Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Next Article in Journal
Autoimmune Thyroid Disease and Sjögren Disease: Organ-Specific Disease Triggered by Systemic Autoimmunity?
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Standard Care Versus Intrinsic Relaxation at Home on Physiological Parameters in Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Comparative Cohort Study from Romania
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Potential of SHAP and Machine Learning for Personalized Explanations of Influencing Factors in Myopic Treatment for Children
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Protein Expression in Warmed Human Lens Epithelium Cells Using Shotgun Proteomics

1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Osaka 577-8502, Japan
2
Research Promotion Headquarters, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan
3
Faculty of Pharmacy, Keio University, 1-5-30 Shibakoen, Tokyo 105-8512, Japan
4
Faculty of Pharmacy, Teikyo University, 2-11-1 Kaga, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan
5
Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada 920-0293, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Medicina 2025, 61(2), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020286
Submission received: 18 January 2025 / Revised: 1 February 2025 / Accepted: 4 February 2025 / Published: 7 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ophthalmology: New Diagnostic and Treatment Approaches)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: In previous studies, we reported that the assessment of the cumulative thermal dose in the crystalline lens, conducted through computational modeling utilizing a supercomputer and the biothermal transport equation, exhibited a significant association with the incidence of nuclear cataracts. In this study, we have investigated the types of proteins that expressed underlying 35.0 °C (normal-temp) and 37.5 °C (warming-temp) by using the shotgun liquid chromatography (LC) with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)-based global proteomic approach. Materials and Methods: We have discussed the changes in protein expression in warmed iHLEC-NY2 cells using Gene Ontology analysis and a label-free semiquantitative method based on spectral counting. Results: In iHLEC-NY2, 615 proteins were detected, including 307 (49.9%) present in both lenses cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp, 130 (21.1%) unique to the lens cultured at normal-temp, and 178 (29.0%) unique to the lens cultured at warming-temp. Furthermore, LC–MS/MS analysis showed that warming decreased the expression of actin, alpha cardiac muscle 1, actin-related protein 2, putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 17-like protein 1, ubiquitin-ribosomal protein eL40 fusion protein, ribosome biogenesis protein BMS1 homolog, histone H2B type 1-M, and histone H2A.J. in iHLEC-NY2. Conclusions: The decreases in the specific protein levels of actin, tubulin, ubiquitin, ribosomes, and histones may be related to cataract development under warming conditions. This investigation could provide a critical framework for understanding the correlation between temperature dynamics and the development of nuclear cataracts.

1. Introduction

Cataracts are a leading cause of blindness worldwide. With the increasing lifespan worldwide, the number of individuals whose sight is threatened by this disease is expected to increase. There are four major types of cataracts: cortical, nuclear, posterior subcapsular, and mixed. Different risk factors were associated with each risk type. Epidemiological research has identified multiple factors that are linked to an elevated risk of developing nuclear cataracts (NUCs), including greater sunlight exposure, lower socioeconomic status, poorer nutrition, smoking, cortical cataracts due to diabetes, greater sunlight exposure, and female sex [1,2,3,4]. NUCs have the greatest clinical significance because they are the most common type of cataracts and occur along the visual axis. Treatments that prevent the appearance or delay the progression of NUCs have significant therapeutic value. Previous research has shown that the prevalence of NUCs, graded at level ≥1 according to the World Health Organization (WHO) cataract grading system, was notably higher in tropical and subtropical regions than in temperate and subarctic regions, regardless of racial factors [5,6,7]. Therefore, elevated lens temperatures resulting from higher environmental temperatures may contribute to an increased risk of NUC formation.
Thus, we hypothesized that the occurrence of cataracts is associated with environmental temperature. The supporting evidence includes a study on ambient temperature effects, where the lens temperature of monkeys exposed to direct sunlight at 49 °C increased to 41 °C within 10 min [8]. Similarly, in rabbits, the lens temperature decreased by 7 °C when maintained in an environment at 4 °C [9]. Another rabbit-based experiment demonstrated significant correlations between ambient temperature under sunlight and the temperatures of the lens and posterior chamber aqueous humor [8].
In this study, we investigated the relationship between environmental temperature and lens temperature through an in silico computer simulation. The lens temperature was estimated to range between 35 °C and 37.5 °C depending on the ambient temperature surrounding the eyeball. However, when the ambient temperature exceeded 30 °C, the estimated lens temperature varied with age, showing an increase in older individuals [10]. Our study showed that, as environmental temperatures rise, the temperature of the eye lens increases to 35–37.5 °C or higher, which correlates with the development of NUCs. The temperature increase, particularly in the lens nucleus, coincides with the opacity area of the cataract. When the lens temperature exceeds 37.5 °C, cumulative heat exposure is positively correlated with NUC incidence [5,10]. This suggests that prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures, especially with aging, may increase the risk of developing NUCs. In addition, we previously investigated the relationship between temperature and NUC incidence in the rat whole lens (including the epithelium, cortex, and nucleus) using a shotgun proteomic analysis approach and showed that the levels of actin, tubulin, vimentin, filensin, and fatty acid-binding protein 5 decreased under warming-temperatures (37.5 °C) [11]. However, it remains unclear whether similar results can be obtained in the human lens, and the detailed mechanisms underlying these findings have yet to be elucidated.
Based on this background, identifying the expression of proteins that fluctuate under warming conditions in human lens cells and discussing preventive measures could contribute to the clinical prevention of NUCs. In this study, we employed a shotgun proteomic analysis approach [12,13] in iHLEC-NY2 (human lens epithelial cells) to investigate the cataractous factors that are relevant to normal and warming conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Culture Cells

The immortalized human lens epithelial cell line iHLEC-NY2 was used as described by Yamamoto et al. [14]. Briefly, the iHLEC-NY2 cell line (source of the cell line “Fujita Health University, Research Promotion Headquarters”), derived from human lens epithelial cells and transfected with modified SV40 large T antigen [15,16], was cultured in medium containing FBS, bFGF, GlutaMAXTM I, DMEM/F12, and penicillin–streptomycin. Cells were cultured at 35.0 °C (normal-temp) and 37.5 °C (warming-temp) in a 5% CO2 incubator. The experiment using iHLEC-NY2 was approved by the Ethic Review Committee of Fujita Health University (No. 004, approval date 1 April 2021) and Kanazawa Medical University Biosafety Committee for Recombinant DNA Research (Approval No. 2020-18, approval date 11 November 2020).

2.2. Tryptic Digestion of Proteins Extracted from iHLEC-NY2

iHLEC-NY2 cells were homogenized using at the Minute™ total protein extraction kit for mass spectrometry (Invent Biotechnologies, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Gel-free trypsin digestion was performed as previously described [17]. Briefly, 10 µg of protein extract from each sample was reduced at 37.5 °C for 30 min using 20 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer and 45 mM dithiothreitol. Subsequently, the proteins were alkylated with 100 mM iodoacetamide in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer at 37.5 °C for 30 min. Following this alkylation, the samples were digested at 37.5 °C for 24 h using MS-grade trypsin gold (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA) at a trypsin-to-protein ratio of 1:100 (w:w). Finally, the digested peptides were purified using PepClean C-18 Spin Columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Identification of Proteins

The analysis was performed following our previous study [12,13]. Briefly, peptide samples (2 µg) were injected using a peptide L-trap column (Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan) and HTC PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland). Peptide separation occurred on a Paradigm MS4 system (AMR Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with a reverse-phase C18 column (L-column, 3-µm gel particles, 120 Å pore size, and 0.2 mm × 150 mm) at a flow rate of 1 µL/min. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (solution A) and acetonitrile (solution B), with gradient elution from 5% to 40% solution B over 120 min. Peptides were analyzed using an LTQ ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) without sheath or auxiliary gas. MS scan sequences included full-scan MS followed by MS/MS of the two most intense peaks, with parameters optimized for fragmentation. MS/MS data were searched against the SwissProt database using Mascot version 2.4.01, enabling trypsin digestion, missed cleavages, and modifications such as cysteine carbamidomethylation and methionine oxidation. In this study, the fold change in expression was determined as the log2-transformed ratio of protein abundance (Rsc) and assessed via spectral counting [18]. Rsc was calculated by Equation (1) as follows:
R s c = l o g 2 n s + f n n + f + l o g 2 t n + n n + f t s + n s f
In addition, the normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) [19] was computed by Equation (2) as follows:
N S A F = S p C n / L n S U M ( S p C n / L n )
Here, nn and ns represent the spectral counts for proteins in rat retinas, whereas tn and ts indicate the total spectral counts for all proteins in each sample. The correction factor, denoted as ƒ, was 1.25. SpCn refers to the spectral count of the protein in rat lenses incubated at normal-temp and warming-temp, while Ln denotes the protein length in these conditions. Proteins were considered differentially expressed when the Rsc value was greater than 2 or less than −2, which corresponded to fold changes greater than 2 or less than 0.5, respectively.

2.4. Bioinformatics

This study explored the roles of proteins that exhibited notable changes under normal and warming conditions. The sequences were annotated by assigning Gene Ontology (GO) terms corresponding to molecular functions, cellular components, and biological processes, along with Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathways, utilizing the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, https://davidbioinformatics.nih.gov/tools.jsp, accessed on 3 February 2025) [20,21,22]. Additionally, p-values for the GO analysis were computed through this database tool.

3. Results

Protein Expression in iHLEC-NY2 With or Without Warming

Amounts of 437 and 485 proteins were identified in iHLEC-NY2 cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp, respectively (Figure 1A). Moreover, 615 proteins were detected in iHLEC-NY2, including 307 (49.9%) present in both lenses cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp, 130 (21.1%) unique to the lens cultured at normal-temp, and 178 (29.0%) unique to the lens cultured at warming-temp (Figure 1A). Next, we investigated the proteins expressed in the iHLEC-NY2 cells. Figure 1B shows the Rsc values for the proteins identified in the lenses cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp. A positive Rsc value indicated enhanced expression of proteins in the iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at elevated temperatures, while a negative value signified reduced expression. Additionally, the NSAF value was computed for each protein identified in iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at both normal- and warming-temp. Proteins with Rsc values greater than 2 or less than −2 were identified as candidate proteins exhibiting differential regulation in response to the different culture conditions. At different culture temperatures, the housekeeping protein levels (GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) did not change.
We performed a GO analysis on the candidate proteins regulated in the iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at elevated temperatures. For this analysis, we queried GO terms using the DAVID database, and the results of “molecular function”, “cellular component”, “biological processes”, and “KEGG pathway” are shown in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. In the categories of “molecular function”, “cellular component”, “biological processes”, and “KEGG pathway”, the detected counts were 29, 44, 43, and 16, respectively. Among these, the most abundant terms in each category were “protein binding”, “extracellular exosome”, “nucleosome assembly”, and “neutrophil extracellular trap formation”, respectively.
In addition, we listed proteins with expression changes at warming-temp that showed Rsc > 2 or <−2 via the label-free semiquantitative method based on spectral counting (Table 5 and Table 6). The proteins demonstrating Rsc > 2 or <−2 were detected to be 30 in total, and, at warming-temp, the expression levels of 19 proteins were upregulated, while the expression levels of another 11 proteins were downregulated. In this study, our focus was on the downregulated proteins at warming-temp since they are more prone to being influenced than overexpressed proteins. The factors in this study were actin, alpha cardiac muscle 1, actin-related protein 2, putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 17-like protein 1, ubiquitin-ribosomal protein eL40 fusion protein, ribosome biogenesis protein BMS1 homolog, histone H2B type 1-M, and histone H2A.J. Keratin was also detected via proteomic analysis. However, because keratin is not present in the lens, the possibility of contamination during lens extraction has been suggested.

4. Discussion

Previous research has shown that the prevalence of NUCs, graded at level ≥1 according to the WHO cataract grading system, was notably higher in tropical and subtropical regions than in temperate and subarctic regions regardless of racial factors [5,6,7]. In addition, it was reported that cumulative heat exposure is positively corelated with NUC incidence when the lens temperature exceeds 37.5 °C [5,10]. Thus, elevated lens temperatures resulting from higher environmental temperatures may contribute to an increased risk of NUC formation. However, the exact connection between NUCs and temperature is yet to be fully understood. We demonstrated the types of proteins expressed under normal and warming conditions by using shotgun proteomic analysis and found a decrease in the specific proteins involved in actin, tubulin, ubiquitin, ribosome, and histone under warming conditions in this study.
First, we determined the incubation temperature at normal-temp and warming-temp following a previous computer simulation in silico study [14] and identified 30 proteins exhibiting > 2-fold changes in expression between iHLEC-NY2 under normal-temp and warming-temp. Furthermore, the effect on the expression system is typically more significant when a protein is underexpressed compared to when it is overexpressed. Therefore, we have focused on variations in the expression of 11 factors (the specific proteins concerned were actin, tubulin, ubiquitin, ribosome, and histone), as described in Table 6. Decreased actin and tubulin expression was observed under warming conditions (Table 1). The cytoskeleton of the human eye, comprising actin microfilaments, intermediate filaments, microtubules, and their associated proteins, is essential for cellular growth, maturation, differentiation, integrity, and function. Actin microfilaments are composed of F-actin helices, which are built from G-actin subunits (47 kD) [23,24]. These filaments are distributed throughout the cytoplasm, form a fine mesh under the plasma membrane, or organize into stress fibers. The processes of actin polymerization and depolymerization are modulated by actin-regulatory proteins such as gelsolin. Additionally, various associated proteins bind actin filaments to the plasma membrane, supporting the cellular architecture [23,24]. Therefore, a decrease in actin levels may weaken cell membrane protein binding, resulting in lens opacity.
The putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B is a cytoskeletal protein that constitutes a part of a structure known as microtubules. Microtubules play a crucial role in maintaining cell shape, cell division, and intracellular transport. Tubulin forms microtubules by dimerizing α-tubulin and β-tubulin, thereby providing structural stability within cells. The lens cells rely on microtubules to maintain their morphology [25]. Tubulin dysfunction can compromise microtubule stability, thus leading to alterations in cell shape and function, which may result in the loss of lens transparency. Furthermore, microtubules are essential for the proper transport of proteins within cells, including lens cells, where their functions are critical [26]. Abnormalities in putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B may disrupt protein transport, potentially causing protein aggregation within the lens. This aggregation contributes to lens opacification. Additionally, because microtubules are involved in the proliferation and maintenance of lens cells, tubulin defects can lead to cellular dysfunction, which may contribute to lens opacity. Therefore, the putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B plays a vital role in maintaining the structural integrity of lens cells and protein transport. A reduction in putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B under high-temperature conditions may be one of the factors that contribute to lens opacification.
In addition, the expression of the proteins related to ubiquitin and ribosome in warming-temp-incubated iHLEC-NY2 was also lower than that in normal-temp-incubated iHLEC-NY2. Many of the signals that maintain lens epithelia appear to be substrates of the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway [27]. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L17-like protein 1 is an enzyme that is responsible for protein degradation and is particularly involved in the ubiquitin–proteasome system, a key protein quality control mechanism [28,29]. This system is essential for preserving cellular homeostasis by facilitating the elimination of damaged or misfolded proteins.
The eL40 fusion protein consists of ubiquitin, which tags damaged or unnecessary proteins for degradation, and the ribosomal protein eL40, which is involved in protein synthesis [30]. The BMS1 homolog is crucial for ribosome assembly, particularly ribosomal RNA (rRNA) processing and ribosomal subunit assembly [31]. Ribosomes are essential for protein synthesis within cells, and proteins such as BMS1 are indispensable for the proper formation of functional ribosomes [32]. Impairment of ribosome biogenesis can lead to increased production of misfolded proteins, especially in long-lived cells such as lens cells, which can contribute to cataract formation. Therefore, dysfunctions or mutations in BMS1 may increase the risk of cataract development.
Histones are key proteins involved in DNA packaging within the nuclei of eukaryotic cells. They wrap DNA to form chromatin, thus enabling it to be compactly stored and to regulate gene expression [33]. If histone modifications or structural changes adversely affect the expression of genes that are critical for maintaining lens transparency, improper protein folding and aggregation within the lens may occur, leading to loss of lens transparency.
Moreover, we examined their functions by analyzing the four GO terms (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). The GO analysis indicated that the most common factors identified in the molecular function, cellular component, biological processes, and KEGG pathway categories were “protein binding”, “extracellular exosome”, “nucleosome assembly”, and “neutrophil extracellular trap formation”, respectively (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). The proteins involved in protein binding were actin and alpha cardiac muscle 1. The proteins associated with extracellular exosomes included actin, alpha cardiac muscle 1, actin-related protein 2, ribosome biogenesis protein BMS1 homolog, histone H2B type 1-M, and histone H2B type 1-M. Additionally, the protein involved in nucleosome assembly was histone H2B type 1-M. Taken together, it is possible that factors associated with actin, ribosomes, and histones are specifically involved in the onset of cataracts due to temperature changes. However, the present results also show that the expression of other proteins related to tubulin and histones, such as tubulin alpha-1C chain and histone-H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I, -H2B type F-S, -H2B type 1-D, -H2A type 1-H, and -H3.1, increases at warming-temp (Table 5). Therefore, changes in the tubulin and histone levels may be associated with homeostatic maintenance. Further investigations are required in order to determine whether the decrease or increase in these proteins at higher ambient temperatures plays a dominant role.
It is crucial to explore whether the overexpression of certain proteins and the reduction in others at elevated temperatures are associated with lens dysfunction. In our previous study utilizing a similar shotgun proteomic analysis, we demonstrated that heating the rat whole lens (including the epithelium, cortex, and nucleus) at warming-temp resulted in reductions in actin, tubulin, vimentin, filensin, and fatty acid-binding protein 5 [11]. Among these, both actin and tubulin were found to decrease upon heating in both the rat lens and iHLEC-NY2. These findings suggest that the observed reductions in actin and tubulin may at least be attributable to epithelial cells. Thus, this study has successfully screened lens proteins that change in response to elevated temperature, which were previously unidentified as potential causes of NUCs. As a result, it is now possible to consider temperature-related factors in NUC development, contributing to future research advancements. However, this study does not fully reflect the changes occurring in the nuclear or cortical regions of the lens since human epithelial cells were used. Moreover, additional research is required to assess the relationship between the onset of NUCs and changes in the proteins involved in actin, tubulin, ubiquitin, ribosomes, and histones. Therefore, we are planning to measure the localization and expression of the specific proteins concerning actin, tubulin, ubiquitin, ribosomes, and histones under warming-temp by using Western blotting and an immunostaining method.

5. Conclusions

The conducted shotgun proteomic analysis revealed that warming decreased the expression of specific proteins involved in actin, tubulin, ubiquitin, ribosomes, and histones in iHLEC-NY2. This study could provide a valuable framework for understanding the relationship between temperature and the onset of NUCs. However, additional research is necessary to fully comprehend the mechanisms that link these factors. In addition, regarding the clinical correlation of shotgun proteomics and future directions, it is desirable to investigate whether similar protein fluctuations occur using postoperative samples from human NUC patients. Furthermore, establishing prevention or treatment strategies for nuclear cataracts by suppressing these protein fluctuations is anticipated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.O. and N.N.; methodology, H.O., A.T., H.S. and N.N.; formal analysis, H.O., T.Y., N.Y., Y.N., Y.M. and A.T.; investigation, H.O., T.Y., N.Y., Y.N., Y.M. and H.S.; data curation, H.O., T.Y., A.T. and H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, H.O. and N.N.; writing—review and editing, H.O. and N.N.; visualization, N.N.; supervision, N.N.; funding acquisition, N.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Takeda Science Foundation Pharmaceutical Research Grants (grant number: 2024068087).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Fujita Health University (No. 004, approval date 1 April 2021) and was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human tissue. This gene-recombination experiment was approved by the Kanazawa Medical University Biosafety Committee for Recombinant DNA Research (Approval No. 2020-18, approval date 11 November 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw MS data files were deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the jPOST partner repository (http://jpostdb.org, accessed on 18 January 2025) under the dataset identifier PXD059029/JPST003507. Publicly available datasets, such as the UniProt dataset (https://www.uniprot.org/help/downloads, accessed on 18 January 2025) utilized in this study, can also be accessed through their respective repositories following the guidelines provided by the data-sharing platforms. The data generated in this study can be requested from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

DAVIDDatabase for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
GOGene Ontology
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
LC–MS/MSLiquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry
NSAFNormalized spectral abundance factor
NSINanoelectrospray ionization
NUCNuclear cataract
Rsclog2-transformed ratio of protein abundances

References

  1. Robman, L.; Taylor, H. External factors in the development of cataract. Eye 2005, 19, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chua, J.; Koh, J.Y.; Tan, A.G.; Zhao, W.; Lamoureux, E.; Mitchell, P.; Wang, J.J.; Wong, T.Y.; Cheng, C.-Y. Ancestry, Socioeconomic Status, and Age-Related Cataract in Asians: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 2169–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kai, J.-Y.; Zhou, M.; Li, D.-L.; Zhu, K.-Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, X.-F.; Pan, C.-W. Smoking, dietary factors and major age-related eye disorders: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 108, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, Y.; Liang, A.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Z.; Li, Q.; Su, T.; Wu, Q.; Fang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Sun, W.; et al. Sex-specific social, lifestyle, and physical health risk factors in cataracts development. Eye 2024, 38, 2939–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sasaki, K.; Sasaki, H.; Jonasson, F.; Kojima, M.; Cheng, H.M. Racial differences of lens transparency properties with aging and prevalence of age related cataract applying a WHO classification system. Ophthalmic. Res. 2004, 36, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Miyashita, H.; Hatsusaka, N.; Shibuya, E.; Mita, N.; Yamazaki, M.; Shibata, T.; Ishida, H.; Ukai, Y.; Kubo, E.; Sasaki, H. Association between ultraviolet radiation exposure dose and cataract in Han people living in China and Taiwan: A cross sectional study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215338. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sasaki, H.; Jonasson, F.; Shui, Y.B.; Kojima, M.; Ono, M.; Katoh, N.; Cheng, H.-M.; Takahashi, N.; Sasaki, K. High prevalence of nuclear cataract in the population of tropical and subtropical areas. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2002, 35, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Al-Ghadyan, A.A.; Cotlier, E. Rise in lens temperature on exposure to sunlight or high ambient temperature. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1986, 70, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Schwartz, B. Environmental temperature and the ocular temperature gradient. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1965, 74, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kodera, S.; Hirata, A.; Miura, F.; Rashed, E.A.; Hatsusaka, N.; Yamamoto, N.; Kudo, E.; Sasaki, H. Model-based approach for analyzing prevalence of nuclear cataracts in elderly residents. Comput. Biol. Med. 2020, 126, 104009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Otake, H.; Masuda, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Miyata, Y.; Nakazawa, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Taga, A.; Sasaki, H.; Nagai, N. Semiquantitative analysis of protein expression in heated rat lens using shotgun proteomics. Mol. Med. Rep. 2025, 31, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joseph, R.; Srivastava, O.P.; Pfister, R.R. Differential epithelial and stromal protein profiles in keratoconus and normal human corneas. Exp. Eye Res. 2011, 92, 282–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Meade, M.L.; Shiyanov, P.; Schlager, J.J. Nhanced detection ethod for corneal protein identification using shotgun roteomics. Proteome Sci. 2009, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Takeda, S.; Yamamoto, N.; Nagai, N.; Hiramatsu, N.; Deguchi, S.; Hatsusaka, N.; Kubo, E.; Sasaki, H. Function of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase is enhanced in human lens epithelial cells at high temperatures. Mol. Med. Rep. 2023, 27, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yamasaki, K.; Kawasaki, S.; Young, R.D.; Fukuoka, H.; Tanioka, H.; Nakatsukasa, M.; Quantock, A.J.; Kinoshita, S. Genomic aberrations and cellular heterogeneity in SV40-immortalized human corneal epithelial cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009, 50, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, C.W.; Go, R.E.; Lee, G.A.; Kim, C.D.; Chun, Y.J.; Choi, K.C. Immortalization of human corneal epithelial cells using simian virus 40 large T antigen and cell characterization. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2016, 78, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bluemlein, K.; Ralser, M. Monitoring protein expression in whole cell extracts by targeted label- and standard-free LC-MS/MS. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Old, W.M.; Meyer-Arendt, K.; Aveline-Wolf, L.; Pierce, K.G.; Mendoza, A.; Sevinsky, J.R.; Resing, K.A.; Ahn, N.G. Comparison of label free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2005, 4, 1487–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zybailov, B.; Coleman, M.K.; Florens, L.; Washburn, M.P. Correlation of relative adundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 6218–6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dennis, G., Jr.; Sherman, B.T.; Hosack, D.A.; Yang, J.; Gao, W.; Lane, H.C.; Lempicki, R.A. DAVID: Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Zheng, X.; Yang, J.; Inamichi, T.; Stephens, R.; Lempicki, R.A. Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2009, 27, 13.11.1–13.11.13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weeds, A.G.; Gooch, J.; Hawkins, M.; Pops, B.; Way, M. Role of actin-binding proteins in cytoskeletal dynamics. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1991, 19, 1016–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kivelä, T.; Tarkkanen, A.; Frangione, B.; Ghiso, J.; Haltia, M. Ocular amyloid deposition in familial amyloidosis, Finnish: An analysis of native and variant gelsolin in Meretoja’s syndrome. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994, 35, 3759–3769. [Google Scholar]
  25. Farnsworth, P.N.; Shybe, S.E.; Caputo, S.J.; Fasano, A.V.; Spector, A. Microtubules: A major cytoskeletal component of the human lens. Exp. Eye Res. 1980, 30, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Audette, D.S.; Scheiblin, D.A.; Duncan, M.K. The molecular mechanisms underlying lens fiber elongation. Exp. Eye Res. 2017, 156, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Roberts, A.B.; Derynck, R. Meeting report: Signaling schemes for TGF-beta. Sci. STKE 2001, 113, pe43. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagasaka, M.; Inoue, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Miyajima, C.; Morishita, D.; Tokugawa, M.; Nakamoto, H.; Sugano, M.; Ohoka, N.; Hayashi, H. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP17 regulates c-Myc levels and controls cell proliferation and glycolysis. FEBS Lett. 2022, 596, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ramakrishna, S.; Suresh, B.; Baek, K.-H. Biological functions of hyaluronan and cytokine-inducible deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1855, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tong, L.; Zheng, X.; Wang, T.; Gu, W.; Shen, T.; Yuan, W.; Wang, S.; Xing, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. Inhibition of UBA52 induces autophagy via EMC6 to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis and progression. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2024, 28, e18164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, S.; Broeck, A.V.; Miller, L.; Chaker-Margot, M.; Klinge, S. Nucleolar maturation of the human small subunit processome. Science 2021, 373, eabj5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Karbstein, K.; Jonas, S.; Doudna, J.A. An essential GTPase promotes assembly of preribosomal RNA processing complexes. Mol. Cell 2005, 20, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Andley, U.P.; Naumann, B.N.; Hamilton, P.D.; Bozeman, S.L. Changes in relative histone abundance and heterochromatin in αA-crystallin and αB-crystallin knock-in mutant mouse lenses. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Identification and semiquantitative comparison of the differentially expressed proteins in iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp. (A) Venn diagram depicting proteins identified in iHLEC-NY2 cells grown at normal-temp and warming-temp. (B) Semiquantitative analysis of proteins differentially expressed in iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at warming-temp. To compare the expression levels of identified proteins between cells cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp, Rsc and NSAF values were calculated. The blue peak represents Rsc, while the green and red peaks correspond to the NSAF values at normal-temp (lower peak) and warming-temp (upper peak), respectively. Rsc is plotted such that its expression increases from left to right under warming-temp, providing a visual representation of the detected protein behavior. When focusing on GAPDH as a housekeeping protein, it is detected at the approximate center of the x-axis, with NSAF values at normal- (lower peak) and warming-temp (upper peak) showing similar intensities. This consistency suggests that the semiquantitative analysis of proteins was conducted appropriately.
Figure 1. Identification and semiquantitative comparison of the differentially expressed proteins in iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp. (A) Venn diagram depicting proteins identified in iHLEC-NY2 cells grown at normal-temp and warming-temp. (B) Semiquantitative analysis of proteins differentially expressed in iHLEC-NY2 cells cultured at warming-temp. To compare the expression levels of identified proteins between cells cultured at normal-temp and warming-temp, Rsc and NSAF values were calculated. The blue peak represents Rsc, while the green and red peaks correspond to the NSAF values at normal-temp (lower peak) and warming-temp (upper peak), respectively. Rsc is plotted such that its expression increases from left to right under warming-temp, providing a visual representation of the detected protein behavior. When focusing on GAPDH as a housekeeping protein, it is detected at the approximate center of the x-axis, with NSAF values at normal- (lower peak) and warming-temp (upper peak) showing similar intensities. This consistency suggests that the semiquantitative analysis of proteins was conducted appropriately.
Medicina 61 00286 g001
Table 1. GO analysis of identified proteins in molecular function category.
Table 1. GO analysis of identified proteins in molecular function category.
Molecular Function Category Relative Abundance (%)Molecular Function Category Relative Abundance (%)
Protein binding77.1Unfolded protein binding6.37
RNA binding32.5Structural molecule activity5.73
DNA binding29.3Structural constituent of muscle4.46
Protein heterodimerization activity28.0Double-stranded DNA binding3.18
Structural constituent of chromatin27.4Protein binding involved in protein folding3.18
ATP binding15.9Collagen binding2.55
Protein domain specific binding12.1Heat shock protein binding2.55
Cadherin binding11.5Microfilament motor activity2.55
GTP binding8.28Misfolded protein binding2.55
Structural constituent of cytoskeleton8.28Motor activity2.55
ATPase activity7.64Structural constituent of epidermis2.55
GTPase activity7.64mRNA 5’-UTR binding1.91
Structural constituent of ribosome7.64Protein disulfide isomerase activity1.91
Actin binding6.37Large ribosomal subunit rRNA binding1.27
Actin filament binding6.37
Table 2. GO analysis of identified proteins in cellular component category.
Table 2. GO analysis of identified proteins in cellular component category.
Cellular Component CategoryRelative Abundance (%)Cellular Component CategoryRelative Abundance (%)
Extracellular exosome63.7Cytosolic large ribosomal subunit4.46
Nucleus58.6Ribonucleoprotein complex4.46
Cytosol53.5Cytosolic small ribosomal subunit3.82
Cytoplasm41.4Ficolin-1-rich granule lumen3.82
Nucleoplasm39.5Actin filament3.18
Membrane36.9Meiotic spindle3.18
Nucleosome28.0Small-subunit processome3.18
Extracellular region22.9Vesicle3.18
Macromolecular complex21.7Z disc3.18
Focal adhesion15.3Intercellular bridge2.55
Nuclear chromosome15.3Myosin complex2.55
Extracellular space14.7Myosin II complex2.55
Endoplasmic reticulum12.7Ruffle membrane2.55
CENP-A-containing nucleosome10.2Sarcomere2.55
Chromosome, telomeric region10.2Small ribosomal subunit2.55
Perinuclear region of cytoplasm8.28Smooth endoplasmic reticulum2.55
Ribosome8.28Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone complex1.91
Cytosolic ribosome7.01Myosin filament1.91
Melanosome5.73Polysome1.91
Endoplasmic reticulum lumen5.10CRD-mediated mRNA stability complex1.27
Intermediate filament5.10Muscle thin filament tropomyosin1.27
Microtubule5.10Myosin II filament1.27
Table 3. GO analysis of identified proteins in biological process category.
Table 3. GO analysis of identified proteins in biological process category.
Cellular Component CategoryRelative Abundance (%)Cellular Component CategoryRelative Abundance (%)
Nucleosome assembly23.6Cytoskeleton organization3.82
Chromatin organization17.2Microtubule-based process3.82
DNA replication-dependent nucleosome assembly15.3Actomyosin structure organization3.18
Telomere organization15.3Muscle contraction3.18
Protein localization to CENP-A containing chromatin10.2Oocyte maturation3.18
DNA-templated transcription, initiation9.55Osteoblast differentiation3.18
DNA replication-independent nucleosome assembly8.92Ribosomal small subunit biogenesis3.18
Negative regulation of megakaryocyte differentiation8.92Spindle assembly involved in female meiosis3.18
Cytoplasmic translation7.64Cellular response to unfolded protein2.55
Negative regulation of apoptotic process7.64Chaperone mediated protein folding requiring cofactor2.55
Translation7.64Protein folding in endoplasmic reticulum2.55
Gene expression7.01Protein refolding2.55
Regulation of gene expression, epigenetic6.37Actin filament-based movement2.55
Protein folding5.73Cellular copper ion homeostasis1.91
Antibacterial humoral response5.10Cellular response to interleukin-71.91
Antimicrobial humoral immune response mediated by antimicrobial peptide5.10Dendritic spine organization1.91
Defense response to Gram-positive bacterium5.10Long-term synaptic depression1.91
Heterochromatin assembly5.10Mitotic cleavage furrow ingression1.91
Innate immune response in mucosa5.10Regulation of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin nucleation1.91
Mitotic cell cycle5.10Regulation of receptor internalization1.91
Intermediate filament organization4.46Skeletal muscle myosin thick filament assembly1.27
Microtubule cytoskeleton organization4.46
Table 4. GO analysis of identified proteins in pathway category.
Table 4. GO analysis of identified proteins in pathway category.
Molecular Function Category Relative Abundance (%)Molecular Function Category Relative Abundance (%)
Neutrophil extracellular trap formation26.7Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum6.37
Alcoholism25.5Motor proteins5.73
Systemic lupus erythematosus25.5Parkinson disease5.73
Viral carcinogenesis17.2Prion disease5.73
Shigellosis9.55Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection5.10
Coronavirus disease—COVID-197.01Necroptosis4.46
Ribosome7.01Estrogen signaling pathway3.82
Transcriptional misregulation in cancer7.01Antigen processing and presentation3.18
Table 5. Semiquantitative comparison of proteins with increased expression in iHLEC-NY2 cultured under warming-temp conditions.
Table 5. Semiquantitative comparison of proteins with increased expression in iHLEC-NY2 cultured under warming-temp conditions.
IDAccession Number and DescriptionNumber of Amino AcidsSpectral Counting
Warming-TempNormal-TempFold Change, Rsc
TBA1C_HUMANQ9BQE3Tubulin alpha-1C chain4498906.156903
HS902_HUMANQ14568Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha3432104.122102
H2B1C_HUMANP62807Histone H2B type 1-C/E/F/G/I1261803.912511
H2BFS_HUMANP57053Histone H2B type F-S1261703.834335
H2B1D_HUMANP58876Histone H2B type 1-D1261703.834335
H2A1H_HUMANQ96KK5Histone H2A type 1-H1281603.753820
H31_HUMANP68431Histone H3.1136702.687759
RS3A_HUMANP61247Small ribosomal subunit protein eS1264602.501132
PGAM2_HUMANP15259Phosphoglycerate mutase 2253502.286793
RLA0L_HUMANQ8NHW5Putative ribosomal protein uL10-like317502.286793
TGM2_HUMANP21980Protein-glutamine gamma-glutamyltransferase 26871932.219596
HS71L_HUMANP34931Heat shock 70 kDa protein 1-like6411422.196653
HSP76_HUMANP17066Heat shock 70 kDa protein 66431832.146318
CNGB1_HUMANQ14028Cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel beta-11251402.035040
RPN1_HUMANP04843Dolichyl-diphosphooligosaccharide--protein glycosyltransferase subunit 1607402.035040
RL15_HUMANP61313Large ribosomal subunit protein eL15204402.035040
MYH14_HUMANQ7Z406Myosin-141995402.035040
TAF9B_HUMANQ9HBM6Transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 9B251402.035040
PDIA4_HUMANP13667Protein disulfide-isomerase A4645812.004817
Table 6. Semiquantitative comparison of proteins with decreased expression in iHLEC-NY2 cultured under warming-temp conditions.
Table 6. Semiquantitative comparison of proteins with decreased expression in iHLEC-NY2 cultured under warming-temp conditions.
IDAccession Number and DescriptionNumber of Amino AcidsSpectral Counting
Warming-TempNormal-TempFold Change, Rsc
ACTC_HUMANP68032Actin, alpha cardiac muscle 13770816.094116
H2B1M_HUMANQ99879Histone H2B type 1-M1260344.861313
K2C75_HUMANO95678Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 755510163.826320
H2AJ_HUMANQ9BTM1Histone H2A.J1290103.208328
TBA4B_HUMANQ9H853Putative tubulin-like protein alpha-4B241093.073807
K1C26_HUMANQ7Z3Y9Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 26468082.925489
U17L1_HUMANQ7RTZ2Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 17-like protein 1530072.760210
K2C79_HUMANQ5XKE5Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 79535052.359232
RL40_HUMANP62987Ubiquitin-ribosomal protein eL40 fusion protein128042.107474
ARP2_HUMANP61160Actin-related protein 2394042.107474
BMS1_HUMANQ14692Ribosome biogenesis protein BMS1 homolog1282042.107474
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Otake, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, N.; Nakazawa, Y.; Miyata, Y.; Taga, A.; Sasaki, H.; Nagai, N. Changes in Protein Expression in Warmed Human Lens Epithelium Cells Using Shotgun Proteomics. Medicina 2025, 61, 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020286

AMA Style

Otake H, Yamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Nakazawa Y, Miyata Y, Taga A, Sasaki H, Nagai N. Changes in Protein Expression in Warmed Human Lens Epithelium Cells Using Shotgun Proteomics. Medicina. 2025; 61(2):286. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Otake, Hiroko, Tetsushi Yamamoto, Naoki Yamamoto, Yosuke Nakazawa, Yoshiki Miyata, Atsushi Taga, Hiroshi Sasaki, and Noriaki Nagai. 2025. "Changes in Protein Expression in Warmed Human Lens Epithelium Cells Using Shotgun Proteomics" Medicina 61, no. 2: 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020286

APA Style

Otake, H., Yamamoto, T., Yamamoto, N., Nakazawa, Y., Miyata, Y., Taga, A., Sasaki, H., & Nagai, N. (2025). Changes in Protein Expression in Warmed Human Lens Epithelium Cells Using Shotgun Proteomics. Medicina, 61(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020286

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop