Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Article in Journal
Statistical Analysis of Extreme Dry Events in the Tunisian Sub-Humid Region Based on Probability Laws
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Sustainable Optimal Marine Microgrid Active-Power Management and Control Including Hybrid Power Generation and Multiple-Energy Storage Devices
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Characterizing the Impact of Hydrants on Transients †

1
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
2
Scottish Water, Edinburgh EH10 6YQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd International Joint Conference on Water Distribution Systems Analysis & Computing and Control for the Water Industry (WDSA/CCWI 2024), Ferrara, Italy, 1–4 July 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 69(1), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069208
Published: 27 November 2024

Abstract

:
Attempts have been made to detect and locate leakage using hydraulic transients; however, there has been limited success under field-based conditions on operational systems. It is believed that this is partly due to fire hydrants, the most convenient access points, complicating the signal generated and received in the operational systems. Using the transient simulator TSNet based on the method of characteristics (MOC), this paper demonstrates that hydrants can have a significant impact on transient signals and that characterizing and filtering for the hydrant impact can lead to more accurate leak localization. A practical method for characterizing hydrant properties is proposed using an inverse transient analysis approach (ITA) and validated numerically.

1. Introduction

Hydraulic transients have been shown to be potentially useful for locating leakage, unknown faults, and other asset information in water distribution systems [1]. This is dependent on a well-characterized input signal [2]. The majority of research has been conducted in laboratory conditions with transients induced using valves located directly on the pipeline, either using side discharge or in-line valves. This is impractical for implementation in operational systems; it is more likely that transients will be induced through fire hydrants. Brunone et al. [3] highlighted the complications added to input signals when a transient is induced through a hydrant, with additional reflections generated by the hydrant bowl, standpipe, and other ancillaries. This work conceptualizes the ancillary features as composed of a standpipe, hydrant, and connector (Figure 1). The standpipe and hydrant are going to be relatively invariant from site to site; however, the connectors can vary more greatly. It should be noted that the hydrants which are complicating the transient signal are also the points used for signal capture.
This paper has two aims. Firstly, to determine the impact of hydrants and ancillary features on transient signals and the consequent impact on leak detection. This will be explored through simulation of the transmitted and received transient signal with different ancillary features and a correlation technique to determine the impact on leak localization. Secondly, a method for determining connector properties is proposed and validated, which should facilitate the accurate modelled representation of ancillary features in field-based conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Impact of Hydrant and Ancillary Features

To determine the impact of the hydrant and its ancillary features modelling work has been conducted using TSNet [4] which is transient modelling software that uses the method of characteristics. Each feature is given its own length, wavespeed, and diameter, with relevant characteristics shown in Table 1. A wavespeed of 400 m/s would represent a plastic pipe, which would have corresponding viscoelastic properties; however, for the purposes of this study, steady friction alone has been modelled. The valve closure time is 5 ms, which is realistic for a mechanical valve closure attached to a hydrant [5].
The connector pipe which attaches the hydrant to the main pipeline has been given a variable wavespeed of between 400 and 1400 m/s. The purpose of this is to determine whether accurately characterizing the ancillary features has a significant impact on the transient waves. The ‘modelled’ transient wave reflected back from the leak has been correlated with the ‘measured’ pressure signal to identify the location of the leak from the correlation peak. This process of identifying the leak location has been replicated for various levels of additional white Gaussian noise to verify the impact in more realistic conditions. The ‘Correlation confidence’ (Equation (1)) is then plotted for the various levels of additional noise.
C o r r e l a t i o n   c o n f i d e n c e = C o r r e l a t i o n   v a l u e × R e a l   l e a k   t i m e R e a l   l e a k   t i m e i d e n t i f i e d   l e a k   t i m e R e a l   l e a k   t i m e
To identify the leak time determined by the correlations, the largest peak between 0.35 and 0.45 s has been identified. As there are multiple peaks in the signal, an identification ‘boundary’ had to be imposed, and this range was deemed appropriate.

2.2. Determining Connector Properties

The standpipe and hydrant properties can be determined in advance through a combination of physical measurement and fitting transient data. This is because the same standpipe can be used for testing and its features determined beforehand, and hydrants are built to the same standard and are relatively invariant. Of the ancillary features this alone leaves the connector as uncharacterized. To determine connector properties an initial transient test is proposed using a high sampling frequency and solenoid valve, followed by an inverse transient analysis (ITA) approach to fit the ‘modelled’ transient signal before any reflections are received from the main pipeline to the ‘measured’ transient signal. All work conducted is based on a modelling approach; however, for the purposes of this paper, the ‘measured’ signal is assumed to be when the connector has a wavespeed of 700 m/s, diameter of 0.05 m, and length of 2 m. The three properties of the connector—wavespeed, diameter, and length—are varied using a brute force optimization algorithm with the root mean squared error (RMSE) being the output. This is carried out to characterize the search space when connector properties are varied giving an indication of what optimization techniques may be appropriate.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Impact of Hydrant and Ancillary Feature

Results from Figure 2c show the correlation confidence (Equation (1)) results and how they vary with different levels of additional noise. With no noise and the correct connector wavespeed (700 m/s), the correlation confidence is 1, and this confidence decreases as noise is added and incorrect connector wavespeeds are used. This shows that correctly identifying the connector wavespeed increases the leakage localization accuracy, and this relationship is maintained even when the noise added to the signal becomes large enough so as to obscure any discernable pattern in the leak reflection (Figure 2a). These results support the conclusion that correctly determining the properties of ancillary features is important for accurate transient based leakage detection even in noisy conditions.

