The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
Duncan B Campbell
Duncan B Campbell is a specialist in ancient Greek and Roman warfare. He published his first paper in 1984, as an undergraduate at Glasgow University, and produced a complete re-assessment of Roman siegecraft for his PhD. His work has appeared in several international journals. He is a regular contributor to Ancient Warfare magazine.
Related to The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193
Titles in the series (71)
The Northern Ireland Troubles: Operation Banner 1969–2007 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Islamic Conquests AD 632–750 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Second War of Italian Unification 1859–61 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rome at War AD 293–696 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Napoleonic Wars (3): The Peninsular War 1807–1814 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Indian Mutiny 1857–58 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Russia’s Wars in Chechnya 1994–2009 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Civil War (3): The war in the East 1863–1865 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crusades Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Napoleonic Wars (1): The rise of the Emperor 1805–1807 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wars of Alexander the Great: 336–323 BC Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Soviet–Afghan War 1979–89 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Second World War (1): The Pacific Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWar in Japan 1467–1615 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Wars of Spanish American Independence 1809–29 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Civil War (1): The war in the East 1861–May 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Peloponnesian War 431–404 BC Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Greek and Persian Wars 499–386 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First World War (1): The Eastern Front 1914–1918 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Civil War (4): The war in the West 1863–1865 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Civil War (2): The war in the West 1861–July 1863 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe First World War (2): The Western Front 1914–1916 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Napoleonic Wars (4): The fall of the French empire 1813–1815 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Caesar's Civil War: 49–44 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Zulu War 1879 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second World War (5): The Eastern Front 1941–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Second World War (2): Europe 1939–1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe French Wars 1667–1714: The Sun King at war Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related ebooks
Rome at War AD 293–696 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Julius Caesar: Rome's Greatest Warlord Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmperor Alexander Severus: Rome's Age of Insurrection, AD 222–235 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of War in the Middle Ages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Crisis of Rome: The Jugurthine and Northern Wars and the Rise of Marius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Roman Legionaries: Soldiers of Empire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Roman Conquests: Italy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rome, Blood & Politics: Reform, Murder and Popular Politics in the Late Republic, 133–70 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fall of the Seleukid Empire, 187–75 BC Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Augustus at War: The Struggle for the Pax Augusta Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Illyrian Revolt: Rome's Forgotten War in the Balkans, AD 6–9 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pertinax: The Son of a Slave Who Became Roman Emperor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsViriathus: & the Lusitanian Resistance to Rome, 155–139 BC Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Roman Conquests: Britain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Army of the Roman Republic: From the Regal Period to the Army of Julius Caesar Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBelisarius: The Last Roman General Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aetius: Attila's Nemesis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fighting Emperors of Byzantium Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Byzantium Triumphant: The Military History of the Byzantines 959–1025 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Vandals Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Military History of Late Rome 425–457 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilitary History of Late Rome, 284–361 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Roman Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConstantius II: Usurpers, Eunuchs and the Antichrist Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecorated Roman Armour: From the Age of the Kings to the Death of Justinian the Great Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rome Seizes the Trident: The Defeat of Carthaginian Seapower & the Forging of the Roman Empire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nisibis War: The Defence of the Roman East AD 337–363 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Roman Emperor Aurelian: Restorer of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Byzantium at War: AD 600–1453 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
European History For You
The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Time Traveler's Guide to Medieval England: A Handbook for Visitors to the Fourteenth Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Six Wives of Henry VIII Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Very Secret Sex Lives of Medieval Women Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mein Kampf: English Translation of Mein Kamphf - Mein Kampt - Mein Kamphf Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Anglo-Saxons: A History of the Beginnings of England: 400 – 1066 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing England: The Brutal Struggle for American Independence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Neither here nor there: Travels in Europe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Finding Freedom: Harry and Meghan and the Making of a Modern Royal Family Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Quite Nice and Fairly Accurate Good Omens Script Book: The Script Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Oscar Wilde: The Unrepentant Years Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Galileo's Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith and Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of English Magic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotes from a Small Island Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Churchill's Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler's Defeat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Witch: A History of Fear, from Ancient Times to the Present Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 2]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jane Austen: The Complete Novels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Swingtime for Hitler: Goebbels’s Jazzmen, Tokyo Rose, and Propaganda That Carries a Tune Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Five: The Untold Lives of the Women Killed by Jack the Ripper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193
3 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Rise of Imperial Rome AD 14–193 - Duncan B Campbell
Background to war
The Roman empire in AD 14
The first emperor
When Augustus (r. 27 BC–AD 14) came to the throne as the first emperor of Rome, he began to bring order to the chaos that 20 years of civil war had wrought. The old Republican system of rule by the senate, with its two annually elected consuls, still functioned, but had proved vulnerable to manipulation by powerful individuals. During the mid-1st century BC, Julius Caesar in particular had subverted the senate by carefully amassing personal power, at first through the agency of a triumvirate (‘rule by three men’, which he came to dominate), and then by becoming dictator perpetuo (‘dictator for life’) in 44 BC. Consequently, the Roman populace had become used to autocratic rule.
Caesar’s example was followed by his adopted son and heir, Augustus, who – initially going by the name Caesar, in the aftermath of the dictator’s assassination in 44 BC – swore ‘to attain his father’s honours’ (Cicero, Letters to Atticus 16.15.3). Although no less ambitious, the new Caesar was perhaps more savvy. He moved from being a member of a triumvirate – whose supreme authority was carefully disguised in its remit ‘to restore the Republic’ – to being the saviour of Italy from the clutches of an orientalized Mark Antony (whom he defeated at the naval battle of Actium in 31 BC). But he always downplayed the extent of his power. ‘After I extinguished the fires of civil war’, he later wrote, ‘having taken control of affairs in accordance with the wishes of my fellow citizens, I transferred the Republic from my own power into the arbitration of the senate and people of Rome’ (The Achievements of the Divine Augustus 34.1).
As an ‘ordinary citizen’ – he referred to himself only as princeps (‘the first citizen’), from which this period of history has become known as the Principate – the new Caesar made sure to remain in the public eye, first by monopolizing the annual consulship (but only until 23 BC), and secondly by staging three ostentatious triumphal processions, reminding everyone of his victories in Illyricum in 34–33 BC and at Actium in 31 BC, and of his subsequent capture of Egypt from Cleopatra, last of the Ptolemies. Then, having been voted the name Augustus (‘sacred one’) in 27 BC, he began (cunningly but tactfully) to accumulate a range of traditional Republican offices, which would (legally but unobtrusively) guarantee the continuation of his authority at Rome.
The famous statue of Augustus, discovered at Livia’s villa at Prima Porta near Rome. The sculpted cuirass depicts the handing over of a Roman battle-standard, thought to represent those lost to the Parthians by Crassus in 53 BC, which were returned to Augustus in 20 BC. (UIG via Getty Images)
Like the magistrates of old, he was granted a provincia (‘sphere of authority’, usually implying the temporary governorship of a geographical territory), except that Augustus’ province extended across Spain and Gaul in the west, and Syria and Egypt in the east, encompassing all the armies that were located there, and, although technically temporary, gradually became permanent. He arranged this ‘on the pretext that the senate might enjoy the best parts of the empire without anxiety, while he himself took on the hardships and hazards’, as the historian Cassius Dio explained, ‘but the real object of this arrangement was that the senators should be unarmed and unequipped for battle, while he alone possessed arms and maintained soldiers’ (Roman History 53.12.3). This ulterior motive is compelling, for, by this stage, only one Roman legion lay outside the emperor’s domain and took its orders from the annually elected proconsul of Africa.
Of course, the government of Rome was still the preserve of the senatorial class, the landed aristocracy of which Augustus and his successors were all members. But the new emperor began to involve their equestrian counterparts – those families who either could not afford to join the senatorial order (there was a property qualification of one million sesterces, whereas an equestrian required only a net worth of 400,000 sesterces, at a time when the common man might earn 500 sesterces a year) or chose not to. This move was ostensibly to widen the pool of available army officers, but fortuitously served as a surreptitious foil to the senatorial monopoly on power. The important governorship of Egypt, with its agrarian wealth (on one estimate, as much as one-third of Rome’s grain came from Egypt), was entrusted to an equestrian praefectus (‘prefect’), rather than a senatorial proconsul or a legatus (‘legate’), even though special provision had to be made to bring his powers into line with his senatorial counterparts.
In 23 BC, although Augustus now stepped down from the consulship, he took the tribunicia potestas (‘power of a tribune’), referring to the tribune of the plebs, an annually renewed office that had symbolic overtones of ‘the people’s champion’; more importantly, besides conferring sacrosanctitas (‘immunity from prosecution’), it granted Augustus the practical privilege of vetoing any proposals in the senate. Each of his successors made sure that they acquired this power and, more importantly, that they renewed it every year.
All of the titles, honours and functions taken by Augustus formed the basis of the legal authority that successive Roman emperors would wield. Their power, though absolute, was firmly based in Republican tradition. The long reign of Augustus, which lasted over 40 years, gave the new regime time to become embedded in the Roman consciousness. Furthermore, Augustus’ decision to implement a dynastic succession by adopting his stepson Tiberius as his chosen heir, and bestowing the tribunicia potestas upon him, influenced the future direction of the Roman Principate. It would be many years before the arcanus imperii (‘secret of empire’) was divulged: namely, as Tacitus put it, that ‘an emperor could be made elsewhere than at Rome’ (Histories 1.4).
A military regime
Augustus himself emphasized that ‘I excelled everyone in auctoritas [‘influence’], although I possessed no more official power than others who were my colleagues’ (The Achievements of the Divine Augustus 34.3). Indeed, his senatorial colleagues continued to play their traditional role in government, though Augustus, by force of his auctoritas, was able to influence their decisions. Senators continued to occupy the main military and civil offices, such as legionary commands and provincial governorships, but most of these now operated within the emperor’s provincia, and thus fell under his overall control. To be sure, the emperor could (and often did) summon a consilium (‘council’) of advisors, but was under no obligation to do so.
Patronage had always played a major part in Roman society. Every senator had his clients, who paid their respects in return for favours and benefits. Under the Principate, the emperor became a super-patron with the power to make or break men’s careers. A young man’s entry to the senatorial career itself was in the gift of the emperor. His provincial governors were styled ‘friends’ (amici), though the friendship was sometimes false: the 1st-century philosopher Epictetus observed that ‘No one loves Caesar himself, unless he is particularly worthy, but we love wealth and tribunates, praetorships, consulships’ (Discourses 4.1.60), referring to the various favours that the emperor might bestow. There was a kind of trickle-down effect, whereby those favoured by the emperor could, in turn, favour others. Thus, for example, the well-connected senator might petition the emperor for lucrative posts on behalf of friends and relatives, and the governor of a military province appears to have had a free hand in appointing his officers (though probably only below the rank of legionary commander).
Augustus had bought the favour of the populace at Rome with the generous provision of ‘bread and games’ (as this form of bribery was later summed up by the poet Juvenal) and grandiose building schemes: not only temples and porticoes, but public baths and an improved water and sewerage system. Meanwhile, the favour of the armies was bought with regular pay and generous pensions; both were necessary to compensate the soldiers for long service on far-flung frontiers. In 30 BC after Actium, and again in 14 BC, large numbers of veterans had earned their discharge and expected their loyalty to be rewarded. Consequently, time-served soldiers were each granted a parcel of land on the colonies that Augustus founded up and down Italy. However, later programmes of discharge offered the men a cash gratuity instead, perhaps amounting to ten years’ pay; this enormous financial burden was paid out of Augustus’ newly created aerarium militare (‘military treasury’).
It was surely to impress the armies that Augustus, early on, took as his first name the honorific title imperator (‘conquering general’), the term by which a successful commander had traditionally been hailed by his army. (Indeed, this is the word from which ‘emperor’ comes.) At the same time, Augustus took over sole responsibility for issuing state coinage – which was, after all, principally used for paying the armies – and carefully manipulated its physical appearance to promote himself. Coins now bore an ageless likeness of his head – continuing Julius Caesar’s break with Republican practice, which had never permitted the depiction of a living Roman – along with brief legends subtly emphasizing his authority (for example, CAESAR AVGVSTVS, stressing his link with Julius Caesar, or COMM CONS, claiming that he ruled communi consensu, ‘by common consent’).
Augustus continued the Republican tradition of the commander’s bodyguard, surrounding himself and his family with a personal force of Germani corporis custodes (‘Germanic bodyguard’, mostly of Batavian origin) and stationing individual cohorts of praetoriani (‘Praetorian Guard’, alluding to the praetorium or military headquarters of the emperor) in and around Rome. He also instituted two key paramilitary organizations in Rome, the urbaniciani (‘urban cohorts’) and the vigiles (‘night watchmen’), whose roles were, respectively, those of a police force and a fire brigade, broadly speaking. The Praetorian Guard was another institution that Augustus was perhaps wary of placing in senatorial hands, for the powerful praefectus praetorio (the Praetorian prefect), effectively the emperor’s right-hand man, was always a senior equestrian. Often, two praefecti were appointed, so that the Guard might be divided (or so that each prefect could watch the other).
The legions – once upon a time mobilized only during times of trouble, their ranks filled by peasant citizens, eager for adventure and booty, and just as eager to return to their Italian farms – had, in many cases, become long-service regiments, whose recruits, drawn from the more Romanized provinces, were loyal to their paymaster. Under Augustus, this ad hoc situation became regularized and incorporated into his vision of empire: