Agronomy

Research

Jump to: Review

24 pages, 1398 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Integrating Cover Crops as a Source of Carbon for Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation

by Luca Vecchia, Francesco Di Gioia, Antonio Ferrante, Jason C. Hong, Charles White and Erin N. Rosskopf

Agronomy 2020, 10(10), 1614; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10101614 - 21 Oct 2020

Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4824

Abstract

The adoption of anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), a biologically-based method for the management of soilborne pests and pathogens at the commercial scale strictly depends on the availability of effective and low-cost sources of carbon (C). A three-phase pot study was conducted to evaluate [...] Read more.

The adoption of anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD), a biologically-based method for the management of soilborne pests and pathogens at the commercial scale strictly depends on the availability of effective and low-cost sources of carbon (C). A three-phase pot study was conducted to evaluate the performance of twelve cover crop species as alternative sources of C in comparison to molasses. Buckwheat produced the greatest above-ground and total plant dry biomass and accumulated the largest amount of total C. In the second phase, simulating the application of ASD in a pot-in-pot system, molasses-amended soil achieved substantially higher levels of anaerobicity, and lowered soil pH at 3 and 7 days after treatment application compared to soil amended with the cover crops tested. In the third phase of the study, after the ASD simulation, lettuce was planted to assess the impact of cover crops and molasses-based ASD on lettuce yield and quality. The treatments had limited effects on lettuce plant growth and quality as none of the treatments caused plant stunting or phytotoxicity. Tested cover crop species and molasses had a significant impact on the availability of macro and micro-elements in the soil, which in turn influenced the uptake of minerals in lettuce. Fast growing cover crops like buckwheat or oat, capable of accumulating high levels of C in a relatively short time, may represent a viable alternative to substitute or be combined with standard C sources like molasses, which could provide an on-farm C source and reduce cost of application. Further research is needed to assess the performance of cover crops at the field scale and verify their decomposability and efficacy in managing soil-borne pests and pathogens. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4460 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Gene Expression and Metabolite Profiling of Thirteen Nigerian Cassava Landraces to Elucidate Starch and Carotenoid Composition

by Priscilla Olayide, Annabel Large, Linnea Stridh, Ismail Rabbi, Susanne Baldermann, Livia Stavolone and Erik Alexandersson

Agronomy 2020, 10(3), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030424 - 20 Mar 2020

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3619

Abstract

The prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa necessitates effective approaches to improve provitamin A content of major staple crops. Cassava holds much promise for food security in sub-Saharan Africa, but a negative correlation between β-carotene, a provitamin A carotenoid, and dry [...] Read more.

The prevalence of vitamin A deficiency in sub-Saharan Africa necessitates effective approaches to improve provitamin A content of major staple crops. Cassava holds much promise for food security in sub-Saharan Africa, but a negative correlation between β-carotene, a provitamin A carotenoid, and dry matter content has been reported, which poses a challenge to cassava biofortification by conventional breeding. To identify suitable material for genetic transformation in tissue culture with the overall aim to increase β-carotene and maintain starch content as well as better understand carotenoid composition, root and leaf tissues from thirteen field-grown cassava landraces were analyzed for agronomic traits, carotenoid, chlorophyll, and starch content. The expression of five genes related to carotenoid biosynthesis were determined in selected landraces. Analysis revealed a weak negative correlation between starch and β-carotene content, whereas there was a strong positive correlation between root yield and many carotenoids including β-carotene. Carotenoid synthesis genes were expressed in both white and yellow cassava roots, but phytoene synthase 2 (PSY2), lycopene-ε-cyclase (LCYε), and β-carotenoid hydroxylase (CHYβ) expression were generally higher in yellow roots. This study identified lines with reasonably high content of starch and β-carotene that could be candidates for biofortification by further breeding or plant biotechnological means. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
Schematic carotenoid biosynthesis pathway showing metabolites and genes involved in their synthesis. Genes measured by quantitative real-time polymerase reaction (qPCR) are marked. Geranylgenranyl diphosphosphate synthase (GGPPS), Phytoene synthase (PSY), phytoene desaturase (PDS), ζ-carotene desaturase (ZDS), ζ-carotene isomerase (ZISO), carotenoid isomerase (CRTISO), lycopene ε-cyclase (LCYε), lycopene β-cyclase (LCYβ) β-carotenoid hydroxylases (CHYβ), zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP), violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE), 9-cis-expoxycarotenoid dioxygenase. Full article ">Figure 2
(A) Starch in dried 8-month-old root tissue from 13 cassava genotypes using starch enzymatic assay. (B) Dry matter content (DMC, %). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean from three biological replicates with three technical repetitions per genotype. Groupings generated from ANOVA and Tukey ad hoc tests are above each bar. Full article ">Figure 3
(A) All-trans β-carotene concentration in µg g–1 dry weight of cassava. (B) Total β-carotene in µg g–1 dry weight of cassava. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean. Groupings generated from ANOVA and Tukey adhoc tests are above each bar. Full article ">Figure 4
Comparison of total β-carotene and starch content for cassava genotypes. Full article ">Figure 5
Correlations between agronomic traits and carotenoids. Red circular nodes are agronomic traits, while purple diamond nodes are metabolites. Green lines represent positive correlations, while red lines represent negative correlations. The thickness of the lines reflects the strength of the correlation. Spearman correlation cutoff are values greater than 0.5 or less than −0.5 (Rt = roots, Lf = leaf, S1 = season 1, S2 = season 2). Full article ">Figure 6
Relative gene expression (RQ) and comparison between selected metabolites across five cassava genotypes. (A)–(E) show relative expression of PSY1, PSY2, LCYε, CHYβ and NCED1 and their expression correlation with starch and total β-carotene composition across selected genotypes. Full article ">

9 pages, 1603 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Soil Type and Zinc Doses in Agronomic Biofortification of Lettuce Genotypes

by Hilário Júnior de Almeida, Victor Manuel Vergara Carmona, Maykom Ferreira Inocêncio, Antônio Eduardo Furtini Neto, Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho and Munir Mauad

Agronomy 2020, 10(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010124 - 15 Jan 2020

Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4245

Abstract

The incidence of many malnutrition-related diseases among the populations of developing countries is closely related to low dietary zinc (Zn) intakes. This study evaluated the potential of agronomic biofortification of lettuce genotypes with Zn in different soils. We evaluated the ability to biofortify [...] Read more.

