the multipolar antennas MP2−MP4, for resonance orders R1, R3, and R5.<div class="html-table-p">(<b>Left</b>) Super-dipole multipin polarity excitation (SP). (<b>Right</b>) Alternate-polarity excitation (AP).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Normalized far-field radiation patterns of the MP3 multipolar antenna for different polarity excitations (SP or AP) and difference resonance-order designs (R1, R3, or R5). Diagrams are simulated for emissions at 100 GHz; the gain colour scale is normalized. Diagrams for alternate polarity at the first resonance (R1) are not represented, as the antennas are not matched in terms of impedance. Some diagrams are shown for cases of slight or strong impedance mismatch (such mismatches are indicated in the figure), as they are representative of these types of antennas and could ultimately be adequate on high-index substrates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The overall simulated structure. A THz antenna (yellow) on a photo-conductor (pink) and high-resistivity Si-lens (grey). The antenna is an MP3 configuration. Inset: a multi-axial cable (six conductors) used to feed the multipolar antenna.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Normalized far-field pattern simulations for the multipolar antennas coupled to a hyper-hemispherical lens. Associated realized gains are reported for each configuration. Diagrams are simulated for an emission at 100 GHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Validation of multipin port excitation in comparison to standard port excitation; (<b>a</b>) S<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>11</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> parameters for multipin or discrete port excitation of a standard dipole antenna designed at 100 GHz; (<b>b</b>) normalized far-field radiation patterns for both excitations.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Comparison between real-life materials; (<b>a</b>) S<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>11</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> parameters of ideal and real materials; (<b>b</b>) far-field radiation patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Validation of accuracy; (<b>a</b>) S<math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>11</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> parameter for different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>λ</mi> </semantics></math> values; (<b>b</b>) field energies for different <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>λ</mi> </semantics></math> values; (<b>c</b>) far-field radiation patterns for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>λ</mi> </semantics></math>/10 and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>λ</mi> </semantics></math>/40.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 4004 KiB  
Communication
A Novel Unit Classification Method for Fast and Accurate Calculation of Radiation Patterns
by Hao Zhou, Jiren Li and Kun Wei
Electronics 2023, 12(16), 3512; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12163512 - 19 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1337
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel unit classification technique to enhance the accuracy of the conventional pattern multiplication method by taking the mutual coupling effect and edge effect into consideration. The proposed technique classifies antenna elements into different groups based on their positions in [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a novel unit classification technique to enhance the accuracy of the conventional pattern multiplication method by taking the mutual coupling effect and edge effect into consideration. The proposed technique classifies antenna elements into different groups based on their positions in arrays, specifically corner, edge, and inner groups. By simulating the radiation patterns of antenna elements with different boundary conditions, the pattern multiplication method is then used to calculate the radiation pattern of the antenna array based on the simulated results. Several numerical examples, including a square array, a hexagonal array, and a phased array, are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The numerical results demonstrate that the proposed method not only reduces the computational time and memory usage but also significantly improves the accuracy. The proposed method provides a powerful tool for synthesizing and predicting the radiation pattern of array antennas and offers new avenues for optimizing array antennas and phased array antennas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Unit classification method: (<b>a</b>) schematic of a square array with patch antennas; (<b>b</b>) classification diagram; (<b>c</b>) three views of the patch antenna element; (<b>d</b>) nine units simulation boundaries; (<b>e</b>) unit used in traditional multiplication methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Square array calculation results comparison: (<b>a</b>) radiation pattern results at phi = 0 degree plane; (<b>b</b>) radiation pattern results of front side and backside at phi = 0 degree plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hexagonal array results comparison: (<b>a</b>) schematic and classification diagram of a hexagonal array; (<b>b</b>) radiation pattern results comparison at phi = 90 degree plane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Phased array calculation results comparison: (<b>a</b>) the excitation phase distribution; (<b>b</b>) radiation pattern results of the phased array at phi = 90 degree plane.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7031 KiB  
Article
Bifocal Dual Reflectarray with Curved Main Surface
by Antonio Pino, Yolanda Rodriguez-Vaqueiro, Eduardo Martinez-de-Rioja, Daniel Martinez-de-Rioja, Borja González-Valdés, Marcos Arias, Oscar Rubiños, José Antonio Encinar and Giovanni Toso
Electronics 2023, 12(12), 2619; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12122619 - 10 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1218
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to synthesizing curved reflectarrays using Geometrical Optics (GO). It introduces the concepts of virtual normal and path length shift, which enable a vector-based formulation of the problem that can be solved using ray tracing techniques. The formulation [...] Read more.
This paper presents a novel approach to synthesizing curved reflectarrays using Geometrical Optics (GO). It introduces the concepts of virtual normal and path length shift, which enable a vector-based formulation of the problem that can be solved using ray tracing techniques. The formulation is applied for the design of two different versions of a Dual Bifocal Reflectarray with a parabolic main surface and a flat subreflectarray. The first version aims to enhance the performance of the multibeam antenna by providing a focal ring located at the feed cluster plane. The second version focuses on improving the scanning characteristics of the antenna in the horizontal plane by incorporating two foci. The synthesis procedure yields samples of the path length shift or its derivatives. To reconstruct the phase distribution, an interpolation scheme is employed and described in this paper. Numerical results are presented for both the focal-ring and two-foci configurations, demonstrating the feasibility of this solution for multibeam or scanning satellite antennas operating in the Ka. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Absolute system and local system for the reflectarray surface.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Detail of incident and reflection angles, and ray vectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Bifocal reflectarray synthesis algorithm for a linear section. Two procedures were applied based on the same algorithm to double the density of data points: starting at a known point <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on the main-RA to generate “<b><span style="color:red">×</span></b>” points and starting at a known point <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on the sub-RA to generating “<b><span style="color:#70AD47">♦</span></b>” points. Both procedures lead to the same geometry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bifocal reflectarray 3D synthesis scheme. A central section in the plane of symmetry is first synthesized as “Starting profile”. Then, starting at each point of the starting profile, a lateral strip is synthesized allowing the 3D extension of the reflectarray surface. Crosses are obtained by starting at the main-RA central section while diamonds are obtained by starting at sub-RA central section. The left part, not represented in the figure, is obtained by symmetry means.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Bifocal 3D extension by rotation about the <span class="html-italic">Z</span> axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Baseline Cassegrain: (<b>a</b>) General view and ray tracing; (<b>b</b>) Detail of flat sub-RA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Multibeam configuration for one antenna (two are necessary for whole coverage): (<b>a</b>) map of beams, each color represents a different polarization; (<b>b</b>) feed cluster where each antenna generates two beams with perpendicular polarizations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Derivatives of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the focal ring bifocal: (<b>a</b>) main-RA; (<b>b</b>) sub-RA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Path length shift distribution across the reflectarrays.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Ripple of the path length shift (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∆</mo> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>) across the main-RA aperture when scanning: (<b>a</b>) to −1.68°; (<b>b</b>) to +1.68°.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>PO patterns at 20 GHz: (<b>a</b>) XZ cut; (<b>b</b>) YZ cut.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Set of data points obtained for the synthesis of the bifocal dual reflectarray.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Path length shift of the bifocal dual reflectarray with two focal points: (<b>a</b>) main-RA; (<b>b</b>) sub-RA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Path length rms of the scanned aperture for the bifocal and the Cassegrain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Physical Optics patterns for the bifocal design with two foci. Dotted lines depict masks of requirements for main lobe and side lobes.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Transformation of the vectors <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> </mrow> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>,</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> </mrow> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> to obtain the orthonormal system <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>,</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 5163 KiB  
Article
Beampattern Synthesis and Optimization for Frequency Diverse Arc Array Based on the Virtual Element
by Wei Xu, Zhuo Deng, Pingping Huang, Weixian Tan and Zhiqi Gao
Electronics 2023, 12(10), 2231; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12102231 - 14 May 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1645
Abstract
With its special, arch-shaped array structure, a frequency diverse arc array (FDAA) can perform beam scanning in 360 degrees in azimuth and in arbitrary ranges by selectively activating array elements in different positions, utilizing array element phase compensation, and adopting a frequency offset [...] Read more.
With its special, arch-shaped array structure, a frequency diverse arc array (FDAA) can perform beam scanning in 360 degrees in azimuth and in arbitrary ranges by selectively activating array elements in different positions, utilizing array element phase compensation, and adopting a frequency offset design. In this paper, a beampattern synthesis and optimization method for FDDA using the virtual array element based on the geometric configuration of FDDA is proposed. First, the position of the virtual array element is determined by the direction of the target, and then activated array elements are selected. Afterwards, the frequency offset of each array element is set up on the equiphase surface to obtain the dot-shaped beampattern. Finally, amplitude weighting is introduced to suppress the increased sidelobe level of the dot-shaped beampattern, which is caused by inverse density weighting of the arch-shaped array structure. Simulation results validate the proposed method for beampattern synthesis and optimization in FDAA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three-dimensional geometric structure of FDAA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Two-dimensional geometric structure of FDAA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The flow diagram of the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Beam scanning based on virtual element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>FDAA activated elements expansion diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Phase compensation diagram of FDAA based on virtual the element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of equiphase plane based on virtual element and traditional FDA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>FDAA beampattern synthesis diagram based on virtual element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Element spacing for each element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of FDA and FDAA.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Beampattern synthesis results before optimization. (<b>a</b>) Sym Log-FDA. (<b>b</b>) Sym Log-FDA in the range domain. (<b>c</b>) Sym Log-FDA in the angle domain. (<b>d</b>) Sym Log-FDAA. (<b>e</b>) Sym Log-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>f</b>) Sym Log-FDAA in the angle domain. (<b>g</b>) Sym Hamming-FDAA. (<b>h</b>) Sym Hamming-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>i</b>) Sym Hamming-FDAA in the angle domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Beampattern synthesis results before optimization. (<b>a</b>) Sym Log-FDA. (<b>b</b>) Sym Log-FDA in the range domain. (<b>c</b>) Sym Log-FDA in the angle domain. (<b>d</b>) Sym Log-FDAA. (<b>e</b>) Sym Log-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>f</b>) Sym Log-FDAA in the angle domain. (<b>g</b>) Sym Hamming-FDAA. (<b>h</b>) Sym Hamming-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>i</b>) Sym Hamming-FDAA in the angle domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Beampattern synthesis results after optimization. (<b>a</b>) Hamming weighted Sym Log-FDAA. (<b>b</b>) Hamming weighted Sym Log-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>c</b>) Hamming weighted Sym Log-FDAA in the angle domain. (<b>d</b>) Taylor weighted Sym Log-FDAA. (<b>e</b>) Taylor weighted Sym Log-FDAA in the range domain. (<b>f</b>) Taylor weighted Sym Log-FDAA in the angle domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of beampattern in range dimension before and after optimization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Comparison of beampattern in angle dimension before and after optimization.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2639 KiB  
Article
Data-Driven Surrogate-Assisted Optimization of Metamaterial-Based Filtenna Using Deep Learning
by Peyman Mahouti, Aysu Belen, Ozlem Tari, Mehmet Ali Belen, Serdal Karahan and Slawomir Koziel
Electronics 2023, 12(7), 1584; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071584 - 28 Mar 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2611
Abstract
In this work, a computationally efficient method based on data-driven surrogate models is proposed for the design optimization procedure of a Frequency Selective Surface (FSS)-based filtering antenna (Filtenna). A Filtenna acts as a module that simultaneously pre-filters unwanted signals, and enhances the desired [...] Read more.
In this work, a computationally efficient method based on data-driven surrogate models is proposed for the design optimization procedure of a Frequency Selective Surface (FSS)-based filtering antenna (Filtenna). A Filtenna acts as a module that simultaneously pre-filters unwanted signals, and enhances the desired signals at the operating frequency. However, due to a typically large number of design variables of FSS unit elements, and their complex interrelations affecting the scattering response, FSS optimization is a challenging task. Herein, a deep-learning-based algorithm, Modified-Multi-Layer-Perceptron (M2LP), is developed to render an accurate behavioral model of the unit cell. Subsequently, the M2LP model is applied to optimize FSS elements being parts of the Filtenna under design. The exemplary device operates at 5 GHz to 7 GHz band. The numerical results demonstrate that the presented approach allows for an almost 90% reduction of the computational cost of the optimization process as compared to direct EM-driven design. At the same time, physical measurements of the fabricated Filtenna prototype corroborate the relevance of the proposed methodology. One of the important advantages of our technique is that the unit cell model can be re-used to design FSS and Filtenna operating various operating bands without incurring any extra computational expenses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antenna Design and Its Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic views of the proposed 3D FSS unit element.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Parametric analysis of the FSS unit element for: (<b>a</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>11</sub>| (as a function of <span class="html-italic">H</span>); (<b>b</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>11</sub>| (as a function of <span class="html-italic">H</span><sub>1</sub>); (<b>c</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>21</sub>| (as a function of <span class="html-italic">L</span><sub>2</sub>); (<b>d</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>21</sub>| (as a function of <span class="html-italic">W</span><sub>2</sub>). All the variables are taken as constant values while the selected one is swept, <span class="html-italic">H</span> = 10.5, <span class="html-italic">H</span><sub>1</sub> = 2, <span class="html-italic">L</span><sub>2</sub> = 2, and <span class="html-italic">W</span><sub>2</sub> = 4, all variables are in [mm].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>EM-simulated and M2LP-predicted responses: (<b>a</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>11</sub>|, (<b>b</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>21</sub>|, responses of optimally selected FSS element. <span class="html-italic">H</span> = 10, <span class="html-italic">H</span><sub>1</sub> = 1, <span class="html-italic">L</span><sub>1</sub> = 18, <span class="html-italic">L</span><sub>2</sub> = 2, <span class="html-italic">W</span><sub>1</sub> = 14, <span class="html-italic">W</span><sub>2</sub> = 4, and <span class="html-italic">W</span> = <span class="html-italic">L</span> = 20 all in [mm].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photograph of the prototyped filtennas: (<b>a</b>) FSS unit cell, (<b>b</b>) FSS array design, and (<b>c</b>) filtenna structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scattering parameters responses of the 3D unit element and proposed filtenna: (<b>a</b>) simulated |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>11</sub>|, (<b>b</b>) simulated |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>21</sub>|, (<b>c</b>) measured |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>11</sub>|, (<b>d</b>) gain, simulated (<b>e</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>11</sub>|, and (<b>f</b>) |<span class="html-italic">S</span><sub>21</sub>| for different oblique incidences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Measured radiation pattern (@ <span class="html-italic">ϕ</span> = 90°) of the horn and filtenna designs at (<b>a</b>) 4 GHz, (<b>b</b>) 5 GHz, (<b>c</b>) 7 GHz, and (<b>d</b>) 8 GHz.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop