Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2022, Politics Today
In today’s world, intelligence service directors take an active role in the processes of foreign policy formulation. This new role has led intelligence services to transform themselves into structures that play a more active role in foreign policy decision-making processes, unlike the classical intelligence service activities whose scopes have long been limited to specified duties. Ali Burak Darıcılı explores the changing structure of global intelligence with the following concepts and terminology: technology-centered development, the increasing cyber espionage capacity of intelligence services, the developing relations between intelligence services and private intelligence companies, new-generation threats and risks that emerge with the rise of social media, open-source intelligence (OSINT) collection methods, and the concept of intelligence diplomacy.
THE EURO-ATLANTIC VALUES IN THE BALKAN COUNTRIES
The Place and Role of the Intelligence and Counterintelligence ServicesThe security (Intelligence and Counterintelligence) services are one of the key elements for dealing with the 21st century challenges. The principle itself is directed mostly in preventive action i.e. early discovery, identifying and stopping the security threats. Intelligence is a process of collecting, processing, analyzing and distribution of intelligence data. The Intelligence i.e. the Intelligence services own the capacity for collecting information which is important for the safety and the constitutional order of the country. Counterintelligence is inverse process of the Intelligence i.e. detecting of unfriendly intelligence capacities. After the end of the Cold War, the security threats and challenges in the world changed, so according to that many countries changed their entire security system. Intelligence services are also susceptible to transformation. With the emergence of terrorism as a security threat no. 1 in the 21st century, the biggest parts of the Intelligences’ a...
2007 •
Intelligence services are government agencies responsible for the collection, analysis and disclosure of information considered relevant to the decision-making process and the implementation of public policies in the areas of foreign policy, national defense, and public order. These government agencies are also known as secret services or information services. Although the use of spies and specialized informants goes back to antiquity in areas as dispersed as Chennai, the Near East, and the Roman Empire, intelligence activity has acquired a new operational scale as a social, professional and permanent occupation of the modern state in Europe. Even then, intelligence services, as we know them today, really only began to institutionalize in the twentieth century. After the end of the Cold War, in many countries the necessity and role of these services was debated, which might indicate that their growing institutional weight was in fact only a passing phenomenon, a product of the two world wars and the Cold War itself. During the first half of the 1990s, the services of intelligence had in fact had their budgets reduced significantly while the new international context became more volatile and, as a result, the demands for information became more demanding and diversified. On the other way, the emergence and rapid growth of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) enabled private companies to offer information on insurance issues on a global scale, competing in many areas with the services of intelligence for the attention and government resources. The response of the intelligence services to these challenges initially tended to be reactive, adapting to the new budgets and to the new international scene. However, as the 21st century commenced and intelligence services continued to be a stable part of the government apparatus of the countries, the typical response to the challenges of the new international reality tended to shift to a much more " IOIU profile "on the efficiency and effectiveness of intelligence services in fulfilling their goals. In the context more direct competition with other information providers, more scarce resources and a changing international situation, the search for agility would correspond to a strategy based on three integrated axes: 1) Speed: the processes of collection, analysis and dissemination 2) Capacity: how raw data collection and production technologies have vastly exceeded the capacity for processing, production and retrieval of "finished" intelligence. An increase in capacity in these areas becomes crucial for intelligence organizations to be able to add higher-value-added inputs to the decision-making processes of the national security area.
Security and Human Rights
From Oversight to Undersight: the Internationalization of Intelligence2014 •
Due to the globalization and nodalisation of intelligence - resulting in hybrid intelligence assemblages - well-known problems related to overseeing intelligence are deteriorating. Not only does the international cooperation between intelligence services contribute to this problem, but especially the internationalization of intelligence collection meaning that as a consequence of technological and market transformations intelligence collection has become footloose and can be conducted remotely. In that way it leaves any idea of national sovereignty or the national protection of civil rights increasingly obsolete. Instead of oversight by institutions the real counter-power in post-democratic constellations seems to be practised by whistleblowers and investigative journalists. Sousveillance or undersight therefore seems to be the most important current oversight mechanism.
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
ROLE OF PRIVATE COMPANIES IN THE FUTURE’S INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT; ANALYSIS OF THE US INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM WITHIN THIS SCOPE2019 •
Following the war waged against radical terror under the leadership of United States of America upon the September 11 attacks, a remarkable increase has been recorded in private companies’ significance and roles in intelligence system. Due to changing threat perceptions, threats’ becoming asymmetrical and increased demands for risk analyses required by global companies for their international investments, private intelligence companies have entered into a major development process. In this period, completely profit-oriented private intelligence companies have gained a wide-ranging movement area through occasional support and guidance of intelligence services of their country. In addition to this, for recent years, thanks to the developing economic strengths and intelligence network of the given companies, they have almost begun to work as an intelligence service and provide services to their customers. As a consequence, it is evident that private intelligence companies will play a crucial role in intelligence management of the future. In this respect, this study will primarily examine the roles of private intelligence companies in the USA’s intelligence system where they efficiently operate, and problems they arise. And thus, functions of private intelligence companies, whose influence on intelligence management will rapidly enhance, within the USA’s system will be analysed and therefore, on global scale, efficiency of such kind of companies on future’s intelligence management will be revealed.
International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence
The Revolution in Intelligence Affairs: 1989–20032014 •
The terrorist attacks at New York, London and Madrid have changed the global landscape for international security and intelligence services. More importantly, The deadliest terrorist attack of 9/11 has provided the foundation to convert traditional security measures into transnational dimension. This mega incident has reshaped the perception of international community for threats of terrorism. Thus, after the perceived failure of intelligence services, it was necessitated that both intelligence and security management agencies should integrate their intelligence skills and form coordination for establishing effective mechanism on counter terrorism. The current research is aimed at making a review of the international collective efforts on combating terrorism after the mega terrorist attack of 9/11. At has evaluated the overall weaknesses of the system of global security and intelligence sharing.
5th International Students Social Sciences Congress (Proceedings - II)
Reorientation of Modern Diplomacy Regarding Counterterrorism Intelligence2021 •
Insecurity is known to be one of the overarching contemporary challenges of the world. The world is undoubtedly invaded by asymmetric warfares changing the course of his- tory as war is no longer the exclusive preserve of state actors. Terrorism continues to orchest- rate thousands of victims all over the world and gives no possibility to States for its effective prevention despite their sophisticated military arsenal. In response to this strategic surprise, involved States concentrate their maximum efforts on intelligence activities in order to gauge those non-state actors’ capabilities and intentions by keeping track of their threats. If the role of intelligence is to provide necessary information to policymakers and not to give advice neces- sarily on what should be done, that of modern diplomacy remains more or less the design and implementation of foreign policy. Thanks to diplomacy’s useful ways of gathering information, a professional and committed diplomat with expert knowledge in diplomatic dialogue and the art of negotiation can provide valuable insights to detect either others’ capabilities and intentions are benign or malign. As such, diplomacy better equipped for the information gathering rela- ted to threats prevention is regarded as a tremendous asset for counterterrorism intelligence process. The present contribution is aimed at shedding light on the support of modern diplo- macy to counterterrorism intelligence and argues that through the exploration of negotiation’s psychology, policy-making ability, dialogue and art of pertinent reporting, genuine diplomats meet counterterrorism intelligence’s needs for effective gauging of terrorists’ capabilities and intentions. Keywords: Modern Diplomacy, Asymmetric Warfares, Counterterrorism Intelligence, Foreign Intelligence Liaison, Psychology of Negotiation, Diplomatic Reporting.
2019 •
2014 •
Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices
Decolonizing Family Language Policy, or reimagining family multilingualism as an inclusive field (2023)2023 •
MATEC Web of Conferences
Advancing Safety in Organisations: Application via the Luton Safety Stack2019 •
2009 •
Der Wert der Preise. Valorisierungsdynamik in der deutschen Literaturpreislandschaft 1990-2019
Maaß - Borghardt - Der Wert der Preise2022 •
2014 •
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
The foraminifer and ostracod collections of the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris : a key but fragile scientific heritage in a context of global warming2022 •
International journal of applied thermodynamics
Thermodynamic Analysis, Advanced Non-Linear Dynamic Simulation and Multi-Criteria Optimization of a 100 MW Parabolic Trough Solar Steam Power Plant2021 •
Revista de ciencia política
Más allá de la izquierda y la derecha: patrones de actitudes populistas en LatinoaMérica2024 •
Representation theory
𝚤Hall algebras of weighted projective lines and quantum symmetric pairs2024 •
European Journal of Cancer
Neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable stage III non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)1993 •