3.2. Determining Connector Properties

The optimization results show clearly that the correct connector properties are identified when using a brute force optimization method. Local minima are identified for Figure 3c (diameter and length), but not for Figure 3a (length and wavespeed) or Figure 3b (diameter and wavespeed). This suggests that if the length or diameter of the connector can be identified beforehand, the problem is convex and a simple gradient-based optimization algorithm will work for determining the connector properties. Otherwise, if length and diameter are unknown, a more sophisticated optimization technique will be required to avoid local minima traps. However, the principle of using the initial transient signal as a basis for an ITA-based approach to determine connector properties is shown to work.

4. Conclusions

Modelling work has been performed which shows the importance of correctly modelling hydrants and ancillary features for transient based leakage detection. To increase the accuracy of transient-based methods, it is important to include and accurately model the ancillary features. Of particular note is the connector, which is buried underground, with features that cannot be predetermined. An ITA analysis-based approach, which uses the initial wave reflection to accurately model these features, has been suggested and has been shown to be successful. Future work will look at applying these findings in field-based conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., J.B. and S.Y.; methodology, C.W., R.C. and J.B.; software, C.W.; validation, C.W.; formal analysis, C.W.; investigation, C.W.; resources, C.W.; data curation, C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.W.; writing—review and editing, C.W., R.C., J.B. and S.Y.; visualization, C.W.; supervision, R.C. and J.B.; project administration, R.C.; funding acquisition, R.C. and J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Scottish Water and the ESPRC through the Water Infrastructure and Resilience (WIRe) Centre for Doctoral Training (EP/S023666/1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Che, T.C.; Duan, H.F.; Lee, P.J. Transient wave-based methods for anomaly detection in fluid pipes: A review. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 160, 107874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zeng, W.; Gong, J.; Simpson, A.R.; Cazzolato, B.S.; Zecchin, A.C.; Lambert, M.F. Paired-IRF Method for Detecting Leaks in Pipe Networks. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2020, 146, 04020021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brunone, B.; Maietta, F.; Capponi, C.; Keramat, A.; Meniconi, S. A review of physical experiments for leak detection in water pipes through transient tests for addressing future research. J. Hydraul. Res. 2022, 60, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xing, L.; Sela, L. Transient simulations in water distribution networks: TSNet python package. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2020, 149, 102884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stephens, M.L.; Lambert, M.F.; Simpson, A.R. Determining the Internal Wall Condition of a Water Pipeline in the Field Using an Inverse Transient. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2013, 139, 310–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Modelled pipeline.
Figure 1. Modelled pipeline.
Engproc 69 00208 g001
Figure 2. (a) ‘Measured’ pressure signal with noise; (b) noiseless correlation results; (c) correlation confidence with noise.
Figure 2. (a) ‘Measured’ pressure signal with noise; (b) noiseless correlation results; (c) correlation confidence with noise.
Engproc 69 00208 g002
Figure 3. Connector calibration results. (a) Length and wavespeed, (b) diameter and wavespeed, (c) diameter and length.
Figure 3. Connector calibration results. (a) Length and wavespeed, (b) diameter and wavespeed, (c) diameter and length.
Engproc 69 00208 g003
Table 1. Properties of modelled pipeline.
Table 1. Properties of modelled pipeline.
PipeLength (m)Diameter (m)Wavespeed (m/s)
1750.05400
2150.05400
3400.05400
420.05400/700/1000/1400
50.30.121000
610.081000
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Whitelegg, C.; Collins, R.; Boxall, J.; Young, S. Characterizing the Impact of Hydrants on Transients. Eng. Proc. 2024, 69, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069208

AMA Style

Whitelegg C, Collins R, Boxall J, Young S. Characterizing the Impact of Hydrants on Transients. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 69(1):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Whitelegg, Charlie, Richard Collins, Joby Boxall, and Scott Young. 2024. "Characterizing the Impact of Hydrants on Transients" Engineering Proceedings 69, no. 1: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069208

APA Style

Whitelegg, C., Collins, R., Boxall, J., & Young, S. (2024). Characterizing the Impact of Hydrants on Transients. Engineering Proceedings, 69(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024069208

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop