Scripta Materialia 47 (2002) 225–229
www.actamat-journals.com
A microstructural model for the prediction of high cycle
fatigue life
J.S. Park a, S.H. Park b, C.S. Lee
a
a,*
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology,
San 31, Hyoja-dong, Pohang 790-784, South Korea
b
POSCO Technical Research Laboratories, Pohang 790-785, South Korea
Received 13 February 2002; accepted 2 April 2002
Abstract
In this study, a model predicting the high cycle fatigue life was developed in relation to the microstructural variable,
especially, the grain size. The concept of small crack propagation theory was adopted to reflect the influence of the
microstructural variables. Reasonable agreement was found between the experimental data and the predicted curve.
Ó 2002 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: High cycle fatigue; Life prediction; Small crack theory; Microstructure
1. Introduction
High cycle fatigue properties are generally represented by the S–N (stress–life) curves. For obtaining a single S–N curve, it usually takes long
time and tedious efforts so that there have been
several attempts to develop the appropriate fatigue
life prediction models. Most of earlier models
based on the continuum damage mechanics contain various kinds of fatigue damage parameters
[1]. Though the earlier models utilizing the macrovariables such as strain energy and elastic modulus
are useful for predicting high cycle fatigue life in a
macroscopic sense, they are lacking in the influence of microstructures. Previous works on fatigue
*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +82-562-279-2141; fax: +82562-279-2399.
E-mail address: cslee@postech.ac.kr (C.S. Lee).
behavior of materials [2,3] have evidenced that the
fatigue life is greatly influenced by the microstructural variables such as the grain size, morphology, size and distribution of second phase
particles. It is, therefore strongly required to develop a model reflecting the influence of microstructural parameters in the high cycle fatigue.
The small crack theory, originally developed by
Miller et al., has received much attention as a
candidate to achieve this goal for its unique concept of microstructural barriers. However, previous studies on the small crack theory have been
focused on the propagation behavior [4,5] and
there have been few attempts to introduce the
small crack concept into the HCF prediction
model.
Therefore, in this study, the concept of small
crack theory was utilized not only to estimate the
overall life spent during high cycle fatigue but also
to incorporate the microstructural influence into
1359-6462/02/$ - see front matter Ó 2002 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 1 3 5 9 - 6 4 6 2 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 1 1 5 - X
226
J.S. Park et al. / Scripta Materialia 47 (2002) 225–229
the model. Also, the effect of crack arrest on HCF
life was considered quantitatively based on the
concept of strain accumulation. Particular interest
was given to develop the life prediction model with
respect to the grain size.
2. Development of life prediction model for high
cycle fatigue
It is well known that the fatigue crack initiation
takes most of the high cycle fatigue life. In the
small crack theory, the fatigue crack initiation
process is thought to be composed of three stages,
such as crack nucleation, microcrack propagation
and propagation through a barrier [6]. However,
the crack nucleation stage is considered negligible
in the entire life, since it has been reported that the
crack nucleation occurs within small cycles [4,7].
Therefore, the fatigue crack initiation stage can be
thought as the sum of each period for microcrack
propagation and propagation through a barrier.
Also, there were many works reporting that most
of the life (about 70–90%) is spent for propagating
the first grain after crack nucleation [4,7]. As such,
in this model, it is assumed that the entire life is
proportional to the cycles spent in one grain and
one barrier, as shown in Fig. 1. If the barrier is a
grain boundary, N3f can be neglected because the
width of grain boundary is very small. Therefore,
the entire life can be expressed by the sum of
N1f , the propagation period through a grain and
N2f , the arrest period at grain boundary. As a first
approximation to construct the N1f , small crack
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram showing the concept of modeling: 1
grain þ 1 barrier.
growth law (Eq. (1)) suggested by Miller [5] was
adopted.
da=dN ¼ CðDcÞa ðd aÞ
ð1Þ
where Dc is the resolved shear strain range, d is
the grain size, a is the crack length, and C and a
are material constants. The Dc in the above
equation can be converted to the resolved shear
stress range (Ds) using a following relationship,
n
Ds ¼ KðDcÞ , as shown in Eq. (2).
m
da=dN ¼ AðDsÞ ðd aÞ
ð2Þ
where A and m are material constants. Since the
microstructural variables influence on the resolved
shear stress, modification for Ds can be made by
considering the microstructural effect on the driving force as shown in Eq. (3).
Ds ¼ Dsapp Dsf Dsb
ð3Þ
where Dsapp , Dsf and Dsb indicate the applied
stress, the friction stress due to solute atom and the
friction stress due to the back stress arising from
the dislocation pile-up, respectively. Here, the Dsb
can be expressed by Eq. (4), where d is the grain
size and Cb is a constant [8,9].
Dsapp
Dsb ¼ Cb pffiffiffi
d
ð4Þ
When substituting Eqs. (3) and (4) into Eq. (2), the
modified small crack growth rate can be obtained
by Eq. (5).
m
da
Dsapp
¼ A Dsapp Dsf Cb pffiffiffi
ðd aÞ
ð5Þ
dN
d
Integrating from a ¼ 0 to acr (the length of crack
when the small crack is arrested in front of a
barrier) will result N1f (the cycles required to
propagate a crack through a grain) with the form
of Eq. (6).
d
log
d acr
m
ð6Þ
N1f ¼
Dsapp
A Dsapp Dsf Cb pffiffiffi
d
Cumulative strain criterion has been used to calculate N2f , the cycles spent for the arrest at a
barrier. When the crack is arrested in front of a
barrier, the crack does not advance with continued
J.S. Park et al. / Scripta Materialia 47 (2002) 225–229
cycles. However, the strain resulted from the pileup dislocations will be accumulated during the
cyclic loading. With continued cycling, the accumulated strain reaches to a critical value, and then
the barrier is broken. In general, when s is applied
on the slip band having the length of L, the pile-up
stress sp can be expressed by Eq. (7) where m is
Poisson ratio and l is the shear modulus [10].
sp ¼
ð1 mÞps2 L
4l
ð7Þ
During cyclic loading, Eq. (8) can be obtained.
2
Dsp ¼
ð1 mÞpðDsÞ L
4l
ð8Þ
Using Eqs. (3) and (4), Eq. (8) can be expressed as
follow.
2
ð1 mÞp
Dsapp
Dsp ¼
Dsapp Dsf Cb pffiffiffi ðd acr Þ
4l
d
ð9Þ
Using Eq. (9) and the cyclic stress–strain relation,
the strain accumulated on the barrier in a cycle, Dc
can be obtained. If the Dc is the critical strain
required to overcome the barrier, then N2f , the
cycles spent at crack arrest can be expressed as Dc
divided by Dc.
N2f ¼
2=n
Dc
Dsapp
½d acr
¼ f Dsapp Dsf Cb pffiffiffi
Dc
d
1=n
where
f ¼ Dc
ð1 mÞp
4Kl
1=n
ð10Þ
The total life, the sum of N1f and N2f , can be
given by Eq. (11).
d
log da
cr
NT ¼
m
Ds
ffiffi
A Dsapp Dsf Cb papp
d
where
Dsapp
þ f Dsapp Dsf Cb pffiffiffi
d
f ¼ Dc
ð1 mÞp
4Kl
1=n
2=n
½d acr
1=n
ð11Þ
227
3. Experimental procedure
A stress–life (S–N ) test was conducted using
steel specimens with various grain sizes. The
chemical composition of the tested steel includes
0.17C, 0.94Mn in wt.% and the balanced Fe. To
obtain the specimens with various grain sizes, as
received specimens (average grain size 4.6 lm)
were heat-treated at 800 and 1000 °C for 30 min,
respectively, followed by air cooling. The average
grain sizes of the heat-treated steels were 9.3 and
13.3 lm respectively. Hourglass specimens with
the length of 160 mm and the smallest section area
of 30 mm2 were machined for the HCF test. Before
mechanical testing the specimens were polished
using abrasive papers up to no. 2000. S–N test was
performed under the uni-axial loading condition.
The sine wave form was adopted with the stress
ratio (R) of zero and the frequency of 30 Hz.
4. Verification of the model with experimental
results
Fig. 2 shows the experimental S–N data for the
steels with grain size of 4.6 and 9.3 lm. For each
steel, the unknown constants (Dsf , Cb , m, acr , A, f )
in Eq. (11) were determined by some reasonable
calculation and iteration method, as follows. Here,
the friction force (Dsf ) arising from the presence of
the solute atoms in the grain interior was assumed
to be constant for the steels with the same chemical
composition. The value of Dsf was obtained as
82.1 MPa by an empirical equation developed by
Pickering [11] for carbon steels, as shown in Eq.
(12).
rfriction ¼ 15:4½3:5 þ 2:1ð%MnÞ þ 5:4ð%SiÞ
ð12Þ
Wilson and Bate [12] proposed a method to estimate the back stress by calculating half the difference between the lower yield stresses observed
in Bauschinger test. That is,
rb
1=2ðryf ryr Þ
ð13Þ
where ryf and ryr are yield stresses in forward and
reversed loading respectively. To obtain the correct Cb value, Baushinger test was carried out in
this study under the strain rate of 0.001 s1 for the
228
J.S. Park et al. / Scripta Materialia 47 (2002) 225–229
Fig. 2. S–N curves for the steels with grain size of (a) 4.6 and (b) 9.3 lm.
each steel. The applied strains were 0.04, 0.08 and
0.12. Fig. 3 shows the variation of back stress with
respect to the value of Drapp =d 1=2 . From Fig. 4
and Eq. (4), the value of Cb was determined as
0.368 lm1=2 . The m value, which was related to the
propagation velocity of small crack through the
grain interior and was calculated from the work of
Ibrahim and Miller [7]. The n value (strain hardening exponent) was determined from the results
of tensile test for each steel. Table 1 summarizes
the values of unknown constants in Eq. (11).
Using the known constants of steels with the
grain sizes of 4.6 and 9.3 lm, the predicted life for
specimen with the grain size of 13.3 lm was calculated. Calculation was based on the assumption
that the iterated constants (acr , A and f) show the
linear relationship with the grain size. The calculated and measured constants for the steel with the
grain size of 13.3 lm were listed in Table 2. After
substituting the constants into Eq. (11), the predicted curve for the steel with grain size of 13.3 lm
was compared with the experimental S–N data. As
shown in Fig. 4, reasonable agreement was found
between the experimental data and the predicted
curve.
However, the deviation was noted near the
short fatigue life region (<5 105 cycles), where
high stress range was applied. It was thought that
the deviation was partly resulted from the assumption that several constants (acr , A and f) vary
linearly with the variation of grain size. Also, as
the fatigue life reduces to the shorter value, the
Fig. 3. The variation of back stress with the value of applied
stress and grain size.
Fig. 4. A plot showing the experimental data and predicted
curve for the steel with grain size of 13.3 lm.
229
J.S. Park et al. / Scripta Materialia 47 (2002) 225–229
Table 1
Constants of Eq. (11) for the steels with the grain size of 4.6 and 9.3 lm
Steels
Calculated
As received
800 °C
Measured
Iterated
1031
Dsf
Cb
m
d
n
acr
A
84.3
84.3
0.369
0.369
10.98
10.98
4.6
9.3
0.182
0.235
4.53
9.10
1.39
1.35
1022
f
45.5
19.2
Table 2
Constants of Eq. (11) for the steels with the grain size of 13.3 lm
Steel
1000 °C
Calculated (identical values in Table 1)
Measured
Calculated from Table 1 (assume
linear relation with GS)
Dsf
Cb
m
d
n
acr
A
84.3
0.369
10.98
13.3
0.267
12.89
1.29
portion of crack propagation becomes more significant, which was considered negligible in this
study, since our interest was focused on the regime
of high cycle fatigue. Therefore, our model using
the concept of small crack theory is valid in the
high cycle fatigue region and another model for
the prediction of fatigue life at the high stress
range is needed.
1031
f
1022
1.2
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Korean Ministry of Education under the grant no. 2001-041E00432, and also partly supported by Pohang
Steel Company, Korea.
References
5. Summary
This study aims to develop a model predicting
the high cycle fatigue life in relation to the microstructural variable, especially, the grain size.
The concept of small crack propagation suggested
by Miller was adopted and modified to reflect the
influence of the microstructural variables. It was
assumed that the whole fatigue crack initiation
process can be represented by the microcrack
propagation consisting of two stages, the propagation through one grain and the arrest at a barrier. Reasonable agreement was found between the
experimental data and the predicted curve.
[1] Fatemi A, Yang L. Int J Fatigue 1998;20:9.
[2] Landgraf RW. In: Meshii M, editor. Fatigue and microstructures. Ohio: ASM; 1979. p. 439.
[3] Park KJ, Lee CS. Scripta Metall Mater 1996;34:215.
[4] Newmann Jr JC. Prog Aerospace Sci 1998;34:347.
[5] Miller KJ. Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct 1987;10:93.
[6] Kujawski D, Ellyin F. In: Short fatigue cracks. London:
Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd.; 1992. p. 3915.
[7] Ibrahim MFE, Miller KJ. Fatigue Engng Mater Struct
1980;2:351.
[8] Lin MR, Fine ME, Mura T. Acta Metall 1986;34:619.
[9] Johnston TL, Feltner CE. Metall Trans A 1970;1:1161.
[10] Hirth JP, Loathe J. In: Theory of dislocations. New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1982. p. 771.
[11] Leslie William C. In: The Physical Metallurgy of Steels.
New York: Hemisphere Corp.; 1981. p. 147.
[12] Wilson DV, Bate PS. Acta Metall 1986;34:1107.