The incidence of many malnutrition-related diseases among the populations of developing countries is closely related to low dietary zinc (Zn) intakes. This study evaluated the potential of agronomic biofortification of lettuce genotypes with Zn in different soils. We evaluated the ability to biofortify three lettuce genotypes (‘Grand Rapids’, ‘Regina de Verão’, and ‘Delícia’) in two soils (Red-Yellow Latosol and Dystroferric Red Latosol) using five doses of Zn (0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 mg kg⁻¹). At 55 days after sowing, the plants were harvested. There was an interaction among the soils, genotypes, and Zn doses. Regardless of the soil and genotype, the increase in Zn supply promoted a linear increase in shoot Zn concentration. However, shoot and root dry matter yields were differentially affected by Zn supply according to the genotype and soil type. Overall, the Red-Yellow Latosol provided a higher shoot Zn concentration but also caused greater growth damage, especially in ‘Regina de Verão’ and ‘Delícia’. ‘Grand Rapids’ was biofortified the most in Red-Yellow Latosol. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
Shoots and roots dry matter of three lettuce genotypes grown in Red-Yellow Latosol (RYL) and Dystroferric Red Latosol (dRL) with different Zn doses. (a,d) presents the dry matter production in ‘Grand Rapids’; (b,e) presents the dry matter production in ‘Regina de Verão’; and (c,f) presents the dry matter production in ‘Delícia’. *, ** and ns means significance at 1%, 5% probability and not significant by F test, respectively. Full article ">Figure 2
Zn concentration and accumulation in the shoot dry matter of three lettuce genotypes grown in Red-Yellow Latosol (RYL) and Dystroferric Red Latosol (dRL) with different Zn doses. (a,d) presents the values in ‘Grand Rapids’; (b,e) presents the values in ‘Regina de Verão’; and (c,f) presents the values in ‘Delícia’. *, ** and ns means ignificance at 1%, 5% probability and not significant by F test, respectively. Full article ">Figure 3
Correlation of leaf Zn concentration with shoot dry matter (●) and root dry matter (∆) in three lettuce genotypes grown in Red-Yellow Latosol and Dystroferric Red Latosol with the application of different Zn doses. (a,c,e) presents the correlations obtained in the Red-Yellow Latosol; and (b,d,f) presents the correlations obtained in the Dystroferric Red Latosol. *, ** and ns means significance at 1%, 5% probability and not significant by F test, respectively. Full article ">

21 pages, 1773 KiB

Open AccessArticle

SelectedAspects of Iodate and Iodosalicylate Metabolism in Lettuce Including the Activity of Vanadium Dependent Haloperoxidases as Affected by Exogenous Vanadium

by Sylwester Smoleń, Iwona Kowalska, Mariya Halka, Iwona Ledwożyw-Smoleń, Marlena Grzanka, Łukasz Skoczylas, Małgorzata Czernicka and Joanna Pitala

Agronomy 2020, 10(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010001 - 18 Dec 2019

Cited by 31 | Viewed by 3748

Abstract

In marine algae, vanadium (V) regulates the cellular uptake of iodine (I) and its volatilization as I₂, the processes catalyzed by vanadium-dependent haloperoxidases (vHPO). Relationships between I and vanadium V in higher plants, including crop plants, have not yet been described. [...] Read more.

In marine algae, vanadium (V) regulates the cellular uptake of iodine (I) and its volatilization as I₂, the processes catalyzed by vanadium-dependent haloperoxidases (vHPO). Relationships between I and vanadium V in higher plants, including crop plants, have not yet been described. Little is known about the possibility of the synthesis of plant-derived thyroid hormone analogs (PDTHA) in crop plants. The activity of vHPO in crop plants as well as the uptake and metabolism of iodosalicylates in lettuce have not yet been studied. This studyaimed to determine the effect of V on the uptake and accumulation of various forms of I, the metabolism of iodosalicylates and iodobenzoates and, finally, on the accumulation of T3 (triiodothyronine—as example of PDTHA) in plants. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata ‘Melodion’ cv.) cultivation in a hydroponic NutrientFilm Technique (NFT) system was conducted with the introduction of 0 (control), 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 µM V doses of ammonium metavanadate (NH₄VO₃) in four independent experiments. No iodine treatment was applied in Experiment No. 1, while iodine compounds were applied at a dose of 10 µM (based on our own previous research) as KIO₃, 5-iodosalicylic acid (5-ISA) and 3,5-diiodosalicylic acid (3,5-diISA) in Experiment Nos. 2, 3 and 4, respectively. When lettuce was grown at trace amount of I in the nutrient solution, increasing doses of V contributed to the increase of (a) I content in roots, (b) I uptake by whole lettuce plants (leaves + roots), and (c) vHPO activity in leaves (for doses 0.05–0.20 µM V). Vanadium was mainly found in roots where the content of this element increased proportionally to its dose. The content of V in leaves was not modified by V introduced into the nutrient solution. We found that5-ISA, 3,5-diISA and T3 were naturally synthesized in lettuce and its content increased when 5-ISA, 3,5-diISA were applied. Quantitative changes in the accumulation of organic metabolites (iodosalicylates and iodobenzoates) accumulation were observed, along with increased T3 synthesis, with its content in leaves exceeding the level of individual iodosalicylates and iodobenzoates. The content of T3 was not affected by V fertilization. It was concluded that iodosalicylates may participate in the biosynthesis pathway of T3—and probably of other PDTHA compounds. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3406 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Iodine Agronomic Biofortification of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Is Effective under Farmer Field Conditions

by Joe Ojok, Peter Omara, Emmanuel Opolot, Walter Odongo, Solomon Olum, Du Laing Gijs, Xavier Gellynck, Hans De Steur and Duncan Ongeng

Agronomy 2019, 9(12), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120797 - 23 Nov 2019

Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4595

Abstract

Iodine (I) is an essential micronutrient, which plays a critical role in human metabolism. However, its concentration is known to be low in most soils, making it deficient in crops. With most I agronomic biofortification studies conducted under controlled environments, limited information currently [...] Read more.

Iodine (I) is an essential micronutrient, which plays a critical role in human metabolism. However, its concentration is known to be low in most soils, making it deficient in crops. With most I agronomic biofortification studies conducted under controlled environments, limited information currently exists on this approach of enriching I deficient crops under farmer field conditions. Two-year field experiments were conducted in 2017 and 2018 to examine efficacy of cowpea and cabbage in the uptake of foliar applied potassium iodide (KI) and potassium iodate (KIO₃), each with 0, 5, 10, and 15 kg I ha⁻¹ under farmer field conditions. Results indicate that KI was 34% more efficient than KIO₃. Iodine concentration increased with application rate. In cabbage, the lowest I concentration (8.2 mg kg⁻¹) was registered at 5 kg I ha⁻¹ with KIO₃ while the highest was 109.1 mg kg⁻¹ at 15 kg I ha⁻¹ with KI. Cowpea registered the lowest I concentration of 531.5 mg kg⁻¹ at 5 kg I ha⁻¹ with KIO₃ while the highest (5854.2 mg kg⁻¹) was registered at 15 kg I ha⁻¹ with KI. Therefore, cowpea and cabbage can be effectively biofortified through foliar application of both KI and KIO₃ under farmer field conditions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
Total monthly rainfall and average air temperature for Lira and Gulu experimental locations; (A) second planting season 2017 and (B) First planting season 2018. Full article ">Figure 2
Mean iodine concentration of cabbage for control, iodate-, and iodide-treated plots in 2017 and 2018 (each year, n = 18) for the combined Gulu and Lira sites. Vertical columns within a year with different letters are statistically different at p < 0.05; Tukey’s HSD test. Full article ">Figure 3
Mean iodine concentration of cowpea for control, iodate-, and iodide-treated plots in 2017 and 2018 (each year, n = 18) for the combined Gulu and Lira sites. Vertical columns within a year with different letters are statistically different at p < 0.05; Tukey’s HSD test. Full article ">Figure 4
Mean iodine concentration of cabbage for different iodate and iodide fertilizer rates (kg I ha−1) in 2017 and 2018 (each year, n = 6) for the combined Gulu and Lira sites. Vertical columns within a year with different letters are statistically different at p < 0.05; Tukey’s HSD. Full article ">Figure 5
Mean iodine concentration of cowpea for different iodate and iodide fertilizer rates (kg I ha−1) in 2017 and 2018 (each year, n = 6) for the combined Gulu and Lira sites. Vertical columns within a year with different letters are statistically different at p < 0.05; Tukey’s HSD test. Full article ">Figure 6
Visual comparison of the effect of application rate on cowpea after spraying with potassium iodate (302, 303, and 304) and potassium iodide (306, 307, and 308) in 2018. Note that plates 301 and 305 are from control plots (no foliar application of iodine). Full article ">

15 pages, 922 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Bioavailability of Iron and the Influence of Vitamin a in Biofortified Foods

by Paula Tavares Antunes, Maria das Graças Vaz-Tostes, Cíntia Tomáz Sant’Ana, Renata Araújo de Faria, Renata Celi Lopes Toledo and Neuza Maria Brunoro Costa

Agronomy 2019, 9(12), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120777 - 20 Nov 2019

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3009

Abstract

Inadequate eating habits, among other factors, lead to nutritional deficiencies worldwide. Attempts have been made to control micronutrient deficits, such as biofortification of usually consumed crops, but the interaction between food components may affect the bioavailability of the nutrients. Thus, this study aimed [...] Read more.

Inadequate eating habits, among other factors, lead to nutritional deficiencies worldwide. Attempts have been made to control micronutrient deficits, such as biofortification of usually consumed crops, but the interaction between food components may affect the bioavailability of the nutrients. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of pro-vitamin A on the bioavailability of iron in biofortified cowpea and cassava mixture, compared to their conventional counterparts. The chemical composition of the raw material was determined, and an in vivo study was performed, with Wistar rats, using the depletion-repletion method. Gene expression of iron-metabolism proteins was evaluated. Results were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). Biofortified cowpea (BRS Aracê) showed an increase of approximately 19.5% in iron content compared to conventional (BRS Nova era). No difference in Hemoglobin gain was observed between groups. However, the animals fed biofortified cowpea were similar to ferrous sulfate (Control group) regarding the expression of the hephaestin and ferroportin proteins, suggesting a greater efficiency in the intestinal absorption of iron. Thus, this study points out a higher efficiency of the biofortified cowpea in the bioavailability of iron, regardless of the presence of pro-vitamin A. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 667 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Steeping of Biofortified Orange Maize Genotypes for Ogi Production Modifies Pasting Properties and Carotenoid Stability

by Darwin Ortiz, Smith G. Nkhata, Torbert Rocheford and Mario G. Ferruzzi

Agronomy 2019, 9(11), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110771 - 18 Nov 2019

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4490

Abstract

Biofortified orange maize open-pollinated varieties and hybrids with higher provitamin A carotenoids (pVACs) have been released in sub-Saharan Africa and will be introduced throughout the local food systems. This study assessed the impact of steeping, a traditional processing method, on retention of carotenoids [...] Read more.

Biofortified orange maize open-pollinated varieties and hybrids with higher provitamin A carotenoids (pVACs) have been released in sub-Saharan Africa and will be introduced throughout the local food systems. This study assessed the impact of steeping, a traditional processing method, on retention of carotenoids and starch pasting properties of porridges made from select biofortified maize genotypes. Steeping had a modest effect (<9% loss) on total carotenoid stability during relatively shorter steeping periods (<72 h). However, more extended steeping periods (up to 120 h) had a detrimental effect on total carotenoid recovery (61% loss). Xanthophylls showed greater stability (82% retention) compared to carotenes (30% retention) during subsequent wet cooking of fermented flours. Interestingly, steeping of maize did modify pasting properties, with peak viscosities increasing from 24–72 h of steeping potentially impacting cooking stability. These results suggest that steeping can impact carotenoid retention and potentially optimal steeping times would be 24–72 h for acceptable carotenoid retention. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 960 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Expression Levels of the γ-Glutamyl Hydrolase I Gene Predict Vitamin B₉ Content in Potato Tubers

by Bruce R. Robinson, Carolina Garcia Salinas, Perla Ramos Parra, John Bamberg, Rocio I. Diaz de la Garza and Aymeric Goyer

Agronomy 2019, 9(11), 734; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110734 - 9 Nov 2019

Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2915

Abstract

Biofortification of folates in staple crops is an important strategy to help eradicate human folate deficiencies. Folate biofortification using genetic engineering has shown great success in rice grain, tomato fruit, lettuce, and potato tuber. However, consumers’ skepticism, juridical hurdles, and lack of economic [...] Read more.

Biofortification of folates in staple crops is an important strategy to help eradicate human folate deficiencies. Folate biofortification using genetic engineering has shown great success in rice grain, tomato fruit, lettuce, and potato tuber. However, consumers’ skepticism, juridical hurdles, and lack of economic model have prevented the widespread adoption of nutritionally-enhanced genetically-engineered (GE) food crops. Meanwhile, little effort has been made to biofortify food crops with folate by breeding. Previously we reported >10-fold variation in folate content in potato genotypes. To facilitate breeding for enhanced folate content, we attempted to identify genes that control folate content in potato tuber. For this, we analyzed the expression of folate biosynthesis and salvage genes in low- and high-folate potato genotypes. First, RNA-Seq analysis showed that, amongst all folate biosynthesis and salvage genes analyzed, only one gene, which encodes γ-glutamyl hydrolase 1 (GGH1), was consistently expressed at higher levels in high- compared to low-folate segregants of a Solanum boliviense Dunal accession. Second, quantitative PCR showed that GGH1 transcript levels were higher in high- compared to low-folate segregants for seven out of eight pairs of folate segregants analyzed. These results suggest that GGH1 gene expression is an indicator of folate content in potato tubers. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
Folate concentrations of fol lines from four independent harvests. Data for June 2012 are means of two technical determinations on a pool of tubers from several clonal plants (n = 1). Data for November 2012 are means ± SE of two technical determinations on each of two biological replications (n = 2), one biological replication being made of tubers harvested from one plant. Data for 2016 are means ± SE of three technical determinations on each of two biological replicates (n = 2), one biological replication being made of tubers pooled from several plants and then split into two biological replicates. Data for 2017 are means ± SE of three technical determinations on each of three biological replicates (n = 3), one biological replication being made of tubers harvested from one individual plant. Samples that share identical letters were not significantly different as determined by ANOVA and Tukey HSD at a p-value = 0.05. Full article ">Figure 2
Distribution of folate species in potato lines harvested in November 2012. Due to the acidic pH of the mobile phase tetrahydrofolate (THF) plus 5,10-CH2THF, and 5,10-CH = THF plus 10-CHO-THF cannot be distinguished during the chromatography. Full article ">Figure 3
Glutamylation profile of 5-CH3-THF in high and low folate clones. * Different letters in the same row are significantly different (Least Significant Difference test, p < 0.05) and are based on three independent determinations. Full article ">

20 pages, 2010 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Zinc and Iron Agronomic Biofortification of Brassicaceae Microgreens

by Francesco Di Gioia, Spyridon A. Petropoulos, Monica Ozores-Hampton, Kelly Morgan and Erin N. Rosskopf

Agronomy 2019, 9(11), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110677 - 25 Oct 2019

Cited by 83 | Viewed by 10112

Abstract

Insufficient or suboptimal dietary intake of iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) represent a latent health issue affecting a large proportion of the global population, particularly among young children and women living in poor regions at high risk of malnutrition. Agronomic crop biofortification, which [...] Read more.

Insufficient or suboptimal dietary intake of iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) represent a latent health issue affecting a large proportion of the global population, particularly among young children and women living in poor regions at high risk of malnutrition. Agronomic crop biofortification, which consists of increasing the accumulation of target nutrients in edible plant tissues through fertilization or other eliciting factors, has been proposed as a short-term approach to develop functional staple crops and vegetables to address micronutrient deficiency. The aim of the presented study was to evaluate the potential for biofortification of Brassicaceae microgreens through Zn and Fe enrichment. The effect of nutrient solutions supplemented with zinc sulfate (Exp-1; 0, 5, 10, 20 mg L⁻¹) and iron sulfate (Exp-2; 0, 10, 20, 40 mg L⁻¹) was tested on the growth, yield, and mineral concentration of arugula, red cabbage, and red mustard microgreens. Zn and Fe accumulation in all three species increased according to a quadratic model. However, significant interactions were observed between Zn or Fe level and the species examined, suggesting that the response to Zn and Fe enrichment was genotype specific. The application of Zn at 5 and 10 mg L⁻¹ resulted in an increase in Zn concentration compared to the untreated control ranging from 75% to 281%, while solutions enriched with Fe at 10 and 20 mg L⁻¹ increased Fe shoot concentration from 64% in arugula up to 278% in red cabbage. In conclusion, the tested Brassicaceae species grown in soilless systems are good targets to produce high quality Zn and Fe biofortified microgreens through the simple manipulation of nutrient solution composition. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
Relationship between single shoot fresh weight (A), fresh yield (B), zinc plant tissue concentration (C) and nutrient solution zinc concentration for arugula, red cabbage, and red mustard. Equations and coefficient of determination (R2) are reported in <a href="#app1-agronomy-09-00677" class="html-app">Table S1</a>. Full article ">Figure 2
Arugula, red cabbage, and red mustard microgreens zinc (Zn) concentration in response to nutrient solution Zn level (0, 5, 10 mg L−1). Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE of three replications. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different (p < 0.05) using Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test. Full article ">Figure 3
Relationship between single shoot fresh weight (A), fresh yield (B), iron plant tissue concentration (C) and nutrient solution iron concentration for arugula, red cabbage, and red mustard. Equations and coefficient of determination (R2) are reported in <a href="#app1-agronomy-09-00677" class="html-app">Table S2</a>. Full article ">Figure 4
Arugula, red cabbage, and red mustard microgreens iron (Fe) concentration in response to nutrient solution Fe level (0, 10, 20 mg L−1). Vertical bars represent the mean ± SE of three replications. Different letters indicate means that are significantly different (p < 0.05) using Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test. Full article ">

18 pages, 2387 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Changes in the Chemical Composition of Six Lettuce Cultivars (Lactuca sativa L.) in Response to Biofortification with Iodine and Selenium Combined with Salicylic Acid Application

by Sylwester Smoleń, Iwona Kowalska, Peter Kováčik, Włodzimierz Sady, Marlena Grzanka and Umit Baris Kutman

Agronomy 2019, 9(10), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100660 - 19 Oct 2019

Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4069

Abstract

A two-year greenhouse study was conducted to assess the effects of the application of I (as KIO₃), Se (as Na₂SeO₃), and salicylic acid (SA) in nutrient solutions on the chemical composition of six lettuce cultivars, i.e., two [...] Read more.

A two-year greenhouse study was conducted to assess the effects of the application of I (as KIO₃), Se (as Na₂SeO₃), and salicylic acid (SA) in nutrient solutions on the chemical composition of six lettuce cultivars, i.e., two butterhead lettuces (BUTL), “Cud Voorburgu” and “Zimująca”; two iceberg lettuces (ICEL), “Maugli” and “Królowa lata”; and two Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa L. (REDL) cultivars, “Lollorossa” and “Redin”, grown in the NFT (nutrient film technique) system. The treatments were as follows: control, I+Se, I+Se+0.1 mg SA dm⁻³, I+Se+1.0 mg SA dm⁻³, and I+Se+10.0 mg SA dm⁻³. KIO₃ was used at a dose of 5 mg I dm⁻³, while Na₂SeO₃ was used at 0.5 mg Se dm⁻³. The application of I+Se was a mild abiotic stress factor for the plants of the ICEL and REDL cultivars. In contrast, I+Se did not have a negative impact on the BUTLcultivars. The application of 1.0 mg SA dm⁻³ improved the biomass productivity in all cultivars compared with I+Se. In the majority of the cultivars, the applied combinations of I+Se and I+Se+SA resulted in a reduction in the nitrate(V) content that was beneficial to the consumer and increased levels of sugars, phenols, phenylpropanoids, flavonols, and anthocyanins. In addition, an increase in ascorbic acid content was observed, but only in the BUTL cultivars and REDL “Redin”. The application of I, Se, and SA had upward or downward effects on the concentrations of N, K, P, Ca, Mg, S, Na, B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, and Zn in the leaves. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
Index of tolerance. Means for cultivars followed by the same letters separately for each treatment (type of nutrient solution) are not significantly different at p< 0.05. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 8). Full article ">Figure 2
Concentrations of ascorbic acid (A) and nitrate(V) (NO3−) (B) in lettuce. Means for cultivars followed by the same letters separately for each treatment (type of nutrient solution) are not significantly different at p< 0.05. LSD (least significant difference) for interaction “treatments × variety” at p< 0.05. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 8). f.w.—fresh matter weight. Full article ">Figure 3
Total sugars in lettuce as sum concentrations of glucose (full gradient), fructose (diagonal lines gradient), and sucrose (empty gradient). Means for cultivars followed by the same letters separately for each treatment (type of nutrient solution) and each kind of sugar are not significantly different at p< 0.05. Determination of homogeneous groups: lowercase black letters for glucose, lowercase blue italic letters for fructose, lowercase red bold italics for sucrose, and capital black letters for total sugars. LSD for interaction “treatments × variety” at p< 0.05. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 8). f.w.—fresh matter weight. Full article ">Figure 4
Concentrations of phenolic compounds (A), flavonols (B), phenylpropanoids (C), and anthocyanins (D) in lettuce. Means for cultivars followed by the same letters separately for each treatment (type of nutrient solution) are not significantly different at p< 0.05. LSD for interaction “treatments × variety” at p< 0.05. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 8). f.w.—fresh matter weight. Full article ">Figure 5
Concentrations of macronutrients: N (A), K (B), P (C), Ca (D), Mg (E), S (F), and Na (G) in lettuce. Means for cultivars followed by the same letters separately for each treatment (type of nutrient solution) are not significantly different at p< 0.05. LSD for interaction “treatments × variety” at p< 0.05. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 8). d.w.—dry matter weight. Full article ">Figure 6
Concentrations of micronutrients: B (A), Cu (B), Fe (C), Mn (D), Mo (E), and Zn (F) in lettuce. Means for cultivars followed by the same letters separately for each treatment (type of nutrient solution) are not significantly different at p< 0.05. LSD for interaction “treatments × variety” at p< 0.05. Bars indicate standard errors (n = 8). d.w.—dry matter weight. Full article ">

12 pages, 845 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Hydroponic Production of Reduced-Potassium Swiss Chard and Spinach: A Feasible Agronomic Approach to Tailoring Vegetables for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

by Massimiliano D’Imperio, Francesco F. Montesano, Massimiliano Renna, Angelo Parente, Antonio F. Logrieco and Francesco Serio

Agronomy 2019, 9(10), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9100627 - 11 Oct 2019

Cited by 17 | Viewed by 4679

Abstract

Tailored foods are specifically suitable for target groups of people with particular nutritional needs. Although most research on tailored foods has been focused on increasing the nutrient content in plant tissues (biofortification), in populations with specific physiological conditions, it is recommended to reduce [...] Read more.

Tailored foods are specifically suitable for target groups of people with particular nutritional needs. Although most research on tailored foods has been focused on increasing the nutrient content in plant tissues (biofortification), in populations with specific physiological conditions, it is recommended to reduce the uptake of specific nutrients in order to improve their health. People affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD) must limit their consumption of vegetables because of the generally high potassium (K) content in the edible parts. This study aimed to define an appropriate production technique for two baby leaf vegetables, spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) and Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris), with reduced K tissue content, minimizing the negative effects on their crop performance and overall nutritional quality. Plants were grown in a hydroponic floating system. The K concentration in the nutrient solution (NS) was reduced from 200 mg/L (K₂₀₀, the concentration usually used for growing baby leaf vegetables in hydroponic conditions) to 50 mg/L over the entire growing cycle (K₅₀) or only during the seven days before harvest (K_50-7d). The reduction of K in the NS resulted in a significant decrease of K tissue content in both species (32% for K₅₀ and 10% for K_50-7d, on average), while it did not, in general, compromise the crop performance and quality traits or the bioaccessibility of K, magnesium, and calcium. The production of reduced-potassium leafy vegetables is a feasible tailored nutrition approach for CKD patients in order to take advantage of the positive effects of vegetable consumption on health without excessively increasing potassium intake. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2764 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Enhancing Zinc Accumulation and Bioavailability in Wheat Grains by Integrated Zinc and Pesticide Application

by Peng Ning, Shaoxia Wang, Peiwen Fei, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Jinjin Dong, Jianglan Shi and Xiaohong Tian

Agronomy 2019, 9(9), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090530 - 11 Sep 2019

Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3692

Abstract

Incorporating foliar zinc (Zn) spray into existing pesticide application is considered highly cost-effective to biofortify wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Zn. However, the effectiveness of this combined approach in terms of Zn enrichment and bioavailability in grain and its milling fractions is [...] Read more.

Incorporating foliar zinc (Zn) spray into existing pesticide application is considered highly cost-effective to biofortify wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Zn. However, the effectiveness of this combined approach in terms of Zn enrichment and bioavailability in grain and its milling fractions is not well examined. Two-year field experiments were conducted in 2017 and 2018 with three sets of foliar applications (nil Zn as control, foliar Zn alone, and foliar Zn plus pesticides) at the anthesis, milk stage, or both. Compared to the control, grain yield was not affected by foliar Zn application alone or combined with pesticides, while the Zn concentrations and bioavailability substantially increased in the whole-grain, bran, and flour irrespective of spray timing. Yield losses by 28%–39% (2018 vs. 2017) led to 7%–18% and 18%–38% increase of Zn density in grain and flour, respectively. Further, such negative responses were uncoupled by foliar spray of Zn or Zn plus pesticides, and absent from the control plants. Nonetheless, grain Zn biofortification was achieved in both low- and high-yield plants with either Zn spray alone or combined with pesticides. Together with the enhanced Zn bioavailability in grain, bran, and flour, the effectiveness of this combined strategy is validated to biofortify wheat with Zn. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
The monthly precipitation and mean temperature during wheat growing seasons in 2016–2018. Full article ">Figure 2
The grain yield and grain Zn uptake in wheat plants harvested in 2017 and 2018. Treatments consisted of nil Zn spray (control, Ctrl) and foliar Zn application alone (Zn) or plus pesticides (PZn) at the anthesis (A), milk stage (M) or both (A+M). Pesticides were a mixture of fungicide + insecticide which were thiophanate-methyl + beta-cypermethrin at anthesis (P1ZnA) and triadimefon + imidacloprid at milk stage (P2ZnM). Vertical bars represent the standard error of four replications. Columns with no letter in common indicate significant differences between treatments each year by least significant difference (LSD) test (p < 0.05). Full article ">Figure 3
Zinc concentrations in grain, bran, and flour of wheat plants harvested in 2017 and 2018. Treatments consist of nil Zn spray (control, Ctrl) and foliar Zn application alone (Zn) or plus pesticides (PZn) at the anthesis (A), milk stage (M) or both (A+M). Pesticides were a mixture of fungicide + insecticide which were thiophanate-methyl + beta-cypermethrin at anthesis (P1ZnA) and triadimefon + imidacloprid at milk stage (P2ZnM). Vertical bars represent the standard error of four replications. Columns with no letter in common indicate significant differences between treatments each year by LSD test (p < 0.05). Full article ">Figure 4
The correlation analysis of grain Zn uptake (a) and concentration (b) against grain yield in wheat with nil Zn application (control) and foliar Zn spray (with and without pesticides). The arrow pointing data were removed from the trend-line to give a higher r2. ***, p < 0.001; n.s., not significant. Full article ">Figure 5
The protein and phytate concentrations in grain, bran, and flour in wheat with nil Zn spray (control) and foliar Zn application alone (Zn) or plus pesticides (P+Zn) in 2017 and 2018. Vertical bars represent the standard error of four replications. Full article ">Figure 6
Pearson correlation coefficients between Zn and protein concentrations and between Zn and phytate concentrations in grain, bran, and flour of wheat plants from all treatments (control, foliar Zn, and Zn plus pesticides) or from foliar Zn spray treated plants (with and without pesticides). *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001; n.s., not significant. Full article ">Figure 7
The estimated Zn bioavailability in whole-grain and its milling fractions (bran and flour) of wheat harvested in 2017 and 2018. Treatments consisted of nil Zn spray (control, Ctrl) and foliar Zn application alone (Zn) or plus pesticides (PZn) at the anthesis (A), milk stage (M) or both (A+M). Pesticides were a mixture of fungicide + insecticide which were thiophanate-methyl + beta-cypermethrin at anthesis (P1ZnA) and triadimefon + imidacloprid at milk stage (P2ZnM). Vertical bars represent the standard error of four replications. Columns with no letter in common indicate significant differences between treatments each year by LSD test (p < 0.05). Full article ">

24 pages, 381 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Nutrients’ and Antinutrients’ Seed Content in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Lines Carrying Mutations Affecting Seed Composition

by Gianluca Giuberti, Aldo Tava, Giuseppe Mennella, Luciano Pecetti, Francesco Masoero, Francesca Sparvoli, Antonio Lo Fiego and Bruno Campion

Agronomy 2019, 9(6), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060317 - 16 Jun 2019

Cited by 16 | Viewed by 6224

Abstract

Lectins, phytic acid and condensed tannins exert major antinutritional effects in common bean when grains are consumed as a staple food. In addition, phaseolin, i.e., the major storage protein of the bean seed, is marginally digested when introduced in the raw form. Our [...] Read more.

Lectins, phytic acid and condensed tannins exert major antinutritional effects in common bean when grains are consumed as a staple food. In addition, phaseolin, i.e., the major storage protein of the bean seed, is marginally digested when introduced in the raw form. Our breeding target was to adjust the nutrient/antinutrient balance of the bean seed for obtaining a plant food with improved nutritional value for human consumption. In this study, the seeds of twelve phytohaemagglutinin-E-free bean lines carrying the mutations low phytic acid, phytohaemagglutinin-L-free, α-Amylase inhibitors-free, phaseolin-free, and reduced amount of condensed tannins, introgressed and differently combined in seven genetic groups, were analyzed for their nutrient composition. Inedited characteristics, such as a strong positive correlation (+0.839 **) between the genetic combination “Absence of phaseolin + Presence of the α-Amylase Inhibitors” and the amount of “accumulated iron and zinc”, were detected. Three lines carrying this genetic combination showed a much higher iron content than the baseline (+22.4%) and one of them in particular, achieved high level (+29.1%; 91.37 µg g⁻¹) without any specific breeding intervention. If confirmed by scientific verification, the association of these genetic traits might be usefully exploited for raising iron and zinc seed content in a bean biofortification breeding program. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

18 pages, 1222 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Winter Wheat Grain Quality, Zinc and Iron Concentration Affected by a Combined Foliar Spray of Zinc and Iron Fertilizers

by Etienne Niyigaba, Angelique Twizerimana, Innocent Mugenzi, Wansim Aboubakar Ngnadong, Yu Ping Ye, Bang Mo Wu and Jiang Bo Hai

Agronomy 2019, 9(5), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9050250 - 20 May 2019

Cited by 74 | Viewed by 9195

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the main foods globally. Nutrition problems associated with Zinc and Iron deficiency affect more than two billion individuals. Biofortification is a strategy believed to be sustainable, economical and easily implemented. This study evaluated the effect [...] Read more.

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the main foods globally. Nutrition problems associated with Zinc and Iron deficiency affect more than two billion individuals. Biofortification is a strategy believed to be sustainable, economical and easily implemented. This study evaluated the effect of combined Zn and Fe applied as foliar fertilizer to winter wheat on grain yield, quality, Zn and Fe concentration in the grains. Results showed that treatments containing high Fe increased the yield. Grain crude fat content remained unaffected. Crude fiber was enhanced up to three-fold by 60% Zn + 40% Fe_5.5 (5.5 kg ha⁻¹ of 60% Zn + 40% Fe). Moreover, 80% Zn + 20% Fe_5.5 (5.5 kg ha⁻¹ of 80% Zn + 20% Fe) was the best combination for increasing crude protein. Zinc applied alone enhanced Zn concentration in grain. In addition, Fe was slightly improved by an application of Zn and Fe in the first year, but a greater increase was observed in the second year, where 100% Fe₁₃ (13 kg ha⁻¹ of 100% Fe) was the best in improving Fe in grain. Foliar application of Zn and Fe is a practical approach to increase Zn and Fe concentration, and to improve the quality of wheat grains. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

13 pages, 639 KiB

Open AccessReview

Legume Biofortification and the Role of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in a Sustainable Agricultural Era

by Mariana Roriz, Susana M. P. Carvalho, Paula M. L. Castro and Marta W. Vasconcelos

Agronomy 2020, 10(3), 435; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030435 - 22 Mar 2020

Cited by 33 | Viewed by 8528

Abstract

World population growth, together with climate changes and increased hidden hunger, bring an urgent need for finding sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural approaches to improve crop yield and nutritional value. The existing methodologies for enhancing the concentration of bioavailable micronutrients in edible crop tissues [...] Read more.

World population growth, together with climate changes and increased hidden hunger, bring an urgent need for finding sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural approaches to improve crop yield and nutritional value. The existing methodologies for enhancing the concentration of bioavailable micronutrients in edible crop tissues (i.e., biofortification), including some agronomic strategies, conventional plant breeding, and genetic engineering, have not always been successful. In recent years, the use of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) has been suggested as a promising approach for the biofortification of important crops, including legumes. Legumes have many beneficial health effects, namely, improved immunological, metabolic and hormonal regulation, anticarcinogenic and anti-inflammatory effects, and decreased risk of cardiovascular and obesity-related diseases. These crops also play a key role in the environment through symbiotic nitrogen (N) fixation, reducing the need for N fertilizers, reducing CO₂ emissions, improving soil composition, and increasing plant resistance to pests and diseases. PGPB act by a series of direct and indirect mechanisms to potentially improve crop yields and nutrition. This review will focus on the: (i) importance of legumes in the accomplishment of United Nations Sustainable Development Goals for production systems; (ii) understanding the role of PGPB in plant nutrition; (iii) iron biofortification of legumes with PGPB, which is an interesting case study of a green technology for sustainable plant-food production improving nutrition and promoting sustainable agriculture. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 743 KiB

Open AccessEditor’s ChoiceReview

Advances in Genomic Interventions for Wheat Biofortification: A Review

by Dinesh Kumar Saini, Pooja Devi and Prashant Kaushik

Agronomy 2020, 10(1), 62; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010062 - 2 Jan 2020

Cited by 56 | Viewed by 7727

Abstract

Wheat is an essential constituent of cereal-based diets, and one of the most significant sources of calories. However, modern wheat varieties are low in proteins and minerals. Biofortification is a method for increasing the availability of essential elements in the edible portions of [...] Read more.

Wheat is an essential constituent of cereal-based diets, and one of the most significant sources of calories. However, modern wheat varieties are low in proteins and minerals. Biofortification is a method for increasing the availability of essential elements in the edible portions of crops through agronomic or genetic and genomic interventions. Wheat biofortification, as a research topic, has become increasingly prevalent. Recent accomplishments in genomic biofortification could potentially be helpful for the development of biofortified wheat grains, as a sustainable solution to the issue of “hidden hunger”. Genomic interventions mainly include quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, marker-assisted selection (MAS), and genomic selection (GS). Developments in the identification of QTL and in the understanding of the physiological and molecular bases of the QTLs controlling the biofortification traits in wheat have revealed new horizons for the improvement of modern wheat varieties. Markers linked with the QTLs of desirable traits can be identified through QTL mapping, which can be employed for MAS. Besides MAS, a powerful tool, GS, also has great potential for crop improvement. We have compiled information from QTL mapping studies on wheat, carried out for the identification of the QTLs associated with biofortification traits, and have discussed the present status of MAS and different prospects of GS for wheat biofortification. Accelerated mapping studies, as well as MAS and GS schemes, are expected to improve wheat breeding efficiency further. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3467 KiB

Open AccessReview

Rice Biofortification: High Iron, Zinc, and Vitamin-A to Fight against “Hidden Hunger”

by Shuvobrata Majumder, Karabi Datta and Swapan Kumar Datta

Agronomy 2019, 9(12), 803; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120803 - 25 Nov 2019

Cited by 95 | Viewed by 19094

Abstract

One out of three humans suffer from micronutrient deficiencies called “hidden hunger”. Underprivileged people, including preschool children and women, suffer most from deficiency diseases and other health-related issues. Rice (Oryza sativa), a staple food, is their source of nutrients, contributing up [...] Read more.

One out of three humans suffer from micronutrient deficiencies called “hidden hunger”. Underprivileged people, including preschool children and women, suffer most from deficiency diseases and other health-related issues. Rice (Oryza sativa), a staple food, is their source of nutrients, contributing up to 70% of daily calories for more than half of the world’s population. Solving “hidden hunger” through rice biofortification would be a sustainable approach for those people who mainly consume rice and have limited access to diversified food. White milled rice grains lose essential nutrients through polishing. Therefore, seed-specific higher accumulation of essential nutrients is a necessity. Through the method of biofortification (via genetic engineering/molecular breeding), significant increases in iron and zinc with other essential minerals and provitamin-A (β-carotene) was achieved in rice grain. Many indica and japonica rice cultivars have been biofortified worldwide, being popularly known as ‘high iron rice’, ‘low phytate rice’, ‘high zinc rice’, and ‘high carotenoid rice’ (golden rice) varieties. Market availability of such varieties could reduce “hidden hunger”, and a large population of the world could be cured from iron deficiency anemia (IDA), zinc deficiency, and vitamin-A deficiency (VAD). In this review, different approaches of rice biofortification with their outcomes have been elaborated and discussed. Future strategies of nutrition improvement using genome editing (CRISPR/Cas9) and the need of policy support have been highlighted. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 832 KiB

Open AccessReview

Possible Roles of Rhizospheric and Endophytic Microbes to Provide a Safe and Affordable Means of Crop Biofortification

by Yee-Shan Ku, Hafiz Mamoon Rehman and Hon-Ming Lam

Agronomy 2019, 9(11), 764; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110764 - 16 Nov 2019

Cited by 45 | Viewed by 8357

Abstract

Biofortification has been used to improve micronutrient contents in crops for human consumption. In under-developed regions, it is important to fortify crops so that people can obtain essential micronutrients despite the limited variety in their diets. In wealthy societies, fortified crops are regarded [...] Read more.

Biofortification has been used to improve micronutrient contents in crops for human consumption. In under-developed regions, it is important to fortify crops so that people can obtain essential micronutrients despite the limited variety in their diets. In wealthy societies, fortified crops are regarded as a “greener” choice for health supplements. Biofortification is also used in crops to boost the contents of other non-essential secondary metabolites which are considered beneficial to human health. Breeding of elite germplasms and metabolic engineering are common approaches to fortifying crops. However, the time required for breeding and the acceptance of genetically modified crops by the public have presented significant hurdles. As an alternative approach, microbe-mediated biofortification has not received the attention it deserves, despite having great potential. It has been reported that the inoculation of soil or crops with rhizospheric or endophytic microbes, respectively, can enhance the micronutrient contents in various plant tissues including roots, leaves and fruits. In this review, we highlight the applications of microbes as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative for biofortification by improving the mineral, vitamin, and beneficial secondary metabolite contents in crops through naturally occurring processes. In addition, the complex plant–microbe interactions involved in biofortification are also addressed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 801 KiB

Open AccessReview

Microalgal Biostimulants and Biofertilisers in Crop Productions

by Domenico Ronga, Elisa Biazzi, Katia Parati, Domenico Carminati, Elio Carminati and Aldo Tava

Agronomy 2019, 9(4), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040192 - 15 Apr 2019

Cited by 318 | Viewed by 23129

Abstract

Microalgae are attracting the interest of agrochemical industries and farmers, due to their biostimulant and biofertiliser properties. Microalgal biostimulants (MBS) and biofertilisers (MBF) might be used in crop production to increase agricultural sustainability. Biostimulants are products derived from organic material that, applied in [...] Read more.

Microalgae are attracting the interest of agrochemical industries and farmers, due to their biostimulant and biofertiliser properties. Microalgal biostimulants (MBS) and biofertilisers (MBF) might be used in crop production to increase agricultural sustainability. Biostimulants are products derived from organic material that, applied in small quantities, are able to stimulate the growth and development of several crops under both optimal and stressful conditions. Biofertilisers are products containing living microorganisms or natural substances that are able to improve chemical and biological soil properties, stimulating plant growth, and restoring soil fertility. This review is aimed at reporting developments in the processing of MBS and MBF, summarising the biologically-active compounds, and examining the researches supporting the use of MBS and MBF for managing productivity and abiotic stresses in crop productions. Microalgae are used in agriculture in different applications, such as amendment, foliar application, and seed priming. MBS and MBF might be applied as an alternative technique, or used in conjunction with synthetic fertilisers, crop protection products and plant growth regulators, generating multiple benefits, such as enhanced rooting, higher crop yields and quality and tolerance to drought and salt. Worldwide, MBS and MBF remain largely unexploited, such that this study highlights some of the current researches and future development priorities. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofortification of Crops)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Biofortification of Crops

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (19 papers)

Research

Review

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI